ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The full reference for this paper is: Kümpel, N.F., Cunningham, A.A., Fa, J.E., Jones, J.P.G., Rowcliffe, J.M. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2015) Ebola and bushmeat: myth and reality. NWFP Update 5: Bushmeat. FAO, Rome. Available from: http://forestry.fao.msgfocus.com/q/1bqqKZHedDwdxkXJuzD/wv or https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276937390_Ebola_and_bushmeat_myth_and_reality.
Ebola and bushmeat: myth and reality
Noëlle F. Kümpel, Andrew A. Cunningham, John E. Fa, Julia P.G. Jones, J. Marcus
Rowcliffe and E.J. Milner-Gulland
Bushmeat, or wild meat, is a term that is usually applied to the meat of any wild-caught
animal that doesn’t fall under the category of fish, from caterpillars to crocodiles to gorillas.
The term derives from viande de brousse, which originated in colonial Africa. While wild meat
has been consumed around the world for as long as humans have existed, this is still particularly
prevalent in the tropics. In particular, the forest regions of Central and West Africa have a high
level of extraction of, and dependence on, wild meat1, as alternative sources of protein are
limited and there are still some relatively intact faunas which can support high levels of offtake.
In Asia, by contrast, there is comparatively more marine fish available and wildlife populations
are depleted in many areas.2 In Latin America, domestic livestock and fish are more widely
consumed,3 although the bushmeat trade is more significant than commonly assumed.4 In the
Congo basin, high human population densities and a substantial trade of wildlife into cities have
triggered concerns about a “bushmeat crisis. Despite objections to its African connotations,
the term bushmeat has to some extent stuck; it is used by international conventions and
increasingly to refer to wild meat on other continents.5
The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa has triggered much, often conflicting, comment by
conservationists, wildlife health professionals and the general media regarding the links
between bushmeat and Ebola.6 In January 2015, a meeting of the UK Bushmeat Working Group
an open forum for discussion on policy and research relating to bushmeat, funded by the UK
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs7 was convened to discuss the topic. Here
we summarise and expand on some of the points raised at the meeting, in an attempt to dispel
some common misconceptions, and recommend some key policy and research needs.
Some myths and misconceptions
The threat from Ebola: Around 60% of human diseases, and around 75% of emerging
infectious diseases, are believed to be zoonotic (i.e. derived from animals), mainly from
wildlife.8 They are transmitted via different pathways; in the case of Ebola, only through
1 Milner-Gulland, E. J., E. L. Bennett, and S. A. M. W. M. Group. 2003. Wild meat: the bigger picture. Trends in Ecology
& Evolution 18:351-357.
2Bennett, E. L., and M. Rao. 2002. Wild meat consumption in Asian tropical forests: is this a glimpse of the future for
Africa? in S. Mainka, and M. Trivedi, editors. Links between biodiversity conservation, livelihoods and food
security: the sustainable use of wild species for meat. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
3 Fa, J. E., and C. A. Peres. 2001. Game vertebrate extraction in African and Neotropical forests: an intercontinental
comparison. Pages 203-241 in J. D. Reynolds, G. M. Mace, J. G. Robinson, and K. H. Redford, editors.
Conservation of exploited species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4 van Vliet, N., M. P. Quiceno-Mesa, D. Cruz-Antia, C. Morsello, C. Adams, F. Mori, B. Yagüe, S. Hernández, T. Bonilla, L.
Tellez, L. Neves de Aquino, J. Moreno, T. Schor, M. De Oliveira Princi, E. Haiden, F. Trujillo, and R. Nasi. 2014.
Bushmeat in the tri-frontier region of Brazil, Peru and Colombia: Demise or persistence?. Occasional Paper
118. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
5 Ibid.
6 Pooley, S., J. E. Fa, and R. Nasi. 2015. No conservation silver lining to Ebola. Conservation Biology DOI:
10.1111/cobi.12454.
7 See www.zsl.org/ukbwg for more details
8 Cleaveland, S., D. T. Haydon, and L. Taylor. 2007. Overview of pathogen emergence: which pathogens emerge when,
where and why. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 315:85-111.
direct contact with bodily fluids such as blood, sweat or saliva. Ebola has probably been
under-reported in both humans and wildlife, as its symptoms can be misdiagnosed and
it is found in areas with low diagnostic capacity. While the scale and horror of the
current Ebola outbreak has justifiably made headlines, the total human death toll from
the current outbreak will probably be under 10,000, compared with the totals
succumbing every year to better-known but less news-worthy diseases (e.g. over
500,000 malaria deaths globally per year).
