Assessment of a Mobile Game
(‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’) to Promote
Physical Activity Among Children
S. Mazdak Abulnaga,
Jean Pierre Chanoine,
J. Mark Ansermino,
and Guy A. Dumont
Objective: The majority of children in North America are not meeting current physical activity guidelines. The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a mobile phone game (‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’) as a
tool to promote voluntary physical activity among children.
Materials and Methods: The game integrates data from an accelerometer-based activity monitor (Tractivity
Kineteks Corp., Vancouver, BC, Canada) wirelessly connected to a phone and was developed with the involvement
of a team of young advisors (KidsCan Initiative: Involving Youth as Ambassadors for Research). Fifty-four children
8–13 years old completed a week of baseline data collection by wearing an accelerometer but receiving no feedback
about their activity levels. The 54 children were then sequentially assigned to two groups: One group played
‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor,’’ and the other received daily activity feedback (steps and active minutes) via an
online program. The physical activity (baseline and intervention weeks) was measured using the activity monitor and
compared using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (intervention ·time).
Results: Forty-seven children with a body mass index (BMI) z-score of 0.35 –1.18 successfully completed the
study. Signiﬁcant (P=0.01) increases in physical activity were observed during the intervention week in both
the game and feedback groups (1191 and 796 steps/day, respectively). In the game group, greater physical
activity was demonstrated in children with higher BMI z-score, showing 964 steps/day more per BMI z-score
unit (P=0.03; 95 percent conﬁdence interval of 98 to 1829).
Conclusions: Further investigation is required to conﬁrm that our game design promotes physical activity.
Obesity is among the most urgent health problems
faced by children today. Over the past three decades, the
proportion of children who are classiﬁed as overweight or
obese has increased substantially. Globally, an estimated 170
million children and youth under 18 years of age are now
estimated to be overweight.
Being overweight or obese has
highly negative social
consequences in children
and youth. Greater body mass index (BMI) is associated with
increased incidence of diseases such as diabetes, high blood
pressure, and stroke and is directly related to a reduced
quality of life and greater risk of being teased, bullied, and
Because of the increasing prevalence and
associated health consequences, obesity has been considered
one of the most serious health challenges of this century.
The increased prevalence of obesity has been reported to
be due to both an increase in the consumption of unhealthy
foods and a decrease in physical activity.
majority of children and youth do not meet current physical
activity guidelines and are considered to be physically hy-
There is a pressing need for interventions that
increase physical activity in children; understanding the
factors that inﬂuence their activity is essential to designing
The growing inclination of youth toward
sedentary forms of entertainment such as television,
media, and electronic games is listed as a leading cause of the
reluctance in children and youth to engage in and maintain
Electrical and Computer Engineering in Medicine Group,
Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Department of Pediatrics, and
Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia and BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British
Clinical and Population Studies at the Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
GAMES FOR HEALTH JOURNAL: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications
Volume 4, Number 2, 2015
ªMary Ann Liebert, Inc.
appropriate levels of physical activity.
Thus, a possible
solution to promote physical activity among youth could be
to engage them using tools and technology that they volun-
tarily choose, such as mobile devices and games.
Several studies have been conducted to investigate the
ability of active videogames (exergames) to promote physi-
cal activity in children.
In some cases it has been found
that energy expenditure increases while playing active vi-
deogames, indicating a possible beneﬁt.
domized controlled trials studying exergames have produced
Although some show an increase in
physical activity, others have shown no signiﬁcant differ-
ence. More research on the long-term effects of playing
exergames is needed.
Exergaming is expanding as an option for reducing sed-
entary behavior in children. However, the time spent playing
indoors, on screens (television, computer, phone, video-
games), is one of the known factors inhibiting children from
being physically active.
Exergaming applied to mobile
phones may provide a fun way of promoting indoor and
outdoor physical activity that is not constrained by a home
console environment. Therefore, we designed a mobile ex-
ergame called ‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’ (MKMM)
with the direct involvement of a group of youth advisors to
encourage voluntary physical activity among children. In
order to increase the user’s awareness of his or her own level
of physical activity, the game integrates data from an activity
monitor wirelessly connected to the phone into a reward
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the
MKMM game in increasing physical activity. We also in-
vestigated the effect of providing feedback to children re-
garding their daily physical activity using software provided
by the activity monitor. First, we assessed the hypothesis that
although both interventions would raise physical activity
above baseline, playing the MKMM game would motivate a
greater increase among children. Second, we hypothesized
that the children would ﬁnd the game highly enjoyable as it
was developed with the direct involvement of youth.
Development and design
The MKMM game was developed by Ayogo Games Inc.
