Content uploaded by Consolacion Ragasa
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Consolacion Ragasa on Aug 07, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.derpharmachemica.comt Available online a
Scholars Research Library
Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7(7):395-399
(http://derpharmachemica.com/archive.html)
ISSN 0975-413X
CODEN (USA): PCHHAX
395
www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com
Chemical Constituents of Moringa oleifera Lam. Leaves
Consolacion Y Ragasa
1,2*
, Melanie P. Medecilo
3
, and Chien-Chang Shen
4
1
Chemistry Department, De La Salle University Science & Technology Complex Leandro V. Locsin
Campus, Biñan City,Laguna, Philippines.
2
Chemistry Department, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, 1004, Philippines.
3
Biological Sciences Department, De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines.
4
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 155-1, Li-Nong St.,
Sec. 2, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
Chemical investigation of the ethanol extract of the leaves of Moringa oleifera Lam. yielded lutein (1), β-carotene
(2), phytyl fatty acid ester (3), polyprenol (4), chlorophyll a (5), β-sitosterol (6),triacylglycerols (7), fatty acids, fatty
alcohols, and saturated hydrocarbons. Their structures were identified by comparison of their NMR data with those
reported in the literature.
Keywords: Moringa oleifera Lam, Moraceae, lutein, β-carotene, phytyl fatty acid esters, polyprenol, chlorophyll a,
β-sitosterol, triacylglycerols, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, hydrocarbons
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
MoringaoleiferaLam.locally known as malunggayhas been used to combat malnutrition, specially among infants
and nursing mothers [1].The leaves are used for the treatment of malaria, typhoid fever, parasitic diseases, genito-
urinary ailments, hypertension, arthritis, swellings, cuts, diseases of the skin, and diabetes as well as cardiac
stimulants, contraceptive remedy, elicit lactation and to boost the immune system [2–7].
Investigation of the carotenoid contents from the leaves, flowers and fruits of eight M. oleifera cultivars from India
yielded luteoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene. Lutein was identified as the major constituent of the leaves
and fruits accounting for 53.6 and 52.0 % of the total carotenoids, respectively [8]. Furthermore, the β-sitosterol,
total phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the leaves of M. oleifera were reported as 90 mg/g, 8 µg/mL and 27
µg/mL, respectively [9]. The leaves of M. oleifera were also reported to contain chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b,
vitamin C, carotenoids, proteins, amino acids and minerals [10]. We earlier reported the isolation of polyprenol,
phytyl fatty acid esters and lutein from the leaves of M. oleifera [11]. A review on the cultivation, genetic,
ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of M. oleifera leaves has been provided [12].
We report herein the isolation of lutein (1), β-carotene (2), phytyl fatty acid ester (3), polyprenol (4), chlorophyll a
(5), β-sitosterol (6), triacylglycerols (7) (Fig. 1), fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and saturated hydrocarbons from the
leaves of M. oleifera.
Consolacion Y Ragasa et al Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7 (7):395-399
___________________________________________________________________________
396
www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com
6
2
OH
HO 1
H
2
C
HC
OCR
OCR'
H
2
C OCR"
O
O
O
7 R, R', R" = long chain fatty acid
HO
1
3
6
10
11
14
17
18
19
22 24
26
29
N
N
N
N
Mg
CH
3
O
CH
3
HC
H
3
C
H
H
3
CH
O
H
3
CO
5
1
1a
2
2a
alpha
delta
8
8a
7
7a
17 16
6
5
5a
9
10
10a
10b
2b
7b
7c
beta
gamma
12 13
3
3a
4
4a
4b
14
15
O
O
1' 7'3' 11' 16'
20'17' 18' 19'
OH
[
]3
[]n
4
CH
2
OCR
O
3 R = long chain fatty acid
1
3
7
11 1'
17
20
16
1
3
7915 1'
3'
7'
12'
15'
16
17
16'
18'
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of lutein (1), β-carotene (2), phytyl fatty acid ester (3), polyprenol (4), chlorophyll a (5), β-sitosterol (6),
triacylglycerols (7) from the leaves of M. oleifera Lam.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General Experimental Procedure
NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian VNMRS spectrometer in CDCl
3
at 600 MHz for
1
H NMR and 150 MHz
for
13
C NMR spectra. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel 60 (70-230 mesh). Thinlayer
Consolacion Y Ragasa et al Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7 (7):395-399
___________________________________________________________________________
397
www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com
chromatography was performed with plastic backed plates coated with silica gel F
254
and the plates were visualized
by spraying with vanillin/H
2
SO
4
solution followed by warming.
