A southern plantation house half-hidden by trees; an empty pool semi-obscured by the bars of a gate; children leaning against yellowing stucco walls papered with posters advertising 40-ounce bottles of beer; these are among the images that mobilize affecting geographies of Blackness in RaMell Ross's Hale County This Morning, This Evening (2018) and Sophia Nahli Allison's A Love Song for Latasha (2019). Affecting geography in film, as I am conceiving it here, refers to the manufacture and circulation of affect through evocation of associative relations between images of space, place, and time (by way of cutting, montage, and duration, for example).[1] Ross's shots of the plantation, for example, are cross-cut with found footage from a silent-era film featuring a blackfaced Black actor peeking out from behind a line of trees.[2] The sequence opens with a "phantom ride" filmed from a car as it quickly makes its way up the palatial house's gravel driveway. Whatever visceral response might be mobilized for a spectator by the apprehension of a plantation house, which at once signifies histories of wealth, beauty, and captive, enslaved bodies, is linked to affects that are mobilized by the evocation of silent-era minstrels, which are then linked to the present moment by way of the contemporary vehicle driving up the lane. The sequence is free from any of the expository discourse that is typical of the documentary form, save for one question posed via an intertitle card-"What happens when all the cotton is picked?"-and instead opens meaning through affecting images that reference, but do not represent, spaces, places, and times. By "affect" here, I loosely distinguish between emotion, a named (although not necessarily reliably named) response to stimuli, and affect, a pre-cognitive, unnamable, and physical response to the proximity of objects.[3] Affect, in other words, is generated at the point of immediate perception-conscious naming or contemplation of affect translates it into emotion. The aesthetics of affect in film involves cinematographic techniques (manipulation and manufacture of images and sounds) that function to generate visceral spectator responses to subjects, objects, and sounds on screen without necessarily aiming to attach them to specific emotional interpretations. The affecting devices might involve expressions of emotion on screen (through gestures, sounds, or words-a person crying, for example), but film affect is unnamable, something experienced bodily by spectators rather than, or prior to, being experienced as cognition or interpretation.[4] Steve Pile similarly describes the distinction between the field of emotional geography and affect geography. Emotional geography is interested in the study of professed or observable emotional responses to spaces, places, and other geographic or architectural objects. The field of affect geography is interested in the ways in which affect functions