ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Stress is not new experience to all of us, it’s seen as modern society’s illness, as most people, no matter how well adjusted, will suffer at least short-term distress while they negotiate periods of transition, trauma, challenges and loss. Stress has great impact on one performance and efficiency; however, the intense pressure and the demands of coping determine the consequence of stress on performance. Therefore, this paper discusses on the relationship between stress and coping mechanisms. The purpose of this study is twofold: to understand the history of stress related problems, and to provide suitable model that brings all ways of coping mechanism into one. Eventually, the important variables or factors associated with stress, and their direct or indirect effects on various outcome measures such as mental health, physical health, and performance will be taken into account. The result and the explanations of this literature might help everyone to find out the main reason for their stressors, best way to cope and greatest technique to use in managing stress. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p479
Content may be subject to copyright.
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
Stress and Coping Mechanisms: A Historical Overview
Dr. Shadiya Mohamed Saleh Baqutayan
Perdana School of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, University technology Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur Campus
Stress is not new experience to all of us, it’s seen as modern society’s illness, as most people, no matter how well adjusted, will
suffer at least short-term distress while they negotiate periods of transition, trauma, challenges and loss. Stress has great
impact on one performance and efficiency; however, the intense pressure and the demands of coping determine the
consequence of stress on performance. Therefore, this paper discusses on the relationship between stress and coping
mechanisms. The purpose of this study is twofold: to understand the history of stress related problems, and to provide suitable
model that brings all ways of coping mechanism into one. Eventually, the important variables or factors associated with stress,
and their direct or indirect effects on various outcome measures such as mental health, physical health, and performance will
be taken into account. The result and the explanations of this literature might help everyone to find out the main reason for their
stressors, best way to cope and greatest technique to use in managing stress.
Keyword: Stress Management; Stress And Coping Mechanisms; From the History of Stress; History of Coping
1. Introduction
This study was based on a theory of psychological stress and coping developed by Lazarus and his colleagues over a
number of years (Folkman & Lazarus, 1985), and then expanded by Carver and colleagues in 1989. The theory identifies
the process of coping as critical mediators of stressful person-environment relations and their immediate and long-range
outcomes. No doubt, in the first place, psychologist has defined stress as an unpleasant state of emotional and
physiological arousal that people experience in situations that they perceive as dangerous or threatening to their well-
being. And coping as the cognitive and behavioral efforts to master, reduce, or tolerate those demands (Folkman &
Lazarus, 1980). But due to the differences between researchers in how stress was defined, and how coping with it was
different, this research tries to provide a full understanding and more detail about the meaning of stress, strain and coping
mechanisms from the past literatures.
2. Background
Hans Selye firstly introduced the term “stress” into the health psychology language in 1926. Although the term “stress” is
a household word, Selye actually used the descriptive term “strain” to denote his concept, since it suggested structural
changes whereas stress emphasized external factors. To him “stress” consisted of the “sum of all nonspecific changes
(within an organism) caused by function or damage” or, more simply “the rate of wear and tear in the body” (Selye, 1956).
Then, from Hans Selye’s starting point, researchers used the term “stress” in the index of psychological abstracts
in 1944 (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). Some writers, like Pollock in 1988, argued that the use of the term “stress” is
relatively recent. But she suggested that although it was used to some extent throughout the 19th century and was
loosely associated with ill health, it is only in the last few decades that it has really become an established term. Newton
(1995), however, disagreed that the term is of recent origin, having found definitions of stress in the Oxford English
Dictionary, which are very close to our present understanding of the term, dating back to the 16th and 17th century.
Nevertheless, there seems to be a general consensus that popularity of the concept gained ground from the Second
World War on wards (Kugelmann, 1992; Newton, 1995).
It is true that everyone is talking about stress, but usually when they talk, they use the term of pressure they are
feeling from something happening around them or to them. For example, students talk about being under stress because
of poor exam performance or an impending deadline for a major paper. Parents talk about the strain of raising teenagers
and the financial burdens of running a household. Teachers talk about the pressure of maintaining professional currency
and research while still managing to keep up with teaching and advising. Doctors, nurses, and lawyers talk about meeting
the endless demands of their patients and clients (Rice, 1999). But what is the exact meaning of the word “stress”?
Stress is something that all of us experience from time to time but have difficulty defining it. If people were asked to
talk about it, they tend to describe how it feels to them or what it makes them do, but they can hardly ever say what it is.
According to Hans Selye, the prolific writer on the topic of stress over the last 50 years, that stress is the non-specific
response of the body to any demand made upon it (Selye, 1973). By this, there is a common response to different types
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
of stressors, and he named this set of responses the general adaptation syndrome (GAS). The term non-specific refers to
the fact that a wide variety of demands or stressors bring forth a common response. He identified three stages in the GAS
each associated with changes in nervous and endocrine functioning: the alarm reaction, the stage of resistance and the
stage of exhaustion (Jones & Bright, 2001).
Gradually, the growth of the study of psychology has led to a proliferation of definitions, which has not necessarily
helped to clarify the meaning of the term. Over 20 years ago, Kasl (1978) listed a range of conceptualizations, from the
highly specific to the extremely general, encompassing both stimulus and response. For example, stress was sometimes
conceptualized in terms of environmental conditions which were considered stressful (Landy & Trumbo, 1976), or in
terms of ‘frustration or threat’ (Bonner, 1967) or more advanced conceptualizations incorporating the stimuli and response
and the relationship between the two. Here Kasl cites the popular definition by McGrath (1976) who suggested that stress
was a (perceived) substantial imbalance between demand and response capability, under conditions where failure to
meet demand has important (perceived) consequences. This diversity of conceptualizations has persisted over the years.
Still, much confusion exists about the meaning of stress. This confusion is because some stressors can motivate,
stimulate and push people beyond the limits of what they believe themselves capable. But the symptoms and harmful
effects of stress have been emphasized so frequently that the word itself now connotes little short of illness, a disease,
something to be rigorously avoided.
Most people see stress as a bad thing but we can all use a bit of stress now and then. According to Smith (1990),
stress makes us do things at times when we need a push; it gets us out of our chair; it makes us think about things
differently; it makes us seek solutions to problems; and it sometimes makes us sensitive to what others may think of us
and our actions. In addition to that, many people use stress and distress as though they are interchangeable terms.
Perhaps this is because common sense suggests that stress is something bad.
To avoid this dilemma, Hans Selye introduced the term’s “distress” and “eustress”. According to Selye (1974),
distress is damaging or unpleasant stress. Expressed in these terms, stress is much the same as a state of anxiety, fear,
worry, or agitation. The core of the psychological experience is negative, painful, something to be avoided. Pleasurable,
satisfying experiences come from what Selye (1974) calls eustress. Participating in a wedding ceremony, anticipating
competition in a major sport event, and performing in a theatrical producing are examples of eustress. This is positive
stress. We even hear of the “joy of stress” a phrase some use to emphasize the good that can come from stress
(Hanson, 1986). So is stress healthful or injurious? This can be answered through the definition of stress.