The risk of Ebola from bushmeat: Bushmeat hunting and butchering is a key though
not the only mechanism by which human populations come into contact with
reservoirs of disease, including Ebola virus, circulating in the wild. As the Ebola virus can
remain viable in untreated carcasses for up to 3-4 days,9 there is a risk of transporting it
to bushmeat markets (although there is no evidence of this to date). However, the risk
of transmitting Ebola in bushmeat overseas to Europe or the USA is extremely low, given
the total travel time and the fact that these carcasses are usually smoked (which
probably inactivates the virus). The risk of spread to new areas lies with the movement
of infected people, not infected meat.
The role of bats: Bats have some physiological features which mean they are more
likely to transmit viruses, and not just as bushmeat. Firstly, they fly, which means they
can potentially spread a virus across large distances and also drop infected material
(semi-chewed fruit, droppings or urine) which can be picked up by other animals.
Secondly, bats are known to harbour more zoonotic pathogens per species than any
other taxon,10 without themselves succumbing to disease. It has been hypothesised
that this is due to bat pathogens adapting to their host’s cyclically high body
temperature and metabolism, which then makes them resistant to the defensive fevers
triggered in other infected taxa.11 Bats are widely eaten as bushmeat in West Africa; for
example, over 100,000 bats are traded and consumed annually in southern Ghana,12 but
there has been no recorded outbreak of Ebola in that country even though Ebola is
known to be present in bats there.13 We still have much to learn about bats and
zoonotic diseases, but a kneejerk reaction to the potential zoonotic threat posed by bats
(e.g. through culling) would be massively counterproductive, given their role in
livelihoods and their particularly substantive contribution to ecosystem services,
through pollination and seed dispersal.14
9 Leroy, E. M., P. Rouquet, P. Formenty, S. Souquière, A. Kilbourne, J. M. Froment, M. Bermejo, S. Smit, W. Karesh, R.
Swanepoel, S. R. Zaki, and P. E. Rollin. 2004. Multiple Ebola virus transmission events and rapid decline of
central African wildlife. Science 303:387 - 390.
10 Luis, A. D., D. T. S. Hayman, T. J. O’shea, P. M. Cryan, A. T. Gilbert, J. R. C. Pulliam, J. N. Mills, C. K. R. Willis, M. E.
Timonin, A. A. Cunningham, A. R. Fooks, C. E. Rupprecht, J. L. N. Wood, and C. T. Webb. 2013. A comparison of bats
and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: Are bats special? . Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 280:2012-2753.
11 O’Shea, T. J., P. M. Cryan, A. A. Cunningham, A. R. Fooks, D. T. S. Hayman, A. D. Luis, A. J. Peel, R. K. Plowright, and J.
L. N. Wood. 2014. Bat flight and emerging zoonotic viruses. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20.
12 Kamins, A. O., O. Restif, Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu, R. Suu-Ire, D. T. S. Hayman, A. A. Cunningham, J. L. N. Wood, and J. M.
Rowcliffe. 2011. Uncovering the fruit bat bushmeat commodity chain and the true extent of fruit bat hunting in
Ghana, West Africa. Biological Conservation 144:3000-3008.
13 Hayman, D. T. S., P. Emmerich, R. Suu-Ire, A. R. Fooks, A. A. Cunningham, and J. L. N. Wood. 2010. Long-term
survival of an urban fruit bat seropositive for Ebola and Lagos Bat viruses. PLoS ONE 5:e11978.;
Hayman, D. T. S., M. Yu, G. Crameri, L.-F. Wang, R. Suu-Ire, J. L. N. Wood, and A. A. Cunningham. 2012. Ebola virus
antibodies in fruit bats, Ghana, West Africa. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18.
14 Kamins, A. O., O. Restif, Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu, R. Suu-Ire, D. T. S. Hayman, A. A. Cunningham, J. L. N. Wood, and J. M.
Rowcliffe. 2011. Uncovering the fruit bat bushmeat commodity chain and the true extent of fruit bat hunting in
Ghana, West Africa. Biological Conservation 144:3000-3008.
The role of primates: Until the latest outbreak, more great apes (gorillas and
chimpanzees) than humans were believed to have died from Ebola, and the virus is a
major conservation threat to the persistence of these threatened species.15 While
primates should not necessarily be singled-out as posing a particularly high risk of
transmitting Ebola to people (28 species from 6 mammal orders, including rodents,
carnivores and cetartiodactyls, have been linked to Ebola: J.E. Fa, unpubl. data), as they
are known to get sick with the disease, they are likely to develop high viral loads which
could threaten public health. Beyond Ebola, because humans and other primates are
closely-related, there is higher cross-transmission risk of diseases in general (e.g. simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV) in chimpanzees and sooty mangabeys mutating into HIV in
humans). As above, the main risk is to people who butcher and handle infected animals,
especially (but not exclusively) a sick animal showing signs of disease.
