ChapterPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The investigation of the cause and guiding principles of the orientation of houses has been a neglected field in archaeological studies. If clear regularity can be observed in the location of houses and constructions, it is assumed to follow the prevailing winds in most cases. The position of a house is influenced by environmental and non-environmental factors. Besides the winds, sunlight, heat, etc., it is argued in anthropology that there is no phase in building traditional houses in which the position is not connected to a rite. Careful investigation of the orientation can reveal some attitude of prehistoric peoples to their natural surroundings that involve not only the terrestrial but also the celestial “landscape” as an inseparable unity.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age
Houses in Central Europe 112
´lia Pa
´sztor and Judit P. Barna
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1308
Orientation and Archaeology .................................................................. 1309
Case Study: Prevailing Wind or Midwinter Sun? . . . . ..................................... 1312
Northern or Eastern Orientation? .............................................................. 1313
Case Study: Bronze Age Settlement of the Tumulus Cultural Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1313
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1314
Cross-References ............................................................................... 1315
References ...................................................................................... 1315
The investigation of the cause and guiding principles of the orientation of houses
has been a neglected field in archaeological studies. If clear regularity can be
observed in the location of houses and constructions, it is assumed to follow the
prevailing winds in most cases.
The position of a house is influenced by environmental and non-environmental
factors. Besides the winds, sunlight, heat, etc., it is argued in anthropology that
there is no phase in building traditional houses in which the position is not
connected to a rite. Careful investigation of the orientation can reveal some
attitude of prehistoric peoples to their natural surroundings that involve not only
the terrestrial but also the celestial “landscape” as an inseparable unity.
E. Pa
´sztor (*)
Magistratum Studio, Dunafo
´r, Hungary
J.P. Barna
Balatoni Museum, Keszthely, Hungary
C.L.N. Ruggles (ed.), Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6141-8_126,
#Springer Science+Business Media New York 201
The orientation of houses has not stirred up serious interest among archaeologists.
If the regularity is a striking feature, they consider its cause to be the prevailing
wind. There are however exceptions. The analysis of the alignments of British and
Irish Neolithic houses denotes the followings causes (Topping 1996):
1. Pointing into the wind to give greater structural stability against the prevailing
air flow
2. Solar radiation – direct absorption of the heat by aligning the axes roughly with
east–west, to get the largest possibly roof area to face the longest period of the
sun’s path in the sky
3. Light penetration in location and orientation of doorway.
Unusual alignments, changing doorways, pits with sacral deposits, and cultic
artifacts inside the houses, all may also indicate social and/or spiritual expectations.
The impact of this factor is observable, if there are houses of different orientations
in different periods at the same site, or if the orientation is altered in a settlement in
several layers. Did the prevailing wind change?
Ethnographical records attest the presence of non-environmental factors in
building houses or settlements. Basic functions of human existence are closely
attached to houses, which are totally or partly the subject of traditions and
beliefs. Creating analogies between the outer and inner world is characteristic
to traditional way of thinking. Omens coming from the transcendent world are
significant groups in a belief system concerning houses. There are few ethno-
graphical analogies to select the site and the orientation of houses in the
Carpathian Basin as in the last centuries, possession became stable, and there
were no free sites to occupy. A new house had to follow the already established
pattern (Bereznai 1999).
One of the exceptions is the old Csa
´(a Hungarian-speaking minority in
Moldova), whose belief in the significant role of the sun influenced their folk
architecture. Their villages were situated in valleys, which extended from the east
to the west, e.g., Magyarfalu, La
´bnik, Pokolpatak, Kle
´zse. The paths leading
through the villages were heading from “napjo¨vet” – the course of the rising
sun – to “napszent
uletre” – toward where the sun goes to sleep (they are old
Hungarian expressions). The orientation of the openings of the houses, to allow
the sun to shine into them, was also important. Southward positions were generally
favored with orientation, i.e., when the facade faced south (Duma-Istva
Anthropological records also report a double role of the houses. It was partly
a stage for everyday life and partly a shrine on special occasions. The profane space
transformed into a sacral one by ritual activities.
