ArticlePDF Available

Habitat correlates of Odonata species diversity in the northern Western Ghats, India

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Sixty-two localities from Sahyadri Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra State, India, were surveyed for habitat correlates of Odonata diversity. Proximate habitat variables (canopy cover , area of water spread on transect, and altitude) and broad scale environmental variables derived from climate database were used. Seventy species were recorded during the survey. Vestalis apicalis was found to be the most abundant species. Multiple regression analysis failed to resolve relationship among variables. Proximate habitat variables, except altitude, showed slightly higher contribution in shaping species richness and diversity than broad-scale habitat variables. Canonical correspondence analysis based on species abundance data and multiple variables suggested that canopy cover and area of water on the transect are driving species assemblages. Almost all of the Western Ghats endemics recorded during the survey were found to be associated with high canopy forests and streams, suggesting the critical habitat requirement of these species. The study provides baseline and local habitat association data on Odonata, which can be used as evidence in the conservation of the Sahyadri Tiger Reserve corridor which is under threat of forest felling.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
21
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
1
st
June 2015
Habitat correlates of Odonata species diversity
in the northern Western Ghats, India
Pankaj Koparde
1,2
*, Prachi Mhaske
1
& Ankur Patwardhan
1
1
Department of Biodiversity, Abasaheb Garware College, Karve road,
Pune-411004, Maharashtra, India
2
Current address: Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology & Natural History, Anaikatty
(Post), Coimbatore-641108, Tamil Nadu, India;
*
<pankajkoparde@gmail.com>
Received 10
th
May 2014; revised and accepted 22
nd
February 2015
Abstract. Sixty-two localities from Sahyadri Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra State, India, were
surveyed for habitat correlates of Odonata diversity. Proximate habitat variables (canopy cov-
er, area of water spread on transect, and altitude) and broad scale environmental variables
derived from climate database were used. Seventy species were recorded during the sur-
vey. Vestalis apicalis was found to be the most abundant species. Multiple regression analysis
failed to resolve relationship among variables. Proximate habitat variables, except altitude,
showed slightly higher contribution in shaping species richness and diversity than broad-
scale habitat variables. Canonical correspondence analysis based on species abundance data
and multiple variables suggested that canopy cover and area of water on the transect are driv-
ing species assemblages. Almost all of the Western Ghats endemics recorded during the sur-
vey were found to be associated with high canopy forests and streams, suggesting the critical
habitat requirement of these species. e study provides baseline and local habitat associa-
tion data on Odonata, which can be used as evidence in the conservation of the Sahyadri
Tiger Reserve corridor which is under threat of forest felling.
Key words. Dragony, Maharashtra, canopy cover, endemic, biodiversity, CCA, poisson
multiple regression
Introducon
Odonata, being one of the most widely studied insect groups, has been well-
documented in terms of its habitat requirements. Most Odonata are habitat
sensitive (e.g., S 2005; S et al. 2008). Presence
and/or absence of some species may indicate habitat health in terms of mi-
cro-habitat structure (e.g., O S 1996; S S
1996; S et al. 2008; G-A N-G
2010) and to some extent macro-habitat structure (S et al. 2003;
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
22
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
O 2005; C et al. 2010; D et al. 2011). Odonata species
assemblages might vary depending upon habitat quality (D  L-
2003; S et al. 2003; G-AN-G
2010). Physical habitats are oen dynamic and it is hard to depict them in
quantitative terms, as not all the environmental variables can be measured.
Although much descriptive literature on habitat/s of Odonata is available,
few studies have conducted quantitative analyses of it. Such studies are im-
portant in detecting eect of habitat loss on Odonata. Few such studies have
been used in conservation practices. Given this, it is highly important to
determine local Odonata assemblage patterns and their habitat correlates.
e Western Ghats, a global biodiversity hotspot (M et al. 2000; M-
 et al. 2011), have a rich Odonata fauna that is relatively well-
studied (F 1933, 1934, 1936; E  R 2000;
E et al. 2005; S 2005, 2007; S S-
 2005; R et al. 2010; K et al. 2012;
K S 2013; S et al. 2013; K et
al. 2014; R N 2014). A review by S (2007)
has reported 176 species from Western Ghats, of which 68 are known to
be endemic to the region. Despite this fact, the literature lacks articles on
quantitative habitat association of Indian Odonata species, apart from a few
research papers by S et al. (2005), S  S-
 (2005), D A (2007), S et
al. (2008), and K S (2013). e Western Ghats of
Maharashtra State are characterized by highly fragmented forest cover. e
fragmentation is increased by anthropogenic pressure (G et al. 2011).
Studies pertaining to Odonata of Western Ghats of Maharashtra are scarce
except for a few articles by K et al. (2012), K S-
 (2013) and Ket al. (2014). Species richness, diversity, and
composition are likely to change in response to changes in environmental
and habitat variables (e.g., S  S 2005; F S 2008).
Most of the species endemic to Western Ghats are associated with closed
forests and owing water system (S et al. 2011). e habitat
association of these species has been described by many (e.g., F 1933,
1934, 1936; S 2005; K  R 2013), in descriptive terms.
Previous studies on stream insects in Western Ghats by S
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
23
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
S (2005) suggest that genus-level richness is aected by
altitude, micro-habitat richness, canopy cover, number of dry months, and
annual rainfall in various habitats such as cascades, ries, and pools. In
another study by S et al. (2005) on similar lines, only micro-
habitat richness, canopy cover, and depth of water were found to have low
correlation with genera richness. In a highly fragmented landscape, such
as Western Ghats of Maharashtra, ne scale habitat variables (e.g., type of
aquatic system, canopy cover, and elevation) may aect Odonata diversity
more than broad-scale habitat variables (e.g., annual temperature and pre-
cipitation at the locality). Here, we hypothesize that these broad habitat vari-
ables may play a less important role in Odonata diversity than the aforemen-
tioned proximate habitat variables concerned with micro-habitat. In order
to understand the eect of dierent environmental and habitat variables on
Odonata diversity and assemblages, a study was carried out during 2011–
2013. is paper investigates how the scale of habitat correlates inuences
Odonata diversity and species composition. We also explore if the descrip-
tive literature on habitat association of endemic Odonata of Western Ghats
can be tested in a systematic framework.
Methods
Study site
Although highly fragmented, the landscape of the northern Western Ghats
retains some of the unique topographic features such as lateritic plateaux.
e part of the northern Western Ghats that lies in Maharashtra State, India,
is located roughly between 15°30’N to 20°30’N and 73°E to 74°E. Most of
this landscape is under legal protection. e largest protected area is Sahy-
adri Tiger Reserve (Fig.1), a 1,165 km²
forested landscape that lies between
16°57’N to 17°49’N and 73°35’E to 73°54’E. e core area of the Sahyadri
Tiger Reserve (STR) is 600.12 km² and the buer zone is 565.45 km². It is
spread across four districts, namely Satara, Sangli, Kolhapur, and Ratnagiri.
e forest type of the core area is primarily evergreen, semi-evergreen, and
moist deciduous forest; whereas that of the buer area is primarily dry de-
ciduous, and scrubland. Koyna wildlife sanctuary and Chandoli national
park are protected areas within the Reserve, situated on the banks of Shivsa-
gar and Vasantsagar water reservoirs respectively. e Reserve also supports
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan24
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
many inland freshwater habitats suitable for Odonata including streams,
ponds, puddles, and marshes. e bioclimate of the region is not uniform
given the topography of the landscape. e vegetation structure changes
from evergreen, moist-deciduous forest patches in the core area to dry-
deciduous, scrub-forest in the buer area. e annual temperature ranges
from 13°C to 35°C. Annual mean precipitation is 178 mm. e study area
experiences three distinct seasons: Summer (February–May; mean temper-
ature 26°C, mean precipitation 24 mm); Monsoon (June–October; mean
temperature 22°C, mean precipitation 497 mm), and Winter (November
January; mean temperature 22°C, mean precipitation 16 mm) (H et
al. 2005). e post-monsoon season (November–March) is the best season
to observe Odonata in the eld, in India (S 2005; N 2011).
Figure 1.-
veyed in northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra State, India (www.diva-gis.org/
          
