ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Lucid dreaming is the ability of a dreamer to become aware that he is dreaming and to possibly change some aspects of his current dream. This ability is associated with higher creativity and a proclivity for divergent thinking. Between subjects, dreams have different structural characteristics, such as the incorporation of daytime events, aversive dream content, or dream recall frequency (DRF). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics like aversive dream content, personal significance, dream recall, incorporation of daytime events and great dreams. A total of 334 participants took part in an online study. The results show that lucid dreamers scored higher on the creative personality scale of the Adjective Checklist and reported a higher DRF than non-lucid dreamers. As to the dream structure, lucid dreamers were more likely to incorporate daytime events into their dreams, and their dreams had a higher personal significance than those of non-lucid dreamers. Furthermore, substantial gender differences were found in DRF and other dream characteristics. The results confirm the relationship between lucid dreaming and creativity and indicate that lucid dreamers differ from non-lucid dreamers in their general dream structure.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013)98
D
IJoR
1. Introduction
Lucid dreaming is dened as the fact that a dreamer is
aware that he is dreaming while dreaming (e.g., LaBerge,
1987, Spoormaker & van den Bout, 2006). Tholey and
Utecht (1997) added more criteria to this phenomenon
such as awareness of freedom of decision, memory of the
waking state, and full intellectual abilities. However, only
very few of all lucid dreams seem to fulll all of Tholey and
Utecht´s criteria (Barret, 1992). An Austrian representative
survey by Stepansky, Holzinger, Schmeiser-Rieder, Saletu,
Kunze & Zeitlhofer (1998) showed that 26% of the sample
had experienced the phenomenon of lucid dreaming. In an-
otherstudy, 82% of an unselected student sample reported
having experience with becoming aware that they were in
a dream (Schredl & Erlacher, 2004) and in a representa-
tive German sample 51% of the participants reported that
they had experienced a lucid dream at least once (Schredl
& Erlacher, 2011). Nevertheless, only 0.3% to 0.7% of all
recalled dreams seem to be related to this specic state of
mind (Barret, 1991; Zadra, Donderi & Phil, 1992). Applica-
tions of lucid dreaming are for example training of complex
actions in lucid dreams (Tholey & Utecht, 1997) and its rel-
evance in psychotherapy, especially as an effective night-
mare treatment (Brylowski, 1990, Schriever, 1934, Zarda &
Pihl, 1997). Studies have found that lucid dreamers have a
higher internal locus of control, need for cognition, and they
are more creative than non-lucid dreamers (Blagrove & Hart-
nell, 1998; Blagrove & Tucker, 1994; Gackenbach, Heilman,
Boyt & LaBerge, 1985; Galvin, 1990). We suggest that all
these aspects of cognition could be related to lucid dreams
as they represent cognitive complexity and exibility
Creativity appears to be an important variable associated
with lucid dreaming. In a eld study, Stumbrys and Daniels
(2010) provide some evidence that lucid dreaming may con-
tribute to problem solving when dealing with more creative
rather than logical tasks. Both, frequent and occasional
lucid dreamers reported higher scores of creative person-
ality (Blagrove & Hartnell, 1998). Also, individuals with thin
boundaries were reported to be more creative (Hartmann,
1989; 1991). As to creative dreams, Schredl and Erlacher
(2007) found that the main factors inuencing frequency of
creative dreams were DRF and the thin boundaries person-
ality dimension. Creativity can be described as the ability to
a ‘new combination of information’ (Holm-Hadulla, 2011).
Measuring creativity or creative personality proves to be dif-
cult because of the diversity of existing denitions (Baron
& Harrington, 1981). According to Baron and Harrington
(1981), a differentiation has to be made between creativity
as a socially valuable product in order to call an act or a per-
son creative and creativity as being intrinsically valuable, so
nothing of demonstrable social value needs to be produced,
such as creativity of dreams, thoughts, imaginative expres-
sion or the curiosity of a child. Another differentiation can
be made with regard to the type of creative performance,
such as the difculty of the problem solved, the elegance
or beauty of the product, or the impact of its consequences
(Baron & Harrington, 1981). Furthermore, one must differ-
entiate between creativity as an achievement, creativity as
an ability, and creativity as a disposition or attitude (Baron &
Harrington, 1981). Rhodes (1961) described four basic ele-
Relationship between lucid dreaming, creativity
and dream characteristics
Nicolas Zink & Reinhard Pietrowsky
Department of Clinical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
Corresponding address:
Reinhard Pietrowsky, Henrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf,
Klinische Psychologie, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225 Düsseldorf,
Germany.
Email: R.Pietrowsky@hhu.de
Submitted for publication: June 2013
Accepted for publication: October 2013
Summary. Lucid dreaming is the ability of a dreamer to become aware that he is dreaming and to possibly change some
aspects of his current dream. This ability is associated with higher creativity and a proclivity for divergent thinking. Be-
tween subjects, dreams have different structural characteristics, such as the incorporation of daytime events, aversive
dream content, or dream recall frequency (DRF). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between lucid dream-
ing, creativity and dream characteristics like aversive dream content, personal signicance, dream recall, incorporation
of daytime events and great dreams. A total of 334 participants took part in an online study. The results show that lucid
dreamers scored higher on the creative personality scale of the Adjective Checklist and reported a higher DRF than
non-lucid dreamers. As to the dream structure, lucid dreamers were more likely to incorporate daytime events into their
dreams, and their dreams had a higher personal signicance than those of non-lucid dreamers. Furthermore, substantial
gender differences were found in DRF and other dream characteristics. The results conrm the relationship between
lucid dreaming and creativity and indicate that lucid dreamers differ from non-lucid dreamers in their general dream
structure.
Keywords: Lucid dreaming, dreams, creativity, dream recall frequency, dream characteristics, gender effects
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013) 99
D
IJoR
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
ments of creativity: The creative person, the creative pro-
cess, the creative product and the creative environment. As
a measure of the creative personality the Adjective Checklist
(ACL, Gough, 1983), which was used in this study, focuses
on Rhode’s rst basic element, the creative person.
Just as dream contents can be described and classied
(e.g. Hall & van de Castle, 1966), other dream characteristics
like dream recall frequency (DRF), personal signicance of
dreams, incorporation of daytime evens, the sensory quality
of the dream, aversive dreams, and great dreams can be
classied as well. These dream characteristics, which are
assessed in part with different dream inventories, consti-
tute what is termed as dream structure in the following. An
outstanding dream characteristic is the DRF. Several fac-
tors are associated with DRF. In a comparison of four repre-
sentative German samples, a substantial gender difference
in DRF could be demonstrated, with higher DRF in women
than men (Schredl & Piel, 2002). Likewise, individuals with
thin boundaries (Hartmann, 1989; 1991) have a higher DRF
(Aumann, Lahl & Pietrowsky, 2012; Pietrowsky & Köthe,
2003; Schredl & Piel, 2002). A higher DRF was also associ-
ated with a greater impact of dreams on waking behavior
the next day.
