COGNITIVISM AND ITS IMPLICATION IN THE SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING

Abstract

This paper aims to elaborate cognitivism and its implications to the second language learning. Cognitive theory or approach views the learner as a thinking being and an active processor of information. Thus, learning is a process in which the learner actively tries to analyze the situations where the application of the rule would be appropriate and to make sense of data. In other words, we learn by thinking about and trying to make sense of what we see, hear and feel. In order to get a clear picture of the cognitive theory in relation to second language learning, other related theories were also described briefly from the historical points of view. In general cognitivism can be grouped under the innatist model which is also known as ‘nativist’. ‘mentalism’ (thinking as rule-governed activity), ‘rationalism’. The implications of cognitive theories can be revealed in the basic teaching techniques which cover activities such as problem-based solving activity, discovery learning, cognitive strategies, project-based learning, etc. Keywords : cognitive, second language, acquisition, innatist, problem-solving, behaviorist

Full text

48
COGNITIVISM AND ITS IMPLICATION IN THE
SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Suharno
Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro
Abstract
This paper aims to elaborate cognitivism and its implications to the
second language learning. Cognitive theory or approach views the
learner as a thinking being and an active processor of information.
Thus, learning is a process in which the learner actively tries to
analyze the situations where the application of the rule would be
appropriate and to make sense of data. In other words, we learn by
thinking about and trying to make sense of what we see, hear and
feel. In order to get a clear picture of the cognitive theory in
relation to second language learning, other related theories were
also described briefly from the historical points of view. In general
cognitivism can be grouped under the innatist model which is also
known as „nativist‟. „mentalism‟ (thinking as rule-governed
activity), „rationalism‟. The implications of cognitive theories can
be revealed in the basic teaching techniques which cover activities
such as problem-based solving activity, discovery learning,
cognitive strategies, project-based learning, etc.
Keywords : cognitive, second language, acquisition, innatist,
problem-solving, behaviorist
1. INTRODUCTION
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
(Chinese proverb)
The entry point for all language teaching should be an understanding of how
people learn, but as a matter of fact the „learning factors‟ are the last to be
considered. In the past the research only focused on the language analysis and
learning factors were, to a large extent, still ignored; only after the language
systemization has been done, learning factors were incorporated in the domain of
language teaching and learning. In the sixteenth century Comenius (1592-1670), a
Czech theologian and educator, conducted empirical observations in language
learning, and some guidelines for the Direct Method at the end of the 19th century
(Stern, 1983), but no relevant theory of learning appeared until the establishment
of psychology as a notable field of study in scientific enquiry in the early 20th
century. (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 39)

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
49
From a historical point of view there are three major scientific research
traditions in the second language acquisition: (1) Behaviorist, (2) Cognitive, and
(3) Dialogical. Behaviorist is generally related to the work of Pavlov in the Soviet
Union and of Skinner in the United States. This theory emphasizes “a mechanical
process of habit formation and proceeds by means of the frequent reinforcement
of a stimulus-response sequence”. (Hutchinson & Waters 1987: 40) Meanwhile,
the term „cognitive‟ refers to the course of intellectual development in a child
through various stages. (Piaget in Brown, 1994:58), learners as thinking beings
(Hutchinson & Waters, 11987:43), and the learner to be an active processor of
information. (Ausubel et al, 1978) And the term „dialogical‟, the last tradition, can
be associated to the following names: discursive (Harree and Gillet 1994),
hermeneutic (Young 1999; Markee 1994; Ochsner 1979), hermeneutic-dialectical
(Rommetveit 1987), dialogically based social-cognitive (Rommetveit 1992), and
cultural (Bruner 1996). (see Johnson 1954:9)
This essay will elaborate the second tradition (Cognitive theory) with its
implication in the second language learning. In order to get a clear picture about
the two domains, I will also describe briefly some key words such as the terms
„first and second language‟, „first and second language acquisition‟, concepts of
language learning, and finally some implications of cognitive theories in the
second language learning.
2. FIRST AND SECOND LANGUAGE
When we talk about language teaching or learning, we should be familiar with the
terms such as first language, second language, foreign language, mother tongue,
bilingual. Those terms are sometimes ambiguous and confusing, even for some
language practitioners. In this regard, Stern (1983:9) makes a tabulation of the two
sets of terms as follows:
Table 1: First language and Second language
L1
L2
First language
Native language
Mother tongue
Primary language
Stronger language
Second language
Non-native language
Foreign language
Secondary language
Weaker language
The two sets of terms above can be compared to the pair words such „left
and right‟, „I/we and you‟, or „at home‟ and „abroad‟. Those terms are always
relative to a person or a group of persons. They show a subjective relationship
between a language and an individual or a group. For the two sets of terms above,
Stern (1983: 11-12) gives illustration as follows:
- The L1 terms are used to indicate, first of all, that a person has
acquired the language in infancy and early childhood (hence „first‟ or
„native‟) and generally within the family (hence „mother tongue‟). For
example, the expressions such as „English is my mother tongue‟; „I am
a native speaker of French‟; „His first language was Hungarian‟ all

