ArticlePDF Available

Research Protocol Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized placebo-controlled pilot study

Authors:

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is an emerging health problem in young females characterized by ovarian dysfunction and hyperandrogenism. Existing information indicates a positive role of homoeopathy but more rigorous studies are desirable. This protocol has been developed to undertake a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of homoeopathic intervention using established diagnostic criteria. Methods/Design: It will be a multi-centric, randomized, placebo controlled pilot study with a 6-month intervention and follow up period. Minimum 60 cases fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be enrolled and randomized to receive either the homoeopathic intervention or the identical placebo. Both the arms follow lifestyle modification for weight reduction. Primary endpoint will be the establishment of regular menstrual cycle along with improvement in either ultrasonology or hirsutism/acne. Secondary endpoints will be to compare the changes in total and individual domain scores of PCOS questionnaire at monthly interval and the changes in ultrasound of polycystic ovaries. For the primary outcome and each of the secondary outcomes, both per protocol and modified intention to treat analysis will be done. Discussion: This pilot study has been planned considering the varied presentation of PCOS as per international diagnostic criteria and accordingly the composite endpoints have been kept for evaluation. The outcome of this pilot study will help in planning a definite study. Trial registration: CTRI/2013/09/003983 [Registered on: 16/09/2013].
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 3
ABSTRACT
Background: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is an emerging health problem in
young females characterized by ovarian dysfunction and hyperandrogenism. Existing
information indicates a positive role of homoeopathy but more rigorous studies are
desirable. This protocol has been developed to undertake a pilot study to evaluate the
efficacy of homoeopathic intervention using established diagnostic criteria.
Methods/Design: It will be a multi‑centric, randomized, placebo controlled pilot study
with a 6‑month intervention and follow up period. Minimum 60 cases fulfilling the
eligibility criteria will be enrolled and randomized to receive either the homoeopathic
intervention or the identical placebo. Both the arms follow lifestyle modification for
weight reduction. Primary endpoint will be the establishment of regular menstrual
cycle along with improvement in either ultrasonology or hirsutism/acne. Secondary
endpoints will be to compare the changes in total and individual domain scores of
PCOS questionnaire at monthly interval and the changes in ultrasound of polycystic
ovaries. For the primary outcome and each of the secondary outcomes, both per
protocol and modified intention to treat analysis will be done.
Discussion: This pilot study has been planned considering the varied presentation of
PCOS as per international diagnostic criteria and accordingly the composite endpoints
have been kept for evaluation. The outcome of this pilot study will help in planning a
definite study.
Trial registration: CTRI/2013/09/003983 [Registered on: 16/09/2013].
Keywords: Anovulation, Homoeopathy, Hyperandrogenism, Insulin resistance,
Oligomenorrhoea, Polycystic ovarian syndrome, Polycystic ovary syndrome
questionnaire
BACKGROUND
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a complex
metabolic, endocrine and reproductive disorder
affecting approximately 5-10% of the female
population in developed countries. The developing
countries like China and India, undergoing rapid
nutritional transitions due to westernised diets and
IHJ R
Access this article online
Website:
www.ijrh.org
DOI:
10.4103/0974-7168.129671
Quick Response Code:
lifestyle also indicate similar prevalence (9.13%).[1,2]
Its clinical characteristics include hyperandrogenism,
chronic anovulation, insulin resistance and infertility.
