Content uploaded by Giulia Bellini
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Giulia Bellini on Mar 16, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Association between cannabinoid receptor type 2 Q63R variant and
oligo/polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
GBellini
1
,ANOlivieri
2
, A Grandone
2
,MAlessio
3
, MF Gicchino
2
, B Nobili
2
,LPerrone
2
, S Maione
1
, E Miraglia del Giudice
2
,
FRossi
2
1
Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples (SUN),
2
Department of Women, Child and General and Specialist
Surgery, SUN, and
3
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Naples, Italy
Objectives: To investigate whether the functional variant Q63R of the cannabinoid 2 (CB2) receptor is associated with
susceptibility to oligo/poly-articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and with its clinical features.
Method: A total of 171 Italian children with oligoarticular/rheumatoid factor negative poly-articular JIA and 600 healthy
controls were enrolled in the study and genotyped.
Results: A significant difference in genotype distribution of the CB2 Q63R variant (CNR2 rs35761398) between oligo/
poly-articular JIA patients and controls was found (p¼0.001). The R63 variant was associated with increased rates of
relapse (p¼0.0001).
Conclusions: This study indicates that the CB2 receptor contributes to susceptibility to oligo/polyarticular JIA and to the
severity of its clinical course.
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an inflammatory
chronic disease affecting joints and other structures.
Sevensubtypesofarthritiscanbeidentifiedbyassociation
with the number of joints and the type of extra-articular
involvement occurring in the first 6 months of the disease:
systemic, oligoarticular (<5 joints), polyarticular (5
joints) rheumatoid factor (RF) positive or negative, psor-
iatic, enthesitis-related, and undifferentiated arthritis (1,2).
Although crucial or initiating antigens have not yet
been determined, enhanced proliferation of T-cells from
synovial fluid of pediatric JIA, correlating with disease
phenotype, has been shown (3).
T cells express cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and
CB2). These receptors and the endocannabinoids with the
enzymes for their metabolism, represent the endocanna-
binoid (EC) system. The ‘EC’system is involved in a
plenty of physiological functions, including suppression
of cell activation, Th1 and Th2 balance, inhibition of pro-
inflammatory cytokine production. CB2 receptors, highly
expressed by all immune cells, regulate their develop-
ment, migration, proliferation and effector functions,
representing the key component of the ‘EC’system for
immune function modulation (4).
A common variant, rs35761398, of the CNR2 gene
encoding for the CB2 receptor, is associated to autoim-
munity unbalance (5). The relative glutamine-arginine
substitution at codon 63 (Q63R), affects the response of
CB2 to cannabinoid, differently modulating the EC-
induced inhibition of lymphocytes proliferation (6).
Lymphocytes from RR subjects had two-fold reduction
of EC-induced inhibition of proliferation compared to
those from QQ, suggesting the R variant as the less func-
tional (6). This less functional variant has been asso-
ciated, in childhood, with increased risk of chronic
immune thrombocytopenic purpura and celiac disease
(7,8). Drugs selectively acting on cannabinoid receptors
can ameliorate the symptomatology of several diseases
with unbalance of the innate or adaptative immune
response (9). CB2 Q63R variant has been found to influ-
ence the evolution of some liver diseases (10–12).
Genome wide association studies have shown a note-
worthy genetic component of JIA pathogenesis (13).
Based on these evidences, we have investigated the influ-
ence of the CB2 Q63R variant on the susceptibility to the
two most common subtypes of JIA, IgM rheumatoid
factor (RF)–negative polyarticular JIA and oligoarticular
JIA (1), performing a case-control association analysis in
a cohort of 171 Italian children and adolescents with JIA
and in 600 healthy Italian controls.
Patients and Methods
Patients. This study includes 171 children (124 females, 47
males; mean age at diagnosis 5.93.8) with oligo-articular
and poly-articular JIA treated atthe Department of Women,
Child and General and Specialistic Surgery of the Second
Anna Grandone, Department of Women, Child and General and
Specialist Surgery, Second University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.
E-mail: agrandone@gmail.com
Accepted 16 February 2015
Scand J Rheumatol 2015;iFirst article:1–4 1
© 2015 Informa Healthcare on license from Scandinavian Rheumatology Research Foundation
DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1020863 www.scandjrheumatol.dk
Scand J Rheumatol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 89.97.220.66 on 05/15/15
For personal use only.
University of Naples from November 1999 to June 2011.
