ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

This paper serves as an introduction to this special issue on talent management. The articles featured here are inspired by the second EIASM workshop on talent management. Following a summary review of the current state of the talent management literature the paper introduces the four articles in the issue.
Talent Management: progress and progress
Please cite as:
Collings, D.G., Scullion, H. and Vaiman, H. (2015). Talent management:
Progress and Prospects. Human Resource Management Review.
doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.04.005
David G Collings*
DCU Business School,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9
Ireland
David.collings@dcu.ie
Tel +35317006937
Hugh Scullion
Department of Management,
J.E. CAirnes School of Business & Economics,
NUI Galway,
Galway,
Ireland
Hugh.scullion@nuigalway.ie
Vlad Vaiman
School of Management
California Lutheran University
60 West Olsen Rd., #3550
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, USA
Tel: 1-805-493-3892
vvaiman@callutheran.edu
*Corresponding author
Talent Management: progress and prospects
Abstract
This paper serves as an introduction to this special issue on talent management. The
papers are inspirsed by the second EIASM workshop on talent management.
Following a summary review of the current state of the talent management literature
the paper introduces the four papers in the issue.
Key words: Talent management; Global talent management; value;
Introduction
There is little doubt that the area of talent management has become one of fastest
growing areas of academic work in the management field over recent decades. One of
the first academic reviews of the area of talent management published almost a
decade ago (Lewis and Heckman, 2006: 139) concluded, ‘if the volume of literature
in the popular and practitioner press is any guide, practitioners in the field of human
resources are now primarily in the business of talent management’. However, the
same paper lamented the lack of academic work underpinning the development of
talent management. The intervening period has represented a period of catch up in
the conceptual and intellectual development of the area. This special issue draws
inspiration from the second workshop on Talent Management organised by the
European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management held in Brussels, Belgium in
2013. This workshop has emerged as an important forum for the discussion of
emerging insights in the area. The workshop and special issue also build on a number
of recent special issues on the theme of talent management over the past five years or
so (see Al Ariss, Cascio and Paauwe, 2014; Collings, Scullion and Vaiman, 2011;
Dries, 2013; McDonnell, Collings, and Burgess, 2012; Scullion, Collings and
Caligiuri, 2010; Vaiman and Collings, 2013).
While there has been significant development of our understanding of the area, many
questions remain. Dries (2013) has argued that the research agenda has developed
based largely on a phenomenon-driven agenda as opposed to a theory driven one.
Arguably this is reflective of the emergence of talent management in practice and the
on-going challenges which organisations face around effectively managing talent
(BCG, 2013). This has also been reflected in a largely managerialist and performative
agenda in much of the earlier work in the field (Collings, 2014a). However more
recently a more pluralist understanding of the contribution of talent management has
emerged (Collings, 2014b; Thunnissen, Boselie, and Fruytier, 2013). Additionally, the
employee perspective has received greater attention in recent years. This represents a
shift from the managerialist orientation of the earlier work (c.f. Björkman, Ehrnroot,
Mäkelä, Smale, and Sumelius, 2013; Farndale, Pa, Sparrow, and Scullion, 2014;
Gelens, Hofmans, Dries, and Pepermans, 2014; Sonnenberg, van Zijderveld, and
Brinks, 2014). Indeed the phenomenon-based emergence of academic work helps to
explain the thematic (Collings and Mellahi, 2009; Lewis and Heckma, 2006) and
theoretical fragmentation of the field (Cappelli and Keller, 2014; Dries, 2013;
Sparrow, Scullion and Tarique, 2014).
We believe that the four papers which comprise this special issue provide a further
step in the development of the conceptual and intellectual development of talent
management. As a collection they help to evaluate the current state of the art within
the area (Gallardo-Gallardo, Nijs, Dries and Gallo, this issue). Furthermore the global
context of talent management is brought to the fore in two of the papers (Khilji,
Tarique, and Schuler this issue; Vaiman, Haslberger and Vance, this issue). Finally
the theme of value is explicated in Sparrow and Makram (this issue). The following
section introduces these papers.