While reproductive features are prominent, it
has potential for major metabolic consequences
including obesity, type2 diabetes and cardiovascular
disease.[3] It remains a syndrome and, as such, no
single diagnostic criterion(such as hyperandrogenism
RESEARCH PROTOCOL
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian
syndrome: A randomized
placebo‑controlled pilot study
Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
 Address for correspondence:
Dr. Raj K. Manchanda,
Central Council for Research in
Homoeopathy, New Delhi, India
E-mail: rkmanchanda@gmail.com
Received: 18-02-2014
Accepted: 19-02-2014
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome‑A randomized placebo controlled pilot study
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 4
or PCO) is sufficient for diagnosis. It also remains
a diagnosis of exclusion. Known disorders such as
late-onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia that mimic
the PCOS phenotype should be excluded.[4]
Although there are more than 5,000 scientific
publications, majority relates to pathophysiology and
treatment of PCOS but assessment of psychological
impact has largely been ignored. Only recently has
the complexity of the symptomatology of PCOS
begun to be investigated in a comprehensive manner
to address the psychosocial implications. It has been
concluded that depression and anxiety are common
in patients with PCOS as compared with healthy
women. Depression in PCOS is often associated
with obesity and metabolic abnormalities.[5,6] The
depression and anxiety did not show a significant
change in PCOS after treatment with oral
contraceptive pills.[7] Homoeopathic prescription
being holistic might help in these aspects, hence,
polycystic ovary syndrome questionnaire (PCOSQ),
which evaluates emotional aspects along with body
hair, weight, infertility and menstrual problems for
the assessment of quality of life is being used in the
study.[8]
Lifestyle modification is the first line of treatment
and it is known that even 5-10% weight loss
has led to significant clinical benefits improving
psychological outcomes, reproductive and metabolic
features.[9,10] In conventional medical system,
metformin, oral contraceptives, anti-androgens,
clomiphene citrate and thiazolidinediones are used
for the management of different presentations of
PCOS. Metformin is commonly used either alone
or in combination with other medicines for the
treatment of most of the clinical manifestations
of PCOS.[11] In a study, metformin reduced
hyperinsulinaemia and hyperandrogenaemia,
independently of changes in body weight. In a large
number of subjects these changes were associated
with striking, sustained improvements in menstrual
abnormalities and resumption of ovulation[12] but
it causes gastrointestinal intolerance (nausea,
abdominal pain and/or diarrhoea) in 30% of patients.
It is contraindicated in liver disease and certain
other clinical conditions. Other medicines also have
their side effects.[11]
There are few reports indicating the usefulness
of homoeopathic treatment. Sanchez et al.,[13] and
Gupta et al.,[14] reported symptomatic as well as
ultrasonological improvement but more studies are
required with proper rigor. Council has developed
this protocol for a pilot study. The primary objective
of the study shall be to determine the feasibility of
the study to evaluate the efficacy of homoeopathic
intervention in PCOS in establishing the menstrual
regularity with either ultrasonological improvement
of PCO or improvement in hirsutism/acne and the
secondary objective shall be to assess the changes
in ultrasound reports of polycystic ovaries and
to assess the changes in the total and individual
domain scores of PCOSQ.
METHODS/DESIGN
Study Design
The study shall be multi-centric, randomized,
placebo controlled with 6-month intervention and
follow up period.
Eligibility Criteria
The inclusion criteria for the study are:
(1) female aged 18-36 years (2) oligomenorrhoea
(intermenstrual period of more than 35 days for 3
consecutive cycles)/ amenorrhoea for more than
3 months (2 years after menarche)(3) ultrasound
findings of polycystic ovaries [The PCO should
have at least one of the following: either 12 or
more follicles measuring 2 ± 9 mm in diameter
or increased ovarian volume (>10 cm3). If there
is evidence of a dominant follicle (>10 mm) or a
corpus luteum, the scan should be repeated during
the next cycle. Only one ovary fitting this definition
or a single occurrence of one of the above criteria is
sufficient to define the PCO.[15](4) clinical evidence
of hirsuitism (Ferriman score 8 and above)[16] and/
or acne (acne global severity scale score 1 and
above)[17]; (5) Body Mass Index (BMI) 23 and above
(6) participants willing to adopt healthy diet and to
take regular exercise(at least 30minutes of exercise
for at least 5 days a week) (7) written informed
consent from the patient.
The exclusion criteria includes: (1) diabetes
mellitus, Cushing’s disease, hyper-prolactinemia;
(2) untreated hypo or hyperthyroidism (3) adrenal
hyperplasia and adrenal tumour (4) ovarian
tumour (5) hyperthecosis (6) significant renal
impairment (7)history of intake of drugs aldactone/
metformin or history of oral contraceptive pills
(OCP) use or intake of drugs known to interfere
with carbohydrate metabolism 4 weeks prior to
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome ‑A randomized placebo controlled pilot study
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 5
enrolment (8) pregnancy, breast feeding (9) cases
with any systemic disease.
The patients presenting with PCOS will be
screened for eligibility and will undergo pelvic
ultrasound, complete blood count with erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, fasting glucose, thyroid
function test, serum prolactin, basal morning
17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), complete urine
examination and urine pregnancy test in case
of married women with amenorrhoea prior to
enrolment.
