ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

This article reviews recent research concerning dog-human relationships and how attributes that arise from them can be measured. It highlights the influence of human characteristics on dog behavior, and consequently, the dog-human bond. Of particular importance are the influences of human attitudes and personality. These themes have received surprisingly little attention from researchers. Identifying human attributes that contribute to successful dog-human relationships could assist in the development of a behavioral template to ensure dyadic potential is optimized. Additionally, this article reveals how dyadic functionality and working performance may not necessarily be mutually inclusive. Potential underpinnings of various dog-human relationships and how these may influence dogs' perceptions of their handlers are also discussed. The article considers attachment bonds between humans and dogs, how these may potentially clash with or complement each other, and the effects of different bonds on the dog-human dyad as a whole. We review existing tools designed to measure the dog-human bond and offer potential refinements to improve their accuracy. Positive attitudes and affiliative interactions seem to contribute to the enhanced well-being of both species, as reflected in resultant physiological changes. Thus, promoting positive dog-human relationships would capitalize on these benefits, thereby improving animal welfare. Finally, this article proposes future research directions that may assist in disambiguating what constitutes successful bonding between dogs and the humans in their lives.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... For instance, studies indicate that dogs possess a sensitivity to our emotional states [12] and can interpret our social cues [13], even engaging in sophisticated communication through behaviors like gaze alternation [14]. Furthermore, dogs are capable of forming intricate attachment relationships with humans, resembling the bonds found in relationships between infants and caregivers [15]. suggest that among the various animals involved in animal-assisted therapy (AAT), dogs tend to exhibit superior interactions with people compared to other species, benefiting both children and adults [6]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Animal-assisted therapy, also known as pet therapy, is a therapeutic intervention that involves animals to enhance the well-being of individuals across various populations and settings. This systematic study aims to assess the outcomes of animal-assisted therapy interventions and explore the associated policies. Methods A total of 16 papers published between 2015 and 2023 were selected for analysis. These papers were chosen based on their relevance to the research topic of animal-assisted therapy and their availability in scholarly databases. Thematic synthesis and meta-analysis were employed to synthesize the qualitative and quantitative data extracted from the selected papers. Results The analysis included sixteen studies that met the inclusion criteria and were deemed to be of moderate or higher quality. Among these studies, four demonstrated positive results for therapeutic mediation and one for supportive mediation in psychiatric disorders. Additionally, all studies showed positive outcomes for depression and neurological disorders. Regarding stress and anxiety, three studies indicated supportive mediation while two studies showed activating mediation. Conclusion The overall assessment of animal-assisted therapy shows promise as an effective intervention in promoting well-being among diverse populations. Further research and the establishment of standardized outcome assessment measures and comprehensive policies are essential for advancing the field and maximizing the benefits of animal-assisted therapy.
... Martins et al. (2023) have pointed out several variables that can in uencing the bene ts of having a pet for health (23). One of the proposed mechanisms could be the level of attachment to a pet (40). Over the decades, it has been hypothesized that pets, especially dogs, provide a unique bond that serves as an important mediator in the relationship between pet ownership and human health (41,42). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background The human-animal bond has been recognized as having positive effects on the health and well-being of both humans and pets. The present study aims to explore the influence of attachment on physical activity (PA), lifestyle, and health outcomes of dog owners (DO), highlighting the mutual benefits resulting from the relationship between DO and dogs. Methods Thirty-eight DO and their dogs participated in this study. Socio-demographic data, the Subjective Perceptive Health Scale (SPHS), FANTASTIC lifestyle, and the Lexington Attachment Pet Scale (LAPS) were assessed. PA was measured in both the DO and the dogs, using an ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer in the context of daily routine. Descriptive statistics and Spearman rank correlation analyses were performed to examine the associations between LAPS, PA levels, variables socio-demographic, lifestyle behaviors, and SPHS. Results Significant correlations were found between the DO’s light-level PA and the pets' vigorous level of PA (rho = 0.45). Furthermore, the importance of the pets' health and the LAPS subscales, namely proximity and attachment, were related to taking the pet for a walk. Concerning lifestyle, DO with a healthier lifestyle have a better self-assessment of their health using the SHPS (rho = 0.39, p = 0.02). Moreover, DO with better lifestyles have also exhibited greater concern for their pet's health and had higher levels of PA. Conclusions This study underlines that individuals adopting healthier habits tend to perceive themselves as healthier and exhibit greater concern for their pets' health. The attachment between DO and dogs is important to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors and PA engagement. Our results highlight that the presence of a dog is associated with a higher level of DO’s PA, depending on the strength of the human-animal bond.
