Determining Attitudinal Beliefs about Controversial Advertising

Abstract

This study aims to determine the beliefs about advertising of two controversial products, namely political parties and sexual diseases prevention. The theory of reasoned action was utilized as underlying premise to elicit beliefs about controversial advertising in order to understand the formation of attitude towards the advertising. A qualitative approach by means of personal interview was adopted to explore the relatively unknown phenomenon. Subsequently, 43 interviews were conducted in Sarawak and the transcripts were then content-analyzed by multiple coders. The findings show that there are 11 statements of belief for the advertising of political parties and 6 statements for the advertising of sexual diseases prevention. Although both types of advertising are primarily considered as a source of information, their descriptions are largely different. While the advertising of political parties is mainly believed to be giving misleading information and for personal interest, the advertising of sexual diseases prevention is regarded as a form of education when executed appropriately. Therefore, the former must be carried out with care to avoid negative responses, and the latter should be done fittingly. This articulates the underlying consideration that there are different beliefs by type of advertising, and about what might create controversy.

Full text

DETERMINING ATTITUDINAL BELIEFS ABOUT
CONTROVERSIAL ADVERTISING
Ernest Cyril de Run♣
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Hiram Ting
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the beliefs about advertising of two controversial products,
namely political parties and sexual diseases prevention. The theory of reasoned action was
utilized as underlying premise to elicit beliefs about controversial advertising in order to
understand the formation of attitude towards the advertising. A qualitative approach by means of
personal interview was adopted to explore the relatively unknown phenomenon. Subsequently,
43 interviews were conducted in Sarawak and the transcripts were then content-analyzed by
multiple coders. The findings show that there are 11 statements of belief for the advertising of
political parties and 6 statements for the advertising of sexual diseases prevention. Although
both types of advertising are primarily considered as a source of information, their descriptions
are largely different. While the advertising of political parties is mainly believed to be giving
misleading information and for personal interest, the advertising of sexual diseases prevention
is regarded as a form of education when executed appropriately. Therefore, the former must be
carried out with care to avoid negative responses, and the latter should be done fittingly. This
articulates the underlying consideration that there are different beliefs by type of advertising,
and about what might create controversy.
Keywords: Controversial Advertising; Belief; Political; Sex Diseases Prevention.
1. INTRODUCTION
Marketers and business practitioners are constantly confronted with intricate tasks of targeting
and promoting products to consumers effectively. Consequently, advertising with novel,
fresh and even unorthodox ideas and themes is more than often needed, and hence used to
generate awareness and interest in the marketplace (Jewler & Drewniany, 2001; Reid, et al.,
1998; Wells, et al., 2003). Despite having laws to govern advertising and its activities, various
advertising-related matters are left to the discretion of the senders, and are based mostly on
ethical considerations (Wells, et al., 2003). As a result, controversial images, slogans and
subjects, including products that may potentially be seen as offensive when advertised, are
frequently exploited (McIntyre, 2000; Pope, et al., 2004). These have become more common
over the last two decades with no sign of abatement (Pope, et al., 2004; Severn, et al., 1990).
♣ Corresponding author: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia, Email: drernest@feb.unimas.my;
Tel/Fax: +6082-582280/+6082-582484
International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 15 No. 3, 2014, 465 - 476

