ArticlePDF Available

Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare

Authors:

Abstract

Obesity stigma is reported across population groups, impacting the wellbeing of obese people. Perhaps counterintuitively, healthcare professionals have stigmatising attitudes and, in some cases, fail to provide advice and treatment to obese patients. The reports summarised in this review suggest that intervention is required to improve treatment and to reduce adverse patient behaviours such as avoiding appointments and not reporting concerns to healthcare providers.
14 British Journal of Obesity Volume 1 No 1 2015
Article
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact
in healthcare
Stuart William Flint
Citation: Flint SW (2015)
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and
impact in healthcare. British
Journal of Obesity 1: 14–18
Article points
1. Healthcare providers have
been repor ted to have negative
attitudes towards obese
people, perceiving them to
be lazy, non-compliant with
treatment and unintelligent.
2. These stereotypes are not
supported by evidence and can
lead to suboptimal healthcare
care provision from the
practitioner and dissatisfaction,
embarrassment and reduced
motivation to seek medical
help and make diet and
lifestyle changes in patients.
3. Obesity stigma is reinforced
early in a medical student’s
education, and it is at this
stage that interventions to
reduce stigma have been
found to be successful.
Key words
- Obesity
- Stigma
Author
Stuart Flint is a Research
Fellow in Exercise Psychology,
Shefeld Hallam University.
Obesity stigma is reported across population groups, impacting the wellbeing of obese
people. Perhaps counterintuitively, healthcare professionals have stigmatising attitudes
and, in some cases, fail to provide advice and treatment to obese patients. The reports
summarised in this review suggest that intervention is required to improve treatment
and to reduce adverse patient behaviours such as avoiding appointments and not
reporting concerns to healthcare providers.
Obesity has emerged as a public health
concern across the world. Over time,
there has been a substantial increase in
the prevalence of obesity and its associated health
complications, such as diabetes and coronary
heart disease (James, 2008). Obese children and
adults often become withdrawn from society
through experiences of rejection, stigma or
stereotyping, which may have additional impacts
on health and psychological wellbeing (Puhl and
Brownell, 2006). The impacts of obesity stigma
on the individual include depression, anxiety, low
self-esteem, body image concerns, binge eating,
avoidance of physical activity, self-harm and
suicide (Faith et al, 2002; Puhl and Brownell,
2006; Vartanian and Shaprow, 2008; Puhl and
Heuer, 2009).
A plethora of studies (e.g. Tillman et al,
2007; Puhl and Heuer, 2009) indicates that
overweight and obese people are perceived
negatively by others, which can result in a
number of harmful psychological responses,
such as lowered self-esteem and confidence.
Rejection and stigmatisation are purported to
be more likely in childhood and adolescence, the
years of development in which socially adaptive
relationships are formed more frequently (Pearce
et al, 2002). Obesity stigmatisation is reported in
various populations; for instance, in jurors in their
decisions of guilt and responsibility (Schvey et al,
2013) and obesity researchers (Flint and Reale,
2014), as well as settings including the home and
school (Puhl and Latner, 2007), the workplace
(Flint and Snooke, 2014) and exercise facilities
(Robertson and Vohora, 2008).
Previous research examining obesity stigma
has shown that obese people are stereotyped
as lazy, gluttonous, unattractive, intellectually
slow, socially inept and lacking in self-esteem
(Crandall, 1994). These stereotypes are often
without evidence but they are informed by a
variety of sources, including the media and
education. The foundations for stigmatising obese
people is suggested to be a result of attributing
the condition to controllable causes (i.e. energy
intake vs. energy expenditure), and this is a
constant message in a society that is bombarded
with information suggesting that body fatness
can be modified relatively easily, which has led to
increased awareness of body shape and size. It has
also been reported that healthcare professionals
report a belief that obesity is controllable, which
is linked to obesity stigma (Swift et al, 2013a). In
fact, Latner et al (2008) suggest that obesity stigma
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare
British Journal of Obesity Volume 1 No 1 2015 15
is likely to be stronger than other forms of stigma,
and that this may be due to the differences in
perceptions of personal responsibility.
It would be reasonable to expect healthcare
professionals to be an inf luential source when
forming perceptions about health conditions.
However, an area of increasing interest is the
potential impact of obesity stigma on medical
treatment. Counterintuitively, obesity stigmatisation
has been reported in healthcare professionals,
including physicians, nurses, psychologists and
dietitians. Healthcare professionals have a critical
role in the management of obesity. Thus, assessing
current practice and examining opportunities to
improve healthcare provision is of high importance.
When evaluating obesity stigma, it has been
proposed that measuring implicit attitudes (i.e.
those that occur without conscious awareness
and are formed involuntarily) is superior to
measuring explicit attitudes (i.e. those that occur
consciously and are deliberately formed), as this
negates demand characteristics and response
biases (Rudman, 2004). Demand characteristics
occur when participants form an interpretation
of the research aims and subsequently modify
their behaviour. Response bias refers to inaccurate
responses due to, for instance, the wording of a
question, and this is commonly associated with
survey research.
Whilst measurement of implicit attitudes can
be employed using, for instance, the Implicit
Association Test (Greenwald et al, 1998),
which has occasionally been used to examine
obesity stigma (Flint et al, 2013), research on
the phenomenon in healthcare professionals has
primarily involved measures such as the Attitudes
Toward Obese Persons scale and the Beliefs About
Obese Persons scale (Allison et al, 1991), or the
F-Scale (Bacon et al, 2001). Notwithstanding
these weaknesses, the research to date indicates
the presence of stigmatising attitudes in healthcare
professionals.
Teachman and Brownell (2001) report that
healthcare professionals have negative attitudes
towards both obesity as a condition and people
who are obese. Healthcare providers perceive
obese people to be lazy, non-compliant, poorly
self-controlled, weak-willed, sloppy, dishonest,
unsuccessful and unintelligent (Price et al, 1987;
Hebl and Xu, 2001; Foster et al, 2003; Ferrante et
al, 2009; Puhl and Heuer, 2009; Huizinga et al,
2009).