Diagnoses were made according to International League
Against Rheumatism (ILAR) criteria and treatment was
assigned according to recommendations from the
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (1,14).
The number of affected joints, age of disease onset,
follow-up duration, presence of comorbidities, presence
of associated autoimmune diseases, and relapses were
evaluated. Clinical remission was defined according to
Wallace’s criteria (15). Any symptom appearing after a
minimum of 6 months if on medication and for 12 months
if off medication was considered as relapse of arthritis.
The presence of uveitis was considered as a comorbidity;
coeliac disease, thyroidites, and diabetes mellitus were con-
sidered associated autoimmune diseases. Six hundred healthy
children, of the same ethnic origin, Caucasian, previously
genotyped for the CB2 Q63R (7,8), were used as controls.
The study was approved by the SUN Medical Ethics
Committee and was performed in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was
obtained from all patients’parents.
Molecular study
Genomic DNA extraction and TaqMan assay were per-
formed as described previously (7).
Statistical analysis
Aχ
2
test was used to determine Hardy–Weinberg equili-
brium and the differences in genotype frequencies between
patients and controls. Logistic regression was used to assess
the association with clinical findings, adjusted for age, sex,
disease duration, and year of recruitment. Odds ratios (ORs)
for JIA with respect to the different genotypes were calcu-
lated according to an additive model. An analysis of var-
iance (ANOVA) was performed for the age of onset
considered as a continuous variable. Associated p-values
<0.05 were considered significant. All the analysis were
conducted by using Statgraphics Centurion XV.II software
(Adalta, Arezzo, Italy; Statpoint Technologies, Inc,
Warrenton, VA, USA).
Results
In this study we genotyped 105 oligoarticular and 66
polyarticular JIA children for the CNR2 rs35761398
variant. Data for the same variant in 600 healthy
children were also included (7,8). The results are
summarized in Table 1. The genotype distribution
showed significant differences between patients and
controls: RR subjects showed a twofold risk for
developing JIA compared to QQ subjects and,
among patients, a fivefold risk for developing poly-
articular JIA (Table 1). Association of the CB2 Q63R
variant with clinical findings revealed significant cor-
relations with the relapse of arthritis (p ¼110
–4
).
We considered the presence or the absence of extended
oligoarticular disease as a categorical variable in the
analysis and it did not influence the results, possibly
because of the low number of patients affected
(15 subjects).
Table 1. Case–control association study of the CB2 Q63R polymorphism in oligo/polyarticular JIA Italian children: genotype distribution
comparison
Oligo/polyarticular JIA patients
(n ¼171)
Controls
(n ¼600) p-value
Genotype QQ QR RR QQ QR RR
No. of patients 16 75 80 96 307 194 0.001 (χ
2
¼13.900, df ¼2)
Oligo/polyarticular JIA vs. controls
(171 vs. 600 subjects) OR 95% CI p-value
QR vs. QQ 1.466 0.789–2.754 0.215 (χ
2
¼1.648, df ¼1)
RR vs QQ 2.474 1.326–4.668 0.002 (χ
2
¼9.461, df ¼1)
RR vs QR 1.688 1.326–4.668 0.005 (χ
2
¼8.087, df ¼1)
Polyarticular JIA patients
(n ¼66)
Oligoarticular JIA patients
(n ¼105) p-value
Genotype QQ QR RR QQ QR RR
No. of patients 2 30 34 14 46 45 0.071 (χ
2
¼5.28, df ¼2)
Polyarticular vs. oligoarticular
(66 vs. 105 patients) OR 95% CI p-value
RR vs QQ 5.289 1.034–36.218 0.025 (χ
2
¼5.272, df ¼1)
RR vs QR 1.159 0.581–2.312 0.652 (χ
2
¼0.203, df ¼1)
QR vs QQ 4.565 0.886–31.408 0.039 (χ
2
¼4.239, df ¼1)
2 G Bellini et al
www.scandjrheumatol.dk
Scand J Rheumatol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 89.97.220.66 on 05/15/15
For personal use only.
Discussion
No study has previously evaluated the role of the CNR2
rs35761398 variant in JIA. We show for the first time a
role of the CB2 receptor in determining JIA and its
clinical course.
The contribution to the synovial inflammation of oligo/
polyarticular JIA is driven by a T-cell imbalance, leading
to failure of T-cell tolerance to self-antigens and to the
synovial massive leucocyte inflammatory migration (4).
