Micromachines 2015, 6, 778-789; doi:10.3390/mi6060778
Dynamics of Electrowetting Droplet Motion in Digital
Microfluidics Systems: From Dynamic Saturation to
Weiwei Cui, Menglun Zhang, Xuexin Duan, Wei Pang *, Daihua Zhang and Hao Zhang *
State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University,
Tianjin 300072, China; E-Mails: email@example.com (W.C.); firstname.lastname@example.org (M.Z.);
email@example.com (X.D.); firstname.lastname@example.org (W.P.); email@example.com (D.Z.)
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: firstname.lastname@example.org (W.P.);
email@example.com (H.Z.); Tel.: +86-22-2740-1248 (H.Z.).
Academic Editors: Andrew deMello and Xavier Casadevall i Solvas
Received: 5 May 2015 / Accepted: 16 June 2015 / Published: 19 June 2015
Abstract: A quantitative description of the dynamics of droplet motion has been a
long-standing concern in electrowetting research. Although many static and dynamic models
focusing on droplet motion induced by electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) already exist,
some dynamic features do not fit these models well, especially the dynamic saturation
phenomenon. In this paper, a dynamic saturation model of droplet motion on the single-plate
EWOD device is presented. The phenomenon that droplet velocity is limited by a dynamic
saturation effect is precisely predicted. Based on this model, the relationship between droplet
motion and device physics is extensively discussed. The static saturation phenomenon is
treated with a double-layer capacitance electric model, and it is demonstrated as one critical
factor determining the dynamics of droplet motion. This work presents the relationship
between dynamics of electrowetting induced droplet motion and device physics including
device structure, surface material and interface electronics, which helps to better understand
electrowetting induced droplet motions and physics of digital microfluidics systems.
Keywords: droplet motion; dynamic saturation; electrowetting; digital microfluidics; device
physics; contact angle saturation
Micromachines 2015, 6 779
As one of the most promising droplet-actuation technologies, electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD),
is considered one of most promising tools to realize lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices by building digital
microfluidics platforms for chemical and biological detections. EWOD actuation is induced by the
electrowetting phenomenon that wetting can be effectively controlled by an electric field [1–3]. The
wetting is generally characterized by contact angle, and from its change the electrowetting force is born,
as shown in Figure 1a,b. Figure 1c indicates the driving force on a droplet generated by the surface
tension on the contact line. The traditional scheme of EWOD implies a droplet lying on a metal substrate,
covered by dielectric material and Teflon hydrophobic surface, and inserted with a metal line on the top,
as shown in Figure 1b.
Recently, a rapid growth in EWOD-based microfluidic systems has been seen with many biological
applications, such as DNA enrichment  and ligation , enzyme assays [6–8], cell-based assays ,
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) , and proteomics [11–14]. At the same time, the fundamentals
of electrowetting have remained not fully understood. Figure 1d represents the contact angle
saturation phenomenon and pinning effect, and the explanations of them are very different and highly
debatable [15–17]. The dynamic saturation phenomenon, that droplet velocity would be limited by a
saturated value, is still imperfectly explained [18,19]. The developed dynamic models, represented by
Brochard’s theoretical model, cannot predict the dynamic saturation phenomenon (Figure 2). In the
present paper, a dynamic saturation model of droplets transported on a single-plate EWOD device, from
the common-sense electrowetting theories, such as Lippmann equation and three-contact-line theory,
Additionally, the contact angle saturation is treated with a double-layer capacitance-based electric
circuit to further understand the dynamic saturation phenomenon.
Figure 1. Schematics of (a) surface tensions on the tri-line interface of droplet on an
electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) device; (b) the electrowetting principle; (c) driving
force derived from integration of the surface tension in contacting line; and (d) static effects
on the droplet including the contact angle saturation (CAS) effect and pinning effect. The
surface tensions in (c) represent the component in the driving direction. Furthermore, θS in
(d) stands for the saturated contact angle when the applied voltage is large enough.
Micromachines 2015, 6 780
Figure 2. Comparison of curves induced by Brochard’s theoretical model (solid line) and
the saturation phenomenon found in experiments (dashed one), which indicates that the
dynamic saturation effect cannot be predicted by Brochard’s model.