The role of commercial vs subsistence hunting: A number of organisations have
suggested that one way of limiting disease transmission is to ban the commercial trade
in bushmeat, while allowing subsistence hunting. This is an approach that has been
suggested for a number of years in order to reduce unsustainable bushmeat hunting.
Studies over the last 10-15 years16 have shown that individual hunters have different
balances of commercial and subsistence use depending on their current needs and
livelihood options, and people move in and out of hunting as other opportunities arise
or are curtailed. Although trade in fresh meat to urban centres may pose a disease risk,
so too does movement of people, but the livelihood implications of limiting either of
these could be severe. Governments must consider these costs and relative risks when
setting and implementing policies.
Links to deforestation: Loss of forest to agriculture, and other forms of development,
increases human-wildlife contact and provides the potential for previously-contained
zoonotic diseases to adapt to new anthropogenic environments (e.g. zoonotic spill-over
when domestic animals are reared in recently-cleared areas and act as a bridging, or
amplifier host, as occurred with Nipah virus emergence in Malaysia). However,
increased access to intact forest (e.g. through the construction of logging roads) might
present a higher risk of spill-over events. To date, most Ebola outbreaks have occurred
in areas with high levels of forest cover, such as Democratic Republic of Congo, Republic
of Congo and Gabon, but these have been contained due to low human population
densities and their remote locations. Entry of people into forest areas, particularly for
high risk activities such as hunting, increases the risk of an infected person exporting the
disease from the forest with resultant human-to-human transmission and, hence,
outbreak detection.
The food security quandary: The population of Africa is projected to at least double by
2050, but supplies of wild protein (both bushmeat and fish) are dwindling even under
current levels of demand.17 Bushmeat is seen as a ‘luxury’ in many urban centres, but
15 Walsh, P. D., K. A. Abernethy, M. Bermejo, R. Beyers, P. de Wachter, M. Ella Akou, B. Huijbregts, D. Idiata
Mambounga, A. Kamdem Toham, A. M. Kilbourn, S. A. Lahm, S. Latour, F. Maisels, C. Mbina, Y. Mihindou, S. Ndong
Obiang, E. Ntsame Effa, M. Starkey, P. Telfer, M. Thibault, C. E. G. Tutin, L. J. T. White, and D. S. Wilkie. 2003.
Catastrophic ape decline in western equatorial Africa. Nature 422:611-614.
16 Coad, L., J. Schleicher, E. J. Milner-Gulland, T. R. Marthews, M. Starkey, A. Manica, A. Balmford, W. Mbombe, T. R.
Diop Bineni, and K. A. Abernethy. 2013. Social and ecological change over a decade in a village hunting system, central
Gabon. Conservation Biology 27:270-280.; Gill, D. J. C., J. E. Fa, J. M. Rowcliffe, and N. F. Kümpel. 2010. Drivers of
change in hunter offtake and hunting strategies in Sendje, Equatorial Guinea. Conservation Biology 26:10521060.
17 Fa, J. E., D. Currie, and J. Meeuwig. 2003. Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: linkages between wildlife
and people's future. Environmental Conservation 30:71-78.
often this may be because it is a fresh (rather than frozen) meat, rather than because
bushmeat itself is preferred. For example, East et al.18 showed that preferences in
Equatorial Guinea were for fresh meat, including fish and bushmeat, rather than frozen
fish and frozen domestic meat. Bushmeat is not just one kind of meat; for example cane
rat is often preferred, and it is a common agricultural pest.19 Chimpanzee, on the other
hand, is not generally a preferred species.20 The challenge therefore is how to ensure
that there are sufficient quantities and diversity of acceptable protein for urban people
(domestic meat, wild meat and fish), while limiting the conversion of natural habitat to
agriculture as much as possible, better managing hunting to ensure sustainable
bushmeat supplies for rural people, and minimising contact between wildlife and
livestock to limit opportunities for disease emergence (including through holding
multiple species in live animal markets).
Recommendations to African governments to reduce the risk of transmission of Ebola from
wildlife to humans:
Publicise basic public health measures related to the use of bushmeat: Public
awareness programmes should encourage people (1) to take steps to avoid being bitten
and to wear protective clothing (ideally including latex, or similar, gloves that prevent
skin contact with animal body fluids or faeces) while hunting and butchering wildlife, (2)
to not touch or collect dead or dying animals, and (3) to ensure all bushmeat is
thoroughly cooked before eating. Properly smoked or dried carcasses also carry
minimal risk of Ebola (although could pose other disease or health risks, e.g. a high level
of carcinogen load: Chaber21, and are not always preferred). These are the simplest and
most important measures that can be taken to minimise the risks of zoonotic disease
transmission in general and to prevent another Ebola outbreak.