466
Even though a good number of studies have been dedicated to investigating attitude towards
controversial advertising (De Run, et al., 2010; Fam, et al., 2004; Waller, 1999a, 1999b), there
is still a dearth of knowledge as to what actually forms such attitude, which in turn predicts
intention and behaviour.
Consequently, little is known about the specific descriptions pertaining to the attributes of
controversial advertising, and the manner by which attitude towards them, often measured by
the level of favorability in past literature, is actually formed. Moreover, despite the advancement
of communication technology as seen in Internet and mobile devices, most of the studies focus
on the western attitude towards such advertising (Fam, et al., 2009). Therefore, this study
aims utilize a qualitative approach to elicit the determinants of attitude towards the most and
the least controversial products when they are being advertised and seen. The former is the
advertising of political parties while the latter sexual diseases prevention. Using the theory of
reasoned action (TRA) as the underlying basis, attitudinal beliefs will be looked into in order
to elicit the descriptions that explain views about the product and articulate reasons why one
holds certain attitude and intention towards controversial advertising.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Controversial Advertising
Earlier findings have shown that controversial advertising was found to be predominantly
viewed as something negative as it was described as unmentionables, offensive, intrusive and
irritating, and socially sensitive (Aaker & Bruzzone, 1985; Bartos, 1981; Fahy, et al., 1995;
Li, et al., 2002; Phau & Prendergast, 2001; Rehman & Brooks, 1987; Shao & Hill, 1994; Triff,
et al., 1987; Waller, 1999a; Wilson & West, 1981). It is often referred to when the advertising
brings out reactions of embarrassment, distaste, disgust or outrage from a group of people
when advertised and seen (Waller, 2005). It can easily turn out to be something offensive when
it abuses the norm, and induces negative perceptions and reactions from the consumers (Dahl,
et al., 2003). Any of such negativity can be detrimental to advertising effectiveness and the
product itself.
However, despite being controversial, there appears to be an increase in the amount of such
advertising printed and broadcast (Fam & Waller, 2003). It is further intensified by the rapid
progression of communication technologies since advertisements can now be seen by people
in any part of the world (Waller & Fam, 2000). The rise of controversial advertising is mainly
generated by the fact that advertising with fresh ideas and even unexpected elements can
be successful in gaining awareness or winning attention and increasing profits in complex
societies (Dahl, et al., 2003; McIntyre, 2000; Pope, et al., 2004; Waller, 1999b). As a result,
understanding attitude towards controversial advertising becomes a major interest among
marketing researchers and practitioners. Therefore it is of utmost importance to delve into
the formation of attitude towards advertising so as to understand what makes the advertising
controversial and how one differs from another.
Past researchers have studied products that are deemed controversial when advertised, and
come out with 17 of them (De Run, et al., 2010; Waller, et al., 2005). These 17 products
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising

467
are alcoholic products, charities, cigarettes, condoms, female contraceptives, female hygiene
products, female underwear, funeral services, gambling, guns and armaments, male underwear,
pharmaceuticals, political parties, racially extremist groups, religious denominations, sexual
diseases prevention, and weight loss programs. However, only five of them are examined in the
preliminary stage to ascertain their level of controversy due to contextual considerations which
will be explained in later section. Then the most and the least controversial products are to be
adopted as the context of the present study in order to elicit the beliefs about them respectively.
2.2. Theoretical Consideration
In spite of the fact that qualitative inquiry is assumed in the study, the theory of reasoned action
(TRA) is used as the underlying premise to look into beliefs about controversial advertising
(Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). TRA spells out clearly that an individual’s behavioural intention to
perform a behavior is mainly influenced by his attitude (Farley, et al., 1981; Oliver & Bearden,
1985). Attitude, in turn, is predicted by his belief (Brackett & Carr, 2001; Ducoffe, 1996;
Pollay & Mittal, 1993; Wang, et al., 2009). Beliefs are mostly defined as specific statements
about the attributes of objects, and they are antecedents of attitude, which is described as the
summative evaluation of objects (Pollay & Mittal, 1993). Both consumers’ belief and attitude
towards advertising are known as important indicators of advertising effectiveness (Mehta,
2000). It is therefore surmised that the elicitation of beliefs about controversial advertising can
contribute to better understanding of attitude towards the advertising (Ajzen, 1991).
2.3. Contextual Consideration
Advertising activities in Malaysia are governed under Malaysian Code of Advertising
Practices which promotes cultural sensitivity and social harmony in advertising and forbids
advertisements that contain or insinuate statements which may upset the religious, racial,
political or sentimental susceptibilities of any group of people (Deng, et al., 1994). As such,
this study excludes products that are either prohibited entirely or controlled firmly by the
authorities when it comes to advertising since not everyone in the state would have seen the
advertisements. These include addictive and gender-related products which are highly sensitive
in nature and execution (Ting & de Run, 2012). In the same vein, all social and political products,
with the exception of political parties, are taken out of the equation. Although the advertising
of political parties is also regulated, it is still highly visible in public due to its pivotal role in
election campaign in democratic countries, including Malaysia (Waller & Polonsky, 1996).
As a result, twelve products are left out, and what remains are pharmaceuticals, weight loss
programs, charities, sexual diseases prevention and political parties.
3. METHODOLOGY
Due to the explorative stance of the study, Sarawak, instead of Malaysia, was selected as the
research site to establish initial findings that will serve as a precursor to a future nationwide
study. Sarawak is the largest state in land size and the fourth most populated state in Malaysia,
and it is as diverse as the whole nation (Department of Statistics, 2010). Over the years the
state has emerged as a promising investment hub, and is becoming a lucrative market for
businesses (Malaysian Rating Corporation Berhad, 2011). As such it is necessary to have in-
Ernest Cyril de Run and Hiram Ting

