ArticlePDF Available

Food Security Challenges in Nigeria: A Paradox of Rising Domestic Food Production and Food Import

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This paper examined the food security challenges vis-á-vis the paradox of increased domestic food production and food import in Nigeria. The study used time-series data from National Bureau of Statistic, Central Bank of Nigeria, Nigeria's National Dailies and CIA Factbook reports. The trend analysis showed that the share of agriculture to the total Gross Domestic Product, GDP had a downward trend, especially from 1960-1979, where food import hovered around 2.92 % from 1960-74 and up to 9.85 % in 1975-79 of GDP. The result depicts an undulating trend in the contribution of agriculture and food import values to 2009 where food import rose astronomically from N2.6trillion (3.83 %) in 2005-2009 to about N20.6trillion (25.02 %) in 2010-2012. Results of the regression analysis confirmed that agriculture has a positive relationship with GDP, and contributes significantly with a coefficient of 0.852. The paradox however is that food import negates the a priori expectation as it is found to be positively related to the GDP: as food production increases marginally, food importation increases asymptotically. The paper recommends that reliance on food import could be minimized through increased budgetary allocation to the sector, and improvement in postharvest management practices that have hitherto, aggravated food insecurity in the country.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available online at www.ilns.pl
International Letters of Natural Sciences
13(1) (2014) 38-46 ISSN 2300-9675
Food security challenges in Nigeria: a paradox of
rising domestic food production and food import
G. T. Ahungwa, U. Haruna, B. G. Muktar
Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Federal University Dutse,
P.M.B. 7156, Dutse, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
This paper examined the food security challenges vis-á-vis the paradox of increased domestic
food production and food import in Nigeria. The study used time-series data from National Bureau of
Statistic, Central Bank of Nigeria, Nigeria’s National Dailies and CIA Factbook reports. The trend
analysis showed that the share of agriculture to the total Gross Domestic Product, GDP had a
downward trend, especially from 1960-1979, where food import hovered around 2.92 % from 1960-
74 and up to 9.85 % in 1975-79 of GDP. The result depicts an undulating trend in the contribution of
agriculture and food import values to 2009 where food import rose astronomically from N2.6trillion
(3.83 %) in 2005-2009 to about N20.6trillion (25.02 %) in 2010-2012. Results of the regression
analysis confirmed that agriculture has a positive relationship with GDP, and contributes significantly
with a coefficient of 0.852. The paradox however is that food import negates the a priori expectation
as it is found to be positively related to the GDP: as food production increases marginally, food
importation increases asymptotically. The paper recommends that reliance on food import could be
minimized through increased budgetary allocation to the sector, and improvement in postharvest
management practices that have hitherto, aggravated food insecurity in the country.
Keywords: Food security; Paradox; Domestic food production; Food import; Nigeria
1. INTRODUCTION
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has warned repeatedly
of catastrophic food shortages in Africa, because the average per capita calorie intake in
majority of African countries has now fallen below the minimum nutritional standards,
considering the relatively poor performance of the agricultural sector. The warning outlined
one of the important challenges for agriculture in development as the neglect of this sector in
the development priorities of the governments of African countries (Ehigiamusoe, 2012).
This development has predisposed the continent to the twin jeopardy of severe poverty and a
glaring state of food insecurity.
Recent statistics depicts that, the agricultural sector in Nigeria has not been able to
fulfill its traditional roles of feeding the population, meeting the raw materials needs of
industries, as well as providing substantial export earnings for the economy. Indeed, the
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-39-
contribution of the sector to total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has been falling, not
necessarily because a strong industrial sector is displacing agriculture but as a result of low
productivity. The largely subsistence agricultural sector has failed to keep up with rapid
population growth of Africa’s most populous country - a once a large net exporter of food,
but now a net food importer (Nwajiuba, 2012).
It is on record that Nigeria faces huge food security challenges as about 70 percent of
the population lives on less than US$ 1.25 per day, thus, suffering from hunger and poverty
(Nwajiuba, 2012). Nigeria’s claim to remain an agrarian economy hinges on two key facts.
The first is the share of agriculture in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the second is
the proportion of the population engaged in the agricultural sector. On both scores, the
agricultural sector contributes more than any other sector of the economy, providing over 40
% of GDP while the population of Nigeria involved in farming is between 60 and 70%
(Nwajiuba, 2012). However, according to the Nigeria’s senate President, David Mark as
quoted in Thisday Newspaper (May, 3, 2012), Nigeria still spends about N24.5 trillion on
food importation per annum.
Nigeria is naturally blessed with abundant land and water resources, which have given
the nation’s agricultural sector high potentials for increased growth, but these potentials are
not being fully realized, prompting the nation to set up the Vision 2020 wherein, agriculture
is pivotal to its realization of positioning herself amongst the 20th world leading economies
by the year 2020. Despite all these obvious abundant human and natural resources, the
country is still unable to feed its’ citizens, producing for instance, about 500,000 tons of rice
while the annual consumption is 2.5 million tons, according Nigeria the world's second-
largest rice importer after Singapore. Over the past 20 years, food production increase has not
kept pace with population growth, resulting in rising food imports and declining levels of
national food self-sufficiency (FGN, 2009).