... A strong relationship meant handlers prevented them from working in dangerous circumstances such as when it was too hot, or the tsetse challenge (and therefore the risk of contracting trypanosomiasis) was too high. Most studies on the relationship between working dogs and their handlers have found dogs to be in an improved welfare state, have less behavioral problems and for humans provide emotional and psychological benefits (37)(38)(39)(40)(41). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Dogs are increasingly being employed for conservation purposes worldwide. In Africa, they work in challenging environments with unique health risks which have not been investigated until now. Methods To understand the health challenges faced by the dogs, semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from 14 organisations that used working dogs in their conservation programmes. The data was qualitatively analysed by thematic analysis. Results Five themes were generated. Three affective themes influenced how participants responded to the challenges associated with having a successful conservation dog programme. A strong handler-dog attachment, proficient handler training, and the acknowledgement of the challenging environment were pivotal to maintaining dog health. Two themes related to the difficulties in managing these programmes and how veterinary support interacts with the management choices being made. Discussion To have healthy conservation dogs, current and future programmes should focus on fostering the handler-dog relationship and provide continuous handler training. The management of conservation dogs’ health should adopt an evidence-based approach. Future research should focus on areas where the evidence base is lacking, particularly in the areas of prevention and treatment of African canine trypanosomiasis. Programmes should develop a good working relationship with a veterinarian that has access to evidence-based veterinary medical information.
... Due to the complex and dynamic interaction between the humananimal bond and human-related factors (Payne et al., 2015), there is currently a lack of consensus on the terminology used to evaluate human-animal relationships (Anderson, 2007). The instruments available are limited and often focus on the humananimal bond between adult participants and dogs (Anderson, 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and aims: There is increasing evidence to suggest companion animal ownership may positively impact mental health and wellbeing. However, there is limited research related to the role of companion animal ownership for mental health that focuses on people living with severe mental illness (SMI). We aimed to explore the connection among loneliness, mental health, wellbeing, animal ownership, and the perceived strength of the human-animal bond in this population. Methods: We conducted a survey in an existing UK cohort of people living with SMI. The survey questionnaire included standardized measures to collect information related to mental health, loneliness, and the perceived strength of the human-animal bond. Results: Of 286 participants who had previously consented to participate in the follow-up survey, 170 participants (59.4%) completed the survey. Of these, 81 (47.6%) owned at least one animal, and most perceived to have a strong human-animal bond with their companion animal as indicated by the Comfort from Companion Animals Scale (M = 39.80 of a maximum score of 44). However, regression analyses showed that owning an animal was not significantly associated with wellbeing, depression, anxiety, or loneliness scores. Likewise, the perceived strength of the human-animal bond was not significantly associated with animal species owned or wellbeing, depression, and anxiety scores. Conclusion: The findings provide a counterpoint to the commonly held assumption that companion animals are beneficial for all owners’ mental health. Further exploration of the role of human-animal relationships, including challenges and support needs related to animal ownership, in people living with SMI is required.
Article
Full-text available
As companion dogs spend most of their lives with humans, the human–dog relationship and owner temperament may affect the dog behavior. In this study (n = 440), we investigated the relationship between the dog owner temperament (ATQ-R), owner-perceived dog–owner relationship (MDORS) and the dog behavior in three behavioral tests: the object-choice test, the unsolvable task, and the cylinder test. Dog owner temperament influenced the dog–owner relationship. Owners with high negative affectivity showed higher emotional closeness and perceived costs of their dog, whereas owners with high effortful control showed lower emotional closeness and perceived costs. Higher dog activity during the behavioral tests was also connected with owner-perceived lower emotional closeness. Furthermore, dog breed group modulated the connection between the owner temperament and dog behavior. Owner’s high negative affectivity correlated with herding dogs’ lower scores in the object choice test, while the behavior of primitive type dogs was unaffected by the owner temperament. Our results confirm that human characteristics are associated with the owner-reported dog–owner relationship, and owner temperament may have a modulatory effect on the dog social and cognitive behavior depending on the dog breed group, which should be investigated further.
