ArticlePublisher preview available

Behavioral Processes Underlying the Decline of Narcissists' Popularity Over Time

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Following a dual-pathway approach to the social consequences of grandiose narcissism, we investigated the behavioral processes underlying (a) the decline of narcissists' popularity in social groups over time and (b) how this is differentially influenced by the 2 narcissism facets admiration and rivalry. In a longitudinal laboratory study, participants (N = 311) first provided narcissism self-reports using the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire, and subsequently interacted with each other in small groups in weekly sessions over the course of 3 weeks. All sessions were videotaped and trained raters coded participants' behavior during the interactions. Within the sessions participants provided mutual ratings on assertiveness, untrustworthiness, and likability. Results showed that (a) over time narcissists become less popular and (b) this is reflected in an initially positive but decreasing effect of narcissistic admiration as well as an increasing negative effect of narcissistic rivalry. As hypothesized, these patterns of results could be explained by means of 2 diverging behavioral pathways: The negative narcissistic pathway (i.e., arrogant-aggressive behavior and being seen as untrustworthy) plays an increasing role and is triggered by narcissistic rivalry, whereas the relevance of the positive narcissistic pathway (i.e., dominant-expressive behavior and being seen as assertive) triggered by narcissistic admiration decreases over time. These findings underline the utility of a behavioral pathway approach for disentangling the complex effects of personality on social outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Behavioral Processes Underlying the Decline of Narcissists’ Popularity
Over Time
Marius Leckelt, Albrecht C. P. Küfner, Steffen Nestler, and Mitja D. Back
University of Münster
Following a dual-pathway approach to the social consequences of grandiose narcissism, we investigated
the behavioral processes underlying (a) the decline of narcissists’ popularity in social groups over time
and (b) how this is differentially influenced by the 2 narcissism facets admiration and rivalry. In a
longitudinal laboratory study, participants (N311) first provided narcissism self-reports using the
Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire, and
subsequently interacted with each other in small groups in weekly sessions over the course of 3 weeks.
All sessions were videotaped and trained raters coded participants’ behavior during the interactions.
Within the sessions participants provided mutual ratings on assertiveness, untrustworthiness, and lik-
ability. Results showed that (a) over time narcissists become less popular and (b) this is reflected in an
initially positive but decreasing effect of narcissistic admiration as well as an increasing negative effect
of narcissistic rivalry. As hypothesized, these patterns of results could be explained by means of 2
diverging behavioral pathways: The negative narcissistic pathway (i.e., arrogant–aggressive behavior and
being seen as untrustworthy) plays an increasing role and is triggered by narcissistic rivalry, whereas the
relevance of the positive narcissistic pathway (i.e., dominant– expressive behavior and being seen as
assertive) triggered by narcissistic admiration decreases over time. These findings underline the utility of
a behavioral pathway approach for disentangling the complex effects of personality on social outcomes.
Keywords: narcissism, popularity, behavioral processes, relationship development, interpersonal
perception
Throughout the life course, individuals repeatedly enter new
social contexts (e.g., meeting people at work, at school or univer-
sity, and in private life with whom they were not previously
acquainted) in which they are confronted with the complex task of
acquiring new social partners (e.g., friends, peers, coworkers,
romantic partners). Getting to know others is a fundamental part of
our daily lives and being liked by others in the early stages of the
“getting-acquainted-process” is a crucial factor in the successful
emergence of relationships: Positive evaluations by others facili-
tate the initiation of satisfying social interactions and are associ-
ated with positive interpersonal outcomes (e.g., being popular,
making friends, acquiring a high status; Human, Sandstrom,
Biesanz, & Dunn, 2013;Sunnafrank & Ramirez, 2004). One key
individual difference variable that has long been discussed as
influencing these early interpersonal dynamics is narcissism. Re-
search on narcissism’s role in the emergence of relationships has,
however, revealed an inconsistent pattern of results, ranging from
positive to negative effects of narcissism on popularity (Campbell
& Campbell, 2009;Küfner, Nestler, & Back, 2013).