No country can truly be a sovereign nation if it is not capable of ensuring food security
for its citizens. Histories have shown that no nation has actually become great without
developing its agriculture and its concomitant institutions (Isife and Abert, 2009). Experts
have argued that significant food and nutrition problems exist in Nigeria (Olayide, 1982;
Famoriyo, 1998; Okuneye 2002; Ahungwa et al, 2013). Recent estimates put the number of
hungry people in Nigeria at over 53 million of the country's total population and that 52 per
cent of the populace lives below the poverty line (Azubike, 2012).
Statistics have shown that Nigeria has become a floodgate for food imports. For a
country that has the potentials of supporting a wide range of agricultural ventures, still spends
over N635 billion on import of wheat, N356 billion on import of rice, N217 billion on sugar
importation and despite the huge marine resources spent N97 billion importing fish as of
2010 (Adesina as quoted by Azubike, 2012). At the moment, Nigeria’s food import has risen
from $3 billion in 2009, $11 billion in 2010/11 to N24.5 trillion in 2012 as affirmed by
Corporate Nigeria, (2009), Osagie (2013) and the Nigeria’s senate president, David Mark
(2012). The loss of food sovereignty and the dependence on food importation are also making
the country quite susceptible to fluctuations in global food crisis. This explained why Nigeria
was strongly affected by the global food crisis in 2007/2008.
The immediate response to the recent food crisis in the country propelled the Federal
Government, through the ministry of agriculture and water resources then, to facilitate the
development of a National Food Crisis Response Programme (NFCRP), The Food Security
Thematic Group (FSTG), established in 2009 and the Food and Agricultural Organization
(FAO) was invited to provide guidance. The Agricultural Transformation Agenda and
Growth Enhancement Support Scheme were also introduced with the primary objective of
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-40-
import substitution to deal with the hidden hunger crisis confronting the country (Osagie,
2013).
Despite demonstrated efforts at building institutions to address hunger and poverty in
the country, no further step has since been taken to consolidate set agenda. It is in this light
that the paper seeks to examine the paradox of the Nigeria’s massive food import amidst
plenty opportunities of domestic food production.
2. CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES
Agricultural production was the mainstay of Nigeria’s economy and a source of food.
In the colonial era and briefly after independence, agriculture played a dominant role in the
nation’s economy from the standpoint of adequate food for its population. According to
Akande (1998) at independence agriculture was able to match the expectation ascribed to it as
regards food security.
Today, domestic food production is on the rise in Nigeria but it is not enough to meet
the national food demand, worst still losses of produced crops are on the rise because
processing and storage of crops are not adequately done (FGN, 2009). Nutritious foods are
limited by low income, and poverty stricken citizens; most nutritious food is often expensive,
food intake and nutritional wellbeing of many households is of relatively low quantity, and is
affected by their low economic status. According to FAO (2011) households’ food insecurity,
under nutrition and micro nutrient deficiencies are found throughout Nigeria.
Ogen (2003) posits that during the first ten years after independence Nigeria could be
seen as an agricultural economy because agriculture was the engine of growth of its overall
economy, during this time Nigeria was the world’s second largest producer of cocoa, and
highest producer and exporter of palm-kernel and palm-oil. According to Lawal (1997) then
Nigerian farmers produced 70% of Nigerian export and 95% of its food needs, thus helping to
contribute immensely to the maintenance of a healthy population; and a source of food and
nutrition for households in Nigeria. However, it has not done well enough, especially from
the time the country started the production of crude oil in commercial quantity in the mid
1960’s till now.
It was observed that, the volume of commodity output is inconsistent, even when it
increases marginally and this showed poor performances of agricultural sector. However, a
lot was said on the reasons of these poor performances, for example Abdulrahaman (2013)
and Iganiga and Unemhilin (2011) attributed the problem to low budgetary allocation to the
sector. In his opinion, Aditoloye (2012) blamed insufficient funds and how these funds are
disbursed to the farmers by Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme. On the contrary,
Iwuchukwu and Igbokwe (2012) put the blames on poor policies and agricultural programs.
3. FOOD SECURITY IN NIGERIA
The food security in Nigeria hangs on a very delicate balance of domestic food
production and volatile food imports, as asserted by many experts. Although the number of
people faced with the problem of acute starvation in the country may not be alarming at the
moment, like it is in some parts of the world, especially in the horn of Africa, a jolt on
Nigeria’s food supply system could push the country into a hunger challenge of adverse
proportion.
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-41-
Analysts have always noted that Nigeria’s current food security is by no means
sustainable. The most populous black nation on earth became a net importer of food,
squandering $11 billion importing basic food commodities including wheat on which N635
billion was expended yearly and rice, on which Nigeria spent N356 billion annually,
amounting to about N1 billion per day. So, although Nigeria is not currently enmeshed in
famine, extreme lack of food or starvation, it is mainly for one reason only, and that is
because every day, it still sells enough crude oil to purchase sufficient food to salvage its
population from the brink of starvation. But this clearly is not a sustainable way to feed about
170 million people (Osagie, 2013).