The word stress means different things to different people. Some people define stress as events or situations that
cause them to feel tension, pressure, or negative emotions such as anxiety and anger. Others view stress as the
response to these situations. This response includes physiological changes—such as increased heart rate and muscle
tension—as well as emotional and behavioral changes. However, most psychologists regard stress as a process
involving a person's interpretation and response to a threatening event (Microsoft Corporation 2000).
Mills (1982) defined stress as our inner reaction to things that happen to us and demands that are placed on us.
We all experience stress when we are anxious, worried, shamed, or angry, whether the source of our feeling is ourselves,
some other person, or something that happens to us. We can deal with stress adequately only when we consider both
components of stress: the external events and demands in our lives and our inner reaction to them. Sandhu et al. (1994)
defined stress as the adaptive physiological response of the human organism to internal and external force and events
that disturb the homeostatic balance of the individual. Psychological stress occurs as results of a person perceiving
environmental demand exceeding coping abilities.
Buck (1972) defined stress as the work of environment; according to him environment is perhaps most often
central in the experience of stress among adults. Swent & Gmelch (1977) found that 75% of the stress educational
administrators felt come from their jobs. Conditions of one’s job and events related to work, then, become critical
components of the stress syndrome. Cooper & Marshall (1976) determined that professionals involved in interaction with
other people were more vulnerable to work- related stress than workers in product-oriented organizations were. Studies
of police, administrators, teachers, students, and others verify this fact. Benjamir & Walz (1990) conclude that stress can
best be understood as the product of interaction between three elements: the environment (the organizational or social
climate, interpersonal relationships, operating procedures), the nature of the stressor (nagging, daily pressures or life-
threatening events), and the individual’s vulnerability to stress (difference to coping styles, support groups, health history
In contemporary scientific literature, stress has three distinct meanings. First, it may refer to any event or
environmental stimulus that causes a person to feel tense or aroused. In this sense, stress is something external.
Second, stress may refer to a subjective response. In this sense, stress is the internal mental state of tension or arousal.
It is the interpretive, emotive, defensive, and coping processes occurring inside a person. Such processes may promote
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
growth and maturity. They also may produce mental strain. Finally, stress may be the body’s physical reaction to demand
or damaging intrusions. The function of these physical reactions is probably to support behavioral and psychological
efforts at coping (Baum, 1990).
According to Jones and Bright (2001), some writers disagree with the idea that there is disagreement about the
concept of stress. For example, Cox (1993) criticizes the ‘unfortunate but popular misconception that there is little
consensus on the definitions of stress as a scientific concept or, worse, that stress is in some way indefinable and
immeasurable’. However, the definition he offers suggests that the goal of a clear conceptualization remains as elusive as
ever. He states that ‘stress can be defined as a psychological state which is part of and reflects a wider process of
interaction between individuals and their work environment ‘(Cox, 1993, p. 29).
The term ‘stress’ is so vague in definition that it has been suggested that perhaps the most useful approach to
stress would be to regard it not as a variable but as a ‘rubric consisting of many variables and processes’. In addition to
that, researchers should adopt a systematic theoretical framework encompassing relevant antecedents, processes and
outcomes (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984).
One person's stress may well be another's pleasure. According to Kenneth et al. (1997), one useful definition of
stress describes it as our psychological and physiological reactions to a situation perceived as exceeding our coping
resources. Many psychologists distinguish between the situation (the "stress") and our resulting response ("distress"),
recognizing that it is the latter that is likely to be detrimental to health and well-being. How negatively we react to stress
depends on a number of factors, including how much control we feel over the situation, how predictable and intense the
stressor is, and our individual perspective. For example, the hustle and bustle of a crowded city street may be sweet
music to one driver and unbearable to another.
To be clearer about the concept of stress, you have to know the sources of stress (stressors), so that you can
relate stress to its sources. Indeed, many psychologists talked about it, and one of them is Carlesworth, while the other is
Nathan. In 1982, Carlesworth & Nathan defined stressors as the external demands of life or the internal attitude and
thoughts that require us to adopt. Stressors can include traffic jams, pollution in the city, the fifth cup of coffee, the pushy
salesman who will not take no for an answer, or the angry boss. Stressors can also include the work that never seems to
get done, the children who never seem to listen, or the way some people put themselves down for their shortcomings.
Notice that some of these stressors come from our surrounding and others from our inner struggles. Some stressors
come from both sources.
Individuals cannot remain in a continuous state of tension and emotional strain. Even if a deliberate and conscious
strategy is not adopted to deal with stress, some strategy is adopted; for example, to leave the conflicts and stress to take
care of themselves. The concepts of stress and coping are neutral. Although people commonly see stress as negative
and coping as positive, the relationship is not that simple. Stress can be psychologically positive or negative, and the
means of coping can be effective or ineffective in meeting the challenge presented by the stressful situation.
In one early attempt to define coping, Folkman and Lazarus (1980) suggested that coping is all the cognitive and
behavioral efforts to master, reduce, or tolerate demands. It makes no difference whether the demands are imposed from
the outside (by family, friend, job, school, for example) or from inside (while wrestling with an emotional conflict or setting
impossibly high standards, for example). Coping seeks in some way to soften the impact of demands.
Kenneth Matheny and his coworkers reviewed a large body of coping research and arrived at a similar definition
(Matheny, Aycok, Pugh,Curlette, and Silva-Cannella, 1986). They defined coping as “any effort, healthy or unhealthy,
conscious or unconscious, to prevent, eliminate, or weaken stressors, or to tolerate their effects in the least hurtful
manner”. One aspect of this definition deserves comment that is coping efforts are not always healthy and constructive.
People sometimes adopt coping strategies that actually get them into more difficulty. One example is the person who
embezzles money to solve personal financial problems. Coping efforts may have a positive goal, but the out come of
faulty coping may be anything but positive.
Psychologists (e.g., Pestonjee, 1992) have identified two major ways in which people cope with stress. In the first
approach, a person may decide to suffer or deny the experienced stress; this is the passive approach. Alternatively, a
person may decide to face the realities of the experienced stress and clarify the problem through negotiations with other
members. This is the active approach.
Researchers have grouped the ways people cope with stress into four categories. First, they may decide to fight
the realities of experienced stress; they try to struggle in order to achieve what they want. Second, they may decide to
flight or leave what make them feel stressed. Third, they may reduce their stress through such activities like social
support, and religious orientation. Finally, they may decide to accept their life as it is. The main question is that, which
one of these four categories is applicable to cope with academic stress.
Lazarus and Folkman concentrate on two types of coping strategies: problem-focused coping and emotion-focused
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
coping. In the problem-focused coping, efforts are made to change the stressful situations through problem solving,
decision-making and/or direct action. In emotion-focused coping, attempts are made to regulate distressing emotion,
sometimes by changing the meaning of the stressful situation cognitively without actually changing the situation (Folkman
& Lazarus, 1985).
