ArticlePDF Available

Analysis of the Caloric and Macronutrient Content of Meal Options Offered to Children at Popular Restaurant Chains

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background: Previous research suggests that consumption of foods from restaurants is associated with poor dietary quality and adverse health outcomes. There are few studies that examine the nutrient content of children's meal options offered at both sit-down and fast-food chain restaurants. The main objective was to describe the average energy and nutrient profiles of meal options on children's menus at chain restaurants in the United States (US) and compare them to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Methods: The sample consisted of 13 sit-down and 16 fast-food restaurants ranked within the top 50 US restaurant chains in 2009 (meal nutrient content was accessed in 2010). There were 421 and 275 meal options listed on children's menus from sit-down and fast-food restaurants, respectively. Descriptive statistics are presented for calories, fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, fiber, and sodium. Results: In general, nutrient contents of children's meal options at sit-down and fast-food restaurants were similar. Meal options accounted for large percentages of the recommended daily intakes of calories, fat, saturated fat, and sodium and small percentages of the recommended daily intakes of fiber, carbohydrate, and protein for children. More than half of children's meals at these restaurants exceeded recommendations for fat and saturated fat. Conclusions: Children's meal options at sit-down and fast-food restaurant chains that complied with the US Dietary Guidelines were limited. The majority of the meal options had fat, saturated fat and sodium contents that exceed recommendations, while providing low amounts of fiber.
Content may be subject to copyright.
108 International Journal of Ch ild Health and Nutrition, 2014, 3, 108-11 3
E-ISSN: 1929-4247/14 © 2014 Lifescience G lobal
Analysis of the Caloric and Macronutrient Content of Meal Options
Offered to Children at Popular Restaurant Chains
Andrea L. Deierlein*, Kelley Coffman and Luz Claudio
One Gustave L. Levy Place Box 1057, New York, NY 10029, USA
Abstract: Background: Previous research suggests that consumption of foods from restaurants is associated with poor
dietary quality an d adverse health outcomes. There are few studies that examine the nutri ent content of children’s meal
options of fered at both sit-down and fast- food chain restaurants. The ma in objective was to describe the average energy
and nutrient profi les of meal options on chi ldren’s menus at chain r estaurants in the Unite d States (US) and compare
them to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
Methods: The samp le consisted of 13 sit-down and 16 fast-food restaurants ranked within th e top 50 US restaurant
chains in 2009 (meal nutrient content was accessed in 2010). Ther e were 421 and 275 meal options listed on children’s
menus from sit-down and fast-food restaurants, respectiv ely. D escriptive statistics are presented for calories, fat,
saturated fat, pr otein, carbohydrates, fiber, and sodium.
Results: In general, nutrient cont ents of c hildre n’s meal options at sit-dow n and fast-food restaurants wer e similar. Meal
options accounted for large percent ages of the recommended d aily intakes of calor ies, fa t, saturated fat, and sodium an d
small percentages of the recommended daily intakes of fiber, carbohydrate, and pr otein for children. More than half of
children’s meals at these restaurants exceeded recommenda tions f or fat and saturated fat.
Conclusions: Children’s meal options at sit-down and fast-food restaur ant chai ns that complied with the US Dietary
Guidelines were li mited. The majority of t he meal options had fat, saturated fat and sodium contents that exceed
recommen dations, while providing low amounts of fiber.
Keywords: Children, restaurant, nutrition, chain, meal.
INTRODUCTION
Foods prepared away from home account for
approximately one quarter of daily meals and snacks
and one third of total caloric intakes for individuals ages
2 years and older [1]. Consumption of foods from
restaurants is associated with less healthy dietary
quality in children [2]. Among children ages 4-19 years,
approximately 23-43% report eating fast-food on a
typical day, resulting in a greater average daily caloric
intake of 187 calories compared to non-consumers [3].
In adolescents, fast-food consumption is associated
with high calorie and fat intakes [4] and increased
weight and waist circumference, as well as adverse
metabolic outcomes [5,6].
Despite the large focus in the literature on dietary
patterns and health outcomes, there are few studies
that examine the nutrient content meal options offered
to children at fast-food and sit-down restaurant chains,
especially with respect to fiber and sodium content.
Fiber and sodium have been the targets of recent
public health campaigns. Fiber is a main constituent of
fruits, vegetables, and whole grains and is associated
with a lower risk of disease development, including
diabetes, obesity, and coronary heart disease [7]. In
*Address correspondence to this author at the One Gustave L. Levy Place Box
1057, New York, NY 10029, USA; Tel: 212-824-7044; Fax : 212-996-0407;
E-mail: andrea.deierlein@mssm.edu
contrast, sodium is added to the majority of processed
foods and is linked to increased risk of hypertension
and cardiovascular disease [8].
The main objective of this study was to describe
and compare the average energy and nutrient profiles
of meal options available on children’s menus at
popular sit-down and fast-food restaurant chains in the
United States (US), focusing on calories,
macronutrients, sodium, and fiber. We also compared
these profiles to current dietary recommendations
based on the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
issued by the US Department of Agriculture and the US
Department of Health and Human Services [9].