Prior empirical work on the social consequences of narcissism has
rarely looked at the underlying processes that drive narcissism’s
diverging effects on social outcomes, including the behavioral and
perceptual mechanisms of how narcissism influences popularity.
Moreover, the temporal dynamics of these behavioral and perceptual
processes have yet to be systematically investigated. That is, it is to
date unclear which changes in behavior and/or impressions on others
lead to changes in narcissism’s influence on popularity during the
early phases of getting acquainted. In addition, it has not yet been
studied whether different facets of grandiose narcissism, such as
agentic and antagonistic facets, affect changes in popularity differ-
ently and, if so, how they do so.
In the present study, we systematically analyze the role of
narcissism in the emergence of popularity within new social
groups by applying a dual-pathway approach (Küfner et al., 2013)
to a rich longitudinal dataset that includes different measures of
narcissism, ratings of interpersonal perceptions, and observations
This article was published Online First July 20, 2015.
Marius Leckelt, Albrecht C. P. Küfner, Steffen Nestler, and Mitja D.
Back, Department of Psychology, University of Münster.
This research was supported by Grant BA 3731/6-1 of the German
Research Foundation (DFG).
We are grateful to Leonie Althaus, Anna Auth, Simon Breil, Kyra Elias,
Jasmina Eskic, Lea Sophie Fetköter, Francesca Froreich, Stella Grau, Marc
Grünberg, Lisa Höke, Astrid Janich, Carolin Landers, Simon Lintz, Jana
Mattern, Christian Pill, Theresa Pohl, Lisa Wierichs, and Christina Wöb-
kenberg for invaluable help with data collection and to Boris Egloff,
Katharina Geukes, Sarah Humberg, and Roos Hutteman for fruitful dis-
cussions on this research.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marius
Leckelt, Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Fliednerstr. 21,
48149 Münster, Germany. E-mail: marius.leckelt@wwu.de
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2015, Vol. 109, No. 5, 856– 871
© 2015 American Psychological Association 0022-3514/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000057
856
... The social networks of narcissists are fueled by dysfunctional relations and negatively perceived by narcissists themselves (Lamkin et al., 2014). Even the positive appeal of narcissists declines over time because of their arrogant, untrustworthy, and aggressive behavior (Leckelt et al., 2015). Hence, it is not surprising that narcissism is positively associated with short-term mating, intimate partner violence, and sexual aggression (Schmitt et al., 2017) and negatively with long-term mating (Holtzman & Strube, 2013), or that narcissistic individuals (especially vulnerable ones) have lower relationship satisfaction (Balzen et al., 2022). ...
... These findings are in line with the previous data showing that narcissists tend to avoid long-term romantic relationships (Holtzman & Strube, 2013); their relationships are marked by violence and aggression (Schmitt et al., 2017) and they find less satisfaction in romantic relationships (Balzen et al., 2022). This may be the expression of insecure romantic attachment (Ahmadi et al., 2013), and antagonistic and dysfunctional social networks, where even the initial positive social image of narcissists declines over time (Lamkin et al., 2014;Leckelt et al., 2015). Hence, if we view narcissism as a single trait, which is entirely plausible due to high correlation between its two major components, narcissism as a whole is associated with lower fitness; if these findings can be replicated on representative samples they indicate the possibility of negative directional selection on narcissism. ...