When analyzing the internal space, some researchers came to the conclusion that
the enclosed space as a microcosmos expressed its occupants’ beliefs about the
world they lived in. The orientations, the constructional elements, and the position-
ing of functional activities were all a visible embodiment of that cosmology
(Pearson and Richards 1994).
1308 E. Pa
´sztor and J.P. Barna
The so-called ba
´nyos ha
´zak (houses with idols) in the Hungarian region of
´g seem to support this argument. The main, trimmed oak pillars of the
houses, 270–280-cm high and often with a diameter of 50–60 cm, were dug with
their roots. They held the principal beams, the whole roof. The decorated prop,
which divided the facade, is a characteristic unit of the folk architecture of the
´region in Hungary. There are often ancient cosmological signs among the
symbols of the decoration (Fig. 112.1,Pa
´sztor 2009a).
Arguments on orientation by ethnographical analogies:
The facade/the main entrance is relevant for the alignment.
The order of outer directions is always altered inside. While outside the sun is the
reference, it is often a human body inside.
There is always a sacral direction; however, the orientation of houses does not
follow it clearly.
Traditions (almost) always take over the helm from the environmental factors;
principles of space organization are guided by beliefs.
Directions are often joined by color symbolism.
Orientation and Archaeology
Mostly the alignments of Neolithic houses have been investigated. Marshall argues
by anthropological fieldwork performed in Papua New Guinea that the essential
cause for the main axes of Neolithic trapezoid long houses with their narrower ends
is the alignment to the prevailing wind (Marshall 1981).
Fig. 112.1 The house with
carved prop, Ta
region, Hungary (Pa
112 Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe 1309
In the case of the Neolithic Linear Pottery Culture in Central Europe, Coudart
made the point that house orientation was probably not chosen to minimize the
effects of the wind and adverse climatic conditions. There was certainly a link
between house orientation and the prevailing summer winds, but this does not apply
to all the areas occupied by Danubian groups (Coudar 1998).
Studying the Danubian long houses, Hodder also concludes that the topographic
factors could be of secondary consideration to certain communities, and the sym-
bolic or social influences were of greater importance as he points out a certain
correlation between the Central European longhouses and those of contemporary
tombs (Hodder 1990).
Bradley even argues that the buildings in Linear Pottery settlements were
generally orientated toward the areas of the origin of the communities, who lived
there (Bradley 2001).
In the Early Neolithic Period, groups can be classified for the orientations of
houses in Southeastern Europe. There are no significant orientation for them in
most tell settlements, where the territory occupied by the houses was more
important than the houses themselves. The relation of the clusters might be of
decision. There is also a group with strict North–south orientation that can be
attributed to the heritage of the surviving indigenous Mesolithic populations
´nffy 2004).
In the Middle Neolithic Linear Pottery culture (LPC), north–south was a general
custom. The long pits along the walls indicate well this alignment (Marton and Oross
´k1994). The strict orientation is one of the most characteristic
elements of the LPC houses, which are assumed to be manifestations of a community
with a completely new identity (Ba
´nffy 2004).
While analyzing the orientation of the houses of the Middle/Late Neolithic site
¨ldek, different principles can be detected. Preserving Middle
Neolithic traditions, the people of the Sopot culture oriented all the houses they
built toward the north–south, the most frequent value is 352east of north. The
houses built by the Late Neolithic Lengyel community however seem to be aligned
according to a differing principle, the enclosure. The houses rather deviate in order
not to cross the circular, possible sacral boundary ditch, they rather follow it
(Fig. 112.2). The significance of the territory took over the government of the
houses. It might indicate the growing importance of the ideology that the circular
enclosures represent (Barna and Pa
´sztor 2011). The same ideology seems to
influence on positioning the houses of the tell settlement of Polga
(Raczky et al. 2005) and the settlement with two rondels in the site at Svodı
Slovakia (Ne
´1995) as well.
