ArticlePDF Available

IMPORTANCE OF MOUTH GUARDS IN SPORTS: A REVIEW

Authors:

Abstract

Teens and adults experience thousands of injuries on the playing field, while biking and during other activities. Injuries to the face in nearly every sport can harm teeth, lips, cheeks and tongue. A properly fitted mouth protector is important to protect teeth and smile. This article gives a brief review on the mouth guards to be used to protect smile.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8903
IMPORTANCE OF MOUTH GUARDS IN SPORTS: A REVIEW
Priyadarshani G Pawar1, Mukesh M. Suryawanshi2, Ashishkumar K. Patil3, Pravin S Purnale4,
Fareedi Mukram Ali5
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
Priyadarshani G Pawar, Mukesh M Suryawanshi, Ashishkumar K Patil, Pravin S Purnale, Fareedi Mukram Ali. “Importance
of mouth guards in sports: a review”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2013; Vol. 2,
Issue 46, November 18; Page: 8903-8908.
ABSTRACT: Teens and adults experience thousands of injuries on the playing field, while biking and
during other activities. Injuries to the face in nearly every sport can harm teeth, lips, cheeks and
tongue. A properly fitted mouth protector is important to protect teeth and smile. This article gives a
brief review on the mouth guards to be used to protect smile.
KEY WORDS: mouth guard, mouth protector
INTRODUCTION: Sports have the potential to seriously harm the head, face or mouth as a result of
head-to- head contact , hazardous falls, tooth clenching or blow to the mouth. Knowing how to
prevent injuries is important if you participate in organized sports or other recreational activities.
When it comes to protecting your mouth, a mouth guard is an essential piece of athletic gear that
should be part of an athlete’s standard equipment from an early age. In fact, an athlete is 60 times
more likely to suffer harm to the teeth when not wearing a mouth guard. Mouth guards help buffer
an impact or blow that otherwise could cause broken teeth, jaw injuries or cuts to the lip, tongue or
face. Mouth guards also may reduce the rate and severity of concussions. Sport, leisure and
recreation activities are the most common cause of dental injuries. Dental injuries can be painful,
disfiguring and expensive to treat. Dental injuries may result in time off work or school to recover,
and lengthy (and expensive) dental treatment. A mouth guard, custom-fitted by your dentist and
worn every time you play or train, will protect against dental injury.
HISTORY: The exact origins of the mouth guard are unclear. Most evidence indicates that the
concept of a mouth guard was initiated in the sport of boxing. Originally, boxers used to wear mouth
guards out of cotton, tape, sponge, or small pieces of wood. They bite the material between their
teeth.(1) These devices proved impractical, a British dentist, began to fabricate mouthpieces for
boxers in 1892. Krause placed strips of a natural rubber resin, gutta-percha, over the maxillary
incisors of boxers. (2) Philip Krause was an amateur boxer used his own device before 1921.(3) In the
early 1900s, Jacob Marks created a custom fitted mouth guard in London.(4) In 1927 boxing match
between Jack Sharkey and Mike McTigue. McTigue was winning for most of the fight, but a chipped
tooth cut his lip, and he was forced to forfeit the match. From that point on, mouth guards were
acceptable.(4,5) In 1947, a Los Angeles dentist, made a breakthrough by using transparent acrylic
resin to form an "acrylic splint”. In the 1948 issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association,
the procedure for making and fitting the acrylic mouth guard was described in detail by Dr.
Lilyquist.(6) He was awarded nationwide as the father of the modern mouth guard for athletes. (6,7) In
the 1940s and 1950s, dental injuries were responsible for 24-50% of all injuries in American
football. In 1952, Life magazine did a report on Notre Dame football players without incisors.(8) In
the 1950s, the American Dental Association (ADA) began conducting research on mouth guards and
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8904
soon promoted to the public.(9) In 1960, the ADA recommended the use of latex mouth guards in all
contact sports. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) followed suit in 1973 and made
mouth guards mandatory in college football. Since the introduction of the mouth guard, the number
of dental injuries has decreased dramatically.(10) Mouth guards have become a standard in many
sports.
