ArticlePDF Available

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Successful Completion of Anesthesia Residency: A Case Report

Authors:

Abstract

Cognitive and physical disabilities among anesthesia residents are not well studied. Cognitive disabilities may often go undiagnosed among trainees, and these trainees may struggle during their graduate medical education. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is an executive function disorder that may manifest as lack of vigilance, an inability to adapt to the rapid changes associated with anesthesia cases, distractibility, an inability to prioritize activities, and even periods of hyperfocusing, among other signs. Programs are encouraged to work closely with residents with such disabilities to develop an educational plan that includes accommodations for their unique learning practices while maintaining the critical aspects of the program. The authors present the management of a case of an anesthesia resident with a diagnosis of ADHD, the perspectives of the trainee, program director, clinical competency director, and the office of general counsel. This article also provides follow-up in the five years since completion of residency.
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 2 / February 2016
210
Article
Motor, sensory, and cognitive
disabilities are not well studied
among residents in anesthesia. To our
knowledge, just a single case report exists
documenting the successful completion
of residency by a trainee with an acquired
motor disability.1 Programs may not admit
trainees with disabilities because of a lack
of knowledge about protections afforded
to such individuals, a lack of faith in
their ability to function in the anesthesia
environment, and the misperception that
accommodation to assist the trainee may
interfere with the core requirements of the
program. To help fill these gaps, we present
a case of a resident in anesthesia with
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD) who completed an anesthesia
residency program and subsequently
embarked on a successful career in
anesthesiology. We secured permission
from the trainee prior to publication of
this article to share its contents.
Case Report
The resident doctor we observed was
first diagnosed with ADHD at age 10
per his direct report. During childhood
he was noted to be inattentive, with a
tendency to be “spacey” and to daydream.
On psychometric testing as an adult,
the resident always exhibited superior
intellectual functioning, but had relatively
weaker verbal IQ than performance IQ,
and weaknesses on measures of processing
speed, trouble with self-motivation, time
management, and organization. During
subsequent testing as an adult, a diagnosis
of mild developmental learning disability
was noted in addition to the executive
function problems associated with
ADHD.
The resident received psychopharmacologic
treatment and academic accommodations
throughout his schooling years. While
in elementary school, tests were orally
administered. To address difficulties in
high school, college, and medical school,
for example, exams were administered
in a separate room with additional time
accommodations, and earplugs were
allowed. He took the Medical College
Admission Test with the accommodation
of additional time and testing in a
separate room. However, because of a
concern for being stigmatized, he never
requested accommodations for any
national board examinations.
Although the resident was always a
relatively slow reader, even while in
medical school, he described to us that he
worked harder than most other students,
putting more time into studying, and
as a result excelled academically. This
was especially true during clinical
rotations in medical school. Following
medical school, the resident did a one-
year internship, followed by a two-year
research fellowship, and subsequently
matched into an anesthesiology residency
at a top-tier, internationally recognized
program.
The resident had his medication regimen
adjusted to minimize difficulties
specifically related to prioritization,
organization, and executive function-
ing prior to starting residency in
anesthesiology. However, difficulties
were noted by supervising physicians
early on in his training, with excessive
perfectionistic tendencies that were
thought by his supervisors to be a
negative characteristic for being a good
anesthesiologist. These difficulties were
reported via written evaluations and
verbal report to the program director.
Despite the resident’s efforts to minimize
these issues, they were increasingly
noticed by superiors because of recurrent
lateness, time management issues, task
prioritization difficulties, and fixation
on issues that were of little value in
the provision of safe, quality patient
care. The resident was initially placed
on “structured remediation” by the
clinical competency committee (CCC).
Remediation included explanation
of written expectations, including
counseling, defined break times,
weekly meetings with the resident’s
preceptor, and an expectation that cases
would be discussed with the attending
Abstract
Cognitive and physical disabilities
among anesthesia residents are not well
studied. Cognitive disabilities may often
go undiagnosed among trainees, and
these trainees may struggle during their
graduate medical education. Attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is
an executive function disorder that may
manifest as lack of vigilance, an inability
to adapt to the rapid changes associated
with anesthesia cases, distractibility,
an inability to prioritize activities, and
even periods of hyperfocusing, among
other signs. Programs are encouraged
to work closely with residents with such
disabilities to develop an educational
plan that includes accommodations for
their unique learning practices while
maintaining the critical aspects of the
program. The authors present the
management of a case of an anesthesia
resident with a diagnosis of ADHD, the
perspectives of the trainee, program
director, clinical competency director, and
the office of general counsel. This article
also provides follow-up in the five years
since completion of residency.
Acad Med. 2016;91:210–214.
First published online August 3, 2015
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000854
Please see the end of this article for information
about the authors.
Correspondence should be addressed to Michael G.
Fitzsimons, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care,
and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital,
55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114; telephone: (617)
726-8980; e-mail: mfitzsimons@partners.org.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
and Successful Completion of Anesthesia
Residency: A Case Report
Michael G. Fitzsimons, MD, Jason C. Brookman, MD, Sarah H. Arnholz, JD,
and Keith Baker, MD, PhD
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Article
Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 2 / February 2016 211
physician the night before. Difficulties
continued, and because the CCC felt that
anesthesiology might not be the right
specialty for him, the resident took a
voluntary leave of absence to assess his
choice of specialty.
During the leave of absence, the resident
began a structured program of cognitive
behavioral therapy to further assist with
ADHD symptom management. He also
chose to inform the program director
about his diagnosis of ADHD and
requested educational accommodations
within the structure of the residency
program to help achieve the academic
potential that he believed was possible
(see List 1). These accommodations
helped the resident develop different
strategies to manage his condition, and
had a significant positive impact on his
clinical work performance. He underwent
a “fitness for duty” evaluation through
the occupational health clinic before
returning from his leave of absence. On
return to clinical duties, the resident was
more closely supervised and continued
to excel academically. He successfully
completed the initial residency program
and went on to a highly competitive
subspecialty fellowship. After successful
completion of this fellowship, this
individual joined the faculty of a top-tier
academic program, where he has excelled
clinically and remains one of the top
faculty educators in the department.