Types of Intervention
Patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be
enrolled and randomized as per computer generated
randomization chart[18] to receive either the
homoeopathic intervention or the identical placebo
as illustrated in Figure 1. Medicine shall be given
in Q, 6C, 30C, 200C or 1M potency as per the
prescribing totality. Mother tincture shall only be
prescribed in persistent amenorrhoea. The medicine
will be repeated depending on the potency and
complaints of the patient in accordance with the
principles of homoeopathy.[19] All the participants
will be asked to follow healthy diet and to take up
regular exercise (at least 30 minutes of exercise at
least 5days a week).
Criteria for Baseline Assessment and Follow Up
All the enrolled subjects will undergo complete
case taking along with clinical examination,
baseline investigations for sex hormone binding
globin, Luteinizing Hormone/Follicle Stimulating
Hormone (LH/FSH) ratio, total Testosterone,
Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), serum
insulin, glucose insulin ratio, triglycerides and
High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol at
baseline and shall fill PCOSQ.
Patient will be assessed at monthly intervals (or
earlier as per the need) for 6 months. Symptomatic
assessment and clinical examination will be
done every month and PCOSQ will be filled. Any
inter-current complaint arising during the treatment
period is to be managed as per the acute totality
in both the groups. Prescription will be changed
and selection of the medicine will be based on the
characteristic symptoms including exciting cause,
mental and physical generals and qualified particular
symptoms modified as a consequence of acute
disease. Previously prescribed medicine/placebo is
to be discontinued as per the need of the case till
acute phase is over. Record of any such event is to
be maintained in follow up sheet for acute phase.
If the case does not respond to the homoeopathic
intervention, patient shall be referred accordingly
for the conventional treatment. The patient will be
encouraged to revert back after the acute phase
gets over. Such cases will be followed up as per the
protocol subsequently.
At completion of the study, symptomatic assessment,
clinical examination and pelvic ultrasound will
be done. All patients will fill PCOSQ. Only those
investigations will be repeated at 6 months, which
were out of range at baseline.
Study Endpoints
Primary study endpoint is the establishment of
regular menstrual cycle along with either ultra
sonological improvement of PCO or improvement
in hirsutism/acne. Secondary study endpoints are
to compare the changes in total and individual
domain scores of PCOSQ(consists of five domains,
each relating to a common symptom of PCOS;
emotions, body hair, weight, infertility and menstrual
problems. Each question on the PCOSQ is associated
with a 7-point scale in which 7 represents optimal
function and 1 the poorest function) in verum and
placebo groups at monthly interval for 6 months
and to compare the changes in ultrasound reports
of polycystic ovaries at entry and 6months in verum
and placebo groups.
Randomization
Separate sets of random numbers have been
generated for the two study sites(each site is strata)
using stratified randomization method.
Allocation
The patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria shall
be enrolled and randomized as per computer
)HPDOHVZLWK
3&26IXOILOOLQJ
HOLJLELOLW\FULWHULD
±\HDUV
Q 
,QGLYLGXDOLVHG
KRPRHRSDWKLFWUHDWPHQW
SOXVOLIHVW\OHPDQDJHPHQW
Q 
,GHQWLFDOSODFHERSOXV
OLIHVW\OHPDQDJHPHQW
Q 
Figure 1: Flow chart of the study groups
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome‑A randomized placebo controlled pilot study
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 6
generated randomization chart to receive either the
homoeopathic intervention or the identical placebo.
Blinding
The patients will remain blinded to the identity of
the treatment group.
Sample Size Calculation
In the initial stage of the study, 30cases of PCOS
in verum and 30 cases in placebo group shall be
enrolled. After the analysis of the data, the sample
size shall be revisited and according to the outcome
of this study, further study shall be continued or
discontinued.
Study Duration
The duration of the study will be 2years(1year for
enrolment, 6months for follow up and 6months for
data compilation).
Data Collection
Each case will be followed up for 6months to assess
the outcome results of the treatment. Study data will
be collected at baseline, every follow up(monthly or
early if required) and at final/termination visit. The
patients will be evaluated for symptomatic, clinical
assessment, laboratory parameters and adverse
events, if any, as per the study protocol.
