ArticlePDF Available

Muscle Activation Pattern During Isometric Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise in Different Shoulder Angle-Positions_2015

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

OBJECTIVE: To investigate muscle activation of the shoulder extensors and trunk stabilizers by surface electromyography (sEMG) activity during the isometric Ab Wheel Rollout exercise in different shoulder joint positions. METHOD: We recruited 8 young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25 ± 3 years, height: 178 ± 5 cm, and total body mass: 81 ± 2 kg). All subjects performed two sets of 10 sec. maximal isometric contractions of the Ab Wheel Rollout exercise keeping the knees fixed on the floor and the arms taut. To perform the exercise, all subjects were randomly assessed in the following three positions related to the angle between the arms and trunk, in random order: arms aligned vertically with the Ab Wheel Rollout exercise (neutral); 90º and 150º. A rest period of 5 minutes was provided between tests. The sEMG signals were recorded in the following muscles: Latissimus Dorsi; Pectoralis Major; Erector Spinae; Rectus Abdominis. RESULTS: There were significant increases in Rectus Abdominis muscle activity between: neutral vs. 90º, neutral vs. 150º and 90º vs. 150º. There was a significant increase in Pectoralis Major muscle activity between neutral x 150º. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that (a) Ab Wheel Rollout exercise emphasizes the muscle action of the Pectoralis Major and Rectus Abdominis more than the Latissimus Dorsi and Erector Spinae; (b) the level of muscle activation depends on the external force created by the body mass and lever arm from the center of mass.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Muscle Activation Pattern During Isometric Ab Wheel
Rollout Exercise in Dierent Shoulder Angle-Positions
Paulo Henrique MarchettiI,II, Brad J. SchoenfeldIII, Josinaldo Jarbas da SilvaI, Mauro Antonio GuiseliniI, Fabio Sisconeto
de FreitasI, Silvio Luiz PecoraroI, Willy Andrade GomesI, Charles Ricardo LopesI,IV
DOI: 10.5935/MedicalExpress.2015.04.04
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
I Methodist University of Piracicaba, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
II University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, Institute of Orthopedics and Trauma-tology, Laboratory of Kinesiology, São Paulo, Brazil
III The City University of New York, Lehman College, Department of Health Sciences, Program of Exercise Science, Bronx, NY, USA.
IV Adven-tist Faculty of Hortolândia, Hortolândia, Brazil
OBJECTIVE: To investigate muscle activation of the shoulder extensors and trunk stabilizers by surface
electromyography (sEMG) activity during the isometric Ab Wheel Rollout exercise in dierent shoulder joint positions.
METHOD: We recruited 8 young, healthy, resistance trained men (age: 25 ± 3 years, height: 178 ± 5 cm, and total
body mass: 81 ± 2 kg). All subjects performed two sets of 10 sec. maximal isometric contractions of the Ab Wheel
Rollout exercise keeping the knees xed on the oor and the arms taut. To perform the exercise, all subjects were
randomly assessed in the following three positions related to the angle between the arms and trunk, in random
order: arms aligned vertically with the Ab Wheel Rollout exercise (neutral); 90° and 150°. A rest period of 5 minutes
was provided between tests. The sEMG signals were recorded in the following muscles: Latissimus Dorsi; Pectoralis
Major; Erector Spinae; Rectus Abdominis.
RESULTS: There were signicant increases in Rectus Abdominis muscle activity between: neutral x 90°, neutral x
150° and 90° x 150°. There was a signicant increase in Pectoralis Major muscle activity between neutral x 150°.
CONCLUSIONS: The present ndings indicate that (a) Ab Wheel Rollout exercise emphasizes the muscle action
of the Pectoralis Major and Rectus Abdominis more than the Latissimus Dorsi and Erector Spinae; (b) the level of
muscle activation depends on the external force created by the body mass and lever arm from the center of mass.
KEYWORDS: Biomechanics; Exercise performance; Functional exercise.
Marchetti PH, Schoenfeld BJ, Silva JJ, Guiselini MA, Freitas FS, Pecoraro SL, Gomes WA, Lopes CR. Muscle Activation Pattern During Isometric
Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise in Dierent Shoulder An-gle-Positions. MEDICALEXPRESS. 2015;2(4)M150404
Received for Publication on June 5, 2015; First review on June 25, 2015; Accepted for publication on July 7, 2015
E-mail: dr.pmarchetti@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
Among the many different variables in resistance
training, exercise choice is one of the most important
for achieving the aims of the program.1 In addition, it