Recent study done by Sacchi (2000) indicated that coping includes behavior and thoughts employed by the
individual to manage the stressing situation. Moreover, according to him, Folkman and Lazarus’ theory defines two
coping principles: the first category, problem focused coping, refers to strategies employed to alter or manage source of
stress. The second category, emotion focused coping, has to do with the strategies used to manage emotions.
Distinction between these two general types of coping, Lazarus and Folkman (1989) explained them in detail.
According to them, problem-focused coping is aimed at problem solving or doing something to alter the source of the
stress. Whereas emotion-focused coping is aimed at reducing or managing the emotional distress that is associated with
the situation. Eventually, and since this study focuses on the historical perspective of stress and coping, it aims to
structure a good model for stress and coping that brings all ways of coping mechanism into one.
3. Theoretical Frameworks
The method used by Lazarus and Folkman was based on specific efforts, both behavioral and psychological, that people
employ to master, tolerate, reduce, or minimize stressful events. Their method was very clear; they had distinguished
between the two general coping strategies: problem-solving strategies are efforts to do something active to alleviate
stressful circumstances, whereas emotion-focused coping strategies involve efforts to regulate the emotional
consequences of stressful or potentially stressful events. Therefore, researcher concludes that coping has two major
functions: dealing with the problem that is causing the distress (problem-focused coping) and regulating emotion
(emotion-focused coping).
Obviously, Problem-focused coping is the use of specific activities getting the task accomplished, whereas
emotion-focused coping is the use of activities to feel better about the task. If the students applied for instant the method
of problem-focused coping for a task that was beyond their accomplishment, they would only frustrate themselves and
become distressed. Given such an impossible task, they would do better to joke about it, or discuss their feelings with a
friend. Conversely, if a task can be accomplished but they are uncertain by joking and partying with friends, they are
employing emotion-focus coping when they should have engaged in activities to get the task done.
According to Lazarus and Folkman, problem focused coping include confrontative Coping, Seeking Social Support,
Plan full Problem-Solving, and Seeking Social Support. Whereas, emotion focused coping includes Self-Control, Seeking
Social Support, Distancing, Positive Appraisal, Accepting Responsibility, and Escape/Avoidance.
Table 3.1. Ways of Coping Mechanisms used by (Lazarus, et al. 1986)
Problem focused coping: Emotion focused coping:
-Confrontative Coping
-Seeking Social Support
-Plan full Problem-Solving
-Seeking Social Support
-Positive Appraisal
-Accepting Responsibility
Moreover, according to Carver and Weintraub (1989), problem-focused coping include active coping, planning, restraint
coping, seeking social support for instrumental reasons, and suppression of competing activities; whereas emotion-
focused coping are positive reinterpretation and growth, religion, humor, acceptance, and seeking social support for
emotional reasons. Moreover, he added one more model named dysfunctional coping, which contents focus on, and
venting of emotions, denial, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement, and alcohol/drug use. Carver et al.
reported alpha reliabilities all above (0.6) except for the mental disengagement scale (.45).
Table 3.2. Ways of Coping Mechanisms Used by (Carver, et al., 1989)
Problem-focused coping: Emotion-focused coping: Dysfunctional Coping:
ctive coping
-Suppression of competing activities
-Restraint coping
-Seeking social support for instrumental reasons
-Seeking social support for emotional reasons
-Positive reinforcement and growth
-Turning to religion
- Humor
-Focus on and venting of emotions
-Behavioral disengagement
-Mental disengagement
-Alcohol-drug use
- Denial
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
This literature tried to group both ways of coping mechanisms used by Lazarus and Folkman (emotion-and-problem-
focused coping) into one, except that the 15 ways of Carver’s distinct activities were supplementary into these two
categories of coping mechanisms (Table 3.3).
Table 3.3. Researcher own Usage for Coping Mechanisms in this Study
Problem focused coping: Emotion focused coping:
ctive coping
-Suppression of competing activities
-Restraint coping
-Seeking social support for instrumental reasons
- Behavioral disengagement
-Seeking social support for emotional reasons
-Positive reinterpretation and growth
-Turning to religion
-Focus on and venting of emotions
-Mental disengagement
- Alcohol-drug use *
* Researcher is going to discourage the use of alcohol and drugs.
Since this paper stressed on the stress and coping: The historical perspective, it focuses on both types of coping
mechanism: problem-and emotion-focused coping that aimed as intervention in reducing or managing the stress among
people. At the end, researcher tried to find out the best between these two types of coping mechanism as a way to be
used for managing stress (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Theoretical Frameworks
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
4. What Does the Term Stress Refer to?
There is no agreement regarding the derivation of the term “stress.” Some sources suggested that the term was derived
from the Latin word stringer meaning to “bind tightly.” Other sources contend that the term derived from the French word
destress (English-distress) and suggested that the prefix “dis” was eventually eliminated because of slurring, as in the
case of the word because sometimes becoming cause (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993).
Stress is a term that almost everybody from all walks of life knows and uses, yet understanding and assessing
stress is a complex task. It is often loosely used to refer to any situation that evokes negative thoughts and feelings in a
person. The same situation is not evocative or stressful for all people, and all people do not experience the same
negative thoughts and feelings when stressed (Whitman, 1984).
In 1925, Hans Seyle, the European physician trained at the German University in Prague, noticed that all his
patients displayed the same symptoms, including fatigue, aching bones and joints, fever, and appetite and weight loss.
He subsequently developed the concept of "stress" and the body's adaptive reactions to any demand or "the rate of wear-
and-tear caused by life." A number of agents can cause stress, including intoxification, trauma, nervous strain, heat, cold,
muscular fatigue, polluted air and radiation. According to Seyle, the body reacts to stress in the same way it reacts to
danger - by going through a series of biochemical changes, which he called the General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS). In
the firs phase, the body mobilizes its defenses against the stressor agent in a "fight or flight" response: the heartbeat is
accelerated, blood pressure levels are elevated, an increased amount of blood flows to the muscles, and the lungs dilate
to increase respiratory effort. The second phase of GAS is the "resistance phase" during which the body continues to
fight the stress long after the effects of the "fight or flight" response have worn off. If infectious agents induce the stress,
the body's immune system activity increases; if the stress is physical, the neuroendocrine system converts protein to
energy; if the stress is psychological, a combination of responses may occur (Smith, 1999).
Many people may not be aware that they are undergoing stress; few recognize that events such as pregnancy,
retirement, marriage, death of a close family member, divorce, and writing exams or a number of smaller events, overload
the adaptive system of the body, which causes high levels of stress (smith, 1999).
A common generalized literal description of the term is a “constraining force or influence.” When applied to human
beings, this could be interpreted to mean the extent to which the body can withstand a given force or influence. In this
regard, one of the most often quoted descriptions of stress is that of the Hans Selye (1956), who described it as the “non-
specific response of the body to any demand made upon it.”