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
50
suggest this particular way of acquiring a language at this particular
time in life.
- The concept of L2 („non-native language‟, „second language‟, „foreign
language‟) implies the prior availability to the individual of an L1; in
other words, it is some form of bilingualism. Again, the use of the L2
set of terms has a dual function: it indicates something about the
acquisition of the language and something about the nature of the
command; for instance: „We‟re learning French in school‟; „I‟m trying
to learn Singhalese‟; „Our Danish „aur pair‟ girl has been sent by her
parents to England to learn English in our family. She has no lessons.‟
A certain language can be grouped as a second language when it is a non-
native language which is learnt and used within one country; on the other hand, it
can be grouped as a foreign language when it is a non native language which is
learnt and used with reference to a speech community outside national or
territorial boundaries. In addition, it can be a foreign language when it is
undertaken with different purposes of mind, e.g. travel abroad, communication
with native speakers, reading of a foreign literature, etc. Other requirements of
being a second language are (1) the language becomes the official language or
one of two or more recognized languages; (2) the language is needed for “full
participation in the political and economic life of the nation” (Paulston 1974:12-
13); (3) the language is needed for education. (Mackwardt 1963); and (4) the
language has official status or a recognized function within a country which a
foreign language has not. (Sterne, 1983: 15-16)
3. FIRST AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
3.1. First language acquisition
Language acquisition which is a multi-faceted and complex phenomenon can be
simplified into three major crucial issues by Rice (1986) as follows: (a) The nature
of language, (b) The role of the child, and (c) The role of the environment.
3.1.1. The nature of language
Issues of the nature of language is quite abundant to explore and to discuss,
especially the aspects which are closely related to the first language acquisition.
For instance, language can be seen as a set of grammar or syntactic rules or how
these rules are processed internally, and another issue which is equally essential is
pragmatic aspects of the language or how the language is used in community.
From the illustration above, language basically contains three aspects: form,
meaning, and use.
3.1.2. The Role of the Child
To elaborate the issues of the child‟s role in the first language acquisition covering
the questions whether the child becomes active or passive receiver of the
„teaching‟ from adults, or whether there is an innate linguistic knowledge, I will
refer to two influential figures – Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky.

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
51
3.1.2.1. Piagetian View of Cognitive and Language Development
According to Piaget (1959) cognitive development and language acquisition are
closely interrelated processes. During the childhood the abstract knowledge about
the world can be gained through seeing objects around them and by observing
how the objects function and interact each other. This stage of development lasts
from birth to 18 months, called the sensorimotor period. In Piaget‟s view
cognitive knowledge about the world, without cognitive development language
acquisition will not take place, even if it does the children will only gain little.
This kind of view is often labeled as „cognitive determinism‟ - the development of
language forms is governed by cognitive growth, i.e. cognitive development
before language. In other words, the sequence of development within language
learning is governed by the stages of cognitive growth. (See Figure 1)
Figure 1: Cognitive Determinism
3.1.2.2. Vygotskyan View of Cognitive and Language Development
Vygotsky‟s (1962) cognitive view in language development was inspired by
Piaget‟s at least in two ways : (i)) the important relation between cultural and
social environment and language learning; (ii) cognition closely related to
language is considered not static manner but dynamic one since the children‟s
cognition will improve along with their interaction with the people around (e.g.
parents, siblings, neighbors). The child‟s language acquisition is obtained through
daily conversation with adults such as naming objects. In other words, the adult
people teach the children about the world around and appropriate behavior.
According to Vygotsky, language is a means of influencing later cognitive
development. In this context, by getting along with the people around them and
practicing their own language, the children will learn to interpret new experiences
which will further develop their thinking competence. For an illustration, as the
children who have grown bigger and mastered certain aspects of language will be
more critical by asking some questions about the things they see and hear. They
also start to enjoy listening to stories and describing the characters in the stories.
The children‟s interaction with the world around can be seen in the following
figure.
Experience with
objects
Cognitive
development
(thought)
Language