(Vancouver, BC, Canada), a company focused on gaming
psychology and patient self-care. The chosen activity
, is a commercially available device
manufactured by Kineteks Corp. (Vancouver). Tractivity is
an accelerometer-based activity monitor that measures the
number of steps per minute. Through a wireless connection,
the data from the sensor is transmitted to the phone and
converted into points within the MKMM game (Fig. 1).
Real-world physical activity thereby generates gaming
currency that grants the user playtime in the MKMM game.
The physical activity measurements are also used to gen-
erate interpersonal competition and encourage peer support
among young users, with the aim of instilling healthy
habits. The MKMM game incorporates several theoretical
models of motivation to appeal to children between 8 and
13 years of age, based on the Self-Determination Theory
suggested by Deci and Ryan
through competence, relat-
edness, and autonomy.
MKMM players are able to receive
positive feedback from the environment and visualize their
achievements and progress within the game. They have
autonomy within the game, but also achieve milestones with
their peers. MKMM uses a monster character theme for its
graphics and rewards players with ‘‘gold’’ tokens to en-
courage them to venture through the game’s ascending
The overall goal of the MKMM game is to set the monsters
free from a number of mansions (Fig. 1.3). Players achieve this
by completing active games or challenges (Fig. 1.2), winning
˜atas’’ based on their performance and, in turn, earning
‘‘beanz,’’ the currency they need to buy ‘‘monsterriﬁc’’ ingre-
dients. Once the players have collected all of a monster’s re-
quired ingredients, the monster will be set free, and the player can
FIG. 1. Some screen shots of the ‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’ (MKMM) game: (1) Loading ‘‘MobileKids Monster
Manor’’; (2) starting a challenge; (3) monster rooms; and (4) encouraging your teammates.
150 GARDE ET AL.
collect his or her ‘‘gold’’ and propel his or her team up the
leaderboards (Fig. 1.3). These aspects of choice, challenge, cu-
riosity, fantasy, and structural features are suggested by the
Theory of Motivation in Videogames
as important factors
for motivation within gaming.
As teams compete, players can see the overall team rankings
collected that day (Fig. 1.3). Players are provided an encour-
agement mechanism to provide positive support and motivation
between teammates by stimulating healthy competition, as well
as to keep players engaged over the long term (Fig. 1.4). Table 1
at the Appendix of this article provides a detailed description of
the MKMM game.
KidsCan: Involving Youth as Ambassadors for Research
Clinical research is changing, with researchers acknowl-
edging the need for direct input from the people they are
studying. This can help identify research issues and questions
that may be otherwise missed by professionals.
young people in research, a youth research advisory group,
KidsCan, has been established at the Child and Family Re-
search Institute (CFRI) in Vancouver, according to a proto-
col approved by the University of British Columbia and the
Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia
Research Ethics Board (protocol number H13-00448). In
2013, its inaugural year, this advisory group enrolled 17
members 14–18 years of age. The aim of this initiative is to
engage youth in pediatric research not only as clinical sub-
jects, but as partners in research related to their demographic.
The KidsCan advisors played a role in several stages of the
MKMM development. They called on their social networks
and community connections to increase awareness of the
study and were part of the beta testing of the game, offering
feedback in the technical and operational details to be im-
proved prior to the study participants’ use.
Materials and Methods
A convenience sample size of 54 subjects was recruited for the
study. Subjects were recruited through poster advertisements in
local schools and community centers and through our KidsCan
Subjects 8–13 years of age and ﬂuent in En-
glish were recruited according to a protocol as described above.
In addition to obtaining written informed consent from a parent/
guardian for every subject, written assent was also sought from
participants on an assent form, which described the study in an
appropriate way for the child’s age and learning abilities. Sub-
jects with a medical history that included respiratory, cardio-
vascular, and/or neurological problems were excluded from
participation. Screening for exclusion criteria was completed by
the research assistant before enrollment of the subject in the
The weight, height, and age values, reported by the chil-
dren’s parents, were used for calculating the BMI. Each BMI
value was standardized by conversion to a z-score (BMI
z-score) in groups deﬁned by age and gender, using the World
Health Organization child growth standards.
From the 54
subjects,47(16boysand31girls)of10.2–1.2 (mean –
standard deviation) years of age successfully completed the
study (all attrition was due to broken/lost sensors). The study
was conducted in two cohorts, during July and August 2013, at
the CFRI in Vancouver. The staged design was used to limit the
number of mobile devices required for the study.
Subjects were sequentially allocated into either the ‘‘Game’’
or ‘‘Feedback’’ group (Fig. 2 and Table 2). The participants and
the research assistant were blinded to the allocation until the
beginning of the intervention. Siblings were allowed to par-
ticipate and were assigned to the same group. No systematic
bias was involved in the allocation process.
