ArticlePDF Available

Feral cats steal milk from northern Elephant Seals

Authors:
J.P. Gallo-Reynoso at Research Center for Food and Development A.C.
J.P. Gallo-Reynoso
Charles Leo Ortiz at University of California, Santa Cruz
Charles Leo Ortiz
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

Feral cats abound at Isla de Guadalupe; they forage on birds, mice, and placental tissue as well as carcasses of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) and stranded cetaceans such as Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). We have found that feral cats are also drinking elephant seal's milk, stealing it directly from the teats of nursing females. The amount of energy obtained this way might be significant for feral cats in the northern elephant seal rookeries on the island.
Content uploaded by J.P. Gallo-Reynoso
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by J.P. Gallo-Reynoso on Nov 13, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Abstract
Resumen
THERYA, Diciembre, 2010
Vol.1(3): 207-212
Juan-Pablo Gallo-Reynoso1 and Charles Leo Ortiz2
Feral cats abound at Isla de Guadalupe; they forage on birds, mice, and placental tissue
as well as carcasses of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), Guadalupe
fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) and
stranded cetaceans such as Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). We have found
that feral cats are also drinking elephant seal’s milk, stealing it directly from the teats of
nursing females. The amount of energy obtained this way might be signicant for feral
cats in the northern elephant seal rookeries on the island.
Key words: Feral cats, northern elephant seal, milk, Isla Guadalupe.
Los gatos ferales abundan en la Isla Guadalupe, se alimentan de aves, ratones y
tejido placental, asi como también de los cadáveres de elefante marino (Mirounga
angustirostris), lobo no de Guadalupe (Arctocephalus townsendi), lobo marino de
California (Zalophus californianus) y de cetáceos varados como el zio de Cuvier (Ziphius
cavirostris). Se observó que los gatos ferales también se alimentan de leche de elefante
marino, robándola de las tetas de las hembras que están amamantando. La cantidad de
energía obtenida de esta manera por los gatos asilvestrados puede ser signicativa en las
colonias de elefantes marinos de la isla.
Palabras clave: Gatos asilvestrados, elefante marino del norte, leche, Isla Guadalupe.
While censusing, satellite tagging adult males and rototag tagging weaned pups of
northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) at Playa Norte, Isla de Guadalupe
(14 - 19 February, 2003), we opportunistically observed the stealing of elephant seal’s
milk by feral cats (Felis catus) and western gulls (Larus occidentalis). Western gulls have
been previously reported stealing milk from female northern elephant seals in several
elephant seal colonies (J. P. Gallo-Reynoso personal observations; Pierotti and Annett
1Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Unidad Guaymas. Carretera a Varadero Nacional Km. 6.6. Colo-
nia Las Playitas, Guaymas, Sonora, 85480 México. E-mail: jpgallo@ciad.mx 
2University of California Santa Cruz, Earth and Marine Sciences A 308. 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064. U. S. A.
Feral cats steal milk from northern
Elephant Seals
Introduction
208 THERYA Vol.1(3): 207-212
FERAL CATS STEAL MILK FROM NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEALS
1995), and this behavior has also been observed in other seabirds such as the Pale-faced
sheathbill (Chionis alba), feeding on southern elephant seal (M. leonina) milk (Favero
1996). However, this is the rst report that focuses on feral cats stealing milk from
elephant seals.
The elephant seal harems at Playa Norte (North beach), during the reproductive
season of 2003, were composed of 182 females, 179 pups, 21 adult males, 23 sub-adult
males, several yearlings, and 1,084 weaners. The total population of elephant seals at
this site was estimated at 2,634 individuals (adding one female for each weaner and
each dead pup). The number of pups born on that beach in 2003 was 1,324 (dead pups
accounted for 61 or 4.6 % of total pups). Thus an equal number of milk bearing females
were available, considering that the mean milk transfer to pups equals 137.7 kg during
four weeks of nursing (Ortiz et al. 1984), these females roughly will be delivering to
suckling pups an equivalent of 182,300 kg of elephant seal milk.
Three different cats were opportunistically observed to steal elephant seal’s milk.
A striped male that was observed on three different nights; the other two, a lactating
female and a black male, were only seen on one occasion each. Although observed only
once, this does not mean that these cats did not steal milk before or after the recorded
observations. These three, and another two smaller, marginal cats were observed around
our campsite. We have more observations of the striped male as this cat was easier to
spot.
