Content uploaded by Brandon S Shaw
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Brandon S Shaw on Aug 11, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Analysis
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, August 2015, Vol 22, No 8 385
Resistance exercise is medicine:
Strength training in health
promotion and rehabilitation
The benets of aerobic training in health promotion are well documented, and this mode of exercise
training continues to be the gold standard for health professionals when prescribing exercise
programmes. However, resistance training has a wealth of unique benets over those of aerobic
training. It is these unique benets that demonstrate the necessary role of resistance training in health
promotion. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that resistance training is equally, and in some
cases superior, to aerobic training in its health-promoting benets, such as the increasing and/or
maintenance of lean body mass and bone mineral density. As such, resistance training should
be considered an integral component, along with aerobic and exibility training, in any exercise
programme designed to promote health in all populations. However, it is essential for health
professionals to understand and differentiate the subtypes of resistance training as these will have
different impacts on sports performance, health promotion and rehabilitation.
Key words: ■ Health ■ Strength training ■ Weight training ■ Wellness
Submitted 5 May 2015; sent back for revisions 20 May 2015; accepted for publication following double-blind peer review 9 June 2015
Brandon S Shaw, Ina Shaw, Gregory A Brown
Numerous studies have demonstrated
the benefits of aerobic training in
health promotion, and this mode of
exercise training, usually in the form
of walking, continues to be the gold standard
for health professionals when prescribing
exercise programmes for their clientele or
patients (Westcott et al, 2009). Exercise
prescriptions that focus solely on aerobic
exercise are problematic in that resistance
training has been shown to have a wealth of
unique benets over those of aerobic training
(Shaw and Shaw, 2005; Phillips, 2007). In
addition, adherence to exclusively aerobic
exercise results in its own complications, such
as the inability of aerobic training to reverse
or halt the 4–6 pound (1.8–2.6 kg) loss in lean
body mass and conc om itant 2–3% loss in
resting metabolic rate per decade associated
with normal ageing (Westcott et al, 2009).
However, as resistance training has until
recently received little attention for its value in
health promotion, the majority of literature on
the health benefits following aerobic training
has continued to make this mode of exercise
the foremost focus of the physical activity
guidelines governing the majority of major
health organisations (Phillips and Winett, 2010).
These endorsements continue to ensure that
health professionals prescribe evidence-based
programmes of mainly aerobic-type exercise.
This omission and the inferior status awarded
to resistance training in such guidelines is also
usually interpreted as a lack of importance of
resistance training, especially when designing
exercise programmes for health promotion and
rehabilitation. Thus, the aim of this article is to:
■ Demonstrate that resistance training is equally,
and in some cases superior, to aerobic training
in its health-promoting benets
■ Motivate health professionals to make use of
resistance training, either alone or in combina-
tion with other modes of exercise.
Types of resistance training
It is typically believed that high loads and low
repetitions are best to increase muscular strength,
while lower loads and higher repetitions are
best to increase muscle endurance. Phillips and
Winett (2010) argue that it is this type of over-
simplication of resistance training programme
design that has depreciated resistance training
as inferior to aerobic training and led to cardio-
centric research in health promotion. A large
number of studies whose results formulate the
basis for current resistance training programmes
were conducted during the 1950s and 1960s
further obscure the potential health benets that
could be attained following resistance training
(Feigenbaum and Pollock, 1999).
In the past, in most cases, training designs
that resulted in improvements in strength,
Brandon S Shaw,
Professor, Department
of Sport and Movement
Studies, Faculty of Health
Sciences, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa;
Ina Shaw,
Research manager,
Monash University
(South Africa Campus)
and visiting full
professor, Department
of Sport and Movement
Studies, Faculty of Health
Sciences, University of
Johannesburg, South Africa;
Gregory A Brown,
Professor, Department
of Kinesiology and Sport
Sciences, University of
Nebraska, Kearney, USA.
Correspondence to:
Brandon S Shaw
Email:
brandons@uj.ac.za
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd
Analysis
386 International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, August 2015, Vol 22, No 8
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd
Analysis
muscle endurance and/or muscle hypertrophy
spread quickly and became accepted globally.
In contrast, programme designs that did not
result in improvements in strength, muscle
endurance and/or muscle hypertrophy were
lost. This is problematic in that such designs
may have proved effective in other contexts, for
example, in the promotion of health. Further,
at the infancy of resistance training studies,
it was not easy to distinguish successful from
unsuccessful training practices, primarily
because it was difficult to clearly define the
parameters of training. Precursors of resistance
training also did not have at their disposal the
sophisticated equipment that is available today
(Stojiljkovic et al, 2013).
While resistance training (or weight training)
is commonly called strength training, this term
is a misnomer. Just as aerobic training can take
the guise of long slow distance training, interval
training and fartlek or ‘speed play’ training,
resistance training can take the guise of strength
training, power training, hypertrophy training,
and/or muscular strength training (Baechle et
al, 2008). As resistance training encompasses
a myriad of subtypes of exercise, it is essential
for health professionals to understand and
differentiate between these subtypes as they
have different impacts on sports performance,
health promotion and rehabilitation, specically
(Baechle et al, 2008):
■ Strength training requires training at a load
of 85% or more of one repetition maximum
(1RM) for 6 or less repetitions of 2–6 sets with
rest periods of 2–5 minutes
■ Power (single-effort) training requires training
at a load of 80–90% 1RM performed at
maximum speed for 1–2 repetitions of 3–5sets
with rest periods of 2–5 minutes
■ Power (multiple-effort) training requires
training at a load of 75–85% 1RM performed
at maximum speed for 3–5 repetitions of
3–5sets with rest periods of 2–5 minutes
■ Hypertrophy training requires training at
a load of 67–85% 1RM for 6–12 repetitions
of 3–6 sets with rest periods of 30 seconds to
1.5minutes
■ Muscular endurance training requires
resistance training at a load of 67% or less of
1RM for 12 or more repetitions of 2–3 sets
with rest periods of 30 seconds or less.
It is critical that the health professional utilise
the most recent evidence for effective resistance
training in different populations (i.e. children,
adults, the elderly) and/or different conditions
(i.e. cardiopulmonary disease, cerebral palsy)
when designing resistance training programmes.
However, it must be noted that numerous
other factors can be manipulated within the
resistance training programme design that could
affect its effectiveness. These include, inter
alia, time under tension, order of exercise, total
training volume (Phillips and Winett, 2010),
mode of resistance training (i.e. free weight
vs variable resistance machines), and type of
movement (i.e. isotonic, isokinetic or isometric)
(Feigenbaum and Pollock, 1999).
LITERATURE REVIEW
Until recently, there has been insufficient
evidence to support the role of resistance training
in health promotion or the prevention of disease
(Hurley et al, 2011). While evidence now
exists to support the role of resistance training
in improving risk factors for specic diseases,
no studies have provided a comprehensive
assessment of resistance training, as compared to
aerobic training, as a tool for health promotion.
However, what is clear about the essential and
necessary role of resistance training in health
promotion is that resistance training, compared
with aerobic training, has the ability to decrease
fat mass (especially abdominal and visceral
fat) (Shaw et al, 2010a; Westcott, 2012), while
simultaneously increasing lean body mass. This
can occur even in the absence of changes in the
dietary intake of total kilocalories, carbohydrates,
proteins and fats (Shaw et al, 2008). The increase
in lean body mass is especially important in
the ever-increasing ageing population, which
typically loses 4–6 pounds (1.8–2.6 kg) of lean
body mass per decade (Westcott et al, 2009).
Age-related progressive loss in lean body mass
is also associated with a 2–3% loss in resting
metabolic rate per decade, which results in a
further increase in fat mass and dyslipidemia and
reduced insulin sensitivity (Hunter et al, 2004).
Furthermore, resistance training, and not
aerobic training, may increase bone mineral
density by as much as 1–3% (Westcott et al,
2009). Resistance training has also been shown
to improve cardiovascular health by:
■ Reducing resting blood pressure (Shaw et al,
2010b)
■ Improving lipoprotein-lipid profiles and/or
dyslipidemia (i.e. decreasing low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol)
■ Decreasing triglycerides
■ Increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(Shaw et al, 2011; Williams et al, 2011)
■ Reducing cardiovascular demands to physical
activity (Kraemer et al, 2002a).