Discussion
The Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990 (ADA) defines disability as a
physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more of a
person’s major life activities.2 Under the
ADA, employers may not discriminate
against a qualified individual with a
disability and must provide a reasonable
accommodation to enable the individual
to perform the essential functions
of his or her position, so long as the
accommodation does not create an
undue hardship for the employer.
Courts have treated medical residents
as employees under federal and state
antidiscrimination laws.3–5 Disability
among residents in the nation’s training
programs at academic medical centers is
poorly studied and thus may be poorly
managed. Physical and sensory disability
(PSD) is defined as any impairment of
special sense organs, including vision
or hearing, that limits one or more life
activities. PSD occurs in approximately
1 in 178 matriculating medical students
and 1 in 238 medical students who
graduate. Of students who matriculate
with PSD, 76.8% go on to graduate.6
Although this is an impressive success
rate, it is still well below the 96.6%
eight-year graduation rate for students
without PSD.7 The most common PSDs
are associated with hearing, ambulation,
and vision.6
Impairment due to learning disabilities
is also poorly studied. Amendments to
the ADA passed by Congress in 2008
provide strong support for the view that
ADHD may be considered a disability
under the statute, and the condition has
been recognized as such by at least one
federal district court.8 Certain learning
disabilities have been recognized as a
disability under the ADA for which a
reasonable accommodation must be
offered. It is estimated that 3% to 6%
of college students have some form of
learning disability.9 The incidence among
medical students is unknown, but Faigel10
noted that services offered to medical
students with learning disabilities
increased significantly after the passage
of the ADA. A national study of residents
in emergency medicine programs noted
that 1.3% of trainees have a documented
disability, and over 50% of program
directors suspected that at least one of
their residents may have a disability.11 Of
the various disabilities that exist, learning
disabilities were the most common,
followed by depression/bipolar disorder
and musculoskeletal impairment.11 The
majority of the disabilities (61%) were
diagnosed before residency.11 Increased
time allotment for examinations was
required for 15% of the individuals,
although four residents without disability
were also granted additional time.
Individuals diagnosed with a disability
before residency were more likely to
graduate on time when compared with
those diagnosed during residency.11
Childhood ADHD is characterized by
impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention
and specifically has been recognized as
a disability under the ADA. Behaviors
and patterns indicating inattention
and hyperactivity–impulsivity are
defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (see Appendix 1). Studies
generally demonstrate that nearly half
of the individuals diagnosed as children
will have symptoms that persist into
List 1
Requested Educational Accommodations and Expectations of Supervising Staff
for a Resident With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Completing an
Anesthesia Residency
1. A period of intense supervision of the resident by a single staff physician upon return from
leave of absence
2. Direct daily feedback by staff to the resident specifically addressing:
a. Time management
b. Task prioritization / focus / fixation
c. Areas for improvement
3. Daily case debriefing
4. Specification and discussion by the attending physician with the resident of high-level issues
that are relevant to the case at hand
5. Review of daily task list by the resident
6. Guidance to staff members by the resident as to when and how to provide instruction and
nonurgent teaching
7. Allowance for a written task list to be generated by the resident in the operating room
8. Assistance by faculty for the resident to develop a comprehensive reading plan
9. Assistance by faculty for the resident to develop a checklist for managing logistics of the daily
case load
10. Allowance by faculty for the resident to type up preoperative evaluations to assist with
presentation
11. Time allowance by faculty for the resident’s personal health care appointments
12. Deployment of the resident to more difficult rotations and responsibilities as soon as
appropriate
13. Providing the resident with a copy of all written communications and counseling
14. Allowing the resident to attend clinical competency committee meetings when performance is
discussed
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Article
Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 2 / February 2016
212
adulthood.12 Symptoms of hyperactivity
may diminish while inattention persists
with age. Inattention in adulthood
manifests as difficulty keeping
appointments, meeting deadlines, or
focusing on a single task.13 Adults with
ADHD often manifest sleep disorders,
although this depends on the type
of ADHD diagnosed.14 Additionally,
children with ADHD may develop
substance use disorders later in life.15
The incidence of ADHD in anesthesia
residents and trained anesthesiologists
has not been reported, to our
knowledge. Critical executive skills of
anesthesiologists include the ability to
focus on detail, multitasking, efficiency,
crisis management, personal interactions,
and two-way communications, all of
which may be compromised by poorly
treated ADHD. Anesthesiologists are in
a highest-risk specialty for developing
substance use disorders.16 A history
of ADHD may compound that risk.
Individuals whose sleep patterns may
already be compromised may only worsen
with the rigorous and unpredictable
schedule of residency, fellowship, and
posttraining clinical practice.
The management of ADHD involves both
pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic
therapies. Stimulants such as
amphetamine and methylphenidate are
used effectively to reduce distractibility
and increase attention.13 Side effects
include decreased appetite, weight loss,
insomnia, depression, and anxiety. The
long-term effects of such medications
are unknown. Atomoxetine is the only
nonstimulant medication approved for
the treatment of ADHD. Atomoxetine is
a blocker of norepinephrine transmitters.
Cognitive behavioral therapy is the
primary nonpharmacologic treatment for
ADHD and has been shown to be highly
effective in adults with ADHD when
used in combination with pharmacologic
treatment.17,18
The training of a physician with ADHD
during residency involves a fine balance
between the obligations to the individual
and the protection of the patient.19
Because ADHD may constitute a
disability and courts have recognized an
employer’s obligation to participate in
an “interactive process” to assess possible
reasonable accomodations for a disability,
residency programs are well advised to
engage in the reasonable accommodation
process with qualified residents with
this condition.4,20,21 Accommodations
may include an adjustment to the work
schedule, time off, reassignment of
certain responsibilities, or modifying the
work environment. Accommodations
must, however, meet two major
requirements. First, the accommodation
may not create undue financial or
administrative burden on the program
and, second, must not significantly alter
the nature of the program.19 In the health
care setting, patient safety considerations
also must be factored into the assessment
of reasonable accommodations.