There are also gender differences for different variables of
dream structure. Studies have shown that females exhibit a
higher DRF and a stronger impact of dreams on the waking
state on the next day (Brand, Beck, Kalak, Gerber, Kirov,
Pühse, Hatzinger & Holsboer-Trachsler, 2011). A multiple re-
gression analysis in that study indicated that female gender,
sleep quality and creativity are predictors of a higher DRF.
Hartmann (1991) found that females have thinner boundar-
ies than males, which may account for more frequent incor-
poration of daily events into their dreams.
Several instruments have been developed to measure the
structure and characteristics of dreams. These question-
naires assess variables such as dream importance, DRF
(Schredl, 2002a, 2002b, 2004), dream vividness (Kallmeyer
& Chang, 1997), attitude towards dreams (Schredl, Nürn-
berg, & Weiler, 1996), the emotional and narrative content
of signicant dreams (Kuiken, Lee, Eng & Singh, 2006) or
dream intensity (Yu, 2008). Data obtained with the above-
mentioned questionnaires revealed that dreams of individu-
als can be differentiated by those variables, such as DRF
and attitude towards dreams (Schredl, Ciric, Götz & Witt-
mann, 2003), emotional and narrative content of impactful
dreams (Eng, Kuiken, Temme & Sharma, 2005), or dream
intensity (Yu, 2008, 2010).
The Düsseldorf Dream Inventory (DDI), which was devel-
oped by the authors based on an item and factor analy-
sis procedure (Aumann et al., 2012; Pietrowsky, Zink &
Schmitz, unpublished) is another questionnaire for assess-
ing dream structure. It includes a sleep quality scale (sleep
duration, time to sleep onset, nocturnal awakenings, intake
of tranquilizer or sleeping pills, alcohol consumption, sub-
jective sleep restfulness and light sleep) and the ve dream
structure scales “aversive dream contents”, “personal sig-
nicance” (of the dream), “dream recall”, “incorporation” (of
daytime events into the dream) and “great dreams” (dreams
with elements of wishful thinking, fullling desires and
gaining happiness). Using a preceding version of the DDI,
Aumann et al. (2012) found that DRF is associated with a
higher dream intensity and greater personal signicance of
dreams.
The aim of the present study was to examine the relation-
ship between lucid dreaming and creativity and their asso-
ciation with structural aspects of dreaming. As discussed
earlier, lucid dreamers were expected to report more cre-
ativity than non-lucid dreamers. With regard to the high as-
sociation between lucid dreaming and DRF (e.g., Schredl
& Erlacher, 2004, 2011), it was proposed that lucid dream-
ers have a higher personal signicance of dreams, because
their dream characteristics and dream recognition may lead
to an intensive occupation with dreams. Since some lucid
dreamers can change elements in their dreams, fewer aver-
sive dreams and more great dreams were expected in lucid
dreamers compared to non-lucid dreamers. Gender differ-
ences were expected in a higher DRF and a higher personal
signicance of dreams with more impact on the next day.
Considering the possibility that not only the ability to have
lucid dreams but also their frequency has an impact on the
results, a differentiation between frequent and occasional
lucid dreaming was made, because differences between
frequent and non-lucid dreamers are assumed to be more
signicant than between occasional lucid dreamers and
non-lucid dreamers.
2. Method
2.1. Participants
All 334 participants were recruited for the pseudonymous
online study via social networks and the mailing list of the
University of Düsseldorf E-mail system. Participants who re-
ported depression, other mental disorders or the intake of
benzodiazepines in the online questionnaire were excluded
since they may have alterations in their sleep quantity and
quality which may affect dreaming and dream structure.
Thus, 36 participants were excluded. Data from the remain-
ing 298 participants (240 female, 58 male; mean age 23.66
years, SD ±5.71 years), who were mostly students, were in-
cluded in the analysis. Psychology students received credit
for participating in the study and three randomly chosen
participants received book tokens as gratication.
2.2. Instruments
Several demographic items (gender, age, education, occu-
pation, mental disorders) and sleep quality (by the respec-
tive DDI scales) were assessed for the description of the
sample and the exclusion of participants not fullling the
inclusion criteria (mental disorders, intake of tranquillizers or
sleeping pills) by self-report. In order to assess lucid dream-
ing, we rst formulated a denition of lucid dreams: ‘Lucid
dreams are dreams, in which the dreaming person becomes
aware of being in a dream and intentionally changes certain
elements.’ This denition comprises the common criteria for
lucid dreaming, as well as two of Tholey and Utecht’s (1997)
criteria. This denition is more strict than in most other stud-
ies. An additional item was used to measure the frequency
of lucid dreams. The answer options were ‘at least once a
month’ (frequent), ‘once in a lifetime, but less than once in a
month’ (occasional), and ‘never’.
DRF in general was assessed by the item ‘How many
dreams do you remember over the last four weeks?’ A cut-
off was set at 30 dreams to prevent outliers from biasing
DRF mean scores.
Creativity was measured using the creativity scale (Smith
& Schaefer, 1969) of the Adjective Checklist (ACL; Gough &
Heilbrun, 1965). The ACL is a list of 300 adjectives contain-
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013)100
D
IJoR
ing 37 scales for a systematic, comprehensive and sum-
marizing method to measure self-description by adjectives.
The creativity scale does not assess creativity per se but is
an implicit self-description of a creative personality by ad-
jectives. The creativity scale of the ACL was empirically de-
veloped and cross-validated to gain adjectives that indicate
different aspects of creative thinking and behavior (Domino,
1970). It contains 30 items with 18 positive and 12 nega-
tive items (Gough, 1979). As no German translation of the
ACL was available, the adjectives were translated into Ger-
man by the rst author (N.Z.). After retranslation by a native
English speaker, synonyms were checked and corrected.
Participants were instructed to read all 300 adjectives and
check the ones that describe their personality (not how they
wish to be); they were also advised not to spend too much
time checking individual ACL items.