SPORTS WHICH NEED MOUTHGUARD:
The ADA recommends mouth guards be used in
Acrobatics
Ice Skating
Water polo
Basketball
Inline Skating
Weight Lifting
Bicycling
Lacrosse
Wrestling
Boxing
Martial Arts
Volleyball
Equestrian Events
Racquetball
Squash
Extreme Sports
Rugby
Surfing
Field Hockey
Shot putting
Soccer
Football
Skateboarding
Softball
Gymnastics
Skiing
Skydiving
Handball
Common Dental Injuries And Risk factors: Common Dental Injuries Incurred During Sport Or
Leisure Activities Include Cut lips, Cut gums, Cut cheeks, Cuts to the tongue or face, Chipped teeth,
Broken teeth, Knocked out teeth, Broken jaw, Temporomandibular joint fractures. Some people are
at higher risk of dental injury. Risk factors include: Protrusive front teeth, Inadequate lip coverage
over the front teeth, Current orthodontic treatment, such as wearing braces .Participation in sports
or leisure activities that carry a high risk of collision or falls. In 1995 Dr. Raymond Flanders st
reported on the high incidence of injuries in sports other than football, in both male and female
sporting activities. In football where mouth guards are worn, .07% of the injuries were orofacial. In
basketball where mouth guards are not routinely worn, 34% of the injuries were orofacial. Various
degrees of injury, from simple contusions and lacerations to avulsions and fractured jaws are being
reported. Dental injuries can be painful, disfiguring and expensive to treat. Dental injuries may result
in time off work or school to recover, and lengthy (and expensive) dental treatment. Without using
mouth guards, the athlete increases their chance of injury, especially concussion, from a blow to the
chin. Some of these injuries, such as concussion, can cause lifelong effects.
Mouth guard features: Wearing an appropriately designed and made mouth guard while
participating in sport will protect against dental injuries. Players of all ages involved in sports and
activities where they are at risk of an injury to the face should protect their teeth with a properly
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8905
fitted mouth guard. A protective mouth guard should be comfortable yet tight-fitting, allows normal
breathing, speech and swallowing. It does not cause gagging or irritation. It should be odourless and
tasteless and thick enough (4mm) to provide protection against impact. The mouth guards were
made of the following materials: (1) Poly (vinyl acetate-ethylene) copolymer clear thermoplastic (2)
Polyurethane (3) Laminated thermoplastic.
Types of Mouth guards: The Three Basic Types Of Mouth guard Include:
The Ready-Made Or Stock Mouth guard
The Mouth- Formed “ Boil-And- Bite” Mouth guard
The Custom-Fitted Mouth guard --- A) The Vacuum Mouth guard
B) Pressure Laminated Mouth guard.
Stock a ready-to-wear mouth guard that comes pre-formed. The stock mouth guard, available at
most sporting good stores, come in limited sizes and are the least expensive and least protective. The
stock mouth guard is the least acceptable. This type of mouth guard is often altered and cut by the
athlete in an attempt to make it more comfortable, further reducing the protective properties of the
mouth guard. these are the least expensive mouth guard, they also offer the least amount of
protection. They tend to be uncomfortable and fit poorly.(fig.1)
Boil-and-bite once the lining is softened in boiling water, the person bites on the mouth guard to
help it take the shape of their mouth. These mouth guards may not conform to the person’s bite and
can be uncomfortable to wear. Athletes also cut and alter these bulky and ill fitting boil and bite
mouth guards due to their poor fit, poor retention, and gagging effects11.(fig.2)
Custom-fitted It considered to provide the best protection for the teeth, lips and jaw. Custom-
fitted mouth guards are made by a dentist or a dental technician to fit the individual’s mouth. They
provide the best protection due to their close fit, comfort and cushioning (shock absorption) effect.