Both groups performed the same tasks in the ﬁrst 7 days of
the study (baseline activity): Subjects were given the Trac-
tivity sensor and were required to wear the sensor around
their ankle at all times, apart from when in water. We applied
a within-subject study design in parallel to assess the effect
of the two different interventions (Fig. 2):
a. Intervention 1: ‘‘Game’’ group (MKMM game pro-
vided). In the second week of the study, the game
group was given an Apple (Cupertino, CA) iPhone
3GS, 4, or 4S with an installation of the MKMM game.
The iPhones were restricted to allow access only to the
game. Subjects were divided into three in-game teams
that competed remotely by having individual players’
scores accumulate into a total team score (Fig. 1.3).
b. Intervention 2: ‘‘Feedback’’ group (activity feedback,
through Tractivity online software provided). In the
second week of the study, the feedback group was
given access to the Tractivity online software and re-
ceived quantitative physical activity feedback via a
Web-based interface. The software provided subjects
with a count of total steps taken in hourly, daily, and
weekly formats. The subjects were required to check
their physical activity at least once every day.
We recruited 54 subjects in this study. After ﬁnalizing en-
rollment, weight, height, and other demographic information
including gender and age was collected from each subject.
Physical activity was recorded in terms of steps walked and
active minutes, using the Tractivity activity monitor.
tivity software considers a minute to be active only if it con-
tains at least 20 steps and it is within a window of 7 active
minutes. Both groups were required to wear the sensor con-
tinuously for 2 weeks. The ﬁrst week served as the baseline
data collection, and the second week evaluated the effect of
the intervention on their activity pattern. The data, which were
collected after the second week of the study, were saved on
password-protected servers at the CFRI.
To assess the response of the study participants’ experi-
ence with MKMM and activity monitoring, an eight-question
survey was distributed electronically to participants in the
game group. The survey was developed based on a validated
survey instrument, called the Fun Toolkit, devised to assist
researchers and developers in gathering opinions from chil-
dren about technology.
This survey posed key questions
unveiling information about players’ attitudes toward the
activity sensor, the game, the social encouragement within
gameplay, the requirement of being active to earn points, and
if the game encouraged more physical activity overall.
‘‘MOBILEKIDS’’: PROMOTING ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN 151
Data are summarized as mean and standard deviation.
After applying the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, a two-way
repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to inves-
tigate the hypothesis that playing the MKMM game or
having daily activity feedback increases physical activity in
children. The differences between interventions and across
weeks, in both total steps taken and total active minutes,
were studied. In addition, a linear regression model was
applied to investigate the relationships between physical
activity (steps and active minutes) and gender, age, and
BMI z-score. A probability of P<0.05 was considered
signiﬁcant. All analyses were performed using IBM (Ar-
monk, NY) SPSS Statistics version 19 software.
The compliance, or ‘‘wear time,’’ is deﬁned as the
number of hours the sensor was worn and was calculated by
subtracting ‘‘non-wear time’’ from total daily time. As
suggested by adolescent accelerometer methods, guide-
lines, and deﬁnitions,
a consecutive 60 minutes with zero
steps is considered a ‘‘non-wear time.’’ Only days with
more than 10 hours of ‘‘wear time’’ were considered, and a
minimum of 5 wearing days was required for inclusion in
the ﬁnal dataset. The data were normalized with respect to
the compliance to avoid the bias introduced by the ‘‘wear
From the 54 recruited subjects, 47 successfully completed
the study. From the 29 subjects allocated to the game group,
three discontinued the study because they lost or broke their
sensor. The remaining 26 children ﬁnished the game-based
study, but three subjects were excluded from further analysis
because they did not meet the ‘‘wear time’’ criteria. From the
25 subjects allocated to the feedback group, four dis-
continued the study because they lost or broke their sensor,
and the remaining 21 subjects successfully ﬁnished the study
and met the established ‘‘wear time’’ criteria. The BMI
z-score (mean –standard deviation) was 0.35 –1.18 (Fig. 3).
Based on the World Health Organization guidelines, 9 per-
cent were classiﬁed as obese, 19 percent as overweight,
70 percent as normal, and 2 percent as underweight,
which represents the current BMI distribution of children in
The primary outcome of the study was the impact of each
intervention on children’s physical activity, and the sec-
ondary outcome was the MKMM game enjoyment.
Primary outcome: Intervention effect in activity
The average numbers of steps and active minutes per day
during the baseline week and during the intervention week
were calculated for each subject within the game and feed-
back group (Fig. 4). Both groups experienced a signiﬁcant
increase in activity during the intervention period compared
with their baseline: The game group had an average indi-
vidual daily increase of 1191 steps and 25 active minutes,
and the feedback group averaged 796 more steps and 6 more
active minutes per day, per subject. The horizontal lines in
Figure 4a and 4b illustrate this increased tendency in steps
and active minutes during both interventions. A steeper in-
crease is reﬂected in the game group compared with the
feedback group, especially in active minutes.