METHODS
The sample consisted of restaurants ranked within
the top 50 restaurant chains in the US in 2009 [10].
Rankings were based on restaurants’ total sales in
2008. The sample consisted of restaurants that offered
entrees as part of meal options for children.
Restaurants that offered only buffets, pizza, or
convenience/snack options (ice cream, pastries, coffee,
and other convenience items) were excluded (n=11).
Since the objective of this study was to describe the
nutrient profiles of meal options on children’s menus,
restaurants that only provided one menu (presumably
an adult menu) were excluded (n=4). Lastly,
restaurants that did not provide nutritional information
Analysis of the Caloric and Macronutrient Content of Meal Options International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2 109
for the meals (accessed June-July 2010) were
excluded (n=6). The remaining 29 restaurants were
then classified as sit-down restaurants (n=13) and fast-
food restaurants (n=16). Sit-down restaurants were
defined as restaurants with wait-staff service and fast-
food restaurants were defined as restaurants offering
self-service or carry out without wait-staff service [11].
The total sample of 29 restaurants represented over
$184 billion in total sales for 2008, with fast-food
restaurants accounting for approximately $157 billion of
the sales (85%).
In order to determine the average nutrient profiles of
meals available to children at fast-food and sit-down
restaurant chains, the nutrition information for all meals
offered on the menus was calculated using all possible
combinations of entrées and side options, including all
size/portion options and all dressing/sauce options if
provided. The following items were excluded from the
analysis: meals that were not offered as part of
restaurants’ daily menus; meals on breakfast and
lunch-specific menus; seasonal or region-specific
offers; gluten-free or special diet meals; side salads or
soups not labeled as a main “entrée” or not offered as
part of a meal by the restaurant; desserts; additional
sauces and toppings that were not specifically
indicated for the meal; and unlimited meal offers, such
as buffets. All beverages were also excluded.
Statistical Analyses
For children’s menus, there were 421 possible meal
combinations available at sit-down restaurants and 275
meal options available at fast-food restaurants.
Nutrition information for all meal combinations was
entered into an Excel database and Stata 11.0 was
used for statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were
computed for total calories, fat (g), percent calories
from fat, total saturated fat (g), percent calories from
saturated fat, protein (g), percent calories from protein,
total carbohydrates (g), percent calories from
carbohydrates, fiber (g), and sodium (mg). The values
for sodium represented sodium that was either
naturally occurring in the food or was added during
processing or preparation, not sodium from table salt
added by the customer. Average nutrient information
for children’s meals was compared to
recommendations provided by the 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans [9]. The percentages of
calories from macronutrients within meals were
calculated assuming 4 calories per gram of
carbohydrates and protein and 9 calories per gram of
fat and saturated fat. The percentage of calories from
each macronutrient was compared to the
recommended macronutrient ranges suggested in the
Guidelines as follows: 45-65% carbohydrates; 10-30%
protein; 25-35% fat; and less than 10% saturated fat
[9]. The Guidelines’ recommendations for sodium and
fiber are age and gender-specific. For these analyses,
we used reference daily intakes of 1500 mg of sodium
(1500 mg/day is the Adequate Intake recommended for
individuals ages 9 years and older and no more than
2200 mg/day is recommended for children ages 9-13
years) and 25 g of fiber (22 g/day and 25 g/day are
recommended for girls and boys, respectively, ages 9-
13 years).
RESULTS
In general, children’s meal options at sit-down and
fast-food restaurants exceeded the daily recommended
intakes of fat, saturated fat, and sodium while they
were within or below the recommendations for
carbohydrates, protein, and fiber. The mean (standard
deviation, SD), median, and ranges for: total calories
(kcal), total fat (g), percent of calories from fat (%),
saturated fat (g), percent of calories from saturated fat
(%), protein (g), percent of calories from protein (%),
carbohydrates (g), percent of calories from
carbohydrates (%), sodium (mg), and fiber (g) are
shown in Table 1 for children’s meal options at sit-down
and fast-food restaurants. The frequencies (%) of meal
options at sit-down and fast-food restaurants that
exceeded the 2010 Dietary Guidelines recommended
daily intakes of percent of calories from fat, percent of
calories from saturated fat, and sodium are displayed in
Figure 1.
Sit-Down Restaurants
The average sit-down restaurant meal provided a
mean energy intake of 537.7 (SD=202.1) calories. Over
one third of these calories were from fat with 12.1%
(SD=7.5) of calories from saturated fat. Children’s
meals contained a mean of 1118.9 mg (SD=587.2) of
sodium, which is three quarters of the Adequate Intake
(and over half the recommended limit of daily intake),
and 4.6 g (SD=2.7) of fiber, which is 18.4% of the
recommended daily intake (Table 1). The majority of
children’s meal options from sit-down restaurants
exceeded the recommended daily intakes of percent of
calories from fat or saturated fat and one-fifth contained
more than 1500 mg of sodium (Figure 1). A total of
14.3% of children’s meal options at sit-down
restaurants exceeded the recommendations for all
three of the selected nutrients.
