ArticlePDF Available

Molluscan Diversity of Bhavanapadu Mangroves, Northeast Coast of Andhra Pradesh, India

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The Bhavanapadu mangroves are located (Long: 18° 33' 52'' to 18° 32' 11'' N; Lat: 84° 21' 26'' to 84° 18' 22'' E) on the Bay of Bengal North East Coast of Andhra Pradesh. Survey has been made on molluscan fauna in the mangroves along the Tekkali Creek upto Kothalingudu. 19 species of molluscs of which 15 gastropods and four bivalves were recorded.
Content may be subject to copyright.
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 78 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences
Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 4 [1] December 2014: 78-84
©2014 Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India
Online ISSN 2277-1808
Journal’s URL:http://www.bepls.com
CODEN: BEPLAD
Global Impact Factor 0.533
Universal Impact Factor 0.9804
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Molluscan Diversity of Bhavanapadu Mangroves, Northeast Coast
of Andhra Pradesh, India
Joseph Uday Ranjan T.
1
and Dr. Ramesh Babu
K.
2
Department of Marine Living Resources, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530003, Andhra Pradesh,
India.
E-mail: ranjan.uday@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The Bhavanapadu mangroves are located (Long: 18° 33' 52'' to 18° 32' 11'' N; Lat: 84° 21' 26'' to 84° 18' 22'' E) on the
Bay of Bengal North East Coast of Andhra Pradesh. Survey has been made on molluscan fauna in the mangroves along
the Tekkali Creek upto Kothalingudu. 19 species of molluscs of which 15 gastropods and four bivalves were recorded.
Keywords: Bhavanapadu, Mangrove, Malacofauna.
Received 28.07.2014 Revised 10.10.2014 Accepted 21.10.2014
INTRODUCTION
Mangroves are salt-tolerant plants inhabiting the tropical and subtropical estuarine regions. They are
ranked among the most productive ecosystem of the earth [1]. Mangrove ecosystem provides an ideal
nursery and breeding grounds to most of the marine and brackish water fish and shellfish. Indian
mangroves represent a rich diversity of soil dwelling organisms which include micro, meio and macro
forms [2]. Mangrove derived detritus is an important food source for benthic food webs [3,4]. Mangrove
molluscs occupy at all the levels of food web as herbivores, predators, detrivores and filter feeders with
horizontal and vertical distribution and play an important role in the productivity of mangroves [5].
Gastropods and bivalves are two important molluscan groups in mangrove areas. The present survey has
been made to procure an inventory of molluscs in unexplored Bhavanapadu mangroves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area:
Bhavanapadu mangroves (Long: 18° 33' 52'' to 18° 32' 11'' N; Lat: 84° 21' 26'' E to 84° 18' 22'' E) have
been situated on the North East coast of Andhra Pradesh, adjoining the Bay of Bengal (Fig.1). It consists of
backwaters, adjacent salt pans and aquaculture farms covering an approximate extent of mangrove
marshy land of 2000 ha which comes under revenue land. Many marine fisherman habitations have been
located in the vicinity. Mangroves are dwarf, mostly dominated by Avicennia marina on the right and left
banks. Eight species of halophytes and two sea grasses have already been reported [6].
Collection of samples:
Field survey was taken up in the mangrove area from April, 2012 to December, 2013. The mangrove
molluscs were collected by hand picking and by digging the substratum [7]. The arboreal forms
(crawlers) were gathered from the stems, roots and other parts of the vertically growing mangrove plants
[8]. The recorded specimens were sampled from mud banks, mud flats, mangroves, sand-mud swamps,
wooden posts, rocky boulders etc. For correct identification, standard keys were followed [9, 10, 11, 12].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Gastropods and bivalves are the two major classes of molluscans occupying mangrove areas. A total of 19
species of molluscs representing 10 orders, 9 families and 13 genera were recorded from the mangroves
(Table 1; Fig. 2 to 20). The mangrove molluscs have been divided into three categories (1) arboreal, those
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 79 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
who live attached to stem and roots of mangrove vegetation (2) epifauna, those lying on the mud (3)
infauna, those burying in the mud and some live in overlapping habitat [13, 14, 15].