2. Dynamic Saturation Model of Droplet Motion on the Open DMF Chip
The derivation of this model is based on the analysis of the kinetic equilibrium between driving force
and damp effects, and droplet deformation, t, is taken into account. The influences of pining effect and
errors caused by the droplet deformation, contact line length variation, and velocity measuring method
have been carefully considered. The modeling process and details are presented in the supplement.
Equation (1) presents the mathematical expression of the velocity of electrowetting droplet motion on
the open digital microfluidics (DMF) chip.
KC R V
where d is the thickness of the dielectric layer. εr and ε are the relative permittivity of the dielectric and
the vacuum permittivity, respectively. The hysteresis effect [20,21] in the EWOD surface should be
taken into account, which is assumed to be a constant ∆f. l represents the effective contact line length,
and R is the droplet radium. K1, Kc, and CV, respectively, stand for the factor induced by the droplet
acceleration and deceleration process, the pinning effect in the triangle region, and the viscous damp
from the area on the chip the droplet covers. This model indicates the relationship between droplet
motion dynamics and the device physics including device structure properties (d, εr, and l), hydrophobic
surface (γ, ∆f, and CV), and interface electronics (Kc). The consideration of these properties is presented
in the supplementary information.
Figure 3 shows the droplet velocity curve plotted based on the dynamic saturation model. Wherein,
the black dots represent the reported experimental data from reference . The validity of the dynamic
model is limited to a certain value of the system parameters, which is influenced by the device properties.
The mismatch at low voltages mainly comes from the difficulty of estimating the parameters of the DMF
chip used in reference, especially ones related to the hydrophobic surface properties.
Micromachines 2015, 6 781
Figure 3. Comparison between the dynamic saturation model (line) and experiment results
in reference  (plots). The red curve is induced by Equation (1) and its modification,
taking the radium variation into account, is represented by the blue curve.
Compared with the conventional dynamic model of electrowetting droplet motion, Equation (1)
represents a novel expression of the dynamic properties of droplets motion on DMF chips. It is clear that
the role of 2
rVεε could be neglected when the applied voltage is high enough. Thus, the droplet velocity
is independent from the voltage. In other words, the saturated velocity of the droplet is determined by
the parameters of the DMF system, including the EWOD device and the droplet itself. Furthermore, it
suggests the importance of designing the EWOD device and controlling the droplet carefully to obtain
the optimized actuation effect.
Finally, the dynamic model developed in this paper provides one explanation of the dynamic
saturation phenomenon. The basic view of this model can be summarized as the following. The
electrowetting force increases with the applied voltage, and at the same time the damping force will get
larger as a result of the enlargement of the wetted surface. Both of these inverse effects are generated by
the electrowetting force; finally, the dynamic saturation occurs as a compromise between them.
3. Influence of Device Physics on the Dynamics of Droplet Motion
For a better understanding of the dynamic saturation model, the parameters in the model are discussed
in the following. In the discussion, the role of the electrowetting number is redefined. The influence of
structure parameters, such as dielectric thickness, permittivity and contact angle are presented in detail
from the view of device physics. The hydrophobic surface properties and interface electronics in the
triple line are also concluded. All the above discussions are based on Equation (1), neglecting the droplet
radium variation for simplicity.
3.1. Electrowetting Number, M
The relationship between droplet velocity and the applied voltage is plotted in Figure 4. For a better
understanding, the dynamic process is divided into linear, transition, and saturation regions, according
to the applicability of the traditional Lippmann static laws. Especially, the electrowetting number
Micromachines 2015, 6 782
γ is redefined as the measure of the dynamic saturation model. The calculated velocity of the
droplet as a function of M is plotted in Figure 5a. When M is very small, the dynamic properties keep
consistent with the Lippmann static laws. However, when M is great enough, the dynamic properties fit
with the saturation region. The process between the linear and saturation is the transition region, where
the saturation effect comes to influence the velocity curve. The relationship between the electrowetting
number and the applied voltage is presented in Figure 5b. For thinner dielectric layers, M is larger with
the same voltage and thus the electrowetting process is more effective. In this way, the sensitivity of M
to applied voltage determines the EWOD actuation efficiency.
