Content uploaded by Gary M. Erickson
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gary M. Erickson on Dec 05, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Finance and Economics
Volume 2, Issue 4 (2014), 17-24
ISSN 2291-4951 E-ISSN 2291-496X
Published by Science and Education Centre of North America
~ 17 ~
Global Warming: An Econometric Analysis
Gary M Erickson1*
1Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
*Correspondence: Gary M Erickson, Professor Emeritus, Foster School of Business, University of
Washington, Box 353200, Seattle, WA, 98195-3200, USA. Tel: 1-206-661-6112. E-mail:
erick@uw.edu
DOI: 10.12735/jfe.v2i4p17 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.12735/jfe.v2i4p17
Abstract
An econometric analysis is provided of the system of relationships involving global CO2 emissions,
atmospheric concentration of anthropogenic CO2, and global surface temperature increase since the
preindustrial era. Empirical methods used are feasible generalized least squares and generalized
method of moments. It is found that global surface temperature increase is estimated to have a
positive effect on the CO2 absorption capacity of the environment.
JEL Classifications: C39, Q54
Keywords: anthropogenic CO2, atmospheric CO2 concentration, CO2 emissions, econometric
analysis, global warming
1. Introduction
There has been a considerable amount of science devoted to the study of the climate effects of
anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their increasing concentration in the
atmosphere. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in particular, has prepared its
Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) that includes three Working Group Reports and a Synthesis Report.
In addition, there continue to be numerous contributions to the academic literature on the subject.
Climate change is a well-studied phenomenon.
Even so, there remain unresolved issues regarding climate change and its attendant global
warming. An open matter of particular importance is whether increasing temperatures are affecting
the ability of the earth’s terrestrial and oceanic environments to absorb CO2, and if so, whether the
effect is positive or negative.
The present study aims to shed light on the global warming issue, in particular the effect of
warming on the earth’s ability to absorb CO2, through econometric analysis of available data on
fossil-fuel CO2 emissions, atmospheric concentration of CO2, and global temperature increase.
Econometric analysis can be insightful, in that such analysis is effective in the empirical study of
systems of relationships, and the interaction involving CO2 and global temperature is such a system.
The paper proceeds as follows. The next section summarizes the state of knowledge regarding
global warming, and is followed by sections that describe the data, outline the estimation model,
provide estimation results, and draw implications. A conclusions section finishes the paper.
Gary M. Erickson Submitted on September 18, 2014
~ 18 ~
2. State of Knowledge
This section provides a summary of the essential basics of what is known, and not known, about
global warming related to anthropogenic GHG emissions. Stocker et al. (2013) provide a thorough
assessment of the current state of scientific knowledge.
There are two critical dynamic processes at work that are interrelated: (1) changes in
atmospheric concentrations of GHG; (2) changes in global surface temperature.
2.1 Changes in Atmospheric Concentrations of GHG
Concentrations of long-lived GHG, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O),
have increased substantially since the onset of the industrial revolution in the eighteenth century.
The increase is due to human activities, largely the burning of fossil fuels. The biggest contributor
to the radiative forcing of the climate system, and thereby global warming, is CO2, and so the
understanding of the influence of CO2 on global surface temperature is especially critical (Stocker
et al., 2013, Ch. 8).
The earth’s terrestrial and ocean environments are able to absorb CO2. After CO2 enters the
atmosphere, a third to half of the CO2 pulse is absorbed by land and ocean, with the remainder
removed through reaction with calcium carbonate over a few thousand years, and silicate
weathering over several hundred thousand years (Stocker et al., 2013, Ch. 6).
It is possible that the warming of the earth’s atmosphere is affecting the environment’s ability to
absorb CO2. However, this is not well understood. Nor is it well understood, if warming does affect
absorption capacity, whether the effect is positive or negative (Hansen, Kharecha, & Sato, 2013).
Studies offer apparently conflicting conclusions. Piao et al. (2008) and Zhao and Running (2010)
appear to find reduction in terrestrial carbon absorption in recent years, while Le Quéré et al. (2007)
and Schuster and Watson (2007) estimate decline in the ocean CO2 sink. On the other hand, Knorr
(2009) can find no trend, and Sarmiento et al. (2010) and Ballantyne, Alden, Miller, Tans, and
White (2012) observe increase in the environment’s net CO2 uptake since 1960. A contribution of
the present study is to shed an econometric light on this important issue.
