ArticlePDF Available

Objective classification of Australian climates

Authors:

Abstract

Köppen's scheme to classify world climates was devised in 1918 by Dr Wladimir Köppen of the University of Graz in Austria. Over the decades it has achieved wide acceptance amongst climatologists. However, the scheme has also had its share of critics, who have challenged the scheme's validity on a number of grounds. For example, Köppen's rigid boundary criteria often lead to large discrepancies between climatic subdivisions and features of the natural landscape. Furthermore, whilst some of his boundaries have been chosen largely with natural landscape features in mind, other boundaries have been chosen largely with human experience of climatic features in mind. The present paper presents a modification of Köppen's classification that addresses some of the concerns and illustrates this modification with its application to Australia.
Introduction
Köppen’s scheme to classify world climates was
devised in 1918 by Dr Wladimir Köppen of the
University of Graz in Austria (Köppen 1931; Köppen
and Geiger 1928, 1930-39). This paper presents a
modification of Köppen’s scheme.
The Köppen classification is based on the concept
that native vegetation is the best expression of cli-
mate, climate zone boundaries having been selected
with vegetation limits in mind (Trewartha 1943). The
classification may be applied to present-day climatic
conditions. Alternatively, it also may be used to
develop a future climatology that is implied by the
output of a numerical climate model (Löhmann et al.
1993) – although the reliability of such a future cli-
matology would be dependent upon the reliability of
the numerical climate model output.
Köppen recognises five principal groups of world
climates that are intended to correspond with five
principal vegetation groups. These five climatic
groups may be described as tropical rainy, dry, tem-
perate rainy, cold snowy forest, and polar.
The dry climates are defined on the basis of there
being an excess of evaporation over precipitation
(which is determined from the mean annual tempera-
ture and the mean annual rainfall). The tropical rainy
Aust. Met. Mag. 49 (2000) 87-96
Objective classification of Australian
climates
Harvey Stern and Graham de Hoedt
Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
and
Jeneanne Ernst
Technische Fachhochschule, Berlin, Germany
(Manuscript received July 1999; revised December 1999)
Köppen’s scheme to classify world climates was devised in 1918
by Dr Wladimir Köppen of the University of Graz in Austria.
Over the decades it has achieved wide acceptance amongst cli-
matologists. However, the scheme has also had its share of crit-
ics, who have challenged the scheme's validity on a number of
grounds. For example, Köppen’s rigid boundary criteria often
lead to large discrepancies between climatic subdivisions and
features of the natural landscape. Furthermore, whilst some of
his boundaries have been chosen largely with natural landscape
features in mind, other boundaries have been chosen largely
with human experience of climatic features in mind. The pre-
sent paper presents a modification of Köppen’s classification
that addresses some of the concerns and illustrates this modifi-
cation with its application to Australia.
87
Corresponding author address: Harvey Stern, Victorian Regional
Office, Bureau of Meteorology, Box 1636M, Melbourne, Vic. 3001,
Australia.
e-mail: H.Stern@bom.gov.au
climates are climates, as yet unclassified, with a mean
temperature of the coolest month of at least 18°C.
The polar climates are climates, as yet unclassified,
with a mean temperature of the warmest month of
below 10°C. The cold snowy forest climates are cli-
mates, as yet unclassified, with a mean temperature of
the coolest month of below -3°C. Remaining climates
are defined as temperate rainy.
Each of these climates is further divided into sub-
divisions based upon differences in the seasonal dis-
tribution of temperature and precipitation. For exam-
ple, Köppen climates with distinctly dry winters are
defined as those temperate rainy climates and cold
snowy forest climates with at least ten times as much
rain in the wettest summer month as in the driest win-
ter month. Trewartha (1943) presents a full descrip-
tion of all of the subdivisions and provides a detailed
map depicting the distribution around the globe of the
original Köppen climates.
The purpose of this paper is two-fold. Firstly, a
new modification of Köppen’s classification of world
climates is presented. Secondly, the modification is
illustrated with its application to Australia.
Discussion
Trewartha (1943) notes that Köppen’s classification
has been criticised from ‘various points of view’
(Thornthwaite 1931; Jones 1932; Ackerman 1941).
Rigid boundary criteria often lead to large discrepan-
cies between climatic subdivisions and features of the
natural landscape. Some boundaries have been cho-
sen largely with natural landscape features in mind
(for example, ‘rainforest’), whilst other boundaries
have been chosen largely with human experience of
climatic features in mind (for example, ‘monsoon’).
Trewartha (1943) acknowledges the validity of these
criticisms when he writes that ‘climatic boundaries, as
seen on a map, even when precisely defined, are nei-
ther better nor worse than the human judgements that
selected them, and the wisdom of those selections is
always open to debate’. He emphasises, however,
that such boundaries are always subject to change
‘with revision of boundary conditions … (and that) …
such revisions have been made by Köppen himself
and by other climatologists as well’.
Nevertheless, the telling evidence that the Köppen
classification's merits outweigh its deficiencies lies in
its wide acceptance. Trewartha (1943) observes that
‘its individual climatic formulas are almost a common
language among climatologists and geographers
throughout the world … (and that) … its basic princi-
ples have been … widely copied (even) by those who
have insisted upon making their own empirical classi-
fications’. Trewartha's (1943) comments are as rele-
vant today as they were half a century ago (see, for
example, Müller (1982); Löhmann et al. (1993)).
For the above reasons, in modifying the Köppen
classification (Figs 1 and 2), the authors have chosen
to depart only slightly from the original.