Sample Collection
The sample was collected from Laurel, Batangas, Philippines on September 4, 2014. The sample was authenticated
as Moringa oleifera Lam. by one of the authors (MPM).
General Isolation Procedure
A glass column 18 inches in height and 1.0 inches internal diameter was packed with silica gel. The crude extract
from the twigs were fractionated by silica gel chromatography using increasing proportions ofacetone in
dichloromethane (10% increment) as eluents. Fifty milliliter fractions were collected. All fractions were monitored
by thin layer chromatography. Fractions with spots of the same R
f
values were combined andrechromatographed in
appropriate solvent systems until TLC pure isolates were obtained. A glass column 12inches in height and 0.5 inch
internal diameter was used for the rechromatography. Two milliliter fractions were collected. Final purifications
were conducted using Pasteur pipettes as columns. One milliliter fractions were collected.
Isolation of the Chemical Constituents of the Leaves
Fresh leaves (14.2 kg) of Moringa oleifera were air-dried for about 1 week to afford 2.65 kg of dried leaves which
were soaked in EtOH at room temperature for 3 days and then filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under vacuum
to afford a crude extract (218 g). The crude EtOH extract (10 g) was chromatographed using increasing proportions
of acetone in CH
2
Cl
2
at 10% increment by volume. The CH
2
Cl
2
and 10% acetone in CH
2
Cl
2
fractions were
combined and rechromatographed using petroleum ether, followed by 1% EtOAc in petroleum ether, and finally
2.5% EtOAc in petroleum ether. The fractions eluted with petroleum ether were rechromatographed using
petroleum ether to yield saturated hydrocarbons (15 mg). The fractions eluted with 1% EtOAc in petroleum ether
were combined and rechromatographed (2 ×) using 2.5% EtOAc in petroleum ether to afford 2 (3 mg) after washing
with petroleum ether. The fractions eluted with 2.5% EtOAc in petroleum ether were combined and
rechromatographed (3 ×) using 5% EtOAc in petroleum ether to yield 3 (4 mg). The 20% to 30% acetone in CH
2
Cl
2
fractions were combined and rechromatographed using 5% EtOAc in petroleum ether, followed by 7.5% EtOAc in
petroleum ether, and finally 10% EtOAc in petroleum ether. The fractions eluted with 5% EtOAc in petroleum ether
were combined and rechromatographed (2 ×) using 7.5% EtOAc in petroleum ether to afford 4 (5 mg). The
fractions eluted with 7.5% EtOAc in petroleum ether were combined and rechromatographed using the same solvent
to afford 7 (6 mg). The fractions eluted with 10% EtOAc in petroleum ether were combined and rechromatographed
using the same solvent to afford fatty alcohols (4 mg). The 40% to 60% acetone in CH
2
Cl
2
fractions were combined
and rechromatographed using CH
2
Cl
2
. The less polar fractions were combined and rechromatographed (3×) using
15% EtOAc in petroleum ether to afford 6 (2 mg) after washing with petroleum ether. The more polar fractions
were combined and rechromatographed(4 ×) using 20% EtOAc in petroleum ether yield5 (10 mg) after washing
with petroleum ether, followed by Et
2
O. The 70% to 80% acetone in CH
2
Cl
2
fractions were combined and
rechromatographed using CH
3
CN:Et
2
O:CH
2
Cl
2
(0.5:0.5:9, v/v). The less polar fractions were rechromatographed
using CH
3
CN:Et
2
O:CH
2
Cl
2
(0.5:0.5:9, v/v) to afford fatty acids (7 mg). The more polar fractions were combined
and rechromatographed (3 ×) using CH
3
CN:Et
2
O:CH
2
Cl
2
(1:1:8, v/v) to afford 1 (12 mg) after washing with
petroleum ether, followed by Et
2
O.
Lutein(1):
13
C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 12.81, 13.10, 21.61, 22.86, 24.25, 28.72, 29.49, 30.25, 34.02, 37.11,
42.52, 44.61, 48.39, 54.94, 65.10, 65.94, 124.43, 124.79, 124.92, 125.57, 126.14, 128.71, 130.03, 130.07, 130.79,
131.29, 132.56, 135.06, 135.68, 136.48, 137.56, 137.74, 138.01, 138.49.
β-Carotene (2):
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 6.09-6.64 (CH=), 1.01 (12H, s, CH
3
), 1.95 (12H, s, allylic CH
3
),
1.69 (6H, s, allylic CH
3
).