A lot has been written on food crisis in Nigeria, a country once considered as a major
food exporter now found itself in the midst of food importation. Adeniyi et al (2009),
Adebayo (2010) and Abdulrahaman (2013), confirmed the existence of food insecurity in
Nigeria. What causes the crisis is a subject of debate among scholars. For example
Abdulrahaman (2013) is of the opinion that, the amount of statutory allocation given to the
sector is too small for the sector to achieved its primary objective. Adeniyi et al (2009)
pointed at poor agricultural policies and programs and the ways and procedures on how
agricultural loans are disbursed to the farmers respectively are responsible for low
agricultural productivity. In his contribution Adebayo (2010) blamed the effects of
deregulation policies on agricultural sector as a consequence to food security. Other factors
include high increase in the prices of food stuffs and the hand-work of hoarders in sabotaging
enough food in the market.
4. METHODOLOGY
4. 1. Source of Data
This study is aimed at examining the interplay of domestic food production and food
importation to the overall Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Nigeria’s economy (a proxy
measure of the nation’s wellbeing) using the time series data between 1960-2012. The data
used in the study are the sectoral component shares of the Nigerian GDP, component shares
of agriculture to the overall GDP (as a proxy value of domestic food production), and the
values of food import (in N million). Data were obtained from the National Bureau of
Statistics and Central Bank of Nigeria Annual report (CBN Statistical Bulletin, 2010); CIA
Factbook (2013) and NPC annual report (2012).
4. 2. Data Analysis and Model Specification
Trend analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to examine the effects of
component shares of agricultural production and food imports on the gross domestic product
of the nation which serves as a pseudo measure of the nation’s ability to meet the food needs
of the populace.
4. 3. Double_Log Regression analysis:
The model is explicitly expressed as:
      
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-42-
where:
 = Gross Domestic product (at current basic prices, 1960-2012),  = Intercept,
  = regression coefficients,  = log contribution of Agriculture to GDP (in N m),
 = log of annual food import bill (in N m) and  = log of white noise error term
assumed to be 1.
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5. 1. Trend Analysis
Table 1 and Figure 1 show the contribution of agriculture and naira values of food
import as the percentage of GDP of Nigeria. The contribution of agriculture depicts a
downward trend from 1960 to 1979 (61.65 to 23.80 %), whereas, the value of food imports
were relatively stable at about 2.92 % between 1960-1974.
This observation is consistent with earlier findings by Ahungwa et al (2014) and
Anyanwu et al (2013) which showed the dominance of agriculture share of GDP in the first
two decades, though at a declining rate. The reason could be attributed to the fact that the
nation’s only alternative to economic sustenance was agriculture.
Table 1. Values of Agriculture and Food imports in relation to the total GDP of Nigeria
(1960-2012).
Year
Total GDP
Agriculture
Value of food import (excluding
vegetable oil and animal fats)
N’m
GDP N’m
%
%
1960-1964
2568.40
1579.64
61.65
2.87
1965-1969
3088.58
1640.26
53.27
2.55
1970-1974
9314.62
3268.40
39.69
3.13
1975-1979
31233.22
7328.64
23.80
9.85
1980-1984
51809.44
16426.78
31.30
10.62
1985-1989
119632.20
44270.86
38.12
3.69
1990-1994
539207.30
181622.32
32.55
5.21
1995-1999
2668070.00
920018.08
34.32
10.52
2000-2004
22500196.0
2734641.32
37.05
6.80
2005-2009
20560630.0
6929310.42
33.50
3.83
2010-2012*
37129386.5
12368898.7
37.02
25.02
Sources: CBN Statistical Bulletin, 2010; *NPC (2013); *CIA Factbook (2012).
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-43-
Fig. 1. Values of the contribution of Agriculture to GDP and food import (1960-2012).
Then, agriculture was able to play its traditional roles of food provision, earning of
foreign exchange and provision of raw materials to the industries. However, there were
drastic changes especially in the amount of food importation resulting from the neglect of the
agricultural sector prior to the discovery of oil and also the resultant effect of the civil war in
1967-1970. Agricultural production declined and food importation rose sharply from 9.85 %
to 10.62 % in 1975-1979 and 1980-1984, respectively. The sudden increase in food
importation could also be linked to the windfall from oil sector and sudden change in taste for
foreign food by an average Nigerian. Agricultural sector continued to strive, contributing
annually to the nation’s GDP at an undulating rate between 31.30 % in 1980-84 to 37.02 % in
2010-2012. Food importation however, decline from 10.62 % in 1980-84 to 5.21 % in 1990-
94. The situation was reverse and food import rose to 10.52 % again between 1995-99. The
advent of political dispensation ushered in a new dimension to the agricultural sector with
introduction of a number of agricultural programmes and initiatives that generated so much
interest among farmers. However, according to FGN Vision 20:2020 (2009) such initiatives
lacked concurrent provisions for storage and processing facilities, thus resulting in large
postharvest losses and apathy on the side of the farmers.
