ArticlePDF Available
COMMENTARY
Year : 2015 | Volume : 6 | Issue : 2 | Page : 94--97
Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives
Subramani Parasuraman1, Ramasamy Raveendran2, KK Mueen Ahmed3,
1 Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, 08100 Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia
2 Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
3 Phcog.Net and SCIBIOLMED.ORg, Bore Bank Road Cross, Benson Town, Bangalore, India
Correspondence Address:
Subramani Parasuraman
Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, 08100 Bedong, Kedah
Malaysia
How to cite this article:
Parasuraman S, Raveendran R, Mueen Ahmed K K. Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives.J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2015;6:94-97
How to cite this URL:
Parasuraman S, Raveendran R, Mueen Ahmed K K. Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives. J Pharmacol Pharmacother [serial online] 2015 [cited 2015
Apr 25 ];6:94-97
Available from: http://www.jpharmacol.com/text.asp?2015/6/2/94/155487
Full Text
Scientific journals are in existence for more than 300 years and their role is to further t he progress of science by providing a platform to communicate new findings and the results of
scientific research. Publication of articles is a kind of documentation and journals are one of the most powerful tools for documentation. After the advent of computers, electronic
publication plays a major role in the field of science and medicine. [1] Publication process, like m any other systems, has evolved a code of c onduct which is called "publication ethics."
Publication Ethics may be defined as a self-regulatory mechanism insisting on integrity on the part of authors, peer reviewers and publishers to establish higher standards of editorial
processing f or the scholarly journals. Violation of publication ethics is a global problem which includes duplicate submission, multiple submissions, plagiarism, gift authorship, fake
affiliation, ghost authorship, pressured authorship, salami publication and fraud (fabrication and falsification) [2],[3] but excludes the honest errors committed by the authors. Plagiarism,
multiple submission (submission of the same article to more than one journal) and duplicate submission (single manuscript submitted more than once to the same journal) are a few of the
major issues faced by the authors of this article as the editors of biomedical journals. When a considerable amount of time is spent tackling t hese issues, there is a waste of human
resources and increase in office expenses. Apart from being unethical, multiple submissions can exaggerate the research findings, if the s ame article is published in different journals.
Violation of publication ethics corrodes the integrity of science. [4] While monitoring the status of articles withdrawn f rom the Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, we
noticed that a few of the submitted articles were published in other journals and the dates of submission in two journals were very close suggesting multiple submission. It prompted us to
delve into the issue of violation of publication ethics committed by the authors contributing articles to a few journals published by the Inpharm Association. Hence, we planned to analyze
the profile of unethical practices in three journals and suggest some possible reasons and remedies.
A retrospective analysis of scientific submissions to the Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics (JPP), Journal of Young Pharmacist (JYP) and Free-Radicals and
Antioxidants (FRA) with regard to violation of publication ethics was carried out. JPP, JYP and FRA are peer-reviewed scientific journals. The first two are supported by the Inpharm
Association and the last one is supported by SciBiolMed and Phcog.Net. A total of 2675 manuscripts were received through online manuscript management system of JPP, JYP and FRA
between January 2010 and December 2014 and 2575 manuscripts were included for the study. The articles submitted under the correspondence section were excluded from analysis.
The manuscripts submitted by the authors were screened for plagiarism using the online tools such as Duplichecker and iThenticate. The reports of plagiarism generated by the software
were verified manually to ensure plagiarism had actually taken place. An attempt was made t o detect multiple submissions by checking with electronic search engines such as Google,
Google Scholar, PubMed and Microsoft Academic Search for published titles which were similar or identical to the manuscripts withdrawn by the authors or rejected by the journal. When
the similarities were confirmed manually, the submission date of publication elsewhere and the manuscript processing dates in the above journals were compared.