The north–south orientation as a heritage, and a long tradition, had still a leading
role in the Bronze Age Carpathian Basin. It can be even recognized in tell
settlements. The houses arranged in triple groups at the site Tiszaug-Ke
were placed in a North–South direction with their axes. The strict geometrical order
of the decorations found on the outside walls supports the assumption about the
strong interweaving of the everyday life and the creation of a living-place with the
religious beliefs (Csa
´nyi 2003).
1310 E. Pa
´sztor and J.P. Barna
Fig. 112.2 Orientation of houses at site Sorma
¨ldek (Barna and Pa
´sztor 2011,
Fig. 12). 1: Orientation of the longer axis of the houses excavated in the site at Sorma
¨ldek. 2: Rates of the diameters, the number of the roundels having the same rate and the rate
expressed in interreges. 3: Diameters of Enclosure No. II. in the site at Sorma
composing lanes running through gates No. 2 and 8. 4: Orientation of the longer axis of houses
representing the cardinal (cosmic) points
112 Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe 1311
Analyzing the Late Bronze Age settlements in the Carpathian Basin, V. Szabo
establishes the fact that at present, there are no constructions, which could be
considered as a shrine or communal or chieftain’s building by their layout or finds.
The houses are thus assumed to be also places for sacral activities (V. Szabo
The investigation of Bronze Age houses of the Carpathian Basin (26 sites, 127
houses) indicates that:
In most cases, the dispersion is quite low, which refers to intentional orientation,
apart from the target.
There are sites, where alteration can be observed in the orientation, although the
settlements belongs to one cultural group.
The north–south and the northwest-southeast are the most preferred directions. If
it is northwestern and southeastern, the value is around 140of North.
Case Study: Prevailing Wind or Midwinter Sun?
A comparative analysis of the prevailing winds and the orientations attests that 17
of 35 investigated sites of the Carpathian Basin close to 50 % do not show
a correlation with the prevailing wind of the site (Pa
´sztor 2012).
Investigation of an Early Bronze Age cultural group, the Bell Beaker–Csepel group:
Thirteen boat-shaped timber houses (Fig. 112.3) were unearthed at two sites. The
freestanding constructions were probably inhabited by extended families, making
Fig. 112.3 Reconstruction of a Bell Beaker boat-shaped house in the Archaeological Park,
´zhalombatta (Pa
´sztor 2005, Fig. 3)
1312 E. Pa
´sztor and J.P. Barna
home for 100–120 inhabitants. The orientations of the houses are almost parallel,
with a mean value of 141East of North with a statistical dispersion as low as 10.
This direction is only 15south of the sunrise at the winter solstice at the geo-
graphical latitude of the settlements. This direction is however the direction of the
prevailing wind as well.
The houses might have meant more than shelters from the adverse climatic condi-
tions for the residents. This assumption is supported by the ritual pits inside the houses.
The household rituals converted the profane space into a sacral one when it was
needed. No traces of hearths were found inside the houses, but remains of temporary
fireplaces were unearthed in pits in the southern part of the settlement section; thus,
smoke was not needed to be removed on a regular basis. During the time around the
winter solstice, the sun reached the altitude of 9.2at the mean orientation of the houses
at about 9 a.m. This means that the sun then filled the houses with light through the
open gables (Endro
˝di and Pa
´sztor 2006;Pa
´sztor 2005,Fig.112.3).
The entrance can take over the leading role from the facade in the belief system.
One of the best examples is given by the Iron Age settlement system in ancient Israel.
The main entrances of the buildings including not only the dwelling houses, but
public buildings in towns as well were generally aligned to the East. The high
preference in the investigated cases cannot be interpreted by either the climatic
conditions or functional expectations in the second phase of the Iron Age. Further
support comes from the ethnographical reports and from the Bible, where the Hebrew
word of east has a very positive meaning, while west has a negative one (Faust 2001).
Northern or Eastern Orientation?
