Content uploaded by Maria Vieira Fonseca
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Maria Vieira Fonseca on Jul 19, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chapter 9
Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory
and Analgesic Drugs:
Mechanisms of Action and
Perspectives in the
Development of Pharmaceutical
Forms
Waldiceu A. Verri Jr.*, Fabiana T.M.C. Vicentini
{
, Marcela M. Baracat
{
,
Sandra R. Georgetti
{
, Renato D.R. Cardoso*, Thiago M. Cunha
}
,
Sergio H. Ferreira
}
, Fernando Q. Cunha
}
, Maria J.V. Fonseca
{
and
Rubia Casagrande
{
*
Departamento de Ciencias Patologicas, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Estadual
de Londrina, Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, Campus Universitario, Londrina, Parana, Brazil
{
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao
Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
{
Departamento de Ciencias Farmaceuticas, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Estadual
de Londrina, Londrina, Parana, Brazil
}
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo,
Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
INTRODUCTION
Flavonoids constitute a large group of aromatic amino acids widely
distributed in the plant kingdom [1–3]. In fact, flavonoids are important com-
ponents of the human diet. The intake of flavonoids can range between 50 and
800mg/day, depending on the consumption of vegetables and fruits [4–6].
Flavonoids are free radical scavengers (chain-breaking antioxidants) because
they are highly reactive as hydrogen or electron donors, which has led to their
potential use as therapeutic drugs [2,3,5,7–9].
In this chapter, we will discuss the current knowledge on the anti-inflammatory
and analgesic effects and mechanisms of flavonoids. The basic chemistry of
Bioactive Natural Products, Vol. 36. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53836-9.00026-8
#2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 297
flavonoids, structure–activity relationship, preclinical evidence and models, and
the development of pharmaceutical forms for their administration are also
addressed.
CHEMISTRY AND CLASSIFICATION
Flavonoids are formed in plants from the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine
and malonate. As shown in Fig. 1, the basic flavonoid structure is the flavan
nucleus, which consists of 15 carbon atoms arranged in three rings (C-6–C-3–
C-6) that are labeled A, B, and C. The various classes of flavonoids differ in
the level of oxidation and the pattern of substitution of the C ring, whereas indi-
vidual compounds within a class differ in the pattern of substitution of the
A and B rings as presented in Fig. 2. The flavonoid classes are flavones, flava-
nones, isoflavones, flavonols, flavanonols, flavan-3-ols, anthocyanidins, chal-
cones, and aurones. The dimerization of flavonoids has also been shown [10].
Flavonoids are primarily found in plants as glycosides, whereas aglycones
(the forms lacking sugar moieties) are found less frequently. At least eight
different monosaccharides or combinations of these (di- or trisaccharides)
can bind to different hydroxyl groups of the flavonoid aglycone [11].T
he
most common sugar moieties include D-glucose and L-rhamnose. The glyco-
sides are typically O-glycosides with the sugar moiety bound to the hydroxyl
group at the C-3 or C-7 position [12].
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AND ANALGESIC FLAVONOIDS AND
THEIR MECHANISMS
Inflammation involves the development of four phenomena: edema, pain, ery-
thema, and an increase in temperature/fever. Depending on the intensity of
these cardinal signs, there can be loss of function. Although it is not a cardinal
inflammatory sign, the recruitment and activity of cells during inflammation
is important for the host response against infections and tissue repair. The
development of inflammation is initiated by the release of mediators of differ-
ent structures/classes through many cellular sources. Regarding the cellular
sources, resident cells, including macrophages and mast cells, are the first to
A
8
5
6
7
4
1
26⬘
5⬘
4⬘
3⬘
2⬘
1⬘
3
C
O
B
FIGURE 1 Core structure of flavonoids.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry298
respond to inflammatory stimuli, and they communicate to the other cells of
the host by producing inflammatory mediators, which have been shown to
organize the host response and indicate what cells should be recruited to the
inflammatory foci and what activity should be performed by these cells.
A didactic description of inflammatory mediators examines those that are pro-
duced by cells and those that are produced from components present in the
plasma. The mediators produced by cells are serotonin, histamine, cytokines
and chemokines, nitric oxide (NO), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and lipid
mediators, such as prostanoids, leukotrienes, and lipoxins. Those derived from
components present in the plasma include bradykinin and members of the
complement and coagulation system [13].Flavonoids interfere with these
molecules at various degrees, depending on the concentration/doses of flavo-
noids used in vitro and in vivo. In the following sections, we will discuss the
anti-inflammatory and analgesic mechanisms of flavonoids as antioxidants,
O
O
5
7
3⬘Flavones
Luteolin
Apigenin
Chrysin
Baicalein
Baicalin
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH
OH
Flavonones
Flavonols
Flavanolol
4⬘4⬘3⬘765
5⬘4⬘3⬘75
Quercetin
Kaempferol
Galangin
Fisetin
Myricetin
Isoquercetin
Myricetrin
Rutin
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
O9C12H21
OH
4⬘3⬘75
Taxifolin OH OH OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
Hesperetin
Narigenin
OH
OH
OH OCH3
OH
4⬘3⬘5
OH
OH
7
O
O
OH
5
7
3⬘
4⬘
5⬘
O
O
5
7
3⬘
4⬘
O
OOH
5
7
3⬘
4⬘
FIGURE 2 (A) Structural characteristics of flavonoids.
continued
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 299
inhibitors of cytokine production and cyclooxygenase (COX) expression, and
inhibitors of a variety of intracellular pathways.
Antioxidant Effect of Flavonoids and Structure–Activity
Relationship
Many of the biological functions of flavonoids are attributed to their antioxi-
dant effects. The mechanisms are related to the neutralization of ROS, such as
peroxide anions, superoxide anion, hydroxyl radicals, lipid peroxides, and
hydroperoxides. Flavonoids also prevent oxidation of low-density lipopro-
teins, which have been implicated in atherosclerosis [14].
O
OH
7
3⬘
4⬘
5⬘
O
+
5
3
7
3⬘
4⬘
O
O
O
O
O
5
3
7
4⬘
Isoflavones
Flavan-3-ols
Anthocyanidins
Chalcones
Aurones
Genistein
(+)-catechin bOH
aOH
OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH
aOH OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH
OH
(-)-epicatechin
Auresidin
Leptosidin
(-)-epigallocatechin
gallate
Procyanidins
Cyanidin
Cyanin
Pelargonidin
Butein
2-hidroxychalcone
OH OH OH
Genistin OH Oglc OH
Daidzein OH OH
Daidzin Oglc OH
Biochanin A OHOH OCH3
Formononetin OH OCH3
Dehydroequol OH OH
Equol OH OH
Isoequol OH OH
4⬘75
3573⬘4⬘
OH
O-glc
OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH
OH OH OH OH
3573⬘
OH OH OHOH
OH
353⬘4⬘
4⬘
OH OH OH OH
OH OCH3OH OH
467 3⬘4⬘
5⬘
FIGURE 2—cont’d (B) Structural characteristics of flavonoids.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry300
The prominent antioxidant activity of flavonoids is related to their low
redox potential (0.23<E7<0.75) [15]; therefore, they are thermodynamically
able to reduce free radicals with redox potentials between 2.13 and 1.0V.
Structure–activity studies of flavonoids have shown that three main compo-
nents are important for their activity: (1) o-dihydroxy on the B ring confers
the high stability to the flavonoid after the H atom donation, forming a phe-
noxyl radical by participating in the electron delocalization; (2) the presence
of 2,3-double bound bond in conjugation with a 4-oxo group on the C ring
allows for the dislocation of an electron from the phenoxyl radicals on the
B ring to the C ring; and (3) the 3-hydroxy group in combination with the
2,3-double bound increases the resonance stabilization for electron dislocation
across the molecule [16]. Flavonoids have been shown to chelate metals,
which is a characteristic associated with the presence of o-dihydroxy group
in the B ring, 3-hydroxy and 4-oxo groups in the C ring, and 5-hydroxy and
4-oxo groups in the C and A rings as shown in Fig. 1. Variations in these
structures resulted in variations in activity. It is noteworthy to mention that
quercetin is considered a standard flavonoid because it contains these three
structures related to flavonoids activity (Fig. 1). Figure 2 shows the basic
structure of the other members of the flavonoid family with substituent groups
forming some prominent flavonoids.
Flavonoids have also been shown to inhibit xanthine oxidase, which is
involved in the production of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide. There-
fore, this is a likely antioxidant mechanism of flavonoids [17].
Interestingly, flavonoids can also exert pro-oxidant activities, which are
related to the presence of hydroxyl groups, especially in the B ring. Further,
the unsaturated 2,3-bond and 4-oxo arrangement of flavones may promote the
formation of ROS induced by divalent copper in the presence of oxygen. These
data suggest that the same structural attributes that increased the antioxidant
capacity could also exacerbate oxidative stress and the damage to functional
and structural cellular molecules [18].
Inhibition of Production and Activity of Cytokines and Other
Related Molecules by Flavonoids
There is evidence that free radicals could activate oxidative stress sensitive
transcription factors, such as nuclear factor kB (NF-kB). NF-kB is known
as a pro-inflammatory transcription factor that induces the production of
COX-2, cytokines, and other pro-inflammatory molecules. In this vein, free
radicals are also pro-inflammatory molecules. Further, this is reciprocal
because cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor a(TNFa), have been shown
to activate nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase (NADPH
oxidase) to produce superoxide anion, which, in turn, could activate NF-kB,
although this relationship was not found in every cell and experimental condi-
tion [19].This could be one mechanism for the inhibition of cytokine produc-
tion or cytokine-dependent inflammation by flavonoids. Cytokines induce the
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 301
production of other cytokines and chemokines, and the inhibition of cytokine
effects limits this amplification system [20]. Cytokines have been shown to
induce the production of prostanoids, such as prostaglandin E
2
(PGE
2
), from
COX-2 and have been shown to induce NF-kB activation, resulting in
increased COX-2 expression (enzyme that produced prostaglandin). Thus, this
modulation of cytokines and NF-kB activity might explain other effects of
flavonoids, such as the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis [19,21,22].
An interesting study investigated the mechanisms of baicalin (7-glucuro-
nic acid 5,6-dihydroxy-flavone), which is a flavonoid derived from Scutel-
laria baicalensis Georgi. Baicalin acts through an NF-kB-independent
mechanism and selectively binds to chemokines (subtype of cytokines), such
as stromal cell-derived factor (SDF), IL-8, MIP-1b, MCP-2, and C lymphotac-
tin without interacting with fractalkine (CX3C chemokine), neurotactin, or
other cytokines, such as TNFaand IFNg. Baicalin does not compete with che-
mokines for receptor binding; thus, it is not a receptor antagonist. Therefore,
the anti-inflammatory mechanism of baicalin could be attributed to selectively
binding/scavenging chemokines and limiting their biological activity [23].
In addition, studies have shown that flavonoids also induced the expression
of anti-inflammatory molecules, such as IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), as
shown for luteolin in alveolar macrophages. Luteolin has been shown to
increase IL-1ra mRNA expression in alveolar macrophages without affecting
the mRNA expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [24].
Therefore, flavonoids can inhibit NF-kB-dependent cytokine production,
act as a scavenger of some chemokines or induce the expression of anti-
inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1ra. This role is important in inflamma-
tion because cytokines and chemokines initiate the inflammatory response.
Cytokines and chemokines activate and induce the increased expression of
adhesion molecules allowing the rolling of leukocytes over the endothelium,
which is necessary for their recruitment. Chemokines are important for the
selective recruitment of leukocytes during a variety of inflammatory condi-
tions. Cytokines are also involved in the development of fever by inducing
the production of prostaglandins, which act on EP3 (subtype of PGE
2
recep-
tor) [25] receptors to alter the activity of warm and cold sensitive neurons
in the hypothalamus to induce thermodysregulation. Another component of
inflammation is pain, which results from the activation and sensitization of
nociceptors (neurons transmitting the painful stimulus). Cytokines can
directly modulate nociceptor activity via their receptors. Thus, during inflam-
mation, flavonoids function to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production
and inducing anti-inflammatory cytokines or scavenging chemokines. As
described for baicalin, the scavenging effects were selective for some chemo-
kines and were similar to those observed with soluble receptors or anti-cytokine
antibodies. In this sense, because not all flavonoids may present the same
effects described for the general form, every flavonoid must be analyzed sepa-
rately in different in vivo and/or in vitro assays.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry302
Cytokines have also been shown to increase the expression of inducible
nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which is responsible for NO synthesis in inflam-
matory states [26].The inhibition of iNOS-derived NO production is an
important anti-inflammatory mechanism of flavonoids because excessive
NO production is one of the components responsible for tissue destruction
in inflammation. In contrast, flavonoids, such as baicalin, increased the
expression of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) during ischemia/reperfusion injury
model, which mediated the reduction of NF-kB localization in the nucleus
(active NF-kB) and inhibition of IkB degradation. Therefore, the reduction
of TNFa, IL-6, and COX-2 mRNA expression was observed [27].