110 International Journal of Child Health and Nutritio n, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2
Deierlein et al.
Fast-Food Restaurants
The average fast-food restaurant children’s meal
provided a mean energy intake of 529.5 (SD=162.7)
calories. More than one third of these calories were
from fat with 14.7% (SD=5.5) from saturated fat.
Children’s meals contained a mean of 999.8 mg
(SD=299.3) of sodium, which is two thirds of the
Adequate Intake (and almost half the recommended
limit of daily intake), and 3.6 (SD=1.7) g of fiber, which
is 14.4% of the recommended intake (Table 1).
Approximately 72% of children’s meal options from
fast-food restaurants exceeded the recommended daily
intake of percent of calories from fat; 79% exceeded
the recommended daily intake of percent of calories
from saturated fat; and 3% of meals contained more
than 1500 mg of sodium (Figure 1).
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to describe the
average nutrient information of meal options available
on children’s menus at popular US sit-down and fast-
food restaurant chains and to compare this information
to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans [9]. The
results show that meals offered at these restaurants,
on average, accounted for large percentages of the
recommended daily intakes of calories, fat, saturated
fat, and sodium and small percentages of the
recommended daily intakes of fiber, carbohydrates,
and protein for children. More than half of children’s
meals at sit-down and fast-food restaurants exceeded
the recommendations for fat and saturated fat.
Our study adds valuable information to the relatively
sparse literature regarding the average nutrient profiles
of meal options available to children at popular US
restaurant chains. The average percent of calories from
fat in children’s meals ranged from approximately 38-
50% and the average percent of calories from
saturated fat ranged from approximately 12-16%,
exceeding national recommendations for children.
Despite somewhat similar percent calorie distributions
of macronutrients, children’s meals at sit-down
restaurants had higher average amounts of calories,
fat, saturated fat, and sodium compared to meals at
fast-food restaurants. These differences are likely due
to larger portion sizes at sit-down restaurants
compared to fast-food restaurants [12]. This finding is
important because children consume larger quantities
of energy-dense foods (such as those offered at fast-
food and sit-down restaurants) as portion sizes
increase and, consequently consume increased
amounts of calories, fat, and other nutrients [13].
The average amounts of sodium in meals were
particularly alarming, accounting for approximately half
of the limited daily intake for children (based on a
recommended intake of no more than 2200 mg/day).
Table 1: Descriptive Nutrition Information for Meal Options on Adults’ and Children’s Menus at Sit-Down (n=13) and
Fast-Food (n=16) Chain Restaurants Ranked within the Top 50 Chain Restaurants in the United States
Sit-Down Restaurants (n=13) Fast-food Restaurants (n=16)
N Mean ± SD Median Range N Mean ± SD Median Range
Children 421 275
Calories (kcal) 421 537.7 ± 202.1 510.0 125.0-1268.3 275 529.5 ± 162.7 530.0 140.0-850.0
Total Fat (g) 421 24.8 ± 15.4 23.0 0.0-78.4 275 23.2 ± 9.1 23.0 1.5-45.0
Percent Calories fr om
Fat (%) 421 38.3 ± 15.1 39.8 0.0-77.5 275 38.7 ± 8.4 39.1 7.3-5 6.5
Saturated Fat (g) 296 8.4 ± 7.0 6.0 0.0-32.1 275 9.2 ± 5.1 8.5 0.0-20.0
Percent Calories fr om
Saturated Fat (%) 296 12.1 ± 7.5 10.9 0.0-34.6 275 15.1 ± 6.3 13.0 7.1-48.6
Carbohydrates ( g) 408 55.0 ± 24.9 53.0 6.0-145.4 275 60.1 ± 20. 5 63.0 4.0-9 2.0
Percent Calories fr om
Carbohydrates ( %) 408 42.0 ± 15. 9 40.5 4.4-92.0 275 45.3 ± 8.7 45.8 11.4-84.3
Protein (g) 316 24.2 ± 9.4 24.0 5.0-49.0 275 18.3 ± 4. 5 18.0 6.0-30.0
Percent Calories fr om
Protein (%) 316 19.3 ± 10. 9 16.0 6.0-61.7 275 15. 1 ± 6.3 13. 0 7.1-48.6
Sodium (mg) 421 1118.9 ± 587.2 1045.0 50.0-4398.0 275 999.8 ± 299.3 997.0 270.0-1890.0
Fiber (g) 337 4.6 ± 2.7 4.0 0.0-14.8 275 3.6 ± 1.7 3.0 0.0- 12.0
Analysis of the Caloric and Macronutrient Content of Meal Options International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2 111
Excess dietary sodium contributes to the later
development of hypertension, which is a known risk
factor for adverse cardiovascular events and kidney
disease [14,15]. Reductions in dietary sodium are
associated with decreased systolic and diastolic blood
pressure in children [16]. In contrast to sodium, the
average amounts of fiber in meals were low, providing
less than one fifth of the recommended intake for
children. In adults, dietary fiber is positively associated
with satiety and acts to decrease hunger, thereby
playing an important role in body weight regulation and
the prevention of obesity, as well as the related co-
morbidites, such as diabetes [17-19]. Though evidence
for such health benefits of dietary fiber among children
is currently not established, it is likely that fiber plays an
important role in children’s health [17].