Case Study: Bronze Age Settlement of the Tumulus Cultural Group
The Late Bronze Age settlement at Dunakeszi – Sze
˝site, Hungary, exca-
vated by Ga
´bor Szilas, includes about 60 houses. The longer axes of the houses
show a very good correlation with the north–south direction, which is not the most
favored for environmental factors. The statistical dispersion for the direction of the
main axes is 13.5, which is not high. It signals that the possible goal for the
orientation might have been a celestial, but not a topographical one as in this latter
case, the parallaxes would be noticeable (Pa
´sztor 2012).
The South is where the sun and any other celestial bodies reach the height of
their daily path, at the peak of “their power”. This direction is easy to stake out as
the sun shows it every day. The ethnographical records however prove how well
traditional people knew the motion of the sun; consequently, the statistical disper-
sion is too high for their practical knowledge.
The same correlation can be argued for the main entrances in connection with
the East as the main doorways, detected often as a two-swing door, were
generally found on the eastern side of the houses, close to their southern end.
The chart attests the rising sun may become more relevant as there is not a single
doorway, which did not face the rising sun, as the solstices are at 52-54 and
112 Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe 1313
126-128 degrees in the Carpathian Basin (Fig. 112.4). The chart also indicates
that most houses were staked out around equinoxes. The ancient building technique
may also have applied props to the structures like in the Ta
´region (see above).
The preference of north–south orientation was also a custom in the Carpathian
Basin for a long time.
Positioning the dwellings in north–south direction is not a favorable one regard-
ing the environmental conditions. As archaeological evidence attests, it might be
a long tradition going back as far as the Mesolithic period. It might be the visual
manifestation of a hunter-gatherer’s cosmology for which the south–north direction
was of significance, and which might have been generated by the migratory birds
´sztor 2009b).
Although the data may indicate a clear eastern or southern orientation, the
anthropological records can report very different reasons for a direction. Tradi-
tional Japanese houses faced the south, or rather their fac¸ade avoided the
north that had a negative meaning for them. The houses in the Indonesian
village named Toraja face the north where the rivers have their sources
´sztor 2009a).
The anthropological records indicate how complex causes of cultural
understanding can have an influence on positioning a house. The sun often has
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
N = 57
110 115 120 125 130 135
Fig. 112.4 The orientation of the main entrances of Tumulus culture houses excavated at the site
˝, Hungary. x-axis: azimuth in degrees. (Pa
´sztor 2012,8.a
1314 E. Pa
´sztor and J.P. Barna
a double role. As an environmental factor, it gives light and heat to houses, and as
a non-environmental factor, it is often an essential element of the belief system.
Materializations of beliefs can however be different even inside one system.
Analyzing Orientations
Cultural Interpretation of Archaeological Evidence Relating to Astronomy
Cultural Interpretation of Ethnographic Evidence Relating to Astronomy
Neolithic Circular Ditch Systems (“Rondels”) in Central Europe
Solar Alignments - Identification and Analysis
´nffy E (2004) The 6th millennium BC boundary in Western Transdanubia and its role in the
Central European transition (The Szentgyo
¨lgy-Pityerdomb settlement). Varia
Archaeologica Hungaria 15, Budapest
Barna JP, Pa
´sztor E (2011) Different ways of using space: traces of domestic and ritual activities at
a Late Neolithic settlement at Sorma
¨ldek. Documenta Praehistorica 38: 185–206.