Flavonoids modulate the activity of other enzymes, such as myeloperoxidase,
which is an enzyme found in neutrophils and macrophages that produce the
microbicidal molecule hypochlorite. Flavonoids, such as myricitrin and quer-
cetin, are substrates for myeloperoxidase and inactivate it in vitro and in vivo
[22,28,29].
During inflammation, cytokines activate and increase the expression of
adhesion molecules, which are responsible for the interactions between leuko-
cytes and endothelial cells resulting in the sequence of rolling, firm adhesion
and transmigration of leukocytes culminating in leukocyte recruitment toward
the inflammatory foci. The three main groups of adhesion molecules include
selectins, integrins, and adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin super
family. Their expression was reduced by the treatment with flavonoids
[30–33].
Thus, flavonoids affect the biology of cytokines/chemokines and other
systems, such as iNOS/NO and HO-1, to different extents and mechanisms.
Figure 3 summarizes these data.
Effect of Flavonoids on the Production of Lipid Mediators
It has been shown that flavonoids inhibit the peroxidase active site of COX-1,
COX-2, and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) [62], resulting in inhibition of prostanoids
(prostaglandins and tromboxanes) and leukotrienes production, respectively.
In fact, flavonoids inhibited the production of PGE
2
, which was consistent
with the inhibition of COX activity. In addition to the inhibition of the
COX-2 peroxidase active site [62], there is evidence that flavonoids inhibited
the NF-kB-dependent expression of COX-2 [63].
The inhibition of COX has the potential to be used as clinical activity
because of the use of selective and nonselective COX inhibitors, which have
been classified as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Prosta-
glandins contributed to edema as a consequence of increased vascular perme-
ability and modulated the activity of neurons responsible for painful stimuli
perception and thermal regulation [13].It is noteworthy that COX-1 inhibitors
have side effects, such as an increase in gastric and intestinal ulcers, because
prostaglandins have been shown to increase protective mucus production, and
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 303
JAK
16
1
10
12
11
2
13
15
CYTOPLASMNUCLEUS
14
HO-1
5-LO
COX-1
MAP3K
NF-kB
c-Jun
AP-1
NF-kB
activated
-Proinflammatory mediators;
-Proinflammatory enzymes (COX-2; iNOS);
-Immune regulation;
-Lymphocyte Differentiation.
JNK1,2,3
MAP2K
UV
MAPK 317
6
5
4
7
8
9
17
ROS
IKK
IKBp38
c-Fos
IKB
Ub-proteasome
STAT
STAT
STAT
STAT
NADPH
ERK 1/2
P
P
P
P
P
CHEMOKINES
P
P
P
P
PP
ROS
FIGURE 3 Intracellular targets of flavonoids in inflammation. A variety of inflammatory stimuli
activate cells via receptors to produce inflammatory mediators that regulate the inflammatory pro-
cess. This cellular activation depends on intracellular signaling pathways. Receptor-independent
mechanisms also exist, such as those activated by UV radiation. Some examples of flavonoid clas-
ses regulating inflammation by modulating/blocking JAK (janus kinase)/STAT (signal transducers
and activators of transcription), MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases), AP-1 (activating
protein 1) and NF-kB (nuclear factor kB) pathways are shown. These data support that the flavo-
noid apigenin (flavone) inhibited the expression of 1–2 [34] and 7–10 [35,36], decreased 13 [37]
production and inhibited the phosphorylation of 4–6 [38]. Delphinidin (anthocyanidins) inhibited
4–6, 9, 11–12 [39,40]. The epigallocatechin gallate (aflavan-3-ols) suppressed 12 and 9 activation
[41], phosphorylation of 5 and 6 [42], upregulated 13 [43] and inhibited 16 [44]. The isoflavone
genistein also inhibited the activation of 2–4 and 12 [45] and upregulates 13 [43]. Naringenin
(flavonones) suppressed the activation of 1–4, 6, and 8 pathways and the downstream signal trans-
ducer of 2 and 12 [34,46,47] and induced production of 13 [48]. Quercetin (flavonols) modulated
1–2 [49] and 12–13 pathways [32,50], reduced the expression of 14 and 16 [32,51], inhibited 11
[52] degradation and attenuated the activation of points 3–10 [32,53]. Butein (chalcone) inhibited
11 degradation [54] and 1–2, 4–6, and 12 activation [54,55]. Taxifolin (flavonolol) inhibited the
activation of 1–3 and 6 [56,57]. Baicalein reduced 1–2, 4–6, 11, and 15 [29,58,59] activation
and scavenged 16 [60]. Fisetin (flavonol) targeted 4 [61] and increased 13 expression [61].In
addition to the inhibition of COX-2 expression, flavonoids also inhibited the peroxidase site of
COX-2 [62]. Finally, all flavonoids have antioxidant activities and, therefore, inhibited 17. This
is a general scheme of flavonoid targets [13,14,18]. However, it is important to note that not all
cellular mechanisms are shown, and the flavonoids present in this study may have other targets
that are not presented in this figure.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry304
treatment with COX-2 inhibitors increased the cardiovascular risk because the
COX-2-derived PGE
2
produced by endothelial cells present anti-aggregating
and vascular relaxing activities [64,65]. However, because the activity of fla-
vonoids do not rely exclusively on the inhibition of COX enzymes but affect
other pathways concomitantly to COX inhibition, they do not present these
common side effects of NSAIDs that target COX enzymes. In fact, flavonoids
have opposite effects compared to the COX inhibitors. The treatment with
extracts containing flavonoids and/or flavonoid-rich fractions of extracts
reduced the gastric lesions induced by NSAIDs, such as aspirin and indometh-
acin, or even promoted tissue healing [66,67]. Studies have also shown that
isolated flavonoids, such as rutin, reduced ulcers [68]. Moreover, in a rando-
mized clinical trial, a cream containing quercetin caused pain relief and
aphthous ulcer healing [69]. The analgesic mechanisms are discussed in a
separated section.
Regarding leukotrienes, there are 5-LO inhibitors and leukotriene receptor
antagonists available for clinical use. Because inhibition of leukotriene
synthesis [62] is a possible mechanism of action for some flavonoids, it is
possible that flavonoids inhibit inflammatory conditions that depend on leuko-
trienes. In fact, isoquercitrin inhibited leukotriene-induced airway contraction
in guinea pigs [70], and genistein inhibited leukotriene synthesis in eosino-
phils in asthma [71]. Further, flavonoids have additional mechanisms. Nari-
genin reduced mucus secretion by modulating ROS production and inhibited
NF-kB activity via epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/phosphatidyli-
nositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt/extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) mitogen
activated protein kinase (MAP kinases) signaling in human airway epithelial
cells [72], quercetin induced a bronchodilator effect in an acute asthma model
[73], and apigenin reduced allergen-induced airway inflammation [74]. There-
fore, it is likely that flavonoids could represent a possible therapeutic approach
in asthma and in leukotriene-related diseases because leukotriene synthesis
inhibitors and receptor antagonists are in clinical use. Further, flavonoids have
a low toxicity, whereas leukotriene inhibitors have neurological side effects
and induce liver toxicity (more information on leukotriene inhibitors can be
found at www.fda.gov); therefore, flavonoids are safer than leukotriene
synthesis inhibitors and receptor antagonists.
Flavonoids can also modulate other lipid mediators. Isoflavones, such as
genistein and daidzein, inhibited the hydrolysis of anandamide by fatty acid
amide hydrolase (FAAH) at low micromolar concentrations. Among the
flavonoids tested by Thors et al.[75],kaempferol was the most potent and
was shown to inhibit FAAH in a competitive manner. The implications of
this mechanism of action included the reduced degradation of endocannabi-
noids and, therefore, the enhancement of the activation of cannabinoid
receptors. The consequences would be the increase in the analgesic effect of
endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids in cancer and inflammatory pain
[76–78].
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 305
Inhibition of Intracellular Signaling Pathways by Flavonoids
During Inflammation and Possible Implications Regarding Their
Antioxidant Effects
During inflammation, a variety of signaling pathways can be activated
depending on the inflammatory mediators, type of antigen and type of cell.
For example, PI3K and the three main MAP kinases, ERK, p38, and c-Jun
N-terminal kinase (JNK), are triggered during inflammation and may be
responsible for NADPH oxidase activation/oxidative burst, leukocyte recruit-
ment and activation of transcription factors, such as NF-kB and activating
protein-1 (AP-1) [79].In inflammation, inhibition of one MAP kinase reduced
the production of free radicals and inflammatory mediators. For instance,
TNFa-induced superoxide anion production via NADPH oxidase activation
depends on three pathways: (i) PI3K-induced PKC (protein kinase C) d,
(ii) PI3K/ERK-induced PKCd, and (iii) p38 activation of NADPH oxidase
in a PKCd-independent manner. As a consequence, inhibition of MAP kinases
reduced superoxide anion production [80]. Therefore, because a variety of fla-
vonoids have been shown to inhibit MAP kinases, including p38, JNK, and
ERK [72,81,82], it is possible that flavonoids do not act as antioxidants only
by scavenging free radicals but also by inhibiting NADPH oxidase-dependent
production of superoxide anion and other ROS. Further, excessive NADPH
oxidase activation may lead to tissue lesions; thus, flavonoids could limit tis-
sue lesions. Because these MAP kinases and PI3K pathways lead to NF-kB
and/or AP-1 activation and, consequently, pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g.,
cytokines) and enzymes (e.g., COX-2), their inhibition by flavonoids also
reduced the production of these inflammatory mediators [24,29,72,83].
Leukocyte recruitment is an important feature of inflammation because
leukocytes, such as neutrophils, must reach the inflammatory foci to phagocy-
tose and eliminate the foreign antigen. However, excessive leukocyte recruit-
ment and activation, in general, resulted in tissue lesions. Therefore, it is
important to limit the leukocyte recruitment to reduce tissue lesions. In auto-
immune diseases, leukocytes have a major role in tissue destruction, and inhi-
biting their recruitment was shown to be beneficial [84,85].MAP kinases and
PI3K are also activated during leukocyte recruitment with different kinases
activated based on the inflammatory stimulus and leukocyte. Because flavo-
noids inhibit the activation of those kinases, this is a possible mechanism that
is involved in flavonoid inhibition of leukocyte recruitment. Nevertheless, the
efficacy of each flavonoid in each inflammatory condition needs to be demon-
strated [72,81,82].
Intracellular signaling pathways are involved in flavonoid-induced activa-
tion of antioxidant mechanisms. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(HUVECs), it was demonstrated that treatment with small interfering
RNA (siRNA) and pharmacological inhibitors targeting PKCdand p38
MAPK attenuated HO-1 induction by fisetin (flavonol). The fisetin-induced
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry306
HO-1 expression was dependent on increased nuclear factor (erythroid-derived
2)-like 2 (Nrf2) translocation and antioxidant response element (ARE), as
detected by luciferase activity. Consistent with this, the treatment with an
HO-1 inhibitor reduced the inhibitory effect of fisetin for H
2
O
2
production [86].
Therefore, several models were able to demonstrate that the signaling
pathways were inhibited by flavonoids. It was difficult to present all signaling
pathways affected by flavonoids. In this vein, some additional intracellular
mechanisms targeted by flavonoids are summarized in Fig. 3.
Structure–Activity Relationship of Flavonoids in Inflammation
There are some slight differences in the intracellular pathways inhibited by
the different classes of flavonoids, but they share many similar targets as
shown in Fig. 3.Unfortunately, the majority of studies that examined the
activity of flavonoids did not investigate the structure–activity relationship.
However, there were several studies that did examine this relationship.
Tran et al.[87] synthesized derivatives from 20-hydroxychalcone and
investigated their effect on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced PGE
2
synthesis
in macrophages. They concluded that the structure required the combination
of at least two alkoxy groups on the B ring of chalcones (see Fig. 2 for the basic
structure) where one group was substituted at position 4 and the other group
was substituted at positions 3 or 5 of B ring, which may enhance the inhibitory
activity of PGE
2
production. The benzyloxy moiety plays an important role in
establishing strong interactions between chalcone and COX-2. Importantly,
the inhibition of PGE
2
production from RAW 264.7 cells by 2-hydroxychalcone
derivatives was not associated with their cytotoxicity, which further corrobo-
rates the safety of flavonoids.