The situation become alarming within the interval of 2010-2012 wherein agricultural
share to GDP was 37.02 % with an amazing figure of food import of 25.02 % . Principal
reason for such could be attributed to the resultant effect of the 2012 flood that affected over
12 states of the federation. Within this interval, the actual monetary values of food import
rose from N4.2 trillion to N24.5 trillion, an amount five times the nation’s annual budgets
5. 2. Regression Results
The Double-Log regression model was used to explain the impact of the shares of
agricultural sector and the values of food import on the GDP. The results of the regression
shows that there is a positive relationship between the dependent variable (GDP) and the
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
value of Agric
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-44-
share of agriculture which also conform to the a priori expectation that agriculture is
positively related to the GDP. The magnitude of the coefficient of agriculture (0.852) is
statistically significant at 1% level. This implies that a percent increase in the share of
agriculture will contribute to about 85.2 % change in the GDP of Nigeria. The findings
further confirm the pivotal role of agriculture to the Nigeria’ economy (Kola, 2011; Umaru
and Zubairu, 2012; Anyanwu et al., 2013, and Ahungwa et al,. 2014).
The paradox however, is that the coefficient of food import, expected to be inversely
related to the GDP was found to be positive, though not statistically significant. This negates
the findings of Muhammad and Atte (2006) which indicated that as food import increases,
domestic agricultural production decreases. Nonetheless, statistical figures available showed
otherwise. Whereas the domestic food production was on a marginal increase, especially in
the recent years, due to government renewed efforts in agriculture, food importation is rather
on the increase. Deductively, it could be averred that food imports is contributing rather to
the GDP through raised import duties and tariffs (e.g. 100% on rice), as well as internally
generated revenues from such business ventures. Empirically, the negation could to be
attributed to the facts that the various government initiatives that generated interest in
agricultural production were without concurrent provisions for storage and processing, thus
resulting in large postharvest losses and apathy on the side of the farmers (FGN, 2009).
Moreso, the population increase that has jumped from 160 million in 2006 to about 170
million in 2012, thus bringing Nigeria to the 7th most populous nation, is not accompanied
with corresponding domestic food production. This is in consonance with the view of
Nwajiuba, (2012) that domestic food production is unable to feed the growing population.
The R2 of 0.994 implies that 94.4 percent of total variance in GDP is explained by the
regression equation. Coincidentally, the goodness of fit of the regression remained same after
adjusting for the degrees of freedom as indicated by the adjusted R2 (R2 = 0.987 or 98.7 %).
F-statistics 1960.46, which is the measure of the joint significance of the explanatory
variables, is found to be statistically significant at 5 percent as indicated by the corresponding
probability value (0.000).
Table 1. Parameters of Regression Results of Agriculture and Food Import of the GDP
against total GDP.
Variables
Coefficients
t-statistics
Sig.
(Constant)
-
2.892
.006**
Agriculture
.852
10.548
.000*
Food Import
0.144
1.783
.081
R-square
0.994
0.987
Adjusted R-Square
F-statistic
1960.457 .000*
* = Significant at 1 %, ** = Significant at 5 %.
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-45-
6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Nigeria food equation hangs on a delicate balance of domestic food production that
is heavily dependent on natural forces and volatile food imports that is only sustainable as
long as the proceeds from the oil sector keep flowing. The concurrent increase in domestic
food production and food import were as a result of monumental postharvest losses resulting
from inadequate storage and processing facilities, growing consumer population and
overdependence of the agriculture on weather that is highly unpredictable.
The paper recommends that to minimises the increasing reliance on food import, it is
essential that productivity enhancing measures be implemented in the agricultural sector such
that food production can expand at a rate that is commensurate with food deficit caused by
increasing population. This could be achieve through increased budgetary allocation to the
agricultural sector, raising of embargo on food produce that the nation has comparative
advantages to produce and introduction of postharvest saving mechanism that will minimize
wastages that have hitherto, exacerbated food security in the country.
References
[1] Abdulrahaman S., International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow 2(1) (2013) 1-6.
[2] Adebayo A. A., Int. Journal of Economic Research and Investment 1(1) (2011) 132-150.
[3] Adeniyi I. M., AbdulRasheed A., Bello A. I., Journal of International Economic Review
2(1-2) (2009) 167-176.
[4] Adetiloye K. A., J Economics 3(1) (2012) 39-48.
[5] Agriculture in Nigeria (2011). State of Food Security in Nigeria. Retrieved on 2nd
October, 2011 from
http://aricultureinnigeria.blogspot.com/2011/04/state-of-food-security-innigeria.
[6] Ahungwa G. T., J. C. Umeh, Muktar B. G., International Organisation of Scientific
Research Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 6(1) (2013) 57-62.
