Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 26 No 6 June 2012350
Canadian Digestive Health Foundation Public Impact
Series 4: Celiac disease in Canada. Incidence,
prevalence, and direct and indirect economic impact
Richard N Fedorak MD FRCPC
1
, Connie M Switzer MD FRCPC
1
, Ron J Bridges MD FRCPC
2
1
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton;
2
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Correspondence: Dr Richard N Fedorak, 2-14A Zeidler Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2X8.
Telephone 780-492-6941, fax 780-492-8121, e-mail richard.fedorak@ualberta.ca
Received for publication October 3, 2011. Accepted October 7, 2011
T
he Canadian Digestive Health Foundation (CDHF) launched a
scientific project to define incidence, prevalence, mortality and
economic impact of digestive disorders across Canada. Detailed infor-
mation was compiled on 19 digestive disorders through systematic
reviews, government documents and websites. This information was
published as Establishing Digestive Health as a Priority for Canadians, The
Canadian Digestive Health Foundation National Digestive Disorders
Prevalence and Impact Study Report, and released to the press and gov-
ernment in late 2009 (www.CDHF.ca). The CDHF Public Impact
Series presents a full compilation of the available statistics for the
impact of digestive disorders in Canada.
Previous studies have indicated that celiac disease is a prevalent,
chronic and costly disease representing a considerable burden to
health care systems, the individual and, by extension, their families.
Although data are available, this information has not been extrapo-
lated to the Canadian context in an accessible format. Written to
inform both medical professionals and patients, the present review will
increase awareness of celiac disease through a comprehensive over-
view of disease incidence and prevalence, and the Canadian implica-
tions for our health care system and socioeconomics.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve peer-
reviewed, scholarly literature written in English using the databases
PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. The search term used
was “celiac disease”, with a specific focus on epidemiology and eco-
nomic studies from developed countries. Additional information was
retrieved from government sources and not-for-profit organizations.
INCIDENCE
In a study of newborns from Denver, Colorado (USA), who were
uniformly tested for celiac disease, the predicted incidence of celiac
disease potentially affecting the cohort by five years of age was one in
104 (0.9%) (1). European studies of pediatric disease suggest that some
countries may have incidence rates as high as one in 300 (2). In the
absence of any Canadian data, assuming a conservative 0.9% inci-
dence rate implies that there are 16,540 Canadian children younger
than five years of age potentially affected by celiac disease (3).
Delays in the diagnosis of celiac disease (and failure to comply with a
gluten-free diet) leads to complications later in life: chronic, nonspecific
gastrointestinal complaints; refractory iron-deficiency anemia; infertil-
ity; osteoporosis; intestinal lymphoma; and, possibly, the development
of other autoimmune diseases (eg, type 1 diabetes) (4,5).
PREVALENCE
The average prevalence of celiac disease in western countries is 1% of
the population according to serology studies (range 0.152% to 2.67%)
(6). Prevalence, determined by biopsies, is lower, with a range of
0.152% to 1.87%. In North America, the original prevalence rate was
estimated to be as low as 33 in 100,000 not-at-risk people. A recent
study provides good evidence for a higher prevalence of 949 cases in
100,000 or 1% (6). However, when considering the incidence rate to
be at least 0.9%, the 1% prevalence rate is likely to be much higher. By
modern standards, celiac disease is considered to be a common medical
condition in North America for both adults and children (5,6). In
2011, the Canadian Celiac Association had 28 affiliated chapters and
30 satellite groups (7).
Longitudinal data regarding the increasing prevalence of celiac
disease is available for Finland, where large cohorts (eg, 8000 partici-
pants) were specifically tested. From 1978 to 1980, the prevalence rate
was 1.05% and subsequently increased to 1.99% in 2000 to 2001 (8).
A second study conducted in 2010 found that the prevalence rate in
adults 30 to 64 years of age was as high as 2.4% (range 2.0% to 2.8%)
(9). The high prevalence of celiac disease in Finland is not mirrored in
other European countries such as Germany (0.3%) and Italy (0.7%)
(9). On average, celiac disease affects 1.0% of the European popula-
tion and it is not well understood why there are significant regional
variations.
REVIEW
©2012 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved
RN Fedorak, CM Switzer, RJ Bridges. Canadian Digestive
Health Foundation Public Impact Series 4: Celiac disease in
Canada. Incidence, prevalence, and direct and indirect economic
impact. Can J Gastroenterol 2012;26(6):350-352.
The Canadian Digestive Health Foundation initiated a scientific pro-
gram to assess the incidence, prevalence, mortality and economic
impact of digestive disorders across Canada in 2009. The current arti-
cle presents the updated findings from the study concerning celiac
disease.