Interestingly, previous studies have found the effects of flavonols (kaemp-
ferol, quercetin, and myricetin) and flavones (flavone, chrysin, apigenin,
luteolin, baicalein, and baicalin) on the TNFa-stimulated ICAM-1 (adhesion
molecule) expression. Among the flavonoids tested, quercetin, kaempferol,
chrysin, apigenin, and luteolin inhibited TNFa-induced ICAM-1 expression.
These results suggest that the activity was independent of the flavonoid class
(flavonols and flavones) (Fig. 2). The TNFa-induced expression of ICAM-1
was dependent on the activation of MAP kinases (ERK, JNK, and p38),
NF-kB, and AP-1. Apigenin and luteolin (flavones) inhibited TNFa-induced
activation of all MAP kinases, AP-1, and IKK/NF-kB pathways. In compari-
son, kaempferol (flavonols) and chrysin (flavones) only inhibited JNK and
AP-1 activity. Further, kaempferol (flavonols) and chrysin (flavones) showed
similar mechanisms of action, whereas flavones (apigenin and luteolin com-
pared to chrysin) signaled through a unique mechanism. Thus, the flavonoid
class does not define the mechanism of action, but the –OH group at positions
5 and 7 of the A ring and at position 4 of the B ring is an important structural
component for determining the flavonoid mechanisms of action (see Fig. 2 for
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 307
the basic structure). Further, the presence of an –OH group at position 3 of the
B ring reduced the activity, whereas the –OH group at position 5 of the B ring
abolished the activity [29].
Previous studies have also shown that kaempferol had increased activity
than quercetin regarding the inhibition of the expression of adhesion mole-
cules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and L-selectin) [32],which was consistent with
the data mentioned above [29]. However, quercetin showed increased inhibi-
tion of iNOS and COX-2 protein expression and NF-kB and AP-1 than
kaempferol [32]. These compounds differ by the presence of the –OH at posi-
tion 3 in the B ring in quercetin. This structural difference was considered to
be predictive of the reduced activity in the study of Chen et al.[29],as
described above. In contrast, the –OH group at positions 3 and 4 in the B ring
found in quercetin conferred high stability to the flavonoid after H atom dona-
tion, forming a phenoxyl radical by participating in the electron delocaliza-
tion, and represents one out of three possible antioxidant mechanisms of
flavonoids, as described above [16]. Because iNOS and COX-2 could be
induced by transcription factors, including NF-kB and AP-1, and that free
radicals activate NF-kB, the presence of the –OH group at positions 3 and 4
in the B ring and the resulting antioxidant effect might account for the inhibi-
tion of gene expression and NF-kB and AP-1 activation by LPS [32]. There-
fore, it is likely that depending on the experimental model, the –OH groups
may result in contrasting data regarding the structure–activity relationship.
Analgesic Flavonoids
The sensitization of primary sensory neurons is essential to inflammatory
pain. Nonetheless, previously, the sensitization of nociceptors was believed
to be the result of the excitatory action of a “soup” of various inflammatory
mediators released at the site of inflamed or damaged tissue. However, this
hypothesis was challenged by the discovery of the mechanism of action of
NSAIDs by Vane’s group [88] and by the demonstration, in humans and in
animals, that eicosanoids were primarily responsible for nociceptor sensitiza-
tion and not overt pain [89]. In addition to PGE
2
, other inflammatory media-
tors, including sympathetic amines, endothelin, substance P, bradykinin, and
NGF, also possessed the same nociceptor-sensitizing property. These media-
tors acted directly on neuronal receptors, triggering molecular mechanisms
that facilitated the electrical activity of the neuronal membrane. Although
our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of nociceptor sensitization
is not complete, there is a general agreement that the stimulation of
G-protein-coupled receptors by inflammatory mediators activate the enzyme
adenylate cyclase to produce cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). This
substance, in turn, triggers the activation of a group of protein kinases [protein
kinase A (PKA) and C (PKC)], which leads to the phosphorylation of ion
channels in the membrane. These data were a result of a facilitation of the
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry308
inward sodium current via tetrodotoxin (TTX)-resistant Na
þ
channels, a facil-
itation of inward Ca
2þ
currents, and an inhibition of outward K
þ
currents.
This sequence of events is the basic peripheral mechanism of hyperalgesia,
a state in which a slight or normally non-noxious thermal, mechanical, or
chemical stimulus becomes painful [21].
We refer to the mediators that act directly on the primary nociceptor as
“final mediators,” which was in contrast with “intermediate” mediators
released during inflammation by resident and migrating cells or by plasma,
which stimulated the release of the final mediators. Whereas the inflammatory
signs and symptoms were similar, the resident and migrating cells and the
intermediate and final mediators varied depending on the time frame, the type
of tissue, and the type of inflammatory stimuli. In general, measurements of
mediators in exudates or inflamed tissues at a single time point gave a dis-
torted picture of the evolution of the pathological process and suggested a
disorganized “soup” of cells and mediators. In fact, sequential release of
inflammatory mediators or cellular events observed after a challenge by
inflammatory stimuli could be observed only by performing a series of mea-
surements. Commonly, it is this temporal and pathophysiological hierarchy
that allowed the researcher to discover the site of action of existing drugs or
to propose targets for new drug development [21].
Studies have shown that flavonoids have analgesic effects. They have been
shown to inhibit both inflammatory and neuropathic pain through mechanisms
involving the inhibition of cytokine production (e.g., IL-1b) and prostaglandin
and inducing NO production and endogenous opioid-dependent mechanisms.
These data were demonstrated for quercetin and other flavonoids (e.g., myri-
citrin, hesperidin, and dihydroxy flavones) in models of overt pain-like behav-
ior, such as acetic acid and phenyl-p-benzoquinone-induced abdominal
contortions and in the formalin test, in models of mechanical hyperalgesia
induced by carrageenan and in thermal hyperalgesia in streptozotocin-induced
diabetes [90–95].Depending on the experimental model, flavonoids inhibited
the production of intermediate and directly acting nociceptive mediators in
inflammatory pain [93] as well as directly antagonized nociceptor sensitiza-
tion by activating neuronal mechanisms, including the release of endogenous
opioids in streptozotocin-induced diabetic neuropathy [90]. Previous studies
have demonstrated that myrecetin reduced, in a concentration- and p38-
dependent manner, the K
þ
currents in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons
using whole cell patch-clamp recordings. This effect does not induce analge-
sia. Therefore, it is unlikely that the analgesic mechanism of a flavonoid
would depend on the direct modulation of K
þ
currents in neurons [96].In
contrast, studies have shown that the inhibition of TNFa-induced activation
of MAP kinase, p38, in DRG neurons reduced the activation of TTX-resistant
Na
þ
channels, such as Nav 1.8, that have been implicated in inflammatory
and neuropathic pain [21]. Thus, the inhibition of these Na
þ
currents is
an analgesic mechanism [97]. Together with the data demonstrating that
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 309
flavonoids inhibited MAP kinase activation [81], it would be appropriate to
determine whether flavonoids reduce TTX-resistant sodium channels currents
in DRG neurons.
In support of the involvement of the inhibition of oxidative stress in flavo-
noids analgesic mechanisms of action, quercetin has been shown to inhibit car-
rageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia and the accompanying reduction in
the decreased glutathione levels [92].Interestingly, baicalin reduced streptozo-
tocin-induced neuropathic pain by inhibiting p38 activation, oxidative–nitrosa-
tive stress, and 12/15-lipoxygenase overexpression and activation without
affecting glucose levels [98]. Therefore, as discussed for other inflammatory
signs, it is likely that flavonoids function through more than one mechanism.
Further, glucocorticosteroids (steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) increased the
blood glucose levels, which is a relevant side effect for diabetic patients. In this
sense, the ability of baicalin to reduce pain without affecting glucose levels
indicates that it would be a potential treatment option for diabetic patients’ pain
management [98].
Structure modifications are also an interesting approach to increase the activ-
ity of flavonoids. El-Sabbagh et al.[99] synthesized 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4
(1H)-one derivatives bearing chalcone moieties. One compound showed a signif-
icant analgesic effect in the acetic acid-induced writhing test and in the reduction
of carrageenan-induced paw edema compared to celecoxib (a commonly used
NSAID that selectively inhibits COX-2), and it also exhibited a similar loss
of gastric effects, as compared to celecoxib, which were reduced compared to
COX-1 inhibitors, such as indomethacin. Therefore, structural modifications
of flavonoids could be a promising approach to increase their analgesic and
anti-inflammatory activities. However, it remains to be determined whether the
side effects are also maintained in very low levels.
Evidence of Flavonoids Effects in Human Inflammatory Diseases
and Human Cell Models of Disease
To further corroborate the data discussed above on the anti-inflammatory
effects, mechanisms and structure–activity relationship of flavonoids, studies
support their use in in vitro models to evaluate inflammatory signaling using
human cells and in human diseases.
Dietary supplementation of quercetin at 900mg/day for 4 weeks did not
change the blood biomarkers of inflammation and disease severity of rheuma-
toid arthritis patients [100].However, there are some concerns to be mentioned.
Quercetin has poor oral absorption, and therefore, optimized pharmaceutical
formulation might help increase its absorption. The patients were recommended
to refrain from ingesting nutritional antioxidants because their ingestion nor-
mally ranged between 50 and 800mg/day [4–6]. Thus, the treatment with quer-
cetin at the dose tested would only replenish the deficit of intake. Moreover,
only one dose was tested and the period was short. Further, these patients were
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry310
under conventional medical treatments that made it difficult to observe the
additional anti-inflammatory effects with quercetin treatment [100].
In contrast, quercetin has been shown to inhibit phorbol 12-myristate 13-
acetate (PMA)- and calcium ionophore A23187 (PMACI)-induced gene
expression and the production of TNFa, IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-8 in a human
mast cell line. Quercetin also attenuated PMACI-induced activation of NF-k
B and p38 MAP kinase in mast cells [101].Because mast cells play an impor-
tant role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, modulation of the produc-
tion of inflammatory mediators by these cells could be a target of quercetin
[85]. Further data regarding rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated that hesperitin
and myricetin also reduced IL-1b-induced production of metalloprotease and
IL-6 in human synovial cell line in a JNK and JNK- and p38-dependent man-
ner, respectively [102,103]. Luteolin also reduced IL-1b-induced cytokine and
metalloprotease activation by inhibiting MAP kinases, NF-kB, and AP-1 in a
human synovial sarcoma cell line [104].
In another autoimmune disease, lupus, patients need alternatives to ster-
oids and cytotoxic drugs. Apigenin inhibited autoantigen-presenting and stim-
ulatory functions of antigen presenting cells (APCs) necessary for the
activation and expansion of autoreactive Th1 and Th17 cells and B cells in
lupus. Apigenin also has been shown to cause apoptosis of hyperactive lupus
APCs and T and B cells by inhibiting expression of NF-kB-regulated anti-
apoptotic molecules, especially COX-2 and cellular caspase-8 (FLICE)-like
inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), which are hyper-expressed by lupus immune cells.
Increasing the bioavailability of dietary plant-derived COX-2 and NF-kB
inhibitors, such as apigenin, could be valuable for suppressing inflammation
in lupus and other Th17-mediated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis,
Crohn’s disease, and psoriasis, and in the prevention of inflammation-based
tumors overexpressing COX-2 (colon and breast) [105].
Interestingly, one study addressed the effect of flavonoid intake in chronic
diseases. People with an increased quercetin intake had a lower mortality from
ischemic heart disease. The incidence of cerebrovascular disease was lower
with a higher intake of kaempferol, naringenin, and hesperetin. Men with
increased quercetin intake had a lower lung cancer incidence, and men
with higher myricetin intake had a lower prostate cancer risk. The incidence
of asthma was lower with increased quercetin, naringenin, and hesperetin
intakes. A trend toward a reduction in the risk of type 2 diabetes was asso-
ciated with higher quercetin and myricetin intakes [106].Therefore, there
are data suggesting a protective role of flavonoids in human disease and/or
human cell systems. Of note, the effects of flavonoids, as shown in humans
[106], might depend on long-term treatment.
Evidence also suggests that flavonoids might be useful to reduce the exces-
sive inflammatory responses induced in the presence of bacterial (e.g., LPS
and fMLP) products by inhibiting the activation of MAP kinases, PI3K, and
NF-kB and inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and NO
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 311
[107–109]. Further, long-term ultraviolet-induced skin inflammation has been
shown to contribute to cancer development, and flavonoids have been shown
to reduce the inflammatory state by mechanisms that are discussed in the sec-
tion regarding topical formulation development [110–113].