[7] Agriculture to the Gross Domestic Product of Nigeria (1960-2012). International
Organisation of Scientific Research Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science
(IOSR-JAVS), 7(1); 50-55.
[8] Akande S. O. (1998). Public policy in Nigeria agriculture In Institutional reforms for
Agriculture development. Oludimu O.L. and Imodu P.B. (eds) Triumph Books
Publishers, pp. 20-54.
[9] Anyanwu S. O., U. S. Offor, O. M. Adesope, Ibekwe U. C., Global Advanced Research
Journal of Management and Business Studies 2(6) (2013) 342-348.
[10] Azubike G. (2012). Nigeria: Food Insecurity as a time bomb, March 2012:
(http://allafrica.com/stories/201203110293.html), accessed 25/11/2013.
[11] CBN (2010). Central Bank of Nigeria: Statistical Bulletin, 2010 Edition
[12] Corporate Nigeria (2009). The Business, Trade and Investment Guide 2010/2011,
www.corporatenigeria.net, accessed 1/22/2014.
International Letters of Natural Sciences 13(1) (2014) 38-46
-46-
[13] Ehigiamusoe U. K., International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
Intervention 1(1) (2012) 13-23.
[14] Famoriyo O. A., Applied Tropical Agriculture 3(1) (1998) 1-9.
[15] FGN (2009). Report of the Vision 2020 National Technical Working Group on
Agriculture and Food Security, July 2009.
[16] Food and Agricultural Organization (2011). Global food losses and waste: Extent,
causes and prevention. Study conducted for the International congress (FAO) Rome.
[17] Iganiga B. O., D. O. Unemhilin, Journal of Economics 2(2) (2011) 81-88.
[18] Iwuchukwu J. C., Igbokwe E. M., Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 5 (2012).
[19] Isife B. I., C. O. Abert, The perception of Extension Professionals Agric. Journal 4
(2009) 22-26.
[20] Kola D., Publication of Central Bank of Nigeria 25(3) (2001) 32-38.
[21] Lawal A. A. (1997). The economy and the state from the pre-colonial times to the
present. In Osuntokun, A and Olukoya A (eds). Nigeria People and culture Ibadan;
Davidson.
[22] Muhammad L. A., O. A Atte, African Journal of General Agriculture 2(1) (2006)
132-150.
[23] Nwajiuba C. (2012). “Nigeria’s Food Security Challenges”, www.nestinterative.org,
accessed, 11/25/2013.
[24] Ogen O. (2003). Patterns of Economic growth and development in Nigeria since 1960.
In Arifalo S.O. and Ajayii (eds) (2003). Essays in Nigerian contemporary History.
Lagos: first academic publishers
[25] Okunneye P. A., CBN Economic and Financial Review 39(4) (2002) 6.
[26] Olayide S. O. (1982). Food and Nutrition Crisis in Nigeria. Ibadan: Card.
[27] Osagie C. (2013). Year 2013: The Struggle to Stem Indiscriminate Food Importation,
Thisday Newspaper, 31 Dec. 2013. www.thisdaylive.com/news accessed, 6/3/2014.
[28] Tollens F. (2000). Food Security: Incidence and Causes of Food Insecurity Among
Vulnerable Groups and Coping Strategies, In, CTA (2000) Food Insecurity in ACP
Countries, Proceedings of a CTA Seminar, pp. 27-50.
[29] Umaru A., A. A. Zubairu, International Journal of Social Science and Education 2(4)
(2012) 12.
( Received 13 June 2014; accepted 02 July 2014 )
... Even with the success achieved so far in food production in Nigeria, Ejika & Omede (2016) still stuck to the old mantra of inadequate domestic food production as the sole cause of food insecurity. Other works with similar postulation include, Otaho (2013), Ahungwa et al. (2014), Fasayiro & Taiwo (2012). ...
... Whence went the over 20 million metric ton of food that was added to domestic food supply within this period? More still, Ahungwa et al. (2014) noted that within this period of recorded high domestic output, there paradoxically was an astronomical increase in food importation in the country. Between 2005 and 2009, 2.6 trillion naira was spent on food import, however from 2010 to 2012 the amount shoot up to 20 trillion naira. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper argues that agricultural policies alone, no matter how well formulated and implemented cannot ensure food security in Nigeria without a corresponding sound macroeconomic management, poverty reduction strategy and social safety net. We argue that increase in domestic food production will only positively affect the supply side of food security while poverty rate if unattended to will negatively affect the demand side ensuring the persistence of food insecurity.
... Even with the success achieved so far in food production in Nigeria, Ejika & Omede (2016) still stuck to the old mantra of inadequate domestic food production as the sole cause of food insecurity. Other works with similar postulation include, Otaho (2013), Ahungwa et al. (2014), Fasayiro & Taiwo (2012). ...
