Content uploaded by Robert Holm
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Robert Holm on Apr 05, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015 1
Disparate Tectonic Settings for Mineralisation
in an Active Arc, Eastern Papua New Guinea
and the Solomon Islands
R J Holm1, S W Richards2,3, G Rosenbaum4 and C Spandler5
ABSTRACT
The recent and active magmatic arcs of eastern Papua New Guinea (PNG) and the Solomon
Islands are well endowed with sulde mineralisation and include deposits such as Ladolam,
Panguna and Solwara 1. The majority of the mineral systems in this belt are younger than
four million years old, with some deposits remaining active to the present day as exemplied
by active hydrothermal systems on the island of Lihir. The geodynamic setting that led to the
formation of these deposits is still unresolved, with, for example, both the Pacic and Solomon
Sea plates considered responsible for the formation of the Ladolam deposit on the island of
Lihir under different models. In order to understand and characterise the formation of south-
west Pacic mineral deposits, we must rst reconstruct the complex geodynamic evolution
of the region. New kinematic reconstructions show that while mineral systems in eastern
PNG and the Solomon Islands are hosted within a single arc related to subduction at the New
Britain and San Cristobal trenches, variable and discrete geodynamic settings exist within both
the upper and lower plates throughout this region, which give rise to distinct mineralised
corridors. Most notably, this region is host to:
•the Solwara 1 deposit, which occurs within a major transtensional corridor in the eastern
Bismarck Sea
•the Ladolam deposit (Lihir), which is interpreted to have formed above but in relation to
tearing of the subducting slab
•the Panguna deposit, which is related to structure in the subducting slab marginal to the
actively spreading Woodlark Basin.
An evaluation of the nature and variability of these diverse geodynamic settings through
time can provide us with a better understanding of the relationship between the active south-
west Pacic magmatic arcs and mineral deposit formation. It may also provide insights into the
1. Associate Lecturer, Economic Geology Research Centre, College of Science, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive,
Townsville Qld 4811. Email: robert.holm@jcu.edu.au
2. Head of Geology, Exploration and Geophysics, Citigold, Gregory Highway, Charters Towers Qld 4820. Email: srichards@citigold.com
3. MAusIMM, Adjunct Lecturer, Economic Geology Research Centre, College of Science, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University,
1 James Cook Drive, Townsville Qld 4811.
4. Associate Professor, School of Earth Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane Qld 4072. Email: g.rosenbaum@uq.edu.au
5. Senior Lecturer, Economic Geology Research Centre, College of Science, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive,
Townsville Qld 4811. Email: carl.spandler@jcu.edu.au
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015
R J Holm et al
2
diverse array of deposit settings at ancient convergent margins, with applications in mineral
prospectivity studies.
INTRODUCTION
The south-west Pacic has long been the focus of research towards our understanding of giant
ore deposit formation, with New Guinea and the Solomon Islands playing host to deposits
such as Grasberg, Ok Tedi, Freida River, Porgera, Lihir and Panguna (Figure 1; Cooke,
Hollings and Walshe, 2005; Sillitoe, 2010; Richards, 2013). Changes in regional tectonics at
convergent margins have often been viewed as a contributing factor in the formation of
mineral deposits. In particular, changes in the subduction regime are commonly considered
as crucial parameters triggering mineralising events, associated with, for example, terrane
collisions, subduction of slab structure or changes in the slab angle during subduction (Cooke,
Hollings and Walshe, 2005; Rosenbaum et al, 2005; Richards, 2013; Richards and Holm, 2013;
Sillitoe, 2010). At present, Papua New Guinea (PNG) and the Solomon Islands lie within a
tectonically complex zone of oblique convergence between the Australian and Pacic plates,
trapped between the converging Ontong Java Plateau and Australian continent (Figure 1).
Previous tectonic studies provide us with a basic understanding of the geodynamic framework
for much of the south-west Pacic (eg Hall, 2002; Schellart, Lister and Toy, 2006). However,
FIG 1 – Tectonic setting and mineral deposits of eastern Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands. The modern arc setting related to
formation of the mineral deposits comprises, from west to east, the West Bismarck arc, the New Britain arc, the Tabar-Lihir-Tanga-
Feni Chain and the Solomon arc, associated with north-dipping subduction/underthrusting at the Ramu-Markham fault zone, New
Britain trench and San Cristobal trench respectively. Arrows denote plate motion direction of the Australian and Pacic plates. Filled
triangles denote active subduction. Outlined triangles denote slow or extinct subduction. NBP: North Bismarck plate; SBP: South
Bismarck plate; AT: Adelbert Terrane; FT: Finisterre Terrane; RMF: Ramu-Markham fault zone; NBT: New Britain trench.
