ArticlePDF Available

Scyliorhinus ugoi, a new species of catshark from Brazil (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae)

Authors:
Accepted by M.R. de Carvalho: 27 Feb. 2015; published: 25 Mar. 2015
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN
1175-5334
(online edition)
Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press
Zootaxa 3937 (2): 347
361
www.mapress.com
/
zootaxa
/
Article
347
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3937.2.6
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E654E1ED-708D-4537-A7EC-8FFF8EC2DCF4
Scyliorhinus ugoi, a new species of catshark from Brazil (Chondrichthyes:
Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae)
KARLA D. A. SOARES
1,4
, OTTO F. B. GADIG
2
& ULISSES L. GOMES
3
¹Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Zoologia, Rua do Matão, Trav. 14, no. 101, São Paulo, SP, CEP
05508-900, Brazil. E-mail:
karlad.soares@yahoo.com.br
²Laboratório de Pesquisa de Elasmobrânquios, Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio Mesquita Filho’, Campus Experimental do
Litoral Paulista, Departamento de Biologia Marinha, Praça Infante Dom Henrique, s/n, Parque Bitaru, São Vicente, SP, CEP 11330-
900, Brazil. E-mail: gadig@clp.unesp.br
³Laboratório de Taxonomia de Elasmobrânquios, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia,
Departamento de
Zoologia, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20550-900. E-mail: ulisseslg@uerj.br
4
Corresponding au thor
Abstract
A new species of catshark (Carcharhiniformes, Scyliorhinidae), Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., is described from off North-
eastern and Southeastern Brazil. The new species is closest to the Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group and S. hesperius
but differs in background coloration, head width, sexual maturity, and in cranial and body proportions.
Key words: Scyliorhinidae, Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., dark freckled catshark, southwestern Atlantic Ocean, Brazil
Introduction
The genus Scyliorhinus Blainville 1816, consists of 15 species whose geographical distribution covers all seas,
from cold to tropical waters, except the Antarctic and Southeastern Indian Ocean. Species of this genus live in close
association with the substrate, from coastal regions to the edge of the continental shelf, reaching depths of
about 2,000 m (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948; Springer, 1966, 1979; Compagno et al., 2005).
According to Springer (1979) and Compagno (1984), Scyliorhinus presents the following characters: color
pattern with dark dorsal saddles, clear and/or dark blotches, supraorbital crest present, small snout, small lower
labial furrow and upper labial furrow absent, and second dorsal fin smaller than first. There is a small flap that
slightly overlaps the lower lip at each corner of the mouth, the outer edge of which may extend anteriorl y,
from the corner of the mouth for a short distance, giving the impression that an upper labial furrow is present.
Scyliorhinus is most diverse in the western Atlantic and at least three species are listed as occurring in the
Brazilian coast, as follows: S. haeckelii Miranda Ribeiro, 1907, distributed from Venezuela to Argentina
(Compagno, 1984; Figueiroa, 2011), S. besnardi Springer & Sadowsky, 1970, found in southeastern Brazil to
Argentina (Springer & Sadowsky, 1970, Springer, 1966, 1979; Figueiroa, 2011), and S. hesperius Springer, 1966,
recorded from Honduras in the Caribbean Sea to the Brazilian central coast (Gadig & Gomes, 2003). But because
of their great similarity and lack of exclusive characters, S. haeckelii and S. besnardi are treated here as the S.
haeckelii/besnardi group (Gadig, 2001; Gomes et al., 2010; Soares, 2014). However, Soares (2014) has found that
S. hesperius of Gadig & Gomes (2003) and Scyliorhinus sp. of Gomes et al. (2010) represent a new species
occurring from northeastern Brazil to Rio de Janeiro state; this species is herein described.
Material and methods
Abbreviations and methodology for body measurements followed Compagno (2001) with addition of the
SOARES ET AL.
348
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
measurement ‘vent-caudal length’. Measurements are expressed as percentages of total length (%TL). Cranium
terminology and cranial measurements followed Compagno (1988a). Clasper terminology was based on
Jungersen (1899). Counts of v ertebrae and fin radials were t a k en from radiographs and dissected specimens.
Tooth row counts and nomenclature for dentition followed Compagno (1988a). Dermal denticles were taken from
the left side of the body above the pectoral and below first dorsal fins. Dermal denticles were photographed
using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). The
distribution of the new species is shown in a map which was generated based on the software Google Earth.The
holotype and paratypes (Fig. 1) were deposited in the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro (MNRJ), Museu de
Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP) and ichthyological collection of the Universidade do Estado do
Rio de Janeiro (UERJ).
Scyliorhinidae Gill, 1862
Scyliorhinus Blainville, 1816
Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov.
(Figs. 1–9)
Proposed common name: dark freckled catshark (English), cação-gato negrinho (Portuguese).
Scyliohinus sp.: Gadig, 2001, pp. 149–150, coast of Espírito Santo state; Gomes et al. 2010, pp. 85–86, fig. 110, coast of Rio de
Janeiro state.
Scyliorhinus hesperius: Gadig & Gomes, 2003, p. 22, coasts of Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro states.
Scyliorhinus sp. 1: Soares, 2014, pp. 80–84, figs. 17, 68.
Holotype. MNRJ 42619, adult female, 496 mm TL (southern Bahia, Central Brazilian coast).
Paratypes. MZUSP 110448, adult male, 465 mm TL (Alagoas, Northeastern Brazil, S 34° 50’W);
MZUSP 110449, adult male, 445 mm TL (Rio Grande do Norte, Northeastern Brazil, 14’S 34° 51’W); UERJ
1725, adult male, 530 mm TL (Central Brazilian coast, between southern Bahia and northern Rio de Janeiro;
cranium, jaws and claspers); UERJ 2179, immature male, 415 mm TL (southern Bahia, Central Brazilian coast).
Additional material examined. 5 specimens (see Appendix).
Diagnosis. A southwestern Atlantic Ocean Scyliorhinus distinguished by a considerably broad head (vs.
slender in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group and S. hesperius), and color pattern with brown saddles on a light
brown background, predorsal saddles with anterior and posterior sharp median projections (vs. no projections
in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group or S. hesperius); and light and dark, spiracle-sized or slightly smaller spots,
lacking large white spots (vs. large white spots in S. hesperius). The following combination of characters also
distinguishes these species: snout rounded and moderately short, preoral length 5% TL (vs. 4.5% TL in the S.
haeckelii/besnardi group); preorbital length 6.4% TL and head length 20% TL (vs. 5% TL and 18% TL in S.
hesperius); mouth width corresponding to 9% TL (vs. 8% TL in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group and 7.2% TL in S.
hesperius); pectoral-pelvic space 1.5 times pelvic-anal space (vs. equal in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group), and
interdorsal space 2.3 times dorsal-caudal space (vs. 1.6 times in S. haeckelii/besnardi group); anal-fin base 8% TL
(vs. 6.7% TL in S. hesperius and 8.3% TL in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group); cranium with flat basal plate, without
keels; cranial width larger in females (42.7% NL) (vs. 37.4% NL in the S. haeckelii/besnardi group); a terminal
dermal cover present in hindmost portion of clasper, covering terminal cartilages (lacking in S. hesperius);
medium-sized, adult male at 445 mm TL and adult female 500 mm TL (vs. 353 mm and 410 mm, respectively, for
the S. haeckelii/besnardi group).
Description. Morphometric measurements are given in Table 1 and cranial measurements in Table 2. Modes of
meristic counts are given as well their range in parentheses (if different).
Head (Fig. 2a–c) broad and depressed, greatest width 0.63 times of head length. Snout thick, somewhat
flattened and relatively short, preoral length corresponding to 4.3–5.6% TL and 0.5 times the mouth width.
Ampullae pores not greatly enlarged on snout. Preoral length 1.1–1.4 times in preorbital length (vs. 1.4–1.7 in the
Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group) (Tab. 1).
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
349
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
TABLE 1. Measurements in millimeters and proportions as percentage of total length for Scyliorhinus ugoi sp.
nov. Mean (x), standard deviation (SD) and range of proportions (%).