The CCC chair and the program
director work closely to assist trainees
experiencing performance problems
during residency. Program collaboration
with the hospital’s in-house counsel on
these matters is helpful to allow for an
understanding of the legal obligations
of the program, as well as the limits on
those obligations. At our institution,
several educational interventions were
made to assist the resident with ADHD
prior to implementation of remediation.
Appropriate assessment of the impact of a
medical condition on clinical performance
can prove difficult, especially while
attempting to maintain medical privacy.
Use of a “fitness for duty” assessment
through the hospital’s occupational health
department is critical to obtain guidance
on possible workplace accommodations
while ensuring privacy with regard to
the resident’s health condition. When
the resident disclosed a disability due
to ADHD, two-way communication
was facilitated and more options were
available to develop a plan to manage the
condition and to incorporate appropriate
accommodations. The resident’s health
care providers documented that the
resident’s condition and treatment plan
were compatible with the safe performance
of residency-related duties. Thus he
was formally deemed fit for duty. The
accommodations requested by the resident
were viewed as reasonable, and many were
simply good educational practice, such
as direct daily feedback and debriefing
after cases (List 1). We also considered
issues related to “forward feeding”
of clinical performance information.
Forward feeding is the practice of
providing a trainee’s performance data
to future faculty members to allow
them to structure their rotation and
interactions to maximize a trainee’s
performance. Trainees with marginal
performance may escape detection when
information is not conveyed to faculty
members.22 Information not shared
may thus potentially place a patient at
risk. We decided to share the requested
accommodations with subsequent
rotations and faculty members but not
disclose the resident’s disability. On
completion of training, the condition was
viewed as fully controlled, without risk
to patients. The personal leave of absence
to optimize his approach to learning was
mentioned in letters of recommendation
for both fellowship and faculty positions,
but the clinical diagnosis was not
disclosed. When he applied to another
state for a medical license, the board of
medicine was informed of his diagnosis
and the fact that he successfully completed
the requirements of the residency as well
as optimized his approach to learning.
The resident in this case made significant
personal contributions to the positive
outcome achieved during his residency
training. He acknowledged his disability
and the impact it was having on clinical
performance, personal interactions,
and professional responsibilities. The
resident accepted personal responsibility
for investigating the requested
accommodations and balanced this
with taking personal responsibility
for attending appointments and other
therapeutic interventions, all while
maintaining a positive relationship with
his supervisors throughout his residency.
Our program has a written performance
improvement policy that guides our
approach to performance issues. Our
CCC consists of respected educators
within the department who are willing
to consider factors such as disability
and impairment as causes of failure to
achieve our expectations. We encourage
CCC members in anesthesiology and
other specialties to consider such factors,
engage in open discussions with trainees
about their learning style, develop
relationships with individuals trained in
the diagnosis of cognitive disability, and
establish a culture where trainees can seek
and use the tools they need to succeed.
Conclusions
Educational and other accommodations
are tools to enable a resident to meet
the essential performance demands of a
residency in the face of a disability. We
describe the successful management of
a resident with ADHD. Through the use
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Article
Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 2 / February 2016 213
of workplace accommodations and other
supports put in place by the resident,
including pharmacotherapy and cognitive
behavioral therapy, the resident was
able to successfully graduate from our
program and carry out the independent
practice of anesthesiology. The resident
subsequently successfully completed a
fellowship, became board certified in
anesthesiology, and has won teaching
awards as a faculty member at a noted
academic institution.
Funding/Support: None reported.
Other disclosures: None reported.
Ethical approval: The permission of the trainee
has been obtained prior to creation and
publication of this article. Identifying details,
including the location and time frame of the
events described, have been omitted to maintain
confidentiality.
M.G. Fitzsimons is assistant professor, Harvard
Medical School, and Department of Anesthesia,
Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J.C. Brookman is assistant professor of
anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and
Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland.
S.H. Arnholz is legal counsel, Office of the General
Counsel, Partners Healthcare System, Boston,
Massachusetts.
K. Baker is associate professor, Harvard Medical
School, and Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care,
and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, Massachusetts.
References
1 Elder J, Waisel DB. Case report of the one-
armed anesthesiology resident. J Clin Anesth.
2004;16:445–448.
2 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. PL
101-336. Approved July 26, 1990 (104 Stat 327).
3 Isaacs v. Datrmouth-Hitchcock Med Cet. No
12-cv-040-LM, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54183
(D.N.H. April 18, 2014).
4 Jakubowski v. Christ Hosp., Inc., 627 F.3d 195
(6th Cir. 2010).
5 Mayo Foundation for Education and
Research et al. vs. United States, 562 U.S. 44
(2011).
6 Eickmeyer SM, Do KD, Kirschner KL, Curry
RH. North American medical schools’
experience with and approaches to the
needs of students with physical and sensory
disabilities. Acad Med. 2012;87:567–573.
7 Caulfield M, Redden G, Sondheimer H.
Graduation rates and attrition factors for
U.S. medical school students. AAMC Analysis
in Brief. 2014;14. https://www.aamc.org/
download/379220/data/may2014aib-graduat
ionratesandattritionfactorsforusmedschools.
pdf. Accessed April 24, 2015.
8 McCarthy v. Maple Twp. Ambulance Corps,
869 F. Supp. 2d 638 (E.D. Pa. 2012).
9 Cohen J. Learning disabilities and the college
student: Identification and diagnosis. Adolesc
Psychiatry. 1983;11:177–198.
10 Faigel HC. Changes in services for students
with learning disabilities in U.S. and
Canadian medical schools, 1991 to 1997.