Bereznai ZS (1999) A ha
´s hiedelem e
´s szoka
´nek funkciona
´lis vizsga
´lata. Cumania
Bradley R (2001) Orientations and origin: a symbolic dimension to the long house in Neolithic
Europe. Antiquity 75:56–62
´nyi M (2003) Bronzkori telep
´si go
´c a Tiszaugban. In: Visy ZS (ed) Magyar re
´szet az
´n. NKO
¨M, Budapest, pp 143–144
Coudar A (1998) Architecture et socie
´olithique L’unite
´et la variance de la maison
danubienne. Documents d’arche
´ologie franc¸ aise 67, Maison Des Sciences de L’Homme, Paris
´n A (2005) Csa
´gia. Havas Kiado
˝di A, Pa
´sztor E (2006) The role of symbolism and tradition in the society of Bell-Beaker
Csepel group. Archaeolo
´giai E
Faust A (2001) Doorway orientation, settlement planning and cosmology in ancient Israel during
Iron Age II. Oxf J Archaeol 20(2):129–157
Hodder I (1990) The domestication of Europe. Blackwell, Oxford
Marshall A (1981) Environmental adaptation and structural design in axially-pitched longhouses
from Neolithic Europe. World Archaeol 13(1):101–121
Marton T, Oross K (2009) Reconstructing space in a Familiar World. In: Kozłowski J (ed)
Interactions Between Different Models of Neolithization North of the Central European
Agro-Ecological Barrier. Polska Akademia Umieje˛tnos
´ci. Prace Komisji Prehistorii Karpat
PAU 5. Krako
´w, pp 51–73
´V (1995) Svodı
´n. Zwei Kreisgrabenanlagen der Lengyel-kultur. Katedra
´gie Filozofickej Fak, Bratislava
´sztor E (2005) Sunshine in Bell Beaker’s houses: on the orientation of the houses of the Bell
Beaker – Csepel group. In: Zedda MP, Belmonte JA (eds) Lights and shadows in cultural
astronomy. Associazione Archaeofila Sarda, Isili, pp 116–124
´sztor E (2009a) The connection between the terrestrial and celestial landscape during the Bronze
Age in the Carpathian Basin: orientation of houses. In: Dimitriadis G (ed) Landscape in mind:
dialogue on space between anthropology and archaeology. BAR International Series S2003,
Archaeopress, Oxford
112 Neolithic Longhouses and Bronze Age Houses in Central Europe 1315
´sztor E (2009b) Prehistoric cosmologies – a methodological framework for an attempt to
reconstruct Bronze Age cosmologic ideas in the Carpathian Basin. In: Rubin
˜o Martı
´n JA,
Belmonte JA, Prada F, Alberdi A (eds) Cosmology across cultures. ASP conference series,
vol 409. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp 457–463
´sztor E (2013) Bronzkori ha
´zak ta
´sa a Ka
´ben (Orientation of Bronze Age
houses in the Carpathian Basin, English summary). O
´szeti Levelek 13:13–25
´k J (1994) S
´rovo. Ein Siedlungplatz der Kultur mit Linearkeramik und der Z
Gruppe. Nitra
Pearson MP, Richards C (1994) Ordering the World: perceptions of architecture, space and time.
In: Pearson MP, Richards C (eds) Architecture and order. Routledge, London/New York,
pp 1–38
Raczky P, Anders A, Hajdu
´Zs, Nagy E Gy (2005) Zwischen Himmel und Erde – Polga
˝szhalom, eine Siedlung in Ostungarn. In: Daim – Neubauer (eds) Zeitreise Heldenberg.
Geheimnisvolle Kreigr
aben. Niedero
¨sterreichische Landesaustellung, pp 203–209
V. Szabo
´G (2004) Ha
´z, telep
´s telep
´sszerkezet a ke
˝bronzkori (BD, HA, HB perio
´ken. MOMOSZ II:137–171
Topping P (1996) Structure and ritual in the Neolithic house: some example from Britain and
Ireland. In: Darvill T, Thomas J (eds) Neolithic houses in Northwest Europe and beyond.
Oxbow monograph 57. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 157–170
1316 E. Pa
´sztor and J.P. Barna
... The reasons for the orientation of the LBK and post-LBK Neolithic houses have long been a traditional issue for investigation (e.g. Pásztor and Barna 2014;Pavlů et al. 1986). It is generally agreed that the position of the house is constrained by environmental and non-environmental factors. ...
... Several points should be stressed. The first is an optimal house temperature regime, whereby sunshine from the east, south, and west can warm the house during the day in the harsher climate of central Europe (Pásztor and Barna 2014). The effect of prevailing winds can also be borne in mind as one of the ecological factors; however, it cannot be seen as the main reason for LBK and post-LBK house orientation (Mattheusser 1991). ...