Selye’s definition means that stress involves a mobilization of the bodily resources in response to some sort of
stimulus (stressor). These responses can include various physical and chemical changes in the body. Saying that it
involves demands that tax and/or exceed the resources of the human body could extend this description of stress. This
means that stress not only involves these bodily responses, but that it also involves wear and tear on the body brought
about by these responses. In essence, stress can be considered any factor acting internally or externally that makes it
difficult to adapt and that induces increased effort on the part of a person to maintain a state of balance within him or her
and the external environment. It should be understood that stress is a state that one is in, and this should not be confused
with any stimuli that produces such a state (stressor) (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993).
McGrath (1970) defined stress as a substantial imbalance between environmental demand and the response
capability of the focal organism. Whereas, Kaplan (1983) defined stress as subject’s inability to forestall diminish
perception, recall, anticipation, imagination of disvalued circumstances, those that in reality or fantasy signify great and/or
increased distance from desirable (valued) experiential states, and consequently, evoke a need to approximate the
valued states. One could combine Kaplan’s and McGrath’s definitions of stress and emerge with a rather complete model
and definition such as Hobfoll’s (1988) definition of stress. He define stress as the state in which individuals judge their
response capabilities as unable to meet the threat to the loss of desirable experiential states—states that are directed by
their values and expectations.
One model that is useful in understanding stress is the person- environment model. According to one variation of
this model, an individual can appraise stressful events as “challenging” or “threatening” (Lazarus, 1966). When people
appraise their problem a challenge, stress can bring them a sense of competence and an increased capacity to learn. But
when this problem is seen as a threat, however, stress can elicit feelings of helplessness and a foreboding sense of loss.
5. Coping Mechanism
In more detail, the term coping refers to the ways that people respond to and interact with problem situations (Zamble &
Gekoski, 1994). Life continuously presents people with circumstances that can affect their physical or psychological well-
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
being. The way they deal with these situations can determine whether they surmount them or suffer a variety of
undesirable consequences.
Cohen and Lazarus (1979) defined coping as the action-orientated and intrapsychic efforts to manage
environments and internal demands, and conflicts among them, which tax or exceed a person's resources. Later, Lazarus
and Folkman (1984) revised this definition to be the constantly changing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage
specific external and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources of the person.
According to Hobfoll (1988), coping is one specific domain of activities for resisting the vicissitudes of stress.
Moreover, the term coping in stress research refers to the set of behaviors we used in our efforts to manage stressful
situations, regardless of whether such attempts are beneficial (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).
Different individuals use different coping strategies, inanition to that different problems lead individuals to use
different coping strategies in different times. And according to Buettner et al., (1995), coping is a process that it changes
over time. A person may use an emotion-focused strategy and then shift to a problem-focused strategy or vice versa.
A variety of idiosyncratic coping measures exists, but in recent years, researchers have typically used one of two
instruments: the Ways of Coping measure (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980) or the COPE (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub,
1989). Both of these two instruments focus on the two types of coping (problem-focus and emotion-focus). In addition, the
COPE was developed and expanded from the way of coping, but it was classified as problem, emotion-focused or other
ways of coping. Therefore, the researcher tried to concentrate on this method as being the latest one, but classified it into
two problem and emotion focused only.
5.1 Problem-Focused Coping
Psychologies who study stress distinguish between coping strategies that are problem-focused and coping strategies that
are emotion-focused. For the problem-focused coping, it involves taking steps to change the source of the stress,
whereas emotion-focused coping involves efforts to change one’s emotional response to the stressor.
Problem-Focused Coping is a rational approach that attempts to change the situation by changing either
something in the environment or how the person interacts with the environment (Lazarus & folkman, 1987). Therefore, it
is very clear that this type of coping aimed at reducing the demands of the situation or expanding the resources for
dealing with it. And it is clear that often used when the person believes that the demand is changeable.
According to psychologists, Problem-focused coping (take-charge strategies that deal with the problem at hand or
eliminate the stressors through problem solving) often enhances feelings of control and reduces stress and its adverse
consequences, assuming that the situation can be changed. Therefore, Researcher tried in this chapter to note the sub-
types of problem focused-coping as Carver et al., (1989) divided it, and it was as follow:
5.2 Emotion-focused coping
Broad distinctions, such as problem-solving versus emotion-focused, have only limited utility for understanding coping,
and so research on coping and its measurement has evolved to address a variety of more specific coping strategies.
Emotion focused coping is used to manage all forms of emotional distress including feeling of depression, anxiety,
frustration and anger. As discussed earlier, emotional distress usually compounds the problem of chronic pain (Hanson,
1997). According to Zamble and Gekoski (1994), individual with emotion-focused coping style tend to make themselves
feel better about a problematic situation without changing the problem itself or the perception of it. In contrast, individuals
with problem-focused style tend to actually make changes on their situation or their perception of a situation in order to
make it less or no longer stressful.
Research indicates that people use both types of strategies to combat most stressful events (Folkman & Lazarus,
1980). The predominance of one type of strategy over another is determined, in part, by personal style (e.g., some people
cope more actively than others) and also by the type of stressful event; for example, people typically employ problem-
focused coping to deal with potential controllable problems such as work-related problems and family-related problems,
whereas stressors perceived as less controllable, such as certain kinds of physical health problems, prompt more
emotion-focused coping.
Broad distinctions, such as problem solving versus emotion-focused, have only limited utility for understanding
coping, and so research on coping and its measurement has evolved to address a variety of more specific coping
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
6. The Impact of Both Types of Coping (Problem-Focused and Emotion-Focused Coping) on Well-Being
A generalized beneficial effect of some activities of emotion-focused and problem focused coping such as instumental
and emotional social support could occur because large social networks provide persons with regular positive
experiences and a set of stable, socially rewarded roles in the community. This kind of support could be related to overall
well-being because it provides positive affect, a sense of predictability and stability in one’s life situation, and a
recognition of self-worth. Integration in a social network may also help one to a void negative experiences (e.g.,
academic, economic or legal problems) that otherwise would increase the probability of psychological or physical
disorder. This view of support has been conceptualized from a sociological perspective as “regularized social interaction”
or “embeddedness” in roles (Cassel, 1976). And from a psychological perspective as social interaction, social integration,
relational reward, or status support (e.g., Levinger & Huesmann, 1980; Moos & Moos, 1994; Reis, 2000).
Social support considered as one of the most important sub-types of problem- and emotion-focused coping. It
could be related physical health outcomes through emotionally induced effects on neuroenducrine or immune system
functioning (Jemmott & Locke, 1984) or through influence on health-related behavioural patterns such as cigarette
smoking, alcohol use, or medical help seeking (Krantz, Grunberg, & Baum, 1985). In an extreme version, the main effect
model postulates that an increase in social support will result in an increase in well being irrespective of the existing level
of support. Furthermore, there is some evidence, however, that explained the main effect of support on major health
outcomes for the contrast between persons who are essentially social isolates (i.e., those with very few or no social
contacts) and persons with moderate or high level of support (House et al., 1988). Although the evidence is not
conclusive, the suggestion is that there may be a minimum threshold of social contract required for an effect on mortality
to be observed, with little improvement in health outcomes for levels of support above the threshold.