2.2 Changes in Global Surface Temperature
The earth’s surface temperature is considered to adjust gradually to an increase in atmospheric CO2
toward an equilibrium. There are two key aspects of the relationship: the equilibrium temperature,
and the rate of adjustment toward the equilibrium.
Much effort has been dedicated, through a combination of historical temperature data analyses
and model simulations, to establish a range for “equilibrium climate sensitivity”, defined as the
global mean warming for a doubling of CO2 from the concentration level in the year 1750. The
IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) concludes that equilibrium climate sensitivity “…is likely in
the range 1.5oC to 4.5oC…” (Stocker et al., 2013, p. 1033). There remains uncertainty about the
precise ultimate change in temperature due to increasing atmospheric CO2.
The likely rate of adjustment to equilibrium can be gleaned from simulations done for IPCC’s
AR5. In particular, a scenario referred to as RCP4.5 shows stabilization in atmospheric CO2
concentration by about the year 2100, yet, for that scenario, mean surface air temperature is
projected to continue to rise by .5oC by 2200 and .7oC by 2300 (Stocker et al., 2013, Table 12.2).
The two data points in the temperature projections, coupled with an assumed exponential
adjustment relationship, suggest an annual adjustment rate of just about .01.
www.todayscience.org/jfe.php Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 2, Issue 4, 2014
~ 19 ~
3. Data
Data for the study are readily available from various sources.
Global fossil-fuel CO2 emissions data are provided, on an annual basis from 1751 through
2012, by U.S. Department of Energy’s Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.html. Emissions are measured in millions of metric tons
of carbon.
Annual atmospheric CO2 concentration measurements at Mauna Loa are available from Earth
System Research Laboratory of U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic & Atmospheric
Administration http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/, and are used with the permission of that
facility. CO2 concentration is measured as a dry mole fraction, number of molecules of CO2
divided by number of all molecules in air after water vapor has been removed, and expressed as
parts per million (ppm). Data are also available from 1980 on a global basis, but since the Mauna
Loa data closely match the global data, the Mauna Loa concentration data from 1959 are used in the
analysis. Further, since the interest is in anthropogenic CO2, we subtract the preindustrial
concentration level of 280 from the data.
Annual global surface temperatures are from National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s
Goddard Institute for Space Studies http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp. Temperature is measured in
units of .01oC, and is expressed as the difference from the first year available, 1880, the temperature
for which year being used as a proxy for the preindustrial temperature level.
Finally, since annual variability in both temperature and CO2 concentration are correlated
with the Niño 3.4 index (Hansen, Ruedy, Sato, & Lo, 2010; Hansen et al., 2013), that index,
expressed as anomalies from the base period 1981-2010, is used as a covariate for both
relationships. The data on the Niño 3.4 anomalies are obtained from the National Weather
Service’s Climate Prediction Center http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices. Another index
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao_index.html is the AO
(Arctic Oscillation) index, which is related to temperatures in North America and Eurasia
(Thompson, Wallace, Jones, & Kennedy, 2009; Thompson, Wallace, & Hegerl, 2000), and so is
used as a covariate in the temperature relationship. Both indices are available on a monthly basis,
and are annualized by summing over the 12 months of the year.
Merging the various data provides an annual data base for the years 1959 through 2012.
4. Estimation Model
Define the following variables:
t
C=
atmospheric concentration of anthropogenic CO2 in year t
t
T=
global surface temperature increase over 1880 in year t
t
M=
global CO2 emissions in year t
t
N=
Niño 3.4 index level in year t
t
A=
AO index level in year t.
Dependent variables for the econometric analysis are the annual changes in CO2 concentration and
temperature:
11
, .
t t t t tt
C C C T TT
−−
∆ = − ∆=−
Gary M. Erickson Submitted on September 18, 2014
~ 20 ~
The global warming process is depicted as a system of two equations:
( )
( )
1 11
1 1 11
t t t tt t
t t t tt t
C M N TC
T N A CT
α β γδ µ
ε ζ ηθ ν
− −−
− − −−
∆= + −+ +
∆= + + − +
(1)
where
α
,
β
,
γ
,
δ
,
ε
,
ζ
,
η
,
θ
are parameters to be estimated, and
,
tt
µν
are random disturbances
that are allowed to be correlated.