Table 1.
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India 25
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Sampling and data collection
Sampling was carried out during the post-monsoon season (September
March), when Odonata activity is at its peak. Belt transects of 500 × 10 m
were used to survey Odonata. An 8×40 (magnication × lens diameter) bin-
ocular was used to observe Odonata. Records other than on transects were
noted separately. Odonata were identied using eld-guides (S
2005; N 2011) and taxonomic monographs (F 1933, 1934, 1936).
e recorded species were listed according to the classication by D
et al. (2013) and S (2014). Area of water spread and canopy
cover on transect were measured on a 0–10 scale, 0 being absence. Area of
water spread on transect was estimated by observing the proportion of area
of water spread with respect to total area of transect. e position of transect
diered for dierent wetland systems. For instance, for streams and marshes,
the transect passed through the stream; whereas for ponds and reservoirs,
the transect was placed on the shore. Canopy cover was measured at inter-
vals of 50 m, on a 500 m transect, giving 11 survey points. e mode value
of canopy cover was used for further analysis. Transects with more than
30 % (more than 3 on 0–10 scale) of area of water spread were considered to
be wetland systems, which were further classied as pond/reservoir/stream.
Transects with average canopy cover of 40 % or more (equal or greater than
4 on 0–10 scale) were considered as closed forest systems. We created new
variables by combining canopy cover and wetland systems. Each locality
was dened based on these variables. ese new variables are representa-
tive of forest-wetland systems. Table1 summarizes the forest-wetland sys-
tems. In the present study, there were no areas in which we could nd pond/
reservoir in high canopy forest. Sixty-two localities from STR were studied
for Odonata diversity and habitat correlates (Tab.2). Sampling sites were
selected randomly covering the entire STR landscape and major wetland
systems. e data on mean annual precipitation, mean summer precipita-
tion, mean monsoon precipitation, mean winter precipitation, mean annu-
al temperature, mean summer temperature, mean monsoon temperature,
mean winter temperature, mean temperature of driest quarter, and mean
precipitation of driest quarter were obtained from WorldClim database at
30’ resolution (1 km² grid) (H et al. 2005). e data on altitude was
collected in the eld using a Garmin Map 60CSx GPS. For convenience, all
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
26
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
the variables have been divided into three sets: a) proximate habitat vari-
ables include canopy cover, area of water spread on transect and altitude;
b)broad-scale habitat variables were extracted from WorldClim database;
c) forest-wetland systems.
Data analysis
For all statistical analyses R soware v3.1.1 and PAST v3.2 (H et
al. 2001) were used. For Chao1 and Chao2 estimates of species richness,
EstimateS 9.1.0 (C 2013) was used. is measure provides the best
estimate of species richness (e.g., C  C 1994; W
 M 1998; W  M 2001; C 2004). Simpsons diver-
sity index, Fisher’s alpha index, relative abundance, and relative frequency
were calculated. Each species was assigned an occurrence value based on
percentage frequency. A Poisson multiple regression analysis was used to
determine drivers of diversity. For this, proximate and broad-scale habitat
variables were used. As variables derived from climate database are oen
correlated, a Kendall’s tau correlation analysis was carried out. Variables
that were highly correlated > 0.8 or τ < -0.8 at p < 0.01) were discarded. We
Table 1. 

FWS Abbre-

AWST  Forest type Wetland
type
    
deciduous forest
NULL
Agriculture AGR    NULL
    

NULL

forest
   agriculture/scrub-land/


 SAGR   agriculture 

canopy forest
   Moist-deciduous/


Pond/reservoir in low
canopy forest
   Agriculture/scrub-land/

pond/
reservoir
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
27
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Table 2.         



