ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Significance California ranks first in the United States in population, economic activity, and agricultural value. The state is currently experiencing a record-setting drought, which has led to acute water shortages, groundwater overdraft, critically low streamflow, and enhanced wildfire risk. Our analyses show that California has historically been more likely to experience drought if precipitation deficits co-occur with warm conditions and that such confluences have increased in recent decades, leading to increases in the fraction of low-precipitation years that yield drought. In addition, we find that human emissions have increased the probability that low-precipitation years are also warm, suggesting that anthropogenic warming is increasing the probability of the co-occurring warm–dry conditions that have created the current California drought.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk
in California
Noah S. Diffenbaugh
, Daniel L. Swain
, and Danielle Touma
Department of Environmental Earth System Science and
Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Edited by Jane Lubchenco, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, and approved January 30, 2015 (received for review November 22, 2014)
California is currently in the midst of a record-setting drought. The
drought began in 2012 and now includes the lowest calendar-year
and 12-mo precipitation, the highest annual temperature, and the
most extreme drought indicators on record. The extremely warm
and dry conditions have led to acute water shortages, ground-
water overdraft, critically low streamflow, and enhanced wildfire
risk. Analyzing historical climate observations from California, we
find that precipitation deficits in California were more than twice
as likely to yield drought years if they occurred when conditions
were warm. We find that although there has not been a sub-
stantial change in the probability of either negative or moderately
negative precipitation anomalies in recent decades, the occur-
rence of drought years has been greater in the past two decades
than in the preceding century. In addition, the probability that
precipitation deficits co-occur with warm conditions and the
probability that precipitation deficits produce drought have both
increased. Climate model experiments with and without anthro-
pogenic forcings reveal that human activities have increased the
probability that dry precipitation years are also warm. Further, a
large ensemble of climate model realizations reveals that addi-
tional global warming over the next few decades is very likely to
create 100% probability that any annual-scale dry period is also
extremely warm. We therefore conclude that anthropogenic warm-
ing is increasing the probability of co-occurring warmdry condi-
tions like those that have created the acute human and ecosystem
impacts associated with the exceptional20122014 drought
in California.
climate extremes
climate change detection
event attribution
The state of California is the largest contributor to the eco-
nomic and agricultural activity of the United States, account-
ing for a greater share of population (12%) (1), gross domestic
product (12%) (2), and cash farm receipts (11%) (3) than any
other state. California also includes a diverse array of marine and
terrestrial ecosystems that span a wide range of climatic toler-
ances and together encompass a global biodiversity hotspot(4).
These human and natural systems face a complex web of com-
peting demands for freshwater (5). The states agricultural sector
accounts for 77% of California water use (5), and hydroelectric
power provides more than 9% of the states electricity (6). Be-
cause the majority of Californias precipitation occurs far from its
urban centers and primary agricultural zones, California main-
tains a vast and complex water management, storage, and distri-
bution/conveyance infrastructure that has been the focus of nearly
constant legislative, legal, and political battles (5). As a result,
many riverine ecosystems depend on mandated environmental
flowsreleased by upstream dams, which become a point of con-
tention during critically dry periods (5).
California is currently in the midst of a multiyear drought (7).
The event encompasses the lowest calendar-year and 12-mo
precipitation on record (8), and almost every month between
December 2011 and September 2014 exhibited multiple indica-
tors of drought (Fig. S1). The proximal cause of the precipitation
deficits was the recurring poleward deflection of the cool-season
storm track by a region of persistently high atmospheric pressure,
which steered Pacific storms away from California over consec-
utive seasons (811). Although the extremely persistent high
pressure is at least a century-scale occurrence (8), anthropogenic
global warming has very likely increased the probability of such
conditions (8, 9).
Despite insights into the causes and historical context of pre-
cipitation deficits (811), the influence of historical temperature
changes on the probability of individual droughts hasuntil re-
centlyreceived less attention (1214). Although precipitation
deficits are a prerequisite for the moisture deficits that constitute
drought(by any definition) (15), elevated temperatures can
greatly amplify evaporative demand, thereby increasing overall
drought intensity and impact (16, 17). Temperature is especially
important in California, where water storage and distribution
systems are critically dependent on winter/spring snowpack, and
excess demand is typically met by groundwater withdrawal (18
20). The impacts of runoff and soil moisture deficits associated
with warm temperatures can be acute, including enhanced wildfire
risk (21), land subsidence from excessive groundwater withdrawals
(22), decreased hydropower production (23), and damage to
habitat of vulnerable riparian species (24).