Social support may play a role at two different points in the causal chain linking stress to illness (Cohen, 1980;
House, 1988). First, support may intervene between the stressful event (and expectation of that event) and stress
reaction by attenuating or preventing a stress appraisal response. That is, the perception that others can and will provide
necessary resources may redefine the potential for harm posed by a situation and/or bolster one’s perceived ability to
cope with imposed demands, and hence prevent a particular situation from being appraised as highly stressful. Second,
adequate support may intervene between the experience of stress and the onset of the pathological outcome by reducing
or eliminating the stress reaction or by directly influencing physiological processes. Support may alleviate the impact of
stress appraisal by providing a solution to the problem, by reducing the perceived importance of the problem, by
tranquilizing the neuroendocrine system so that people are less reactive to perceived stress, or by facilitating healthful
behaviours (House, 1988).
Acceptance of the problem is very important in life, people have to accept their problems and take it as a
challenge. A study done by Farhall and Gehrke’s (1997), found that acceptance had the highest mean score of the coping
sub-scales, followed by positive reinterpretation and growth and active coping. Acceptance was also the strongest factor
in their research, only just failing to significantly predict hallucination control. Seeking social support for emotional reasons
had the lowest mean score. This ought to be disturbing to health professionals who often perceive themselves as
providers of emotional support. Participants in this project reported that they seldom sought emotional support, which
perhaps relates to the stigma associated with stress. Interestingly, distress was positively associated with problem-
focused coping. It may be that distress prompts people to attempt solving problems.
Study on emotion-focused styles of coping such as distancing, escape-avoidance and acceptance of responsibility
were related to high levels of psychological distress in careers, confirming some earlier findings (Felton, Revenson, &
Henrichsen, 1984; Pruchno & Nancy, 1989). Quayhagen and Quayhagen (1988), reported that fantasising (intrapsychic)
was inversely associated with well being among patients. The use of emotion-focused coping strategies serves to avoid
actually confronting the problem, and has been reported to show a positive association with depression and negative
association with satisfactory outcome (Gass, & Chag, 1989). However, the results from the present study are contrary to
those reported by Pearlin and Schooler (1978), who found that strategies involving perceptual distortions of reality (e.g.
intrapsychic) are adaptive, especially when the stressful situation was unavoidable. It could be possible that these
discrepancies are related to the nature of the stressor being experienced
Early in this century, Sigmund Freud wrote about the deleterious effects of religion on psychological development
and predicted that religion was an illusion that had no future. More recently, attorney Richard Yao founded a group
named “Fundamentalists Anonymous” designed to help people overcome the so-called “emotional distress” of a
conservative religious upbringing (Malony, 1995). Among this group are a counsellor Donald Slot, who titled his recent
book “the dangers of growing up in Christian home,” and California Clergyman named Book,” who has appeared on a
number of television talk shows warning the public about the bad effects of what he has termed “religious addiction”
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
(Malony, 1995).
While the caution of Freud, Yao, Sloat, and Booth have been heard by many, the most vocal contender that
religion is bad for mental health has been psychologist like Albert Ellis (1971), the founder of Rational Emotive
Psychotherapy. Ellis, in a booklet entitled “the Case Against Religion,” lists several aspects of religion which he feels
keep people from becoming mentally healthy. These include his contentions that religion (i) makes people feel guilty and
preoccupied with repentance when they should be accepting their humanness and getting on with life; (ii) encourages
people to depend on God for direction when they should be autonomous and self-directed; (iii) indulges people’s desire
for certainty and predictability in life when they should be willing to live courageously with ambiguity and precariousness,
and (iv) allows people to think that change come about by magical rituals rather than by logical reasoning and hard work
(Malony, 1995).
A study done by Donahue (1995), found that there is a positive relationship between religion and both mental and
physical health. In particular, regular religious practices (as opposed to specific beliefs) such as church or synagogue
attendance, prayer and scripture reading, have been shown to be related to positive mental and physical health. In
addition to that he suggested that religiously committed women who are battered suffer less severe symptoms than
women without such commitment. However, his research also indicates that battered women attend religious services
less frequently than maritally distressed controls.
7. Conclusion
Stress is a factor in the life of every person on Earth. The causes of stress range from the environment to genetics, with
effects just as far reaching. It cannot be overstated that not all stress is harmful. Generally, chronic stress accounts for
the greatest negative effects, both mentally and physically. Many theories have been put forth concerning stress and
coping, however the overwhelming opinion of stress is that there is still much to learn. The foundation and processes
connected to stress were not fully understood, which inhibits our knowledge of how and why stress affects human body
as well as their thinking. Once the causes and effects of stress were fully understood, researcher would be able to more
effectively manage and relieve it. In counclusion, stress and coping mechanisms goes together, but which method is the
best to be used is depending on type of stress and individual needs. Based on the results of this study, a meditation-
based stress reduction-counseling program can help and guide the person to know which coping method suite their
Ashforth, B. & Humphrey R., (1993). Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity. Academy of Management Executive 18(1): 88-
Baum, A., (1990). Stress, intrusive imagery, and chronic distress. Health psychology, 9, 653-675.
Benjamin, L., & Walz, G.R. (1990). Counseling students and faculty for stress management. ASHE-ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and
Personnel Services.
Bonner, K., (1967). Industrial implication of stress in L. Levi, (ed.) emotional stress. New Your: American Elsevier Publishing Co., 1967, 225-232.
Buck, V.1972. Working Under pressure, London, Staples Press.
Buettner, H.M. et al., (1995). Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed by probabilistic analysis. Biophys. J. 69, 796–802.
Caplan, R. D., (1983). Person-environment fit: Past, present, and future. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Stress research (pp. 35-78). New York: Wiley.
Carlesworth, E. A., & Nathan, R. G. (1984). Stress management: A comprehensive guide to wellness. New York: Athenaeum.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K., (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 56 (2): 267-283.
Cassel, J., (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidomology, 104: 107-123.
Cohen, F., & Lazarus, R.S., (1979). Coping with thestress of illness, in Stone, C.G., Cohen, F., Adler, N.E., editors. Health psychology: A
handbook. San Francisco: 217-254. CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, S., (1980). After effects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Journal of psychological
bulletin, 88: 82-108.
Cooper, C.L., & Marshall, J., (1976). Occupational sources of stress: A review of the literature relating to coronary heart disease and mental
health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1976, 49, 11 -28.
Cox, T. (1993). Stress research and stress management: Putting theory at work. HSE Contract Research Report, 25, London: HMSO.
Donahue, M. J., & Benson P. L., (1995). Religion and the well-being of adolescents. Journal of Social Issues, 51 (2), 145–160.
Ellis, A., (1971). The case against religion: A psychotherapist’s view. New York: Institute for Rational Living.
Farhall, J., & Gehrke, M., (1997). Coping with hallucinations: exploring stress and coping frameworks. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36,
Felton, B., Revenson, T., & Henrichsen, G., (1984). Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults.