Acad Med. 1998;73:1290–1293.
11 Takakuwa KM, Ernst AA, Weiss SJ. Residents
with disabilities: A national survey of
directors of emergency medicine residency
programs. South Med J. 2002;95:436–440.
12 Hechtman L. Predictors of long-term
outcome in children with attention-deficit/
hyperactivity disorder. Pediatr Clin North
Am. 1999;46:1039–1052.
13 Volkow ND, Swanson JM. Clinical practice:
Adult attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.
N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1935–1944.
14 Yoon SY, Jain UR, Shapiro CM. Sleep and
daytime function in adults with attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Subtype
differences. Sleep Med. 2013;14:648–655.
15 Charach A, Yeung E, Climans T, Lillie E.
Childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder and future substance use disorders:
Comparative meta-analyses. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50:9–21.
16 Warner DO, Berge K, Sun H, Harman A,
Hanson A, Schroeder DR. Substance use
disorder among anesthesiology residents,
1975–2009. JAMA. 2013;310:2289–2296.
17 Safren SA, Otto MW, Sprich S, Winett
CL, Wilens TE, Biederman J. Cognitive-
behavioral therapy for ADHD in medication-
treated adults with continued symptoms.
Behav Res Ther. 2005;43:831–842.
18 Safren SA, Sprich S, Mimiaga MJ, et al.
Cognitive behavioral therapy vs relaxation
with educational support for medication-
treated adults with ADHD and persistent
symptoms: A randomized controlled trial.
JAMA. 2010;304:875–880.
19 Melnick DE. Commentary: Balancing
responsibility to patients and responsibility
to aspiring physicians with disabilities. Acad
Med. 2011;86:674–676.
20 Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics, Inc. 70 F.3d
667, 674 (1st Cir 1995).
21 United States Government Printing Office.
Code of Federal Regulation. Regulations to
implement the equal employment provisions
of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 29 C.F.R.
1630.2. 2011. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/
CFR-2011-title29-vol4/pdf/CFR-2011-title29-
vol4-sec1630-2.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2015.
22 Cleary L. “Forward feeding” about students’
progress: The case for longitudinal,
progressive, and shared assessment of
medical students. Acad Med. 2008;83:800.
Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Article
Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 2 / February 2016
214
Appendix 1
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Diagnostic Criteria
A. A persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity–impulsivity that interferes with functioning or development, as characterized by (1) and/or (2):
1. Inattention: Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is inconsistent with developmental
level and that negatively impacts directly on social and academic/occupational activities:
Note: The symptoms are not solely a manifestation of oppositional behavior, defiance, hostility, or failure to understand tasks or instructions. For
older adolescents and adults (age 17 and older), at least five symptoms are required.
a. Often fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes in schoolwork, at work, or during other activities (e.g., overlooks or
misses details, work is inaccurate).
b. Often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities (e.g., has difficulty remaining focused during lectures, conversations, or
lengthy reading).
c. Often does not listen when spoken to directly (e.g., mind seems elsewhere, even in the absence of any obvious distraction).
d. Often does not follow through on instructions and fails to finish schoolwork, chores, or other duties in the workplace (e.g., starts tasks but
quickly loses focus and is easily sidetracked).
e. Often has difficulty organizing tasks and activities (e.g., difficulty managing sequential tasks; difficulty keeping materials and belongings in
order; messy, disorganized work; has poor time management; fails to meet deadlines).
f. Often avoids, dislikes, or is reluctant to engage in tasks that require sustained mental effort (e.g., schoolwork or homework; for older
adolescents and adults, preparing reports, completing forms, reviewing lengthy papers).
g. Often loses things necessary for tasks or activities (e.g., school materials, pencils, books, tools, wallet, keys, paperwork, eyeglasses, mobile
telephones).
h. Is often easily distracted by extraneous stimuli (for older adolescents or adults, may include unrelated thoughts).
i. Is often forgetful in daily activities (e.g., doing chores, running errands; for older adolescents or adults, returning calls, paying bills, keeping
appointments).
2. Hyperactivity and impulsivity: Six (or more) of the following symptoms have persisted for at least six months to a degree that is inconsistent
with developmental level and that negatively impacts directly on social and academic/developmental activities:
Note: The symptoms are not solely a manifestation of oppositional behavior, defiance, hostility, or failure to understand tasks or instructions. For
older adolescents and adults (age 17 and older), at least five symptoms are required.
a. Often fidgets with or taps hands or feet or squirms in seat.
b. Often leaves seat in situations when remaining seated is expected (e.g., leaves his or her place in the classroom, in the office or other
workplace, or in other situations that require remaining in place).
c. Often runs about or climbs in situations where it is inappropriate. (Note: in adolescents or adults, may be limited to feeling restless.)
d. Often unable to play or engage in leisure activities quietly.
e. Is often “on the go,” acting as if “driven by a motor” (e.g., is unable to be or uncomfortable being still for extended time, as in restaurants,
meetings; may be experienced by others as being restless or difficult to keep up with.
f. Often talks excessively.
g. Often blurts out an answer before a question has completed (e.g., completes people’s sentences; cannot wait for turn in conversation).
h. Often has difficulty waiting his or her turn (e.g., while waiting in line).
i. Often interrupts or intrudes on others (e.g., butts into conversations, games, or activities; may start using other people’s things without
asking or receiving permission; for adolescents and adults, may intrude into or take over what others are doing).
B. Several inattentive or hyperactive–impulsive symptoms were present prior to age 12 years.
C. Several inattentive or hyperactive–impulsive symptoms are present in two or more settings (e.g., at home, school, or work; with friends or relatives;
in other activities).
D. There is clear evidence that the symptoms interfere with, or reduce the quality of, social, academic, or occupational functioning.
E. The symptoms do not occur exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder and are not better explained by another
mental disorder (e.g., mood disorder, anxiety disorder, dissociative disorder, personality disorder, substance intoxication or withdrawal).
