ArticlePDF Available

Driving and Texting Performance When Drivers Text Behind the Wheel

Authors:

Abstract

Texting while driving is a prevalent risky behavior among drivers that causes thousands of fatalities each year. Compared to the attention cell phone conversations while driving is given, texting while driving is still not thoroughly investigated. This article reviews the risks of texting while driving, mutual interference of texting and driving performance and future research questions. More research focusing on texting while driving and technology solutions to reduce its risks is needed.
Research Article Open Access
He et al., J Ergonomics 2014, S3
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.S3-e001
Editorial Open Access
Ergonomics
J Ergonomics ISSN: 2165-7556 JER, an open access journal
Driver Safety
Keywords: Driver distraction; Cellphone; Texting while driving
Introduction
With the increasing prevalence of smartphones and wearable
devices, texting while driving is becoming an important public safety
hazard [1]. e National Highway and Trac Safety Administration
(NHTSA) reported that 11% of drivers are using cell phones at any one
time [2]. In 2011 surveys, 74.3% to 91% of college students admitted they
text while driving, with 51.8% doing so on a weekly basis [3,4]. According
to the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), the proportion of
driving fatalities caused by distraction increased from 10.5% in 2005 to
15.8% in 2008, which was partly due to texting while driving [5]. With
new types of cell phones and devices emerging, such as Google Glass and
smart watches, the rate of texting while driving may increase even more.
According to the theory of dual-task performance, if two tasks share
similar resources, performance of either or both tasks will be impaired
when they are performed concurrently. Driving and texting require
the same visual and cognitive resources, thus driving and texting
performance can both be impaired when drivers text behind the wheel.
A mutual interference of texting and driving performance has been
reported [6].
Texting while driving impairs driving performance in various ways.
For example, texting while driving increases hazard response time [7,8],
causes larger variations of lane position [9-12], increases variability of
headway distance [8,13], increases gaze-o-road durations [10,14,15],
causes more collisions [8].
Driving also impairs texting performance [6,13]. In a study by
the research group at Wichita State University, a classic Lane Change
Task (LCT) and a car-following task were used to measure driving
performance; a custom Android application logged the texting
performance. Results showed that texting impaired driving performance
by increasing brake response time and the standard deviation of lane
positions [6,13]. Both the LCT and car-following tasks impaired texting
by reducing the texting speed and increasing the texting errors. e
mean and standard deviation of the time interval between key entries
also increased signicantly. Similarly, another study also reported that
driving impaired concurrent secondary performance, such as language
production and comprehension in a story-retelling task [16].
To better understand these risks, it is important to consider
dierent features and designs of cell phones and their eects on driving
performance, such as cell phone types (a phone with physical keyboard
versus touch screen), hands-free vs. handheld phones, reading versus
writing text messages.
Firstly, the texting performance may vary for keyboard type, such as
a touch screen keyboard or a physical keyboard. Physical keyboards can
provide texters tactical feedback about key entries, thus can potentially
allow experienced texters to keep their eyes on the road longer than
phones with a touch screen interface [17]. One eye-tracking study
showed that touch screen smartphone users tended to produce a larger
number of glances longer than 2s than users of physical keyboard,
though the dierence was not statistically signicant [18].
Secondly, the impact of voice-recognition technology or handsfree
texting is another important question concerning texting while driving.
Several studies have shown the benets of handsfree cell phone use over
handheld cell phone [14]. However, the benet of voice-recognition
technology is not consistently observed [19,20]. A meta-analysis by
Horrey and Wickens [20] has shown the distracting eect of handsfree
and handheld phone use is similar. Whether a handsfree phone can
provide better performance over a handheld phone may depend on the
quality of the voice-recognition technology and duration of the texting
task [12,13].
irdly, dierent components of texting behaviors can potentially
inuence driving performance dierently, such as reading and writing
text messages via either visual, auditory, or verbal modalities [12].
Text-to-speech and voice-recognition technologies may potentially
reduce the amount of visual distraction compared to looking down at a
phone to read messages [21]. A meta-analysis study found that lateral
vehicle control and glances away from the road were less aected by
reading text messages than writing them, however other research has
found that reading and writing text messages almost equally impaired
driving performance [1,12].
Texting while driving is becoming an increasing risk factor on the
road, and the situation is likely to get worse with the rapid increase
of mobile devices. More research should be carried out to promote
our understanding of texting while driving and guide technology
innovation, design, legislation, and driver training.