Recent work suggests that the aggregate combination of ex-
tremely high temperatures and very low precipitation during the
20122014 event is the most severe in over a millennium (12).
Given the known influence of temperature on drought, the fact
that the 20122014 record drought severity has co-occurred with
record statewide warmth (7) raises the question of whether long-
term warming has altered the probability that precipitation deficits
yield extreme drought in California.
California ranks first in the United States in population, eco-
nomic activity, and agricultural value. The state is currently
experiencing a record-setting drought, which has led to acute
water shortages, groundwater overdraft, critically low stream-
flow, and enhanced wildfire risk. Our analyses show that Cal-
ifornia has historically been more likely to experience drought if
precipitation deficits co-occur with warm conditions and that
such confluences have increased in recent decades, leading to
increases in the fraction of low-precipitation years that yield
drought. In addition, we find that human emissions have in-
creased the probability that low-precipitation years are also
warm, suggesting that anthropogenic warming is increasing the
probability of the co-occurring warmdry conditions that have
created the current California drought.
Author contributions : N.S.D., D.L.S., and D.T. de signed research, perf ormed research,
contributed new reagents/analytic tools, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
See Commentary on page 3858.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email:
This article contains supporting information online at
1073/pnas.1422385112/-/DCSupplemental. PNAS
March 31, 2015
vol. 112
no. 13
We analyze the Palmerdrought metrics available from the US
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) (25). The NCDC
Palmer metrics are based on the Palmer Drought Severity Index
(PDSI), which uses monthly precipitation and temperature to
calculate moisture balance using a simple supply-and-demand
model (26) (Materials and Methods). We focus on the Palmer
Modified Drought Index (PMDI), which moderates transitions
between wet and dry periods (compared with the PDSI) (27).
However, we note that the long-term time series of the PMDI is
similar to that of other Palmer drought indicators, particularly at
the annual scale (Figs. S1 and S2).
Because multiple drought indicators reached historic lows in
July 2014 (Figs. S1S3), we initially focus on statewide PMDI,
temperature, and precipitation averaged over the AugustJuly
12-mo period. We find that years with a negative PMDI anomaly
exceeding 1.0 SDs (hereafter 1-SD drought) have occurred
approximately twice as often in the past two decades as in the
preceding century (six events in 19952014 =30% of years; 14
events in 18961994 =14% of years) (Fig. 1Aand Fig. S4). This
increase in the occurrence of 1-SD drought years has taken place
without a substantial change in the probability of negative pre-
cipitation anomalies (53% in 18962014 and 55% in 19952014)
(Figs. 1Band 2 Aand B). Rather, the observed doubling of the
occurrence of 1-SD drought years has coincided with a doubling
of the frequency with which a negative precipitation year pro-
duces a 1-SD drought, with 55% of negative precipitation years
in 19952014 co-occurring with a 1.0 SD PMDI anomaly, com-
pared with 27% in 18961994 (Fig. 1 Aand B).
Most 1-SD drought years have occurred when conditions were
both dry (precipitation anomaly <0) and warm (temperature
anomaly >0), including 15 of 20 1-SD drought years during
18962014 (Fig. 2Aand Fig. S4) and 6 of 6 during 19952014
(Fig. 2Band Fig. S4). Similarly, negative precipitation anomalies
are much more likely to produce 1-SD drought if they co-occur
with a positive temperature anomaly. For example, of the 63
negative precipitation years during 18962014, 15 of the 32
warmdry years (47%) produced 1-SD drought, compared with
only 5 of the 31 cooldry years (16%) (Fig. 2A). (During 18961994,
41% of warmdry years produced 1-SD droughts, compared with
17% of cooldry years.) The probability that a negative precipita-
tion anomaly co-occurs with a positive temperature anomaly has
increased recently, with warmdry years occurring more than twice
as often in the past two decades (91%)asintheprecedingcentury
(42%) (Fig. 1B).