Dream structure was accessed using a revised 43-item
version of the DDI (Pietrowsky, Zink & Schmitz, unpub-
lished). The actual version of the DDI consists of 36 items
to assess dream structure and seven items to assess sleep
quality. The sleep quality items include sleep duration, time
to sleep onset, nocturnal awakenings, intake of tranquil-
izer or sleeping pills, alcohol consumption, subjective sleep
restfulness and light sleep. The 36 dream structure items
have factor loadings on ve scales (in descending order of
variance explained by the factor: Aversive dream content,
personal signicance, dream recall, incorporation and great
dreams). In addition to the scores on each of the ve fac-
tors a total DDI score can be calculated which indicates a
general strong occupation with the dreams and a high sub-
jective signicance of dreaming. The scale aversive dream
content consists out of 8 items (e.g.‘I have nightmares’,’ I
dream about personal failure’,’ I dream about threats’), the
scale personal signicance consists out of 10 items (e.g.
positive items like ‘my dream are messages from subcon-
sciousness’, ‘my dreams are a gate to a spiritual world’ or
negative items like ‘interpretation of dreams is waste of
time’,’ my dreams have no special signicance for my life.’),
the scale dream recall consists out of 7 items (e.g. positive
items like ‘I can remember my dreams after waking’,’ I can
recall many details of my dreams’ or negative items like ‘I
usually awake from a deep and dreamless sleep’ ‘I usually
quickly forget what I dreamed’), the scale incorporation con-
sists out of 8 items (e.g. ‘I dream about things I experienced
the day before’; ‘stress has an inuence on my dreams’; ‘if
I was anxious in a situation, I dream about it’) and the scale
great dreams consists out of 3 items (e.g. ‘in my dreams
my personal wishes come true; I have dreams that are so
beautiful that I wish they become reality’).
2.3. Data Analysis
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare cre-
ativity, DRF and the DDI scores between the three groups
of participants (frequent lucid dreamers, occasional lucid
dreamers, non-lucid dreamers). Subsequent t-Tests served
to identify signicant differences between each two groups
of participants. In addition, the lucid dreamers (frequent an
occasional) were collapsed to the group of lucid dreamers
and contrasted with non-lucid dreamers by t-Tests. Gender
differences for all measures were tested by t-Tests for in-
dependent samples. All analyses were performed with IBM
SPSS Statistics.Version 21.
3. Results
Of the total of 298 participants, 85 (28.5%) reported no lu-
cid dreams, 142 (47.7%) reported occasional lucid dreams,
and 71 (23.8%) had frequent lucid dreams (at least once in
a month).
Creativity did not differ signicantly between the three
groups of participants; F(2,295) = 2.33, p = .099. In the
subsequent comparison, lucid dreamers (frequent and oc-
casional) had signicantly higher creativity sores when con-
trastet to non-lucid dreamers; t(295) = 2.08, p = .038 (see
Table 1).
Comparing the mean frequencies of dream recall during
the last four weeks (Table 1), the three groups of partici-
pants differed in DRF, F(2,290) = 5.08, p = .007. Subsequent
t-Tests between each two groups revealed that both, fre-
quent and occasional lucid dreamers had a higher DRF
compared to non-lucid dreamers; t(150) = 2.70, p = .008;
t(222) = 3.02, p = .003, respectively. The pattern was slightly
different for the DDI scale “dream recall” (Table 1). The ANO-
VA also revealed a signicant group effect, F(2,295) = 3.18,
p = .043. But subsequent contrasts showed that frequent
Table 1. Means ( ± SD) of personal creativity scores, dream recall frequency (DRF) and measures of dream structure in lucid
and non-lucid dreamers
Variable Frequent Lucid
Dreamers (N = 71)
Occasional Lucid
Dreamers (N = 142)
All Lucid Dreamers
(N = 213)
Non-Lucid
Dreamers (N = 85)
Creativity 55.76 ± 9.94 55.02 ± 8.59 55.27 ± 9.05 52.90 ± 8.15
DRF 7.07 ± 6.52 6.88 ± 5.90 6.94 ± 6.09 4.54 ± 5.05
Dream Structure
Aversive Dream Content 20.07 ± 8.05 19.97 ± 7.36 20.00 ± 7.58 20.20 ± 7.15
Personal Signicance 24.59 ± 7.36 23.02 ± 6.40 23.54 ± 6.76 22.66 ± 6.26
Dream Recall 22.07 ± 5.92 20.14 ± 5.97 20.78 ± 6.01 19.73 ± 6.75
Incorporation 24.62 ± 6.26 24.77 ± 6.11 24.72 ± 6.15 23.14 ± 6.34
Great Dreams 8.66 ± 3.20 7.62 ± 2.86 7.96 ± 3.01 7.36 ± 3.15
Total DDI Score 100.01 ± 21.53 95.52 ± 19.82 97.02 ± 20.47 93.09 ± 18.83
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013) 101
D
IJoR
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
lucid dreamers scored signicantly higher than non-lucid
dreamers and occasional lucid dreamers; ; t(154) = 2.28, p
= .024; t(211) = 2.23, p = .027, respectively.
Scores on the DDI scale “aversive dream contents” (Table
1) were not affected by lucid dreaming), as was the “per-
sonal signicance” scale of the DDI; F(2,295) = 0.25, p = .98;
F(2,295) = 1.89, p = .15, respectively (see Table 1).
No signicant differences were also observed for the DDI
scale “incorporation” between the three groups of partici-
pants, F(2,295) = 1.98, p = .14, However, comparing the
collapsed group of lucid dreamers with non-lucid dream-
ers revealed signicantly higher scores for lucid dreamers;
t(296) = 1.99, p = .048 (see Table 1).
For the DDI scale “great dreams” a signicant group ef-
fect was observed; F(2,295) = 4.03, p = .019. Subsequent
t-Tests revealed that frequent lucid dreamers scored high-
er on this scale than either occasional lucid dreamers or
non-lucid dreamers; t(211) = 2.43, p = .016; t(154) = 2.54,
p = .012 (see Table 1).
The total DDI scores (Table 1) were not affected by lucid
dreaming; F(2,295) = 2.37, p = .095.
Regarding gender differences (Table 2) no signicant dif-
ferences were observed for lucid dream frequency. No gen-
der difference was found for creativity; t(295) = 0.15, n.s.;
while DRF was higher in females compared to males as was
“dream recall” scale; t(291) = 1.70, p < .05; t(296) = 3.02,
p < .01, respectively. A highly signicant gender difference
was observed for the total DDI score, females scoring high-
er than males, t(296) = 4.21, p < .001. Females also scored
higher on the aversive dreams scale; t(296) = 3.28, p < .001;
and incorporation; t(296) = 7.33, p < .001; but there was no
difference on the personal signicance scale; t(296) = 1.08,
n.s.. Finally, males scored higher than females on the great
dream scale.