Social Science and Medicine, 18, 889-898.
ISSN 2039-2117 (online)
ISSN 2039-9340 (print)
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol 6 No 2 S1
March 2015
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in middle-aged community sample. Journal of health and social behavior, 21: 219-
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S., (1985). If it changes it must be a process: A study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college
examination. Journal of personality and social psychology; 48: 150-170.
Gass, K., and Chang, A., (1989). Appraisals of bereavement, coping, resources, and psychosocial health dysfunction in widows and widowers.
Nurs Res, 38:31-36, 1989.
Hanson, P. G., (1986). The joy of stress. Fairway KS. Andrews McMeel & Parker.
Hanson, R. K., (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor
General of Canada.
Hobfoll, S. E., (1988). Stress, social support, and women. New York: A Member of the Taylor & Francis Group.
House, J. S., Landies, K. R., & Umberson, F., (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241: 540-550.
Jemmott, J. B., & Locke S. E., (1984). Psychological factor, immunologic mediation, and human susceptibility to infectious diseases: how much
do we know? Psychological Bulletin, 95, 78-108.
Jones, F. & Bright, J., (2001). Stress: Myth, theory and research. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall.
Kasl, S. V., (1978). Epidemiological contributions to the sutdy of work stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Pane (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 3-48).
Chichester: Wiley.
Kenneth M. et al., (1997). Humor as a stress moderator in the prediction of blood pressure obtained during five stressful tasks. Journal of
Research in Personality 31, 523–542.
Krantz, D. S., Grunberg, N. E., & Baum, A., (1985). Health psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 349-383.
Kugelmann, R. (1992). Stress: The nature and history of engineered grief. Westport: CT: Praeger.
Landy, F.J. & Trumbo, D.A., (1976). Psychology of Work Behaviour. Homewood publication, Dorsey Press.
Lazarus, R. S., (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. NewYork: McGraw- Hill
Lazarus, R. S., et al, (1986). Dynamics of stressful Encounter: Cognitive Appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 50 (5): 992-1003.
Lazarus, R. S., Folkman, S., (1984). Stress, Ap- praisal and Coping. NewYork: Springer
Lazarus, R. S., Folkman, S., (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur. J. Personality 1:141-69.
Levinger, G., & Huesmann, L. R., (1980). An "incremental exchange" perspective on the pair relationship: Interpersonal reward and level of
involvement. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 165-196).
New York: Plenum Press.
Maloney, P. R., (1995). ApJ, 447, L17 Pogge, R. W. 1989, ApJ, 345, 730.
Matheny, K. B., Aycock, D. W., Pugh, J. L., Curlette, W. L., & Silva Cannella, K. A., (1986). Stress coping: A qualitative and quantita- tive
synthesis with implications for treatment. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 499-549.
McGrath, J., (1970). Social and Psychological Factors in Stress, New York: Holt, Rlne art, and Winston.
Microsoft Word [computer software]. (2000). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
Mills M.R. (1982). Psychological Stress and Coping Techniques Among selected Elementary School Principals. Dissertation Abstract
International, P.167.
Moos, R., & Moos, B., (1994). Family environment scale manual: Development, applications, research (Third ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting
Psychologist Press.
National Health Ministries (2006). Stress & The College Student. Retrieved December, 17, 2014, from:
Newton, T. (1995). Managing stress: Emotion and power at work. London: Sage.
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C., (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21. doi:10.2307/2136319
Pestonjee, D. M. (1992). Stress and coping. New Delhi: Sage.
Pruchno, R. A. and Nancy L. R., (1989). “Husbands and Wives as Caregivers: Antecedents of Depression and Burden.” The Gerontologist 29(2):
Quayhagen M.P. & Quayhagen M., (1988). Alzheimer's stress: Coping with the care giving role. Gerontologist. 28, 391-396.
Reis, H. T., & Collins, N., (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood & B.
Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and interventions: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136-194). New York: Oxford.
Rice PL. (1999). Stress and Health. 3rd Ed. USA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Sacchi, M., (2000), FX ARMA filters: 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2092–2095.
Sandhu, B.K., et al., (1994). Factors relating to stress: Gaining control. In L. Murphy & J. Hurrell & S. Sauter & G. Keita (Eds.). Job Stress
Interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Selye, H., (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw Hill.
Selye, H., (1973). The evolution of the stress concept. Am. Sci, 61692-699.
Selye, H., (1974). Stress without distress. McClelland Stewart, Toronto.
Smith C. S., (1999). Organizational climate and occupational stressors as predictors of with- drawal behaviors and injuries in nurses. J Occup
Organ Psychol 72:285–299.
Smith, P. J. (1990). Managing Stress a Guide to Asian living, Federal Publications (S) pte. Ltd, Singapore, pp:6-16 Turkington, C.A. (1998).
Stress Management for Busy People. McGraw-Hill, New York, pg. 17-23.
Swept, B., & Gmelch, W. H., (1977). Stress at the Desk and How to Cope Creatively. Oregon School Study Council, Vol. 21, No. 4, December
Zamble, E. & Gekoski, W. L., (1994). Coping. In Ramachandron, V.S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia o f Human Behaviour (Vol.3). New York: Academic
... The term stress was first introduced in the language of health psychology by Hans Selye in 1926. Stress is an imbalance between demand and the ability to fulfill that demand (Baqutayan 2015). According to Hans Selye in (Baqutayan 2015) stress is a non-specific response of the body to the demands made on it. ...
... Stress is an imbalance between demand and the ability to fulfill that demand (Baqutayan 2015). According to Hans Selye in (Baqutayan 2015) stress is a non-specific response of the body to the demands made on it. Thus, understanding the occurrence of stress is very important to avoid the adverse effects of stress on psychology, physics, and economy (Dijkstra & Homan 2016). ...
... Lazarus & Folkman explained the main difference between the two types of coping, namely problem focus coping to solve problems and manage sources of stress. While emotion focus coping is to reduce or manage emotions that arise due to existing circumstances (Baqutayan 2015). ...
... A published work of Baqutayan provided a review of the various definitions of stress and coping mechanisms as well as a model that integrated the various coping mechanisms. [26] This framework combined the coping mechanisms forwarded by Lazarus and Folkman [6] and that of Carver and Weintraub. [27] ...
Full-text available
Background: The seafarers’ poor mental health has been associated with significant morbidity, inefficiency, and accidents on board. Mental and physical health is largely dependent on the way seafarers handle stressors. Anchored on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, this study aimed to identify the typology of Filipino merchant marine ratings according to their coping strategies to stressors on board vessels. Methods: Thirty-seven (37) Filipino merchant marine ratings participated in this study. They were chosen by purposive sampling. They rank-ordered 25 opinion statements on various stressors and coping mechanisms. The rank-ordered sorts were subjected to by-person factor analysis with Varimax rotation using the PQ Method version 2.32. The resulting factors were interpreted using the inductive approach, aided by the interview done after Q sorting. Results: Four factors were generated: solution-focused seafarers, stressor-focused seafarers, self-management–focused seafarers, and the social milieu-focused seafarers. There is a consensus on the supplication-focused seafarers who ask for God’s help in times of stress. Conclusion: The generated typology provides a better understanding of seafarers’ outlook on stress and coping and may help the stakeholders craft individualized strategies to help improve their coping mechanisms and overall mental health. Occupational health research must continue to focus on understanding the role of culture and adaptation on stress and coping behaviors to retain quality seafarers and promote a healthier workplace.