Article
Full-text available
The main goal of the present research was to explore the links between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and fertility (number of children) due to its conceptual significance in estimating the adaptiveness of narcissism in an evolutionary sense. Furthermore, we aimed to explain these links via mating behavior (attachment in romantic relationships, short and long-term mating, and relationship satisfaction) and reproductive motivation (positive and negative childbearing motivations, and age of first reproduction) in participants from Serbia (N = 953). Correlation analysis showed similar associations between the two narcissism dimensions, mating and reproduction: negative associations are found between narcissism components and fertility, and long-term mating, followed by positive correlations with insecure attachment and negative childbearing motivations (although grandiose narcissism had positive associations with positive childbearing motives as well). Therefore, correlation analysis together with the structural model where narcissism is analyzed as a single trait showed that narcissism as a whole is associated with lower fitness. However, a structural model where two subdimensions are modeled separately revealed substantial differences between the two forms of narcissism in regard to mating and reproduction. The link between vulnerable narcissism and fertility was completely mediated by lower reproductive motivation (both types of motives), shorter duration of romantic relationships, and diminished relationship satisfaction. On the other hand, grandiose narcissism was positively associated with positive childbearing motives and relationship satisfaction; hence, it was positively indirectly associated with fertility via these links. The present findings may shed some light on differences between the narcissistic traits in their links with fertility—while both narcissistic dimensions seem to be largely maladaptive in an evolutionary sense, the distinctive features of grandiose narcissism may have some benefits for fertility.
... At the same time narcissists show arrogant and combative behavior, which leads to being seen as aggressive, which then decreases their popularity. Follow-up research by Leckelt et al. (2015) took a detailed look at the subcomponents of narcissism, as postulated by the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Concept (NARC; Back et al., 2013). According to the results, the narcissismassertiveness-popularity pathway was driven by the admiration component of grandiose narcissism, which represents a tendency toward agentic self-enhancement. ...
... Contrary to our expectation (Hypothesis VI), however, it was also admirationand not rivalry-that uniquely predicted arrogantcombative behavior. Even though the latter finding diverges from past research studying single-group contexts (Leckelt et al., 2015), the results nevertheless show that one narcissism dimension (i.e., admiration) was linked to behavior. Accordingly, null effects of narcissism on social behavior within the intergroup competition also cannot be the explanation. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this registered report ( N = 423), we investigated in a competitive intergroup context to what extent the perception of targets scoring high in grandiose narcissism varies depending on whether they belong to one’s own group or to an opposing outgroup. In a laboratory study, members of newly formed groups had direct contact with another group and competed for scarce resources. Contrary to our hypothesis, perceivers did not ascribe targets scoring high in narcissistic admiration higher status when they belonged to their ingroup versus the outgroup. Also unexpectedly, they did not like targets scoring high in narcissistic rivalry better when they belonged to their ingroup. Instead, our findings indicate that narcissistic admiration was generally linked to more dominant-expressive behavior and that participants had a stronger inclination to interpret a specific behavior as aggressive when it was shown by a member of the outgroup, rather than a member of the ingroup.
... Narcissistic traits and their diagnostic assessment seem to be omnipresent in current personality research (e.g., Jauk et al., 2022;Miller et al., 2017Miller et al., , 2021Weiss et al., 2021). Even at subclinical levels narcissistic behavior can affect social interactions in various ways, emphasizing the social relevance of narcissistic personality traits in interpersonal contexts (e.g., Du et al., 2022;Leckelt et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS) is a an economical, widely used self-report measure of vulnerable narcissism. Developed and mostly used as a unidimensional scale, previous structural examinations suggest two correlated dimensions, one emphasizing hypersensitive/neurotic aspects and the other highlighting egocentric/antagonistic aspects of vulnerable narcissism. The few extant factor analyses of the HSNS, however, differ profoundly in their methodological approach, the resulting item-to-factor assignment, and lack a thorough validation of the two putative subscales. To fill these gaps, we systematically examined and compared alternative measurement models for the HSNS and conducted comprehensive correlation analyses to map the proposed HSNS dimensions onto current models of general personality, narcissism, and psychopathology. In a first study, we constructed a German adaptation using data from three large samples (accumulated N = 3,655). In-depth examination of this German HSNS (Study 2, N = 1,359) confirmed the dimensions Oversensitivity and Egocentrism and suggested at least metric model invariance across gender and age. The two dimensions displayed distinct nomological nets and differed with respect to various personality traits, personality pathology markers, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology, and psychological (mal-)adjustment. HSNS-Oversensitivity corresponds with measures of neurotic narcissism and predicts internalizing pathology and intrapersonal dysfunctions, whereas Egocentrism overlaps with antagonistic narcissism, low agreeableness, and externalizing problems. Taken together, our research reconciles the HSNS with other multidimensional narcissism measures as well as current dimensional models of personality and psychopathology and attests to its utility to capture vulnerable narcissistic traits at a finer grained level.
