How Occupy Wall Street Influenced the Reputation of Banks with the Media

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.


This study reports on two surveys with business journalists to identify the impact the Occupy Wall Street movement had on the reputation of banks. The first survey was conducted before the movement and the second was after. Perceptions after the Occupy Wall Street movement, that the media caused the loss of trust in banks decreased but beliefs that the media were the main barrier in repairing the reputation of the US banking industry increased. While business journalists felt less strongly after the movement, greed remained their main belief of what caused the loss of trust and that transparent communication is needed to repair the reputation of the US banking industry. The Occupy Wall Street movement appears to have also influenced their thoughts on how many banks were involved in the financial crisis, how long it will take to repair it, and the impact of financial reforms.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Plus, once a reputation is damaged, it is extremely difficult to repair (DiStaso, 2015). ...
Cyberattacks are becoming a part of daily life, but navigating before, during, and after an attack is far from routine. With reputations on the line, cybersecurity is much more than an IT problem. Strategic communication across entire organizations is necessary to successfully navigate cybersecurity. This article outlines cybersecurity and cyberattacks from a communication perspective and provides five cybersecurity communication challenges. Suggestions for further research are also included.
... According to DiStaso (2015, p.100), the protesters' message that they "represented 99 percent of Americans resonated with many people across the globe as it quickly spread and put pressure on political figures, big companies, financial institutions, and banks." After the movement fizzled out, business journalists agreed that more transparent communication was the way to repair corporate reputation (DiStaso, 2015). Hence, we posit that the Lehman Brothers collapse and the OWS movement triggered an increase in the demand for CSR transparency arising from the social context, which may have stimulated firms to provide more CSR information overall. ...
In this paper, we conceptualize shareholder activism demanding CSR transparency as an outcome of the marketization of a social movement. We argue that the infusion of profit-oriented motivations into the social justice ideals on which the original shareholder activism movement was founded has contributed to create a conceptualization of CSR as a risk to be managed. As marketized solutions to risk management privilege the provision of information, they contribute to explaining the emphasis placed by shareholders on transparency in their proposals. Drawing on a sample of U.S. firms over 2006–2012, our evidence suggests a marked increase in CSR disclosure for the sample firms targeted by transparency proposals. However, our analysis reveals that concerns over the CSR practices of the same firms worsen, suggesting that shareholder activism demanding CSR transparency does not inspire change in corporate activities beyond disclosure, at least in the short term. Our contribution to the accounting literature lies in conceptualizing how the emphasis placed on CSR disclosure contributes to ensconcing the social movement into a corporation-centric, market-driven approach, moving away from the initial ideals of social justice aiming to push corporations to act on societal concerns. Altogether, we expose how the accounting practice of CSR disclosure is complicit in the attrition of the initial ideals of shareholder activism on CSR.
Full-text available
A reputação corporativa se tornou um bem intangível sobre o qual as empresas devem sempre estar atentas, principalmente, para aquelas que são ou desejam ser internacionalizadas. A imagem e identidade corporativa também contribuem diretamente para a reputação das organizações. Dessa forma, as organizações dirigem esforços para que a sua reputação não seja influenciada negativamente, considerando que a disseminação de informações, atualmente, é cada vez maior e atinge um grande número de pessoas, em todo o mundo, não se restringindo ao ambiente local. Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar os atributos de reputação corporativa a partir de reportagens veiculadas sobre empresas internacionalizadas que figuram no ranking do Monitor Empresarial de Reputação Corporativa (MERCO). Para esse propósito, realizou-se uma pesquisa qualitativa do tipo documental e utilizou-se a análise de conteúdo como técnica de análise. Os resultados sinalizam, exatamente para a atuação das empresas, o que pode ter influenciado negativamente a sua reputação, de forma a variar sua posição no ranking.
Full-text available
As the number of high-profile failures and mergers of many large financial companies continues to grow, so does distrust in the industry. This study explores how communication professionals at financial companies are handling the global financial crisis. Although participants believed that communication must be accurate, timely, and transparent, they are greatly challenged by the quantity of communication needed. Many of the participants in this study had unique ways of handling certain aspects of communication needs. Ultimately, the collective of communication professionals at individual financial instructions can lead to the rebuilding of trust and confidence in financial organizations, and this study provides a glimpse into how they are accomplishing this massive feat.
Full-text available
We propose a four-stage model of the organizational actions that potentially increase the speed and likelihood that an organization will restore its legitimacy with stake- holders following a transgression. Organizations that work to discover the facts of the transgression, provide an appropriate explanation of their wrongdoing, accept and serve an equitable punishment, and make consistent internal and external rehabili- tative changes increase the likelihood of meeting stakeholder demands and, conse- quently, have a higher probability of successfully achieving reintegration with stake- holders than those that do not.