*Corresponding author: Jibo He, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260,
USA, Tel: 2174173830; E-mail: drhojibo@gmail.com
Received May 27, 2014; Accepted May 28, 2014; Published June 03, 2014
Citation: He J, Choi W, Ellis J (2014) Driving and Texting Performance When
Drivers Text Behind the Wheel. J Ergonomics S3: e001. doi:10.4172/2165-7556.
S3-e001
Copyright: © 2014 He J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Abstract
Texting while driving is a prevalent risky behavior among drivers that causes thousands of fatalities each
year. Compared to the attention cell phone conversations while driving is given, texting while driving is still not
thoroughly investigated. This article reviews the risks of texting while driving, mutual interference of texting and
driving performance and future research questions. More research focusing on texting while driving and technology
solutions to reduce its risks is needed.
Driving and Texting Performance When Drivers Text Behind the Wheel
Jibo He*, William Choi and Jake Ellis
Department of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA
Citation: He J, Choi W, Ellis J (2014) Driving and Texting Performance When Drivers Text Behind the Wheel. J Ergonomics S3: e001. doi:10.4172/2165-
7556.S3-e001
Page 2 of 2
J Ergonomics ISSN: 2165-7556 JER, an open access journal
Driver Safety
References
1. Caird JK, Johnston K, Willness C, Asbridge M (2013) A Research Synthesis
of Text Messaging and Driving Performance. In 7th International Driving
Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle
Design.
2. National Safety Council (2010) NSC estimates 1.6 million crashes caused by
cell phone use and texting.
3. Cook JL, Jones RM (2011) Texting and accessing the web while driving: trafc
citations and crashes among young adult drivers. Trafc Inj Prev 12: 545-549.
4. Harrison MA (2011) College students’ prevalence and perceptions of text
messaging while driving. Accid Anal Prev 43: 1516-1520.
5. Wilson FA, Stimpson JP (2010) Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the
United States, 1999 to 2008. Am J Public Health 100: 2213-2219.
6. He J, Chaparro A, Crandall J, Turner C, Turner K, Ellis J (2014) Mutual
interferences of driving and texting performance. Proceedings of Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society, Chicago, IL.
7. Burge R, Chaparro A (2012) The effects of texting and driving on hazard
perception. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Annual Meeting 56(1): 715-719.
8. Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey CN, Cooper JM, Strayer DL (2009) Text
messaging during simulated driving. Hum Factors 51: 762-770.
9. Crandall JM, Chaparro A (2012) Driver distraction: effects of text entry methods
on driving performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society Annual Meeting 56(1):1693-1697.
10. Hosking SG, Young KL, Regan MA (2009) The effects of text messaging on
young drivers. Hum Factors 51: 582-592.
11. Libby D, Chaparro A (2009) Text messaging versus talking on a cell phone:
A comparison of their effects on driving performance. In Proceedings of the
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 53(18): 1353-1357.
12. Yager CE, Cooper JM, Chrysler ST (2012) The effects of reading and writing
text-based messages while driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and
Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56 (1): 2196-2200.
13. He J, Chaparro A, Nguyen B, Burge R, Crandall J, et al. (2013) Texting
while driving: is speech-based texting less risky than handheld texting?. In
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces
and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 124-130). ACM.
14. Libby D, Chaparro A, He J (2013) Distracted While Driving A Comparison of the
Effects of Texting and Talking On a Cell Phone. In Proceedings of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57(1): 1874-1878.
15. Owens JM, McLaughlin SB, Sudweeks J (2011) Driver performance while text
messaging using handheld and in-vehicle systems. Accid Anal Prev 43: 939-
947.
16. Becic E, Dell GS, Bock K, Garnsey SM, Kubose T, et al. (2010) Driving impairs
talking. Psychon Bull Rev 17: 15-21.
17. Reimer B, Mehler B, Donmez B, Pala S, Wang, Y, et al. (2012) A driving
simulator study examining phone dialing with an iPhone vs. a button style ip-
phone. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual
Meeting 56(1): 2191-2195.
18. Samuel S, Pollatsek A, Fisher D (2011) Texting while driving: Evaluation of
glance distributions for frequent/infrequent texters and keypad/touchpad
texters. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human
Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: 424-432.
19. Hendrick JL, Switzer JR (2007) Hands-free versus hand-held cell phone
conversation on a braking response by young drivers. Percept Mot Skills 105:
514-522.
