Do Facebook Status Updates Reﬂect Subjective Well-Being?
Pan Liu, PhD,
William Tov, PhD,
Michal Kosinski, PhD,
David J. Stillwell, PhD,
and Lin Qiu, PhD
Nowadays, millions of people around the world use social networking sites to express everyday thoughts and
feelings. Many researchers have tried to make use of social media to study users’ online behaviors and
psychological states. However, previous studies show mixed results about whether self-generated contents on
Facebook reﬂect users’ subjective well-being (SWB). This study analyzed Facebook status updates to determine
the extent to which users’ emotional expression predicted their SWB—speciﬁcally their self-reported satis-
faction with life. It was found that positive emotional expressions on Facebook did not correlate with life
satisfaction, whereas negative emotional expressions within the past 9–10 months (but not beyond) were
signiﬁcantly related to life satisfaction. These ﬁndings suggest that both the type of emotional expressions and
the time frame of status updates determine whether emotional expressions in Facebook status updates can
effectively reﬂect users’ SWB. The ﬁndings shed light on the characteristics of online social media and improve
the understanding of how user-generated contents reﬂect users’ psychological states.
Facebook is one of the most widely used online social
networking sites (SNS). Users frequently express and
share emotional experiences through their status updates.
With around 300,000 status updates published every minute,
Facebook provides a huge and natural record of users’ ev-
eryday emotional experiences.
Given that daily experiences
are an important predictor of subjective well-being (SWB),
it is likely that contents in Facebook status updates are re-
lated to users’ SWB. Judgments of SWB indicate how
people evaluate their quality of life, and SWB is an im-
portant predictor of many important aspects of life including
the probability of getting married and staying in marriage,
the likelihood of earning high income, and the tendency of
having a healthy lifestyle.
Understanding how Facebook
status updates reﬂect SWB can help the development of tools
to assess emotional states and quality of life automatically
on an unprecedented scale. Because status updates offer a
snapshot of users’ everyday lives from one period of time to
another, they provide real-time information about users’
mental states and offer the potential for studying changes in
SWB in broad segments of the population, without intrusive
Past research studying the relationship between Facebook
status updates and SWB has found mixed results. Kramer
proposed an index of Gross National Happiness (GNH) by
calculating the difference between the percentage of positive
and negative emotion words in millions of status updates
posted by users in a given country. GNH peaked on national
and cultural holidays such as Christmas and Thanksgiving,
and dipped on days of national tragedies such as the death of
Michael Jackson. It also followed a weekly cycle with peaks
on Friday and dips on Monday. This provided evidence of
face validity and suggested that the positive and negative
emotion word use in status updates was associated with
SWB. However, Wang et al.
challenged the validity of
Facebook GNH by comparing it with self-reported SWB
judgment of Facebook users. They showed that GNH did not
correlate with SWB scores aggregated by day and week, and
had a negative correlation with SWB scores aggregated by
month. Wang et al.’s study
suggested that Facebook GNH
does not accurately reﬂect SWB. However, their sample size
of 34 users on average every day is too small for a reliable
Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the rela-
tionship between emotional expressions in Facebook status
updates and SWB further. Past research has shown that SWB
ﬂuctuates with everyday positive and negative experi-
High levels of SWB are characterized by high
satisfaction with life, frequent experience of positive emo-
tions, and infrequent experience of negative emotions.
Behavioural Sciences Institute, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
The Psychometrics Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY,BEHAVIOR,AND SOCIAL NETWORKING
Volume 18, Number 7, 2015
ªMary Ann Liebert, Inc.
addition, Rutledge et al.
showed that emotional reactivity
to recent events predicted SWB based on evidence from a
computational model and functional fMRI. Suh et al.
participants to report positive and negative events they ex-
perienced over the past 4 years, and found that life satis-
faction only correlated with events in the past 3 months. The
above ﬁndings suggest that only recent events are related to
SWB. Therefore, it was hypothesized that only recent
emotional expressions in Facebook status updates would be
associated with SWB.