Previous studies have described the nutrient
profiles of fast-food and/or chain restaurant meal
options, using varying methodologies, and the results
are consistent with and complement the results of the
current study [20,21]. Higher intakes of calories, fat,
and added sugars are reported when children consume
foods at fast-food and other restaurants [3,12,22,23]. In
a cross-sectional study of participants in the Continuing
Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (1994-1998),
fast-food use was reported by 42% of children.
Children with reported fast-food consumption on a
given day had higher calorie, fat, saturated fat, sodium,
and soft drink intakes and lower vitamin, fruit,
vegetable, and milk intakes compared to a day when
fast-food was not consumed and compared to non-
consumers of fast-food [24]. Only 3% of fast-food kids’
meals offered at major fast-food restaurant chains met
all of the criteria of the National School Lunch Program
[23]. In a comparison of children’s meals at fast-food
and non-fast-food restaurants, the overall mean
percentages of calories from fat were similar (37.5% at
fast-food vs. 40.5% at non-fast-food restaurants) and
there were no significant differences in macronutrient
content when evaluating meals with the highest calorie
side item at the two types of restaurants [12]. However,
similar to the findings in the current study, children’s
meals at fast-food restaurants were smaller, contained
less calories, fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates,
and fiber, and included lower calorie side options
compared to meals at non-fast-food restaurants [12].
The results of this study should be considered
within the context of its limitations. This is a descriptive
study reporting the average nutrient profiles of
children’s meal options from menus posted on
restaurants’ websites in 2010; therefore, we cannot
comment on recent menu changes, regional
differences in meal options, or consumer purchasing
behaviors of meals. We used nutrition information that
was provided by restaurants rather than an
independent source. Previous studies suggest that
Figure 1: Frequency of children’s meal options on menus at sit-down and fast-food chain restaurants that exceeded the 2010
Dietary Guidelines recommendations for daily intakes of percent of calories from fat, percent of calories from saturated fat, and
sodiuma.
aAmong sit-down restaurants (n=13), there were 421 meals with available nutrition information for calories from fat; 296 meals
for calories from saturated fat; and 421 meals for sodium. Among fast-food restaurants (n=16), there were 275 meals with
available nutrition information for calories from fat, calories from saturated fat, and sodium.
112 International Journal of Child Health and Nutritio n, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2 Deierlein et al.
some of this nutrient information may be under-
reported [25], which would likely underestimate the
reported average meal nutrient values. Also, by design
of our study, we were unable to account for any
condiments, sauces, or salt added (or subtracted)
during or after food preparation and any beverages
consumed with the meals. Such additions to meals
would likely account for substantial increases in
calories, macronutrients, and sodium. Overall, these
limitations suggest that the reported nutrient content of
meals is lower than what is actually being consumed by
children.
CONCLUSIONS
Sit-down and fast-food chain restaurants offer
convenient, affordable, and quick meal options for
children [26]; however, evidence from this study and
others [3,12,20-23] show that the majority of these
meals are high in calories, fat, and sodium and low in
fiber. Meals at sit-down chain restaurants may be of
particular concern because of large portion sizes.
Public health initiatives to increase consumer
knowledge and awareness by providing nutrition
information on menus in chain restaurants may help
guide consumers to make healthier choices [27,28],
especially for children [29], but are likely inadequate to
prevent excessive dietary intakes [28,30]. Alterations to
restaurant meals that favor low calorie options, reduce
portion sizes [31], and include fruits, vegetables, and
whole grains are necessary to decrease calories, fat,
and sodium and increase fiber intakes among child
consumers.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing
interests. All authors were involved in the
implementation of the study as well as read and
approved the final manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Research Training
Program in Environmental Pediatrics (T32HD049311)
and the Short-term Training Programs for Minority
Students (R25 HL108857 and T35 ES007298). The
authors would like to thank Brenda Vazquez for her
assistance in gathering restaurant information and
participating in data entry.
REFERENCES
[1] Guthrie JF, Lin BH, Frazao E. Role of food prepared away
from home in the American d iet, 1977-78 vers us 1994-96:
changes and cons equences. J Nutr Educ Be hav 2002; 34:
140-50.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60083-3
[2] Ayala GX, R ogers M, Arred ondo E M, et al. Away-from-home
food intake and risk for obesity: Examining the influence of
context. Obesity 2008; 1 6: 1002-8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1038/oby.2008. 34
[3] Bowman SA, Gortmaker SL, E bbeling CB, Pereira MA,
Ludwig DS . Effects of fast-food consumption on energy
intake and diet quality among children in a national
household survey. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 112-8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1542/peds.113. 1.112
[4] French SA, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, Fulkerson JA,
Hannan P. Fast food restaurant use among adolescents:
associations with nutrient intake, food choices and behavioral
and psychosocial variables. Int J Obes 2001; 25: 1823-33.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1038/sj.ijo.080 1820
[5] Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Jacobs DR, Willia ms OD,
Popkin BM. Differential associations of fast f ood and
restaurant food consumption with 3-y change in body mass
index: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young
Adults Study. A m J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 201-8.