4. Discussion
The present study showed that lucid dreamers have a high-
er degree of creativity than non-lucid dreamers. In addition,
the number of dreams recalled within the last four weeks
was higher in frequent and occasional lucid dreamers than
non-lucid dreamers. Dream recall frequency assessed by
the DDI, in addition, revealed that frequent lucid dreamers
recalled more dreams that occasional lucid dreamers. Note,
however, the dream recall scale of the DDI covers a wider
range of aspects than just the DRF. Lucid dreamers scored
higher than non-lucid dreamers on the incorporation scale
of the DDI. Moreover, frequent lucid dreamers scored higher
than non-lucid dreamers and occasional lucid dreamers on
the DDI subscale great dreams. . Females have a higher
DRF, more aversive dream content and incorporations in
dreams and fewer great dreams than males. The fact that
females also had a higher total DDI score suggests that their
dreams are experienced more intensely than is the case for
male participants.
Roughly 24% of the participants reported having a lucid
dream at least once a month and about 48% having at least
one lucid dream in their lifetime. These data corroborate the
ndings of Schredl and Erlacher (2004), in which also a stu-
dent sample displayed 82% of lucid dreamers. In a more re-
cent study by Schredl and Erlacher (2011), in a representa-
tive German survey, 51 % of the participants reported lucid
dreams as least once in lifetime, which is close to the 48 %
of participants in the present study, reporting at least one
lucid dream in their life. With regard to creativity, DRF and
incorporation, both frequent and occasional lucid dreamers
differ signicantly from those individuals who reported no
lucid dreams. This leads to the conclusion that the funda-
mental capacity to have lucid dreams (irrespective of the
actual occurrence of lucid dreams) has an impact on dream
structure, dream recall and creativity.
Furthermore, individuals who had frequent lucid dreams
had higher scores in the DDI scales dream recall and great
dreams than occasional lucid dreamers, so it can be sup-
posed that these measures of dream structure are affected
not only by the ability to have lucid dreams, but also by their
frequency. The results thus indicate that creativity, DRF and
incorporation of daily events into dreams are associated
with the ability to have lucid dreams, while their frequency
has less impact, except of the DDI subscales “dream recall
and “great dreams”. There was no signicant gender differ-
ence between lucid and non-lucid dreamers.
The result that lucid dreamers are more creative than non-
lucid dreamers conrms the earlier ndings of Blagrove &
Hartnell (1998), probably displaying underlying cognitive
processes like cognitive complexity and exibility, which
could lead to more creativity and the capacity for lucid
dreaming. Gruber, Steffen and Vonderhaar (1995) showed
that the global factor “independence” of the 16-PF Ques-
tionnaire (Costa & McCrae, 1985) could reliably distinguish
between frequent, occasional and non-lucid dreamers,
those who score high on this factor exhibit initiative, while
low scores are associated with passiveness and the need
for external support. Gruber et al. (1995) assumed higher
independence scores to be associated with the ability of
self-reection and more intentional control while dreaming,
due to a better regulation of emotions in the wake state (Bla-
grove & Hartnell, 1998).
Table 2. Frequency of lucid dreams (%) and means (±SD) of
personal creativity scores, dream recall frequency
and measures of dream structure in male and
female participants
Variable Males Females
Lucid Dream Frequency
Frequent lucid dreams 29.3% 28.3%
Occasional lucid dreams 41.4% 49.2%
No lucid dreams 29.3% 22.5%
Creativity 54.44 ± 8.13 54.64 ± 9.03
DRF 5.07 ± 5.96 6.55 ± 5.87
Dream Structure
Aversive Dream Content 17.22 ± 6.20 20.75 ± 7.57
Personal Signicance 22.45 ± 7.38 23.50 ± 6.43
Dream Recall 18.29 ± 6.01 21.01 ± 6.19
Incorporation 19.31 ± 5.15 25.47 ± 5.88
Great Dreams 8.95 ± 3.46 7.51 ± 2.89
Total DDI Score 86.22 ± 19.64 98.24 ± 19.46
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013)102
D
IJoR
The higher DRF of lucid dreamers, which was previously
found in another study by Schredl and Erlacher (2007), might
be due to the fact that lucid dreams can more often be re-
called. Furthermore the ability to recall more dreams can be
part of the ability to have lucid dreams or vice versa. In addi-
tion, it may be possible that lucid dreams are regarded with
more signicance than non-lucid dreams. This assumption
supports the nding that lucid dreamers score higher than
non-lucid dreamers on the DDI scale incorporation.
The higher score on DDI scale “incorporation” in lucid
dreamers compared to non-lucid dreamers may imply that
the rst experience more impact of the waking state on
dreams. Together with the DDI scale “personal signicance”
these two subscales reect the boundaries between dream-
ing and waking and how they affect each other. In terms
of validity, the content of those scales corresponds to the
concept of boundary structure (Hartmann, 1989, 1991). In
line with this, Aumann et al. (2012) found that individuals
with thin boundaries have a higher DRF than those with
thick boundaries. They also described their dreams as be-
ing more personally signicant, bizarre and aversive. The
present study shows that incorporation scores were higher
for those who reported lucid dreams regardless of their fre-
quency. The results concerning great dreams correspond to
the dream contents of frequent lucid dreamers, who devel-
oped greater control over dreams, so that aversive dream
content was reduced and great dreams were increased (La-
Berge, 1987).
Gender differences like the higher DRF for females con-
rm earlier ndings (Brand et al., 2001; Schredl & Piel, 2002).
Females also scored higher on the total DDI as well as on
the subscales aversive dream contents, incorporation, and
dream recall. Males only scored higher on the DDI subscale
great dreams. Thus, the same pattern arises between the
genders and between lucid and non-lucid dreamers: fe-
males and frequent lucid dreamer have a higher DRF and
more incorporation in their dreams. Possible associations
between these ndings require further examination. Higher
DRF may lead to more incorporation and vice versa, or else
a third variable leads to higher scores in dream character-
istics and is associated with lucid dreaming such as the
boundary structure (Hartmann, 1989; 1991). In addition, the
similarities between gender differences and differences in
lucid dreaming lend support to the hypothesis of some un-
derlying genetic predisposition. However, gender differenc-
es in cognitive exibility and creativity have not been found
in other gender studies (Baer & Kaufmann, 2008).
Although the present study was undertaken in a rather
big sample of participants there are several limitations of
the study which affect its generalizability. First, the study
was undertaken online and thus this sample is self-selected
probably due to interest in lucid dreaming. This bears an
overestimation or bias of the number of lucid dreamers. Ad-
ditionally, no control on the correctness of the data is given
in an online survey. However, a large portion of participants
have been undergraduate psychology students which re-
ceived credits for participation. For those subjects a bias
due to personal interest in lucid dreaming can be negligi-
ble. Second, there are a rather small number of male par-
ticipants which may also weaken the representativeness of
the study. Third, creativity was measured indirectly by self-
description as a personality trait and not as a performance
measure. This may weaken the generalizability of the results
with other studies on creativity, which used the more com-
mon performance measures. Last, our denition of lucidity
is more strict, than in most other studies since we included
the criterion to intentionally take inuence on the dream (in
addition to being aware of dreaming).