Source: Reprinted with permission from American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, Va: American Psychiatric
Association; 2013. All rights reserved.
... Caring for patients while juggling multiple competing priorities can be crushing to learners with attention issues. [1][2][3] Learners with attention problems (including hyperfocusing, distractibility, and disorganization) 4 are common in postgraduate education. Meeks and Herzer surveyed US allopathic medical schools and found that 33.7% of students receiving accommodations for a disability had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). ...
... 7,14 Residents with disabilities who have access to accommodations have fewer depressive symptoms and are more likely to complete residency. 1,2,15,16 Moreover, Meeks and colleagues found medical students with disabilities who received accommodations achieved higher Step 1 scores than their unaccommodated peers with disabilities. 17 Despite this finding, only 25% of students with disabilities in their sample used accommodations on Step 1. 18 Meeks and Jain noted that a lack of clearly defined policies, the absence of a trained point of contact for accommodation requests, and insufficient understanding of ADA requirements were common structural barriers to requesting and accessing accommodations. ...
... P<.001. 2 The difference in timing of implementation of accommodations depended on the timing of identification of need, χ 2 test of independence (1, N=143)=6.77, P=.009. ...
Article
Background: An increasing number of medical students applying to residency programs request accommodations for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Early implementation of accommodations for individuals with ADHD during family medicine (FM) residency could help learners and programs, but the number of programs prepared to invite learners to disclose ADHD and to implement accommodations is unclear. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe practices employed by FM residency programs to identify residents who need accommodations for ADHD. We also chose to examine the frequency with which basic categories of ADHD accommodations are used and whether review of technical standards (ie, resident job description) is associated with timing of accommodations. Methods: We analyzed responses from the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) national survey of FM residency program directors, which was distributed via email invitation to all US programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A total of 298 program directors (44.3%) responded. Results: Approximately one in six FM residency programs are proactive in their identification of learners with ADHD, typically recognizing the need for accommodations during the interview process or orientation. Once the need is identified, most programs implement accommodations within 1 month, and many employ multiple types of accommodations. Conclusions: While a small subset of programs has developed processes to identify and accommodate ADHD proactively, results suggested that the majority of programs approach accommodation processes on an ad hoc basis. In turn, ad hoc identification precludes a proactive approach, given use of poor performance to identify the need for supports.
... Im and Tamarelli improvement, review of daily task lists by residents, guidance by the resident to staff members as to when and how to provide instruction and non-urgent teaching, assistance by faculty for residents to develop a comprehensive reading plan, time allowance by faculty for residents' personal health-care appointments, and coordination between residents' care providers, program supervisors, and residents regarding helpful accommodations and any changes in these over time. 52 While these accommodations have likely provided significant benefit to medical students and residents struggling with ADHD, little to no mention is made in the literature about one particular task area that is a crucial part of medical training and practice, and likely an area of challenge for learners and physicians with ADHD: the reading of scientific articles. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by functionally impairing levels of inattention and/or hyperactive-impulsive behavior. It affects 3% to 5% of adults. This perspective piece aims to highlight the occurrence of ADHD in medical learners and physicians, including its reported prevalence in these groups, why reported rates may reflect underestimates, consequences of untreated symptoms, and a potentially helpful innovative educational tool to assist these individuals with a critical aspect of medical training and practice. Results Despite recent attention being paid to concerning levels of depression, anxiety, and burnout in medical learners and physicians, comparatively little attention has been devoted to the occurrence of ADHD in these groups. Reported rates of ADHD in medical learners and physicians, though low compared to rates of other mental health conditions and compared to rates of ADHD in the general population, may represent underestimates for a variety of reasons. The consequences of untreated ADHD symptoms are likely numerous and significant for these groups. Research has shown that about half of adults with ADHD discontinue prescribed treatment (stimulant medication) over time due to lack of perceived effectiveness, highlighting the need for durable, effective interventions to help medical learners and physicians with ADHD during and after their training. An innovative educational tool to assist medical learners and physicians with ADHD with a critical facet of their training and practice – the reading of scientific articles – is proposed, including a description of the tool, rationale for its design, practical considerations around implementation, and proposed directions for future research. Conclusion Untreated ADHD in medical learners and physicians may have numerous and significant consequences that can adversely impact training, practice, and ultimately patient care. These challenges warrant proper support for medical learners and physicians with ADHD via evidence-based treatments, program-based accommodations, and innovative educational tools.
... Therefore, we endorse additional opportunities for faculty development that highlight existing guidance on best practices for the inclusion of residents with disabilities, 7,21 ACGME mandates on disability and diversity inclusion, [8][9][10] and literature that shows successful integration of resident accommodations. 22,23 Actionable and specific goals to include disability must be created if family medicine programs seek to improve their diversity efforts with regard to disabled residents. ...
Article
Background and objectives: Leading medical organizations including the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) espouse the value of a diverse physician workforce, including disability, yet there is a dearth of research about this population in graduate medical education (GME). More information is needed on the prevalence of disability in the resident population, plans to recruit residents with disabilities, and program perceptions of barriers to inclusion. The goal of this study was to better understand the prevalence of disability in the resident population, plans to recruit residents with disabilities, and program perceptions of barriers to disability inclusion and frequency of disability-related complaints and litigation. Methods: Surveys were emailed to 200 department chairs via SurveyMonkey as part of a larger omnibus survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA). Results: More than 30% of family medicine programs reported at least one faculty member with a disability, while 50% reported matriculating at least one resident with a disability in the previous 5 years. Programs with greater numbers of physicians with disabilities were more likely to have a plan to recruit residents with disabilities, and inadequate expertise was the largest perceived barrier to disability inclusion. Conclusions: Employing faculty with disabilities may be the driving force for having an active plan to recruit residents with disabilities. In order to meet the stated diversity goals of medicine, programs will need to increase professional development around disability inclusion.
