ArticlePDF Available

Coyote, Canis latrans , Predation on a Bison, Bison bison , Calf in Yellowstone National Park

Authors:

Abstract

We observed a single adult male Coyote (Canis latrans) kill a Bison (Bison bison) calf in Yellowstone National Park. The predation is, to our knowledge, the only direct and complete observation of a lone Coyote capturing and killing a Bison calf. The bison calf had unsuccessfully attempted to ford a river with a group and subsequently become stranded alone in the territory of a six-year-old alpha male Coyote.
260
In the Yellowstone ecosystem, Coyote spring/sum-
mer diet consists of small mammals and ungulate
neonates, primarily American Elk calves (Cervus ela-
phus), but also Pronghorn (Antilocapra americana)
calves and the fawns of Mule Deer (Odocoileus
hemionus) and White-tailed Deer (O. virginianus)
(Murie 1940; Gese and Grothe 1995; Gese et al. 1996).
Bison (Bison bison) appear to be a rare food source
for Coyotes. Murie’s (1940) analysis of 5086 Coyote
scats showed a percentage occurrence of 0.20% Bison,
and Murie found it unlikely that Coyotes would kill
Bison calves, recording that anecdotal reports of the
same “lacked proof” (page 117). More recently, a study
of Coyote predation on large ungulates in Yellowstone
found that both White-tailed Deer and Elk were killed
by packs of Coyotes hunting together in winter (Gese
and Grothe 1995). No predation on Bison was record-
ed in either of these Yellowstone Coyote studies. Cir-
cumstantial evidence at kill sites in Yellowstone has
suggested that predation on Bison calves by groups of
Coyotes may occur, but no report has been published.
A single instance of cooperative hunting by a Wolf
(Canis lupus) accompanied by a pack of four Coyotes
resulted in a Bison calf mortality (Smith et al. 2001).
However, successful solo predation by a Coyote on a
Bison has not, to our knowledge, been previously
observed. An instance of predation on a calf after sep-
aration from the herd was observed in Elk Island
National Park, Canada (Lu Carbyn, personal commu-
nication); however, a fence served to trap the calf. Our
observation therefore extends what has been known
about the predatory capacity of Coyotes with regard
to large ungulates.
The observers (GR, ACB, and KL) arrived at a van-
tage point on the Lamar River, Yellowstone National
Park (44°5448.774'N, 110°16'28.28'W) on 28 May
2009 at 1825 h. Yellowstone cinematographer Bob
Landis reported (personal communication) that, at ap-
proximately 0700 h, a cow-calf herd of Bison swam the
river from south to north, northeast of the observers’
vantage point. During the crossing, a calf was washed
300–500 m downriver from the main group, emerg-
ing on the northern bank 100 m east of the vantage
point. The Bison herd proceeded southward, leaving
the calf behind on the opposite side of the river. By
1600 h, the Bison calf had bedded down west of the
vantage point and the Coyote was present approxi-
mately 10 m from the calf. When GR, ACB, and KL
arrived, the Coyote had already attacked the calf once,
according to observers already present.
The Coyote, M361, was radio-tagged in October of
2004 (capture weight 13.2 kg) and had been monitored
continuously since then. At the time of the event, he
was the six-year-old alpha male of the Paradise Park
pack, occupying a known home range which encom-
passed the kill site. The mean weight of Bison calf
neonates is ~23 kg (Mattson 1997), thus the calf out-
weighed Coyote M361 by a factor of two.
The following observations were recorded on 28
May 2009:
1939 h M361 approached the bedded Bison calf from the
rear and bit repeatedly at the hind legs. The calf stood up
kicking, striking M361 in the head. This interaction lasted
approximately 30 seconds, after which M361 moved to a
position 10 m from the calf and bedded down. The calf
remained standing.
2014 h The calf lay down approximately 10 m away from
M361.
2132 h M361 stood up and attacked the calf. The calf stood
up and kicked at M361 as he bit at the calf’s back legs.