They are the most expensive option. However, the cost of an injury to the teeth or jaw will be a lot
more expensive. Dentists recommend custom-fitted mouth guards. There are two categories of
custom mouth guards, the Vacuum Mouth guard and the Pressure Laminated Mouth guard.
It is made from a stone cast of the mouth, usually of the maxillary (upper) arch, using an
impression by dentist. A thermoplastic mouth guard material is adapted over the cast with a special
vacuum machine which will chemically fuse under high heat and pressure with machines such as the
Drufomat, the Erkopress 2004, or the Biostar. (fig. 3, 4) The most common material for this use is a
poly-EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) copolymer. (fig. 5) The mouth guard is then trimmed and polished
to allow for proper tooth and gum adaptation. (fig. 6) All posterior teeth should be covered and
muscle attachments unimpinged. (fig. 7, 8) It should be noted that these mouth guards are still
superior to the store bought stock and boil and bite mouth guards because they have a much better
fit, made from a mold of your mouth, and are designed by dentist.
How To Care For Mouth guard It include:
Rinse the mouth guard in soap and warm water after each use. Allow it to air-dry.
Disinfect the mouth guard from time to time with a mouthwash.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8906
Keep the mouth guard in a well-ventilated plastic storage box when not in use. The box
should have several holes in it.
Do not leave the mouth guard in direct sunlight, in a closed car or in the car’s glove box. Heat
can damage it.
Ensure your mouth guard is in good condition before each use.
Ask your dentist to inspect your mouth guard at every dental check-up.
Replace the mouth guard if it is damaged.
Replace a child’s mouth guard every 12 to 18 months, even if it appears to be in good
condition. Growth and new teeth can alter the fit.
Replace an adult’s mouth guard after dental treatment or tooth loss. Otherwise it should last
for several years.
Wear the mouth guard at all times, including games and training sessions.
Players undergoing dental treatment can have a custom-fitted mouth guard made by their
dentist to fit comfortably and accurately over their braces.
DISCUSSION: As sports dentists and health professionals, we highly recommend the custom made
mouth guard, especially those of the laboratory lamination type for the very best in oral/facial
protection as well as concussion deterrence. This section has presented a discussion of the various
issues relating to injury prevention and mouth guards. By acknowledging these significant
differences in mouth guards, the public will be better informed and educated to seek their dental
sports protection from dental health professionals.
CONCLUSION: Sport, leisure and recreation activities are the most common cause of dental injuries.
A mouth guard, custom-fitted by your dentist, is considered to provide the best protection for the
teeth, lips and jaw. The cost of an injury to the teeth or jaw far exceeds the cost of a custom-fitted
mouth guard.
REFERENCES:
1. Knapik J. J., Marshall S. W., Lee R. B., Darakjy S. S., Jones S. B., Mitchener T. A., & Jones, B. H.
Mouth guards in Sport Activities. J Sports Medicine 2007;37(2), p.120.
2. Reed, R. V. Origin and early history of the dental mouthpiece. British Dental Journal 1994 ;176 :
p. 479.
3. Knapik et al., 2007: p. 120.
4. Pontsa, Peter T. (2008). Mouth Guards Prevent Dental Trauma in Sports. The Dent-Liner
2008;12 (3).
5. Knapik et al., 2007 :p. 121.
6. "Acrylic Splints for Athletes: Transparent Slip Casings for the Teeth as a Protection From
Blows." Journal of the American Dental Association 36.1 (1948) 109-110.
7. "Protecting Athletes' Teeth." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 1948 :21.162-18.
8. Using Mouth guards to Reduce the Incidence and Severity of Sports-related Oral Injuries."
Journal of the American Dental Association 137.12 (2006): 1712-1720.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8907
9. Zadik Y, Jeffet U, Levin L . "Prevention of dental trauma in a high-risk military population: the
discrepancy between knowledge and willingness to comply". Mil Med 2010; 175 (12): 1000
1003.