20. Horrey WJ, Wickens CD (2006) Examining the impact of cell phone
conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Hum Factors 48:
196-205.
21. Curín J, Labský M, Macek T, Kleindienst J, Young H, et al. (2011) Dictating
and Editing Short Texts While Driving: Distraction and Task Completion. In
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces
and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 13–20). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS
Group submissions
Unique features:
• Userfriendly/feasiblewebsite-translationofyourpaperto50world’sleadinglanguages
• AudioVersionofpublishedpaper
• Digitalarticlestoshareandexplore
Special features:
• 350OpenAccessJournals
• 30,000editorialteam
• 21daysrapidreviewprocess
• Qualityandquickeditorial,reviewandpublicationprocessing
• IndexingatPubMed(partial),Scopus,EBSCO,IndexCopernicusandGoogleScholaretc
• SharingOption:SocialNetworkingEnabled
• Authors,ReviewersandEditorsrewardedwithonlineScienticCredits
• Betterdiscountforyoursubsequentarticles
Submityourmanuscriptat:www.omicsonline.org/submission
Thisarticlewasoriginallypublishedinaspecialissue,Driver Safety
handledbyEditor(s).Prof.JiboHe,WichitaStateUniversity,USA
Citation: He J, Choi W, Ellis J (2014) Driving and Texting Performance When
Drivers Text Behind the Wheel. J Ergonomics S3: e001. doi:10.4172/2165-
7556.S3-e001
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
In the United States, 39 states have passed legislation banning texting while driving. By comparison, no state bans hands-free cellular phone use by adults while driving. The concern regarding texting reflects an underlying assumption that it poses a greater risk than talking on a cellular phone. However, there have been few published studies directly comparing these two tasks and their effects on driving performance. This study investigated the effects of texting and talking on a cellular phone on simulated driving performance while equating task duration. Even after equating the time spent on each task, texting still had a greater impact on driving performance. Drivers in the texting condition had significantly slower reaction times, made more eye movements away from the roadway, and failed to detect as many peripheral letter targets compared to when they were in the calling condition. The results of this study suggest that texting is a more disruptive form of distraction than talking and that its effects are not simply due to differences in task duration.
Article
Full-text available
Despite legislative and social campaigns to reduce texting while driving, drivers continue to text behind the wheel. There is abundant evidence demonstrating that texting while driving impairs driving performance. While past driver distraction research has focused on how texting influences driving, the influence of driving on texting behaviors is often ignored. This study used a classic Lane Change Task and a smartphone texting application to study the mutual influences of driving and texting. Results showed that concurrent texting impaired driving by increasing variability in lane position. Meanwhile, driving impaired texting by increasing the texting task completion time and texting errors, and reduced texting key entry speed. The finding of mutual interferences of driving and texting provides new knowledge for social campaigns, which intend to persuade drivers not to drive while texting, and importantly provides a scientific basis for the development of smartphone-based technology to reduce the risky behavior of driving while texting.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Research indicates that using a cell phone to talk or text while maneuvering a vehicle impairs driving performance. However, few published studies directly compare the distracting effects of texting using a hands-free (i.e., speech-based interface) versus handheld cell phone, which is an important issue for legislation, automotive interface design and driving safety training. This study compared the effect of speech-based versus handheld texting on simulated driving performance by asking participants to perform a car following task while controlling the duration of a secondary texting task. Results showed that both speech-based and handheld texting impaired driving performance relative to the drive-only condition by causing more variation in speed and lane position. Handheld texting also increased the brake response time and increased variation in headway distance. Texting using a speech-based cell phone was less detrimental to driving performance than handheld texting. Nevertheless, the speech-based texting task still significantly impaired driving compared to the drive-only condition. These results suggest that speech-based interaction disrupts driving, but reduces the levels of performance interference compared to handheld devices. In addition, the difference in the distraction effect caused by speech-based and handheld texting is not simply due to the difference in task duration.
