ArticlePDF Available

Geophagy: an assessment of implications for the development of Australian Indigenous plant processing technologies

Authors:

Abstract

The practice of geophagy, in particular the consumption of clay and charcoal by humans, is global in its distribution, is of considerable antiquity and has a number of complex functions. One of these functions is the ability of clays and charcoals to adsorb toxins. This has been known anecdotally for some time and has more recently been scientifically demonstrated. This article reviews evidence that indicates that the adsorptive qualities of clays were well recognised by Indigenous Australians. This Indigenous knowledge therefore has significant implications for the timing and nature of adaptation to many of the toxic plants of Australia. It is proposed that knowledge of these adsorptive qualities arrived with the earliest colonisers and enabled them to adapt to toxic plants earlier and more easily than has usually been assumed.
50 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
M.J. Rowland
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract: The practice of geophagy, in particular the
consumption of clay and charcoal by humans, is global in
its distribution, is of considerable antiquity and has a
number of complex functions. One of these functions is the
ability of clays and charcoals to adsorb toxins. This has been
known anecdotally for some time and has more recently
been scientifically demonstrated. This article reviews
evidence that indicates that the adsorptive qualities of
clays were well recognised by Indigenous Australians.
This Indigenous knowledge therefore has significant impli-
cations for the timing and nature of adaptation to many of
the toxic plants of Australia. It is proposed that knowledge
of these adsorptive qualities arrived with the earliest
colonisers and enabled them to adapt to toxic plants earlier
and more easily than has usually been assumed.
Introduction
The consumption of clay and charcoal—known as
‘geophagy’—is generally adaptive, has a global
distribution, is of considerable antiquity and has a
number of complex functions. One of these functions
is the ability of clays and charcoal to adsorb toxins.
Geophagous behaviour is common among a range of
animals, and humans could easily have imitated and
adapted it to their own needs by observing these
animals. It therefore follows that the practice of
geophagy could have arrived on Australia’s shores
with the initial arrivals, at least 40,000 years ago. It is
proposed that the ability of clays and charcoal to
adsorb toxins may have enabled people to rapidly
adapt to some of the many toxic plants of Australia.
Such a view brings into question, for example,
Beaton’s (1977:201–3) observation that ‘there is no
such thing as people who eat cycads, and those who
are are only just learning about how to prepare them’.
It also raises doubts about his proposed mid to
late Holocene introduction of a ‘Basic Leaching
Technology’. Questions are also raised concerning
Webb’s (1973) classic interpretation of the need for
Indigenous Australians to ‘eat, die, and learn’ in
adapting to the flora of Australia. Other significant
issues, relating to Aboriginal use of clay and charcoal
requiring further research, are also highlighted.
Geophagy—a definition
The eating of clay or charcoal and a range of other
substances might superficially be considered bizarre
or at best to be of limited adaptive value, and this is
reflected in a long and continuing debate about the
benefits or otherwise of geophagy. Avicenna, for
example, who lived around AD 1000, saw it as a
negative practice and called for the control of it ‘in
boys by use of the whip, in older patients by
restraints, prison and medical exhibits, while incorri-
gible ones are abandoned to the grave’ (Halsted
Geophagy: an assessment of implications
for the development of Australian
Indigenous plant processing technologies
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 51
1968:1385). Yet most substances consumed by humans
are likely to have at least some adaptive features, even
if seemingly obscure. On close examination, the
eating of rotted wood garnished with honey, by the
Vedda of Sri Lanka, for example, reveals that bacteria
produce useful B vitamins during the putrefaction
process (Armelagos 1987:579). Equally, it should not
be surprising that many substances might have a
considerable antiquity of use. Birch-bark tar with
teeth marks, for example, has been found in a number
of European sites, dating from around 10,000 years
ago, and was probably chewed for its antiseptic and
other medicinal properties (Aveling and Heron 1999;
see also Johns et al 2000).
The literature on geophagy is extensive.
1
But,
despite considerable recent research, there is no
simple universal definition of geophagy. This is
understandable since it involves a complex of
behaviours, including spiritual and religious beliefs,
ritual oaths and ceremonies, medicinal practice, and
nutritional need, while crossing all geographical,
racial and ethnic boundaries (Danford 1982:303;
Hunter and De Kleine 1984:157, table 1; Johns 1990).
The French physician Ambrose Pare first used the
term ‘pica’ in the sixteenth century, a Medieval Latin
word meaning ‘magpie’ (a bird noted for its tendency
to pick up a diversity of things to satisfy hunger or
curiosity), to describe the human habit of eating
unusual substances (Danford 1982:304). Danford
(1982) and Lackey (1978) use the term to describe
pathological cravings both for items normally
considered food by a population, such as sometimes
reported during pregnancy, and for substances not
normally regarded as food, including clay. Halsted
(1968:1384) distinguishes between geophagy, which
he defines as the habit of eating earth, including clay
and other types of soil, and pica, which he defines as
the eating of any foreign substance.
There is a substantial view that pica and
geophagy are aberrant and harmful forms of
behaviour, thought to lead to anaemia, mineral
imbalances and deficiencies, parasitic infections,
intestinal irritation and damage (Danford 1982;
Halsted 1968), although identifying cause and effect
remains a problem (Halsted 1968; Hunter 1973;
Lackey 1978). In this article, geophagy is defined as
the consumption of clay and charcoal and, while this
can have negative effects, it is the adaptive features of
this practice that are the focus here.
Clay and charcoal consumption
The human consumption of clay has a long history.
Earth (terra sigillata) from the Greek island of Lemnos,
for example, mixed with goat blood, prepared as
small lozenges, dried, and stamped with the seal of a
goat figure is recorded in use over 2000 years ago
(Hunter 1973:170–1). In the Andes, clays have been in
use for at least 2500 years and were traded over at
least 600 km (Browman and Gundersen 1993:413–14).
The bones of Homo habilis at Kalambo Falls, Zambia,
have been found side by side with white clay and
associated evidence would suggest the clay was being
eaten (Root-Bernstein and Root-Bernstein 2000:62–3).
Thus, the consumption of clay by proto-humans and
humans has a long history. The extensive trade in clay
tablets in many countries provides further evidence of
the significance of the practice (Hunter and De Kleine
1984).
Following his extensive review of geophagy,
Laufer concluded that clay was eaten in times of:
scarcity and famine as a food substitute to allay the
pangs of hunger…as a sort of condiment or relish,
usually in combination with articles of food;
mixed with
acrid tubers or acorns as a corrective taste
; as a dainty or
delicacy for its own sake; as a remedy for certain
diseases; as part of religious rites and ceremonies.
(1930:102–3, emphasis added)
Laufer further noted an abnormal or morbid use of
clay was produced by or accompanied certain
diseases, or was due to nervous conditions.
Presciently, he suggested that, since both the Pomo
Indians of California and the peasants of Sardinia
mixed clay with acorn meal, a physiologist should
investigate the connection (Laufer 1930:108; see also
Johns 1986, 1990:85–6; Johns and Duquette 1991a,
1991b). The crux of the acorn economy of California
(see Gifford 1936; McCorriston 1994) was the removal
of tannic acid from the nuts. Subsequent laboratory
simulations demonstrated that tannic acid ingestion
from acorns could be reduced by as much as 77 per
cent with the supplementation of clay, therefore
making them both palatable and less toxic (Johns and
Duquette 1991a, 1991b).
Clay eating has been recognised as occurring
most commonly during pregnancy (e.g. Lackey 1978).
Calcium, potassium, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper,
nickel, manganese, cobalt and selenium are thought
52 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
to be obtained and are considered vital to the healthy
growth and development of the human foetus
(Hunter and De Kleine 1984:169; see also Johns 1986,
1990). It has been argued, for example, that soils sold
at markets to pregnant women in Ghana are richer in
iron and copper than the dietary supplement pills
made by pharmaceutical companies specifically for
prenatal use (Diamond 1999). Clay eating is also
widely recognised for its antidiarrheal properties
(Vermeer and Ferrell 1985), and among monkeys has
been argued to reduce the effects of parasitosis
(Knezevich 1999). Aufreiter et al (1997:304) analysed a
range of clays from three continents (China, USA,
Africa) and concluded that, depending on the type of
clay used, the clays were useful in alleviating some
effects of chronic poor nutrition and short-term
starvation. However, they further noted that clay was
used for minor digestive disorders, which they
attributed to the ability of the clay lattice to absorb
toxins.
2
It is this less obvious function of clays, which
is the focus of this article. Examples are drawn from
animal and human behaviour (Browman and
Gundersen 1993; Johns 1986, 1989, 1990; Johns and
Duquette 1991a, 1991b; Johns and Kubo 1988) and, in
particular, from recent studies of bird behaviour
(Diamond et al 1999; Gilardi et al 1999).
Johns’ (1986, 1989, 1990) ongoing discussion of
Andean use of the potato has provided a convincing
link between clay eating and the detoxification of
plant remains. Potato tubers contain a number of
chemicals (including glycoalkaloids) that act as
defences against attack by herbivores and patholo-
gical micro-organisms. Cooking is the primary
mechanism for making plants available to humans
(Wrangham et al 1999), but cooking does not always
destroy the heat-stable, water-insoluble glyco-
alkaloids of the potato. Modern Andean populations
detoxify potatoes using elaborate and labour-
intensive leaching and freeze-drying processes. But,
as Johns (1989:513) notes, while these techniques were
undoubtedly important in expanding the level of
exploitation of potatoes, they are unlikely to have
been involved in the initial stages of domestication.
Thus, his (1986:636) observation that the Indians of
the American southwest and adjacent Mexico
consume clays with wild potato species (Solanum) for
the express reason of eliminating bitterness and to
prevent stomach pains or vomiting is significant.
Johns (1989) concluded that the Andean clays might
thus be employed to bind the bitter phytotoxin,
solanine, in potatoes into an insoluble precipitate,
rendering the tubers palatable. He further suggests
that clay eating may have had an important role
to play in the domestication of both potatoes and
yams (Johns 1990:204), including the most important
African famine food, the wild yam, Dioscorea
dumentorum Pax (Johns 1989:514). Andeans are able to
name at least two dozen potentially edible earths.
When tested, these clays showed a considerable
variation and included smectites, illites and
kaolinites.
3
The detoxification function of clay eating has been
most recently and convincingly confirmed by two
studies: one by Gilardi et al (1999) on Peruvian
Amazon rainforest parrots; the other by Diamond
et al (1999) on rainforest birds of the New Guinea
Highlands. In their study, Gilardi et al noted that a
thousand or more individuals of 21 species of
Amazon rainforest parrots gathered each morning on
the Manu River at certain sites on riverbanks or cliff
faces with exposed bare soil. They congregated not
just on one particular bend of the river, but at one soil
band running hundreds of metres horizontally along
that bend, spurning the dirt in bands 1 m above or
below the preferred band. When analysed, these
bands were found to comprise predominantly clay.