Nevertheless, the additional division of some of the
Köppen climates and some recombining of other
Köppen climates may better reflect human experience
of significant features. In recognition of this, the fol-
lowing changes, which are also summarised in Table
1, have been adopted in this work:
(1) The former tropical group is now divided into two
new groups, an equatorial group and a new tropi-
cal group. The equatorial group corresponds to
the former tropical group's isothermal subdivi-
sion. The new tropical group corresponds to that
remaining of the former tropical group. This is
done to distinguish strongly between those cli-
88 Australian Meteorological Magazine 49:2 June 2000
Table 1. A summary of key differences between Köppen's original scheme and the new scheme.
Köppen's original scheme New scheme
Tropical group Divided into equatorial & tropical groups
Monsoon subdivision Becomes rainforest (monsoonal) subdivision
Dry group Divided into desert & grassland groups
Summer/winter drought subdivisions Now requires 30+mm in wettest month
Temperate group Divided into subtropical & temperate groups
Cold-snowy-forest group Cold group
Dry summer/winter subdivisions Moderately dry winter subdivision added
Polar group Maritime subdivision added
Frequent fog subdivision Applies now only to the desert group
Frequent fog subdivision Becomes high humidity subdivision
High-sun dry season subdivision Absorbed into other subdivisions
Autumn rainfall max subdivision Absorbed into other subdivisions
Other minor subdivisions Absorbed into other subdivisions
mates with a significant annual temperature cycle
from those climates without one (although this
feature is not as marked in the Australian context,
as elsewhere in the world). Under this definition
some climates, distant from the equator, are clas-
sified as equatorial. This is considered acceptable
as that characteristic is typical of climates close to
the equator. Figure 1 shows that, in Australia,
equatorial climates are confined to Queensland's
Cape York Peninsula and the far north of the
Northern Territory.
(2) The equatorial and tropical group monsoon sub-
divisions are re-named as rainforest (monsoonal)
subdivisions. This is done because, in these sub-
divisions, the dry season is so short, and the total
rainfall is so great, that the ground remains suffi-
ciently wet throughout the year to support rain-
forest. Figure 2 shows that, in Australia, rainfor-
est subdivisions are found along sections of the
northern part of Queensland's east coast.
(3) The former dry group is now divided into two
new groups, a desert group and a grassland group.
The new groups correspond to the former desert
and steppe subdivisions of the dry group. This is
believed necessary because of the significant dif-
ferences between the types of vegetation found in
deserts and grasslands. That there is a part of cen-
tral Australia covered by the grassland group of
climates (Fig. 1) is a consequence of the higher
rainfall due to the ranges in that region.
(4) The new desert and grassland winter drought
(summer drought) subdivisions now require the
additional criterion that there is more than 30
mm in the wettest summer month (winter month)
to be so classified. This change is carried out
because drought conditions may be said to pre-
vail throughout the year in climates without at
least a few relatively wet months. It should be
noted that the original set of Köppen climates
employed the phrases ‘winter drought’ and ‘sum-
mer drought’ to respectively describe climates
that are seasonally dry. Figure 2 shows that the
summer drought subdivisions are found in the
southern half of the country, whilst the winter
drought subdivisions are found in the northern
half of the country.
(5) The former temperate group is divided into two
new groups, a temperate group and a subtropical
group. The new subtropical group corresponds
to that part of the former temperate group with a
mean annual temperature of at least 18°C. The
new temperate group corresponds to that part of
the former temperate group remaining. This is
done because of the significant differences in the
vegetation found in areas characterised by the
two new groups, and in order that there is conti-
nuity in the boundary between the hot and warm
desert and grassland climates where they adjoin
rainy climates. Figure 1 shows that a large
region, covering much of southeast Queensland
and some elevated areas further north, is now
characterised as subtropical.
(6) For simplicity, the former Köppen cold snowy
forest group of climates is re-named as the cold
group. Figure 1 shows that this climate is not
found on the Australian mainland or in Tasmania.
(7) For the temperate, subtropical, and the cold
groups, the distinctly dry winter subdivision
requires the additional criterion of no more than
30 mm in the driest winter month to be so classi-
fied. In order that there be consistency between
the criteria for the distinctly dry winter and the
distinctly dry summer subdivisions, this is
thought to be a worthwhile change. Figure 2
shows that, whereas that part of Western
Australia characterised as subtropical has a dis-
tinctly dry summer, much of subtropical south-
east Queensland has no distinctly dry season.
(8) Carved out of the temperate, subtropical, and the
cold groups with no distinctly dry season subdi-
vision is the moderately dry winter subdivision.
This new subdivision receives at least three times
(but less than ten times) the rainfall in the driest
winter month. This subdivision has been added
in order that there be a match with that part of the
distinctly dry summer subdivision that was not
matched by the distinctly dry winter subdivision.
Figure 2 shows that parts of subtropical southeast
Queensland have a moderately dry winter.
(9) The polar group has added to it the subdivision
polar maritime, this subdivision reflecting the
climate of the sub-antarctic islands, which other-
wise would have been classified (inappropriate-
ly) as polar tundra. Polar tundra would be an
inappropriate description for climates where the
average temperature of the coldest month is -3°C
or above. This is because, with the temperature
not well below freezing, it is difficult for the
ground to become frozen (a characteristic of
‘polar tundra’). Figure 1 shows that this climate
is not found on the Australian mainland or in
Tasmania.
(10) The frequent-fog desert and grassland climates
are re-named as high-humidity climates. They
are also defined in terms of mean annual relative
humidity, rather than in terms of fog frequency.
This is on account of the dew-fall that results
from the high humidity being a significant con-
tributor to plant moisture in regions with such
climates. They are also restricted to desert cli-
Stern et al.: Objective classification of Australian climates 89
90 Australian Meteorological Magazine 49:2 June 2000
Fig. 1 The key climate groups.
ClimateClassification
ofAustralia Majorclassification groups
Equatorial
Tropical
Subtropical
Desert
Grassland
Temperate
Based on amodified Koeppen classification system.
Classification derived from0.025 x 0.025 degreeresolution mean
rainfall, mean maximumand mean minimumtemperaturegridded data.