M361 then bit the neck of the calf and pulled the calf to
Notes
Coyote, Canis latrans, Predation on a Bison, Bison bison, Calf in
Yellowstone National Park
J. W. SHELDON, GREGORY REED, A. CHEYENNE BURNETT, KEVIN LI, and ROBERT L. CRABTREE
Yellowstone Ecological Research Center, 2048 Analysis Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718 USA
Sheldon, J. W., Gregory Reed, A. Cheyenne Burnett, Kevin Li, and Robert L. Crabtree. 2009. Coyote, Canis latrans, predation
on a Bison, Bison bison, calf in Yellowstone National Park. Canadian Field-Naturalist 123(3): 260–261.
We observed a single adult male Coyote (Canis latrans) kill a Bison (Bison bison) calf in Yellowstone National Park. The
predation is, to our knowledge, the only direct and complete observation of a lone Coyote capturing and killing a Bison calf.
The bison calf had unsuccessfully attempted to ford a river with a group and subsequently become stranded alone in the
territory of a six-year-old alpha male Coyote.
Key Words: Coyote, Canis latrans, Bison, Bison bison, predation, Yellowstone.
2009 NOTES 261
the ground. The calf struggled for approximately two
minutes as M361 continued to hold onto its neck.
2134 h The calf stopped moving. M361 lay down next to the
calf.
2138 h M361 began feeding on the calf.
The predation sequence, which began before 1800 h,
was concluded at 2134 h, an elapsed time of 3.5 hours.
This “slow-motion” predation method has been
observed in other ungulate encounters between Coy-
otes and Elk and White-tailed Deer: Gese and Grothe
(1995) observed predation sequences by Coyotes last-
ing up to 21 hours. Prey may undergo physiological
shock and/or become stiff during the extended inter-
action, providing a strategic advantage for the Coyotes.
The extent to which shock/hypothermia resulting from
the Bison calf’s river crossing effort contributed to its
vulnerability is unknown.
Coyotes are opportunistic predators capable of kill-
ing ungulate prey, usually hunting in packs. However,
Bison embody a formidable set of anti-predator adap-
tations, including well-developed maternal guarding
behaviors (Carbyn and Trottier 1987, 1988), general
herd behaviors of cow-calf groups, and size constraints
that regulate prey acquisition by the relatively small-
framed and light-weight Coyote. The cost of predation
attempts on ungulate neonates is demonstrably high:
an alpha female Coyote with pups in the den was killed
during a predation attempt on an Elk calf (unpublished
data; this study; 2005), with her post-mortem indicat-
ing blunt-force trauma as the cause of death. Certainly,
predation attempts on ungulate neonates are a high-
risk activity for Coyotes. Notably, in eight out of nine
predation attempts on large ungulate prey, the alpha
male led the attack (Gese and Grothe 1995), as was
also the case in our observation. In this instance, the
stranding of the Bison calf was a causal factor lead-
ing to its death.
The observed successful kill by a single adult male
Coyote shows that predation on Bison calves may be
possible under certain, albeit rare, conditions involving
separation of a calf from its mother. It also shows that
the size/weight limit of prey for adult Coyotes may be
revised slightly upward. The ecological context for
the observed predation suggests that it may be part of
a larger prey-switching phenomenon accompanying
changes in spring use areas by ungulate prey, prima-
rily Elk (Garrott et al. 2007). Our observation is of
additional interest because the Yellowstone ecological
community embodies the southernmost outpost of an
intact and functioning ungulate-predator system in
North America, surrounded by areas of increasingly
intensive human activity.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge and thank the Yellowstone Cen-
ter for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, the
Yellowstone Ecological Research Center, and Bob
Landis. Observers were Gregory Reed, A. Cheyenne
Burnett, and Kevin Li.
Literature Cited
Carbyn, L. N., and T. Trottier. 1987. Responses of bison
on their calving grounds to predation by wolves in Wood
Buffalo National Park. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65:
2072-2078.
Carbyn, L.N., and T. Trottier. 1988. Descriptions of wolf
attacks on bison calves in Wood Buffalo National Park.
Arctic 41: 297-302.
Garrott, R. A., J. E. Bruggeman, M. S. Becker, S. T.
Kalinowski, and P. J. White. 2007. Evaluating prey
switching in wolf-ungulate systems.Ecological Applica-
tions 17: 1588-1597.
Gese, E. M., and S. Grothe. 1995. Analysis of coyote preda-
tion on deer and elk during winter in Yellowstone National
Park, Wyoming. American Midland Naturalist 133: 36-43.