  2 thereby potentially mediating

exercise can generate mechanical and physiological


 

Copyright © 2015 MEDICALEXPRESS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution
Non-Commercial License (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
3

 9,10
1112,13
    


     
 

  
11,14  
 

10,11,13,   

2
MEDICALEXPRESS 2015 August;2(4):M150404 sEMG during Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise
Marchetti PH
   

21


   
    

 

   
  




11,22








    



    



    



 


  
  

  


Data analyses
   
 


   
  
 11  


   



exercise can be mechanically compared to the static prone

,19

 


    

commonly performed exercise. Therefore, the aim of the




METHODS
Subjects

data     
      
   20
   

 









Procedures




they reported to have refrained from performing any





3
MEDICALEXPRESS 2015 August;2(4):M150404sEMG during Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise
Marchetti PH
Figure 1 - Ab Wheel Rollout exercise: (A) neutral position; (B) 90 degrees position; and (C) 150 degrees position.
       
  


Statistical Analysis


 

  


  
23
     
      
  24

RESULTS
  
    
  p
p = 


p 
p 
p 
   
p 

DISCUSSION

 
    
Figure 2 - Mean ± standard deviation of the IEMG from Rectus Abdominis (Rectus
Abdominis), Erectus Spinae (ES), Pectoralis Major (Pectoralis Major) and Latissimus
Dorsi (Latissimus Dorsi) during isometric Ab Wheel Rollout exercise for dierent
extension shoulder angle-positions (neutral, 90 degrees and 150 degrees) * Signicant
dierence, p < 0.05.



21 In this position, the lever arm is minimal







   





   


by the body mass and lever arm from center of mass,
  
  

 
4
MEDICALEXPRESS 2015 August;2(4):M150404 sEMG during Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise
Marchetti PH



11

  
 

  
   
   
    
  

   
  

   


2519
Tong et al.   
  




  vs.   
2519
  
    
25
     vs. 10.23%
 
19
vs.

  





   
  
into program design.
CONCLUSION
 



   



by the body mass and lever arm from the center of mass.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
(Laboratório 
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:
   

   
  


revision.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
   

PADRÃO ISOMÉTRICO DE ATIVAÇÃO MUSCULAR
DURANTE O EXERCÍCIO AB WHEEL ROLLOUT EM
DIFERENTES POSIÇÕES DO COMPLEXO ARTICU
LAR DO OMBRO
OBJETIVO:

 

     
Ab Wheel Rollout.
MÉTODO:  


    
 Ab Wheel Rollout, e mantiveram



na vertical e alinhado ao eixo do Ab Wheel Rollout




RESULTADOS:    
  

5
MEDICALEXPRESS 2015 August;2(4):M150404sEMG during Ab Wheel Rollout Exercise
Marchetti PH
   


  



  

       


  




 











        
2013.
   
 


  






     


CONCLUSÕES:
Ab Wheel Rollout 



corporal e braço de alavanca do centro de massa.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE:

REFERENCES
 

 



   


 


 


 
 

 


  
      