Measurements Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov. Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi
x SD% x SD %
Total length (TL) 516 ±68.1 100 354.4 ±78.7 100
Precaudal length 393.7± 55.7 74.7–76.8 275.6 ±63.5 76.5–77.9
Eye-spiracle length 6.1 ± 1.3 0.9–1.3 3.3 ±1.2 0.6–1.3
Preoral length 23.8 ±4.7 4.3–5.6 16.9 ±3.2 4.3–4.7
Preorbital length 32.6 ±3.8 6.4 23.2 ±4.5 6.2–8.0
Prespiracular length 53.1 ±5.9 10.4–10.7 37.6 ±7.7 10.6–10.7
Prebranchial length 76.6 ±11.4 14.5–15.2 54.2±11.9 14.8–15.4
Head length 103.2 ±14.3 19.5–20.3 71 ±16.1 18.7–19.2
Prepectoral length 94.0 ±12.1 17.9 66 ±15.3 16.1–18.2
Prepelvic length 217.5±33.8 41.0–43.4 148 ±33.5 38.2–43.7
Snout-vent length 232.2±34.9 43.6–45.4 152 ±33.9 40.9–42.3
Vent-caudal length 262.5 ±43.4 53.7–55.3 189.6 ±40.9 51.3–58.3
Preanal length 314.1 ±50.3 59.1–64.4 213.2 ±51.4 55–62.7
Pre-first dorsal length 257.5 ±38.2 48.4–51.2 177 ±41.3 44.9–51.3
Interdorsal space 57.2 ±9.5 10.9–11.0 40.4 ±13.5 7.0–10.7
Dorsal-caudal space 22.3 ±4.7 4.2– 5.1 18.2 ±3.9 5.8–6.7
Pectoral-pelvic space 96.3 ±16.4 17.6–20.1 63.5 ±15.9 10–20.3
Pelvic-anal space 59.7 ±13.3 10.5–12.8 44.1 ±12.3 12.7–14.6
Anal-caudal space 39.2 ±5.6 7.4–7.6 28.5 ±6.5 8.7–8.9
Eye length 19.8 ±2.8 3.8–4.0 13.6 ±3.4 3.3–4.3
Eye height 3.8 ±0.3 0.9–1.4 4.7 ±1.1 1.3–1.5
Internarial space 10.1 ±3.6 1.4–2.4 9 ±3.4 2.0–4.0
Interorbital space 31.1 ±3.1 6.1–6.6 24.3 ±4.8 6.4–7.3
Spiracle length 4.3 ±1.1 0.4–0.9 2.6 ±1.1 0.6–1.3
Mouth length 23.5 ±5.0 3.7–5. 1 14.9 ±4.8 4.7–5.6
Mouth width 46.6 ±7.4 9.0–9.7 27.8 ±6.4 8.0
Lower labial furrow length 10.6 ±1.9 1.9–2.1 6.6 ±1.8 1.3–2.0
First gill slit height 15.2 ±2.7 2.8–3.1 9 ±2.3 2.0–2.8
Fifth gill slit height 8.6 ±2.3 0.9–1.8 4.7 ±1.3 1.3–1.9
Pectoral length 68.5 ±7.4 12.8–13.6 41 ±11.4 10.7–13.8
Pectoral anterior margin 74.6 ±9.0 14.5–15.0 47.5 ±11.9 12.7–15.6
Pectoral base 34.1 ±10.3 3.1–7.2 24.3 ±7.1 6.7–9.7
Pectoral posterior margin 45.6 ±6.3 8.7–9.0 30 ±8.8 5.3–8.9
Pectoral inner margin 32.2 ±2.3 5.9–7.1 21.9 ±5.8 5.3–7.6
Pelvic length 54.3 ±10.1 9.0–10.5 37.58 ±11.4 8.7–12.5
Pelvic inner margin 18.0 ±3.1 3.1–3.8 16.3 ±6.7 4–6.8
Pelvic base 38.0 ±11.0 6.4–8.9 24.4 ±6.6 4.7–8.0
Pelvic anterior margin 36.0 ±5.8 6.6–7.4 23 ±6.1 5.3–7.0
Pelvic posterior margin 33.6 ±4.8 6.4–6.6 22.7 ±7.2 3.2–7.4
Clasper outer length 20.3 ±4.5 3.8–4.1 16.8 ±8.1 2.0–6.2
......continued on the next page
SOARES ET AL.
350
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
Eyes (Fig. 3) large and spindle-shaped; eye length 5.2 times in head length and 2.5–4.2 times eye height.
Eyes dorsolateral on head, with lower edges well medial to horizontal head rim in dorsal view; subocular ridges
strong. Nictitating lower eyelids of rudimentary type (sensu Compagno, 1970), with shallow subocular pouches
and secondary lower eyelids free from upper eyelids. Prespiracular length corresponding to 10.5% TL (Tab. 1).
Nostrils (Fig. 4) with broad incurrent apertures, without nasoral grooves or nasal barbels, small oval excurrent
apertures and short posterior nasal flaps. Anterior nasal flaps large, covering posterior nasal flaps and
excurrent apertures somewhat anterior to mouth. Internarial space 2.4–4.6 times in interorbital space.Mouth (Fig.
4) broadly arched, moderately wide and short, mouth width 2.2 times in head length; mouth length 0.5 times
in mouth width. Teeth prominently exposed in ventral view. Lower labial furrows short, 0.2 times in mouth
width; upper labial furrows absent. Tongue moderate-sized flat and rounded, occupying most of mouth floor.
Dorsal labial cartilages 1.5 times the ventral one; anterior tip of dorsal cartilages reaching orbital processes of
palatoquadrate.
TABLE 1. (Continued)
Measurements Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov. Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi
x SD% x SD %
Clasper inner length 44.5 ±14.8 8.1–9.0 35.7 ±12.6 6.0–10.4
Clasper base width 3.5 ±2.1 0.4–0.8 4 ±1.4 0.6–1.1
Anal base 39.8 ±8.0 5.7–7.7 30.2 ±6.3 8.0–8.7
Anal anterior margin 44.1±6.3 8.3–8.7 28.1 ±6.3 8.0–8.7
Anal posterior margin 26.8 ±3.1 5.1–5.4 17.6 ±4.9 4.7–6.0
Anal inner margin 13.5 ±2.3 2.6–2.9 9 ±3.7 2.0–4.9
Anal height 22.3 ±3.8 4.2–4.6 13 ±3.6 3.3–5.1
First dorsal anterior margin 51.1 ±6.3 9.7–10.0 34.9 ±8.5 8.7–10.6
First dorsal base 36.1 ±5.7 6.6–7.1 24.1 ±6.4 6.7–8.0
First dorsal height 30.2 ±4.9 5.7 –5.9 19.1 ±5.7 2.7–6.0
First dorsal inner margin 15.7 ±2.7 3.1–3.4 10.2 ±2.8 2.0–3.6
Second dorsal anterior margin 36.6 ±7.9 5.0–7.6 26.5 ±6.1 5.3–7.6
Second dorsal base 30.1 ±4.8 5.5–6.1 19.5 ±4.9 5.3–6.6
Second dorsal height 21.1 ±4.6 3.8–4.7 12.6 ±3.4 3.3–4.7
Second dorsal inner margin 13.7 ±2.5 2.6–2.9 9 ±2.4 1.3–3.0
Dorsal caudal margin 122.5 ±13.4 23.4–25.3 78.7 ±16 23.2–23.5
Postventral caudal margin 50.7 ±4.0 9.4–10.7 35.4 ±7.5 8.7–10.0
Subterminal caudal margin 48.5 ±9.0 8.8–10.7 30.9 ±6.8 8.0–8.5
Terminal caudal margin 25.8 ±4.0 5.2–5.4 18.4 ±5.1 0.6–7.0
Terminal caudal lobe 29.0 ±4.0 5.4–5.6 18.6 ±5.3 4.0–7.2
Head height 32.6 ±7.4 5.4–6.6 22.7 ±5.8 4.7–7.0
Trunk height 53.8 ±11.4 9.5–12.2 42.2 ±8.9 10.7–11.6
Abdomen height 37.3 ±7.0 7.1–8.2 28.5 ±8 6.0–8.9
Caudal height 28.8 ±8.3 5.0–7.6 20.9 ±6 5.3–7.4
Caudal peduncle height 15.8 ±2.5 3.1–3.3 12.6 ±3.8 3.3–4.9
Head width 65.0 ±8.6 13. 0–13.3 41.4 ±13.5 3.3–11.7
Trunk width 63.8 ±13.7 10.9–14.5 43.7 ±10.3 11.4–12.7
Abdomen width 42.3 ±9.2 6.6–8.7 26.7 ±7.2 6.7–8.9
Caudal width 22.0 ±5.0 3.8–4.9 16 ±4.2 4.0–4.9
Caudal peduncle width 12.0 ±2.2 1.9–2.3 10.8 ±3.6 2.7–4.1
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
351
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
FIGURE 1. Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., holotype, MNRJ 42619, female, 500 mm TL. A) Dorsal view. B) Lateral view;
paratype, UERJ 2179, male, 419 mm TL. C) Dorsal view. D) Lateral view. Scale bar: 5 cm.
First two gill openings about equally long; first gill opening twice as large as fifth (Fig. 2c). All gill openings
slightly concave and not elevated on dorsolateral surface of head, gill filaments not visible externally.
Sexual heterodonty weak; adult males presenting teeth longer with undeveloped lateral cusps on central
portion of lower jaw. Upper teeth slightly higher-crowned than lower teeth, with longer, stronger transverse
ridges, otherwise very similar. Medial teeth (M) and anteroposterior teeth (AN) poorly differentiated; symphysial
teeth (S) with higher-crown and smaller than anteroposteriors, with erect or semi-erect cusps and one weak
cusplet on either side of the cusp. Anteroposteriors in both jaws larger than medials and symphysials, with semi
oblique cusps, usually one strong high cusplet on either side, longitudinal ridges confined to the basal ledges,
and low, flat roots. Gradient monognathic heterodonty well-developed in anteroposterior teeth; anteroposteriors
smaller distally, with thicker and more oblique cusps, and lower cusplets.
Teeth in 52/49 (47–56/45–53) rows, 3/2 (2–3/2–3) functional series. Teeth not highly differentiated in upper
and lower jaws or along jaws. Tooth formula:
Left AN16–19 M6–8 S1 S1 M6–8 AN16–19 Right
AN15–17 M6–9 M7–10 AN16–17
Lateral trunk denticles (Fig. 5) with flat, elongated teardrop-shaped crowns 1.4–2.1 times as long as wide,
anterior part covered with ectodermal pits (sensu Muñoz- Chápuli, 1985). Crown with a strong medial ridge
that extends entire length of crown on the long medial cusp. Lateral cusps not well developed, 0.3 times in medial
cusp; lateral ridges anterior to them very short or absent. Males with dermal denticles longer than females.
Density of dermal denticles on posterior regions lower than on anterior regions.
SOARES ET AL.
352
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
TABLE 2. Measurements in millimeters and proportions as percentage of nasobasal length for Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov.
Female (F), male (M), and range of proportions (%NL).
Body (Fig. 1) stout and depressed on head region, tapering considerably to caudal fin. Prepectoral length
corresponding to 17.9% of total length (TL) and prepelvic length 41–43.4% TL. Snout–vent length 0.8 times in
vent-caudal length. Pectoral-pelvic space 1.5–1.6 times pelvic–anal space (vs. 0.8–1.4 in the Scyliorhinus
haeckelii/besnardi group). Interdorsal space 2.1–2.5 times dorsal-caudal space (Tab. 1).
Pectoral fins (Figs. 1 and 2) large and rounded-triangular, not falcate, with narrowly rounded apexes and broad
bases. Origin of pectorals under interspace between third and fourth gill openings. Pectoral base 0.3– 0.7 times
mouth width (vs. 0.8 times in the Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group). Pectoral anterior margin 2–4.8 times its
base (vs. 1.7–2.3 in the Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group) and 1.6 times the posterior margin (Tab. 1).