FIG. 2. The protocol of the study for each intervention. The baseline activity of both the game group and the feedback
group was recorded during the ﬁrst week and compared with the second week to evaluate the effect of both interventions.
The difference between both interventions was that during the second week, the game group was given the ‘‘MobileKids
Monster Manor’’ game with which to play, whereas the feedback group was given an online-based program to track their
daily activity (steps and active minutes). Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/g4h
Table 2. Background Information for the
Children in the Game and Feedback Groups
Number (female, male) 26 (17, 9) 21 (14, 7)
Age (years) 10.2 –2.5 10.3 –1.3
BMI (z-score) 0.40 –1.30 0.34 –1.03
BMI, body mass index.
152 GARDE ET AL.
The two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance ap-
plied to steps and active minutes showed a signiﬁcant in-
crease during the intervention week (F=7.8, P=0.01 and
F=6.0, P=0.03, respectively). Although the physical activity
increase was higher in the game group than in the feedback
group, the interaction between intervention (game versus
feedback) and time (Week 1 or baseline versus Week 2) was
not signiﬁcant. The feedback group was more compliant and
wore the sensor signiﬁcantly longer than the game group
(F=11.4, P=0.003) (Fig. 4c), which showed the require-
ment of data normalization.
A linear regression model showed that within the game
group, subjects with a higher BMI z-score had a signiﬁcantly
greater increase in activity while playing the game. This effect
was reﬂected by an increase of 963 more steps (P=0.03; 95
percent conﬁdence interval of 98 to 1829) and 15 more active
minutes (P=0.05; 95 percent conﬁdence interval of 0.2 to 31)
per day for children with each unit higher BMI z-score. The
feedback group showed no signiﬁcant correlation between the
BMI and the increase in physical activity.
Secondary outcome: Survey answers
Upon completion of the second week of the study, subjects
in the game group ﬁlled out a survey based on their experi-
ence playing the game and wearing the sensor. Eighty-one
percent of subjects reported liking the game, whereas 19
percent reported not enjoying it (Fig. 5). The reasons given
by the children for not liking the game were mainly related to
exercise suggestions provided by the game, namely, that the
younger children misunderstood and thought that they had to
perform the suggested activities, rather than any physically
active behavior of their choice. These children stopped
playing the MKMM early during the intervention week. By
selecting only the children who liked the game (n=22), the
results showed a greater increase reﬂected by 1845 more
steps per day (F=10.4, P=0.005) and 36 more active min-
utes per day (F=7.5, P=0.01) during the intervention week.
The survey also showed that 89 percent of the children
liked having to be active to score points in the MKMM game
and that 85 percent enjoyed comparing their score with the
scores of other players. In addition, 85 percent liked being
able to send and receive messages with teammates, and 93
percent of the children found the sensor easy to wear.
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of
the MKMM game in increasing physical activity among
children. The goal of our MKMM game, designed for
FIG. 3. Body mass index (BMI) z-score histogram for the
47 subjects who successfully completed the study. Color
images available online at www.liebertonline.com/g4h
FIG. 4. Mean and standard deviation of (a) the steps walked per day, (b) active minutes per day, and (c) compliance or
‘‘wear time’’ per day for both interventions, during baseline (Week 1) and intervention week (Week 2). The feedback group
is represented by a solid line, and the game group is indicated by a dot-dash line. The error bars reﬂect the standard
deviation of the steps, active minutes, and compliance within each intervention during Week 1 and Week 2. Color images
available online at www.liebertonline.com/g4h
‘‘MOBILEKIDS’’: PROMOTING ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN 153
children, using advice from other young people, was to
promote voluntary physical activity by rewarding higher
levels of activity with motivational features and prizes.
Despite having advice from our KidsCan young advisors to
develop the game, the mobile-gaming intervention did not
have universal appeal among children as conﬁrmed from
our poststudy participant survey. A statistically signiﬁcant
increase was observed in physical activity during the in-
tervention week. Overall, the game had a positive outcome
because it signiﬁcantly raised physical activity above
baseline, and the increase was greater than in the feedback
group. The children who reported liking the game (81
percent) showed a much greater increase than children who
reported not liking it (n=4). These results are particularly
promising, but similar to all behavioral interventions, the
MKMM game is unlikely to apply to all people with equal
success. In addition, children with a higher BMI z-score
showed a signiﬁcantly greater increase in physical activity
while playing the game.