DEVELOPMENT OF ORAL FORMULATIONS
CONTAINING FLAVONOIDS
Encapsulation of Flavonoids
The research and application of flavonoids have been areas of great interest in
the functional foods, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries due to their
high spectrum of biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory,
antibacterial, and antiviral functions [86–118].However, the effectiveness of
nutraceutical products, including flavonoids, in preventing diseases is depen-
dent on preserving the bioavailability of the active ingredients. This can be
difficult because only a small proportion of the molecules remain available
following oral administration due to insufficient gastric residence time, low
permeability and/or solubility within the gut, and their instability under condi-
tions encountered in food processing and storage (temperature, oxygen, and
light) or in the gastrointestinal tract (pH, enzymes, and in the presence of other
nutrients) [119].
In fact, flavonoids have weak water solubility and could undergo degradation
in the acidic stomach environment. These properties cause low flavonoid dissolu-
tion rates from solid, oral dosage forms, such as capsules and tablets, from meals
or from the partial degradation in the harsh pH conditions of the gastric environ-
ment, resulting in a low absorption and bioavailability. Thus, to encapsulate flavo-
noids in gastro-resistant polymers to transport them directly to the intestine may
improve their bioavailability after oral administration [120].To increase the
effectiveness of flavonoids, formulations must provide protective mechanisms
that can maintain the active molecular form until the time of consumption and
deliver this form to the physiological target within the organism [121].
Most of the bioactive food components were administered in encapsulated
forms to overcome the drawbacks of their instability, alleviate unpleasant
tastes or flavors, and improve the bioavailability and half-life of the com-
pound in vivo and in vitro [122–129].
Microencapsulation is defined as a process in which tiny particles or dro-
plets of the active ingredient(s) are surrounded by a coating or embedded in a
homogeneous or heterogeneous matrix, generally of polymeric materials, to
give small capsules that may range from sub-microns to several millimeters
in size with many useful properties [130].Nanoencapsulation involves the for-
mation of active, loaded particles with diameters ranging from 1 to 1000 nm
[129]. The term nanoparticle is a collective name for both nanospheres and
nanocapsules. Nanospheres have a matrix type structure. Active particles
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry312
may be absorbed at the sphere surface or encapsulated within the particle.
Nanocapsules are vesicular systems in which the active particle is confined
to a cavity consisting of an inner liquid core surrounded by a polymeric mem-
brane [131]. Compared to micron-sized particles, nanoparticles provide a
greater surface area and have the potential to increase the solubility due to a
combination of large interfacial adsorption of the core compound, enhanced
bioavailability, and improved controlled release, which enabled better preci-
sion targeting of the encapsulated materials [130,132].
The encapsulation, depending on the polymers and technology used, may
stabilize these labile compounds and extend their shelf-life. From an industrial
perspective, encapsulated powders would be easy to handle and to use in food
and pharmaceutical processing, keeping their initial flavonoid content,
bioactivity, and safety for prolonged storage. In nano- and microsystems,
stabilization occurred because the wall/coating material acts as a physical
barrier; therefore, for this reason, the shelf-life of the encapsulated drugs
was prolonged. Moreover, polymers may modulate the release rate and
solubility in intestinal fluid [120,133–135].
Various techniques have been used for encapsulation, including spray-dry-
ing, spray freezing, extrusion, coacervation, liposome entrapment, inclusion
complexation, lyophilization, and emulsion [136,137,133].
Spray-Drying
Spray-drying encapsulation is commonly used in pharmaceutical and bio-
chemical fields and in the food industry due to the large availability of equip-
ment and for the ease of industrialization. It is also a mild, “one-step”
processing operation to move from a liquid feed into a powder product
[138,139].The spray-drying process is an economical, flexible, continuous
operation that produces particles of good quality. The typical shape of
spray-dried particles is spherical, with a mean size range of 10–100 mm
[137]. Because the fast solvent evaporation keeps the droplet temperature
far below the drying air temperature, spray-drying is strongly recommended
for heat sensitive materials, such as flavonoids [114]. Ersus and Yurdagel
[140] microencapsulated the flavonoid anthocyanin pigments of the black car-
rot by spray-drying using maltodextrins as a carrier and coating agents to pro-
tect the flavonoids from oxidation. The ethanolic extracts of black carrots that
were dried with high air inlet temperatures (>160–180C) caused greater
anthocyanin losses, whereas the maltodextrin of 20–21 DE (Glucodry
Ò
210)
gave the highest anthocyanin content powder at the end of drying process
[140]. The maltodextrin could also be mixed with arabic gum as wall mate-
rial. A mixture of maltodextrin (60%) and arabic gum (40%) has been used
for encapsulation of procyanidins from grape seeds [141]. The encapsulation
efficiency was up to 89%, and the procyanidin was not changed during dry-
ing. The stability of the products was improved by spray-drying.
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 313
Other flavonoids, such as naringin and rutin, that present different struc-
tures and physicochemical characteristics were microencapsulated by spray-
drying using cellulose-derived polymers [142].The protective ability of cellu-
lose derivatives was based either on the ability to form amorphous matrices
loading drugs during the spray-drying process or on their pH dependent solu-
bility. Cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) was as insoluble and stable in acidic
gastric fluid as in its nonionized form. It becomes soluble, swellable, and dis-
integrable as the phthalic acid groups ionized above pH 6 in intestinal fluid
[143]. However, these results showed that satisfactory, gastro-resistant micro-
systems were produced only for the more soluble glycosides, such as rutin and
naringin [142,144]. Nevertheless, in the development of gastro-resistant
microparticles containing low-solubility, the ingredients required a compro-
mise between the enhancement of the dissolution rate and protection in the
gastric environment. An incomplete flavonoid release in the simulated intesti-
nal fluid was observed for the slightly water-soluble, such as quercetin
[142,144]. Sansone et al.[120] produced naringenin and quercetin gastro-
resistant microparticles by spray-drying and investigated the effects of the
combined use of CAP as coating polymer and three different materials
(sodium dodecylbenzensulfonate, tween-85, and sodium carboxymethylcellu-
lose crosslinked) that were able to enhance the dissolution test. The presence
of a combination of CAP and surfactants or swelling agents in the formulations
produced microparticles with a good resistance at a low gastric fluid pH and
complete flavonoid release in the intestinal environment. The spray-drying
technique and the process conditions selected have produced good encapsula-
tion efficiencies and product yields. Chitosan has also been used as a wall mate-
rial in spray-drying of olive leaf extract (OLE) [145]. Another wall material
successfully used for encapsulation of polyphenol was the protein–lipid
(sodium caseinate–soy lecithin) emulsion, which has been used in spray-drying
of grape seed extract, apple polyphenol extract, and olive leaf extract [146].
Therefore, there is an increase in groups attempting to develop gastro-resistant
formulations containing flavonoids to increase their availability.
Coacervation
Complex coacervation is commonly associated with no definite forms and is
an expensive method for encapsulating food ingredients [147]; however, this
process should be related to the potential benefits it might offer, especially
to high value, labile functional ingredients, such as the encapsulation of flavo-
noids [148]. The size of the capsule and its characteristics can be varied by
changing the pH, the ion concentration, the ratio of matrix molecule and the
bioactive component, and the type of matrix. The technique is primarily
driven by electrostatic interactions, but hydrophobic interactions are also
involved [136,148,149]. This is immobilization rather than encapsulation
technology and is, therefore, mostly proposed and applied for bioactive food
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry314
molecules rather than for bioactive, living cells. The technique is applied for
flavors, oils, and for some water-soluble bioactive molecules [119].
The studies on encapsulation of flavonoids by coacervation used wall
materials, such as calcium alginate and calcium alginate-chitosan, to encapsu-
late yerba mate extract [125], gelatin to encapsulate () epigallocatechin gal-
late [150], glucan to encapsulate black currant extract [151], and propolis
extract was encapsulated using pectin and soy protein [126]. Other coacerva-
tion coating systems such as gliadin, heparin/gelatin, carrageenan, soy protein,
polyvinyl alcohol, gelatin/carboxymethylcellulose, b-lactoglobulin/gum aca-
cia, and guar gum/dextran have also been studied [147]. However, most of
the core materials in these studies were essential oils rather than flavonoids.
Liposomes
Liposomes are spherical bilayers that enclose bioactive molecules. The lipo-
somes are formed by dispersion of polar lipids (mostly phospholipids) in an
aqueous solution. Liposomes can be utilized in the entrapment, release of
water-soluble, lipid-soluble, and amphiphilic materials [152].Bioactive
agents encapsulated into liposomes can be protected from digestion in the
stomach and showed significant levels of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract,
leading to the enhancement of bioactivity and bioavailability [153]. A variety of
liposome techniques have been employed for the encapsulation of flavonoids,
such as film evaporation, sonication, reverse phase evaporation, melting, and
freezing–thawing [154]. The encapsulating efficiency of liposomes was highest
when they were prepared by freezing–thawing, followed by thin film evapora-
tion, then reverse phase evaporation, whereas melting and sonication have the
lowest efficiency. Liposomal systems prepared by sonication, melting, and
reverse phase evaporation displayed better dispersion.
The nature of the core materials is another factor that affects the efficiency
of liposome encapsulation. The isomers of (þ)-catechin and ()-epicatechin
entrapped in liposomes showed similar encapsulation levels and release rates
[155].However, another type of catechin, ()-epigallocatechin-3-gallate
(EGCG), has been observed to have an increased level of encapsulation
for the same liposome system. EGCG contains a galloyl group, indicating
a greater lipophilicity. Hence, it is possible that EGCG was more effective
when localized within the liposome bilayers, thereby increasing the
entrapment.
There is evidence of quercetin liposomes prepared from egg phosphatidyl-
choline/cholesterol (2:1). A lower dose (20 mg/kg body weight) and a faster
rate of absorption were observed with intranasal quercetin liposomes when
compared with oral quercetin (300mg/kg body weight). These results suggest
that intranasal delivery of quercetin in the form of liposomes to the brain
could allow for a reduction in the dose to reduce the potential of toxicity of
the quercetin [156].
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 315
Inclusion Encapsulation—Cyclodextrins
Cyclodextrins can envelop molecular structures by forming molecular inclu-
sion complexes. Cyclodextrins have a hydrophobic interior and a hydrophilic
exterior. The hydrophobic interior of the capsule can be varied in size by
varying the number of glucose units of the cyclodextrin molecules
[157,158].It has been applied to increase the solubility of hydrophobic mole-
cules and to protect molecules from inactivation or degradation.
The inclusion of hesperetin and hesperidin in (2-hydroxypropyl)-b-cyclodextrin
(HP-b-CD) [159];quercetin and myricetin in HP-b-CD, maltosyl-b-CDs, and
b-CDs [160]; kaempferol, quercetin, and myricetin in HP-b-CD [161]; 3-hydro-
xyflavone (3-OHeF), morin, and quercetin in a- and b-CDs [162]; and rutin in
b-CD [163] have been studied, and their water solubility improved by
encapsulation. In addition, their antioxidant activities were shown to be
increased in these CD-encapsulated systems. The improved antioxidant efficacy
of the inclusion complex may be a result of the protection of the flavonoid
against rapid oxidation by free radicals [161], which may, in part, be explained
by an increase in their solubility in the biological moiety [163]. The encapsula-
tion efficacy of CD inclusion was affected by the core materials. In general, the
higher the hydrophobicity and the smaller the molecule, the greater the affinity
for the CD was.
Freeze-Drying
Freeze-drying is an industrial process used to ensure the long-term stability
and to preserve the original properties of pharmaceutical and biological pro-
ducts [164]. Freeze-drying, also known as lyophilization or cryodesiccation,
is a process used for the dehydration most heat-sensitive materials and aro-
mas. Freeze-drying works by freezing the material, reducing the surrounding
pressure, and adding enough heat to allow the frozen water in the material
to sublimate directly from the solid phase to the gas phase. Encapsulation
by freeze-drying is achieved as the core materials homogenize in matrix solu-
tions and then co-lyophilize, resulting in uncertain forms.