Pectoral fin skeleton aplesodic (Fig. 6) with radials mostly divided into three segments, longest distal
radial segment (DRA) 1.8 times length of its proximal radial segment (PRA). Pectoral skeleton tribasal,
propterygium (PRO) with a single radial, mesopterygium (MES) with 3 radials, and metapterygium (MET) with
8 ( 7–9) radials on basal segment and 1 ( 1–2) on metapterygial axis (MTS); total radial count 13 (12–15).
Propterygium small, short and rectangular or trapezoidal. Mesopterygium short, diamond-shaped and slightly
elongated and distally expanded in the axes of its radials. A fused plate formed by the proximal segment of the
second, third and fourth mesopterygial radials. Metapterygium basal segment triangular, elongated slightly
diagonal to the axes of its radials; metapterygial axis quadrangular, trisegmental, and with length about 0.4
times of metapterygial basal segment. This segment presents a projection directed anteriorly in its inner margin.
Pelvic fins (Fig. 2) broadly triangular; pelvic anterior margins 0.5 times of pectoral anterior margins. Pelvic
anterior margin 0.9–1.1 times posterior margin (Tab.1). Total radial count 13 (12–15).
Claspers (Fig. 7) moderately long and slender, cylindrical and blunt-tipped, extending free rear tips of pelvic
fins, by a distance about 0.2 times pelvic inner margin. Most of clasper except dorsomedial and posteromedial
surface of glans (including rhipidion) covered by large denticles with anteriorly directed cusps. An envelope
(EN) delimits anteriorly an exorhipidion (ERH) not differentiated from lateral edge of glans, specialized clasper
hooks absent. Rhipidion (RH) well developed medially covered by a poorly developed cover rhipidion (CRH).
Measurements Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov.
F % NL M % NL
Nasobasal length (NL)54.3 100 51.5 100
Rostral length 14.6 20.8–29.3 12 22.4–24
Width across lateral rostral cartilages 7.6 13.8–14.5 6.5 12.2–13
Width across nasal capsules 43.6 77.5– 85.4 40 76–79.6
Nasal capsule width 21.6 37.9–43.7 21 40.8
Nasal capsule length 20.6 37.5–39.6 19 35.1–38.7
Nasal aperture width 13.5 25–25.8 14 26.5–27.7
Distance between nasal apertures 6.6 10.4–13.8 6.5 12.2–13
Distance between rostral base and anterior edge of anterior
fontanelle
21 39.5 19.5 36.7–38.8
Anterior fontanelle width 13.3 24.1–25 12.5 22.4–26
Basal plate width 22.6 39.6–45.8 19.5 37–38.7
Orbit length 24.3 44.8–47.9 24 46.3–47
Preorbital process length 3.3 6.2–7.4 3.5 6.1–7.4
Postorbital process length 4.5 8.3–8.6 4.5 8.1–9.2
Nasal capsules length 11 18.7–20.7 10.5 20.4
Suborbital shelf width 36 65.5–73 32.5 62.8–63.2
Otic capsules width 28 54.1–57.4 28.5 55.1–55.5
Width across preorbital processes 31.6 56.9–62.5 29.5 57.1–57.5
Width across postorbital processes 39.5 72.4–77 36 69.4–70.3
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
353
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
Pseudosiphon poorly developed and visualized only internally; pseudopera absent. Apopyle (AP) and hypopyle
(HP) connected by a long clasper groove, with its dorsal margins fused over the clasper groove. Clasper skeleton
(Fig. 7b) relatively simple. The axial cartilage connected proximally by a single basal segment and a dorsal beta
cartilage to the pelvic basipterygium. Clasper shaft slender and formed from the axial cartilage and tightly
rolled dorsal and ventral marginal (RD and RV) cartilages. A poorly developed acessory dorsal marginal
cartilage (RD2) present between the terminal portion of the dorsal marginal cartilage and anterior portion of the
dorsal terminal (TD); this cartilage supports the rhipidion. The skeleton of the clasper glans comprises a large,
curved, wedge-shaped dorsal terminal and a similarly shaped ventral terminal (TV), articulating with and
separated by a terminal extension of the axial cartilage, the narrow end-style (G); ventral terminal longer than
dorsal terminal cartilage. There is no accessory terminal cartilage or dorsal terminal 2 cartilage, but a slender
ventral terminal cartilage (TV2) is positioned on the ventral terminal cartilage. A terminal dermal cover (TDC –
new term) present in the hindmost portion of the clasper, covering the terminal cartilages and presenting no
denticles.
FIGURE 2. Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov. A) Dorsal view of the head of a female, MNRJ 42619, female, 500 mm TL. B)
Dorsal view of the head of a male, UERJ 2179, 419 mm TL. C) Lateral view of head, UERJ 2179 male, 419 mm TL. D)
First
dorsal fin. E) Second dorsal fin. F) Anal fin. G) Caudal fin. H) Ventral view of trunk, MNRJ 42619, female, 500 mm
TL. Scale bars: 2 cm.
SOARES ET AL.
354
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 3. Eye of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., MNRJ 42619, female, 500 mm TL. Scale bar: 2 cm.
FIGURE 4. Nostrils and mouth of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., MNRJ 42619, female, 500 mm TL. Scale bar: 2 cm.
First dorsal fin (Figs. 1, 2) triangular, apically narrow and not falcate, with nearly straight anterior margin,
rounded apex and angular free rear tip. First dorsal origin above to insertions of pelvic fins. First dorsal base
1.6 times in interdorsal space, 3.4 times in dorsal caudal margin. First dorsal anterior margin 1.4 times its base;
first dorsal height 0.8 times first dorsal base. Total radial count 13 (12–14).
Second dorsal fin (Figs. 1, 2) low, triangular, apically narrow and not falcate; second dorsal fin height 0.7
times first dorsal fin height, base 0.8 times first dorsal fin base. Second dorsal fin with nearly straight
anterior margin, bluntly rounded apex, narrowly rounded free rear tip, and straight inner margin. Second
dorsal fin origin slightly behind anal midbase. Second dorsal fin base 0.7 times in dorsocaudal space, second
dorsal fin height 1.4 times in second dorsal fin base. Total radial count 10 (9–12).
Anal fin low (Figs. 1, 2), apically narrow, not falcate and somewhat larger than second dorsal fin, anal fin
height 1.1 times second dorsal fin height and base 1.3 times second dorsal fin base. Anal fin anterior margin
nearly straight, apex narrowly rounded, free rear tip acutely pointed, and inner margin straight. Anal fin base
without preanal ridges, anal fin origin and anal fin base length behind pelvic fins insertions. Anal fin base 0.5
times interdorsal space (vs. 0.6–0.8 in the Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group) and 1.3–1.5 times dorsocaudal
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
355
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
space. Anal anterior margin 1.5–1.7 times posterior one, anal fin height 1.8 times in anal fin base. Total radial
count 20 (18–22).
Caudal fin (Figs. 1, 2) narrow-lobed and asymmetrical, with large and hardly developed terminal lobe.
Caudal fin short, dorsal margin 3.2 times in precaudal length; subterminal margin 0.9–1 time in terminal margin.
Dorsal caudal fin margin slightly convex, without lateral undulations. No crests of denticles on the caudal fin
margins.
FIGURE 5. Lateral trunk denticles of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov. A–C) UERJ 1726, female, 602 mm TL. D–F) UERJ 1725,
adult male, 534 mm TL. A, D) Region above pectoral fin. B, E) Region below fi r s t dorsal fin. C, F) Region below
second dorsal fin.
FIGURE 6. Pectoral fin skeleton of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., UERJ 1722, female, 600 mm TL. Scale bar: 2 cm. DRA,
distal segment; MES, mesopterygium; MET, metapterygium; MTS, metapterygial axis; PRA, proximal segment; PRO,
propterygium.
SOARES ET AL.
356
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 7. Clasper of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., UERJ 1725, male, 530 mm TL. A) Clasper gland. B) Skeleton. Scale bar =
5 mm. AP, apopyle; CRH, cover rhipidion; G, end-style; EN, envelope; ERH, exorhipidion; HP, hypopyle; RD, marginal dorsal
cartilage; RD2, accessory marginal dorsal cartilage; RH, rhipidion; RV, marginal ventral cartilage; TD, terminal dorsal
cartilage; TDC, terminal dermal cover; TV, terminal ventral cartilage; TV2, terminal ventral cartilage 2.
Total vertebral counts 127 (119–135), monospondylous precaudal centra (MP) 39 (38–39). Transition
between monospondylous and diplospondylous (DP) centra behind pelvic fin bases and over clasper shafts.
Last MP centra before MP–DP transition smaller than the anterior and larger than the first DP, not forming a
'stutter- zone' of alternating long and short centra.
Intestinal valve of conicospiral type, with 6 (6–8) turns.
Cranium (Fig. 8) broad and flattened, corresponding to 10% TL (Tab. 2). Rostral cartilages short and
slender; rostrum length 20.8–29.3% of nasobasal length (NL). Medial rostral cartilage (MR) originates from
anteroventral tip of internasal septum and extends anterodorsally. Distance between lateral rostral cartilages
(LR) proportionately larger on females (13.8–14.5% NL) than males (12.2–13% NL). Nasal capsules (NC)
large, transversely oval, its width larger than length. Width across capsules 76– 85.4% NL. Nasal apertures
(NA) broadly circular and laterally positioned on capsules; two thirds of its area covered by nasal fontanelle
(NF). Males with nasal apertures proportionately larger (26.5–27.7% NL) than females (25–25.8% NL).
Internasal septum (IS) high and compressed, not hypercalcified in adults. Distance between rostral base and
anterior edge of anterior fontanelle (AF) proportionately larger in females (39.5% NL) than males
(36.7– 38.8% NL). Cranial roof (CRF) broadly arched between supraorbital crests (SC) in frontal view, with a
definite saddle-like medial depression in lateral view. Anterior fontanelle broad and subquadrate on males and
heart-shaped on females, length 1.3 times width, width 4 times in nasobasal length. Basal plate flat, without keels;
width larger in females (39.6–45.8% NL) (vs. 33.3–40.8% NL in the Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group).