Consider strengthening controls on commercial trade of bats and primates for
bushmeat: This is both for conservation and public health reasons, although it is
important that these two rationales for any policy change are not confounded, as it may
risk “demonizing” these species and prompt extermination attempts. In public health
terms, these taxa are relatively high risk for zoonotic disease transmission in general
(not just Ebola) compared to other species, although this risk is still extremely low and
must not be overstated. In conservation and livelihood terms, these taxa are particularly
vulnerable to over-hunting.
Improve management of livestock farming and animal markets: This should aim to
reduce contact between livestock and wildlife to limit transmission of disease between
the two.
18 East, T., N. F. Kümpel, E. J. Milner-Gulland, and J. M. Rowcliffe. 2005. Determinants of urban bushmeat
consumption in Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea. Biological Conservation 126:206-215.
19 Alexander, J., J. McNamara, J. M. Rowcliffe, J. Oppong, and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2014. The role of bushmeat in a
West African agricultural landscape. Oryx:1-9.
20 Kümpel, N. F., E. J. Milner-Gulland, J. M. Rowcliffe, and G. Cowlishaw. 2008. Impact of gun-hunting on diurnal
primates in continental Equatorial Guinea. International Journal of Primatology 29:1065-1082.
21 Chaber, A. L. 2008. An analysis of the African bushmeat trade in France. MSc thesis, Royal Veterinary College and
ZSL Institute of Zoology, London.
Longer-term needs:
Modelling and predicting the risk of future outbreaks of Ebola, incorporating socio-
political factors to evaluate the risk of an outbreak becoming an epidemic. This
modelling needs to include, and be informed by, virus prevalence data of wildlife
species along with the dynamics of human-wildlife contact in a range of guises (including
bushmeat hunting), in order better to predict the changing risks of zoonotic
transmission as intact forest is entered by more people and as fresh bushmeat is
transported to urban centres.
Better understanding of the transmission dynamics of Ebola and other key zoonotic
viruses in their natural wildlife hosts in West Africa and across the continent. In the first
instance, this should include identifying which species are reservoir hosts (in which the
pathogen persists at the population level) and which are spill-over hosts (which are
intermittently infected from reservoir species but in which the pathogen does not
persist at the population level). In the case of bats, this can lead to a more informed
strategy for managing human-bat interactions in order to safeguard bat populations and
their key services, while also reducing disease transmission risks.
Better understanding of local use of bushmeat, including perceptions of disease risk
from bushmeat, and the precautions people do and don't currently take, and why.
Large-scale research into scaling up provision of alternative sources of meat and fish in
Africa, which are acceptable to consumers, while maintaining intact ecosystems such as
forests which provide important local and global ecosystem services in addition to
bushmeat. This research should include gaining a better understanding of the levels of
sustainable harvest for different bushmeat species; at the moment the lack of basic
knowledge on the distribution, abundance and biology of many bushmeat species
means that it is not possible to make specific recommendations about the potential
sustainability of bushmeat hunting in different locations and for different species.
Better understanding of the various roles of bushmeat hunting in the livelihoods of rural
people, thereby enabling interventions aimed at modifying the way that people use
bushmeat to be more appropriately designed and targeted.
Improved channels for providing appropriate advice to those implementing
interventions and disseminating information on the ground (e.g. policy-making, law
enforcement and social marketing by governments and local NGOs).
Noelle Kumpel is a Policy Programme Manager at the Zoological Society of London and
chair of UK Bushmeat Working Group (noelle.kumpel@zsl.org); A. Cunningham is
Professor of Wildlife Epidemiology and Wildlife Epidemiology Theme Leader at the ZSL
Institute of Zoology, working on bats and zoonotic diseases (a.cunningham@ioz.ac.uk);
John Fa is a Visiting Professor, Imperial College London, and Senior Associate Researcher,
CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, working on CIFOR’s Bushmeat Research Initiative
(jfa949@gmail.com); Julia Jones is a Senior Lecturer in Conservation Science at the
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, working
on bushmeat issues in Madagascar (julia.jones@bangor.ac.uk). Marcus Rowcliffe is a
Research Fellow at the ZSL Institute of Zoology and Co-Director of the ZSL Bushmeat
Research Programme (marcus.rowcliffe@ioz.ac.uk); E.J. Milner-Gulland is a Professor of
Conservation Science and Director, Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the
Environment, at Imperial College London (e.j.milner-gulland@ic.ac.uk).