Stigma among specific healthcare
practitioners
Physicians
A cluster of studies have reported that physicians
view obese patients as less self-disciplined,
less compliant and more annoying than non-
obese ones and that, as patients’ BMI increases,
physicians are likely to have less patience and desire
to help them (Hebl and Xu, 2001; Huizinga et
al, 2009). Additionally, physicians have reported
that seeing obese people was a waste of their time
and that they had less respect for these patients.
For example, Kristeller and Hoerr (1997) sampled
more than 1200 physicians, examining attitudes,
intervention approaches and referral procedures for
obesity. The physicians’ responses were indicative
of poor management. Despite an awareness of the
associative health risks and despite acknowledging
that many patients were overweight or obese, the
physicians failed to intervene to the extent they
should have in their role, appeared ambivalent in
relation to the management of patients, and were
unlikely to refer patients to weight management
programmes. Moreover, the authors reported
that only 18% of physicians would discuss weight
management with overweight patients, while 42%
would do so with mildly obese patients. Similarly,
Price et al (1987) reported that 23% of physicians
did not recommend treatment to obese patients,
with 47% reporting that weight management
counselling was inconvenient.
Nurses
Physicians are not the only healthcare providers
who have been found to hold anti-fat attitudes and
perceptions. Both registered and student nurses
stereotype obese patients (Foster et al, 2003; Poon
and Tarrant, 2009). For example, nurses were
reported to view these patients as lazy, lacking
in self-control and non-compliant to treatment
(Ogden and Hoppe, 1998). Reports that nurses
have stigmatising attitudes are concerning given
that a concomitant increase in obesity-related
clinical practice has been observed in line with
the increased prevalence of the condition across
Page points
1. While many studies into
obesity stigma are limited by
their use of measurements of
explicit attitudes, there is a lot
of evidence that healthcare
professionals hold negative
stereotypes of both obesity as
a condition and obese people.
2. Physicians have been found
to have less patience and
respect for obese patients,
and less desire to help them.
3. Despite knowing the associated
health risks, less than half of
physicians report discussing
weight management with
obese patients, feeling that
it is a waste of their time.
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare
16 British Journal of Obesity Volume 1 No 1 2015
the world. For example, Brown et al (2007)
reported that UK practice nurses often provide
lifestyle advice and engage in other obesity-related
activities. Nurses’ anti-fat attitudes are particularly
alarming given the potential implications on
patients’ quality of life (Kolotkin et al, 2001) and
experiences of healthcare (Puhl and Brownell,
20 01).
Healthcare students
A number of studies have evaluated the attitudes of
students in training for a range of obesity-related
occupations, including doctors, nurses, dietitians,
psychologists and nutritionists. This research has
demonstrated stereotypical attitudes towards obese
patients, including beliefs that they have poor self-
control and no willpower, and that they are sloppy,
less likely to adhere to treatment, unsuccessful
and responsible for their symptoms (Keane,
1991; Wigton and McGaghie, 2001; Persky and
Eccleston, 2011; Swift et al, 2013a). It has also
been reported that medical students’ derogatory
and cynical humour is directed at obese patients
(Wear et al, 2006). Swift et al (2013a) examined
weight bias in 1130 healthcare students in the
UK. They demonstrated that the majority of the
sample, and in particular those who were training
to become nurses, reported fat stigmatisation
and strong beliefs that obesity is controllable.
Controllability beliefs are particularly important,
as it is suggested that there is a positive correlation
between beliefs that obesity is controllable and
stigmatising attitudes towards obese people
(Allison et al, 1991).
Patient impact
The importance of studying healthcare
professionals’ attitudes is also highlighted by the
impact of stigmatising experiences on patients.
Patients report feelings of disrespect, criticism
and being dismissed by healthcare professionals,
which has led to the perception that their weight-
related concerns are not taken seriously and that
professionals are reluctant to address them (Brown
et al, 2006). For example, Brown et al (2007)
report that obese patients are reluctant and, in
some instances, ambivalent about raising concerns
about their weight due to their experiences with
the GP or practice nurse. This breakdown in
communication further exacerbates the poor
patient–practitioner relationship, potentially
leading to increased feelings of shame and
embarrassment in reporting health concerns.
Furthermore, these perceptions are suggested
to lead to patients avoiding and cancelling
appointments. There are also reports that parents
of obese children believe they are criticised by
healthcare professionals, which impacts the
patient–practitioner relationship (Anderson
and Wadden, 2004; Bertakis and Azari, 2005).
Tackling obesity stigma in healthcare to avoid this
detrimental impact on patients is warranted. Puhl
and Heuer (2010) suggest that obesity stigma is a
health threat, may cause health inequalities and
can hinder efforts to intervene with obesity.
Terminology used by healthcare
professionals
Beyond the attitudes of healthcare professionals,
consideration of the language used in consultation
has drawn some attention. Various terms are used
to refer to overweight and obese people (Smith
et al, 2007), and the impact of these terms has
been highlighted over the last decade. Schwartz
and Brownell (2004) suggest that the language
used may have a number of implications that are
particularly important in healthcare settings. The
interchangeable terminology used to describe
excess fatness and the impact of inappropriate
language employed by healthcare professionals
suggest that guidelines are warranted. Previous
research has highlighted the detrimental impacts
of inappropriate language on the patient–
practitioner relationship (Tailor and Ogden, 2009;
Dutton et al, 2010; Jochemsen-van der Leeuw
et al, 2011).
Certain language used by healthcare professionals
has been reported to stigmatise and impact
motivation by giving the impression of blaming
patients for their weight. Communicating effectively
by not stigmatising patients, emphasising health
improvement with change and identifying
achievable behavioural goals rather than weight
targets is recommended and may increase the
effectiveness of healthcare provision. Terms such
as fat, morbidly obese and chubby are reported
to be the most stigmatising and least motivating,
whilst other terms that should be used are weight,
Page points
1. Stigma in healthcare
professionals can be traced as
far back as medical school,
with the majority of healthcare
students reporting stigmatising
attitudes and the belief that
obesity is controllable.
2. The effects of this stigma on
patients include reluctance
to raise concerns about their
weight to their practitioner and
avoiding contact with them.