   
deciduous forest.
Locality  Longitude FWS SF PA AWST 
Adoshi 17.699 73.706   6 0
Akalpe 17.733 73.687   6 0
 16.966 73.818 SAGR AGR  5 0
 16.97457 73.801221    0 7
 16.981 73.799    0 0
Arav 17.727 73.631    6 0
Atoli 17.30535 73.767214    0 8
 17.30061 73.825293    3 9
 17.581 73.864 AGR   3 0
 17.546 73.843    5 1
 17.16331 73.711052    5 8
 16.927 73.864    5 0
Golivane 17.021 73.858    2 0
 17.179 73.867    0 0
 17.075 73.819    7 3
Kasani 17.19 73.896    7 0
Kathi 1 17.495 73.807 AGR   2 0
Kathi 2 17.493 73.814    5 0
Katrewadi 1 17.6348 73.8104    2 0
 17.38966 73.657781    0 4
 17.38339 73.666205    0 1
Kharoshi 17.77756 73.639083   0 0
Kolne 1 17.32225 73.721077    3 7
Kolne 2 17.329 73.73    3 0
 17.397 73.675 AGR AGR  0 0
 17.37593 73.706932    0 0
Male 1 17.31381 73.689008    0 6
Male 2 17.2886 73.7121    4 0
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
28
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Locality  Longitude FWS SF PA AWST 
Mandur 1 17.14 73.88  AGR  7 3
Manoli 2 16.956 73.798 AGR   1 3
Manoli 16.944 73.803    5 2
 17.67682 73.723697    3 4
Navja 17.42 73.741    5 2
Nechal 17.367 73.694    0 0
Paneri 17.222 73.828    0 1
Patharpunj 15.95104 74.0001    0 7
Pophali 1 17.44329 73.650413 AGR   2 0
Pophali 2 17.43074 73.667042    0 5
Pophali 3 17.42192 73.654726    5 0
Rundiv 17.24483 73.71603    2 7
Saatar 17.221 73.758623    5 0
Siddheshwar 17.19156 73.773    0 7
Sonpatra 1 17.43396 73.693199    0 6
Sonpatra 2 17.42641 73.67334    1 0
Tanali 17.128 73.8    2 0
Thoseghar 17.593 73.849    0 0
Thoseghar S1 17.574 73.807    1 0
Thoseghar S21 17.513 73.82 AGR   2 0
Thoseghar S22 17.512 73.816    2 0
Uchat 17.75652 73.631744    5 2
Udgiri 17.07479 73.836064    0 0
 16.96138 73.848435 SAGR AGR  4 0
 16.97756 73.846364    4 2
 17.72765 73.588185   0 7
 17.715 73.605325    1 3
 17.4256 73.649428    4 1
 17.439 73.847 AGR   2 0
 17.55484 73.828   0 5
 17.557 73.811   0 0
 17.232 73.722    4 4
West Kusawade 17.5071 73.737405    3 2
 17.57833 73.7459   0 7
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
29
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
ran twelve Poisson multiple regression models to check the eect of various
variables on Simpsons diversity index and Fisher’s alpha index. ese mod-
els include proximate and broad-scale habitat variables in combination, as
well as in separate analyses. e signicance of each model was tested us-
ing a goodness of t test. If the test is statistically signicant, it suggests
that the data does not t the model. A canonical correspondence analysis
(CCA) was performed on species abundance data and all variable datasets.
A Monte-Carlo permutation test (n = 10,000) was performed on CCA for
signicance testing. A cluster analysis using the Bray-Curtis algorithm was
carried out with 10,000 bootstraps to understand overlap and uniqueness of
species between dierent forest-wetland systems in terms of species com-
position.
Results
Diversity and distribution of Odonata of Sahyadri Tiger Reserve
A total of 70 species of Odonata belonging to 45 genera and ten families
represented by 1,215 individuals was recorded during the survey. 64 species
were recorded on transects. 43 species belonged to the suborder Anisoptera,
and 27 species belonged to the suborder Zygoptera. Table 3 summarizes the
records. e Chao1 estimate of species richness ranged from 64–114 and
Chao2 ranged from 67–140. Vestalis apicalis Selys, 1873 was found to be
the most abundant species followed by Trithemis aurora (Burmeister, 1839)
and Pantala avescens (Fabricius, 1798) (Tab.3). Diplacodes trivialis (Ram-
bur, 1842) was the most widespread species in the study area followed by
P.aves cens and Trithemis festiva (Rambur, 1842). e most diverse locality
for Odonata fauna was Vakoli 1, followed by Uchat and Male 2.
Eect of habitat variables on Odonata diversity and species richness
In a preliminary correlation analysis on multiple variables, mean tempera-
ture and precipitation of summer, monsoon, winter, and driest quarter were
discarded. Altitude and mean annual temperature were highly negatively
correlated = -0.96814, p = 0.00000001), therefore eect of altitude was
checked separately and all the analyses were re-run substituting altitude in
place of mean annual temperature. Table 4 summarizes output of models
1–12.
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
30
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Table 3.-
        
-



No Taxon RA Oc Hcf Shcf Lcf Slcf Plcf Agr Sagr

1 Lestes elatus Hagen in Selys, 1862 0.0016 R
2 Lestes umbrinus Selys, 1891 0.0016 R

3 Protoscta hearseyi 0.0091 R

4 Vestalis apicalis Selys, 1873 0.0857 
5 Vestalis gracilis 0.0016 

6 Libellago lineata 0.0016 R
7 Heliocypha bisignata Hagen in Selys,
1853
0.0272 

8 Euphaea fraseri 0.0124 R

9 Copera marginipes 0.0247 
10 Copera viata Selys, 1863 0.0033 R
11 Caconeura ramburi 0.0058 
12 Disparoneura quadrimaculata

0.0198 
13 Elaoneura nigerrima (Laidlaw, 1917) 0.0041 R
14 Prodasineura vercalis (Selys, 1860) 0.0058 

15 Aciagrion hisopa (Selys, 1876) 0.014 
16 Aciagrion occidentale Laidlaw, 1919 0.0049 R
17 Aciagrion pallidum Selys, 1891 0.0025 
18 Agriocnemis pygmaea 0.0066 
19 Agriocnemis splendidissima Laidlaw,
1919
0.066 
20 Ceriagrion coromandelianum
(Fabricius, 1798)
0.0008 R
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
31
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
No Taxon RA Oc Hcf Shcf Lcf Slcf Plcf Agr Sagr
21 Ceriagrion olivaceum Laidlaw, 1914 0.0041 
22 Ischnura aurora 0.0016 R
23 Ischnura senegalensis
24 Pseudagrion decorum
25 Pseudagrion indicum 0.0016 R
26 Pseudagrion microcephalum

0.0041 
27 Pseudagrion rubriceps Selys, 1876 0.0412 
Aeshnidae Leach, 1815
28 Anax guatus 0.0008 R
29 Anax immaculifrons 0.0115 
30 Gynacaha bayadera Selys, 1891 0.0066 
31 Gynacaha dravida 0.0016 R

32 Gomphidia kodaguensis  0.0008 R
33 Heliogomphus promelas  0.0008 R
34 Icnogomphus rapax
35 Paragomphus lineatus (Selys, 1850) 0.0016 R