... The rise in global human population growth has pushed man to seek for protein from bushmeat [13][14][15] in which some ...
Article
Full-text available
Dreaded realities await us each day as we wake up due to the impact of anthropogenic activities. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has etched itself into every aspect of our lives, changing the way we behave and creating new normal. Our consumption habit has been unsustainable even before coronavirus hit. COVID-19 has just made a bad situation much worse. Since news of the coronavirus was first announced in January, its horrors have not stopped. The number of cases worldwide is still rising, and its death toll is appallingly high. Lockdowns was introduced in order to curb transmission of COVID-19 in which both e-commerce and health sectors resolved to using plastics (‘known unknowns’). There is no denying that single-use plastic has been a lifesaver in the fight against COVID-19, especially for frontline health workers. It has also facilitated adherence to social-distancing rules, by enabling home delivery of basic goods, especially food. And it may have helped to curb transmission, by replacing reusable coffee cups and shopping bags in many cities over fears that the virus could stick to them. Though other studies have shown that SARS-COV-2 still last longer on single-use plastics (72 hours) than on cardboard (24 hours) and yet the paper industry association is not using this as an opportunity to lobby or directly profit from the crisis in comparison to the plastic industry association appealing for reversal on the ban of single-use plastics. Plastic pollution impacts behind the scenes on public and environmental health have both short- and long- term effects. Plastic-to-Ocean movement has created a lot of micro-and nano plastics in an alarming rate. The question is, would the COVID-19 crisis prompt innovation for waste reduction, as it had for virtual health access, small business e-commerce, community collaboration and more? This review suggests recent environmentally friendly and sustainable plastic waste management practices. Plastic waste would be a thing of the past through the most recent molecular re-engineering technique which combined two super enzymes, PETase and MHETase which yielded a faster breakdown of PET. Also, plastic waste can be fought through the use of underwater robot called Smart Infrared Based Remotely Operated Vehicle to identify microplastics in marine environments. The way forward towards a near-zero plastic waste in the ongoing-and post-COVID-19 era demands that we let go business-as-usual and simultaneously adopt the System Change Scenario concept. If returning back to normal is not an option, perhaps the best hope we can find in our present situation is this: there is no better time for change than now. The COVID-19 pandemic is an eye opener towards a need for cooperation among individuals, expert organizations, and the government for a more sustainable environment.
... By contrast, COVID-19's societal impact is unseen in recent history: it is not limited to the Global South, and originated in Wuhan, an urban centre of economic activity. Transport duration of bushmeat, remoteness and low human population density limited chances of spreading EVD overseas, as it mainly depends on direct contact with bodily fluids of patients (Kümpel et al. 2015). Conversely, Wuhan's strong intercontinental transport links, and COVID-19's contagiousness (Peeri et al. 2020) prompted widespread adoption of GUCMs to avoid COVID-19 overrunning health systems ( Figure 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Ebola and COVID-19 are textbook emerging diseases influenced by humans. Ebola is often considered a result of exotic nature threatening health. Conversely, COVID-19, emerged in an urban environment, entails risks worldwide. Geographical, virological and demographic differences influence risk perceptions and responses to both diseases. Because ecological understanding of urban human-animal relations improves disease risk assessment, we call for ethnographical exploration of this interface. ‘Global Urban Confinement Measures’ impact health by influencing disease perceptions, limiting nature access, and strengthening inequities. To prevent and mitigate zoonotic pandemics and their consequences, policy should promote nature connectedness, concert with stakeholders, and integrate nature-city-inhabitant interactions.
... The health implications of the trade in wildlife have not been widely used to implement controls, or advocate for reduction in consumption, and may be a more effective message than its conservation impacts. This needs to be done judiciously, however, as disease spillover is a rare event and both bushmeat hunters and consumers will be wary of public health messages that do not fit with their experiences[93,106]. Second, a revision of an earlier analysis of global drivers of disease emergence[53]shows that land-use change correlates strongly with the emergence of zoonoses from wildlife (P Daszak 2017, unpublished observation). ...