Due to the long dehydration period required (generally 20 h), this technol-
ogy is rarely applied but may serve as a solution of specific encapsulation
issues for encapsulating water-soluble essences and natural aromas and drugs
[137].Freeze-dried samples of pomace containing anthocyanin and maltodex-
trin have shown good shelf life stability during storage at 50C/0.5 water
activity for up to 2 months [165]. Laine et al.[166] encapsulated phenolic-
rich cloudberry extract by freeze-drying, using maltodextrins as wall materi-
als. The microencapsulated cloudberry extract offered better protection for
phenolics during storage, whereas the antioxidant activity remained the same
or even improved slightly. However, studies have shown that freeze-drying
induced encapsulation was unable to improve stability or bioactivity. When
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry316
Hibiscus anthocyanin extract was encapsulated in pullulan by freeze-drying,
the free anthocyanins were shown to have 1.5–1.8 times faster degradation
than the pullulan–anthocyanin co-lyophilized materials [167]. These results
showed that they can be both free and co-lyophilized with pullulan, Hibiscus
anthocyanins exhibited good antiradical activity throughout storage, and no
significant differences were observed between the materials, suggesting that
the encapsulation might not be necessary if the Hibiscus anthocyanin extract
is to be freeze dried.
DEVELOPMENT OF TOPICAL FORMULATIONS
CONTAINING FLAVONOIDS
The UV components of sunlight are now recognized as major environmental
factors that are deleterious to human health. Acute exposure to ultraviolet
radiation (UVR) from the sun is harmful to the skin, causing sunburn, immune
suppression, DNA damage, and connective tissue degradation. Accumulated
damage resulting from chronic sun exposure has been shown to cause skin
cancer and premature skin aging (photoaging) [168].The genesis of skin dis-
eases due to UVR exposure is a result of the generation of free radicals and
mobilization of transition metal ions, and, thus, inflammation [22].
In principle, the conscientious use of sunscreens/blocks or protective
clothing should prevent UV exposure to the skin. Nevertheless, as epidemio-
logical studies have indicated that the use of sunscreen and sun block are not
completely effective in preventing UV-induced skin injuries, further
approaches are needed to more effectively protect human skin against UV-
caused damage [169].Instead of only blocking the UVR from being absorbed
by the skin, as is usually found with UV absorbers and sunscreens, the skin
could also be protected by preventing the formation of the photooxidants that
result in radical damage and cutaneous diseases [170].
There is increased interest in the identification of natural product sources
for novel anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds that might prove to
be of superior efficacy in preventing and/or treating the skin from the photo-
damage [171,172].Naturally occurring agents are considered to be less toxic
and more effective approaches in controlling various human malignancies
[173,174]; thus, a new concept in cosmetics research and development is
the use of the so-called “biological filters,” such as the potent antioxidants,
vitamins, and flavonoids, which can have protective effects against UVR
and may also have biologically relevant filtering activity [175].
In addition to their innate antioxidant activity, flavonoids, which are
widely distributed in medicinal plants, are known as natural anti-inflammatory
agents [176],which strongly suggest the potential of these compounds to
antagonize critical UV-induced damaging events. Therefore, their topical
use may provide the necessary photoprotection in addition to human
sunscreens.
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 317
The topical delivery of bioactive substances is a powerful strategy to avoid
possible systemic toxicity and, at the same time, to restrict the therapeutic
effects to specific tissues [177] because it is the considered route of adminis-
tration of agents against the UV-induced skin damages. Nevertheless, the
most difficult aspect of a topical delivery system is to overcome the barrier
of the stratum corneum (SC) against foreign substances [178,179]. Further,
most flavonoids are highly lipophilic substances, and their penetration across
the SC (epidermis’ outermost layer) and into viable skin layers may be diffi-
cult due to their affinity for SC components (principally lipophilic in nature)
and the tendency to be retained in this layer [180].
Therefore, adequate cutaneous absorption is known to be an essential
requirement for topically applied photoprotective agents [181],andthevehicle
in which the drug is applied could effectively influence its release from a topi-
cal pharmaceutical preparation [177]. When a delivery system is applied topi-
cally to the skin, the active agent must be released from its carrier (vehicle)
before it contacts the epidermal surface and be available for penetration into
the SC and lower layers of the skin [182,183]. Thus, the percutaneous absorp-
tion of a drug could be influenced by the partition of the active agent between
the vehicle and SC, which was influenced by active agent–vehicle–skin
interactions [184].
In addition, to propose the topical application of flavonoids or delivery
systems containing these agents, extensive in vivo studies are required to test
the long-term treatment effects of the proposed agents, their half-life and the
optimum dose for beneficial effects. Recently, many studies were designed to
evaluate the in vivo efficacy against the UV-induced damage of different
flavonoids when topically applied.
Quercetin, the best studied and one of the most common flavonoids found
in nature, which was shown to have a poor ability to permeate through excised
human skin [177],has been incorporated into different delivery systems to
inhibit the oxidative skin damage and the inflammatory processes induced
by the solar UVR.
Among the first studies that incorporated quercetin into two different
oil-in-water emulsions, with a distinct lipid content, was developed by Casa-
grande et al.[22,177],and they evaluated their potential application as a topi-
cal carrier system for the delivery of this flavonoid. The in vivo results
suggested that these functionally stable formulations containing quercetin
may be used as a topical active product to control UVB-induced skin damage.
Based on these promising results, further studies investigated the design of
novel administration forms to increase the quercetin effectiveness when topi-
cally applied. In this context, quercetin was incorporated into a liquid, crystal-
line formulation, and the influence of this carrier in the in vitro antioxidant
activity of this flavonoid was evaluated. Vehicles having a liquid, crystalline
structure allowed for an easier diffusion of biologically active substances
through the skin have a considerable solubilizing capacity for both oil- and
water-soluble compounds; in addition, liquid crystals were thermodynamically
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry318
stable and could be stored for long periods of time without phase separation
[185]. In fact, Scalia and Mezzena [186]demonstrated that the incorporation
of quercetin in lipid microparticles improved the photo- and chemical stability
of the flavonoid, and the biocompatibility of the lipoparticle carrier system
represents an additional advantage for the development of quercetin-based pro-
ducts for skin care.
In addition, quercetin was also incorporated into water-in-oil (w/o) micro-
emulsion and evaluated regarding its protective effect against UVB-induced
damage in the hairless mouse skin. These results confirmed the possible use-
fulness of topical formulations containing quercetin to prevent UVB radiation
skin as suggested by Casagrande et al.[22].However, the incorporation into
the w/o microemulsion optimized the effects of the flavonoid because a dose
approximately sixfold smaller produced the same in vivo results obtained with
nonionic emulsion containing quercetin. The optimization was due to the sig-
nificant increase in quercetin skin penetration caused by its incorporation into
w/o microemulsion [21]. Further, by evaluating the effects of this w/o micro-
emulsion incorporating quercetin in UV-induced erythema formation and
histopathological changes, we suggest that the protective effects of this for-
mulation on UV-induced responses was not secondary to the interference of
UV transmission (i.e., blocking the UVB radiation from being absorbed by
the skin), as is usually performed with UVB absorbers and sunscreens, but
was due to different biological effects of this flavonoid [168].
Microemulsion systems, which represent pharmaceutically versatile formu-
lations for various applications, have received increasing attention during recent
years because they have several advantages, such as ease of manufacturing,
thermodynamic stability, and high solubilizing power, that allow for the
incorporation of large amounts of poorly soluble compounds and increased drug
permeation rates [179,187].
This type of formulation was also employed as a carrier of another flavo-
noid with lipophilic characteristics. Hesperetin, a flavanone compound, which
has been demonstrated to have protective effects for skin damage [188],was
incorporated into microemulsions for topical whitening products after UVR.
This in vivo study demonstrated that hesperetin-loaded microemulsions showed
significant topical whitening effects and diminished skin irritations when com-
pared with the nontreated group. The authors suggested that the observed
inhibition on the irritation effect might be due to the anti-inflammatory effect
of flavonoids [178]. It was also observed that there was an in vivo protective
effect of hesperetin that was incorporated into a cream formulation when
combined with a combination of the penetration enhancers, such as menthol,
linoleic acid, and lecitin [179].
The evaluation of the in vivo effect of different extracts where flavonoids
were among the main chemical constituents has also been shown. Typically,
as a first step, the extracts that have previously been shown to have anti-
inflammatory and antioxidant activities, in addition to other pharmacological
properties, were incorporated into a topical administration forms, and its
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 319
release and its skin penetration were evaluated to select the most promising
system to deliver the studied active agent.
Gebre-Mariam et al.[182] incorporated the extract of Melilotus elegans
into three different types of formulations (hydrophilic, amphiphilic, and lipo-
philic cream) and evaluated the release profiles of the kaempferol glycosides
from these formulations. As expected, the faster and higher release was
obtained by employing the lipophilic cream in which the glycoside forms of
flavonoids, due to their polarity, have less affinity for the cream base.
The postirradiation, topical application of lotions containing increasing
levels of the plant extract, pycnogenol B, significantly inhibited the acute
inflammation-edema response to solar-simulated UVR [190].
The potential of a topical preparation (SK Ato Formula) containing flavo-
noid mixtures from S. baicalensis Georgi roots and Ginkgo biloba L. leaves
with an extract of Gentiana scabra Bunge roots was evaluated in an animal
model of chronic skin inflammation. In this study, the animals were treated
with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate for 7 consecutive days to induce
a chronic skin inflammation, and when topically applied in this model, the
studied formulation reduced these responses. Further, it inhibited PGE
2
gener-
ation and suppressed the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, COX-2, and
IL-1bin the skin lesion [176].
Reseada luteola L., which is a natural source of luteolin (flavone), was
used to obtain a luteolin-rich extract to be investigated in the prevention or
treatment of inflammatory skin diseases (e.g., sunburn). Due to poor solubility
of the Reseada extract, a nanoparticular soluble state of the extract (s-RE) was
used and clinically assessed on its anti-inflammatory properties in a standar-
dized test model in human volunteers in vivo. These results showed that topi-
cal application of a solubilized luteolin-rich extract from R. luteola effectively
reduced UVB-induced skin inflammation [189].
Fonseca et al.[172] investigated the potential use of extracts from Calen-
dula officinalis L. (also known as marigold), which is used primarily for cuta-
neous and internal inflammatory diseases of several origins that was added in
various topical formulations to prevent or to treat the UVB irradiation-induced
skin damage. The topical application of the gel formulation containing C. offi-
cinalis reduced the histological skin changes induced by UVB irradiation,
providing a photoprotective effect in the hairless mice.
Studies have shown that topically applied isoflavones and their metabo-
lites may offer protection from UV-induced inflammation and immunosup-
pression [191].The topical administration may also be a suitable route for
soy isoflavones to obtain systemic bioavailability because of their rapid clear-
ance from the plasma [192].
Widyarini et al.[193] assessed the effect of several red clover (Trifolium
pratense) isoflavones on UVR-induced skin inflammation that was measured
as the edema component of this reaction by the increase in the irradiated skin-
fold thickness and on the systemic suppression of immune function measured
as the contact hypersensitivity response. This study had shown that topical
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry320
application of lotions containing genistein, equol, isoequol, or dehydroequol
provided protection not only against UVR-induced cutaneous inflammation
observed as the sunburn reaction but also against photoimmune suppression,
which was evident as a defective contact hypersensitivity reaction that was
initiated by the UV-irradiated skin.
Several isoflavonoid derivatives have been identified as metabolites produced
from dietary isoflavones by the gastrointestinal microflora in humans and found to
have various potent biological activities [189].Studies that have focused on
equol ([S]-40,7-dihydroxyisoflavane) because it was shown that its contribution
to the protection against solar-simulated UVR-induced erythemal-associated
edema and immunosuppression [190] showed a potential role in the prevention
of human skin cancer [190] by acting as a sunscreen and, thus, inhibiting DNA
photodamage [191] when topically applied as a lotion.
Soybeans are a rich source of flavonoids called isoflavones, with the most
potent isoflavones being genistein and daidzein and the soybean cake, a bypro-
duct obtained during the processing of soybean oil that has been shown to be a
rich source of isoflavones and other functional components. Chiu et al.[194]
found that isoflavone extract from soybean cake could decrease the early acti-
vation of the signaling pathway in response to UVB and could prevent skin cell
apoptosis, erythema, and inflammation reactions. Thus, this extract might be a
good candidate for an anti-photoaging agent in skin care that has many advan-
tages, such as convenience, economy, and environmental protection.
Propolis is a resinous material that honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) collect
from various plant species and mix with wax and other substances. In general,
it is a complex mixture of different constituents, including flavonoids, aro-
matic acids and esters, aldehydes and ketones, fatty acids and esters, terpenes,
steroids, amino acids, polysaccharides, hydrocarbons, alcohols, hydroxyben-
zene, and several other compounds in trace amounts [195].Although its
composition varies with the source, most samples share significant similarity
in their overall chemical nature, and approximately 50% of the raw propolis is
represented by resin, composed of flavonoids and related phenolic acids
[196]. Many of these constituents were biologically active and were involved
in a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties of propolis, with the main
properties being antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory
[197,198]. It has been suggested that these properties may arise from complex
mechanisms or synergistic interactions between compounds [199]. The topical
application of a crude de-waxed ethanolic extract of “Sydney” propolis in the
Skh:hr-1 albino hairless mouse was effective in reducing inflammation,
immunosuppression, and oxidative damage caused by UV exposure [171].