Allmeansbased on astandard 30-yearclimatology (1961 to 1990).
Stern et al.: Objective classification of Australian climates 91
Fig. 2 Subdivisions within the key climate groups.
C li m a te C la ss if ic at io n
o f A u st ra lia
Equatorial
Tropical
Subtropical
Desert
Grassland
Temperate
rainforest (monsoonal)
savanna
rainforest (persistently wet)
rainforest (monsoonal)
savanna
no dry season
distinctly dry summer
distinctly dry winter
moderately dry winter
hot (persistently dry)
hot (summer drought)
hot (winter drought)
warm (persistently dry)
hot (persistently dry)
hot (summer drought)
hot (winter drought)
warm (persistently dry)
warm (summer drought)
no dry season (hot summer)
moderately dry winter (hot summer)
distinctly dry (and hot) summer
no dry season (warm summer)
moderately dry winter (warm summer)
distinctly dry (and warm) summer
no dry season (mild summer)
distinctly dry (and mild) summer
no dry season (cool summer)
Based on a modified Koeppen classification system.
Classification derived from 0.025 x 0.025 degree resolution mean
rainfall, mean maximum and mean minimum temperature gridded data.
All means based on a standard 30-year climatology (1961 to 1990).
mates. This is on account of the dew-fall in
grassland climates not being a significant mois-
ture contributor (in comparison with the total
rain that falls in grassland climates). Whereas
this climate subdivision is found in the desert
regions on the west coasts of the other two
southern hemisphere continents, the relative
humidity in the west coast desert region of
Australia is far too low for the climate to be
characterised as high humidity.
(11) Some equatorial and tropical subdivisions (those
equatorial and tropical climates with an autumn
rainfall maximum, those with a high-sun dry sea-
son, and those with a hottest month prior to the
summer solstice) are considered to be minor and
have therefore been absorbed into the other equa-
torial and tropical subdivisions.
(12) Some subtropical and temperate subdivisions
(those subtropical and temperate climates that
are isothermal, those that have a hottest month
prior to the summer solstice, and those with a
late-spring/early-summer rainfall maximum) are
also considered to be minor and have therefore
been absorbed into other subtropical and temper-
ate subdivisions.
Method of analysis
The above issues have been addressed in preparing
the new climate classification. The new climate clas-
sification is defined in the Appendix. It is illustrated
over Australia in Fig. 1, which presents the key cli-
mate groups, and Fig. 2, which presents the subdivi-
sions within those groups. Figures 1 and 2 may be
contrasted with the presentation of Köppen's original
scheme, as depicted by Trewartha (1943). Although
many features are depicted in a similar manner in both
the old and new schemes, the detail is greatly
enhanced in the new scheme.
A previous paper by the present authors (Stern et
al. 1999) depicted an analysis of climate groups and
subdivisions over Australia. That analysis, also as
defined in the Appendix, is based on a ‘smoothed’ 25
km grid spacing. That paper employed the Barnes
analysis technique, as modified and described by
Jones and Weymouth (1997). However, the disad-
vantages of that approach were that the smoothing
was too great to allow depiction of some of the very
fine detail, and that the Barnes approach does not ade-
quately reflect the impact of altitude in sparse data
and mountainous areas.
The present paper's analyses are generated using
Hutchinson’s interpolation method of thin plate
smoothing splines (Hutchinson 1995). The analysis
and interpolation are done in three dimensions, incor-
porating elevation as well as latitude and longitude, at
a resolution of 0.025 degrees. The interpolated (grid-
ded) data are then smoothed using a one-pass 13x13
binomial smoother.
The gridded data are based on the Australian
Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) mean monthly rain-
fall, mean annual rainfall, mean maximum tempera-
ture, and mean minimum temperature gridded
datasets (39 gridded datasets in total), the datasets
forming part of an updated Australian rainfall and
temperature climatology. Humidity data were not
available in gridded form but, because no Australian
desert station's humidity data came close to satisfying
the ‘humid’ criterion, it was assumed that no
Australian desert climate should be classified as
‘humid’. Station data used to generate the gridded
datasets were extracted from the BoM's national cli-
mate database, ADAM (Australian Data Archive for
Meteorology). The data extracted from ADAM,
approximately 6000 sites with rainfall data and
approximately 600 sites with temperature data, con-
formed to the WMO (World Meteorological
Organization) guidelines for the quality and continu-
ity of data used in climatological analyses (WMO
1989). Also, in keeping with the WMO guidelines,
the 30-year period 1961–1990 was used as the stan-
dard averaging period. The 39 smoothed rainfall and
temperature grids are then objectively combined (on a
gridcell by gridcell basis) according to the rules for
classification.
One possible deficiency of the approach may arise
if an inappropriate grid length is used. For example, if
the grid length is too large, important detail may be
lost; by contrast, if the grid length is too small, unim-
portant detail may clutter the maps.
A second possible deficiency is that in some parts
of Australia, notably central Australia, observation
sites are well scattered, although the statistical tech-
nique used largely overcomes the impact of this defi-
ciency by taking into account the influence of topo-
graphical features of the landscape.
Summary and conclusion
A modification of the Köppen classification of world
climates has been presented. The extension has been
illustrated by its application to Australian climates.
Even with the additional complexity, the final classi-
fication contains some surprising homogeneity. For
example, there is a common classification between
the coastal areas of both southern Victoria and south-
ern New South Wales. There is also the identical clas-
sification of western and eastern Tasmania. This aris-
92 Australian Meteorological Magazine 49:2 June 2000
es due to the classification not identifying every cli-
mate variation because a compromise has to be
reached between sacrificing either detail or simplici-
ty. For example, regions with only a slight annual
cycle in rainfall distribution do not have that variation
so specified in the classification. Similarly, regions
with only slightly different mean annual temperatures
are sometimes classified as being of the same climate.
