ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Agricultural practices have a substantial impact on many ecosystems worldwide, and give rise to variety of ecological problems. Soil degradation is one the key areas in which agriculture impacts upon ecology. Soil erosion is a result of poor farming practices which cause removal of vegetation cover from soils, the use of large fields without boundaries to slow water movement and inappropriate ploughing techniques all stimulate soil erosion. Salinity of soil is another important factor which limits the use of this natural resource. In present review the causes, the cost of soil erosion and certain soil conservation practices have been discussed.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1(4), pp. 50-55, 2014
Available online at http://www.ijsrpub.com/ijsras
ISSN: 2345-6795; ©2014 IJSRPUB
http://dx.doi.org/10.12983/ijsras-2014-p0050-0055
50
Editorial Publication
Soil Degradation: A Challenge to Sustainable Agriculture
Afroz Alam
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk-304 022 (Rajasthan), India
*Corresponding Author: afrozalamsafvi@gmail.com
Received 10 June 2014; Accepted 04 July 2014
Abstract. Agricultural practices have a substantial impact on many ecosystems worldwide, and give rise to variety of
ecological problems. Soil degradation is one the key areas in which agriculture impacts upon ecology. Soil erosion is a result
of poor farming practices which cause removal of vegetation cover from soils, the use of large fields without boundaries to
slow water movement and inappropriate ploughing techniques all stimulate soil erosion. Salinity of soil is another important
factor which limits the use of this natural resource. In present review the causes, the cost of soil erosion and certain soil
conservation practices have been discussed.
Keywords: Agriculture, conservation, degradation, erosion, farming, soil, salinity.
1. INTRODUCTION
Few ecosystems worldwide escape the impact of
human activity, and one pervasive influence is
agricultural activity, which necessarily involves gross
changes to the local ecosystem, and may have more
wide-reaching effects (Eswaran et al., 1997a).
Conservation and augmentation of quality of
natural resources principally of soil and water are the
central to ensuring food security of the growing
population. Ever-increasing salinity of these two
principal resources along with soil erosion is the
foremost restraint on our capacity for sustainable
agriculture to ensure food security. To avoid the
productive lands from getting salinized as well as to
make use of the existing salty land and water, it is
necessary to correct the harmful condition through
application of proper technology.
Soil degradation is the decline in soil characteristic
originated by its inappropriate use, typically for
agricultural, pastural, industrial or urban causes
(Johnson and Lewis, 1995). It is a severe universal
ecological crisis and may be aggravated by weather
change. Soil degradation is one of the most important
threats facing mankind which not only weakens the
productive capability of an ecosystem but also affects
overall climate (Barrow, 1991). Having already
affected more than two billion hectares of land
globally, the typical rate of soil degradation is almost
8-9 m ha/yr as per FAO/UNEP recent approximation.
A large fraction of Indian land shows clear indication
of advanced and nonstop degradation, frightening to
destabilize our capacity to augment food production
and improve pastoral poverty. The socio-economic
and ecological consequences are massive (Beinroth et
al., 1994).
It has been estimated that due to desertification and
soil erosion the productivity of some lands has
declined by 50%. For instance, in African countries,
the yield reduction due to previous soil erosion may
range from 2 to 40%, with an average loss of 8.2% for
the continent (Darkoh, 1995; Eswaran et al., 1997b).
Likewise, in South Asia, annual loss in productivity is
estimated at 36 million tons of cereal equivalent
valued at US$5,400 million by water erosion, and
US$1,800 million due to wind erosion. Globally the
annual loss of 75 billion tons of soil costs the world
about US$400 billion per year, or approximately
US$70 per person per year (Crosson, 1997).
Just about 3% of the global land surface can be
regarded as or Class I land (Prime) and this is not
occur in the tropics (Lal, 1994; 2009). An added 8%
of land is in Classes II and III. This 11% of land must
give food to the six billion people today and the 7.6
billion expected in 2020. Desertification is
experienced on 33% of the global land surface and
affects more than one billion people (Darkoh, 1995).