3. In addition to healthcare
providers’ at titudes, their
choice of language can affect
the relationship with patients
and can cause feelings of
stigma and demotivation.
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare
British Journal of Obesity Volume 1 No 1 2015 17
unhealthy weight and overweight. Patients’ reactions
to stigmatising language include feeling upset and
embarrassed, seeking new healthcare support,
not talking to healthcare professionals about their
obesity and experiences, and avoiding subsequent
medical appointments (Amy et al, 2006; Tailor and
Ogden, 2009; Puhl et al, 2011; 2013).
Interventions to reduce obesity
stigmatisation
Anti-fat attitudes are reported to be robust
and resilient to change, and there have been
a number of unsuccessful intervention efforts
(e.g. Flint et al, 2013). Interventions that have
shown promise in studies of healthcare students
are those that attempt to address beliefs about
the controllability of obesity (O’Brien et al,
2010; Swift et al, 2013b). These interventions
can reduce obesity stigma through education
about the uncontrollable causes of obesity.
This is in line with suggestions that the more
controllable obesity is believed to be, the more
likely a healthcare provider is to have stigmatising
attitudes towards obese people.
Of the interventions for obesity stigmatisation,
educational interventions appear to be the
most successful (Daníelsdóttir et al, 2010). For
example, Poustchi et al (2013) reported that a
brief intervention in which medical students
were exposed to a 17-minute video titled Weight
Bias in Health Care, in addition to discussions
about their experiences with obese patients, was
effective in reducing obesity stereotypes and
increasing their belief that uncontrollable factors
such as genetics are a contributing cause of obesity.
Likewise, Kuschner et al (2014) reported that an
educational intervention consisting of interactions
with an overweight or obese patient, targeted
reading and a facilitated discussion was effective
in reducing stereotyping and increasing empathy
and confidence in counselling skills in a sample
of first-year undergraduate medical students.
However, despite the promising short-term
findings in reducing such stereotypes, follow-up
analysis 1 year later revealed that the reduction
in stereotyping had reverted to baseline levels.
Furthermore, to date, no evidence to demonstrate
the long-term effectiveness of interventions to
reduce obesity stigma has been published.
Conclusion
Given that the role of healthcare is preventive and
curative, reports that healthcare professionals
stigmatise obese patients and, in some cases, are
not performing their job by providing advice and
treatment are both concerning and unacceptable.
Stigmatising attitudes and behaviours of healthcare
professionals threaten efforts to address the
prevalence of obesity. The extent and impact of
stigmatising attitudes noted in extant literature
suggests that intervention is warranted. Stigmatising
attitudes towards obese people are reported in
medical students, and it is at this stage of training
where intervention appears to be most appropriate.
Reports that healthcare professionals and
students stigmatise obesity would suggest that
current training fails to address this issue. Recent
reports demonstrate that educational interventions
to modify beliefs about the controllability of
obesity is effective in reducing obesity stigma
during training; however, long-term interventions
are warranted. n
Allison DB, Basile VC, Yuker HE (1991) The measurement of
attitudes toward and beliefs about obese p ersons. Int J Eat Disord
10: 599 –607
Amy NK, Aalborg A, Lyons P, Keranen L (2006) Barriers to routine
gynecological cancer screening for white and African-American
obese women. Int J Obes (Lond) 30: 147–55
Anderson DA, Wadden TA (2004) Bariatric surgery patients’ views
of their physicians’ weight-related at titudes and practices. Obes
Res 12: 1587–95
Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE (2001) Fat phobia scale
revisited: the shor t form. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: 252–7
Bertakis KD, Azari R (2005) The impac t of obesity on primary care
visits. Obes Res 13: 1615–2 3
Brown I, Thompson J, Tod A, Jones G (200 6) Primary care support
for tackling obesit y: a qualitative study of the perceptions of
obese patients. Br J Gen Pract 56: 666 –72
Brown I, Stride C, Psarou A et al (2007) Management of obe sity in
primary care: nurses’ practice s, beliefs and attitudes. J Adv Nurs
59: 329 –41
Crandall CS (1994) Prejudice against fat people: ide ology and self-
interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 66: 882–94
Daníelsdóttir S, O’Brien KS, Ciao A (2010) Anti-fat prejudice
reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 3: 47–58
Dutton GR, Tan F, Perri MG et al (2010) What words should we use
when discussing excess weight? J A m Board Fam Med 23: 60 6–13
Faith MS, Leone MA, Ayers TS et al (2002) Weight criticism during
physical activity, coping skills, and reported physical ac tivity in
children. Pediatrics 110 : e23
Ferrante JM, Piasecki AK, Ohman-Strickland PA, Crabtr ee BF (2009)
Family physicians’ practices and attitudes regarding care of
extremely obese patient s. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17: 17 10 –6
Page points
1. Educational interventions that
inform practitioners about the
uncontrollable causes of obesity
and allow discussion with obese
people about their experiences
have been shown to reduce
stigma and stereotyping.
2. These interventions are most
effective when delivered
to healthcare student s.
3. However, there is no
evidence that these ef fects
persist over the long term.
Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare
18 British Journal of Obesity Volume 1 No 1 2015
Flint SW, Reale S (2014) Obesity stigmatisation from obesity
researchers. Lancet 384: 1925 6
Flint SW, Snooke J (2014) Obesity and discrimination: the next “big
issue”? International Journal of Discriminatio n and the Law 14:
183 –9 3.
Flint SW, Hudson J, Lavallee D (2013) Counter-conditioning as
an intervention to modify anti- fat attitudes. Health Psychology
Research 1: 122–5.
Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP et al (2003) Primary care
physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. O bes Res
11: 11 68 –7 7
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring
individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit
association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74 : 14 64 –80
Hebl MR, Xu J (2001) Weighing the care: physicians’ reactions to
the size of a patient. Int J Obes Relat Metab D isord 25: 1246–52
Huizinga MM, Cooper LA, Bleich SN et al (2009) Physician respect
for patients wit h obesity. J Gen Intern Med 24: 123 6–9
James WP (2008) WHO recognition of the global obesity epidemic.