The classification descriptions need to be concise,
for ease of reference. As a result, the descriptions are
not always complete. For example, the word ‘hot’ is
used in reference to those deserts with the highest
annual average temperatures, even though winter
nights, even in hot desert climates, can't realistically
be described as ‘hot’.
In conclusion, the authors see the classification
assisting in the selection of new station networks.
There is also the potential for undertaking subsequent
studies that examine climate change in the terms of
shifts in climate classification boundaries by using
data from different historical periods, and by using
different characteristics to define climate type such as
‘inter-annual variability of precipitation’. In the
future, it is planned to prepare climate classification
maps on a global scale, as well as on a regional
Australian scale.
Acknowledgments
The authors take great pleasure in acknowledging the
valuable contributions to their work made by Bureau
of Meteorology colleagues. In particular, we thank
colleagues in the National Climate Centre, in
Regional Climate and Consultancy Sections and in
the Victorian Regional Office.
Dr William Wright of the National Climate Centre
provided the authors with the gridded datasets upon
which the analyses were based.
The work was originally inspired by a discussion
between Mr Tom Garnett of Blackwood's Garden of
St Erth, who saw the potential application of climate
classification to his industry, and the lead author.
Finally we thank the two Australian
Meteorological Magazine reviewers (Terry Skinner
and an unknown reviewer), and Associate Editor Neil
Plummer, for their helpful suggestions.
References
Ackerman, E.A. 1941. The Köppen classification of climates in
North America. Geog. Rev., 31, 105-11.
Hutchinson, M.F. 1995. Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate
smoothing splines. International Journal of Geographical
Information Systems, 9, 385-403.
Jones, D. and Weymouth, G. 1997. An Australian monthly rainfall
dataset. Technical Report 70. Bur. Met., Australia., 19pp.
Jones, S.B. 1932. Classifications of North American climates. Econ.
Geog., 8, 205-8.
Köppen, W. 1931. Klimakarte der Erde. Grundriss der Klimakunde,
2nd Ed., Berlin and Leipzig.
Köppen, W. and Geiger, R. 1928. Klimakarte der Erde. Wall-map 150
cm x 200 cm, Verlag Justus Perthes, Gotha.
Köppen, W. and Geiger, R. 1930-39. Handbuch der Klimatologie, 5
Vols., Berlin.
Löhmann, U., Sausen, R., Bengtsson, L., Cubasch, U., Perlwitz, J.
and Roeckner, E. 1993. The Köppen climate classification as a
diagnostic tool for general circulation models. Report No. 92,
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 22pp.
Müller, M.J. 1982. Selected climatic data for a global set of standard
stations for vegetation science. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The
Hague, Boston, London. 306 pp.
Stern, H., de Hoedt, G. and Ernst J. 1999. Objective classification of
Australian climates. 8th Conf. on Aviation, Range and Aerospace
Meteorology, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Dallas, Texas, 10-15 Jan.,
1999.
Thornthwaite, C.W. 1931. The climates of North America according
to a new classification. Geog. Rev., 21, 633-55.
Trewartha, G.T. 1943. An introduction to weather and climate.
McGraw-Hill, 545 pp.
WMO 1989. Calculation of monthly and annual 30-year standard
normals. World Climate Data Programme Report No. 10, World
Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 11pp.
Stern et al.: Objective classification of Australian climates 93
94 Australian Meteorological Magazine 49:2 June 2000
Appendix
Defining the climate groups and subdivisions.
The source data upon which the classification is based
Defining the derived data and classification criteria
(defining the Temperature elements)
(defining the Temperature criteria)
(defining the Precipitation elements)
(defining the Precipitation criteria)
(defining the Humidity element)
(defining the Humidity criterion)
Where min1, max1, rn1, rh1; min2, max2, rn2, rh2; etc., represent the mean minimum temperature, maximum tempera-
ture, total rainfall and relative humidity of Jan., Feb., etc.
tm1=(min1+max1)/2 tm2=(min2+max2)/2 etc.
ta= (tm1+tm2+ … +tm12)/12 tw= max(tm1,tm2, … ,tm12) tc= min(tm1,tm2, … ,tm12)
t1= (tw-tc)lt5 t2= (ta)ge18 t3= (tw)ge18 t4= (tw)ge22 t5= (tw)ge10 t6= (tw)ge0
t7= ((((tm1)ge10)+ … +((tm12)ge10))gt3) t8= (tc)ge18 t9= (tc)ge-3 t10= (tc)ge -38
h= (rh1+ rh2+ … + rh12)/12
h1= (h)gt70
p1= ((rds)le30 and (rww)gt30 and (rww)ge(3*(rds))) and not ((rws)ge(10*(rdw)))
p2= ((rdw)le30 and (rws)gt30 and (rws)ge(10*(rdw))) and not ((rww)ge(3*(rds)))
p3= (ra)lt(10*(ta)) p4= (ra)lt(10*((ta)+7)) p5= (ra)lt(10*((ta)+14)) p6= (ra)lt(20*(ta))
p7= (ra)lt(20*((ta)+7)) p8= (ra)lt(20*((ta)+14)) p9= (rd)lt60 p10 = (rd)lt(100-(ra/25))
p11= not (((p2) and (p5)) or ((p1) and (p3)) or ((p4) and not ((p1) or (p2))) or ((p2) and (p8) and not (p5)) or ((p1) and (p6)
and not (p3)) or ((p7) and not ((p1) or (p2) or (p4))))
p12= ((rws)ge(3*(rdw))) and ((rdw)le30) and not ((rww)ge(3*(rds)))
p13= (rwau) gt max(rws, rww) and (rwsp) gt max(rws, rww)
ra= (rn1+rn2+ … +rn12)
rw= max(rn1,rn2,..rn12) rd= min(rn1,rn2,..rn12) rws= max(rn12,rn1,rn2) rds=min(rn12,rn1,rn2)
rww= max(rn6,rn7,rn8) rdw= min(rn6,rn7,rn8)
rwau= max(rn3,rn4,rn5) rwsp=max(rn9,rn10,rn11)
Stern et al.: Objective classification of Australian climates 95
Defining the climate classes
(generating the Desert climates)
(generating the Grassland climates)
(generating the Equatorial climates)
(generating the Tropical climates)
(generating the Subtropical climates)
(generating the Temperate climates)
de1= [p4 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and t2 = hot (persistently dry)
de2= [p1 and p3 and not(h1)] and t2 = hot (summer drought)
de3= [p2 and p5 and not(h1)] and t2 = hot (winter drought)
de4= [p4 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (persistently dry)
de5= [p1 and p3 and not(h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (summer drought)