36 Epophthalmia viata 0.0016 R
37 Macromia  0.0025 R
Libellulidae Leach, 1815
38 Acisoma panorpoides 0.0016 R
39 Brachythemis contaminata
(Fabricius, 1793)
0.0033 R
40 Bradinopyga geminata 0.0107 
41 Cralia lineata Förster, 1903 0.0091 
42 Crocothemis servilia 0.0346
43 Diplacodes trivialis 0.0816
44 Hylaeothemis indica Fraser, 1946 0.0008 R
45 Idionyx spp. Hagen, 1867 0.0008 R
46 Indothemis carnaca (Fabricius, 1798) 0.0016 R
47 Lathrecista asiaca (Fabricius, 1798) 0.1402 
48 Neurothemis fulvia 0.0157 
49 Neurothemis intermedia
1842)
0.0239 
50 Neurothemis tullia 0.0016 R
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
32
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Eect of habitat variables on Odonata species assemblage
e CCA was statistically signicant based on Monte Carlo permutation
test (n = 10000) at p = 0.001 for the rst two axes. Axis 1 and axis 2 captured
31.48 % and 14.96 % of variation in data respectively. Area of water spread
on transect and canopy cover exerted strongest inuence on rst two axes
(Tab.5). Axis 1 was inuenced by canopy cover and axis 2 by area of water
spread on transects (Fig.2). e Bray-Curtis cluster analysis was supported
by a cophenetic correlation coecient of 0.9103. It showed that closed for-
est localities form a separate group in terms of species composition with
respect to other localities. Within low canopy forest areas, streams in low
canopy forest areas form a separate group (Fig.3).
No Taxon RA Oc Hcf Shcf Lcf Slcf Plcf Agr Sagr
51 Onychothemis testacea
52 Orthetrum chrysis
53 Orthetrum glaucum 0.0132 
54 Orthetrum luzonicum 0.0107 
55 Orthetrum pruinosum
1839)
0.042 
56 Orthetrum sabina 0.0313
57 Orthetrum taeniolatum (Schneider,
1845)
0.0322 
58 Orthetrum triangulare
59 Palpopleura sexmaculata (Fabricius,
1787)
0.0033 
60 Pantala avescens (Fabricius, 1798) 0.0816
61 Potamarcha congener 0.0025 
62 Rhodothemis rufa 0.0008 R
63 Tholymis llarga (Fabricius, 1798) 0.0041 
64 Tramea basilaris
1807)
0.0049 
65 Tramea limbata 0.0049 
66 Trithemis aurora 0.0824
67 Trithemis fesva 0.0684
68 Trithemis kirbyi Selys, 1891 0.0074 
69 Trithemis pallidinervis (Kirby, 1889) 0.0008 R
70 Zygonyx iris Kirby, 1869 0.0016 R
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
33
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Table 4. 
-
-

No Model
Goodness of

Model

Results
1


 NO


2

ALT
 NO


3   NO


4   NO


5   

of any variables
6   

of any variables
7   

of any variables
8   

of any variables
9   NO


10   NO


11   NO


12   NO

of any variables
Table 5. -
respondence analysis.
  Axis 1 Axis 2
AWST Area of water spread on transect -0.31505 -0.46876
  0.908706 -0.2412
ALT  0.063418 0.324567
PPT  0.199895 -0.08853
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
34
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
  Axis 1 Axis 2
  -0.08561 -0.31314
 Pond/reservoir in low canopy forest -0.22914 0.031612
SAGR  -0.13576 -0.19749
 High canopy forest 0.771148 -0.12779
  0.291415 -0.16173
  -0.26073 -0.48257
AGR  -0.23825 0.170657
 Low canopy forest -0.25416 0.559464
AH Aciagrion hisopa -0.17007 -1.17183
AO Aciagrion occidentale -0.88573 -1.08728
AP Aciagrion pallidium 0.840023 -0.53094
APan Acisoma panorpoides -0.7317 -1.64806
Apyg Agriocnemis pygmya -0.81358 0.161933
AS Agriocnemis splendidissima -0.3866 -1.28271
AG Anax guatus -0.8209 2.06463
AI Anax immaculifrons -0.11968 -0.13052
 Brachythemis contaminata -0.41514 1.87693
 Bradinopyga geminata -0.12105 0.04665
 Caconeura ramburi 2.90255 -0.19429
 Ceriagrion coromandelianum -0.11607 -2.02898
 Ceriagrion olivaceum 1.35895 -0.64487
 Copera marginipes -0.51656 -1.55066
 Copera viata 1.62109 -0.50493
 Cralla lineata 1.71031 0.28603
 Crocothemis servilia -0.36506 0.113149
 Diplacodes trivialis -0.596 1.79608
 Disparoneura quadrimaculata -0.54781 -0.91932
 Elaoneura nigerrima -0.77748 -1.64685
 Epophthalmia viata -0.47128 1.04956
 Euphaea fraseri 2.20991 -0.47546
GK Gomphidia kodaguensis 0.319412 2.31644
 Gynacantha bayadera 1.45126 0.034593
 Gynacantha dravida 0.136866 -0.01031
HP Heliogomphus promelas 3.11169 -0.21512
HI Hylaeothemis indica 3.11169 -0.21512
Isp Idionyx sp. 3.11169 -0.21512
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
35
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
  Axis 1 Axis 2
 Indothemis carnaca -0.77581 1.4425
IA Ischnura aurora -0.76071 1.36924
LA Lathrecista asiaca 1.35767 0.243602
 Lestes elatus -0.25383 3.21404
LU Lestes umbrinus -0.58309 -0.53566
LL Libellago lineata -0.42904 -0.03508
Msp Macromia sp. 2.13695 -0.408
NF Neurothemis fulvia 0.422692 -0.26085
NI Neurothemis intermedia 0.09702 -0.20195
NT Neurothemis tullia 0.154605 -1.6177
OG Orthetrum glaucum -0.05074 0.552532
OL Orthetrum luzonicum -0.68201 -0.47811
OP Orthetrum pruinosum -0.53654 0.245645
OS Orthetrum sabina -0.62998 0.286743
OT Orthetrum taeniolatum -0.59983 1.01873
PS Palpopleura sexmaculata -0.32919 -1.73163
PF Pantala avescens -0.5233 1.5364
PL Paragomphus lineatus -0.69852 -1.84859
 Potamarcha congener -0.41571 0.913003
 Prodasineura vercalis -0.62318 -1.45403
PH Protoscta hearseyi 2.84585 -0.26773
PI Pseudagrion indicum -0.7317 -1.64806
PM Pseudagrion microcephalum -0.20332 -1.21093
PR Pseudagrion rubriceps -0.67421 -1.20751
 Rhinocypha bisignata 0.007045 -0.86936
RR Rhodothemis rufa -0.50573 2.84
TT Tholymis llarga 0.500541 -0.4299
 Tramea basilaris 0.356902 1.18236
TL Tramea limbata -0.49017 0.972019
TA Trithemis aurora -0.63741 -0.47091
TF Trithemis fesva -0.56165 -0.60919
TK Trithemis kirbyi -0.76246 -1.42525
TP Trithemis pallidinervis -0.54835 2.68694
Vestalis apicalis 2.20657 0.249879
 Vestalis gracilis 1.31079 -0.06045
ZI Zygonyx iris 1.26974 -0.30099
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
36
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Discussion
e taxonomy and natural history of the Odonata of India is well known,
but few studies from India have focused on quantitative habitat correlates
of diversity and habitat associations. Species diversity and composition are
likely to change with respect to changes in micro-habitat and other environ-
mental variables. Detecting the relation between variables that might aect
species presence is crucial to understand gain or loss of species diversity
and to answer which species might get aected the most if environment or
habitat changes. is becomes important if species in question are endemic
or threatened. During this study, we were interested to know, given a set of
environmental variables, which variables might aect diversity and species
composition the most. All the localities in the study area were apparently
non-polluted, and are dicult to reach by roads. erefore, the inuence
of anthropogenic disturbance on all the sampling sites was either absent or
minimal. Most of the sampling was done in the post-monsoon season, when
Odonata activity is at its peak. e observed number of species, i.e., 70, falls
between the expected range of Chao1 (n = 64–114) and Chao2 (n = 67–
Figure 2.        
-