Key Words: Burden of disease; Canada; Celiac disease; Chronic disease;
Digestive disease; Epidemiology
Quatrième article de la série sur les répercussions
sur le public de la Fondation canadienne pour la
promotion de la santé digestive : l’incidence, la
prévalence et les conséquences économiques
directes et indirectes de la maladie cœliaque
En 2009, la Fondation canadienne pour la promotion de la santé diges-
tive a lancé un programme scientifique pour évaluer l’incidence, la
prévalence, la mortalité et les conséquences économiques des maladies
digestives au Canada. Le présent article expose les observations mises
à jour de l’étude sur la maladie cœliaque.
CDHF Public Impact Series 4: Celiac disease in Canada
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 26 No 6 June 2012 351
A cross-sectional study (n=1200) conducted in the United
Kingdom (UK) between 1999 and 2001 (10), found that the preva-
lence rates of celiac disease were higher in individuals with irritable
bowel syndrome (3.3%), iron-deficiency anemia (4.7%) or fatigue
(3.3%) compared with the primary care population (1%). Other popu-
lations considered to be at-risk for developing celiac disease are first-
degree relatives of celiac patients (20%), individuals with symptomatic
iron-deficiency anemia (9% to 14%) and those with osteoporosis (1%
to 3%) (6,10). Although a previous study found that type 1 diabetes
patients had a 3% to 6% increased prevalence of celiac disease com-
pared with the general population, a serology and biopsy study of
pediatric type 1 diabetic patients in British Columbia found a preva-
lence rate that was even higher (7.7%) (6,11). An American study of
a pediatric cohort diagnosed with celiac disease (2) found that several
patients had thyroiditis, short stature and Down syndrome; the centre
now routinely screens these at-risk patients.
Comparing two pediatric celiac disease studies conducted within
Canada, it appears that children nowadays are presenting with a
greater range of symptoms and signs of the disease and, potentially, at
a later age. A study conducted in Toronto (Ontario) in 1969 reported
an average age of diagnosis of 2.6 years compared with 4.8 years in the
2005 study (5). This latter onset of noticeable symptoms and signs of
celiac disease is also mirrored in an American study. In 153 Wisconsin
(USA) children diagnosed with celiac disease, the age at diagnosis was
5.32 years between 1986 and 1995, and 8.70 years for those diagnosed
in 1995 through to 2003 (2).
Although a preliminary indicator of celiac disease is a straight-
forward serum test, the realistic prevalence in Canadian society is
likely to be much lower for several reasons. First, the clinical symptoms
and signs of celiac disease are widespread, with significant variation
between patients and are often unrelated to the gut, such as eczema,
bone/joint pain, mouth ulcers and muscle cramps. Several common
complaints are only now being associated with celiac disease, such as
anemia, mood swings, constipation, extreme weakness and depression
(5). In fact, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and being
underweight, the traditional hallmarks of celiac disease, are usually
indicators of more severe disease in children (2,12). Second, the avail-
ability of less-expensive celiac disease screening tests was limited
within Canada in 2005 (5). Finally, physician and public awareness of
the disease has been increasing in the past decade but may still be a
barrier to prompt testing. The median time to diagnosis of celiac dis-
ease from the onset of symptoms is one year (range zero to 12 years)
(5). Even now, there is no medical practice guideline on this topic
available in the Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, although celiac
disease guidelines do exist for celiac disease through the North
American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Nutrition.
MORTALITY
The average number of deaths attributed to celiac disease from
2000 through to 2007 was seven per year (Figure 1) (13).
ECONOMICS
Direct costs
Historically, celiac disease was not believed to be a common disease
within North America, and only the most persistent and ill patients
were diagnosed. Although the situation is changing, one-third of
Canadian families report having to see two or more pediatric phys-
icians before having their child diagnosed with celiac disease (5).
Assuming an average charge of CAD$50 for each visit, this delay in
diagnosis itself represents a cost of $400,000. Of concern are the results
from a longitudinal, pediatric UK study (n=5470) published in 2007
(14). Of the 1% of children who were positive for celiac disease, only
10% had been formally diagnosed by a physician. In combination, the
wide variety of nongastrointestinal symptoms and the known pro-
tracted delay in obtaining a diagnosis increase the socioeconomic
burden of disease because patients are at increased risk for developing
complications later in life: chronic nonspecific gastrointestinal com-
plaints; refractory iron-deficiency anemia; infertility; osteoporosis;
intestinal lymphoma; and, possibly, the development of other auto-
immune diseases (eg, type 1 diabetes) (4,5).