Article
Full-text available
Infectious diseases affect people, domestic animals and wildlife alike, with many pathogens being able to infect multiple species. Fifty years ago, following the wide-scale manufacture and use of antibiotics and vaccines, it seemed that the battle against infections was being won for the human population. Since then, however, and in addition to increasing antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens, there has been an increase in the emergence of, mostly viral, zoonotic diseases from wildlife, sometimes causing fatal outbreaks of epidemic proportions. Concurrently, infectious disease has been identified as an increasing threat to wildlife conservation. A synthesis published in 2000 showed common anthropogenic drivers of disease threats to biodiversity and human health, including encroachment and destruction of wildlife habitat and the human-assisted spread of pathogens. Almost two decades later, the situation has not changed and, despite improved knowledge of the underlying causes, little has been done at the policy level to address these threats. For the sake of public health and wellbeing, human-kind needs to work better to conserve nature and preserve the ecosystem services, including disease regulation, that biodiversity provides while also understanding and mitigating activities which lead to disease emergence. We consider that holistic, One Health approaches to the management and mitigation of the risks of emerging infectious diseases have the greatest chance of success.This article is part of the themed issue 'One Health for a changing world: zoonoses, ecosystems and human well-being'.
... The health implications of the trade in wildlife have not been widely used to implement controls, or advocate for reduction in consumption, and may be a more effective message than its conservation impacts. This needs to be done judiciously, however, as disease spillover is a rare event and both bushmeat hunters and consumers will be wary of public health messages that do not fit with their experiences[93,106]. Second, a revision of an earlier analysis of global drivers of disease emergence[53]shows that land-use change correlates strongly with the emergence of zoonoses from wildlife (P Daszak 2017, unpublished observation). ...
Article
Full-text available
Infectious diseases affect people, domestic animals and wildlife alike, with many pathogens being able to infect multiple species. Fifty years ago, following the wide-scale manufacture and use of antibiotics and vaccines, it seemed that the battle against infections was being won for the human population. Since then, however, and in addition to increasing antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens, there has been an increase in the emergence of, mostly viral, zoonotic diseases from wildlife, sometimes causing fatal outbreaks of epidemic proportions. Concurrently, infectious disease has been identified as an increasing threat to wildlife conservation. A synthesis published in 2000 showed common anthropogenic drivers of disease threats to biodiversity and human health, including encroachment and destruction of wildlife habitat and the human-assisted spread of pathogens. Almost two decades later, the situation has not changed and, despite improved knowledge of the underlying causes, little has been done at the policy level to address these threats. For the sake of public health and wellbeing, human-kind needs to work better to conserve nature and preserve the ecosystem services, including disease regulation, that biodiversity provides while also understanding and mitigating activities which lead to disease emergence. We consider that holistic, One Health approaches to the management and mitigation of the risks of emerging infectious diseases have the greatest chance of success. This article is part of the themed issue ‘One Health for a changing world: zoonoses, ecosystems and human well-being’.
Chapter
Public health and health systems must prepare a plan for the emergencies and disasters that will inevitably occur sooner or later. Such plans are needed at global, national, and local levels. A basic framework for emergency preparedness will include a cycle of plan–prepare–respond–recover–report. Planning includes consideration of all events that may occur, prioritized by severity and likelihood. Preparation includes consideration of staff, supplies, structures, and systems—including decision and communication systems. For mass casualty incidents, public health will likely have a lesser role in the response phase; but for pandemics, public health expertise is crucial. A prolonged recovery phase must be expected, even for acute incidents such as earthquakes and terrorism. Post-disaster incident reports allow learning to be shared; such reports also feed back into a revised plan. Mental healthcare and service abroad require specific attention. The concept of ‘everyday resilience’ can help systems to cope.
Article
Full-text available
This work was funded by the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Grant Number NE/J001570/1 and the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme under ANTIGONE with Project Number 278976. AAC is supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit award.
Article
Full-text available
Bats are sources of high viral diversity and high-profile zoonotic viruses worldwide. Although apparently not pathogenic in their reservoir hosts, some viruses from bats severely affect other mammals, including humans. Examples include severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses, Ebola and Marburg viruses, and Nipah and Hendra viruses. Factors underlying high viral diversity in bats are the subject of speculation. We hypothesize that flight, a factor common to all bats but to no other mammals, provides an intensive selective force for coexistence with viral parasites through a daily cycle that elevates metabolism and body temperature analogous to the febrile response in other mammals. On an evolutionary scale, this host-virus interaction might have resulted in the large diversity of zoonotic viruses in bats, possibly through bat viruses adapting to be more tolerant of the fever response and less virulent to their natural hosts.