Diamond et al found a similar pattern of behaviour
among New Guinea Highland parrots.
4
In attempting to explain their observations,
Gilardi et al (1999:899; see also Diamond et al
1999:186) note that there are many hypotheses
proposed to explain geophagy in vertebrates, the best
known being: (1) mechanical enhancement of
digestive grinding by large particles (grit); (2) supple-
mentation of nutrition by release of minerals; (3)
buffering of gastrointestinal pH; (4) reduction of
toxicity of food by adsorption of plant toxins to clay;
and (5) enhancement of the ability of the gastroin-
testinal tract to protect itself from chemical insult
(cytoprotection) by induction and alteration of mucus
secretion. Their initial thoughts centred on the more
obvious explanation that the parrots of both the Manu
River and New Guinea Highlands might have been
consuming dirt for its digestive grinding function.
Instead, it became apparent that the parrots regularly
ate seeds and unripe fruits whose contents of
alkaloids and other toxins make them bitter and even
lethal to humans and other animals. It was thus
proposed that the chemicals were bonding to clay
minerals, reducing their toxicity.
Gilardi et al (1999) were able to confirm their
proposal by two sets of bio-assays. In one, brine
shrimp were exposed to extracts of seeds routinely
eaten by the parrots, the result being that most brine
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 53
shrimp died. In the other test, some parrots were
given an oral dose of the alkaloid quinidine with or
without preferred soil. Providing soil along with the
quinidine resulted in a reduction in absorbed
quinidine blood levels of 60 per cent. Although the
mechanism of the interactions is poorly understood, it
appears that the presence of clay in the gut increases
the secretion of mucus by goblet cells and prevents
mucolysis through increased protein cross-linking.
The clay thereby enhances the ability of the mucus
barrier to protect the gut lining from various chemical
insults. Clay also remains in the gut, bound to the
mucus layer, where it may continue to adsorb various
toxins, making the two functions, cytoprotection and
adsorption, mutually compatible.
5
Soil consumption has been observed in many
animals, including invertebrates, reptiles, birds and
mammals. It is also common among a variety of non-
human primates (Diamond et al 1999; Gilardi et al
1999; Johns 1990:68; Krishnamani and Mahaney 2000;
Struhsaker et al 1997:62). For example, specific clays,
often from termite mounds, are eaten daily,
sometimes seasonally, by chimpanzees, along with
toxic plant materials. Primate ecologists have
therefore also suggested a detoxification function in
relation to plant secondary compounds, although this
has been difficult to test (Johns 1990:69). It could be
argued that, since the practice is so widespread
among so many animals and primates, it may always
have been part of the diet of pre-humans and humans.
Browman and Gundersen (1993:413–14, 424) have
proposed that it is not necessary to conceive of
humans sampling all sorts of earth in a trial and error
method to obtain the right clays for consumption, but
simply for them to follow their prey, the various
camelids, deer and other herbivores, and exploit the
same locales which these animals used as licks.
In sum, it can be concluded that clay eating,
among other effects, has both cytoprotection and
detoxification functions that have been widely
recognised by humans over a long period of time. It
could easily have been learnt from the geophagous
behaviour of a wide range of animals and might in
fact have had its origins among the earliest pre-
human primates.
Charcoal consumption is not as widely reported
as clay consumption but may have had a similar
adsorptive function. It has been reported in only one
non-human primate species, the Zanzibar red colobus
monkey (Procolobus kirkii). In this case, the monkeys
eat young Indian almond and mango leaves con-
taining phenolics, which are adsorbed strongly by
charcoal, while proteins remain mostly unbound and
available for digestion and adsorption in the gut
(Struhsaker et al 1997:68). Coprolites believed to be
those of Neanderthals have been found to contain
charcoal (Johns 1990:76), and charcoal consumption
has occurred widely among humans in recent
centuries (Cooney 1995). Thus, it would appear that
charcoal like clay might have served a similar
adsorptive function among humans. Charcoal does
have adsorptive qualities and activated charcoal
continues to be used in modern pharmaceutical
practice (see Cooney 1995).
Plant processing and the role of geophagy
Global surveys of plant processing techniques (see
Johns 1990:72–8; Johns and Kubo 1988; Stahl 1989)
demonstrate that humans have developed conside-
rable sophistication in detoxifying plant foods, and
the methods are often highly specific to particular
plants. The range of processing techniques includes
heating, solution, fermentation, adsorption (by clay
and charcoal), drying in association with physical
processing such as grating, grinding, pounding and
freezing, and causing pH change by the addition of
ashes and acids (Johns and Kubo 1988; Stahl
1989:172). Cooking is probably the oldest and
most obvious method of plant processing, with most
significant implications for human societies
(Wrangham et al 1999), while leaching, fermentation,
grating, the use of lye, and drying are all techniques
that may also be of considerable antiquity.
Water is a solvent that is readily available to
humans in most parts of the world, and is widely
used as a way of removing toxins and bitter
compounds. Soaking and leaching methods take
many forms and were techniques widely observed in
use by Indigenous Australians at the time of
European contact for detoxifying nuts and a range of
other plants (Jones and Meehan 1989; Lawrence 1969;
Levitt 1981). Importantly, plant food processing
provides a potential avenue for intensification of
subsistence that is independent of resource change
(Stahl 1989:171), and it could be linked to the first
steps towards domestication (Johns 1989).
The question of how humans first learned to
detoxify plants in particular ways is difficult to
resolve, and the ubiquity of most techniques is
suggestive of their antiquity. It is also apparent that
54 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
humans are able to make judgements on the toxic
content of plants by taste (Johns 1989:511). Heating,
leaching, fermentation and drying all have simple
cause-and-effect relationships that could be observed
in common events (Johns 1990:81–2). Harris (1977),
for example, suggested that plants that are detoxified
by leaching might originally have been placed in
water as fish poisons. Whatever method was used,
processing requires an expenditure of energy that
must be returned in added caloric value (Stahl 1989).
One of the earliest and most cost-effective
techniques of detoxification may have been the
consumption of clay. Johns (1990:86–7) suggests that a
careful reading of the geophagy literature relating to
humans reveals many instances where detoxification,
while not expressed as the basis for clay use, is
probably a central reason for this practice. Most
observers, for example, refer to the eating of clay
during famine to satisfy hunger. While this may be
true, a few reports explicitly document the consum-
ption of clay with famine foods such as wild roots and
bark, so that an essential connection between the two
may have been overlooked. Also, the widespread
medicinal use of clays to treat diarrhoea and other
gastrointestinal ailments may relate to the detoxi-
fication function of geophagy either directly or
indirectly via the ‘psychological’ response to gastroin-
testinal upset. The consumption of clay with toxic
substances might have enabled early adaptation to a
range of plants that were later treated by more
intensive forms of leaching.
Australian Indigenous use of clay
and charcoal
The following review of Aboriginal consumption of
clay and charcoal has attempted to be comprehensive
in its coverage; however, other examples are likely
to exist. This review demonstrates that, as expected,
clay and charcoal served a wide range of functions.
It is also apparent that, as is the case elsewhere, some
observers’ perception of clay or charcoal consumption
as a negative behaviour has influenced their inter-
pretation of what they observed. Finally, the evidence
favours the view that Indigenous Australians were
cognisant of the pharmaceutical properties of clays
and charcoal.
Grey (1841, cited by Laufer 1930) made one of the
earliest observations on clay use by Indigenous
Australians and suggested that they used it to remove
the bitter taste from the roots of Haemodorum
coccineum Hook, a plant characterised by phototoxic
phenalenone (Johns 1990:86). In recent times, the
Anbarra of the Blyth River, Northern Territory, ate
quite a lot of mineral matter as a normal part of each
meal, sometimes collecting white clay or ant-bed as
food in its own right. Meehan (1982:148–9) notes that,
on several occasions, old women collected quantities
of ant-bed which they ate and that a sample of
galabamba, red ant-bed, contained some protein (0.79 g
per 100 g). Termite mounds and white clay were used
medicinally throughout the Northern Territory,
especially for the treatment of diarrhoea. It was
suggested that, because the clay particles were very
small, it is possible they functioned to adsorb toxic
substances in the bowel.
Levitt (1981:61) reports that on Groote Eylandt
women ate several types of clay but men did not. A
reddish or yellow clay (malarra) was assumed to cure
mineral deficiencies, as was termite clay (ebinga).
White clay (duingira) was used as a treatment for
diarrhoea. It was also eaten by pregnant women to
‘make the stomach cool’. Some women also ate it if
they were hungry, particularly if they craved fish
since it is said to have tasted like fish (Isaacs 1987:198).
On the tidal flats of Mornington Island, red and white
clay were collected. Red clay was used as a body paint
in dance and ceremony and was believed to have
special magico-religious powers. White clay was also
used for body decoration. Another use was to cure
internal pains, headaches, joint pains, eye complaints
and snakebite wounds. It was eaten, drunk in solution
and rubbed over the body, sometimes to the
accompaniment of special songs, hand touching,
breath blowing and the rubbing of underarm
perspiration on the body of the sick. White clay was
also used to increase the flow of breast milk
(Memmott 1979:109).
Pregnant women on Mer (Murray) Island in the
Torres Strait apparently ate clay to ensure the birth of
a fair skinned child. Haddon described the clay as a
greasy chocolate-like earth, which was kneaded into
balls, rolled up in banana leaves and roasted. On Mer,
children also ate clay to make them stronger, braver
and sturdier. According to Anell and Lagercrantz
(1958:9), clay was never eaten as a substitute for food
on the Torres Strait Islands. Colliver (1974) indicated
that clay eating was common throughout Queensland
and suggested that a Mr Hyam (1939:118) had
provided a plausible reason for the habit when he
suggested the practice was allied to the modern
practice of prescribing colloidal clays, kaolins and
precipitated chalk to relieve damaged stomach tissue.
At Bloomfield and Cooktown, north Queensland,
a white kind of kaolin was picked out from rocks or
dug out from riverbeds, pounded up and carefully
sieved to eliminate all coarser particles. It was then
put in a trough, mixed with water and stirred into a
tough dough. This was then kneaded into the form of
flat longish cakes that were laid out in the sun to dry
for six to eight days. The cakes were then wrapped in
leaves and buried in ashes, whereupon a fire was lit
above them. When the cakes had cooled they were
ready for eating and were regarded as a great delicacy
(Anell and Lagercrantz 1958:14–16). Queensland
Aborigines of the northwest and central districts
apparently used huge clay or mud pills, of which one
or two at a time were prescribed for diarrhoea (Roth
1897:163).
In Western Australia, clay and fat were used in the
treatment of wounds. Red clay (known as wilgi) or
white pipeclay, while still hot, were mixed with fat of
any sort of emu oil and applied in paperbark, a
gumleaf or a wad of possum fur to wounds. Clay was
also applied to sore eyes (Hammond 1980:58–9).