10. Zadik Y, Levin L. "Orofacial injuries and mouth guard use in elite commando fighters". Mil Med
2008;173 (12): 11851187.
11. Zadik Y, Levin L. "Does a free-of-charge distribution of boil-and-bite mouth guards to young
adult amateur sportsmen affect oral and facial trauma?". Dent Traumatol 2009; 25 (1): 6972.
Fig. 1: Stock mouth guard
Fig. 2 (A) Boil and bite mouth guard- before fitting
Fig. 2 (B) boil and bite mouth guard- after fitting
Fig.4: Fabricate a Biostar vinyl base on the cast
REVIEW ARTICLE
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 46/ November 18, 2013 Page 8908
AUTHORS:
1. Priyadarshani G. Pawar
2. Mukesh M. Suryawanshi
3. Ashishkumar K. Patil
4. Pravin S Purnale
5. Fareedi Mukram Ali
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
1. Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics,
MGV’s KBH Dental College and Hospital,
Nashik.
2. Senior Resident III, Department of Plastic
Surgery, Grant Medical College, Sir J.J. Group
of Hospitals, Mumbai.
3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative
& Endodontics, SMBT Dental College,
Sangamner Taluka, Maharashtra State.
4. Post Graduate Student, Department of
Prostshodontics, Rural Dental College, Loni.
5. Reader, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial
Surgery, SMBT Dental College, Sangamner
Taluka, Maharashtra.
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Priyadarshani G. Pawar,
Lecturer,
MGV’s KBH Dental College and Hospital,
Nashik.
Email pri_s77@yahoo.com
Date of Submission: 15/10/2013.
Date of Peer Review: 17/10/2013.
Date of Acceptance: 31/10/2013.
Date of Publishing: 12/11/2013
9
R
ar
e
c
as
e
re
p
or
t:
W
er
Fig. 5: Bio-star vinyl sheet after fabrication
Fig.6: Try-in on cast after removal of excess
Fig.7 Custom fitted sports mouth guard prepared
Fig. 8: Intraoral view
... Furthermore, pediatric dentists can play a vital role in fabricating mouthguards to safeguard the teeth of individuals at risk of dental injuries. [35] In this study, the limitations stemmed from exclusively relying on clinical records from a single study site. To improve the accuracy and generalizability of our findings, future research endeavors should contemplate adopting a multi-center longitudinal approach. ...
Article
Full-text available
Context Children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN) are “those who have, or are at increased risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional condition and who also require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally.” Among the challenges this population faces in accessing healthcare, oral health is regarded as their most significant treatment need. Previous studies on CYSHCN in Nigeria have relied on data from the south. Aim The objective of this study is to describe the oral health status of CYSHCN in a northern Nigeria population. Settings and Design Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH) is a tertiary-level hospital located in Kano state, northwest Nigeria. Materials and Methods Clinic records of CYSHCN who received treatment from the Paediatric Dentistry clinic of AKTH between 2017 and 2022 were retrieved and analyzed. Oral conditions were diagnosed based on the World Health Organization protocols. Statistical Analysis Used Categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Ages were described in terms of mean and standard deviation. Chi-square statistics were used to test for associations between categorical variables. The level of significance was set at a P value of ≤0.05. Conclusion Hematological disorders were the most prevalent medical conditions of CYSHCNs seen in AKTH. Dental caries was the prevalent dental condition in the population.
... Several authors even claim that properly adjusted mouthguard reduces the incidence of orofacial injuries in sports [4][5][6]. For this purpose, there are three types of mouthguards: Ready-Made or Stock Mouth guard; the Mouth-Formed "Boil-And-Bite" and the Custom-Fitted Mouth guard, which is considered the best protection for teeth, lips and jaw, because it is done by a dentist or dental technician and can be adapted to the athlete's mouth [7]. According to Bastian et al. [8] the boil andbite mouthguards were the most recommended by orthodontists. ...