We also studied the impact of providing children with
feedback about their daily activity. For the feedback group, a
signiﬁcant increase in activity between the baseline and in-
tervention weeks was also observed. Although the increase in
the game group was greater than that seen in the feedback
group (increases of 1191 versus 796 steps per day), this
difference was not signiﬁcant. This reﬂects the fact that al-
though the knowledge of their daily activity level enhanced
the children’s activity level, more gaming features such as
social messaging and healthy competition may further mo-
tivate children to increase and sustain this behavior. The
MKMM game introduces a fun way to convert active be-
havior into points that children may ﬁnd more appealing than
steps or active minutes. However, both interventions may be
favorably used to encourage a healthier lifestyle among
Self-reported physical activity has been described as an
unreliable measure of physical activity owing to recall bias
and/or its susceptibility to reporting bias by social desir-
An advantage of the MKMM game is that it is
synchronized with an activity monitor, providing objective,
real-time physical activity information to the game. The
Tractivity sensor was found to be the optimal activity mon-
itor for this study as it introduces minimal inconvenience to
and permits wireless communication with
the phone. The Tractivity device can record and store data for
long continuous periods, creating an accurate representation
of habitual activity patterns.
Implementing exergames on mobile phones, in compar-
ison with Internet- or computer-based games, has the ben-
eﬁt of providing the ability to play while away from a
computer. MKMM is a smart mobile game in which the
players have to earn their playtime through physical ac-
tivity, thus reducing screen time relative to other games.
MKMM takes advantage of the afﬁnity of children toward
mobile technology and gaming and is not restricted to in-
door sedentary play.
Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the
ability of active computer and video-console games to
promote physical activity among children.
active videogames often include multiplayer aspects, both
competitive and cooperative, and variable rewards.
systematic review of randomized controlled trials studying
the effect of active computer and video-console games has
shown that exergames have mixed results.
energy expenditure increased while playing active video-
games (measured by BMI changes, step count, or minutes
of daily physical activity), indicating a possible beneﬁt to
playing active games. ‘‘MetaKenkoh,’’ for example, is an
Internet-based game for children to promote physical ac-
tivity using a pedometer to relate a player’s daily step count
to their game progress.
A pilot study on children 9–11
years of age found that using ‘‘MetaKenkoh’’ increased
physical activity by 10 percent.
However, some studies
showed no signiﬁcant difference.
Baranowski et al.
reported a study of 133 participants randomized into in-
tervention and control groups where the intervention group
played two videogames designed to promote physical ac-
tivity and nutrition, whereas the control group had an In-
ternet learning experience in two parts. Although 80–90
percent of the children reported enjoying the game, physical
activity measured via accelerometry showed no signiﬁcant
difference between the groups immediately after playing
the game and 2 months later. The researchers reported that
more work is needed in active game design to produce ef-
fective games conditional on behavior change, such as
MKMM. They hypothesized that there might be a greater
effect in children with a higher BMI.
should remain cautious about the ability of exergames to
enhance children’s health.
One of the challenges of using games as tools to promote
activity is that the game enthusiasm decreases with time,
especially in children. A similar study found that the ma-
jority of participants increased their awareness of physical
activity levels through playing the game. However, interest
in the game faded after 2 weeks.
To further evaluate
children’s sustained interest
in the MKMM game, longer
studies will be required. The active involvement of youth in
the design and iterative improvement process will help to
ﬁnd innovative ways of sustaining youth interest in the
MKMM game. However, we are hopeful that playing the
game, even for a short time period, may increase physical
FIG. 5. The answers obtained to the question, ‘‘How did
you like the MKMM [‘MobileKids Monster Manor’]
game?’’ Eighty-one percent of the subjects reported liking
(good, really good and brilliant) the game versus 19 percent
who did not ﬁnd it appealing (not very good, awful). Color
images available online at www.liebertonline.com/g4h
154 GARDE ET AL.
Limitations and future studies
Despite the promising results of the study, further inves-
tigation of the MKMM game is needed with an appropriately
powered randomized, controlled trial.
The high variability
in physical activity shown by children in both groups indi-
cates that a higher sample size is required to improve the
signiﬁcance of the results. Therefore, to evaluate the effec-
tiveness and sustainability of the MKMM game as well as its
ability to positively affect children’s health, we plan to
perform a larger scale follow-up study that includes children
at schools in our region. This will allow us to evaluate the
game in a school-based environment to determine the ef-
fectiveness of game use in an educational setting.