de6= [p2 and p5 and not(h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (winter drought)
de7 = [p4 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and [t5 and not(t3)] = cool (persistently dry)
de8 = [p1 and p3 and not(h1)] and [t5 and not (t3)] = cool (summer drought)
de9 = [p2 and p5 and not(h1)] and [t5 and not(t3)] = cool (winter drought)
de10 = [h1] and [{p4 and not(p1 or p2)} or {p1 and p3} or {p2 and p5}] = humid
gr1= [p7 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and t2 = hot (persistently dry)
gr2= [p1 and p6 and not(h1)] and t2 = hot (summer drought)
gr3= [p2 and p8 and not(h1)] and t2 = hot (winter drought)
gr4= [p7 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (persistently dry)
gr5= [p1 and p6 and not(h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (summer drought)
gr6= [p2 and p8 and not(h1)] and [t3 and not(t2)] = warm (winter drought)
gr7 = [p7 and not(p1 or p2 or h1)] and [t5 and not(t3)] = cool (persistently dry)
gr8 = [p1 and p6 and not(h1)] and [t5 and not (t3)] = cool (summer drought)
gr9 = [p2 and p8 and not(h1)] and [t5 and not(t3)] = cool (winter drought)
eq1= [t1 and t8] and [p11 and not(p9)] = rainforest (persistently wet)
eq2= [t1 and t8] and [p9 and p11 and not(p10 or p13)] = rainforest (monsoonal)
eq3= [t1 and t8] and [p9 and p11 and p13 and not(p10)] = rainforest(double monsoonal)
eq4= [t1 and t8] and [p9 and p10 and p11] = savanna
tr1= [t8 and not(t1)] and [p11 and not(p9)] = rainforest (persistently wet)
tr2= [t8 and not(t1)] and [p9 and p11 and not(p10)] = rainforest (monsoonal)
tr3= [t8 and not(t1)] and [p9 and p10 and p11] = savanna
st1= [t2 and not(t8)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season
st2= [t2 and not(t8)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter
st3= [t2 and not(t8)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter
st4= [t2 and not(t8)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry summer
te1= [t4 and t9 and not(t2)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season (hot summer)
te2= [t4 and t9 and not(t2)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (hot summer)
te3= [t4 and t9 and not(t2)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (hot summer)
te4= [t4 and t9 and not(t2)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and hot) summer
te5= [t3 and t9 and not(t4)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season (warm summer)
te6= [t3 and t9 and not(t4)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (warm summer)
te7= [t3 and t9 and not(t4)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (warm summer)
te8= [t3 and t9 and not(t4)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and warm) summer
te9= [t7 and t9 and not(t3)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season (mild summer)
te10= [t7 and t9 and not(t3)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (mild summer)
te11= [t7 and t9 and not(t3)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (mild summer)
te12= [t7 and t9 and not(t3)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and mild) summer
te13= [t5 and t9 and not(t7)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season (cool summer)
te14= [t5 and t9 and not(t7)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (cool summer)
te15= [t5 and t9 and not(t7)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (cool summer)
te16= [t5 and t9 and not(t7)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and cool) summer
96 Australian Meteorological Magazine 49:2 June 2000
(generating the Cold climates)
(generating the Polar climates)
co1= [t4 and t10 and not(t2 or t9)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season
(hot summer)
co2= [t4 and t10 and not(t2 or t9)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] =moderately dry winter (hot summer)
co3= [t4 and t10 and not(t2 or t9)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (hot summer)
co4= [t4 and t10 and not(t2 or t9)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and hot) summer
co5= [t3 and t10 and not(t4 or t9)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season
(warm summer)
co6= [t3 and t10 and not(t4 or t9)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (warm summer)
co7= [t3 and t10 and not(t4 or t9)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (warm summer)
co8= [t3 and t10 and not(t4 or t9)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and warm) summer
co9= [t7 and t10 and not(t3 or t9)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season
(mild summer)
co10= [t7 and t10 and not(t3 or t9)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (mild summer)
co11= [t7 and t10 and not(t3 or t9)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (mild summer)
co12= [t7 and t10 and not(t3 or t9)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and mild) summer
co13= [t5 and t10 and not(t7 or t9)] and [not(p1 or p2 or p7 or p12)] = no dry season
(cool summer)
co14= [t5 and t10 and not(t7 or t9)] and [p12 and not(p1 or p2 or p7)] = moderately dry winter (cool summer)
co15= [t5 and t10 and not(t7or t9)] and [p2 and not(p8)] = distinctly dry winter (cool summer)
co16= [t5 and t10 and not(t7 or t9)] and [p1 and not(p6)] = distinctly dry (and cool) summer
co17= t5 and not (t10) = very severe winter
po1= t6 and t9 and not(t5) = maritime
po2= t6 and not(t5 or t9) = tundra
po3= not(t6) = perpetual frost
... We hypothesised that jurisdictions sharing a border would have more similar noxious weed lists than jurisdictions not sharing a border. Our reasoning is that neighbouring jurisdictions share large areas of environmental risk along their borders, which have similar climatic and anthropogenic conditions (Stern et al. 2000). To investigate this hypothesis, we used three common community ecology metrics, treating each jurisdiction as a 'site' (n = 8 jurisdictions): pair-wise dissimilarity (distance), nestedness, and proportion of species overlapped by jurisdiction. ...