Article
Full-text available
Up to this moment, there is no guideline regarding the materials to produce mouthguards. The most used is Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate (EVA). Studies indicate that laminating EVA sheets with rigid components could increase the protection capacities of the mouthguards whereas other studies suggest that only replacement of the material within it structure can increase energy absorption. The aim of this work is to evaluate the impact response of four different foils when compared to a 4 mm thickness EVA sheet. Five groups of different materials were subjected to impact tests with energies of 1.72 J, 2.85 J and 4.40 J. In this context was considered the following materials: EVA foils (G1), EVA foils with an EVA foam core (G2), EVA foils with an acetate core (G3), Foils of Erkoloc-pro (G4) and Foils of Ortho IBT resin (G5). Comparisons between the materials were made by qualitative analysis of the average energy-time and load-displacement curves, as well as by comparison of the peak load, maximum displacement, contact time and absorbed energy using the Kruskal-Wallis test. It was possible to conclude that statistically significant differences were found in the energy absorbed (p=0.001). Laminated foils with a soft core (G2) are a good option to produce mouthguards, while EVA foils with an acetate core (G3) and foils of Ortho IBT resin (G5) were declared unsuitable.
... Furthermore, to the authors' knowledge, no other paper has investigated the possibility of dental trauma in this group, with most literature on dental trauma in sport looking at sports such as boxing, rugby or hockey. 11 One of the limitations of this study is that we cannot state exactly how many individuals within these sports have personally experienced dental trauma due to the fact that the question also analysed witnessed trauma, as when designing the questionnaire, it was assumed that dental trauma would be a relatively infrequent occurrence. Furthermore, for the same reason, we did not ask about the number of traumatic episodes, and the specifics of long-term implications, such as treatment required, long-term damage to teeth and other possible outcomes. ...
Article
Background Mouthguards are routinely used in many sports, however their use in grappling sports has not really been examined to date, and to the authors' knowledge, there is no available data on the level of dental trauma experienced by this group. Materials and method The authors approached six different grappling schools, as well as leaving an invite on a grappling event page for volunteers to fill out a short survey. Results Around 81 respondents took part in the survey, with nearly 25% reporting that they never wore a mouthguard during grappling, and less than 50% not wearing a mouthguard all the time. Sixty-three percent of respondents had either seen dental and peri-oral injuries, or had experienced dental injuries as a result of grappling. Conclusion More work is needed to investigate whether mouthguards have a positive effect on the dental injury experience, and to establish the percentage of grapplers who at some point will be affected by dental trauma.
... Leisure activities, as well as many sports, increase the risk of orofacial, in particular dental trauma [6,9,[11][12][13][14][15]. In-vivo situations and stresses in the mouth differ in every case. ...
Article
Full-text available
This in-vitro study compares the shock absorption qualities of five mouthguard designs measured with a triangulation laser sensor during small hard object collisions. The aim was to investigate the impact of different labial designs on mouthguard performance. Methods: Five different custom-fabricated ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) types of mouthguards with varying thickness and different labial inserts (polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), nylon mesh, air space) were tested with a triangulation laser sensor during different energy blows, generated with a pendulum testing device. The pendulum hits were applied to the center of a pivoted tooth crown in a custom-built upper jaw model. Measurements were executed with the mouthguards on the model and with no mouthguard as a negative control. Results: Tooth deflection was reduced with all mouthguards in comparison to no mouthguard. Increasing mouthguard thickness improved the mouthguards’ shock absorption capacities. Also, adding labial inserts increased their preventive qualities in ascending order: Mouthguard with a soft insert (nylon mesh), a hard insert (PETG), air space plus a hard insert (PETG). Conclusion: Increasing EVA foil thickness of a mouthguard, increasing labial thickness, and adding labial inserts (soft, stiff and air space) improve mouthguard shock absorption capabilities during small hard object collisions, thereby improving dental trauma prevention.