... Kneeling rollout is considered a core exercise [22][23][24] that can be performed using suspension devices. The use of an ab wheel [25][26][27], a Swiss ball [28,29], a suspension device [30,31], and placing the hands on the ground while maintaining their position [31] have been reported in the literature. All these authors analysed the core muscles, obtaining the highest values for the rectus abdominis, closely followed by the external oblique, and much lower values for the lumbar paraspinal muscles. ...
... The infraspinatus has also shown significant differences in both vibratory conditions compared to non-vibration, with a small effect at 25 Hz (d = 0.62, CI: 0.03; 1.22) and 40 Hz (d = 0.46, CI: −0.13; 1.05) (Table 1). Similarly, Grant and associates [14] reported significant differences when performing triceps dips on a vibrating platform at 35 Hz, whereas muscle activity was moderate (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) in the present study. Moreover, Grant and associates [14] reported moderate (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) and high activation (41-60% MVIC) when performing triceps dips and isometric shoulder flexion with vibration, respectively. ...
... Similarly, Grant and associates [14] reported significant differences when performing triceps dips on a vibrating platform at 35 Hz, whereas muscle activity was moderate (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) in the present study. Moreover, Grant and associates [14] reported moderate (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) and high activation (41-60% MVIC) when performing triceps dips and isometric shoulder flexion with vibration, respectively. However, when performing press-ups, the activation was low (<21% MVIC). ...
Article
Full-text available
Training using instability devices is common; however, for highly trained athletes, a single device may not provide sufficient challenge. This study examines the effect of superimposed vibration in suspended kneeling rollout. Seventeen physically active participants performed the exercise with non-vibration, vibration at 25 Hz, and vibration at 40 Hz. Muscle activation of the pectoralis clavicularis, pectoralis sternalis, anterior deltoid, serratus anterior, infraspinatus, and latissimus dorsi was recorded during exercise, and the perception of effort was recorded after exercise (OMNI-Res scale). One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences for the kneeling rollout (p < 0.05). Friedman’s test showed significant differences in the OMNI-Res (p = 0.003). Pairwise comparison showed significant differences in the anterior deltoid (p = 0.004), latissimus dorsi (p < 0.001), infraspinatus (p = 0.001), and global activity (p < 0.001) between the 25 Hz and non-vibration conditions. It also showed significant differences between the 40 Hz and non-vibration conditions for pectoralis sternalis (p = 0.021), anterior deltoid (p = 0.005), latissimus dorsi (p < 0.001), infraspinatus (p = 0.027), and global activity (p < 0.001). The post hoc Conover pairwise comparison showed significant differences in the OMNI-Res only between the non-vibration and vibration at 40 Hz conditions (p = 0.011). Superimposed vibration increases the muscle activation of the upper limbs when performing the suspended kneeling rollout.
... Several studies have reported greater myoelectric activation of the PM when compared to the LD for the PO exercise [with dumbbell (2,3), straight bar (3,12,13), and W bar (1)] in dynamic contractions. On the other hand, no study was found comparing PM and LD for PW exercise. ...
... It is possible to assume that the myoelectric activation is angle-dependent and pennate muscles like PM and LD have an oblique disposition of their fibers in relation to the tendon (7). In this way, the myoelectric activation and the capacity to produce force can be affected by the disposition of the muscle fibers, as well as by the joint position throughout the movement cycle (12,13). However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no study comparing force production and myoelectric activation between both exercises in similar mechanical conditions. ...
... The results of this study corroborated the main hypothesis that all muscle groups around the shoulder joint were affected by the joint position. Previous studies have shown that the myoelectric activation of the PM and LD varied according to the direction of the external load in relation to the shoulder joint position for shoulder extension exercises (Pullover and Ab Wheel Rollout) (12,13). According to Hamil et al., (8) pennate muscles have fibers that advance diagonally in relation to the tendon, thus, the maximal myoelectric activation might be affected by the shoulder joint position. ...
Article
Full-text available