... Therefore, we endorse additional opportunities for faculty development that highlight existing guidance on best practices for the inclusion of residents with disabilities, 7,21 ACGME mandates on disability and diversity inclusion, [8][9][10] and literature that shows successful integration of resident accommodations. 22,23 Actionable and specific goals to include disability must be created if family medicine programs seek to improve their diversity efforts with regard to disabled residents. ...
Article
Background and objectives: Increasing the diversity of family medicine residency programs includes matriculating residents with disabilities. Accrediting agencies and associations provide mandates and recommendations to assist programs with building inclusive policies and practices. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess programs' compliance with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates and alignment with Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) best practices; (2) to understand perceptions of sources of accommodation funding; and (3) to document family medicine chairs' primary source of disability-related information. Methods: Data were collected as part of the 2019 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance Chairs' Survey. Respondents answered questions about disability policy, disability disclosure structure, source of accommodation funding, and source of information regarding disability. Results: Half (56%) of responding chairs reported maintaining a disability policy in alignment with ACGME mandates, while half (52%) maintain a disability disclosure structure in opposition to AAMC recommendations. Funding sources for accommodation were reported as unknown (32.9%), the hospital system (27.1%), or the departmental budget (24.3%). Chairs listed human resources (50.7%) or diversity, equity, and inclusion offices (23.9%) as the main sources of disability guidance. Conclusions: The number of students with disabilities in medical education is growing, increasing the likelihood that family medicine residency programs will select and train residents with disabilities. Results from this study suggest an urgent need to review disability policy and processes within departments to ensure alignment with current guidance on disability inclusion. Department chairs, as institutional leaders, are well positioned to lead this change.
Article
Full-text available
Hyperfocus (HF), or intense, deep concentration on a task, has gained significant research attention in recent years, particularly in regard to clinical populations such as Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The present work aims to provide validation of the 12-item dispositional adult hyperfocus questionnaire (AHQ-D) as a quantitative metric of HF in adults. We preregistered the study design and hypotheses. We administered the AHQ-D and several additional questionnaires to 347 adults (mean ± SD age: 33 ± 11 years; 47% female). Exploratory factor analysis revealed high factor loadings (0.57–0.81) on a single HF factor; item response theory analysis suggested that the questionnaire items had high discrimination and covered a wide range of responses; and we report strong internal consistency metrics (Cronbach’s alpha 0.93, mean split-half reliability 0.93). Replicating our previous work, HF was positively correlated with Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) scores (r(345) = 0.53), suggesting that HF may be related to ADHD traits (though in this sample we did not specifically recruit individuals with ADHD). The AHQ-D demonstrated the hypothesized convergent validity; HF on the AHQ-D was positively correlated with HF measured using a different HF scale (r(344) = 0.69), as well as flow (r(345) = 0.12) and mind wandering (r(345) = 0.39) scores. AHQ-D HF scores showed a weak negative correlation with grit (r(345) = − 0.29). Though there was a weak negative correlation between HF and social desirability response tendency (r(345) = − 0.24), suggesting that those who care more about what others think may report less HF, there was no relationship between HF and extrasensory perception beliefs (r(345) = 0.01), suggesting that participants were not simply biased in their response tendencies. Taken together, we demonstrate strong scale metrics for the AHQ-D, the expected convergent validity, and a general lack of response bias, in addition to replicating our previous association of HF with ADHD traits. We suggest that the AHQ-D can be confidently used in future work as a valid way to measure HF in adults.
Article
Medical studies are hard to manage especially for students with specific needs. These students warrant some adaptations in studies and trainings in order to achieve learning goals. Studies showed they face structural and cultural barriers and stigma. Current efforts aim to encourage integration of these persons in order to increase diversity. This study aimed to assess perception of Tunisian medical students with specific needs. Cross-sectional study through online questionnaire including learners affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis (students, interns, and residents) who consider they have specific needs. This questionnaire was elaborated by authors and explored barriers faced by participants, needed help, and suggested solutions. Study respected consent and confidentiality. This study included 40 participants. Most of them (n = 32) were post-graduate (interns and residents). The most reported condition was mental disability (n = 14). Main challenges faced by participants were work time schedule, unhealthy lifestyle, and negative attitudes from peers and supervisors, and 19 felt victim of stigma. Reported specific needs were adapting work schedule and psychological support from peers, from supervisors, or from mental health professionals. Almost half of the participants did never disclose their difficulties (n = 21). Suggested solutions involved to have a counseling center within the faculty. Only 8 participants knew there was a new unit helping students with specific needs in FMT. Despite efforts of the university, medical learners with chronic conditions still face many structural and cultural barriers to inclusion. Most participants suggested to have more psychological support from faculty.
Article
Full-text available
Physicians with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may have unrecognized workplace difficulties because of inattention and impulsivity. If these behaviours interfere with patient care or organizational functioning, leaders may erroneously attribute the physician’s actions to unprofessionalism. As such, corrective efforts with punitive measures may be ineffective. ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder that responds to evidence-based treatments, including medications, accommodations, and supports. Physician leaders who understand the unique presentations of ADHD in physicians may better identify when this condition may be contributing to workplace behaviour. Furthermore, physician leaders may have a professional or legal duty to accommodate or support physicians with underlying medical and/or psychiatric conditions, such as ADHD. Using our own clinical experience, we provide a general overview of ADHD in physicians and guide physician leaders on how to help physicians who may be struggling with ADHD in the workplace. We hope that our clinical experience and observations of this hidden problem will spur discussion, awareness, and action for further research and support.
