In a period marked by profound social and economic changes resulting from the crisis that has affected the European economy since the end of the 2000s, Portugal has experienced significant changes in the framework of labour relations, availability of employment, wage values and levels of employment and social protection provided to its citizens.
Immigrant workers, often included in the "secondary labour market", were hard hit by these structural transformations, systematically presenting unemployment rates higher than those of the nationals and lower levels of remuneration. The huge dependence on income from work as a way of life assumes, in a context of diminishing jobs, reduction of wages and more flexible contractual relationship, an even more important character whose conditions of fragility and exclusion are important to know.
Not neglecting existing studies on the economic crisis and migration, this research sought to contribute to a better understanding of the effects of the economic crisis of 2007-2008 on the living conditions of immigrants, as well as on the strategies adopted and on the resources mobilized by families to meet the challenges and ensure their survival. In territorial terms, the analysis is focused on the southern region of the country, ie Lisbon, Alentejo, with the case study of Odemira, and Algarve. Due to the nature of the financing that sponsored the project, it was necessary to restrict the analysis to third-country nationals. The fieldwork for collection of information ran between February and June 2015.
The study consists of three major chapters, ending with some conclusions and recommendations. In the first chapter the object of study and the research questions are presented, the objectives of the research are defined and the territories under study are presented. The methodology is also clarified and the limitations associated with the work are presented. In the second chapter, and in order to understand Portugal's position in the context of international migrations in times of crisis, a brief discussion, evolution and characterization of immigration is included, as well as the effects of the crisis on migratory flows and recent changes in migration’s legal framework for foreign residents.
Chapter three of the study takes place around immigrant work, beginning with a more general overview and then focusing on an extensive analysis of immigrant labour incorporation according to the main geographical origins. Here, the study also analyses the effects of the crisis on the conditions of economic activity in the three territories under study, analysing some statistical indicators provided by the various official sources and exploring in detail the answers of the immigrants directly interviewed. Institutional responses to mitigate the effects of the crisis and the strategies adopted by immigrants, as well as the resources mobilized by them, complete this chapter.
One of the consequences of the economic crisis was the decrease in the stock of foreign nationals residing in Portugal through the reduction of inflows, but also the increase in the number of outflows for workers seeking, in other countries, a labour market insertion more consistent with their qualifications, or at least that enables them to earn a living.
As for the consequences of the labour insertion and living conditions of immigrants, the crisis had a considerable impact on the population. While most of the foreign citizens surveyed in the study live on their wages, often in a subordinated position in the labour market, with many of them included in sectors particularly affected by economic contraction, unemployment rates (calculated on the basis of the INE Employment Survey) show that foreign workers have much higher percentages compared to national workers, even in the period before the crisis (2003: 13.5% and 6.1%, 2014: 22.3% and 13.7%). Among the respondents in the study, unemployment rates are high, with older workers having the highest rates compared to the most recent ones: 33.3% among the arrivals between 1966 and 1990 and 16.3% among those who came between 2009 and 2015. As for nationalities, Asian (6.3%) and Ukrainian (7.9%) citizens have the lowest unemployment rates, while the Portuguese-speaking African countries have the highest unemployment rate (43.2%).
Another aspect affected by the crisis refers to the labour trajectory and it is very differentiated according to the regions. The opinion of the surveyed population in the Algarve is more positive, with 66.3% affirming that they have always worked when considering the period of one year after their arrival in Portugal and the moment of responding to the survey, compared to the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon (46.9%) and Odemira (35.4%). In parallel, just over half of the respondents (53.2%) consider that it is not so easy to find work today, with worth-mentioning differences. Regarding the improvement of the professional situation, 71.3% of respondents in the Algarve respond favourably, whereas in the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon this figure is 46.9%. Regarding the increase in income, in the Algarve, 88.8% responded positively, while in the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon this figure is 46%. At the same time, there is a much higher percentage of Metropolitan Area of Lisbon residents among those who reported having been without work (23.5% vs. 2.5% in the Algarve and 13.8% in Odemira).
Among the strategies undertaken by immigrants to overcome the negative impact of the crisis, the use of their own savings is the most frequent (64%), followed by the support of social networks, in national territory (19.8%) or in the respondents’ origin country (5.6%), as well as the change in consumption patterns, not acquiring some goods (4.1%) or informal work (2%). There are significant differences between nationalities and related to length of stay in Portugal. The majority of the citizens of the Portuguese-speaking African countries have recourse to the help of family members in the national territory (28.4%), while 93.9% of Moldovans use individual resources (namely savings), and 19.6% of the Asians receive help from family members in the country of origin. Regarding the creation of their own employment, several community leaders, and even representatives of local authorities, emphasized the entrepreneurial nature of many immigrants who lost their jobs, decided to stay in Portugal and open their own business (eg Brazilians in the areas food and beauty parlours).
Remigration is not a choice for all immigrants living in Portugal and facing the challenges of daily life in a crisis context, but some have chosen to leave. Among the immigrants surveyed, 5.6% had already worked at least once in another country and 4.0% several times. This strategy is assumed to be essentially male and the main destinations have been Spain and France, with labour insertion in the civil construction sector.
Recommendations at the labour market level: a) Extend the network of the Professional Insertion Offices (GIP) by linking the work of the Institute of Employment and Vocational Training (IEFP) with the immigrant associations, NGOs and other entities that host GIPs; (b) to organize more effectively the contracting of non-Community workers, in particular for activities of a temporary nature, guaranteeing expeditious but solid bureaucratic procedures which respect social rights; c) Implementing experimental strategies to support the development of places of origin involving employers and sectoral associations and involving temporary migrants who are interested (co-development); (d) to promote networking between companies requiring seasonal labour; (e) Maintain, if not reinforcing, the monitoring and combating of discriminatory and racist attitudes and practices, implicit and explicit, in the workplace; f) Streamline the process of academic and professional recognition in order to avoid the professional deskilling of foreign workers; g) To make a global summary of the evaluations of retraining, adjustment and professional updating initiatives specifically aimed at qualified immigrants.
Recommendations at the level of public services: a) To adequate training of civil servants in the area of employment, entrepreneurship and social security; b) To reinforce supervision - which implies providing the supervisory body with more resources - of the contractual practices used by companies in relation to foreign workers; (c) To strengthen the monitoring of contractual practices and the conditions of employment and accommodation used (or "stimulated") by temporary employment contractors and by intermediaries working in this field; d) To continue the itinerant CLAIIs in order to reach citizens who do not have the means to go to the services.
Recommendations regarding the regularization of immigrants and their conditions: a) To ensure that unemployed immigrant workers are not excluded from the social security system; b) To ensure that foreign workers who lose their jobs are not "pushed" into an unavoidable condition of irregularity.
Recommendations at the specific level of the Portuguese language: a) To reinforce the promotion of Portuguese language learning; b) To provide information in several languages on the labour market and labour legislation.
Recommendations at the level of international cooperation and representations of countries of origin: a) To stimulate the work of the Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries (CPLP) in the area of immigration; b) To evaluate the role of the diplomatic representations of the main countries of origin in the protection of the labour and social rights of its citizens immigrated to Portugal.
In cross-cutting terms, it is important to ensure that immigrants have access to programs to support and encourage their own employment and SMEs, and also that, within the ideal framework for expanding the mechanisms for supporting the employability of young people, young people from countries and descendants of immigrants of these origins are duly covered by these measures.