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015
Disparate tectonic settings for Mineralisation in an active arc
3
our current understanding does not provide sufcient insight into the relationships and
feedbacks underpinning the complex tectonic settings. This in turn negates meaningful
comparisons between mineral deposit formation and geodynamic setting. In this study, we
report on the relationships between the tectonic evolution of eastern PNG and the Solomon
Islands established from new reconstructions, and the timing and location of mineral deposit
formation.
METHODS
Plate tectonic reconstructions provide us with a mechanism to test kinematic and dynamic
relationships throughout this structurally complex region. We developed a new plate tectonic
reconstruction for PNG and the Solomon Islands for the Late Neogene and Quaternary using
GPlates software (eg Seton et al, 2012). The reconstructions were generated in one million year
time intervals relative to the hybrid absolute reference frame of Seton et al (2012) and tectonic
plates were assumed to be rigid and non-deforming. Existing data sets of sea oor magnetic
isochrons, subducted slab maps and numerous prior studies into the tectonic history of the
region (eg Hall, 2002; Schellart, Lister and Toy, 2006; Holm and Richards, 2013; Holm, Spandler
and Richards, 2014) were integrated within GPlates as digitised polygon and polyline features
and spatially manipulated to provide constraint on reconstructions at specic geological times.
GPlates then interpolated plate motions about a reconstruction pole between known events to
produce the reconstruction model. A series of iterations were required to ensure a complete and
closed plate circuit. The plate tectonic reconstruction was then correlated with the formation of
mineral deposits in time and space (Figure 2), where deposit ages were derived from Cooke,
Hollings and Walshe (2005) and Singer, Berger and Moring (2008) and references therein.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Active magmatism in eastern PNG and the Solomon Islands is associated with north-dipping
subduction of the Australian plate and several microplates (Figure 1). While the modern-
day active arc appears as a single magmatic arc, it comprises several different geodynamic
settings. In the west, the continental crust of PNG is underthrust beneath the Adelbert and
Finisterre Terranes at the Ramu-Markham fault zone, giving rise to the West Bismarck arc
(Holm and Richards, 2013). Subduction of the Solomon Sea plate at the New Britain trench
results in magmatism of the New Britain arc, Tabar-Lihir-Tanga-Feni Chain and the western
Solomon arc. Subduction of the actively spreading Woodlark Basin and Australian plate at
the San Cristobal trench is related to magmatism of the Solomon arc. Similar to the variation
in arc development, mineral deposits show a comparable degree of variation along the arc
(Figure 1). In the west, there is a distinct lack of reported mineral occurrences, while the eastern
Bismarck, Tabar-Lihir-Tanga-Feni and Solomon arcs are well endowed with mineral deposits,
including the giant Lihir and Panguna deposits. This suggests that there is a relationship
between regional tectonics and ore deposit formation.
A comparison of the location and timing of mineral deposit formation with the tectonic
reconstructions (Figure 2) reveals a strong correlation between deposit emplacement and
the occurrence or passage of major structures in the upper or lower plate respectively. The
Solwara deposits of the eastern Bismarck Sea lie along a major transtensional structure that
accommodates sinistral motion between the North and South Bismarck microplates as well as
the opening of the Manus Basin (Figure 2). This setting is not unique within the Bismarck Sea;
however, this is the only occurrence of a dilational upper plate structure associated with active
subduction at depth. To the east, mineral deposits of the Tabar-Lihir-Tanga-Feni chain are
interpreted to have formed as the North Bismarck plate tracked over a tear in the subducting
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015
R J Holm et al
4
Solomon Sea plate (Figure 2). The reasons for development of the slab tear are numerous;
however, the two key factors are:
1. accommodating the subduction of a relatively at oceanic plate into a subduction trench
with a 90° bend
2. the left-lateral transpression imposed on the eastern part of the subduction zone caused by
the west-directed motion of the Ontong Java Plateau.
In the Solomon Islands, reconstructions showing the subduction of the active Woodlark
Basin spreading centre and associated extensional basin structures, such as transform faults,
demonstrate a spatial and temporal relationship with the formation of deposits. Specically,
FIG 2 – Selected snapshots from plate tectonic reconstructions with timing of corresponding mineral deposit formation. Reconstruction snapshots
are derived from GPlates reconstructions. Reconstructions shown here include aspects of sea oor spreading in the Woodlark Basin and Manus Basin,
sea oor magnetic isochrons of the Solomon Sea, subducted slab model for the Solomon Sea with 100 km depth contours (Holm and Richards, 2013)
and an associated projection of the subducted slab model area oated to the surface. Oceanic plateaus are shown in dark grey, with the Ontong Java
Plateau to the north-east and the Louisiade Plateau to the south. The arc crust is shown in light grey derived from 1000 m bathymetric contour.