International Journal of Exercise Science 15(4): 797-807, 2022 The aim of the present study was to compare the myoelectric activation and peak force (PF) between pullover (PO) and pulldown (PW) exercises in different shoulder joint positions during maximal isometric contractions (0º, 45º, 90º, 135º, and 180°). Fifteen young, healthy, resistance-trained men were recruited. The participants performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions for each exercise at five shoulder joint positions. The myoelectric activation (iEMG) from pectoralis major (PM); latissimus dorsi (LD); posterior deltoid (PD), and PF were measured. For PF, there were significant main effects for exercise and joint positions (p < 0.001). For iEMG PM, there was significant a main effect for joint positions (p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between exercises and joint positions (p < 0.001). For iEMG LD, there was a significant main effect for joint positions (p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between exercises and joint positions. For iEMG PD, there was a significant main effect for joint positions (p < 0.001). There was no significant interaction between exercises and joint positions. For RPE, there were no significant differences between exercises and joint positions. The study concludes that specific shoulder joint positions affect PF production and iEMG during both exercises. RPE was not affected.
... This corroborates the findings of Marchetti and coauthors [24], who analyzed the roll-out exercise in isometry with an ab wheel at different arm and trunk angles (0º, 90º, and 150º). Their results demonstrated that increasing the angle between the arms and the trunk increases the lever arm and thus the activity of the trunk stabilizer muscles. ...
... Thus, abdominal exercises are often incorporated into resistance training (RT) programs aimed at different objectives such as performance, quality International Journal of Exercise Science http://www.intjexersci.com 539 of life and health, and rehabilitation (2,22,24,25). Superficial muscles like the rectus abdominis (RA) are the main contributors to abdominal exercises (12) and their main functions are to flex the trunk on a fixed pelvis, to flex the pelvis on a fixed trunk (9), or to contribute to trunk stability (28,29,39). Despite the rich scientific literature on muscle recruitment in abdominal exercises (8,(11)(12)(13), studies that evaluated the acute responses and chronic adaptations of the abdominal muscles with different RT strategies of manipulation of volume and intensity are scarce. ...
Article
Full-text available
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate acute dose response of different intensities with total volume equalized during the abdominal crunch exercise on muscle thickness, echo-intensity, peak force, time under tension, total load lifted, and perception of effort in recreationally-trained participants. Fifteen resistance-trained participants (23 ± 3 years) performed the abdominal crunch exercise in one of two different resistance training (RT) protocols in a randomized order: RT4x10RM (4 sets of 10RM / 1-min rest) or RT1x40RM (1 set of 40RM). Muscle thickness (MT), echo- intensity (EI), peak force (PF), time under tension (TUT), total load lifted (TLL), and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) were measured pre-test and post-test (0-min and 15-min). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs (2 x 3) were used to test differences between RT protocols (RT4x10RM and RT1x40RM) and time (pre-test, post-0, and post-15) for MT, EI, and PF. Paired t-test was used to compare RT protocols for sRPE, TLL, and TUT. For MT, there were significant differences for RT4x10RM between pre- x post-0 (p = 0.011), pre- x post-15 (p < 0.001), and post-0 x post-15 (p = 0.02); and for RT1x40RM between pre- x post-0 (p < 0.001) and pre- x post-15 (p = 0.003). For EI, there was a significant difference for RT4x10RM between pre- x post-0 (p = 0.002). For sRPE, there was no significant difference between RT protocols. For TLL and TUT, there were significant differences between RT protocols (p < 0.05). In conclusion, both RT protocols (RT4x10RM and RT1x40RM) induced similar increases in MT but not for EI. TLL and TUT were higher for RT4x10RM. PF and sRPE were similar between RT protocols.
... The surface electrodes were then placed on the URA, LRA, EO, ES, and RF muscles of the right antimere (Table 1 and Figure 1), according to the literature (6,10,11). Before data collection, the volunteers were asked to identify their preferred writing hand, which was considered their dominant arm (18). All volunteers were right-hand dominant. ...
Article