1.1. The causes of soil degradation
Good soil produces good vegetation which provides
food and habitat for animals. A major concern of good
Alam
Soil Degradation: A Challenge to Sustainable Agriculture
51
soil management is keeping soil in place and
maintaining its fertility. Once lost soil is irreplaceable
i.e. 1 cm of soil may take more than 500 years to
form, yet can be lost within a year. Soil erosion and
the loss of fertility due to salinity as a result of poor
farming practices are serious problems globally
(Hartemink, 1995). Indigenous systems are
insufficient alone to prevent agricultural land from
continuing to loss productive soil, water and nutrient
resources. This is partly because not all farmland is
protected by conservation measures, but also because
not all erosion arises from farmland. Both roads and
urban areas concentrates water flows and
nonagricultural areas are also subjected to erosion.
Farmers may not be conserving soil and water due to
lack of local knowledge and skills, or they may be
unwilling to invest in conservation measures if the
economic cost is greater than the benefits (Oldeman et
al., 1992). For instance, the high price of wheat has
encouraged winter cultivation in fragile environments,
which has led to a large increase in soil erosion
(UNEP, 1992; 1993; 1994). Soil erosion can in the
order of 30-100 tons per hectare in fields where
hedges have been removed. Erosion is greatest where
there is little vegetation cover, such as during winter,
and when slopes are long, such as big fields
(Fahnestock et al., 1995). To farmers, erosion reduces
the biological productivity of soils and the capacity to
sustain productivity in the future. Soil erosion may
also cause widespread flooding as soil becomes less
able to retain water. The importance of land
degradation among global issues is increased because
of its blow on world food security and quality of the
environment. High population density is not
essentially related to land deprivation; it is what a
inhabitants does to the land that decides the extent of
dreadful conditions. Inhabitants can be a major
advantage in overturning a trend towards degradation.
Nevertheless, they need to be politically strong and
economically motivated to care for the land, as
survival agriculture, scarcity, and illiteracy can be
important causes of land and environmental
degradation (Mermut and Eswaran, 1997).
Ecosystem services provided by soils are vital to
the carbon and water cycles and include cultural
functions. There are strong links between climate
change and soil condition (Virmani et al., 1994).
In simple terms, soil degradation includes physical,
chemical and biological deterioration. Examples of
soil degradation are loss of organic matter,
unfavorable changes in salinity, acidity or alkalinity,
and the effects of toxic chemicals, decreased soil
fertility, decline in structural state, erosion, pollutants
or excessive flooding.
Fig. 1: Types of Land degradation
International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1(4), pp. 50-55, 2014
52
Degradation possibly caused physically by taking
away of top soil through water and wind erosion,
reduced capability to store water, augmented
receptiveness to overflow and gradual absorption of
soluble salts in root zone (Fig. 1). Overgrazing,
increase of canal irrigation, unrestrained urbanization
and surface mining etc. are some of the other actions
that prop up degradation of soil.
Chemical degradation results in internal soil
corrosion resulting from buildup of chemical
substances like salts or loss of nutrients in addition
through physical processes including water logging.
The influences of physical and chemical degradation
are straightforwardly noticeable. But the cost of
biological degradation caused due to decline in
organic matter, biomass carbon, decline in diversity
and activity of flora and fauna are more restrained.
Salinity is the buildup of salt in soil and water to a
level that impacts on the normal and built
surroundings. Salinity occurs naturally in several parts
of the landscape but in several cases has been worsens
where human activities hasten the mobilization and
buildup of salt. Today extend of salinity impacts
farms, wetlands, rivers, irrigation areas, drinking
water and infrastructure. It is a global issue at present.
It has taken many decades for the problem to appear
and will be with us for a long time to come. Solving it
is a shared responsibility involving land managers,
conservationists, native communities, scientists,
businesses and all levels of government (Mackenzie et
al., 1999).
Salinization is a prevalent problem in irrigated
agriculture, dropping the world's irrigated area by 1
2% each year. The salinization badly affects
agricultural land right across the country, but is most
severe in dry areas such as Rajasthan. As a result crop
growth and yield are poor in this particular region.
