Executive Summary What follows is an attempt to define a research agenda for the ongoing study of 9/11 and related events. The aim of this agenda is to deepen our understanding of 9/11 and its consequences and to develop a broader understanding of the ways in which power is exercised in the contemporary world. This paper has been developed from the research agenda recently published by the International Center for 9/11 Justice and is intended as a living document that will be regularly updated in light of feedback and as significant research developments emerge. Understanding the 9/11 event • The official investigations upon which the official 9/11 narrative rests-the 9/11 Commission Report and the National Institute of Standards and Technology reports on the destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7-are all demonstrably flawed. • The most likely explanation for the complete destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7 is that of demolition planned prior to 9/11. • Multiple inconsistencies afflict the official narrative regarding the alleged hijackers, including with respect to their alleged movements and religiosity. Continued research into the history, behavior and activities of the alleged hijackers is warranted. • Multiple anomalies with respect to phone calls reportedly made by people onboard flights AA11, AA77, UA175 and UA93 indicate that they were not authentic. • It is highly unlikely the hijacked aircraft could have been flown by the alleged individuals in the manner claimed by US authorities. Further investigation is necessary into the supposed training and competencies of the alleged hijackers, the complexity of the flight maneuvers and their feasibility for the alleged hijackers, and the possible role of remote guidance technology. Journal of 9/11 Studies August 2024 2 • Developing a plausible and evidence-based account of what actually transpired with respect to the four airliners is a research priority. • Multiple inconsistences regarding key military and political officials, compelling evidence of insider trading prior to 9/11, multiple training exercises, and the 2001 anthrax attacks, all provide substantial circumstantial evidence that 9/11 was planned and executed by persons connected to the US government. • Continued research into 9/11-related financial crimes, military training exercises, and politically exploited acts of bioterrorism, or threats thereof, is necessary. • Further research is necessary regarding the possible involvement of other state and non-state actors including the roles of Saudi, UAE, Kuwaiti, British, and Israeli officials, corporations, and persons. • The most plausible proximal explanation for 9/11 is that a belligerent and expansionist neoconservative political block instigated and then exploited the event in order to initiate a series of major wars in the international system. Wider geopolitical and domestic consequences of 9/11 and deep events • The 'structural deep event' (SDE) and 'state crimes against democracy' (SCAD) concepts provide a basis for conceptually grounded and rigorous academic analysis of both the 9/11 event and its wider consequences. • Existing academic research on the 'global war on terror' that ensued 9/11, and the multiple conflicts fought under that banner, is severely limited because of its failure to properly understand what happened on 9/11 and its propensity to engage in insufficiently critical 'problem solving' or 'administrative' research. • Ensuing 'regime change' wars in countries and regions including, but not limited to, Afghanistan, Iraq, North Africa and Syria, as well as geopolitical developments with respect to Russia and Ukraine and now Israel-Palestine, require critical examination through the SDE and SCAD lenses and, alongside this, identification of strategic deceptions and propaganda. • At the domestic level, the 9/11 event led to a sharp reduction in civil liberties across liberal democracies and further concentration of political power. Sustained critical research is necessary into the rise of surveillance society, suppression of public dissent (and freedom of expression), co-optation of corporate media, corruption of legal structures, and the use of 'lower-level' false flags across democracies. Journal of 9/11 Studies August 2024 3 • Systematic and conceptually grounded comparative research into other SDEs and SCADs, such as the JFK assassination and the COVID-19 event, is now essential in order to accurately describe, understand and explain the extent to which democratic politics has been overturned by political and economic elites pursuing a politics of fear. • Attention needs to be given to developing structures and mechanisms that can avert SDEs and SCADS whilst strengthening the ability of citizens and social movements to counter concentrated elite power.