Silva, FHO, Arantes, FJ, Gregorio, FC, Santos, FRA, Fidale, TM, Bérzin, F, Bigaton, DR, and Lizardo, FB. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of the trunk and rectus femoris muscles during traditional crunch and exercise using the 5-minute Shaper device. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-Different training devices are available to trigger greater activation of the abdominal muscles compared with that achieved during traditional abdominal exercises. This study aimed to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the upper and lower rectus abdominis, external oblique abdominis, erector spinae, and rectus femoris (RF) muscles during traditional crunch and exercise using the 5-minute Shaper device. A convenience sample of 15 healthy men (mean ± SD; age: 23.65 ± 4.49 years, body fat percentage: 14.26 ± 3.56%) was selected. All men regularly participated in physical activity. Electromyographic data were collected for 5 repetitions of each abdominal exercise (traditional crunch and exercise using the 5-minute Shaper device at beginner, intermediate, advanced, and extreme levels) in a randomized and counterbalanced manner. Data were collected using simple differential surface electrodes and analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Electromyographic signals were quantified using a root-mean-square analysis and normalized using the maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Traditional crunch produced greater or similar EMG activity in the abdominal muscles and minimized RF activity compared to the 5-minute Shaper device, hence, traditional crunch is preferred for training, especially for individuals with weak abdominal musculature and lower back problems. Therefore, the use of the 5-minute Shaper device may be questioned when it is intended to intensify the activity of the abdominal muscles; however, this apparatus may be used if greater variations in training are desired, depending on individual preferences.
... Prior to data collection, subjects were asked to identify their preferred hand for writing, which was then considered their dominant arm. All subjects were right-hand dominant (MARCHETTI et al., 2015). The electrodes were placed in the following locations: (RA) positioned vertically and fixed in the center of the muscular belly at the midpoint between the xiphoid process of the sternum and umbilical scar, approximately 3 centimeters lateral to the median line and 5 centimeters superior to the umbilical scar; (IO) positioned horizontally and placed two centimeters inferomedial to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), within a triangle confined by the inguinal ligament, lateral border of the rectus sheath, and a line connecting each ASIS; (MF) positioned in the level of the spinous process of the fifth lumbar vertebra approximately 2 to 3 centimeters from the median line of the body; (ES) positioned laterally to the spinous process of the third lumbar vertebra approximately 2 to 3 centimeters from the median line (GARCÍA-VAQUERO et al., 2012;HERMENS;FRERIKS, 1999;HIBBS et al., 2011). ...
Article
The muscle co-contraction is a phenomenon characterized by the simultaneous contraction of two or more muscles around a joint. The objective of this study was to compare the antagonist co-contraction of the local and global trunk muscles during side bridge exercise, in four situations: (a) stable; (b) instability in the upper limbs with bosu; (c) instability in the upper limbs with disc and (d) double instability. The sample consisted of 20 male volunteers and data collection was performed with simple differential surface electrodes. The electromyographic activity was collected from the Rectus Abdominis (RA), Internal Oblique Abdominis (IO), Multifidus (MF) and Erector Spinae (ES). Were utilized specific routines developed in the Matlab program (Mathworks Natick, USA) to calculate the percentage of antagonist cocontraction between local (IO/MF) and global muscles (RA/ES). The collected data were submitted to parametric statistical analysis (repeated measures ANOVA) or non-parametric (Friedman). The results demonstrated that no significant differences were observed in the pattern of global and local co contraction in the different side bridge exercises with and without unstable surface. It is concluded that the use of unstable surface in the side bridge stabilization exercise does not increase the level of co-contraction of the trunk flexor and extensor muscles compared to normal stability. However, future studies should use a longer time of isometric contraction in trunk stabilization exercises to optimize the understanding of the effects of different unstable equipment on global and local levels of co-contraction of the trunk muscles.
Article
Full-text available
Electromyographic Activation of Pectoralis Major and Triceps Brachii during Dumbbell Pullover. JEPonline 2021;24(4):1-11. The purpose of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity of pectoralis major (PM), sternal (PMS) and clavicular portions (PMC) and triceps brachii long portion (TB) muscles, with different elbow positions in the dumbbell pullover exercise. Thirteen males participated in this study. Initially, anthropometric measurements and 10 repetition maximum test (10-RM) were performed. After initial tests, on two non-consecutive days separated by 48 hours, the electromyographic signal was collected in the dumbbell pullover exercise with 90% 10-RM load, performed with elbow extension or elbow flexion. In both elbow positions, the electromyographic activation of TB was greater than PMC (P<0.05). However, in relation to PMS, TB showed greater activation with elbow flexion (P = 0.002). Greater activation was found in PMS compared to PMC performed with elbow extension (P = 0.039). It was concluded that TB showed greater muscle activation in the dumbbell pullover exercise, regardless of elbow position. Also, the dumbbell pullover with elbow extension showed greater PMS muscle activation.