Observations were done mainly at sundown, but once early in the morning and once
at night using several lamps that allowed us to observe the black cat. The stripped cat
was usually moving between female elephant seals at dusk and dawn, while the black
cat was at the harem at night. These cats avoided female elephant seals positioned in
the center of the harem because they responded more to external threats than peripheral
females. Therefore, all of the milk stealing activity was observed to take place on
peripheral females. Cats that were caught licking a teat were chased by the mother of
the pup, and on several occasions by other female elephant seals that either observed
the cat’s approach, or stealing of milk. These cats were also observed to compete with
seagulls for portions of fresh placentas and decomposing elephant seal carcasses.
To be able to get to a female elephant seal’s teat and milk, the stripped cat approached
the elephant seal pup and harassed it by tapping repeatedly on the head with a paw (claws
extended). The pup would then move away from its mother, sometimes protesting, and
as milk continued to drip out from the female’s teat, the cat would lick it. However, we
never observed a behavior that resembled suckling and we only observed that the tongue
licked the dripping milk but none of the three cats were observed touching the female
with their paws. The effort (time) that feral cats dedicated to searching for a female in
good position once entering the harem, and the time spent stealing milk were measured
(Table 1). We estimated that cats were successful at stealing milk 40.7 % of the total time
that they spent looking for a suitable female from which to steal milk.
A similar behavior was carried out by western gulls; they approached a pup and
pecked on the pup’s head, causing it to retreat, and then positioned their beak sideways
to receive the milk dripping from the teat of the female elephant seal. This was observed
several times during our stay at Guadalupe, always during daylight hours. The perpetrators
were adult gulls and second year chicks.
www.mastozoologiamexicana.org 209
Juan-Pablo Gallo-Reynoso and Charles Leo Ortiz
What is the reproductive cost for a female elephant seal with such a loss of milk transfer
to the pup? It is difcult to calculate how much milk is actually stolen in this way from
any particular female, or from all the females on the beach. We estimate that if there
were 182 females nursing pups at the end of the reproductive season, the amount of milk
available for pups, and with potential to be stolen, was more than 25,000 kg. Assuming
that the milk transferred from mothers to pups is the same as calculated by Ortiz et al.
(1984) of about 137.7 kg of milk to their pups for the whole nursing period of 28.2 days,
or 4.9 kg / day; and taking into account that the stomach capacity of a cat is around 300
g (Grandage 2003), and assuming that they were successful lling themselves up twice
each day, then the maximum amount of milk available to be stolen each day by the three
cats would be 1.8 kg. The variable that intervenes here in favor of the pups is that cats
do not steal milk from the same females; they stole the milk from a different female each
time. Perhaps the amount of milk stolen from an individual female elephant seal is not
signicant for the development of elephant seal pups or the parental investment and
reproductive success of their mothers. On the other hand, cats will try to steal elephant
seal milk due to its availability and its rich energy content which is a large surplus (with
an energy content of 543.8 Kcal/ 100 g, with 54.4% fat, 9 % protein, 32.8 % water and
0.7 % ash (Le Boeuf and Ortiz 1977)), translating into a signicant gain in their survival.
Cats that performed this behavior were in good condition, highly territorial and actively
excluded other cats from the area.
What would be the cost for pups losing time suckling milk (and kilocalories) to
develop? Pups refrained from nursing for a few minutes will not be deprived from large
quantities of milk. The amount of milk that pups might lose for the time they are deprived
from suckling, ranges from 4.6 kg/ day to 4.9 kg/ day (Ortiz et al. 1984). This amount will
not signicantly affect their development if a given female is only perpetrated once a day.
Even if the cat stole that amount of milk from the same female each day for the nursing
period (about 8.5 kg, or 0.74 x 105 kcal) this amount would still not be signicant.
Pups were not signicantly injured by cats, only a few scratches that were healed
in a few days, compared to the pecking of sea gulls on their heads and eyes that can
pose a threat to the defenseless small pups. Also, cats can not spend much time licking
the female; their scaled tongue alerts the female that something is wrong and she will
respond to it by chasing away the cat or turning her belly down, denying access to her
teats.