The primary limitation of using activity monitors is the
reliance on the participant wearing them as directed and the
inability to verify who is wearing them. Not being able to
control compliance or ‘‘wear time’’ was a limitation of the
study because, as is illustrated in Figure 4c, the feedback
group showed higher compliance than the game group. A
possible explanation of this effect could be that although the
children in both groups were instructed to wear the sensor at
all times, the children in the game group were more focused
on the additional equipment (iPhone with MKMM) pro-
vided. In this relatively young population, the presence of the
equipment may have removed the emphasis of wearing the
activity monitor continuously, thus resulting in reduced
‘‘wear time.’’ The children of the feedback group however
were more focused on wearing the sensor at all times because
it was the sole component of their trial.
Another limitation of the study is the use of parent-
reported weight and height values rather than an objective
measurement. This makes our observation that children with
higher BMI z-score respond better to the game less reliable.
To further evaluate the results obtained in this study, showing
greater physical activity in children with a higher BMI z-score,
we aim to incorporate MKMM into the Shapedown BC obe-
sity management program (www.childhoodobesityfoundation
.ca/shapedownbc), at BC Children’s Hospital, as this cohort
consists primarily of children who are at or above the 95th
percentile for BMI. Children with higher BMIs may be more
inclined to sedentary activity using TV/smartphones, so this
game presents an opportunity to improve their physical ac-
tivity by taking advantage of their high afﬁnity/reliance to-
ward technology. Another potential advantage of the game is
that it allows for activity within the privacy of the home, as
children in this type of program have reported embarrassment
exercising in traditional settings.
Our MKMM game, designed for children with input from
youth, enhanced physical activity, especially in children who
reported liking the game. Increasing awareness of the im-
portance of maintaining sufﬁcient activity levels among
young people has the potential to reduce the impact of
obesity-related diseases in children and adults, thus reducing
the impact on families and the healthcare system.
This research was funded by grants from the Peter Wall
Institute for Advanced Studies under the Peter Wall Solu-
tions Initiative program (number PW-11-029) and the
Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (number KT-
KTA-00001-112). The game developer Ayogo Games Inc.
was paid as a contractor with funds from the Peter Wall
Institute for Advanced Studies. The authors would like to
thank Ayogo Games Inc. and Kineteks Corp. for their col-
laboration and continuous feedback, Guohai Zhou for his
advice regarding statistical analyses, and Mika Johnson for
helping to revise this manuscript. The authors would also like
to especially thank the Pediatric Anesthesia Research Team
at the BC Children’s Hospital.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no competing ﬁnancial interests exist.
1. World Health Organization. Population-Based Approaches
to Childhood Obesity Prevention. Geneva: World Health
2. Faith MS, Leone MA, Ayers TS, et al. Weight criticism
during physical activity, coping skills, and reported physi-
cal activity in children. Pediatrics 2014; 110:e23.
3. Kelly AS, Barlow SE, Rao G, et al. Severe obesity in
children and adolescents: Identiﬁcation, associated health
risks, and treatment approaches: A scientiﬁc statement from
the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128:
4. Mitchell JA, Mattocks C, Ness AR, et al. Sedentary be-
havior and obesity in a large cohort of children. Obesity
(Silver Spring) 2009; 17:1596–1602.
5. Janz K. Fatness, physical activity, and television viewing in
children during the adiposity rebound period: The Iowa
Bone Development Study. Prev Med 2002; 35:563–571.
6. LeBlanc AG, Chaput J-P, McFarlane A, et al. Active video
games and health indicators in children and youth: A sys-
tematic review. PLoS One 2013; 8:e65351.
7. Singer DG, Singer JL, Agostino HD, Delong R. Children’s
pastimes and play in sixteen nations: Is free-play declining?
Am J Play 2009; 1:283–312.
8. Anderson SE, Economos CD, Must A. Active play and
screen time in US children aged 4 to 11 years in relation to
sociodemographic and weight status characteristics: A
nationally representative cross-sectional analysis. BMC
Public Health 2008; 8:366.
9. Salmon J, Campbell KJ, Crawford DA. Television viewing
habits associated with obesity risk factors: A survey of
Melbourne schoolchildren. Med J Aust 2006; 184:64–67.
10. Vandewater EA, Shim M, Caplovitz AG. Linking obesity
and activity level with children’s television and video game
use. J Adolesc 2004; 27:71–85.
11. Lin JJ, Mamykina L, Lindtner S, et al. Fish’n’Steps: En-
couraging physical activity with an interactive computer
game. In: Dourish P, Friday A, eds. UbiComp 2006. LNCS
4206. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006: 261–278.
12. Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Thompson D. Video game
play, child diet, and physical activity behavior change. Am
J Prev Med 2010; 40:33–38.
13. Guy S, Ratzki-Leewing A, Gwadry-Sridhar F. Moving
beyond the stigma: Systematic review of video games and
their potential to combat obesity. Int J Hypertens 2011;
14. Lu AS, Kharrazi H, Gharghabi F, Thompson D. A sys-
tematic review of health videogames on childhood obesity
‘‘MOBILEKIDS’’: PROMOTING ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN 155
prevention and intervention. Games Health J 2013; 2:131–
15. Parisod H, Pakarinen A, Kauhanen L, et al. Promoting
children’s health with digital games: A review of reviews.