Statistical Analysis
Data obtained during the study would be verified
and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social
Sciences(SPSS) version20. Chisquare test shall be
applied for checking the improvement in menstrual
cycle and acne. Pre and post analysis (paired t
test) shall be applied for checking the changes in
hirsutism, ultrasound assessment of ovaries and
laboratory investigations. Repeated measure analysis
of variance(ANOVA) and pre and post analysis(paired
t test) shall be applied for checking the difference
in the total score and individual domain score of
PCOSQ. Hereditary factor, socio-economic status,
stress, etc., would be considered as potential
confounders in PCOS.
For the primary outcome and each of the secondary
outcomes, both per protocol and modified intention
to treat (mITT) analysis will be done. mITT analysis
will be done on the patients completing a minimum
of three scheduled follow up visits.
Regulatory and Ethical Approval
The study protocol is in accordance with the latest
revision of the Helsinki declaration[20] on human
experimentation and Good Clinical Practices India.[21]
Although, medicines proposed to be used during
the study are known homoeopathic pharmacopoeal
preparations, yet necessary clearance of the Ethical
Committee and Scientific Advisory Committee has
been obtained before undertaking the study.
DISCUSSION
As the PCOS is a multi-faceted problem with
reproductive, endocrine and metabolic dysfunction;
therefore, the study has been planned keeping
in view the multi-factorial evaluation of the
intervention. Accordingly, to establish the diagnosis
of PCOS, the criteria laid down by 2003 Consensus
Statement on PCOS[4] and 2006 Androgen Excess
Society have been followed.[22] It is reported that
Lifestyle modification should be the first line of
treatment and is effective in reducing the signs and
symptoms of PCOS,[13] therefore, the study has been
designed as placebo controlled trial with both the
arms following Lifestyle modification so that the
effect of Lifestyle modification and homoeopathy
can be evaluated.
As the investigations are only suggestive and not
fully confirmatory, therefore, the outcome will be
assessed on composite endpoints, namely, menstrual
regularity, ultrasonological improvement of PCO[15]
and hyperandrogenism (hirsutism and/or acne as
per Ferriman–Gallwey scoring system[16] and/or
acne global severity scale[17]). PCOSQ, a validated
questionnaire, will be used for evaluation of quality
of life in cases of PCOS.[8]
Conventional treatment varies as per the symptoms
and also has some side effects. Studies in
homoeopathy[14,15] have indicated a positive role
but these studies primarily evaluated menstrual
irregularity and PCO through ultrasonography.
Hyperandrogenism and effect of Lifestyle
modification was not evaluated and statistical rigor
was also lacking. Due consideration has been given
to all these aspects while drafting this protocol.
High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct,
reporting and external review of clinical trials. This
study protocol is in accordance with the SPIRIT
2013[23] and covers all the domains of model validity
of homoeopathic trials (MVHT).[24] The protocol
shall generate data that can be reported as per
CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomised trials
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome ‑A randomized placebo controlled pilot study
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 7
with parallel groups[25] and the Reporting data on
Homoeopathic Treatments (RedHot) supplement
to CONSORT.[26] The overall risk of bias appears
to be minimal as only one domain (allocation
concealment) out of six has high risk of bias.[27] The
study is not double-blind due to nature of disease,
which may require multiple prescriptions in
different potencies depending on the presentation,
and moreover the outcome measures are not likely
to be influenced by lack of blinding. The outcome
of this pilot study will help in planning a definite
study subsequently.
Trial Status
Participant recruitment has been initiated in
February 2014.
CONTRIBUTIONS
Study concept and design: Raj K. Manchanda, 1Chetna Deep Lamba
Expertise: 2Madhu Aggarwal, 3Neelam Aggarwal, 4Ajay Ajmani,
5Ravindra Mohan Pandey
Coordination: Raj K. Manchanda, 1Chetna Deep Lamba, 6VikramSingh,
7Anil Khurana, 8Jaya Gupta, 8PraveenOberai
Statistical planning: 9Maya Padmanabhan, 1Chetna Deep Lamba
Drafting of protocol with ethical and technical approval: 1Chetna Deep Lamba
Drafting and revision of manuscript: 1Chetna Deep Lamba
Critical review of manuscript: Raj K. Manchanda
Funding/ Support: Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy.