Article
This research investigates the effect of cell phone interface design on simulated driving performance. The effects of three text message conditions (no text, touch screen keyboard, physical keyboard) on lateral vehicle control and operator workload (mental and physical) were evaluated. Twenty three participants performed a lane change task for each of the text message conditions. The results indicate that drivers had greater lane variability and reported higher workload when using a touch screen compared to physical keyboard. The findings of this study suggest that a touch screen interface may exacerbate the effects of a secondary task (e.g. texting) on driving performance. Copyright 2012 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
Previous research, using driving simulation, crash data, and naturalistic methods, has begun to shed light on the dangers of texting while driving. Perhaps because of the dangers, no published work has experimentally investigated the dangers of texting while driving using an actual vehicle. Additionally, previous research does not clearly differentiate the dangers associated with reading and writing text-based messages. To address these issues, 42 participants drove an instrumented research vehicle on a closed driving course. Participants drove under control, text reading, and text writing conditions using a QWERTY keyboard mobile phone. Baseline text reading and writing data were also collected outside of the research vehicle. When reading or writing text-based messages, drivers exhibited reductions in reaction time that were nearly twice as great as previously thought. Drivers also exhibited nearly identical impairment in the reading and writing conditions, suggesting that both reading and writing text-based messages may be equally dangerous. These results have immediate implications for improving our understanding of the dangers of texting while driving and may be useful for future public policy discussions.
Article
Hazard perception has received little attention compared to measures of vehicle control in studies exploring the effects of texting on driving performance, despite being a more direct measure of crash risk. Furthermore, the driver strategies attempting to moderate such distraction are not well understood. The current study attempts to address these two facets of texting while driving. Participants (10 male; 10 female) drove a low fidelity simulator that measures situational awareness, while text messaging in order to assess hazard perception performance. Participants were required to identify and appropriately respond to events that would result in a collision. Two text message conditions (i.e., copying and alphabetizing a 5-letter string) were used to compare low vs. high cognitive load, respectively. Participants missed more hazards in the alphabetize-text compared to the copy-text and driving only conditions. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) analyses revealed the adoption of a more liberal response bias (B") (i.e., participants increased false) when required to copy the text message but not when required to alphabetize. Last, participants were slower to react to hazards in the alphabetize-text condition compared to the copy-text and driving only conditions. These findings suggest that the impact of text messaging on the detection of driving hazards depends in part, on the cognitive load imposed by the text messaging task and the adoption of strategies to compensate for the interference on the driving task. Copyright 2012 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
The threat that cell-phones pose to driving has been a well researched topic. There are fewer studies of the threat that texting creates for drivers, but the risks are obvious and the few existing studies confirm this. What is not obvious is whether frequent texters will expose themselves to the same risks as infrequent texters. This is important to know because many texters, especially teens who text frequently, may consider themselves immune to the dangers of texting while driving. As such, a comparison of frequent and infrequent texters was undertaken on a driving simulator. It is also not immediately clear what effects the different types of interfaces have on driving performance while text messaging. The interfaces under evaluation included keypad or "qwerty" phones (e.g., Blackberries) and touchpad phones (iPhone). It was found that the frequent and infrequent texters were equally likely to glance at least once for more than 2s inside the vehicle while sending a text message. It was also found that touchpad texters had a larger number of glances above the 2s threshold than keypad users, though this difference was not significant. The implications of this for future public policy are discussed.
Article
Research indicates that using a cell phone to talk or text while maneuvering a vehicle impairs driving performance. However, few published studies directly compare the distracting effects of texting using a hands-free (i.e., speech-based interface) versus handheld cell phone, which is an important issue for legislation, automotive interface design and driving safety training. This study compared the effect of speech-based versus handheld texting on simulated driving performance by asking participants to perform a car following task while controlling the duration of a secondary texting task. Results showed that both speech-based and handheld texting impaired driving performance relative to the drive-only condition by causing more variation in speed and lane position. Handheld texting also increased the brake response time and increased variation in headway distance. Texting using a speech-based cell phone was less detrimental to driving performance than handheld texting. Nevertheless, the speech-based texting task still significantly impaired driving compared to the drive-only condition. These results suggest that speech-based interaction disrupts driving, but reduces the levels of performance interference compared to handheld devices. In addition, the difference in the distraction effect caused by speech-based and handheld texting is not simply due to the difference in task duration.
This study compared the effects of texting to other modes of responding on driving performance. While driving a simulator participants were instructed to categorize words appearing on billboards as a state (e.g., Maine), fruit (e.g., kiwi) or drink (e.g., Pepsi). The word categories were reported by texting, phoning in or identifying them aloud. There was significant effect of response mode on measures of driving performance. Drivers in the texting condition had significantly slower reaction times to peripheral letter targets, drove more slowly, exhibited greater variance in their lane position and took their eyes off of the road more often than in either the cell phone condition or the verbal condition. Drivers in the cell phone condition often performed more poorly than in the verbal response condition.