Games Health J 2014; 3:145–156.
16. Graf DL, Pratt L V, Hester CN, Short KR. Playing active
video games increases energy expenditure in children. Pe-
diatrics 2009; 124:534–540.
17. Biddiss E, Irwin J. Active video games to promote physical
activity in children and youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
18. Reading SA, Prickett K. Evaluation of children playing a
new-generation motion-sensitive active videogame by ac-
celerometry and indirect calorimetry. Games Health J 2013;
19. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal
pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of be-
havior. Psychol Inq 2000; 11:227–268.
20. Brockman R, Jago R, Fox KR. Children’s active play: Self-
reported motivators, barriers and facilitators. BMC Public
Health 2011; 11:461.
21. Jesper J. Fear of failing? The many meanings of difﬁculty in
video games. Video Game Theory Read 2009; 2:237–252.
22. Malone TW. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating
instruction. Cogn Sci 1981; 4:333–369.
23. Flicker S, Maley O, Ridgley A, et al. e-PAR: Using tech-
nology and participatory action research to engage youth in
health promotion. Action Res 2008; 6:285–303.
24. Robertson L,Dumont GA, Junker A. Addressing youth health
challengesusing participatory action research andtechnology.
Presented at the 2014 Western Region Meeting, Carmel, CA,
USA; American Federation for Medical Research; 2014.
25. de Onis M, Onyango AW. WHO child growth standards.
Lancet 2008; 371:204.
26. Warburton D, Jeklin A, Bredin S. The validity of the
Tractivity motion sensor during walking. Heal Fit J Canada
27. Read JC. Validating the Fun Toolkit: An instrument for
measuring children’s opinions of technology. Cogn Tech-
nol Work 2007; 10:119–128.
28. Cain KL, Sallis JF, Conway TL, et al. Using accelerometers
in youth physical activity studies: A review of methods. J
Phys Act Health 2013; 10:437–450.
29. Roberts KC, Shields M, de Groh M, et al. Overweight and
Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Results from the 2009
to 2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Ottawa: Sta-
tistics Canada; 2012.
30. Lamonte MJ, Ainsworth BE. Quantifying energy expendi-
ture and physical activity in the context of dose response.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33(6 Suppl):S370–S378; dis-
31. Yıldırım M, Verloigne M, de Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Study
protocol of physical activity and sedentary behaviour
measurement among schoolchildren by accelerometry—
Cross-sectional survey as part of the ENERGY-project.
BMC Public Health 2011; 11:182.
32. Plasqui G, Westerterp K. Physical activity assessment with
accelerometers: An evaluation against doubly labeled
water. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15:2371–2379.
33. Wang X, Perry AC. Metabolic and physiologic responses to
video game play in 7- to 10-year-old boys. Arch Pediatr
Adolesc Med 2006; 160:411–415.
34. Baranowski T, Buday R, Thompson DI, Baranowski J.
Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related
behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34:534–540.
35. Graves L, Stratton G, Ridgers ND, Cable NT. Comparison
of energy expenditure in adolescents when playing new
generation and sedentary computer games: Cross sectional
study. BMJ 2007; 335:1282–1284.
36. Siegel SR. Energy expenditure in overweight youth using
active video games versus a straight stationary bike pro-
tocol. (Abstract) Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(Suppl 1):S460.
37. Calvert S, Staiano A, Bond B. Electronic gaming and the obe-
sity crisis. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev 2013; (139):51–57.
38. Thai AM, Lowenstein D, Ching D, Rejeski D. Game
Changer: Investing in Digital Play to Advance Children’s
Learning and Health. New York: Joan Ganz Cooney
39. Southard D, Southard B. Promoting physical activity in
children with MetaKenkoh. Clin Investig Med 2006;
40. Baranowski T, Abdelsamad D, Baranowski J, et al. Impact
of an active video game on healthy children’s physical
activity. Pediatrics 2012; 129:e636–e642.
41. Unnithan V. Evaluation of the energy cost of playing a
dance simulation video game in overweight and non-
overweight children and adolescents. Int J Sports Med
42. Daley AJ. Can exergaming contribute to improving physi-
cal activity levels and health outcomes in children? Pe-
diatrics 2009; 124:763–771.