Boolga, a type of red earth, was eaten in cases of
stomach trouble. In the west Kimberley, there was a
kind of fatty red earth which was eaten by itself or by
mixing it up with seeds, roots and other edible
substances and baking it in the ashes (White 1985:262,
295). North of the Kimberleys, at Napier Broome Bay,
northwest of Wyndham on the mouth of King
Edward River, where milk and other delicacies did
not reach children, they are reported as filling their
stomachs with handfuls of dirt and pebbles (Perez
1977).
On Cape York, old people ate white clay that was
reputedly good for treating coughing or tuberculosis.
In other areas, clay was eaten for the relief of
diarrhoea (Isaacs 1987:198). The Thaayorre and Wik
Ngantjera, of the coastal plain from Coleman to
Kendall Rivers on Cape York, used a special clay for
the treatment of diarrhoea. This was gathered at the
seaside and roasted in a fire before being chewed or
swallowed. Taylor (1977:425–7) notes that the
missionaries mistook the native cure of earth eating
as a behavioural aberration. In general, Taylor
(1977:432) also portrayed a negative view, however,
concluding that disease was unlikely to have been
ameliorated by conscious therapeutic or preventative
measures in the area.
Britnell (1992:9) refers to an edible clay called
gumburu, used by the Kuku Yalanji of the northern
Queensland rainforest. He was personally aware of
only two recorded locations where the clay could be
found, but he knew of many places where clay is or
was available. It was said to have been eaten only
during lean times, and today it is still used as a body
decoration by Kuku Yalanji dancers. Mjoberg
(1918:523–31) also refers to clay eating on the Evelyn
River, on the Evelyn Tablelands in the north
Queensland rainforest.
6
His informants advised him
that it was used for abortive and contraceptive
purposes, but his own explanation is cynical and
unclear. McCracken (1982:1) refers to a number of
locations in the northern rainforests where edible clay
and ‘stones’ were gathered and eaten. McCracken,
like many others, concluded that ‘Aborigines ate clay
when there was either no food, or a shortage of food
during the change of seasons’. He reported four main
areas where clay was once gathered. These included
the Bloomfield River, on an unnamed stream that
flows into the river, and Saltwater River downstream
from Pollock’s Crossing. The most important source
was at Barrats Creek, where the clay was known as
gumbura. At the Daintree River, a soft stone like a talc
(Morebay) described as being of several colours
(purple, pink, yellow, white, brown and red) was also
occasionally eaten.
L’Oste-Brown and Godwin (1995:31–2) refer to a
soft white stone called copi which was ground up and
used for painting and as a plaster in making items
such as emu egg–shaped objects, used in increase
ceremonies. In the case of Taroom Reserve, it was also
heated, broken up, rolled to a fine powder resembling
cornflour and mixed with water to treat a wide
variety of ailments.
Reports relating to the more recent use of clay by
Aborigines throughout Australia frequently provide a
more negative view of the practice, for reasons that
will become obvious in the following discussions.
Evans (1975:346; Evans and Walker 1977:87–9), for
example, refer to a 1899 report by Archibald Meston
which indicates that the Aboriginal inhabitants of
Bogimbah Creek on Fraser Island had, in their
deprivation, taken to eating white clay (dulong) from
Little Woody Island. Some children also ate sand,
charcoal, brick, chalk, shell and slate pencil as a result
of institutionalisation and hunger. A lump of pipeclay
from Fraser Island is located in the Queensland
Museum [with the annotation ‘QE 2062 A. Meston
2.11.1898 White calcareous clay. Eaten on Fraser’s
Island and is found in lumps on the beach’ (Devitt
1980, table 1)]. At Yarrabah mission in 1915, earth
eating was common and at least 15 deaths were
attributed to the habit (Thomson 1989:52).
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 55
Cheek et al (1981:511; see also Cheek et al 1982)
studied the health of the inhabitants of three coastal
Aboriginal missions in the northwest of the
Kimberley area (300 people). They found that zinc
deficiency was common and attributed this in part to
geophagy, which they claimed reduced zinc
adsorption. They indicated that, although not widely
reported, the habit of eating clay was known to be
widespread. Bateson and Lebroy (1978) studied 11
Aboriginal patients from the Northern Territory, in
whom radiological examination of the abdomen
demonstrated opaque masses of clay in the colon. The
clay was reputedly eaten mainly for medicinal
purposes or to allay hunger, but the results were
not always beneficial, since the clay had caused
complications (including obstruction and perforation
of the colon) in 5 out of the 11 patients. Bateson and
Lebroy concluded that clay was used as a medicine to
cure stomach-aches and diarrhoea and to ‘settle the
stomach’. Significantly, they also note it was taken to
‘line the stomach’ before eating yams, or fish which
may be poisonous.
The clay when analysed consisted predominantly
of aluminium and silicon (92.6 per cent) and was thus
found to be similar to hydrated aluminium silicate,
the clay used in kaolin preparations. It was generally
white and obtained from the beds of rivers,
freshwater springs, and billabongs in coastal areas.
Use of the clay was very common at Maningrida and
was also known at Lake Evalla, Groote Eylandt, Elcho
Island, Daly River and Yirrkala. It was reportedly
used at Numbulwar, Melville Island, Roper River and
Delissaville as well.
Chemical analysis of clay samples from Yirrkala
(Aboriginal Communities of the Northern Territory
1988:215), Maningrida (Bateson and Lebroy 1978:3),
Groote Eylandt (Levitt 1981:64) and Kuku Yalanji
country of the north Queensland rainforest (Britnell
1992:9) has revealed a range of clay types with a
variety of trace elements. However, all have a high
silica/aluminium content, as might be expected for
clays used for the purposes described in each case.
In a medical thesis and a number of publications,
Eastwell (1978, 1979, 1984) has considered the issue of
clay eating among Indigenous Australians. He
decided the main reason that people on the coast and
in north Arnhem Land ate clay was to alleviate
boredom. He argued that girls, in particular, formed
clay-eating groups because boys were sniffing petrol
and on grog, a practice he suggested may prevent the
taking up of iron, although the issue of cause and
effect in this relationship remains unresolved (Johns
and Duquette 1991a). Eastwell suggests that, in the
old days, people ate clay in the form of anthill earth to
round out a meal and that this practice still occurred
on outstations to stop loose bowels or diarrhoea. He
noted that, at Maningrida, the much-prized clay
Benamanrka-gunara (White Clay Dreaming) was
exchanged with neighbouring groups over a distance
of 100 miles [167 km] or more and was used for gas-
trointestinal disorders and diarrhoea. In April 1973,
35 people who were camped at an outstation 50 miles
[83 km] from Maningrida consumed 2 kg of earthy
termite mound. Eastwell records another occurrence
in 1974, mainly among women who were not
forthcoming in terms of explanations other than ‘it’s
good medicine’ or ‘it cools the stomach’. Again,
Eastwell’s (1979:222) overall conclusion was that clay
eating occurred in response to men drinking beer,
thus providing women with their own means to
establish an identity.
In a comprehensive investigation of the possible
nutritional/medicinal value of termite mounds used
by Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory, Foti
(1994) found that termitaria were used for gastric
disorders or after eating certain foods, like yams,
turtle or goannas. She concluded this could be related
to the clay content, in particular kaolin, while
consumption during pregnancy or lactation could be
associated with their elemental content, in particular
iron and calcium. She also found that, at all sites and
for all species, the mounds selected by Aboriginal
people had a higher percentage of clay than the
adjacent topsoil. The species most favoured by the
Daly River people had the highest mean clay content.
Other evidence from Australia also suggests that
Indigenous Australians were aware of the complex
properties of clays. For example, it is reported that
Aboriginal women protected their hands and arms
with clay when handling the caustic part of the
Australian cashew nut (Semecarpus australiensis)
(Webb 1969:83). In southeastern and southwestern
Australia, Cumbungi or Bulrush, Typha species, was a
common Aboriginal food and fibre source (Gott
1982, 1983, 1999). The carbohydrate content of Typha
consists largely of starch, tasting rather like potato
when cooked, but is thought to contain an
unidentified toxic principle that has purgative and
emetic properties. Typha is generally roasted in ashes
or steamed in earth ovens and there are no known
references to it being eaten with clay.
56 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 57
Nevertheless, Gott (1999:40) refers to a detailed
record of Typha preparation that might suggest a link
with the special properties of clay. In this particular
case, Typha was cooked in an earth oven using balls of
clay apparently as ‘heat retainers’. The women dug a
hole, 90 cm in diameter and 45 cm deep. Pieces of clay
about the size of cricket balls were placed to one side.
The hole was swept out with grass or boughs and
filled with firewood, which was then set alight with
the clay balls on top. When the fire had died down,
the clay balls were removed with two sticks used as
tongs, and the ashes were swept out. The hole was
lined with moistened grass on which the rhizomes
were placed, more moistened grass was used as a
cover, and baked clay modules placed on top. The
whole was then covered with earth until the food was
cooked. Gott indicates that there are still mounds
remaining on the floodplain which are full of these
baked clay balls. Whether clay has a detoxification
function in this context, however, has yet to be
investigated.
Although the primary focus of this article is on the
consumption of clay, it is apparent that Indigenous
Australians were also cognisant of some of the
biochemical functions of charcoal. This is demons-
trated in the widespread use of pituri. Pituri (Duboisia
hopwoodii), of the family Solanaceae (which contains
some of the most physiologically active plants),
contains nicotine as a salt of organic acids, and in this
form it does not pass readily through the mucus
membrane into the body. By the addition of an alkali
in the form of ash, the pure nicotine was freed and the
pituri was thus made more powerful (Webb
1973:293–4). The ash most often used was from Acacia
salincina, also known as Acacia ligulata or wirra.
Analysis of this ash revealed that calcium sulphate
was present in extraordinary quantities as sulphuric
anhydride (30.09 per cent) and lime (40.7 per cent),
making it one of the most alkaline plant ashes known.
Watson (1983:23) therefore concluded that, either by
accident or experimentation, Aborigines had disco-
vered a most efficient agent to release nicotine.
Charcoal is also reported as being used in one
of three methods of preparing Macrozamia for
consumption. In this particular method, the kernels
were removed whole from the sclerotesta, rolled in
hot sand mixed with charcoal and then placed in a
bag with more charcoal. The contents of the bag were
dried in the sun for several days and then leached in
water. After four to seven days, the kernels were
removed from the water and pounded into a long
cake, before being roasted. This lengthy procedure
produced bread called munburra, of different taste and
texture to that of other methods of preparation (Beck
et al 1988:141).
In sum, it is clear from the above review of
Indigenous clay eating that clay was consumed
throughout Australia for a wide range of reasons. The
evidence for trade in clays also highlights the
significance of the practice. As well, it is apparent
in many, but not all, cases that cytoprotection or
adsorption, or both, may have been an underlying
function, although this is obscured in later studies by
a tendency to see clay eating as an aberrant behaviour
or simply as a means to satisfy hunger. It is also clear
that Indigenous Australians were aware of the
biochemical functions of charcoal.