Article
Abstract The importance of secure human attachments in childhood for healthy psychological development is well-established, yet the well-being implications of child-dog symbiotic relationships are less understood. Children form strong emotional bonds with their pet dogs that meet the prerequisites for an attachment relationship. These bonds can be mutually reinforcing and beneficial and could indicate positive child well-being. However, not all child-dog relationships are positive and here we explore whether harmful and unsafe interactions are associated with poorer emotional and behavioural functioning. The aim of this study was to examine whether the type of child-dog behaviour (positive or negative) mediates the relationship between child-dog attachment and well-being indicators. Data from caregiver reports (N = 117) and child self-reports (N = 77) were collected through an online survey. The results revealed that positive child-dog interactions significantly mediated the relationship between high attachment scores and better child outcomes (higher scores for well-being, positive outlook, happiness, quality of life, higher social satisfaction, and lower loneliness), whereas the reverse was found for negative child-dog interactions, predicting lower attachment scores and worse child outcomes (negative outlook, increased loneliness and social dissatisfaction, lower quality of life). This study has identified important mechanisms through which pet dogs may pose both benefits and risks to children’s psychological well-being. These findings will aid the development and evaluation of interventions that promote positive and safe child-dog interactions and subsequent child and dog psychological health and welfare.
Article
Empowering animals with choice, which increases predictability and control during husbandry procedures, has the potential to increase their well-being and the safety of the handler. This case study will consider differences in dogs’ clinical signs indicating stress during nail clipping when done with or without choice and control. Dogs were in two independent groups based on owner’s current husbandry routine – group 1, where the dogs had been trained with choice and were not restrained during nail clipping and group 2, where the dogs were restrained during nail clipping. Group 2 showed more stress signals. These findings suggest that offering choice and control to a dog during husbandry procedures will most likely lower the clinical sign of stress, possibly having a beneficial impact on their own and their handler’s welfare. Information © The Authors 2023
Article
Full-text available
Dogs’ ability to cooperate with humans is widely acknowledged, but the factors influencing their spontaneous cooperative tendencies are largely unknown. We investigated whether breed function, training experience, and owner-reported social motivation level contribute to spontaneous dog–owner cooperation. Family dogs (N = 100) of three breed groups (non-working dogs, cooperative/independent working breeds) with various training experiences were tested in an ‘out–of–reach’ task with their owners as their partners, who never directly asked for help during the test. We measured dogs’ behaviour along three main components of successful cooperation: paying attention, understanding the problem, and willingness to cooperate. Breed groups had no significant effect on dogs’ behaviour. No factor was associated with the behavioural variables related to not understanding the task. Dogs with high training levels and high social motivation showed more attention-related behaviours and were more likely to help the owner (training level and social motivation were not correlated with each other). Our results highlight the importance of training experience and social motivation in dogs’ attentiveness and spontaneous cooperativity. This also points to the need for careful sample balancing and experimental procedures that do not rely on specific trained skills.
Book
Full-text available
Throughout history animals have been used to assist humans in work and play or simply to satisfy our curiosity. Several paintings from Ancient Egypt demonstrate that we have been charming, cajoling and exploiting animals for many thousands of years. One example depicts men hand-feeding hyenas that are shown lying on their backs, a feature that strongly suggests that they were tame. There is evidence from the same source that gazelles, ibex and oryx were equally relaxed in human company. In view of the enormous investment of time required for the gentling of non-domesticated species, it is fascinating to speculate about the jobs these animals performed in Ancient Egypt. Some of the uses to which animals have been put in the past may seem unacceptable by modern ethical standards. For example, the Romans tied songbirds to bushes in their gardens and even used animals to torture and execute their enemies. Animals have long been used to keep vermin such as rats away from human households or grain stores and to act as guards warning of possible intruders. Across different cultures such guards have included geese, guinea fowl and pigs, as well as dogs. Large species such as horses, donkeys and cattle have for many millennia been used as sources of power. In its crudest form this means traction, as in pulling ploughs, sleds or carts. Later, animals were also used to provide power for primitive machines designed, for example, for milling grain or for raising water from deep wells. Similarly, dogs were forced to run in large wall-mounted wheels to turn roasting-spits. None of the forms of work mentioned so far required large changes in the animals’ behaviour. In contrast to these relatively simple uses of animals, in the domains of hunting and herding humans since pre-history have sought to increase their efficiency by investing considerable time in training animals. Training means changing the frequency with which animals show certain behaviours. Unwelcome behaviours become less likely, while desirable ones become more likely. Ancient Egyptians even tamed cheetahs for hunting and the work that these big cats performed may have been seen as the most sophisticated and effective hunting tool then available. However, this is a very unusual example. More generally, hunting and herding were the domains in which the dog truly came to the fore as the most trainable of all species. The role of animals in warfare and in the relative success of different human cultures is often under-estimated. The cultures that have prevailed from ancient origins are those that most fully exploited a variety of animals in combat, especially horses. Chief