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
52
Figure 2: Changing Relationships between Cognitive Development and Language
3.1.2.3. The Role of the Environment
The third component of language acquisition which contributes to the children‟s
cognitive competence is both social and linguistic environment. Social
environment is a setting where the children are nurtured and learn things about the
world. Whereas linguistic environment is a situation in which the children use
language in their interaction with adults. In their interaction, they will get input
and direct or indirect feedback on their language use. Special terms referring to
the kind of language used by adults to the children are motherese,
caregiver/caretaker language and child-directed language. Another issue about
the environment in relation to adults‟ behaviors and strategies during play and
caregiving are called joint referencing and joint action. Joint referencing refers to
an act of communication which often covers naming or describing; whereas joint
action is related to a shared action sequence by adult and child, such as rolling a
ball, laying peek-a-boo or „round and round the garden‟. (Goh, 2004:14-16)
3.1.2.4. Theoretical Models
There are three theoretical model which are very influential in language
acquisition, especially in relation to three main issues: the way language, the child
and the environment interact to each other. These models are known as
behaviorist, innatist (also nativist) and interactionist. They are broad models
which represent different views on and approaches to the understanding of
language acquisition.
3.1.2.5. The Behaviorist Model
The model was very popular in the forties and fifties owing to the work of Ivan
Pavlov, B. F. Skinner, John Watson, and Edward Thorndike. It is also related to
the empiricist school due to its concern with the physical and the observable. In
Interaction with
the world and with
others
Cognitive
development
(thought)
Language

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
53
this view, the main focus in learning is change of behavior through habit
formation, and the existence of stimuli and response. For several decades this
school of thought was very dominant in various areas of learning, including
language learning. In Verbal Behavior B.F. Skinner (1957) argued that language
acquisition was a form of operant conditioning, directly resulting from adult
modeling and reinforcement, imitation, practice and habit formation on the part of
the child. Another main feature of the behaviorist view is the existence of
reinforcement – both positive and negative. A child will be given praise and
physical rewards when he gives a correct utterance. On the other hand, if the
utterance is not correct, the reward will be suspended.
3.1.2.6. The Innatist Model
This model is also known as „nativist‟, „mentalism‟ or „rationalism‟. In this
model, language is seen not as a behavior learned through imitation and
conditioning, but is rule-based and generative in nature, processed and produced
through complicated cognitive processes and mechanism. There are two
underlying assumptions in this model. The first assumption proposed by
Chomsky, the severest critic of behaviorism, stated that human beings possess an
innate mental capacity for language. It is a special language mechanism in which
individuals are hard-wired with syntactic principles, or rules about grammar. It is
also believed, in this view, that the language has a universal nature so that anyone
can learn any language they are exposed to.
The second basic assumption is concerned with the language development
which is directed by a biological and chronological program. In this model, Eric
Lenneberg (1967) proposed a hypothesis known as „the Critical Period
Hypothesis‟ – „a critical point for language acquisition occurs around puberty and
beyond this point, people who try to learn a language will not acquire it fully.‟
This hypothesis was supported by natural experiments in which children fail to
acquire a language normally during their childhood. The well known evidences
are the wolf boy, Victor, in France and Genie, the girl from California.
Other main features of this model refer to an innate mechanism called the
Language Acquisition Device (LAD) which was pre-programmed with syntactic
rules or principles about language that enabled the child to generate and
understand sentences, and Universal Grammar (UG) which assumes that all
languages in the world share common features, such as plurals, signaling,
temporal or spatial distinctions and negating a proposition.
3.1.2.7. The Interactionist Model
This model is closely related to Vygotsky‟s Zone Proximal Development (ZPD)
which is defined as the distance between a child‟s current state of cognitive
capacity and the level of potential development. In other words, it is what the
child can manage on his or her own compared with what they can only manage
with assistance from adults. The emergence of the interactionist model was also
due to the dissatisfaction with Chomsky‟s transformational grammar which only
focuses on the competence of the „ideal speaker-listener‟ in a „homogenous
speech community‟ instead of examining the way language is actually used in