Meanwhile, past research has shown that users often en-
gaged in impression management when they use Facebook.
Due to self-representational concerns, they selectively disclose
more positive than negative emotions to present a positive self-
This desire to make a positive impression on others
may reduce individual differences in the expression of positive
emotion on Facebook, weakening the association between the
latter and self-reported SWB. In contrast, because there is rel-
atively less social pressure to express negative emotion (vs.
positive emotion), such expressions are more likely to reﬂect
how a person actually feels. Therefore, it was predicted that the
amount of negative (but not positive) emotional expressions
in Facebook status updates would be related to self-reported
Many studies have used the Linguistic Inquiry and Word
Count (LIWC) text analysis software
to examine emotional
expressions in social media. LIWC counts words in pre-
deﬁned categories that have been developed based on psy-
chological measurement scales and validated by independent
It has been widely used and proven reliable to
measure psychological attributes from writing samples, in-
cluding emotion, personality, thinking styles, and social re-
A recent study shows that LIWC coding of
emotion in diary entries consistently correlated with self-
reported emotional experiences.
Chee et al.
to examine postings from illness groups in Yahoo! Groups
and revealed changes in sentiment after FDA approval of
certain drugs. Yu et al.
assessed overall sentiment in con-
gressional speeches to classify political party afﬁliation.
Golder and Macy
identiﬁed diurnal and seasonal mood
patterns in cultures across the globe from millions of tweets.
Qiu et al.
showed that extraverts expressed more positive
emotions in tweets than introverts. These studies suggest that
LIWC is a reliable tool for measuring emotional expressions,
and therefore it was used in the present study to analyze
Facebook status updates.
Data were obtained from the myPersonality Facebook
application, which has been used by more than six million
users to voluntarily take a variety of psychological tests and
All users provided consent to the anon-
ymous use of their Facebook data and test results for research
purposes upon installation of the myPersonality application.
They had the option to choose which Facebook data to dis-
close. Their data are only accessible to registered researchers
of the myPersonality project. This research protocol has re-
ceived IRB approval.
A total of 99,408 participants took the Satisfaction With
Life Scale (SWLS).
The scale has ﬁve items, including
‘‘I am satisﬁed with my life’’ and ‘‘If I could live my life
over, I would change almost nothing’’ with a 7-point Likert
response scale (1 =‘‘strongly disagree’’ to 7 =‘‘strongly
agree’’). It is a well-established and widely used measure of
an individual’s own evaluation of life satisfaction and cog-
nitive judgment of SWB.
In the current study, SWLS
scores were highly reliable (Cronbach’s a=0.82; M=4.38,
SD =1.37), consistent with past studies.
Among all the participants, only 3,324 provided access to
their Facebook status updates. Their status updates posted in
the year before they completed the SWLS were downloaded.
Status updates were grouped into four 3 month periods.
Period 1 consisted of the most recent updates (i.e., those
posted within the 3 months prior to completing the SWLS).
Period 4 consisted of the oldest updates (i.e., those posted in
the 10–12 months prior to completing the SWLS). To keep
the sample size consistent across the four periods, only 1,124
participants were included who had at least one status update
in each of the four periods in the ﬁnal analysis. In this
sample, the SWLS exhibited high reliability (Cronbach’s
a=0.83) and had an average score of 4.32 (SD =1.40),
comparable to that of the full sample. A total of 134,087
status updates were collected. The average number of words
per status update was 13.8 (SD =6.1). Among the 195 users
who reported their sex, 132 female were female. Among the
193 users who reported their age, the mean age was 26.2
years (interquartile range =6.5).
First, the status updates of the sample (1,124 participants)
were analyzed using LIWC. The mean frequency of positive
and negative emotion words was 4.7% (SD =1.7%) and 2.5%
(SD =1.2%), respectively. To examine the representativeness
of the sample, the frequency of emotional expressions of a
larger sample was analyzed: 150,383 myPersonality users who
provided their status updates but did not provide their SWLS
ratings. The mean frequency of positive and negative emo-
tional words was 3.9% (SD=2.0%) and 1.8% (SD =1.1%),
respectively. In both samples, positive emotional words were
used about twice as often as negative emotional words.
Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics and corre-
lations among the variables in this study. Results showed no
signiﬁcant correlation between life satisfaction and positive
emotional expression at any of the four periods ( p>0.10).
In contrast, life satisfaction correlated negatively with neg-
ative emotional expression in the three most recent periods
(p<0.001), demonstrating that negative emotional experi-
ences within the past 9 months were related to SWB.
It is possible that the prediction of life satisfaction im-
proves monotonically as status updates are aggregated over
longer periods of time. For example, impression management
notwithstanding, people who are truly happy may express
positive emotion in their status updates more consistently
across time. Therefore, status updates were combined into in-
creasing periods of 1 month. Thus, the ﬁrst period consisted of
only the most recent month of updates, whereas the 12th period
consisted of a full year of updates. LIWC emotion codings
were obtained for each cumulative period. If aggregation im-
proves the prediction of SWB, the correlation between life
satisfaction and emotional expression should increase as up-
dates are cumulated across more months. However, the results
did not completely support this prediction (see Fig. 1). The
374 LIU ET AL.
correlation between positive emotion and life satisfaction did
not improve as status updates were cumulated across time.
Even when updates were cumulated across the full year, the
correlation was not statistically signiﬁcant ( p>0.05). Thus,
merely increasing the amount of status updates did not improve
the prediction of life satisfaction from positive emotional ex-
pression. The correlation between negative emotion and life
satisfaction increased gradually, but leveled out after aggre-
gating 10 months of updates. This is consistent with the cor-
relational analysis in Table 1 where the negative emotional
experiences from the 10th to 12th last month (i.e., NE4) did
not correlate with life satisfaction. Overall, the above results
conﬁrmed the hypotheses that only negative emotional ex-
pressions in status updates are associated with SWB, and only
expressions within the most recent months (i.e., 9–10 months
prior) are related to SWB.
To evaluate the relationship between emotional expres-
sions and SWB further, a multiple mediation model was
tested to examine both the direct effects and indirect effects
of negative emotional expression at periods 1–4 on life
satisfaction. A direct effect refers to whether expression at
any given time period predicts life satisfaction, controlling
for expression at other periods. However, it is also possible
for expression at one period to have indirect effects on life
satisfaction through subsequent time periods. For example, a
car accident in period 4 might have trickle down effects on
subsequent periods (e.g., increased ﬁnancial burden due to
repair costs and hospital fees), which ultimately affects life
satisfaction. SPSS was used with the PROCESS macro,
which employs a bias corrected bootstrapping method to
provide conﬁdence intervals (CI) around the indirect ef-
To evaluate the direct and indirect effects of each
period, 5,000 bootstrap samples were speciﬁed and 95% CI
were constructed. A 95% CI that does not include 0 indicates
a signiﬁcant (nonzero) indirect mediation effect.
