ArticlePDF Available

HOW TO END HOLY WAR: Negotiations and Peace Treaties between Muslims and Crusaders in the Latin East

Authors:
Yvonne Friedman at Bar Ilan University
Yvonne Friedman
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

Crusaders and Muslims each applied to their conflict in the Latin East a doctrine of holy war. Although so ideological a stance toward each other would seem to preclude peacemaking efforts, some 120 treaties were signed between parties to the conflict during the two-century Latin presence in the Holy Land (1097–1291). Explored here is how each party overcame this incongruity between ideology and praxis and sought a “small peace,” which is temporary and practical, rather than “great peace,” which is a final settlement. Features of these peacemaking efforts examined here include the temporal nature of the treaties, the need for a pretext for making peace, gestural language and public ceremonies, gift giving, meal sharing, and oath taking that demonstrate familiarity with one’s opponent’s beliefs. Also considered is the interplay between state and nonstate entities in peacemaking endeavors and how it reflected the balance of power in the medieval Latin arena. The article concludes with a brief consideration of the shifting historical circumstances that ended medieval peacemaking in the East.
Content uploaded by Yvonne Friedman
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Yvonne Friedman on Jul 05, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Common Knowledge
COLUMNS
Part of the Problem
Caroline Walker Bynum
1
Inseparable from Your Own Life
Ana Almeida
5
This Is How I Want You to
Remember Me
Wayne Andersen
9
SYMPOSIUM
Peace by Other Means:
Symposium on the Role of
Ethnography and the Humanities in
the Understanding, Prevention, and
Resolution of Enmity
Part 2
Introduction: Greco- Latin Findings
Jeffrey M. Perl
10
Slaves, Stories, and Cults: Conict
Resolution between Masters and
Slaves in Ancient Greece
Sara Forsdyke
19
Livy and Corneille: Conict and
Resolution in the Story of the Horatii
Colin Davis
44
Thumos, War, and Peace
Richard Ned Lebow
50
How to End Holy War: Negotiations
and Peace Treaties between Muslims
and Crusaders in the Latin East
Yvonne Friedman
83
lITTle ReVIewS
Michael P. Kramer
Gerard Wiegers
Lee Palmer Wandel
Patrick Wilcken
John Boardman
Rebecca Bushnell
Linda Safran
David Bellos
Kathy Eden
Richard Jenkyns
Orest Ranum
Santiago Zabala
Matthew Mutter
David Konstan
Colin Richmond
Jeffrey F. Hamburger
Sarah Spence
Mi g uel Ta m en
Rudy Ising
Oren Harman
The Editors
104
Common Knowledge
Volume 21 | Issue 1
January 2015
POETRY AND FICTION
“The Night All Mankind Grew Old”
and Three Other Tanka Sequences
Tatsuhiko Ishii
Translated by Hiroaki Sato
126
Moles
Eric Chevillard
Translated by Alyson Waters
137
ARTICLE
Can There Be Common Knowledge
without a Common Language?
German Picht versus English Duty
Anna Wierzbicka
141
noTeS on ConTRIBUToRS 172
... 3 Second, peaceful exchange between Muslims and Christians had to be explicitly explained and justified within the crusader ethos, while warfare did not. 4 This paper seeks to build on Friedman's work and examine the process by which crusaders reconciled their religious ideology with diplomacy. Thomas Asbridge's 2013 article in the Journal of Medieval Studies explores the role of negotiation between Richard I and Saladin. ...
View
Peacemaking and holy war: Christian–Muslim diplomacy, c. 1095–1291, in crusades historiography
Article
  • Jan 2020
The Christian holy wars known as the crusades are amongst the most well‐known events of the Middle Ages and continue to influence perceptions of Christian–Muslim relations to the present day. Less often acknowledged is the fact that treaties and negotiations across religious boundaries were a continuous feature throughout the crusading era. This article provides an outline of Christian–Muslim peacemaking during the crusades to the East, as well as an introduction to how inter‐religious diplomacy has been interpreted in crusades historiography. It then considers the broader implications of peacemaking for the study of the crusades and recommends potential areas for further research.
View
Suspicions of peace in medieval christian discourse
Article
  • May 2015
Oppositional constructions of peace and war and simplistic equations of peace with justice obscure the importance of activities primarily geared toward the limitation of harm. The medieval and patristic legacy of thinking with peace restricts peace to variants of a singular concept that dictates the diplomatic and domestic policy of modern states. At the same time, secular political theory has moved away from medieval clerical acknowledgment of compatibilities between turbulence and peace, producing temporally bounded categories of peace and war that facilitate damage or at best allow harm to endure. In this discourse, social disruption must act as signifier for more general (structural and systemic) violence—but then is repressed on exactly the same terms, making it difficult to arrive at solutions for conflict on the ground without renouncing calls for justice and equity in the long term.
View
Peace and war in nonstate societies: An anatomy of the literature in anthropology and political science