The rich diversity of mangrove periwinkles (Littoraria sp.) and the common nerites have been densely
found on the leaves, trunks and pneumatophores as well as on the stilt roots of mangrove plants. The
crawling Littoraria sp., were recorded on the mangrove vegetation up to 1 meter height. Assiminea nitida,
Cassidula nucleus, Cerethidea obtusa, Haminoea sp., Onchidium sp., have been found on the mud as well as
on the stem and root system of mangroves. Cerethidea cingulata and Telescopium telescopium are two
dominant mud crawlers. Gastropods graze on decomposing fallen leaves and also consume the mud
mainly formed by mangrove litter [16, 17, 18].
Table 1: List of gastropods and bivalves recorded in Bhavanapadu mangroves
No. Order Family Scientific name
Gasropods
1 Littorinimorpha Assiminidae
Assiminea nitida (Pease, 1865)
2
Caenogastropoda
Potamididae
Cerithidea cingulata (Gmelin, 1791)
3
Caenogastropoda
Potamididae
Cerithidea obtusa (Lamarck, 1822)
4
Caenogastropoda
Potamididae
Telescopium telescopium (Linnaeus, 1758)
5 Littorinimorpha Littorinidae
Littoraria melanostoma (Gray, 1839)
6 Littorinimorpha Littorinidae
Littoraria carnifera (Menke, 1830)
7 Littorinimorpha Littorinidae
Littoraria angulifera (Lamarck, 1822)
8 Littorinimorpha Littorinidae
Littoraria pallescens (Philippi, 1846)
9 Littorinimorpha Littorinidae
Littoraria conica (Philippi, 1846)
10 Cycloneritimorpha Neritidae
Clithon oualaniensis (Lesson, 1831)
11 Cycloneritimorpha Neritidae
Neritina violacea (Gmelin, 1791)
12 Cycloneritimorpha Neritidae
Nerita histrio (Linnaeus, 1758)
13 Cephalaspedia Haminoeidae
Haminoea sp. (Carrington, 1830)
14 Bassomatophora Ellobium
Cassidula nucleus (Gmelin, 1791)
15
Systellommatophora
Onchidiidae
Onchidium sp. (Agassiz, 1846)
Bivalves
16
Arcoida
Arcidae
Anadara granosa (Linnaeus, 1758)
17 Eulamellibranchiata Veneridae
Meretrix meretrix (Linnaeus, 1758)
18
Mytiloida
Mytilidae
Perna viridis (Linnaeus, 1758)
19
Ostreoida
Ostreidae
Crassostrea madrasensis (Preston, 1916)
Fig.1: General map of the study area
Ranjan and Babu
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 80 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
Fig.2: Assiminea nitida Fig.3: Cerithidea cingulata
Fig.4: Cerithidea obtuse Fig.5: Telescopium telescopium
Fig.6: Littoraria melanostoma Fig.7: Littoraria carnifera
Fig.8: Littoraria angulifera Fig.9: Littoraria pallescens
Ranjan and Babu
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 81 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
Fig.10: Littoraria conica Fig.11: Clithon oualaniensis
Fig.12: Neritina violacea Fig.13: Nerita histrio
Fig.14: Haminoea sp. Fig.15: Cassidula nucleus
Fig.16: Onchidium sp. Fig.17: Anadara granosa
Ranjan and Babu
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 82 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
Fig.18: Meretrix meretrix Fig.19: Perna viridis
Fig.20: Crassostrea madrasensis
Bivalve molluscs have been found attached to wooden jetties, dykes, wooden posts and even to the shells
when a suitable substratum is not available. The oyster, Crassostrea madrasensis, the mussel Perna virdis,
the clam Meretrix meretrix and the blood cockle Anadora granosa have been recorded as beds along the
banks of the Creek. These edible bivalves are abundant in the local estuaries [19]. Maximum number of
species has been observed from mud flats of the mangroves. Oysters in particular are seen attached to
calcareous substratum and also seen attached to other structures like the gaps of the cracks and rocky
boulders along the banks in addition to various calcareous hard materials lying in the muddy substratum.
M. meretrix and A. granosa have been found buried in the soft mud. Perna virdis was found attached to
fibre like roots and root nodules of mangrove plants with their distribution restricted to mouth region
and harbour area. C. madrasensis has been also found more in the middle of the Creek by forming beds.
Molluscs dwell on the sediment surface or reside in burrows, others live on pneumatophores and lower
tree trunks or prop-roots, burrow in decaying wood, or can even be found in the tree canopies [8, 20]. In
India numerous explorations have been covered so far, out of which 6 species reported from Nuvvalarevu
backwaters [21], 9 from Krishna estuary [22], 10 from Pitchavaram mangroves [23], 11 from Godavari
estuary [24], 13 species from Vellar estuary [25], 20 from Mahanadi estuary [26], not more than 100
species of mangrove associated molluscs were reported [27] and hundred species from Andaman and
Nicobar islands [28].