Ghats. Text in red colour shows habitat variables.
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
37
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
Figure 3. 
Reserve, northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra State, India. Nodal values show

140), suggesting that the study successfully recorded a near complete list of
Odonata in the study area. We recorded one species which was not previ-
ously known from Maharashtra State namely, Gomphidia kodaguensis Fra-
ser, 1923, which is known from central and southern Western Ghats (Goa,
Karnataka, and Kerala; R  N 2014). A single specimen was
observed at Valvan. During the study we also obtained multiple records of
Elattoneura nigerrima (Laidlaw, 1917), Onychothemis testacea Laidlaw, 1902,
and Zygonyx iris Kirby, 1869, which are under-recorded from the northern
Western Ghats (F 1933; B et al. 2013; K et al. 2014).
e Poisson multiple regression analysis on species richness (models 1–4,
table 4) indicate eect of canopy cover, area of water spread on transect, and
annual mean precipitation, but not all the predicted models had a good t
to the data. Models based on Simpsons diversity index (models 5–8, table 4)
were statistically signicant (models tted data), but did not show any eect
of variables on the diversity index. e regression analysis on Fisher’s alpha
index (models 9–12) showed that canopy cover and area of water spread on
transect are aecting diversity index values; however the models did not
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
38
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
have a good t to the data. To check the eect of broad-scale habitat varia-
bles, i.e., mean annual temperature and precipitation, and proximate habitat
variables, i.e., canopy cover, area of water spread on transect, and altitude,
we carried out the analyses in combination as well as separately. In all the
analyses, there was no statistical signicance relating the variables to diver-
sity index or species richness. Diversity and species richness indices sum-
marize abundance and species number data in a single value. As dierent
species may respond dierently to changes in environment, summarizing
them in a single variable may result in loss of data. is might be the rea-
son behind failure of the multiple regression analysis to identify any signi-
cant variables. e multiple regression analysis shows that all the proximate
habitat variables, except altitude, inuence species richness and diversity as
compared to broad-scale environmental variables in the study area. Howev-
er, in all these models we did not nd a case where the model tted the data
and the variables in the model showed statistically signicant eect on de-
pendent variables. S  S (2005) and S-
 et al. (2005) found that altitude, micro-habitat complexity, canopy
cover, number of dry months, and annual rainfall were driving diversity and
distribution of stream insect communities in Kudremukh national park,
Western Ghats. In their studies, mean annual temperature did not show a
signicant correlation with diversity and distribution of aquatic insects. In
the present study, we did not nd correlation between mean annual tem-
perature and diversity and species richness of Odonata, but could recover
weak eect of canopy cover. Further, we found a weak eect of area of water
spread on transect on diversity and species richness of Odonata. S-
 S (2005) and S et al. (2005) looked
at aquatic insect communities and present study restricts to Odonata. is
might limit the power of comparison of results obtained.
To explore the eect of dierent habitat variables on species composition,
we performed canonical correspondence analysis. CCA revealed that can-
opy cover and area of water spread on transect are driving species com-
position, as compared to other variables (Fig.2; Tab.5). Proximate habi-
tat variables, except altitude, were found to be major driver for changes in
species assemblages. O (2005) reports that shading, water speed and
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
39
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
water permanence aected Odonata species assemblages in a study done
at Papua New Guinea. O (2005) measured shading in terms of percent
of shade on water body, which is analogous but not same as that of canopy
cover. Most of the Western Ghats endemic species recorded during the sur-
vey were found to be associated with high canopy cover, high canopy for-
ests, and streams in high canopy forests (Fig.2). Bray-Curtis cluster analysis
(Fig.3) also showed a similar trend with high canopy forests having very low
similarity in species composition as compared to other forest-wetland sys-
tems. e pattern of Western Ghats endemic species associated with dense
forests has been discussed by F (1933, 1934, 1936), S et
al. (2011), and K  R (2013). Similar studies from Mt. Hamiguitan
wildlife sanctuary in the Philippines by VM (2010)
has reported that dense montane forests showed high number of species
endemic to Mindanao as compared to other forest types.
Although lot of descriptive literature on habitat association of Indian
Odonata is available, quantitative testing of the same has not been attempt-
ed before. In the present study, we found a similar habitat association of
species from Western Ghats of Maharashtra, as described in literature. Most
of endemic species recorded in the study were found to be associated with
high canopy cover and streams. According to S et al. (2011),
endemic Odonata of Western Ghats are mostly found in riverine habitats
such as montane streams and rivers. Western Ghats endemics like Proto-
sticta hearseyi Fraser, 1922 and Euphaea fraseri (Laidlaw, 1920) are known
to inhabit montane streams in dense forests (F 1933, 1934, 1936;
S  2005; N 2011). Heliogomphus promelas (Selys, 1873) and
Caconeura sp. occur in good water and forest quality (N 2011). Most
of the localities in which these species were recorded were either semi-ev-
ergreen or moist-deciduous forests. Species, other than those endemic to
Western Ghats, showed consensus in their habitat association as described
in literature and observed during the present study. For instance Lestes ela-
tus Hagen in Selys, 1862, is known to inhabit ponds or lakes (S-
 2005; N 2011) in scrub jungles during the post-monsoon and drier
season (F 1933). Similarly, Indothemis carnatica (Fabricius, 1798) is
known to inhabit heavily weeded ponds and lakes. During our study, we
found both these species near ponds with low or no canopy cover (Fig.2).
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
40
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
In the present study we considered only three proximate habitat variables
viz. canopy cover, area of water spread on transect and altitude, which may
not represent overall eect of all the proximate habitat variables such as wa-
ter quality, water ow-rate, substrate structure, and vegetation structure in
combination, on species assemblage. Adding more continuous habitat vari-
ables to the analysis may be more informative on the eect of habitat change
on Odonata diversity.
e tiger corridor between Koyna wildlife sanctuary and Chandoli national
park is highly fragmented in terms of forest cover. Most of the new records
were observed in Bahe, Atoli, and Kolne 1 localities, all of which fall in the
corridor area. Other than these areas, Chandel and Rundiv locality of Chan-
doli national park (Fig.1) were found to be rich in endemic species. e
corridor area has smaller patches of forest, which are under high pressure of
wood-cutting by local villagers. Developmental activities such as wind-mills
and road widening were observed to be the causal agents of habitat distur-
bance. Studies have shown that anthropogenic disturbances can have detri-
mental eects on Odonata species (M 2009; VM-
 2010) or may aect species assemblage (D A
2007; R  MI 2009; K  S 2013). S-
 et al. (2011) points towards agricultural pollution and urban and
industrial development as the major threats to the Odonata fauna of West-
ern Ghats. Many endemic species are narrowly distributed across Western
Ghats, occurring in only small patches of suitable habitats (S
et al. 2011; K et al. 2014). To ensure conservation of such species,
it is highly important to protect their micro-habitats, especially closed for-
ested streams. e core areas of Sahyadri Tiger Reserve are under legal pro-
tection and with current status of the population of endemic species, it is
easy to conserve them. However, the conservation of the species in buer
areas, especially in the corridor area, is highly dependent on conservation
of forests within.
Acknowledgments
e present study was supported under the Indian Space Research Organ-
ization-University of Pune collaboration initiative. We thank Dr M.C. Ut-
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
41
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
tam, Director of ISRO-UoP for his encouragement. Dr. K.A. Subramanian
of ZSI, Kolkata, was always helpful in conrming the identication of the
specimens. We are thankful to him for reviewing the rst dra of manu-
script. We also thank forest department sta of Sahyadri Tiger Reserve for
their help. We also thank Principal, Abasaheb Garware College, Pune, for
his support. Field level support and assistance from post-graduate students
and research sta of Department of Biodiversity, Garware college, is grate-
fully acknowledged. We also thank the anonymous referees for their critical
comments.
References
      