The CB2 Q63R functional variant modulates T-cell pro-
liferation differently, and then their tolerance to self-
antigens, with the minor inhibition exerted by the R63
variant (5). Indeed, we found an association between JIA
and the less functional R63 variant. According to an
additive model, RR subjects show a risk for developing
JIA more than twice that with respect to QQ subjects, and
QR subjects show a lower risk for developing JIA with
respect to RR.
Accordingly, RR homozygotes show a higher risk for
developing polyarticular disease compared to QQ, and
QR patients had an intermediate risk (Table 1). A signifi-
cant correlation of the Q63R variant with the relapse of
arthritis was found, corrected for age, sex, follow-up
duration, and year of recruitment, considered as a proxy
to account for changing treatment patterns.
Finally, considering the risk allele in the homozygous
state, homozygous RR patients showed an earlier onset of
the disease with about double the risk of developing
disease before 5 years of age compared to QQ/QR
patients [OR ¼1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI)
1.03–3.47, p ¼0.038]. No other association was found.
To date, the CNR2 locus has not been associated with
JIA in GWAS, but as GWAS are performed through silent
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), functional vari-
ants that contribute to a part of the heritability could have
been missed (16). Association of the interleukin (IL)-10
cytokine family cluster with JIA has been shown (17). The
CB2 receptor modulates production directly, increasing the
anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 (18). A heredi-
tary predisposition to low IL-10 production in children
with extended oligoarticular JIA has been found. The less
functional R63 variant is significantly associated with
relapses of arthritis, suggesting that a facilitated T-cell
imbalance may drive the active inflammatory state. These
data were still significant when risk factors contributing to
arthritis relapse (duration of treatment, treatment starting
age, and year of recruitment) were included as covariates.
Quantification of some relapse risk biomarkers for the
predictionof JIA relapse has been validated (19), including
the neutrophil-derived S100A12, which induces monocyte
activationbinding to Toll-like receptor4 (TLR4). Selective
stimulationoftheCB2receptordown-regulatestheTLR4-
activated pathway, probably facilitating relapse in patients
carrying the less functional R63 variant (20). CB2 agonists
exert their anti-inflammatory properties inhibiting the acti-
vation of autoreactive T cells and the leucocyte trafficking
towards the inflamed site (21), suggesting that the
disinhibition of the regulatory mechanism of T-cell recruit-
ment can result in an earlier onset of the disease and a more
severe phenotype. Accordingly, we found that, as for
immune thrombocytopenic purpura (11), the homozygous
R63 genotype was significantly associatedwith an onset of
the symptoms before 5 years of age.
A significant difference in the Q63R genotype distribu-
tion was also found between oligoarticular and polyarti-
cular JIA, with increased frequency of RR homozygous
polyarticular patients. Considering the 105 oligoarticular
JIA (QQ ¼14, QR ¼46, RR ¼45) or the 66 polyarticular
JIA patients (QQ ¼2, QR ¼30, RR ¼34) alone, the
genotype distribution was still significantly different from
that of the controls (QQ ¼96, QR ¼307, RR ¼194) only
for the polyarticular form (oligoarticular vs. controls χ
2
¼
4.275, df ¼2, p ¼0.118; polyarticular vs. controls χ
2
¼
13.525, df ¼2, p ¼0.0012). Among JIA patients, QR
carriers and RR carriers showed an increased risk of four-
fold and fivefold, respectively, to be affected by a poly-
articular disease with respect to QQ subjects. These
findings are consistent with the hypothesis that, in the
polyarticular disease, there is a greater failure of a regu-
latory mechanism of T-cell recruitment and activation
(5) and could suggest a CB2 Q63R genotype contribu-
tion to this difference. This observation may lead
to important potential therapeutic consequences, as
development of drugs acting on the CB2 receptor for
clinical application represents a major topic of pharma-
ceutical research. These preliminary findings need to be
confirmed by independent studies. Despite this limita-
tion, our data suggest, for the first time, the CB2 receptor
as a possible molecular determinant contributing to the
susceptibility to oligo/polyarticular JIA and to its clin-
ical course.
References
1. Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet
2007;369:767–78.
2. Martini A. It is time to rethink juvenile idiopathic arthritis
classification and nomenclature. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:1437–9.
3. Amariglio N, Klein A, Dagan L, Lev A, Padeh S, Rechavi G, et al. T-
cell compartment in synovial fluid of pediatric patients with JIA
correlates with disease phenotype. J Clin Immunol 2011;31:1021–8.