The papers in the special issue
The opening paper in the issue by Shaista Khilji, Ibraiz Tariq and Randall Schuler
broadens the scope of thinking on global talent management (GTM) to consider
macro, country level effects. They argue that our understanding of GTM has been
limited by its focus upon individuals and organizations, with country level effects and
influences underexplored. They point to the import of talent mobility, and respective
governments’ direct involvement in attracting and developing national talent as
central questions at the macro level of analysis. The paper develops a conceptual
framework for macro global talent management (MGTM), which incorporates a
macro view and supports and recognises the requirement for interdisciplinary
research. Their framework foregrounds the macro context in which GTM while
illuminating its multiple consequences traversing levels of analysis. It also captures
the essence of complexities associated with managing talent globally. The paper
concludes with a consideration of directions for future research and the implications
for managers and policy makers.
Our second paper by Paul Sparrow and Heba Makram draws on the concepts of talent
philosophies and a theory of value to bring some coherence and organisation to the talent
management literature. Drawing insights on talent management architectures, the paper first
analyses four talent management philosophies and the different underlying claims they make
about the value of individual talent and talent management architectures to demonstrate the
limitations of human capital theory in capturing current developments. Having demonstrated
the complexity of issues being researched, the paper goes on to syntheses these into a theory
of value, and develops a framework based on four separate value-generating processes (value
creation, value capture, value leverage and value protection). A strength of the paper is the
insights drawn from cognate areas of non-HR literatures, such as those on value creation, the
RBV perspective, dynamic capabilities, and global knowledge management. These insights
are used to understand the nature of value and how this might inform the design of any talent
management system or architecture. The paper concludes with a clear research agenda and
the development of research propositions.
The third paper in the special issue by Eva Gallardo-Gallardo, Sanne Nijs, Nicky Dries
and Pedro Gallo adopts methods derived from bibliometrics and content analysis to
evaluate the state of the field of talent management and to derive implications for
research and practice unbiased towards a-priori assumptions of which frameworks or
methods are most adequate. Based on their analyses of publication volume, journals
and their impact factors, most cited articles and authors, preferred methods, and
represented countries, the authors assess whether TM should be approached as an
embryonic, growth, or mature phenomenon, and examine dominant (i.e., resource-
based view, international human resource management, employee assessment, and
institutionalism) versus ‘alternative’ (i.e., knowledge management, career
management, strength-based approach, and social exchange theory) theoretical
frameworks. The paper will be of value to TM researchers in positioning their work
more explicitly vis-à-vis current debates in the existing literature and encourage them
to think about which approach best fits their research aims, questions, and designs.
In the final paper of the issue by Vlad Vaiman, Arno Haslberger and Charles Vance
return to the global theme by exploring the theme of self-initiated expatriation. As
organisations continue to look beyond traditional company-assigned expatriates in
staffing global organisations, this paper provides a valuable examination of global
talent management issues involving self-initiated expatriates. Vaiman and his
colleagues identify self-initated expatriates as an important employee group and argue
that they have been under-researched in the literature on global talent management.
The paper goes on to discuss how central elements of talent management (i.e.,
identifying, recruiting, and selecting talent from the external labour market;
developing employees; managing talent flows; ensuring retention of talented
employees) can apply to the effective utilization of self-initiated expatriates, with
direct implications for guiding the future work of practitioners and researchers alike.
Conclusions
As illustrated by the four papers in this special issue our conceptual understanding of
the area of talent management continues to evolve at a high pace. It is hard to disagree
with Gallardo-Gallardo et als’ (this issue) assessment that the area remains far short of
maturity. However we do see increasing legitimacy for talent management as an area
of study. For example, the EIASM workshop upon which the current issue is based
represents an important forum for the dissemination of research on talent
management. Furthermore, the Journal of World Business which has a strong
tradition in publishing talent management research (Gallardo-Gallardo et al, this
issue) has as of January 2015 appointed a Senior Editor for Talent Management and
International HRM, reflecting the recognition of the importance of talent management
as an area of study.
However it is equally clear that the scepticism that surrounds the concept of talent
management owing to the lack of a boilerplate to bound the area conceptually,
combined with the relatively mixed quality of empirical work in the area means that
research explicitly in talent management has yet to gain credibility in the top tier of
academic outlets. While there is much work that broadly speaks to a talent
management perspective the discourse of talent management is rarely used in these
top-level outlets (see for example Bidwell, 2011; Bidwell and Keller, 2014).