... To date, such an interpretation has been put forward only marginally in connection with Neolithic longhouses; it is usually mentioned as a conceivable, but implausible explanation, or as a theory not further expanded on (Mattheußer, 1991: 37;van de Velde, 2007: 22-23;Bickle, 2013: 163-64). The influence of celestial bodies on longhouse position was investigated more closely by Pásztor and Barna (2015), although their study focuses instead on Bronze Age dwellings, leaving the issue of Neolithic longhouses on a theoretical level. ...
Full-text available
This article is focused on the deliberate orientation of longhouses observed within the wide area of the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) and succeeding cultures (post-LBK). Spatial analysis is based on the assemblage of 1546 buildings, whose purpose it was to attempt to cover the whole area of longhouse distribution. Despite variability, which considerably increased over time, the alignment of house entrances towards the south or south-east was observed. The widely accepted theory of house alignment towards the ‘ancestral homeland’ is therefore challenged by a new hypothesis, which sees orientation governed by the celestial path of the sun. Using 3D-modelling of light-and-shadow and solar impact, sun alignment is discussed as an integral element of the longhouse concept already present by the time of its genesis. The tendency of aligning longhouse entrances towards the east, which emerged during the LBK expansion westwards, is considered to be a regionally limited pattern, as no analogical shift was observed in the eastern areas of longhouse distribution.
... Currently exposed remains on the island comprise a complex system of post holes indicating large compartmentalised structures, arranged in parallel alignments ( Fig. 16.2), and resembling the ground plans of the Neolithic longhouses in Central Europe (cf. Pásztor and Barna 2014).The longest rows extend for over 40 m in the northern area while individual post holes are large, between 0.8 and 1.3 m in diameter. ...
Full-text available
Through the analysis of geomorphological processes coupled to archaeological time markers in one selected site – Ognina in south-eastern Sicily – this paper investigates ritual practices and sacred places associated with sea-level change and shoreline locations. The interdisciplinary approach adopted in this research also provides new data on relative sea-level change during the late Holocene, while at the same time bringing together diverse approaches and methods for the analysis of submerged landscapes. It also aims to act as a blueprint for future directions in this specific field.
Full-text available
Download ********* Catalogue Full PDF and ***Plans Full PDF download here: ********* This book presents a complex analysis of the Hrdlovka Neolithic settlement in Northwest Bohemia (Czech Republic). As the site was occupied without interruption from the Linear Pottery (Linearbandkeramik, LBK) to the Stroked Pottery (Stichbandkeramik, SBK) phase, development of many phenomena could be observed in the long-term perspective, especially the Neolithic longhouse architecture. With many well-preserved LBK and post-LBK longhouse ground plans and recorded constructional details, the Hrdlovka site can be regarded as one of the best examples of Neolithic architecture in Central Europe. The volume comprises analyses of all essential categories of archaeological finds – pottery, lithic and stone artefacts, and animal bones. The chronology of the settlement area lays the cornerstone for further investigation of the dwellers’ subsistence strategies and household activities. Text is accompanied by comprehensive catalogue of excavated artefacts, sunken features and longhouses.
Full-text available
This study aims to identify what the houses of prehistoric men and women were like on the European continent. The work focuses on the physical characteristics of houses, as archaeological records are limited and ethnographical knowledge is required to correctly interpret any remains excavated.
Full-text available
On archaeological sites of coastal hunter-gatherers, marine taxa often far outnumber terrestrial mammals among the unmodified faunal remains. In such cases, terrestrial mammals are generally deemed unimportant in the overall economy because of their minor contribution to the diet. Such inferences overlook the fact that land mammals also provide numerous other materials including bone and antler, which may have played crucial roles in past economic lifeways. Several lines of evidence indicate the importance of terrestrial mammals as a source of raw materials for the manufacture of marine hunting and fishing equipment. These tools were used to support the main subsistence economies. This observation stems from our experience in working with the archaeological records from the Northwest Coast of North America (FR) and the coast of Arctic Norway (LH).