Analysis
Analysis
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, August 2015, Vol 22, No 8 387
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd
Resistance training should also form an
integral part of any exercise guideline or
programme for health promotion since this mode
of training has the unique ability to improve
muscle metabolic properties that may assist in
the management and/or prevention of type 2
diabetes by decreasing visceral fat, reducing
HbA1c levels, increasing the density of glucose
transporter type 4, and improving insulin
sensitivity (Bweir et al, 2009; Westcott, 2012).
Resistance training is critical for reducing the
risk of falls, especially in the elderly (Phillips,
2007), and has also been shown to reverse
specific ageing factors in skeletal muscle (i.e.
sarcopenia) and reduce the risk and severity of
musculoskeletal injuries (Shaw and Shaw, 2014).
In terms of musculoskeletal health promotion,
resistance training has proven effective for
reducing low back pain and easing discomfort,
inflammation, muscle weakness and fatigue
associated with arthritis and fibromyalgia
(Hurley et al, 2011; Westcott, 2012).
Resistance training has further proved essential
in improving and promoting (Hunter et al, 2004;
Phillips, 2007; Westcott, 2012):
■ Physical performance
■ Movement control
■ Walking speed
■ Functional independence
■ Cognitive abilities
■ Self-esteem
■ Participation in spontaneous physical activity.
However, although there is no evidence that
resistance training can reverse any of the major
biological or behavioural outcomes of diseases,
such as cerebral palsy (Verschuren et al, 2011)
or Alzheimer’s disease, there is increasing
evidence to suggest that the prevalence of these
conditions is inversely associated with muscle
mass and strength (Hurley et al, 2007), further
presenting the need for resistance training
in promoting mental health. While it has been
found that increased cardiorespiratory fitness
has been linked to a larger prefrontal cortex,
resistance training may specifically help
individuals who already have a condition known
as mild cognitive impairment delay the onset of
dementia (Liu-Ambrose and Donaldson, 2009).
These researchers highlight an underappreciated
aspect of resistance training in promoting overall
physical and mental health.
A PARADIGM SHIFT
Much as the public health message regarding
aerobic exercise has embraced simple acts of
low-to-moderate intensity activity, there is a need
for resistance exercise to be viewed as essential,
effective, and easy to do.
Due to the ever-mounting evidence for
the use and/or inclusion of resistance training
in holistic exercise programmes, major health
organisations, such as the American College
of Sports Medicine (ACSM), have developed
resistance training guidelines (ACSM, 2009).
In this regard, the ACSM’s minimum exercise
guidelines recommends performing one set of
8–12 repetitions resistance of training exercises
that train the major muscle groups twice weekly
(hypertrophy-type training), in addition to
20 minutes of aerobic training thrice weekly.
However, research on the efficacy of these
recommendations has been minimal (Westcott et
al, 2009) and, as stated earlier, since resistance
training has received little attention, aerobic
training has evidently continued to be the
foremost focus in such guidelines.
Even when resistance training does not prove
superior to that of aerobic training in promoting
health, evidence for at least the equal inclusion
of resistance training along with aerobic training
in health promotion is becoming increasingly
convincing (Pitsavos et al, 2009; Shaw et
al, 2010b). Although it is supposed that an
interference effect exists when combining
aerobic and resistance exercises in athletes,
but not in the general population (Shaw et al,
2009), increasing evidence is becoming available
for the use of comprehensive programmes
that combine aerobic training and resistance
training. Concurrent training has previously been
shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in
previously sedentary individuals (Shaw et al,
2010b). However, further research is needed
on the effect of concurrent training on health
promotion since Wallace et al (1997) and Pierson
et al (2001) did not find positive changes in
lipoprotein lipids and blood pressure following
their concurrent training programmes.
Having said this, it seems that the type of
aerobic training performed with resistance
training may result in different effects. For
example, when resistance training is performed
concurrently with running, but not cycling,
significant decrements can be found in both
hypertrophy and strength (Wilson et al, 2012).