Gese, E.M., R. L Ruff, and R. L. Crabtree. 1996. Foraging
ecology of coyotes (Canis latrans): the influence of extrin-
sic factors and a dominance hierarchy. Canadian Journal
of Zoology 74: 769-783.
Mattson, D. J. 1997. Use of ungulates by Yellowstone griz-
zly bears Ursus arctos. Biological Conservation 81(1-2):
161-177.
Murie, A. 1940. Ecology of the coyote in the Yellowstone.
National Park Service Fauna Series, Number 4. U.S. Gov-
ernment Printing Office, Washington.
Smith, D. W., L. D. Mech, M. Meagher, W. E. Clark, R.
Jaffe, M. K. Phillips, and J. A. Mack. 2000. Wolf-bison
interactions in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of
Mammalogy 81: 1128-1135.
Smith, D. W., K. M. Murphy, and S. Monger. 2001. Killing
of a Bison, Bison bison, calf by a Wolf, Canis lupus, and
four Coyotes, Canis latrans, in Yellowstone National Park.
Canadian Field-Naturalist 115: 343-345.
Received 6 July 2009
Accepted 11 May 2010
... In the last 10 000 years, bison have faced predation from mountain lions (Puma concolor) and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) (Jones and Treanor 2008), but most predation has been caused by wolves (C. lupis) (Lott 1991;Bowyer et al. 2007;Jones and Treanor 2008;Sheldon et al. 2009). Coyotes are also a potential predator of young bison. ...
... Gese (1999) observed bison acting aggressively towards coyotes. Sheldon et al. (2009) observed a male coyote killing a bison calf, although the calf had become isolated from the herd after failing to ford a river. Coyotes are the most prominent potential predator of young bison on Antelope Island State Park. ...
Article
Full-text available
Context Human activities can affect habitat selection by ungulates during parturition. Minimising human–wildlife conflicts during the birthing period can be critical in national and state parks that receive high numbers of human visitors. American bison (Bison bison) are an iconic species in North America, and many conservation herds of bison occupy national and state parks and wildlife refuges. Aims We investigated timing of births and birth-site selection of bison on Antelope Island State Park, Utah, at multiple spatial scales to determine the relative influence of surrounding vegetation, topography and distance to anthropogenic features (i.e. trails, roads or structures) on selection of birthing habitat. Methods We used vaginal implant transmitters to determine timing of births and to identify birth sites of bison. We used logistic regression within a model-selection framework to differentiate between birth sites and random locations, based on potential explanatory variables. We then used model-averaged coefficients to produce and project a GIS model of birthing habitat onto Antelope Island. Key results During 2010 and 2011, we quantified variables surrounding 35 birth sites and 101 random sites. Variables in top models of birth-site selection for bison included landscape curvature and elevation, averaged at a 500-m radius around birth sites, as well as distance to nearest trails, roads or structures. Five-fold cross validation (rho = 0.89; P < 0.05) indicated that these variables successfully predicted birth sites of bison in our study area; 80% of 41 births occurred in April (range = March 22 to May 20). Conclusions Bison selected areas for birthing with concave topography and increased elevation that were away from trails, roads or structures. Implications Our GIS model of birthing habitat, and data concerning timing of births, provide a map of high-probability birthing areas and a time of year at which human access could be limited to reduce disturbance from recreational activity. This approach could aid managers in minimising conflict between recreationists and parturient bison in other national and state parks and wildlife refuges.
... ataques a humanos, depredación de animales domésticos y transmisión de parásitos y patógenos a animales domésticos), que algunas veces han sido sobredimensionadas por las personas(Pence, 1995; Siemers et al., 2014). De hecho, aunque los coyotes se acercan a áreas rurales y urbanas, éstos suelen evitar espacios en donde podrían encontrarse con personas, y los pocos conflictos reportados se han producido cuando el coyote está enfermo o es molestado(Gehrt et al., 2009; Siemers et al., 2014).Además, de acuerdo con algunos estudios sobre dieta de esta especie, la frecuencia de consumo de mascotas es baja y los ataques al ganado u otras presas de talla grande son raros(Wainwright, 2007;Sheldon et al. 2009;Lukasik et al. 2012;Lloyd, 2020).Aparte de los aspectos negativos que se le atribuyen a este canido, su importancia ecológica ha sido documentada(Gompper, 2002;Grubbs y Krausman, 2009;Levi y Wilmers, 2012;Gehrt et al, 2013;Waser et al., 2014;Power et al., 2015). Los coyotes como competidores o depredadores alteran la distribución y abundancia de otros depredadores y herbívoros (p. ...