Orbits oval-subquadrate in shape; its length 2.2 times in nasobasal length. Supraorbital crests low, strong and
deeply arched. Postorbital processes (PTP) angular, situated on anterior ends of optic capsules; width across
postorbital processes 1.2 times preorbital processes (PEP). Optic capsules short, length 4.7 times in nasobasal
length; its width 2.5–2.7 times optic capsules length. Hyomandibular facets (HF) large, extending across the
entire lateral face of each optic capsule, with slightly exserted ends.
Color pattern with brown saddles on a light brown background, predorsal saddles with anterior and posterior
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
357
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
sharp median projections; light and dark spots spiracle-sized or slightly smaller, no large white spots. Light brown
on ventral region; some specimens with dark points on body and fins. Remarkably darker than the Scyliorhinus
haeckelii/besnardi group and S. hesperius.
FIGURE 8. Cranium of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov., UERJ 1725, male, 530 mm TL. A) Dorsal view. B) Ventral view; UERJ
1726, female, 597 mm TL. C) Dorsal view. D) Ventral view. Scale bar = 1 cm. AF, anterior fontanelle; ASC, anterior
semicircular canal; CRF, cranial roof; FOE, external foramen of preorbital canal; FPE, external profundus foramen; HF,
hyomandibular facet; ICF, internal carotid foramen; IS, internasal septum; LR, lateral rostral cartilage; MR, medial rostral
cartilage; NA, nasal aperture; NC, nasal capsule; NF, nasal fontanelle; OC, optic capsule; PEP, preorbital process; PRF,
parietal fossa; PSC, posterior semicircular canal; PT, pterotic process; PTP, postorbital process; SC, supraorbital crest;
SF, stapedial foramen; SG, supraorbital groove; SS, suborbital shelf.
Distribution and biological data. This species (Fig. 9) is recorded from the coast of the states of Rio Grande
do Norte, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Bahia (northeastern Brazil), Espírito Santo, and northern Rio de Janeiro
(southeastern Brazil). Accurate occurrence records are known only for a few specimens, but this species has been
collected for several years between Rio Grande do Norte and Rio de Janeiro states. Most specimens recorded are
demersal, about 400–500 m deep, associated with coral formations, where it possibly lays its egg-cases. Stomach
contents include small invertebrates (cephalopods), small bony fishes, and one hagfish (Class Myxini) egg-case
was found in the stomach of an adult specimen. Maximum total length about 630 mm. Size of the first maturity not
well defined, but 450 mm TL males and 470 mm TL females are adults. Males ranging in size from 419–534 mm
and females from 431–630 mm. Reproduction is by oviparity, producing at least two amber colored egg capsules,
one for each uterus, which are smooth, lacking longitudinal grooves and measuring about 152 mm long and 58 mm
wide (Gadig, 2001; Gomes et al, 2010).
SOARES ET AL.
358
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 9. Distribution of Scyliorhinus ugoi sp. nov. Yellow diamonds represent records of type series, and white star
locality of the holotype.
Etymology. The specific name ugoi is dedicated to Ugo de Luna Gomes, son of Ulisses L. Gomes.
Comparisons with other species of Scyliorhinus. Seven species of Scyliorhinus are readily distinguished
from Scyliorhinus ugoi by color pattern. Scyliorhinus retifer (Garman, 1881) has a unique reticulated pattern of
dark lines; S. boa Goode & Bean, 1896, S. canicula Linnaeus, 1758, S. cervigoni Maurin & Bonnet, 1970, S.
garmani (Fowler, 1934), and S. stellaris Linnaeus, 1758 have conspicuous, small to medium-sized, rounded dark
spots and indistinct saddle blotches (Springer, 1979; Compagno, 1984; Compagno et al., 2005). In the Scyliorhinus
haeckelii/besnardi group, when contrasting saddles are present, specimens lack pre-dorsal saddles with anterior
and posterior sharp median projections (Soares, 2014). Scyliorhinus meadi Springer, 1966 has a color pattern of
dark saddles on a light background, without light or dark spots (Springer, 1979; Compagno, 1984).
Scyliorhinus ugoi, S comoroensis Compagno, 1988, S. capensis (Müller & Henle, 1838), S. torrei Howell-
Rivero, 1936, S. hesperius Springer, 1966, S. tokubee Shirai, Hagiwara & Nakaya, 1992, and S. torazame (Tanaka,
1908) are similar in having a color pattern of light spots on a darker background, combined with dark saddles, but
only Scyliorhinus ugoi presents small dark spots and pre-dorsal saddles with anterior and posterior sharp
median projections (Springer, 1979; Compagno, 1988; Shirai et al., 1992; Compagno et al., 2005; Soares, 2014).
Scyliorhinus canicula has relatively larger, broader anterior nasal flaps that reach the mouth, covering the
shallow nasoral grooves that are lacking in S. ugoi and in all other species of the genus (Springer, 1979;
Compagno, 1984; Compagno et al., 2005; Soares, 2014).
Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean differs from S. ugoi in its smaller size,
with adult males known at about 350–370 mm, while in S. ugoi males at about 420 mm are still immature. Its
snout is more slender, usually more pointed and longer than that of S. ugoi, with preoral length 1.4–1.7 times in
preorbital length vs. 1.1–1 . 4 times in S. ugoi (Soares, 2014). The wider and stout head of S. ugoi is easily
observable in all specimens and, together with its characteristic color pattern, permits a precise distinction.
The abdomen of S. ugoi is relatively longer than in S. haeckelii/besnardi, with pectoral–pelvic space 1.5–1.6
times pelvic–anal space vs 0.8–1.4. Interdorsal space 2.1–2.5 times dorsal–caudal space vs. 1.2–2 in the
Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi group (Soares, 2014).
Monospondylous vertebral counts of S. ugoi (38–39) differ from counts for S. meadi (43–49), S. torrei
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
359
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
(30–34), S. comoroensis (45) and S. capensis (48), but do not differ appreciably from counts for S. retifer, S.
boa, S. hesperius and S. haeckelii/besnardi (Springer & Sadowsky, 1970; Springer, 1979; Compagno, 1988b;
Soares, 2014).
The occurrence of S. hesperius in the uppermost slope (274–457 m in depth) of the Atlantic from Central
America to Brazil (Gadig & Gomes, 2003) is an error of identification and refers, in fact, to S. ugoi (Soares,
2014). Beyond the differences in color pattern, S. ugoi has a larger head, with preorbital length 6.4% TL and
head length 19.5–20.3% TL vs. 4.9–5.3% TL and 18.9% TL in S. hesperius, respectively. The mouth is also
larger in S. ugoi, its width 9.0–9.7% TL vs. 7.0–7.5 in S. hesperius, as is its anal base length at 7.7–8.2% TL vs.
5.7–7.7% TL in S. hesperius (Springer, 1979; Soares, 2014).
It is apparent from the comparisons presented above that S. ugoi is not particularly close to its geographically
nearest congener, S. haeckelii/besnardi of the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, and is differentiated from S. hesperius
of Central America by color pattern and body proportions.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge José Lima Figueiredo, Aléssio Datovo (MZUSP) and Lynne Parenti (USNM)
for the loan of specimens used in this work. We also acknowledge Herculano Alvarenga (MHNT) for the
radiographs of some specimens and Alan Moraes (Laboratory of Eletronical Microscopy, UERJ) for help with the
SEM. Marcelo Carvalho (IBUSP) is thanked for extensive review of the manuscript. The first and second authors
are supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) and Conselho
Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), respectively.
References
Bigelow, H.B. & Schroeder, W.C. (1948) Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Part I. Lancelets, Cyclostomes and Sharks.
Memoirs Sears Foundation. Yale University, New Haven, 576 pp.
Compagno, L.J.V. (1970) Systematics of the genus Hemitriakis (Selachii: Carcharhinidae), and related genera. Proceedings of
California Academic Sciences, Series 4, 38, 63–98.
Compagno, L.J.V. (1984) FAO species catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of
shark species known to date. Part 2. Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, no. 125, 4, 251–655.
Compagno, L.J.V. (1988a) Sharks of the Order Carcharhiniformes. Princeton University Press, 467 pp.
Compagno, L.J.V. (1988b) Scyliorhinus comoroensis sp. n., a new catshark from the Comoro Islands, western Indian Ocean
(Carcharhiniformes, Scyliorhinidae). Bulletin Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 10 (3), 603–625.
Compagno, L.J.V. (2001) Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Vol.
2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO Species
Catalogue for Fishery Purposes, Rome, 269 pp.
Compagno, L.J.V., Dando, M. & Fowler, S. (2005) Sharks of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 368 pp.
Figueroa, D.E. (2011) Clave ilustrada de ágnatos y peces cartilaginosos de Argentina y Uruguay. In: Wöhler, O.C., Cedrola,
P.Y. & Cosseau, M.B. (Eds.), Contribuciones sobre biologia, pesca y comercialización de tiburones en la Argentina.
Aportes para la elaboracíon del Plan de Acción Nacional. Consejo Federal Pesquero, Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp.
25–74.
Gadig, O.B.F. (2001) Tubarões da costa brasileira. Unpubl. PhD thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio Mesquita Filho’,
Rio Claro, São Paulo, 343 pp.
Gadig, O.B.F. & Gomes, U.L. (2003) Classe Chondrichthy es. In: Menezes, N.A., Buckup, P.A., Figueiredo, J.L. & Moura,
R.L. (Eds.), Catálogo das espécies de peixes marinhos do Brasil. Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo,
São Paulo, pp. 21–22.
Gomes, U.L., Signori, C.N., Gadig, O.B.F. & Santos, H.R.S. (2010) Guia para Identificação de Tubarões e Raias do Rio de
Janeiro. Technical Books, Rio de Janeiro, 234 pp.
Jungersen, H.F.E. (1899) On the apendices genitales in the greenland shark Somniosus microcephalus (Bl. Schn.) and
another selachians. Danish Ingolf Expedition, Bianco Luno, Copenhagen, 88 pp.
Shirai, S., Hagiwara, S. & Nakaya, K. (1992) Scyliorhinus tokubee sp. nov. from Izu Peninsula, Southern Japan (Scyliorhinidae,
Elasmobranchii). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 39 (1), 9–16.