In sum, the present study shows that individuals with lu-
cid dreams differ in self-reported creativity and some dream
characteristics from those who report no lucid dreams.
Whether lucid dreaming is the cause or the consequence of
these dream characteristics is not clear and needs further
examination. As lucid dreamers especially differ from non-
lucid dreamers in those dream characteristics associated
with boundaries or the connectivity between dreaming and
waking states, the interaction of these two states appears to
be a trait of lucid dreaming. The results of this study suggest
that – with the exception of experiencing great dreams – it is
more the ability to have lucid dreams that is associated with
creativity, DRF and other dream characteristics than the fre-
quency of such dreams.
References
Aumann, C., Lahl, O., & Pietrowsky, R. (2012). Relationship be-
tween dream structure, boundary structure and the Big
Five personality dimensions. Dreaming, 22, 124-135.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2006). Gender differences in creativ-
ity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105
Barrett, D. (1991). Flying dreams and lucidity. Dreaming, 1, 129-
134.
Barrett, D. (1992). Just how lucid are lucid dreams? Dreaming,
2, 221-228.
Blagrove, M. & Hartnell, S. J. (1998). Lucid dreaming: associa-
tions with internal locus of control, need for cognition
and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences,
28, 41-47.
Blagrove, M. & Tucker, M. (1994). Individual differences in locus
of control in the reporting of lucid dreaming. Personality
and Individual Differences, 16, 981-984.
Brand, S., Beck, J., Kalak, N., Gerber, M., Kirov, R., Pühse, U.,
Hatzinger, M., & Holsboer-Trachsler, E. (2011). Dream
recall and its relationship to sleep, perceived stress,
and creativity among adolescents. Journal of Adoles-
cent Health, 49, 525-531.
Brylowski, A. (1990). Nightmares in crisis: Clinical applications
of lucid dreaming techniques. Psychiatric Journal of the
University of Ottawa, 15, 79-84
Charlton, S. & Bakan, P. (1990). Creativity and physiognomic
perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 11,
419-420.
Domino, G. (1970). Identication of potentially creative persons
from the Adjective Check List. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 35, 48-51.
Eng, T., Kuiken, D., Temme, K., & Sharma, R. (2005). Navigating
the emotional complexities of two cultures: Bicultural
competence, feeling expression, and feeling change in
dreams. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychol-
ogy, 3, 3-4
Gackenbach, J., Heilman, N., Boyt, S., & LaBerge, S. (1985).
The relationship between eld independence and lucid
dreaming ability. Journal of Mental Imagery, 9, 9-20.
Galvin, F. (1990). The boundary characteristics of lucid dream-
ers. Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa, 15,
73-78.
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjec-
tive Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 37, 1398-1405.
Gough, H. G. & Heilbrun, A. B. (1965). The Adjective Check List
Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
International Journal of Dream Research Volume 6, No. 2 (2013) 103
D
IJoR
Lucid dreaming, creativity and dream characteristics
Gruber, R. E., Steffen, J. J., &Vonderhaar, S. P. (1995). Lucid
dreaming, waking personality and cognitive develop-
ment. Dreaming, 5, 1-12.
Hall, C. S. & Van De Castle, R. L. (1966). The content analysis of
dreams. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hartmann, E. (1989). Boundaries of dreams, boundaries of
dreamers: thin and thick boundaries as a new personal-
ity dimension. Psychiatric Journal of the University of
Ottawa, 14, 557-560.
Hartmann, E. (1991). Boundaries in the Mind. New York: Basic
Books.
Holm-Hadulla, R. M. (2011). Kreativität zwischen Schöpfung
und Zerstörung: Konzepte aus Kulturwissenschaften,
Psychologie, Neurobiologie und ihre praktischen An-
wendungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Kallmeyer, R. J., & Chang, E. C. (1997). The Multidimensional
Dream Inventory: Preliminary evidence for validity and
reliability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 803-808.
Kuiken, D., Lee, M. N., Eng, T., & Singh, T. (2006) The inuence
of impactful dreams on self-perceptual depth and spiri-
tual transformation. Dreaming, 16, 258-279.
LaBerge, S. P. (1987). Hellwach im Traum. Paderborn: Junfer-
mann-Verlag.
Pietrowsky, R. & Köthe, M. (2003). Personal boundaries and
nightmare consequences in frequent nightmare suffer-
ers. Dreaming, 13, 245-254.
Pietrowsky, R., Zink, N. & Schmitz, A. (2013). Development of
the Düsseldorf Dream Inventory. (unpublished manu-
script).
Schredl, M. (2002a). Messung der Traumerinnerung: siebenstu-
ge Skala und Daten gesunder Personen. Somnologie,
6, 34–38.
Schredl, M. (2002b). Questionnaires and diaries as research
instruments in dream research: methodological issues.
Dreaming, 12, 17–15.
Schredl, M. (2004). Reliability and stability of a dream recall fre-
quency scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1422-
1426.
Schredl, M. & Erlacher, D. (2004). Lucid dreaming frequency
and personality, Personality and Individual Differences,
37, 1463-1473.
Schredl, M., & Erlacher, D. (2007). Self-reported effects of
dreams on waking-life creativity: An empirical study.
Journal of Psychology, 141, 35–46.
Schredl, M., & Erlacher, D. (2011). Frequency of lucid dreaming
in a representative German sample. Perceptual and Mo-
tor Skills, 112, 104–108.
Schredl, M., Ciric, P., Götz, S., & Wittmann, L. (2003). Dream re-
call frequency, attitudes towards dreams and openness
to experience. Dreaming, 13, 145-153.
Schredl, M., & Piel, E. (2003). Gender differences in dream re-
call: Data from four representative German samples.
Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1185-1189.
Schredl, M., Nürnberg, C., & Weiler, S. (1996). Dream recall, at-
titude toward dreams, and personality. Personality and
Individual Differences, 20, 613–618.
Schriever, W. (1934). Einige Traumbeobachtungen. Zeitschrift
für Psychologie, 34, 349–371.
Spoormaker, V.I. & van den Bout, J. (2006). Lucid dreaming
treatment for nightmares: A pilot study. Psychotherapy
and Psychosomatics, 75, 389-394.
Smith, J. M. & Schaefer, C. E. (1969). Development of a cre-
ativity scale for the Adjective Check List. Psychological
Reports, 25, 87-92.