... In terms of participant score levels, the current study revealed lower levels of rivalry, admiration, and narcissism compared to previous investigations conducted in Germany Leckelt et al., 2015), Spain, Chile, and Colombia (Doroszuk et al., 2020). The observed variations between Brazil and these countries may be indicative of the multidimensional nature of narcissism, encompassing cognitive, affective-motivational, and behavioral facets, as well as intra and interpersonal processes . ...
Article
Full-text available
The “Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire” (NARQ) assesses narcissism’s admiration and rivalry dimensions. This study aimed at the translation, semantic adaptation, and psychometric validation of the NARQ into Brazilian Portuguese and to check gender invariance. All 789 participants were a convenience sample recruited online from Brazil. After the translation, semantic validation, and back translation, the final version and a socio-economic characterization questionnaire were sent to participants. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. The results confirmed the original model of the questionnaire (χ² = 580.27, df = 126 (p < 0.001), RMSEA = 0.08 (CI 90% = 0.07–0.08), CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99 and χ²/df = 4.60). A configural, metric, and scalar invariance for gender was assessed revealing diverse levels of narcissism for this characteristic. Finally, our version of the NARQ showed adequate validity for this sample preserving the between-gender invariance.
Article
Purpose Previous research on narcissism and leadership seldom takes into account the leader–subordinate dyadic relationship and ignores the role of subordinate. Drawing on the contextual reinforcement model of narcissism, the purpose of this study is to explore the joint effects of both leaders’ and their subordinates’ narcissism on the former’s effectiveness through the latter’s perceived relationship conflict with them (RCWL). Design/methodology/approach Self-report data were collected from 315 full-time employees using a three-wave survey. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis were used to test the hypotheses. Findings The results of this study reveal that although RCWL is higher when leaders’ narcissism is higher along both congruence and incongruence line, RCWL is lower when leaders’ narcissism exceeds that of their subordinates than it falls short of subordinates’ narcissism when both leader’s and subordinate’s narcissism are low. Furthermore, the results of this study also demonstrate that leader–subordinate (in)congruence in narcissism has an indirect influence on the leaders’ effectiveness because of the resulting relationship conflict, and that the response surface of the total effect of joint narcissism on leader effectiveness possesses a convex surface, which demonstrates that leader effectiveness is lower at the median point when compared to the low- and high-level congruence points. Originality/value This study not only contributes to fit theory, vertical relational conflict and research on narcissistic leader by simultaneously investigating both leaders’ and subordinates’ narcissism and their joint influence on leader–subordinate relational conflict and leaders’ effectiveness but also offers several practical recommendations for companies to enhance leaders’ effectiveness.
Chapter
This chapter describes the worst bad leader, ones from the dark triad, with zero degrees of empathy. The dark triad consists of corporate psychopaths, malignant narcissists, and Machiavellians. These toxic dark side leaders cause considerable damage to their subordinates because they lack empathy with them. The chapter describes what empathy is along with the behavior and characteristics of these leaders and the outcomes for their subordinates and organizations.