Soares, K.D.A. (2014) Estudo taxonômico das espécies de Scyliorhinus do grupo haeckelii/besnardi (Carcharhiniformes,
Scyliorhinidae) das regiões Sudeste e Sul do Brasil (Oceano Atlântico Sul Ocidental). Unpubl. Master's thesis,
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 208 pp.
SOARES ET AL.
360
·
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
Springer, S. (1966) A review of Western Atlantic catsharks, Scyliorhinidae, with descriptions of a new genus and five new
species. Fishery Bulletin, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 65 (3), 581–624.
Springer, S. (1979) A revision of the catsharks, Family Scyliorhinidae. NOAA Technical Report NMFS, 422, 1–97.
Springer, S. & Sadowsky, V. (1970) Subspecies of the western Atlantic catshark, Scyliorhinus retifer. Proceedings of the
Biological Society of Washington, 83 (7), 83–98.
APPENDIX. Comparative material.
Scyliorhinus ugoi: 5 specimens. UERJ 1426, female, 513 mm TL (off Bahia, Central Brazilian coast); UERJ 1722, adult
female, 600 mm TL (off Salvador, Bahia, Central Brazilian coast); UERJ 1723, female, 427 mm TL (Central Brazilian coast,
between Pernambuco and northern Rio de Janeiro); UERJ 1726, adult female, 597 mm TL (Central Brazilian coast, between
Pernambuco and northern Rio de Janeiro); UNESP-CLP 0093, adult female, 580 mm TL (Bahia, Northeastern Brazil).
Scyliorhinus boa: 9 specimens. USNM 186195.1, male, 350 mm TL (6°29’N 52°30’W, French Guiana); USNM 186195.2,
male, 315 mm TL (6°29’N 52°30’W, French Guiana); USNM 186195.3, female, 285 mm TL (6°29’N 52°30’W, French
Guiana); USNM 204378, female, 435 mm TL (11º15’N 68°13’W, Caribbean Venezuela); USNM 221565.1, female, 425
mm TL (11º50’N 73°5’W, Caribbean Colombia); USNM 221565.2, female, 350 mm TL (11º50’N 73°5’W, Caribbean
Colombia); USNM 221565.3, male, 376 mm TL (11º50’N 73°5’W, Caribbean Colombia); USNM 221566, male, 210
mm TL (11°58’N 69°30’W, Caribbean Venezuela); USNM 221567, male, 205 mm TL (11°31’N 64°11’W, Caribbean
Venezuela).
Scyliorhinus haeckelii/besnardi: 92 specimens. MNRJ 494, male, 317 mm (Ilha Rasa, Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil);
MZUSP 9963, female, 329 mm TL (35°18'S 52° 32'W, Uruguay; MZUSP 9965, male, 361 mm TL (35°18'S 52° 32'W,
Uruguay); MZUSP 9966, male, 169 mm TL (35°18'S 52° 32'W, Uruguay); MZUSP 37282, female, 280 mm TL (23°05’S 41°
59'W, São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil); MZUSP 37283, male, 356 mm TL (23°05’S 41° 59'W, São Paulo, Southeastern
Brazil); MZUSP 37284, male, 391 mm TL (23°10’S 43º05’W, São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil); MZUSP 37284, female, 355
mm TL (23°10’S 43º05’W, São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 71.1, female, 394 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
71.2, male, 364 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1489, male, 491 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1574, female,
371 mm TL (off Paraná, Southern Brazil); UERJ 1496.1, female, 361 mm TL (Itajaí, Santa Catarina, southern Brazil); UERJ
1496.2, female, 367 mm TL (Itajaí, Santa Catarina, southern Brazil); UERJ 1573, female, 297 mm TL (off Paraná, southern
Brazil); UERJ 1689, male, 566 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1690, female, 467 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
1691, male, 522 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1692, male, 389 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
1693, male, 469 mm TL (Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1695, female, 494 mm TL (Southeastern
Brazil); UERJ 1696, female, 451 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1697, male, 491 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil);
UERJ 1698, male, 454 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1699, female, 400 mm TL (Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1701, female, 405 mm TL (Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1703, male,
451 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1704, male, 425 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1705, female,
450 mm TL (Cabo F rio, Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 1706, female, 422 mm TL (Cabo Frio, Rio de
Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2202, male, 444 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2208, male, 216 mm TL
(Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.1, female, 341 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.2, female, 304
mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.3, female, 348 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
2232.4, male, 383 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.5, male, 321 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.6, male, 341 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.7, male, 415 mm
TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.8, male, 337 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
2232.9, male, 293 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.10, male, 318 mm TL (Southeastern Brazil);
UERJ 2232.11, female, 334 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.12, female, 326 mm TL (Rio de
Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.13, male, 325 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.14,
female, 334 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.15, female, 305 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.16, male, 314 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.17, male, 296
mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.18, male, 274 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil);
UERJ 2232.19, male, 368 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.20, female, 323 mm TL (Rio de
Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.21, male, 353 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.23, male,
416 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.24, female, 241 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern
Brazil); UERJ 2232.25, female, 326 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.26, female, 305 mm TL (Rio
de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.27, female, 277 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.28,
female, 308 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.33, male, 315 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern
Brazil); UERJ 2232.39, female, 299 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.7, female, 348 mm TL (Rio
de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.13, female, 366 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.14,
female, 250 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.29, female, 370 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern
Brazil); UERJ 2232.30, male, 344 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.31, female, 269 mm TL (Rio
Zootaxa 3937 (2) © 2015 Magnolia Press
·
361
DESCRIPTION OF SCYLIORHINUS UGOI
de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.32, male, 262 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.34,
female, 259 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.35, male, 339 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern
Brazil); UERJ 2232.36, male, 282 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.37, male, 382 mm TL (Rio
de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.38, female, 334 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
2232.40, male, 341 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.41, female, 281 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.42, female, 255 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.43, male, 281
mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.45, female, 300 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil);
UERJ 2232.47, female, 255 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.49, female, 306 mm TL (Rio de
Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.50, female, 318 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.51,
female, 287 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2232.52, female, 335 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.1, male, 353 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.2, male, 438 mm
TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.3, female, 409 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
2233.4, female, 401 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.5, female, 357 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.6, male, 449 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.8, female, 443 mm
TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.9, female, 413 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ
2233.10, female, 432 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.11, male, 447 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro,
Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.12, female, 461 mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil); UERJ 2233.15, female, 413
mm TL (Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil).
Scyliorhinus hesperius: 1 specimen. USNM 187729, female, 265 mm TL (16°52’N, 81°30’W).
Scyliorhinus meadi: 1 specimen. USNM 187730, female, 459 mm TL (17°40’N, 77°55’W).
ABBREVIATIONS
AF, anterior fontanelle; AN, anteroposterior tooth; AP, apopyle; ASC, anterior semicircular canal; CRF, cranial
roof; CRH, cover rhipidion; DP, diplospondylous centra; DRA, distal segment; G, end-style; EN, envelope; ERH,
exorhipidion; FOE, external foramen of preorbital canal; FPE, external profundus foramen; HF, hyomandibular
facet; HP, hypopyle; IBUSP, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo; ICF, internal carotid foramen;
IS, internasal septum; LR, lateral rostral cartilage; M, medial tooth; MÊS, mesopterygium; MET, metapterygium;
MHNT, Museu de História Natural de Taubaté; MP, monospondylous centra; MR, medial rostral cartilage; MTS,
metapterygial axis; NA, nasal aperture; NC, nasal capsule; NF, nasal fontanelle; NL, nasobasal length; PEP,
preorbital process; PRA, proximal segment; PRF, parietal fossa; PRO, propterygium; PSC, posterior semicircular
canal; PT, pterotic process; PTP, postorbital process; RD, marginal dorsal cartilage; RD2, accessory marginal dorsal
cartilage; RH, rhipidion; RV, marginal ventral cartilage; S, symphysial tooth; SC, supraorbital crest; SF, stapedial
foramen; SG, supraorbital groove; SS, suborbital shelf; TD, terminal dorsal cartilage; TDC, terminal dermal cover;
TL, total length; TV, terminal ventral cartilage; TV2, terminal ventral cartilage 2; USNM, Smithsonian National
Museum of Natural History.
... Specimens of S. comoroensis and S. garmani were not dissected due to the lack of available material for study. Data on meristics, external morphology and internal anatomy of S. cabofriensis, S. haeckelii and S. ugoi were extracted from Soares et al. (2015Soares et al. ( , 2016. Specimens of the other genera of the subfamily Scyliorhininae were examined and dissected, including four of the 18 species of Cephaloscyllium and the two species of Poroderma. ...
... Compagno (1988a) suggested a tendency concerning the enlargement of the subnasal plate in derived taxa and consequent substitution of the nasal fontanelle by cartilage. The anterior fontanelle, the anterodorsal aperture of the neurocranium covered by a layer of connective tissue, presents different shapes amongst species and also varies between sexes (Soares et al. 2015(Soares et al. , 2016. This fontanelle may present a notch or an indentation on its posterior border, the epiphyseal notch to the pineal body, as observed in Atelomycterus, Halaelurus, Holohalaelurus, Schroederichthys and Scyliorhinus (state 1; Figs 13A, C, D, 14) or a straight and continuous border, as in Cephaloscyllium, Poroderma and in the other taxa examined (state 0; Figs 13B, E and G). ...
... Compagno (1988a) described and illustrated the presence of a 'brush-like papillose structure' on the distal tip of the clasper glans of Holohalaelurus cf. punctatus; this structure is here considered the terminal dermal cover (as per Soares et al. 2015). The adjective 'rough' is used as a substitute for 'papillose' by considering that the structure does not present papillae but rugosities. ...