Stepansky, R. Holzinger, B., Schmeiser-Rieder, A., Saletu, B.,
Kunze, M. & Zeitlhofer, J. (1998). Austrian dream be-
havior: results of a representative population survey.
Dreaming, 8, 23-30
Stumbrys, T., & Daniels, M. (2010). An exploratory study of cre-
ative problem solving in lucid dreams: Preliminary nd-
ings and methodological considerations. International
Journal of Dream Research, 3, 121–129.
Tholey, P. & Utecht, K. (1997). Schöpferisch träumen – Der Klar-
traum als Lebenshilfe. Niedernhausen: Klotz.
Yu, C., K.-C. (2008). Dream intensity Inventory and Chinese
people´s dream experience frequencies. Dreaming, 18,
94-111.
Yu, C., K.-C. (2010a). Dream intensity prole as an indicator
of the hysterical tendencies to dissociation and conver-
sion, Dreaming, 20, 184-198.
Yu, C., K.-C. (2010b). Dream intensity scale: Factors in the phe-
nomenological analysis of dreams. Dreaming, 20, 107-
129
Zadra, A. L. & Pihl, R. O. (1997). Lucid dreaming as a treatment
for recurrent nightmares. Psychotherapy and Psycho-
somatics, 66, 50-55.
Zadra, A. L., Donderi, D. C. & Pihl, R. O. (1992). Efcacy of
lucid dream induction for lucid and non-lucid dreamers.
Dreaming, 2, 85-97.
... We consider two main hypotheses to explain the high incidence of frequent lucid dreamers found in our present study. First, our sample is mainly constituted of young women, who comprise the cohort with higher dream recall frequency, which is closely associated with high lucid dreaming recall frequency [58]. Women are also more prone to report dreams and tend to be more interested in dreams than men [59]. ...
... Other studies also reported an increase in dream recall during the pandemic [34,35,37]. The association between dreams and lucid dreaming recall has been already largely documented, i.e., the more a person remembers dreams in general, the more they will be able to remember lucid dreams (for review see [56,58,60,66,67]. An example of this is the dream diary, which consists of keeping a daily report of the dreams one remembers having during the night [68]. ...
... Such a proportion mounted up, achieving 32.45% of those who remembered three to five dreams a week, then reducing to 26.50% for participants remembering dreams (almost) daily. Furthermore, our sample was mainly constituted of women, who are the public with higher dream recall [41,58,[73][74][75][76] mainly when passing through stress [77]. However, in the present study, gender lacked enough evidence to endorse its statistical significance regarding the increase of lucid dreaming during the pandemic. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic changed people’s lives all over the world. While anxiety and stress decreased sleep quality for most people, an increase in total sleep time was also observed in certain cohorts. Dream recall frequency also increased, especially for nightmares. However, to date, there are no consistent reports focusing on pandemic-related changes in lucid dreaming, a state during which dreamers become conscious of being in a dream as it unfolds. Here we investigated lucid dreaming recall frequency and other sleep variables in 1,857 Brazilian subjects, using an online questionnaire. Firstly, we found that most participants (64.78%) maintained their lucid dream recall frequency during the pandemic, but a considerable fraction (22.62%) informed that lucid dreams became more frequent, whereas a smaller subset (12.60%) reported a decrease in these events during the pandemic. Secondly, the number of participants reporting lucid dreams at least once per week increased during the pandemic. Using a mixed logistic regression model, we confirmed that the pandemic significantly enhanced the recall frequency of lucid dreams (p = 0.002). Such increase in lucid dreaming during the pandemic was significantly associated with an enhancement in both dream and nightmare recall frequencies, as well as with sleep quality and symptoms of REM sleep behavior disorder. Pandemic-related increases in stress, anxiety, sleep fragmentation, and sleep extension, which enhance REM sleep awakening, may be associated with the increase in the occurrence of lucid dreams, dreams in general, and nightmares.
... If the efficiency of an individual's LD practice could be predicted, perspective practitioners could be identified in advance. At present, there are a few ways to predict LD predispositions among the general population: field independence (Gackenbach et al., 1985), narcolepsy (Dodet et al., 2015;Rak et al., 2015), internal locus of control (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000), need for cognition (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000), creativity (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013), out-of-body experiences (Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), sleep paralysis (Denis & Poerio, 2017;Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), false awakenings (Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), and dream recall frequency (DRF; Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020;Schredl & Erlacher, 2011;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013). ...
... If the efficiency of an individual's LD practice could be predicted, perspective practitioners could be identified in advance. At present, there are a few ways to predict LD predispositions among the general population: field independence (Gackenbach et al., 1985), narcolepsy (Dodet et al., 2015;Rak et al., 2015), internal locus of control (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000), need for cognition (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000), creativity (Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013), out-of-body experiences (Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), sleep paralysis (Denis & Poerio, 2017;Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), false awakenings (Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020), and dream recall frequency (DRF; Raduga, Kuyava, et al., 2020;Schredl & Erlacher, 2011;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013). ...
... In 2008, Erlacher et al. observed the correlation on 153 Japanese students. In 2013, Zink and Pietrowsky conducted an online study with 334 participants, finding that lucid dreamers reported a higher DRF than nonlucid dreamers (Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013). As most of the studies were conducted on general population, they cannot be fully eligible for estimation the efficiency of LD practice. ...
Article
Full-text available
Lucid dreaming (LD) are dreams in which humans maintain self-awareness. People may have different predispositions for mastering this skill, and a person’s level of LD mastery could be predicted by their dream recall frequency (DRF). Though this fact is well established, it was never controlled for specific sleep hours, and we do not know the extent of this correlation. To fill the gap, an online survey was administered among 594 adults who have tried to master LD. Significant Spearmen’s rho values (p < .001, 95% confidence interval) indicate that overall DRF and dream vividness both correlate with total LD amount, as well as its intentional and spontaneous frequency, vividness, and duration. An analysis considering a healthy sleep range of 7 to 9 hr confirmed the general correlation. DRF and dream vividness directly correlate with effective LD practice for people with similar sleep durations. If this is the case, effective LD practitioners can be identified in advance. At the same time, standard LD techniques may be relatively ineffective for some practitioners due to physiological limitations; these individuals require new solutions.
... Lucid dreaming differs from normal dreaming in that sleepers are aware they are dreaming and are often able to exert varying levels of control over their dreams, including the ability to awaken themselves. Proneness to lucid dreams has been associated with several personality characteristics, such as creativity, higher internal locus of control, divergent thinking, interest in and positive attitudes to dreams, and thin boundaries (Cernovsky, 1984;Schredl & Erlacher, 2007;Stumbrys & Daniels, 2010;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013). Women are more likely to report lucid dreams, perhaps because women are also more likely to exhibit greater interest in dreams and increased recall (Pagel & Kwiatkowski, 2003;Schredl & Erlacher, 2011). ...