This situation hits badly on the livelihood of farmers,
reducing their profits or even forcing them their land.
Reducing the consequence of salinization in
agriculture is decisive for attaining food security. But
in India and other affected countries, lucid approaches
for reducing or managing salinity in agriculture are
inadequate.
1.2. The cost of Soil degradation
Most agricultural systems are based on short term-
economic gain and as soil erosion occurs so gradually
that it is almost imperceptible it may not, in the short-
term, appears serious. Fifteen tons of soil lost from a
hectare of land in single storm will diminish soil depth
by 1 mm. However, tons of soil is ejected from
various rivers into respective gulfs ever second.
Eroded soil is not simply a loss of a valuable resource;
it can cause air, water and land pollution. The great
soil erosion event of the south and southwest USA in
the 1930s lead to the area being called the ‘Dust bowl’
from the level of air pollution.
The main blow of soil degradation is a
considerable reduction in the productivity of soil and
land directly affecting those whose employment
depends on this natural source. There are adequate
evidences (Blaikie and Brookfield, 1987; Barrow,
1991; Johnson and Lewis, 1995) that undoubtedly
reveal the fact that land degradation affects all aspects
of life.
Certain agricultural practices also diminish soil
fertility. Soil that is continually cropped or grazed will
eventually lose its fertility because the normal cycle
that returns mineral-rich dead plant matter to the soil
is disrupted. Soil compaction that results from the use
of heavy machinery can destroy the structure of soil,
restrict water infiltration and lead to increased erosion.
The problem of soil erosion is greatest in the third
World where extensive areas of land are cleared for
food production. Population growth puts stress on the
need for increased agricultural production as well as
the clearing of land for cropping and firewood
supplies (Sajjapongse, 1998).
However, despite these problems, some efforts to
improve erosion control have been successful. In
Ethiopia, walls of rock and earth are built across
hillsides to catch eroding soil. This forms natural
terraces to help reduce further erosion. In Australia,
wide-spread use of fencerows and hedgerows as
physical barriers helps prevent wind erosion of
agricultural fields (Mackenzie et al., 1999).
1.3. Soil conservation practices
Many issues that deal with those working in the
domain of land resources comprise technologies to
decrease degradation and also the techniques to
evaluate and observe land degradation. A number of
difficulties remain unreciprocated and these include
predictability of land degradation, sufficiency of early
warning indicators of land degradation, absence of
land tenure and the resulting lack of stewardship,
societal responsibility of soil scientists regarding
anthropogenic induced decline in soil quality,
development of full proof public policy, international
collaboration to reduce the problem at global level,
quantification of the aesthetic value of land,
quantification of consumption of land etc (Stocking,
1986).
There are three steps involved in the management
of the problem: assessment, monitoring, and
application of mitigating technologies. All three steps
are in the tasks of agriculturists and particularly, soil
scientists. The last step without a doubt has the job for
soil science, and over the past decade considerable
Alam
Soil Degradation: A Challenge to Sustainable Agriculture
53
advancement has been made in awaking the dangers
of land degradation (Mabbutt, 1992).
Soil science has made noteworthy aid to the
mission of soil resource assessment but its users have
shown modest or no curiosity in the additional task of
monitoring the resource base (Mermut and Eswaran,
1997; Tilman et al., 2002). This still remains a new
area of investigation requiring guidelines, standards,
and procedures. The challenge is to accept an
internationally good enough method for this task. Soil
scientists have a compulsion not only to show the
spatial distribution of stressed systems but also to
provide realistic estimates of their rates of
degradation. They should develop early warning
indicators of degradation to allow them to collaborate
with others, such as social scientists, to develop and
implement mitigating technologies. Soil scientists also
have a role in assisting national decision-makers to
develop appropriate land use policies.