[6] Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Steffen LM, Jacobs DR, Popkin
BM. Regular consumption from fast food establishments
relative to other restaurants is differentially associated with
metabolic outcomes in young adults. J Nutr 2009; 139: 2113-
8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.3945/jn.109.109520
[7] Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH, et al. Health benefits of
dietary fiber. Nutr Rev 20 09; 67: 188-205.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1111/j.1753-488 7.2009. 00189.x
[8] Frieden TR, Briss PA. We can r educe dietary sodium, s ave
money, and s ave lives. Ann Int Med 2010; 152: 526-7.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.7326/000 3-4819- 152-8-201004200-
00214
[9] U.S. Department of Agr icultur e and U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. Di etary Guidelines for
Americans, 2010 7th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office; December 2010.
[10] Restaurants & Institutions. R&I 2009 Top 400 Rest aurant
Chains. Accessed 0 6/01, 201 0. Refer ence available from:
http://www.rolypoly.com/news/articles/R&I2009Top400
RestaurantChains.pdf.
[11] Biing-Hwan L, Frazao E. Nutritional quality of foods at and
away from home. Food Review. US Government Print ing
Office, Food and Rural Economics Division, Economics
Research Service, USDA 1997; pp. 499-503.
[12] Serra no EL, Jedda VB. Comparison of fast-food and non-
fast-food children's menu items. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009; 41:
132-7.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/j.jneb.2008.02.005
[13] Fisher JO, Kral TVE. Super-size me: Portion size effects on
young children's eating. Phys B ehav 2008; 94: 39-47.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.015
[14] Jones DW. Di etary sodium and blood pressure. Hypertension
2004; 43: 932-5.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1161/01.HYP.0000126610.89002.c6
[15] MacGregor GA. Salt: blood pressure, the kidney, and other
harmful effects. Nephro l Dial Transplant 199 8; 13: 2 471-9.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1093/ndt/13.10.2471
[16] Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP,
Meerpohl JJ. Effect of lower sodium intake on health:
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: 1326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1326
[17] Kranz S, Brauchla M, Slavin JL, Mi ller KB. What do we know
about dietary fiber intake in children and hea lth? The effects
of fiber intake on constipation, obesity, and diabetes in
children. Adv N utr 2012; 3: 47-53.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.3945/an. 111.001362
Analysis of the Caloric and Macronutrient Content of Meal Options International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2 113
[18] Pereira MA, Ludwig DS. Dietary fiber and body-weight
regulation. Observations and Mechanisms. Pediatr Clin Nor
Am 2001; 48: 969-80.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70351-5
[19] Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Dietary fiber and
weight regulation. Nutr Rev 2001; 59: 129-39.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1111/j.1753-488 7.2001. tb07001.x
[20] Batada A, Bruening M, Marchlewicz EH, Story M, Wootan
MG. Poor nutrition on the menu: children’s meals at
America's top chain restaurants . Child Obes 2012; 8: 251-4.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1089/chi .2012. 0016
[21] Wu HW, Stur m R. What's on the menu? A review of the
energy and nutritional content of US chain restaurant menus.
Public Health Nutr 2013; 16: 87-96.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1017/S13689800120012 2X
[22] Zoumas-Morse C, Rock CL, Sobo EJ, Neuhouser ML.
Children's patterns of macronutrient intake a nd associations
with restaur ant and home eati ng. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;
101: 923-5.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.10 16/S0002-8223(01)00228-0
[23] O'Donnell SI, Hoerr SL, Mendoza JA, Goh ET. Nutrient
quality of fast food kids meals. Am J C lin Nutr 2008; 88:
1388-95.
[24] Paeratakul S, Ferdinand DP, Champagne CM, Ryan DH,
Bray GA. Fast-food consumption among US adults and
children: dietary and nutrient intake profile. J Am Diet Assoc
2003; 103: 1332-8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/S0002-8223(03)01086-1
[25] Urba n LE, McCrory MA, Dallal GE, Das S K, Saltzman E,
Weber JL, et al. Accuracy of st ated en ergy contents of
restaurant foods. JA MA 2011; 306: 287-93.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1001/jama.2011 .993
[26] Rydell SA, Harnack LJ, Oakes JM, Story M, Jeffrey RW,
French SA. Why eat at fast-food restaurants: reported
reasons among frequent consumers. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;
108: 2066-70.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1016/j.jada.2008.09.008
[27] Elbel B. Consumer estimation of recommended and actual
calories at fast f ood restaurants. Obes ity 2011; 19: 1971-8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1038/oby.2011. 214
[28] Dumanovsky T, Huang CY, Nonas CA, Matte T, Bassett MT,
Silver LD . Changes in energy content of lunc htime purchases
from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie
labeling: cross sectional customer surveys. BMJ 2011; 343:
d4464.
http://dx .doi.or g/10.1136/bmj.d4464
[29] Tandon PS, Wright J, Zhou C , Rogers CB, Christakis DA.