A path diagram of the multiple mediation model is shown
in Figure 2. Note that these path estimates control for all
possible indirect effects among the different periods (e.g., the
path from period 4 to period 2 to life satisfaction). However,
to simplify the presentation and discussion, the focus is only
FIG. 1. Correlation between life
satisfaction and emotional expres-
sion in status updates cumulatively
combined across 12 months. Num-
bers represent the magnitude of
correlation between positive/nega-
tive emotion and life satisfaction;
*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Table 1. Descriptive Characteristics and Correlations Among Life Satisfaction
and Positive and Negative Emotion in Each Period
LS PE1 PE2 PE3 PE4 NE1 NE2 NE3 NE4
PE1 0.043 —
PE2 0.037 0.296*** —
PE3 -0.003 0.216*** 0.191*** —
PE4 -0.017 0.149*** 0.130*** 0.264*** —
NE1 -0.145*** -0.114*** 0.036 -0.003 0.025 —
NE2 -0.105*** -0.027 -0.098** 0.079** 0.051 0.220*** —
NE3 -0.120*** -0.023 -0.014 -0.043 -0.040 0.194*** 0.223*** —
NE4 -0.037 -0.027 -0.042 -0.058 -0.087** 0.241*** 0.211*** 0.178*** —
M4.32 4.75 4.78 5.00 4.81 2.46 2.43 2.56 2.71
SD 1.40 2.58 3.24 3.92 4.60 1.82 1.95 2.58 3.60
LS, life satisfaction; PE1, positive emotion in period 1 (the 1st to 3rd last months); PE2, positive emotion in period 2 (the 4th to 6th last
months); PE3, positive emotion in period 3 (the 7th to 9th last months); PE4, positive emotion in period 4 (the 10th to 12th last months);
NE1 to NE4, negative emotion in periods 1–4.
FACEBOOK STATUS UPDATES REFLECT SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING 375
on the direct effect of each period, as well as the indirect
effects through adjacent periods. The direct effect of each
period is indicated by the arrows running directly from each
period to life satisfaction. Signiﬁcant direct effects were
observed for periods 1–3, suggesting that negative emotional
expressions at each period improves the prediction of life
satisfaction above and beyond each other. There were also a
number of indirect effects. For example, negative emotional
expressions in period 2 predicted expressions in period 1,
which in turn predicted lower life satisfaction. As shown in
Table 2, each period prior to period 1 exerted signiﬁcant
indirect effects on life satisfaction. Although negative ex-
pressions in period 4 did not directly predict life satisfaction,
they indirectly predicted lower life satisfaction through their
effects on periods 3 through 1. This suggests that distant
negative experiences may be related to life satisfaction
through more recent negative experiences.
Nowadays, millions of people use online media to express
thoughts and feelings. Understanding how user-generated
contents are related to psychological variables can improve
the understanding of online behavior and allow better use to
be made of online data. This study examined how emotional
expressions in Facebook status updates are related to SWB—
speciﬁcally, self-reported life satisfaction. The results show
that positive emotional experiences reported on Facebook
were not associated with life satisfaction. However, negative
emotional experiences in the last 9–10 months were nega-
tively related to life satisfaction. These ﬁndings have im-
portant theoretical and practical implications.
First, this study shows that Facebook status updates reveal
users’ SWB. This is consistent with past ﬁndings where us-
ers’ behaviors on Facebook reﬂect a wide range of traits and
attributes, including personality, ethnicity, gender, age, and
It suggests that Facebook data can
be a valid source to explore psychological processes and
phenomena. However, it is important to note that some
previously established relationships may not hold in social
media. For example, past research has shown that positive
emotion is related to SWB.
However, in the present study,
positive emotional expressions in Facebook status updates
were not associated with life satisfaction. This is probably
due to the use of impression management strategies to
present a positive social image in social media. Users have
been found to disclose more positive than negative emotions
on Facebook selectively.
In the present study, positive
emotional words were used about twice as often as negative
emotional words. This may reduce the predictive power of
FIG. 2. Path analysis for direct
and indirect prediction of life
satisfaction (LS) by negative
emotion in each period. NE1 to
NE4 =negative emotion in periods
1–4. Numbers beside each arrow
represent the path coefﬁcients.
*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Table 2. Prediction of Life Satisfaction by Negative Emotion in Each Period
Prediction of LS
Predictor Mediator(s) Direct Indirect Total
NE1 —-0.0914*** —-0.0914***
(-0.1382, -0.0445) (-0.1382, -0.0445)
NE2 NE1 -0.0461* -0.0130* -0.0590*
(-0.0897, -0.0025) (-0.0273, -0.0045) (-0.1024, -0.0157)
NE3 NE1 -0.0469** -0.0167* -0.0636*
NE2 (-0.0796, -0.0142) (-0.0305, -0.0080) (-0.0957, -0.0315)
NE4 NE1 0.0080
*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
NE1, negative emotion in period 1 (the 1st to 3rd last months); NE2, negative emotion in period 2 (the 4th to 6th last months); NE3,
negative emotion in period 3 (the 7th to 9th last months); NE4, negative emotion in period 4 (the 10th to 12th last months). Numbers above
brackets represent the path coefﬁcients. Numbers in brackets represent the 95% conﬁdence intervals.