Figure 4. Calculated droplet velocity as a function of the applied voltage, according to
Equation (1). The parameters used in the calculation are summarized in Table S2 in the
Figure 5. (a) Velocity of droplet motion as a function of the electrowetting number, M; and
(b) the electrowetting number varies with the applied voltage.
3.2. Dielectric Thickness, t, Permittivity, ε, and Contact Line l
An EWOD device consisting of a dielectric layer of thinner thickness and high permittivity is
preferred. The relationship between the droplet velocity and the dielectric thickness and permittivity are,
respectively, presented in Figure 6a,b. Obviously, the saturated velocity is independent of the dielectric
Micromachines 2015, 6 783
characters in the saturation region. However, the advantages of thinner thickness and higher permittivity
become attractive in the linear and transition regions. Both thinner thickness and higher permittivity
contribute to lower threshold voltage and more effective actuation. The droplet actuation efficiency is
defined by the value of dU/dV, i.e., the slope of the U–V curve. Many attempts to improve EWOD
devices have concentrated on utilizing these features, and, at the same time, lower actuation voltages
and better dynamics have been achieved [22–24]. Moon et al. reported an EWOD with driving voltage
as low as 12 V by reducing the dielectric layer to the nanometer scale . However, a thin dielectric
layer is prone to dielectric breakdown. Chang et al. presented an EWOD with Al2O3 of 127 nm as the
dielectric layer. The high permittivity and the ultrathin thickness of the Al2O3 layer reduced the EWOD
driving voltage to 3 V . In addition, the Al2O3 film formed by atomic layer deposition (ALD) is
dense, with little pinholes, and the surface is very flat and smooth, which are critical to avoid dielectric
breakdown and enhance the dynamic performance of the EWOD device.
The connection part configuration of the two adjacent electrodes is of importance to the droplet
dynamic properties on EWOD device. This factor is treated by using an average contact line length in
the modeling (see Figure S2 in Supplementary Information). Meanwhile, the droplet velocity varies with
its positions on the EWOD following a function determined by the adjacent electrodes connecting
configure. This factor is critical in the EWOD device design, and many works have considered it
Figure 6. Influence of (a) dielectric layer thickness and (b) relative permittivity on the
velocity of the droplet according to Equation (1), with the parameters in Table S2, as
presented in the supplementary information.
3.3. Super-Hydrophobic Surface
As much attention focuses on the improvement of the hydrophobic surface, different materials with
super-hydrophobic features have been utilized to replace traditional hydrophobic materials [27–30]. For
the purpose of droplet operations, the super-hydrophobic surface should satisfy the Cassie state, wherein
the damp force and hysteresis effect are reduced dramatically. Experiments of super-hydrophobic
materials have been presented to satisfy the condition for improved electrowetting applications [27,31–33].
Therefore, the model of super-hydrophobic surface discussed here is only suitable for the Cassie case.
Micromachines 2015, 6 784
To adjust the analysis of these applications, the initial contact angle is treated to be variable in the
modeling. Following the same modeling process, the relationship between initial contact angle θ0 and
droplet velocity U is obtained:
where, ∆f is neglected due to the very low hysteresis effect of the super-hydrophobic surface.
The droplet velocity U, as a function of the initial contact angle from 120° to 180°, is plotted in Figure 7.
For the same applied voltage, the droplet velocity increases with larger initial contact angles, i.e., with
more hydrophobic surfaces. Especially in the region from 150° to 165°, the droplet velocity changes
violently with applied voltage. This region is “the most effective area”, as Figure 7 shows, where a
narrow voltage range can be used to achieve the same modulation of the droplet velocity. The different
curves in Figure 7 converge to the same point, which indicates that the saturation droplet velocity is
independent of the initial contact angle.
Figure 7. Effect of a droplet’s initial contact angle on velocity, according to Equation (2).
The initial contact angle is determined by the surface property of the EWOD device. The
applied voltages, respectively, are 10, 20, 30, 50, 70, and 160 V from bottom to top. For the
range from 150° to 165°, the velocity increases more rapidly with the applied voltage;
therefore, this range is “the most effective area” to convert electric energy into droplet kinetic
energy. When the applied voltage is greater than 160 V, the saturation velocity is
independent with the initial contact angle.