Article
Full-text available
Tropical moist forests in Africa are concentrated in the Congo Basin. A variety of animals in these forests, in particular mammals, are hunted for their meat, termed bushmeat. This paper investigates current and future trends of bushmeat protein, and non-bushmeat protein supply, for inhabitants of the main Congo Basin countries. Since most bushmeat is derived from forest mammals, published extraction (E) and production (P) estimates of mammal populations were used to calculate the per person protein supplied by these. Current bushmeat protein supply may range from 30 g person1 in the Democratic Republic of Congo, to 180 g person1 in Gabon. Future bushmeat protein supplies were predicted for the next 50 years by employing current E:P ratios, and controlling for known deforestation and population growth rates. At current exploitation rates, bushmeat protein supply would drop 81% in all countries in less than 50 years; only three countries would be able to maintain a protein supply above the recommended daily requirement of 52 g person1. However, if bushmeat harvests were reduced to a sustainable level, all countries except Gabon would be dramatically affected by the loss of wild protein supply. The dependence on bushmeat protein is emphasized by the fact that four out of the five countries studied do not produce sufficient amounts of non-bushmeat protein to feed their populations. These findings imply that a significant number of forest mammals could become extinct relatively soon, and that protein malnutrition is likely to increase dramatically if food security in the region is not promptly resolved.
Article
Full-text available
Harvesting, consumption and trade of bushmeat are important causes of both biodiversity loss and potential zoonotic disease emergence. In order to identify possible ways to mitigate these threats, it is essential to improve our understanding of the mechanisms by which bushmeat gets from the site of capture to the consumer's table. In this paper we highlight the previously unrecognized scale of hunting of the African straw-colored fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, a species which is important in both ecological and public health contexts, and describe the commodity chain in southern Ghana for its trade. Based on interviews with 551 Ghanaians, including bat hunters, vendors and consumers, we estimate that a minimum of 128,000 E. helvum bats are sold each year through a commodity chain stretching up to 400 km and involving multiple vendors. Unlike the general bushmeat trade in Ghana, where animals are sold in both specialized bushmeat markets and in restaurants, E. helvum is sold primarily in marketplaces; many bats are also kept by hunters for personal consumption. The offtake estimated in this paper raises serious conservation concerns, while the commodity chain identified in this study may offer possible points for management intervention. The separation of the E. helvum commodity chain from that of other bushmeat highlights the need for species-specific research in this area, particularly for bats, whose status as bushmeat is largely unknown.
Article
Full-text available
TO THE EDITOR: Fruit bats are the presumptive reservoir hosts of Ebola viruses (EBOVs) (genus Ebolavirus, family Filoviridae). When transmitted to humans and nonhuman primates, EBOVs can cause hemorrhagic fevers with high case-fatality rates. In 2008, we detected Zaire EBOV (ZEBOV) antibodies in a single migratory fruit bat (Eidolon helvum) from a roost in Accra, Ghana (1). This bat is common in sub-Saharan Africa and lives in large colonies, often in cities. The flight of an individual E. helvum bat during migration has been recorded as >2,500 km (2).
Article
Full-text available
Bushmeat hunting is threatening wildlife populations across west-central Africa, and now poses a greater threat to primates than habitat loss or degradation does in some areas. However, species vary in their abilities to withstand hunting, either because hunters target them differentially or they vary in their vulnerability to a given level of hunting. We studied the impact of current levels of gun-hunting on diurnal primate species in the little-studied Monte Mitra area of Monte Alén National Park, continental Equatorial Guinea. Most bushmeat is currently trapped, but gun-hunting is increasing as shotguns become more available and affordable, allowing targeting of arboreal as well as terrestrial prey. We collected data over 15-mo, via hunter interviews, gun-hunter follows, an offtake survey recording 9374 individuals, and primate surveys covering 408km of line transects in 2 sites with differing gun-hunting histories. Inside the park, where gun-hunting pressure was recent and light, we found high primate diversity, density, and biomass, with black colobus (Colobus satanas) particularly abundant at 57 individuals/km2. However, around the village, where gun-hunting was longer-established, though other species such as the guenons still persisted (albeit at lower densities), Colobus satanas were virtually absent. Being slow and large-bodied, Colobus satanas are preferred and susceptible prey, and an early indicator of overhunting. Monte Alén National Park is currently an important stronghold for primates, particularly Colobus satanas, but regulation of the trade and enforcement of hunting bans in the park are urgently needed to safeguard their future and that of other vulnerable species.
Article
Full-text available
Ebolaviruses (EBOV) (family Filoviridae) cause viral hemorrhagic fevers in humans and non-human primates when they spill over from their wildlife reservoir hosts with case fatality rates of up to 90%. Fruit bats may act as reservoirs of the Filoviridae. The migratory fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, is common across sub-Saharan Africa and lives in large colonies, often situated in cities. We screened sera from 262 E. helvum using indirect fluorescent tests for antibodies against EBOV subtype Zaire. We detected a seropositive bat from Accra, Ghana, and confirmed this using western blot analysis. The bat was also seropositive for Lagos bat virus, a Lyssavirus, by virus neutralization test. The bat was fitted with a radio transmitter and was last detected in Accra 13 months after release post-sampling, demonstrating long-term survival. Antibodies to filoviruses have not been previously demonstrated in E. helvum. Radio-telemetry data demonstrates long-term survival of an individual bat following exposure to viruses of families that can be highly pathogenic to other mammal species. Because E. helvum typically lives in large urban colonies and is a source of bushmeat in some regions, further studies should determine if this species forms a reservoir for EBOV from which spillover infections into the human population may occur.