among the peoples that owed their success to the horse were the Mongol hordes. These excellent equestrians used their horses as sources of milk and meat when they were not exploiting their fleetness of foot for lightning raids on unmounted victims. The training of horses to perform specific behaviours useful in warfare eventually gave rise to the emergence of military riding academies. The haute-ecole dressage movements that the Lippizaner stallions of Vienna now perform in their displays were first developed some four hundred years ago to vanquish enemies in face-to-face combat. Training and riding skills contributed to the success of armies and the survival of individuals. Horses are not the only species to have been conscripted into human conflicts. Dogs and pigeons were used to carry messages during the trench warfare of the World War I. In World War II the Russians used carefully selected dogs as anti-tank operatives, while the U.S. Navy trained dolphins to place explosive devices on the hulls of ships. The same war prompted research into the deployment of pigeons to guide what was intended as the world's first smart missile. Three pigeons were strapped into position and trained to peck a spot on recognition of approximations to their target, this peck being transmitted to the guidance system of a missile that was actually never used. This long tradition of involving animals in human conflict still continues. Dolphins were used to search for mines in the second Gulf War and dogs are used to detect landmines and are trained to search buildings for terrorists with tiny cameras strapped to their foreheads. Explosive detection is becoming ever more sophisticated these days with techniques that concentrate volatile substances from a single site and seal them in small air-tight capsules so that these can be sent to the dog for his opinion. Although the behaviour of intensively trained animals can fascinate us, the animals with which most of us have frequent contact are those that have come into our homes as companions. We may be using animals less in the workplace, but we are not necessarily spending less time with them. Even highly domesticated companion animals need to be trained, although the level of dedication and expertise needed is far below that required to train a Lippizaner stallion or mine-detecting dolphin to perform at a high level. Over the very long history of training animals, a variety of expert traditions have developed. The language used to describe them is just as varied. For example, the way a shepherd describes how to train his dog is very different from the accounts of how they train their animals that might be given by a falconer or by an elephant trainer. The ways in which these different animals are trained also appears to differ enormously and in turn seems quite different from the advice given in a booklet on ‘How to train your pet’. However, the basic idea behind Carrots and Sticks is that these differences are superficial ones and that the same general principles apply to any kind of animal training. We reached this conclusion by different routes. One of us (PMcG) trained as a veterinarian and specialized in animal behaviour, with a particular interest in and love of dogs and horses. The other (RAB) trained as a research psychologist, with a particular interest in comparative psychology and learning theory. This book is a result of our collaboration in trying to make clear what we believe these general principles to be. One set of principles has to do with behaviour that is largely determined by what kind of animal it is. We refer to this as instinctive behaviour. Although this is an old fashioned and ambiguous term, nevertheless it is better than any other label for denoting behaviour more strongly determined by an animal’s genes – its nature - than by its experience – its nurture. Chapter One discusses those aspects of instinctive behaviour that are important from the perspective of an animal trainer, and also the way that instinctive behavior changes as a result of experience; hence the title Instincts and their modification. One of the core principles of training is that based on positive reward; the ‘carrot’. The properties of such learning have been extensively studied by psychologists using various kinds of conditioning methods. This research had led to the principles of importance to animal training that are described in Chapter Two. A related set of principles, described in Chapter Three, have been derived from conditioning studies that have employed aversive events – ‘sticks’ – to find out how punishment works (and sometimes doesn’t work) and how avoidance behaviour is learned. Many attempts at training fail because the trainer assumes that animals have very human-like ways of perceiving and thinking about the world. The limitations of this assumption and the realities of animal intelligence are the main topics in Chapter Four. You are invited to approach the two parts of the book in different ways. The first part can be read in the conventional way from beginning to end, while the second part has a quite different format. It contains a range of case histories to illustrate how the basic principles have been put into practice by trainers. The cases are intended for browsing in no particular order. Since the overall goal of this book is to take the mystery out of training, in the case studies we have unpicked the various processes by which the animals acquired their sometimes amazing behaviours. The accounts of their training are offered as illustrations of training practices. They are not intended as models for readers to emulate. The performances you see represent the end-points of a long process of behavioural modification that may have begun when the animals were very young. Having considered various approaches, you will be better able to decide for yourself whether it is right or wrong that animals are used in these ways. Are certain behaviours undignified? How can animal welfare be ensured when animals are required to work for a living? Should zoos require their animals to perform? Can this enrich their lives? It is possible that your informed response to these questions may then be at odds, say, with your views on riding horses. Regardless of these dilemmas, the information in this book should add to your fascination with the non-human animals with whom we share the world. The main theme of this book is that, despite huge diversity in the aims of different kinds of training and in the way that trainers explain their methods, all successful training depends largely on the principles we discuss in the four chapters of Part One.