... However, their physical size, social organization, and temperament, make bison formidable prey (Fuller 1953;Smith et al. 2000). Gray Wolves, Coyotes, and Grizzly Bears are the only known predators of bison, and they most often focus on calves and yearlings (Carbyn andTrottier 1987, 1988;Smith et al. 2000;Sheldon et al. 2009); however, adults are occasionally killed by both wolves (Smith et al. 2000, Jung 2011) and bears (Wyman 2002). In some areas, local wolf packs are relatively adept at killing bison (Carbyn and Trottier 1987;. ...
Article
Full-text available
We examined the influence of intrinsic (age, sex, and social status) and extrinsic (snow depth, snowpack hardness, temperature, available ungulate carcass biomass) factors in relation to time-activity budgets of coyotes (Canis latrans) in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. We observed 54 coyotes (49 residents from 5 packs, plus 5 transients) for 2507 h from January 1991 to June 1993. Snow depth, ungulate carcass biomass, and habitai type influenced the amount of time coyotes rested, travelled, hunted small mammals, and fed on carcasses. Coyotes decreased travelling and hunting and increased resting and feeding on carcasses as snow depth and available carcass biomass increased. Age and social status of the coyote influenced activity budgets. During times of deep snow and high carcass biomass, pups fed less on carcasses and hunted small mammals more than alpha and beta coyotes. Pups apparently were restricted by older pack members from feeding on a carcass. Thus, pups adopted a different foraging strategy by spending more time hunting small mammals. Coyotes spent most of their time hunting small mammals in mesic meadows and shrub-meadows, where prey densities were highest. Prey-detection rates and prey-capture rates explained 78 and 84%, respectively, of the variation in the amount of lime coyotes spent hunting small mammals in each habitat in each winter. Our findings strongly suggested that resource partitioning, as mediated by defense by older coyotes, occurred among coyote pack members in Yellowstone National Park.
Article
Full-text available
Canis lupus predation on Bison bison in late spring/early summer directed toward cow/calf herds. Five apparent defense strategies to protect calves were noted: 1) to run to the cow, 2) to run to a herd, 3) to run to the nearest bull, 4) to get out in front and center of a stampeding herd, and 5) to run through water bodies. When fleeing from wolves in open areas, cows with young calves took the lead, while bulls often were seen at the rear of the herds. When under attack from wolves, cows and particularly bulls were sometimes seen to defend the calves. -from Authors
Article
Full-text available
Direct observations of coyote (Canis latrans) predation on large wild prey are rare. We observed nine predation attempts by coyotes on deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and elk (Cervus elaphus) during winter in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Coyotes were successful in five attempts. The alpha male coyote led the attack in eight of nine observations. Snow depth was significantly deeper during successful kills compared to unsuccessful attempts. Two adult coyotes could successfully kill calf and adult elk when there was deep snowcover and the prey was in poor nutritional condition.
Article
Full-text available
Bison-wolf interactions were observed from a tower located in the centre of a meadow in Wood Buffalo National Park, Alberta, Canada, from 10 May to 9 September 1980. Special attention was directed to the relationship between bison cow-calf interactions, calf pod formations, and wolf predation attempts. Pod formation began in May and peaked in June. During 102 days in the field, 166 encounters between wolves and bison were observed, of which 51 involved a single wolf interacting with bison. In the main, single wolves watched bison (23% of observations), trailed without follow-up (14%), trailed with follow-up (27%), or harassed them without making physical contact (34%). Only rarely (2% of the observations) did they attack. The remaining 115 encounters involved a pack of wolves (two or more individuals). The majority of them involved trailing with follow-up (26%) or harassment (48%), and rushing with physical contact (13%). Wolves, especially those in packs, preferentially attacked bison herds with calves over herds without calves. Single wolves were more likely than wolves in packs to attack herds of bulls only (34 vs. 5% of such encounters). Strategies used by bison in defence of their calves were recorded along with the hunting strategies employed by wolves.