In contrast, although Fonseca et al.[199] had demonstrated that oral treat-
ment of the hairless mice with two Brazilian propolis extracts (green and
brown) prevented irradiation-induced oxidative stress by preventing GSH
depletion, the topical pretreatment of animals with solutions containing both
propolis extracts was not effective. The low topical effectiveness of both
extracts could be explained by poor diffusion of the active compounds
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 321
through the SC and viable epidermis of mouse skin. To this end, topical for-
mulations that diffuse more effectively through the skin could be developed
and additional studies should be performed.
Finally, the topical application of dermocosmetic formulations containing
an association of vitamins and bioflavonoids showed relevant biological activ-
ity in terms of photoprotection, demonstrating the potentiality of using the
association of active substances with different mechanisms of action against
the UV-induced skin damages [147].
In conclusion, the above-mentioned findings suggest that the in vivo topi-
cal application of flavonoids has the potential to antagonize critical damaging
events, such as the inflammatory reaction, induced by UVR and could be
developed as dermatological and cosmetic products in addition to sunscreens
that would provide photoprotection for humans.
CONCLUSIONS
In this chapter, we described evidence that demonstrated the anti-inflamma-
tory and analgesic effects of flavonoids by mechanisms involving the inhibi-
tion of oxidative stress, cytokines and lipid mediators production, scavenging
chemokines, NF-kB, AP-1, JAK/STAT, MAP kinases and PI3K activation,
IkB degradation, myeloperoxidase, and stimulation of endogenous opioids
release, NO production, IL-1ra, and HO-1 expression. There have been stud-
ies that examined the structure–activity relationship of flavonoids, but there
have not been conclusive data. Further, there has been an increased focus
on developing novel formulations and pharmaceutical forms that could
improve the stability and absorption of flavonoids for oral administration
and that could be incorporated into topical formulations for the protection
against UV radiation-induced skin damage. Finally, the use of flavonoids
may represent a better pharmacological approach compared to current thera-
pies because flavonoids do not act by a single mechanism, but they have been
shown to inhibit the activity and expression of pro-inflammatory enzymes
(e.g., COX-1, COX-2, and 5-LO), inhibit cytokine production and scavenge
them, inhibit intracellular signaling pathways essential for inflammation/pain
induction (e.g., MAP kinases and PI3K), transcription factors (e.g., NF-kB
and AP-1), and oxidative stress while presenting a better profile regarding
side effects, such as gastrointestinal and renal lesions, as compared to nonse-
lective and selective COX-2 inhibitors, respectively. Moreover, steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs increased blood glucose levels, and there is evidence that
it does not occur, at least for some flavonoids, suggesting a better profile for
diabetic patients. Thus, flavonoids represent a promising class of drugs for
anti-inflammatory and analgesic use, and there is increasing attention on the
development of pharmaceutical forms of flavonoids. Further studies using
human cells and long-term clinical trials are necessary to confirm their
usefulness.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry322
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the financial support of Fundac¸a
˜o de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sa
˜o Paulo
(FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı
´fico e Tecnolo
´gico (CNPq),
Coordenac¸a
˜o de Aperfeic¸oamento de Pessoal de Nı
´vel Superior (CAPES), Fundac¸a
˜o
Arauca
´ria and Governo do Estado do Parana
´/SETI, Brazil.
ABBREVIATIONS
5-LO 5-lipoxygenase
AP-1 activating protein-1
APCs antigen presenting cells
CAP cellulose acetate phthalate
cFLIP cellular caspase-8 (FLICE)-like inhibitory protein
COX cyclooxygenase
DRG dorsal root ganglia
EGCG ()-epigallocatechin-3-gallate
EP3 PGE
2
receptor 3
ERK extracellular signal-regulated kinase
FAAH fatty acid amide hydrolase
GSH reduced glutathione
IKK IkB kinase
IL interleukin
iNOS inducible nitric oxide synthase
JNK Jun N-terminal Kinase
MAP kinases mitogen-activated protein kinases
MCP-2 monocyte chemotatic protein-2
MIP-1bmacrophage inflammatory protein-1
NADPH oxidase nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase
NF-kBnuclear factor kB
NO nitric oxide
NSAIDS nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
PGE
2
prostaglandin E
2
PI3K phosphoinositide 3-kinase
PMA phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
PMACI PMA calcium ionophore A23187
ROS reactive oxidative species
SC stratum corneum
SDF stromal cell-derived factor
Th T helper
UVR ultraviolet radiation
w/o water-in-oil
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 323
REFERENCES
[1] J. Peterson, J. Dwyer, Nutr. Res. 18 (1998) 1995–2018.
[2] N. Cotelle, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1 (2001) 569–590.
[3] D. Amic, D. Davidovic-Amic, D. Beslo, N. Trinajstic, Croat Chem. Acta 76 (2003) 55–61.
[4] P.C. Hollman, M.B. Katan, Food Chem. Toxicol. 37 (1999) 937–942.
[5] B. Yang, A. Kotani, K. Arai, F. Kusu, Anal. Sci. 17 (2001) 599–604.
[6] A. Lugasi, J. Ho
´va
´ri, K.V. Sa
´gi, L. Bıro
´, Acta Biol. Szeged. 47 (2003) 119–125.
[7] C. Kaur, H. Kapoor, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 36 (2001) 703–725.
[8] A.S. Pannala, T.S. Chan, P.J. O’Brien, C.A. Rice-Evans, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
282 (2001) 1161–1168.
[9] M.A. Soobrattee, V.S. Neergheen, A. Luximon-Ramma, O.I. Aruoma, T. Bahorun, Mutat.
Res. 579 (2005) 200–213.
[10] P.-G. Pietta, J. Nat. Prod. 63 (2000) 1035–1042.
[11] J.B. Harbone, C.A. Williams, Phytochemistry 55 (1992) 481–504.
[12] I. Erlund, Nutr. Res. 24 (2004) 851–874.
[13] S.L. Robbins, V. Kumar, A.K. Abbas, R.S. Cotran, N. Fausto, Hardback, Saunders/Elsevier,
Philadelphia, 2010, pp. 43–78.
[14] R.J. Williams, J.P.E. Spencer, C. Rice-Evans, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 36 (2004) 838–849.
[15] S.V. Jovanovic, S. Steenken, M. Tosic, B. Marjanovic, M.G. Simic, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116
(1994) 4846–4851.
[16] W. Bors, W. Heller, C. Michel, M. Saran, Methods Enzymol. 186 (1990) 343–355.
[17] A.K. Verma, R. Pratap, Nat. Prod. Rep. 27 (2010) 1571–1593.
[18] K.E. Heim, A.R. Tagliaferro, D.J. Bobilya, J. Nutr. Biochem. 13 (2002) 572–584.
[19] A. Bowie, L.A. O’Neill, Biochem. Pharmacol. 59 (2000) 13–23.
[20] D. Porath, C. Riegger, J. Drewe, J. Schwager, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 315 (2005)
1172–1180.
[21] W.A. Verri Jr., T.M. Cunha, C.A. Parada, S. Poole, F.Q. Cunha, S.H. Ferreira, Pharmacol.
Ther. 112 (2006) 116–138.
[22] R. Casagrande, S.R. Georgetti, W.A. Verri Jr., D.J. Dorta, A.C. dos Santos, M.J. Fonseca,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 84 (2006) 21–27.
[23] B.Q. Li, T. Fu, W.H. Gong, N. Dunlop, H. Kung, Y. Yan, J. Kang, J.M. Wang, Immunophar-
macology 49 (2000) 295–306.
[24] C.Y. Chen, W.H. Peng, K.D. Tsai, S.L. Hsu, Life Sci. 81 (2007) 1602–1614.
[25] M. Lazarus, K. Yoshida, R. Coppari, C.E. Bass, T. Mochizuki, B.B. Lowell, C.B. Saper, Nat.
Neurosci. 10 (2007) 1131–1133.
[26] S. Prasad, K. Phromnoi, V.R. Yadav, M.M. Chaturvedi, B.B. Aggarwal, Planta Med. 76
(2010) 1044–1063.
[27] S.J. Kim, Y.J. Moon, S.M. Lee, J. Nat. Prod. 73 (2010) 2003–2008.
[28] F.C. Meotti, R. Senthilmohan, D.T. Harwood, F.C. Missau, M.G. Pizzolatti, A.J. Kettle, Free
Radic. Biol. Med. 44 (2008) 109–120.
[29] C.C. Chen, M.P. Chow, W.C. Huang, Y.C. Lin, Y.J. Chang, Mol. Pharmacol. 66 (2004)
683–693.
[30] M.E. Gerritsen, W.W. Carley, G.E. Ranges, C.P. Shen, S.A. Phan, G.F. Ligon, C.A. Perry,
Am. J. Pathol. 147 (1995) 278–292.
[31] H. Kobuchi, S. Roy, C.K. Sen, H.G. Nguyen, L. Packer, Am. J. Physiol. 277 (1999)
403–411.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry324
[32] I. Crespo, M.V. Garcı
´a-Mediavilla, B. Gutie
´rrez, S. Sa
´nchez-Campos, M.J. Tun
˜o
´n,
J. Gonza
´lez-Gallego, Br. J. Nutr. 100 (2008) 968–976.
[33] S. Tribolo, F. Lodi, C. Connor, S. Suri, V.G. Wilson, M.A. Taylor, P.W. Needs, P.A. Kroon,
D.A. Hughes, Atherosclerosis 197 (2008) 50–56.
[34] H. Lim, H. Park, H.P. Kim, J. Pharmacol. Sci. (2011) 1–11.
[35] Y.P. Hwang, K.N. Oh, H.J. Yun, H.G. Jeong, J. Dermatol. Sci. 61 (2011) 23–31.
[36] K. Yamagata, A. Myiashita, H. Matsufuji, M. Chino, J. Nutr. Biochem. 21 (2010) 116–124.
[37] A. Abate, G. Yang, R.J. Wong, H. Schroder, D.K. Stevenson, P.A. Dennery, Free Radic.
Biol. Med. 39 (2005) 711–718.
[38] J. Kowalski, A. Samojedny, M. Paul, G. Pietsz, T. Wilczok, Pharmacol. Rep. 57 (2005)
390–394.
[39] C.T. Yeh, G.C. Yen, J. Agric. Food Chem. 53 (2005) 1740–1749.
[40] S.S. Hecht, C. Huang, G.D. Stoner, J. Li, M.J. Patrick, S.J. Sturla, S.G. Carmella, Carcino-
genesis 27 (2006) 1617–1627.
[41] P.A. Abboud, P.W. Hake, T.J. Burroughs, K. Odoms, M. O’Connor, P. Mangeshkar,
H.R. Wong, B. Zingarelli, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 579 (2008) 411–417.
[42] S.J. Kima, H.J. Jeonga, K.M. Leeb, N.Y. Myungc, N.H. Anc, W.M. Yangd, S.K. Parkd,
H.J. Leee, S.H. Hongc, H.M. Kima, J.H. Uma, J. Nutr. Biochem. 18 (2007) 587–596.
[43] C.C. Wu, M.C. Hsu, C.W. Hsieh, J.B. Lin, P.H. Lai, B.S. Wung, Life Sci. 78 (2006)
2889–2897.
[44] M.H. Hong, M.H. Kim, H.J. Chang, N.K. Kim, B.A. Shin, B.W. Ahn, Y.D. Jung, Life Sci.
80 (2007) 1957–1965.
[45] E.K. Kima, K.B. Kwon, M.Y. Songa, S.W. Seo, S.J. Park, S.O. Kaa, K.A. Kima, D.G. Ryub,
H.S. Sod, J.W. Park, B.H. Park, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 278 (2007) 18–28.
[46] K. Vafeiadou, D. Vauzour, H.Y. Lee, A. Rodriguez-Mateos, R.J. Williams, J.P.E. Spencer,
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 484 (2009) 100–109.
[47] R. Mukai, Y. Shirai, N. Saito, Y. Fukuda, S. Nishiumi, K. Yoshida, H. Ashida, Arch. Bio-
chem. Biophys. 501 (2010) 134–141.
[48] H.Y. Lin, S.C. Shen, Y.C. Chen, J. Cell. Physiol. 202 (2005) 579–590.