Full-text available
The distribution of the Bell Beaker 'phenomenon' or material culture over the vast area of the European continent is today most commonly explained as the result of a spread of an enigmatic phenomenon -- ideology. The question of the origin of Bell Beakers has not satisfactorily answered yet. It is possible that there were separate developments, in Iberian Peninsula, and in Central Europe. However, there are other theories seeking its origin in Rhine river region in Germany or Netherlands as well. Bell Beakers are named after their bell shaped pots. The pottery occurs all over Europe from the Middle Danube to the Iberian Peninsula and from Ireland, Great Britain, and Denmark to Sicily and North Africa. Due to the very favourable geographic location of Budapest in Hungary new groups of people belonging to Bell Beakers material culture settled along the narrow bank of the Danube in the second phase of the Early Bronze Age (2800 -2000 BC). The peoples of the Bell Beaker-Csepel-group had their characteristic cemeteries laying further from the Danube, while their settlements were found closer to the riverbank. On these riverbank settlements 13 houses were unearthed with many other valuable finds. The freestanding constructions were probably inhabited by extended families, making home for 100-120 inhabitants. The ground plan of the boat shaped timber houses observed at the excavation were oriented NW-SE depending on the prevailing wind-direction according to the archaeologist’s assumption. The paper is going to investigate and offer another possible explanation for orientation of houses.
Full-text available
In the present paper, we called attention to a so far unknown religious idea of the Bell Beaker – Csepel group after observations made at the excavation of Budapest-Albertfalva, archaeo-astronomical analyses, two special shards with channelled knob ornaments and their analogues. The schematic representation of the Sun symbol appears, although rarely, in the accompanying material (“Begleitkeramik”) of the Csepel group (on grave ceramics, the Albertfalva fragment was probably originally intended to be placed in a grave). The custom of the building of round houses in the western group of the Bell Beaker culture and the burials with round ditches in the eastern group make us think. The orientation of the houses according to the winter solstice at Albertfalva and the existence of a territory enclosed by a round ditch between the houses render the role of the Sun in the daily and religious life of the population of the Csepel group even more emphatic. The representation of the Sun in various forms (gold discs, incised Sun motives) can be observed on nearly the entire territory of the Bell Beaker culture yet we do not want to interpret this phenomenon as a Sun cult. The religious beliefs of the Bell Beaker culture are extremely complicated, complex and colourful, and Sun, an environmental factor that defines daily life, could only be an element in it.
The long houses of the Linear Pottery Culture and its immediate successors are usually interpreted in functional terms, but they have certain anomalous features. This paper considers the processes by which they were built, lengthened, abandoned and replaced and suggests that they may have charted the development of the households who lived inside them. The buildings in Linear Pottery settlements were generally orientated towards the areas of the origin of the communities who lived there.
This paper analyses the structural and functional design of trapezoidal longhouses from the European Neolithic in the light of studies of ethnographic parallels from the highland area of New Guinea, which is comparable to temperate and sub‐alpine Europe in many aspects of its environment. It is argued that both longhouse types represent a parallel adaptation to adverse climatic conditions, and that their orientations are determined largely by wind direction in order to minimise structural stress and to increase heat retention. It is therefore suggested that, since the European examples show regionally consistent orientations which differ markedly from present‐day wind directions, significant changes have occurred in atmospheric circulation since the Neolithic period, and that studies of changes in orientation of longhouses through time might provide important information on climatic change in Europe since the Atlantic period.
Legends, myths personify the sky elements and tell stories about their deeds all over the world. Their activities take place in the celestial landscape, which is the idealized reflection of the terrestrial one. It seems therefore that the world view of the prehistoric Europeans could also have involved not only the significant topographical elements of the surrounding landscape but celestial bodies and the eye-catching meteorological phenomena as well. Might the impact of celestial bodies be so significant that people took them as a leading factor in the layout of their living or cult structures? In this case study the author investigates this assumption for a late Bronze Age settlement with an outstanding number of houses.