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015
Disparate tectonic settings for Mineralisation in an active arc
5
the New Georgia Island group hosting the Mase deposit resides above the projected trend of
the subducted Woodlark spreading centre (Figure 1). The reconstructions also show that the
deposit has been located adjacent to the subducting spreading centre since at least the mid-
Pliocene (Figure 2), suggesting a prolonged inuence of ridge subduction on the formation of
the deposit. Finally, the location and timing of the Panguna and Fauro Island deposits of and
adjacent to Bougainville and the Hidden Valley and Koloula deposits of Guadalcanal correlate
well with subduction of lower plate structures marginal to the Woodlark Basin (Figure 2).
Reconstructions of the metalogenic Solomon Islands and eastern PNG subduction margins
suggest that the location of favourable structures or the passage of subducting structures
contributes to the localisation of mineralisation corridors. The reasons for this relationship
require further research, but we hypothesise that these structures either promote increased
uid ux within the mantle resulting from a larger exposure of the subducting slab to the
surrounding asthenospheric mantle (Richards and Holm, 2013) or that upper plate structures
may act as preferential conduits to promote high uid ux within the upper crust. Increased
uid ux within either the mantle or upper plate likely promotes the transport of metals,
leading to a favourable setting for mineral deposit formation.
CONCLUSIONS
In this extended abstract, we compared the location and timing for ore deposit formation with
new plate tectonic reconstructions for eastern PNG and the Solomon Islands. The comparison
revealed a correlation between deposit emplacement and the location of major structures
through time, where both upper plate and lower plate structures may independently contribute
to prospective settings for deposit formation. Favourable structures seen to contribute to
the localisation of mineralised corridors are varied in nature, including structures within
the subducting slab that comprise slab tearing or slab windows, and possible reactivation
of inherited structures as slab tears; or upper plate structures that promote localisation of
magmatism and uid-ow such as transtensional strain in the eastern Bismarck Sea. These
ndings suggest that a good understanding of geodynamic settings for ore deposit formation
have the potential to contribute to prospectivity studies and the generation of new exploration
targets at regional scales.
REFERENCES
Cooke, D R, Hollings, P and Walshe, J L, 2005. Giant porphyry deposits: characteristics, distribution, and
tectonic controls, Economic Geology, 100:801–818.
Hall, R, 2002. Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacic: computer-
based reconstructions, model and animations, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 20:353–431.
Holm, R J and Richards, S W, 2013. A re-evaluation of arc-continent collision and along-arc variation in
the Bismarck Sea region, Papua New Guinea, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 60:605–619.
Holm, R J, Spandler, C and Richards, S W, 2014. Continental collision, orogenesis and arc magmatism
of the Miocene Maramuni arc, Papua New Guinea, Gondwana Research, doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.09.011.
Richards, J P, 2013. Giant ore deposits formed by optimal alignments and combinations of geological
processes, Nature Geoscience, 6:911–916.
Richards, S W and Holm, R J, 2013. Tectonic preconditioning and the formation of giant porphyry
deposits, in Tectonics, Metallogeny, and Discovery: The North American Cordillera and Similar Accretionary
Settings, special publication 17, pp 265–275 (Society of Economic Geologists: Littleton).
Rosenbaum, G, Giles, D, Saxon, M, Betts, P G, Weinberg, R F and Duboz, C, 2005. Subduction of the
Nazca Ridge and the Inca Plateau: insights into the formation of ore deposits in Peru, Earth and
Planetary Science Letters, 239:18–32.
PACRIM 2015 CONGRESS / HONG KONG, CHINA, 18–21 MARCH 2015
R J Holm et al
6
Schellart, W P, Lister, G S and Toy, V G, 2006. A Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic reconstruction of the
southwest Pacic region: tectonics controlled by subduction and slab rollback processes, Earth-Science
Reviews, 76:191–233.
Seton, M, Müller, R D, Zahirovic, S, Gaina, C, Torsvik, T, Shephard, G, Talsma, A, Gurnis, M, Turner,
M, Maus, S and Chandler, M, 2012. Global continental and ocean basin reconstructions since 200 Ma,
Earth-Science Reviews, 113:212–270.
Sillitoe, R H, 2010. Porphyry copper systems, Economic Geology, 105:3–41.
Singer, D A, Berger, V I and Moring, B C, 2008. Porphyry copper deposits of the world: database and
grade and tonnage models, US Geological Survey open-le report 2008–1155.