Article
Full-text available
Because rapidly expanding human populations have devastated gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) habitats in East and West Africa, the relatively intact forests of western equatorial Africa have been viewed as the last stronghold of African apes. Gabon and the Republic of Congo alone are thought to hold roughly 80% of the world's gorillas and most of the common chimpanzees. Here we present survey results conservatively indicating that ape populations in Gabon declined by more than half between 1983 and 2000. The primary cause of the decline in ape numbers during this period was commercial hunting, facilitated by the rapid expansion of mechanized logging. Furthermore, Ebola haemorrhagic fever is currently spreading through ape populations in Gabon and Congo and now rivals hunting as a threat to apes. Gorillas and common chimpanzees should be elevated immediately to 'critically endangered' status. Without aggressive investments in law enforcement, protected area management and Ebola prevention, the next decade will see our closest relatives pushed to the brink of extinction.
Article
Full-text available
Several human and animal Ebola outbreaks have occurred over the past 4 years in Gabon and the Republic of Congo. The human outbreaks consisted of multiple simultaneous epidemics caused by different viral strains, and each epidemic resulted from the handling of a distinct gorilla, chimpanzee, or duiker carcass. These animal populations declined markedly during human Ebola outbreaks, apparently as a result of Ebola infection. Recovered carcasses were infected by a variety of Ebola strains, suggesting that Ebola outbreaks in great apes result from multiple virus introductions from the natural host. Surveillance of animal mortality may help to predict and prevent human Ebola outbreaks.
Article
Despite widespread recognition of the major threat to tropical forest biological diversity and local food security posed by unsustainable bushmeat hunting, virtually no long-term studies tracking the socioecological dynamics of hunting systems have been conducted. We interviewed local hunters and collected detailed hunting data to investigate changes in offtake and hunter characteristics over 10 years (20012010) in Dibouka and Kouagna villages, central Gabon, in the context of hunter recollections of longer term trends since the 1950s. To control for changes in hunter behavior, such as trap location and characteristics, we report hunting offtake data per trap. Our results suggest the hunting area was already highly depleted by 2001; local hunters reported that 16 large-bodied prey species had become rare or locally extirpated over the last 60 years. Overall, we observed no significant declines in hunting offtake or changes in species composition from 2001 to 2010, and offtakes per trap increased slightly between 2004 and 2010. However, trapping distance from the villages increased, and there was a switch in hunting techniques; a larger proportion of the catch was hunted with guns in 2010. The number of hunters declined by 20% from 2004 to 2010, and male livelihood activities shifted away from hunting. Hunters with the lowest hunting incomes in 2004 were more likely than successful hunters to have moved away from the village by 2010 (often in response to alternative employment opportunities). Therefore, changes in trap success (potentially related to biological factors) were interacting with system-level changes in hunter number and composition (related to external socioeconomic factors) to produce a relatively static overall offtake. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the small-scale context of hunting to correctly interpret changes or apparent stasis in hunting effort and offtake over time.
Article
Understanding the factors driving demand for wild meat and its substitutes is crucial for predicting the effects of changing socio-economic conditions on consumption, and managing supplies sustainably. However urban demand for wild meat remains relatively understudied, particularly in West/Central Africa. We use interviews with consumers in households, markets and restaurants and a market survey to examine patterns of consumption of bushmeat, domestic meat and fish in Bata, Equatorial Guinea, a country currently undergoing a period of strong economic and population growth. Consumers make a much clearer distinction between fresh and frozen foods than between bushmeat, domestic meat and fish. Fresh foods are greatly preferred over frozen but are more expensive and less consumed. Consumption of all fresh foods increases with income. Controlling for income, native Equatoguineans consume more bushmeat than other nationalities, while of the two dominant Equatoguinean tribes, the continental Fang consume more bushmeat than the coastal Ndowe. Our findings indicate that increasing wealth of a growing urban population will greatly increase future demand for all fresh foods, including bushmeat. There is no evidence of a luxury bushmeat market based on rare species, thus controlled demand for bushmeat could be met from common, highly productive species that are relatively robust to exploitation. Improving the supply of under-developed commodities, particularly domestic livestock, could also offset demand for bushmeat.