... Leisure activities as well as many branches of sports, especially contact sports increase the risk of orofacial, in particular dental trauma 35,[59][60][61][62] and charging amplifier M482/A04) in order to understand mouthguards' damping behavior 20 . ...
Thesis
Background/Aims: This in-vitro study compares the preventive qualities of five different individual mouthguard designs with a triangulation laser sensor during small hard object collisions. The aim was to investigate the impact of different labial designs on mouthguard performance. Materials and methods: Five different custom-fabricated ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguards with varying thickness and different labial inserts (polyethylene terephthalate glycolmodified (PETG), nylon mesh, air space) were manufactured and tested with a triangulation laser sensor from Micro-Epsilon (optoNCDT 1750, Micro-Epsilon, Ortenburg, Germany) during different energy blows (0.07 J – 1.72 J) which were generated with a pendulum testing device. The stainless steel pendulum was applied to the center of the crown of a pivoted tooth in a custom-built stainless steel alloy upper jaw model. Measurements of the impacted pivoted tooth were carried out with a triangulation sensor with the samples (mouthguards) on the model and with no mouthguard as a negative control. Results: Tooth deflection was reduced with all tested mouthguards in comparison to tooth deflection with no mouthguard. Increasing the thickness of the mouthguard improved mouthguards’ shock absorption capabilities, as well as adding labial inserts increased the preventive qualities in ascending order: mouthguard with a soft insert (nylon mesh), with a hard insert (PETG), with air space and a hard insert (PETG). Conclusion: Increasing EVA foil thickness of the mouthguard, increasing labial thickness, adding labial inserts (soft, stiff and air space) improves mouthguard shock absorption capabilities during hard, small object collisions thereby improving dental trauma prevention.
Article
Introduction Kickboxing is a heavily participated combat sport within the UK. With the sport involving striking opponents, it is widely perceived to be associated with an elevated risk of maxillofacial injury. However, the research is limited, with gaps that require further investigation. This study aimed to assess the frequency and distribution of these injuries and whether protective modalities, including headgear and mouthguards, help reduce them.Materials and methods In total, 92 kickboxers completed an electronic questionnaire from 11 October to 11 November 2021.Results There was an incidence rate of 71.7% where participants had experienced at least one maxillofacial injury. The lip was the most affected (26.1%; p <0.05). Injury rates per participant for headgears, mouthguards and no protection were 2.1, 2.6 and 4.7, respectively.Conclusions Maxillofacial injuries in kickboxing have a prevalence of 71%. Protective equipment successfully reduced the frequency of maxillofacial injuries (p <0.05). Experience levels are a major contributor in the incidence of these injuries. Updated regulations to mandate protective equipment may significantly reduce incidence of injury. More research is required in relation to variables such as ethnicity and bone density to identify high-risk groups.
Chapter
The practice of a sport is increasingly inserted into a healthy lifestyle, having more and more adherents. However, some risks of orofacial trauma and/or traumatic dental injuries are associated with several sports, especially team sports. In this context, and despite being relatively recent, mouthguards are increasingly used in recreational or professional sports, whose federations even impose their use. It is therefore not surprising that there is an enormous effort to find new materials and more effective manufacturing techniques to maximize their efficiency and comfort. The present study evaluated the impact response of several materials to assess whether they have the necessary properties to be used in manufacturing mouthguards. It was possible to conclude that mouthguards produced by TPU and using the 3D printing technology are an alternative solution relative to the traditional EVA material. In addition, it was observed that the thickness can be lower than the values currently suggested in the literature, consequently minimizing the athletes’ discomfort.