When researching the effect of or designing
such concurrent resistance and aerobic exercise
training programmes, both researchers and
health professionals need to be mindful that
the time commitments for these concurrent
programmes, whether performed on the same
day or alternate days, should not exceed single
Analysis
388 International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, August 2015, Vol 22, No 8
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd
Analysis
modality resistance training or aerobic training
programmes as this may limit the potential
impact of health promotion and adherence rates
to exercise programmes (Bosy-Westphal et al,
2004; Shaw et al, 2009). Interestingly, Heyward
(1997) previously pointed out that individuals
adhere to an exercise programme more readily
when that programme is deemed enjoyable.
The good news is that performing a resistance
training session that meets the ACSM guidelines
should only take 20–30 minutes (Phillips
and Ziuraitis, 2004), which is similar to the
recommended duration for aerobic exercise.
Further, it is critical to note that even though
resistance training benefits can be safely
obtained by most segments of the population
(Hass et al, 2001), resistance training prog-
rammes and guidelines by their very nature
and design have been developed separately to
promote or restore health in:
■ Healthy adults who are either sedentary or
physically active (Kraemer et al, 2002b)
■ Young people (Faigenbaum et al, 2009)
■ The elderly (Willoughby, 2014)
■ Patients with cardiopulmonary disease
(Pollock et al, 2000).
In many educational and clinical contexts,
resistance training is reputed to be made up of
dangerous activities, such as weightlifting,
especially in special populations such as
children. However, there is no statistically
convincing evidence that resistance training is
particularly hazardous. In fact, the overwhelming
impression from the surveys and literature is
that resistance training is markedly safer than
many other sports, certainly when supervised by
qualied health professionals (Hamill, 1994).
When it comes to resistance training
and health promotion, heavier is not better
(Phillips and Winett, 2010) and the aim
(i.e.improvement in blood pressure) and target
population (youth vs elderly) of the resistance
training programme must be clearly dened. As
such, proper resistance training design that uses
progressive overload, variation, and specicity
is essential to maximise the health benets of
resistance training.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the relative lack of promotion of
resistance training compared with aerobic
training as a mainstream mode of exercise for
health promotion, a central tenet of this article
is that resistance training is equal, and in some
cases superior, in its health-promoting and
cardiopulmonary benets to aerobic training. In
recent years, this tenet has been gaining support
among researchers and health professionals, with
compelling evidence suggesting that resistance
training should assume a position at least equal
to that of aerobic training when designing
exercise programmes and/or developing physical
activity guidelines.
In view of this growing evidence base, it is
hoped that health professionals will be further
motivated to make use of resistance training,
either alone or in combination with other modes
of exercise. In addition, when designing resistance
training programmes, health professionals should
at all times consider the complexity of this mode
of exercise and the population, client or patient
for whom the programme is designed for. IJTR
Conict of interest: none declared.
American College of Sports Medicine (2009) American
College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression
models in resistance training for healthy adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(3): 687–708. doi: 10.1249/
MSS.0b013e3181915670
Baechle TR, Earle RW, Wathen D (2008) Resistance train-
ing. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW, eds. Essentials of Strength
Training and Conditioning. 3rd edn. Human Kinetics,
Champaign, IL: 381–412
Bosy-Westphal A, Reinecke U, Schlörke T, Illner K, Kutzner
D, Heller M, Müller MJ (2004) Effect of organ and tis-
sue masses on resting energy expenditure in underweight,
normal weight and obese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab
Disord 28(1): 72–9
Bweir S, Al-Jarrah M, Almalty AM, Maayah M, Smirnova
IV, Novikova L, Stehno-Bittel L (2009) Resistance exer-
cise training lowers HbA1c more than aerobic training in
adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 1: 27.
doi:10.1186/1758-5996-1-27
Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJ et al (2009) Youth
resistance training: updated position statement paper
from the national strength and conditioning association.