Contributor’s information
Director General, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
1Scientist-1, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
2Professor and Head, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Dr. B. R. Sur Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, New Delhi
3Senior Consultant, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate
Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
4Senior Consultant, Dept. of Endocrinology, BLK Super Specialty Hospital,
New Delhi
5Professor and Head, Dept. of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, New Delhi
6Former Deputy Director (H), Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
7Assistant Director (H)/ Scientist-4, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
8Scientist-4, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy
9Statistical Assistant, Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy.
REFERENCES
1. Heidi A. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in urban India.
Manlove University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Available from: http://
digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1937&
context=thesesdissertations[Lastaccessedon2011Jan05].
2. NidhiR,PadmalathaV,NagarathnaR,AmritanshuR.Prevalenceof
polycysticovariansyndromeinIndianadolescents.JPediatrAdolesc
Gynecol2011;24:223‑7.
3. Evidence‑based guideline for the assessment and management
of polycystic ovary syndrome. Jean Halles for Women’s health.
Available from http://www.med.monash.edu.au/epidemiology/news/
sept2nded/evidence‑based‑guideline‑polycystic‑ovary‑syndrome.
pdf[Lastaccessedon2011Jan05].
4. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM‑Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop
group.Revised2003consensusondiagnosticcriteriaandlong‐term
health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum
Reprod2004;19:41‑7.
5. McCook, Reame NE, Thatcher SS. Health‑related quality of life
issuesinwomenwithpolycystic ovarysyndrome. JObstet Gynecol
NeonatalNurs2005;34:12‑20.
6. Cinar N, Kizilarslanoglu MC, Harmanci A, Aksoy DY, Bozdag G,
Demir B, et al. Depression, anxiety and cardio metabolic risk in
polycysticovarysyndrome.HumReprod2011;26:3339‑45.
7. Cinar N, Harmanci A, Demir B, Yildiz BO. Effect of an oral
contraceptive on emotional distress, anxiety and depression of
womenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome:Aprospective study. Hum
Reprod2012;27:1840‑5.
8. CroninL,Guyatt G,GriffithL, WongE,Azziz R,FutterweitW,etal.
Developmentofahealth‑relatedquality‑of‑lifequestionnaire(PCOSQ)
forwomenwithpolycysticovarysyndrome(PCOS).JClinEndocrinol
Metab1998;83:1976‑87.
9. BatesGWJr,PropstAM.Polycysticovariansyndromemanagement
options.ObstetGynecolClinNorthAm2012;39:495‑506.
10. GanieMA,KalraS.Polycysticovarysyndrome‑Ametabolicmalady,
the mother of all lifestyle disorders in women‑Can Indian health
budgettackleitinfuture?IndianJEndocrinolMetab2011;15:239‑41.
11. Sheehan MT. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Diagnosis and
management.ClinMedRes2004;2:13‑27.
12. MoghettiP,CastelloR,NegriC,TosiF,PerroneF,CaputoM,etal.
Metformin effects on clinical features, endocrine and metabolic
profiles, and insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome:
A randomized, double‑blind, placebo controlled 6‑month trial,
followed by open, long‑term clinical evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab2000;85:139‑46.
13. Sanchez‑ResendizJ,Guzman‑GomezF.Polycysticovarysyndrome.
BoletinMexicanodeHomeopatica1997;30:11‑5.
14. Gupta. Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD). The Homoeopathic
Heritage;May2009;11‑7
15. Balen AH, Laven JS, Tan SL, Dewailly D. Ultrasound assessment
of the polycystic ovary: International consensus definitions. Hum
ReprodUpdate2003;9:505‑14.
16. Available from: http://www.ae‑society.org/tools [Last accessed on
2012Jul04].
17. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/02/
briefing/3904B1_03_%20Acne%20Global%20Severity%20Scale.
pdf[Lastaccessedon2012Jul04].
18. Randomizationchart.IBMSPSSver20.0.
19. Hahnemann S. Organon of Medicine. Reprint, 5th ed. New Delhi:
BJainPublishers;1982.
20. Declaration of Helsinki. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/
20activities/10ethics/10helsinki/draft_historical_contemporary_
perspectives.pdf[Lastaccessedon2012Jul04].