... Whence went the over 20 million metric ton of food that was added to domestic food supply within this period? More still, Ahungwa et al. (2014) noted that within this period of recorded high domestic output, there paradoxically was an astronomical increase in food importation in the country. Between 2005 and 2009, 2.6 trillion naira was spent on food import, however from 2010 to 2012 the amount shoot up to 20 trillion naira. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper argues that agricultural policies alone, no matter how well formulated and implemented cannot ensure food security in Nigeria without a corresponding sound macroeconomic management, poverty reduction strategy and social safety net. We argue that increase in domestic food production will only positively affect the supply side of food security while poverty rate if unattended to will negatively affect the demand side ensuring the persistence of food insecurity. Keywords: Food security, agriculture, policy, macroeconomics. The paradox of food insecurity in Nigeria (2011-2017). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362156534_The_paradox_of_food_insecurity_in_Nigeria_2011-2017 [accessed Jan 25 2023].
... This has resulted in a significant decline in contribution of agriculture to the Gross Domestic Products (GDP) which is due to infrastructural deficit militating against the rural farmers, limiting them to subsistence farming practices and consequent low productivity with persistence poverty in the rural communities (Osabohien, 2019). Source (Gabriel et al., 2014) The discovery of crude oil has in no small measure helped the country's economy but has however been a factor against agricultural development mostly in the rural areas (Oluwatayo and Henrietta, 2015). This happened because farming became a less preferred activity compared to the easy income made from petroleum (Fasanya, 2018), and was displaced as the main driver of economy soon after crude oil was discovered in commercially large quantity (Uwakonye et al., 2006) in 1968 and its subsequent boom in the 1970s due to Arab crisis with the West (NISER, 2015). ...
... As a result, most Nigerian peasant farmers, whose farmland are usually between 1-3 hectares are faced with very limited or lack of improved faming facilities (Ogunlela and Mukhtar, 2009) and other basic social amenities. Lack of appropriate storage facility results to unimaginable post-harvest waste of both perishable and grains (Gabriel et al., 2014), causing wide price variation of agro-produce and consequent low income inflow to the farmers. World Bank record in 2012 shows that sub-Saharan Africa loose US $4bn equivalent of grains annually due to lack of post-harvest processing infrastructure (Bank, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
More than 50 percent of Nigerian total population resides in the rural areas with farming as their major occupation and means economic sustenance. Hence rural areas in Nigeria have the potentials to contribute significantly to the national socio-economic development through sustainable agriculture. However, unlike in the past when Nigerian agricultural sector used to be a strong sustainer of the economy through provision of food for the population and raw materials for the industries, general infrastructural deficit and neglect of the rural communities have diminished the attractiveness of agriculture, leaving it for the poor in the society. This is due, partly to the advent of crude oil in Nigeria and has led to poverty, hunger, malnutrition, and diseases in the rural communities. Nigerian government had however taken a number of measures towards agricultural development; these include River Basin Development Authority, HANCOR Borrowers, and a number of other initiatives. However, a larger percentage of the beneficiaries of these developmental efforts have always been in the urban and peri-urban centres, with minimum or no effect of the initiatives in the rural communities. This paper therefore review Nigerian agricultural development challenges and issues, and proposes rural economic development through sustainable agricultural infrastructure with focus on integrated approach involving the use of renewable energy, post-harvest processing, and agro-training program. This approach takes beneficiaries integration into consideration from design to execution of the programme, thereby ensuring their total commitment. This would improve agricultural productivity for immediate consumption and for industrial use, as well as prevent post-harvest waste, with improvement in the marketing systems of farm produces and rural farmers’ economy and living standards.
... This has resulted in a significant decline in contribution of agriculture to the Gross Domestic Products (GDP) which is due to infrastructural deficit militating against the rural farmers, limiting them to subsistence farming practices and consequent low productivity with persistence poverty in the rural communities (Osabohien, 2019). Source (Gabriel et al., 2014) The discovery of crude oil has in no small measure helped the country's economy but has however been a factor against agricultural development mostly in the rural areas (Oluwatayo and Henrietta, 2015). This happened because farming became a less preferred activity compared to the easy income made from petroleum (Fasanya, 2018), and was displaced as the main driver of economy soon after crude oil was discovered in commercially large quantity (Uwakonye et al., 2006) in 1968 and its subsequent boom in the 1970s due to Arab crisis with the West (NISER, 2015). ...
... As a result, most Nigerian peasant farmers, whose farmland are usually between 1-3 hectares are faced with very limited or lack of improved faming facilities (Ogunlela and Mukhtar, 2009) and other basic social amenities. Lack of appropriate storage facility results to unimaginable post-harvest waste of both perishable and grains (Gabriel et al., 2014), causing wide price variation of agro-produce and consequent low income inflow to the farmers. World Bank record in 2012 shows that sub-Saharan Africa loose US $4bn equivalent of grains annually due to lack of post-harvest processing infrastructure (Bank, 2012). ...
... Agricultural production was the mainstay of Nigeria's economy and a source of food. In the colonial era and briefly after independence, agriculture played a dominant role in the nation's economy from the standpoint of adequate food for its population until the discovery of oil in commercial quantities [11]. Today, domestic food production is on the rise in Nigeria, but it is not enough to meet the national food demand. ...