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
54
society. Dell Hymes (1971) also proposed a model of communicative competence.
This competence will make persons able to express and interpret messages
appropriately in specific communicative contexts. (Goh, 2004: 17-22)
The main features of the three models can be seen in the following table
(Goh, 2004: 25):
Table 2: Key features of Behaviorist, Innatist and Interactionist
Approaches
Behaviorist
Innatist
Interactionist
 Concerned with
learning in
general
 Important
linguistic input
from the
environment
 Modeling
 Imitation
 Practice
 Reinforcement
 Habit formation
 Concerned with
specific aspects of
language learning
 Degenerate input
from the
environment
 Biological program
(CPH)
 Special language
learning ability
 Universal Grammar
(UG)
 Linguistic rule
extraction
 Hypothesis testing
 Natural order of
acquisition
 Concerned with social
and psychological aspects
of language learning
 Meaningful linguistic
input from the
environment
 The importance of
communicative contexts
 Child‟s pragmatic
intentions
 Adult‟s rich
interpretation and
feedback
 Conversational
adjustments
 Child‟s capacity for
learning
 Interdependence of
cognitive and language
developments
4. SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
The description of second language acquisition (SLA) will also refer to the three
broad models: behaviorist, innatist, and interactionist. And each model which is
applied in the second language acquisition will be elaborated below.
4.1. Behaviorism and SLA
There is no significant difference between the behaviorist model applied in L1 and
L2 learning. The same principles are still used in L2 learning such as imitation,
practice, reinforcement/feedback and habit formation following a stimulus-
response model. This model assumes that all learning is similar; there is no
different treatment between L1 and L2. The child, or learner of any age for SLA
should imitate, repeat, practice and receive feedback in order to establish „good
habits‟ and avoid „bad habits‟.
In this model of learning, it is also relevant to mention the Contrastive
Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) (Lado (1957) which assumes that all elements in L1

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
55
and in L2 which are similar will be easier to learn; on the other hand, any
elements which are different in L1 and in L2 will be more difficult to learn.
Implementation of the behaviorist ideas are reflected in the teaching
method /approach known as Audiolingualism (coined by Professor Nelson Brooks
in 1964) which stresses on the systematic presentation of grammatical forms from
the easiest elements to the most difficult ones. The main features in this practice
are repetitive drills, no translation, no explanation of grammatical rules, word
meaning learned in context, more spoken practices. Accordingly, there is
extensive use of dialogue memorization, repetition and drills.
4.2. Innatism and SLA
Similar to the behaviorist model, the principles of innatist model for first language
acquisition and SLA are basically the same. In this model, there is an innate
mental capacity for language learning which is different from other learning.
Language learning is based on discovering the underlying abstract representations
(or rules) of the specific language from among all possible rules of languages
universally. According to Chomsky, these universal rules are called Universal
Grammar (UG) which provides a kind of blue print that the child is born with.
In this kind of learning, there are two major issues which are closely
related to SLA. First, it is called an access issue which covers three possibilities.
First possibility is the learner accesses UG in the same way for both first and
second language learning (full access); second possibility is the learner does not
access UG directly for second language learning but must go through the first
language ( no access); and third possibility is the learner has a partial, but
incomplete, access to UG for SLA. The mechanism of UG access can be seen in
the following figure (Figure 3):
Figure 3: UG Access and SLA
„Full Access‟
First language
Second language
Child‟s mind
(UG)
„No access‟
First language
Second language
Child‟s
mind (UG)