This situation raises some questions of conservation concern to the northern elephant
seals on the island. The feral cat population on Isla de Guadalupe is quite large, cats
are found in all areas of the island (Keitt et al. 2005). They primarily feed on birds, feral
Cat N Effort to obtain milk (min) Time spent licking (min)
Stripped male 3 2.2 ± 0.4 range: 1.8 - 2.8 1.5 ± 0.1 range:1.3 -1.7
Black male 1 2.7 1.2
Female 1 3.1 0.5
Total 5 2.7 ± 0.4 range: 3.1 – 1.8 1.1 ± 0.4 range: 1.7 – 0.5
Table 1. Observations of
feral cat effort (search for
a suitable female in a good
position), and success to
obtain milk (time licking
the perfused milk) from
female elephant seals.
Data shows the Mean ± SD.
210 THERYA Vol.1(3): 207-212
FERAL CATS STEAL MILK FROM NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEALS
Acknowledgements
mice (Mus musculus), adults and chicks of Laysan Albatrosses (Phoebastria immutabilis),
other birds; pinniped, cetacean (Cuvier’s beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris)) and feral
goat carrion (Gallo-Reynoso pers. obs. 1993, 2010; Keitt et al. 2005); they also eat the
placenta of elephant seals, Guadalupe fur seals (Arctocephalus townsendi) and California
sea lions (Zalophus californianus). By stealing milk from this threatened species, feral
introduced cats can pose a direct threat by coming into contact with the female’s body.
The concern is that by licking the teats, entero-bacteria, protozoans and viruses can be
passed in the saliva from cats to female elephant seals with the possibility of an infection.
Diseases that could be caused by feral cats on Isla de Guadalupe pinnipeds should be
sought and evaluated, due to the nding of a northern elephant seal with encephalitis,
infected with toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma godingii) cysts (Dubey et al. 2004), also
present in other marine mammals (Dubey et al., 2003). Toxoplasmosis is known to be
transmitted by cats (Frenkel et al., 1970); if cats result in a threat to elephant seals, then
it is imperative that they be subject to management by the Reserva de la Biosfera Isla de
Guadalupe (Isla Guadalupe Biosphere Reserve).
We wish to thank R. Passion, D. Larsen, D. Crocker, C. Champagne, J. Hasrick, J. Guillén
and O. Maravilla, who participated on the expedition to Isla de Guadalupe and to E.
Coria for her advice regarding cats and their diseases. These observations were carried
out with permits: SEMARNAP/SGPA/DGVS/7095. 07 Octubre 2002. The manuscript
beneted from the suggestions of J. E. Maldonado and two anonymous reviewers.
dubey, J. P., T. P. liPscomb and m. mense. 2004. Toxoplasmosis in an elephant seal
(Mirounga angustirostris). Journal of Parasitology 90:410-411.
dubey, J. P., R. ZaRnke, n. J. Thomas, s. k. WonG, W. Van bonn, m. bRiGGs, J. W. daVis,
R. eWinG, m. mense, o. c. h. kWok, s. Romand and P. ThullieZ. 2003. Toxoplasma
godingii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Sarcocystis canis-like
infections in marine mammals. Veterinary Parasitology 111:275-296.
FaVeRo, m. 1996. Foraging ecology of Pale-faced sheathbills in colonies of southern
elephant seals at King George Island, Antarctica. Journal of Field Ornithologists
67:292-299.
FRenkel, J. k., J. P. dubey and n. l. milleR. 1970. Toxoplasma godingii in cats: fecal stages
identied as coccidian oocysts. Science 167:893-896.
GRandaGe, J. 2003. Functional anatomy of the digestive system. Pp. 499-521 in
Textbook of small animal surgery (D. H. Slatter ed.) 2nd ed. W. B. Saunders Co.
Philadelphia, Pensylvania
keiTT, b., R. W. henRy, a. aGuiRRe-muñoZ, c. GaRcía, l. luna-mendoZa, m. a. heRmosillo,
b. TeRshy and d. cRoll. 2005. El impacto de los gatos introducidos (Felis catus) en
el ecosistema de Isla Guadalupe. Pp. 219-229 in Isla Guadalupe, Restauración y
Conservación (Santos del Prado K., and E. Peters.Compilers). Instituto Nacional de
Ecologia, Mexico Distrito Federal.
le boeuF, b. J. and c. l. oRTiZ. 1977. Composition of elephant seal milk. Journal of
Mammalogy 58:683-685.