21. GoodClinicalPracticesforClinicalResearchinIndia.Availablefrom:
http://cdsco.nic.in/html/GCP.htm[Lastaccessedon2012Jul04].
22. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti‑Kandarakis E,
Escobar‑Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Task Force on the
Phenotype of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome of The Androgen
Excess and PCOS Society. The Androgen Excess and PCOS
Societycriteriaforthepolycysticovarysyndrome:Thecompletetask
forcereport.FertilSteril2009;91:456‑88.
23. ChanAW,TetzlaffJM,GфtzschePC,AltmanDG,MannH,BerlinJA,
et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: Guidance for
protocolsofclinicaltrials.BMJ2013;346:e7586.
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome‑A randomized placebo controlled pilot study
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy / Vol. 8 / Issue 1 / Jan-Mar 2014 8
i`’BHkwfe% cgqiqfVd fMEcxzfUFk flUMªkse ¼ihlhvks,l½ ;qofr;ksa esa ,d mHkjrh gqbZ LokLF; leL;k gS tksfd fMEcxzfUFk f”kfFkyrk o mPp ,UMªkstsu }kjk
fpf=r dh tkrh gSA ekStwnk lwpuk bl leL;k esa gksE;ksiSFkh dh ldkjkRed Hkwfedk dh vksj ladsr djrh gS] ysfdu vkSj vf/kd dBksj v/;;uksa
dh vko”;drk gSA ;g izksVksdksy LFkkfir uSnkfud ekun.Mksa dk iz;ksx dj gksE;ksiSfFkd gLr{ksi dh izHkkfork dk vkdyu djus ds fy;s ,d
ik;yV v/;;u “kq: djus ds fy;s fodflr fd;k x;k gSA
fof/k% ;g N% ekg ds gLr{ksi o vuqlj.k dky ds lkFk cgqdsfUnd] ;kn`fPNd] Iykflcks fu;fU=r ik;yV v/;;u gksxkA ik=rk ds ekin.Mksa dks
iwjk djus okys de ls de 60 ekeyksa dks ukekafdr fd;k tk;sxk vkSj mudks ;k rks gksE;ksiSfFkd gLr{ksi ;k Iykflcks ds fy;s ;kn`fPNr fd;k
tk;sxkA nksuks gh “kk[kk;sa thou “kSyh la”kks/ku dks Hkkj de djus ds fy;s vuqlj.k djsaxhA izFke vUrfcUnq ;k rks vYVªklksuksyksth ;k eq¡gkls esa
lq/kkj ds lkFk fu;fer ekfld /keZ LFkkfir djuk gksxkA f}rh; vUrfcUnq ihlhvks,l iz”u i= ds dqy o O;fDrxr vuq{ks= Ldksj esa ifjorZuksa
dk ekfld vUrjky o cgqiqfVd fMEcxzfUFk;ksa esa vYVªklkm.M ifjorZu esa rqyuk djuk gksxkA izFke ifj.kke o izR;sd f}rh;d ifj.kkeksa ds fy;s]
izksVksdkWy ds vuqlkj vkSj fo”ys’k.k dhs foospuk ds fy;s la”kksf/kr xgurk nksuks gh fd;k tk;sxkA
ppkZ% bl ik;yV v/;;u dh ;kstuk ihlhvks,l ds l?ku vUrfcUnq o vUrZjk’Vªh; uSnkfud ekin.Mksa ds vuqlkj fofo/k izLrqfr ij fopkj djus
ds ckn vkdyu ds fy;s cukbZ x;h gSA bl v/;;u ds ifj.kke ,d fuf”pr v/;;u dh ;kstuk cukus esa lgk;rk djsxsaA
24. Mathie RT, Roniger H, Van Wassenhoven M, Frye J, Jacobs J,
Oberbaum M, et al. Method for appraising model validity of
randomisedcontrolledtrialsof homoeopathic treatment: Multi‑rater
concordancestudy.BMCMedResMethodol2012;12:49.
25. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT
2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group
randomisedtrials.BMJ2010;340:c332
26. DeanME,CoulterMK,FisherP,JobstKA,WalachH.Reportingdata
onhomoeopathictreatments(RedHot):AsupplementtoCONSORT.
JAlternComplementMed2007;13:19‑23.