4. Basu S, Dittel BN. Unraveling the complexities of cannabinoid
receptor 2 (CB2) immune regulation in health and disease.
Immunol Res 2011;51:26–38.
5. Sipe JC, Arbour N, Gerber A, Beutler E. Reduced endocannabinoid
immune modulation by a common cannabinoid 2 (CB2) receptor
gene polymorphism: possible risk for autoimmune disorders.
J Leukoc Biol 2005;78:231–8.
6. Carrasquer A, Nebane NM, Williams WM, Song ZH. Functional
consequences of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms
in the CB2 cannabinoid receptor. Pharmacogenet Genomics
2010;20:157–66.
7. Rossi F, Mancusi S, Bellini G, Roberti D, Punzo F, Vetrella S, et al.
CNR2 functional variant (Q63R) influences childhood immune
thrombocytopenic purpura. Haematologica 2011;96:1883–5.
8. Rossi F, Bellini G, Tolone C, Luongo L, Mancusi S, Papparella A,
et al. The cannabinoid receptor type 2 Q63R variant increases the risk
of celiac disease: implication for a novel molecular biomarker and
future therapeutic intervention. Pharmacol Res 2012;66:88–94.
JIA and the CB2 receptor 3
www.scandjrheumatol.dk
Scand J Rheumatol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 89.97.220.66 on 05/15/15
For personal use only.
9. Vera G, López-Miranda V, Herradón E, Martín MI, Abalo R.
Characterization of cannabinoid-induced relief of neuropathic pain
in rat models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Pharmacol Biochem
Behav 2012;102:335–43.
10. Rossi F, Bellini G, Alisi A, Alterio A, Maione S, Perrone L, et al.
Cannabinoid receptor type 2 functional variant influences liver
damage in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PloS
One 2012;7:e42259.
11. Coppola N, Zampino R, Bellini G, Macera M, Marrone A,
Pisaturo M, et al. Association between a polymorphism in
cannabinoid receptor 2 and severe necroinflammation in
patients wit h chronic hepatitis C. Cli n Gastroenterol Hepatol
2014;12:334–40.
12. Rossi F, Bellini G, Nobili B, Maione S, Perrone L, del Giudice EM.
Association of the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) Gln63Arg
polymorphism with indices of liver damage in obese children: an
alternative way to highlight the CB2 hepatoprotective properties.
Hepatology 2011;54:1102.
13. Hinks A, Cobb J, Marion MC, Prahalad S, Sudman M, Bowes J,
et al. Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies
14 new susceptibility loci for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Nat Genet
2013;45:664–9.
14. Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Cron
RQ, DeWitt EM, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology
recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis:
initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the
treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res
2011;63:465–82.
15. Wallace CA, Ruperto N, Giannini E; Childhood Arthritis and
Rheumatology Research Alliance; Pediatric Rheumatology
International Trials Organization; Pediatric Rheumatology
Collaborative Study Group. Preliminary criteria for clinical
remission for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
J Rheumatol 2004:31:2290–4.
16. Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.
Nature 2008;456:18–21.
17. Omoyinmi E, Forabosco P, Hamaoui R, Bryant A, Hinks A, Ursu S;
Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS); BSPAR study
group; Childhood Arthritis Response to Medication Study
(CHARMS), Wedderburn LR, Thomson W, Lewis CM, Woo P.
Association of the IL-10 gene family locus on chromosome 1 with
juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47673.
18. Correa F, Hernangómez M, Mestre L, Loría F, Spagnolo A,
Docagne F, et al. Anandamide enhances IL-10 production in
activated microglia by targeting CB(2) receptors: roles of ERK1/2,
JNK, and NF-kappaB. Glia 2010;58:135–47.
19. Rothmund F, Gerss J, Ruperto N, Däbritz J, Wittkowski H,Frosch M,
et al. Validation of relapse risk biomarkers for routine use in patients
with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2014;66:949–55.
20. Gertsch J. Anti-inflammatory cannabinoids in diet: towards a better
understanding of CB(2) receptor action? Commun Integr Biol
2008;1:26–8.
21. Xu H, Cheng CL, Chen M, Manivannan A, Cabay L, Pertwee RG,
et al. Anti-inflammatory property of the cannabinoid receptor-2-
selective agonist JWH-133 in a rodent model of autoimmune
uveoretinitis. J Leukoc Biol 2007;82:532–41.
4 G Bellini et al
www.scandjrheumatol.dk
Scand J Rheumatol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 89.97.220.66 on 05/15/15
For personal use only.