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
56
Second issue in the innatist model is concerned with age. With regard to
this, some research on learning and age is used to determine whether UG really is
a biological attribute. Lennenberg (1967) proposed a learning theory called
Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) which assumes that in fact there is a critical
period for language learning. According to CPH, learning second language after
puberty is not so efficient as learning before puberty. In other words, the learner
will not achieve a complete mastery of second language after puberty. The
implications of Innatist model can be seen in the practice of Natural Approach
proposed by Terrell (1977), and this approach to classroom teaching is an effort to
insert naturalistic learning into classroom situations. (Goh, 2004: 32-35)
4.3. Interactionism and SLA
Interactionist model is closely related to the views of sociolinguistics and
language use for communication. Second language acquisition for adolescents
(over 20+ years) pays attention to the interaction between second language
learners and native speakers. Preliminary studies of this interaction was largely
focused on the comprehensible input (meaning) which was then related to innatist
models. However, some other researchers argued that learning process covers not
only understanding (comprehensible input) but also communication (language
use). Thus, the ideal learning situation is combination of both factors. Such a
situation is often connected to the linguistic environment – the way(s) that
language is used, with and around the learner. The research has tried to explore
possible roles for input, negotiation, output and interactional feedback in second
language learning. The implications of Interactionist model can be seen in the
practice of Communicative Language Teaching Approaches (CLTAs) which
cover various topics or activities such as functional-notional, thematic, content-
based, task-based, etc.(Goh, 2004: 41-42)
The following is a summary of Basic Theories and Models for SLA.
Table 3: Basic Theories and Models for SLA
Behaviorist
Modeling, practice and reinforcement from proficient L2
language user.
Habits formed in first language can interfere with L2 learning
Instructional approach: Audiolingualism.
Innatist
UG is accessible for first and second language acquisition or UG
is only available for first language learning or UG is partially
available for second language learning – an unresolved question.
If UG is biological, there may be an optimal time period for
second language acquisition (prior to puberty) because the adult
mind learns language differently.
Instructional approach: The Natural Approach
Interactionist
Input, negotiation, output and international feedback may be
necessary for L2 learning.
Other sociocultural aspects may also need to be considered.
Instruction approach : CLTAs

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
57
5. CONCEPTS OF LANGUAGE LEARNING
If we talk about the concept of second language learning, it is unavoidable to use
psychological concepts since our thinking on learning is influenced by the
psychological knowledge that is part of the common on understanding of human
behavior in our culture. The psychological terms such as „remembering‟,
„forgetting‟, „skill‟, „motivation‟, „frustration‟, „inhibition‟, etc. are adopted in the
process of second language learning. In this section, the two key concepts for a
language teaching theory, i.e. language and learning will be reviewed in terms of
general psychology so that we can have a clear picture about the underpinning of
second language learning.
5.1. Language in psychology
Language has always played a certain role in the history of psychology.
According to Stern (1983: 291) psychology can be defined as the science of the
mental life and behavior of the individual. Psychology studies the behavior,
activities, conduct, and mental processes. Since speech is one of the features that
distinguishes man most clearly from other species, it becomes an object of
psychological enquiry. From about 1900 the objects of psychological studies paid
attention to not only the learning, memory, thinking and intelligence (the higher
mental processes), but also to the emotions, personality, psychological growth of
the child, and the measurement of individual differences.
Wundt (1877), the founder of modern scientific psychology, included a
study of language in the first volume of his monumental study of “ethnic
psychology”. Word association experiments which showed the subjects‟ instant
response to the verbal stimuli was done by Galton (1883). While in the area of
emotions, some research has been undertaken by Freud with his treatment of slips
of the tongue or the pen (the emotional dynamics of verbal behavior), by Jung‟s
(1918) verbal associations as a diagnostic tool to uncover emotional complexes. In
this regard, Jung theorized that someone with emotional problems will easily
deviate from the common verbal associations of his speech community.
In the studies of mental development of the child, „nature or nurture‟
became hotly debated issues. Some experts tended to support „nature‟ meaning
the mental development of the child obtained by maturation (biological and
nativistic), while some others favored „nurture‟ meaning the mental development
was mainly gained through social or environmental interaction. Such a debate had
finally come to a compromise in 1940s, called “biosocial” compromise: the
division between the two points of view became less rigid. In other words, there
was no a clear-cut solution, and the question was on the proportion for each view:
how much biological growth, heredity, innate disposition, and maturation could
contribute to the child‟s mental development; and, similarly, what proportion of
environmental influences could increase its mental development. In this issue,
intelligence as „bio‟ component was considered stronger than „social‟ aspect.
Another major issue about language in psychology for many decades was
the relationship between language and thought. The Swiss psychologist Piaget, in
his major work on language and thought in childhood (1923) proposed the thesis
that language development and functional use of language in childhood reflect the