  Records
of the Zoological Survey of India 347: 1-60
    
    
odonate richness and diversity with eleva-
      -
-
  Insect Conservaon and
Diversity 3: 302-312


-

   -
     
    

  -
   
 Philosophical Transacons
of the Royal Society of London 
Sciences) 345: 101-118
     2003. Odo-

upper Guinean forest. Archiv für Hydrobio
lo gie 157: 397-412
     




 2013.
     -
 
   
 

Zootaxa 3703 (1): 1-82
    S. 2007. An-
    
Journal
of Insect Science 7: 1-9
       

rain forest as indicators of changes in bio-

Tropical Zoology 24: 1-9
    
    
Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Records of
the Zoological Survey of India 98: 157-167

-


P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
42
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
      
    -
est lakes: rapid species turnover driven by
  Insect Conservaon and
Diversity 1: 169-179
       -

 Taylor and Francis, London
       -

 Taylor and Francis, London
       -

 Taylor and Francis, London

      -
     
     
 2011. Report of the
Western Ghats ecology expert panel. Part I.
     

    
2010. Richness and structure of an Odonata
-
 
Odonatologica
39: 305-318
      
-
sion 1.89. University of Oslo, Oslo
     
-
    
global land areas. Internaonal Journal of
Climatology 25: 1965-1978
      
    

Sciences, Kerala
      A.
  

Jour
nal of threatened Taxa 6: 5744-5754
 A.  K.A. 2013.
     -
nata (Insecta) of Mula and Mutha river ba-
sins, Maharashtra, India. Journal of threat
ened Taxa 5: 4084-4095

2012. Insecta: Odonata. In:
Fauna of Maharashtra: State Fauna Series
20: 397-428. Zoological Survey of India,
Kolkata
     -

   
      
isoptera). Odonatologica 38: 247-255
    
 2011. Glo-
    
       
    -
 -
-
berg
   
-
    -
Nature 403: 853-858
   
of Orissa and eastern India. Wildlife Organi-


      
     
rainforest in Papua New Guinea. Interna
onal Journal of Odonatology 8: 243-257
Habitat correlates of Odonata in northern Western Ghats, India
43
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43
-
     -
terns at new ponds in South Africa. Odona
tologica 25: 49-58
  2014. Further ad-
      
Goa, India. Journal of threatened Taxa 6:
5585-5589
   
O.
of Goa. Journal of threatened Taxa 2: 805-
814
      -
    

anthropogenic disturbance. Insect Conser
vaon and Diversity 2: 73-80
      
    
     -
Bio
logical Conservaon 78: 279-288
 2003.
   
-
ate approach. Hydrobiologia 497: 169-180
    


    -
nates of the Western Ghats: Habitat dis-
     


 K.A. 2014. A checklist of
Odonata (Insecta) of India. Zoological Sur-
vey of India, Kolkata


     
Ghats. Current Science 89: 976-987
   

      -
Journal
of Insect Science 5: 1-10.
     
2008. Odonata as indicators of riparian

western Karnataka, India. Fraseria (NS) 7:
83-95
     
      
    
      
      
     
bio diversity in the Western Ghats, India:
    


2013. Idionyx

species. Zootaxa 3652: 277-288
      -

     
diversity. Biodiversity & Conservaon 14:
165-178
-
versity and status of Odonata across veg-
     