... Despite Tasmania being an island, we categorised Victoria and Tasmania as bordering. Freight and movement of people is frequent between these jurisdictions and they share similar climates (Davies et al. 2023;Stern et al. 2000). ...
Article
Full-text available
Effective regulation is essential for preventing the establishment of new invasive plants and managing the environmental, social, and economic impacts of those already established. Invasive plants are regulated by jurisdictions at a mix of local, regional, national, and international levels. Enhanced coordination of policy and regulations has been identified as a key strategy for addressing the impacts of invasive species; however, coordination between jurisdictions, and even within jurisdictions, is not always considered. To review regulatory coordination in Australia, we compiled a comprehensive dataset of noxious weeds (defined as invasive plants and potentially invasive plants with controls specified in regulation) in each Australian jurisdiction (i.e., state or territory). We found that jurisdictions on average shared ca. 67% (SD = 15%) of noxious weed listings. Neighboring jurisdictions were not more similar than separated jurisdictions in their noxious weed listings. There were significant differences in the biogeographic native ranges of noxious weeds between jurisdictions, with species native to temperate Asia being most frequently listed overall. The predominant likely entry pathway for noxious weeds in Australia was the ornamental trade. Listings were primarily dedicated to proactive control, prohibiting the cultivation of noxious weeds to avoid their naturalization. There were 415 noxious weeds regulated in a harmonious manner across jurisdictions. However, there were 327 noxious weeds regulated by jurisdictions in a discordant manner, potentially leaving neighboring jurisdictions vulnerable to invasion. We suggest jurisdictions reassess the regulation of these 327 discordant noxious weeds in Australia and utilize a national taxonomic standard to avoid problematic synonyms. Improved cohesion of policies could be achieved through wider adoption of existing regulatory systems and codevelopment of regulations between government and industry.
... Australia's climate is marked by variable rainfall patterns and diverse environmental conditions, with a vast arid interior and relatively narrow humid, vegetated regions along the east coast, ranging from temperate to tropical climates. 24,29 In contrast, North America, particularly the eastern US and Canada, has extensive temperate regions, offering more predictable climatic conditions. Such climatic heterogeneity likely plays a significant role in shaping the migratory behaviors of avian species. ...
... To aid interpretation of the climate types at each site, We incorporated the climate zones of Australia following Australia Bureau of Meteorology's climate classification. 24 We further investigated the spatial-temporal distributions of bird movement within each day/night, as well as on a seasonal scale throughout the year. We selected northward movements in the first half of the year (1 January to 31 June) and southward movements in the second half of the year (1 July to 31 December) to focus on potential migratory movements. ...
... climate/maps/ (accessed on 20 October 2024). The map was established by identifying the classification and distribution of the dominant vegetation types and climate conditions [38]. The grassland cover categories include savannah grasslands (SGs), open grasslands (OGs), and desert grasslands (DGs), respectively ( Figure 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Grasslands are key components of land ecosystems, providing valuable ecosystem services and contributing to local carbon sequestration. Australian grasslands, covering approximately 70% of the continent, are vital for agriculture, pasture, and ecosystem services. Ongoing climate change introduces considerable uncertainties about the dynamic responses of different types of grasslands to changes in regional climate and its variation. This study, bringing together high-resolution meteorological data, calibrated long-term satellite NDVI data, and NPP and statistical models, investigated the spatiotemporal variability of NDVI and NPP and their predominant drivers (temperature and soil water content) across Australia’s grassland zones from 1992 to 2021. Results showed a slight, non-significant NDVI increase, primarily driven by improved vegetation in northern savannah grasslands (SGs). Areal average annual NPP values fluctuated annually but with a levelled trend over time, illustrating grassland resilience. NDVI and NPP measures aligned spatially, with values decreasing from the coastal to the inland regions and north to south. Most of the SGs experienced an increase in NDVI and NPP, boosted by abundant soil moisture and warm weather, which promoted vegetation growth and sustained a stable growing biomass in this zone. The increased NDVI and NPP in northern open grasslands (OGs) were linked to wetter conditions, while their decreases in western desert grasslands (DGs) were ascribed to warming and drier weather. Soil water availability was the dominant driver of grassland growth, with NDVI being positively correlated with soil water content but being negatively correlated with temperature across most grasslands. Projections under the SSP126 and SSP370 scenarios using ACCESS-ESM1.5 showed slight NPP increases by 2050 under warmer and wetter conditions, though western and southern grasslands may see declines in vegetation coverage and carbon storage. This study provides insights into the responses of Australian grasslands to climate variability. The results will help to underpin the design of sustainable grassland management strategies and practices under a changing climate for Australia.
... This study was undertaken across native grasslands of the Riverine Plain bioregion in south-western NSW ( Figure 2). Here, the dry semiarid climate is characterized by hot summers and cool winters, with winter-dominant mean annual rainfall ranging from 300 mm in the west to 450 mm in the east (Stern et al., 2000). Red-brown and gray clays supporting native grasslands dominate the landscape (Porteners, 1993). ...
