ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

This is an overview of the academic and intellectual contribution of John L. Harper to the study of, and development of, plant ecology as a science. The article includes a complete list of his publications.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 1/40
JohnL.Harper
RoyTurkington
LASTMODIFIED:29APRIL2015
DOI:10.1093/OBO/97801998300600135
Introduction
ProfessorJohnLanderHarperCBE,FRS(b.May27,1925–d.March22,2009)revolutionizedplantecologyandhadperhapsa
greaterimpactonitsdevelopmentasamodernsciencethananyotherecologistinthe20thcentury.RaisedonafarminRugby,
England,HarperdidhisundergraduateandgraduatedegreesinOxford.HethenspentnineyearsasalecturerattheDepartment
ofAgriculture,and,in1960,hewasappointedheadofagriculturalbotanyattheUniversityCollegeofNorthWales,Bangor.He
servedaspresidentoftheBritishEcologicalSocietyin1966–1967andoftheEuropeanSocietyforEvolutionaryBiologyfrom
1993to1995;hewaselectedaFellowoftheRoyalSocietyin1978.Hetaughtusanentirelynewdisciplineandanentirelynew
waytostudyplantsbychangingthewaywethinkaboutvegetation;insteadofbeingrelativelystatic,vegetationwasviewedasa
dynamicsystemofplantpopulations,inastateofcontinuousflux,basedonbirthanddeathsofindividuals.Almostsingle
handedlyhepioneeredtheestablishmentofthefieldofplantpopulationecology.Bybringingpopulationbiologyandexperimental
approachestotheforefrontofplantecology,helinkeddemographyandselectionand,therefore,ecologyandevolution.Harper’s
ideasarenowsocentraltoplantecologythattheyhavebecomebasictoourwayofthinking.Hebegantoaskquestionsabout
plantpopulationsthatzoologistshadbeenaskingaboutanimalpopulationssinceatleastthe1930s.Althoughfacedwiththedual
difficultiesofplantplasticityandofhowtodefine“anindividualplant,”Harpernotonlyfoundwaysofansweringthesequestions,
butalsohepresentedtheanswersinawaythatconvincedusthatplantswereworthyofstudy;furthermore,plantpopulations
wereofteneasiertostudythananimalpopulationsbecausethey“standstillandwaittobecounted”(Harper1977,p.515,cited
underBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants).TherepertoireofHarperianecologyincludedseedproduction,seedbanks,seed
dispersal,seeddormancy,seedsoilinteractions,seedlingrecruitment,effectsofneighbors,interference,populationregulation,
plantanimalinteractions,dynamicsofplantpopulations,demography,populationevolution,resourceallocation,andplantlife
histories.Hisupbringingonafarmandagriculturalbackgroundareclearlyreflectedinthesubjectsusedinmuchofhisresearch—
cropplants,grasses,andweeds—andthepastureatHenfaes,NorthWales,servedasthestudysiteforatleasttengraduate
studentsandoverseasvisitors.In1977HarperpublishedhismonumentalPopulationBiologyofPlants.
Biography
AdetailedprofileofHarper’slifeuntil1985isprovidedinSagar1985andinobituariesinFranco,etal.2009andTurkington2009.
JohnLanderHarperwasbornonMay27,1925,intoafarmingfamily.HewaseducatedatLawrenceSheriffSchool,Rugby,
where,undertheenthusiasticleadershipofWilfredKings,hedevelopedadeepenthusiasmfornaturalhistory.Attheageof
thirteen,Harperobservedandcountedbuttercupsalongatransectacrossanundulatingpastureonhisfather’sfarm(Harper
1989).Henotedthatdifferentspeciesofbuttercupsgrewindifferentpartsofthepasture(personalcommunication).In1943he
enteredMagdalenCollege,Oxford,andgraduatedwithafirstclasshonorsinbotanyin1946,followedbyamaster’sdegreeanda
doctorateinphilosophyin1950,completedunderthesupervisionofDr.J.L.Harley.Harperwasthenappointedasa
demonstratoratOxfordUniversityin1951andpersonallyacknowledgesthatG.E.Blackmanwas“exceptionallysupportivein
helpingmetoacquiremyowngroupofD.Phil.students;G.R.SagarandI.H.McNaughtoncametomefromtheOxfordBotany
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 2/40
DepartmentandJohnClatworthycamefromRhodesiaasaRhodesScholar”(J.L.Harper,unpublishedmemoirs;providedby
Claire,hisdaughter).From1953to1959hewaslecturerintheDepartmentofAgricultureand,afterasabbatical(1959–1960)asa
RockefellerFoundationfellowattheUniversityofCalifornia,Davis,hewasappointedheadofagriculturalbotanyattheUniversity
CollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor.In1967theDepartmentsofBotanyandAgriculturalBotanymergedandHarperbecame
headofthenewSchoolofPlantBiology.Heretainedthatpositionuntil1982.AtthistimehewasalsopresidentoftheBritish
EcologicalSociety(BES)(1966–1967).TheSchoolofPlantBiologyatBangorbecamethemeccaforplantpopulationbiologists.It
becameidentifiedwithalmosteverythingnewemerginginthefieldofplantpopulationecology,attractinggraduatestudentsand
visitorsfromallovertheworld.In1982HarperbecameemeritusprofessoratUCNW,buthecontinuedasheadof“TheUnit”—the
UnitofPopulationBiology,SchoolofPlantBiology,UCNW.JohnHarperservedaspresidentoftheEuropeanSocietyfor
EvolutionaryBiologyfrom1993to1995,andheservedasavisitingprofessorattheUniversityofExeterin1998.
Franco,Miguel,JoséSarukhán,andRodolfoDirzo.2009.ADarwinianplantecologist,JohnLanderHarperCBEFRS,
1925–2009.InMemoriesofJohnL.Harper:Aremembrancebyhisfriends,students,andcolleagues.2ded.Editedby
GlennR.Matlack,98–100.Bangor,UK:JPB.
ThisonlineresourcewrittenbythreeofHarper’sgraduatestudentsprovidesanoverviewofHarper’sacademiccareerand
influence,andhowthisinfluencehasspreadintosuccessivegenerationsofMexicanstudents,contributingtothestudyand
conservationofMexico’sbiodiversity.
Harper,JohnL.1989.Plantdemography:AcitationclassiccommentaryonPopulationBiologyofPlantsbyJohnL.
Harper.CurrentContents/Agriculture,BiologyandEnvironmentalSciences5:14.
Inthisonepagearticle,HarperoutlineswhythetimewasripeforhiswritingofPlantPopulationBiology;henotesthat“plant
ecologywasinthedoldrums;itwasrarelyexperimentalandcouldnotlinkeasilywithevolutionarytheory”(p.14).Atthetimeof
writingthisarticle,thebookhadbeencitedinmorethan1,660publications.
Sagar,GeoffR.1985.ProfileofJohnL.Harper.InStudiesofplantdemography:AfestschriftforJohnL.Harper.Edited
byJamesWhite,xix–xxv.London:AcademicPress.
ThisprofilewaswrittenbyoneofHarper’searlygraduatestudentsandlongtimefriendandcolleague.Thusitprovidesextra
detailsofHarper’searlyenthusiasmfornaturalhistory,hisearlyacademicachievements,andthehistoryofthedevelopmentof
theSchoolofPlantBiologyinNorthWales.
Turkington,Roy.2009.Obituary:ProfessorJohnL.Harper,FRSCBE,1925–2009.JournalofEcology97:835–837.
ThistributetoJohnHarperwaswrittenbyaformergraduatestudentandprovidesadescriptionofHarper’spersonality,the
developmentofhisresearchapproach,hisfamilylife,responsesofthosearoundhiminBangor,andanumberofdirect
“Harperian”quotations.ReprintedinBulletinoftheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica91(2010):9–13.
AwardsandService
JohnHarperwasmadeafellowoftheRoyalSocietyin1978(Anonymous1978),anhonoraryassociateoftheSwedishSocietyfor
Phytogeographyin1981andaforeignassociateoftheUSNationalAcademyofSciencesin1981.In1984hewasrecognizedby
theEcologicalSocietyofAmericaas“eminentecologist”(Werner1985).Alsoin1984,theUniversityofSussexawardedhiman
honorarydoctorate(D.Sc.),andin1989hewasmadeanofficeroftheOrderoftheBritishEmpire(CBE).TheRoyalSociety
awardedJohnHarpertheDarwinmedal(Anonymous1990).TheNationalUniversityofMexicoawardedhimanhonorary
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 3/40
doctorate1996.HewasgiventheMillenniumBotanyAwardbytheInternationalBotanicalCongressin1999andtheMarshAward
bytheBritishEcologicalSocietyin2000(Anonymous2000).From1971to1998JohnHarperservedinvariousadvisoryrolesfor
bodies,includingtheNaturalEnvironmentResearchCouncil,theRoyalSociety,theAgriculturalandFoodResearchCouncil,the
ComitėduDirection,C.E.P.E.(C.N.R.S.),theJointNatureConservationCommittee,andasaTrusteeoftheBritishMuseumof
NaturalHistory.Healsoheldvariouseditorialroles,includingeditorinchiefofAgroecosystems(1974–1981),coeditorof
Oecologia(1982–1994),assistanteditorofPhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSociety,(1990–1992),assistanteditorof
ProceedingsoftheRoyalSociety(1980–1982),andeditorofProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,SeriesB(1992–1998).
Anonymous.1978.Harper,JohnLander(EC/1978/12).RoyalSocietyofLondon.
PartofthecitationstatesthatJohnHarperwas“Distinguishedforhisresearchesinplantecology,especiallyontheautecologyof
selectedspeciesandontheestablishment,interactionandcompetitionofcloselyrelatedspecies.Hiw(sic)workischaracterized
byacuteobservations,ingeniousbutsimplefieldandlaboratoryexperimentsandrigorousstatisticalappraisal.”
Anonymous.1990.TheDarwinmedal:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheRoyalSocietyofLondon.RoyalSocietyNews5:4.
Partofthecitationreads:“Byhisbreadth,originalityandimaginativeexperimentationhehasbecomeaworldleaderinthefieldof
plantecology”(p.4).
Anonymous.2000.MarshAwardforecology:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheBritishEcologicalSociety.Bulletinofthe
BritishEcologicalSociety31:15.
Thisawardwasgivenfor“pioneeringawholenewfieldofscientificendeavor:thepopulationbiologyofplants[and]the
developmentofthescienceofplantecology”(p.15).
Werner,Patricia.1985.Eminentecologistcitation:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica.Bulletin
oftheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica66:20–21.
PartofthecitationstatesthatJohnHarper“revolutionizedplantecology...noonehashadmoreinfluenceonplantpopulation
ecologyduringtheperiodofitscomingofage”(p.20).Availableonlineforpurchase.
AcademicDevelopment
ManycircumstancesandindividualsinfluencedHarper’sacademicdevelopment.Harperpublicallyrecognizedtheinfluenceof
WilfredKings,hishighschoolbiologyteacher,inthededicationofPopulationBiologyofPlants:“toW.K.,TeacherandFriend.”At
amuchbroaderlevelhewasprofoundlyinfluencedbyCharlesDarwinandnofewerthanfifteendirectquotationsfromTheOrigin
ofSpeciesarefoundinHarper’spresidentialaddresstotheBritishEcologicalSociety—ADarwinianApproachtoPlantEcology
(Harper1967;citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandEvolutionary
Ecology).DuringhistenureatOxford,HarperwasprobablymostinfluencedbyG.E.Blackmanandhedevelopedhisdistinctive
styleofplantecologicalresearchthatincorporatednaturalselection,experimentsandtheory.Hisdevelopmentwasalsoshaped
byArthurG.Tansley’smanner,albeitshortterm,ofdoingexperiments(Tansley1913),andAlexS.Watt’sextendedfield
observationsanddetailedanalysisofproximalecologicaleventsinvolvingthemonitoringofindividuals(Watt1947).Harperwas
alsoinfluencedbyJohnMaynardSmith’sanalysisofevolutionarytheoryandoftheroleofsexualreproductionasacrucialfactor
inevolutionandinthesurvivalofspecies.Harperacknowledgesthathehadgreatteachers,CharlesEltonandGeorgeVarley
(Varley1957),“animalecologistwhogavemegreatencouragementwhentheworkwasviewedbygreatsuspicionbyplant
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 4/40
ecologists”(Harper1989,p.14,citedunderBiography).AndhehailsLedyardStebbinsandBobAllard,who“bothforcedmeto
thinkasanevolutionist”(p.14).OftenoverlookedistheinfluenceofHarper’sdepartmentalcolleagueinBangor,ProfessorPeter
GreigSmith.Duringthe1960secologistsactivelydebatedtheroleofreductionismandholismastoolstounderstandecological
phenomena.Thedebatewascarriedonworldwide,andittookplaceinamesocosminBangor.JohnHarperwasastrong
proponentofanexperimentalandreductionistapproachtoecologicalresearch,andPeterGreigSmithwasaquantitative
ecologistseekinglargescalepatternsinvegetation.AsdescribedinHill2003andMatlack2009,HarperandGreigSmith
engagedinfrequent,goodhumoreddebatesfollowingdepartmentalseminars,which“wereconductedamidlegendarycloudsof
pipesmoke”(Ezcurra2014).Thesestimulating,rigorous,andgoodnatureddiscussionsnotonlylikelysharpenedtheintellectual
abilitiesofHarperandGreigSmith,buttheyalsohadadeepinfluenceonagenerationofBangorianstudents.Seealsothe
OxfordBibliographiesarticlebyExequielEzcurra“PeterGreigSmith.”
Ezcurra,Exequiel.2014.“PeterGreigSmith.”InOxfordBibliographiesinEcology.
AbibliographicaccountofPeterGreigSmithdescribinghisearlyworkonsanddunesandtropicalecology,hismovetothe
UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(Bangor).Thereisgreatcoverageofhiscontributiontotheintellectualdevelopmentof
multivariateanalysis,classificationandordination,especiallythroughtheworkofhisacademicoffspring.
Hill,MarkO.2003.PeterGreigSmith,1922–2003.BulletinoftheBritishEcologicalSociety34.4:10–11.
MarkHill,aformerstudentofPeterGreigSmithatBangor,wroteadetailedobituaryforGreigSmith.
Matlack,GlennR.,ed.2009.MemoriesofJohnL.Harper:Aremembrancebyhisfriends,students,andcolleagues.2ded.
Bangor,UK:SPB.
AcompilationofalmostfortyshortcontributionsfromformerstudentsandcollaboratorsofJohnHarper.Theserecollections
describeallfacetsoflifeandexperiencesinHarper’sBangorlab,includingacademic,personal,andhumorous.Alsocitedunder
Biography.
Tansley,ArthurG.1913.AreviewofBrockmannJerosch,H.andRubel,E.:Auniversalclassificationofplant
communities:DieEinteilungderPflanzengesellschaftennachOkologischPhysiognomischenGesichtspunkten.Journal
ofEcology1:27–42.
InthisveryfirstvolumeoftheJournalofEcology,TansleycriticallyreviewsBrockmannJeroschandRubel’sbookandarguesthat
atrulyinductivesciencethatwillhelpusunderstandthosefeaturesthatdeterminevegetationcanbeestablishedonlyby
comparison,byobservation,andbyexperiment.
Varley,GeorgeC.1957.Ecologyasanexperimentalscience.JournalofAnimalEcology26:251–261.
ThispresidentialaddresstotheBritishEcologicalSocietyarguesthecaseforexperimentalecology.
Watt,AlexS.1947.Patternandprocessintheplantcommunity.JournalofEcology35:1–22.
Wattdescribestheplantcommunityas“aworkingmechanism,whichmaintainsandregeneratesitself.”Histhesisisthatplant
communitiesareamosaicofpatchesatdifferentstagesofregeneration,andthisideapavedthewayforthestudyofpatch
dynamics.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 5/40
BackgroundDevelopment
JohnHarperspenthisentireacademiccareeratOxfordandinNorthWales.AtOxfordhedevelopedhisdistinctivestyleof
researchdescribedearlier,onethatincorporatednaturalselection,experiments,andtheory.ItwasatOxfordthatheandhis
studentsbegantostudyfinescaleinteractionsamongseeds,seedlings,andtheirenvironment.TheOxfordyearspavedtheway
foranentirelynewapproachtothestudyofplantecologythatwastoflowfromBangor.
Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture
WhileatOxfordduringthe1950sHarper,LandraginandLudwigbeganaseriesofstudiesontheinfluenceoftheenvironmenton
seedandseedlingmortality(Harper,etal.1955).Duringthissameperiod,Harperalsogaveincreasingattentiontothestudyof
weeds,andfrom1953to1960hepublishedtenpapersonweeds,particularlyRanunculusspp.(HarperandSagar1953)and
Plantagospp.,andtheseincludedsomeclassicecologicalpapers(Harper1957,Harper1960).Theseearlystudiesproducedthe
ninepaper“thecomparativebiology”seriesthatbeganaftermanyrigorousandvigorousdiscussionsamongIanMcNaughton,
JohnClatworthy,andGeoffSagartogetherwithJohnHarper.Thesefourindividualswereperplexedbythediversityofnatural
vegetationandwhysomanyspeciescouldcoexist,oftencloselyrelatedspecies,especiallyinlightofbothGause’scompetitive
exclusionprincipleandbecauseDarwinarguedthattheseverestcompetitionshouldcomefromthemostsimilarspecies
(McNaughtonandHarper1960;Harper,etal.1961;HarperandMcNaughton1962).BeforeHarperleftOxfordheorganizedthe
firstsymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSocietytitled“TheBiologyofWeeds”;hewaseditoroftheresultingbook(Harper1960;
citedunderBooks:TheBiologyofWeeds)aswellastheauthoroftwochapters(e.g.,Harper1960).Laterhepresentedthe
keynoteaddresson“ApproachestotheStudyofPlantCompetition”(Harper1961)atasymposiumoftheSocietyforExperimental
Biology.
Harper,JohnL.1957.Theecologicalsignificanceofdormancyanditsimportanceinweedcontrol.Proceedingsofthe
IvthInternationalCongressofCropProtection,Hamburg1990.EditedbyJohannesKrause,415–420.Brunswick,
Germany:InternationalCongressofCropProtection.
Thispapersetthestagefornumerouspapersonweedseeddormancyandgerminationandisstillcited.
Harper,JohnL.1960.Factorscontrollingplantnumbers.InThebiologyofweeds.ByJohnL.Harper,119–132.British
EcologicalSocietySymposium1.Oxford:Blackwell.
Arguablyoneoftheearliestexperimentalplantecologypaperstogiveseriousattentiontodensitydependentregulationinplant
populations,referringspecificallytotheweedyspeciesPapaverspp.andAgrostemmagithago.
Harper,JohnL.1961.Approachestothestudyofplantcompetition.InMechanismsinbiologicalcompetition.Editedby
theSocietyforExperimentalBiology,1–39.SymposiaoftheSocietyforExperimentalBiology15.NewYork:Academic
Press.
Thispapercomparesthemanyandvariedmethodsusedbyphysiologists,agronomists,ecologists,andgeneticiststostudy
competition.
Harper,JohnL.,JohnN.Clatworthy,IanH.McNaughton,andGeoffR.Sagar.1961.Theevolutionandecologyofclosely
relatedspecieslivinginsamearea.Evolution15:209–227.
Thissixteenpageessayclassic“wasfinallypublishedin1961butnotbeforetwoprestigiousandsubsequentlyreformedBritish
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 6/40
journalshaddeclinedtodoso,presumablybecausethetreatmentwassofarremovedfromthecurrentmainstreamofecological
researchintheplantsciences”(Sagar1985,pp.xxi–xxii;citedunderBiography).
Harper,JohnL.,PhyllisA.Landragin,andJerzyW.Ludwig.1955.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedling
mortality,I:Theinfluenceoftimeofplantingonthegerminationofmaize.NewPhytologist54:107–118.
Thisisthefirstinaseriesofeightpapersshowinghowmicroscaleheterogeneityofthesoilsurfacecanactasafilterorsieve
allowingsomeseedstogerminatebutpreventingothers.MaizewasusedbecauseG.E.Blackman(UnitofExperimental
Agronomy,Oxford)wasconsideringitspossibleuseasacropinBritain.
Harper,JohnL.,andIanH.McNaughton.1962.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,VII:InterferencebetweenindividualsinpureandmixedpopulationsofPapaverspecies.NewPhytologist61:175–
188.
ThisisthefirstofmanystudiesinwhichHarper’slabmadeuseofthedeWitreplacementseriesapproachtostudyingplant
“competition”(interference).Unaccountably,deWitisnotcitedinthetextbuthisnameisincludedinthelistofreferences.Harper
championedthismethodasapowerfulwaytoexperimentallydissectthecomplexityofplantinterference.
Harper,JohnL.,andGeoffR.Sagar.1953.Someaspectsoftheecologyofbuttercupsinpermanentgrasslands.In
ProceedingsoftheBritishWeedControlConference.EditedbyBritishCropProtectionCouncil,256–263.Brighton,UK:
BritishCropProtectionCouncil.
ThispapermarkedthebeginningofHarperianecologyandpavedthewayforagenerationofstudiesonplantpopulation
dynamics.ThispaperharborstheoriginsoftheRanunculuswork,thePapaverwork,andtheserieson“closelyrelatedspecies
livinginthesamearea.”
McNaughton,IanH.,andJohnL.Harper.1960.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,I:ExternalbreedingbarriersbetweenPapaverspecies.NewPhytologist58:15–26.
ThefirstinaseriesofninearticlesthatdealwithhowcloselyrelatedspeciescouldcoexistgivenGause’scompetitiveexclusion
principleandDarwin’sargumentthattheseverestcompetitionshouldcomefromthemostsimilarspecies.Thetheoreticaland
philosophicalbackgroundtothisseriesisHarper,etal.1961.
UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor
TheOxfordyearswereproductiveandtheyprovidedanintellectualenvironmentthatpromotedthedevelopmentofafoundation
forawholeneweraofplantecologicalthoughtandresearchthatwastoflowfromBangor,muchofwhichisencapsulatedin
Harper1964a,Harper1964b,andHarper1965aswellasHarper1967(alsocitedunderEvolutionaryEcology),Harper1968(also
citedunderRegulation),andHarper1969.ItwasfromBangorthatmanyseminalandinfluentialpaperswerepublishedandto
whichmanygraduatestudents,doctoralgraduates,andothervisitors,mostoftenfromoverseas,wereattracted.Harperandhis
labcontinuedwiththeDarwinianthemeandprobedplantpopulationbiologywithparticularemphasisonreproductiveallocation,
interference,populationdynamics,anddemography.
Harper,JohnL.1964a.Theindividualinthepopulation.JournalofAnimalEcology33:149–158.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 7/40
Thispaperbringstogethersomeexamplesofplantinteractionsthatresultinchangesinthebehaviorofindividualsasthey
becomeinfluencedbytheproximityoftheirneighbors.Availableonlineforpurchase.
Harper,JohnL.1964b.Thenatureandconsequenceofinterferenceamongstplants.InGeneticstoday:Proceedingsof
theXIthInternationalCongressofGenetics,TheHague,theNetherlands,September1963.Vol.2.EditedbyS.J.Geerts,
465–482.Oxford:Pergamon.
Thispaperstressestheneedforseriousattentiontobepaidtothewaysinwhichplantsmayinterferewitheachotherandthe
consequencesofthisinterference.
Harper,JohnL.1965.Establishment,aggression,andcohabitationinweedyspecies.InThegeneticsofcolonizing
species.EditedbyHerbertG.BakerandG.LedyardStebbins,243–263.NewYork:AcademicPress.
ThispapercaughttheattentionofthefamousAmericanbiologistsE.O.Wilson,G.L.Stebbins,ErnstMayr,andHerbertBaker.
ThispresentationarguablyopenedHarper’sgatewaytotheecologicalaudienceintheUnitedStates.Thepaperconcludesthat
germinationandseedlingestablishmentarethemostimportantfactorsforsuccessfulspreadandresistancetonativeflora.
Harper,JohnL.1967.ADarwinianapproachtoplantecology:Presidentialaddress,BritishEcologicalSociety.Journalof
Ecology55:247–270.
Thisenormouslyinfluentialpaperbecameaninstantclassicintheecologicalliteratureandinspiredanentiregenerationofplant
ecologists.Thissinglepaperdescribes,orintroduces,muchofHarper’sresearchcareer.Thispaperwaslistedas“oneofthetop
100mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritishEcologicalSociety(1913–2012)”aspartoftheBEScentenarycelebrations.
AlsoavailableinJournalofAppliedEcology4(1967):267–290,andJournalofAnimalEcology36(1967):495–518.
Harper,JohnL.1968.Theregulationofnumbersandmassinplantpopulations.InPopulationbiologyandevolution.
EditedbyRichardC.Lewontin,139–158.NewYork:SyracuseUniv.Press.
Thekeywordinthistitleis“plant.”Harperargueswhyitisriskytouncriticallyapplypopulationtheoryderivedforanimals,to
plants.Healsodiscusses“theindividualasapopulation,”dormancy(whichanimalsdon’treallydo!),anddeWitmethodsof
studyingplantcompetitionandregulation.
Harper,JohnL.1969.Theroleofpredationinvegetationaldiversity.InDiversityandstabilityinecologicalsystems:
ReportofasymposiumheldMay26–28,1969.EditedbyG.M.WoodwellandH.H.Smith,48–62.BrookhavenSymposiain
Biology22.Upton,NY:BrookhavenNationalLaboratory.
Thispapercautionsthatjustbecausetheworldisgreendoesnotmeanthatherbivoresareunimportanttoplants.Threemajor
typesofexperimentaredescribedthattesttheeffectsofherbivoresonvegetation.AlsocitedunderDarwinianandWallacian
Perspectives.
ResearchFramework
ThroughouthiscareerHarperusedhissingleauthorshippapers,whichwereoftenpublishedproceedingsfrominternational
conferences,todevelopandpresenthiscorescientificframework.Manyofthesewerebasedonpurescholarshipratherthanthe
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 8/40
usualconventionalreviewsanditisfromthesepapersthathisideas,arguments,andquestionswereformulated,manyofwhich
remainunanswered,andfromwhichHarper’suniqueacademicresearchphilosophycaneasilybeidentified,namelynatural
selection(evolutionaryecology),experiments,andtheory.
EvolutionaryEcology
Harper’sfoundationalthemewasthatDarwin’stheoryofevolutionbynaturalselectionisanecologicaltheoryandthatecologyis
evolutioninaction(Harper1967,alsocitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor,
Harper1983).ThisisrootedinDarwin’semphasisontherolethatindividualdifferencesplayinevolutionbynaturalselection
(Harper1964a,citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor),yetthestudyofthe
fateofindividualplantswaslargelyignored.Hepioneeredafieldofstudyinwhichthefateofindividuals,andthemechanismby
whichtheyleavedescendants,wasparamount.
Harper,JohnL.1967.ADarwinianapproachtoplantecology:Presidentialaddress,BritishEcologicalSociety.Journalof
Ecology55:247–270.
HarperdevelopshisfoundationalthemethatDarwin’stheoryofevolutionbynaturalselectionisanecologicaltheory.Thereareat
leastfifteenquotationsfromchapters3and4ofDarwin’sOriginofSpecies,numerousquestionsareposed,andthepaper
emphasizestherolethatindividualdifferencesplayinnaturalselection.AlsoavailableinJournalofAppliedEcology4(1967):
267–290,andJournalofAnimalEcology36(1967):495–518.
Harper,JohnL.1983.ADarwinianplantecology.InEvolutionfrommoleculestomen.EditedbyD.Bendall,323–345.
Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.
ThispaperbrieflyreviewsandcontraststhescientificapproachesofDarwinandWallace.Harpercommendstheearlymodeling
workofNägeliinthe1870sandGause,andheapplaudsthelongtermstudiesofTamm(andothers)whomadepermanentplots
andmonitoredthefateofindividuals.
DarwinianandWallacianPerspectives
Studiesdescribingpatternsofdifferentiationinplantpopulationshavebeenundertakenformorethan250years.Langlet1971
cites111referencesthatarepre1900,sixofwhicharefromthe1700s.Inmostcasestheprocessesgeneratingthepatternswere
largelyignoreduntilthe1960s.MostofthispreviousworkhadbeendominatedbywhatHarpercalls“aWallacianattitude”(Harper
1977,citedunderBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants).Wallacethoughtofnaturalselectionasprimarilyastruggleagainstthe
physicalfactorsoftheenvironment,suchasmoisture,temperature,orsoiltype,withtheresultthatdifferenttypesoforganisms
liveindifferentenvironments.Suchstudieswereimportantandoftenclearlydemonstratedthatmicroevolutionoccurredoververy
shortdistances,ofteninthepresenceofextensivegeneflowandoverrelativelyshorttimeintervals.Incontrast,Darwin
emphasizedtheroleofbioticfactors,suchascompetitionandherbivory,andsoughttounderstandhowsomanytypesofplants
(andanimals)couldcoexistandavoidelimination.Harperhighlightedthiswhenhewrote“itisthereforeratheroddthatalthoughit
isDarwin’sinfluencethatisusuallyacknowledgedinthedevelopmentofevolutionarytheory,itisaWallacianattitudethathas
dominatedthestudyofadaptationinplants”(Harper1977,p.750).Keypaperswiththisemphasisontheimpactofbioticfactors
onplantpopulationsareHarper1969(citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),
Bangor),TurkingtonandHarper1979,Burdon1980,DirzoandHarper1982a,andDirzoandHarper1982b.
Burdon,JeremyJ.1980.IntraspecificdiversityinanaturalpopulationofTrifoliumrepens.JournalofEcology68:717–
735.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 9/40
Inthispaper,fiftyclonesofTrifoliumrepensweresampledfromthefieldatHenfaes.Theywerescreenedforanumberoftraits,
mostofwhichwereselectivelyimportant,includingsusceptibilitytosomepathogens.Theclonesdifferedfromoneanotheron
averageby3.3vegetativecharacters.Availableonlineforpurchase.
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1982a.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,III:Differencesinthe
acceptabilityofindividualplantsofTrifoliumrepenstoslugsandsnails.JournalofEcology70:101–118.
FieldandlaboratorytrialsusingfourspeciesofsnailsandslugsshowedthatcyanogenesisinTrifoliumrepens(whiteclover)
markedlyreduced,butdidnotcompletelyprevent,damagetocloverleavesbythegrazingmollusks.Ahypotheticalcoevolutionary
interpretationofthemolluskcyanogenesisinteractioninwhitecloverispresented.
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1982b.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,IV:Theperformanceof
cyanogenicandacyanogenicmorphsofTrifoliumrepensinthefield.JournalofEcology70:119–138.
Duringthegrowingseasoninapermanentpasture,pathogensdamagedleavesofcyanogenicandacyanogenicmorphsof
Trifoliumrepens(whiteclover),butinfectionbythesystemicrustUromycestrifoliiwasalmostexclusivelyonacyanogenicmorphs.
Mollusksconsistentlypreferredacyanogenicmorphsandweevilsappearednottobedeterredbycyanogenesis,
Harper,JohnL.1969.Theroleofpredationinvegetationaldiversity.InDiversityandstabilityinecologicalsystems:
ReportofasymposiumheldMay26–28,1969.EditedbyG.M.WoodwellandH.H.Smith,48–62.BrookhavenSymposiain
Biology22.Upton,NY:BrookhavenNationalLaboratory.
Threemajortypesofexperimentaredescribedthattesttheeffectsofherbivoresonvegetation.
Langlet,O.1971.Twohundredyearsgenecology.Taxon20:653–722.
ThispaperwrittenmostlyinEnglish,butwithnumerousnonEnglishquotations,providesadetailedhistoryofthedisciplineof
genecology.Itprovidesanexhaustivebibliographyondifferentiationin“vegetation,”includingsixpapersfrombefore1800.
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,IV:Finescalebioticdifferentiation.JournalofEcology67:245–254.
Thiswasthefirstpapertodemonstratethataplantpopulationcoulddifferentiateinresponsetotheidentityofitsneighbors,that
is,thebioticenvironment,independentoftheabioticfactorsoftheenvironment.Thepaperwaslistedas“oneofthetop100most
influentialpaperspublishedbytheBritishEcologicalSociety(1913–2012).”
IndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeView
AnunderlyingthemeofHarper1967(citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor
andEvolutionaryEcology)andofHarper1977(citedunderBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants)PopulationBiologyofPlantsis
thatthetheoryofevolutionbynaturalselectionisanecologicaltheory.Harperstressesthatthebiologyofaspeciesgrowingin
isolationmaynotaccountforitsecology.Asanindividualplantcomesintoproximitywithotherindividualsofthesameandof
differentspecies,typicallymarkedchangestakeplaceinthebehaviorofthatindividual(Harper1964).Harperwasconcernedthat
experimentsonpopulationsnotbeconfusedwithexperimentsonindividuals.WhileaDarwinianisinterestedinpopulationlevel
processes,itistheresponseoftheindividualswithinapopulationtothepresenceoftheirneighborsthatiscritical.Amajor
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 10/40
disadvantageofdescriptivepopulationbehavioristhatitfocusesonmeanyield,ormeanplantperformance,andtherebymasks
theexistenceofplanttoplantvariation;yet,itisthisvariationbetweenindividualsthatisthedrivingforceofnaturalselection
(Harper1964).ThisindividuallevelfocusishighlightedinRossandHarper1972;MackandHarper1977;andMithen,etal.1984.
Ifwearetoseeevolutionaryprocessesinactioninplantcommunitieswemustdrawourattentionawayfromanthropomorphic
scalesofsquaremetersand,instead,focusonthescaleappropriatetotheorganismwearestudying—thisisaskingforaplant’s
eyeviewofthecommunity,asillustratedinHarper1977andTurkingtonandHarper1979.
Harper,JohnL.1964.Theindividualinthepopulation.JournalofAnimalEcology.33:149–158.