Annual check-ups are recommended to assess the nutritional status
and disease progression of the patient. The North American Society
for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, which
includes Canadian physicians, also recommends annual serology tests
for tissue transglutaminase antibody (tTG) (15). Interestingly, mon-
itoring the body mass index of patients is an important consideration
when studies report that patients gain weight after switching to a glu-
ten-free diet. For example, in an American study (n=188), after two
years on a gluten-free diet, 81% of patients experienced weight gain,
4% had no change and 15% had weight loss (12). For patients who
were overweight at baseline, 82% gained additional weight.
From an author response regarding serological tests for celiac dis-
ease, the cost for a single antibody test was US$50 while the entire
panel (immunoglobulin [Ig]A tTG, IgG tTG, endomysial IgA anti-
bodies (EMA) and IgA/G antigliadin antibodies) was US$250 in 2006
(16). However, the article stated that it was more cost effective to
begin screening with IgA tTG or IgA EMA, then proceed if only these
were positive. A Finnish firm has a home celiac disease testing kit
(Biocard Celiac Test, ANIbiotech, Finland) that was approved for sale
in Canada (CAD$50) in 2009 (17).
An important consideration of the direct costs of celiac disease is
that patients have a 30% increased risk for developing a malignancy
compared with the general population; the most common is non-
Hodgkin’s lymphoma (4). However, it should be noted that this value
may be inflated due to the under-recognition of ‘silent’ or asymptom-
atic celiac disease cases, which are only identified in large-scale
screening studies (4). Typically, the health care costs associated with
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma are $10,650 per patient per year (18).
The scholarly literature is replete with articles describing or calling
for cost-effective, population-wide, celiac disease screening. General
population testing strategies or targeting high-risk individuals are also
being debated. Population screening in the community of six-year-old
children by primary care nurses was considered to be a viable approach
for identifying individuals who were not identified in the clinical
environment. The inexpensive cost, ease of use and rapid results
afforded by the Biocard kit makes such an approach feasible (19).
Indirect costs
Presently, the recommended treatment for celiac disease is for the
patient to adhere to a gluten-free diet throughout his or her life.
This adds to the individual’s food costs and can be inconvenient
(20). A recent Canadian study assessed the prices of 56 gluten-free
products with similar gluten-containing products (21). The average
Figure 1) Canadian deaths primarily attributed to celiac disease
Fedorak et al
Can J Gastroenterol Vol 26 No 6 June 2012352
costs of the gluten-free items were 242% more expensive than their
gluten-containing counterparts. If the average weekly food cost for a
family of four living in Toronto was $185.44, and assuming that it is
easier to cook for the entire family instead of a single person, the food
bill would be $448.76 per week (22).
More than one-half of the surveyed members of the Canadian
Celiac Association reported extreme difficulty finding gluten-free
foods and often encountered poorly labelled food items (5). When
asked to rate the two most important areas that would improve a fam-
ilies’ quality of life, better labelling of gluten-containing and gluten-
free products was rated the highest at 63% (5,19). Dietary restrictions
negatively influenced family activities such as travel or dining out.
Fortunately, Health Canada has proposed regulatory amendments to
food allergen labelling to encourage manufacturers to clearly state the
sourse of gluten in foodstuffs (eg, barley, oats, rye, triticale, or wheat
including kamut or spelt) (23).
Celiac disease patients can claim gluten-free foods as a medical
expense. The necessary documents required from the physician as
proof of celiac disease are associated with a fee. However, these forms
are required to be completed only once. For tax filing, the cost of the
gluten-free food and the comparable gluten-containing product need
to be inventoried and accompanied by receipts. The difference
between the two totals represents the allowable medical expense.
However, if only one person in the family has celiac disease, and the
foodstuffs are purchased for family dinners, only the portion consumed
by the patient is eligible. The medical expenses are tallied with other
personal deductions and the final amount claimed depends on the
claimant’s annual income (24). Reports from celiac disease patients
from an online forum indicate that the process is arduous and requires
the paid assistance of an accountant. The deduction amount is vari-
able, but for one individual it was $600, which is a trivial amount
compared with $60 spent a week on dried blueberries as a gluten-free
‘snack’ (25).
The side effects of celiac disease, such as diarrhea, headaches,
fatigue, bloating and abdominal discomfort (6), likely increase an
employee’s absence from work. However, no studies have been com-
pleted to provide a financial impact of celiac disease in the
workforce.
REFERENCES
1. Hoffenberg EJ, MacKenzie T, Barriga KJ, et al. A prospective study of
the incidence of childhood celiac disease. J Pediatr 2003;143:308-14.