However organisational talent are regularly conceptualised as stars in top level
publications (see Aguinis and O’Boyle, 2014; Aguinis, O’Boyle, Gonzalez_Mule and
Joo, 2014; Groysberg, & Lee, 2009; Groysberg, Lee and Nanda, 2008; Oldroyd, and
Morris, 2012). The fact that this work is not framed in the language of talent
management has two implications. First it is often excluded in reviews of research on
talent management. This means that the extent of empirical and theoretical work in
the area may be underestimated. Second, it may be more difficult for reflective
practitioners who aim to access academic work to access it as they may be searching
with inappropriate key words. As the field moves towards maturity establishing the
legitimacy of talent management as an intellectual area of study remains a key
challenge.
References
Aguinis, H., and O'Boyle, E. (2014). Star Performers in TwentyFirst Century
Organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 313-350.
Aguinis, H., O'Boyle, E., GonzalezMule, E., & Joo, H. (2014). Cumulative
Advantage: Conductors and Insulators of Heavytailed Productivity Distributions and
Productivity Stars. Personnel Psychology, DOI: 10.1111/peps.12095
Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W. F., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current
theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173-179.
BCG (2013). Creating People Advantage 2013. Boston Consulting Group, London.
Downloaded from
https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/human_resources_organization_des
ign_creating_people_advantage_2013/?chapter=2#chapter2_section2. Last accessed
November 24th 2014.
Bidwell, M. (2011). Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus
internal mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 pp. 369-407.
Bidwell, M. and Keller, J.R. (2014). Within or Without? How Firms Combine
Internal and External Labor Markets to Fill Jobs. Academy of Management
Jounral,57, 1035-1055.
Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or
not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management,
52(2), 195-214.
Peter Cappelli, JR Keller (2014), Talent management: Conceptual approaches and
practical challenges, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and
Organizational Behavior , 1 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091314
Collings, D.G (2014a) “The Contribution of Talent Management to Organisation
Success”, in J. Passmore, K. Kraiger and N. Santos (eds) The Wiley Blackwell
Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development and Feedback, London,
Wiley Blackwell.
Collings, D.G. (2014b) ‘Towards Mature Talent Management: Beyond shareholder
value’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25: 3, 301-319.
Collings, D.G., Scullion, H. and Vaiman, V. (2011) “European Perspectives on Talent
Management”, European Journal of International Management, 5: 5, 453-62.
Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research
agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272-285.
Farndale, E., Pai, A., Sparrow, P., & Scullion, H. (2014). Balancing individual and
organizational goals in global talent management: A mutual-benefits perspective.
Journal of World Business, 49(2), 204-214.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Nijs, S., Dries, N. and Gallo, P. (2015) Towards an
Understanding of Talent Management as a Phenomenon-Driven Field Using
Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Human Resource Management Review, this issue.
Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Talent management and
organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification. Human
Resource Management Journal, 24(2), 159-175.
Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. E. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and
exploitation in professional service firms. Organization science, 20(4), 740-758.
Groysberg, B., Lee, L. E., & Nanda, A. (2008). Can they take it with them? The
portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Science, 54(7),
1213-1230.
Lewis, R. E., and Heckman, R.J. (2006). "Talent management: A critical review."
Human Resource Management Review 16.2: 139-154.
McDonnell, A., Collings, D.G. and Burgess, J. (2012) “Asia Pacific Perspectives on
Talent Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50: 4, 391-98.
Oldroyd, J. B., & Morris, S. S. (2012). Catching falling stars: A human resource
response to social capital's detrimental effect of information overload on star
employees. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 396-418.
Scullion, H., Collings, D.G. and Caligiuri, P. (2010) “Global Talent Management”,
Journal of World Business, 45, 2, 105-8.
Sonnenberg, M., van Zijderveld, V., & Brinks, M. (2014). The role of talent-
perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business,
49(2), 272-280.
Sparrow, P., Scullion, H. and Tarique, I. (2014). ‘Multiple lenses on talent
management: definitions and contours of the field’ in P. Sparrow, H. Scullion and I.
Tarique (eds) Strategic talent management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridg.
Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). A review of talent
management:‘infancy or adolescence?’. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 24(9), 1744-1761.
Vaiman, V. and Collings, D.G. (2013) ‘Talent Management: Advancing the Field’,
International Journal of Human Reosurce Management, 24: 9, 1737-1743.