Thispaperdealswithindividuals,thedifferencesbetweenthem,andhowbetweenplantvariationissocriticalwhenplantscome
intoproximitywiththeirneighbors.Availableonlineforpurchase.
Harper,JohnL.1977.Thecontributionsofterrestrialplantstudiestothedevelopmentofthetheoryofecology.In
Changingscenesinnaturalsciences,1776–1976.EditedbyClydeE.Goulden,139–157.SpecialPublication12.
Philadelphia:AcademyofNaturalSciences.
Theideaofviewingvegetationfroma“plant’seyeview”isintroduced.
Mack,RichardN.,andJohnL.Harper.1977.Interferenceinduneannuals:Spatialpatternandneighbourhoodeffects.
JournalofEcology65:345–363.
Thispaperexploresthedynamicsofinterferenceinfivesandduneannualsinagreenhouseexperimentusingarangeofdifferent
mixtures;13,000individualplantsweremapped.
Mithen,Richard,JohnL.Harper,andJacobWeiner.1984.Growthandmortalityofindividualplantsasafunctionof
availablearea.Oecologia62:57–60.
The“barearea”aroundafocalplantisagoodpredictorofplantweight.Asplantsgrow,therelationshipchangesbetweenplant
weightand“barearea”available.Plantsinsmallpolygonsaremuchmorelikelytodiethanthoseinlargerareas.
Ross,MaxA.,andJohnL.Harper.1972.Occupationofbiologicalspaceduringseedlingestablishment.Journalof
Ecology60:77–88.
Thegrowthrateofanindividualdevelopingseedlingislargelyaccountedforbythedistancetothenearestneighborsanditsstage
ofgrowth.
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.ThegrowthdistributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,I:Ordinationpatternandcontact.JournalofEcology67:201–218.
Ifthespeciesthemselvesaretheprimedeterminantsofeachother’sdistribution,itisofinteresttoaskhowthespecies
themselvessamplethevegetation.Aplant’seyeviewofthecommunitywasrecorded,usingamethodinwhichtheplant
themselvesarethesamplingpoints.
ExperimentalEcology
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 11/40
PriortoHarper’sstudies,plantecologyhadbeendominatedbythedescriptionofvegetationandtheanalysisofthebiologyof
individualspecies.TheDarwinianapproachfocusingonindividualsandthehazardstheyexperiencehadabriefappearanceon
theecologicalsceneinthe1920s.Threeleadingecologists—ClementsintheUnitedStates,SukatschevinRussia,andTansleyin
England—allcarriedoutsimplecompetitionexperimentsusingdeliberatelysownplantpopulations(Harper1983),andthenthey
promptlydroppedthispursuitandreturnedtodescriptivevegetationstudies.Harperwrites:“itisnaturalthatthefirststagesinthe
growthofanyscience(physicalorbiological)shouldconsistofthedescriptionandorderingofthematerialforstudy.Thenext
stageistosearchforcorrelationsbetweenandcausationofwhathasbeendescribed”(Harper1982,p.12).Harper’s
experimentalapproachwasevidentfromhistimeasafirstyeargraduatestudenttutortoundergraduatesintheDepartmentof
Agriculture,Oxford,in1947atagetwentytwoyears.Harperwrites:“Wewereterriblyshortofstandardlaboratoryequipmentthat
wouldhavebeenusedinconventionalpracticalclasses.Weevenhadnoclassmicroscopes.Mostofmylaboratoryexperiments
wereabsurdlysimpleandinvolvednomoreequipmentthanapacketofseedsandsomepotsofsoil.Astudentcoulddesign
experimentstoanswersimplequestionssuchas:Doesthedepthatwhichseedsaresownaffectthetimeatwhichseedlings
emerge?Doesitdependonthespecies?Doescompactingthesoilhaveaneffect?Whenseedlingsof,forexample,radish
emergefromthesoildotheygrowmoreslowlyifoneoftheirtwoseedlingleavesisremoved?Ifhalfofeachofthetwoseedling
leavesisremovedistheeffectthesameasremovingonewholeleaffromthepair?”Hecontinues“Agoodclassexperimentought
toteachtheelementsofhowscienceworksandshouldbewrittenupinawaythatexamineswhattheresultsmeanandwhatthey
don’t.Experimentsofthissortprovidequantitativedataforlogicalexperimentaldesign,primitivestatisticalanalysisandalsofor
argumentaboutrepeatability.Iftwostudentsdothesameexperimentatthesametimewilltheygetexactlythesameresult?Ifone
studentrepeatsthesameexperimentatdifferenttimeswillitgiveexactlythesameresults?(Itusuallydoesn’t).Howwaryshould
onebeindrawingconclusions.Ihadcertainlyneverbeentaughtscienceinthiswayeitheratuniversityoratschool”(J.L.Harper,
unpublishedmemoirs;providedbyClaire,hisdaughter).Monitoringofpopulationsandofindividualsoftenproducesvaluable
informationbutitisecologicallynotveryusefulunlessthemonitoringiscoupledwithexperimentstounderstandthemechanisms
underlyingobservedchanges.Yet,despitetheemphasisonexperimentalecology,Harperalsorecognizedthevalueand
necessityofdetaileddescriptiveobservationsasapreludetoexperimentaltesting.ThefieldatHenfaeswasoftenusedinsucha
way,asdetailed,forexample,inCahnandHarper1976,TurkingtonandHarper1979,andDirzoandHarper1982.
Cahn,MartinG.,andJohnL.Harper.1976.ThebiologyofleafmarkpolymorphisminTrifoliumrepensL.,I:Distribution
ofphenotypesatalocalscale.Heredity37:309–325.
DetailedrecordsofthedistributionofclonesofTrifoliumrepensshowedanaverageofthreetofourdifferentclonesper10x10cm.
Also,detailedmapsofthedistributionofwhiteleafmorphsin1m quadrats.
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1982.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,IV:Theperformanceof
cyanogenicandacyanogenicmorphsofTrifoliumrepensinthefield.JournalofEcology70:119–138.
Acontourmapshowingthedensityofactiveslugsinthefield.
HarperJ.L.1982.Afterdescription.InTheplantcommunityasaworkingmechanism.EditedbyEdwardI.Newman,11–
25.SpecialPublicationoftheBritishEcologicalSociety1.Oxford:Blackwell.
Perhapsmoresoherethaninanyotherpaper,Harperdiscusses(ventshisfrustration)whatheperceivestobesomeofthe
dangersinthethinkingandwritingofecologists.
Harper,JohnL.1983.ADarwinianplantecology.InEvolutionfrommoleculestomen.EditedbyD.Bendall,323–345.
Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.
Anoverviewandanalysisoftheintensiveresearchdonebygraduatestudents(Cahn,Dirzo,LovettDoust,Peters,Sarukhan,
2
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 12/40
Thorhallsdottir,Trathan,Turkington)andavisitingresearcher(Burdon),inasinglesmall(1ha)fieldofpermanentgrasslandatthe
CollegeFarmatHenfaes,Aber,nearBangorinNorthWales.
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.ThegrowthdistributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,I:Ordinationpatternandcontact.JournalofEcology67:201–218.
AgeneraldescriptionofthefieldatHenfaes,includingtopography,soils,anddistributionsofindividualspecies.
EcologicalTheory
Harper1977aandHarper1980contendthatplantecologywasdirectionlessandhadlittleincommonintellectuallywithanimal
ecologybecauseitlackedacomparabletheoreticalbase.UsingDobzhansky’sstatement:“Nothinginbiologyhasmeaningexcept
inthelightofevolution”asaspringboard(Dobzhansky1973),HarperreasonedthatifDobzhanskywerecorrect,andifevolutionis
aboutindividualsandtheirdescendants,thatis,fitness,weshouldnotexpecttoreachanyrealecologicalunderstandingfrom
studiesthatfocusatlevelshigherthantheindividual,whethertheydealwithdescriptiveecology,productionecology,orthegross
populationphenomenaofthepopulationbiologist.Whenwestudyapopulation,community,orecosystem,wearestudyingthe
productofthoseindividualsthatleftdescendants.Thisisthelinkbetweendemographyandselection,andthereforebetween
ecologyandevolution,andultimatelythesearethelinksthatgiveplantecologyasoundtheoreticalbasis.Theapplicationof
demographictheorytoplantshasbeenhinderedbecauseofconfusionoverthedefinitionofanindividual.Clonalgrowthinwhich
theproductofazygotegrowstobecomeaseriesofrootedshoots,whichsometimessever,createsadifficulty.Evolutiondepends
onsomezygotesleavingmoredescendantzygotesthanothers.Mostplantsgrowbytheadditionofrepeatedmodulesofstructure
(typicallyashoot,root,andanaxillarybud).Therefore,ademographictheoryofplantsneedstorecognizetwolevelsofpopulation
organization:thegeneticindividualandthemodularunitofstructure(Harper1977b,Harper1980,HarperandWhite1974).
Dobzhansky,T.1973.Nothinginbiologyhasmeaningexceptinthelightofevolution.AmericanBiologyTeacher(March):
125–129.
Thecaseismadethatonlythetheoryofevolutioncanaccountforthediversityoflife,theunityoflife,and,indeed,everything
biologicalthatweobserveontheearth.
Harper,JohnL.1977a.Thecontributionsofterrestrialplantstudiestothedevelopmentofthetheoryofecology.In
Changingscenesinnaturalsciences,1776–1976.EditedbyClydeE.Goulden,139–157.SpecialPublication12.
Philadelphia:AcademyofNaturalSciences.
Thethreetypesofinvestigationthathavedominatedplantecologyareevaluated:descriptive,production,andpopulationecology.
Thepaperhighlightssomeoftheoutstandingquestionsinthethreeareasandtheproblemsthatevolutionarythinkingposesto
ecologicalinterpretation.
Harper,JohnL.1977b.Plantrelationsinpastures.InPlantrelationsinpastures.EditedbyJ.R.Wilson,3–14.Melbourne:
CommonwealthScientificandIndustrialOrganization.
Muchemphasisislaidonunderstandingthebehaviorofindividualssothatwemaybeabletointerpretwhatweknowaboutthe
behaviorofpopulations.Thishasbeendoneatboththeimmediate(proximate)ecologicallevelandatthelongerterm(ultimate)
evolutionarylevel.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 13/40
Harper,JohnL.1980.Plantdemographyandecologicaltheory.Oikos35:244–253.
Examplesaregiventoillustratethetheorythataplantisapopulationofpartsthatarebornanddieandthewaysinwhichsucha
theorycanbeappliedtofieldstudies.
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1974.Thedemographyofplants.AnnualReviewofEcologyandSystematics5:419–
463.
Thisreviewexaminessomeofthetheoreticalbasesforthedevelopmentofplantdemography(birthanddeathstatistics)and
surveysthecurrentknowledgeofthetopic.
PlantPopulationDynamics
Populationdynamicsdealswiththewaypopulationsareaffectedbybirth,death,immigration,andemigrationrates,thatis,the
vitalratesofapopulationovertime,andithasabroadoverlapwithdemography.Ultimately,suchanalysesofbirthanddeath
statisticsmustfocusattentionontheneedtodiscoverthemechanismsthatcontrol,limit,orregulatepopulationsize.Afewearlier
studieshadbeenconductedbyTamminSweden,RabotnovinRussia,SagarinEngland,andAntonovicsinWales,butitwas
JohnHarperandhisstudentswhobroughtthesubjecttoprominence.Thiseffortbeganwithafourpartserieson“Studiesinthe
dynamicsofplantpopulations”(e.g.,CaversandHarper1967;PutwainandHarper1972),apaper(WhiteandHarper1970),and
review(HarperandWhite1971).
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1967.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,I:Thefateofseedand
transplantsintroducedintovarioushabitats.JournalofEcology55:59–71.
Demonstratesthatseedsofthreespecieswereabletogerminateinavarietyofhabitatsbutthattheselectionsievewasmuch
strongerattheseedlingthanatthegerminationstage.
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1971.Thedynamicsofplantpopulations.InProceedingsoftheAdvancedStudy
InstituteonDynamicsofNumbersinPopulations,Oosterbeek,theNetherlands,September1970.EditedbyJ.denBoer
andG.R.Gradwell,41–63.Wageningen,TheNetherlands:CentreforAgriculturalPublishingandDocumentation.
Aschematicmodelispresentedthatdescribesthebehaviorofplantpopulationsatthesuccessivestages(calledsievesorfilters)
thatregulateplantpopulations:seedbank,environmentalfactors,growthcrowdingandinterference,seedproduction.
Putwain,PhilipD.,andJohnL.Harper.1972.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,V:Mechanismsgoverningsex
ratioinRumexacetosaandR.acetosella.JournalofEcology60:113–129.
Demonstratesthatfrequencydependentcontrolofbiasedsexratiosintwospecieswasmoreeffectiveathighdensityandargues
thatthesexesofeachspeciesshowsuchfrequencydependentinteractionbecausetheyoccupyatleastpartlydifferentecological
niches.
White,James,andJohnL.Harper.1970.Correlatedchangesinplantsizeandnumberinplantpopulations.Journalof
Ecology58:467–485.
Thisresearchconfirmsthe3/2powerlawthatrelatesthenumberofsurvivingplantsinapopulationundergoingselfthinningto
theirmeandryweightandextendsthelawtoseveralotherspecies.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 14/40
Germination
Onceseedsaredispersedtheircontinuedsurvivaldependsuponlandingonasubstratesuitableforgermination.Manyseedswill
beeatenandotherswilllandonsurfacesnotsuitableforgerminationandmaybeinducedorenforcedintoadormantstate
(Harper1957).Thesoilsurfacemaythenbeconsideredtooperateasafilterorsievedeterminingwhichseedsgerminateto
produceseedlings(HarperandWhite1971,citedunderPlantPopulationDynamics).Theideaofthesoilsurfaceactingasasieve
hasbeenshowninsomedetailbyaseriesofexperimentsbeganinthe1950sbyHarperandhisassociates(Harper,etal.1955)
ontheinfluenceoftheenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality(see,e.g.,SagarandHarper1960;Harper,etal.1965;
WilliamsandHarper1965;CaversandHarper1966).Thesestudiesdemonstratedthatslightvariationsinthesoilsurfaceimpose
arigorousfilteronsitesinwhichaseedcan,orcannot,germinate.Inaddition,therearespeciesspecificsubtletiesinthe
requirementsforgerminationandseedsizeandshapethatplayamajorroleinfluencingtheprobabilityofgermination(Harper,et
al.1970).
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1966.GerminationpolymorphisminRumexcrispusandRumexobtusifolius.Journal
ofEcology54:367–382.
Differencesingerminationresponsewereobservedbetweenseedsofthesamespeciesbutfromdifferenthabitats,different
plants(ofthesamespecies)inthesamehabitat,anddifferentpositionsonthesameplant.Thesurvivalvalueofgermination
polymorphismisdiscussed.
Harper,JohnL.,PhyllisA.Landragin,andJerzyW.Ludwig.1955.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedling
mortality,I:Theinfluenceoftimeofplantingonthegerminationofmaize.NewPhytologist54:107–118.
Thisisthefirstofaseriesofeightpapersshowinghowmicroscaleheterogeneityofthesoilsurfaceactsasafilterorsieve
allowingsomeseedstogerminatebutpreventingothersfromdoingso.
Harper,JohnL.1957.Theecologicalsignificanceofdormancyanditsimportanceinweedcontrol.InProceedingsofthe
IVthInternationalCongressofCropProtection,Hamburg1990.EditedbyJohannesKrause,415–420.Brunswick,
Germany:InternationalCongressofCropProtection.
Seeddormancymaintainsareserveofseedsthatarenotexposedtohazardsfacedbythegrowingplantandapopulationof
genotypespermittinganoverlapofgenerationsandabufferingofapopulationagainsttemporaryselectiveforces.
Harper,JohnL.,PeterH.Lovell,andKeithG.Moore.1970.Theshapesandsizesofseeds.AnnualReviewofEcologyand
Systematics1:327–356.
Aclassicwithmorethan1,000citations,inthisreviewtheauthorsarguethatseedsizesandshapesarebothcomplexadaptive
compromises;seedsizeisacompromisewithseednumber,andseedshapesarecompromisesbetweentheformsmostefficient
fordispersal,landing,andseedlingestablishment.
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1971.Thedynamicsofplantpopulations.InProceedingsoftheAdvancedStudy
InstituteonDynamicsofNumbersinPopulations,Oosterbeek,theNetherlands,September1970.EditedbyJ.denBoer
andG.R.Gradwell,41–63.Wageningen,TheNetherlands:CentreforAgriculturalPublishingandDocumentation.
Thesievesorfiltersthatregulateplantpopulationsoperateatallstagesintheplantlifecycle;themostriskystages,thatis,when
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 15/40
thefiltersaremostrigorous,areduringgerminationandestablishment.
Harper,JohnL.,J.TrevorWilliams,andGeoffR.Sagar.1965.Thebehaviourofseedsinsoil,I:Theheterogeneityofsoil
surfacesanditsroleindeterminingtheestablishmentofplantsfromseed.JournalofEcology53:273–286.