J Strength Cond Res 23(5 Suppl): S60–79. doi: 10.1519/
JSC.0b013e31819df407
Feigenbaum MS, Pollock ML (1999) Prescription of resist-
ance training for health and disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc
31(1): 38–45
Hamill BP (1994) Relative safety of weightlifting and weight
training. J Strength Cond Res 8(1): 53–7
Hass CJ, Feigenbaum MS, Franklin BA (2001) Prescription
of resistance training for healthy populations. Sports Med
31(14): 953–64
Heyward VH (1997) Advanced Fitness Assessment and
Exercise Prescription. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
Hunter GR, McCarthy JP, Bamman MM (2004) Effects of
resistance training on older adults. Sports Med 34(5): 329–48
Hurley BF, Hanson ED, Sheaff AK (2011) Strength training
as a countermeasure to aging muscle and chronic disease.
Sports Med 41(4): 289–306. doi: 10.2165/11585920-
000000000-00000
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, French DN (2002a) Resistance
training for health and performance. Curr Sports Med Rep
1(3): 165–71
Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E et al (2002b) American
College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression
models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 34(2): 364–80
Liu-Ambrose T, Donaldson MG (2009) Exercise and cogni-
tion in older adults: Is there a role for resistance training
programmes? Br J Sports Med 43(1): 25–7. doi: 10.1136/
bjsm.2008.055616
Analysis
Analysis
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, August 2015, Vol 22, No 8 389
© 2015 MA Healthcare Ltd
Phillips SM (2007) Resistance exercise: good for more than
just Grandma and Grandpa’s muscles. Appl Physiol Nutr
Metab 32(6): 1198–205
Phillips SM, Winett RA (2010) Uncomplicated resistance
training and health-related outcomes: Evidence for a pub-
lic health mandate. Curr Sports Med Rep 9(4): 208–13.
doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181e7da73
Phillips WT, Ziuraitis JR (2004) Energy cost of single-set
resistance training in older adults. J Strength Cond Res
18(3): 606–9
Pierson LM, Herbert WG, Norton HJ et al (2001) Effects
of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aero-
bic training alone in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm
Rehabil 21(2): 101–10
Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Tambalis KD et al (2009)
Resistance exercise plus to aerobic activities is associated
with better lipids’ prole among healthy individuals: the
ATTICA study. QJM 102(9): 609–16. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/
hcp083
Pollock ML, Franklin BA, Balady GJ et al (2000) Resistance
exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular
disease: Benefits, rationale, safety, and prescription an
advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation,
and Prevention, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American
Heart Association. Circulation 101: 828–33. doi:
10.1161/01.CIR.101.7.828
Shaw BS, Shaw I (2005) Effect of resistance training on car-
diorespiratory endurance and coronary artery disease risk:
Cardiovascular topics. Cardiovasc J S Afr 16(5): 200–4
Shaw BS, Shaw I, Brown GA (2008) Self-reported dietary
intake following endurance, resistance and concurrent
endurance and resistance training. J Sports Sci Med 7(2):
255–9.
Shaw BS, Shaw I, Brown GA (2009) Comparison of resist-
ance and concurrent resistance and endurance training
regimes in the development of strength. J Strength Cond
Res 23(9): 2507–14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bc191e
Shaw BS, Shaw I, Mamen A (2010a) Contrasting effects in
anthropometric measures of total fatness and abdominal
fat mass following endurance and concurrent endurance
and resistance training. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 50(2):
207–13
Shaw I, Shaw BS, Brown GA, Cilliers JF (2010b) Concurrent
resistance and aerobic training as protection against heart
disease. Cardiovasc J Afr 21(4): 196–9
Shaw BS, Shaw I, Goon DT (2011) Resistance training and
blood lipid regulation: A review of the evidence. Med
Sport 64(4): 511–21
Shaw I, Shaw BS (2014) Resistance training and the preven-
tion of sports injuries. In: Hopkins G, ed. Sports Injuries:
Prevention, Management and Risk Factors. Nova Science,
New York: 123–36
Stojiljkovic N, Ignjatovic A, Savic Z, Markovic, Z, Milanovic
S (2013) History of resistance training. Activities in
Physical Education and Sport 3(1): 135–8
Verschuren O, Ada L, Maltais DB, Gorter JW, Scianni A,
Ketelaar M (2011) Muscle strengthening in children and
adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy: Considerations
for future resistance training protocols. Phys Ther 91(7):
1130–9. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100356
Wallace MB, Mills BD, Browning CL (1997) Effects of
cross-training on markers of insulin resistance/hyperin-
sulinemia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(9): 1170–5
Westcott WL, Winett RA, Annesi JJ, Wojcik JR, Anderson
ES, Madden PJ (2009) Prescribing physical activity:
Applying the ACSM protocols for exercise type, intensity,
and duration across 3 training frequencies. Phys Sportsmed
37(2): 51–8. doi: 10.3810/psm.2009.06.1709
Westcott WL (2012) Resistance training is medicine: Effects
of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep 11(4):
209–16. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825dabb8
Williams AD, Almond J, Ahuja KD, Beard DC, Robertson
IK, Ball MJ (2011) Cardiovascular and metabolic effects
of community based resistance training in an older pop-
ulation. J Sci Med Sport 14(4): 331–7. doi: 10.1016/j.