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
58
mental development of the child. Later, such thesis led to the theory, for instance
by Cameron (1947) who stated that the individual‟s view of the world and his
entire cognitive system were shaped by the verbal symbols given to each one of us
by society as we learn our native language. (Stern, 1983: 291-294)
5.2. The psychology of learning
Learning has been approached in two main ways: (a) through theoretical and
experimental studies and (b) through empirical studies in education setting. The
two together constitute the psychology of learning.
5.2.1. The theoretical and experimental study of learning
This school of thought can be divided into two groups. The first, deriving from the
British associationist school of philosophy (Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and
Hume), refers a largely environmentalist view of man. A further development of
this school can be found in Pavlov‟s studies of conditioning, Watson‟s
behaviorism, Thorndike‟s connectionism, and Skinner‟s operant conditioning.
Theories in this school of thought, so-called S-R theories, focus on externally
observable responses (R) to specific stimuli (S), an empirical and experimental
approach, and the avoidance of subjective or „mentalist‟ concepts. What they
agree in this tradition is they disregard the mental process of the learners. In
other words, they do not pay attention to the intentions, the thinking, the
conscious planning, and internal processes of the learner.
The second group, so-called cognitive approaches to learning, was initially
represented by Gestalt psychology. It emphasizes on innate organizing principles
in human perception, cognition, sensorimotor skills, learning, and even in social
conduct. Gestalt theory ignores repetition or practice, the mechanical „stamping
in‟ or Thorndike‟s laws of learning or Skinner‟s „shaping‟, as characteristic of
human learning. Other features of Gestalt psychology also cover concepts such as
„whole and part‟, „integration and differentiation‟, „figure and ground‟, „field‟,
„structure‟, and „organization‟. (Stern, 1983: 307)
Other figures who advocated a cognitive theory of learning are Ausubel
(1967:10) who stresses on „meaningful learning‟, meaning being understood not
as a behavioral response, but as „a clearly articulated and precisely differentiated
conscious experience that emerges when potentially meaningful signs, symbols,
concepts, or propositions are related to and incorporated within a given
individual‟s cognitive structure… .‟
Ausebel gives two significant contributions in the development of
language learning since his theories have been developed from research in main
stream cognitive psychology. His firs contribution is the notion of „advance
organizer‟ – a device or a mental learning aid to help us „get a grip on the new
information‟. His second contribution is the active nature of reception learning.
He distinguishes between rote and meaningful learning. The point here is how to
make reception learning as meaningful as possible. In this approach, the students
need to be active in learning by underlining, by completing missing words, by
rewording sentences, or by giving additional examples.
(http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/lynda-abbott/cognitive.html)