The potential role of clay eating
Indigenous Australians dealt with toxic plants in a
number of complex ways. Some of these are discussed
below, prior to developing a case that clay eating may
have been one of the earliest and most basic
techniques used. The implication of this for the sig-
nificance of other techniques is also discussed.
In a seminal paper concerning the strategic
patterns of Aboriginal adaptation to the Australian
continent, Golson (1971) suggested that the initial
immigrants to Australia’s northern shores would
have met strange animals but familiar plants. He
found that, at the generic or specific level, the vast
majority of the plants used for food in Arnhem Land
would have been familiar to migrants from the
Malaysian region, the totals of plants used for food
being close to 90 per cent both in Arnhem Land and
Cape York, and in Malaysia. However, many of the
plants used in Malaysia and Australia require special
preparation, commonly involving both heating and
leaching to rid them of toxic substances before they
are fit for consumption.
7
These include the seeds of
various species of mangrove, Avicennia, the seeds of
Entada phaseoloides, the nuts of various species of
Cycas and the tubers of some of the Dioscorea (Golson
1971:199–208). Tropical yams, varieties of Dioscorea
sp., for example, are toxic and require lengthy
leaching time in water. They were an important staple
across humid northern Australia, in Arnhem Land
(Jones 1981; Meehan 1982; Thomson 1939, 1949) and
on Bathurst and Melville Islands (Goodale 1971; Hart
and Pilling 1960; Levitt 1981).
58 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
The most significant among these plants are the
cycads, a primitive, pantropical group of plants, of
which there are two important genera in Australia:
Macrozamia along the eastern and southwestern
coasts, and Cycas in the north of the continent. Cycads
were exploited throughout their area of distribution
and were a staple in the north Queensland rainforests,
where alternative plant foods were limited. The
nutritional value of the cycad lies in the edible starch
extracted from the root, stem and nut, and parts of the
plant are also used for medicinal purposes. All
cycads, however, contain a closely related series of
glycosides, with the nitrogen-containing methyla-
zoxymethanol (MAM) being the main toxic element
(Beaton 1982:54). It is generally accepted that consum-
ption of unprocessed cycads results in severe gas-
trointestinal disturbance, fever, numerous other
symptoms of distress, and often death (Beaton 1982;
Beck et al 1988:137; Johns 1990:60; Whiting 1963, table
3). It is widely known, for example, that Captain
Cook’s men became violently ill on eating the nuts
(Beaton 1982:54).
In 1977, Beaton noted ‘there is no such thing
as people who eat cycads, and those who are are
only just learning about how to prepare them’
(1977:201–3). In 1982, he concluded that, without
leaching, ‘no cycad food of any kind is possible’
(1982:58). He could find no record in the literature of
cycads being roasted and eaten without first having
been leached. Two lines of evidence did, however,
suggest that non-leaching was a possibility. First, the
location of Rainbow and Wanderers’ Caves, where
Beaton discovered the first extensive archaeological
evidence of cycad use, suggested the possibility that
the nuts could have been roasted and consumed at
these sites, which are several kilometres removed
from even ephemeral water sources. Second, he
became aware that the melting point of the MAM host
macrozamin is 199–200ºC. On the basis of an
experiment with an open beach fire, he discovered
that this temperature could be quite easily achieved.
He also noted that year-old cycads could be eaten
(Beaton 1982:55–6).
Nevertheless, while Beaton (1982:57) considered
the prehistoric mundane use of cycads was an almost
certain reality, he considered that such a use did not fit
the archaeological evidence from the Carnarvon area.
Based on his excavations at rockshelters in this area,
Beaton therefore developed the concept of a ‘Basic
Leaching Technology’, a leaching/drying/fermenting
process which he linked to the Australian Small Tool
Tradition and which he dated to about 4300BP. The
evidence from Carnarvon also suggested to Beaton
that, in this area, cycads were used as a ‘communion’
food (Beaton 1977, 1982; see also Bowdler 1981:108;
Hiscock 1994:271). In general, he concluded that
something had changed dramatically in Australia at
around 4500 years ago and that, associated with these
changes, there were good indications that from then
on the full leaching system was operating, whereas
there are no hints of its existence before that time. He
suggested that perhaps the origin of the entire system
was dependent on understanding the methods of
eliminating MAM from cycads. He further proposed
that it was very likely that the technology arrived in
Australia complete, with all the necessary subtleties
of leaching and fermenting well under control.
Evidence from elsewhere in Australia, however,
suggests that the method of detoxifying Macrozamia
was not a mid to late Holocene introduction.
Detoxification by leaching was occurring by 13000BP
at Cheetup Cave, 55 km east of Esperance, Western
Australia (Smith 1983, 1996). Thus, it is not the case
that initial use of Macrozamia was contemporaneous
with artefacts of the Australian Small Tool Tradition,
nor was it restricted to a ‘communion’ role in all
regions of Australia. Furthermore, Beck et al
(1988:145; Beck 1989) have demonstrated that
knowledgeable people can safely eat old seeds after
inspection. They further argue that it is possible to
distinguish between fresh and aged cycad specimens
in the archaeological record and therefore, by
implication, between deliberately leached and
unleached seeds. They also note that it is possible that
the use of aged cycad seeds preceded the water-
leaching techniques by people who observed them
naturally weathering on the ground and replicated
this by drying and/or washing seeds harvested from
the plant. In a recent review, Lourandos (1997:143) has
drawn together the evidence from both Beaton and
Smith to conform to his model of late Holocene inten-
sification. He argues that the use of cycads and
leaching methods may date from around the terminal
Pleistocene, and that the ‘intensification’ of cycad use
from about 4300BP, at least, subsequently occurred in
the south-central Queensland uplands.
Other evidence also supports a view that the
concept of leaching was not a late introduction. For
example, Harris (1987) was able to identify at least 59
plant species in the north Queensland rainforest used
for food, many of them toxic or at least bitter and
requiring roasting, pounding or grating and soaking
or washing in water before they could be safely eaten.
Black Bean or Moreton Bay chestnut (Castanosperum
australe) and Matchbox bean (Entada scadens)
provided large seeds that were ground and washed in
running water to yield a saponin-free flour. Saponin-
containing roots and bark from Barringtonia,
Tenstroemia and Pangamia were used to stupefy and
catch fish in waterholes, as were the rotenone-
containing Derris and Tephrosia. Harris has suggested
that this use could have subsequently been developed
into a leaching process.
None of the tropical rainforest genera of
Queensland is restricted to Australia and this
suggests that, as with food plants associated with the
tropical rainforest, knowledge of their biological
activity arrived with the early immigrants (Webb
1973:292–3). In contrast, however, Webb (1973:295)
argues that an important food staple of inland
Australia was provided by ripe fruits of wild
gooseberries, of which the immature fruits are
generally poisonous, containing alkaloids such as
solanine so ‘that botany had to begin anew for
Aborigines in sclerophyll Australia’.
Horsfall (1987:255) has argued there are four
important characteristics of tropical rainforest toxic
plants: they occur in abundance; many of them are
available for extended periods; storage is often
possible (either untreated or after processing); and
some are available at times of the year when non-toxic
food plants are in short supply. She (1987:240–1)
further argued that the inclusion of toxic items in the
diet, and their time-consuming preparation, had
advantages: it increased the amounts of food
harvested from a specific region, bridged the dietary
gap at lean times of the year, and allowed more
people to inhabit an area. She (Horsfall 1984:169)
concluded that the intensive use of toxic plant
products by means of the leaching process was
essential if a given area of rainforest was to support a
large population, since animal biomass is typically
low. In short, she assumed that high population
density and dependence on the leaching technology
went hand in hand in the north Queensland
rainforest.
Horsfall therefore hypothesises that early
occupation of the rainforests was at a low population
level, with little or no use of toxic plant products.
While she suggested that occupation might (or might
not) date from the earliest colonisation of Australia,
the patterns of life in the rainforest were altered at
some later time, perhaps in response to some external
stimulus, perhaps as part of the continuing inter-
action between people and their environment.
Population density increased, resource exploitation
intensified and the leaching technique was either
invented, introduced, or its already known appli-
cation increased. Excavations at Jiyer Cave on the
Russell River, deep within the tropical rainforest of
northeast Queensland, demonstrated a minimum age
of occupation of 5000 years. Abundant charred
nutshells implied to Horsfall the use of rainforest nut
species as early as 3500BP, and toxic varieties by
1000BP, although the earliest use of toxic types could
not be identified because of poor preservation. From
Nara Inlet 1, on the Whitsunday Islands, Barker
(1991:105) proposes a period of intensification
commencing sometime after 3990BP and before
2090BP, with the appearance of cycads and orange
mangrove that required grinding and leaching from
around 550BP.
In most regions of Australia, rainforest
exploitation is a mid to late Holocene phenomenon.
Beaton (1977, 1982), Bowdler (1983) and Horsfall
(1987) favour a Southeast Asian link in the exploi-
tation of rainforests, in particular through the
knowledge of toxic-plant food processing. However,
since the strongest evidence for the earliest use of
rainforests comes from Melanesia, Cosgrove (1996)
proposes that it is likely that the northeast
Queensland rainforest culture has its original links,
not with southeast Asia, but with Melanesia. He
therefore proposes that the successful exploitation
and manipulation of Australian tropical rainforest has
a very long antiquity, probably acquired before the
drowning of the Torres Strait land bridge 9000 years
ago. It could be argued that, with knowledge of clay
eating and the addition of other simple detoxification
techniques, the earliest arrivals could have exploited
the toxic plants of these rainforests, thus adding
further support to Cosgrove’s hypothesis.
Discussion and conclusions
Western science often dismisses indigenous peoples’
knowledge and practices as tangential or irrelevant to
the advance of Western knowledge. While such
accumulated wisdom continues to inform medical
practice, there remains a residual distrust of such
knowledge (Dickson 1999). The practice of consuming
clay and charcoal is an example of that confusion and
distrust. Many reviews still consider the practice as
aberrant or pathological (justified in some cases), and
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 59
60 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
it is only in the last decade that it has been seen to
have had a much more significant range of
biophysical effects. It might now be considered to be
the most fundamental human plant-processing
detoxification technique, with behavioural antece-
dents in a wide range of other species.
While clay was eaten for various reasons, its
widespread medicinal use by humans to treat
diarrhoea and other gastrointestinal ailments
indicates a detoxification function either directly, or
indirectly via the ‘psychological response to gastroin-
testinal upset’ (Johns 1986:643). Recent studies by
Gilardi et al (1999) and Diamond et al (1999) have
confirmed the link between clay consumption and
adsorption of toxic plant substances. The practice of
clay eating could easily have been learnt by observing
the geophagous behaviour of a whole range of other
animals, or may have been a pre-human condition. A
recent reinterpretation of the initial stages of human
development (O’Connell et al 1999) has led to a view
that, two million years ago, conditions favoured
hominids that could efficiently harvest underground
tubers. Such a view allows for the possibility that
human knowledge of a plant toxicity/clay association
could be at least that old.