jsams.2011.02.011
Willoughby DS (2014) Resistance training and the older
adult. American College of Sports Medicine Current
Comment. http://acsm.org/docs/current-comments/resistan-
cetrainingandtheoa.pdf (accessed 1 July 2015)
Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, Wilson SM, Loenneke JP,
Anderson JC (2012) Concurrent training: A meta-analysis
examining interference of aerobic and resistance exer-
cises. J Strength Cond Res 26(8): 2293–307. doi: 10.1519/
JSC.0b013e31823a3e2d
■ Findings unequivocally indicate that resistance training is safe for most
segments of the population, especially when supervised by qualied
healthprofessionals
■ Health professionals must utilise the most recent evidence for effective
resistance training in different populations and/or different conditions when
designing resistance training programmes
■ Resistance training is equally, and in some cases superior, to aerobic training
in its health-promoting benets
■ Health professionals should make use of resistance training, either alone or
in combination with other modes of aerobic exercise to maximise the unique
benets of each for their patients.
Key poInTs
Support and care for patients with long-term conditions
Helen McVeigh
n Each chapter presents learning points, using a re ective approach
n Essential guide to long-term conditions, exploring the key principles of practice,
skills and policy
n Case history examples included to illustrate issues discussed
ISBN-13: 978-1-85642-392-2; 234 x 156 mm; paperback; 280 pages; publication 2010; £24.99
Order your copies by visiting
www.quaybooks.co.uk
or call our Hotline
+44(0)1722 716 935
Support and care for patients with long-term conditions
Fundamental Aspects of Nursing series
Fundamental Aspects of
Long-Term Conditions
Edited by Helen McVeigh
Fundamental Aspects of Long-Term Conditions
Edited by Helen McVeigh
9 781856423922
ISBN 1-85642-392-1
www.quaybooks.co.uk
About the book
Providing support and care for individuals with a long-term condition is an essential feature of modern
health care. Over 15 million people in England currently have a long-term condition, and it is predicted that
these numbers will continue to rise. Treating the range of long-term conditions that affect the population
will therefore play an important role for health professionals. This book is an essential guide to long-term
conditions, exploring the key principles of practice, skills and policy. The chapters in this book can be read
as stand-alone chapters, or the book can be read in sequence. Full references are provided.
Like other books in this series, Fundamental Aspects of Long-Term Conditions provides a succinct, useful
basis from which both student nurses and adult nurses can extend their knowledge and skills.
About the author
Helen McVeigh is a Senior Lecturer in Primary Care at De Montfort University Leicester. She is a qualif ied
District Nurse. She has over 20 years experience of working in Primary Care working in both rural and inner
city practices.
Other titles in the Fundamental Aspects of Nursing series:
Series Editor: John Fowler
Children & Young Peoples Nursing Procedures
Community Nursing
Complementary therapies
Finding Information
Mental Health Nursing
Nursing Adults with Respiratory Disorders
Nursing the Acutely Ill Adult
Pain Assessment & Management
Palliative Care Nursing 2nd edition
Research for Nurses
FA LTCs cover.indd 1 18/1/10 12:38:13