The first equation in the system (1) shows that the annual change in atmospheric CO2
concentration derives positively from CO2 emissions and negatively from environmental absorption
of atmospheric CO2. Annual change in the concentration is also affected by the Niño index. The
CO2 absorption rate depends on the temperature level, where the sign of the
δ
parameter can be
positive or negative, and which sign will indicate whether temperature has a positive or negative
influence on the absorption rate. The model (1) allows the data to indicate the direction of the
influence.
The second equation in (1) shows that annual change in temperature is a partial adjustment to the
difference between the equilibrium temperature increase, which equilibrium depends on the current
CO2 concentration level, and the current temperature increase. Annual temperature change is also
influenced by the Niño and AO indices.
5. Estimation
Estimation of the nonlinear system (1) is accomplished using the Stata data analysis package. Two
estimation approaches are used. The first is maximum likelihood, specifically feasible generalized
least squares (FGLS), which allows the random disturbances for the two equations to be correlated.
The results from this estimation are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. FGLS estimation
Coefficient Estimate Standard error z
α
.0003863 .0001304 2.96
β
.0341525 .0070081 4.87
γ
.0053833 .0115154 0.47
δ
.0000875 .0000309 2.83
ε
.4941749 .1909941 2.59
ζ
.3766008 .2272498 1.66
η
.6918035 .1176141 5.88
θ
.7446362 .0275520 27.03
All coefficient estimates for the FGLS estimation are positive and statistically significant, except
for the base CO2 absorption rate, while the estimate for the AO effect on temperature change is
significant at only the .10 level. In particular, the estimate for the effect of temperature on the CO2
absorption rate is positive and significant. The point estimate values appear reasonable, except for
www.todayscience.org/jfe.php Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 2, Issue 4, 2014
~ 21 ~
that of the temperature adjustment parameter
η
, which is much higher than the .01 value suggested
by the RCP4.5 scenario.
The second estimation approach allows for correlation of regressors with the random
disturbances. This is likely the case, due to the interrelationship of atmospheric CO2 and
temperature exhibited in the system (1). The appropriate approach for this possibility is generalized
method of moments (GMM). Instruments are needed for this approach, and the following are used
as instruments in the estimation:
11
, , ,
tt t
MN A
−−
year, (year − 1959)^2. The estimation results are
shown in Table 2.
Table 2. GMM estimation
Coefficient Estimate Standard error z
α
.0002506 .0001166 2.15
β
.0378597 .0071695 5.28
γ
−.0062871 .0102935 −0.61
δ
.0000871 .0000245 3.55
ε
.2136107 .2172791 0.98
ζ
.1606706 .2552154 0.63
η
.1027354 .2237836 0.46
θ
.8803589 .3651523 2.41
The estimates for the CO2 concentration relationship are similar to those for FGLS estimation.
In particular, it is especially noteworthy that the estimated effect of temperature on the CO2
absorption rate is positive. Increase in global surface temperature appears to enhance the
environment’s ability to absorb CO2.
For the temperature relationship, the parameter estimates for GMM differ considerably from
those for FGLS. In particular, the estimate for the annual temperature adjustment parameter is much
smaller; in addition, the .01 value from the RCP4.5 scenario is within the 95% confidence interval
with GMM estimation, while it falls outside the interval with FGLS estimation.
6. Implications
Long-run implications for global temperatures can be drawn from the model (1) and its parameter
estimates. Consider the following continuous-time version of the model that disregards the short-
term Niño and AO effects and random disturbances:
( )
( )
() () ()
() () .
dC Mt Tt Ct
dt
dT Ct Tt
dt
α γδ
ηθ
= −+
= −
(2)
For the system (2) to achieve a steady state, emissions M (t) must stabilize; assume such at a value
of M s, so that (2) becomes
Gary M. Erickson Submitted on September 18, 2014
~ 22 ~
( )
( )
() ()
() () .
s
dC M Tt Ct
dt
dT Ct Tt
dt
α γδ
ηθ
= −+
= −
(3)
Setting
0dC dt dT dt= =
achieves the following steady-state values for CO2 concentration and
temperature increase:
()
()
2
2
14
2
14.