Article
Full-text available
Sports dentistry is a branch of oral sciences concerned with the treatment, management, and prevention of the trauma to the orofacial region sustained while participating in any sports activity. Sports have been frequently reported to be an important cause of overall oral trauma in children, as well as adults. There is an evident lack of knowledge in the general population regarding how sports injuries are to be prevented and dealt with. Dentists, if included in sports teams and schools, can help penetrate this knowledge and awareness barrier. Lifestyle, eating habits, stress, etc., have an impact on the performance of the athletes. Stress in athletes can lead to substance abuse, more precisely, tobacco abuse which can affect their performance. Like physiotherapists, even dentists can be made a part of a professional sports team where they can help prevent the complications arising due to facial traumas by the administration of various protective appliances and handle maxillofacial trauma. The present study aimed to evaluate and comprehend the current opportunities for dentists in the field of sports dentistry, whilst emphasising their significance in the professional sports system.
Article
Background: This report reviews the available literature on the types and properties of athletic mouthguards, current fabrication methods and the role of mouth protectors in reducing the incidence and severity of sports-related oral injuries. Overview: For more than 50 years, the American Dental Association has promoted the protective value of wearing properly fitted mouthguards while participating in athletic or recreational activities that carry a risk of dental injury. Safety is essential to maintaining oral health, and a properly fitted mouthguard can minimize the risks of sustaining oral injuries during participation in sports. Conclusions: The dental literature supports the use and protective value of mouthguards in reducing sports-related injuries to the teeth and soft tissues. Dentists are encouraged to educate patients regarding the risks of oral injury in sports, fabricate properly fitted mouthguards, and provide appropriate guidance on mouthguard types and their protective properties, costs and benefits. Further studies addressing the effectiveness of currently available mouthguard types and population-based interventions for reducing oral injuries are recommended. Clinical implications: Participants in sporting and recreational activities are often susceptible to oral injury. To reduce the incidence and severity of sports-related oral trauma, the use of a properly fitted mouthguard is recommended in any athletic or recreational activity that carries a risk of injury.
Article
Three systematic reviews were conducted on: (i) the history of mouthguard use in sports; (ii) mouthguard material and construction; and (iii) the effectiveness of mouthguards in preventing orofacial injuries and concussions. Retrieval databases and bibliographies were explored to find studies using specific key words for each topic. The first recorded use of mouthguards was by boxers, and in the 1920s professional boxing became the first sport to require mouthguards. Advocacy by the American Dental Association led to the mandating of mouthguards for US high school football in the 1962 season. Currently, the US National Collegiate Athletic Association requires mouthguards for four sports (ice hockey, lacrosse, field hockey and football). However, the American Dental Association recommends the use of mouthguards in 29 sports/exercise activities. Mouthguard properties measured in various studies included shock-absorbing capability, hardness, stiffness (indicative of protective capability), tensile strength, tear strength (indicative of durability) and water absorption. Materials used for mouthguards included: (i) polyvinylacetate-polyethylene or ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer; (ii) polyvinylchloride; (iii) latex rubber; (iv) acrylic resin; and (v) polyurethane. Latex rubber was a popular material used in early mouthguards but it has lower shock absorbency, lower hardness and less tear and tensile strength than EVA or polyurethane. Among the more modern materials, none seems to stand out as superior to another since the characteristics of all the modern materials can be manipulated to provide a range of favourable characteristics. Impact studies have shown that compared with no mouthguard, mouthguards composed of many types of materials reduce the number of fractured teeth and head acceleration. In mouthguard design, consideration must be given to the nature of the collision (hard or soft objects) and characteristics of the mouth (e.g. brittle incisors, more rugged occusal surfaces of molars, soft gingiva). Laminates with different shock absorbing and stress distributing (stiffness) capability may be one way to accommodate these factors. Studies comparing mouthguard users with nonusers have examined different sports, employed a variety of study designs and used widely-varying injury case definitions. Prior to the 1980s, most studies exhibited relatively low methodological quality. Despite these issues, meta-analyses indicated that the risk of an orofacial sports injury was 1.61.9 times higher when a mouthguard was not worn. However, the evidence that mouthguards protect against concussion was inconsistent, and no conclusion regarding the effectiveness of mouthguards in preventing concussion can be drawn at present. Mouthguards should continue to be used in sport activities where there is significant risk of orofacial injury.