Accepting that a knowledge of clay eating for the
purposes of adsorbing toxins is universal has
considerable antiquity, and may have been simply
learnt from animals or was a pre-human behaviour, it
follows that the practice could have arrived on
Australia’s shores with the initial arrivals. Thus, those
plants that Golson (1971) identified as familiar, but
toxic, may have been potentially usable from initial
occupation. With a knowledge of toxic plant use
extending back at least 40,000 years, it therefore no
longer seems necessary to accept Beaton’s view that a
‘Basic Leaching Technology’ had to await the late
Holocene to be invented or received from outside.
It remains an open question, however, at what
stage substantial water leaching may have been
necessary to support the production of large
quantities of Macrozamia in the central Queensland
highlands as suggested by Beaton, or to support the
large rainforest populations of northern Queensland
as suggested by Horsfall. Given Beck’s observations
that old cycads can be eaten, and the emerging
evidence that clay may have been used to adsorb
toxins in edible plants, it may no longer be necessary
to see water leaching as such a critical process in plant
processing and rainforest occupation. Furthermore,
while it has been argued that rainforests are
particularly hard places to colonise (Bailey et al 1989),
new evidence from a number of localities suggests
that they were occupied in the Pleistocene (e.g.
Athens and Ward 1999; Pavlides and Gosden 1994;
Roosevelt et al 1996).
From an anthropological/archaeological perspe-
ctive, the more recent perception of the significant
qualities of clays, discussed in this article, raises a
number of interesting questions that have yet to be
investigated. For example, it needs to be determined
how humans discriminate between various types of
clays. Some clays have a greater capacity than others
to adsorb toxins, and it will be of considerable interest
to determine if Indigenous Australians were aware of
this, and thus if they used specific clays for specific
purposes. Which plant toxins clays can adsorb also
needs to be further investigated. It is important, too,
not to lose sight of the complex of other uses that clay
was put to. Trade in clay is another area worthy of
close investigation. Such trade appears to have been
of major significance in many parts of the world but
has not been investigated in any detail in Australia.
From an archaeological perspective, it becomes of
much greater significance to record the location
of clay extraction sites. They are known to exist in
the northern rainforests of Queensland, where a
wide range of toxic nuts and tubers was eaten
and where observations suggest that clays were
widely consumed. However, no extraction sites are
currently recorded on the Queensland Environmental
Protection Agency’s site database of over 14,000
sites. White kaolinite clay was also widely used
in Aboriginal rock art (David and Lourandos
1998:205–6) and it is therefore necessary for archaeo-
logists excavating deposits to be aware that clay piles
or nodules in excavated deposits may have greater
significance than as residual material to be discarded.
The broader issue of Indigenous medicines also
deserves closer attention than it has received in the
recent past.
Finally, there seems no logical reason to suggest
that the first colonisers of Australia had to wait
hundreds or thousands of years to adapt to the flora
of this land by a process of ‘eat, die and learn’, or to
await the arrival of external technologies to process
poisonous plants. The knowledge of plant processing
methods was probably fully developed with the
initial colonists. It may be that some technologies
were introduced in the mid to late Holocene that
would have allowed the more intensified use of some
plants. However, it might be just as reasonable to
suggest that existing techniques were ‘intensified’ in
response to a complex interplay of population
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 61
growth, environmental change and sociocultural
change in the Holocene (see, for example, Lourandos
1997; Rowland 1999).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Many thanks are due to Dr Richard Prankerd, Senior
Lecturer, School of Pharmacy, University of
Queensland; Dr R.A. McKenzie, Principal Veterinary
Pathologist, Queensland Department of Primary
Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly;
Mr Nick Mesterovic, Medical Information Unit
Leader, Medical Services Department, Pharmacia and
Upjohn Pty Ltd, Rydalmere, Sydney; Dr Alan
Chappell, Advanced Analytical Centre, James Cook
University, Townsville; and Dr Mick O’Sullivan,
General Practitioner, Bellbowrie, Queensland, who all
provided expert advice when I was delving into
unfamiliar territory.
Thanks are also due to Dr Ian McNiven, School of
Fine Arts, Classical Studies and Archaeology,
University of Melbourne, for comments on a final
draft of this article. Fay Adams, Administrative
Officer, Mossman; Jeanette Stevens, Project Officer,
Cairns; Dr Stephen Garnett, Senior Principal
Conservation Officer, Cairns; Aaron Stasi, Senior
Environmental Officer, Brisbane; Stefan Van Rhyn,
Environmental Officer, Toowoomba, all of the
Queensland Environmental Protection Agency/Parks
and Wildlife Service, are thanked for helpful
comments and advice. Thanks are also due to Sean
Ulm for the opportunity to present an earlier version
as a seminar paper in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander Studies Unit, University of Queensland,
seminar series (1999), and to all those present who
offered comments. Monica Garner, of the
Environmental Protection Agency/Parks and Wildlife
Service Library, tracked some elusive references with
her usual skill. Mr Walter Blumenfeld of Holt, ACT,
transcribed the relevant section of Mjoberg (1918).
Thanks are also due to Dr Richard Davis, Dr
Harry Lourandos and an anonymous reviewer for
guidance in making this article more logical in
structure and meaning. I remain responsible for any
errors or misinterpretations.
NOTES
1. Seminal reviews are by Laufer (1930) and Anell and Lagercrantz
(1958). Other general contributions and reviews are by Halsted
(1968), Hunter (1973, 1985), Danford (1982), Hunter and De Kleine
(1984), Vermeer and Ferrell (1985), Reid (1992), Abrahams and
Parsons (1996), Ziegler (1997) Krishnamani and Mahaney (2000)
and Wiley and Katz (1998). Geographically specific studies are by
Behbehani (1985), Vermeer and Ferrell (1985) and Hunter (1985). A
recent, general but useful review is by Root-Bernstein and Root-
Bernstein (2000). Of primary importance to the discussions
developed in this article are publications by Johns (1986, 1989,
1990), Johns and Kubo (1988), Johns and Duquette (1991a, 1991b),
Browman and Gundersen (1993), and, in particular, recent research
by Gilardi et al (1999) and Diamond et al (1999).
2. One of the earliest references to a purported link between clay
consumption and toxin adsorption is from Baden, Germany, in
1581. In this case, a condemned criminal facing the hangman made
a counter-proposal to the court. He requested poison, provided that
he was also given some
terra silligata at the same time. He was
therefore given mercuric chloride (the dosage 3–6 times that
required to kill an average size man), followed by terra silligata and
wine. Although he was sick, he survived (Root-Bernstein and Root-
Bernstein 2000:59–60).
3. The chief groups of clay minerals are kaolinite, halloysite, illite,
montmorillite and vericulie, whose outstanding property is the
capacity for holding water (Huffman 1997:174). The size of the
surface area is the important feature of specific clay types, since
toxins are held (i.e. adsorbed) at the surface of the clay. The unique
properties of clays have led to their use in modern pharmaceuticals
for both therapeutic effect and excipient action. The crystal
structure of clay minerals is well understood, and the behaviour of
clays in pharmaceutical systems is predictable based on structural
considerations (Browne et al 1980).
4. Sulphur-crested cockatoos in the Sydney area ingest clay (Cooper
2001) and it has been noted that the Golden-shouldered parrots of
north Queensland eat clay from termite mounds in association with
fruit from Cooktown Ironwood (Stephen Garnett, pers. comm.),
evidence of the widespread nature of the practice.
5. Clays are surprisingly complex and may have played a
cooperative role with catalytic peptides in an intermediate stage of
prebiological chemistry preceding the emergence of life on earth
(Rao et al 1980). They are crystalline in nature and are essentially
made up of stacked layers of silica tetrahedral and aluminium (or
magnesium) octahedral sheets. Organic molecules may be
adsorbed onto the surfaces of clays through a number of means,
including cation, anion, and ligand exchange, protonation water
bridging, hydrogen bonding, and non-specific van der Waals
interactions (see Soma and Soma 1989 for details; Johns 1990:89).
Generally, clays do not contain the essential components of
nutrition, such as protein, carbohydrates, lipids or vitamins.
It has been demonstrated in recent studies that high-surface-
area clays such as smectic and attapulgite are effective in inducing
these cytoprotective effects and alleviating the symptoms of
diarrhoea (Gilardi et al 1999:917). For example, attapulgite is about
six times as effective as kaolin in detoxifying strychnine. As a result,
the active ingredient of some antidiarrheal medications has been
changed to these clay types from the historic kaolin-pectin
formulations. Soils from many geophagy sites are kaolin-rich, but it
remains unclear whether these low-surface-area clays can induce
cytoprotection.
6. His description is cited in full as it is the first time that it has been
fully transcribed from the Swedish original:
During my stay at Evelyne in the large rainforest area, I saw
some women one-day, engaged eagerly digging up white,
kaolin-like clay lumps, which disappeared into their wide
mouths. My black companion, who showed himself to have
unusual good knowledge about everything, explained that
they did this not only to get rid of being with child but also not
to become pregnant. I was interested in the matter. Even other
blacks gave me similar information. The lumps that they
consumed were large and were obtained by digging into the
riverbank. They greedily devoured one after the other. I
gathered samples of the material, which on the exterior greatly
reminded me of kaolin. As an immediate study was not
possible, I stored the lumps in my collection so that an expert
could undertake an analysis after my homecoming. The
commercial chemist J. Landin has been so kind as to carry out
critical analysis, which gave the result that ‘sample consists of
kaolin-like clay, essentially silicon acid and clay soil
(aluminium oxide), as well as smaller amounts with traces of
iron oxide, lime, magnesium and alkalies. There are only small
traces of phosphate and water-soluble substances are absent’.
The blacks at Evelyne and even in the Malanda region state
with certainty that the consumption of clay soil lumps occurs
for both abortive and contraceptive purposes. The analysis
scarcely infers that such substances are available which would
be effective as indicated above. Should the blacks really have
found such means for abortion? Truly not. In my opinion, the
probable explanation for this peculiar diet is that some
medicine man got the sceptical to believe that the eating of clay
soil lumps, their ‘cloak’ [the translator suggests this means
‘protection’], should have the just-mentioned effect. The
custom of eating lumps has since been more generally
established amongst women, who more so than men, believe
in the fanciful ‘nature physicians’. (Mjoberg 1918:515–18)
7. The systematic investigation of Australian flora for constituents
of value for medicinal drugs, or for other purposes, had its origins
during World War II, and the chemical composition of numerous
Australian plants is therefore well established (Collins et al 1990).