Asian Journal of
Biodiversity 1: 25-35
    2001. Species
    
Ibis 143:
413-419
      -
    
  Parasitology 116:
395-405
P. Koparde, P. Mhaske & A. Patwardhan
44
Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 21-43Odonatologica 44(1/2) 2015: 44
... In India, there have only been scarce attempts to understand the determinants of Odonata diversity. Koparde et al. (2015) showed that canopy cover and area of water on the transect drive species assemblages in the northern Western Ghats. Although the Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics 2025  11 (in press) Indian odonate fauna is well described in terms of adult taxonomy, their ecology and distribution remain understudied . ...
Article
Full-text available
Odonata diversity of the Kuruva Islands in Wayanad, a part of the Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot in southern India, was studied for a year using transect counts. A total of 59 species were recorded of which 7 are endemic to the Western Ghats. Herb cover, shrub cover, open space, water pH, air temperature, and a composite water chemistry variable incorporating conductivity, TDS, and salinity emerged as the most important predictors of Odonata diversity. The distribution of the endemic and Vulnerable Disparoneura apicalis (Fraser, 1924) in the islands is influenced by particular species of plants that act as their perching posts and ovipositing sites. It is recommended that the tourists visiting the Kuruva Islands be sensitized about the importance of the place as an odonate habitat. The highly range-restricted D. apicalis can be made a flagship species for the conservation of this unique ecosystem.
... Their potential richness and relationships with their habitats in the tropics are not well understood. There have been few ecological analyses on Odonate in the context of India [14][15][16][17][18] . In this overview, studies on dragonflies in general and a few particular species that really are related to diversity and habitat are highlighted. ...
Article
Full-text available
One of the most prevalent insects flying over forests, fields, meadows, lakes, and streams are dragonflies and damselflies, which are collectively known to as odonates. The number of living species worldwide is about 6,000. With more over 500 species currently known, India is very diversified. One of the oldest groups of insects is the odonata. It first originated along with mayflies during the Carboniferous era, some 250 million years ago (Ephemeroptera). Monsters include up the Odonata group from the Carboniferous period; for instance, Meganeuropsis americana from that time had wingspan of 71 cm, which is almost as long as a pigeon. Ancient insect species like dragonflies and mayflies were some of the first to acquire wings and take to the air. Dragonflies have perfected the art of flight and are still skilled acrobats. The order Odonata is divided into three categories depending on morphology: the Anisozygoptera, the Zygoptera, and the dragonflies (Anisoptera). Epiophlebia laidlawi, one of the two species mostly in suborder Anisozygoptera, is documented from Darjeeling. In the field, dragonflies and damselflies are easily distinguished. Although their morphologies are very different, they have similar overall life histories.
... Lestes concinnus is known to inhabit habitats with long dried grass (Fraser 1933) and streams, ponds and reservoirs in low canopy forests (Koparde 2015). In Sri Lanka, Lestes concinnus is only known from the coastal habitats with dry grasslands and dense reed patches (Figs 4, 5) in the north-western part of the country (Fig. 6). ...
Article
Full-text available
Lestes concinnus is a widespread species in tropical Asia and Oceania. It is a species known to have variable colour patterns ranging between pale and dark phenotypes which have earlier been recognized as distinct species. Lestes concinnus has never been known from Sri Lanka before. We report observations of both phenotypes of the species and intermediate morphs of Lestes concinnus from coastal habitats with dry reed patches in the northern part of the country, adding it to the Odonata fauna of Sri Lanka. With multiple field observations examined, we also provide comments on its identification and natural history in the country.
... A total of 419 specimens of Odonata under 5 families, 10 genera and 10 species was observed, with Libellulidae being more speciose (6 species) followed by Euphaeidae (2) (Table 2). The dominance of Libellulidae has been previously reported from other parts of the Western Ghats (Subramanian et al., 2008;Koparde et al., 2015). Libellulidae occur commonly in the plains, semi evergreen forests, moist deciduous forests, coastal swamps (Subramanian et al., 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
A total of 419 individuals under 5 families, 10 genera and 10 species of Odonata were observed in the present study on the Odonata from a coffee ecosystem at the lower Palni Hills, Tamil Nadu, India. Among these, the family Libellulidae included six species followed by Euphaeidae (2), and Chlorocyphidae, Coenagrionidae and Aeshnidae (1 each). The dominant species were: Pantala flavescens (44.40%) > Diplacodes trivialis (22.70%) > Orthetrum chrysis (7.40%). Pantala flavescens was maximum during northeast monsoon season (50.0%) followed by summer and winter (43.8% each). Margalef index of species richness was maximum (2.00) during winter, and that of Simpson index was maximum (0.75) during south west monsoon. Shannon-Wiener index of dominance was maximum (1.75) during summer. The species were evenly distributed during summer with Pielou’s evenness index value of 0.76.
... The Odonata fauna of the state is well-reported through several studies conducted since the beginning of the twentieth century (Laidlaw, 1917;Fraser, 1919;1933;1934;1936). Then, many authors have significantly contributed to the taxonomy, diversity, and distribution of odonates of the Maharashtra State (Prasad, 1996;Babu et al., 2009;Babu & Nandy, 2010;Tiple, 2012;Tiple et al., 2013;Tiple et al., 2014;Kulkarni & Subramanian, 2013;Koparde et al., 2014;Koparde et al., 2015;Koparde et al., 2019;Jere et al., 2020;Mujumdar et al., 2020). The most recently updated Odonata list of Maharashtra compiled by Tiple & Koparde (2015) and Konkan region of the State. ...
Article
Full-text available
The occurrences of Macromidia donaldi donaldi (Fraser, 1924) and Merogomphus longistigma (Fraser, 1922) are reported for the first time in the northern Western Ghats of India. The observations are the northernmost records of these species. Detailed descriptions, diagnostic characters and a comparison on with closely related species are provided.
... Lestes concinnus is known to inhabit habitats with long dried grass (Fraser 1933) and streams, ponds and reservoirs in low canopy forests (Koparde 2015). In Sri Lanka, Lestes concinnus is only known from the coastal habitats with dry grasslands and dense reed patches (Figs 4, 5) in the north-western part of the country (Fig. 6). ...
Article
Full-text available
Lestes concinnus is a widespread species in tropical Asia and Oceania. It is a species known to have variable colour patterns ranging between pale and dark phenotypes which have earlier been recognized as distinct species. Lestes concinnus has never been known from Sri Lanka before. We report observations of both phenotypes of the species and intermediate morphs of Lestes concinnus from coastal habitats with dry reed patches in the northern part of the country, adding it to the Odonata fauna of Sri Lanka. With multiple field observations examined, we also provide comments on its identification and natural history in the country.
... The four (4) new records to the district and 3 endemic species were recorded from the wetlands of rural which found associated with the closed forested streams of Kallar and Siruvani forests. There is a contrasting variation in the diversity of species between rural and urban wetlands due to the availability of vegetation, shade cover which favours the habitat of odonata in the wetlands of rural are found in this study which is supported by the earlier works of (Pushparaj and Natraj, 2014) and (Koparde et al., 2015). The presence of marginal vegetation such as water hyacinth, water lilies, sedges, bushes and grasses in the wetlands enhance the distribution of odonata, which proved to be correct in the Singanallur lake (Arulprakash and Gunathilagaraj, 2010a). ...
Article
Full-text available