Nutrition menu la beling may lead t o lower-calorie restaurant
meal choices for children. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 244-8.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1542/peds.2009-1117
[30] Girz L, Polivy J, Herman CP, Lee H. The effects of calorie
information on food sel ection and intake. Int J Obes 2012;
36: 1340-5.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1038/ijo.2011.135
[31] Dumanovsky T, Nonas CA, Huang CY, Silver LD, Bassett
MT. What people buy from fast-food res taurants: cal oric
content and menu item selection, New York City 2007.
Obesity 2009; 17: 1369-1374.
http://dx.doi.or g/10.1038/oby.2009. 90
Received on 21-02-2014 Accepted on 24-04-2014 Published on 30-05-2014
http://dx.doi.or g/10.6000/1929-4247. 2014.03.02.6
© 2014 Deierlein et al.; Licensee Lifescience Global.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in
any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Away-from-home food consumption has rapidly increased, though little is known about the independent associations of restaurant food and fast food intake with body mass index (BMI) and BMI change. The aim was to compare the associations of restaurant food and fast food consumption with current and 3-y changes in BMI. Multivariate linear regression models, with control for demographic and lifestyle factors, were used to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of away-from-home eating with BMI by using data from subjects of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (n = 3394) obtained at exam years 7 (1992-1993) and 10 (1995-1996). Forty percent of the sample increased their weekly consumption of restaurant or fast food, though mean (+/-SD) changes were -0.16 +/- 2.39 times/wk (P = 0.0001) and -0.56 +/- 3.04 times/wk (P < 0.0001), respectively. Cross-sectionally, fast food, but not restaurant food, consumption was positively associated with BMI. Similarly, higher consumption of fast food at year 7 was associated with a 0.16-unit higher BMI at year 10. After adjustment for baseline away-from-home eating, increased consumption of fast food only (beta: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.39) and of both restaurant food and fast food (beta: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.51) were positively associated with BMI change, though the estimates were not significantly different (P = 0.47). Increased consumption of restaurant food only was unrelated to BMI change (beta: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.21, 0.19), which differed significantly (P = 0.014) from the estimate for an increase in both restaurant food and fast food intake. We found differential effects of restaurant food and fast food intakes on BMI, although the observed differences were not always statistically significant. More research is needed to determine whether the differential effects are related to consumer characteristics or the food itself.
Article
Full-text available
Fast food has become a prominent feature of the diet of children in the United States and, increasingly, throughout the world. However, few studies have examined the effects of fast-food consumption on any nutrition or health-related outcome. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fast-food consumption adversely affects dietary factors linked to obesity risk. This study included 6212 children and adolescents 4 to 19 years old in the United States participating in the nationally representative Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals conducted from 1994 to 1996 and the Supplemental Children's Survey conducted in 1998. We examined the associations between fast-food consumption and measures of dietary quality using between-subject comparisons involving the whole cohort and within-subject comparisons involving 2080 individuals who ate fast food on one but not both survey days. On a typical day, 30.3% of the total sample reported consuming fast food. Fast-food consumption was highly prevalent in both genders, all racial/ethnic groups, and all regions of the country. Controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables, increased fast-food consumption was independently associated with male gender, older age, higher household incomes, non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity, and residing in the South. Children who ate fast food, compared with those who did not, consumed more total energy (187 kcal; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 109-265), more energy per gram of food (0.29 kcal/g; 95% CI: 0.25-0.33), more total fat (9 g; 95% CI: 5.0-13.0), more total carbohydrate (24 g; 95% CI: 12.6-35.4), more added sugars (26 g; 95% CI: 18.2-34.6), more sugar-sweetened beverages (228 g; 95% CI: 184-272), less fiber (-1.1 g; 95% CI: -1.8 to -0.4), less milk (-65 g; 95% CI: -95 to -30), and fewer fruits and nonstarchy vegetables (-45 g; 95% CI: -58.6 to -31.4). Very similar results were observed by using within-subject analyses in which subjects served as their own controls: that is, children ate more total energy and had poorer diet quality on days with, compared with without, fast food. Consumption of fast food among children in the United States seems to have an adverse effect on dietary quality in ways that plausibly could increase risk for obesity.