[49] G. Muthian, J.J. Bright, J. Clin. Immunol. 24 (2004) 542–552.
[50] M. Matsushima, K. Takagi, M. Ogawa, E. Hirose, Y. Ota, F. Abe, K. Baba, T. Hasegawa,
Y. Hasegawa, T. Kawabe, Inflamm. Res. 58 (2009) 705–715.
[51] S.R. Panickera, P. Sreenivasb, M.S. Babuc, D. Karunagarand, C.C. Karthac, Pharmacol. Res.
62 (2010) 328–336.
[52] Z.J. Sun, G. Chen, X. Hu, W. Zhang, Y. Liu, L.X. Zhu, Q. Zhou, Y.F. Zhao, Apoptosis 15
(2010) 850–863.
[53] B. Ying, T. Yang, X. Song, X. Hu, H. Fan, X. Lu, L. Chen, D. Cheng, T. Wang, D. Liu,
X. Xu, Y. Wei, F. Wen, Mol. Biol. Rep. 36 (2009) 1825–1832.
[54] M.K. Pandey, S.K. Sandur, B. Sung, G. Sethi, A.B. Kunnumakkara, B.B. Aggarwal, J. Biol.
Chem. 282 (2007) 17340–17350.
[55] M.K. Pandey, B. Sung, K.S. Ahn, B.B. Aggarwal, Mol. Pharmacol. 75 (2009) 525–533.
[56] T. Bitoa, S. Royb, K. Senb, T. Shirakawac, A. Gotohc, M. Uedad, M. Ichihashid, L. Packera,
FEBS Lett. 520 (2002) 145–152.
[57] Y.H. Wanga, W.Y. Wangb, J.F. Liaoa, C.F. Chena, Y.C. Houc, K.T. Liouf, Y.C. Chou,
J.H. Tieng, Y.C. Shend, Biochem. Pharmacol. 67 (2004) 2251–2262.
[58] S. Liu, Z. Ma, H. Cai, Q. Li, W. Rong, M. Kawano, Eur. J. Haematol. 84 (2010) 137–144.
[59] S. Yoo, S. Han, Y.S. Park, J.H. Lee, U. Oh, S.W. Hwang, Mol. Cells 27 (2009) 417–422.
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 325
[60] Z.F. Li, X.M. Xia, C. Huang, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, A.J. Zhang, Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis.
Int. 8 (2) (2009) 201–208.
[61] R.R. de Sousa, K.C. Queiroz, A.C. Souza, S.A. Gurgueira, A.C. Augusto, M.A. Miranda,
M.P. Peppelenbosch, C.V. Ferreira, H. Aoyama, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 22 (2007)
439–444.
[62] B.P. Burnett, Q. Jia, Y. Zhao, R.M. Levy, J. Med. Food 10 (2007) 442–451.
[63] K. Morikawa, M. Nonaka, M. Narahara, I. Torii, K. Kawaguchi, T. Yoshikawa,
Y. Kumazawa, S. Morikawa, Life Sci. 74 (2003) 709–721.
[64] T.D. Warner, F. Giuliano, I. Vojnovic, A. Bukasa, J.A. Mitchell, J.R. Vane, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 7563–7568.
[65] M.A. Buerkle, S. Lehrer, H.Y. Sohn, P. Conzen, U. Pohl, F. Kro
¨tz, Circulation 110 (2004)
2053–2059.
[66] M.S. Alam, M.A. Alam, S. Ahmad, A.K. Najmi, M. Asif, T. Jahangir, Toxicol. Mech. Meth-
ods 20 (2010) 572–578.
[67] P.C. Vasconcelos, M.A. Andreo, W. Vilegas, C.A. Hiruma-Lima, C.H. Pellizzon, J. Ethno-
pharmacol. 131 (2010) 146–153.
[68] I.T. Abdel-Raheem, Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 107 (2010) 742–750.
[69] A.A. Hamdy, M.A. Ibrahem, J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 11 (2010) 9–16.
[70] J. Fernandez, R. Reyes, H. Ponce, M. Oropeza, M.R. Vancalsteren, C. Jankowski,
M.G. Campos, Eur. J. Pharmacol. 522 (2005) 108–115.
[71] R. Kalhan, L.J. Smith, M.C. Nlend, A. Nair, J.L. Hixon, P.H. Sporn, Clin. Exp. Allergy 38
(2008) 103–112.
[72] J. Yang, Q. Li, X.D. Zhou, V.P. Kolosov, J.M. Perelman, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 351 (2011)
29–40.
[73] M. Joskova, S. Franova, V. Sadlonova, Bratisl. Lek. Listy 112 (2011) 9–12.
[74] R.R. Li, L.L. Pang, Q. Du, Y. Shi, W.J. Dai, K.S. Yin, Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol.
32 (2010) 364–370.
[75] L. Thors, M. Belghiti, C.J. Fowler, Br. J. Pharmacol. 155 (2008) 244–252.
[76] N. Clayton, F.H. Marshall, C. Bountra, C.T. O’Shaughnessy, Pain 96 (2002) 253–260.
[77] L.J. Kehl, D.T. Hamamoto, P.W. Wacnik, D.L. Croft, B.D. Norsted, G.L. Wilcox,
D.A. Simone, Pain 103 (2003) 175–186.
[78] T. Gutierrez, J.N. Farthing, A.M. Zvonok, A. Makriyannis, A.G. Hohmann, Br. J. Pharma-
col. 150 (2007) 153–163.
[79] E. Herlaar, Z. Brown, Mol. Med. Today 5 (1999) 439–447.
[80] L.E. Kilpatrick, S. Sun, H. Li, T.C. Vary, H.M. Korchak, J. Leukoc. Biol. 87 (2010)
153–164.
[81] T.W. Nam, C.I. Yoo, H.T. Kim, C.H. Kwon, J.Y. Park, Y.K. Kim, J. Bone Miner. Metab. 26
(2008) 551–560.
[82] L. Navarro-Nu
´n
˜ez, M.L. Lozano, C. Martı
´nez, V. Vicente, J. Rivera, Fitoterapia 81 (2010)
75–80.
[83] A. Xagorari, C. Roussos, A. Papapetropoulos, Br. J. Pharmacol. 136 (2002) 1058–1064.
[84] H. Jonsson, P. Allen, S.L. Peng, Nat. Med. 11 (2005) 666–671.
[85] W.A. Verri Jr., F.O. Souto, S.M. Vieira, S.C. Almeida, S.Y. Fukada, D. Xu, J.C. Alves-
Filho, T.M. Cunha, A.T. Guerrero, R.B. Mattos-Guimaraes, F.R. Oliveira, M.M. Teixeira,
J.S. Silva, I.B. McInnes, S.H. Ferreira, P. Louzada-Junior, F.Y. Liew, F.Q. Cunha, Ann.
Rheum. Dis. 69 (2010) 1697–1703.
[86] S.E. Lee, S.I. Jeong, H. Yang, C.S. Park, Y.H. Jin, Y.S. Park, J. Cell. Biochem. 112 (2011)
2352–2360, doi:10.1002/jcb.23158.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry326
[87] T.D. Tran, H. Park, H.P. Kim, G.F. Ecker, K.M. Thai, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009)
1650–1653.
[88] J.R. Vane, Nat. New Biol. 231 (1971) 232–235.
[89] S.H. Ferreira, Nat. New Biol. 240 (1972) 200–203.
[90] M. Anjaneyulu, K. Chopra, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiat. 27 (2003)
1001–1005.
[91] M. Anjaneyulu, K. Chopra, Indian J. Exp. Biol. 42 (2004) 766–769.
[92] A.W. Filho, V.C. Filho, L. Olinger, M.M. de Souza, Arch. Pharm. Res. 31 (2008) 713–721.
[93] D.A. Vale
´rio, S.R. Georgetti, D.A. Magro, R. Casagrande, T.M. Cunha, F.T. Vicentini,
S.M. Vieira, M.J. Fonseca, S.H. Ferreira, F.Q. Cunha, W.A. Verri Jr., J. Nat. Prod. 72
(2009) 1975–1979.
[94] K. Vidyalakshmi, P. Kamalakannan, S. Viswanathan, S. Ramaswamy, Pharmacol. Bio-
chem. Behav. 96 (2010) 1–6.
[95] M.M. Co
´rdova, M.F. Werner, M.D. Silva, A.P. Ruani, M.G. Pizzolatti, A.R. Santos, Neu-
rosci. Lett. 495 (2011) 173–177.
[96] T. Hagenacker, I. Hillebrand, D. Bu
¨sselberg, M. Scha
¨fers, Brain Res. Bull. 83 (2010)
292–296.
[97] X. Jin, R.W. Gereau, J. Neurosci. 26 (2006) 246–255.
[98] R. Stavniichuk, V.R. Drel, H. Shevalye, Y. Maksimchyk, T.M. Kuchmerovska, J.L. Nadler,
I.G. Obrosova, Exp. Neurol. 230 (2011) 106–113.
[99] O.I. El-Sabbagh, S.M. Ibrahim, M.M. Baraka, H. Kothayer, Arch. Pharm. 343 (2010)
274–281.
[100] S.C. Bae, W.J. Jung, E.J. Lee, R. Yu, M.K. Sung, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 28 (2009) 56–62.
[101] Y.D. Min, C.H. Choi, H. Bark, H.Y. Son, H.H. Park, S. Lee, J.W. Park, E.K. Park, H.I. Shin,
S.H. Kim, Inflamm. Res. 56 (2007) 210–215.
[102] E.M. Choi, Y.S. Lee, Cell. Immunol. 264 (2010) 1–3.
[103] Y.S. Lee, E.M. Choi, Int. Immunopharmacol. 10 (2010) 812–814.
[104] E.M. Choi, Y.S. Lee, Food Chem. Toxicol. 48 (2010) 2607–2611.
[105] H.K. Kang, D. Ecklund, M. Liu, S.K. Datta, Arthritis Res. Ther. 11 (2009) R59.
[106] P. Knekt, J. Kumpulainen, R. Ja
¨rvinen, H. Rissanen, M. Helio
¨vaara, A. Reunanen,
T. Hakulinen, A. Aromaa, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76 (2002) 560–568.
[107] C. Nicholas, S. Batra, M.A. Vargo, O.H. Voss, M.A. Gavrilin, M.D. Wewers,
D.C. Guttridge, E. Grotewold, A.I. Doseff, J. Immunol. 179 (2007) 7121–7127.
[108] K. Shanmugam, L. Holmquist, M. Steele, G. Stuchbury, K. Berbaum, O. Schulz,
O. Benavente-Garcı
´a, J. Castillo, J. Burnell, V. Garcia-Rivas, G. Dobson, G. Mu
¨nch,
Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 52 (2008) 427–438.
[109] F.O. Souto, A.C. Zarpelon, L. Staurengo-Ferrari, V. Fattori, R. Casagrande, M.J. Fonseca,
T.M. Cunha, S.H. Ferreira, F.Q. Cunha, W.A. Verri Jr., J. Nat. Prod. 74 (2011) 113–118.
[110] F.T. Vicentini, T. He, Y. Shao, M.J. Fonseca, W.A. Verri Jr., G.J. Fisher, Y. Xu, J. Derma-
tol. Sci. 61 (2011) 162–168.
[111] U. Wo
¨lfle, P.R. Esser, B. Simon-Haarhaus, S.F. Martin, J. Lademann, C.M. Schempp, Free
Radic. Biol. Med. 50 (2011) 1081–1093.
[112] Y.N. Wang, W. Wu, H.C. Chen, H. Fang, J. Dermatol. Sci. 58 (2010) 19–27.
[113] J.H. Huang, C.C. Huang, J.Y. Fang, C. Yang, C.M. Chan, N.L. Wu, S.W. Kang, C.F. Hung,
Toxicol. In Vitro 24 (2010) 21–28.
[114] A. Bennick, Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 13 (2002) 184–196.
[115] E. Haslam, J. Nat. Prod. 59 (1996) 205–215.
[116] S. Quideau, K.S. Feldman, Chem. Rev. 96 (1996) 475–503.
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 327
[117] C. Manach, A. Scalbert, C. Morand, C. Re
´me
´sy, L. Jime
´nez, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79 (2004)
727–747.
[118] A. Scalbert, C. Manach, C. Morand, C. Re
´me
´sy, L. Jime
´nez, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 45
(2005) 287–306.
[119] P. De Vos, M.M. Faas, M. Spasojevic, J. Sikkema, Int. Dairy J. 20 (2010) 292–302.