Article
Background: Graduate medical education (GME) institutions must ensure equal access for trainees with disabilities through appropriate and reasonable accommodations and policies. To date, no comprehensive review of the availability and inclusiveness of GME policies for residents with disabilities exists. Objective: We examined institutions' compliance with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements and alignment with Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) policy considerations. Methods: Between June and August 2019, we conducted a directed content analysis of GME institutional policies using the AAMC report on disability considerations and the ACGME institutional requirements as a framework. Results: Of the 47 GME handbooks available for review, 32 (68%) included a disability policy. Forty-one of the 47 (87%) handbooks maintained a nondiscrimination statement that included disability. Twelve of the 32 (38%) handbooks included a specific disability policy and language that encouraged disclosure, and 17 (53%) included a statement about the confidential documentation used to determine reasonable accommodations. Nineteen of the 32 (59%) maintained a clear procedure for disclosing disabilities and requesting accommodations. Conclusions: While disability policies are present in many of the largest GME institutions, it is not yet a standardized practice. For institutions maintaining a disability policy, many lack key elements identified as best practices in the AAMC considerations.
Article
Full-text available
A 31-year-old middle-school teacher sought medical help because she was having trouble keeping up with her job assignments and responsibilities. Her primary symptoms were an inability to stay focused and being easily distracted. She reported day-dreaming with multiple thoughts at the same time, an inability to complete tasks on time, frequently forgetting to do things at work, and being unable to remain still during solitary activities (e.g., watching a movie and reading a book). Her friends described her as excessively talkative, disorganized, impatient, and careless. From childhood, her teachers noted that she was inattentive and messy and often did not turn in homework. She was able to do reasonably well in school despite her symptoms, but more recently, her job demands have overwhelmed her, and she is considering quitting. What would you advise?
Article
Full-text available
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is a prevalent, distressing, and impairing condition that is not fully treated by pharmacotherapy alone and lacks evidence-based psychosocial treatments. To test cognitive behavioral therapy for ADHD in adults treated with medication but who still have clinically significant symptoms. Randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for 86 symptomatic adults with ADHD who were already being treated with medication. The study was conducted at a US hospital between November 2004 and June 2008 (follow-up was conducted through July 2009). Of the 86 patients randomized, 79 completed treatment and 70 completed the follow-up assessments. Patients were randomized to 12 individual sessions of either cognitive behavioral therapy or relaxation with educational support (which is an attention-matched comparison). The primary measures were ADHD symptoms rated by an assessor (ADHD rating scale and Clinical Global Impression scale) at baseline, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. The assessor was blinded to treatment condition assignment. The secondary outcome measure was self-report of ADHD symptoms. Cognitive behavioral therapy achieved lower posttreatment scores on both the Clinical Global Impression scale (magnitude -0.0531; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.01 to -0.05; P = .03) and the ADHD rating scale (magnitude -4.631; 95% CI, -8.30 to -0.963; P = .02) compared with relaxation with educational support. Throughout treatment, self-reported symptoms were also significantly more improved for cognitive behavioral therapy (beta = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.17; P <001), and there were more treatment responders in cognitive behavioral therapy for both the Clinical Global Impression scale (53% vs 23%; odds ratio [OR], 3.80; 95% CI, 1.50 to 9.59; P = .01) and the ADHD rating scale (67% vs 33%; OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 1.74 to 10.58; P = .002). Responders and partial responders in the cognitive behavioral therapy condition maintained their gains over 6 and 12 months. Among adults with persistent ADHD symptoms treated with medication, the use of cognitive behavioral therapy compared with relaxation with educational support resulted in improved ADHD symptoms, which were maintained at 12 months. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00118911.
Article
Substance use disorder (SUD) among anesthesiologists and other physicians poses serious risks to both physicians and patients. Formulation of policy and individual treatment plans is hampered by lack of data regarding the epidemiology and outcomes of physician SUD. To describe the incidence and outcomes of SUD among anesthesiology residents. Retrospective cohort study of physicians who began training in United States anesthesiology residency programs from July 1, 1975, to July 1, 2009, including 44,612 residents contributing 177,848 resident-years to analysis. Follow-up for incidence and relapse was to the end of training and December 31, 2010, respectively. Cases of SUD (including initial SUD episode and any relapse, vital status and cause of death, and professional consequences of SUD) ascertained through training records of the American Board of Anesthesiology, including information from the Disciplinary Action Notification Service of the Federation of State Medical Boards and cause of death information from the National Death Index. Of the residents, 384 had evidence of SUD during training, with an overall incidence of 2.16 (95% CI, 1.95-2.39) per 1000 resident-years (2.68 [95% CI, 2.41-2.98] men and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.93] women per 1000 resident-years). During the study period, an initial rate increase was followed by a period of lower rates in 1996-2002, but the highest incidence has occurred since 2003 (2.87 [95% CI, 2.42-3.39] per 1000 resident-years). The most common substance category was intravenous opioids, followed by alcohol, marijuana or cocaine, anesthetics/hypnotics, and oral opioids. Twenty-eight individuals (7.3%; 95% CI, 4.9%-10.4%) died during the training period; all deaths were related to SUD. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative proportion of survivors experiencing at least 1 relapse by 30 years after the initial episode (based on a median follow-up of 8.9 years [interquartile range, 5.0-18.8 years]) was 43% (95% CI, 34%-51%). Rates of relapse and death did not depend on the category of substance used. Relapse rates did not change over the study period. Among anesthesiology residents entering primary training from 1975 to 2009, 0.86% had evidence of SUD during training. Risk of relapse over the follow-up period was high, indicating persistence of risk after training.
Article
Objectives: Although sleep disorders have been reported to affect more than half of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the association between sleep and ADHD is poorly understood. The aims of our study were to investigate sleep-related variables in adults with ADHD and to assess if any differences exist between ADHD of the predominantly inattentive (ADHD-I) and combined (ADHD-C) subtypes. Methods: We used the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the fatigue severity scale (FSS) to collect data on daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, and fatigue in 126 subjects (45 ADHD-I and 81 ADHD-C subjects). Results: Approximately 85% of subjects reported excessive daytime sleepiness or poor sleep quality. The most common sleep concerns were initial insomnia, interrupted sleep, and feeling too hot. When examining ADHD subtype differences, ADHD-I subtypes reported poorer sleep quality and more fatigue than ADHD-C subtypes. Partial correlation analyses revealed that interrelationships between sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, and fatigue differ between ADHD subtypes; in ADHD-I subtypes fatigue was associated with sleep quality, while in the ADHD-C subtypes fatigue was associated with both sleep quality and daytime sleepiness. There also appears to be a subtype×gender interaction that affects the perception of fatigue, as subjective fatigue was markedly higher in ADHD-I women than in ADHD-C women. Conclusion: Altogether our data indicate that the interplay of variables associated with daytime function and sleep varies between ADHD subtypes. This finding may have considerable relevance in the management and pathophysiologic understanding of ADHD, and thus lead to tailored treatments for ADHD subtypes.