1.4. Challenges and Management Strategies
Land degradation remains a serious global threat but
the science concerning it contains both myths and
facts (Greenland et al., 1994). The debate is
perpetuated by confusion, misunderstanding, and
misinterpretation of the available information. There
are many, usually puzzling, reasons why land users
allow their land to degrade. Many of the reasons are
related to community opinions of land and the values
they place on land. Degradation is also a slow
unnoticeable process and so many people are not
conscious that their land is degrading. Creating
awareness and building up a sense of stewardship are
important steps in the challenge of reducing
degradation. Accordingly, suitable technology is only
a fractional response. The key resolution lies in the
behaviour of the farmer who is subject to economic
and social pressures of the community/country in
which they live. Food security, environmental
balance, and land degradation are strongly inter-linked
and each must be addressed in the context of the other
to have measurable impact (Pimentel et al., 1995).
Important challenges include: Encouragement of
the scientific community to build up an integrated
programme for methods, standards, data collection,
and research networks for evaluation and monitoring
of soil and land degradation. Improvement of land use
models that put together both natural and human-
induced factors that contribute to land degradation and
that could be used for land use planning and
management. Strengthening of the information
systems that connect environmental monitoring,
accounting, and impact depth to land degradation,
development of strategies that persuades sustainable
land use and management and assist in the greater use
of land resource information for sustainable
agriculture. Making certain economic instruments for
the assessment of land ruin and encourage the
sustainable use of land resources, rationalization of
the wide range of terminology and definitions with
different meanings among different regulations
associated with land degradation. Regularity of
evaluation methods for the extent of land degradation.
Development of non-uniform criteria for evaluating
the severity of land degradation. Get the better of the
difficulty in evaluating the on-farm economic impact
of land degradation on productivity. There is an
urgent need to address these issues through a multi-
disciplinary approach, but the most urgent need is to
develop an objective, quantifiable, and precise
concept based on scientific principles.
2. CONCLUSION
It has been known for some time that a number of
methods can be engaged to reduce soil erosion. By
ploughing a field at right angles to the slope, furrows
follow the contours of land rather than the slope. By
using this contour ploughing system, water erosion is
reduced. Planting crops on areas of bare field helps to
prevent soil erosion. If leguminous (Family Fabaceae)
plants are used as cover crops, nitrogen will be fixed
and the nitrogen content of the soil increased. No-till
farming is a system that consists of planting a narrow
slit trench without ploughing the soil. By reducing soil
disturbance, soil erosion is reduced (Ruppenthal,
1995). These systems, along with crop rotation can all
be used to decrease soil loss and fertility. However,
although these techniques are widely known, progress
has been slow in establishing these practices. In
addition, no-tilling farming often uses herbicides,
invoking other problems. Therefore an international
effort is required to combat this ever increasing
problem for sustainable agriculture (UNCED, 1992).
Organization like ICARDA is one such effort which is
doing serious work in this direction through its nation
partnerships with agricultural ministries and research
agencies in Central Asia, Iraq, Iran and Egypt by
providing research-based surviving tactics for farmers
and water managers dealing with salinization. Their
experience, the practices developed with partners, and
research is also beneficial for other areas of the world
where agricultural production is threatened by
increasing levels of salinity, including India, Pakistan,
China and other nations.
REFERENCES
Barrow CJ (1991). Land Degradation: Development
and Breakdown of Terrestrial
International Journal of Scientific Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1(4), pp. 50-55, 2014
54
Environments.Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Beinroth FH, Eswaran H, Reich PF, Van Den Berg E
(1994). Land related stresses in
agroecosystems. In: Stressed Ecosystems and
Sustainable Agriculture, eds. S.M. Virmani,
J.C. Katyal, H. Eswaran, and I.P. Abrol. New
Delhi: Oxford and IBH.
Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987). Land Degradation and
Society. London: Methuen.
Crosson PR (1997). The on-farm economic costs of
erosion. In: Methods for Assessment of Land
Degradation, eds. R. Lal, W.E.H. Blum, C.
Valentin and B.A. Stewart. Boca Raton: CRC.
Darkoh MK (1995). The deterioration of the
environment in Africa’s drylands and river
basins. Desertification Control Bulletin, 24, 35
41.