Address correspondence to:
Ainara Garde Martinez, PhD
Electrical and Computer Engineering in Medicine Group
BC Children’s Hospital
Clinical Support Building, Room V3-351
950 West 28th Avenue
Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
156 GARDE ET AL.
Table 1. Characteristics of a Videogame for Health: ‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’
Health topic(s) Promoting physical activity
Targeted age group(s) Children 8–13 years of age
Other targeted group
of game idea
Physical activity captured through a biometric device advances the player’s
in-game economy, which increases the player’s virtual collections and
raises his or her team’s standing.
Target player(s) Individuals and a small group
or behavior change
theory (or theories), models,
or conceptual framework(s)
The game builds relatedness, competence, and autonomy, consistent with
Elements of challenge, curiosity, and
fantasy found in the game reﬂect the inﬂuence of the theory of motivation
which is built on attribution theory.
Intended health behavior
Increase in voluntary physical activity
to be learned
Awareness of the progressive beneﬁt of daily physical activity
Behavior change procedure(s)
(taken from Michie inventory)
or therapeutic procedure(s) used
Feedback and discrepancy assessment: Individuals compare data on their
behavior with goals and standards.
Clinical or parental
Data shared with parent
No, but possible if required
Type of game Active
Story (if any)
The goal of the MKMM game is to unlock all of the hidden monsters in
four multilevel mansions. A secondary goal is to help your team compete
by participating in the team-to-team activity challenges. Players advance
by completing timed activity challenges, therefore earning pin
˜ata releases ‘‘beanz,’’ the currency they need to buy ‘‘monsterriﬁc’’
ingredients, which when thrown into a cauldron generate the pieces
needed to build a monster. Building a collection of monsters, mansion
furnishings, and pets generates additional ‘‘gold’’ that the player can
spend in the pin
˜ata minigame. Pin
˜atas provide variable rewards of both
‘‘beanz’’ and rare items, but the economy must be continuously
recharged by doing more exercise.
How the story relates
to targeted behavior
The story is about progression. As the player’s fantasy collection grows, the
player can relate his or her progress to healthy activity progress. Players
associate in-game progress with their increase in ability to complete
increasingly difﬁcult physical activity challenges.
By doing daily activity, players advance their team and unlock currency to
create a complete collection of monsters (and their pets and furnishings)
Rules An activity-monitoring device must be worn by the player to participate
and earn currency. Players set personal challenges, and as they move,
data from the monitoring device prove their completion of the challenge.
Players must unlock all the monsters in one house before being able to
unlock the next house.
Game mechanic(s) Progression: To advance levels (houses), gain currency, and enrich the
economy, the player must exercise. When an activity challenge is in
progress, the player receives a countdown on progress toward his or her
Collection: A player builds a collection of virtual goods, including
monsters, furnishing, and pets.
Chance/variable rewards: A player purchases pin
˜atas, which the player
taps to pieces, resulting in unpredictable rewards of currency and rare
‘‘MOBILEKIDS’’: PROMOTING ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN 157
Table 1. (Continued)
Social: Players are allied on teams. The competition between teams is
based on which team collectively accumulates the most gold (through
collection and through activity). Players support each other through
positive encouragements. Team members see the team’s relative standing
on the team leaderboard.
Scheduling: The player’s collection will produce gold over time, but the
economy slows and falters without the input of physical activity.
Procedures to generalize
or transfer what’s
learned in the game
to outside the game
The game’s goal of increasing physical activity is tied to the biometric
activity monitor, which automatically synchronizes data from the device
with the app, turning those data into real-time inputs to the MKMM
The device measures the player’s actual steps and movement as the player
completes a challenge. Once complete, the player receives a pin
valued at a ﬁxed value in gold.
Once a challenge has been completed, the gold is also attributed to the
team’s progress, advancing the team’s standing on the team leaderboard.
The app interprets data from the device and provides players with instant
feedback on their progress on a challenge.
As players successfully attempt novel physical challenges and experience
their physical abilities improving, they are expected to repeat those
activities outside of the game.
Setting A street of spooky old mansions where the player moves from mansion to
mansion as they complete their collection of monsters. Each ﬂoor of the
mansion takes on the personality of the inhabiting monster. The male and
female monsters have their own ideas of what is appealing, so they like
you to furnish their rooms with customized humorous, quirky, and not-
Characteristics The individual player is identiﬁed by his or her username only and his or
her team’s identity. The characters in the game are the animated
monsters—All have a unique personality as shown by their names,
physique, mannerisms, clothing, and furniture.
Abilities Each monster is built from items that the player has purchased. Once
unlocked, they stroll around the mansion.
Game platform(s) needed
to play the game
Smartphone, iPod, or tablet
Sensors used Tractivity (real-time activity monitor)
Estimated play time 30 minutes of physical activity is required to be able to play 5–10 minutes
app, application; MKMM, ‘‘MobileKids Monster Manor’’; NA, not applicable.
158 GARDE ET AL.