Article
To determine the nature and frequency of impairments and related underlying conditions of medical students with physical and sensory disabilities (PSDs), and to assess medical schools' use of relevant publications in setting admission criteria and developing appropriate accommodations. A 25-item survey addressed schools' experiences with students known to have PSDs and their related policies and practices. The survey instrument was directed to student affairs deans at all 163 accredited American and Canadian medical schools. The authors limited the survey to consideration of PSDs, excluding psychiatric, cognitive, and learning disabilities. Eighty-six schools (52.8%) responded, representing an estimated 83,327 students enrolled between 2001 and 2010. Of these students, 0.56% had PSDs at matriculation and 0.42% at graduation. Although 81% of respondents were familiar with published guidelines for technical standards, 71% used locally derived institutional guidelines for the admission of disabled applicants. The most commonly reported accommodations for students with PSDs included extra time to complete tasks/exams (n = 62), ramps, lifts, or accessible entrances (n = 43), and dictated/audio-recorded lectures (n = 40). All responding schools required students' demonstration of physical examination skills; requirements for other technical skills, with or without accommodations, varied considerably. The matriculation and graduation rates of medical students with PSDs remain low. The most frequent accommodations reported were among those required of any academic or clinical setting by the Americans with Disabilities Act. There is a lack of consensus regarding technical standards for admission, suggesting a need to reexamine this critical issue.
Article
In 2008, Congress amended the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to relax court-imposed limitations on evidence required to warrant protection under the ADA. Since passage of the ADA in 1990, medicine has focused not on evaluating the types of accommodations that would best balance the interests of individuals with disabilities, institutions, and patients but, rather, on the question of whether individuals seeking protection under the law qualify for disability accommodations at all. The medical profession should refocus on the nature of accommodations provided to those with disabilities. In doing so, the intent to support disabled persons seeking careers in medicine must be balanced with ethical obligations to protect patient welfare. Medical schools, graduate medical education programs, licensing and certifying authorities, and assessment organizations should work together to establish evidence-based minimum criteria for the physical and cognitive capabilities required of every physician.
Article
In recent years cohort studies have examined childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a risk factor for substance use disorders (SUDs) in adolescence and young adulthood. The long-term risk is estimated for development of alcohol, cannabis, combined alcohol and psychoactive SUDs, combined SUDs (nonalcohol), and nicotine use disorders in children with ADHD. MEDLINE, CINHAL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched through October 2009; reference lists of included studies were hand-searched. Prospective cohort studies were included if they compared children with ADHD to children without, identified cases using standardized criteria by mean age of 12 years, followed participants until adolescence (nicotine use) or young adulthood (psychoactive substance use disorder, with and without alcohol, alcohol use disorder, cannabis use disorder), and reported SUD outcomes. Two independent reviewers examined articles and extracted and cross-checked data. Effects were summarized as pooled odds ratios (ORs) in a random effects model. Thirteen studies were included. Only two of five meta-analyses, for alcohol use disorder (N = 3,184) and for nicotine use (N = 2,067), estimated ORs showing stability when evaluated by sensitivity analyses. Childhood ADHD was associated with alcohol use disorder by young adulthood (OR = 1.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-1.64) and with nicotine use by middle adolescence (OR = 2.36, 95% confidence interval = 1.71-3.27). The association with drug use disorder, nonalcohol (N = 593), was highly influenced by a single study. Childhood ADHD is associated with alcohol and drug use disorders in adulthood and with nicotine use in adolescence.
Article
Between September 1, 1990, and March 31, 1991, 103 of the 142 medical schools in the United States and Canada responded to a questionnaire regarding their services and programs for learning-disabled medical students. Ninety-three schools accepted such students (and ten did not), but only two-thirds had support programs and half lacked the capacity to diagnose learning disability disorders. Twenty-five did not know they could administer licensing examinations in a nonstandard manner, and 19 had no senior administrator or faculty member coordinating learning disability services. The author concludes that these results suggest that medical schools are poorly informed about and unprepared to help learning-disabled students.
Article
The identification and diagnosis of a learning disability in the college student are complex tasks. They constitute important tasks when we realize that 720,000 college students (6 percent, if we assume that there are 12 million in college today) may be learning disabled ( Astin 1983). It is evident that children with learning disabilities are at risk for psychological and social problems in adolescence and young adulthood ( Bellak 1979; Crabtree 1981; Cruikshank et al. 1980; Horowitz 1981). There is a risk that the learning disability will not be identified, and, hence, the problem will be treated as only a psychogenic one. Unfortunately, this will tend to contribute not only to the student's feelings of guilt, stupidity, and inability to change but also to the clinician's sense of frustration. The description of the learning disabled college student and the two-step identification process in this chapter provides guidelines to aid understanding of these issues. Most colleges have not yet come to grips with what it means to have learning disabled students in terms of teaching, academic evaluation, diagnosis, and college counseling. To do so is important not only because of recent laws that guarantee equal educational opportunity for these students but also because a learning disability, whether overt or covert, can profoundly affect a person's educational and psychosocial development. It has often been said that the capacity to love and work is the foundation for the healthy adult. It is easy to see how academic learning is the work of the college student and educational success or failure is linked integrally to self-esteem and self-love.