Eswaran H, Reich PF, Beinroth FH (1997a). Global
distribution of soils with acidity. In: Plant-Soil
Interactions at Low pH: Sustainable Agriculture
and Forestry Production. eds. A.Z. Moniz,
A.M.C. Furlani, R.E. Schaffert, N.K. Fageria,
C.A. Rosolem and H. Cantarella, 159164.
(Proceedings of the 4th International
Symposium on Plant-Soil Interactions at Low
pH, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.)
Eswaran H, Almaraz R, Reich PF, Zdruli PF (1997b).
Soil quality and soil productivity in Africa.
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture,10, 7594.
Fahnestock P, Lal R, Hall GF (1995). Land use and
erosional effects on two Ohio Alfisols. Crop
yields. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 7,
85100.
Greenland DJ, Bowen G, Eswaran H, Rhoades R,
Valentin C (1994). Soil, Water, and Nutrient
Management Research: A New Agenda.
IBSRAM Position Paper. Bangkok: IBSRAM.
Hartemink AE (1995). Land fertility decline under
sisal cultivation in Tanzania. ISRIC Technical
Paper 28. Wageningen: ISRIC.
Johnson Dl, Lewis La (1995). Land Degradation:
Creation and Destruction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lal R (1994). Tillage effects on soil degradation, soil
resilience, soil quality, and sustainability. Soil
Tillage Research,27, 18.
Lal R (2009). Soils and Sustainable Agriculture: A
Review. In: Sustainable Agriculture. eds. E.
Lichtfouse et al., 15-23.
Mabbutt JA (1992). Degradation of the Australian
drylands: a historical approach. In: Degradation
and Restoration of Arid Lands, ed. H.E.
Dregne, 2798. Lubbock: Texas Technical
University.
Mackenzie A, Ball AS, Virdee SR (1999). The
ecology of agriculture. Instant Notes in
Ecology. Viva Book Private Limited. New
Delhi, 295-298.
Mermut AR, Eswaran H (1997). Opportunities for soil
science in a milieu of reduced funds. Canadian
Journal of Soil Science, 77, 17.
Oldeman LR, Hakkeling RTA, Sombroek WG (1992).
World Map of the Status of Human-induced
Soil Degradation: An Explanatory Note.
Wageningen: ISRIC.
Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K,
Kurz D, Mcnair M, Crist S, Shpritz L, Fitton L,
Saffouri R, Blair R (1995). Environmental and
economic costs of soil erosion. Science, 267,
11171123.
Ruppenthal M (1995). Soil Conservation in Andean
Cropping Systems: Soil Erosion and Crop
Productivity in Traditional and Forage-Legume
Based Cassava Cropping Systems in the South
Colombian Andes. Weikersheim: Verlag Josef
Margraf.
Sajjapongse A (1998). ASIALAND Management of
Sloping Lands Network: An Overview of Phase
3.Network Document No. 23, Bangkok:
IBSRAM.
Stocking M (1986). The cost of soil erosion in
Zimbabwe in terms of the loss of three major
nutrients. Consultant’s Working Paper No. 3.,
Soil Conservation Programme. Rome: FAO
Land and Water Division.
Tilman D, Kenneth G, Cassman, Pamela A, Matson,
Rosamond N, Polasky S (2002). Agricultural
sustainability and intensive production
practices. Nature, 318, 671-677.
UNCED (1992). United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro:
UN.
UNEP (1992). World Atlas of Desertification.
London: Edward Arnold.
UNEP (1993). Good news in the fight against
desertification. Desertification Control Bulletin,
22, 3.
UNEP (1994). Land Degradation in South Asia: Its
Severity, Causes and Effects upon the People.
INDP/UNEP/FAO. World Soil Resources
Report 78. Rome: FAO.
Virmani SM, Katyal JC, Eswaran H, Abrol I Eds.
(1994). Stressed Agroecosystems and
Sustainable Agriculture. New Delhi: Oxford
and IBH.
