Article

Look to Europe? Examining the Relevance and Applicability of the European Experiences with the Use of Waste to Energy as a Treatment Method for Residual Waste for the Province of Ontario

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This research explores the development and use of waste to energy (WTE) technologies in Europe and in the Province of Ontario, Canada. As the quantity of waste generated has continued to increase in industrialized countries, the need for alternative waste management methods to reduce the dependency on landfill and to recover the resource in the waste has also increased. Many European countries, including Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany, have developed WTE facilities to achieve these goals, whereas the use of WTE in Ontario has been extremely limited. However, the current shortage of residual waste management capacity in Ontario has sparked debate over the potential for the use of WTE. This thesis examines the driving forces that have promoted the use of WTE in Europe and the barriers that have prevented its use in Ontario. From this investigation the main lessons learned from Europe's use of WTE were identified as well as the areas of knowledge that are required in Ontario to foster the discussions over the potential for WTE technologies. This research analyses the European lessons learned to determine if they are applicable and relevant for satisfying the knowledge gaps in Ontario. As well recommendations are made for ensuring that the discussions over residual waste management and the potential use of WTE in Ontario move forward successfully resulting in crucial actions being taken.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... The first incinerator in Sweden was set up in 1901 outside of Stockholm [6]. During the 1950s and the 1960s more packaging and ready-made products increased the volumes of waste, which triggered the construction of more incineration capacity [6,7]. These installations were solely for reducing waste volume without energy recovery. ...
... In 1974 a governmental study concluded: "waste is resource that should be used". It resulted in thirteen new incinerators with energy recovery built by the end of the 1970s [6,7,9]. ...
... At the same time in the period 1974-1982 there was an increased interest in centralised pre-treatment options including separation and sorting facilities for mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) of waste. Most of these facilities were built with government subsidies [7,8]. Another parallel development in the 1970s was the introduction of a deposit-refund system for glass bottles of liquors and wines. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the development of waste management infrastructure in Sweden in order to understand the trends and factors influencing the developments of waste management systems with extremely low landfilling rates and co-existing high recycling rates and large-scale incineration. The purpose of this paper is to discuss what lessons could be learnt from the existing municipal solid waste management systems in the old EU member states. The system in Sweden is among the best in the EU ensuring high resource recovery rates. The new member states could learn from the past experiences and avoid potential mistakes in long-term strategic planning. The paper focuses on the effects of different administrative and economic policy instruments. The focus is on the effects of a producer responsibility principle, introduction of deposit-refund systems, taxes on landfilling and incineration as well as regulatory bans on waste treatment options. It also provides a historic perspective on what kinds of internal and external factors shaped the development in Sweden. In the end, a discussion is focusing on lessons learnt and possible implications for waste management systems in Lithuania.
... The first incinerator in Sweden was set up in 1901 outside of Stockholm [6]. During the 1950s and the 1960s more packaging and ready-made products increased the volumes of waste, which triggered the construction of more incineration capacity [6,7]. These installations were solely for reducing waste volume without energy recovery. ...
... In 1974 a governmental study concluded: "waste is resource that should be used". It resulted in thirteen new incinerators with energy recovery built by the end of the 1970s [6,7,9]. ...
... At the same time in the period 1974-1982 there was an increased interest in centralised pre-treatment options including separation and sorting facilities for mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) of waste. Most of these facilities were built with government subsidies [7,8]. Another parallel development in the 1970s was the introduction of a deposit-refund system for glass bottles of liquors and wines. ...
Data
Full-text available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.