... The participation criteria of households having a child at or below five years of age, and a mother or primary care-giver (one who prepares the meals and eats together at least four times a week) was used. Umudike has an estimated 500 households while Okwe Ukwu has about 400 households [11]. The total population is about 900 households. ...
... The four major scopes of food security consist of availability, accessibility, adequate use, and the stability of market supplies always [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In a region where food security is better understood in terms of agricultural output on land [28][29][30][31] because farming maintains an intricate dominance in the region's economy. Local food production and animal husbandry as key elements in the daily food needs of West Africans, provide jobs and revenues for the rural poor. ...
... under the moderately low-level colour of pink in nutrition security index. In the next level, spots of moderately high to high scales (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).9% to [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].9%) in food security index were initially clustered around Togo, Burkina Faso, and Senegal followed by Chad and Liberia under the fourth level with the last one in dark brown (Figure 9). Looking at the propensity of drought in a region prone to the risks of changing weather patterns from 1990-2004. ...
... On the other hand, cultivated The underlying drivers of observed change include growing demand for food from ever increasing population and intensive open mining exploration activities in the area. Previous studies in the region shows that food production is yet to keep pace with population increase ( Abdulrahaman, 2013 ;Uma et al., 2014 ;Ahungwa et al., 2014 ) and more than half of the population are still food insecure ( Ojo and Adebayo, 2012 ). The reports of Abbas and Fasona (2012) indicated that exploration of crude oil, agricultural expansion are the major drivers of land use changes with wide ranging negative impacts on the biodiversity resources, rural livelihoods, and ecological processes. ...
Article
Full-text available
The growing demand for cultivable land, deforestation and land conversion have taken their tolls over the past several decades in the region leading to serious degradation on soil and other natural resources. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) parameters were integrated with satellite remote sensing and geographical information systems (GIS) to determine the extent and rate of soil loss. The results indicate significant land conversation during1996 and 2016 with increases in cultivated land by 3400 ha, settlement by 2300 ha and bare land with 2600 ha except grazing land with 300 ha at the expense of forest land, that had declined by 8600 ha. Consistent with the land conversation from native vegetation, soil erosion rate for the entire Upper catchment was from 79 t/ha in 1996 which increased to 149 t/ha for 2016. This was further substantiated by significant (p < 0.05) variation in soil loss among land use types with significant high soil loss in cultivated (38 t/ha) and bare land (28 t/ha) and the lowest under forest cover (17 t/ha). There is urgent need for the development of comprehensive and viable land management land-use necessary to improve the status and utilization of catchment resources in response to sustainable land management practices for supportive livelihood of the local people. Area with high soil erosion losses among land use types should be protected by stone bunds, cultivation and ridge making should be carried out across slope while bare lands should be covered with trees through reforestation approach.
... Although expansion of land under agriculture in Nigeria is attributable to ensuring food security of the large growing population (Abubakar, 2015;World Bank, 1998), food production is yet to keep pace with population increase (Abdulrahaman, 2013;Uma et al., 2014;Ahungwa et al., 2014) and more than half of the population are still food insecure (Ojo and Adebayo, 2012) ranking the country 38th out of 76 on the 2014 Global Hunger Index (IFPRI, 2015). Food insecurity in Nigeria may be attributable to the low productivity of the agricultural sector given the constraints that militates against the sector including climate change, insecure land tenure, lack of access to credit, poor funding, heavy dependence on rain fed agriculture, poor irrigation facilities amongst others (Nwajiuba, 2013;Ojo and Adebayo, 2012), which have reduced labour supply in the sector and resulted into decline in agricultural output and (Apata et al., 2009;Uma et al., 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the gender dimension and food security status of households' during post-planting and post-harvest periods in Nigeria. Secondary source of data of a total of 4979 households' respondents were considered for the analysis in this study. Method of data analysis include descriptive statistics like frequency, percentages and inferential statistics. The FGT method of estimating food security was adapted estimating a threshold of 2250kcalas the minimum energy requirement adult equivalent per day. Result of food security profile of households holistically showed that on the average, the male headed households were more food secure than their female headed household counterparts. Regression result for food security status considering gender perspective during the post-planting period showed that coefficients of age of household head, number of extension contacts and location were positively significant at 1% however, the coefficient of household size was negative which implies inverse relationship with food security status. However, only household size and number of extension contacts significantly affects food security status of the female headed household however, coefficient of household size remained negatively signed. Hence, its recommended that recognition of women as farmers and not simply as farm helpers will improve their sense of responsibility lifting their households out of status of food insecurity; educate households on need to keep moderate or fairly large family size for sustainable livelihood; Improving female household head direct access to land and tenure security; enact policies that will avail female household heads productive and investment opportunities same as their male household head counterparts in order to