An appraisal of economic benefits of community-based Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) has been conducted in 10 villages in Vanuatu and Fiji.
Community-based MPAs are considered among the main fisheries and coastal management tools adapted to the context of many Pacific countries, where intervention of government agencies is minimal and where community participation remains important. Governments, multilateral agencies and NGOs have supported community-based MPAs in the last 15 years and their number was estimated at more than 500 in the Pacific in 2007. Nonetheless, this support must now be improved with more stable financial funding and regulations adapted to this kind of management.
A bottom line analysis of their impacts on local development, poverty reduction and on world biodiversity as a public good was identified as a way to “inform & convince” decision-makers, budget-makers, local stakeholders and donors.
The principal effects of MPAs on selected ecosystem services (fisheries, tourism, coastal protection against flood and bequest value) have been assessed. Economic benefits and costs of MPAs have been valued for all local stakeholders in the spatial perimeter of effects of the MPA as well as for national and international stakeholders.
The study has proceeded through the following steps: (i) identification and valuation of ecosystem services (ES) in the spatial perimeter of MPA effects and (ii) estimation of the MPA effects on the stock and flow of ES values. Valuation is based on observed historic values (ex-post) collected during 2011-2012 and on discounted projections at 25 years.
The 5 MPAs in Vanuatu are placed in the North of Efate with villages summing 1200 habitants and 13 km2 of coral reef fishing ground. 4 MPAs in Fiji are in the tourism zone of the Coral Coast of Viti Levu with 1500 people living in the MPA villages (9 km2 of coral reef fishing ground). The other MPA in Fiji is closed to Suva, the country capital, with 900 habitants and 19 km2 of coral reef fishing ground.
Precise criteria on socio-ecological context and on the presence of MPA success key factors have been employed for the selection of the villages. Each of the sites fulfils the three following criteria: (i) proximity of economic activities (mainly fishing, tourism and human settlements), (ii) the MPA is actively managed and adequately enforced by communities for at least five years and, (iii) the reserve covers at least 10% of the fishing ground area.
RESULTS
The MPAs have been shown to generate benefits mainly improving the nature tourism attractiveness and maintaining the service of coastal protection as well as fishery productivity. Tourism business owners are the main beneficiaries (>60% of the total benefits in most of the cases) followed by village households.
The observed costs of community based MPA are between
US 10k yr-1 km-2 of protected area. The economic effects of MPAs have been estimated between US
US 530k yr-1km-2 of protected area.
All the studied MPAs have produced positive C-B ratios demonstrating that investments in marine reserves, in addition to avoid the risk of overfishing and participate in the conservation of coral reefs, is an effective means to contribute to local economic development. The ecological effects on fish populations and habitats in the MPA have produced concrete and tangible benefits both for the villages with MPA and the surroundings villages.
The level of C-B ratios reflects a significant leverage of investments in MPAs for important impacts on tourism benefits (ES3) and costal protection values (ES5).
The economic value of ES in the study sites was between
US 1.9M per year and per village. Cultural services with tourism revenues from divers, snorkelers, resorts and day tours comprise a large proportion of the total (>60% of the total) with almost 12 000 reef visitors per year in Vanuatu and 42 000 in the Fijian Coral Coast. In the study zones, the service of protection against coastal floods provides benefits for an important number of houses (>500 in some sites) and tourism buildings (>80 000 in some sites).
The main results per country are described below. Recommendations about the interpretation of results and orientation of coastal management policies have been provided.
Content may be subject to copyright.