... Scholars in field (e.g. Collings et al., 2015;Collings & Mellahi, 2013) considered TM as one of the academic fields which is characterized by a lack of theoretical frameworks. It has to be noted also from the figure that few percentage of empirical research means the issue in concern was not yet given due attention from scientific communities. ...
... As shown in figure-5 about 59% of publications (17 out of 29) were in developed regions while 24% (7 out of 29) were in unspecified regions which assumed to be books and book sections. So it can be said that the issue of managing talent in uncertain business environment seems to be emerged and explored in developed country consistent with (Collings et al., 2015;McDonnell et al., 2017) who accused TM as a field in general being developed regions-centric. ...
... Even though the challenges organizations facing today can`t be denied, most literatures were discussing this in the context of developed country with the exception of few papers such as Balog & Demidova (2021); Nair(2019); and Rimita et al.(2020)which were based in emerging and developing countries. Since the challenges due to changing trends mainly specific to regions in focus (Collings et al., 2015), future research should consider the stage of technological advancement and the extent of globalization in specific country so that strategies would be customized accordingly. Regarding strategies suggested (e.g.Fernández-Aráoz'stalent spotting; Frankiewicz& Chamorro-Premuzic's reskilling and up-skilling) much of the strategies are not more than mere proposal and lacks empirical evidence to verify if the outcomes are positive or negative. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper is to systematically review talent management literature in today's changing business environment with the aim of summarizing the current academic and practitioners’ discourses. This study provides a systematic review of qualitative and theoretical literature from both academic and practitioners’ spheres from 2008 to 2021 and utilized 29 relevant publications that fall within the established criteria. The review highlighted talent management issues in today's environment. Most publications did not employ scientific methods but are a kind of theoretical (positional and literature review) in nature. In those publications, three main themes-—challenges, new strategies, and new models—were explored, and possible limitations were discussed. Though new strategies (i.e., mitigation and contingency strategies) and models (i.e., the CP-TSCM model) have been attempted, they lack appropriate empirical support, and most of them had emerged in the practitioners’ world and didn’t pass through peer review. Thus, we call for more comprehensive research.
... Participant 3 highlighted realistic job previews, continuous investment in training and development, and providing clear career pathing as measures HR should focus on. This recommendation reflects strategic HR literature emphasizing the powerful role of robust talent management architectures in shaping sustained employee commitment and motivation (Collings et al. 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores quiet quitting—a distinct form of workplace withdrawal—in the Greek context, adopting a multilevel approach to understand how cultural, institutional and individual factors shape this emerging phenomenon. Drawing upon relevant literature, we investigate the macro, meso-organizational, and micro individual level factors that shape the emergence and persistence of quiet quitting. Through a qualitative, interview-based methodology, we engage with a diverse sample of Greek Human Resource (HR) managers to capture their perceptions and lived experiences of the factors that contribute to quiet quitting. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between societal shifts, cultural norms, organizational practices, and individual coping mechanisms that give rise to and sustain quiet quitting behaviors. We propose a conceptual framework that situates quiet quitting within the unique socio-cultural, economic, and institutional realities of the Greek context. This framework reveals how quiet quitting manifests as a dynamic process, initiated by psychological contract breaches and perpetuated through cycles of emotional exhaustion and identity rationalization. By providing a holistic understanding of the quiet quitting phenomenon, this study contributes to the advancement of contextualized Human Resource Management (HRM) research and offers valuable insights for practitioners navigating the challenges of the modern workplace.
... W tym kontekście badacze wyróżniają trzy podejścia: 1) zarządzanie wysoko wykwalifikowanymi pracownikami; 2) identyfikacja stanowisk strategicznych i systemów zarządzania talentami; 3) podejście integracyjne (McDonnell et al., 2017). W publikacjach autorzy podkreślają znaczenie integrowania zarządzania talentami z innymi funkcjami zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi, takimi jak nauka i rozwój, zarządzanie wynikami i planowanie sukcesji (Collings et al., 2015;Lepak & Gowan, 2010). Dzięki temu organizacje mogą zapewnić, że zarządzanie talentami jest zgodne z szerszymi strategiami zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi i biznesowymi oraz przyczynia się do ogólnej skuteczności i zrównoważonego rozwoju organizacji. ...
Chapter
Artykuł przedstawia założenia wstępne do rozprawy doktorskiej, która podejmować będzie problematykę przekazywania wiedzy ukrytej w środowiskach naukowych związanych z budownictwem, skupiając się na pracownikach z długim stażem naukowym czyli min. 30 lat po doktoracie (DSN) z obszaru budownictwa. Zaplanowane badania mają na celu określenie najlepszych metod wspierających dyfuzję wiedzy ukrytej pracowników DSN wśród pracowników z innych pokoleń. Celem jest stworzenie modelu wspierającego transfer wiedzy ukrytej od DSN do innych pracowników.
... Lately, attention to talents has become a global phenomenon among specialists & researchers. Improving talent management practices is one of the strongest priorities that most professional organizations seek to achieve (Collings et al., 2015). In point of fact, pharmaceutical companies will continue to look towards advanced technologies & techniques in order to create efficiencies among internal functions & operations in order to contribute positively towards its community (Noermijati et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study seeks to examine relationship between talent management practices and level of psychological capital revealed in the Egyptian pharmaceutical sector, the researcher throughout this research tries also to test the mediating role that organizational justice might perform in shaping this relationship. Simple random sample from employees & workers working within various managerial levels inside Arab drug & chemicals industries company was selected in order to test research hypotheses. Results revealed positive significant relationship between both talent recruitment dimension and talent management & evaluation dimension and level of organizational justice revealed, also positive significant impact was found between procedural justice dimension & level of psychological capital. However, in presence of organizational justice as a mediating variable, no significant impact was found between both retaining talents dimension & talents development dimension and level of psychological capital. Finally, in absence of organizational justice as a mediating variable, no significant impact was found between recruiting talents dimension & level of psychological capital.
... The existing research makes it clear that TM in large organisations uses many of the above approaches to identify strategic roles and key positions (Cappelli & Keller, 2014;Cascio & Boudreau, 2016;Collings et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
The management of talented employees has been a hot topic for decades as Multinational corporations (MNCs) around the globe struggle to put together an integrated recipe and a clear image of talent management (TM) strategic approaches that retain talented people in their organisations. The prevalence of talent management within MNCs and among strategic decision-makers has made it increasingly important to understand the nature and scope of talent management activities and initiatives in the Saudi Arabian oil and gas (O & G) industry. An integrative literature review is conducted in this review paper to help understand and analyse perspectives and definitions related to talent management activities. The TM literature has been analysed, and a comprehensive report on talent management is suggested as a part of this paper. Moreover, some major themes within TM literature have been identi- fied: understanding talent management strategies, internal approach used, external focus, and TM challenges faced by MNCs. The findings underscore the importance of addressing talent development and retention challenges, such as the need for more robust training and development opportunities and performance appraisal systems. If unaddressed, these challenges can significantly hinder an organisation’s ability to cultivate a workforce that meets the industry’s evolving demands. Based on our findings, some literature gaps are presented. Strategic researchers and practitioners will be allowed to discuss practical TM actions they can take to address any challenges and obstacles by using manageable steps and finding a meaningful solution.
Article
Full-text available
The differential value supplied by talented people and their contribution to firms in the complex and hypercompetitive global market has made talent management a key focus for the information technology sector. There is little academic research that looks at the relationship between talent management and outcome variables, even though it has been marketed as a key strategy for keeping outstanding employees. Following the pandemic, the IT sector is seeing a high rate of turnover, which has a substantial financial impact on businesses and adverse effects. The information technology sector has begun to regard talent management (TM) as a strategic lever to improve organizational performance by retaining talented personnel. The Resource-Based View (RBV) theory and the Social Exchange Theory(SET) are used in the current study to examine the relationship between talent management and employee retention. Turnover and talent retention are major problems in India's information technology sector. Even though employee retention has been a significant research area, only a few studies have been done on TM and employee retention in the Indian IT sector. The study explored hypotheses to look at the causal association between TM practices and employee retention after reviewing the literature in the associated subject. The study's findings indicated that TM practices in the IT sector had a big impact on staff retention. This article may help define the course for future talent management research and aid managers in comprehending the critical contributions that talent management techniques make to the outcomes of talent management.