Alam
Soil Degradation: A Challenge to Sustainable Agriculture
55
Dr. Afroz Alam, working as Associate Professor in the Department of Bioscience and
Biotechnology, Banasthali University, Rajasthan. He is currently supervising seven Ph. D.
students in different aspects of Plant Science. He has vast experience of teaching and research in
plant science. He has over 60 research publications in prestigious International and National
Journals and a 4 text books with reputed publication houses to his credit. He is life member of
various associations of Plant Sciences.
... A. Soil Degradation: Soil degradation is caused by many factors such as soil erosion, overgrazing, deforestation, repeated cropping, soil contamination, tillage practices, and lack of irrigation and nutrient management (Alam., 2014). The topsoil is rich in nutrients and organic matter which is disturbed by human activities and this reduces agricultural productivity and soil fertility (Sajjapongse., 1998). ...
... The contamination of soil is exposed to a wide range of contaminants, including pesticides and antibiotics, heavy metals like lead, aluminum, cadmium, and iron, and industrial pollutants (Kumar., 2021;Roy and Basu., 2009). Excessive logging for commercialization causes loss of biodiversity and contributes to soil erosion, compaction, and degradation (Alam., 2014). These are the reasons for soil degradation. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Biotechnology has emerged as an important tool to address the multifaceted challenges facing modern agriculture. Biotechnological innovations offer promising prospects for achieving sustainable agriculture as global population growth, climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation increase challenges to traditional farming practices. Agriculture has been transformed by genetically modifying crops to impart traits such as pest resistance, drought tolerance, and improved nutritional value. The development of tailored agricultural improvements is simultaneously enabled by advanced gene-editing methods such as CRISPR-Cas9. These methods allow precise genome modification without the introduction of foreign genes. Through precision agriculture supported by data analysis, satellite imagery, and sensor technology, farmers can efficiently allocate resources and have minimal impact on the environment. Biotechnology is used in integrated pest management (IPM) systems to improve biological pest control, reduce the use of chemical pesticides, and protect beneficial ecosystems. Biopesticides developed from microorganisms or natural substances offer an environmentally sound alternative to man-made chemicals in the field of crop protection. Biotechnology has also enabled the production of disease-resistant crop varieties and hytoremediation plants that can improve soil health in contaminated areas. Biotechnology is used in sustainable agricultural techniques for soil conservation, nutrient management, and the promotion of organic farming. By introducing beneficial microbes and cultivating nitrogen-fixing crops that reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers, modern biotechnology contributes to soil restoration. Incorporating biotechnology into sustainable agricultural practices improves food security, increases economic stability for farmers, and fully exploits the potential of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture, however, issues including legal framework, public perception, and equal access to biotechnology development need to be addressed. Numerous problems of sustainable agriculture can be solved with the use of biotechnology methods. These advances have enabled a more resilient and sustainable future for agriculture, allowing farmers to produce more food with fewer resources and with no adverse environmental impacts.
... Furthermore, the effectiveness of land use management serves to stop (or, at least, slow down) the negative impacts of land use on natural resources [71]. In addition, an adverse process is often understood as the degradation of soil cover under the influence of various types of erosion [72]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Increases in the number of urban residents have significant impacts on spatial pressure, affecting the utilization of river basins. The purpose of this study is to analyze (1) the increase in population and changes in spatial use as determinants of the complexity of the watershed ecosystem; (2) the effect of housing development, urban activity systems, and land use changes on the degradation of the environmental quality of the watershed; and (3) the direct and indirect effects of changes in spatial use, land reclamation, and community behavior on water pollution and the sustainability of watershed management in Maros City. The research method used is a sequential explanatory design combining quantitative and qualitative research methods. Data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, surveys, and documentation. The study findings show that land use change, complexity of spatial use, and community behavior have a negative impact on the environmental quality of the watershed. Housing development, urban activity systems, and changes in land use had a significant effect on environmental quality degradation, with a coefficient of determination of 73.9%. Furthermore, the influence of spatial use, land reclamation, and community behavior on water pollution in the watershed was 72.82%. This study may serve to assist the decision-making of and policy formation by the Maros Regency Government in the framework of controlling the use of watersheds, working towards their social, economic, and environmental sustainability.