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2014
This monograph-length contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium “Peace by Other Means” reviews and assesses the state of ethnographic and political scholarship concerning how nonstate, tribal societies deal with peacemaking and peacekeeping. A central argument is that the condition among nonstate societies was and is neither one of permanent war nor one of permanent peace but one of permanent peacelessness . Nonstate societies recognize the danger of warfare and take measures to reduce its likelihood, or at least try to mitigate its destructiveness. This article treats the politics, strategies, and practices of peacemaking in tribal societies throughout the world, as well as the full spectrum of attempts at war mitigation.
View
War, Peace and the Christian Order
Chapter
  • Oct 2004
In the eleventh and twelfth centuries, ‘Latin’ Europe went through a period of growing social differentiation, in which the function of each class became more clearly defined. The king was seen as the holder of an office, the discharge of which must answer to a basically Christian ordering of affairs. The warrior class emerged as a group whose position in society was determined by their ability and duty to bear arms, which gave them a claim to nobility. Differentials in the religious life emerged with the monastic reforms originating in Cluny and the development of new religious orders: Cistercians, Premonstratensians and canons. Religion also became more strongly centred on the Roman church and the pope. The interaction of these processes of transformation, within aristocratic and chivalric society on the one hand and the church on the other, gave rise to a new phenomenon in medieval history: the crusades. What was new was not so much the adoption of war to a religious context as the fact that the pope was summoning the whole of western Christendom to war: to a certain extent, western Christendom constituted itself as such by going jointly to war. No longer was individual withdrawal from the world into the cloister the sole representation of the ideal Christian life. Rather did war, a worldly activity, and the Christian life come together in a previously unknown relationship, no longer opposed one to the other. Fighting, which had previously been a way for the individual to rise above the mass of the population, shook free of this orientation and became part of a greater whole. © Cambridge University Press 2004 and Cambridge University Press, 2008.
View
Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice
Article
  • Jul 2008
What is jihad? Does it mean violence, as many non-Muslims assume? Or does it mean peace, as some Muslims insist? Because jihad is closely associated with the early spread of Islam, today's debate about the origin and meaning of jihad is nothing less than a struggle over Islam itself. In Jihad in Islamic History, Michael Bonner provides the first study in English that focuses on the early history of jihad, shedding much-needed light on the most recent controversies over jihad. To some, jihad is the essence of radical Islamist ideology, a synonym for terrorism, and even proof of Islam's innate violence. To others, jihad means a peaceful, individual, and internal spiritual striving. Bonner, however, shows that those who argue that jihad means only violence or only peace are both wrong. Jihad is a complex set of doctrines and practices that have changed over time and continue to evolve today. The Quran's messages about fighting and jihad are inseparable from its requirements of generosity and care for the poor. Jihad has often been a constructive and creative force, the key to building new Islamic societies and states. Jihad has regulated relations between Muslims and non-Muslims, in peace as well as in war. And while today's "jihadists" are in some ways following the "classical" jihad tradition, they have in other ways completely broken with it. Written for general readers who want to understand jihad and its controversies, Jihad in Islamic History will also interest specialists because of its original arguments.
View
Talking to the enemy: the role and purpose of negotiations between Saladin and Richard the Lionheart during the Third Crusade
Article
  • Sep 2013
This article considers the role and purpose of the diplomatic interactions between Saladin and Richard the Lionheart during the Third Crusade. It argues that in 1191–2, both leaders variously employed diplomatic contact to garner military and political intelligence, to gain insight into the temperament and mindset of their adversary, and to purposefully wrong-foot the enemy. It suggests that in the course of this crusade Richard I demonstrated a far greater capacity for subtlety and manipulation than has previously been recognised, exhibiting diplomatic skills that equalled, and perhaps even eclipsed, those of his rival Saladin. The use of negotiation to achieve actual conflict resolution is considered and it is argued that neither protagonist pursued peace for its own sake. These findings are contextualised within the wider framework of Latin–Muslim negotiations during the crusading era, and the broader relationship between Islam and the West during the Middle Ages.
View
View