376 LIU ET AL.
positive emotions on SWB. The ﬁndings suggest that the re-
lationship between emotion and SWB can be context depen-
dent, and past observations made in ofﬂine settings may not
hold in online environments. This highlights the importance of
considering social contexts in research on well-being. In ad-
dition, the results provide new longitudinal evidence to support
the past ﬁnding that recent emotional experiences inﬂuence
Although negative experiences that occurred more
than 9 months ago did not directly relate to life satisfaction,
they contributed indirectly by predicting subsequent negative
experiences. Thus, it suggests that distant events matter as
well—even if only in an indirect sense.
Second, SWB is an important measure of life quality and
has been found to affect health, income, and social rela-
Understanding how contents in users’ Facebook
status updates reﬂect SWB provides researchers new op-
portunities for measuring SWB without self-report surveys.
Past research has attempted to measure SWB based on social
media but showed mixed results.
The present study pro-
vides empirical evidence supporting that Facebook status
updates can predict SWB, and found a similar effect size as
—although negative emotional expression
appears to be more diagnostic than positive emotional ex-
pression. It also suggests that it is the time frame, not merely
the amount of status updates, that determines the accuracy of
the prediction. Only recent status updates matter in predict-
ing current SWB. Including more distant status updates may
not improve the accuracy of prediction—particularly in the
case of positive emotional expression.
These ﬁndings provide important insights for optimizing
tools to predict well-being accurately from social media.
They open up the opportunity for health professionals to
monitor users’ psychological states naturally and provide
appropriate interventions if needed. Tools can be developed
to identify factors and events that inﬂuence SWB on a large
scale, and provide policy makers with concrete evidence so
that they can effectively formulate policies and create ac-
tivities to improve the well-being of citizens. This study also
illustrates an example of utilizing Big Data for psychological
research. Future research can incorporate more factors in
social media such as geographical information and network
structure to understand better the interaction between psy-
chological and environmental factors. It will also be impor-
tant to determine if there are ways to disambiguate positive
emotional expressions on status updates (e.g., by incorpo-
rating emoticons) to improve their correspondence with self-
reported well-being. The effects of positive emotion are
distinct from negative emotion. Positive emotions predict
longevity and have important implications for social rela-
Thus, there is value in improving the ability to
detect positive emotional experiences accurately.
This study has several limitations. First, the results are
based on active Facebook users who posted at least one status
update in 3 months. Findings might be different for other
users who do not frequently post on Facebook. It is possible
that their status updates may not provide enough information
to reﬂect SWB. It is also possible that infrequent users en-
gage in less impression management, and therefore make
both of their positive and negative emotional expressions
predictive of their SWB. Future studies need to examine
further the patterns of different users groups and identify
Second, the study did not have detailed information about
the characteristics of the participants, including sex and per-
sonality. Previous studies have shown sex differences in
emotional expression, with women being more emotionally
expressive than men.
In this study, only 195 participants
reported their sex (132 female). No signiﬁcant sex difference
was found in positive or negative emotional expression, ei-
ther for the total 12 months or any of the four 3 month
periods ( p>0.05). Past research has also shown close asso-
ciation between emotional experiences and personality traits,
especially extraversion and neuroticism.
are important lines of research, the main objective of the
present paper was to evaluate prediction and not establish
causality. It could very well be that both the expression of
negative emotions and low life satisfaction are reﬂections of
a common personality trait such as neuroticism. Irrespective
of whether this is the case, efforts to evaluate the quality of
life via social media
are predicated on the assumption that
emotional expressions on these platforms actually reﬂect
how users feel. The observed correlation between negative
emotional expression and self-reported life satisfaction is
critically important from this standpoint. Moreover, the an-
alyses suggest a critical window of 9–10 months, within
which negative expressions correspond with users’ well-
being. Finally, research has shown that different online SNS
have different user characteristics and usage patterns.