Plant secondary compounds as well as inorganic materials are
usually considered to be a plant’s front-line defence against all but
the most specialised herbivores. These products are generally
directly toxic to the consumer or deter consumption by reducing
palatability or digestibility—yet many of these items are found in
human diets. Animals also use plant secondary compounds or
other non-nutritional substances to medicate themselves. That non-
human primates and humans with similar illnesses have selected
the same medicinal plants provides insight into the evolution of
medicinal behaviour in modern humans and the possible nature of
self-medication in early hominids (Huffman 1997).
REFERENCES
Aboriginal Communities of the Northern Territory of Australia
1988 Traditional Bush Medicines: An Aboriginal Pharmacopoeia,
Greenhouse Publications, Melbourne.
Abrahams, P.W. and J.A. Parsons 1996 Geophagy in the Tropics: A
Literature Review,
Geographical Journal 162, 63–72.
Anell, B. and S. Lagercrantz 1958 Geophagical Customs,
Studia
Ethnographia Upsaliensia 17, 1–84.
Armelagos, G. 1987 Biocultural Aspects of Food Choice. In M.
Harris and E.B. Ross (eds),
Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of
Human Food Habits, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 579–94.
Athens, J.S. and J.V. Ward 1999 The Late Quaternary of the Western
Amazon: Climate, Vegetation and Humans,
Antiquity 73, 287–302.
Aufreiter, S., R.G.V. Hancock, W.C. Mahaney, A. Stambolic-Robb
and K. Sanmugadas 1997 Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Soils
Eaten by Humans,
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
48, 293–305.
Aveling, E.M. and C. Heron 1999 Chewing Tar in the Early
Holocene: An Archaeological and Ethnographic Evaluation,
Antiquity 73, 579–84.
Bailey, R.C., G. Head, M. Jenike, B. Owen, R. Rechtman, E.
Zechenter 1989 Hunting and Gathering in Tropical Rainforest: Is It
Possible?
American Anthropologist 91, 59–82.
Barker, B.C. 1991 Nara Inlet 1: Coastal Resource Use and the
Holocene Marine Transgression in the Whitsunday Islands, Central
Queensland,
Archaeology in Oceania 26, 102–9.
Bateson, E. M. and T. Lebroy 1978 Clay Eating by Aboriginals of the
Northern Territory,
Medical Journal of Australia, Special Supplement on
Aboriginal Health 10, 1(1), 1–3.
Beaton, J.M. 1977 Dangerous Harvest: Investigations in the Late
Prehistoric Occupation of Upland South-East Central Queensland,
PhD thesis, Australian National University.
—— 1982 Fire and Water: Aspects of Australian Management of
Cycads,
Archaeology in Oceania 17(1), 51–8.
Beck, W. 1989 The Taphomony of Plants. In W. Beck, A. Clarke and
L. Head (eds),
Plants in Australian Archaeology, Tempus Volume 1,
Anthropology Museum, University of Queensland, Brisbane,
31–53.
Beck, W., R. Fullager and N. White 1988 Archaeology from
Ethnography: The Aboriginal Use of Cycads as an Example. In B.
Meehan and R. Jones (eds),
Archaeology with Ethnography: An
Australian Perspective, Department of Prehistory, Research School of
Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, 137–47.
Behbehani, A.M. 1985 Geophagical Clay: Medicinal Effects,
Science
228, 46–96.
Bowdler, S. 1981 Hunters in the Highlands: Aboriginal Adaptations
in the Eastern Australian Uplands,
Archaeology in Oceania 16(2),
99–111.
—— 1983 Rainforest: Colonised or Coloniser?
Australian
Archaeology 17, 59–66.
Britnell, D. 1992 A Preliminary Assessment of the Cultural Heritage
of the Mossman/Daintree Region, North East Queensland, report
to Bamanga Bubu Ngadimunku Inc. and Wet Tropics Management
Agency.
Browman, D.L. and J.N. Gundersen 1993 Altiplano Comestible
Earths: Prehistoric and Historic Geophagy of Highland Peru and
Bolivia,
Geoarchaeology 8(5), 413–25.
Browne, J.E., J.R. Feldkamp, J.E. White and S.L. Hem 1980
Characterization and Adsorptive Properties of Pharmaceutical
Grade Clays,
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69(7), 816–23.
Cheek, D.B., R.M. Smith, R.M. Spargo and N. Francis 1981 Zinc,
Copper and Environmental Factors in the Aboriginal Peoples of the
North West,
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 11,
508–12.
62 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 63
Cheek, D.B., R.M. Spargo, H.J. Hay and R.M. Smith 1982 Zinc
Deficiency in the Aboriginal People of the Northwest of Australia.
In A.S. Prasad (ed.), Clinical, Biochemical, and Nutritional Aspects of
Trace Elements, Alan R. Liss Inc., New York, 63–81.
Collins, D.J., C.C.J. Culvenor, J.A. Lamberton, J.W. Loder and J.R.
Price 1990
Plants for Medicines: A Chemical and Pharmacological
Survey of Plants in the Australian Region, CSIRO, Melbourne.
Colliver, F.S. 1974
Some Plant Foods of the Queensland Aborigine,
Archaeology Papers, Archaeology Branch, Department of
Aboriginal and Islanders Advancement, Brisbane. Also published
as C.T. White Memorial Lecture 1973 Queensland Naturalist 21(1–2),
22–31.
Cooney, D.O. 1995
Activated Charcoal in Medical Applications, Marcel
Dekker, New York.
Cooper, D.W. 2001 Geography,
Parrot Society of Australia News 11(2),
12–13.
Cosgrove, R. 1996 Origin and Development of Australian
Aboriginal Rainforest Culture: A Reconsideration,
Antiquity 70,
900–12.
Danford, D.E. 1982 Pica and Nutrition,
Annual Reviews of Nutrition
2, 303–22.
David, B. and H. Lourandos 1998 Rock Art and Socio-Demography
in Northeastern Australian Prehistory,
World Archaeology 30(2),
193–219.
Devitt, J. 1980
Fraser Island Material Culture, Occasional Papers in
Anthropology No. 10, Anthropology Museum, University of
Queensland, Brisbane, 9–22.
Diamond, J.M. 1999 Dirty Eating for Healthy Living,
Nature 400,
120–1.
Diamond, J.M., K.D. Bishop and J.D. Gilardi 1999 Geophagy in
New Guinea Birds,
Ibis 141, 181–93.
Dickson, D. 1999 ISCU Seeks To Classify ‘Traditional Knowledge’,
Nature 401, 631.
Eastwell, H.W. 1978 The State of Risk for Psychiatric Illness in the
Tribes of North Australia, Degree of Doctor of Medicine, University
of New South Wales.
—— 1979 A Pica Epidemic: A Price for Sedentarism among
Australian Ex-hunter-gatherers,
Psychiatry 42(3), 264–73.
—— 1984 Pica: Eating Non-food,
Aboriginal Health Worker 8(2),
23–4.
Evans, R. 1975 ‘Helpful, Hurtful and Superfluous’: Racism and
Colonial Queensland. In R. Evans, K. Saunders and K. Cronin (eds),
Exclusion, Exploitation and Extermination: Race Relations in Colonial
Queensland, Australia and New Zealand Book Company, Sydney,
341–72.
Evans, R. and J. Walker 1977
‘These Strangers, Where Are They
Going?’ Aboriginal–European Relations in the Fraser Island and Wide
Bay Region 1770–1905, Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 8,
University of Queensland, Brisbane, 39–105.
Foti, F.L. 1994 The Possible Nutritional/Medicinal Value of Some
Termite Mounds Used by Aboriginal Communities of Nauiyu
Nambiyu (Daly River) and Elliott of the Northern Territory, with
Emphasis on Mineral Elements, MSc thesis, Northern Territory
University.
Gifford, E.W. 1936 Californian Balanophagy. In
Essays in
Anthropology: Presented to A.L. Kroeber in Celebration of His Sixtieth
Birthday, June 11, 1936, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Gilardi, J.D., S.S. Duffey, C.A. Munn and L.A. Tell 1999 Biochemical
Functions of Geophagy in Parrots: Detoxification of Dietary Toxins
and Cytoprotective Effects,
Journal of Chemical Ecology 25(4),
897–922.
Golson, J. 1971 Australian Aboriginal Food Plants: Some Ecological
and Culture-historical Implications. In D.J. Mulvaney and J. Golson
(eds),
Aboriginal Man and Environment in Australia, Australian
National University Press, Canberra, 196–233.
Goodale, J. 1971
Tiwi Wives, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Gott, B. 1982 Ecology of Root Use by Aborigines of Southern
Australia,
Archaeology in Oceania 17(1), 59–67.
—— 1983 Murnong—
Microsersis scapigera: A Study of a Staple Food
of Victorian Aborigines, Australian Aboriginal Studies 2, 2–18.
—— 1999 Cumbungi,
Typha Species: A Staple Aboriginal Food in
Southern Australia, Australian Aboriginal Studies 1, 33–50.
Halsted, J.A. 1968 Geophagia in Man: Its Nature and Nutritional
Effects,
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 21(12), 1384–93.
Hammond, J.E. 1980
Winjan’s People: The Story of the South-West
Australian Aborigines, facsimile edn, Hesperian Press, Perth.
Harris, D.R. 1977 Alternative Pathways toward Agriculture. In C.A.
Reed (ed.),
Origins of Agriculture, Mouton, The Hague, 179–243.
—— 1987 Aboriginal Subsistence in a Tropical Rainforest
Environment: Food Procurement, Cannibalism, and Population
Regulation in Northeastern Australia. In M. Harris and E.B. Ross
(eds),
Food and Evolution: Toward a Theory of Human Food Habits,
Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 357–85.
Hart, C. and Pilling A. 1960
The Tiwi of North Australia, Holt,
Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Hiscock, P. 1994 Technological Responses to Risk in Holocene
Australia,
Journal of World Prehistory 8(3), 267–92.
Horsfall, N. 1984 Theorising about Northeast Queensland
Prehistory,
Queensland Archaeological Research 1, 164–72.
—— 1987 Living in Rainforest (2 vols), PhD thesis, James Cook
University of North Queensland.
Huffman, M.A. 1997 Current Evidence for Self-medication in
Primates: A Multidisciplinary Perspective,
Yearbook of Physical
Anthropology 40, 171–200.
Hunter, J.M. 1973 Geophagy in Africa and in the United States: A
Culture–Nutrition Hypothesis,
Geographical Review 63, 170–95.
—— 1985 Clay Eating,
Science 228, 1040.
Hunter, J.M. and R. De Kleine 1984 Geophagy in Central America,
Geographical Review 74, 157–69.
Hyam, G.N. 1939 The Vegetable Foods of the Australian
Aboriginals,
Victorian Naturalist 56(7), 115–19.
64 Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1
Isaacs, J. 1987 Bush Food: Aboriginal Food and Herbal Medicine,
Weldons, Sydney.
Johns, T. 1986 Detoxification Function of Geophagy and
Domestication of the Potato,
Journal of Chemical Ecology 12(3),
635–46.