Phytyl fatty acid ester (3):
13
C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 61.21 (C-1), 118.12 (C-2), 142.64 (C-3), 39.85 (C-4),
25.03 (C-5), 36.63 (C-6), 32.67 (C-7), 37.35 (C-8), 24.46 (C-9), 37.42 (C-10), 32.78 (C-11), 37.28 (C-12), 24.79 (C-
13), 39.36 (C-14), 27.97 (C-15), 22.71 (C-16), 16.36 (C-17), 19.74, 19.70 (C-18, C-19), 22.62 (C-20),173.95 (C-1'),
34.40 (C-2'), 25.03 (C-3'), 29.59 (C-4'), 29.11-29.69 (CH
2
')
n
, 31.92 (CH
2
'), 29.59 (CH
2
'), 14.12 (CH
3
'-terminal).
Polyprenol (4):
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 4.07 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH
2
OH), 5.42 (1H, =CH), 5.07-5.11
(11H,=CH), 1.94-2.07 (40H, allylic CH
2
), 1.73 (3H, allylic CH
3
), 1.66 (21H, allylic CH
3
), 1.59 (12H, allylic CH
3
).
Consolacion Y Ragasa et al Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7 (7):395-399
___________________________________________________________________________
398
www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com
Chlorophyll a (5):
13
C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 131.85 (C-1),12.12 (C-1a), 136.51 (C-2),129.05 (C-2a),122.79
(C-2b),136.17 (C-3), 11.23 (C-3a), 145.23 (C-4), 19.46 (C-4a), 17.42 (C-4b), 137.93 (C-5),12.12 (C-5a), 129.05 (C-
6), 51.11 (C-7), 29.79 (C-7a), 31.16 (C-7b),172.94 (C-7c), 50.10 (C-8), 23.06 (C-8a), 189.65 (C-9), 64.68 (C-10),
169.60 (C-10a), 52.84 (C-10b), 142.84 (C-11), 136.28 (C-12), 155.66 (C-13), 150.98 (C-14), 129.09 (C-15), 149.64
(C-16), 161.23 (C-17), 172.94 (C-18), 97.54 (C-α), 104.44 (C-β), 105.21 (C-γ), 93.12 (C-δ), 61.45 (1'), 117.68 (2'),
142.03 (3'), 39.77 (4'), 24.96 (5'), 36.62 (6'), 32.60 (7'), 37.30 (8'), 24.40 (9'), 37.37 (10'), 32.74 (11'), 37.24 (12'),
24.75 (13'), 39.33 (14'), 27.94 (15'), 22.70 (16'), 16.27 (17'), 19.63 (18'), 19.70 (19'), 22.60 (20').
β-Sitosterol (6):
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 3.50 (m, H-3), 2.26, 2.21 (H
2
-4), 5.33 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6),
0.66 (s, CH
3
-18), 0.99 (s, CH
3
-19), 0.90 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH
3
-21), 0.79 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH
3
-26), 0.82 (d, J = 7.2
Hz,CH
3
-27), 0.84 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, CH
3
-29).
Triacylglycerols (7):
13
C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 62.08 (glyceryl CH
2
), 68.86 (glyceryl CH), 173.30, 173.26
(C=O α), 172.84 (C=O β), 34.01, 34.04, 34.18 (C-2), 20.54, 22.56, 22.68, 24.82, 24.85, 25.51, 25.60, 25.62, 27.16,
27.19, 27.21, 29.04, 29.07, 29.11, 29.17, 29.19, 29.27, 29.31, 29.34, 29.35, 29.47, 29.52, 29.58, 29.62, 29.65, 29.70,
29.76, 31.52, 31.90, 31.91 (CH
2
), 131.95, 130.22, 130.20, 130.00, 129.98, 129.70, 129.67, 128.28, 128.23,128.21,
128.06, 128.05, 127.88, 127.87, 127.75, 127.73, 127.09 (CH=CH), 14.07, 14.11, 14.27 (terminal CH
3
).
Fatty acids:
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 5.34 (m, =CH), 2.79 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, double allylic CH
2
), 2.75 (t, J = 6.6
Hz, double allylic CH
2
), 2.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, α-CH
2
), 2.03-2.06 (m, allylic CH
2
), 1.56-1.64 (m, β-CH
2
), 1.22-1.35
(CH
2
), 0.96 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, terminal CH
3
), 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, terminal CH
3
).
Fatty Alcohols:
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 3.62 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, terminal CH
2
OH), 1.55 (m, α-CH2), 1.23-1.29
(br s, CH
2
), 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, terminal CH
3
).