Int J Obes (Lond) 32(Suppl 7): 120– 6
Jochemsen-van der Leeuw HG, van Dijk N, Wieringa-de Waard M
(2011) Attitude s towards obesity t reatment in GP training pract ices:
a focus group study. Fam Pract 28: 422–9
Keane M (1991) Acceptance vs. rejection: nursing students’ attitudes
about mental illness. Perspect Psychiatr Care 27: 13 8
Kolotkin RL, Mete r K, Williams GR (2001) Quality of life and ob esity.
Obes Rev 2: 219–29
Kristeller JL, Hoerr RA (1997) Physician attitudes toward managing
obesity: dif ferences among six specialty groups. Prev Med 26:
542–9
Kushner RF, Zeiss DM, Feinglass JM, Yelen M (2014) An obesity
educational inter vention for medical students addressing weight
bias and communication skills using standardized patient s. BMC
Med Educ 14: 53
Latner JD, O’Brien KS, Durso LE et al (2008) Weighing obesity
stigma: the relative strength of different forms of bias. Int J Obes
(Lond) 32: 1145–52
O’Brien KS, Puhl RM , Latner JD et al (2010) Reducing anti-fat
prejudice in preser vice health students: a randomized trial.
Obesity (Silver Spring) 18: 213 8 44
Ogden J, Hoppe R (1998) Changing practice nurses’ management of
ob es ity. J Hum Nutr Diet 11: 24 9– 56
Pearce MJ, Boergers J, Prinstein MJ (2002) Adolescent obesity, overt
and relational peer vic timization, and romantic relationships.
Obes Res 10: 386 –93
Persky S, Eccleston CP (2011) Impact of genetic causal information
on medical students’ clinical encounter s with an obese virtual
patient: health promotion and so cial stigma. Ann Behav Med 41:
363–72
Poon MY, Tarrant M (2009) Obesity: attitudes of undergraduate
student nurses and registered nurses. J Clin Nurs 18: 2355– 65
Poustchi Y, Saks NS, Piasecki AK e t al (2013) Brief intervention
effective in reducing weight bias in medical students. Fam Med
45: 345– 8
Price JH, Desmond SM, Krol RA et al (1987) Family practice
physicians’ beliefs, attitudes, and practices regarding obesity.
Am J Prev Med 3: 339 –45
Puhl R, Brownell KD (2001) Bias, discrimination, and obe sity. Obes
Res 9: 788 –8 05
Puhl RM, Brownell KD (2006) Confronting and coping with weight
stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity
(Silver Spring) 14: 180 2–15
Puhl RM, Heuer C A (2009) The stigma of obesity: a review and
update. Obesity (Silver Spring) 17: 941– 64
Puhl RM, Heuer C A (2010) Obesit y stigma: important consid erations
for public health. Am J Public Health 100 : 10 19 –28
Puhl RM, Latne r JD (2007) Stigma, ob esity, and the health of the
nation’s children. Psychol Bull 133: 557– 80
Puhl RM, Peter son JL, Luedicke J (2011) Parental perceptions of
weight terminology t hat providers use with youth. Pediatrics 128:
e786–93
Puhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke J (2013) Motivating or stigmatizing?
Public perceptions of weight-related language used by health
providers. Int J Ob es (Lond) 37: 612– 9
Robertson N, Vohora R (2008) Fitness vs. fatness: implicit bias
towards obesity among tness professionals and regular
exercisers. Psychol Sport Exerc 9: 547– 57
Rudman LA (2004) Sources of implicit attitudes. Curr Dir Psychol
Sci 13: 79– 82
Schvey NA, Puhl RM, Levandoski KA, Brownell KD (2013) The
inuence of a defendant’s body weight on perceptions of guilt.
Int J Obes (Lond) 37: 1275– 81
Schwartz MB, Brownell KD (2004) Obesity and body image. Body
Image 1: 43–56
Smith CA, Schmoll K, Konik J, Oberlander S (2007) Carrying weight
for the world: inuence of weight descriptors on judgments of
large-sized women. J Appl Soc Psychol 37: 989–1006
Swift JA, Hanlon S, El-Redy L et al (2013a) Weight bias among UK
trainee dietitians, doctors, nur ses and nutritionists. J Hum Nutr
Diet 26: 395 –4 02
Swift JA, Tischler V, Markham S et al (2013b) Are anti-stigma lms a
useful strate gy for reducing weight bias among trainee healthcare
professionals? Results of a pilot randomized control trial.
Obes Facts 6: 91–102
Tailor A, Ogden J (2009) Avoiding the term “obesity”: an
experimental study of the impact of doctors’ language on
patients’ belief s. Patient Educ Couns 76 : 260 –4
Teachman BA, Brownell KD (2001) Implicit anti-fat bias among
health professionals: is anyone immune? Int J Obes Relat Metab
Disord 25: 1525 –31
Tillman T, Kehle TJ, Bray MA et al (2007) Elementar y school students’
perceptions o f overweight peers. Can J School Psychol 22: 68– 80
Vartanian LR, Shaprow JG (20 08) Effec ts of weight stigma on
exercise motivation and b ehavior: a preliminary investigation
among college-age d females. J Health Psychol 13: 131– 8
Wear D, Aultman JM, Varley JD, Zarconi J (2006) Making fun of
patients: medic al students’ perceptions and use of derogatory
and cynical humor in clinical set tings. Acad Med 81: 454 –62
Wigton RS, McGaghie WC (2001) The effect of obesity on medical
students’ approach to patients with abdominal pain. J Gen Intern
Med 16: 262–5
“Given that the
role of healthcare is
preventive and curative,
reports that healthcare
professionals stigmatise
obese patients and, in
some cases, are not
performing their job
by providing advice
and treatment are
both concerning and
unacceptable.
... Stigma can be experienced as direct (stigmatizing behaviour), environmental (such as lack of appropriate equipment) or indirect (fear of being judged or discriminated against) (Lewis et al., 2011). The insidiousness of such obesity-related stigma experiences has been reported in all aspects of individual's lives from family, friends and partners Obesity Collaborators, 2016Vartanian et al., 2014), to public settings (Tapking et al., 2020), and within the healthcare system (Flint, 2015;Malterud & Ulriksen, 2011;Tapking et al., 2020). A scoping review conducted by de MacêDo et al. (2022) has found that obesity-related stigma was present in areas of everyday life such as the media and during interaction with other people during the COVID-19 pandemic. ...