... As such, Mangolothi (2021) describes the dire situation of women in higher education who must multitask through their work responsibilities which include nurturing, child-rearing, and home-caring roles during the lockdown. The women are forced to engage adaptive coping behaviours to reduce, tolerate and manage this stressful balancing game (Algorani & Gupta, 2020;Baqutayan, 2015;Folkman & Lazarus, 1980). Therefore, the question is, what critical-thinking and behaviours were enacted by women departmental heads to cope with, and to continue with daily responsibilities (functionings) in a psychologically-distressed context? ...
This paper explored women departmental heads’ leadership experiences in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper highlighted aspects of their care and coping mechanisms in terms of them working in virtual spaces. Most scholars have examined employees’ effects and challenges while working from home during a lockdown. However, most studies are silent on women in leadership, especially concerning the provision of resources to enhance effective leadership during this crisis. The paper draws on three concepts of Sen’s Capabilities approach: functionings, freedoms, and agency. This approach facilitates an incisive understanding of institutional and individual coping mechanisms that might be beneficial for women leaders to mitigate the challenges of the devastating COVID-19 lockdowns. The qualitative narrative approach, supported by a feminist lens, provides a critical, in-depth understanding of the real-life stories of women in leadership positions when making-sense of their challenges in working in a virtual environment. Data which was collected through semi-structured interviews with ten female heads of department, was analysed thematically by applying the Capabilities Approach as an analytical tool. The findings indicated that functionings and freedoms are inextricably intertwined to institutional ethnographies. These ethnographies might support or hamper the coping capabilities of women leaders in academic institutions, especially during the COVID-19 crisis.
... Menurut Zamble dan Gekoski, individu dengan gaya koping yang berfokus pada emosi (Emotion Focused Coping) cenderung membuat diri mereka merasa lebih baik tentang situasi bermasalah tanpa mengubah masalah itu sendiri atau persepsi itu. Kegiatan yang dilakukan beragam untuk setiap individu, tetapi umumnya kegiatan yang dilakukan merupakan hobi dari individu itu sendiri, contohnya makan yang dikenal dengan emotional eating yaitu dimana seseorang makan agar merasa emosinya lebih baik.7 Perilaku makan setiap individu sangat beragam, ada perilaku makan yang sehat dan tidak sehat. ...
Full-text available
Abstrak Tujuan: Mengetahui hubungan tingkat stres dengan konsumsi junk food melalui pemesanan daring pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak. Metode: Desain penelitian analitik jenis potong lintang dan metode consecutive sampling dengan jumlah subjek penelitian sebanyak 85 orang mahasiswa kedokteran angkatan 2019 dan Angkatan 2020 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak yang mengkonsumsi junk food melalui pemesanan daring. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah Kuesioner Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS 10) untuk mengukur tingkat stres dan kuesioner Junk food Untan Questionnaire Online Ordering (JUQOO) yang meliputi Food Frequency Questionnaire untuk mengetahui frekuensi konsumsi junk food. Data dianalisis secara univariat dan bivariat dengan menggunakan uji korelasi Kendall Tau. Hasil: Berdasarkan uji statistik didapatkan nilai signifikansi sebesar p = 0,352 (p>0,05) yang berarti korelasi antara tingkat stres dan konsumsi junk food melalui pemesanan daring tidak signifikan secara statistik. Nilai koefisien korelasi (r) ialah 0,092 yang berarti korelasi kedua variabel searah karena positif dan kekuatan korelasi antara kedua variabel sangat lemah sehingga tidak bermakna secara klinis. Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara tingkat stres dengan konsumsi junk food melalui pemesanan daring pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran angkatan 2019 dan 2020 Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak. Abstract Objective: To determine the relationship between stress levels and consumption of junk food through online ordering to students of the Faculty of Medicine, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak. Methods: Cross-sectional analytical research design and consecutive sampling method with the number of research subjects as many as 85 medical students in class 2019 and class 2020 Faculty of Medicine, Tanjungpura University Pontianak who consume junk food through online ordering. The measuring instrument used is the Perceived Stress Scale 10 Questionnaire (PSS 10) to measure stress levels and the Junk food Untan Questionnaire Online Ordering (JUQOO) questionnaire which includes the Food Frequency Questionnaire to determine the frequency of junk food consumption. Data were analyzed univariately and bivariately using Kendall Tau correlation test. Results: Based on the statistical test, the significance value of p = 0.352 (p>0.05), which means the correlation between stress levels and consumption of junk food through online ordering is not statistically significant. The value of the correlation coefficient (r) is 0.092, which means
... Coping sa dnes najčastejšie používa v súvislosti so stresom a to pri prežívaní nepríjemného fyzického alebo emocionálneho stavu počas ohrozujúcich okolností (Baqutayan, 2015). V tomto význame vyrovnávania sa s ohrozujúcimi záťažami predstavil teóriu Lazarus (1993), ktorý pod zvládaním rozumie "proces riadenia vnútorných a vonkajších faktorov, ktoré sú človekom v záťažovej situácii (stres) vyhodnotené ako zdroje ohrozenia (stresory)." ...
Full-text available
The conference proceedings contain 16 selected papers, presented at the 21st international conference called Work and Organizational Psychology 2022 held in May 2022 in Bratislava. It includes empirical, review and case studies and introduces research projects from various areas of work psychology. The topics of the contributions covered various areas of e.g., new trends in leadership and the coronavirus pandemic in work and organization. The sections were devoted to attachment security in the workplace; motivation, diversity, and inclusion; work and psychology during the Covid-19 pandemic; new trends in leadership; career and employability; and psychological assessment at work.
... The implementation of coping mechanism in line with theoretical framework that focuses on both types of coping mechanism: problem and emotion focused coping that aimed as intervention in reducing or managing stress [23]. To handle behavior problem of CSEN also need the social support considered as on of the most important sub-types of problem and emotion focused coping. ...
Full-text available
Handling of behavior problems in children with special educational needs(CSEN) in the classroom is urgent for the classroom’s conduciveatmosphere. Therefore, a review needs to be conducted to determine whatsteps the teacher may take for coping purposes in handling the behaviorproblems of CSEN, to determine the predictors for handling the behaviorproblems of CSEN, to identify the analysis basis for determining teacherpredictors, and to figure out the effects of the behavior of CSEN based onthe predictors chosen by the teacher. A survey was conducted on 109teachers of CSEN. This research used a Google Forms questionnairecontaining a list of statements to be chosen by teachers as instrument, andanalysis was carried out by computing the frequencies at which the teacherschose the statements in percentage and by comparing teachers’ statements onthe way they handled behaviors. The results show that the teachers weremore inclined toward problem-focused coping (PFC), the predictor chosenwas intimacy control, the teacher directed the children to do a task at thetime a behaviour problem arose, and in choosing predictors, the teacherswould rather calm the children down and give them comfort, making thechildren calmed.