Article
Full-text available
Near-death experiences (NDEs) are exceptional states of consciousness reported by many individuals who come close to death. Unusual dream phenomena such as more intense and vivid dreams, higher dream recall, and increased lucid dreaming have been purported to occur after NDEs, however, a comprehensive assessment of the dream experiences and attitudes of NDE survivors remains unexplored. Moreover, it remains unknown whether anomalous dream experiences stem from the actual NDE or the traumatic experience of coming close to death. In this study, 138 NDE survivors, 45 participants who experienced a life-threatening event but without NDE, and 129 participants who had never come close to death completed a quantitative questionnaire assessing trauma symptoms and a range of dream-related variables. The NDE group reported significantly more lucid dreams, creative and problem-solving dreams, precognitive dreams, and out-of-body experiences during sleep than both other groups of participants. Furthermore, these experiences appeared to be primarily related to the NDE rather than trauma symptomology. Findings continue to suggest a relationship between nonordinary states and expanded awareness more broadly—whether experienced during sleep or wakefulness—offering further insights into the phenomenon of consciousness in general.
... One of them is creativity, which was studied in a sample of 334 people, giving as a result that lucid dreamers were more likely to incorporate daily events into their dreams, and that these had greater personal relevance, also yielding a higher score in creative personality. 25,26 in a sample of 1,080 subjects who completed an online survey about SL, they were asked about any creative dreams they had (for example, how often dreams have given them creative ideas), also completing a scale of creativity and other personality factors. The results show that 8% of their dreams were a productive source of ideas, in fields such as art, problem solving, emotional issues or motivators in some way. ...
Article
Full-text available
The creative performance, as well as other exclusively human capabilities will be the qualities that the future workers must have, due to what has been called the fourth industrial revolution. Therefore, teachers have the obligation to investigate and innovate on new techniques and implement methodologies that promote these skills. The Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology has shown great benefits in this regard, and there are innovative fields, such as lucid dreams, which could be a new tool for enhancing creative performance. Therefore, the aims of this work were to review the related literature to verify that an intervention using the PBL methodology could be combined with research in lucid dreams in an applicable, relevant, well-founded, coherent, and original way. The second aim was to develop an ABP proposal with these elements to enhance the critical skills that students will need in the future, with special emphasis on creativity. We conclude that this proposal meets the revised characteristics, and we include the design of the proposal, gathering these elements. As a continuation of this work, we intend to carry out an investigation analyzing the data that may be offered by different classrooms that apply the program.
... There have been reports that these techniques may also lead to SP [35]. Previous studies also showed that both LDs and SP are connected to creativity [36][37][38][39]. Further, both phenomena are connected to supernatural and extraordinary experiences. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Sleep paralysis and lucid dreams are two states of consciousness that are connected to REM sleep but are defined by higher awareness in contrast to regular REM sleep. Despite these similarities, the two states differ widely in their emotional tone and their perceived controllability. This review aims to summarize the current research containing sleep paralysis and lucid dreams. However, given the sparsity of the research, one single topic cannot be chosen. Methods: Articles containing both lucid dreams as well as sleep paralysis were searched for in the following databanks: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, PsycArticles, and PSYNDEX. Further, citations of the found papers were examined. Results: 10 studies were included in the review. Most of the studies were surveys, but there was also a case study, a randomized trial, and an observational EEG study. The numbers of participants ranged from a single participant in the case study to 1928 participants in a survey. The main findings were that correlations between sleep paralysis and lucid dreaming were positive and significant in most of the studies. Conclusions: There is a connection between lucid dreaming and sleep paralysis. However, research is still very limited and diverse in the methodologies used. Future research should build standardized methods for examining the two phenomena.
... For example, lucid dreams can effectively reduce the frequency of nightmares and reduce the intensity of nightmares (Abramovitch, 1995;Brylowski, 1990;Spoormaker, van den Bout,& Meijer, 2003;Zadra & Pihl, 1997;Spoormaker & van den Bout, 2006), and can be used for motor skill training (Erlacher & Schredl, 2004Erlacher & Chapin, 2010). There is a significant correlation with creativity (Zink & Pietrowky, 2013), and certain results have also been obtained in the clinical field (Mota-Rolim &Araujo, 2013). ...
... Lucid dreaming refers to a dream in which a person is aware that he or she is in the dream. Lucid dreaming can be used as a source for ideas, insights for problem solving, lucid writing, surgery practice, practicing physical skillsthere are no limits for what can be done in a dream (Zink, & Pietrowksy, 2013). It was found that those who are naturally predisposed for lucid dreaming have bigger pre-frontal cortex, and can be better than others in particular cognitive abilities, such as self-reflection and meta-cognition (Filevich, Dresler, Brick, & Kuhn, 2015); 4) Brain stimulation through tDCS has also been used to enhance Creativity. ...
... For many years, more men than women went to higher education and received a better education. However, since the beginning of the 1990s, female students began to become the dominant gender in higher education institutions (Zink and Pietrowsky, 2013). Hence, this explains the more significant number of female respondents than male respondents in this study. ...
Article
Purpose This study aims to examine the factors influencing the effectiveness of zakat distribution to university students. Specifically, it examines technology improvement, procedural application and governance on Sarawak university students’ zakat distribution effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach This study used the questionnaire as a research instrument and divided it into five parts. Part A gathers demographic information of respondents. Part B measures the respondent’s opinion on current technology improvement. Part C measures university students’ opinion on zakat application procedures. Part D measures the governance concept of the zakat institution. Part E measures the effectiveness of zakat distribution. Findings This study found technology improvement and governance significantly influence the effectiveness of zakat distribution to university students. This study provides no significant influence of the procedural application on zakat distribution’s efficacy to university students. Research limitations/implications This study suggested that technology plays an essential role in zakat distribution effectiveness by providing faster data processing, easier retrieval of information and time reduction to complete a task. The enforcement of good governance by zakat institutions allows them to be competitive, meets the stakeholders’ demand and serves them better. Practical implications This study provides understanding to the zakat institutions in developing appropriate zakat distribution strategies and strengthening their management and governance system. Originality/value This paper integrates technology improvement, procedural application and governance in zakat distribution.
... Several studies have revealed a strong and positive correlation between frequency of lucid dreaming and scores on self-report creativity measures (e.g., Blagrove & Hartnell, 2000;Zink & Pietrowsky, 2013). Tholey (1989) demonstrated that lucid dreamers could be instructed to dream about meeting individuals who only existed in their dreams, and found that these imaginary characters helped with simple creativity tasks such as finding rhyming words. ...