Article
Full-text available
To assess the effect of decreased sodium intake on blood pressure, related cardiovascular diseases, and potential adverse effects such as changes in blood lipids, catecholamine levels, and renal function. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Latin American and Caribbean health science literature database, and the reference lists of previous reviews. Randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies in non-acutely ill adults and children assessing the relations between sodium intake and blood pressure, renal function, blood lipids, and catecholamine levels, and in non-acutely ill adults all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and coronary heart disease. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate and study characteristics and outcomes extracted. When possible we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the effect of lower sodium intake using the inverse variance method and a random effects model. We present results as mean differences or risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals. We included 14 cohort studies and five randomised controlled trials reporting all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, stroke, or coronary heart disease; and 37 randomised controlled trials measuring blood pressure, renal function, blood lipids, and catecholamine levels in adults. Nine controlled trials and one cohort study in children reporting on blood pressure were also included. In adults a reduction in sodium intake significantly reduced resting systolic blood pressure by 3.39 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 2.46 to 4.31) and resting diastolic blood pressure by 1.54 mm Hg (0.98 to 2.11). When sodium intake was <2 g/day versus ≥2 g/day, systolic blood pressure was reduced by 3.47 mm Hg (0.76 to 6.18) and diastolic blood pressure by 1.81 mm Hg (0.54 to 3.08). Decreased sodium intake had no significant adverse effect on blood lipids, catecholamine levels, or renal function in adults (P>0.05). There were insufficient randomised controlled trials to assess the effects of reduced sodium intake on mortality and morbidity. The associations in cohort studies between sodium intake and all cause mortality, incident fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease were non-significant (P>0.05). Increased sodium intake was associated with an increased risk of stroke (risk ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.43), stroke mortality (1.63, 1.27 to 2.10), and coronary heart disease mortality (1.32, 1.13 to 1.53). In children, a reduction in sodium intake significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 0.84 mm Hg (0.25 to 1.43) and diastolic blood pressure by 0.87 mm Hg (0.14 to 1.60). High quality evidence in non-acutely ill adults shows that reduced sodium intake reduces blood pressure and has no adverse effect on blood lipids, catecholamine levels, or renal function, and moderate quality evidence in children shows that a reduction in sodium intake reduces blood pressure. Lower sodium intake is also associated with a reduced risk of stroke and fatal coronary heart disease in adults. The totality of evidence suggests that most people will likely benefit from reducing sodium intake.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The present study aimed to (i) describe the availability of nutrition information in major chain restaurants, (ii) document the energy and nutrient levels of menu items, (iii) evaluate relationships with restaurant characteristics, menu labelling and trans fat laws, and nutrition information accessibility, and (iv) compare energy and nutrient levels against industry-sponsored and government-issued nutrition criteria. Design: Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis of the energy, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, sodium, carbohydrate and protein levels of 29 531 regular and 1392 children's menu items [corrected]. Setting: Energy and nutrition information provided on restaurant websites or upon request, and secondary databases on restaurant characteristics. Subjects: The top 400 US chain restaurants by sales, based on the 2009 list of the Restaurants & Institutions magazine. Results: Complete nutrition information was reported for 245 (61 %) restaurants. Appetizers had more energy, fat and sodium than all other item types. Children's menu specialty beverages had more fat, saturated fat and carbohydrates than comparable regular menu beverages. The majority of main entrées fell below one-third of the US Department of Agriculture's estimated daily energy needs, but as few as 3 % were also within limits for sodium, fat and saturated fat. Main entrées had significantly more energy, fat and saturated fat in family-style restaurants than in fast-food restaurants. Restaurants that made nutrition information easily accessible on websites had significantly lower energy, fat and sodium contents across menu offerings than those providing information only upon request. Conclusions: The paper provides a comprehensive view of chain restaurant menu nutrition prior to nationwide labelling laws. It offers baseline data to evaluate how restaurants respond after laws are implemented.
Article
Full-text available
The effect of dietary fiber intake on chronic diseases has been explored in adults but is largely unknown in children. This paper summarizes the currently existing evidence on the implications of dietary fiber intake on constipation, obesity, and diabetes in children. Current intake studies suggest that all efforts to increase children's dietary fiber consumption should be encouraged. Available data, predominantly from adult studies, indicate significantly lower risks for obesity, diabetes, and constipation could be expected with higher dietary fiber consumption. However, there is a lack of data from clinical studies in children of various ages consuming different levels of dietary fiber to support such assumptions. The existing fiber recommendations for children are conflicting, a surprising situation, because the health benefits associated with higher dietary fiber intake are well established in adults. Data providing conclusive evidence to either support or refute some, if not all, of the current pediatric fiber intake recommendations are lacking. The opportunity to improve children's health should be a priority, because it also relates to their health later in life. The known health benefits of dietary fiber intake, as summarized in this paper, call for increased awareness of the need to examine the potential benefits to children's health through increased dietary fiber.