Hydrocarbons:
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
): δ 1.23 (br s, CH
2
), 0.86 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, terminal CH
3
).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Silica gel chromatography of the dichloromethane extract of the air dried leaves of M. oleifera yieldedlutein (1) [13],
β-carotene (2) [14], phytyl fatty acid ester (3) [15], polyprenol (4) [16], chlorophyll a (5) [17], β-sitosterol (6) [18],
triacylglycerols (7) [19], fatty acids [14], fatty alcohols [20], and saturated hydrocarbons [21]. The structures of
these compounds were identified by comparison of their
1
H or
13
CNMR data with those reported in the literature. α-
Linolenic acid was deduced as one of the fatty acids from the resonances for the methyl triplet at δ 0.96 (t, J = 7.2
Hz), the double allylic methylenes at δ 2.79 (t, J = 6.6 Hz) and the olefinic protons at δ 5.34 (m) [22]. A small
amount of linoleic acid was detected from the low intensity resonance for a double allylic methylene at δ 2.75 [22],
while another unsaturated fatty acid, oleic acid was suggested by the high intensity resonance for allylic methylene
protons at δ 2.03-2.06 [23]. The fatty acids attached to the triacylglycerols are α-linolenic acid, linoleic acid, and
oleic acid as deduced from the aforementioned resonances.
Acknowledgement
Research grants from the De La Salle University Science Foundation through the University Research Coordination
Office and the University Research Office of De La Salle University‒Dasmariñas are gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] J. W. Fahey, Trees for Life Journal, 2005, 1(5), 1–24.
[2] J. O. Popoola, O. O. Obembe, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2013, 150, 682–691.
[3]. B. Sivasankari, M. Anandharaj, P. Gunasekaran, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2014, 153, 408–423.
[4]. F. Anwar, S. Latif, M. Ashraf, A. H. Gilani, Phytother. Res., 2007, 21, 17–25.
[5]. R. Abe, K. Ohtani, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2013, 145, 554–565.
]6]. J. E. Yabesh, S. Prabhu, S. Vijayakumar, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2014, 154, 774–789.
[7]. J. N. Kasolo, G. S. Bimenya, L. Ojok, J. Ochieng, J. W. Ogwal-Okeng, J. Med. Plant Res., 2010, 4, 753–757.
[8] R. Saini, K. Nandini, P. Shetty, P. Giridhar, Eur. Food Res. Tech., 2014, 238(6), 971-978.
[9] M. G. Rajanandh, J. Kavitha, Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res., 2010, 2(2), 1409-1414.
[10] M. Mbailao, T. Mianpereum, N. Albert, J. Food Resource Sci., 2014, 3,12-20.
Consolacion Y Ragasa et al Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7 (7):395-399
___________________________________________________________________________
399
www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com
[11] C. Y. Ragasa, R. M. Levida, M.-J. Don, C.-C. Shen, Philipp. Sci. Lett., 2012, 5(1), 46-52.
[12] A. Leone, A. Spada, A. Battezzati, A. Schiraldi, J. Aristil, S. Bertoli, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2015, 16, 12791-12835.
[13] K. Biona, C.-C. Shen, C. Y. Ragasa, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci., 2015, 6(1), 167-171.
[14] C. Y. Ragasa, O. B. Torres, J. M. P. Gutierrez, H. P. B. C. Kristiansen, C.-C. Shen, J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., 2015,
5(4), 94-100.
[15] C. Y. Ragasa, J. L. Caro, L. G. Lirio, C.-C. Shen, Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci., 2014, 5(6), 344-348.
[16] C. Y. Ragasa, V. A. S. Ng, M. M. De Los Reyes, E. H. Mandia, C.-C. Shen, Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2014, 6(6),
35-42.
[17] C. Y. Ragasa, V. A. S. Ng, V. Ebajo Jr., D. Fortin, M. M. De Los Reyes, C.-C. Shen, Der Pharmacia Lettre,
2014, 6(6), 453-458.
[18] C. Y. Ragasa, V. A. S. Ng, M. M. De Los Reyes, E. H. Mandia, G. G. Oyong, C.-C. Shen ,Der Pharma
Chemica, 2014, 6(5), 182-187.
[19] C. Y. Ragasa, J. Caro, C.-C. Shen, Der Pharma Chemica, 2015, 7(2), 178-182.
[20] C. Y. Ragasa, O. B. Torres, E. H Mandia, C.-C. Shen, Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2014, 6(6), 439-442.
[21] C. Y. Ragasa, K. Lim, Philipp. J. Sci., 2005, 134(1), 63-67.
[22] C. Y. Ragasa, V. A. S. Ng, O. B. Torres, N. S. Y. Sevilla, K. V. M. Uy, M. C. S. Tan, M. G. Noel, C.-C. Shen,
J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 2013, 5(12), 1237-1243.
[23] C. Y. Ragasa, V. A. S. Ng, E. M. Agoo, C.-C. Shen, Int. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. Res., 2015, 7(3), 616-620.