Article
Full-text available
Previous work suggests that unexpected and surprising experiences ( e.g ., living in another culture or looking at surreal images) promotes creative thinking. This targeted literature review examines whether the inherent cognitive disruption associated with experiencing the seemingly impossible has a similar effect. Correlational and experimental research across six domains (entertainment magic, fantasy play, virtual reality and computer gaming, dreaming, science fiction/fantasy, and anomalous experiences) provided consistent support for the hypothesis. In addition, anecdotal evidence illustrated the possible impact that the creative output associated with each of these areas may have had on technology, science, and the arts. It is argued that impossible experiences are an important driver of creative thinking, thus accounting for reports of such experiences across the lifespan and throughout history. The theoretical and practical implications of this work are discussed, along with recommendations for future research.
Chapter
This chapter explores ways for us to enhance our ability to design through cognitive enhancement. It discusses the effectiveness of a variety of methods, from various types of incubation and mind practices through more active means of mind-altering substances and technological interventions.KeywordsCognitive enhancementIncubationSleepDreamsImaginationMeditationHypnosisFoodDrinkDrugsNeurofeedbackTranscranial stimulationBrainwave entrainment
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed at investigating the relationship between dream structure, the concept of boundary structure, and the Big Five personality dimensions. Dream structure was assessed with the recently developed Düsseldorf Dream Inventory, which is based on a factorial assessment of dream structure. Dream structure was correlated with boundary structure (Boundary Questionnaire) and personality dimensions (Big Five Inventory) in 1,958 participants in an online study. The results show that boundary structure, openness to experience and neuroticism were associated with dream structure. Participants with thin boundaries had a higher dream recall frequency (DRF), considered their dreams to be personally more significant, exhibited more bizarre and aversive dreams, and more incorporation of elements from waking life. Openness to experience was positively correlated with DRF and personal significance of dreams. Neuroticism was correlated positively with aversive dreams, more incorporation from waking life, and personal significance of dreams. The present results confirm previous correlations between dream structure and personality and identify dream structures that are relevant for these associations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Biculturally competent individuals may adopt flexible forms of emotional expression that help them address not only acculturation stress but also the forms of distress that affect bicultural and monocultural individuals alike. In a sample of 174 bicultural undergraduates, level of bicultural competence moderated the effects of an “existential” aspect of depression (i.e., the sense of a foreshortened future) in predicting both expressive flexibility during wakefulness and emotional flux within the content of impactful dreams. Among individuals high in bicultural competence, those who sensed a foreshortened future following loss or trauma were more likely to report: (1) feeling exploration through direct self-reflection; (2) feeling exploration through aesthetic response; and (3) spontaneous emotional flux within impactful dreams. These findings suggest that expressive flexibility among biculturally competent individuals becomes evident in their manner of identifying, understanding, and expressing emotions ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to develop a comprehensive assessment tool for measuring subjective dream intensity by revising the original probes and response scales of the Dream Intensity Inventory and incorporating new variables. The factor analyses suggested that 18 items of the new instrument, Dream Intensity Scale, could form four scales and six subscales. The revision of the probes and response scales did not have major effects on the clustering of the indicator variables, which was highly consistent with the original three-factor measurement model. The alpha coefficients, interitem correlations, and item-scale correlations indicated a good internal consistency for the Dream Intensity Scale. Moreover, the convergent and discriminant concurrent validity of the Dream Intensity Scale and the clinical utility of its scale and subscale scores were substantiated by their selective correlations with neuroticism and extraversion.
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to devise a parsimonious instrument for evaluating both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of dream experiences and to quantify Chinese people's dream experiences in ways that facilitated cross-cultural comparisons. The Dream Intensity Inventory was developed and administered to 348 Chinese university students. Individual differences in dream recall frequency were observed, with some participants recalling dreams almost every morning whereas others recalled dreams less than once a month. By contrast, the Chinese participants exhibited less diverse dream awareness frequencies. Multiple dreams in a single night and nightmares were found to be prevalent among the Chinese participants. On the other hand, fewer than half of the participants experienced regularly voluntary control over dream activities and consciousness. The factor analyses of the items in the Dream Intensity Inventory resulted in three readily interpreted factors, which were labeled as the "dream quantity," "altered dream episodes," and "dream vividness" subscales, respectively. When compared with men, women participants had higher frequencies of regular dream experiences including dream awareness, nightmares, and multiple dreams, as measured by the dream quantity subscale.
Article
Full-text available
Research on gender differences in creativity, including creativity test scores, creative achievements, and self-reported creativity is reviewed, as are theories that have been offered to explain such differences and available evidence that supports or refutes such theories. This is a difficult arena in which to conduct research, but there is a consistent lack of gender differences both in creativity test scores and in the creative accomplishments of boys and girls (which if anything tend to favor girls). As a result, it is difficult to show how innate gender differences in creativity could possibly explain later differences in creative accomplishment. At the same time, the large difference in the creative achievement of men and women in many fields make blanket environmental explanations inadequate, and the explanations that have been proposed thus far are at best incomplete. A new theoretical framework (the APT model of creativity) is proposed to allow better understanding of what is known about gender differences in creativity.
Article
The Adjective Check List was administered to 7 male and 5 female samples comprising 1,701 Ss. Direct or inferred ratings of creativity were available for all Ss. The samples covered a wide range of ages and kinds of work; criteria of creativity were also varied, including ratings by expert judges, faculty members, personality assessment staff observers, and life history interviewers. The creativity scales of G. Domino (1974) and C. E. Schaefer (1972, 1973) were scored on all protocols, as were G. S. Welsh's (1975) A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 scales for different combinations of "origence" and "intelligence." From item analyses a new 30-item Creative Personality Scale was developed that was positively and significantly related to all 6 of the prior measures but that surpassed them in its correlations with the criterion evaluations. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Introduction The present paper introduces the three most common methods for measuring dream recall: laboratory awakenings, dream diaries and questionnaire scales. An easy applicable seven-point scale, its retest reliability and validity analyses will be presented. Patients and Methods Within several studies, 941 healthy persons rated their dream recall frequency using the scale. The retest sample (70 days retest interval) consisted of 42 patients with sleep disorders. Results The data of the healthy persons replicated the previous significant findings of gender differences (women tend to recall their dreams more often than men) and the decline of dream recall frequency with age. Retest relibility was high. Conclusions The introduced scale is well qualified for measuring interindividual differences and permits—by breaking down of the data into four age groups—comparisons with samples stemming from different settings, e. g. patient groups.