Article
Full-text available
This study was conducted to formally evaluate the effectiveness of the Human Animal Bond in Colorado (HABIC, 2010), a well-developed animal-assisted therapy (AAT) intervention based in 23 elementary schools in the Front Range. Previous research on the benefits of human and dog relationships, otherwise called the human-animal bond, has provided support for using measures of attachment to rate the quality of connection within this dyad ( Kurdek, 2008 ; Melson, 2003 ; Triebenbacher, 1998 ). The Emotional Availability (EA) Scales 4 th Edition ( Biringen, 2008 ), an attachment-derived system, were used to objectively evaluate the interactions in the human-animal team, representing the first use of the EA system to assess the quality of the human-animal bond. In addition, the Bonding Scale ( Angle, Blumentritt, & Swank, 1994 ) was used to assess the child’s report of bonding to the dog; the Child Behavior Checklist and the Teacher Report Form ( Achenbach, 1991 ) were used to assess behavior problems; and school records yielded information about attendance and disciplinary referrals. All of the participants in this study were boys considered to be at high-risk for internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Paired-sample t-tests revealed that EA (child-dog and child-adult) significantly increased from pre- to post-test. (Child-adult EA scores apply to the child’s display of EA towards both the adult dog trainer and the school professional on the HABIC team.) In addition, a significant decrease was seen in student disciplinary referrals from pre- to post-test.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated a question related to people's perceptions of dog personality. We examined whether people attribute personality characteristics to dogs based on physical features of the dog, specifically, coat color and ear shape. In order to address this question, we presented participants with photographs of dogs in which a single physical characteristic of the dog, either coat color (black vs. yellow) or ear shape (pointy ears vs. floppy ears) had been manipulated. Participants (n = 124) completed an online survey in which they rated the personality of the dogs (one black, one yellow, one with pointy ears, and one with floppy ears) while viewing these photographs. Participants rated dog personality using a brief inventory of the Big Five personality dimensions (the Ten-Item Personality Inventory). Participants rated the yellow dog significantly higher than the black dog on the personality dimensions of Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability. The floppy-eared dog was rated significantly higher than the pointyeared dog on Agreeableness and Emotional Stability and significantly lower on Extraversion. These results indicate that people attribute different personality characteristics to dogs based solely on physical characteristics of the dog. These results have implications for how people judge personality variables in dogs, particularly during brief encounters where physical attributes of the animal are likely to be highly salient.
Article
Full-text available
Creativity has been acknowledged as one of the most predominant factors contributing to individual performance in various domains of work, and both researchers and practitioners have been devoting increasing attention to creative performance. In this study, we examined the potential trait-trait interaction between the Big Five personality factors (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and the motivational orientations of individuals in shaping their creative performance. Our hypotheses were empirically tested using longitudinal data collected from 304 undergraduate students at a North American business school. Results showed that extraversion and openness to experience had significant positive effects on creative performance. Analysis also revealed that the positive relationship between openness to experience and creativity was stronger when the person possessed strong extrinsic motivation. Agreeableness was a positive predictor of creative performance only when the person's extrinsic motivation was low. Patterns found relating to personality-motivation interaction as an explanatory factor of individuals' creative performance are described.
Article
Domestic dogs have proved to be extremely successful in finding hidden food following a series of human social cues such as pointing (an extended hand and index finger indicating the location of the reward), or body position, among many other variants. There is controversy about the mechanisms responsible for these communicative skills in dogs. On the one hand, a hypothesis states that dogs have complex cognitive processes such as a theory of mind, which allow them to attribute intent to the human pointing gesture. A second, more parsimonious, hypothesis proposes that these skills depend on associative learning processes. The purpose of this paper is to provide data that may shed some light on the discussion by looking into two learning processes by using an object choice task: the effect of interference between stimuli on the preference for human social cues and the effect of generalization of the response to novel human social stimuli. The first study revealed that previous training using a physical cue (container location) may hamper the learning of a novel human social cue (distal cross-pointing). The results of the second study indicated stimulus generalization. Dogs learnt a novel cue (distal cross-pointing) faster due to previous experience with a similar cue (proximal pointing), as compared to dogs confronted by a less similar cue (body position) or dogs with no previous experience. In sum, these findings support the hypothesis about the important role of associative learning in interspecific communication mechanisms of domestic dogs.