3.4. Influence of Interface Electronics and Contact Angle Saturation Effect
The above works are carried out based on the dynamic equilibrium between electrowetting force and
the damping force on the droplet. By taking into account the droplet deformation, a dynamic model of
droplet motion on a single-plate EWOD device was induced, which fits well with the dynamic saturation
phenomenon. Contact angle saturation is thought to be one cause of dynamic saturation, but it has not
been considered during this modeling due to the difficulty of describing it mathematically. Many models
or hypotheses have been proposed to explain the contact angle saturation, as reviewed by Mugele ,
Micromachines 2015, 6 785
Chevalliot et al. , Koopal  and Sedev , as well as, more recently, by Chevalliot et al. .
These theories or hypotheses can be briefly summarized as dielectric breakdown, zero interfacial tension,
contact line instability, gas ionization or insulating fluid charging, minimization of the electrostatic
energy, and Tailor cone. At present, the formation of contact angle saturation remains unclear and it is
difficult to describe it quantitatively. In reference , it has been experimentally demonstrated that
contact angle saturation is invariant with numerous variables, including dielectric thickness, interfacial
tension, and the chemical properties of the droplet, such as pH, ion type/size, and solute/solvent
interaction. Here, a trial is made to treat this well-known but not well-understood effect as one factor
and discuss its influence on this model.
A generalized Lippmann Equation was derived from the first principles as the following :
cos ( ) cos (0) 24
where C is the capacitance of the Helmholtz double layer at the interface between droplet and EWOD
substrate. S is the wetted solid area, and 2
Sa=π . a is the radium of the wetted area.
As discussed in reference , the well-known Lippmann equation is a particular case of
electrowetting when the radial derivative of the capacitance of the double layer is constant. This is similar
to the situation where the Lippmann static law is applicable only when the applied voltage is low. This
work has demonstrated that the contact angle of electrowetting depends on the gradient of capacitance
of the double layer in the vicinity of the triple line, which is thought to be dependent on the distribution
of the accumulated charges , as shown in Figure 8a.
Figure 8. (a) Charges distribution on the liquid–solid interface and (b) the equivalent electric
circuit of the triangle line region. C1 is the capacitance of dielectric layer, and C2 is the
capacitance of the double layer that is determined by the accumulated charges distribution.
For a better description of the capacitance distribution in the triple line, an equilibrium electric model
is built, as shown in Figure 8b.
When the voltage is applied, the capacitances are charged. More charges will accumulate in the triple line
area due to its spiky shape, resulting in a stronger capacitance in this location than other wetted areas .
The fact that the triple line is usually de-pinned in the electrowetting and EWOD actuation experiments
is evidence of this . By analyzing the electric model in Figure 8b, the effective voltage applied on the
triple line is obtained:
Micromachines 2015, 6 786
The electric energy working on the triple line region is:
With the applied voltage increasing, more charges accumulate in the triple line region. Furthermore,
the value of C2 would get larger due to the fact that the double layer would get thinner. While the
capacitance, C1, induced by the dielectric layer remains constant. Thus, the increase of effective voltage
cannot keep pace with the applied voltage due to the decrease of the transfer coefficient. There should
exist one point beyond which the effective voltage becomes independent of the applied voltage. At this
time, the voltage working on the electrowetting system keeps constant. From Equation (5), the effective
electric energy working on the triple line region varies in a similar way. As the applied voltage increases
and the transfer coefficient decreases, the value of E would become invariable when the well-known
contact angle saturation occurs. Meanwhile, the accumulated charges in the triple line region would
probably enhance the pinning effect, which helps to increase the damp force on the droplet.