468
depth understanding of how Sarawakians view controversial advertising, and how their views
affect their attitude towards it.
A preliminary study was administered to determine the most and the least controversial products
across the five products using the Likert scale where 1 indicates the least controversial and 5
indicates the most controversial. 63 respondents were approached with an interview protocol
(Hunt, et al., 1982). As a result, the advertising of political parties was found to be the most
controversial of all while the advertising of sexual diseases prevention the least. Subsequently,
the main study was carried out, and personal interview was deemed the most useful method
in drawing out in-depth information (Perry, 1998). As this is a qualitative study, the concept
of data saturation or information replication rather than generalizability of data was the main
emphasis (Strauss & Corbin, 1990, 1998). Therefore a sample of 30 respondents established
in past studies was used as the minimum sample size in order to ascertain whether similar
findings had started to replicate with additional interviews (Charmaz, 2006). Respondents
were selected by means of purposeful sampling strategy to cater the purpose of the study
(Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2007).
Before the actual interview, a pilot study was carried out with three persons in separate
occasions to check whether the questions were clear enough for respondents to give relevant
responses (Dicicco-Bloom & Crabtree, 2006). Funnel approach, beginning with the broad
question ‘What are your beliefs about the advertising of political parties/sexual diseases
prevention” and ending with specific queries about the reasons behind their beliefs, was
adopted during interview sessions (Churchill & Iacobucci, 2005; Hair, et al., 2006; Kinnear &
Taylor, 1995; Saunders, et al., 2003). The actual interview took place in December of 2012, and
consequently 43 interviews were conducted. Most interviews were conducted in the homes of
the respondents at their convenience to ensure their comfort during interview sessions (Evers
& De Boer, 2007; Rubin & Rubin, 2005; Seidman, 2006; Weiss, 1994). All interviews were
audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were also checked to match
against audio records (Kurasaki, 2000). Content analysis was used as it not only focuses at
frequency counts (Wilkinson, 2000), but also allows for interpretation of themes in qualitative
data (Ryan & Bernard, 2000). Accordingly statements of belief in the transcripts were firstly
coded by one of the researchers and two separate coders independently, and were later put
together to finalize the themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
4. FINDINGS
The initial findings in preliminary study indicate the advertising of political parties is the most
controversial advertising (Mean = 4.63), and the advertising of sexual diseases prevention is
the least (Mean = 3.56). Both have no correlation, and are statistically different (t = 3.733, p =
0.00). The characteristics of the respondents were similar to that of the main study.
Table 1 presents the demographic details of the 43 interviewed respondents from various
age and racial groups throughout Sarawak in the main study. Although 30 respondents were
predetermined as the minimum sample size, 13 additional respondents were sampled to ensure
information replication was achieved.
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising

469
4.1. Beliefs about Controversial Advertising
Table 2 shows the 11 statements of belief about the advertising of political parties with
their respective frequency counts. Three coders, including one of the researchers, coded the
transcripts independently before coming together to finalize the themes (statements of belief).
When comparing the themes, inter-coder agreement was above 80 percent, which exceeded
what was generally required to secure data reliability (Kassarjian, 1977). It was found that
most of the statements were actually revealed in the first 30 transcripts. Hence, only minor
changes, especially in wordings, were made.
Table 1: Respondents’ Profile
PercentFrequencyItemsVariables
Age-group 15 to 24 8 18.60
25 to 34 7 16.28
35 to 44 7 16.28
45 to 54 7 16.28
55 to 64 6 13.95
65 and above 8 18.60
Race Iban 14 32.56
Malay 14 32.56
Chinese 13 30.23
Others 2 4.65
Gender Male 24 55.81
Female 19 44.19
Present Residence Kuching city 17 39.53
in Sarawak Sibu 5 11.63
Miri city 3 6.98
Others 18 41.86
Table 2: Beliefs about the Advertising of Political Parties
It is a source of information. 23 21.30
Its message can often be misleading. 18 16.33
Its main goal is to generate interest for personal gain. 16 14.82
It is harmful to our country’s welfare. 12 11.11
It is actually ineffective. 11 10.19
It is a waste of resources. 8 7.41
It can be offensive. 6 5.56
It can be an aid to more development. 5 4.63
It often makes false claims. 3 2.78
It is meaningless. 3 2.78
It is sometimes fun to watch. 3 2.78
PercentFrequencyBelief Statements
Ernest Cyril de Run and Hiram Ting

470
The advertising of political parties was mainly believed to be a source of information (23
counts at 21.3%). However, the said advertising could also be misleading, for personal gain,
harmful to the society at large, and ineffective. Out of the 11 statements, only 2 were found
to be positive: it can be an aid to more development and it can be fun to watch. The findings
indicate that the sentiments shared and expressed by the respondents towards the advertising
were very negative.
In similar fashion, Table 3 shows the 6 statements of belief about sexual diseases prevention
with inter-coder agreement of more than 80 percent as well (Kassarjian, 1977). Most of the
statements of beliefs were also revealed in the first 30 transcripts. The additional transcripts
were thus used to ensure there was no significant themes emerged from the interviews.
Table 3: Beliefs about the Advertising of Sexual Diseases Prevention
It is a source of information. 32 43.84
It is a form of education/instruction. 21 28.77
It benefits societal well-being. 9 12.33
It is actually ineffective. 7 9.59
It may generate unwanted curiosity. 3 4.11
It is a waste of resources. 1 1.37
PercentFrequencyBelief Statements
The advertising of sexual diseases prevention was also predominantly believed to be a source
of information (32 counts at 43.84%). It was also strongly regarded as a form of education
or instruction (21 counts at 28.77%), thus benefitting societal well-being. Nevertheless, such
advertising was also deemed ineffective and could generate unwanted curiosity. It was even
viewed as a waste of resources.
5. DISCUSSIONS
5.1. Beliefs about the Advertising of Political Parties
Being a source of information, it suggests that political parties in Sarawak acknowledge the
importance of being market-oriented by utilizing advertising to win trust and even elections
(Lees-Marshament, 2001). Hence, the finding corresponds to past literature on the use of
advertising by political parties to promote candidates and parties, explaining their policies
and views (Ferguson, 1990; Kaid, et al., 1986; Newman & Sheth, 1985; Wolton, 1990). The
finding also corresponds to belief about advertising in general where it is primarily regarded as
a source of product information (De Run & Ting, 2013; Pollay & Mittal, 1993).
However, despite acknowledging its role in providing information, most people also hold
negative opinions about this particular advertising. The findings clearly show the advertising is
largely believed to be misleading and for personal gain or interest. These descriptions may well
illustrate intense competition between parties, and thus contrasting views from different groups
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising

471
of supporters because they will consider whatever the other parties advertise is distrustful and
mere gimmick to win (De Run, et al., 2013). Moreover it can also be beliefs shared by neutrals
or people who are not as aggressive in political arena. Such inference is made based on the
statements that advertising is harmful to the country’s welfare from a broader perspective,
ineffective in its role, and a waste of resources. Same can be said about those who believe such
advertising is good for development and fun to watch.
Other descriptions such as making false claims (deceptive), meaningless, and even offensive
are equally alarming to say the least. While it is extremely difficult to change political views of
any hardcore supporter, it is possible for a neutral and indecisive voter to change his attitude
and intention towards political parties if he finds such advertising unpleasant. This may well
suggest that the manner by which the advertising of political parties is executed can be much
more of a concern than the product itself (Fam & Waller, 2003; Ting & de Run, 2012).
5.2. Beliefs about the Advertising of Sexual Diseases Prevention
Although empirical studies have found that sexist issues and cultural insensitivity problems
are some of the most commonly cited reasons for finding advertising offensive in the Asian
context (Phau & Prendergast, 2001), most Sarawakians acknowledge the advertising of sexual
diseases prevention as something for a good cause. In other words, the advertising of the
seemingly controversial product does not necessarily make it controversial as well. Like
advertising in general, the findings show the advertising of sexual diseases prevention also
fulfils its primarily role as a provider of information (De Run & Ting, 2013; Pollay & Mittal,
1993). In addition, the belief statements reveal that most people, regardless of their age and
race, accept the advertising as a form of education or instruction. It is also claimed that such
advertising can benefit the society as a whole, especially the younger generations.
However, the advertising of such sensitive issue is not without contradicting views. It is
regarded as futile if there is no channel such as seminar to explain sexual diseases and their
preventive measures to younger generations and the public. Unlike political parties, some
believe that sexual diseases prevention does not need mass advertising in Sarawak. If anything,
it might generate unwanted curiosity about the social welfare in the state. Understandably the
advertising is about prevention, but it does not mean it infers nor condones unethical sexual
behaviours. Therefore it is imperative to maintain the advertising as a tool to inform and
instruct people at suitable areas without overexerting it. It is also essential to get feedback
from the target audience as to understanding whether the advertising along with its message
is decoded in a way that it should be. This highlights that the amount of advertisement itself
simply does not necessarily help the cause, rather the way it is advertised and communicated
to the audience is what really matters.
6. CONCLUSION
Determining beliefs about controversial advertising is important in order to complement the
understanding of how attitude towards controversial advertising is formed. Therefore beliefs
about the advertising of political parties and sexual diseases prevention are elicited via
Ernest Cyril de Run and Hiram Ting

472
qualitative approach to elucidate the specific descriptions of each product’s attributes when
advertised and seen. This has articulated the underlying consideration of what might create
controversy and why people find it controversial. The findings have explicitly shown that
there are different beliefs by type of advertising, hence marketers must know what beliefs one
holds for each advertisement. In other words, what creates controversy for one advertisement
may not be the case for another. By making known what beliefs actually contribute to having
attitude towards the two types of controversial advertising, marketers or relevant parties will
then be able to design their advertising campaign effectively to present their products that is
acceptable to the audience.
It is apparent that the study is only looking at two controversial products, and is limited to the
context of Sarawak. As the level of exposure to global advertising is getting higher especially
with younger generations, it is necessary to determine the beliefs about other controversial
products, and to investigate how they affect attitude and behavioral intention in future studies.
A nationwide study can also be conducted in similar fashion to provide a more comprehensive
view about the subject matter. These qualitative findings can then be incorporated into
quantitative studies so as to obtain empirical results with more rigorous theoretical and
managerial implications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This paper is based on research at Universiti Malaysia Sarawak under Geran Dana Principal
Investigator (Grant no: 03/DPI07/823/2011 (07)). The authors express their gratitude to
UNIMAS for sponsoring the research carried out.
REFERENCES
Aaker, D. A., & Bruzzone, D. E. (1985). Causes of Irritation in Advertising. Journal of
Advertising, 49, 47-57.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organization Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.
London: Prentice-Hall.
Bartos, R. (1981). Ads that Irritate May Erode Trust in Advertised Brands. Harvard Business
Review, July-August, 138-139.
Brackett, L., & Carr, B. (2001). Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs.
Mature Student Attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 23-32.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research
in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising

473
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative
Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2005). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations.
OH: Thomson South-Wester.
Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchandra, R. V. (2003). Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions
to Shocking and Non-shocking Advertising Content among University Students. Journal
of Advertising Research, 43(3), 268-280.
De Run, E. C. & Ting, H. (2013). Generational Cohorts and Their Attitudes toward Advertising.
Trziste/Market Journal, 25(2), 143-160.
De Run, E. C., Butt, M. M., Fam, K.-S., & Jong, H. Y. (2010). Attitudes towards Offensive
Advertising: Malaysian Muslims' Views. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1(1), 25-36.
De Run, E. C., Jee, T. W., & Lau, W. M. (2013). Negative Political Advertising: It's Impact on
Voters. Asian Journal of Business Research, 3(1), 82-96.
Deng, S., Jivan, S., & Hassan, M.-L. (1994). Advertising in Malaysia: A Cultural Perspective.
International Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 231-243.
Department of Statistics. (2010). Total Population by Ethnic Group, Sub-district and State,
Malaysia, 2010. Retrieved 23 July, 2012, from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/
download_Population/files/population/05Jadual_Mukim_negeri/Mukim_Sarawak.pdf
Dicicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The Qualitative Research Interview. Medical
Education, 40(4), 314-321.
Ducoffe, R. (1996). Advertising Value and Advertising on the Web. Journal of Advertising
Research, 36(5), 21-35.
Evers, J., & De Boer, F. (2007). Het Uitvoeren van Een Individueel Interview. In J. Evers
(Eds.), Kwalitatief Interviewen: Kunst en Kunde. Den Haag: Lemma.
Fahy, J., Smart, D., Pride, W., & Ferrell, O. C. (1995). Advertising Sensitive Products.
International Journal of Advertising, 14(3), 231-243.
Fam, K.-S., & Waller, D. S. (2003). Advertising Controversial Products in the Asia Pacific:
What Makes Them Offensive? Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 237-250.
Fam, K.-S., Waller, D. S., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2004). The Influence of Religion on Attitudes
towards the Advertising of Controversial Products. European Journal of Marketing,
38(5/6), 537-555.
Fam, K.-S., Waller, D. S., & Yang, Z. (2009). Addressing the Advertising of Controversial
Products in China: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 43-58.
Farley, J. U., Lehmann, D. R., & Ryan, M. J. (1981). Generalizing from 'Imperfect Replication'.
Journal of Business, 54, 597-610.
Ernest Cyril de Run and Hiram Ting

474
Ferguson, M. (1990). Political Communication: The New Imperatives. London: Sage.
Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2006). Marketing Research within a Changing
Information Environment (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Hunt, S. D., Sparkman, R. D. J., & Wilcox, J. B. (1982). The Pretest in Survey Research: Issues
and Preliminary Findings. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 269-273.
Jewler, A. J., & Drewniany, B. L. (2001). Creative Strategy in Advertising. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.
Kaid, L. L., Nimmo, D., & Sanders, K. R. (1986). New Perspectives on Political Advertising.
Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer
Research, 4(1), 8-18.
Kinnear, T. C., & Taylor, J. R. (1995). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach (5 ed.).
London: McGraw-Hill.
Kurasaki, K. S. (2000). Intercoder Reliability for Validating Conclusions Drawn from Open-
Ended Interview Data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179-194.
Lees-Marshament, J. (2001). The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies, 49,
692-713.
Li, H., Edwards, S. M. & Lee, J. H. (2002). Measuring the Intrusiveness of Advertisements:
Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37-47.
Malaysian Rating Corporation Berhad. (2011). Economic Research. Retrieved 1 December,
2012, from http://www.marc.com.my/home/userfiles/file/221111_The%20State%20
of%20Sarawak.pdf
McIntyre, P. (2000, 27-28 May). Buy Sexual. The Australian Magazine, 26-29.
Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising Attitudes and Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising
Research, 40, 67-72.
Newman, B. I., & Sheth, J. N. (1985). Political Marketing: Readings and Annotated
Bibliography. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
Oliver, R. L., & Bearden, W. O. (1985). Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action:
A Moderating Influence Attempt. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 324-340.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making
the Sampling Process More Public. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 238-254.
Perry, C. (1998). Processes of A Case Study Methodology for Postgraduate Research in
Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785-802.
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising

475
Phau, I., & Prendergast, G. (2001). Offensive Advertising: A View from Singapore. Journal of
Promotion Management, 7(1), 71-90.
Pollay, R. W., & Mittal, B. (1993). Here's the Beef: Factors, Determinants, and Segments in
Consumer Criticism of Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 57, 99-114.
Pope, N. K., Voges, K. E., & Brown, M. R. (2004). The Effect Of Provocation In The Form
Of Mild Erotica On Attitude To The Ad And Corporate Image. Journal of Advertising,
33(1), 69-82.
Rehman, S. N., & Brooks, J. R. (1987). Attitudes towards Television Advertising for
Controversial Products. Journal of Healthcare Marketing, 7, 78-83.
Reid, L. N., King, K. W., & DeLorme, D. E. (1998). Top-Level Agency Creatives Look at
Advertising Creativity Then and Now. Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 1-15.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (2 ed.).
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N. K.
Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2 ed., pp. 769-802).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students (3rd
ed.). London, England: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. A Guide for Researchers in
Education and Social Sciences (3 ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Severn, J., Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (1990). The Effects of Sexual and Non-sexual
Advertising Appeals and Information Level on Cognitive Processing and Communication
Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 14-22.
Shao, A. T., & Hill, J. S. (1994). Global Television Advertising Restrictions: The Case of
Socially Sensitive Products. International Journal of Advertising, 13, 347-366.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and
Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2 ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Ting, H., & de Run, E. C. (2012). Generations X and Y Attitude towards Controversial
Advertising. Asian Journal of Business Research, 2(2), 18-32.
Triff, M., Benningfield, D., & Murphy, J. H. (1987). Advertising Ethics: A Study of Public
Attitudes and Perceptions. Paper presented at the 1987 Conference of the American
Academy of Advertising, Columbia, South Carolina.
Ernest Cyril de Run and Hiram Ting

476
Waller, D. S. (1999a). Attitudes towards Offensive Advertising: An Australian Study. Journal
of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 288-294.
Waller, D. S. (1999b). "Get Stuffed": Attitudes towards Pizza Hut's Outdoor Advertising
Campaign. Journal of Food Product Marketing, 5(4), 45-54.
Waller, D. S. (2005). A Proposed Response Model for Controversial Advertising. Journal of
Promotion Management, 11(2/3), 3-15.
Waller, D. S., & Fam, K.-S. (2000). Cultural Values and Advertising in Malaysia: Views from
the Industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 12(1), 3-16.
Waller, D. S., & Polonsky, M. J. (1996). Advice for Handling Controversial Accounts: from
Products to Politicians. Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14(3), 21-28.
Waller, D. S., Fam, K.-S., & Erdogan, B. Z. (2005). Advertising of Controversial Products: A
Cross-cultural Study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 6-13.
Wang, Y., Sun, S., Lei, W., & Toncar, M. (2009). Examining Beliefs and Attitudes toward
Online Advertising among Chinese Consumers. Direct Marketing: An International
Journal, 3(1), 52-66.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview
Studies. New York: The Free Press.
Wells, W., Burnett, J., & Moriarty, S. (2003). Advertising Principles and Practice (6 ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Hall.
Wilkinson, S. (2000). WOmen with Breast Cancer Talking Causes: Comparing Content,
Biographical and Discursive Analyses. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 431-460.
Wilson, A., & West, C. (1981). The Marketing of 'Unmentionables'. Harvard Business Review,
91-10.
Wolton, D. (1990). Political Communication: The Construction of A Model. European Journal
of Communication, 5, 9-28.
Determining Attitudinal Beliefs About Controversial Advertising