The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is preferred at this institution for lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. Variations in vascular anatomy, despite reassuring Doppler exam, can preclude ALT harvest. In such events we follow an algorithm for contingency planning. In this paper we aim to compare outcomes of contingency strategies to ALT flaps that go as planned.
Between 1/2001 and 2/2012, 548 free ALT flaps were planned for LE reconstruction at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. In 30 cases, the ALT could not be used because perforators were not identified (n=12), were unreliably small (n=14), or injured (n=4). Following our algorithm, the ALT was converted to ipsilateral tensor fascia lata (TFL) flap (n=21), anteromedial thigh flap (n=5), or contralateral vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap (n=4). Outcomes including flap failure, necrosis, and re-exploration rate were compared in cases that went as planned to cases requiring conversion.
The incidence of unreliably small or absent perforators was 4.8%. Adding cases of iatrogenic perforator injury, the incidence was 5.5%. There was no difference in flap survival, flap loss, or need for re-exploration whether the ALT or another flap was used. In 70% of cases we favored the TFL flap, partial flap necrosis occurred in 6 of 21 cases, and total flap loss occurred in 1.
Without preoperative imaging, dilemmas may be encountered in roughly 1 of 20 ALT flaps raised. Following our algorithm, alternative options can be reliably confer comparable results to planned ALT flaps.
III (Therapeutic).