Article
Full-text available
To assess the impact of fast food restaurants adding calorie labelling to menu items on the energy content of individual purchases. Cross sectional surveys in spring 2007 and spring 2009 (one year before and nine months after full implementation of regulation requiring chain restaurants' menus to contain details of the energy content of all menu items). Setting 168 randomly selected locations of the top 11 fast food chains in New York City during lunchtime hours. 7309 adult customers interviewed in 2007 and 8489 in 2009. Energy content of individual purchases, based on customers' register receipts and on calorie information provided for all items in menus. For the full sample, mean calories purchased did not change from before to after regulation (828 v 846 kcal, P = 0.22), though a modest decrease was shown in a regression model adjusted for restaurant chain, poverty level for the store location, sex of customers, type of purchase, and inflation adjusted cost (847 v 827 kcal, P = 0.01). Three major chains, which accounted for 42% of customers surveyed, showed significant reductions in mean energy per purchase (McDonald's 829 v 785 kcal, P = 0.02; Au Bon Pain 555 v 475 kcal, P<0.001; KFC 927 v 868 kcal, P<0.01), while mean energy content increased for one chain (Subway 749 v 882 kcal, P<0.001). In the 2009 survey, 15% (1288/8489) of customers reported using the calorie information, and these customers purchased 106 fewer kilocalories than customers who did not see or use the calorie information (757 v 863 kcal, P<0.001). Although no overall decline in calories purchased was observed for the full sample, several major chains saw significant reductions. After regulation, one in six lunchtime customers used the calorie information provided, and these customers made lower calorie choices.
Article
Full-text available
National recommendations for the prevention and treatment of obesity emphasize reducing energy intake. Foods purchased in restaurants provide approximately 35% of the daily energy intake in US individuals but the accuracy of the energy contents listed for these foods is unknown. To examine the accuracy of stated energy contents of foods purchased in restaurants. A validated bomb calorimetry technique was used to measure dietary energy in food from 42 restaurants, comprising 269 total food items and 242 unique foods. The restaurants and foods were randomly selected from quick-serve and sit-down restaurants in Massachusetts, Arkansas, and Indiana between January and June 2010. The difference between restaurant-stated and laboratory-measured energy contents, which were corrected for standard metabolizable energy conversion factors. The absolute stated energy contents were not significantly different from the absolute measured energy contents overall (difference of 10 kcal/portion; 95% confidence interval [CI], -15 to 34 kcal/portion; P = .52); however, the stated energy contents of individual foods were variable relative to the measured energy contents. Of the 269 food items, 50 (19%) contained measured energy contents of at least 100 kcal/portion more than the stated energy contents. Of the 10% of foods with the highest excess energy in the initial sampling, 13 of 17 were available for a second sampling. In the first analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 289 kcal/portion (95% CI, 186 to 392 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents; in the second analysis, these foods contained average measured energy contents of 258 kcal/portion (95% CI, 154 to 361 kcal/portion) more than the stated energy contents (P <.001 for each vs 0 kcal/portion difference). In addition, foods with lower stated energy contents contained higher measured energy contents than stated, while foods with higher stated energy contents contained lower measured energy contents (P <.001). Stated energy contents of restaurant foods were accurate overall. However, there was substantial inaccuracy for some individual foods, with understated energy contents for those with lower energy contents.
Article
We evaluated the nutritional quality of children's meals at chain restaurants, because children obtain about a third of their daily calories from away-from-home foods and studies show that restaurant foods are often higher in calories and lower in nutritional value than foods prepared at home. We assessed the nutritional quality of children's meals at the 50 largest U.S. restaurant chains by visiting each chain's web site or calling the company. Eighteen of the chains did not have children's meals and 10 did not provide adequate nutrition information to be included in the study. The nutritional quality of each meal combination was evaluated against a set of nutrition standards based on key nutrition recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Of the 22 restaurants that had children's menus and available nutrition information, 99% of 1662 children's meal combinations were of poor nutritional quality. Restaurants should support healthier choices for children by reformulating existing menu items and adding new healthier items, posting calories on menus, and setting nutrition standards for marketing to children.
Article
Recently, localities across the United States have passed laws requiring the mandatory labeling of calories in all chain restaurants, including fast food restaurants. This policy is set to be implemented at the federal level. Early studies have found these policies to be at best minimally effective in altering food choice at a population level. This paper uses receipt and survey data collected from consumers outside fast food restaurants in low-income communities in New York City (NYC) (which implemented labeling) and a comparison community (which did not) to examine two fundamental assumptions necessary (though not sufficient) for calorie labeling to be effective: that consumers know how many calories they should be eating throughout the course of a day and that currently customers improperly estimate the number of calories in their fast food order. Then, we examine whether mandatory menu labeling influences either of these assumptions. We find that approximately one-third of consumers properly estimate that the number of calories an adult should consume daily. Few (8% on average) believe adults should be eating over 2,500 calories daily, and approximately one-third believe adults should eat lesser than 1,500 calories daily. Mandatory labeling in NYC did not change these findings. However, labeling did increase the number of low-income consumers who correctly estimated (within 100 calories) the number of calories in their fast food meal, from 15% before labeling in NYC increasing to 24% after labeling. Overall knowledge remains low even with labeling. Additional public policies likely need to be considered to influence obesity on a large scale.