... Nutrient Cycling: Bryophytes influence nitrogen and phosphorus cycling, absorb nutrients from precipitation, and support nitrogen-fixing bacteria, enriching soil and promoting vascular plant growth 35,36 . They also aid ecological restoration by helping recover nutrient cycling in degraded habitats 37,38 . Habitat Provision: Bryophytes, as ecosystem engineers, create microhabitats for various organisms, including invertebrates, fungi, and microorganisms. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bryophytes, including mosses, liverworts, and hornworts, are non-vascular plants that are increasingly recognized for their potential in environmental remediation, particularly in the field of phytoremediation. These plants possess unique biological characteristics, such as high surface-area-to-volume ratios, tolerance to diverse environmental conditions, and efficient absorption mechanisms, which enable them to accumulate or degrade various pollutants from air, water, and soil. Bryophytes have demonstrated significant potential in the remediation of heavy metals, organic contaminants, and radioactive substances, as well as in the restoration of ecosystems affected by pollution. This review explores the mechanisms by which bryophytes contribute to phytoremediation, including absorption, bioaccumulation, and the breakdown of contaminants, and examines their application in different environmental contexts. The article also addresses the challenges and future prospects of using bryophytes in phytoremediation practices, highlighting the need for further research to enhance their efficiency and applicability.
... For instance, historical data indicate that losses attributed to soil erosion have varied from 2% to 40%, with a mean loss of 8.2% across major continents [3] . Similarly, the global yearly depletion of 75 billion tons of soil leads to a global economic loss of approximately US$400 billion per year, which equates to approximately US$70 per person per year [4] . Only 3% of the Earth's land surface is classified as Class I (prime), with a notable lack of such land in tropical regions [5] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Soil is a crucial nonrenewable resource for agriculture and has a direct impact on food security. However, the decline in crop yield post-Green Revolution suggested soil health deterioration due to soil degradation through harmful chemicals and anthropogenic activities. Therefore, restoring the health of the land and the environment is very important. In the last ten years, there has been a large increase in interest in soil health around the world. Many government, nongovernmental, and private sector groups are working on developing monitoring and assessment techniques. The concept of soil health is defined as the continuous capacity of soil to function as a vital ecosystem service supporting plants, animals, and humans. Biofertilizers, vermicompost, farmyard and green manure, and biopesticides are natural fertilizers that can be used instead of chemical fertilizers. This can help crops grow well while also being good for the land and climate. This brief study focused on soil health indicators such as soil biological, chemical, and physical properties and the urgent need for soil health restoration through the adoption of regenerative agriculture management practices.
... Siderophore-producing microbes (SPM), on the other hand, produce a variety of iron-chelating compounds that help alleviate plant stress in iron-deficient soils. These microbes not only supply iron to plants but also function as biofertilizers and biocontrol agents, making them essential components of sustainable agriculture [24] . ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated the isolation and screening of soil microbial communities from the rhizosphere of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) for their siderophore production capabilities and evaluated their growth-promoting effects on cowpea. These siderophore-producing isolates were tested for their effects on cowpea growth, showing significant improvements in plant height, biomass, and chlorophyll content under iron-deficient conditions. The combination of siderophore-producing microbes with essential nutrients such as zinc, potassium, and phosphate led to the most notable results, including a 20% increase in plant height (up to 24 cm), a 40% increase in dry biomass (5.0 g), and higher chlorophyll content (SPAD reading of 17.0). Additionally, four of the siderophore-producing isolates exhibited antimicrobial activity, forming inhibition zones of up to 15 mm, suggesting a dual role in promoting plant health by enhancing nutrient uptake and suppressing pathogens. These findings highlight the potential of siderophore-producing microbes as effective bioinoculants to boost cowpea growth and resilience in nutrient-deficient and stressed environments. Further research, including field trials, is recommended to confirm their agricultural applicability.