Article
Military fighters are at high risk for oral/tooth injuries. Our aim was to evaluate the knowledge and willingness to use preventive measures among this population to reduce oral trauma. A total of 336 fighters were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group answered a structured questionnaire, which included questions regarding: knowledge of the benefits of mouthguard use, past/current use, and willingness to use a mouthguard. The intervention group received a 60-minute dental trauma lecture, and responded to the same questionnaire. Significantly more subjects in the intervention group were familiar with the benefits of mouthguards compared to the control group, but there was no difference between the groups in their willingness to use mouthguards routinely. Discomfort and potential interference to sport performance were the most common reasons for rejection. It seems that a structured lecture is not sufficient for ensuring usage of mouthguards in a military population. Emphasis on motivation or mandating use may be required.
Article
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the compliance effectiveness of free-of-charge distribution of boil-and-bite mouthguards to amateur sportsmen who exercise and play without a formal team, a coach, or regulations. Several infantry units in the Israel Defense Forces distributed maxillary boil-and-bite mouthguards to their recruits. Target companies from these battalions and from similar battalions (comparison group--mouthguards not supplied), were selected. Soldiers were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Of the 630 male participants, 272 received a mouthguard and 358 served as the comparison group. No differences were found between groups regarding demographic parameters or overall trauma cases. When compliance to a free-of-charge distributed boil-and-bite mouthguard was assessed, 93 (34.2%) participants reported using the mouthguard during sport activities. Compliance was high for martial arts, but low for other sports. Although the number of self-reported sport-related oral/dental trauma cases was similar between mouthguard users and non-users, the users group showed less severe injuries. However, free distribution to young amateur sportsmen does not affect oral and dental trauma unless accompanied by education and motivation.
Article
The incidence, etiology, and consequences of orofacial injuries during service were evaluated among active duty elite commando fighters in the Israel Defense Forces. Male fighters (N = 280) were interviewed. Orofacial injuries were reported by 76 (27.1%) participants, with tooth injuries as the most common: 40 (52.6%) suffered from dental fracture and 6 (7.9%) from subluxation/luxation. Overall incidence was 85.5 cases per 1,000 fighter-years. Most injuries occurred in an isolated training or operational field. Overall, 162 participants (57.9%) received a boil-and-bite mouth guard during recruitment, but only 49 (30.2%) used it regularly during training and sport activities. The prevalence of injuries among fighters who reported regular mouth guard use was smaller than among fighters who reported of no regular use (20.4% vs. 28.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). Commando fighters are highly predisposed to dental trauma, resulting in the interference of their continuous daily activity. Military health care professionals and commanders should promote mouth protection devices for high-risk populations.
Article
For 42 years, the author perused and searched dental literature for the true origin of the mouthpiece. This manuscript is the culmination of that search: identifying the originator, reviewing the contributions of several pioneering dentists in mouthpiece creation, and interviewing two of many notable boxing participants.
Acrylic Splints for Athletes: Transparent Slip Casings for the Teeth as a Protection From Blows
"Acrylic Splints for Athletes: Transparent Slip Casings for the Teeth as a Protection From Blows." Journal of the American Dental Association 36.1 (1948) 109-110.
Mouth Guards Prevent Dental Trauma in Sports
  • Peter T Pontsa
Pontsa, Peter T. (2008). Mouth Guards Prevent Dental Trauma in Sports. The Dent-Liner 2008;12 (3).
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, SMBT Dental College
  • Reader
Reader, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, SMBT Dental College, Sangamner Taluka, Maharashtra.
Dr. Priyadarshani G. Pawar, Lecturer, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital
  • Name Address
  • Id
  • The
  • Author
NAME ADDRESS EMAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Priyadarshani G. Pawar, Lecturer, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik.