Content uploaded by David G. Collings
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by David G. Collings on Feb 12, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Talent Management: progress and progress
Please cite as:
Collings, D.G., Scullion, H. and Vaiman, H. (2015). Talent management:
Progress and Prospects. Human Resource Management Review.
doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.04.005
David G Collings*
DCU Business School,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin,
Dublin 9
Ireland
David.collings@dcu.ie
Tel +35317006937
Hugh Scullion
Department of Management,
J.E. CAirnes School of Business & Economics,
NUI Galway,
Galway,
Ireland
Hugh.scullion@nuigalway.ie
Vlad Vaiman
School of Management
California Lutheran University
60 West Olsen Rd., #3550
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, USA
Tel: 1-805-493-3892
vvaiman@callutheran.edu
*Corresponding author
Talent Management: progress and prospects
Abstract
This paper serves as an introduction to this special issue on talent management. The
papers are inspirsed by the second EIASM workshop on talent management.
Following a summary review of the current state of the talent management literature
the paper introduces the four papers in the issue.
Key words: Talent management; Global talent management; value;
Introduction
There is little doubt that the area of talent management has become one of fastest
growing areas of academic work in the management field over recent decades. One of
the first academic reviews of the area of talent management published almost a
decade ago (Lewis and Heckman, 2006: 139) concluded, ‘if the volume of literature
in the popular and practitioner press is any guide, practitioners in the field of human
resources are now primarily in the business of talent management’. However, the
same paper lamented the lack of academic work underpinning the development of
talent management. The intervening period has represented a period of catch up in
the conceptual and intellectual development of the area. This special issue draws
inspiration from the second workshop on Talent Management organised by the
European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management held in Brussels, Belgium in
2013. This workshop has emerged as an important forum for the discussion of
emerging insights in the area. The workshop and special issue also build on a number
of recent special issues on the theme of talent management over the past five years or
so (see Al Ariss, Cascio and Paauwe, 2014; Collings, Scullion and Vaiman, 2011;
Dries, 2013; McDonnell, Collings, and Burgess, 2012; Scullion, Collings and
Caligiuri, 2010; Vaiman and Collings, 2013).
While there has been significant development of our understanding of the area, many
questions remain. Dries (2013) has argued that the research agenda has developed
based largely on a phenomenon-driven agenda as opposed to a theory driven one.
Arguably this is reflective of the emergence of talent management in practice and the
on-going challenges which organisations face around effectively managing talent
(BCG, 2013). This has also been reflected in a largely managerialist and performative
agenda in much of the earlier work in the field (Collings, 2014a). However more
recently a more pluralist understanding of the contribution of talent management has
emerged (Collings, 2014b; Thunnissen, Boselie, and Fruytier, 2013). Additionally, the
employee perspective has received greater attention in recent years. This represents a
shift from the managerialist orientation of the earlier work (c.f. Björkman, Ehrnroot,
Mäkelä, Smale, and Sumelius, 2013; Farndale, Pa, Sparrow, and Scullion, 2014;
Gelens, Hofmans, Dries, and Pepermans, 2014; Sonnenberg, van Zijderveld, and
Brinks, 2014). Indeed the phenomenon-based emergence of academic work helps to
explain the thematic (Collings and Mellahi, 2009; Lewis and Heckma, 2006) and
theoretical fragmentation of the field (Cappelli and Keller, 2014; Dries, 2013;
Sparrow, Scullion and Tarique, 2014).
We believe that the four papers which comprise this special issue provide a further
step in the development of the conceptual and intellectual development of talent
management. As a collection they help to evaluate the current state of the art within
the area (Gallardo-Gallardo, Nijs, Dries and Gallo, this issue). Furthermore the global
context of talent management is brought to the fore in two of the papers (Khilji,
Tarique, and Schuler this issue; Vaiman, Haslberger and Vance, this issue). Finally
the theme of value is explicated in Sparrow and Makram (this issue). The following
section introduces these papers.
The papers in the special issue
The opening paper in the issue by Shaista Khilji, Ibraiz Tariq and Randall Schuler
broadens the scope of thinking on global talent management (GTM) to consider
macro, country level effects. They argue that our understanding of GTM has been
limited by its focus upon individuals and organizations, with country level effects and
influences underexplored. They point to the import of talent mobility, and respective
governments’ direct involvement in attracting and developing national talent as
central questions at the macro level of analysis. The paper develops a conceptual
framework for macro global talent management (MGTM), which incorporates a
macro view and supports and recognises the requirement for interdisciplinary
research. Their framework foregrounds the macro context in which GTM while
illuminating its multiple consequences traversing levels of analysis. It also captures
the essence of complexities associated with managing talent globally. The paper
concludes with a consideration of directions for future research and the implications
for managers and policy makers.
Our second paper by Paul Sparrow and Heba Makram draws on the concepts of talent
philosophies and a theory of value to bring some coherence and organisation to the talent
management literature. Drawing insights on talent management architectures, the paper first
analyses four talent management philosophies and the different underlying claims they make
about the value of individual talent and talent management architectures to demonstrate the
limitations of human capital theory in capturing current developments. Having demonstrated
the complexity of issues being researched, the paper goes on to syntheses these into a theory
of value, and develops a framework based on four separate value-generating processes (value
creation, value capture, value leverage and value protection). A strength of the paper is the
insights drawn from cognate areas of non-HR literatures, such as those on value creation, the
RBV perspective, dynamic capabilities, and global knowledge management. These insights
are used to understand the nature of value and how this might inform the design of any talent
management system or architecture. The paper concludes with a clear research agenda and
the development of research propositions.
The third paper in the special issue by Eva Gallardo-Gallardo, Sanne Nijs, Nicky Dries
and Pedro Gallo adopts methods derived from bibliometrics and content analysis to
evaluate the state of the field of talent management and to derive implications for
research and practice unbiased towards a-priori assumptions of which frameworks or
methods are most adequate. Based on their analyses of publication volume, journals
and their impact factors, most cited articles and authors, preferred methods, and
represented countries, the authors assess whether TM should be approached as an
embryonic, growth, or mature phenomenon, and examine dominant (i.e., resource-
based view, international human resource management, employee assessment, and
institutionalism) versus ‘alternative’ (i.e., knowledge management, career
management, strength-based approach, and social exchange theory) theoretical
frameworks. The paper will be of value to TM researchers in positioning their work
more explicitly vis-à-vis current debates in the existing literature and encourage them
to think about which approach best fits their research aims, questions, and designs.
In the final paper of the issue by Vlad Vaiman, Arno Haslberger and Charles Vance
return to the global theme by exploring the theme of self-initiated expatriation. As
organisations continue to look beyond traditional company-assigned expatriates in
staffing global organisations, this paper provides a valuable examination of global
talent management issues involving self-initiated expatriates. Vaiman and his
colleagues identify self-initated expatriates as an important employee group and argue
that they have been under-researched in the literature on global talent management.
The paper goes on to discuss how central elements of talent management (i.e.,
identifying, recruiting, and selecting talent from the external labour market;
developing employees; managing talent flows; ensuring retention of talented
employees) can apply to the effective utilization of self-initiated expatriates, with
direct implications for guiding the future work of practitioners and researchers alike.
Conclusions
As illustrated by the four papers in this special issue our conceptual understanding of
the area of talent management continues to evolve at a high pace. It is hard to disagree
with Gallardo-Gallardo et als’ (this issue) assessment that the area remains far short of
maturity. However we do see increasing legitimacy for talent management as an area
of study. For example, the EIASM workshop upon which the current issue is based
represents an important forum for the dissemination of research on talent
management. Furthermore, the Journal of World Business which has a strong
tradition in publishing talent management research (Gallardo-Gallardo et al, this
issue) has as of January 2015 appointed a Senior Editor for Talent Management and
International HRM, reflecting the recognition of the importance of talent management
as an area of study.
However it is equally clear that the scepticism that surrounds the concept of talent
management owing to the lack of a boilerplate to bound the area conceptually,
combined with the relatively mixed quality of empirical work in the area means that
research explicitly in talent management has yet to gain credibility in the top tier of
academic outlets. While there is much work that broadly speaks to a talent
management perspective the discourse of talent management is rarely used in these
top-level outlets (see for example Bidwell, 2011; Bidwell and Keller, 2014).