Article
This article contributes to talent management (TM) research by offering a comprehensive view of TM in the micro, small, and medium enterprise (MSME) context. It captures and categorizes TM practices according to differences in formality and inclusivity, employee participation in TM, and market orientation. On the basis of 31 in‐depth interviews with the top managers of 27 aerospace companies in Luxembourg, we propose a typology of TM in MSMEs. We identify differences in how companies define and manage talent and propose three main types of TM, namely, “planned,” “proactive,” and “reactive.” “Planned” TM sustains organizational growth through the focus on systematically assessing needs and anticipating the future. In contrast, “proactive” TM tests different TM methods to adapt to perceived needs and build the business further. Finally, “reactive” TM focuses on filling the current skill gap to maintain the existing market.
Article
Full-text available
Talent management (TM) has become a popular management discipline in recent decades and is considered crucial for an organization’s competitive advantage. Non-high potentials (NHPs), who constitute the majority of an organization’s employees, experience the most disadvantages from TM practices; however, they are rarely studied in the TM literature. Moreover, how an organization communicates TM-related information to NHPs to mitigate the negative effects is under-explored. Drawing on social exchange theory (SET), the present study examined communication in conveying information related to TM effects on NHPs’ outcomes. Moreover, to clarify the underlying mechanisms, we expanded our study to explore how perceived organizational justice mediates the aforementioned relationship. A total of 181 public sector NHPs in Indonesia took part in a survey with an experimental scenario designed using a post-test. Causal mediation analysis indicated that providing an accurate procedure information before delivering an unfavorable result and delivering an unfavorable result followed by face-to-face feedback had positive effects on justice perception, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction in the respondents. Finally, all aforementioned relationships were mediated by perceived distributive and procedural justice. The results successfully explained the exchange resource function, an unexplored area in the literature of SET. Further, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter reviews the evidence of the impact of talent management on organizational success. Taking a critical stance, the chapter examines the intellectual basis of the posited association between effective talent management and organizational success and proposes some questions that research could usefully address in this important area of contemporary management practice. A central argument in the current chapter is that not only has research failed to establish a relationship between talent management and organizational performance, but that management practice has unfolded based on some flawed assumptions around the relationship. The distance between the dependent variable of organization performance and the independent variables of talent management practices is simply too great to have a clear understanding of the impact of the practices.
Book
Full-text available
With contributions from leading scholars and practitioners, this Cambridge Companion examines the topical issue of talent management from a strategic perspective, mapping out insights from a number of related fields including strategy, organisational learning, marketing and supply chain management. The authors examine the challenges faced when viewing talent management in a global context, showing how both comparative and international HRM thinking have become increasingly important when, for example, managing talent in emerging markets or trying to globalize the talent management function. The book concludes with a valuable summary of key learning points about talent management for both practitioners and researchers, as well as a discussion of the most fruitful areas for future research. This Companion will be an essential resource for academic researchers, graduate students and practitioners of global strategic talent management.
Article
Full-text available
We examine which jobs are more likely to be filled by internal mobility (specifically, promotions and lateral transfers) than by hiring. Building on the assumptions of transaction cost accounts of employment, we develop a new theory that focuses on the interaction between the problems of evaluating and integrating external hires, on the one hand, and the incentive costs of failing to promote eligible workers, on the other. These arguments lead us to predict how three specific characteristics of jobs-demands for firm-specific skills, performance variability, and supply of internal candidates- affect how those jobs are staffed. Using seven years of personnel data spanning all jobs from the U.S. offices of a large investment bank, we find that jobs with higher performance variability and a larger grade ratio of junior to senior workers are more likely to be filled by internal mobility. We also find evidence that the effects of performance variability are contingent on the grade ratio, affecting staffing decsions only when the firm does not face strong pressures to promote junior workers in order to maintain incentives. Contrary to expectations, we find no effect for firm-specific skills.
Article
Full-text available
This review adopts a phenomenon-driven approach in reviewing the talent management (TM) literature, applying methods derived from bibliometrics and content analysis to evaluate the state of the field and derive implications for research and practice unbiased towards a-priori assumptions of which frameworks or methods are most adequate. Based on analyses of publication volume, journals and their impact factors, most cited articles and authors, preferred methods, and represented countries, we assess whether TM should be approached as an embryonic, growth, or mature phenomenon, and examine dominant (i.e., resource-based view, international human resource management, employee assessment, and institutionalism) versus ‘alternative’ (i.e., knowledge management, career management, strength-based approach, and social exchange theory) theoretical frameworks. Our goal is to assist TM researchers in positioning their work more explicitly vis-à-vis current debates in the existing literature and encourage them to think about which approach best fits their research aims, questions, and designs.