How to cite this article: Central Council for Research in
Homoeopathy. Homoeopathy in polycystic ovarian syndrome:
A randomized placebo‑controlled pilot study. Indian J Res
Homoeopathy 2014;8:3‑8.
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
27. Available from: http://ohg.cochrane.org/sites/ohg.cochrane.org/
files/uploads/Risk%20of%20bias%20assessment%20tool.pdf [Last
accesseddateon2012Dec09].
[Downloaded free from http://www.ijrh.org on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, IP: 86.82.50.232]
Article
Full-text available
In view of greater attention given to the incidence of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) in women of reproductive age, particularly in urban and semi-urban population in India, research works in both the regimens of orthodox and complementary and alternative medicines have been rejuvenated in recent years. We report here relative efficacy of two potentized homeopathic remedies, Calcarea carbonica (Calc) and Lycopodium clavatum (Lyco) used traditionally for the removal of ovarian cysts. These drugs are most frequently used based on guiding symptoms of individual patients. Effects of either of these remedies on its ability of removing cysts, along with amelioration of certain other hormones and hormone-related parameters of PCOS, such as follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, Estradiol, Testosterone (Free/Total), Dehydroepiandosterone, Prolactine, Progesterone (17-Hydroxyprogesterone), TSH including T 3 , T 4 , and Insulin were studied. The Insulin-related parameters like changes in fasting or post-prandial glucose levels were also studied. The mentioned hormones play some-direct or indirect roles in causing irregular menstrual cycle and PCOS. The data collected at three fixation time points, namely, at 6, 12, and 18 months were considered. Results showed that out of 40 patients initially having PCOS, cysts were totally removed in 21 patients along with amelioration of other relevant symptoms. Both Calc and Lyco had amelioration of similar nature. Results of this study therefore validate safe and effective use of both Calc and Lyco in homeopathy, to patients with basic guiding symptoms for either drug, and can be recommended for patients with PCOS as they do not have any reported side-effects.
Article
Full-text available
High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended items to include in a clinical trial protocol. This SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides important information to promote full understanding of the checklist recommendations. For each checklist item, we provide a rationale and detailed description; a model example from an actual protocol; and relevant references supporting its importance. We strongly recommend that this explanatory paper be used in conjunction with the SPIRIT Statement. A website of resources is also available (www.spirit-statement.org). The SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration paper, together with the Statement, should help with the drafting of trial protocols. Complete documentation of key trial elements can facilitate transparency and protocol review for the benefit of all stakeholders.
Article
Full-text available
A method for assessing the model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathy is needed. To date, only conventional standards for assessing intrinsic bias (internal validity) of trials have been invoked, with little recognition of the special characteristics of homeopathy. We aimed to identify relevant judgmental domains to use in assessing the model validity of homeopathic treatment (MVHT). We define MVHT as the extent to which a homeopathic intervention and the main measure of its outcome, as implemented in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), reflect 'state-of-the-art' homeopathic practice. Using an iterative process, an international group of experts developed a set of six judgmental domains, with associated descriptive criteria. The domains address: (I) the rationale for the choice of the particular homeopathic intervention; (II) the homeopathic principles reflected in the intervention; (III) the extent of homeopathic practitioner input; (IV) the nature of the main outcome measure; (V) the capability of the main outcome measure to detect change; (VI) the length of follow-up to the endpoint of the study. Six papers reporting RCTs of homeopathy of varying design were randomly selected from the literature. A standard form was used to record each assessor's independent response per domain, using the optional verdicts 'Yes', 'Unclear', 'No'. Concordance among the eight verdicts per domain, across all six papers, was evaluated using the kappa (κ) statistic. The six judgmental domains enabled MVHT to be assessed with 'fair' to 'almost perfect' concordance in each case. For the six RCTs examined, the method allowed MVHT to be classified overall as 'acceptable' in three, 'unclear' in two, and 'inadequate' in one. Future systematic reviews of RCTs in homeopathy should adopt the MVHT method as part of a complete appraisal of trial validity.