Book
Dogs have become the subject of increasing scientific study over the past two decades, chiefly due to their development of specialized social skills, seemingly a result of selection pressures during domestication to help them adapt to the human environment. The Social Dog: Behaviour and Cognition includes chapters from leading researchers in the fields of social cognition and behavior, vocalization, evolution, and more, focusing on topics including dog-dog and dog-human interaction, bonding with humans, social behavior and learning, and more. Dogs are being studied in comparative cognitive sciences as well as genetics, ethology, and many more areas. As the number of published studies increases, this book aims to give the reader an overview of the state of the art on dog research, with an emphasis on social behavior and socio-cognitive skills. It represents a valuable resource for students, veterinarians, dog specialists, or anyone who wants deeper knowledge of his or her canine companion.
Article
This paper examines the variations in dog owners' attitudes toward, treatment of, and interactions with, animals. Based on 28 in-depth interviews with dog owners from a county in the Midwestern United States, I demonstrate that pets are an important part of many people's lives, often providing companionship, entertainment, and meaningful interactions; however, there are notable, distinct variations in how people relate to them. Pet owners typically exhibit one of three orientations toward pets: “dominionistic,” “humanistic,” or “protectionistic.” The dominionistic have relatively low regard for their pets, valuing them primarily for the uses they provide, such as protection. Those employing the humanistic orientation elevate their pets to the status of surrogate humans and value their pets primarily for the affective benefits they enjoy from their close attachments. The protectionistic have high regard for both pets and animals more generally. They view pets as valuable companions and as creatures with their own interests. This typology offers insights for understanding the source and variety of the often ambiguous and contradictory relations between people and pets. I argue that individual characteristics and experiences impact how people understand and relate to animals, in large part, because they represent exposure to different cultural messages. I suggest that these orientations represent three sets of distinct cultural logics, each with distinct histories and contemporary sources.
Article
An overview of available instruments that assess characteristics of human–animal interactions is provided, followed by a matrix of 140 tools, what they measure, information on structure and properties, original published sources, and a citation, when available, to another study in which the tool was also used. Using Anderson's (2007) book Assessing the Human–Animal Bond: A Compendium of Actual Measures, as a baseline, we systematically searched seven electronic databases. Suggested steps for future instrument development and research include greater accessibility through manualizing, carefully naming, providing design and conceptual rationales, defining key terms, describing revisions along with use and scoring instructions, providing scores from several populations, including validity and reliability data, and taking long-term responsibility for further refinement of instruments.
Article
The aim of our study was to examine the influence of dyadic attachment, owner and dog personality, and owner gender on stress hormone dynamics in owner–dog dyads. We hypothesized that owner personality modulates dyadic relationships and, hence, would affect the cortisol levels resulting from acute and chronic stressors. Data were collected during three meetings with 10 male and 12 female owners aged 23–68 years, with their medium-to-large, intact male dogs aged 1.5–6.0 years. These owner-dog dyads were observed and video-taped during different tasks. The NEO-FFI (Five-Factor Inventory) was used to determine owner personality, and questionnaires covering owner–dog relationship and attachment were employed. Salivary cortisol levels were measured from samples collected during the dyads' daily routine and after experimental challenges. It was found that our experimental tasks had little effect on the salivary cortisol levels of either dog or owner except that dogs and male owners showed elevated levels during the first 20 minutes of our visit to their homes. However, owners who scaled high in neuroticism (NEO-FFI dimension 1) or low in conscientiousness (NEO-FFI dimension 5) showed high morning salivary cortisol values, in contrast to their dogs, which were low in morning salivary cortisol. In general, dogs of owners who considered them as being “social partners” and “meaningful companions” showed low morning salivary cortisol values. We conclude that the main individual and dyadic factors for stress coping in owner–dog dyads are owner personality, relationship with the dog, and attachment to the dog, and that relationship had generally a greater effect on dog cortisol levels than our experimental tasks.