Article
Full-text available
Understanding the factors that limit the abundance of threatened species is critical for the development of effective conservation strategies. However, gaining such knowledge from monitoring programs and using it to inform decision‐making for rare species can be difficult due to methodological issues posed by the problems of distinguishing true absences from false absences and the analysis of datasets dominated by zero counts. The plains‐wanderer (Pedionomus torquatus) is a critically endangered ground‐nesting bird that occurs in grasslands of southeastern Australia. Decline of the plains‐wanderer has been attributed to habitat modification but little emphasis has been placed on the role of introduced predators, such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), which have had a devastating effect on small ground‐dwelling vertebrates in dryland regions of Australia. Here, we use a 9‐year time series of spotlight counts to investigate the impact of vegetation structure and fox presence on plains‐wanderer occupancy and abundance. We used distance sampling to determine the effective strip width for sighting plains‐wanderers during spotlight surveys. We then used a hurdle model approach whereby binomial generalized additive models were fitted to presence/absence data within the effective strip‐width across all sites and negative‐binomial models were fitted to an index of abundance at sites where plains‐wanderers were observed. Plains‐wanderer occupancy and abundance fluctuated markedly through time. Where foxes were absent, occupancy (but not abundance) of plains‐wanderers showed a humped relationship with grass height with an optimal height between 50 and 150 mm. Where foxes were present however, this relationship broke down and plains‐wanderers were rarely recorded. Our results suggest that plains‐wanderers should benefit from management strategies that maintain grass height at optimal levels and exclude foxes or effectively suppress their populations. A key message from this study is that if statistical analyses of data generated by monitoring programs for rare species are intended to inform management decisions by identifying relationships between threatened species and drivers of their abundance, there should be consideration of analytic approaches that account for true and false zeroes, high prevalence of zeroes, and the possibility of nonlinear responses.
... The study was conducted from 2021 to 2023 in an 8.3-ha irrigation block of a commercial young almond orchard planted in 2020 in Griffith (34˚S, 146˚E elevation 129 m), within the Riverine Plain, NSW. The Riverina is an agricultural region with a predominantly semi-arid climate characterized by hot summers, cold winters, and annual rainfall that ranges between 250 and 500 mm (Stern et al., 2000). Soils in the Riverine range from calcareous sandy soils to heavy redbrown and gray clays (Hornbuckle and Christen, 1999). ...
Article
Full-text available
The viability of modern horticulture heavily relies on adopting sustainable practices. Understanding soil spatial variability on heavy clay soils and its impact on young trees is crucial to design suitable soil and water management strategies that guarantee the sustainability of orchards. The objective of this study was to assess in an orchard with heavy clay soils of the Riverine Plain, NSW, the impact of soil spatial variability on the development of young almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D. A. Webb) trees and evaluate the use of remote and proximal sensing tools for identifying threatening factors for the sustainability of the crop. Soil and aerial surveys were used to assess the soil and crop spatial variability in an 8.3‐ha irrigation block. The site was divided into five areas based on apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) measurements where soil samples were collected. Tree growth, soil, and plant water status were monitored in two contrasting areas in ECa. In the first year of study, a significant and positive correlation was found between ECa and percentage of ground canopy cover. Soil analysis and soil moisture monitoring revealed that high values of exchangeable sodium percentage, which are indicative of sodic soils prone to dispersion, and limited water infiltration were the cause of the reduced tree growth in areas with low ECa. The impact of soil spatial variability on tree growth decreased in the second growing season due to weather and water management factors that influenced soil water content. This study showcases the usefulness of remote and proximal sensing in assessing potential soil‐spatial‐related issues in newly established orchards as well as the impact soil spatial variability can have on tree development in the first years after planting.
... The majority of sample sites sit < 500 m in elevation, which 323 reflects most of the Australian continent (87% sits below 500 m). Site locations were 324 classified to a climate zone based on a modified Köppen-Geiger classification 325 system which incorporates information on the climatic limits of native vegetation, as 326 the best expression of climate in an area (Stern et al., 2000). Temperate and 327 grassland climate zones had the most sample coverage in the dataset (Fig. 2f). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Motivation: Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are integral to plant nutrient acquisition, carbon cycling, and ecosystem resilience, yet our knowledge of their biogeography is severely limited, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. Australia, despite its landmass and unique ecological characteristics, has been vastly undersampled, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of AM fungal diversity and distribution. The AusAMF database was created to address this deficiency, the first release comprises AM fungal community data from 610 sampling locations across mainland Australia and Tasmania, collected between 2011 and 2023. Using standardised sampling, DNA extraction, sequencing methods and platforms, this database provides a robust resource for exploring spatial patterns in AM fungal diversity, community composition, and the ecological drivers shaping AM fungal biogeography. The AusAMF database will continue to be updated and maintain standardised approaches to facilitate future research into plant-mycorrhizal interactions, nutrient cycling, and to understand the broader role of AM fungi in ecosystem processes. The data here will provide the foundation for more informed management and conservation efforts in Australia while providing valuable data for global scale analyses. Main types of variables contained: Georeferenced occurrence and abundance of high throughput amplicon sequences of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Spatial location and grain Australia. Decimal degrees between 0.000001 to 0.1 resolution Time period and grain: 2011 to 2023. Month and year of sampling. Major taxa and level of measurement: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi identified to family, genus, and virtual taxon (VT). Geographic occurrence and amplicon sequence abundance. Software format: Interact with data via online application. Dataset available as .csv files and raw sequencing data as .fastq files.
Chapter
Given the significant role climate plays in phenology the chapter gives an overview of each country’s climate. It provides details on citizen science—historical and current, horticulture, pollen, phenocams, and land surface phenology. The chapter highlights that with the use of alternative data sources such as government records, naturalist diaries and newspapers there is a rich data source available. Access to, and collation of, these records is fundamental to detect phenological trends and to project future changes. However, these are in hard-copy form and making them accessible will require a major investment from government.