Article
Full-text available
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with psychological and metabolic disturbances. The aim of this study was to determine whether depression, anxiety and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are more common in women with PCOS and associated with metabolic risk. The study included 226 PCOS patients and 85 BMI-matched healthy control women. All participants completed standardized questionnaires assessing depression (Beck Depression Inventory), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and both depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and General Health Questionnaire). Patients also completed a PCOS HRQOL questionnaire. Hirsutism scores, serum androgens and lipids were obtained. All subjects underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test. 28.6% of PCOS women versus 4.7% of control women had clinical depression scores indicating an 8.1-fold increased risk of depression in PCOS (P < 0.001). Depression and anxiety scores were higher in PCOS women than controls (P < 0.01 for all subscales). Obese PCOS subjects had higher depression scores and rates than non-obese PCOS women (P < 0.05). Depression scores were significantly correlated with insulin resistance and lipid parameters and with the number of components comprising the metabolic syndrome. Menstrual and hirsutism problems were the most serious concerns followed by emotional problems on the HRQOL. Depression and anxiety are more common in patients with PCOS compared with healthy women. Depression in PCOS might be associated with obesity and metabolic abnormalities including insulin resistance and dyslipidemia.
Article
The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience. To encourage dissemination of the CONSORT 2010 Statement, this article is freely accessible on www.ijph.it.
Article
In the last few years some studies assessed the effects of attenu- ation of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, obtained by insulin sensitizing agents, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), suggesting potential scope for these drugs in treating the whole spec- trum of reproductive, endocrine, and metabolic abnormalities found in such subjects. However, the results of these studies, mostly un- controlled and short-term, are still inconclusive, and there is no long- term follow-up. In the present study, 23 PCOS subjects (mean (6 SE) body mass index 30.0 6 1.1 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to double- blind treatment with metformin (500 mg tid) or placebo for 6 months, while maintaining their usual eating habits. Before and after treat- ment, menstrual history, endocrine and metabolic profiles, serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone response to GnRH-agonist testing, and in- sulin sensitivity measured by the glucose clamp technique were as- sessed. Eighteen of these women, as well as 14 additional PCOS patients, were subsequently given metformin in an open trial for 11.0 6 1.3 months (range 4 -26), to assess long-term effects of treat- ment and baseline predictors of metformin efficacy on reproductive abnormalities. After metformin treatment, mean frequency of men- struation improved (P 5 0.002), due to striking amelioration of men- strual abnormalities in about 50% of subjects. Women given met- formin showed reduced plasma insulin (at fasting: P 5 0.057; during the clamp studies: P , 0.01) and increased insulin sensitivity (P , 0.05). Concurrently, ovarian hyperandrogenism was attenuated, as indicated by significant reductions in serum free testosterone (P , 0.05) and in the 17-hydroxyprogesterone response to GnRH-agonist testing (P , 0.05). No changes were found in the placebo group. Only comparable minor changes in body mass index were found both in the metformin group and in the placebo group. In the open, long-term trial 17 women (54.8%) showed striking improvements of their menstrual abnormalities and were considered as responders. Logistic regression analysis of baseline characteristics in responders and nonresponders showed that plasma insulin, serum androstenedione, and menstrual history were independent predictors of the treatment's clinical effi- cacy. In 10 subjects whose menses proved regular after treatment, the great majority of cycles became ovulatory (32 out of 39 assessed, 79%). In conclusion, in women with PCOS metformin treatment reduced hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenemia, independently of changes in body weight. In a large number of subjects these changes were associated with striking, sustained improvements in menstrual ab- normalities and resumption of ovulation. Higher plasma insulin, lower serum androstenedione, and less severe menstrual abnormal- ities are baseline predictors of clinical response to metformin. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 139 -146, 2000)
Article
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a disorder of androgen excess and ovarian dysfunction. Hirsutism and elevated free testosterone levels are the most consistent signs of the androgen excess. Irregular, infrequent, or absent menses and infertility are symptoms of ovulatory dysfunction. Obesity is also a feature of this syndrome and contributes to associated metabolic abnormalities. Lifestyle modification should be the first treatment and is effective in reducing the signs and symptoms. The ovulatory infertility associated with PCOS can be overcome in most cases with oral (clomiphene citrate or letrozole) or injectable (gonadotropins) agents. Surgical intervention is reserved for cases resistant to medical management.
Article
Study question We aimed to determine the impact of an oral contraceptive (OC) treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), depressive and anxiety symptoms in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).