Article
Full-text available
Previous results of fecal analysis from the Yellowstone area and the known abilities of grizzly bears Ursus arctos to acquire and digest tissue from vertebrates suggested that grizzlies in this ecosystem obtained substantial energy from ungulates. This issue was addressed using observations from radio-marked grizzly bears, 1977–1992. Ungulates potentially contributed the majority of energy required for activity during the non-denning season for both adult female and male grizzlies. Most of this energy (95%) was estimated to come from the largest-bodied ungulate species (elk Cervus elaphus, bison Bison bison, and moose Alces alces), with greatest proportional contributions by scavenged adult male bison (16%), scavenged calf and yearling elk (10%) and adult female elk that were killed (8%) or scavenged (8%). Grizzlies acquired 30% of total edibles from ungulates by predation, of which 13% (or 4% of the total) came from predation on elk calves. Most scavenging occurred during the spring and was associated with the abundance and relative availability of different types of carrion. Predation and scavenging did not appear to be compensatory. Rather, total consumption of ungulates varied inversely with consumption of whitebark pine Pinus albicaulis seeds. The relative frequency of predation to scavenging increased with ungulate density. Contrary to previous suppositions, neither total ungulate use nor frequency of predation increased during the study, despite large increases in some ungulate populations. As expected by the identified trade-offs, Yellowstone grizzlies seemed to prey selectively upon moose, probably because of their solitary habits and forested surroundings, but otherwise favored vulnerable smaller-bodied ungulates such as elk calves. No predation on adult bison was observed.
Article
We describe a fatal attack on a Bison calf (Bison bison) in Yellowstone National Park by a Wolf (Canis lupus) and four Coyotes (Canis latrans). A lone adult Wolf bit the neck of a lone, malnourished Bison calf while four Coyotes, simultaneously bit at the hindquarters. After the calf died, the Wolf was intolerant of Coyote proximity to the dead calf, and did not allow the Coyotes to feed or approach the carcass.
Article
We studied interactions of reintroduced wolves (Canis lupus) with bison (Bison bison) in Yellowstone National Park. Only 2 of 41 wolves in this study had been exposed to bison before their translocation. Wolves were more successful killing elk (Cervus elaphus) than bison, and elk were more abundant than bison, so elk were the primary prey of wolves. Except for a lone emaciated bison calf killed by 8 1-year-old wolves 21 days after their release, the 1st documented kill occurred 25 months after wolves were released. Fourteen bison kills were documented from April 1995 through March 1999. All kills were made in late winter when bison were vulnerable because of poor condition or of bison that were injured or young. Wolves learned to kill bison and killed more bison where elk were absent or scarce. We predict that wolves that have learned to kill bison will kill them more regularly, at least in spring. The results of this study indicate how adaptable wolves are at killing prey species new to them.
Article
Wolf restoration has become a widely accepted conservation and management practice throughout North America and Europe, though the ecosystem effects of returning top carnivores remain both scientific and societal controversies. Mathematical models predicting and describing wolf-ungulate interactions are typically limited to the wolves' primary prey, with the potential for prey switching in wolf-multiple-ungulate systems only suggested or assumed by a number of investigators. We used insights gained from experiments on small taxa and field data from ongoing wolf-ungulate studies to construct a model of predator diet composition for a wolf-elk-bison system in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. The model explicitly incorporates differential vulnerability of the ungulate prey types to predation, predator preference, differences in prey biomass, and the possibility of prey switching. Our model demonstrates wolf diet shifts with changes in relative abundance of the two prey, with the dynamics of this shift dependent on the combined influences of preference, differential vulnerability, relative abundances of prey, and whether or not switching occurs. Differences in vulnerability between elk and bison, and strong wolf preference for elk, result in an abrupt dietary shift occurring only when elk are very rare relative to bison, whereas incorporating switching initiates the dietary shift more gradually and at higher bison-elk ratios. We demonstrate how researchers can apply these equations in newly restored wolf-two-prey systems to empirically evaluate whether prey switching is occurring. Each coefficient in the model has a biological interpretation, and most can be directly estimated from empirical data collected from field studies. Given the potential for switching to dramatically influence predator-prey dynamics and the wide range of expected prey types and abundances in some systems where wolves are present and/or being restored, we suggest that this is an important and productive line of research that should be pursued by ecologists working in wolf-ungulate systems.