References
www.mastozoologiamexicana.org 211
Juan-Pablo Gallo-Reynoso and Charles Leo Ortiz
oRTiZ, c. l., b. J. le boeuF and d. P. cosTa. 1984. Milk intake of elephant seal pups: and
index of parental investment. The American Naturalist 124:416-422.
PieRoTTi, R. J., and c. a. anneTT. 1995. Western Gull (Larus occidentalis). In The Birds
of North America (Poole A., and F. Gill. eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, District of
Columbia.
Sometido: 15 abril 2010
Revisado: 12 julio 2010
Aceptado: 9 noviembre 2010
Editor asociado Jesús Maldonado
A synthesis of Mexican mammalogy in Therya: the first 10 years! Therya Advance
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2021
Mammalogy as a discipline was pursued in Mexico since the mid-17 th century. However, Mexican researchers were involved primarily in the mid-20 th century, when national scientific journals were established to emphasize research on mammals. In 2010, the Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C., initiated the journal Therya. Therya has now completed its first decade of publication, and in this work, we analyze the articles and scientific notes published in Therya, focused on the studies of mammals in Mexican territory, including researchers and institutions, to describe the path that mammalogy has taken in recent years in Mexico. This synthesis therefore serves as a frame of reference for future mammalogy studies. We compiled all papers published in Therya during the period 2010-2019. We built a database gathering information from these publications such as authors, institutions and states of origin, study areas, capture methods, topics and taxa studied. We excluded from the analyses research outside of Mexico. We did a descriptive statistics analysis including mean, proportions, percentage and trends for each and all the sections. Therya has published 181 articles and 52 scientific notes on mammals distributed in Mexico. The majority of authors and institutions were from Mexico City. The states of southeastern Mexico were the most used as a study area, particularly Oaxaca and Chiapas. The orders Carnivora and Cetartiodactyla were the most studied, mainly using indirect methods. Trapping methods were most commonly used for small mammals. The least studied orders were Eulipotyphla, Cingulata, and Pilosa. The most studied topics are ecology, diversity, conservation and distribution. Therya has become one of the most important journals about mammal research in Mexico. Research in mammalo-gy, as reflected in the pages of Therya, is based in academic institutions with the metropolitan area of Mexico City, reflecting the institutional infrastructure and age, and possibly institutional budgetary factors. The southeast portion of the country is well studied due to the existence of regional institutions, as well as to the concentration of high biodiversity. The least studied regions of Mexico may be the result of a reduced number of research groups and social insecurity. Much research is focused on small mammals, making Sherman traps and mist nets the most used trapping methods; carnivores and cetartiodactyls are the most studied groups, using indirect study methods reducing study costs and effort. Ecology, diversity and distribution are the most studied topics, these studies allow the development of management plans. En México la mastozoología tiene registro desde mediados del siglo XVII, con investigadores mexicanos involucrados desde mediados del siglo XX, siendo a finales de éste cuando se establecieron las primeras revistas nacionales con énfasis en mamíferos. En 2010 la Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología, A. C., creó la revista científica Therya, que en 2019 completó su primera década de publicación. En este trabajo analizamos los artículos y notas científicas de Therya, enfocándonos en estudios en el territorio mexicano y los investigadores e instituciones que los realizan, para describir la trayectoria de la mastozoología en México en años recientes. Compilamos todas las publicaciones de la re-vista Therya entre 2010-2019. Construimos una base de datos recopilando la información de autores, instituciones y estados de procedencia, áreas de estudio, métodos de captura, temas y taxones. Excluimos las investigaciones que no incluyeran al territorio mexicano como área de estudio. Finalmente realizamos un análisis descriptivo incluyendo los promedios, proporciones, porcentajes y tendencias más representativas. Therya ha publicado 181 artículos y 52 notas científicas de mamíferos distribuidos en México. La mayoría de los autores e instituciones pro-vienen de la Ciudad de México. El sureste de México, principalmente Oaxaca y Chiapas, es más frecuente como área de estudio. Los órdenes más estudiados fueron Carnivora y Cetartiodactila, principalmente por métodos indirectos. Métodos de trampeo se utilizaron frecuentemente para pequeños mamíferos. Eulipotyphla, Cingulata y Pilosa cuentan con pocos estudios. Los temas más estudiados son ecología, diversidad, conservación y distribución. Therya se ha pocisionado como una de las revistas más importantes sobre investigación de mamíferos en México. La mastozoología, como se refleja en Therya, se ha desarrollado principalmente por instituciones con mayor antigüedad, infraestructura y presupuesto institucional. El sureste del país es más estudiado debido a la existencia de instituciones regionales además de la alta concentra-ción de biodiversidad. Las regiones menos estudiadas pueden relacionarse con la falta de grupos de investigación cercanos y la inseguridad. Muchas investigaciones se concentran en pequeños mamíferos, haciendo de las trampas Sherman y redes de niebla los métodos de trampeo más utilizados; carnívoros y cetartiodáctilos son los grupos más estudiados usando métodos de estudio indirecto que reducen los costos y es-fuerzo de estudio. La ecología, diversidad y distribución son los temas más estudiados, que pueden apoyar el desarrollo de planes de manejo.