Thesocalledgraveyardexperiment.Onekeymessageisthedangerofdrawingconclusionsfromasinglestudy.Harper
particularlylikedthisexperimentbecauseitwasusedby“atleast20ecologyclassesinuniversitiesthroughouttheworldbecause
itwassoeasytodo—butIoftenreceivedletterstellingmethatsomeone’sparticularclassobtainedadifferentresultthanwhatwe
published.Ofcourse!Thatwasoneofthemainpointsofthestudy”(personalcommunication).
Sagar,GeoffR.,andJohnL.Harper.1960.Factorsaffectingthegerminationandearlyestablishmentofplantains
(Plantagolanceolata,P.mediaandP.major).InThebiologyofweeds.ByGeoffR.SagarandJohnL.Harper,236–245.
BritishEcologicalSocietySymposium1.Oxford:Blackwell.
Whenseedsandseedlingsofthethreespeciesweresowninvarioushabitats,thephasesofgerminationandearlyseedlinglife
werecriticalfortheestablishmentofaspecies.Onlyrarelywasitpossibleeithertointroduceaspeciesintoahabitatortoincrease
itsdensitybysowingseeds
Williams,J.Trevor,andJohnL.Harper.1965.Seedpolymorphismandgermination,I:Theinfluenceofnitratesandlow
temperaturesonthegerminationofChenopodiumalbum.WeedResearch5:141–150.
Chenopodiumalbumispolymorphicforseedshapeandcolorandfourcategoriescanberecognized.Allfourtypesmaybeborne
byoneplantandtheydifferingerminationrequirements.
Regulation
Populationregulationisafundamentalprocessrelatedtomostphenomenainecologyandunderliesmostothertopicsofinterest,
suchasinterference(competition)andthestructureanddynamicsofpopulationsandcommunities.Innaturalplantpopulations
numbersarekeptwithincertainboundsbydensitydependentforces.Whenpopulationdensityishigh,thepopulation(of
individualsoroframets)willlikelydecrease,whereasincreasestendtooccurwhenpopulationdensitiesarelow.Harperfirst
discussedplantpopulationregulationintheBiologyofWeeds(Harper1960,citedunderBooks:TheBiologyofWeeds)
SymposiumtotheBritishEcologicalSociety,andtheninmoredetailin“Theregulationofnumbersandmassinplantpopulations”
(Harper1968;alsocitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor).Regulationisalso
acentralissueinthehighlycitedpapersofKaysandHarper1974andWatkinsonandHarper1978.
Harper,JohnL.1968.Theregulationofnumbersandmassinplantpopulations.InPopulationbiologyandevolution.
EditedbyRichardC.Lewontin,139–158.NewYork:SyracuseUniv.Press.
Themainthemeofthispaperisthatanimalpopulationtheorycannotalwaysbeappliedtoplantpopulationsbecauseplantshave
suspendedanimation(dormancy),haveenormousindividualplasticity(becauseoftheirmodularstructureandclonalgrowth),and
arestronglyinfluencedbyneighborsbecausetheycan’trunawaylikeanimalscan.
Kays,Stanley,andJohnL.Harper.1974.Theregulationofplantandtillerdensityinagrasssward.JournalofEcology
62:97–105.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 16/40
Yieldperunitarearapidlybecomesindependentofthenumberofplantspresentandisdominatedbytheavailabilityofresources.
Overaperiodoftwentyweekspopulationsconvergedtowardatillerdensityandameantillerweightthatwasindependentofthe
thirtyfoldrangeinseeddensities.
Watkinson,AndrewR.,andJohnL.Harper.1978.Thedemographyofasandduneannual:Vulpiafasciculate,I:Natural
regulationofpopulations.JournalofEcology66:15–33.
Basedondatacollectedfromfrequentmonitoringandamanipulativefieldexperiment,thispaperpresentsamodelthatdescribes
thepopulationdynamicsofasandduneannualintermsofthedensitydependentregulationofspikeletnumberandthedensity
independentmortalityofindividuals.
Competition
Harperandhiscolleagueswereperplexedbythediversityofnaturalvegetationandwhysomanyspeciescouldcoexist,often
closelyrelatedspeciesespeciallyinlightofbothGause’scompetitiveexclusionprincipleandbecauseDarwinarguedthatthe
severestcompetitionshouldcomefromthemostsimilarspecies.CompetitionamongplantswasforemostinHarper’sthinkingand
hecontendedthatchapter3ofTheOriginofSpecies(“TheStruggleforExistence”)wasthebestwritingeveroncompetition.In
Harper’spresentationatthesymposiumoftheSocietyforExperimentalBiology(Harper1961),helistssevenmajorproblemsin
biologythatrequireinformationonthemannerandeffectsofinterference(competition)betweenorganismsfortheirsolution,and
inhispresentationtotheEleventhInternationalCongressofGeneticshedescribesindetailthenatureandconsequencesof
interferenceamongplants(Harper1964).Thistheme,astrugglebetweenneighborsforlimitingresources,isprominentinHarper
1967(citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandEvolutionaryEcology),
PresidentialaddresstotheBritishEcologicalSocietyandsixofthetwentyfourchaptersofHarper1977(citedunderBooks:
PopulationBiologyofPlants)aredevotedtotheeffectsoftheproximityofneighbors.Itisnosurprisethatmuchoftheresearch
fromHarper’slabdealtwithcompetition,themosthighlycitedbeingHarperandChancellor1959;SagarandHarper1961;
ClatworthyandHarper1962;Obeid,etal.1967;MackandHarper1977;andSchmidandHarper1985.
Clatworthy,JohnN.,andJohnL.Harper.1962.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,V:InterandintraspecificinterferencewithinculturesofLemnaspp.andSalvinianatans.JournalofExperimental
Botany13:307–324.
Threespeciesoffloatingpondweed(Lemna)andafloatingfern(Salvinia)weregrowninpurecultureandinmixturesathighand
lowdensities.Thesuccessofaspeciesinmixturecouldnotbepredictedfromtheparametersofgrowthinpureculture.
Harper,JohnL.1961.Approachestothestudyofplantcompetition.InMechanismsinbiologicalcompetition.Editedby
theSocietyforExperimentalBiology,1–39.SymposiaoftheSocietyforExperimentalBiology15.NewYork:Academic
Press.
Duetotheconfusionaboutthemeaningoftheword“competition,”Harperproposedreplacingitwith“interference”tobeused“as
ablanketwordtodescribethosehardshipswhicharecausedbytheproximityofneighbours(usuallyotherorganismsfeedingat
thesametrophiclevel)”(p.1).
Harper,JohnL.1964.Thenatureandconsequenceofinterferenceamongstplants.InGeneticstoday:Proceedingsofthe
XIthInternationalCongressofGenetics,TheHague,theNetherlands,September1963.Vol.2.EditedbyS.J.Geerts,465–
482.Oxford:Pergamon.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 17/40
Thispaperfocusesattentiononthereactionofaplanttoitsneighborsasacritical,oftenthemostcritical,partoftheautecologyof
aspeciesandtosuggestthatthistypeofstudyhasaunifyingfunctioninthescienceofplantecology.
Harper,JohnL.,andA.PatriciaChancellor.1959.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,IV:Rumex:Interferencebetweenindividualsinpopulationsofoneandtwospecies.JournalofEcology47:679–695.
PotexperimentsweremadetodeterminethenatureoftheinterferencebetweenplantsoffivespeciesofRumexundercontrolled
conditionsofsowingdensity,speciesmixtures,waterregime,andsoiltype.Therewerestrongresponsestowaterregimeandsoil
typeandfourofthespeciesshowedthesamegeneralpatternofresponse.
Mack,RichardN.,andJohnL.Harper.1977.Interferenceinduneannuals:Spatialpatternandneighbourhoodeffects.
JournalofEcology65:345–363.
Thiswasoneofthefirststudiestoshowthattheoutcomeofinterferencewasinfluencedbytheidentityandsizeofaplant’s
neighborsandhowthoseneighborswerearrangedaroundthefocalplants.Thepaperwaslistedas“oneofthetop100most
influentialpaperspublishedbytheBritishEcologicalSociety(1913–2012)”.
Obeid,Mohammed,DavidMachin,andJohnL.Harper.1967.Influenceofdensityonplanttoplantvariationinfiberflax
LinumusitatissimumL.CropScience7:471–473.
Inthisstudy,plantsdevelopedalognormalfrequencydistributionofdryweightwithageandincreaseddensity.Otherplanttraits,
suchascapsulenumberperplantandmeanseednumberpercapsuleandindividualseedweight,developdifferentfrequency
distributions.Thisemphasizeshowplanttoplantvariationitselfchangeswithdensity.
Sagar,GeoffR.,andJohnL.Harper.1961.ControlledinterferencewithnaturalpopulationsofPlantagolanceolata,P.
majorandP.minor.WeedResearch1:163–176.
Theresultsofthisexperimentsuggestthatgrassesplayanimportantroleindeterminingthepresenceorabsenceofparticular
Plantagospeciesandalsoincontrollingthesizeoftheexistingplantainpopulations.
Schmid,Bernhard,andJohnL.Harper.1985.Clonalgrowthingrasslandperennials,I:Densityandpatterndependent
competitionbetweenplantswithdifferentgrowthforms.JournalofEcology73:793–808.
Clonesofaphalanx(Bellis)andguerrilla(Prunella)growthformwereusedtoinvestigatecompetitionbetweenandwithinclones
andbetweenspecies.Differencesinresponsewerecausedbythedifferencesingrowthformofthetwospecies.
ReproductiveStrategies
AlthoughHarperhadwrittenaboutthereproductivebiologyofBritishpoppiesin1966,itwasnotuntiltheDarwinianapproach
(Harper1967;citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandEvolutionary
Ecology)thatheexploredthetopicindetail.Hepresentsthereaderwithsevenresearchquestions.Thewayinwhichanorganism
allocatesitsresourcesmayhaveprofoundecologicalconsequences.Forexample,anyplantshouldallocateresourcestoleaving
offspring(seedoutputandrametproduction)(Harper,etal.1970),tocompetitiveability(heightgrowth,leaves,stems,rootsetc.),
andtopredatoravoidance(unpalatablestructures,suchasdefensivechemicalsorspines).Harperwasparticularlyinterestedin
thestrategyofreproductionandwhenhewaswritingin1967thisbranchofplantecologywasvirtuallyunstudied.Thissubjectis
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 18/40
studiedinOgdenandHarper1970andBazzaz,etal.1979.
Bazzaz,FakhriA.,RogerW.Carlson,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Contributiontoreproductiveeffortbyphotosynthesisof
flowersandfruits.Nature279:554–555.
Theauthorschallengesomeoftheassumptionsmadeinstudiesofreproductiveallocationandparticularlytheconventional
estimationofreproductiveeffort.Thepaperreportsananalysisofthecarbonbudgetofreproductionforfifteentemperate
deciduoustrees.
Harper,JohnL.,PeterH.Lovell,andKeithG.Moore.1970.Theshapesandsizesofseeds.AnnualReviewofEcologyand
Systematics1:327–356.
Table1inthispapersummarizestheproportionofnetannualassimilationthatisinvolvedinreproductiveeffort.Itincludesgrain
cropsandherbaceousperennialandannualplants.Table2showstherangesinseedweight(uptotenordersofmagnitude).
Ogden,John,andJohnL.Harper.1970.Thereproductivestrategyofhigherplants,I:Theconceptofstrategywith
specialreferencetoSeneciovulgarisL.JournalofEcology58:681–698.
Thispaperdescribesthepartitioningofdrymatterandenergythroughoutthelifecycleofdifferentplantspeciesandconsidersthe
conceptsofenergyallocation,strategyandtactics,andthemeasurementof“reproductiveeffort,”primarilyinrelationtoannual
composites.
Demography
Demographydescribesandattemptstoexplainnumbersandchangesinnumbersoforganisms—populationflux,agedistribution,
ageatdeath,survivorship,lifeexpectancy—andithasmuchincommonwithpopulationdynamics.HarperandWhite1974(cited
underEcologicalTheory)andHarper1978arguethatifplantecologyweretobebroughtwithinthehardpredictivesciences,we
couldnotavoidpayingmuchgreaterattentiontodemographicanalysis.DemographicstudyofthetypeenvisionedbyHarperand
Whitefocusesattentiononthelifespanofindividualsandonthetimeandcauseofdeath.Suchdatacanbeobtainedonlyby
detailedobservationsofindividualplantsthataremarkedforrepeatedobservations,suchasinstudiesthatincludeSarukhánand
Harper1973onthreespeciesofRanunculus;WatkinsonandHarper1978onVulpiafasciculata;Noble,etal.1979onCarex
arenaria;andLovettDoust1981onRanunculusrepens.
Harper,JohnL.1978.Thedemographyofplantswithclonalgrowth.InStructureandfunctioningofplantpopulations.
EditedbyA.H.J.FreysenandJ.W.Woldendorp,27–48.Amsterdam:NorthHolland.
Evolutionhappensbecausesomeindividuals,withcertaingenotypes,leavemoredescendantsthanothers.However,higher
plantsexpressthegenotypeinrepeatedmodularunitswithinanindividual,andtheyexpresstheirresponsetoenvironmental
stressmainlybyalteringthenumberofmodularunits.
LovettDoust,Lesley.1981.Populationdynamicsandlocalspecializationinaclonalperennial(Ranunculusrepens),I:
Thedynamicsoframetsincontrastinghabitats.JournalofEcology69:743–755.
ThedemographyoframetswasmonitoredintwoadjacentpopulationsoftheclonalperennialRanunculusrepensinpark
grasslandandinmixeddeciduouswoodland.Thetermsphalanxandguerrillaareintroducedtodescribethedifferentpatternsof
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 19/40
clonalgrowth.Therearetwootherpapersinthisseries:II:“TheDynamicsofLeaves,andaReciprocalTransplantReplant
Experiment,”JournalofEcology69(1981):757–768;andIII:“ResponsestoLightandNutrientSupply,”JournalofEcology75
(1987):555–568.
Noble,JamesC.,AdrianD.Bell,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thepopulationbiologyofplantswithclonalgrowth,I:
MorphologyandstructuraldemographyofCarexarenaria.JournalofEcology67:983–1008.
Thismanipulativefieldstudymonitoredthestructuraldemographyofarhizomatousspeciesintwodunesystems.Plotswere
establishedinthemature,senile,andslackphasesofnaturalpopulations;halftheplotsreceivedamassivenutrientapplicationof
NPKfertilizer.Theshootpopulationswithinpermanentquadratsweremappedatfrequentintervals.
Sarukhán,José,andJohnL.Harper.1973.Studiesonplantdemography:RanunculusrepensL.,R.bulbosusL.andR.
acrisL.,I:Populationfluxandsurvivorship.JournalofEcology61:675–716.
Arguablythemostdetailedplantdemographicstudyeverundertaken.Acensusofallplants,includingseedlings,ofthreespecies
ofRanunculus(morethan9,000individuals)wastakenatintervalsofafewweeksover2.5yearsinagrazedpasture.Thethree
specieshadquitedifferentlifecycles,thatis,solutionstosurvivalinthisonepasture.Thispaperwaslistedas“oneofthetop100
mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritishEcologicalSociety(1913–2012).”
Watkinson,AndrewR.,andJohnL.Harper.1978.Thedemographyofasandduneannual:Vulpiafasciculate,I:The
naturalregulationofpopulations.JournalofEcology66:15–33.
Permanentquadratsweremappedregularlyontwosanddunesystemstoobtaindataonthefatesofseedlingsandthe
reproductiveperformanceofeachindividualplant.Naturaldensitiesoftheplantswerealsomanipulatedtoassesstheroleof
densityinregulatingthepopulations.
DemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity)
Someoftheearlieststudiesonplantdemographysaylessaboutthenumberofindividualsinapopulationthanaboutthenumber
ofunitsormoduleswithinasingleplant.Thenumberofunitsdeterminesthesizeoftheplant,andtheirarrangementdetermines
plantform.Plantsareextremelyvariableinsizeandgrowthform(plasticity),andthisfeaturealongwithclonalgrowth(vegetative
reproduction)hasseriouslyhinderedthedevelopmentofplantdemography.Manyplantsgrowbyproducingrootedbranches,for
example,strawberry,whiteclover(Trifoliumrepens),somebuttercups(Ranunculus),brackenfern(Pteridiumaquilinum),and
tremblingaspen(Populustremuloides).Thedemographerhastodecideonhowtodefineanindividual,whichcouldbeeitherthe
geneticindividual,thatis,everythingthatgrewfromasingleseed,ortheunitofstructurethatformsashootaboveground.The
definitionofthesetwointerlinkedproblemsmadepossiblearigorousdevelopmentofplantpopulationbiology,ingeneral,andof
demographyandpopulationdynamics,inparticular(HarperandBell1979,Harper1981).Inessence,thegeneticindividual
maybeconsideredasapopulationofparts(BazzazandHarper1977,White1979)inwhichthepartsthemselveshavebirthand
deathstatisticsseparatefromthebirthanddeathsofgeneticindividualsinthepopulation.HarperandWhite1974andHarper
1980contendthatanunderstandingofthedemographyofthepartsisthestartingpointforsomeaspectsofthedemographyof
separateindividualsandHarper1978(citedunderDemography)andSackville,etal.1987havedrawnparticularattentionto
plantswithclonalgrowth.Viewedinthisway,growthinsuchanorganismisitselfademographicprocess(Harper1980,cited
underEcologicalTheory).Anyeffectivetheoryofplantdemographymusttakeintoaccountthetwolevelsatwhichbirthanddeath
occurs:thebirthanddeathofgeneticindividualsandthebirthanddeathofthemodulesorunitsthatmakeupthegenetic
individual.Maillette1982appliestheideatothepopulationofbudsinsilverbirch.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 20/40
Bazzaz,F.A.,andJohnL.Harper.1977.DemographicanalysisofgrowthofLinumusitatissimum.NewPhytologist
78:193–208.