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
59
Different from Ausubel who absolutely rejected the behaviorism, Bruner
and Gagne have tried to be more moderate, that is trying to combine both schools.
In their view certain kinds of learning can be appropriately achieved by a
behaviorist stimulus-response theory, but conceptual learning or the learning of
principles require a cognitive theory. Bruner‟s cognitive theory (1960/1977,
1966) gave a significant contribution to the curriculum development in the sixties,
especially in the natural sciences, social sciences, and mathematics, but its
relevance to language teaching was delayed until much later. As an advocate of
discovery learning, Bruner was more popular, at least schools, than Ausubel and
Gagne since his ideas about learning were more acceptable. In his work “Toward
a Theory of Instruction”, Bruner elaborated how his ideas can be easily translated
into teaching practice in the classroom. The key point of his teaching principles is
the word „structure‟. When we teach a subject, we should also pay attention to its
structure. He introduced a real process of a particular subject to the students. For
instance, when learning history, the student should examine a bridge, a building,
or a head stone in a cemetery, then using the information acquired to trace records
of various kinds in order to answer the questions generated about the origins,
purposes, and history of that structure, or the life of the person concerned. The
three stages in Bruner's theory of intellectual development are:
 Enactive where a person learns about the world through actions on objects.
 Iconic where learning occurs through using models and pictures.
 Symbolic which describes the capacity to think in abstract terms.
Bruner's three stages can be explained as follows: underlying principle for
teaching and learning is that a combination of concrete, pictorial then symbolic
activities will lead to more effective learning. The progression is: start with a
concrete experience then move to pictures and finally use symbolic representation.
(http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/lynda-abbott/cognitive.html)
Meanwhile Robert Gagne, who spent early time as an instructional
psychologist for training airforce personnel, proposed the importance of task
analysis and the correct sequencing of instruction. In addition, he argued that
learning is like to a building process which utilizes a hierarchy of skills that
increase in complexity. Gagné‟s theory of learning hierarchies could be said to be
a teaching theory, which is easy to apply in some circumstances, but is not easily
applied in other circumstances. Many of his ideas are readily transferable to
computer-assisted instruction and no doubt at least some readers will be familiar
with his ideas, even if not with Gagné himself as their advocate. The concept of
Gagné's knowledge hierarchy leads to the assumption that it is important to
present all the necessary lower-level facts before proceeding to teach at higher
levels. Related to this is the concept that people can reason with higher-level
concepts if they have learned all of the prerequisite lower-level information.
(http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/lynda-abbott/cognitive.html)
Gagne (1977) in his latest interpretation of varieties of learning
distinguishes five types: learning intellectual skills, concepts, and rules; learning
problem solving or cognitive strategies; verbal information learning; motor skill
learning, and the learning of attitudes. According to Gagne, in order to be

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
60
successful in learning, both behavioral (S-R) and cognitive concepts should be
applied in learning. In short, any concrete learning task, such as learning a
language, might involve several kinds of learning. (Sterne, 1983: 308)
5.2.2. The empirical study of learning in education settings.
Besides theoretical and experimental study of learning, learning problems from
the applied side in practical learning situation have also been investigated. For
instance, the learning school subjects, especially reading and mathematics; the
learning problems of children with educational or emotional difficulties; questions
of work training in industry; problems of rehabilitation and re-education of
individuals requiring remedial treatment; and the theory of „programmed
instruction‟.
Some critics regretted the wide gap that has developed between „classroom
learning theory‟ and the theoretical and laboratory study of learning. In this
regard, Cage (1963) states that research on teaching would fill the gap between
learning theory and educational practice. Others tend to disregard all the debates
about the psychology of the learning and teaching process. And some others
indicated that due to the uncritical acceptance of learning theory the development
of useful psychology of learning has been in disorder.
The psychology of learning in the textbooks of educational psychology are
usually taken from two sources: the theoretical and experimental studies of
learning and the applied investigations of specific learning problems. Categories
of the psychology of learning refer to (a) characteristics of the learner and
individual differences among learners (abilities, personality, attitudes, and
motivation, (b) different kinds of learning, (c) the learning process, and (d)
outcomes of learning. (Sterne, 1983: 308-9).
6. SOME IMPLICATIONS OF THE COGNITIVE THEORIES
Whereas the behaviorist theory of learning portrayed the learner as passive
receiver of information, the cognitive view takes the learner to be an active
processor of information (see Ausubel et al., 1978). Learning and using a rule
require learners to think, that is, to apply their mental powers in order to distil a
workable generative rule from the mass of data presented, and then to analyze the
situations where the application of the rule would be useful or appropriate.
Learning, then, is a process in which the learner actively tries to make sense of
data, and learning can be said to have taken place when the learner has managed
to impose some sort of meaningful interpretation or pattern on the data. This may
sound complex, but in simple terms what it means is that we learn by thinking
about and trying to make sense of what we see, feel and hear. (Hutchinson &
Waters, 1987: 43)
The basic teaching techniques associated with a cognitive theory of
language learning may cover the following activities: (1) problem based learning
(problem solving), (2) discovery learning, (3) cognitive strategies, (4) project
based learning, etc.