—— 1989 A Chemical–Ecological Model of Root and Tuber
Domestication in the Andes. In D.R. Harris and G.C. Hillman (eds),
Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, Unwin
Hyman, London, 504–19.
—— 1990
With Bitter Herbs They Shall Eat It: Chemical Ecology and the
Origins of Human Diet and Medicine, University of Arizona Press,
Tucson.
Johns, T. and M. Duquette 1991a Detoxification and Mineral
Supplementation as Functions of Geophagy,
American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition 53, 448–56.
—— 1991b Traditional Detoxification of Acorn Bread with Clay,
Ecology of Food and Nutrition 25(3), 221–8.
Johns, T. and I. Kubo 1988 A Survey of Traditional Methods
Employed for the Detoxification of Plant Foods,
Journal of
Ethnobiology 8(1), 81–129.
Johns, T., M. Nagarajan, M.L. Parkipuny and P.J.H. Jones 2000
Maasi Gummivory: Implications for Paleolithic Diets and
Contemporary Health,
Current Anthropology 41(3), 453–9.
Jones, R. 1981 Hunters in the Australian Coastal Savanna. In D.R.
Harris (ed.),
Human Ecology in Savanna Environments, Academic
Press, London, 107–46.
Jones, R. and B. Meehan 1989 Plant Foods of the Gidjingali:
Ethnographic and Archaeological Perspectives from Northern
Australia on Tuber and Seed Exploitation. In D.R. Harris and G.C.
Hillman (eds),
Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant
Exploitation, Unwin Hyman, London, 120–35.
Knezevich, M. 1999 Geopaghy as a Therapeutic Mediator of
Endoparasitism in a Free-ranging Group of Rhesus Macaques
(
Macaca mulata), American Journal of Primatology 44(1), 71–82.
Krishnamani, R. and W.G. Mahaney 2000 Geophagy among
Primates: Adaptive Significance and Ecological Consequences,
Animal Behaviour 59, 899–915.
Lackey, C. J. 1978 Pica–A Nutritional Anthropology Concern. In
E.E. Bauwens (ed.),
The Anthropology of Health, C.V. Mosby Co.,
Saint Louis, 121–9.
Laufer, B. 1930
Geophagy, Field Museum of Natural History
Publication 280, Anthological Series Volume 18(2), Field Museum of
Natural History, Chicago, 101–98.
Lawrence, R. 1969
Aboriginal Habitat and Economy, Occasional Paper
6, Department of Geography/School of General Studies, Australian
National University, Canberra.
Levitt, D. 1981
Plants and People: Aboriginal Use of Plants on Groote
Eylandt, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
L’Oste-Brown, S. and L. Godwin 1995
‘Living under the Act’: Taroom
Aboriginal Reserve 1911–1927, Cultural Heritage Monograph Series
Volume 1, Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage,
Brisbane.
Lourandos, H. 1997
Continent of Hunter-gatherers: New Perspectives
in Australian Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McCorriston, J. 1994 Acorn Eating and Agricultural Origins:
California Ethnographies as Analogies for the Ancient Near East,
Antiquity 68, 97–107.
McCracken, C.R. 1982 Ethnographic Notes from the Rainforest
of Mossman, Queensland, site database files, unpublished,
Department of Environment and Heritage, Brisbane.
Meehan, B. 1982
Shell Bed to Shell Midden, Australian Institute of
Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
Memmott, P. 1979
Lardil Artifacts and Shelters, Occasional Papers in
Anthropology No. 9, Anthropology Museum, University of
Queensland, Brisbane, 107–42.
Mjoberg, E. 1918
Bland Stenaldersmonnisker I Queenslands Vilmarker,
Albert Bonniers Forlag, Stockholm.
O’Connell, J.F., K. Hawkes and N.G. Blurton Jones 1999
Grandmothering and the Evolution of Homo erectus,
Journal of
Human Evolution 36, 461–85.
Pavlides, C. and C. Gosden 1994 35,000-year-old Sites in the
Rainforests of West New Britain, Papua New Guinea,
Antiquity 68,
604–10.
Perez, E. 1977
Kalumburu: The Benedictine Mission and the Aborigines
1908–1975, Kalumbura Benedictine Mission, Western Australia.
Rao, M., D.G. Odom and J. Oro 1980 Clays in Prebiological
Chemistry,
Journal of Molecular Evolution 15, 317–31.
Reid, R.M. 1992 Cultural and Medical Perspectives on Geophagia,
Medical Anthropology 13, 337–51.
Roosevelt, A.G., M. Lima da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M. Michab,
N. Mercier, H. Valladas, J. Feathers, W. Barnett, M. Imaza da
Silverira, A. Henderson, J. Silva, B. Chernoff, D.S. Reese, J.A.
Holman, N. Toth, K. Schick 1996 Paleoindian Cave Dwellers in the
Amazon: The Peopling of the Americas,
Science 272, 374–84.
Root-Bernstein, R. and M. Root-Bernstein 2000
Honey, Mud and
Maggots and Other Medical Marvels, Pan Books, London.
Roth, W.E. 1897
Ethnological Studies among the North-West-Central
Queensland Aborigines, Government Printer, Brisbane.
Rowland, M.J. 1999 Holocene Environmental Variability: Have Its
Impacts Been Underestimated in Australian Pre-history?
Artefact
22, 11–48.
Smith, M. 1983 Late Pleistocene Zamia Exploitation in Southern
Western Australia,
Archaeology in Oceania 17(3), 117–21.
—— 1996 Revisiting Pleistocene Macrozamia,
Australian
Archaeology 42, 52–3.
Soma, Y. and M. Soma 1989 Chemical Reactions of Organic
Compounds on Clay Surfaces,
Environmental Health Perspectives 83,
205–14.
Australian Aboriginal Studies 2002/1 65
Stahl, A.B. 1989 Plant-food Processing: Implications for Dietary
Quality. In D.R. Harris and G.C. Hillman (eds), Foraging and
Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, Unwin Hyman, London,
171–94.
Struhsaker, T.T., D.O. Cooney and K.S. Siex 1997 Charcoal
Consumption by Zanzibar Red Colobus Monkeys: Its Function and
Its Ecological and Demographic Consequences,
International Journal
of Primatology 18(1), 61–72.
Taylor, J.C. 1977 A Pre-contact Aboriginal Medical System on Cape
York Peninsula,
Journal of Human Evolution 6, 419–32.
Thomson, D.F. 1939 The Seasonal Factor in Human Culture,
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 5, 209–21.
—— 1949
Economic Structure and Ceremonial Exchange Cycle in
Arnhem Land, Macmillan, Melbourne.
Thomson, J. 1989
Reaching Back: Queensland Aboriginal People Recall
Early Days at Yarrabah Mission, Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra.
Vermeer, D.E. and R.E. Ferrell Jr 1985 Nigerian Geophagical Clay: A
Traditional Antidiarrheal Pharmaceutical,
Science 277, 634–6.
Watson, P. 1983
This Precious Foliage: A Study of the Aboriginal Psycho-
active Drug Pituri, Oceania Monograph 26, University of Sydney.
Webb, L.J. 1969 Australian Plants and Chemical Research. In L.J.
Webb, D. Whitelock and J. Le Gay Brereton (eds),
The Last Lands,
Jacaranda Press, Brisbane, 82–90.
—— 1973 ‘Eat, Die, and Learn’: The Botany of the Australian
Aborigines,
Australian Natural History March, 290–5.
White, I. 1985
Daisy Bates: The Native Tribes of Western Australia,
National Library of Australia, Canberra.
Whiting, M.G. 1963 Toxicity of Cycads,
Economic Botany 17,
271–302.
Wiley, A.S. and S.H. Katz 1998 Geopaghy in Pregnancy: A Test of a
Hypothesis,
Current Anthropology 39, 532–45.
Wrangham, R.W., J.H. Jones, G. Laden, D. Pilbeam and N. Conklin-
Brittain 1999 The Raw and the Stolen: Cooking and the Ecology of
Human Origins,
Current Anthropology 40(5), 567–94.
Ziegler, J.L. 1997 (Editorial) Geophagy: A Vestige of
Palaeonutrition?
Tropical Medicine and International Health 2(7),
609–11.
... In parts of Australia and in sub-Saharan Africa termite mound soils are consumed for a range of medical uses that are largely associated with women and conditions related to fertility, menstrual cycles, and antenatal and postnatal care. These include improving fertility, easing nausea, to help with lactation, constipation, heartburn, anaemia, and abdominal discomfort (Rowland 2002;Shinondo and Mwikuma 2008;Srivastava, Babu, and Pandey 2009). For the Luo people in Kenya, there are taboos around the consumption of termite soils for men once they reach adulthood. ...
... The corpus and praxis of termite soils and women may have led to cosmological associations between termite clay consumption, femininity, fertility, and the identification of termite mounds as female spaces. This is despite the use of termite clays as a treatment for a number of non-gendered ailments such as mineral deficiencies, coughing, diarrhoea, gastric problems, and infections with worms (Rowland 2002;Shinondo and Mwikuma 2008;Macintyre and Dobson 2017). ...
Article
Using multidisciplinary literature, this paper takes a multispecies approach to human-termite interactions across the tropics to demonstrate how termites exploit ecological effects of human behaviours and in turn provide humans with significant ecosystem services. These provisions are deeply entangled within cultural practices and ideologies. Conceptualisations of human and landscape fertility, and the role of termites in facilitating life, create gendered interactions that are manifested in ecological knowledge and praxis relating to termites and termite mounds. The strong association between termites and farmers in particular, may offer insights into past human settlement patterns and their relationships with ecosystems. This paper proposes the use of geomorphology, thin-section ceramic petrography, and stable isotope analysis to investigate these relationships across the tropics. A multispecies approach creates new possibilities for a diachronic understanding of human ecology and raises important questions for the Anthropocene and the future of farming in the tropics.
... Termites also contribute to human nutrition and health through the deliberate ingestion of soil, a phenomenon called geophagy (Hunter 1973). Geophagy has been practiced by humans since antiquity and on almost every continent (Hunter 1973, Rowland 2002. Termitaria are the major sources of the soil consumed by women and children in Kenya (Geissler 2000, Luoba et al. 2004), Tanzania (Knudsen 2002), Zambia, Zimbabwe (Nchito et al. 2004), and South Africa (Saathoff et al. 2002). ...
... Soil from termitaria is high in kaolinic clays, the same base used in Kaopectate, which is prescribed for stomach upset. This indigenous knowledge, therefore, has significant implications for adaptation to many of the toxins in plants eaten by people (Rowland 2002). ...