2. Telega G, Bennet TR, Werlin S. Emerging new clinical patterns in
the presentation of celiac disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
2008;162:164-8.
3. Statistics Canada. Population estimates by sex and age group as of
July 1, 2009, Canada. <www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/091127/
t091127b2-eng.htm> (Accessed April 11, 2011).
4. Silvester JA, Rashid M. Long-term follow-up of individuals with
celiac disease: An evaluation of current practice guidelines.
Can J Gastroenterol 2007;21:557-64.
5. Rashid M, Cranney A, Zarkadas M, et al. Celiac disease:
Evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian
children. Pediatrics 2005;116:e754-9.
6. Dube C, Rostom A, Sy R, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in
average-risk and at-risk Western European populations:
A systematic review. Gastroenterology 2005;128:S57-S67.
7. Canadian Celiac Association. About CCA. <www.celiac.ca/about.php>
(Accessed April 11, 2011).
8. Lohi S, Mustalahti K, Kaukinen K, et al. Increasing prevalence of
coeliac disease over time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:1217-25.
9. Mustalahti K, Catassi C, Reunanen A, et al. The prevalence of
celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass
screening project. Ann Med 2010;42:587-95.
10. Sanders DS, Patel D, Stephenson TJ, et al. A primary care
cross-sectional study of undiagnosed adult coeliac disease.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:407-13.
11. Gillett PM, Gillett HR, Israel DM, et al. High prevalence of celiac
disease in patients with type 1 diabetes detected by antibodies to
endomysium and tissue transglutaminase. Can J Gastroenterol
2001;15:297-301.
12. Dickey W, Kearney N. Overweight in celiac disease: Prevalence,
clinical characteristics, and effect of a gluten-free diet.
Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2356-9.
13. Statistics Canada. Table 102-0531 – Deaths, by cause, Chapter XI:
K00 to K93, age group and sex, Canada, 2000-2007. CANSIM.
<http://cansim2.statcan.gc.ca> (Acccessed April 11, 2011).
14. Ravikumara M, Nootigattu VK, Sandhu BK. Ninety percent of
celiac disease is being missed. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
2007;45:497-9.
15. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in
children: Recommendations of the North American Society for
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005;40:1-19.
16. Fu B. The most reliable testing option is also the most cost-
effective. J Fam Pract (epub) 2006;55.
17. 2G Pharma Inc. Do you have celiac disease?
<http://celiachometest.com/> (Accessed April 11, 2011).
18. Canadian Institute for Health Information. The Cost of
Acute Care Hospital Stays by Medical Condition in Canada:
2004-2005. ISBN 978-1-55465-216-7, 1-155. Ottawa: Canadian
Institute for Health Information, 2008
19. Korponay-Szabo IR, Szabados K, Pusztai J, et al.
Population screening for coeliac disease in primary care by district
nurses using a rapid antibody test: Diagnostic accuracy and
feasibility study. BMJ 2007;335:1244-7.
20. Freeman HJ. Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis of adult celiac
disease. Can J Gastroenterol 2008;22:273-80.
21. Stevens L, Rashid M. Gluten-free and regular foods:
A cost comparison. Can J Diet Pract Res 2008;69:147-50.
22. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Heart and Stroke
Foundation’s Annual Report on Canadian Health.
<www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/February2009/09/c6632.
html> (Accessed February 9, 2009).
23. Health Canada. Health Canada urges food manufacturers to
label priority food allergens, gluten sources and added sulphites
in the pre-publication period of the Food Allergen Labeling
Regulatory Amendments. <www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/label-etiquet/
allergen/guide_ligne_direct_indust-eng.php> (Accessed
February 2, 2009).
24. Canada Revenue Agency. Celiac disease – Medical expense.
<www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/tpcs/ncm-tx/rtrn/cmpltng/ddctns/
lns300-350/330/clc-eng.html> (Acccessed April 11, 2011).
25. Celiac Disease and Gluten-Free Forum. Canadian Tax Credit.
<www.celiac.com/gluten-free/lofiversion/index.php/t37748.html>
(Acccessed April 19, 2012).
Submit your manuscripts at
http://www.hindawi.com
Stem Cells
International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
M EDIATOR S
INFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Behavioural
Neurology
Endocrinology
International Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
Volume 2014
BioMed
Research International
Oncology
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientic
World Journal
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Immunology Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Obesity
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Computational and
Mathematical Methods
in Medicine
Ophthalmology
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Diabetes Research
Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Research and Treatment
AIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Gastroenterology
Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Parkinson’s
Disease
Evidence-Based
Complementary and
Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com