Full-text available
This paper describes the successful development of four indices to measure the drivers of a company's corporate reputation. The indices were developed as formative as opposed to reflective measures and their predictive validity was tested using data from 25 business journalists. The results indicate that these four attributes of a company provide good insight into the drivers of a company's reputation.Corporate Reputation Review (2004) 7, 196-205; doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540220
Full-text available
present the conceptual and empirical development, including validation, of a measure of organizational trust / organizational trust refers to the degree of trust between units of an organization or between organizations / the core of our argument is that trust reduces transaction costs in and between organizations / present the rationale for the approach . . . taken for the development of the OTI / describe the exact procedures followed and the results produced in developing and validating the OTI appendix a: research items in instrument to measure interorganizational trust / appendix b: Organizational Trust Inventory—Long Form (OTI-LF) / appendix c: Organizational Trust Inventory—Short Form (OTI-SF) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Full-text available
We propose a systemic, multilevel framework for understanding trust repair at the organizational level. Drawing on systems theory, we theorize how each component of an organization's system shapes employees' perceptions of the organization's trust-worthiness and can contribute to failures and effective trust repair. We distinguish the framework from prior work grounded in dyadic assumptions and propose underlying principles and a four-stage process for organizational trust repair. Finally, we explore the implications for research and practice.
WASHINGTON — The 2008 financial crisis was an "avoidable" disaster caused by widespread failures in government regulation, corporate mismanagement and heedless risk-taking by Wall Street, according to the conclusions of a federal inquiry. The commission that investigated the crisis casts a wide net of blame, faulting two administrations, the Federal Reserve and other regulators for permitting a calamitous concoction: shoddy mortgage lending, the excessive packaging and sale of loans to investors and risky bets on securities backed by the loans.
This review article focuses on the three control mechanisms that govern economic transactions between actors: price, authority, and trust. In contrast to conventional approaches that view market and hierarchy as mutually exclusive control mechanisms (or as poles of a continuum), we argue that price, authority, and trust are independent and can be combined in a variety of ways. For instance, price and authority are often played off each other within firms, while trust and price are sometimes intertwined to control transactions between firms. We also identify a type of organization largely ignored in the literature: the plural form. In the plural form, organizations simultaneously operate distinct control mechanisms for the same function. For example, organizations operate franchises and company-owned units under the same trademark, and companies sometimes make and buy the same part. To understand this form, the analytic focus must move from individual transactions to the broader architecture of control mechanisms.
Organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation have similar antecedents, social construction processes and consequences. Nonetheless, an improved understanding of relationships between legitimacy and reputation requires that differences between the two be specified and clarified. Our examination of past research indicates that legitimacy emphasizes the social acceptance resulting from adherence to social norms and expectations whereas reputation emphasizes comparisons among organizations. We empirically examine two antecedents of the financial, regulatory, and public dimensions of legitimacy and reputation in a population of US commercial banks. We find that isomorphism improves legitimacy, but its effects on reputation depend on the bank's reputation. Moreover, higher financial performance increases reputation, but does not increase the legitimacy of high performing banks. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2005.
The 2008 global financial crisis has been compared to a "once-in-a-century credit tsunami," a disaster in which the loss of trust and confidence played key precipitating roles and the recovery from which will require the restoration of these crucial factors. Drawing on the analogy between the financial crisis and environmental and technological hazards, recent research on the role of trust and confidence in the latter is used to provide a perspective on the former. Whereas "trust" and "confidence" are used interchangeably and without explicit definition in most discussions of the financial crisis, this perspective uses the TCC model of cooperation to clearly distinguish between the two and to demonstrate how this distinction can lead to an improved understanding of the crisis. The roles of trust and confidence-both in precipitation and in possible recovery-are discussed for each of the three major sets of actors in the crisis, the regulators, the banks, and the public. The roles of trust and confidence in the larger context of risk management are also examined; trust being associated with political approaches, confidence with technical. Finally, the various stances that government can take with regard to trust-such as supportive or skeptical-are considered. Overall, it is argued that a clear understanding of trust and confidence and a close examination of the specific, concrete circumstances of a crisis-revealing when either trust or confidence is appropriate-can lead to useful insights for both recovery and prevention of future occurrences.
About occupy wall street
  • Occupywallst
  • Org
Media non-coverage of occupy wall street gets lots of media coverage
  • E Randall
In the city and wall street, protest has occupied the mainstream
  • P Toynbee
Wall Street protests receive limited attention
  • Pew Research
  • Center
“Transparency” more important than brand appeal in consumer purchasing decisions
  • H Dawson
  • S Wilson
‘2009’s biggest financial scandalsbiggest-financial-scandals-personal-finance
  • D Rice
‘Booth Chicago/Kellogg School Financial Trust Index
  • P Sapienza
  • L Zingales
Occupy movement (occupy wall street)’ The New York Times
  • R Stolarik
The Occupy Movement lives
  • G Glantz
Trust and PR practice
  • B L Rawlins
My state-sponsored assault, courtesy of the NYPD
  • J Knefel
Occupy wall street: Who is the top 1% for income?
  • T Luhby
Obama: Occupy wall street protests show Americans’ frustration
  • M A Memoli
Protests puts coverage in spotlight
  • B Stelter
Principles of journalism
  • Journalism
  • Org
2009’s biggest financial scandals
  • D Rice