... Obesity-related stigma has resulted in a counterproductive outcome hindering the reduction in obesity case numbers overall (Flint, 2015). Previous research has also identified the link between obesityrelated stigma and psychological wellbeing (Jackson, 2016). ...
... This study was conducted as part of the IMI2 SOPHIA (Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimize Future Treatment) project. 1 While the literature provides us with insights into obesity-related stigma (Asbury & Woszidlo, 2016;Farrell et al., 2021;Flint, 2015;Malterud & Ulriksen, 2011;Tapking et al., 2020;Thomas et al., 2008;Ueland et al., 2019;Vartanian et al., 2014), identifying nuances of the lived experience of the phenomenon in an Irish context can play an important role in understanding the issue of obesity-related stigma. This paper presents findings from a qualitative study exploring the lived experience of living with obesity as describe indepth by participants through conversational interviews, photographs capturing and reflecting their stories and group discussions to share and reflect on the experience of living with obesity. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Obesity-related stigma impacts on and shapes the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of individuals living with obesity. Often absent from the literature in the field is the voice(s) of those living with obesity capturing the nuances of the lived experiences of obesity-related stigma. Methods This study adopted a qualitative approach encompassing individual (n = 15) and photovoice method (n = 12), with a purposeful sample of patients accessing treatment for obesity within the healthcare setting during 2021. Analysis was undertaken using thematic analysis. Results Key themes developed from the analysis related to experiencing obesity-related stigma as exposure to external judgement, societal exclusion and felt environmental stigmatization. Exposure to external judgement was described as judgemental comments resulting in hypervigilance to societal judgement. Participants reported how being overlooked and ignored by others had various negative effects and compounded obesity-related stigma through societal exclusion. Public spaces lacking suitable equipment further made obesity-related stigma visible through felt environmental stigmatization when pursuing hobbies and in everyday life. Conclusions Obesity-related stigma had a profoundly negative impact on participants in this study, particularly in shaping social interaction, limiting life experiences and impacting psychosocial wellbeing.
... Previous literature highlighted that people living with obesity experienced negative obesity stigma in all contexts of life, including healthcare settings [7,25]. Some patients had experienced obesity stigma and discrimination from healthcare staff, which led to further psychological harm such as depression, anxiety, low sense of self-worth, and isolation [12,26,27]. Consequently, many people living with obesity reported sometimes avoiding healthcare settings in order to avoid potential stigma and discrimination experiences [10,[27][28][29]. ...
... GPs discussed weight in a way that promoted patient autonomy and minimized the potential for stigmatizing experiences. Previous literature has stressed that some patients who experience stigmatizing experiences avoid future health appointments, further perpetuating the negative health outcomes (regardless if related to weight or not) [10,26,28,47]. The consultations in this study demonstrated GPs promoting patient autonomy in their own health journey by asking patients what their health goals were, working with patients to facilitate their health goals, and working at a pace that suited each individual patient. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective GPs have a complex role in obesity management due to patients' individualized experience of living with obesity, coupled with the challenge to deliver healthcare messages in non‐stigmatizing ways. This study aimed to explore who initiates the topic of weight and how weight was discussed in real‐world GP‐patient consultations. Method A multi‐disciplinary team, including obesity lived experience experts, undertook a secondary data analysis of 43 Australian video recorded consultations and patient surveys from The Digital Library using descriptive content analysis. Results 17/43 consultations included the topic of weight in the discussion. 15 were initiated by the GP and 2 by the patient. 14/17 used a structured approach. All GPs asked for consent to discuss weight or gave patients space to decline the discussion. No overt stigmatizing language was identified. A post‐consultation survey found 15/17 patients (2 unanswered) felt listened to and respected during consultations. Conclusion This study identified the intricate ways GPs approach weight discussions in consultations. GPs navigated weight discussions in ways that made patients feel respected and listened to and related weight to health concerns relevant to each patient. Practice Implications The findings in this study can serve as a foundation for establishing education and training resources for GPs and can be utilized as a way of continuing professional development. Any future communication technique resources for GPs should be co‐designed with obesity lived experience experts to ensure appropriateness and avoid potential stigma and harm.
... Weight stigma encompasses physical barriers in the environment (e.g., not fitting into an airline seat), and in health care, it can involve inadequate seating in waiting rooms, examination tables with weight limits unable to accommodate high-weight patients, and ill-fitting blood pressure cuffs and medical gowns (Alberga et al., 2019). Health care providers demonstrate implicit and explicit antifat biases toward patients (Flint, 2015;Tomiyama et al., 2015Tomiyama et al., , 2018 and express less respect, patience, and desire to help high-weight patients (Flint, 2015). Physicians often overattribute health symptoms and issues to patients' high weight, even when symptoms are unrelated to weight or were present prior to weight gain (Ferrante et al., 2016;Phelan et al., 2015). ...
... Weight stigma encompasses physical barriers in the environment (e.g., not fitting into an airline seat), and in health care, it can involve inadequate seating in waiting rooms, examination tables with weight limits unable to accommodate high-weight patients, and ill-fitting blood pressure cuffs and medical gowns (Alberga et al., 2019). Health care providers demonstrate implicit and explicit antifat biases toward patients (Flint, 2015;Tomiyama et al., 2015Tomiyama et al., , 2018 and express less respect, patience, and desire to help high-weight patients (Flint, 2015). Physicians often overattribute health symptoms and issues to patients' high weight, even when symptoms are unrelated to weight or were present prior to weight gain (Ferrante et al., 2016;Phelan et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to evaluate how weight stigma and masculinity contribute to men’s health care engagement. A U.S. census-matched sample of 912 cisgender, heterosexual male adults (Mage = 46) were recruited through a market research company in April 2023 and administered a questionnaire to assess their experienced weight stigma in health care, weight bias internalization, conformity to masculine norms, and endorsement of precarious manhood beliefs. Weight-based and general reasons for avoiding and delaying health care were also assessed, as well as their perceived patient–provider relationship. Almost half (46.5%) of the participants reported experiencing at least one instance of weight stigma in health care. These experiences, as well as weight bias internalization, were related to greater weight-based and general health care avoidance and delay, as well as weaker patient–provider relationships. Masculinity was also related to greater general health care avoidance and delay and a weaker patient–provider relationship. These findings are consistent with previous research on women’s weight stigma experiences related to health care engagement, suggesting that weight stigma for men is similarly prevalent and impactful in health care. Findings also support previous research on masculinity’s impact on health care engagement. In sum, we found novel evidence to suggest that, relative to masculinity, weight stigma was a stronger predictor of men’s health care engagement.