Contact angle saturation effect is another crucial cause of the dynamic saturation, as a limited electric
energy effectively works on the triple line region. When the effective electric energy in the triple line
region is limited, the electrowetting force will be limited, and the droplet deformation induced by the
electric field will be suspended. Thus, it can be thought that the contact angle saturation accelerates the
dynamic saturation in the transition region and, finally, ends the dynamic process by limiting the
In summary, a dynamic saturation model of electrowetting droplet motion on the open DMF system
is presented in this work. On the basis of the present analysis, the dynamic saturation phenomenon is
primarily a consequence of dynamic equilibrium between driving force and damp effects, and the contact
angle saturation effect. Among them, dynamic equilibrium forms the configuration of the velocity curve
as a function of applied voltage. Meanwhile, contact angle saturation accelerates the saturation process by
limiting the electrowetting force with a finite value, which confines the translation of the electronic energy
to the mechanical energy of the droplet. The influence of device physics, including electrode formation,
dielectric layer, hydrophobic surface and interface conditions, have been discussed based on this model,
which fit well with reported methods to improve electrowetting induced droplet motions. Specifically,
the saturated velocity is independent of the dielectric thickness, as well as the permittivity. Meanwhile,
a dielectric layer of thinner thickness and higher permittivity contributes to more effective actuation and
lower threshold voltage. The “most effective area” of initial contact angle using super-hydrophobic
surface materials or structures helps to optimize the hydrophobic surface. This study helps to deeper
understand electrowetting, and shows practical value for further optimizing EWOD devices.
This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 51375341), the
Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project No. B07014) and the National
High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program No.2015AA042603).
Micromachines 2015, 6 787
Weiwei Cui, Hao Zhang and Wei Pang proposed the idea; Weiwei Cui and Menglun Zhang performed
the model derivation; Weiwei Cui and Hao Zhang prepared the manuscript; Xuexin Duan and
Daihua Zhang contributed to the discussion and gave valuable suggestions on the manuscript revision
according to the referee report.
Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/6/6/778/s1.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1. Lippmann, G. Relations entre les phénomènes électriques et capillaires. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1875,
2. Hayes, R.A.; Feenstra, B.J. Video-speed electronic paper based on electrowetting. Nature 2003,
3. Mugele, F.; Baret, J.C. Electrowetting: From basics to applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2005,
4. Abdelgawad, M.; Freire, S.L.S.; Yang, H.; Wheeler, A.R. All-terrain droplet actuation. Lab Chip
2008, 8, 672–677.
5. Liu, Y.J.; Yao, D.J.; Lin, H.C.; Chang, W.-Y.; Chang, H.-Y. DNA ligation of ultramicro volume using
an EWOD microfluidic system with coplanar electrodes. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18, 045017.
6. Srinivasan, V.; Pamula, V.K.; Fair, R.B. An integrated digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical
diagnostics on human physiological fluids. Lab Chip 2004, 4, 310–315.
7. Taniguchi, T.; Torii, T.; Higuchi, T. Chemical reactions in microdroplets by electrostatic
manipulation of droplets in liquid media. Lab Chip 2002, 2, 19–23.
8. Miller, E.M.; Wheeler, A.R. A digital microfluidic approach to homogeneous enzyme assays.
Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1614–1619.
9. Barbulovic-Nad, I.; Yang, H.; Park, P.S.; Wheeler, A.R. Digital microfluidics for cell-based assays.
Lab Chip 2008, 8, 519–526.
10. Chang, Y.H.; Lee, G.B.; Huang, F.C.; Chen, Y.Y.; Lin, J.L. Integrated polymerase chain reaction
chips utilizing digital microfluidics. Biomed. Microdevices 2006, 8, 215–225.
11. Moon, H.; Wheeler, A.R.; Garrell, R.L.; Loo, J.A.; Kim, C.J. An integrated digital microfluidic chip
for multiplexed proteomic sample preparation and analysis by MALDI-MS. Lab Chip 2006, 6,
12. Wheeler, A.R.; Moon, H.; Bird, C.A.; Loo, R.R.; Kim, C.J.; Loo, J.A.; Garrell, R.L. Digital
microfluidics with in-line sample purification for proteomics analyses with MALDI-MS. Anal.
Chem. 2005, 77, 534–540.
Micromachines 2015, 6 788
13. Wheeler, A.R.; Moon, H.; Kim, C.J.; Loo, J.A.; Garrell, R.L. Electrowetting-based microfluidics
for analysis of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.
Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 4833–4838.
14. Luk, V.N.; Mo, G.C.H.; Wheeler, A.R. Pluronic additives: A solution to sticky problems in digital
microfluidics. Langmuir 2008, 24, 6382–6389.
15. Chevalliot, S.; Kuiper, S.; Heikenfeld, J. Experimental validation of the invariance of electrowetting
contact angle saturation. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 1909–1930.
16. Koopal, L.K. Wetting of solid surfaces: Fundamentals and charge effects. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
2012, 179, 29–42.
17. Chen, L.; Bonaccurso, E. Electrowetting—From statics to dynamics. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
2014, 210, 2–12.
18. Wang, K.L.; Jones, T.B. Saturation effects in dynamic electrowetting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005,
19. Bavière, R.; Boutet, J.; Fouillet, Y. Dynamics of droplet transport induced by electrowetting
actuation. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2008, 4, 287–294.
20. Yeo, L.Y.; Chang, H.C. Static and spontaneous electrowetting. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2005, 19,
21. Gupta, R.; Sheth, D.M.; Boone, T.K.; Sevilla, A.B.; Fréchette, J. Impact of pinning of the triple
contact line on electrowetting performance. Langmuir 2011, 27, 14923–14929.
22. Moon, H.; Cho, S.K.; Garrell, R.L. Low voltage electrowetting-on-dielectric. J. Appl. Phys. 2002,
23. Chang, J.; Choi, D.Y.; Han, S.; Pak, J.J. Driving characteristics of the electrowetting-on-dielectric
device using atomic-layer-deposited aluminum oxide as the dielectric. Microfluidi. Nanofluid. 2010,
24. Berthier, J.; Peponnet, C. A model for the determination of the dimensions of dents for jagged
electrodes in electrowetting on dielectric microsystems. Biomicrofluidics 2007, 1, 014104.
25. Chen, J.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.; Lai, Y.; Zhou, J. Size-variable droplet actuation by interdigitated
electrowetting electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 234102.
26. Pyne, D.G.; Salman, W.M.; Abdelgawad, M.; Sun, Y. Partially filled electrodes for digital
microfluidic devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 024103.
27. Accardo, A.; Mecarini, F.; Leoncini, M.; Brandi, F.; Di Cola, E.; Burghammer, M.; Riekel, C.;
Di Fabrizio, E. Fast, active droplet interaction: Coalescence and reactive mixing controlled by
electrowetting on a superhydrophobic surface. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 332–335.
28. Hill, R.M. Superhydrophobic surfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 11, 193–202.
29. Vasudev, A.; Jagtiani, A.; Du, L.; Zhe, J. A low-voltage droplet microgripper for micro-object
manipulation. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2009, 19, 075005.
30. Sen, P.; Kim, C.J. Capillary spreading dynamics of electrowetted sessile droplets in air. Langmuir
2009, 25, 4302–4305.
31. Verplanck, N.; Coffinier, Y.; Thomy, V.; Boukherroub, R. Wettability switching techniques on
superhydrophobic surfaces. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2007, 2, 577–596.
Micromachines 2015, 6 789
32. Li, Y.; Parkes, W.; Haworth, L.I.; Ross, A.; Stevenson, J.; Walton, A.J. Room-temperature
fabrication of anodic tantalum pentoxide for low-voltage electrowetting on dielectric (EWOD).
J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2008, 17, 1481–1488.
33. Jönsson-Niedziółka, M.; Lapierre, F.; Coffinier, Y.; Parry, S.J.; Zoueshtiagh, F.; Foat, T.; Thomy, V.;
Boukherroub, R. EWOD driven cleaning of bioparticles on hydrophobic and superhydrophobic
surfaces. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 490–496.
34. Mugele, F. Fundamental challenges in electrowetting: From equilibrium shapes to contact angle
saturation and drop dynamics. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 3377–3384.
35. Sedev, R. Electrowetting: Electrocapillarity, saturation, and dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
2011, 197, 307–319.
36. Bormashenko, E.; Gendelman, O. A generalized electrowetting equation: Its derivation and
consequences. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 599, 139–141.
© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license