Article
Full-text available
The genus Scyliorhinus is part of the family Scyliorhinidae, the most diverse family of sharks and of the subfamily Scyliorhininae along with Cephaloscyllium and Poroderma. This study reviews the phylogenetic relationships of species of Scyliorhinus in the subfamily Scyliorhininae. Specimens of all Scyliorhinus species were examined as well as specimens of four of the 18 species of Cephaloscyllium, two species of Poroderma, representatives of almost all other catshark (scyliorhinid) genera and one proscylliid (Proscyllium habereri). A detailed morphological study, including external and internal morphology, morphometry and meristic data, was performed. From this study, a total of 84 morphological characters were compiled into a data matrix. Parsimony analysis was employed to generate hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships using the TNT 1.1. Proscyllium habereri was used to root the clado-gram. The phylogenetic analysis, based on implied weighting (k = 3; 300 replications and 100 trees saved per replication), resulted in three equally most parsimonious cladograms with 233 steps, with a CI of 0.37 and an RI of 0.69. The monophyly of the subfamily Scyliorhininae is supported as well as of the genus Scyliorhinus, which is proposed to be the sister group of Cephaloscyllium. The phylogenetic relationships amongst Scyliorhinus species are presented for the first time.
... In terms of distribution, elasmobranchs are present in every ocean (Compagno, 1977(Compagno, , 1984 while some groups (mainly Myliobatiformes) are also found in river basins of South America, South-eastern Asia, Africa, and Australia (Lucifora et al., 2015). There are over 1170 valid species of extant elasmobranchs (Fricke et al., 2022), a number constantly rising due to ongoing taxonomic research (e.g., Silva & Carvalho, 2011;Loboda & Carvalho, 2013;Soares et al., 2015;Weigmann, 2016;Daly-Engel et al., 2018;Pfleger et al., 2018;Silva & Loboda, 2019, Loboda et al., 2021. ...
Article
Full-text available
The type specimens of the subclass Elasmobranchii deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo are compiled in an annotated list, including updated measurements, verified collection data and recent photographs of holotypes and selected paratypes. Relevant information on the preservation condition of the specimens and their current taxonomic status are also provided. The collection holds a total of 135 lots of type specimens of elasmobranchs, three holotypes and seven paratypes in the division Selachii plus 16 holotypes, one neotype, and 108 paratypes in the division Batoidea (total specimen count: 137). Four paratypes were not located and one was donated to another institution, and publication mistakes in catalog numbers and locality assignments are corrected. The vast majority of specimens belong to the neotropical freshwater stingrays (subfamily Potamotrygoninae). The present catalogue intends to facilitate taxonomic research by providing access to updated information on type specimens of mostly large-sized taxa, which are notoriously difficult or impossible to examine outside of their home institution.
... Character 61 and its character states as proposed by Soares & de Carvalho (2020) are modified here to restrict the observations to the occurrence of dermal denticles on the cover rhipidion. In the proscylliid E. barbouri, scyliorhinoids Ak. suwartanai, Ap. brunneus, Asymbolus spp., Aulohalaelurus kanakorum Séret, 1990 Compagno (1988) and Soares et al. (2015) is found in proscylliids and most scyliorhinoids examined [120:0; Soares, (2020): figs 1-7] except Bythaelurus clevai (Séret, 1987), Cephalurus cephalus, Halaelurus sellus and Pentanchus longicephalus. This dermal cover is also absent in the triakids Hemitriakis japonica and I. omanensis and the carcharhinid L. macrorhinus (120:1). ...
Article
Full-text available
This is the first study to combine morphological and molecular characters to infer the phylogenetic relationships among catsharks. All currently valid genera classified in the family Scyliorhinidae s.l. and representatives of other carcharhinoid families plus one lamnoid and two orectoloboids were included as terminal taxa. A total of 143 morphological characters and 44 NADH2 sequences were analysed. Parsimony analyses under different weighting schemes and strengths were used to generate hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships. The phylogenetic analysis of 78 terminal taxa, using the combined dataset and weighting each column separately (SEP; k = 3) resulted in one most-parsimonious cladogram of 4441 steps with the greatest internal resolution of clades and strongest support. The main changes in nomenclature and classification are the revised definition and scope of Scyliorhinidae, Apristurus and Pentanchus and the revalidation of Atelomycteridae. The monophyly of Pentanchidae is supported, as is that of most catshark genera. Two new subfamilies of the family Pentanchidae are defined: Halaelurinae subfam. nov. and Galeinae subfam. nov. Our analysis emphasizes the relevance of morphological characters in the inference of evolutionary history of carcharhinoids and sheds light on the taxonomic status of some genera in need of further exploration.
... ugoi Soares et al. 2015 (Scylirhinidae); the dogsharks Squalus bahiensis Viana et al. 2016 andS. albicaudus Viana et al. 2016 (Squalidae); the skates Dipturus mennii Gomes and Paragó 2001 and Malacoraja obscura Carvalho et al. 2005 (Rajidae); the swallower Kali colubrina Melo 2008 (Chiasmodontidae); the clusk eel Neobythites monocellatus Nielsen 1999 (Ophidiidae); the eelpout Pachycara alepidotum Anderson and Mincarone 2006 (Zoarcidae); and, in part, the bald cutthroat eel Synaphobranchus calvus Melo 2007 (Synaphobranchidae) (Anderson and Mincarone 2006;Carvalho et al. 2005;Melo 2007Melo , 2008Melo et al. 2009;Nielsen et al. 2009;Soares et al. 2015Soares et al. , 2016Soares and Carvalho 2016;Viana et al. 2016;Vaz and Carvalho 2018). ...
Chapter
The deep sea is the largest and one of the most extreme environments on Earth. It is estimated that 10–15% of all fish species are dwelling in the deep sea, most of which have unique morphological and physiological adaptations. Biological expeditions to sample the deep ocean off Brazil started with the British HMS Challenger Expedition (1872–1876), followed by a few fishery stations made by the German RV Ernst Haeckel (1966) and the North-American MIV Oregon II (1957–1975), the cruises of the French RVs Marion Dufresne (1987) and Thalassa (1999, 2000), the Brazilian RV Atlântico Sul (1996–1999), the FV Diadorim and FV Soloncy Moura (1996–2002), OSB Astro Garoupa (2003), and, more recently, the American RV Luke Thomas and Seward Johnson (2009, 2011), the French RV Antea (2015, 2017), and the Brazilian RV Alpha Crucis. A total of 712 species of deep-sea fishes were recorded, including five species of Myxini, six species of Holocephali, 81 species of Elasmobrachii, and 620 species of Actinopteri. As in other parts of the world, the Brazilian deep-sea ichthyofauna struggles under severe anthropogenic impacts caused by the commercial fishing, and the extraction of oil and gas. The deep ocean is a delicate environment and its recovery is considerably slower than an equivalent in shallow water habitat. Therefore, increasing the research efforts is needed to avoid that part of its diversity disappear without our accurate knowledge.
... ugoi Soares et al. 2015 (Scylirhinidae); the dogsharks Squalus bahiensis Viana et al. 2016 andS. albicaudus Viana et al. 2016 (Squalidae); the skates Dipturus mennii Paragó 2001 andMalacoraja obscura Carvalho et al. 2005 (Rajidae); the swallower Kali colubrina Melo 2008 (Chiasmodontidae); the clusk eel Neobythites monocellatus Nielsen 1999 (Ophidiidae); the eelpout Pachycara alepidotum Anderson and Mincarone 2006 (Zoarcidae); and, in part, the bald cutthroat eel Synaphobranchus calvus Melo 2007 (Synaphobranchidae) (Anderson and Mincarone 2006;Carvalho et al. 2005;Melo 2007Melo , 2008Melo et al. 2009;Nielsen et al. 2009;Soares et al. 2015Soares et al. , 2016Soares and Carvalho 2016;Viana et al. 2016;Vaz and Carvalho 2018). ...
Chapter
The Brazilian Continental Margin (BM) hosts one of the most poorly known deep-water fauna in the world, especially those referred to as habitat forming such as scleractinians and octocorallians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). In waters deeper than 150 m, these anthozoans are the framework builders for coral reefs and coral gardens. Together, these habitats host the highest diversity of metazoans on the external shelf and slope. Although only a few surveys have been dedicated to the study of these organisms in the BM, it is known that Desmophyllum pertusum (former Lophelia pertusa), Solenosmilia variabilis, and Madrepora oculata form extensive reefs especially on the southern and southeastern regions. In the same way, Octocorallia representatives, such as those of the families Priminoidae, Clavulariidae, Plexauridae, Alcyoniidae, Isididae, Coralliidae, and Paragorgidae, also have great ecological importance at the BM and are particularly abundant at the northern and northeastern continental shelves and slope. In order to set a baseline for future research, the present chapter provides a historical review of the studies of these anthozoans from the BM, including a list of all records and their geographical and depth distributions. Based on part of these records, the BM distributional modeling of these organisms is predicted using habitat suitability models, which suggest that carbonate saturation state, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and particulate organic carbon are the main factors structuring habitat suitability along the BM. In addition, a comprehensive review of the studies focusing on reproduction of the main species occurring at the BM, a key process for the maintenance and renewal of coral populations and, therefore, design of marine protected areas, as well as the human-based impacts imposed to the habitats structured by these species, are provided.