... increased stress, mental health issues, and avoidance of healthcare services [5][6][7], with significant negative consequences for the quality of care provided to patients with obesity. For example, patients with obesity may avoid seeking follow-up care because of fear of judgment or mistreatment, leading to worse health outcomes [8][9][10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study aimed to examine how anti‐fat attitudes and attitudes toward obesity management influence orthopedic surgeons' treatment preferences for patients with obesity who are candidates for elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among 150 orthopedic surgeons using a web‐based questionnaire. The survey included four sections: socio‐demographic data, the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA) assessing biases related to obesity (dislike, fear of fatness, and beliefs about willpower), an adapted questionnaire on attitudes toward obesity management, and a custom section on treatment preferences. Results The sample had a mean age of 43.4 years (SD = 9.7) and was predominantly male (70.7%). Participants exhibited moderate anti‐fat attitudes alongside positive views on obesity management. Stronger anti‐fat attitudes correlated with a preference for conservative treatments over surgery (r = 0.45 to r = 0.29, p < 0.001), whereas supportive attitudes toward obesity management were associated with less preference for conservative treatment (r = −0.53, p < 0.001). Male surgeons demonstrated higher anti‐fat attitudes and a greater inclination for conservative treatment than female surgeons. Regression analysis identified attitudes toward obesity management as a significant predictor of treatment preferences (β = −0.54, p < 0.001). Conclusion Findings highlight the impact of weight stigma on clinical decision‐making and emphasise the need for increased awareness and education to ensure equitable access to TKA for patients with obesity.
... In addition to the time pressure and the effect of concurrently more acute and severe somatic conditions, provider/patient concerns about weight stigma were also reported as a barrier to diagnosis and documentation of obesity. 22,23 Although the possible factors are not reflected in our study, these barriers could explain the poor recognition rates of obesity/overweight among our study participants. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Accurate perception of weight by overweight/obese patients and the acknowledgment of their excess weight by medical practitioners are pivotal in managing obesity. This study aims to assess knowledge, perception and practices related to weight reduction among overweight/obese patients and the recognition of their overweight status and interventions by medical practitioners.Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study interviewed 317 overweight/ obese patients during their first visits to general medical clinics at the University Hospital of Kotelawala Defence University. A structured questionnaire assessed their demographic characteristics, comorbidity, knowledge, perception and practices related to weight reduction. Recognition and management of overweight/ obesity by medical practitioners were evaluated through recall of previous six-month consultations and review of medical records.Results: Among the study participants, 163 (51.4%) were obese and 154 (48.6%) were overweight. Only 63 (19.9%) patients knew the meaning of BMI, and 306 (96.5%) could not define the ideal BMI for a Sri Lankan adult. Less than half (45.4%) considered overweight/obesity a medical problem. Body weight misperception observed among 92 (59.7%) overweight and 150 (92.0%) obese participants. Of the 267 participants who reported being evaluated by another medical practitioner in the previous six months, 102 (38.2%) were told the diagnosis of overweight/obesity. However, weight status was documented only in seven (2.6%) patient records. Nonetheless, 110 (41.2%) patients had received weight reduction advice during previous consultations, and 68 (61.8%) had attempted to lose weight.Conclusions: Low comprehension of the term BMI and misperception of body weight among the studied population is concerning. Patients who received weight reduction advice from medical practitioners were more inclined to lose weight. However, acknowledgment and intervention of the excess weight status of overweight /obese patients by medical practitioners were largely inadequate.
... Frequently, health care professionals also tend to treat individuals with obesity negatively. Health professionals and students reveal their prejudices not only through verbal expressions but also through their facial expressions and behaviors when they care for individuals with obesity (Flint, 2015). Due to the explicit or implicit prejudices of health professionals, individuals with obesity may sometimes be exposed to negative attitudes and be personally blamed for their body weight, and they are labeled as individuals who do not comply with treatment, are lazy, and lack self-control and willpower (Koyu et al., 2020;Rubino et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Negative attitudes and beliefs leading to discrimination against individuals with obesity and to their exclusion can cause these individuals to experience various biological, psychological, and social problems. Nursing students constitute the group that will provide care, services, and counseling to individuals with obesity in the future. The present study was aimed at determining the relationship between nursing students’ attitudes toward and beliefs about individuals with obesity and their empathy and body image flexibility levels. This study that has a cross-sectional correlational research design was conducted with 445 students studying at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing between February 2023 and July 2023. The Sociodemographic Information Form, Beliefs About Obese Persons (BAOP) scale, Attitudes Toward Obese Persons (ATOP) scale, Body Image Flexibility Scale (BIFS), and Toronto Empathy Scale (TES) were used as data collection tools. In order to ensure explanatoriness in the analysis of the data, the multiple regression/correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between the scores for the overall BAOP and ATOP scales, which were dependent variables, and BMI and the scores for the overall TES and BIFS, which were the independent variables. The mean scores that the students participating in this study obtained from the overall BAOP and ATOP were 23.89 ± 4.49 and 72.48 ± 11.19, respectively. The mean scores they obtained from the overall TES and BIFS were 51.61 ± 8.80 and 52.19 ± 15.28, respectively. The results demonstrated that higher levels of empathy and body image flexibility were significantly associated with lower levels of negative beliefs about individuals with obesity (B = −0.107, p = .026; B = 0.271, p < .001) and positive attitudes toward individuals with obesity (B = −0.143, p = .002; B = 0.343, p < .001). In the study, as the students’ empathy and body image flexibility levels increased so did their positive perceptions toward individuals with obesity. Nurses should acquire empathic skills during their education in order to demonstrate an equitable and inclusive approach to care and to provide positive health experiences to individuals with obesity. In order for young people studying at university to be more responsive to others, they should be encouraged to develop body image flexibility for their own and others’ bodies. It is also recommended that topics on combating stigma and discrimination to prevent negative attitudes toward and beliefs about individuals with obesity should be added to the curriculum of nursing students.