However organisational talent are regularly conceptualised as stars in top level
publications (see Aguinis and O’Boyle, 2014; Aguinis, O’Boyle, Gonzalez_Mule and
Joo, 2014; Groysberg, & Lee, 2009; Groysberg, Lee and Nanda, 2008; Oldroyd, and
Morris, 2012). The fact that this work is not framed in the language of talent
management has two implications. First it is often excluded in reviews of research on
talent management. This means that the extent of empirical and theoretical work in
the area may be underestimated. Second, it may be more difficult for reflective
practitioners who aim to access academic work to access it as they may be searching
with inappropriate key words. As the field moves towards maturity establishing the
legitimacy of talent management as an intellectual area of study remains a key
challenge.
References
Aguinis, H., and O'Boyle, E. (2014). Star Performers in Twenty‐First Century
Organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 313-350.
Aguinis, H., O'Boyle, E., Gonzalez‐Mule, E., & Joo, H. (2014). Cumulative
Advantage: Conductors and Insulators of Heavy‐tailed Productivity Distributions and
Productivity Stars. Personnel Psychology, DOI: 10.1111/peps.12095
Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W. F., & Paauwe, J. (2014). Talent management: Current
theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 173-179.
BCG (2013). Creating People Advantage 2013. Boston Consulting Group, London.
Downloaded from
https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/human_resources_organization_des
ign_creating_people_advantage_2013/?chapter=2#chapter2_section2. Last accessed
November 24th 2014.
Bidwell, M. (2011). Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus
internal mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 pp. 369-407.
Bidwell, M. and Keller, J.R. (2014). Within or Without? How Firms Combine
Internal and External Labor Markets to Fill Jobs. Academy of Management
Jounral,57, 1035-1055.
Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or
not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management,
52(2), 195-214.
Peter Cappelli, JR Keller (2014), Talent management: Conceptual approaches and
practical challenges, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and
Organizational Behavior , 1 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091314
Collings, D.G (2014a) “The Contribution of Talent Management to Organisation
Success”, in J. Passmore, K. Kraiger and N. Santos (eds) The Wiley Blackwell
Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development and Feedback, London,
Wiley Blackwell.
Collings, D.G. (2014b) ‘Towards Mature Talent Management: Beyond shareholder
value’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25: 3, 301-319.
Collings, D.G., Scullion, H. and Vaiman, V. (2011) “European Perspectives on Talent
Management”, European Journal of International Management, 5: 5, 453-62.
Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research
agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272-285.
Farndale, E., Pai, A., Sparrow, P., & Scullion, H. (2014). Balancing individual and
organizational goals in global talent management: A mutual-benefits perspective.
Journal of World Business, 49(2), 204-214.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Nijs, S., Dries, N. and Gallo, P. (2015) Towards an
Understanding of Talent Management as a Phenomenon-Driven Field Using
Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Human Resource Management Review, this issue.
Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Talent management and
organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification. Human
Resource Management Journal, 24(2), 159-175.
Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. E. (2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and
exploitation in professional service firms. Organization science, 20(4), 740-758.
Groysberg, B., Lee, L. E., & Nanda, A. (2008). Can they take it with them? The
portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Science, 54(7),
1213-1230.
Lewis, R. E., and Heckman, R.J. (2006). "Talent management: A critical review."
Human Resource Management Review 16.2: 139-154.
McDonnell, A., Collings, D.G. and Burgess, J. (2012) “Asia Pacific Perspectives on
Talent Management”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50: 4, 391-98.
Oldroyd, J. B., & Morris, S. S. (2012). Catching falling stars: A human resource
response to social capital's detrimental effect of information overload on star
employees. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 396-418.
Scullion, H., Collings, D.G. and Caligiuri, P. (2010) “Global Talent Management”,
Journal of World Business, 45, 2, 105-8.
Sonnenberg, M., van Zijderveld, V., & Brinks, M. (2014). The role of talent-
perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business,
49(2), 272-280.
Sparrow, P., Scullion, H. and Tarique, I. (2014). ‘Multiple lenses on talent
management: definitions and contours of the field’ in P. Sparrow, H. Scullion and I.
Tarique (eds) Strategic talent management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridg.
Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). A review of talent
management:‘infancy or adolescence?’. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 24(9), 1744-1761.
Vaiman, V. and Collings, D.G. (2013) ‘Talent Management: Advancing the Field’,
International Journal of Human Reosurce Management, 24: 9, 1737-1743.