Thisstudyshowsthattheapplicationoflifetableandotherdemographicanalysestoleafbirthanddeathisfeasibleandpermits
aninterpretationofplantresponsetoenvironmentalfactorsatamoresophisticatedlevelthanispossiblefromclassicalgrowth
analysis.
Harper,JohnL.1981.Theconceptofpopulationinmodularorganisms.InTheoreticalecology.2ded.EditedbyRobert
M.May,53–77.Oxford:Blackwell.
ThisisprobablyHarper’smostexhaustivetreatmentofthemodularconstructionofplants,clonalgrowth,andplasticity,andwhy
anytheoryofplantpopulationdynamicsmusttakeintoaccountboththedynamicsofindividualgenotypes(genets)andthe
dynamicsofmodules(ramets)withinagenotype.
Harper,JohnL.,andAdrianD.Bell.1979.Thepopulationdynamicsofgrowthforminorganismswithmodular
construction.InPopulationsdynamics:The20thsymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety,London1978.Editedby
R.M.Anderson,D.Turner,andL.R.Taylor,29–52.Oxford:Blackwell.
Plantsarenotdifferentfromanimals;rather,organismswithmodulargrowth(mostlyplantsbutalsosomeanimalssuchasObelia,
corals,Hydra)aredifferentfromthosewithunitaryconstruction(mostlyanimals).Thepaperalsomakesthecasethat“form”isa
resultofdemographicprocesses.
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1974.Thedemographyofplants.AnnualReviewofEcologyandSystematics5:419–
463.
Presentstheviewthatanygeneraltheoryofplantdemographythatfailstoconsiderbothlevelsofdemography,thegenetic
individual(thegenet)andthemodulesthatmakeupthatindividualgenet,isseriouslyincomplete.Arecognitionofthisdualism
allowstheplantdemographertodealwithclonalgrowthandplasticity.
Maillette,Lucie.1982.Structuraldynamicsofsilverbirch,I:Thefatesofbuds.JournalofAppliedEcology19:203–218.
Thisstudyconsidersthecrownofatreeasapopulationofrepeatedunits(buds,leaves,shoots,flowers)withdemographic
properties.Theauthoranalyzesthestructuraldynamicsofthegrowthofsilverbirch(Betulapendula)usingdemographic
techniques.Thesecondpaperinthisseriesis:“II:AMatrixModeloftheBudPopulation,”JournalofAppliedEcology19(1982):
219–223.
Sackville,Hamilton,N.Ruaraidh,BernhardSchmid,andJohnL.Harper.1987.Lifehistoryconceptsandthepopulation
biologyofclonalorganisms.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences232:35–57.
Amodelispresentedofasizestructuredpopulationofgeneticindividuals(genets),inwhicheachgenetconsistsofanage
structuredmetapopulationofmodules.ThepredictedresponsestorandKselectiondiffermarkedlyfromthosepredictedfor
unitaryorganisms:rselectionmayfavorclonalgrowthwithnoreproduction,whereasKselectionfavorsgreaterreproduction.
White,James.1979.Theplantasametapopulation.AnnualReviewofEcologyandSystematics10:109–145.
Retainsthewordpopulationforacollectionofgeneticallydistinctindividualsandproposesmetapopulationforthecollectionof
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 21/40
geneticallyidenticalmoduleswithinaplant.Thisreviewcollatesadiffuseliteratureontheplantasametapopulation.Historical
aspectsaretreatedfirstfollowedbyareviewofmodernstudies.Availableonlineforpurchase.
Books
JohnHarperpublishedonemajortextbook,PopulationBiologyofPlants(Harper1977),coauthoredtwoverysuccessful
undergraduatetextbooks,andeditedorcoeditedthreevolumesthatfeaturemultipleauthors.
PopulationBiologyofPlants
PopulationBiologyofPlants,Harper’s892pagetome,hasbeenaffectionatelyknownas“ThegospelaccordingtoJohn.”
Throughoutthisbook,HarperemphasizestheimportanceofDarwiniannaturalselectionandthenecessityofaccuratecensus
dataandexperimentstoaddressquestionsatboththepopulationandcommunitylevelsoforganization.Mostchapterspose
numerousquestions,manyofwhichremaintobeanswered.Atleastninedifferentecologicaljournalsreviewedthebookandtoa
largeextenttheywereglowinglypositive(Woodell1977,Mooney1978,vanderMeijden1978),butsomereviewspointedout
weakcoverageofcertaintopics(vanderMeijden)especiallyphysiologyandgenetics(Solbrig1979).Althoughpublishedin1977it
isstillarichsourceofinformationandideas.Harpernotedwithirritationthatthebook(whichasofFebruary2015hasmorethan
11,000citations)wasoftencitedcarelesslybymanyresearchersmerelytosupportpoorlyformedideas.Throughoutthevolume,
Harperpointsoutwaysinwhichplantandanimalpopulationsaresimilaranddifferent.Intheprefacetothe2010edition,printed
thirtyoneyearsaftertheoriginalpublication,Sarukhán,Dirzo,andFrancowritethatHarper’sbook“linkedtheconceptualand
theoreticaldevelopmentsinpopulationecology,mostlyderivedfromthestudyofanimals,withfieldobservationsandexperimental
evidenceofpopulationregulationandlifehistoryevolutioninplants.Thefieldofpopulationbiologywasalreadywellestablishedin
the1960salthoughwithaclearzoocentricemphasis,however,itisbecauseofHarper’sworkthatthefieldexperiencedaveritable
explosion,reachedmaturityandbecameamainstreamscientificendeavourworldwide.Thisfieldissovastnowthatitwouldbe
pointless,ifnotimpossible,forsomeonetosummariseit.ItispreciselybecauseofthisthatPBP[PopulationBiologyofPlants]is
asrelevantnowasitwasin1977.JohnHarper’sstyleofhighlightingunansweredquestionsandthelimitationsofboththeoryand
empiricalevidenceservedandstillservesasfoundationforresearchagendasworldwide.Muchremainstobedoneinthisfield
andthisalonemakesPBPanessentialelementinthelibraryofeverystudent/researcherofpopulationbiology,whetherinterested
inplantsoranimals.”
Harper,JohnL.1977.Populationbiologyofplants.London:AcademicPress.
This892pagevolumehadaprofoundimpactonthesubjectandbroughttogetherforthefirsttimeamajorsynthesisofthecurrent
stateofknowledgeofthepopulationbiologyofplants.Thetextcoverstheentirerangeoftopicsinplantpopulationbiology,
includingdispersal,dormancy,germination,recruitment,interference,herbivory,predation,naturaldynamics,reproduction,
growth,communitystructure,diversity,andnaturalselection.
Mooney,HaroldA.1978.BookreviewofPopulationbiologyofplants.Science199:675–676.
HaroldMooneywrites:“JohnHarperhasmadeenormouscontributionstoourunderstandingofplantbiology.Harper’sinnovative
ideashaveledtoawholeschoolofthoughtandresearchthatisspreadfarbeyondhishomeUniversity”(p.675).
Solbrig,Otto.1979.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJ.L.Harper.JournalofEcology67.1:386–388.
SolbrigprovidesthemostcriticalofthereviewsofHarper1977.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 22/40
vanderMeijden,Eddy.1978.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJohnL.Harper.Vegetatio38.1:61–62.
AlthoughvanderMeijdenidentifiessomeshortcomingsinthetext,hisreviewislargelycomplimentary.Availableonline.
Woodell,StanR.J.1977.Bestkindofnaturalhistory.Nature270.5637:545.
Woodellnotesthat“thereareenoughideas[inthetextbook]tokeepseveralworkersbusyforalifetime”(p.545).
Ecology:FromIndividualstoEcosystemsandEssentialsofEcology
Itisunusualforanundergraduatetextbooktohavemorethan1,200citationsintheprimaryecologicalliterature.Suchisthe
qualityofbothofthesetextbooks,writtenincollaborationwithMichaelBegon(Liverpool)andColinTownsend(Otago,New
Zealand).Thefirstvolumewaspublishedin1986,isnowinitsfourthedition(Begon,etal.2006),andhasservedasthestandard
undergraduateecologytextbookformorethantwentyyears.Thebookseparatesitselffromothertextbooks,intypicalHarperian
fashion,byrecognitionthatecologyisaconstantlyevolvingsubjectwithitsownuncertaintiesandcontroversies;thus,readersare
forcedtothinkaboutandevaluatealternativeideasratherthanproviding‘theanswer.”Inreviewingthebook,RobertSmith
(Nature319[1986]:809)writes:“Thefreshnessofapproachandbreadthanddepthofcoveragemakemostoftheopposition
[undergraduateecologytextbooks]seemratherstaleandrestricteddietbycomparison...andallteachersofecologyshould
samplethisnouvellecuisine.”Bothofthesetextbookshavehadaprofoundinfluenceonagenerationofundergraduatesand
variouseditionshavebeentranslatedintomanylanguages,includingGerman,Spanish,Russian,Japanese,and,morerecently,
Chinese,Korean,andPortuguese.In2007theauthorsreceivedaLifetimeAchievementAwardfromtheBritishEcological
Society.
Begon,Michael,ColinR.Townsend,andJohnL.Harper.2006.Ecology:Fromindividualstoecosystems.4thed.Oxford:
Blackwell.
Thisundergraduatetextbookhasservedasthestandardadvancedtextbookinecologyfornearlytwentyyears.Itis
comprehensiveincoverage,exploringecologicalconceptswithrelevantfieldandlaboratorystudies.FormerlyknownasEcology:
Individuals,PopulationsandCommunities.Originallypublishedin1986.
Townsend,ColinR.,JohnL.Harper,andMichaelBegon.2008.Essentialsofecology.3ded.Oxford:Blackwell.
ThistextbookalongwithitslargercompaniontextofBegon,etal.2006servedasforerunnersinthescienceofecologytoa
generationofundergraduatestudents.Originallypublishedin1999.
TheBiologyofWeeds
JohnHarper’supbringingonafarmandagriculturalbackgroundareclearlyreflectedinthesubjectsusedinmuchofhisresearch
—cropplants,grasses,andweeds.Duringthe1950sHarperandhiscolleaguesbeganaseriesofstudiesontheinfluenceofthe
environmentonseedandseedlingmortalityand,from1953to1960,theygaveincreasingattentiontothestudyofweeds.The
naturaldevelopmentfromtheseearlystudiesultimatelyledtotheholdingofthefirstsymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety,
whichwastitledtheBiologyofWeeds;hewaseditorofthebook(Harper1960)thatstemmedfromthisconference.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 23/40
Harper,JohnL.,ed.1960.Thebiologyofweeds.SymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety1.Oxford:Blackwell.
ThisbookincludestheproceedingsofthefirstsymposiumheldbytheBritishEcologicalSociety.Itconsistsoftwentyfourchapters
(papers)onallaspectsofweedbiology,includinghistory,ecology,taxonomy,germination,dormancy,dispersal,andcompetition
writtenbymanyofthemostnotableweedbiologistsatthattime.
OtherBooks
Harperwasalsocoeditoroftwoothervolumeswithmultipleauthors:Chaloner,etal.1991andSilvertown,etal.1997.
Chaloner,WilliamG.,JohnL.Harper,andJohnH.Lawton,eds.1991.Theevolutionaryinteractionofanimalsandplants.
PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences333.London:RoyalSociety.
Thisisaseriesoffourteenpaperswrittenbyleadingecologists.Topicsrangefromfossilevidenceforplantarthropodinteractions,
pollination,andherbivorytoevolutionofleafshape,plantsecondarychemicaldiversity,insectmorphology,andcellulosedigestion
ininsects.Eachchapterisfollowedbyadiscussion,andthefinalchapteris“TheCroonianLecture”byTonyBradshaw.
Silvertown,Jonathan,MiguelFranco,andJohnL.Harper,eds.1997.Plantlifehistories:Ecology,phylogenyand
evolution.Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.
Thisbookexaminesthephylogeneticrelationshipbetweenplantlifehistorytraitsandprovidesanimportantsynthesisofthinking
onamultifacetedproblem.Thefinalsectionofthebookfocusesoninteractionsbetweenplantsandcompetitorsandherbivores
andmicrobialsymbionts,recognizingthattheseinteractionsmayhaveanancientevolutionaryhistory.
Legacy
JohnHarper’slegacyincludeshisownaccomplishmentsandrecognitioninthefieldofplantpopulationbiology(seethesection
AwardsandService),hisparticipationinserviceonvariousadvisoryboards,andwhathesometimescalledhisacademicprogeny
—hewasproudofhisstudents.Hislegacyalsoincludesgemsofwisdomforwhichhewillberemembered,suchashispleafor
clarityandprecisionandhisdistasteforfuzzythinking.Harperwasalsoproudofthelegacyproducedbyhismanystudents.He
leftaprofoundecologicalfootprint,especiallyinMexico,theUnitedStates,Canada,andpartsofEurope(Franco,etal.2009).
Twoofhisformerstudents,JoséSarukhánandRodolfoDirzo,wereelectedforeignassociatesoftheUSNationalAcademy,and
SarukhánwasalsoelectedaforeignmemberoftheRoyalSociety.LesleyClegg(nowLesleyLovettDoust)servedasprovostand
vicepresidentforacademicaffairsatMichiganTechnicalUniversityinHoughton,Michigan,until2009,beforebeingappointed
presidentandvicechancellorofNipissingUniversityinNorthBay,Ontario,wheresheservedfrom2009to2012.Foranumberof
years,JoséSarukhánwaspresidentofthelargestuniversityintheworld(UNAM)inMexicoCity.ManyofJohnHarper’sstudents
becamemajorinfluencesintheirownright(seethesectionBiography).Twentyeightformercollaboratorsrepresentingeight
nationalitiesfromninecountriescontributedtoHarper’sfestschrift(White1985)ontheoccasionofhissixtiethbirthday.Individuals
representingmorethantwentynationalitiesparticipatedasmembersofHarper’slabeitherasstudentsorasvisitors,andeighteen
ofhisformerstudentsholdfacultypositionsinuniversitiesaroundtheworld.
Franco,Miguel,JoséSarukhán,andRodolfoDirzo.2009.ADarwinianplantecologist,JohnLanderHarperCBEFRS,
1925–2009.InMemoriesofJohnL.Harper:Aremembrancebyhisfriends,students,andcolleagues.2ded.Editedby
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 24/40
GlennR.Matlack,98–100.Bangor,UK:SPB.
ThisonlineresourcewrittenbythreeofHarper’sgraduatestudentsprovidesanoverviewofHarper’sacademiccareerand
influenceandhowthisinfluencehasspreadtotouchsuccessivegenerationsofMexicanstudents,contributingtothestudyand
conservationofMexico’sbiodiversity.
White,James,ed.1985.Studiesofplantdemography:AfestschriftforJohnL.Harper.London:AcademicPress.
Avolumeoftwentyfourchaptersonplantdemography,writtenbyformerstudentsandcollaborators,compiledtomarkthesixtieth
birthdayofJohnHarper.
CollaborationsandMentorship
Harper’scareerisnoteworthyforhislegacyasamentor.Harperpublishedmanysingleauthoredpapersandtypicallycoauthored
(althoughnotalways)atleastonepaperwitheachofhisstudentsandvisitors.AreviewofHarper’spublicationsdemonstratesthe
enormousmentoringhebroughttogenerationsofstudents,doctoralgraduates,andvisitors.ManystudentsleftHarper’slabto
becomemajorinfluencesintheirownright.TomarkHarper’ssixtiethbirthday,JamesWhitecoordinatedproductionofafestschrift
thatincludestwentyfourchapterswrittenbytwentyeightformercollaboratorsrepresentingeightnationalitiesfromninecountries
(White1985).IndividualsrepresentingmorethantwentynationalitiesweremembersofHarper’slabeitherasstudentsoras
visitors,andeighteenofhisformerstudentsholdfacultypositionsinuniversitiesaroundtheworld.Suchistheglobalinfluenceof
theuniquelyHarperianapproachtoplantecology,which,ofcourse,isalsoamajoraspectofhislegacy.
White,James,ed.1985.Studiesofplantdemography:AfestschriftforJohnL.Harper.London:AcademicPress.