CONCLUSION
In the present survey 19 species of molluscs were recorded on the mud banks, mud flats, mangrove
forest, sandy muddy area and swamps in Bhavanapadu mangroves. Predominant occurrence of
Cerethidea cingulata and Telescopium tescopium was observed on the mud banks and mud flats. The
distributions of mangrove molluscs are threatened with various anthropogenic pressures, nothing much
is known about the fate of the diversity of molluscs associated with these mangroves. Mangrove molluscs
add up to food for other faunal species in higher trophic levels, including humans. In this aspect the
mangrove molluscs along the densely populated Indian coasts, require much more attention from
conservation biologists.
Ranjan and Babu
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 83 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the UGC for granting Maulana Azad National Fellowship to Mr. Joseph Uday
Ranjan T and Head, Department of Marine Living Resources, Andhra University for the facilities.
REFERENCES
1. Kathiresan, K., (2009). Mangrove Ecosystems. In Training Course on Mangroves and Biodiversity.
2. Ananthan, G.A., Sampathkumar, P. Soundarapandian, P. and L. Kannan., (2004). Observation on environmental
characteristics of Ariyankuppam estuary and Veerampattinam coast of Pondicherry, India. Journal of Aquatic
Biology 19(2): 67-72.
3. Fratini S., Cannicci S., Vannini M., (2000). Competition and interaction between Neosarmatium meinerti
(Crustacea: Grapsidae) and Terebralia palustris (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in a Kenyan mangrove. Marine Biology
137:309–316.
4. Cannicci S., Burrows D., Fratini S., Smith III T. J., Offenberg J., Dahdouh-Guebas F., (2008). Faunistic impact on
vegetation structure and ecosystem function in mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany 89:186–200.
5. Boominathan, M, G Ravikumar, M D S Chandran, and T V Ramachandra. (2012). “The Impact of Dams on the
Edible Bivalves A Comparative Study of Kali and Aghanashini Estuaries of Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka,
India.” In National Conference on Mangrove Wetlands and Near Shore Marine Ecosystems from Sustainability
Issues to Management & Restoration, 5-6 March 2012, ed. A L Ramanathan, S Sreekesh, and M Sundararajan,
Abstract:45–46. School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
6. Swain, P.K., Rama Rao, N. and Sanjai Mohan, (2008). New Mangrove Habitats and Additions to the Flora of
Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Forestry, Volume.31, 431-434.
7. Alfred, J.B., R.K. Varshney & A.K. Ghosh (Eds.) (1997). An Assessment Manual for Faunal Biodiversity in south
Asia. SACEP/NORAD publication series on Biodiversity in South Asia No. 1: 181pp.
8. Sasekumar A., (1974). Distribution of the macro fauna on a Malayan mangrove shore. Journal of Animal Ecology
43:51-69.
9. Menon, P. K. B., A. K. Datta and D. Das Gupta, (1951). On the marine fauna of Gulf of Kutch Part II Gastropoda. J.
Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 8(2): 475–494.
10. Subrahmanyam, T. V., Karandikar, K. R., and Murti, N. N., (1949). The Marine Pelecypoda of Bombay. J. Univ. of
Bombay, 17: 50-81.
11. Apte, D. A., (1988). The book of Indian shells. Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press, India pp
115.
12. Fernando, A. and Fernando O.J., (2002). A field guide to the common invertebrates of the East coast of India.
Annamalai University, India, pp: 1-258.
13. Dey, A. (2006). Handbook on Mangrove Associate Molluscs of Sunderbans.(Eds. Director, ZSI, Kolkata), 96pp.
14. Kesavan, K., Palpandi, C. and Shanmugam, A., (2009). A checklist of malaco fauna of the Vellar estuarine
mangroves, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 1(7): 382-384.
15. Shanmugam, A. and Vairamani, S., (2009). Molluscs in Mangroves: A Case Study. In Training Course on
Mangroves and Biodiversity, pp. 371-382.
16. Plaziat J. C., (1984). Mollusk distribution in the mangal. In: Por D., Dor I. (eds) Hydrobiology of the Mangal: the
Ecosystem of the Mangrove Forests. Junk Boston, pp. 111–143.