Article
Full-text available
Despite their well-known role as pests, termites also provide essential ecosystem services. In this paper, we undertook a comprehensive review of studies on human-termite interactions and farmers' indigenous knowledge across Sub-Saharan Africa in an effort to build coherent principles for termite management. The review revealed that local communities have comprehensive indigenous knowledge of termite ecology and taxonomy, and apply various indigenous control practices. Many communities also have elaborate knowledge of the nutritional and medicinal value of termites and mushrooms associated with termite nests. Children and women also widely consume termite mound soil for nutritional or other benefits encouraged by indigenous belief systems. In addition, subsistence farmers use termites as indicators of soil fertility, and use termite mound soil in low-risk farming strategies for crop production. In the past, chemical control of termites has been initiated without empirical data on the termite species, their damage threshold, and the social, ecological, or economic risks and trade-offs of the control. This review has provided new insights into the intimate nature of human-termite interactions in Africa and the risks of chemical control of termites to human welfare and the environment. We recommend that management of termites in future should be built on farmers' indigenous knowledge and adequate understanding of the ecology of the local termite species.
... reptiles (Sokol, 1971), grandes mamíferos Klaus & Schmidg, 1998 Muy relacionado con la geofagia, y prácticamente con la misma finalidad, se sabe que al menos una especie de primate, el colobo rojo de Zanzíbar (Piliocolobus kirkii), consume restos de carbón, por lo general de origen antropogénico. Sin embargo, más que como un suplemento mineral, su principal beneficio sería la adsorción de los compuestos fenólicos presentes de forma habitual en la dieta de los primates Forth, 2011;Rowland, 2002;Struhsaker et al., 1997). Estudios recientes sugieren que otras especies de primates, como el macaco de Berbería (Macaca sylvanus), podrían tener el mismo objetivo con el consumo ocasional de los restos de carbón dejados por turistas tras apagar una hoguera (Boumenir et al., 2022). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
El término Zoofarmacognosia se introdujo por primera vez en el ámbito científico en 1987, como una rama multidisciplinar que estudiaba el comportamiento de automedicación de muchos grupos animales. Humanos y animales se han observado y han interactuado entre ellos desde tiempos prehistóricos, aprendiendo de forma recíproca sobre la naturaleza y el uso de sus recursos. El ser humano ha sido consciente desde hace mucho tiempo de que los animales utilizan sustancias específicas de ciertas formas cuando se sienten enfermos, y que este hábito les ayudaba a recuperarse y sanar. Gracias al desarrollo de la Zoofarmacognosia, estamos empezando a aprender y comprender los aspectos concretos de esta disciplina científica relativamente nueva, que se ocupa de investigar cómo los animales tratan la enfermedad a base de sustancias orgánicas e inorgánicas que encuentran en su medio ambiente. En algunos casos, incluso parecen hacer uso de plantas u otros recursos naturales como medicamentos de una forma muy similar a como lo hacemos los humanos, para tratar los mismos síntomas que nosotros. Aunque la Zoofarmacognosia es una ciencia joven, en nuestro estudio hemos buscado y analizado la relevancia de las menciones al comportamiento autocurativo de los animales en fuentes históricas, lo cual respalda la remarcable antigüedad de la atención y la preocupación del ser humano por entender este tipo de comportamiento.
... They reported that kaolin consumption tends to be a detoxifier of heavy metals and poisons. Authors confirmed clay ability to adsorb toxins especially when associated with charcoals (91). This apparent lack of consensus on the effect of consumption of contaminated kaolin compels further need for research. ...
Article
Full-text available
Geophagy is the habit of consuming clay soil such as chalk or kaolin. Though it is globally practiced, the safety of those involved is yet to be fully established. It is thought to be highly prevalent in pregnant women because of its antinausea or therapeutic effects. This practice is also thought to be provoked by some nutritional needs, but in modern society its etiology is obscure. The mineralogical and chemical compositions of clay may vary from one region to another and even in all form of rocks clay constitutes. Published articles in geophagy indicate lack of adequate investigations into the toxicity of geophagy, though it is globally practiced and more prevalent in Africa (as a continent) or in Africans migrants. Some studies have helped to identify some minerals that are toxic to human if ingested. In most cases, the potential toxicity emphasized by these studies is based on the detection of the presence of these nuisance elements in the geophagic materials. Scientifically, a lot has been done in the light of detection of toxic matter, but more investigations on metabolic studies are still necessary. The variability of clay content with respect to source motivated this review on geophagy and its potential toxicity to human. This review is aimed at bringing out findings that would enable a better understanding of the toxicity potential of geophagy across context and taxa.
... It is known that geophagy is spread globally and people all over the world ingest soil for various reasons (Ghorbani 2008). For example, in Australia, some aborigines consume white clay mainly for medicinal purposes (Rowland 2002). In Africa, geophagy is common in several countries, such as South Africa, Malawi, Kenya, Ghana, Cape Verde, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Swaziland, especially among pregnant women (Walker et al. 1997). ...
Article
Full-text available
The voluntary human consumption of soil known as geophagy is a global practice and deep-rooted in many African cultures. The nature of geophagic material varies widely from the types to the composition. Generally, clay and termite mound soils are the main materials consumed by geophagists. Several studies revealed that gestating women across the world consume more soil than other groups for numerous motives. These motivations are related to medicinal, cultural and nutrients supplementation. Although geophagy in pregnancy (GiP) is a universal dynamic habit, the highest prevalence has been reported in African countries such as Kenya, Ghana, Rwanda, Nigeria, Tanzania, and South Africa. Geophagy can be both beneficial and detrimental. Its health effects depend on the amount and composition of the ingested soils, which is subjective to the geology and soil formation processes. In most cases, the negative health effects concomitant with the practice of geophagy eclipse the positive effects. Therefore, knowledge about the nature of geophagic material and the health effects that might arise from their consumption is important.
... Another adaptive function of consuming termite soil is the ability of clays to adsorb toxins from plants eaten by humans. This may enable people to rapidly adapt to some of the many toxic plants (Rowland, 2002). ...
... The search was conducted in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. Case studies had to include an agricultural context; studies on topics such as geophagy (soil eating; e.g., Rowland 2002), entomophagy, edible wild fungi, and local knowledge of soil biota in isolation from agriculture, e.g., Brazilian studies on myriapods (Costa-Neto 2006) and giant earthworms (Drumond et al. 2015), were not included. ...
Article
Full-text available
General knowledge of the small, invisible, or hidden organisms that make soil one of the most biodiverse habitats on Earth is thought to be scarce, despite their importance in food systems and agricultural production. We provide the first worldwide review of high-quality research that reports on farmers’ knowledge of soil organisms in agriculture. The depth of farmers’ knowledge varied; some farming communities held detailed local taxonomies and observations of soil biota, or used soil biological activity as indicators of soil fertility, while others were largely unaware of soil fauna. Elicitation of soil biota knowledge was often incidental to the main research goal in many of the reviewed studies. Farmers are rarely deliberately or deeply consulted by researchers on their existing knowledge of soil biota, soil ecology, or soil ecological processes. Deeper understanding of how farmers use and value soil life can lead to more effective development of collaborative extension programs, policies, and management initiatives directed at maintaining healthy, living soils.
... Another adaptive function of consuming termite soil is the ability of clays to adsorb toxins from plants eaten by humans. This may enable people to rapidly adapt to some of the many toxic plants (Rowland, 2002). ...
Article
I examine the ungulate remains from late Middle Paleolithic (MP) Kebara Cave (Israel) and offer evidence pointing to overhunting by Levantine Neanderthals toward the close of the MP: (1) the frequency of red deer and aurochs declined over the course of the sequence, largely independent of major fluctuations in the Levantine speleothem climate record; (2) the proportion of juvenile gazelles and fallow deer increased in the younger levels, as did the proportion of young adults; (3) upward in the sequence, hunters brought back fewer gazelle and fallow deer heads, suggesting that they either had to travel farther to hunt, or that they took many more animals per trip, perhaps in cooperative kills. Taken together, these observations, in conjunction with evidence from other sites in the region, suggest that the resource intensification characteristic of the “Broad Spectrum Revolution” (BSR), may already have begun in the latter part of the MP.
Article
Full-text available
Recent writing on hominoid images from Flores Island reveals local conceptions of creatures, now mostly regarded as extinct, which seem zoologically realistic, or natural rather than supernatural. Drawing partly on narratives from the Rajong district recorded by J.A.J. Verheijen, this article explores an attribute that adds to this realism, and hence the putative creatures' empirical plausibility: their consumption of wood charcoal partly in conjunction with eggplants, both of which are claimed to have been regularly stolen in the past from human settlements. Reviewing the evidence for charcoal ingestion by animals and humans in various parts of the world, including Flores, it is shown how this dietary practice can counter toxic effects of various plant foods, including raw eggplant and wild tubers, another, implicit component of the hominoids' diet. It is further suggested that this sort of behaviour and local representations more generally of reputedly recently extant hominoids, as well as the interactions with Homo sapiens which these entail, should be taken into account in future anthropological research into the new hominin chrono-species Homo floresiensis, discovered on Flores in 2003. [Indonesia, Flores, folklore, Homo floresiensis, dietary behaviour].
Book
Walter E. Roth's 1897 study of the Aborigines of North-West-Central Queensland was among the first of its kind in Australia, and established his international reputation as a leading anthropologist and ethnologist. Roth, a physician who was later appointed 'protector of Aboriginals' by the government, gained the confidence and trust of the Aboriginal people among whom he lived, and tried to stop the exploitation and injustice they suffered, in the face of fierce political opposition. His book provides a fascinating and closely observed account of the Aborigines' traditional way of life, including their language, kinship and customs. It describes social organisation, food, tools and weapons, personal decoration, travel and trade, birth and death, and even cannibalism. Containing over 430 illustrations and a glossary summarising key vocabulary, this thoroughly-researched book is widely recognised as a valuable and enduring anthropological record.
Thesis
This thesis reports on archaeological fieldwork carried out between 1973 and 1975 in the southern part of the Great Dividing Range in Queensland, Australia. Fieldwork consisted of an areal .reconnaissance, sample excavations at three rocksheiter sites, and collection of surface artefacts at one open site. The findings include stone tools, bone tools, faunal and plant remains. Excavations and analyses have shown a marked intensification of Aboriginal use of the region beginning about 4000 to 5000 years ago. The increase in occupation is associated with the introduction of a new and distinctive stone tool technology. The rocksheiter excavations also showed that seeds of the cycad, Macrozanria moorei, were the most important food used at the sites, as evidenced by their remains in the shelter deposits. The cycads are known to be highly toxic and potentially carcinogenic to all mammals that have been given the plant material or extracts experimentally. The Aborigines of prehistoric Queensland eliminated the poison, probably by leaching the crushed seeds in water, although other methods may have been used. The natural history, human use and other features of cycads are discussed in light of modem issues in medical and anthropological research concerning these plants. It is proposed that the use of cycads in the Queensland uplands, and possibly elsewhere in Australia, had important implications for prehistoric social integration.
Article
Since cereals and legumes were successful domesticates, archaeologists and botanists have investigated early domestication with particular emphasis on these plants. What about other foods, which may have been staples in their own time, for which we have no simple continuity into a later subsistence in the classic region of Near Eastern domesticates? The mediterranean climate, and the lifeways, of California provide an analogy.