... Adopting a healthy lifestyle also becomes more important when the workplace is home to multiple stressors. However, in such circumstances, many people resort to harmful strategies such as alcohol and drug abuse (Baqutayan, 2015;Bowen et al., 2021;Lindsay & Shelley, 2009;Van Schalkwyk et al., 2016). Although these strategies can reduce the stress experienced in the short term, they also risk having the opposite effect (i.e., increasing the stress) after a certain point or may even lead to the development of alcohol or drug addiction and more serious diseases such as cirrhosis of the liver Lieber, 1997). ...
... L'adoption d'une bonne hygiène de vie est d'autant plus importante dans un contexte où le milieu de travail est assujetti à de nombreux stresseurs. Pourtant, en de telles circonstances, plusieurs ont recours à des stratégies néfastes, incluant la consommation d'alcool, la consommation de drogues ou les jeux de hasard (Baqutayan, 2015;Bowen et al., 2021;Lindsay & Shelley, 2009;Van Schalkwyk et al., 2016). Bien que ces stratégies puissent indéniablement réduire le stress ressenti à court terme, elles sont également susceptibles d'avoir l'effet inverse dépassé un certain stade, voire de conduire vers le développement de dépendances (p. ...
Full-text available
This paper aims to reveal the inner peace dynamics of followers of the Naqshbandiyya-Khālidiyya Order. It employs a qualitative approach with the phenomenological method and in-depth analysis to describe the followers' inner peace dynamics. Interviews and observations have been carried out to collect data. Data reduction, presentation, conclusion drawing, and verification are employed. This study reveals that reaching inner peace dynamics needs problem-solving. The second step is making the decision. The third step is finding the solution to solve the problems to find the right strategy for a particular situation. The fourth step is being patient by emotional restraint. The last step is embracing faith and self-efficacy in dealing with problems. Faith is obtained from dhikr as it will lead to remembering God. The stages and aspects of inner peace are different from Mujib and Mudzakkir's theory. In addition, this study found that internalizing the value of murshid and self-approach to God positively impact inner peace.Contribution: This article contributes to a new finding about the stages of achieving mental peace. So, everyone can seek peace of mind through these various stages. In addition, the Ṭarīqa can also optimize its role because the murshid is considered necessary for increasing peace of mind.
Full-text available
Background In 2017, the prevalence of work-related stress reached 10.7% of the 792 million population. This work-related stress is common in the textile industry, characterized by many environmental risk factors coming from the weaving processes. The stress problem is discussed in various countries worldwide. Objective The study aimed to investigate the personal and environmental risk factors for work-related stress in textile industry workers. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in a textile factory weaving section in Solo, Indonesia. The subjects of this study were 188 female weaving operators that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sound level meter was operated to measure the environmental noise, while environmental working conditions, work experience, social support, and work-related stress were measured using questionnaires. Furthermore, the Somers' Delta correlation was used to analyze the relationship between personal and environmental risk factors for work-related stress. Results Surprisingly, this study found no significant correlation between personal and environmental risk factors (independent variables) with work-related stress (dependent variables). In personal factors, most of the workers are late adulthood (36-45 years old), the length of working dominated more than ten years (90.42%), with most of them having senior high school education (58.51%). In terms of environmental risk factors, most of the workers have good working environment conditions (51.6%); are well experienced in weaving tasks (54.3%), with a high social support category (58%). Conclusion Although some previous studies indicated that personal factors, working conditions, and social support could trigger stress among workers, this study found no correlation between the independent and the dependent variables.
Full-text available
Emotional labor is the display of expected emotions by service agents during service encounters. It is performed through surface acting, deep acting, or the expression of genuine emotion. Emotional labor may facilitate task effectiveness and self-expression, but it also may prime customer expectations that cannot be met and may trigger emotive dissonance and self-alienation. However, following social identity theory, we argue that some effects of emotional labor are moderated by one's social and personal identities and that emotional labor stimulates pressures for the person to identify with the service role. Research implications for the micro, meso, and macro levels of organizations are discussed.
Full-text available
This volume provides a thought-provoking and timely alternative to prevailing approaches to stress at work. These invariably present stress as a 'fact of modern life' and assume it is the individual who must take primary responsibility for his or her capacity - or incapacity - to cope. This book, by contrast, sets stress at work in the context of wider debates about emotion, subjectivity and power in organizations, viewing it as an emotional product of the social and political features of work and organizational life. Tim Newton analyzes the historical development of the dominant `stress discourse' in modern psychology and elsewhere. Drawing on a range of perspectives - from labour process theory to the work of Foucault and Elias - he explores other possible ways of understanding stress at work. He offers a cogent critique of the typical stress management interventions in organizations through which employees are supposed to increase their effectiveness and become `stress-fit'. With contributions from two colleagues (Steve Fineman and Jocelyn Handy), he explores various ways of `rewriting' stress at work. Together they emphasize the gendered nature of stress, the collective production and reproduction of stressful work experiences, and the relation of stress to issues of emotion management and control in organizations.
Full-text available
Emotional labor is the display of expected emotions by service agents during service encounters. It is performed through surface acting, deep acting, or the expression of genuine emotion. Emotional labor may facilitate task effectiveness and self-expression, but it also may prime customer expectations that cannot be met and may trigger emotive dissonance and self-alienation. However, following social identity theory, we argue that some effects of emotional labor are moderated by one's social and personal identities and that emotional labor stimulates pressures for the person to identify with the service role. Research implications for the micro, meso, and macro levels of organizations are discussed.
Until recently, models of social exchange have portrayed the reward structure of relationships as constant over time. In a previous paper (Huesmann & Levinger, 1976) we described a new model, based on a framework we called incremental exchange theory, which incorporates such temporal changes in the reward structure. This model was applied to altruistic behavior, self-disclosure, attraction, and romatic involvement.
This article presents a two-pronged attempt to synthesize the research on stress coping: (1) a review of models and taxonomies of behaviors and resources related to stress coping and (2) a meta-analysis of recent experimental and quasi- experimental studies of stress coping. The review led to the construction of a taxonomy and, in conjunction with the meta-analysis, to a comprehensive model of stress coping in two parts (stress and coping). In the meta-analysis an unbiased effect size of .57 was obtained by comparing groups administered treatments to reduce stress with comparison groups. Social skills training, problem solving, cognitive restructuring, and relaxation training appeared to be among the more effective treatments. In comparing the frequency of treatments identified in the meta-analysis with those in the taxonomy, some treatment domains (such as problem solving) were well represented in the taxonomy but appeared infrequently in the meta-analysis. Implications for stress-coping treatment and research are offered.