17. Kathiresan K., Bingham B. L., (2001). Biology of mangroves and mangroves ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol 40:84–251.
18. Fratini S., Vigiani V., Vannini M., Cannicci S., (2004). Terebralia palustris (Gastropoda;Potamididae) in a Kenyan
mangal: size structure, distribution and impact on consuming leaf litters. Mar Biol 114:1173–1182.
19. Boominathan, M., Chandran, M.D.S., Ramachandra, T.V., (2008). Economic Valuation of Bivalves in the
Aghanashini Estuary, West Coast, Karnataka. ENVIS Technical Report: 30. Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian
Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
20. Macintosh D.J., Ashton E.C., (2002). A review of mangrove biodiversity conservation and management. Final
Report 10/06/2002. Centre for Tropical Ecosystems Research, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
21. Chakravarty M.S. and Joseph Uday Ranjan T., (2014). A Check List of Malacofauna From The Nuvvalarevu
Backwaters of Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Research in Marine Sciences
3(1): 11-15.
22. Radhakrishna, Y. and Janakiram K., (1975). The mangrove molluscs of Godavari and Krishna estuaries. In:
Natarajan, R. (Ed.), Recent Researches in Estuarine Biology, 20-24 Jan 1972. Porto Novo. Hindustan Publishing
Corporation, Delhi, India, 177-184.
23. Kasinathan, R. and Shanmugam, A., (1985). Molluscan fauna of Pitchavaram mangroves, Tamil Nadu. Proceedings
of the Proceeding National Symposium, Biology Utility Conservation of Mangroves, Kolhapur, Distribution, India,
438-443.
24. Kesavan, K., Palpandi, C., Shanmugam, A., (2009). A checklist of malacofauna of the Vellar estuarine mangroves,
India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 1(7) 382- 384.
25. Ganapati, P.N., Rao, M.L.V., (1959). Incidence of marine borers in the mangrove of Godavari estuary. Current
Science 28 332.
26. Rao, N.V.S. & H.P. Mookherjee (1975). On the collection of mollusca from Mahanadi estuary, Orissa, pp. 165-176.
In: Natarajan, R. (ed.). Researches in Estuarine Biology. Hindustan publishing corporation (L), Delhi, India.
27. Dey, A., (2006). Handbook on Mangrove Associate Molluscs of Sunderbans. (Eds. Director, ZSI, Kolkata), 96.
Ranjan and Babu
BEPLS Vol 4 [1] December 2014 84 | P a g e ©2014 AELS, INDIA
28. Das. A.K. & Roy, M.K.D., (1989). A general account of the mangrove fauna of Andaman and Nicobar islanda.
Conservation area series, Zoological survey of India 4: 1-73.
CITATION OF THIS ARTICLE
Joseph Uday Ranjan T.
and Dr. Ramesh Babu
K.Molluscan Diversity of Bhavanapadu Mangroves, Northeast Coast of
Andhra Pradesh, India.Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 4[1] December 2014: 78-84
Ranjan and Babu
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
 In a Kenyan mangrove, we studied the interactions between the gastropod Terebralia palustris and the crab Neosarmatium smithi when foraging on decaying mangrove leaves. Interactions are considerable on account of their wide overlap in zonation (Rhizophora mucronata belt), food items (mangrove leaves) and activity window (diurnal low water). The snails find a leaf by a systematic transecting of the platform and eat the leaf after crawling on to it, usually en masse. The crabs rarely venture beyond 80 cm from their burrows, and once they find a leaf they quickly drag it back into their burrow, probably to reduce the strong intra-specific competition. A crab is able to drag a leaf away even if a number of snails are already feeding on it, by strongly pulling the leaf away or by pushing the snails off the leaf. The success of the “thief ” depends on both the crab's size and the number of snails on the leaf.