[120] F. Sansone, P. Picerno, T. Mencherini, F. Villecco, A.M. D’Ursi, R.P. Aquino, M.R. Lauro,
J. Food Eng. 103 (2011) 188–196.
[121] L. Chen, G.E. Remondetto, M. Subirade, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17 (2006) 272–283.
[122] M.C. Andry, H. Vezin, I. Dumistracel, J.L. Bernier, M.C. Le´vy, Int. J. Pharm. 171 (1998)
217–226.
[123] A.M. Bakowska-Barczak, P.P. Kolodziejczyk, Ind. Crops Prod. 34 (2011) 1301–1309.
[124] M. Cha
´varri, I. Maran
˜o
´n, R. Ares, F.C. Iba
´n
˜ez, F. Marzo, M.C. Villara
´n, Int. J. Food Micro-
biol. 142 (2010) 185–189.
[125] L. Deladino, P.S. Anbinder, A.S. Navarro, M.N. Martino, Carbohydr. Polym. 71 (2008)
126–134.
[126] M.P. Nori, C.S. Favaro-Trindade, S.M. Alencar, M. Thomazini, J.C.C. Balieiro, C.J.C. Castillo,
LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 44 (2011) 429–435.
[127] C. Sae
´nz, S. Tapia, J. Cha
´vez, P. Robert, Food Chem. 114 (2009) 616–622.
[128] A.S. Saraf, Fitoterapia 81 (2010) 680–689.
[129] H. Vila-Real, A.J. Alfaia, M.E. Rosa, A.R. Calado, M.H.L. Ribeiro, Process Biochem. 45
(2010) 841–850.
[130] Z. Fang, B. Bhandari, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21 (2010) 510–523.
[131] P. Couvreur, C. Dubernet, F. Puisieux, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 41 (1995) 2–13.
[132] C.P. Reis, R.J. Neufeld, A.J. Ribeiro, F. Veiga, Nanomedicine: NBM 2 (2006) 8–21.
[133] B.F. Gibbs, S. Kermasha, I. Alli, C.N. Mulligan, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 50 (1999) 213–224.
[134] C. Manach, G. Williamson, C. Morand, A. Scalbert, C. Re
´me
´sy, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81
(2005) 230–242.
[135] L. Sagalowicz, M.E. Leser, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface 15 (2010) 61–72.
[136] M.A. Augustin, Y. Hemar, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 902–912.
[137] K.G.H. Desai, H.J. Park, Dry Technol. 23 (2005) 1361–1394.
[138] K. Cal, K. Sollohub, J. Pharm. Sci. 99 (2010) 575–586.
[139] K. Sollohub, K. Cal, J. Pharm. Sci. 99 (2010) 587–597.
[140] S. Ersus, U. Yurdagel, J. Food Eng. 80 (2007) 805–812.
[141] L. Zhang, D. Mou, Y. Du, J. Agric. Food Chem. 87 (2007) 2192–2197.
[142] M.R. Lauro, L. Maggi, U. Conte, F. De Simone, R.P. Aquino, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.
15 (2005) 363–369.
[143] S.R. Be
´chard, L. Levy, S.D. Clas, Int. J. Pharm. 114 (1995) 205–213.
[144] M.R. Lauro, F. De Simone, F. Sansone, P. Iannelli, R.P. Aquino, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Tech-
nol. 17 (2007) 119–124.
[145] S.L. Kosaraju, L. D’ath, A. Lawrence, Carbohyd. Polym. 64 (2006) 163–167.
[146] S.L. Kosaraju, D. Labbett, M. Emin, I. Konczak, L. Lundin, Nutr. Dietetics 65 (2008)
48–52.
[147] S. Gouin, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 15 (2004) 330–347.
[148] M. Girard, C. Sanchez, S.I. Laneuville, S.L. Turgeon, S.F. Gauthier, Colloid Surf. B 35
(2004) 15–22.
[149] S.I. Laneuville, S.L. Turgeon, C. Sanchez, P. Paquin, Langmuir 22 (2006) 7351–7357.
[150] T.G. Shutava, S.S. Balkundi, Y.M. Lvov, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 330 (2009) 276–283.
[151] S. Xiong, L.D. Melton, A. Easteal, D. Siew, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (2006) 6201–6208.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry328
[152] V. Schafer, H. Von Briesen, R. Andreesen, A.M. Steffan, C. Royer, S. Troster, J. Kreuter,
H. Rubsamen-Waigmann, Pharm. Res. 9 (1992) 541–546.
[153] M. Takahashi, K. Inafuku, T. Miyagi, H. Oku, K. Wada, T. Imura, D. Kitamoto, J. Oleo
Sci. 56 (2007) 35–42.
[154] M.H. Fan, S.Y. Xu, S.Q. Xia, X.M. Zhang, J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 (2007) 3089–3095.
[155] J.Y. Fang, T.L. Hwang, Y.L. Huang, C.L. Fang, Int. J. Pharm. 310 (2006) 131–138.
[156] A. Priprem, J. Watanatorn, S. Sutthiparinyanont, W. Phachonpai, S. Muchimapura, Nano-
medicine: NBM 4 (2008) 70–78.
[157] E. Bilensoy, A.A. Hincal, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 6 (2009) 1161–1173.
[158] A. Harada, Y. Takashima, H. Yamaguchi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 875–882.
[159] S. Tommasini, M.L. Calabro
`, R. Stancanelli, P. Donato, C. Costa, S. Catania, V. Villari,
P. Ficarra, R. Ficarra, J. Pharm. Biomed. 39 (2005) 572–580.
[160] C. Lucas-Abella
´n, M.I. Fortea, J.M. Lo
´pez-Nicola
´s, E. Nu
´nez-Delicado, Food Chem. 104
(2007) 39–44.
[161] M. Mercader-Ros, C. Lucas-Abella
´n, M.I. Fortea, J.A. Gabaldo
´n, E. Nu
´nez-Delicado, Food
Chem. 118 (2010) 769–773.
[162] M.L. Calabro
`, S. Tommasini, P. Donato, D. Raneri, R. Stancanelli, P. Ficarra, R. Ficarra,
C. Costa, S. Catania, C. Rustichelli, G. Gamberini, J. Pharm. Biomed. 35 (2004) 365–377.
[163] H. Ding, J. Chao, G. Zhang, S. Shuang, J. Pan, Spectrochim. Acta A 59 (2003) 3421–3429.
[164] W. Abdelwahed, G. Degobert, H. Fessi, J Int. Pharm. 324 (2006) 74–82.
[165] F. Delgado-Vargas, A.R. Jimenez, O. Paredes-Lopez, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 40 (2000)
173–289.
[166] P. Laine, P. Kylli, M. Heinonen, K. Jouppila, J. Agric. Food Chem. 56 (2008)
11251–11261.
[167] G. Gradinaru, C.G. Biliaderis, S. Kallithraka, P. Kefalas, C. Garcia-Viguera, Food Chem.
83 (2003) 423–436.
[168] F.T. Vicentini, Y.M. Fonseca, D.L. Pitol, M.M. Iyomasa, M.V. Bentley, M.J. Fonseca,
J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 13 (2008) 274–285.
[169] S. Cooper, J. Ranger-Moore, T.G. Bowden, Mol. Carcinog. 43 (2005) 108–116.
[170] S. Maalouf, M. El-Sabban, N. Darwiche, H. Gali-Muhtasib, Mol. Carcinog. 34 (2002)
121–130.
[171] N. Cole, P.W. Sou, A. Ngo, K.H. Tsang, J.A. Severino, S.J. Arun, C.C. Duke, V.E. Reeve,
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 152 (2010) 87–97.
[172] Y.M. Fonseca, C.D. Catini, F.T. Vicentini, A. Nomizo, R.F. Gerlach, M.J. Fonseca, J. Eth-
nopharmacol. 127 (2010) 596–601.
[173] S. Dhanalakshmi, G.U. Mallikarjuna, R.P. Singh, R. Agarwal, Carcinogenesis 25 (2004)
1459–1465.
[174] B.R. Zhou, B.J. Lin, S.L. Jin, D. Luo, Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 25 (2009)
250–258.
[175] P.M. Maia Campos, M.D. Gianeti, A. Kanashiro, Y.M. Lucisano-Valim, L.R. Gaspar,
Photochem. Photobiol. 82 (2006) 683–688.
[176] H. Lim, K.H. Son, H.W. Chang, S.S. Kang, H.P. Kim, Arch. Pharm. Res. 29 (2006)
503–507.
[177] R. Casagrande, S.R. Georgetti, W.A. Verri Jr., M.F. Borin, R.F. Lopez, M.J. Fonseca, Int. J.
Pharm. 328 (2007) 183–190.
[178] Y.H. Tsai, K.F. Lee, Y.B. Huang, C.T. Huang, P.C. Wu, Int. J. Pharm. 388 (2010) 257–262.
[179] Y.B. Huang, K.F. Lee, C.T. Huang, Y.H. Tsai, P.C. Wu, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 58 (2010)
611–614.
Chapter 9Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs 329
[180] L.B. Lopes, H. VanDeWall, H.T. Li, V. Venugopal, H.K. Li, S. Naydin, J. Hosmer,
M. Levndusky, H. Zheng, M.V. Bentley, R. Levin, M.A. Hass, J. Pharm. Sci. 99 (2010)
1346–1357.
[181] Y.M. Fonseca, C.D. Catini, F.T. Vicentini, J.C. Cardoso, R.L. Cavalcanti De Albuquerque
Junior, M.J. Vieira Fonseca, J. Pharm. Sci. 100 (2011) 2182–2193.
[182] T. Gebre-Mariam, K. Asres, M. Getie, A. Endale, R. Neubert, P.C. Schmidt, Eur. J. Pharm.
Biopharm. 60 (2005) 31–38.
[183] F. Marquele-Oliveira, Y.M. Fonseca, O. de Freitas, M.J. Fonseca, Int. J. Pharm. 342 (2007)
40–48.
[184] C.D. Ropke, T.M. Kaneko, R.M. Rodrigues, V.V. da Silva, S. Barros, T.C. Sawada,
M.J. Kato, S.B. Barros, Int. J. Pharm. 249 (2002) 109–116.
[185] F.T. Vicentini, R. Casagrande, W.A. Verri Jr., S.R. Georgetti, M.V. Bentley, M.J. Fonseca,
AAPS Pharm. Sci. Technol. 9 (2008) 591–596.
[186] S. Scalia, M. Mezzena, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 49 (2009) 90–94.
[187] F.T. Vicentini, T.R. Simi, J.O. Del Ciampo, N.O. Wolga, D.L. Pitol, M.M. Iyomasa,
M.V. Bentley, M.J. Fonseca, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 69 (2008) 948–957.
[188] P. Dekker, W.E. Parish, M.R. Green, Photochem. Photobiol. 81 (2005) 837–842.
[189] F. Casetti, W. Jung, U. Wolfle, J. Reuter, K. Neumann, B. Gilb, A. Wahling, S. Wagner,
I. Merfort, C.M. Schempp, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 96 (2009) 260–265.
[190] S. Sime, V.E. Reeve, Photochem. Photobiol. 79 (2004) 193–198.
[191] S. Widyarini, N. Spinks, A.J. Husband, V.E. Reeve, Photochem. Photobiol. 74 (2001)
465–470.
[192] M.G. Busby, A.R. Jeffcoat, L.T. Bloedon, M.A. Koch, T. Black, K.J. Dix, W.D. Heizer,
B.F. Thomas, J.M. Hill, J.A. Crowell, S.H. Zeisel, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75 (2002) 126–136.
[193] S. Widyarini, A.J. Husband, V.E. Reeve, Photochem. Photobiol. 81 (2005) 32–37.
[194] T.M. Chiu, C.C. Huang, T.J. Lin, J.Y. Fang, N.L. Wu, C.F. Hung, J. Ethnopharmacol. 126
(2009) 108–113.
[195] F. Hu, H.R. Hepburn, Y. Li, M. Chen, S.E. Radloff, S. Daya, J. Ethnopharmacol. 100
(2005) 276–283.
[196] P.G. Pietta, C. Gardana, A.M. Pietta, Fitoterapia 73 (2002) 7–20.
[197] G.A. Burdock, Food Chem. Toxicol. 36 (1998) 347–363.
[198] A.H. Banskota, Y. Tezuka, S. Kadota, Phytother. Res. 15 (2001) 561–571.
[199] Y.M. Fonseca, F. Marquele-Oliveira, F.T. Vicentini, N.A. Furtado, J.P. Sousa,
Y.M. Lucisano-Valim, M.J. Fonseca, Evid. Based Complement Alternat. Med. 2011
(2011) pii:863917.
Studies in Natural Products Chemistry330