Article
Full-text available
Introdução: Inúmeras variações de exercícios têm sido aplicadas nas rotinas de treinamento de força, com o objetivo de otimizar os ganhos de força e hipertrofia e, entre os exercícios usados, podemos destacar o pullover. Objetivo: Comparar a atividade eletromiográfica da parte clavicular do músculo peitoral maior (PMC), parte esternocostal do peitoral maior (PME), cabeça longa do tríceps braquial (TBL), do deltoide anterior (DA), deltoide posterior (DP), latíssimo do dorso (LD) e serrátil anterior (SA) entre os exercícios pullover barra (PB) e pullover haltere (PH). Método: Participaram do estudo 11 homens treinados (idade, 24,50 ± 4,34 anos; percentual de gordura = 13,63 ± 1,94; estatura = 1,76 ± 0,04 m; massa corporal total = 73,12 ± 6,10 kg). A primeira fase do estudo consistiu em avaliações antropométricas e teste e re-teste de 10 repetições máximas (RM). A segunda fase do estudo foi composta pela coleta dos sinais eletromiográficos nos exercícios propostos. Para tal, foi realizada uma série com cargas ajustadas a 90% de 10 RM. Para verificar as diferenças na ativação dos respectivos músculos estudados entre os exercícios PB e PH adotou-se o teste t de Student pareado para amostras dependentes. Resultados: Não foram observadas mudanças na ativação de nenhum dos músculos analisados nos exercícios propostos (P > 0,05). Conclusão: Concluiu-se que a realização do exercício pullover com barra ou com o haltere não altera a participação/ativação dos músculos envolvidos.
Article
Full-text available
While there are multiple studies involving abdominal musculature activation and instability devices (e.g., Swiss balls); there is minimal research comparing them with a suspension device (e.g., TRX®). The purpose of this investigation was to measure the electromyographical activity of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae while performing planks with and without multiple instability devices. Twelve apparently healthy men (n=6, age = 23.92± 3.64 years) and women (n=6, age = 22.57 ± 1.87 years) volunteered to participate in this study. All participants performed two isometric contractions of five different plank variations, with or without an instability device, where the order of the exercises was randomized. Mean peak and normalized electromyography of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and erector spinae musculature were compared across the five exercises. Results indicated that planks performed with the instability devices increased electromyographic activity in the superficial musculature when compared to traditional stable planks. Therefore, a traditional plank performed on a labile device may be considered an advanced variation and appropriate for use when a greater challenge is warranted. However, caution should be taken for those individuals with a previous history or weakness in the lumbar region due to the increases in erector spinae activation during instability planks.
Article
Full-text available
In order to understand the potential selective activation of the rectus abdominis muscle, we conducted two experiments. In the first, subjects performed two controlled isometric exercises: the curl up (supine trunk raise) and the leg raise (supine bent leg raise) at low intensity (in which only a few motor units are recruited). In the second experiment, subjects performed the same exercises, but they were required to maintain a certain force level in order to induce fatigue. We recorded the electromyographic (EMG) activities of the lower and upper portions of the rectus abdominis muscle during the exercises and used spatial-temporal and frequency analyses to describe muscle activation patterns. At low-intensity contractions, the ratio between the EMG intensities of the upper and lower portions during the curl up exercise was significantly larger than during the leg raise exercise (p = 0.02). A cross-correlation analysis indicated that the signals of the abdominal portions were related to each other and this relation did not differ between the tasks (p = 0.12). In the fatiguing condition, fatigue for the upper portion was higher than for the lower portion during the curl up exercise (p = 0.008). We conclude that different exercises evoked, to a certain degree, individualized activation of each part of the rectus abdominis muscle, but different portions of the rectus abdominis muscle contributed to the same task, acting like a functional unit. These results corroborate the relevance of varying exercise to modify activation patterns of the rectus abdominis muscle.
Article
Full-text available