The total number of submissions analyzed was 2575. A total of 301 (16.96%) manuscripts c ontained some degree of plagiarism. Multiple submissions were det ected with 35 (1.97%)
manuscripts and an equal number of manuscripts were submitted as new submissions when the identical manuscripts were already in process in t he same journal. Summary of author
submissions, average days taken for review, average days taken for publication are summarized in [Table 1]. The major reasons for rejection of manuscripts are plagiarism and
inappropriate submission (not in scope, incomplete submission). A total of 486 manuscripts (27%) were rejected because they w ere not in the s cope of the journal. Plagiarism was
detected in 301 manuscripts (17%) which were rejected. Manuscripts which had minimal plagiarism were sent back to authors for modification and the revised ones were considered for
further editorial process. Around 25% of manuscripts were rejected based on the recommendations of the reviewers and the editorial board members as they were not up to the standard
set by the journals. Four manuscripts dealing with clinical studies did not produce any evidence of approval of the study by an ethics committee. The reasons for rejection of manuscripts
submitted to JPP, JYP and FRA between January 2010 and December 2014 are summarized in [Table 2].{Table 1}{Table 2}
The major problems with respect to publication ethics were plagiarism and multiple submissions in the three journals. When the authors were challenged, many of them did not reply, and
wrote back saying that they would like to withdraw the manuscript, claimed ignorance or blamed their lack of English language skills. Many authors had copied the text from published
articles with citations and pasted them under the discussion section. To avoid delay in getting the manuscripts published, authors indulged in multiple submissions. 'Multiple submissions'
is almost impossible to detect while the manuscript is being processed. When the manuscript is accepted in one journal, the authors withdraw the same manuscript from other journals
stating that the manuscript processing cycle is too long for them to wait. When an author submits a manuscript to a scholarly journal, he/she declares that manuscript is currently not under
consideration for publication elsewhere, but many do not hesitate to violate the declaration.
Submitting the same manuscript as a new submission to the same journal could be due to lack of knowledge or experience in operating the online submission system. This could be a
manual error and can be rectified by the editor or one of the editorial staff during preliminary screening of the manuscript.
Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives...
http://www.jpharmacol.com/printarticle.asp?issn=0976-500X;year=2015...
1 of 2 25-04-2015 16:28
Sometimes authors provide unrelated or inappropriate affiliations which could not be verified. The institution where the work was carried out must be mentioned (on the byline) rather than
the institution where the author is currently working. The address of the current work place can be given under the correspondence address or in the footnote.
When the authors failed to submit evidence of ethics committee permission on a few occasions, it was difficult to decide whether any violation of research ethics was involved. Authors
should have in their possession, all the necessary source documents in original including the ethics committee permission letter (if applicable), data output sheets from the instruments,
important communications and copies of the cited papers in the manuscript at least for a few years. The JPP editors have in the past asked a few authors to submit copies of the cited
papers in their manuscript and the ethics committee permission letter.
The scientific publication process is by and large built on trust. T he mechanisms currently put in place to detect the unethical practices cannot be foolproof. A cunning and more
determined author can break the regulations and get away with it. More often than not t he unethical publication practices come to light by chance rather than design to detect them. That
calls for self-regulation on the part of the authors and journals should exhort them to follow the code of conduct. However, that does not mean the journals should stop screening for the
violation of code of publication. Authors have equal, if not more responsibility in maintaining the ethical standard of the existing publication process. Realization of this fact and playing
their role with all sincerity and honesty will definitely bring down the instances of unethical publication practices. Authors should be made t o realize "authorship implies not just credit but
responsibility too".
Case: 1
Mr.X submitted a manuscript (case report) to JPP on 15/03/13. A decision to send it for revision w as taken by JPP on 25/03/13.The author submitted the rev ised manuscript which was
sent back to the author again for further corrections as the suggestions of the editorial board were not complied with. But the author never responded even after sending many reminders.
Meanwhile one of the JPP editorial staff accidentally identified the article with the same title published in "Journal Y" by the same author. The manuscript was submitted to the above
journal on 20/01/13.When the author was questioned he responded after a month by simply sending a withdrawal request [Figure 1]. Timeline history of submission of Mr. X in "Journal Y"
and JPP are as follows:{Figure 1}
[INLINE:1]
COMMENT
The author submitted a manuscript to JPP when it was under consideration elsewhere. This amounted to violation of publication ethics.
Case: 2
Mr. X submitted a case report w hich was published in 2013.After t he publication of the article, one of the readers pointed out that it was plagiarized and the data were copied from a
previously published article. When the author was queried it was revealed that the work was not carried out in the hospital where he was affiliated but in the one where he worked
previously. But this fact was not mentioned in the article. The article was retracted because of plagiarism and inappropriate author affiliation.