Avolumeoftwentyfourchaptersonplantdemography,writtenbyformerstudentsandcollaborators,compiledtomarkthesixtieth
birthdayofJohnHarper.
ClarityandPrecision
Harperwasknownforhisrapiersharpwitandequallysharpintellect.Buthisinsistenceonclarityandprecisioninthinkingand
writingconstitutesperhapshisgreatestintellectualtrait.Harperwasruthlessincombattingfuzzythinking,andhadabhorreduseof
sloppyterminology.InHarper1982(citedunderExperimentalEcology),heattacksusageofthewordsstress,strategy,and
adaptation.InBegon,etal.2006(citedunderBooks:Ecology:FromIndividualstoEcosystemsandEssentialsofEcology),andin
Townsend,etal.2008(citedunderBooks:Ecology:FromIndividualstoEcosystemsandEssentialsofEcology),theword
adaptationisdismissedintheearlypagesandapparentlynotusedagain.Heparticularlydislikedthetermvegetative
reproduction:“ifatreesspreadsverticallywecallitgrowth,butifacloverspreadslaterallywecallitreproduction—nonsense”
(personalcommunication).Heloathedthewordcompetition,oratleastthesloppywayinwhichthetermhadbeenusedby
ecologists,andpreferredinsteadthemoregeneralterminterference“asablanketwordtodescribethosehardshipswhichare
causedbytheproximityofneighbours(usuallyotherorganismsfeedingatthesametrophiclevel)”(Harper1961,p.1,citedunder
BackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture).Whilethewordinterferenceappearsinthetitlesofeightpapers
rangingfromHarperandChancellor1959(citedunderCompetition)toMackandHarper1977(citedunderIndividualsina
PopulationandthePlant’sEyeView),nevertheless,thewordcompetitioncreepsintothetitlesofthreeofhispapers(Harper
1961,citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture;SchmidandHarper1985,citedunder
Competition;FrancoandHarper1988).Interestingly,allofthesephobiawordsareusedinhislandmarkADarwinianApproachto
PlantEcology(Harper1967,citedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangorand
EvolutionaryEcology),althoughcompetitionisusedonlyonceanditisinquotations.Whenchallengedonhisuseofthesewords
inearlypapers,Harperresponded:“AmInotallowedtochangemymind?”(questionanddiscussionperiod,RoyalSociety
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 25/40
Symposium,1985).
Franco,Miguel,andJohnL.Harper.1988.Competitionandtheformationofspatialpatterninspacinggradients:An
exampleusingKochiascoparia.JournalofEcology76:959–974.
DespiteHarper’sdistainforhowthewordcompetitionwasusedbyecologists,thewordmanagedtocreepintothetitleofthis
paper.
CompleteBibliographyofthePublishedWorksofJohnL.Harper
ThesecitationsrepresentthecompleteworksofwhichHarperisanauthor.Mostofthecoauthoredpapersthathavebeen
annotatedabovehavebeencitedmorethan130times(WebofKnowledgeorGoogle).Harperdidnotkeeparecordofpapersfor
whichhewasnotacoauthor,eventhoughnumerouspaperswerepublishedbyhisstudentsandvisitorswhileinhislab.Afewof
themoresignificantofthesepublicationsareincludedasannotationsthroughoutthis“CompleteBibliography”butcompilationofa
completelisthasnotbeenattempted.
I.Thesis
Harper,JohnL.1950.Aninvestigationoftheinteractionofsoilmicroorganismswithspecialreferencetothestudyof
thebacterialpopulationsofplantrootsystems.PhDdiss.,MagdalenCollege,UniversityofOxford.
Harper’sD.Phil.workwasneverpublished,buttheideasandworkinPartVofthethesis“Astudyoftherhizosphereofsome
bananavarieties”wereintegratedintoHarper1950aandHarper1950b(bothcitedunderPapers,BookChapters,andConference
Proceedings).Abouthisthesis,Harperwrote,“WhenIcametowriteupmyD.Phil.thesis....technicalproblemsformedhalfthe
thesis.IwroteapapertoNatureaboutthemwhichwasacceptedbutIwithdrewitwhenIdiscoveredyetanothertechnicalproblem
aboutsampling.”(J.L.Harper,unpublishedmemoirs;providedbyClaire,hisdaughter).
II.Papers,BookChapters,andConferenceProceedings
Harper,JohnL.1950a.StudiesintheresistanceofcertainvarietiesofbananatoPanamadisease,I:Internalfactorsforresistance
andantibiotics.PlantandSoil2:374–382.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1950b.StudiesintheresistanceofcertainvarietiesofbananatoPanamadisease,II:Therhizosphere.Plantand
Soil2:383–394.FindThisResource
Osborn,E.M.,andJohnL.Harper.1951.AntibioticproductionbygrowingplantsofLeptosynemaritime.Nature167:685–686.Find
ThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andGeoffR.Sagar.1953.Someaspectsoftheecologyofbuttercupsinpermanentgrasslands.
ProceedingsoftheBritishWeedControlConference1:256–263.
CitedinBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
Harper,JohnL.1954a.Influenceoftemperatureandsoilwatercontentontheseedlingblightofmaize.Nature173:391–393.Find
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 26/40
ThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1954b.SomerelationshipsbetweenthesoilwatertableandthecomparativeecologyofRanunculusbulbosus,R.
repensandR.acris.InHuitièmecongrèsinternationaldebotanique,Paris.EditedbyInternationalBotanicalCongress,207–208.
Paris:InternationalAssociationofPlantTaxonomy.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1955a.Theinfluenceoftheenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,VI:Theeffectsoftheinteractionofsoil
moisturecontentandtemperatureonthemortalityofmaizegrains.AnnalsofAppliedBiology43:696–708.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1955b.Problemsinvolvedintheextensionofmaizecultivationintonortherntemperateregions.WorldCrops
7:93:96.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andPhyllisA.Landragin.1955.Theinfluenceoftheenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,IV:Soil
temperatureandmaizegrainmortalitywithspecialreferencetothecoldtestprocedure.PlantandSoil6:360–372.FindThis
Resource
Harper,JohnL.,PhyllisA.Landragin,andJerzyW.Ludwig.1955a.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedling
mortality,I:Theinfluenceoftimeofplantingonthegerminationofmaize.NewPhytologist54:107–118.
Thenumberingofthisseries“Theinfluenceoftheenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality”isnotinsequence:Nos.I,II,IV,
andVIwerepublishedin1955,Vin1956,IIIin1957,andVIIandVIIIin1958.Inaddition,themaintitleoftheseriesisnot
consistent.Nos.I,II,andIIIbegin“Theinfluenceofenvironmenton...”,nos.IV,VI,VII,andVIIbegin“Theinfluenceofthe
environment...”andinno.V“Theinfluenceoftheenvironmenton...”hasbeenreplacedby“Studiesin...”;onlyinnos.IVand
VIIisseedmortalityhyphenated.CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
Harper,JohnL.,PhyllisA.Landragin,andJerzyW.Ludwig.1955b.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,
II:Thepathogenicpotentialofthesoil.NewPhytologist54:119–131.FindThisResource
Acheson,R.Morrin,JohnL.Harper,andIanH.McNaughton.1956.Distributionofanthocyaninpigmentsinpoppies.Nature
178:1283–1284.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1956a.Studiesinseedandseedlingmortality,V:Directandindirecteffectsoflowtemperaturesonthe
mortalityofmaize.NewPhytologist55:35–44.
Eventhoughthistitleisdifferentfromtheothersintheseries,thisisthecorrecttitle.
Harper,JohnL.1956b.Theevolutionofweedsinrelationtoresistancetoherbicides.InProceedingsoftheThirdBritishWeed
ControlConference,1956,NorbreckHydro,Blackpool,England,November6th,7th,and8th,1956.EditedbyBritishWeed
ControlCouncil,179–188.London:BritishWeedControlCouncil.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1957a.Theecologicalsignificanceofdormancyanditsimportanceinweedcontrol.InProceedingsofthe
IVthInternationalCongressofCropProtection,Hamburg.EditedbyJohannesKrause,415–420.Brunswick,Germany:
InternationalCongressofCropProtection.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgricultureandGermination.
Harper,JohnL.1957b.BiologicalfloraoftheBritishIsles.RanunculusacrisL.,R.repensL.andR.bulbosusL.JournalofEcology
45:289–342.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andW.A.Wood.1957.BiologicalfloraoftheBritishIsles.SeneciojacobaeaL.JournalofEcology45:617–
637.FindThisResource
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 27/40
Ludwig,JerzyW.,ErnestS.Bunting,andJohnL.Harper.1957.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,III:
Theinfluenceofaspectonmaizegermination.JournalofEcology45:205–224.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1958a.Ecologicalaspectsofweedcontrol.OutlookonAgriculture1:197–205.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1958b.Famousplants,8:Thebuttercup.InNewbiology.Vol.26.EditedbyM.L.Johnson,M.Abercrombie,and
G.E.Fogg,30–46.Harmondsworth,UK:Penguin.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1958c.Theecologyofragwort(Seneciojacobaea)withspecialreferencetocontrol.HerbageAbstracts28:151–
157.FindThisResource
Ludwig,JerzyW.,andJohnL.Harper.1958.Theinfluenceoftheenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,VII:Depthof
sowingofmaize.PlantandSoil10:37–48.FindThisResource
Ludwig,JerzyW.,andJohnL.Harper.1958.Theinfluenceofenvironmentonseedandseedlingmortality,VIII:Theinfluenceof
soilcolour.JournalofEcology46:381–389.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andA.PatriciaChancellor.1959.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,IV:Rumex:interferencebetweenindividualsinpopulationsofoneandtwospecies.JournalofEcology47:679–695.
CitedunderCompetition.
Harper,JohnL.1960.Factorscontrollingplantnumbers.InTheBiologyofWeeds.ByJohnL.Harper,119–132.
SymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety1.Oxford:BlackwellScientificPublishing.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
Harper,JohnL.,andIanH.McNaughton.1960.TheinheritanceofdormancyininterandintraspecifichybridsofPapaver.
Heredity15:315–320.FindThisResource
McNaughton,IanH.,andJohnL.Harper.1960.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,I:ExternalbreedingbarriersbetweenPapaverspecies.NewPhytologist58:15–26.
Thenumberingofthepapersintheseries“Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesamearea”isnotin
sequence.NoIVwasthefirsttobepublishedin1959;noI,II,andIIIin1960,noVandVIIin1962,noVIin1963,andnoIXwas
publishedin1967.NoVI(HarperandClatworthy1963)hasanabbreviatedgeneraltitle.ItappearsthatnoVIIIisprobablyHarper,
etal.1961,althoughthispaperisnotnumberedandhasamodifiedtitle:“Theevolutionandecologyofcloselyrelatedspecies
livinginthesamearea.”CitedunderOxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
McNaughton,IanH.,andJohnL.Harper.1960a.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesamearea,II:
AberrantmorphologyandaviruslikesyndromeinhybridsbetweenPapaverrhoeasL.andP.dubiumL.NewPhytologist59:27–
41.FindThisResource
McNaughton,IanH.,andJohnL.Harper.1960b.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesamearea,III:
ThenatureofbarriersisolatingsympatricpopulationsofPapaverdubiumandP.lecoquii.NewPhytologist59:129–137.FindThis
Resource
Sagar,GeoffR.,andJohnL.Harper.1960.Factorsaffectingthegerminationandearlyestablishmentofplantains
(Plantagolanceolata,P.mediaandP.major).TheBiologyofWeeds.BritishEcologicalSocietySymposium1:236–245.
CitedunderGermination.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 28/40
Harper,JohnL.1961.Approachestothestudyofplantcompetition.InMechanismsinbiologicalcompetition.Editedby
theSocietyforExperimentalBiology,1–39.SymposiaoftheSocietyforExperimentalBiology15.NewYork:Academic
Press.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgricultureandCompetition.
Harper,JohnL.,JohnN.Clatworthy,IanH.McNaughton,andGeoffR.Sagar.1961.Theevolutionandecologyofclosely
relatedspecieslivinginsamearea.Evolution15:209–227.
Thispaperiseitherthefirst(butunnumbered)paperintheseries“Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthe
samearea”eventhoughitisnotnumberedandhasamodifiedtitle;ifthisiscorrect,thenthereisnonoVIIIintheseries.Second,
itisperhapsthemissingno.VIIIintheseries.Giventheearlyhistoryofthisseriesthefirstoptionismostlikelycorrect.Cited
underBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
Harper,JohnL.,andDanicaGajic.1961.Experimentalstudiesonthemortalityandplasticityofaweed.WeedResearch1:91–
104.FindThisResource
Sagar,GeoffR.,andJohnL.Harper.1961.ControlledinterferencewithnaturalpopulationsofPlantagolanceolata,P.
majorandP.minor.WeedResearch1:163–176.
CitedunderCompetition.
Acheson,R.Morrin,C.L.Jenkins,JohnL.Harper,andIanH.McNaughton.1962.FloralpigmentsinPapaverandtheir
significanceinthesystematicsofthegenus.NewPhytologist61:256–260.FindThisResource
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1962.TherelativeperformanceofRumexcrispusandRumexobtusifoliusatthreedensities
inpureandmixedstands.InResearchReport:ProceedingsoftheSixthBritishWeedControlConference,Brighton,England,
November6th,7th,and8th,1962.EditedbyBritishWeedControlCouncil,453–462.London:BritishWeedControlCouncil.Find
ThisResource
Clatworthy,JohnN.,andJohnL.Harper.1962.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,V:InterandintraspecificinterferencewithinculturesofLemnaspp.andSalvinianatans.JournalofExperimental
Botany13:307–324.
CitedunderCompetition.
Harper,JohnL.,andIanH.McNaughton.1962a.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesame
area,VII:InterferencebetweenindividualsinpureandmixedpopulationsofPapaverspecies.NewPhytologist61:175–
188.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:Oxford,DepartmentofAgriculture.
Harper,JohnL.,andIanH.McNaughton.1962b.Interferenceinmixedpoppypopulations.AnnalsofAppliedBiology50:352.Find
ThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1963.Thebiologicalroleofsoilwater:Introduction.InSoilMoisture.Vol.4.EditedbyD.F.Ball,52–54.
Aberystwyth,UK:WelshSoilsDiscussionGroup.FindThisResource
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 29/40
Harper,JohnL.,andJohnN.Clatworthy.1963.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecies,VI:Analysisofgrowth
ofTrifoliumrepensandT.fragiferuminpureandmixedpopulations.JournalofExperimentalBotany14:172–190.
Thegeneraltitleofthispaperdiffersfromtheothersintheseries.
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1964.BiologicalfloraoftheBritishIsles:No.98:RumexobtusifoliusL.andR.crispusL.
JournalofEcology52:737–766.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1964a.Theindividualinthepopulation.JournalofAnimalEcology33:149–158.
ThispaperisoftenincorrectlycitedasJournalofEcologyvol.52ratherthanJournalofAnimalEcology.CitedunderBackground
Development:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandIndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeView.
Harper,JohnL.1964b.Thenatureandconsequenceofinterferenceamongstplants.InGeneticstoday:Proceedingsof
theXIthInternationalCongressofGenetics,TheHague,theNetherlands,September1963.Vol.2.EditedbyS.J.Geerts,
465–482.Oxford:Pergamon.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandCompetition.
McNaughton,IanH.,andJohnL.Harper.1964.BiologicalfloraoftheBritishIsles:No.99.PapaverL.JournalofEcology52:767–
793.FindThisResource
Sagar,GeoffR.,andJohnL.Harper.1964.BiologicalfloraoftheBritishIsles:No.95.PlantagomajorL,P.mediaL.andP.
lanceolataL.JournalofEcology52:189–221.FindThisResource
Govier,RobinN.,andJohnL.Harper.1965.Angiospermoushemiparasites.Nature205:722–723.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1965.Establishment,aggression,andcohabitationinweedyspecies.InThegeneticsofcolonizing
species.EditedbyHerbertG.BakerandG.LedyardStebbins,243–263.NewYork:AcademicPress.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor.
Harper,JohnL.,J.TrevorWilliams,andGeoffR.Sagar.1965.Thebehaviourofseedsinsoil,I:Theheterogeneityofsoil
surfacesanditsroleindeterminingtheestablishmentofplantsfromseed.JournalofEcology53:273–286.
CitedunderGermination.
Williams,J.Trevor,andJohnL.Harper.1965.Seedpolymorphismandgermination,I:Theinfluenceofnitratesandlow
temperaturesonthegerminationofChenopodiumalbum.WeedResearch5:141–150.
CitedunderGermination.NoIIinthisseriesisJ.TrevorWilliams(1971)“Seedpolymorphismandgermination,II:Theroleof
hybridizationinthegerminationpolymorphismofRumexcrispusandR.obtusifolius,”WeedResearch11:12–21.
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1966.GerminationpolymorphisminRumexcrispusandRumexobtusifolius.Journal
ofEcology54:367–382.
CitedunderGermination.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 30/40
Harper,JohnL.1966.ThereproductivebiologyoftheBritishpoppies.InReproductivebiologyandtaxonomyofvascularplants.