To examine the validity and reliability of a sports-specific endurance plank test for the evaluation of global core muscle function. Repeated-measures study. Laboratory environment. Twenty-eight male and eight female young athletes. Surface electromyography (sEMG) of selected trunk flexors and extensors, and an intervention of pre-fatigue core workout were applied for test validation. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and the measurement bias ratio */÷ ratio limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated to assess reliability and measurement error. Test validity was shown by the sEMG of selected core muscles, which indicated >50% increase in muscle activation during the test; and the definite discrimination of the ∼30% reduction in global core muscle endurance subsequent to a pre-fatigue core workout. For test-retest reliability, when the first attempt of three repeated trials was considered as familiarisation, the ICC was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), CV was 2.0 ± 1.56% and the measurement bias ratio */÷ ratio LOA was 0.99 */÷ 1.07. The findings suggest that the sport-specific endurance plank test is a valid, reliable and practical method for assessing global core muscle endurance in athletes given that at least one familiarisation trial takes place prior to measurement.
Article
Full-text available
This experiment investigated the effects of varying bench inclination and hand spacing on the EMG activity of five muscles acting at the shoulder joint. Six male weight trainers performed presses under four conditions of trunk inclination and two of hand spacing at 80% of their predetermined max. Preamplified surface EMG electrodes were placed over the five muscles in question. The EMG signals during the 2-sec lift indicated some significant effects of trunk inclination and hand spacing. The sternocostal head of the pectoralis major was more active during the press from a horizontal bench than from a decline bench. Also, the clavicular head of the pectoralis major was no more active during the incline bench press than during the horizontal one, but it was less active during the decline bench press. The clavicular head of the pectoralis major was more active with a narrow hand spacing. Anterior deltoid activity tended to increase as trunk inclination increased. The long head of the triceps brachii was more active during the decline and flat bench presses than the other two conditions, and was also more active with a narrow hand spacing. Latissimus dorsi exhibited low activity in all conditions. (C) 1995 National Strength and Conditioning Association
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the current study was to investigate the EMG activity of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles during the pullover exercise. Eight healthy male volunteers took part in the study. The EMG activity of the pectoralis major and that of the latissimus dorsi of the right side were acquired simultaneously during the pullover exercise with a free-weight barbell during both the concentric and eccentric phases of the movement. After a warm-up, all the subjects were asked to perform the pullover exercise against an external load of 30% of their body weight, during 1 set × 10 repetitions. The criterion adopted to normalize the EMG data was the maximal voluntary isometric activation. The present findings demonstrated that the barbell pullover exercise emphasized the muscle action of the pectoralis major more than that of the latissimus dorsi, and the higher activation depended on the external force lever arm produced.
Article
Full-text available
The bench press exercise exists in multiple forms including the machine and free weight bench press. It is not clear though how each mode differs in its effect on muscle activation. The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activation of the anterior deltoid, medial deltoid, and pectoralis major during a Smith machine and free weight bench press at lower (70% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) and higher (90% 1RM) intensities. Normalized electromyography amplitude values were used during the concentric phase of the bench press to compare muscle activity between a free weight and Smith machine bench press. Participants were classified as either experienced or inexperienced bench pressers. Two testing sessions were used, each of which entailed either all free weight or all Smith machine testing. In each testing session, each participant's 1RM was established followed by 2 repetitions at 70% of 1RM and 2 repetitions at 90% of 1RM. Results indicated greater activation of the medial deltoid on the free weight bench press than on the Smith machine bench press. Also, there was greater muscle activation at the 90% 1RM load than at the 70% 1RM load. The results of this study suggest that strength coaches should consider choosing the free weight bench press over the Smith machine bench press because of its potential for greater upper-body muscular development.
Article