Article
Se le conoce como Estigma de Peso a la devaluación social que experimenta una persona en función de su peso e imagen corporal cuando estos son percibidos como más grandes de lo normal. Por su parte, las Actitudes Anti Obesidad son las evaluaciones y percepciones negativas hacia las personas con sobrepeso u obesidad que realiza una persona. Ambos fenómenos tienen consecuencias negativas sobre la salud, por lo que resulta necesario determinar cómo se relacionan estos fenómenos y como influyen en el desarrollo de sobrepeso u obesidad. Sin embargo, en México aún no se cuentan con instrumentos para evaluar estos constructos. De este modo, el objetivo del presente estudio fue validar el Inventario de Situaciones Estigmatizantes y la Escala de Actitudes Anti Obesidad para población mexicana. Una vez sometidas a un proceso de validación culturalmente pertinente, se obtuvieron dos escalas abreviadas y con adecuadas propiedades psicométricas. Asimismo, los factores obtenidos presentan correlaciones significativas y positivas, proveyendo de evidencias de validez convergente, y correlaciones positivas con el Índice de Masa Corporal, dotando a las escalas de evidencia de validez de criterio.
Book
The significance of our physical bodies is an important topic in contemporary philosophy and theology. Reflection on the body often assumes, even if only implicitly, idealizations that obscure important facts about what it means for humans to be 'enfleshed.' This Element explores a number of ways that reflection on bodies in their concrete particularities is important. It begins with a consideration of why certain forms of idealization are philosophically problematic. It then explores how a number of features of bodies can reveal important truths about human nature, embodiment, and dependence. Careful reflection on the body raises important questions related to community and interdependence. The Element concludes by exploring the ethical demands we face given human embodiment. Among other results, this Element exposes the reader to a wide diversity of human embodiment and the nature of human dependence, encouraging meaningful theological reflection on aspects of the human condition.
Research
Full-text available
Resumo: Introdução: O aumento da prevalência do sobrepeso e da obesidade está acompanhado do aumento dos relatos de estigma relacionado ao peso corporal. Essa estigmatização acontece quando um indivíduo é desvalorizado por ser considerado como “desviante da norma”, durante interações sociais, por indivíduos supostamente “dentro da norma”. As consequências do estigma envolvem danos à saúde psicológica e física, e ele pode vir de nutricionistas e estudantes de nutrição, por meio de atitudes negativas em relação ao corpo gordo com base nos estereótipos existentes. Dessa forma, a questão do estigma se apresenta como um aspecto relevante a ser abordado na área da nutrição. Objetivo: Entender como estudantes de nutrição da Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo que vivenciaram o estigma do peso em atendimento nutricional, como pacientes, perceberam essa vivência e como ela impacta em suas expectativas de futura atuação profissional. Métodos: A pesquisa foi de abordagem qualitativa e utilizou-se a técnica de entrevista individual semiestruturada. O estudo foi realizado com doze estudantes do gênero feminino do curso de nutrição da Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, com idade entre 18 e 32 anos e que foram atendidas por profissional da nutrição em algum momento da vida. A pesquisa foi realizada durante os meses de junho e julho de 2020, na cidade de São Paulo, por meio de videoconferência. Os dados coletados nas entrevistas foram gravados e transcritos, e então foram analisados por meio da análise de conteúdo exploratória. Resultados: Na análise das entrevistas dois eixos interpretativos foram identificados: (1) Reforço do estigma do peso no atendimento nutricional e (2) Desconstruindo o estigma na futura atuação profissional. O primeiro eixo traz as atitudes dos(as) nutricionistas, que validaram e exacerbaram preocupações e crenças das participantes em relação ao corpoe à alimentação, bem como as percepções das participantes em relação a essas atitudes e ao ambiente da consulta. Esse eixo também mostra os impactos de vivenciar esses atendimentos na relação das participantes com o seu corpo e com a sua alimentação. O segundo eixo, por sua vez, traz os impactos dessa vivência nas percepções e expectativas das participantes em relação à futura atuação profissional, e também as suas percepções em relação à obesidade, estigma e atendimento de pessoas com um corpo maior. Conclusões: O reforço do estigma do peso no atendimento nutricional impactou negativamente as participantes em diversos âmbitos e vivenciar esses atendimentos impactou nas suas expectativas como futuras nutricionistas, no sentido de serem profissionais mais acolhedoras e engajadas na desconstrução do estigma do peso.
Chapter
Numerous facets of the practice, delivery, evaluation, and research of simulation-based education (SBE) in nursing across the globe are evident via the traditional publication route or social media posts. Within nursing SBE, key features appear to be the diversity of clinical scenarios and the application of practice to local contexts (Kelly et al. J Nurs Scholarsh 48:312–21, 2016). A common denominator of SBE in health professions education and practice is safety, minimizing medical errors, and the impact on patient outcomes and experiences (Brown et al. Clin Simul Nurs 45:6–15, 2020). Professional standards and codes of practice can also be featured within SBE scenarios to help learners develop their professional identity and to embody the holism of practice (Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Registration standards; 2021). Cultural norms and expectations of learners, educators, and health consumers influence the nuanced topics that can be explored through SBE. For example, it is challenging in many countries to incorporate simulations highlighting mental health issues as this is an undesirable characteristic to be made more 'public' (Tzouvara et al. Int J Soc Psychiatry 62:292–305; 2016; Zolezzi et al. Int J Soc Psychiatry 64:597–609; 2018). Interprofessional SBE may be common in many countries, but in others where societal beliefs about gender roles impact the predominantly female nursing workforce, introducing team-based scenarios can be influences by many more hurdles other than scheduling. To illustrate the diversity and, on occasion, similarities in SBE across international contexts, four case studies from four countries are featured in this chapter to provide a snapshot of activities and innovations. First, the Australian case study focusses on caring for an obese patient to highlight a person-centered approach in pre and post-hospital care, to enhance self-management within the community and social context. The example from the United Kingdom (U.K.) recounts the efforts and outcomes of introducing SBE earlier in the nursing program. In contrast, the case study from Norway focuses on the application of SBE to develop clinical facilitators. Finally, an account from South Korea of how they developed and implemented an interprofessional SBE, a first in their region.