We collected environmental and habitat data for nymphs of 12 dragonfly species (Odonata: Anisoptera) from 91 stream sites throughout eastern Texas, including urban and non-urban locations. Understanding the relationship of dragonflies to habitat structure and other environmental variables is crucial for the purpose of conserving these insects and better using them as predictive tools for water quality assessments, and refining tolerance values. The objectives of this study were to determine the key environmental variables influencing the diversity and distribution of dragonflies in eastern Texas streams, and further determine if differences in those factors could be observed between urban and nonurban sites. We collected samples separately from benthic habitats and woody snag habitats. Significantly fewer sites were observed to have dragonfly species on snag habitat (mean = 1.25) compared to benthic samples (mean = 14.67) (t-test, p = 0.001). The number of dragonfly species collected among non-urban streams (mean = 9.83) was not significantly different than urban streams (mean = 6.08; t-test, p = 0.07). Detrended correspondence analysis of benthic and snag habitat data collected from non-urban and urban locations showed that most of the species are oriented most closely to benthic habitats in non-urban streams. Snag habitat was shown to be poorly ordinated for all of the species. A canonical correspondence analysis of 29 water quality and habitat variables as environmental determinants of dragonfly diversity and distribution showed that distributional relationships among species are complex and often described by multiple environmental factors.
Article
Full-text available
Adult Odonata species assemblage patterns were studied at 8 ponds near Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Different ponds had different assemblages. Strong inferential evidence from multivariate analysis and correlation suggested that the main determinants of assemblage patterns were certain biotic and abiotic environmental variables. In other words, assembly 'rules' may be governed more by factors external to the taxon than by interspecific competition. Larger ponds were not necessarily richer in species than smaller ponds because factors such as water quality, vegetation type and microsite diversity overrode biotope size. Species richness was greatest at shallow, well-vegetated ponds with clear, oxygenated water. Such ponds provide suitable conditions for both larvae and adults. Sunlight/shade and marginal/submerged vegetation gradients were the main drivers of assembly patterns at the ponds. Species assemblage patterns were determined by several variables acting together. In turn, the assemblage patterns at each pond were influenced by different variables representing different ecological successional stages.
Article
Full-text available
The study reports the results from surveys for Odonates in the State of Goa over 19 months during 2007-2008. A total of 66 species of Odonates were documented with 34 new species records from the State. The present study has resulted in an increase of 47.30% in the number of species reported from Goa to 74 from the existing 39. Family Libellulidae dominated the odonate community with 32 species followed by Coenagrionidae with 14 species. Orthetrum sabina was the most abundant species while seven species were documented only once during the survey period. More survey effort are needed to completely document the odonate species diversity of the state.
Article
Full-text available
The paper reports 13 new records of Odonata from the State of Goa. Of these five species are endemic to the Western Ghats. The study also adds one family Macromiidae (Anisoptera) not reported earlier from the State. With this addition of 13 species, 87 species of odonates are currently known from the state.
Article
Full-text available
Catchment landscape degradation and habitat modifications of freshwater ecosystems are a primary cause of biodiversity loss in riverine ecosystems all over the world. Many elements of the flora and fauna of freshwater ecosystems are sensitive to the changes in catchment land use and habitat modification. These sensitive taxa are also reliable indicators of freshwater ecosystem health. In the current study we investigate the seasonal and habitat distribution of Odonata (Insecta) across riparian land use types in Mula and Mutha river basins, northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra. There was a difference in the species composition across land use types and across seasons with highest diversity and abundance during the post monsoon period. The highest Odonata diversity was observed in urban areas followed by forest and agriculture fields. There was a loss of 31% of the odonate fauna in the study area over 50 years which could be due to rapid industrialization and urbanization of the region and consequent degradation of freshwater ecosystems. The significance of catchment land use on Odonata diversity and its value in landscape monitoring is discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The odon. larval assemblage from Río Pinolapa (RP) in the municipality of Tepal-catepec, Michoacán, is described. Sampling was conducted twice in each season (8 trips in total), and additionally some physicochemical variables of the river channel were recorded. Strata (shores, riffles and eddies) and seasonal variation of assemblag-es are described and compared using classical diversity measures such as Shannon's diversity index, Simpson's diversity index as a dominance measure, Margalef's rich-ness index and Pielou's evenness index. For comparing strata and seasonal diversity the Renyi's diversity profiles were used. A Cluster Analysis was performed on a Bray--Curtis similarity matrix to explore the faunal relationships among year seasons and strata. CCA was also performed to investigate the relationships between the physi-cochemical and species abundance matrixes. As results, 28 spp. (12 Zygoptera and 16 Anisoptera) were recorded as larvae. Most abundant species were Erpetogomphus elaps, Brechmorhoga praecox and Phyllogomphoides luisi. The highest number of spp. was registered in winter and the lowest in summer. Among strata the highest abun-dance was recorded in riffles, although the shoreline had the largest number of spp. The most similar assemblages were those of autumn and winter. Shore habitats were more heterogeneous than eddies and riffles and this could explain the larger number of species. The Clench's model explains better the data. Additionally, we used the slope of cumulative number of spp. curve for assessing completeness of the RP list. CCA was significant, with pH, autumn, shoreline and riffles the most important vari-ables. This means that species variation is related to physicochemical, temporal and strata conditions in RP.
Article
Full-text available
Odonates were surveyed across 10 localities from Western Ghats of Maharashtra State, India during 2011-2013. We recorded 64 species belonging to 40 genera and 12 families. Seven species are new records for the region, and four out of them are new records for Maharashtra State. In this paper, we discuss these species records and their micro-habitats, and update previous knowledge on distribution of odonates.
Article
The status and distribution of Idionyx Hagen, 1867 (Odonata: Corduliidae), of the Western Ghats, India, is updated and a new species Idionyx gomantakensis is described and illustrated based on male and female specimens from Kulem (= Collem), Goa, India. This new species can be differentiated from other species of Idionyx by long and slender cerci and epiproct, absence of teeth in the basal half of the cerci, and a tuft of golden hairs at the end of the lateral lobes of the epiproct. A revised key to the species of the genus is provided, and its diversity and ecology in the Western Ghats is discussed.
Article
Diversity and status of odonata in Mt. Hamiguitan Wildlife Sanctuary was determined after a year of sampling in five vegetation types: agroecosystem (400 masl), dipterocarp (900 masl), montane (1200 masl), mossy (1400 masl) and pygmy (1600 masl) using 2-Km transect walk sampling to provide information on species richness trend and ecological status of odonata. Study showed 31 species with 94% endemism for damselflies and 33.3% for dragonflies. Species richness and endemism were low in agroecosystem H’=0.631 and 1 endemic; high and increasing in the dipterocarp H’=2.298 and 4 endemic to dense montane forest with H’= 3.056 and 18 endemic; decreasing in mossy H’=2.036 and pygmy H’=1.846. The effects of disturbance on diversity showed highest in agroecosystem (d=83%), mossy and pygmy had intermediate value d=27% and d=24%. Low disturbance was observed in Montane d=10%, dipterocarp d=18.5%. Bray-curtis similarity index for species composition showed four discernible clusters of habitats. Results suggest that odonata has preference for dense forest, undisturbed vegetation, optimum temperature and presence of aquatic habitat. Keywords - Status of odonata, dragonflies, damselflies,