The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activation of the anterior deltoid, medial deltoid, and pectoralis major during a Smith machine and free weight bench press at lower (70% 1RM) and higher (90% 1RM) intensities. Fourteen experienced (age, 19.9 ± 2.1 years; height, 176.3 ± 7.5 cm; mass, 88.5 ± 19.4 kg) and twelve inexperienced (age, 20.5 ± 2.1 years; height, 179.8 ± 8.0 cm; mass, 75.5 ± 10.4 kg) men completed two testing sessions. Investigators counterbalanced the order of conditions (free weight, Smith machine) and randomized the order of loads (70 and 90% 1RM) to control for biasing of order for each participant. The sessions consisted of determining each subject's 1RM on either the Smith Machine or free weight bench press followed by two repetitions at 70% 1RM and two repetitions at 90% 1RM on the tested mode. One week later, subjects completed the same protocol for the other mode. Surface EMG electrodes were placed superficial to the anterior deltoid, medial deltoid and pectoralis major muscles prior to data collection. Activation of the medial deltoid was significantly greater on the free weight bench press compared to the Smith machine bench press, regardless of load or experience level. There was no difference in the activation of the anterior deltoid or pectoralis major between modes or experience level. Muscle activation was significantly greater at the 90% 1RM load compared to the 70% 1RM load. The results suggest that the instability caused by the free weight bench press necessitates a greater response by the medial deltoid as a stabilizer of the humerus in the glenohumeral joint. The relative constancy in muscle activation of the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major between modes suggests that these two muscles do not play as large a role in stabilizing the shoulder on free weight bench. Alternatively, it may be that the increased stability offered by the Smith machine decreases the need for the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major to stabilize, allowing them to produce more force. The bench press is a common exercise performed by both athletes and recreational lifters and prescribed by trainers. The results of this study help both the practitioner and trainer in providing more information about the differences in between performing the bench press exercise on a Smith machine and on a free weight bench. Specifically, these results suggest that the free weight bench press may lead to an increased requirement for stabilization from muscles such as the medial deltoid.
Article
Abstract: Atkins, SJ, Bentley, I, Brooks, D, Burrows, MP, Hurst, HT, and Sinclair, JK. Electromyographic response of global abdominal stabilizers in response to stable- and unstable-base isometric exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29(6): 1609–1615, 2015—Core stability training traditionally uses stable-base techniques. Less is known as to the use of unstable-base techniques, such as suspension training, to activate core musculature. This study sought to assess the neuromuscular activation of global core stabilizers when using suspension training techniques, compared with more traditional forms of isometric exercise. Eighteen elite level, male youth swimmers (age, 15.5 ± 2.3 years; stature, 163.3 ± 12.7 cm; body mass, 62.2 ± 11.9 kg) participated in this study. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to determine the rate of muscle contraction in postural musculature, associated with core stability and torso bracing (rectus abdominus [RA], external obliques [EO], erector spinae [ES]). A maximal voluntary contraction test was used to determine peak amplitude for all muscles. Static bracing of the core was achieved using a modified “plank” position, with and without a Swiss ball, and held for 30 seconds. A mechanically similar “plank” was then held using suspension straps. Analysis of sEMG revealed that suspension produced higher peak amplitude in the RA than using a prone or Swiss ball “plank” (p = 0.04). This difference was not replicated in either the EO or ES musculature. We conclude that suspension training noticeably improves engagement of anterior core musculature when compared with both lateral and posterior muscles. Further research is required to determine how best to activate both posterior and lateral musculature when using all forms of core stability training.
Article
Variation or periodization of training is an important concept in designing weight-training programs. To date, the majority of studies examining periodization of weight training have used a traditional strength/power training model of decreasing training volume and increasing training intensity as the program progresses. The majority of these studies have used males as subjects and do support the contention that periodized programs can result in greater changes in strength, motor performance, total body weight, lean body mass, and percent body fat than nonperiodized programs. However, studies are needed examining why periodized training is more beneficial than nonperiodized training. Studies are also needed examining the response of females, children, and seniors to periodized weight-training programs and the response to periodized models other than the traditional strength/power training model. (C) 1999 National Strength and Conditioning Association