Article
Full-text available
A concomitant increase has been observed between the prevalence of obesity and the stigmatization and discrimination of the condition. Despite reports of such negative experiences, there appears to be little deterrence for individuals to behave in a non-discriminatory fashion towards the overweight and obese. This article focuses on an emergent academic, legal and medical debate concerning obesity and human well-being and its possible impacts in the workplace and on disability discrimination laws. The disability laws in the United Kingdom require employers and employees not to discriminate or harass their colleagues, yet the model of discrimination seen in the United Kingdom emerges from a historical basis where sex and race were accommodated by the Sex Discrimination Act (1975) and the Race Relations Act (1976) respectively, and laws prohibiting disability were introduced later by the Disability Discrimination Act (1995). These laws in conjunction required UK citizens in the workplace and beyond not to subject their fellow citizens, potential workmates and current employees to less favourable treatment and to provide reasonable adjustments in the workplace where discrimination was a possible outcome of behaviours or policy arrangements.
Article
Full-text available
In order to manage the increasing worldwide problem of obesity, medical students will need to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to assess and counsel patients with obesityFew educational intervention studies have been conducted with medical students addressing stigma and communication skills with patients who are overweight or obese. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in students' attitudes and beliefs about obesity, and their confidence in communication skills after a structured educational intervention that included a clinical encounter with an overweight standardized patient (SP). First year medical students (n = 127, 47% female) enrolled in a communications unit were instructed to discuss the SPs' overweight status and probe about their perceptions of being overweight during an 8 minute encounter. Prior to the session, students were asked to read two articles on communication and stigma as background information. Reflections on the readings and their performance with the SP were conducted prior to and after the encounter when students met in small groups. A newly constructed 16 item questionnaire was completed before, immediately after and one year after the session. Scale analysis was performed based on a priori classification of item intent. Three scales emerged from the questionnaire: negative obesity stereotyping (7 items), empathy (3 items), and counseling confidence (3 items). There were small but significant immediate post-intervention improvements in stereotyping (p = .002) and empathy (p < .0001) and a very large mean improvement in confidence (p < .0001). Significant improvement between baseline and immediate follow-up responses were maintained for empathy and counseling at one year after the encounter but stereotyping reverted to the baseline mean. Percent of students with improved scale scores immediately and at one year follow up were as follows: stereotyping 53.1% and 57.8%; empathy 48.4% and 47.7%; and confidence 86.7% and 85.9%. A structured encounter with an overweight SP was associated with a significant short-term decrease in negative stereotyping, and longer-term increase in empathy and raised confidence among first year medical students toward persons who are obese. The encounter was most effective for increasing confidence in counseling skills.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the effect of anti-fat attitude counter-conditioning using positive images of obese individuals participants com-pleted implicit and explicit measures of atti-tudes towards fatness on three occasions: no intervention; following exposure to positive images of obese members of the general pub-lic; and to images of obese celebrities. Contrary to expectations, positive images of obese individuals did not result in more posi-tive attitudes towards fatness as expected and, in some cases, indices of these attitudes wors-ened. Results suggest that attitudes towards obesity and fatness may be somewhat robust and resistant to change, possibly suggesting a central and not peripheral processing route for their formation.
Article
Full-text available
Response latency measures have yielded an explosion of interest in implicit attitudes. Less forthcoming have been theoretical explanations for why they often differ from explicit (self-reported) attitudes. Theorized differences in the sources of implicit and explicit attitudes are discussed, and evidence consistent with each theory is presented. The hypothesized causal influences on attitudes include early (even preverbal) experiences, affective experiences, cultural biases, and cognitive consistency principles. Each may influence implicit attitudes more than explicit attitudes, underscoring their conceptual distinction.
Article
It has been said that obese persons are the last acceptable targets of discrimination.1-4 Anecdotes abound about overweight individuals being ridiculed by teachers, physicians, and complete strangers in public settings, such as supermarkets, restaurants, and shopping areas. Fat jokes and derogatory portrayals of obese people in popular media are common. Overweight people tell stories of receiving poor grades in school, being denied jobs and promotions, losing the opportunity to adopt children, and more. Some who have written on the topic insist that there is a strong and consistent pattern of discrimination, 5 but no systematic review of the scientific evidence has been done.
Article
Obesity stigmatisation from obesity researchers Obesity stigmatisation has become a major topic of research, with empirical evidence showing negative consequences for people who are stigmatised. With research showing that obesity stigmatisation is widespread and that antifat attitudes are strong...
Article
Objectives: Success of supported exercise programmes to tackle obesity appear to be shaped, in part, by co-exercisers' beliefs. This study, therefore, aimed to assess implicit attitudes towards obesity among two key groups of people in a public exercise setting: fitness professionals offering exercise advice, and regular exercisers. Design: Questionnaire survey. Methods: In all, 57 fitness professionals and 56 regular exercisers were recruited from gyms across Central England. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, semantic differential measure of explicit beliefs and the implicit associations test (IAT). The IAT reveals unconscious attitudes of participants to implicit associations between target concepts (thin vs. fat) and attributes (good vs. bad). The attribute of motivated vs. lazy was adopted in the current study due to relevance in an exercise setting. Results: Evidence of a strong anti-fat bias was found (p<.01) for both fitness professionals and regular exercisers on all implicit and explicit measures (good vs. bad; motivated vs. lazy). This bias was more pronounced for fitness professionals who themselves had never been overweight and who believed personal control dictated body weight. For regular exercisers, a higher level of anti-fat bias was found for females, younger participants and those who had never been overweight. Conclusions: This study suggests that the guidance to support exercise, and combat obesity, may be compromised by the beliefs of those facilitating such programmes.