Therefore, it is important to examine if the ﬁndings can
generalize to other types of SNS and user groups.
The present study reveals the temporal relationship be-
tween emotional expressions in Facebook status updates and
SWB. It showed that users’ negative (but not positive)
emotional expressions in Facebook status updates from the
past 9–10 months were negatively related to their life satis-
faction. These results suggest that both the valence and the
time frame of emotional expressions determine whether
Facebook status updates can accurately reﬂect users’ sub-
jective well-being. The ﬁndings shed light on the character-
istics of online social media and improve the understanding
of how user-generated contents reﬂect users’ psychological
This research was supported by Singapore Ministry of
Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 Grant RGT37/13.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing ﬁnancial interests exist.
¨bler F, Riedl C, Vetter C, et al. (2010) Social connect-
edness on Facebook—an explorative study on status mes-
sage usage. In Proceedings of 16th Americas Conference
on Information Systems. Lima, Peru, Paper 247.
2. Carr CT, Schrok DB, Dauterman P. Speech acts within
Facebook status messages. Journal of Language & Social
Psychology 2012; 31:176–196.
3. Lichterman J. (2014) Facebook teams with Storyful to
highlight news content published on the social network.
FACEBOOK STATUS UPDATES REFLECT SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING 377
(accessed June 21, 2014).
4. Kramer ADI, Chung CK. (2011) Dimensions of self-
expression in Facebook status updates. In Proceedings of
the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and
Social Media. Barcelona, Spain, pp. 169–176.
5. Tov W. Daily experiences and well-being: do memories of
events matter? Cognition & Emotion 2012; 26:1371–1389.
6. Diener E. The remarkable changes in the science of sub-
jective well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science
7. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: subjective
well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied
Psychology: Health & Well-Being 2011; 3:1–43.
8. Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The beneﬁts of frequent
positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psycholo-
gical Bulletin 2005; 131:803–855.
9. Kramer ADI. (2010) An unobtrusive behavioral model of
‘‘gross national happiness.’’ In Proceedings of the SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Atlanta,
GA, pp. 287–290.
10. Wang N, Kosinski M, Stillwell DJ, et al. Can well-being be
measured using Facebook status updates? Validation of
Facebook’s Gross National Happiness Index. Social In-
dicators Research 2014; 115:483–491.
11. Headey B, Wearing A. Personality, life events, and sub-
jective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model.
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1989; 57:731–
12. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, et al. A survey
method for characterizing daily life experience: the day
reconstruction method. Science 2004; 306:1776–1780.
13. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin
14. Rutledge RB, Skandali N, Dayan P, et al. A computational
and neural model of momentary subjective well-being.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America 2014; 111:12252–12257.
15. Suh E, Diener E, Fujita F. Events and subjective well-
being: only recent events matter. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology 1996; 70:1091–1102.
16. Lin H, Tov W, Qiu L. Emotional disclosure on social
networking sites: the role of network structure and psycho-
logical needs. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 41:
17. Bazarova NN, Taft JG, Choi YH, et al. Managing impres-
sions and relationships on Facebook: self-presentational and
relational concerns revealed through the analysis of lan-
guage style. Journal of Language & Social Psychology
18. Qiu L, Lin H, Leung AK, et al. Putting their best foot
forward: emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsy-
chology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:569–
19. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME. (2007) Linguistic
inquiry and word count (LIWC2007). Austin, TX. www
.liwc.net (accessed June 21, 2014).
20. Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, et al. (2007) The
development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007.
Austin, TX. www.liwc.net (accessed June 21, 2014).