... According to Weigmann ( , 2017, Last et al. (2016) and Ebert et al. (2017) there are about 1200 species of sharks and rays recorded in the world, in which approximately 30 are freshwater species. In Brazilian marine waters, a richness of 149 species was published by Rosa and Gadig (2014), there are additional elasmobranch species in Brazil after description aforementioned revision (Soares et al., 2015(Soares et al., , 2019Viana et al., 2016;Vaz and Carvalho, 2018;Bornatowski et al., 2018b) totaling about of 155 current species. Thus, the results of the present study indicate that the extreme south of Brazil has about 60.6% and 8% of the national and global marine elasmobranch biodiversity, respectively (see Table 4). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
Riassunto / Summary Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758), Small spotted catfish secondo la FAO, ma noto anche come (aka) Lesser spotted catfish / Lesser spotted dogfish, di seguito cagnolicchio (il nome comune utilizato dai pescatori da Mazara del Vallo in Sicilia) è uno squalo di piccole-medie dimensioni (50-70cm di lunghezza totale, L, in base alla località). Si riscontra sui fondali dell’Atlantico centro-orientale e del Mediterraneo, dalla prossimità delle coste sino a 500-800m (sempre in base alla località). Il cagnolicchio è anche molto comune nelle catture della pesca sia commerciale sia artigianale realizzate principalmente con le reti a strascico e, in misura minore, con attrezzi fissi quali tremagli, palangari e trappole. Nonostante la sua buona consistenza nelle catture in mare, solo gli esemplari più grandi vengono trattenuti per lo sbarco e la vendita nei mercati ittici, ma solo in alcuni porti; in altre marinerie, buona parte (Mediterraneo) o la quasi totalità (Atlantico) deli esemplari viene, infatti, rigettata in mare (aka scarto). In pratica, la maggior parte dei pescatori considera questo piccolo squalo un fastidio per la loro attività. Di conseguenza, dato il risultante basso valore economico della scarsa cattura sbarcata, a questa specie viene solitamente dedicata poca attenzione per la valutazione e gestione da parte delle agenzie ufficiali e dei governi preposti a gestire la pesca marittima. Al contrario, negli ultimi decenni, il cagnolicchio ha attirato l'attenzione sia dei biologi marini che di quelli della pesca (alieutici) a causa dell’inaspettata resilienza mostrata da molti (non tutti!) stock nonostante l'elevato sforzo di pesca e il generale sovra sfruttamento degli altri stock demersali (in particolare di altri squali demersali ad eccezione della specie “gemella” Galeus melastomus). C’è un consenso generale sul fatto che la spiegazione principale di tale elevata resilienza sia la sua elevata capacità di sopravvivere dopo essere fuggito dalle reti in fondo al mare e dopo essere stato rigettato in mare. In sintesi, i cagnolicchi mostrano una notevole “robustezza” e capacità di sostenere e recuperare rapidamente i fattori di stress correlati alle diverse fasi di pesca. Per la rete a strascico, le fasi possono essere riassunte come segue: a) tentativi di evitare il contatto/l'ingresso nell'attrezzo, b) danni subiti nel cercare di sfuffire dall'attrezzo durante la cala (in particolare, attraverso le maglie del sacco), c) non riuscendo a sfuggire, permanenza all'interno del sacco per diverse ore, d) gli shock termici e di pressione sofferti durante il recupero degli attrezzi, e) gli shock termici / visivi / di manipolazione durante lo smistamento a bordo da parte dei pescatori, e f) lo stress subito nel tentativo di tornare sul fondo dalla superficie con l'incertezza di ritrovare i fondali idonei a causa dello spostamento del peschereccio durante la cala (anche di diverse miglia nautiche visto che la velocità di cala si aggira sui 2.5 nodi). Un'altra spiegazione della resilienza è data dall’attitudine dei cagnolicchi a utilizzare come cibo l'elevata quantità di rigetti delle altre specie che raggiungono, moribondi o morti, il fondale. Gli argomenti precedenti sono plausibili, ma non facilmente dimostrabili statisticamente per diversi motivi, principalmente per la difficoltà di ottenere dati rappresentativi, eseguire analisi affidabili (spesso laboriose e costose) e comprendere, nel suo insieme, un ciclo di vita condiviso dalla maggior parte degli studiosi. Alcuni esempi di queste difficoltà sono: 1) una certa confusione nella terminologia e nelle definizioni dei parametri; 2) la discrepanza tra stock in mare e catture/sbarchi poiché quasi tutte le informazioni provengono dalla rete a strascico (quindi la parte dei cagnolicchi che vivono su aree accidentate non sono adeguatamente campionate, 3) l'elevata plasticità mostrata dai diversi stock a seconda della posizione geografica (di solito spiegata con un gradiente Sud  N in tutto l'areale, ma non con un gradiente W  E nel Mediterraneo), 4) gli alti costi in termini di denaro, personale e requisiti logistici degli esperimenti a bordo o in cattività (in acquario, dove la specie si adatta bene) per stimare la mortalità da pesca collaterale a breve e medio termine dopo la cattura, e 5) la mancanza di un accordo generale tra gli studiosi su molte delle caratteristiche generali dello stock e dei tratti del ciclo di vita (LHT). Per inciso, l'alta plasticità potrebbe spiegare perché i LHT appaiono caotici, contraddittori e bizzarri anche in luoghi contigui. Tra gli LHT, le principali difficoltà riguardano i) il numero e la consistenza della popolazione e dello stock, ii) la distribuzione dei cagnolicchi per profondità e la struttura per taglia / sesso / maturità sessuale, iii) i modelli di crescita / mortalità / accoppiamento / deposizione delle capsule ovigere (EC), iv) la presenza di aree discrete di reclute (nursery) e di riproduzione (spawning) vs aree di riproduzione e reclutamento generalizzate nello spazio, vi) il comportamento alimentare, vii) l'incidenza dei fattori di dipendenza dalla densità e viii) le capacità di produzione/produttività. Scopo del presente documento è quello di tentare una revisione di sintesi del quadro conoscitivo riguardante i cagnolicchi suggerendo, allo stesso tempo, le chiavi interpretative più plausibili (ovviamente, sulla base del sentire dell'autore del presente documento). Allo scopo, innumerevoli pubblicazioni all'interno della letteratura scientifica cd impattata e cd grigia (cioè rapporti tecnici e interni etc.), direttamente o indirettamente correlate ai cagnolicchi, sono state sfogliate, analizzate ed un’ampia selezione inclusa nella Bibliografia. Gli argomenti esplorati spaziano dal fisiologico all'approccio ecosistemico alla pesca. In particolare, per quest'ultimo settore, come precedentemente evidenziato, nonostante l'enorme mole di dati raccolti e analisi effettuate, il grado di condivisione sui LHT dei cagnolicchi e del loro grado di resilienza allo sfruttamento della pesca sembra rimanere basso. Inoltre, i cagnolicchi sfruttati nel Mediterraneo sono raramente (indagini sperimentali) e quasi mai (indagini commerciali) inclusi tra le specie bersaglio/principali (cioè quelle “main species” su cui si dovrebbero produrre regolarmente i piani ufficiali annuali di valutazione e gestione). Come il presente documento cercherà di evidenziare, la letteratura indica chiaramente come ci siano alcuni elementi su cui esiste uno scarso consenso generale tra gli studiosi. Alcuni esempi di controversie riguardano I) la scelta tra pochi stock geografici diffusi invece di molti piccoli stock sparsi e II) se le differenze nella taglia massima individuale riflettano un gradiente latitudinale o uno pseudo nanismo degli stock Mediterranei rispetto a quelli Atlantici (ma uno pseudo nanismo è stato proposto anche tra i cagnolicchi del Centro Nord e C Sud Atlantico e quelli del Mediterraneo E e W). Altri aspetti poco chiari riguardano l'incertezza nelle stime, i conflitti nelle interpretazioni, le frasi contrastanti e la circolarità nelle argomentazioni. L'elemento più critico negli studi sui cagnolicchi è rappresentato dalla cosiddetta "sindrome del compartimento singolo", cioè ogni parametro è generalmente discusso con poca considerazione critica sulla corrispondenza e congruità con le stime degli altri parametri disponibili. Ad esempio, le femmine dei cagnolicchi sono quasi universalmente considerate avere una taglia massima inferiore a quella dei maschi raggiungendo però dopo la maturità sessuale; di conseguenza, ci si dovrebbe aspettare che le femmine subiscano una mortalità (naturale, M, o totale, Z) più elevata dei maschi. Tuttavia, ad un esame più approfondito, il rapporto tra i sessi, la maggior parte delle lunghezze massime e le mortalità appaiono in genere equilibrate e comparabili fra i due sessi. L'Autore del presente documento spera che le 19 schede con delle domande e risposte sui cagnolicchi (organizzate in Tesi, Antitesi e - più plausibile - Sintesi, con una premessa introduttiva) possano aiutare tutti i lettori interessati coinvolti nei diversi campi delle scienze marine, per elaborare un piano di ricerca comune/multidisciplinare per individuare in Scyliorhinus canicula (il cagnolicchio dei pescatori di Mazara del Vallo) un buon candidato per costruire un modello ecosistemico dove le interazioni tra ciclo di vita e resilienza all'intensità della pesca possano essere quantitativamente legate all'ambiente generale / ecosistema in cui vivono questi pesci. Il punto di partenza però dovrebbe consistere nello svolgere delle valutazioni il più possibile complete e integrate a partire da stock unitari identificati su piccola scala (local population), almeno in una prima fase coincidenti con le singole Sub aree geografiche. Inoltre, i ricercatori nelle interpretazioni dei risultati non dovrebbero farsi condizionare da ciò che accade nelle altre sub aree data la plasticità di questa specie che sembra adattare il proprio ciclo vitale (in modo quasi incredibile) alle specifiche caratteristiche geo-morfologiche, oceanografiche e biotiche (non escludendo l’attività di pesca) delle diverse località da cui, almeno in parte, deriva la sconfortante sensazione di enorme e contradittoria variabilità anche confrontando sub aree contigue. Parole chiave – Pesci cartilaginei, Scyliorhinus canicula, Gattuccio, Cagnolicchio, Revisione della letteratura scientifica, Approccio ecosistemico alla pesca, Oceano Atlantico Orientale, Mare Mediterraneo. Summary Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758), Small spotted catfish according to FAO, but aka Lesser spotted catfish / Lesser spotted dogfish, herein “cagnolicchio” (the vernacular / common name employed by fishers from Mazara del Vallo), represents a small / medium sized shark (up 50-70cm of Total Length depending on the location) usually occurring on the bottom of the Eastern North and Central Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea from nearshore down to around the lower edge of the epibathyal (500m) and mesobathyial depth horizon (ca 800m), depending on the location. The cagnolicchio is also a very common occurrence within the gross catch of both commercial and small scale (artisanal) fisheries, mainly caught by bottom trawl, and in a less extent, by set gears such as trammel nets, longlines and traps. However, notwithstanding its medium - high consistency in the gross catch, only the large sized specimens of cagnolicchio might be observed in landings and sold at fish markets, but only in some fishing harbours. As a matter of fact, fishers usually return to the sea (aka discard) almost all (Atlantic) and the most part (Mediterranean) of the cagnolicchi caught in their gears even considering this small shark a nuisance for their activity. Consequently, little attention is usually devoted in the assessment and management of cagnolicchi by the official fisheries bodies and governments since its low economic value resulting from the combination of low landings and low unit prize. On the contrary, in the last decades, the cagnolicchio has attracted the attention of both marine and fisheries biologists for the ascertainment of an unexpected resilience of many (not all!) stocks to fisheries in spite of the high fishing effort and general over exploitation of the other demersal stocks (especially other demersal sharks with the exception of the twin species Galeus melastomus). There is a general consensus that the main explanation of such as high resilience should be its high capability to survive after escaping from the gears and after being returned to the sea and, as a corollary, its capability to support and quick