COMMENT
A manuscript should present the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The author not only plagiarized the article but failed to give the det ails of the place where the work was
carried out and his failure led to the assumption that the work was done in the hospital of his affiliation given in the article.
References
1 Parasuraman S, Mueen Ahmed KK. Issues in manuscript writing. J Young Pharm 2013;5:35-7.
2 Raveendran R. Unethical publication practices: How should we deal with them? Indian J Pharmacol 2006;38:3-4.
3 Tandon VR, Mahajan A, Sharma S, Gupta SK. Unethical publication practices. JK Science 2006;8:123-4.
4 Kim SY. Double submission, double publication. Korean J Fam Med 2012;33:69.
Saturday, April 25, 2015
Site Map | Home | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives...
http://www.jpharmacol.com/printarticle.asp?issn=0976-500X;year=2015...
2 of 2 25-04-2015 16:28
... Publication ethics is the code of conduct during the publication process and may be defined as the self-regulatory mechanism that upholds integrity for the authors, peer reviewers, and publishers to maintain high standards of editorial processing for journals. 2 The purpose of this editorial is to heighten awareness of ethics regarding nursing publication and to share helpful resources, including how to maintain publication ethics during the research dissemination process. First, specific violations of publication ethics and biases in the research literature are defined and discussed. ...
... With the advancement of technology, the electronic publication of articles plays a large role in the dissemination of science to affect clinical practice. 2 When there is a violation to the publication processes and/or data reporting, there is potential to circulate false information, which can negatively affect patient care. Violation of publication ethics is an international and global issue and includes, but is not limited to, multiple or duplicate submissions, plagiarism, gift authorship, fabrication, and falsification and different types of biases. ...
... When 3 journals, Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, Journal of Young Pharmacist, and Free-Radicals and Antioxidants, completed a retrospective analysis of scientific submissions, plagiarism and multiple submissions were found to be the major problems in publication ethics. 2 One form of plagiarism is when authors copy text from other articles verbatim in their own papers. Another form of plagiarism is self-plagiarism. ...
... Violation of publication ethics is a worldwide concern and it includes various reasons such as plagiarism and replication, coerced authorship, fake affiliation, and fraud. Specifically, the key problems faced by the editors of biomedical journals (Parasuraman et al. 2015) are plagiarism, multiple submissions (submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously) and duplicate submissions (submission of single manuscript to the same more than once). There are an increased number of breaches of publication ethics that occur and are published (Ali and Ali 2017). ...
... There are an increased number of breaches of publication ethics that occur and are published (Ali and Ali 2017). This rapid production of retracted papers is motivated primarily by misconduct (Fang et al. 2012;Parasuraman et al. 2015). There is a good or bad observation on the retractions. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the present study is to identify retracted articles in the biomedical literature (co) authored by Indian authors and to examine the features of retracted articles. The PubMed database was searched to find the retracted articles in order to reach the goal. The search yielded 508 records and retrieved for the detailed analysis of: authorships and collaboration type, funding information, who retracts? journals and impact factors, and reasons for retraction. The results show that most of the biomedical articles retracted were published after 2010 and common reasons are plagiarism and fake data for retraction. More than half of the retracted articles were co-authored within the institutions and there is no repeat offender. 25% of retracted articles were published in the top 15 journals and 33% were published in the non-impact factor journals. Average time from publication to retraction is calculated to 2.86 years and retractions due to fake data takes longest period among the reasons. Majority of the funded research was retracted due to fake data whereas it is plagiarism for non-funded.
... Authors were sometimes included in a list without their permission. [14] Even if this is done with the benign intention to acknowledge some contributions, it is problematic since authors carry responsibility for correctness and thus need to have the opportunity to check the manuscript and possibly demand changes. To overcome this, contribution forms has to be signed by each author so that they are aware of the things. ...
... [6] Today shared authorship is common in most academic disciplines to increase the number of publications. [13,14] Increase in academic pressure toward research and assumption that increase in number of publications will give security, satisfy the ego one has started in an unethical, and unhealthy competition setting a race violating the basic human values and ethics. ...