Book
Narcissism is a trait that comes in different forms (agentic, communal, and vulnerable), which are all marked by characteristics such as entitlement, self-centeredness, and little empathy for others. One reason narcissism has gained attention among scholars and laypeople alike is because of its implications for social relationships. Narcissists' behaviors frequently have negative consequences for others. Whether their relationships are with coworkers or close relationship partners, interactions with narcissists can be challenging and emotionally taxing. Despite this, there is a sparse amount of research that addresses how to cope with difficult narcissistic relationships. This Element includes an overview of the trait forms of narcissism and discusses its implications for their social relationships. It provides a background about the development of narcissism and offers some research-informed suggestions for how to cope in narcissistic relationships. Future directions for research are also discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Recent reviewers have concluded that dispositions are not very reliably encoded in nonverbal behavior, although observers seem eager to use nonverbal information to decode the dispositions of others. A modified Brunswik lens model (E. Brunswik, 1956) and behavior mapping were used to examine the encoding and decoding of 8 interpersonal dispositions from nonverbal cues. First, 20 triads completed self-assessments and were videotaped during conversation. Next, 38 of their nonverbal behaviors were independently scored. Finally, 21 unacquainted peers rated all 60 conversers on the same dispositions. Across the 8 dispositions, encoding multiple correlations ranged from 0 to .62 and decoding ranged from .74 to .82. Achievement (self–other correlations) ranged from .18 to .45. Some implications of the results for interpersonal conflict and personality assessment are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Reactions to trait self-enhancers were investigated in 2 longitudinal studies of person.perception in discussion groups. Groups of 4-6 participants met 7 times for 20 rain. After Meetings 1 and 7, group members rated their perceptions of one another. In Study 1, trait self-enhancement was indexed by measures of narcissism and self-deceptive enhancement. At the first meeting, self-enhancers made positive impressions: They were seen as agreeable, well adjusted, and competent. After 7 weeks, however, they were rated negatively and gave self-evaluations discrepant with peer evaluations they received. In Study 2, an independent sample of observers (close acquaintances) enabled a pretest index of discrepancy self-enhancement: It predicted the same deteriorating pattern of interpersonal perceptions as the other three trait measures. Nonetheless, all self-enhancement measures correlated positively with self-esteem.
Article
Two studies addressed parallel questions about the correlates and consequences of self-enhancement bias. Study 1 was conducted in a laboratory context and examined self-enhancing evaluations of performance in a group-interaction task. Study 2 assessed students' illusory beliefs about their academic ability when they first entered college and then followed them longitudinally to test claims about the long-term benefits of positive illusions. Both studies showed that self-enhancement bills was related to narcissism. ego involvement, self-serving attributions, and positive affect. Study 2 found that self-enhancement was associated with decreasing levels of self-esteem and well-being as well as with increasing disengagement front the academic context. Self-enhancement did not predict higher academic performance or higher graduate rates. Thus, the findings suggest that self-enhancing beliefs may be adaptive in the short term but not in the long term.
Book
The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder is the definitive resource for empirically sound information on narcissism for researchers, students, and clinicians at a time when this personality disorder has become a particularly relevant area of interest. This unique work deepens understanding of how narcissistic behavior influences behavior and impedes progress in the worlds of work, relationships, and politics.
Article
This chapter explores the narcissist from the inside and out by examining the ways in which narcissists see themselves, their beliefs about how others see them, and the ways they are actually seen by others in several social contexts. Narcissists show surprising insight into their negative and narcissistic qualities.
Article
Impression management, the process by which people control the impressions others form of them, plays an important role in interpersonal behavior. This article presents a 2-component model within which the literature regarding impression management is reviewed. This model conceptualizes impression management as being composed of 2 discrete processes. The 1st involves impression motivation-the degree to which people are motivated to control how others see them. Impression motivation is conceptualized as a function of 3 factors: the goal-relevance of the impressions one creates, the value of desired outcomes, and the discrepancy between current and desired images. The 2nd component involves impression construction. Five factors appear to determine the kinds of impressions people try to construct: the self-concept, desired and undesired identity images, role constraints, target's values, and current social image. The 2-component model provides coherence to the literature in the area, addresses controversial issues, and supplies a framework for future research regarding impression management.