View
The Effect of Feral Dogs and Other Alien Species on Native Mammals of Isla de Cedros, Mexico
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2013
We report the status of alien species on Isla de Cedros, Mexico, and analyze the information from different years that together with a collaborative effort between academic biologists, Mexican governmental agencies, and local individuals has resulted in major information about the alien species on this island. We also report species richness of distinct endemic mammal species and the presence of feral dogs (Canis lupus familiaris Linnaeus), which is the principal problematic situation in this “Marine Priority Region.” The possible origin of feral dogs could be the migratory movement of stray dogs to find food in the inner part of the island, first moving to garbage dumps, reproducing in the area, and later hunting goats (Capra aegagrus hircus Linnaeus) in packs. The combination of the high density of stray dogs, urban and industrial food garbage dumps, and the large number of marine resources scattered along the seashore made ideal conditions for the establishment of feral dog packs that are affecting native species. The island does not have any natural mammal predator, but the presence of feral species, dogs and cats (Felis silvestris catus Schreber), could disturb the occurrence of endemic fauna as it has happened on other islands in the world.
View
Milk Intake of Elephant Seal Pups: An Index of Parental Investment
Article
Full-text available
  • Sep 1984
Total milk ingested throughout nursing in free-living northern elephant seal pups, derived from the turnover of tritiated water, gives an accurate estimate of the energetic component of parental investment. In 4 wk of nursing, females transferred a mean of 138 kg of milk with a value of 6.04 x 105 kcal, five times the metabolic requirements of pups. The mean rate of energy transfer is more than twice that predicted for the female's size from studies of laboratory and domestic animals. In one month, pups receive sufficient energy and essential nutrients from mother's milk to enable them to fast while continuing to develop for an additional 2 1/2 mo before feeding on their own. Measurement of the energetic component of parental investment makes it possible to test predictions from the theory of parental investment.
View
Toxoplasmosis in an Elephant Seal (Mirounga angustirostris)
Article
Full-text available
  • May 2004
Toxoplasma gondii infections in fish-eating marine mammals is intriguing and indicative of contamination of the sea environment with oocysts. Toxoplasma gondii was identified in an elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) that had encephalitis. Tissue cysts were found in sections of cerebrum, and the diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining with T. gondii-specific polyclonal rabbit serum. This is the first report of T. gondii infection in an elephant seal.
View
Toxoplasma gondii in Cats: Fecal Stages Identified as Coccidian Oocysts
Article
  • Apr 1970
"Toxoplasma gondii in cats: fecal stages identified as coccidian oocysts" by J. K. Frenkel et al. (6 Feb., p. 893), the last sentence of paragraph 1, column 3, page 894, should read "Two unfed kittens did not excrete oocysts, nor was Toxoplasina isolated from their fed feces or organ passages".
View
Foraging ecology of Pale-faced Sheathbills in colonies of southern elephant seals at King George Island, Antarctica
Article
  • Mar 1996
  • J FIELD ORNITHOL
The Pale-faced Sheathbill (Chionis alba) is an opportunistic predator-scavenger. During spring in Antarctica it foraged in colonies of southern elephant seals, obtaining placentas, pup carcasses, milk from nursing cows, blood, and feces. Afterbirths and pup carcasses constituted the bulk of the food consumed. Daily consumption estimates averaged 67 g/bird for placenta and 11 g/bird for pup carcasses, which are 54% and 26% of daily energy requirements, respectively. Sheathbills spent 86% of the day foraging or displaying and 14% resting or preening. Actively feeding birds spent 38% of the time searching for food, 20% feeding, 23% resting, 14% on comfort activities, and 3% in agonistic behaviors.