Article
Full-text available
Scientific journals have a role to further progress science by providing a platform to communicate new findings and the results of scientific research. Publication of articles is a kind of documentation and journals are one of the most important tools for documentation. Now a day, the electronic publication has a major role in the field of science contributing to accessibility. Like other fields, even publication process has a code of conduct which is called as “publication ethics.” This is a self-regulatory mechanism insisting on integrity on the part of authors, peer reviewers, and publishers to establish higher standards of editorial processing for the research. Violation of publication ethics is a global problem, and it is due to the scientific misbehavior.
... Publication is a trustworthy process, and author has to respect the publication ethics. 2 Accuracy of the data published Authors are the responsible persons for the data (in their articles) presented in the journal. Sometimes, the editor may not able to assess the quality of data presented in the journal, and he/ she may seek help from the review process to to aid in the final decision. ...
... Publication is a trustworthy process, and author has to respect the publication ethics. 2 Accuracy of the data published Authors are the responsible persons for the data (in their articles) presented in the journal. Sometimes, the editor may not able to assess the quality of data presented in the journal, and he/ she may seek help from the review process to to aid in the final decision. ...
Article
Full-text available
Double publication can be defined as "publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media".1) The practice of duplicate publications is considered unethical because it exaggerates the findings, wastes the times of editors, peer reviewers, and readers, and also breaks the integrity of science.2) Double publication can be started with double (or multiple) submission. Double submission can be defined as "the submission of a paper to a journal after that is under concurrent review by another publication". Authors should only submit original work that has neither appeared elsewhere for publication, nor which was under review for another refereed publication. Guidelines for authors of many journals contain prohibition of double submission. For example, in instructions for author of Diabetes Care, we can find such a policy as follows. "Diabetes Care publishes only material that has not been published previously (either in print or electronically) and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere". Recently we found a case of double submission. In the course of review, a reviewer of the Korean Journal of Family Medicine (KJFM) found that the manuscript was already published in a foreign Science Citation Index (SCI) journal. Double submission is also considered unethical because it may result in double publication. Double submission can take place for many reasons: the author may not know that double submission is unethical, may be a junior researcher, or may not want to delay publication. Whatever the reason, double submission is a form of publishing misconduct. For the previous case, we will contact corresponding author, will state that submitted work has already been published elsewhere, and will ask for explanation about that. If the author gives a sufficient and reasonable explanation, we reject the submission without penalties. However, if the author does not respond, the explanation is unsatisfactory, or the author admits guilt, we will reject the submission with penalties, for example, sending a letter of warning, imposing a ban on submissions to KJFM for one or two years, or informing the author's superior about the misconduct. Double submission remains one of the least well understood forms of publishing misconduct, and has significant negative impact on the research community. Establishing clear guidelines and training junior researchers sufficiently can help reduce the problem of double submission.
Article
Writing a manuscript is an art of science... Publishing is a kind of documentation to be used for further advancement in research. If it is not documented, it is equal to not being done; this statement itself highlights the importance of documentation/publishing in the field of scientific research. The word "RESEARCH" itself is self-explanatory and it is defined as searching the elements from the existing galaxy. So every researcher is searching for something in the existing galaxy and the person who documents/publishes first will get credit. The process of documentation started in the Neolithic human period itself. They used to make symbols and identification marks when they moved from one place to another and those markings are identifiable till date. We see written scripts in rock temples, pyramids and ancient cultural centers; through this, we can now understand the lifestyle of ancient culture and civilization. From Neolithic to modern humans, the most common unchanged character observed is documentation; but the way of documentation has been changing from time to time. In the modern era, publication is one of the most powerful tools for documentation. Electronic publication plays a major role in the field of science and medicine. In the past few years, while managing the articles that have been submitted to the Journal of Young Pharmacists [www.jyoungpharm.org] and the Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics [www.jpharmacol.com], we observed a wide variety of issues with the submitted manuscripts. In this Editorial, we would like to share some of our experiences, which could help authors to overcome the shortfalls and prepare the manuscript better in order to avoid rejections. It is a part of our duty to highlight such issues to audiences/authors and readers to make them understand the problems associated with writing manuscripts to any scientific journals.
Article
Unethical Publication Practice is a global problem. Journals at large are facing a huge problem of unethical practices in the publication. JK Science strongly discourages such practices and aims to bring this serious issue in notice.