2
s
s
CM
TM
γ γ αδθ
δθ
γ γ αδθ
δ
∞
∞
= −± +
= −± +
(4)
It is straightforward to show that only the larger, positive, steady-state is feasible with nonnegative
initial values C(0), T(0):
()
()
2
2
14
2
14.
2
s
s
CM
TM
γ γ αδθ
δθ
γ γ αδθ
δ
∞
∞
= −+ +
= −+ +
(5)
Assume the GMM point estimates for the parameters
α
,
δ
,
θ
, except set
γ
= 0, since that
parameter estimate is not statistically different from zero. This implies the following steady-state
relationships:
1.81
1.59
s
s
CM
TM
∞
∞
=
=
(6)
and it can be shown that the steady state (6) is asymptotically stable. Since in the estimation
temperature is measured in terms of .01oC, the following converts the steady-state temperature
relationship in terms of oC:
.0159 .
s
TM
∞
=
(7)
The relationship (7) is depicted in Figure 1. In particular, if global emissions could be stabilized
at the current level, around 10 billion metric tons, the global surface temperature would be expected
to rise to 1.59oC above the preindustrial level.
7. Conclusions
This paper provides an econometric analysis of the system of relationships involving global CO2
emissions, atmospheric concentration of anthropogenic CO2, and global surface temperature
increase.
A key finding is that, in both FGLS and GMM estimation of the system, temperature is
estimated to have a positive effect on the capacity of the earth’s environment to absorb CO2.
www.todayscience.org/jfe.php Journal of Finance and Economics Vol. 2, Issue 4, 2014
~ 23 ~
Implications are drawn regarding the ultimate temperature consequences of differing levels of
stabilized CO2 emissions.
It is important to understand the nature of the interactive relationships that lead to global
warming. The econometric analysis herein provides a contribution to such understanding.
Figure 1. Steady-state global surface temperature
References
[1] Ballantyne, A. P., Alden, C. B., Miller, J. B., Tans, P. P., & White, J. W. C. (2012). Increase
in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years. Nature,
488, 70-72. doi:10.1038/nature11299
[2] Hansen, J., Kharecha, P., & Sato, M. (2013). Climate forcing growth rates: Doubling down on our
Faustian bargain. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/011006.
[3] Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., & Lo, K. (2010). Global surface temperature change. Review
of Geophysics, 48(4). doi: 10.1029/2010RG000345
[4] Knorr, W. (2009). Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing?
Geophysical Research Letters, 36(21). doi: 10.1029/2009GL040613
[5] Le Quéré, C., Rödenbeck, C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Conway, T. J., Langenfelds, R., Gomez, A., . .
. Heimann, M. (2007). Saturation of the southern ocean CO2 sink due to recent climate
change. Science, 316(5832), 1735-1738. doi: 10.1126/science.1136188
[6] Piao, S., Ciais, P., Friedlingstein, P., Peylin, P., Reichstein, M., Luyssaert, S., . . . Vesala, T.
(2008). Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming.
Nature, 451, 49-52. doi: 10.1038/nature06444
[7] Sarmiento, J. L., Gloor, M., Gruber, N., Beaulieu, C., Jacobson, A. R., Mikaloff Fletcher, S.
E., . . . Rodgers, K. (2010). Trends and regional distributions of land and ocean carbon sinks.
Biogeosciences, 7, 2351-2367. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-2351-2010
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 5 10 15 20
oC
billions of metric tons
Gary M. Erickson Submitted on September 18, 2014
~ 24 ~
[8] Schuster, U., & Watson, A. J. (2007). A variable and decreasing sink for atmospheric CO2 in the
North Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112(C11). doi:10.1029/2006JC003941
[9] Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M. M. B., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., . . .
Midgley, P. M. (Eds.). (2013). Climate change 2013 the physical science basis. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324
[10] Thompson, D. W. J., Wallace, J. M., & Hegerl, G. C. (2000). Annular modes in the
extratropical circulation. Part II: Trends. Journal of Climate, 13, 1018-1036.
[11] Thompson, D. W. J., Wallace, J. M., Jones, P. D., & Kennedy, J. J. (2009). Identifying
signatures of natural climate variability in time series of global-mean surface temperature:
Methodology and insights. Journal of Climate, 22, 6120-6141.
[12] Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. (2010). Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary
production from 2000 through 2009. Science, 329(5994), 940-943. doi: 10.1126/science.1192666
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights
granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms
and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.