Article
The challenge of agriculture, which serves as the foundation of human civilization, faces threats from multiple sources including pests, soil erosion, and unpredictable weather patterns. These challenges can affect agricultural productivity, food security, and environmental sustainability. Among other solutions, microbial metabolites can provide hope. These secondary metabolites are naturally produced by microorganisms during metabolism, and consist of a broad range of compounds with varied roles. These include acting as biofertilizers, biopesticides, and plant growth promoters, thereby assuring sustainable agriculture. These metabolic metabolites help to liberate nutrients and improve the soil structure. They are also important biocontrol agents for reducing plant pathogens and pests. These metabolites are essential for nutrient cycling, soil fertility and crop productivity. There are many advantages to using microbial metabolites in agriculture, such as low dependence on chemical pesticides and fertilizers, increased crop productivity, and improved crop health. The production, formulation, consistency, and regulatory framework challenges must be resolved before they can be accepted widely. The future of agriculture will be shaped by advancements in microbial metabolite research, integrated with cutting-edge agricultural technologies and supported by aligned administrative policies. In summary, it is well established that microbial metabolites possess the capacity can significantly transform agriculture. Integrating the inherent potential of natural solutions can help create more sustainable and resilient agricultural systems that can protect food security, promote environmental sustainability, and ensure the future of future generations.
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable agriculture aims to increase agricultural productivity while minimising negative environmental impacts [...]
Research
Full-text available
Səhralaşma, torpaq deqradasiyasına təsir göstərən antropogen amillərin müəyyən olunması və onlara qarşı mübarizə tədbirlərinin hazırlanması
Article
An on-farm study was conducted to evaluate the effects of landuse and past erosion on replicated slightly (S), moderately (M), and severely (SV) eroded phases of two Typic Hapludalfs (Miamian and Strawn soil series) and adjacent depositional (DP) areas in Central Ohio for a two year period. Effects on corn (Zea maw) and soybean (Clycine max) yields were evaluated on 3 sites: (A) Strawn soil series on 2 to 6% slope, (B) Strawn soil series on 2 to 7% slope, and (C) Miamian soil series on 2 to 6% slope. Mean corn grain yield in 1992 on site A was 10.1 Mg/ha for SI 11 .O Mg/ha for M, 8.5 Mg/ha for SV, and 7.2 Mg/ha for DP phase. In comparison, mean corn grain yield for site B was 15.0 Mg/ha for S, 14.3 Mg/ha for M, 14.7 Mg/ha for SV, and 15.8 M/ha for the DP. Corn grain yield for 1993 was 7.0 Mg/ha for S, 6.6 M/ha for M, 5.6 Mg/ha for SV and 4.9 Mg/ha for the DP phase on site A, and 7.7 Mg/ha for S, 8.9 Mg/ha for M, 4.8 Mg/ha for SV, and 9.1 Mg/ha for the DP phase on site B. Highest soybean grain and straw yields for site A in 1993 were obtained for the DP phase. In comparison with the S phase, soybean grain yield was reduced by 12.1% for M and 27.3% for SV eroded phase, and increased by 64.7% for the DP phase. Relative soybean grain yield was 100.0 for S, 97.1% for M, 105.9 for SV and 164.7 for DP phases for site B in 1993 compared with 100.0 for S, 90.0 for M, 52.5 for SV and 85.0 for DP phase for site C in 1992. In comparison with S, yield reductions on SV phases of Miamian soils ranged from 15 to 47% for corn and 10 to 48% for soybeans. On Strawn soils yield reductions ranged from 6 to 33% for corn and 36 to 41% for soybeans.
Article
This text aims to summarize the state of scientific knowledge on the drylands of the globe. It explores the current stage of understanding of desertification as well as its extent and possible solutions. The book argues that desertification is one of the world's most pressing environmental problems and that it is a global issue which is accelerating. This edition has been revised and expanded to include updated computer images of desertification, as well as fuller descriptions and explanations of the issues concerned. Using detailed data of the physical and chemical status of soil degradation provided by the Global Assessment of Soil Degradation, the book is fully referenced and covers topics including: desertification and global warming; monitoring on the ground and by remote sensing; vegetation and degradation; local action; cultural factors; financial issues; land reclaimations; the political economy and desertification; and desertification and refugees.