reduce the issue of gender inequality and food insecurity in Nigeria. Introduction There exists an issue of gender inequality in food security status where male-headed households are regarded to be less vulnerable to food insecurity as compared to female-headed households in most developing countries, determines the need for more research in this area. Studies like Ayoola, et al. (2012) who determining the gender disparity along the rice value chain in Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria and move against socio-cultural factors confining women to indoor activities constrained their access to production inputs, processing facilities and market. Advocated for improved access of farmers to inputs, and women in particular to processing facilities and skills would promote production of good quality rice in the study area. Agarwal, (2012) and Kassie et al. (2014) also argued that agriculture is the main source of food both for direct consumption and as raw material for refined foods, and that women unlike men are crucial in the translation of the products of a vibrant agriculture sector into food and nutritional security for their households in most developing countries,. Despite the decisive role played by women in Nigeria, they are in most cases not given the opportunity to fully engage in activities that could otherwise contribute to higher productivity, lower levels of poverty, and reduce under-nutrition and the existence of household food insecurity (Kassie et al., 2015; Abafita and Kim, 2014). There is more than enough food in the world to feed everyone, but the number of people affected by hunger and malnutrition is still unacceptably high with disproportionate impact on women and girls. Reversing this shocking trend must be a top priority for all stakeholders involve in food security nationally. Response must treat food insecurity as equality, rights and social justice issue. Most of these existing studies focused on assessing food security at a particular region of the country and failed to cover the whole country. Dynamics regarding post-planting and post-harvest, gender differential of food security status across the different geopolitical zones in the country has not been adequately addressed by the earlier studies. Against the above background, this research is undertaken to assess the food security status among the households in Nigeria. The objective of the study is to examine farming household food security specifically to examine the gender dimension of food security status among farming households during post-planting and post-harvest periods in Nigeria. This study focused on the gender differentials and food security status of farming households in Nigeria therein form the six (6) geopolitical zones and FCT. With specific concern on gender dimension of household food security status during the post-harvest and post-planting periods in Nigeria. The hypothetical question is whether there is a significant difference between the food security status of male-headed and female-headed household in the study area
Article
Full-text available
The research was conducted to examine the economic viability of broiler production enterprise under Fadama III project scheme, with a view of economic diversification and investment opportunities in Dutse Local Government Area, Jigawa State. In pursuance of this objective, 50 registered broiler farmers were selected through stratified sampling technique in three council wards (Kudai, Modobi and Limawa) of Dutse LGA. Data collection was achieved through face to face questionnaire guided interview. Data were then analyzed using profitability and regression analyses. The profitability indices depict that variable cost accounted for about 54% of the total cost with the cost of feed representing 21% of variable cost. Nevertheless, a gross return of ₦198,170.00 and a net return of ₦23,545 were realized on the average, showing that every ₦1 invested returned ₦1.13, which proved that the enterprise is a profitable venture with promising returns on investment. The estimates of regression analysis show that day old chick, water supply, and labour were the most significant determinants of profitability margin of broiler enterprise in the area. Resource use efficiency reflected overutilization of labor, veterinary services and water while feed and day-old chicks were underutilized. It is recommended that increased stocking rate, reduced use of labour and reliance on the use of local materials for pen construction can greatly minimize cost of production.
Article
At the forthcoming World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference in Argentina, the global community must address real subsidies in agriculture rather than a theoretical construct on the measure of support that also includes impacts of subsidies in rich countries and the tariffs that are duly allowed.
  • S Abdulrahaman
Abdulrahaman S., International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow 2(1) (2013) 1-6.
  • A A Adebayo
Adebayo A. A., Int. Journal of Economic Research and Investment 1(1) (2011) 132-150.
  • I M Adeniyi
  • A Abdulrasheed
  • A I Bello
Adeniyi I. M., AbdulRasheed A., Bello A. I., Journal of International Economic Review 2(1-2) (2009) 167-176.
  • K A Adetiloye
Adetiloye K. A., J Economics 3(1) (2012) 39-48.
State of Food Security in Nigeria
  • Agriculture In Nigeria
Agriculture in Nigeria (2011). State of Food Security in Nigeria. Retrieved on 2nd October, 2011 from http://aricultureinnigeria.blogspot.com/2011/04/state-of-food-security-innigeria.
  • G T Ahungwa
  • J C Umeh
  • B G Muktar
Ahungwa G. T., J. C. Umeh, Muktar B. G., International Organisation of Scientific Research Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 6(1) (2013) 57-62.
International Organisation of
Agriculture to the Gross Domestic Product of Nigeria (1960-2012). International Organisation of Scientific Research Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 7(1); 50-55.
Public policy in Nigeria agriculture In Institutional reforms for Agriculture development
  • S O Akande
Akande S. O. (1998). Public policy in Nigeria agriculture In Institutional reforms for Agriculture development. Oludimu O.L. and Imodu P.B. (eds) Triumph Books Publishers, pp. 20-54.
Nigeria: Food Insecurity as a time bomb
  • G Azubike
Azubike G. (2012). Nigeria: Food Insecurity as a time bomb, March 2012: (http://allafrica.com/stories/201203110293.html), accessed 25/11/2013.