Article
Full-text available
Although the role of macroinvertebrates in the nutrient cycling of the Indo-Pacific mangrove ecosystems is now a paradigm of ecological research, most of the research and scientific assumptions deal with decapod crustaceans alone. However, decapods are not the only representatives of mangrove macrobenthos and in certain mangals they are surely outnumbered by gastropods, especially by potamidids of the genus Terebralia. This paper aims at bridging the gap in the knowledge of the ecological role of the largest and most abundant potamidid species of the Indo-Pacific mangals, the semiterrestrial T. palustris. In particular we studied size structure and distribution in relation to micro-environmental factors and feeding ecology, both in terms of diet composition and grazing rate, of two populations of this gastropod colonising a Kenyan mangrove creek. In contrast to what has been described by various authors concerning other mangals, in our study site juveniles and adults of T. palustris were present throughout the whole forest, from the landward belt to the seaward fringe, locally reaching very high densities at various levels. Both life stages showed a preference for patches characterised by soil with high organic content; thus the habitat of juveniles largely overlapped with that of the adults, although they are known to occupy different ecological niches. Indeed, gut-content analysis confirmed that juveniles are detritivorous and adults are mainly leaf-litter consumers. In situ experiments on the grazing activity of the adult snails showed that, in contrast to the litter-consuming crabs, they feed in every light and tidal condition, for an hourly consumption rate of ~0.65g per snail. Considering an average density of about 10.5 adults m–2, it is estimated that a total of 10.5 leaves m–2 are removed by adult snails in each tidal cycle (i.e. about every 6h). T. palustris is the only leaf consumer capable of searching for food under water during high tide and is responsible for the removal of a great quantity of mangrove litter. The results of the present study strongly suggest that T. palustris plays a major role in the food web, mangrove litter degradation and nutrient cycling of the Kenyan mangal.
Article
This paper deals with two mangrove habitats reported for the first time from the East Coast of Andhra Pradesh. Four mangroves species, four mangrove associates and two Seagrasses are reported here for the first time from these habitats. These species form additions to the flora of Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh.
Article
A survey conducted to know the diversity of malacofauna in Vellar estuarine mangroves (southeast coast of India). In this study, 13 species of molluscs (10 species of gastropods - Melampus ceylonicus, Cerithidea cingulata, Cassidula nucleus, Pythia plicata, Neritina (Dostia) violacea, Littorina scabra, Littorina melanostoma, Ellobium aurisjudae, C. obtusa T. telescopium and Assiminea nitida and 3 species of bivalves - Perna viridis, Crassostrea madrasensis and Modiolus metcalfei were recorded. M. pulchella, C. obtusa, L. scabra and N. violacea were found arboreal. T. telescopium, C. cingulata and E. aurisjudae were found crawling on the intertidal mud.
Article
(1) The environmental parameters and the distribution of the macrofauna in a Malayan mangrove shore were studied. (2) The environment is characterized by plant cover, fine soil sediments with high water-contents, rich organic deposits and variable, often low salinity. Most of the mangrove shore is in the high tide range and is exposed to the air for over 90% of the time. (3) The fauna consists predominantly of decapod crustaceans and gastropods with polychaetes in less variety but in significant numbers. (4) The environmental factors affecting the distribution of animals are discussed.
Article
The last 20 years witnessed a real paradigm shift concerning the impact of biotic factors on ecosystem functions as well as on vegetation structure of mangrove forests. Before this small scientific revolution took place, structural aspects of mangrove forests were viewed to be the result of abiotic processes acting from the bottom-up, while, at ecosystem level, the outwelling hypothesis stated that mangroves primary production was removed via tidal action and carried to adjacent nearshore ecosystems where it fuelled detrital based food-webs. The sesarmid crabs were the first macrofaunal taxon to be considered a main actor in mangrove structuring processes, thanks to a number of studies carried out in the Indo-Pacific forests in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Following these classical papers, a number of studies on Sesarmidae feeding and burrowing ecology were carried out, which leave no doubts about the great importance of these herbivorous crabs in structuring and functioning Old world ecosystems. Although Sesarmidae are still considered very important in shaping mangrove structure and functioning, recent literature emphasizes the significance of other invertebrates. The Ocypodidae have now been shown to have the same role as Sesarmidae in terms of retention of forest products and organic matter processing in New world mangroves. In both New and Old world mangroves, crabs process large amounts of algal primary production, contribute consistently to retention of mangrove production and as ecosystem engineers, change particle size distribution and enhance soil aeration. Our understanding of the strong impact of gastropods, by means of high intake rates of mangrove products and differential consumption of propagules, has changed only recently. The role of insects must also be stressed. It is now clear that older techniques used to assess herbivory rates by insects strongly underestimate their impact, both in case of leaf eating and wood boring species and that herbivorous insects can potentially play a strong role in many aspects of mangrove ecology. Moreover, researchers only recently realized that ant–plant interactions may form an important contribution to our understanding of insect–plant dynamics in these habitats. Ants seem to be able to relieve mangroves from important herbivores such as many insects and sesarmid crabs. It thus seems likely that ants have positive effects on mangrove performance.