recover the stressors correlated to the different fishing phases. For the bottom trawl, the phases can be summarised as follows: a) attempts to avoid contacting / entering the gear, b) damages suffered escaping from the gear during the haul (especially through the cod end mesh), c) permanence within the cod end for one up several hours, d) the thermal / pressure shocks during the gear retrieval, e) the thermal / visive / handling shocks during the sorting on board by fishers, and f) the stress suffered trying to return to the bottom from surface with the uncertain of finding suitable grounds since the spatial displacement of the fishing boat during the catch process (bottom trawl) and sorting. A secondary, although related fact supporting the resilience of cagnolicchi, consists in their likely attitude to feed to the high quantity of discards which reach the bottom after being dyed on the deck of vessels or immediately after discard. The previous arguments are plausible, but not easily statistically demonstrable for different reasons, mainly for the difficulty in getting representative data, performing reliable analyses (often laborious and expensive), and figuring out a complete life cycle shared by the most part of scientists. Some examples of sources of difficulties are: 1) some confusion in terminology and parameter’s definitions; 2) the discrepancy between standing stock at sea and landings (since almost all information came from bottom trawlers, hence the part of the cagnolicchi living on rough grounds are not appropriately sampled and most of the caught specimens discarded), 3) the high plasticity showed by the different stocks according the geographical location (usually explained with a South  N gradient in the whole areale, but not a W  E gradient in the Mediterranean Sea), 4) the high costs in terms of money, staff and logistic requirements of the on board / in aquarium (where the species fits very well) experiments to estimate short- and medium- post catch collateral fishing mortality, and 5) the lack of general agreement among scientists about many of the general stock features and life history traits / stages (LHT) of the cagnolicchi By the way, the high plasticity explains why the LHT might appear chaotic or bizarre even in contiguous locations. Among the LHT, the main difficulties concern i) the number and consistency of population and stock, ii) the depth distribution by size / sex / sexual maturity, iii) the growth / mortality / mating / spawning patterns, iv) the occurrence of discrete nurseries / spawning areas vs generalized (diffuse) spawning and hatching areas, vi) the feeding behaviour, vii) the incidence of density dependence factors, and viii) the production / productivity capabilities. Aim of the present document was to attempt a revision of the cognitive framework concerning the cagnolicchi suggesting, at the same time, the most plausible explanations (obviously, based on the author's feelings of the present document). To do this job, countless publications within both the official (i.e., ISI Journals) and grey (i.e., technical and internal reports etc.) scientific literature (directly or indirectly related to cagnolicchi) were browsed, analysed, and a selection included in the Bibliography. The scientific fields explored span from biomedical / physiological up ecosystem approach to fisheries. In particular, for the latter field, as previously evidenced, in spite of the huge amount of data collected and analysis performed, the degree of knowledge about the cagnolicchi LHT and responsiveness to fisheries exploitation seems to remain quite low. Further, the cagnolicchi exploited in the Mediterranean Sea are rarely (experimental surveys) and almost never (commercial surveys) included among the target (experimental) / main (commercial) species (i.e. those species about which year based official assessment and management plans should be carried out regularly). As the present document will highlight, the literature clearly indicate how there are some items about which there is a weak general consensus among scientists. Some examples of such as controversies regard the choice between few widespread geographical instead of many small scattered stocks (even as stock let) and the maximum individual size reached usually related to a latitudinal gradient or a pseudo nanism of Mediterranean stocks compared with Atlantic counterparts (but nanism / dwarfism, was proposed also between Central North and C South Atlantic and Eastern and Western Mediterranean). Other grey sides showed by the pertinent literature concern the uncertainty in the estimations, conflicts in the interpretations, contrasting sentences, and circularity in the argumentations. The most critical item in cagnolicchi studies may be represented by the so called “single compartment syndrome”, i.e. each parameter is generally discussed with little critical consideration about the match-mismatch with the definitions of the other parameters available. For example, females cagnolicchi are almost universally considered reaching a smaller maximum size (also maturing later) than males. Consequently, females should be expected to suffer a higher natural (M) or total (Z) mortality. However, the current sex ratio and most of the maximum lengths / mortality estimates look quite balanced / comparable. The Author of the present document hopes that the 19 questions about cagnolicchi (organized in Thesis-, Anti-Thesis and - most plausible – Synthesis, with an introductive premise) might help all the interested readers, involved in different fields of marine science, to elaborate a common / multidisciplinary research plan to individuate in Scyliorhinus canicula (the cagnolicchio of fishers from Mazara del Vallo) a nice candidate to build up an ecosystem fishery based model where the interactions between life cycle / resilience to fishing intensity might be quantitatively linked to the ecosystem where the cagnolicchi live. The starting point, however, should be to carry out assessments that are as complete and integrated as possible from unit stocks identified on a small scale (local population), at least in a first phase coinciding with the individual Sub areas. Moreover, researchers should not be influenced, in the interpretations of the results, by what happens in the other sub-areas given the plasticity of this species that adapts its life cycle in an almost incredible way to the specific geo-morphological, oceanographic and biotic characteristics (not excluding fishing activity) of the different locations from which, at least in part, derives the discouraging feeling of enormous and contradictory variability even comparing contiguous sub-areas. Key words – Cartilaginous fish, Scyliorhinus canicula, Small spotted dogfish, Catfish, Cagnolicchio, Literature review, Ecosystem approach to fisheries, Eastern Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea.
Article
548 shark species were considered in this paper. They were classified in function of their depth of occurrence: 218 deep, 114 transitory and 210 shallow. The diets of the 332 deep and transitory species are reviewed. 10 prey categories are recognized here: Chondrichthyes, Teleosts, Cephalopods, Crustaceans, Marine mammals, Annelids, Ctenophores, Egg of Chondrichthyes, Siphonophores, and Bivalves. There is a complete lack of data for 210 species, and 59 have only a limited amount of information available. In general, teleosts, crustaceans, and cephalopods were the main prey found in deep-water sharks. However, some species have a specialized diet. A simple index of dietary knowledge has been developed to highlight the current state of knowledge on the subject, further illustrating the lack of information. The proportion of empty and regurgitated stomachs varies significantly between species and studies. Most data on deep and transitory sharks come from stomach content analysis. Stable isotope analysis provides additional insight into their trophic ecology. Fatty acid profiling and DNA metabarcoding can also add important information, but their use is currently limited with deep-water sharks. The most important conclusion from this synthesis is the lack or scarcity of information for most deep and transitory species.
Book
Full-text available
The table and provided download links below are intended for informational use in Chondrichthyan research. The allocation aims for faciliating to find species numbers and most recent information on taxonomic changes. We will regularly update the table and download links at lest twice annually. The updates will be announced on facebook (https://www.facebook.com/sharkreferences) and in our monthly newsletter (sign up here: https://eepurl.com/sJNGb). The Excel sheet allows for the application of individual filter- and sorting options. The list of described spsecies complements taxonomic information for the list of valid species by providing synonyms and / or new taxonomic combinations.
Article
Full-text available
The presence of claspers is one of the main characteristics of the cartilaginous fishes, but its variations across taxa have received limited use in shark systematics and have generally been neglected in descriptions of species. Clasper descriptions are available only for a few catshark species and most of these are focused only in external morphology. Besides that, divergences regarding the identification of some structures persist in the literature emphasizing the need of more encompassing morphological comparative analyses on claspers of scyliorhinids. In this study, claspers structures of almost all catshark genera were examined, described, and illustrated (except Akheilos and Pentanchus) and comments on their phylogenetic significance are provided. Some characters such as degree of development of rhipidions and terminal dermal cover, occurrence, position and size of accessory marginal and terminal cartilages proved to be useful for taxonomic purposes and their significance along carcharhiniforms systematics needs to be further investigated. Research highlights Clasper morphology of catsharks is described and compared and its systematic significance is discussed here. External morphology and skeleton components of claspers vary widely among scyliorhinids and may be useful in phylogenetic analyses.
Book
Full-text available
A guide to identification of sharks and rays from the Rio de Janeiro, Southeast Brazil.
Article
Full-text available
PhD Thesis - Sharks of the Brazilian Coast
Article
A new l1enus Schroederichthys is described, together with its type species Schroederichthys maculatus from the western Caribbean and a second species Schroederichthys tenuis from the Atlantic off Brazil. Scyliorhinus meadi from the east coast of Florida. The purpose of this paper is to revie.w the west­ ern Atlantic cat sharks with especial attention to description of those characteristics of genem and species that are of interest for a revision of the cat sharks of the world; and also to describe ne·w materiltl collected by exploratory fishing vessels of the Bureau of Commercial Fisherie.s in the western Atlantic, including representatives of a new genus and five new species. For a revision of the fltmily, more material should be examined than is now availa.ble in American museum collections. The distinctions between the genera 8cylim'ki1ltM and Halaelu'T'u.-8, for example, appear to be somewhat superficial, but a revision of generic arrangement is imprac­ tical without, a survey of all known species and tl~e use of a greate.r number of diagnostic characters than can be gleaned from the terse and noninform­ at.ive descriptions of many of the nominal spe­ cies. A family revision which is in progress will provide a bet.ter opportunity for treatment of genera. SOURCES OF MATERIAL Collections of cat sharks made by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries exploratory fishing vessels,
Article
A new catshark,Scyliorhinus tokubee sp. nov., is described based on specimens from the coast of Shirahama, eastern Izu Peninsula, southern Japan. The present species is distinguished from other congeners in having a particular coloration with dark saddles, blotches and numerous small light spots, a wide oral cleft, the anterior nasal flap not reaching the oral cleft, a short interspace between the dorsal fins, developed clasper hooks, and some meristic characters (number of vertebrae, jaw teeth, and spiral valve turns). This species has been bred under captivity for several years in Shimoda Floating Aquarium.