21. Chung CK, Pennebaker JW. (2012) Linguistic inquiry and
word count (LIWC): Pronounced ‘‘Luke,’’.and other
useful facts. In McCarthy P, Boonthum C, eds. Applied
natural language processing and content analysis: Identi-
ﬁcation, investigation, and resolution. Hershey, PA: IGI
Global, pp. 206–229.
22. Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. Psychologi-
cal aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves.
Annual Review of Psychology 2003; 54:547–577.
23. Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW. The psychological meaning
of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods.
Journal of Language & Social Psychology 2010; 29:24–54.
24. Tov W, Ng KL, Lin H, et al. Detecting well-being via
computerized content analysis of brief diary entries. Psy-
chological Assessment 2013; 25:1069–1078.
25. Chee B, Berlin R, Schatz B. (2009) Measuring population
health using personal health messages. In Proceedings of
the Annual American Medical Informatics Association
Symposium. San Francisco, CA, pp. 92–96.
26. Yu B, Kaufmann S, Diermeier D. Classifying party afﬁli-
ation from political speech. Journal of Information Tech-
nology & Politics 2008; 5:33–48.
27. Golder SA, Macy MW. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary
with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures.
Science 2011; 333:1878–1881.
28. Qiu L, Lin H, Ramsay J, et al. You are what you tweet:
personality expression and perception on Twitter. Journal
of Research in Personality 2012; 46:710–718.
29. Kosinski M, Stillwell DJ, Graepel T. Private traits and at-
tributes are predictable from digital records of human be-
havior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 2013; 110:5802–5805.
30. Youyou W, Kosinski M, Stillwell D. Computer-based per-
sonality judgments are more accurate than those made by
humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America 2015; 112:1036–1040.
31. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The Satisfaction
With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985;
32. Palmer B, Donaldson C, Stough C. Emotional intelligence
and life satisfaction. Personality & Individual Differences
33. Pavot W, Diener E. The Satisfaction With Life Scale and
the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of
Positive Psychology 2008; 3:137–152.
34. Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the Satisfaction with Life
Scale. Psychological Assessment 1993; 5:164–172.
35. Hayes AF. (2012) PROCESS: a versatile computational tool
for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional
process modeling [White paper]. www.personal.psu.edu/jxb14/
M554/articles/process2012.pdf (accessed June 21, 2014).
36. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for
estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
37. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated
mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions.
Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007; 42:185–227.
38. Kern ML, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, et al. The online
social self: an open vocabulary approach to personality.
Assessment 2014; 21:158–169.
39. Kern ML, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, et al. From ‘‘Sooo
excited!!!’’ to ‘‘So proud’’: using language to study de-
velopment. Developmental Psychology 2014; 50:178–188.
40. Park G, Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, et al. Automatic per-
sonality assessment through social media language. Journal
of Personality & Social Psychology 2015; 108:934–952.
378 LIU ET AL.
41. Kring AM, Gordon AH. Sex differences in emotion: ex-
pression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Person-
ality & Social Psychology 1998; 74:686–703.
42. Larsen RJ, Ketelaar T. Personality and susceptibility to
positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Person-
ality & Social Psychology 1991; 61:132–140.
43. Rapson Gomez, Andre Gomez, Cooper A. Neuroticism and
extraversion as predictors of negative and positive emotional
information processing: comparing Eysenck’s, Gray’s, and
Newman’s theories. European Journal of Personality 2002;
44. Watson D, Clark LA. On traits and temperament: general
and speciﬁc factors of emotional experience and their re-
lation to the ﬁve-factor model. Journal of Personality 1992;
45. Qiu L, Lin H, Leung AK-Y. Cultural differences and
switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American
(Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2013; 44:106–121.
46. Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT. A review of Face-
book research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psy-
chological Science 2012; 7:203–220.
Address correspondence to:
Prof. Lin Qiu
Division of Psychology
Nanyang Technological University
14 Nanyang Drive
FACEBOOK STATUS UPDATES REFLECT SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING 379