Article
Full-text available
The paper uses two concepts to organize the talent management literature: talent philosophies and a theory of value. It introduces the notion of talent management architectures and first analyses four talent management philosophies and the different claims they make about the value of individual talent and talent management architectures to demonstrate the limitations of human capital theory in capturing current developments. Having demonstrated the complexity of issues being researched, it then synthesises these back down into a theory of value, and develops a framework based on four separate value-generating processes (value creation, value capture, value leverage and value protection). This framework draws upon a number of non-HR literatures, such as those on value creation, the RBV perspective, dynamic capabilities, and global knowledge management, and its use to understand the nature of value and how this might inform the design of any talent management system or architecture. The paper articulates 14 research propositions that the field now needs to prove and suggests how research might now address these.
Article
Full-text available
The challenges associated with managing talent in modern labor markets are a constant source of discussion among academics and practitioners, but the literature on the subject is sparse and has grown somewhat haphazardly. We provide an overview of the literature on talent management-a body of work that spans multiple disciplines-as well as a clear statement as to what defines talent management. The new themes in contemporary talent management focus on (a) the challenge of open labor markets, including issues of retention as well as the general challenge of managing uncertainty, (b) new models for moving employees across jobs within the same organization, and (c) strategic jobs for which investments in talent likely show the greatest return. We review the conceptual and practical literature on these topics, outline the evolution of talent management over time, and present new topics for future research.
Article
Individuals often enter similar jobs via two different routes: internal mobility and external hiring. I examine how the differences between these routes affect subsequent outcomes in those jobs. Drawing on theories of specific skills and incomplete information, I propose that external hires will initially perform worse than workers entering the job from inside the firm and have higher exit rates, yet they will be paid more and have stronger observable indicators of ability as measured by experience and education. I use the same theories to argue that the exact nature of internal mobility (promotions, lateral transfers, or combined promotions and transfers) will also affect workers’ outcomes. Analyses of personnel data from the U.S. investment banking arm of a financial services company from 2003 to 2009 confirm strong effects on pay, performance, and mobility of how workers enter jobs. I find that workers promoted into jobs have significantly better performance for the first two years than workers hired into similar jobs and lower rates of voluntary and involuntary exit. Nonetheless, the external hires are initially paid around 18 percent more than the promoted workers and have higher levels of experience and education. The hires are also promoted faster. I further find that workers who are promoted and transferred at the same time have worse performance than other internal movers.
Article
As noted in the previous chapter, there have been a number of different philosophies that have come to dominate the field of talent management. Collings and Mellahi (2009) helpfully outlined these different philosophies as follows. People approach: talent management as a categorization of people. Practices approach: talent management as the presence of key HRM practices. Position approach: talent management as the identification of pivotal positions. Strategic-pools approach: talent management as internal talent pools and succession planning. These are often presented as competing approaches to talent management, or definitions of it, alternative conceptualizations, and better or worse ways of doing it. In this chapter we: use this way of categorizing approaches to talent management to organize our discussion about the nature of strategic talent management build on the categorization by showing how each philosophy has come about and evolved, its essence, and some of the assumptions it is based on lay out the different assumptions they make about organizational effectiveness, how they have shaped mainstream thinking, and the different strategies they argue are necessary to achieve it put the four philosophies into a framework to help think about, and position, the design of different organizational talent-management systems and determine when each should become most dominant. provide a range of critiques of talent practice, notably the people philosophy. Put the four philosophies into a framework to help think about, and position, the design of different organizational talent-management systems and determine when each should become most dominant.
Article
We argue that the present scope of global talent management (GTM) is limited by its focus upon individuals and organizations, that leaves country effects and influences, as witnessed in the form of talent mobility, and respective governments' direct involvement in attracting and developing national talent, unaddressed. We present a conceptual framework for macro global talent management (MGTM), which incorporates a macro view and supports interdisciplinary research. The framework draws our attention to the macro context in which GTM occurs as well as illuminates its multiple consequences traversing levels of analysis. It also captures the essence of complexities associated with managing talent globally. We offer directions for future research and discuss implications for managers and policy makers. We conclude with some contributions, limitations and conclusions.