View
View
View
Toxoplasma gondii in Cats: Fecal Stages Identified as Coccidian Oocysts
Article
  • Mar 1970
Isospora-type oocysts were excreted by cats following the ingestion of Toxoplasma fromn infected mice. Oocysts appeared 3 to 5 days after cyst. were ingested and 8 to 10 days after trophozoites were ingested, and also 21 to 24 days after the administration of infective fecal suspensions from cats. A close quanititative and biologic correlation between oocysts and Toxoplasma infectivity of the feces was observed which could not be separated by density gradient centrifugation and filtration methods. Toxoplasma is an intestinal coccidian of cats which is fecally spread. It has evolved to multiply in brain and muscle and in other species, making it possible for carnivorism to become another means of transmission.
View
Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Sarcocystis canis-like infections in marine mammals
Article
  • Oct 2003
  • VET PARASITOL
Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and S. canis are related protozoans that can cause mortality in many species of domestic and wild animals. Recently, T. gondii and S. neurona were recognized to cause encephalitis in marine mammals. As yet, there is no report of natural exposure of N. caninum in marine mammals. In the present study, antibodies to T. gondii and N. caninum were assayed in sera of several species of marine mammals. For T. gondii, sera were diluted 1:25, 1:50, and 1:500 and assayed in the T. gondii modified agglutination test (MAT). Antibodies (MAT > or =1:25) to T. gondii were found in 89 of 115 (77%) dead, and 18 of 30 (60%) apparently healthy sea otters (Enhydra lutris), 51 of 311 (16%) Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), 19 of 45 (42%) sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) [corrected] 5 of 32 (16%) ringed seals (Phoca hispida), 4 of 8 (50%) bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus), 1 of 9 (11.1%) spotted seals (Phoca largha), 138 of 141 (98%) Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), and 3 of 53 (6%) walruses (Odobenus rosmarus). For N. caninum, sera were diluted 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, and 1:320 and examined with the Neospora agglutination test (NAT) using mouse-derived tachyzoites. NAT antibodies were found in 3 of 53 (6%) walruses, 28 of 145 (19%) sea otters, 11 of 311 (3.5%) harbor seals, 1 of 27 (3.7%) sea lions, 4 of 32 (12.5%) ringed seals, 1 of 8 (12.5%) bearded seals, and 43 of 47 (91%) bottlenose dolphins. To our knowledge, this is the first report of N. caninum antibodies in any marine mammal, and the first report of T. gondii antibodies in walruses and in ringed, bearded, spotted, and ribbon seals. Current information on T. gondii-like and Sarcocystis-like infections in marine mammals is reviewed. New cases of clinical S. canis and T. gondii infections are also reported in sea lions, and T. gondii infection in an Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus).
View
These observations were carried out with permits: SEMARNAP/SGPA/DGVS/7095. 07 Octubre 2002. The manuscript benefited from the suggestions of J. E. Maldonado and two anonymous reviewers Toxoplasmosis in an elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris)
  • Jan 2004
  • 410-411
Coria for her advice regarding cats and their diseases. These observations were carried out with permits: SEMARNAP/SGPA/DGVS/7095. 07 Octubre 2002. The manuscript benefited from the suggestions of J. E. Maldonado and two anonymous reviewers. dubey, J. P., T. P. liPscomb and m. mense. 2004. Toxoplasmosis in an elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris). Journal of Parasitology 90:410-411.
Van bonn, m. bRiGGs, J. W. daVis, R. eWinG, m. mense, o. c. h. kWok, s. Romand and P. ThullieZ. 2003. Toxoplasma godingii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Sarcocystis canis-like infections in marine mammals
  • 275-296
  • J P Dubey
  • R J Zarnke
  • K Thomas
  • W Wong
dubey, J. P., R. ZaRnke, n. J. Thomas, s. k. WonG, W. Van bonn, m. bRiGGs, J. W. daVis, R. eWinG, m. mense, o. c. h. kWok, s. Romand and P. ThullieZ. 2003. Toxoplasma godingii, Neospora caninum, Sarcocystis neurona, and Sarcocystis canis-like infections in marine mammals. Veterinary Parasitology 111:275-296.