EditedbyJ.G.Hawkes,26–39.London:BotanicalSocietyoftheBritishIsles.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andRichardA.Benton.1966.Thebehaviourofseedsinsoil,II:Germinationofseedsonsurfaceofa
watersupplyingsubstrate.JournalofEcology54:151–166.
CitedunderGermination.NoIIIinthisseriesisJohnC.Sheldon(1974),“Thebehaviourofseedsinsoil,III:Theinfluenceofseed
morphologyandthebehaviourofseedlingsontheestablishmentofplantsfromsurfacelyingseeds”JournalofEcology62:47–66.
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1967a.Thecomparativebiologyofcloselyrelatedspecieslivinginthesamearea,IX:
Rumex:Thenatureofadaptationofaseashorehabitat.JournalofEcology55:73–82.FindThisResource
Cavers,PaulB.,andJohnL.Harper.1967b.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,I:Thefateofseedand
transplantsintroducedintovarioushabitats.JournalofEcology55:59–71.
ThereisnonumberIVintheseries“Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,”butthereisanumberI,II,II,andV.Citedunder
PlantPopulationDynamics.
Harper,JohnL.1967a.ADarwinianapproachtoplantecology:Presidentialaddress:BritishEcologicalSociety.Journal
ofEcology55:247–270.
ThispaperwasoneoffourpapersfromHarper’slablistedas“oneofthetop100mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritish
EcologicalSociety(1913–2012)”aspartoftheBEScentenarycelebrations.AlsoavailableinJournalofAppliedEcology4(1967):
267–290,andJournalofAnimalEcology36(1967):495–518.ThepaperisalsoincludedinLeslieA.RealandJamesH.Brown,
FoundationsofEcology:ClassicPaperswithCommentaries(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1991).Citedunder
BackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),Bangor,EvolutionaryEcology,andClarityandPrecision.
Harper,JohnL.1967b.Theteachingofexperimentalecology.InTheteachingofecology.EditedbyJoyceM.Lambert,135–146.
SymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety7.Oxford:Blackwell.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andMohammedObeid.1967.Influenceofseedsizeanddepthofsowingonestablishmentandgrowthof
varietiesoffiberandoilseedflax.CropScience7:527–532.FindThisResource
Litav,Michael,andJohnL.Harper.1967.Amethodforstudyingspatialrelationshipsbetweenrootsystemsoftwoneighbouring
plants.PlantandSoil26:389–392.FindThisResource
Obeid,Mohammed,DavidMachin,andJohnL.Harper.1967.Influenceofdensityonplanttoplantvariationinfiberflax
LinumusitatissimumL.CropScience7:471–473.
CitedunderCompetition.
Harper,JohnL.1968.Theregulationofnumbersandmassinplantpopulations.InPopulationbiologyandevolution.
EditedbyRichardC.Lewontin,139–158.NewYork:SyracuseUniv.Press.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandRegulation.
Putwain,PhilipD.,DavidMachin,andJohnL.Harper.1968.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,II:Componentsand
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 31/40
regulationofanaturalpopulationofRumexacetosellaL.JournalofEcology56:421–431.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1969.Theroleofpredationinvegetationaldiversity.InDiversityandstabilityinecologicalsystems:
ReportofasymposiumheldMay26–28,1969.EditedbyG.M.WoodwellandH.H.Smith,48–62.BrookhavenSymposiain
Biology22.Upton,NY:BrookhavenNationalLaboratory.
CitedunderBackgroundDevelopment:UniversityCollegeofNorthWales(UCNW),BangorandDarwinianandWallacian
Perspectives.
Hatto,Jane,andJohnL.Harper.1969.ThecontrolofslugsandsnailsinBritishcroppingsystems,especiallygrassland.
ProjectNo.115A.InternationalCopperResearchAssociation.
AreportoftheresultsofaninvestigationsupportedbyaGrantinAidfromtheInternationalCopperResearchAssociationInc.
carriedoutattheSchoolofPlantBiology,UniversityCollegeofNorthWales,Bangorfrom1966–1969.Thisreporthasbeencited
manytimes,oftenwiththeauthorshipreversed,andoftendated1968.Thereasonforsomuchconfusioninitscitationisthatthe
reportwasnotpublished.ThereportisconfidentialandisthepropertyoftheInternationalCopperResearchAssociation.
Informationinthereport“maynotbepublishedexceptwiththewrittenauthorizationoftheInternationalCopperResearch
Association.”
Ellern,SigmundJ.,JohnL.Harper,andGeoffR.Sagar.1970.ComparativestudyofdistributionofrootsofAvenafatuaandA.
strigosainmixedstandsusinga14Clabellingtechnique.JournalofEcology58:865–868.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1970.Grazing,fertilizersandpesticidesinthemanagementofgrasslands.InThescientificmanagementofanimal
andplantcommunitiesforconservation:The11thsymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety,UniversityofEastAnglia,Norwich,
7–9July1970.EditedbyE.DuffeyandAlexS.Watt,15–31.Oxford:Blackwell.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,PeterH.Lovell,andKeithG.Moore.1970.Theshapesandsizesofseeds.AnnualReviewofEcologyand
Systematics1:327–356.
CitedunderGerminationandReproductiveStrategies.
Ogden,John,andJohnL.Harper.1970.Thereproductivestrategyofhigherplants,I:Theconceptofstrategywith
specialreferencetoSeneciovulgarisL.JournalofEcology58:681–698.
CitedunderReproductiveStrategies.No.IIinthisseriesisJohnOgden,“TheReproductiveStrategyofHigherPlants,II:The
ReproductiveStrategyofTussilagofarfaraL.,”JournalofEcology62(1974):291–324.
Putwain,PhilipD.,andJohnL.Harper.1970.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,III:Influenceofassociatedspecieson
populationsofRumexacetosaL.andR.acetosellaL.ingrassland.JournalofEcology58:251–264.FindThisResource
White,James,andJohnL.Harper.1970.Correlatedchangesinplantsizeandnumberinplantpopulations.Journalof
Ecology58:467–485.
CitedunderPlantPopulationDynamics.
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1971.Thedynamicsofplantpopulations.InDynamicsofpopulations:Proceedingsof
theAdvancedStudyInstituteonDynamicsofNumbersinPopulations,Oosterbeek,theNetherlands,7–18September
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 32/40
1970.EditedbyJ.denBoerandG.R.Gradwell,41–63.Wageningen,TheNetherlands:CentreforAgriculturalPublishing
andDocumentation.
CitedunderPlantPopulationDynamicsandGermination.
Harper,JohnL.1972.Projectsandtheirassessmentindegreeexaminations.JournalofBiologicalEducation6:318–321.FindThis
Resource
Putwain,PhilipD.,andJohnL.Harper.1972.Studiesinthedynamicsofplantpopulations,V:Mechanismsgoverningsex
ratioinRumexacetosaandR.acetosella.JournalofEcology60:113–129.
CitedunderPlantPopulationDynamics.
Ross,MaxA.,andJohnL.Harper.1972.Occupationofbiologicalspaceduringseedlingestablishment.Journalof
Ecology60:77–88.
CitedunderIndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeView.
Haizel,KwesiA.,andJohnL.Harper.1973.Theeffectsofdensityandtimingofremovaloninterferencebetweenbarley,white
mustardandwildoats.JournalofAppliedEcology10:23–31.FindThisResource
Sarukhán,José,andJohnL.Harper.1973.Studiesonplantdemography:RanunculusrepensL.,R.bulbosusL.andR.
acrisL.,I:Populationfluxandsurvivorship.JournalofEcology61:675–716.
ThispaperisoneoffourpapersfromHarper’slablistedas“oneofthetop100mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritish
EcologicalSociety(19132012)”aspartoftheBEScentenarycelebrations.Availableonline.CitedunderDemography.NoIIandIII
inthisseriesareJoséSarukhan(1974)“Studiesonplantdemography:RanunculusrepensL.,R.bulbosusL.andR.acrisL.,II:
Reproductivestrategiesandseedpopulationdynamics,”JournalofEcology62:151–177,andJoséSarukhanandMadhavGadgil
(1974)“Studiesonplantdemography:RanunculusrepensL.,R.bulbosusL.andR.acrisL.,III:Amathematicalmodel
Incorporatingmultiplemodesofreproduction,”JournalofEcology62:921–936.
Trenbath,BrianR.,andJohnL.Harper.1973.NeighboureffectsinthegenusAvena,I:Comparisonofcropspecies.
JournalofAppliedEcology10:379–400.
Nos.IIandIIIinthisseriesareBrianR.Trenbath(1974)“NeighboureffectsinthegenusAvena,II:Comparisonofweedspecies,”
JournalofAppliedEcology11:111–125,andBrianR.Trenbath(1975)“NeighboureffectsinthegenusAvena,III:Adiallel
approach,”JournalofAppliedEcology12:189–200.Availableonlineforpurchase.
Tripathi,RadheyS.,andJohnL.Harper.1973.ComparativebiologyofAgropyronrepens(L)BeauvandAgropyron
caninum(L)Beauv,I:Growthofmixedpopulationsestablishedfromtillersandfromseeds.JournalofEcology61:353–
368.
Thereappearstobenofurtherpapersinthisplannedseries.
Harper,JohnL.1974.Agriculturalecosystems.AgroEcosystems1:1–6.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1974.Centenaryinpopulationbiology.Nature252:526–527.FindThisResource
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 33/40
Harper,JohnL.1974.Soilsterilizationanddisinfection:Theperturbationofecosystems.AgroEcosystems1:105–106.FindThis
Resource
Harper,JohnL.,andJamesWhite.1974.Thedemographyofplants.AnnualReviewofEcologyandSystematics5:419–
463.
CitedunderEcologicalTheoryandDemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity).
Kays,Stanley,andJohnL.Harper.1974.Theregulationofplantandtillerdensityinagrasssward.JournalofEcology
62:97–105.
CitedunderRegulation.
Bazzaz,FakhriA.,andJohnL.Harper.1976.RelationshipbetweenplantweightandnumbersinmixedpopulationsofSinapsis
alba(L.)RabenhandLepidiumsativumL.JournalofAppliedEcology13:211–216.FindThisResource
Cahn,MartinG.,andJohnL.Harper.1976.ThebiologyofleafmarkpolymorphisminTrifoliumrepensL.I.Distributionof
phenotypesatalocalscale.Heredity37:309–325.
CitedunderExperimentalEcology.
Cahn,MartinG.,andJohnL.Harper.1976.ThebiologyofleafmarkpolymorphisminTrifoliumrepensL.II:Evidenceforselection
ofleafmarksbyrumenfistulatedsheep.Heredity37:327–333.FindThisResource
Bazzaz,FakhriA.,andJohnL.Harper.1977.DemographicanalysisofgrowthofLinumusitatissimum.NewPhytologist
78:193–208.
CitedunderDemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity).
Harper,JohnL.1977.Thecontributionsofterrestrialplantstudiestothedevelopmentofthetheoryofecology.Special
PublicationoftheAcademyofNaturalSciencesPhiladelphia12:139–157.
CitedunderIndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeViewandEcologicalTheory.
Harper,JohnL.1977.Plantrelationsinpastures.InPlantrelationsinpastures.EditedbyJ.R.Wilson,3–14.Melbourne:
CommonwealthScientificandIndustrialOrganization.
CitedunderEcologicalTheory.
Mack,RichardN.,andJohnL.Harper.1977.Interferenceinduneannuals:Spatialpatternandneighbourhoodeffects.
JournalofEcology65:345–363.
ThispaperwasoneoffourpapersfromHarper’slablistedas“oneofthetop100mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritish
EcologicalSociety(1913–2012)”aspartoftheBEScentenarycelebrations.Availableonline.CitedunderIndividualsina
PopulationandthePlant’sEyeViewandCompetition.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 34/40
Harper,JohnL.1978.Thedemographyofplantswithclonalgrowth.InStructureandfunctioningofplantpopulations.
EditedbyA.H.J.FreysenandJ.W.Woldendorp,27–48.Amsterdam:NorthHolland.
CitedunderDemography.
Watkinson,AndrewR.,andJohnL.Harper.1978.Thedemographyofasandduneannual:Vulpiafasciculata,I:The
naturalregulationofpopulations.JournalofEcology66:15–33.
CitedunderRegulationandDemography.NoIIandIIIinthisseriesareAndrewR.Watkinson(1978)“Thedemographyofasand
duneannual:Vulpiafasciculata,II:Thedynamicsofseedpopulations,”JournalofEcology66:35–44,andAndrewR.Watkinson
(1978)“Thedemographyofasandduneannual:Vulpiafasciculata,III:Thedispersalofseeds,”JournalofEcology66:483–498.
Bazzaz,FakhriA.,RogerW.Carlson,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Contributiontoreproductiveeffortbyphotosynthesisof
flowersandfruits.Nature279:554–555.
CitedunderReproductiveStrategies.
Harper,JohnL.,andAdrianD.Bell.1979.Thepopulationdynamicsofgrowthforminorganismswithmodular
construction.InPopulationdynamics:The20thsymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety.EditedbyR.M.Anderson,
D.Turner,andL.R.Taylor,29–52.Oxford:Blackwell.
CitedunderDemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity).
Huiskes,H.L.,andJohnL.Harper.1979.ThedemographyofleavesandtillersofAmmophilaarenariainadunesere.Oecologia
Plantarum14:435–446.FindThisResource
Noble,JamesC.,AdrianD.Bell,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thepopulationbiologyofplantswithclonalgrowth,I:
MorphologyandstructuraldemographyofCarexarenaria.JournalofEcology67:983–1008.
CitedunderDemography.Nos.IIandIIIinthisseriesareJamesC.NobleandChrisMarshall(1983)“Thepopulationbiologyof
plantswithclonalgrowth,II:ThenutrientstrategyandmodularphysiologyofCarexarenaria,”JournalofEcology71:865–877,
andNevilleR.BartlettandJamesC.Noble(1985)“ThePopulationBiologyofPlantswithClonalGrowth,III:AnalysisofTiller
MortalityinCarexArenaria,”JournalofEcology73:1–10.
Onyekwelu,SteveS.,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Sexratioandnichedifferentiationinspinach(SpinaciaoleraceaL.).Nature
282:609–611.FindThisResource
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.ThegrowthdistributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,I:Ordinationpatternandcontact.JournalofEcology67:201–218.
CitedunderIndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeViewandExperimentalEcology.
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,II:Interandintraspecificcontact.JournalofEcology67:219–230.FindThisResource
Turkington,Roy,MartinA.Cahn,AlexVardy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsof
Trifoliumrepensinapermanentpasture,III:EstablishmentandgrowthofTrifoliumrepensinnaturalandperturbedsites.Journal
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 35/40
ofEcology67:231–243.FindThisResource
Turkington,Roy,andJohnL.Harper.1979.Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensina
permanentpasture,IV:Finescalebioticdifferentiation.JournalofEcology67:245–254.
ThispaperwasoneoffourpapersfromHarper’slablistedas“oneofthetop100mostinfluentialpaperspublishedbytheBritish
EcologicalSociety(1913–2012)”aspartoftheBEScentenarycelebrations.NoVandVIinthisseriesareRoyTurkington(1989)
“Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsofTrifoliumrepensinapermanentpasture,V:Thecoevolutionof
competitors,”JournalofEcology77:717–733,andRoyTurkington(1989)“Thegrowth,distributionandneighbourrelationshipsof
Trifoliumrepensinapermanentpasture,VI:Conditioningeffectsbyneighbours,”JournalofEcology77:734–746.Citedunder
DarwinianandWallacianPerspectives.
Burdon,JeremyJ.,andJohnL.Harper.1980.Relativegrowthratesofindividualmembersofaplantpopulation.Journal
ofEcology68:953–957.
Acompaniontothis,withoutHarperasacoauthor,isJeremyJ.Burdon,“IntraspecificDiversityinaNaturalPopulationof
Trifoliumrepens,”JournalofEcology68(1980):717–735.
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1980.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,II:Theeffectofgrazingby
slugsonhighdensitymonoculturesofCapsellabursapastorisandPoaannua.JournalofEcology68:999–1011.
No.IinthisseriesoffourpapersisasingleauthoredpaperwithoutHarperasacoauthor.RodolfoDirzo,“ExperimentalStudieson
SlugPlantInteractions,I:TheAcceptabilityofThirtyPlantSpeciestotheSlugAgriolomaxcaruanae,”JournalofEcology68
(1980):981–998.
Harper,JohnL.1980.Plantdemographyandecologicaltheory.Oikos35:244–253.
CitedunderEcologicalTheory.
LovettDoust,Jon,andJohnL.Harper.1980.Theresourcecostsofgenderandmaternalsupportinanandromonoecious
UmbelliferSmyrniumolusatrum.NewPhytologist85:251–264.FindThisResource
Vernet,Phillipe,andJohnL.Harper.1980.Thecostsofsexinseaweeds.BiologicalJournaloftheLinneanSociety13:129–
138.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1981.Theconceptofpopulationinmodularorganisms.InTheoreticalecology.2ded.EditedbyRobert
M.May,53–77.Oxford:Blackwell.
CitedunderDemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity).
Harper,JohnL.1981.Themeaningofrarity.InThebiologicalaspectsofrareplantconservation.EditedbyHughSynge,189–
203.NewYork:Wiley.FindThisResource
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1982a.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,III:Differencesinthe
acceptabilityofindividualplantsofTrifoliumrepenstoslugsandsnails.JournalofEcology70:101–117.
CitedunderDarwinianandWallacianPerspectives.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 36/40
Dirzo,Rodolfo,andJohnL.Harper.1982b.Experimentalstudiesonslugplantinteractions,IV:Theperformanceof
cyanogenicandacyanogenicmorphsofTrifoliumrepensinthefield.JournalofEcology70:119–138.
CitedunderDarwinianandWallacianPerspectivesandExperimentalEcology.
Harper,JohnL.1982.Afterdescription.InTheplantcommunityasaworkingmechanism.EditedbyEdwardI.Newman,
11–25.SpecialPublicationoftheBritishEcologicalSociety1.Oxford:Blackwell.
CitedunderExperimentalEcology.
Harper,JohnL.1982.Thebiologyofwhiteclover(Trifoliumrepens)inapermanentpasture.InThesecondnationalsymposium
onnitrogenfixation,Helsinki,8th–10thofJune1982.EditedbyH.GyllenbergandEeroHorstia,255–260.Helsinki:Finnish
NationalFundforResearchandDevelopment.FindThisResource
Fowler,Norma,JohnZasada,andJohnL.Harper.1983.GeneticcomponentsofmorphologicalvariationinSalixrepens.New
Phytologist95:121–131.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1983.ADarwinianplantecology.InEvolutionfrommoleculestomen.EditedbyD.Bendall,323–345.
Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.
CitedunderEvolutionaryEcologyandExperimentalEcology.
Mithen,Richard,JohnL.Harper,andJacobWeiner.1984.Growthandmortalityofindividualplantsasafunctionof
availablearea.Oecologia62:57–60.
CitedunderIndividualsinaPopulationandthePlant’sEyeView.
Harper,JohnL.1985.Modules,branches,andthecaptureofresources.InPopulationbiologyandevolutionofclonalorganisms.
EditedbyJ.B.C.Jackson,L.W.Buss,andR.E.Cook,1–33.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniv.Press.FindThisResource
Schmid,Bernhard,andJohnL.Harper.1985.Clonalgrowthingrasslandperennials,I:Densityandpatterndependent
competitionbetweenplantswithdifferentgrowthforms.JournalofEcology73:793–808.
CitedunderCompetition.NoIIandIIIinthisseriesareBernhardSchmid(1985)“Clonalgrowthingrasslandperennials,II:Growth
formandfinescalecolonizingability,”JournalofEcology73:809–818,andBernhardSchmid(1985)“Clonalgrowthingrassland
perennials,III:GeneticvariationandplasticitybetweenandwithinpopulationsofBellisperennisandPrunellavulgaris,”Journalof
Ecology73:819–830.
Turkington,Roy,JohnL.Harper,PietDeJong,andLonnieW.Aarssen.1985.Areanalysisofinterspecificassociationinanold
pasture.JournalofEcology73:123–131.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1986.Biologiapopulacyjnaiewolucjaorganizmowklonalynch:Modulyirozgalezieniaapobieranie
skladikowpokarmowych.WiadomosciEkologiczne32:327–359.
ThePolishtitleistranslatedas“Populationbiologyandevolutionofclonalorganisms:Modulesbranchesandthecaptureof
resources.”
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 37/40
Harper,JohnL.,BrianR.Rosen,andJamesWhite.1986.Thegrowthandformofmodularorganisms—preface.Philosophical
TransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences313:3–5.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andC.(Katie)Sellek.1987.Theeffectsofseveremineralnutrientdeficienciesonthedemographyofleaves.
ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences232:137–157.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andHilaryL.Wallace.1987.ControloffecunditythroughabortioninEpilobiummontanumL.Oecologia74:31–
38.FindThisResource
Jones,Michelle,andJohnL.Harper.1987.Theinfluenceofneighboursonthegrowthoftrees,I:Thedemographyofbudsin
Betulapendula.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences232:1–18.FindThisResource
Jones,Michelle,andJohnL.Harper.1987.Theinfluenceofneighboursonthegrowthoftrees,II:Thefateofbudsonlongand
shortshootsinBetulapendula.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences232:19–33.FindThisResource
SackvilleHamilton,N.Ruaraidh,BernhardSchmid,andJohnL.Harper.1987.Lifehistoryconceptsandthepopulation
biologyofclonalorganisms.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences232:35–57.
CitedunderDemographicApproachtoPlantForm(Plasticity).
Solangaarachchi,S.Mangalica,andJohnL.Harper.1987.Theeffectofcanopyfilteredlightonthegrowthofwhiteclover
Trifoliumrepens.Oecologia72:372–376.FindThisResource
Franco,Miguel,andJohnL.Harper.1988.Competitionandtheformationofspatialpatterninspacinggradients:An
exampleusingKochiascoparia.JournalofEcology76:959–974.
CitedunderClarityandPrecision.
Thompson,Lindsey,andJohnL.Harper.1988.Theeffectofgrassesonthequalityoftransmittedradiationanditsinfluenceon
thegrowthofwhitecloverTrifoliumrepens.Oecologia75:343–347.FindThisResource
Alliende,M.Catalina,andJohnL.Harper.1989.Demographicstudiesofadioecioustree,I:Colonization,sexandage
structureofapopulationofSalixcinerea.JournalofEcology77:1029–1047.
CitedunderReproductiveStrategies.No.IIinthisseriesisM.CatalinaAlliende,JournalofEcology77(1989):1048–1058.
Harper,JohnL.1989.Canopiesaspopulations.InPlantcanopies:Theirgrowth,formandfunction.EditedbyG.Russell,G.
Marshall,andP.G.Jarvis,105–128.SocietyforExperimentalBiologySeminar31.Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.Find
ThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1989.Plantdemography:AcitationclassiccommentaryonPopulationBiologyofPlantsbyJohnL.
Harper.CurrentContents/Agriculture,BiologyandEnvironmentalSciences5:14.
WhenthiscitationwaspublishedonJanuary30,1989,ThePopulationBiologyofPlantshadbeencitedinmorethan1,660
publications.ByFebruary2015thecountwasover11,000.
Harper,JohnL.1989.Thevalueofaleaf.Oecologia80:53–58.FindThisResource
SackvilleHamilton,N.Ruaraidh,andJohnL.Harper.1989.ThedynamicsofTrifoliumrepensinapermanentpasture,I:
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 38/40
Thepopulationdynamicsofleavesandnodespershootaxis.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,Biological
Sciences237:133–173.
No.IIinthisseriesisN.RuaraidhSackvilleHamilton(1990)“ThedynamicsofTrifoliumrepensinapermanentpasture,II:
Internodelengthandthemovementofshootaxes,”ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences239:359–381.
Solangaarachchi,S.Mangalika,andJohnL.Harper.1989.Thegrowthandasymmetryofneighbouringplantsofwhiteclover
(TrifoliumrepensL.).Oecologia78:208–213.FindThisResource
Boutin,Céline,andJohnL.Harper.1991.AcomparativestudyofthepopulationdynamicsoffivespeciesofVeronicainnatural
habitats.JournalofEcology79:199–221.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,MichelleJones,andN.RuaraidhSackvilleHamilton.1991.Theevolutionofrootsandtheproblemsofanalysing
theirbehaviour.InPlantrootgrowth:Anecologicalperspective.EditedbyD.Atkinson,3–22.SpecialPublicationoftheBritish
EcologicalSociety10.Cambridge,UK:Blackwell.FindThisResource
SackvilleHamilton,N.Ruaraidh,MichelleJones,andJohnL.Harper.1991.Automatedanalysisofrootsinbulksoil.InPlantRoot
Growth:AnEcologicalPerspective.EditedbyD.Atkinson.SpecialPublicationoftheBritishEcologicalSociety10:69–74.
Cambridge,UK:Blackwell.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.,andDavidL.Hawksworth.1994.Biodiversity:Measurementandestimation:Preface.PhilosophicalTransactions
oftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences345:5–12.FindThisResource
Harper,JohnL.1995.Editorialnote.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences262:247.FindThis
Resource
Harper,JohnL.,JonathanSilvertown,andMiguelFranco.1996.Plantlifehistories:Ecologicalcorrelatesandphylogenetic
constraints:Preface.PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences351:1227–1231.FindThis
Resource
III.BooksandEditedVolumes
Harper,JohnL.,ed.1960.Thebiologyofweeds.SymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSociety1.Oxford:Blackwell.FindThis
Resource
Harper,JohnL.1977.Populationbiologyofplants.London:AcademicPress.FindThisResource
Chaloner,WilliamG.,JohnL.Harper,andJohnH.Lawton,eds.1991.Theevolutionaryinteractionofanimalsandplants.
PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon,BiologicalSciences333.London:RoyalSociety.FindThisResource
Silvertown,Jonathan,MiguelFranco,andJohnL.Harper,eds.1997.Plantlifehistories:Ecology,phylogenyandevolution.
Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniv.Press.FindThisResource
Begon,Michael,ColinR.Townsend,andJohnL.Harper.2006.Ecology:Fromindividualstoecosystems.4thed.Oxford:
BlackwellScience.
FormerlyknownasEcology:Individuals,PopulationandCommunities.Publishedinthreeeditions(1986,1990,and1996).Forthe
1996edition,withMichaelBegonandColinR.Townsend.
Townsend,ColinR.,JohnL.Harper,andMichaelBegon.2008.Essentialsofecology.3ded.Oxford:Blackwell.
Originallypublishedin1999;2nded.2003.
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 39/40
IV.ReviewsofPopulationBiologyofPlants
Woodell,StanR.J.1977.Bestkindofnaturalhistory.Nature270:545.
CitedunderBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants.
Bentley,Barbara.1978.Reviews.QuarterlyReviewofBiology58:319.
Availableonline.
Clapham,ArthurR.1978.Reviews:PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJohnL.Harper.NewPhytologist81.1:201–204.
Availableonline.
Jones,EustaceW.1978.Reviews.Forestry51.1:95–97.FindThisResource
Mooney,HaroldA.1978.Plantecology:Mattersofnumbers.Science199:675–676.FindThisResource
Trenbath,BrianR.1978.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJ.L.Harper.JournalofAppliedEcology15.2:642–644.FindThis
Resource
vanderMeijden,Eddy.1978.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJohnL.Harper.Vegetatio38.1:61–62.
Availableonline.CitedunderBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants.
Liddle,MikeJ.1979.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJohnL.Harper.BiologicalConservation15:82–83.FindThisResource
Solbrig,Otto.1979.PopulationbiologyofplantsbyJ.L.Harper.JournalofEcology67.1:386–388.
CitedunderBooks:PopulationBiologyofPlants.
Harper,JohnL.1989.Plantdemography:AcitationclassiccommentaryonPopulationBiologyofPlantsbyJohnL.
Harper.CurrentContents/Agriculture,BiologyandEnvironmentalSciences5:14.
WhenthiscitationwaspublishedonJanuary30,1989,ThePopulationBiologyofPlantshadbeencitedinmorethan1,660
publications.BySeptember2014thecountwas10,819.CitedunderBiography.
V.BiographicandBibliographic
Hutchings,Mike,DavidGibson,andRichardBardgett.VirtualIssue:InmemoriumJohnL.Harper.JournalofEcology.FindThis
Resource
5/14/2015 JohnL.HarperEcologyOxfordBibliographies
http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo9780199830060/obo97801998300600135.xml?rskey=k3uMKq&result=62&print 40/40
Anonymous.1985.ScientificpublicationsofJohnL.Harper,1950–1985.InStudiesofplantdemography:Afestschriftfor
JohnL.Harper.EditedbyJamesWhite,xxvi–xxiii.London:AcademicPress.
CitedunderCollaborationandMentorship.
Sagar,GeoffR.1985.ProfileofJohnL.Harper.InStudiesofplantdemography:AfestschriftforJohnL.Harper.Edited
byJamesWhite,xix–xxv.London:AcademicPress.
CitedunderBiography.
Werner,Patricia.1985.Eminentecologistcitation:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica.Bulletin
oftheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica66:20–21.
CitedunderAwardsandService.
Anonymous.1990.TheDarwinmedal:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheRoyalSocietyofLondon.RoyalSocietyNews5:4.
CitedunderAwardsandService.
Anonymous.2000.MarshAwardforecology:AwardedtoJ.L.HarperbytheBritishEcologicalSociety.Bulletinofthe
BritishEcologicalSociety31:15.
CitedunderAwardsandService.
Franco,Miguel,JoséSarukhán,andRodolfoDirzo.2009.ADarwinianplantecologist,JohnLanderHarperCBEFRS,
1925–2009.InMemoriesofJohnL.Harper:Aremembrancebyhisfriends,students,andcolleagues.2ded.Editedby
GlennR.Matlack,98–100.Bangor,UK:SPB.
CitedunderBiography.
Turkington,Roy.2009.Obituary:ProfessorJohnL.HarperFRSCBE,1925–2009.JournalofEcology97:835–837.
CitedunderBiography.Reprinted,BulletinoftheEcologicalSocietyofAmerica91(2010):9–13.
backtotop
Copyright©2015.Allrightsreserved.
... In stark contrast to much of the descriptive plant ecology of the time, from the very beginning John encouraged his research students to carry out experiments under controlled conditions and in the field. One of John's favourites (Turkington 2015) was the 'graveyard' experiment, so called because its arrangement of blocks of plots resembled a graveyard (figure 5), which examined the impact of manipulating soil heterogeneity in a variety of ways on the establishment of plants from seed (20). Many of the experiments that John encouraged Buttercups, docks, ragwort, plantains, fat hen, blackgrass, wild oats, groundsel, couch grass, shepherds purse and annual meadow grass were all to be species for study over his career, along with a range of crops, especially maize, and forage plants, such as white clover. ...
... As one of the most influential of thinkers, John Harper generated a new discipline: plant population biology. He taught us a new way to study plants and arguably had a greater impact on the development of plant ecology as a modern science than any other ecologist in the twentieth century (Turkington 2015). But he did much more than this. ...
Article
Born into a farming family, John Harper identified a number of influential figures in his formal education, including his inspirational school master Wilfred Kings, and the plant ecologists Roy Clapham (FRS 1959) and Jack Harley (FRS 1964) and animal ecologists Charles Elton (FRS 1953) and George Varley during his university education at Magdalen College, Oxford. His first academic appointments were in the University of Oxford School of Rural Economy and the Department of Agriculture, where he carried out pioneering research on seed and seedling mortality and the ecology and control of weeds. In 1960 John was appointed to head the Department of Agricultural Botany at the University College of North Wales, Bangor. The departments of Botany and Agricultural Botany merged in 1967 with John as head of the new School of Plant Biology. From this base, he established a research centre that attracted students and visitors from around the world. As one of the most influential of thinkers, John Harper generated a new discipline: plant population biology. In addition, by integrating advances in animal population biology and evolution into his own work, John helped to create a complete master discipline of ecology, as reflected in a textbook Ecology: individuals, populations and communities (Oxford, UK: Blackwell) for which he received (with co-authors Mike Begon and Colin Townsend) an exceptional lifetime achievement award from the British Ecological Society.
Article
A technique is illustrated for image analysis of roots in natural soil, using photographs of soil impregnated in resin. The position and size of roots can be determined automatically with an accuracy of 30-50μm. High-contrast photographs have been obtained of the surface of impregnated blocks of soil, obviating the need for preparing thin sections and allowing the preparation of serial surfaces through the soil as close as required. The photographs are analysed using an image analyser trained to recognize roots, determine their position, orientation, size and shape, and to distinguish between grass and clover roots by their anatomy. -from Authors
Article
Roots show no homologies with shoots and it is difficult to conceive of any half-way stage between roots and any other plant organs. The fossil record contains no intermediates between rootless soils and soils with fully developed root systems and it is concluded that roots must have evolved de novo from a single major change. Genes for root development probably originated by plasmid transfer after wounding by microbial infection. Anchorage of a terrestrial plant and the uptake of water and nutrients all depend on the architecture of the root system. Optimal architecture for exploring and exploiting the soil depends on which resources are in short supply and the patchiness of their distribution. Root architecture is therefore a compromise of conflicts. Plasticity and the ability to make extremely localized branching responses to soil heterogeneity are vital attributes of an efficient root system. The main problem in the way of studying the behaviour of roots in nature is that it is impossible to observe a root growing in soil. An attempt to construct the three-dimensional architecture of roots in soil, and one attempt to study the demography of whole roots of Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture are described. -from Authors
Article
This discussion on weed ecology emphasizes that the weed flora of a region may undergo striking changes over long periods. Nevertheless weed populations possess important properties of stability which make it unlikely that the use of herbicides will lead to major weed problems from previously minor, but herbicide-resistant, weeds. Susceptible species may develop resistant strains, and action must be taken to meet this danger.