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
61
6.1. Problem based learning
This activity is based on the problem exposure. The student conducts the research
based on theories, concepts, various scientific principles. First, he/she identifies
the problem, collects the data, and analyzes the data. Finally, he/she should draw a
conclusion or conclusions. The following tables (1 and 2) show the difference
between the problem-based learning and the traditional learning as well as its
strengths and weaknesses of the problem-based learning.
Table 4 : Traditional and Problem-based Learning
Traditional Learning
Problem-based Learning
o The lecturer decides the problem
o The lecturers presents the
information and prepares the
materials.
o The students decide their own
problem.
o The students look for information
and relevant materials.
Table 5 : Strengths and Weaknesses of the Problem-based learning
Strengths
Weaknesses
o It focuses on the meaningfulness,
not the facts.
o It can improve the students‟
initiative.
o It can develop the students‟ skill in
applying the science.
o It can develop the students‟ skills
of interpersonal relationships and
group dynamic.
o It can improve the relationship
between the students and the
facilitator.
o It can improve the students‟
learning achievement.
o The students‟ basic academic
competence is different from each
other.
o It is time-consuming for its
implementation
o The change of role for the students
and the lecturer will take time.
o In general it is not easy to
formulate the problem.
o The lecturer should be able to
design an appropriate instrument
for the students‟ assessment.
6.2. Discovery learning
This activity is aimed to develop a research competence and to improve the
learner‟s appreciation toward science. It would rather focus on the learning
process than the learning product; in addition, discovery learning is designed to
increase the student‟s learning skills, including how to ask questions and how to
evaluate strategies.
6.3. Cognitive strategies
Cognitive strategies are one type of learning strategy that learners use in order to
learn more successfully. These include repetition, organizing new language,

Parole, Vol. 1, Oktober 2010
62
summarizing meaning, guessing meaning from context, using imagery for
memorization. All of these strategies involve deliberate manipulation of language
to improve learning. Classifications of learning strategies distinguish between
cognitive strategies and two other types; metacognitive strategies (organizing
learning), and social/ affective strategies (which enable interaction). For example,
a learner remembers new words by visualizing them represented in a memorable
or ridiculous situation. This makes it easier and faster to recall these words.
Activities in the classroom which can be described as cognitive strategies include
making mind maps, visualization, association, mnemonics, using clues in reading
comprehension, underlining key words, scanning and self-testing and monitoring.
Cognitive strategy is an organized internal competence which can lead the
students in their learning process, i.e. thinking process, problem solving, and
decision making. It enables the students to think systematically and critically. In
other words, it will make their thinking process unique. This uniqueness is called
executive control – high level control (consciousness). (Dandan Supratman‟s
Lecture Handouts).
7. CONCLUSION
From the elaboration in the previous sections, I can draw some points to consider
when using cognitive approach or theory in the second language learning :
1. Cognitive theory or approach can be grouped in the innatist model which
focuses on the role of mental or psycholinguistic processes. This tradition is
also known as „mentalism‟ (thinking as rule-governed activity), „nativist‟,
„rationalism‟.
2. Cognitive code or approach which views the learner as a thinking being and an
active processor of information can be applied to improve the learner‟s
intelligence. In other words, the type of activities will make the learner to
think more critically towards certain topics.
3. The teaching or learning process which is based on the cognitive approach
may cover activities such as problem solving, discovery learning, project
based learning, etc.
4. Apart from its strengths, cognitive approach (through problem solving
activity) has some limitations (time consuming, the learners‟ unequal basic
academic competence, the difficulty of problem formulation).
References
Ausubel, D.P. et al. (1978). Educational Psychology: A cognitive View. Holt,
Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, H.D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York:
Prentice Hall Regents.
Goh, Christine C.M. & R.E. Silver. (2004). Language Acquisition and
Development. Singapore: Longman.

(Suharno) Cognitivism And Its Implication In The Second Language Learning
63
http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/lynda-abbott/cognitive.html. Retrieved 8 July
2009.
Hutchinson, T. & A. Waters. (1987). English for Specific Purposes : A Learning-
centred Approach. Cambridge : CUP.
Johnson, M. (1958). A Philosophy of Second language Acquisition. New Haven &
London: Yale University Press.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John
Wiley.
Piaget, J. (1959/2002). The Language and Thought of the Child. London:
Routledge.
Rice, M. L. (1986). Children’s Language Acquisition. American Psychologist, 44
(3): 149-156.
Stern. H.H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford : OUP.
Supratman, D. (2009). “Cognitive Theories”. A lecture handout.