Article
Background and Aims Fire-released seed dormancy (SD) is a key trait for successful germination and plant persistence in many fire-prone ecosystems. Many local studies have shown that fire-released SD depends on heat and exposure time, dose of smoke-derived compounds, SD class, plant lineage and the fire regime. However, a global quantitative analysis of fire-released SD is lacking. We hypothesized that fire-released SD is more prevalent in fire-prone than in non-fire-prone ecosystems, and in crown-fire compared to surface-fire ecosystems. Additionally, uncovering patterns in the relationship between fire cues and SD classes at the global scale that mirror those identified in local or regional studies was expected. Methods Totally, 246 published germination studies during 1970-2022, encompassing 1782 species from 128 families was used in our meta-analysis. Meta-analysis moderators included different fire cues, smoke application methods, smoke exposure duration and concentration, smoke compounds, fire-proneness, fire regimes, and ecosystem types. Key Results Heat released physical, and smoke released physiological and morphophysiological dormancies. For SD release, heat and smoke acted synergistically, and KAR1 was the most effective smoke compound. Fire-released SD was more prevalent in fire-prone than non-fire-prone regions; and particularly under crown fire regimes. Fire-released SD occurred mainly in Mediterranean ecosystems, temperate dry forests, and temperate warm ecosystems, whereas species from savannas and tropical grasslands, temperate grasslands, and tropical rainforests generally responded negatively to fire. Conclusions Fire-released SD is strongly influenced by fire regimes the latter with significant role in shaping SD and germination patterns on a global scale. The synergistic effect of heat and smoke in dormancy release reveals more intricate interactions between fire cues than previously understood. Understanding these patterns is crucial in the context of shifting fire regimes driven by climate change, as they may disrupt plant life cycles, alter ecosystem functions, biodiversity, and community composition and provide key insights for biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration in fire-prone ecosystems.
Article
Full-text available
Bu çalışmada, farklı iklim sınıflandırma yöntemlerine göre Bartın ilinin geçmişten günümüze iklim özelliklerinin nasıl değiştiğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından kaydedilen 50 yıllık (1974-2023) yağış ve sıcaklık verileri kullanılmıştır. Veri analizleri beşer yıllık dönemler halinde ortalamalar üzerinden yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda Bartın ilinin iklim özelliklerinin belirlenmesinde Thornthwaite ve Köppen-Trewartha sınıflandırma yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, 1999 yılından sonraki ortalama yaz dönemi sıcaklıklarının son 50 yıllık dönemdeki ortalama yaz dönemi sıcaklığının üzerinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Yağış değerlerine göre ise son 30 yılın ortalama toplam yıllık yağış değerleri, son 50 yılın ortalama toplam yıllık yağış değerlerinin üzerinde yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. Yapılan basit doğrusal regresyon analizine göre, ortalama sıcaklık değerlerinde, ortalama toplam yağış değerlerinde, ortalama yaz dönemi sıcaklık ve yağış değerlerinde, yıllara göre artış eğilimi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bartın ili için yapılan sınıflandırma yöntemlerine bakıldığında, Köppen-Trewartha sınıflandırmasına göre son 5 yılda sembol olarak bir değişim söz konusu olduğu, ancak Thornthwaite sınıflandırmasına göre önemli bir düzeyde değişikliğin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Genel olarak değerlendirme yapılacak olursa, sıcaklık ve yağış değerlerindeki değişimlerle birlikte, yıl içerisindeki yağış miktarının ve dağılımının değişmesi Bartın ili ikliminin yavaş yavaş değiştiğinin bir göstergesi olabilir.
Article
Full-text available
The Koppen climate classification was applied to the output of atmospheric general circulation models and coupled atmosphere-ocean circulation models. The classification was used to validate model control runs of the present climate and to analyse greenhouse gas warming simulations The most prominent results of the global warming con~putations were a retreat of regions of permafrost and the increase of areas with tropical rainy climates and dry climates.
Article
Full-text available
Thin plate smoothing splines provide accurate, operationally straightforward and computationally efficient solutions to the problem of the spatial interpolation of annual mean rainfall for a standard period from point data which contains many short period rainfall means. The analyses depend on developing a statistical model of the spatial variation of the observed rainfall means, considered as noisy estimates of standard period means. The error structure of this model has two components which allow separately for strong spatially correlated departures of observed short term means from standard period means and for uncorrelated deficiencies in the representation of standard period mean rainfall by a smooth function of position and elevation. Thin plate splines, with the degree of smoothing determining by minimising generalised cross validation, can estimate this smooth function in two ways. First, the spatially correlated error structure of the data can be accommodated directly by estimating the corresponding non-diagonal error covariance matrix. Secondly, spatial correlation in the data error structure can be removed by standardising the observed short term means to standard period mean estimates using linear regression. When applied to data both methods give similar interpolation accuracy, and error estimates of the fitted surfaces are in good agreement with residuals from withheld data. Simplified versions of the data error model, which require only minimal summary data at each location, are also presented. The interpolation accuracy obtained with these models is only slightly inferior to that obtained with more complete statistical models. It is shown that the incorporation of a continuous, spatially varying, dependence on appropriately scaled elevation makes a dominant contribution to surface accuracy. Incorporating dependence on aspect, as determined from a digital elevation model, makes only a marginal further improvement.
The Köppen classification of climates in North America
  • E A Ackerman
Ackerman, E.A. 1941. The Köppen classification of climates in North America. Geog. Rev., 31, 105-11.
An Australian monthly rainfall dataset
  • D Jones
  • G Weymouth
Jones, D. and Weymouth, G. 1997. An Australian monthly rainfall dataset. Technical Report 70. Bur. Met., Australia., 19pp.
Classifications of North American climates
  • S B Jones
Jones, S.B. 1932. Classifications of North American climates. Econ. Geog., 8, 205-8.
Klimakarte der Erde. Wall-map 150 cm x 200 cm
  • W Köppen
  • R Geiger
Köppen, W. and Geiger, R. 1928. Klimakarte der Erde. Wall-map 150 cm x 200 cm, Verlag Justus Perthes, Gotha.