All 20 AugustJuly 12-mo periods that exhibited a 1.0 SD
PMDI anomaly also exhibited a 0.5 SD precipitation anomaly
(Fig. 1Band 2E), suggesting that moderately low precipitation is
prerequisite for a 1-SD drought year. However, the occurrence of
0.5 SD precipitation anomalies has not increased in recent years
(40% in 18962014 and 40% in 19952014) (Fig. 2 Aand B).
Rather, these moderate precipitation deficits have been far more
likely to produce 1-SD drought when they occur in a warm year.
For example, during 18962014, 1-SD drought occurred in 15 of
the 28 years (54%) that exhibited both a 0.5 SD precipitation
anomaly and a positive temperature anomaly, but in only 5 of the
20 years (25%) that exhibited a 0.5 SD precipitation anomaly and
a negative temperature anomaly (Fig. 2A). During 19952014, 6 of
the 8 moderately dry years produced 1-SD drought (Fig. 1A), with
all 6 occurring in years in which the precipitation anomaly exceeded
0.5 SD and the temperature anomaly exceeded 0.5 SD (Fig. 1C).
Taken together, the observed record from California suggests
that (i) precipitation deficits are more likely to yield 1-SD PMDI
droughts if they occur when conditions are warm and (ii ) the oc-
currence of 1-SD PMDI droughts, the probability of precipitation
deficits producing 1-SD PMDI droughts, and the probability of
precipitation deficits co-occurring with warm conditions have all
been greater in the past two decades than in the preceding century.
These increases in drought risk have occurred despite a lack of
substantial change in the occurrence of low or moderately low
precipitation years (Figs. 1Band 2 Aand B). In contrast, state-
wide warming (Fig. 1C) has led to a substantial increase in warm
conditions, with 80% of years in 19952014 exhibiting a positive
temperature anomaly (Fig. 2B), compared with 45% of years in
18962014 (Fig. 2A). As a result, whereas 58% of moderately dry
years were warm during 18962014 (Fig. 2A) and 50% were
warm during 18961994, 100% of the 8 moderately dry years in
19952014 co-occurred with a positive temperature anomaly (Fig.
2B). The observed statewide warming (Fig. 1C) has therefore
substantially increased the probability that when moderate pre-
cipitation deficits occur, they occur during warm years.
The recent statewide warming clearly occurs in climate model
simulations that include both natural and human forcings
(Historicalexperiment), but not in simulations that include
only natural forcings (Naturalexperiment) (Fig. 3B). In par-
ticular, the Historical and Natural temperatures are found to be
different at the 0.001 significance level during the most recent
20-, 30-, and 40-y periods of the historical simulations (using the
block bootstrap resampling applied in ref. 28). In contrast, although
the Historical experiment exhibits a slightly higher mean annual
precipitation (0.023 significance level), there is no statistically
Fig. 1. Historical time series of drought (A), precipitation (B), and temperature (C) in California. Values are calculated for the AugustJuly 12-mo mean in
each year of the observed record, beginning in August 1895. In each year, the standardized anomaly is expressed as the magnitude of the anomaly from the
long-term annual mean, divided by the SD of the detrended historical annual anomaly time series. The PMDI is used as the primary drought indicator, al-
though the other Palmer indicators exhibit similar historical time series (Figs. S1 and S2). Circles show the years in which the PMDI exhibited a negative
anomaly exceeding 1.0 SDs, which are referred to as 1-SD drought years in the text.
| Diffenbaugh et al.
significant difference in probability of a 0.5 SD precipitation
anomaly (Fig. 3 Aand C). However, the Historical experiment
exhibits greater probability of a 0.5 SD precipitation anomaly
co-occurring with a positive temperature anomaly (0.001 signifi-
cance level) (Fig. 3D), suggesting that human forcing has caused
the observed increase in probability that moderately dry pre-
cipitation years are also warm.
The fact that the occurrence of warm and moderately dry years
approaches that of moderately dry years in the last decades of
the Historical experiment (Fig. 3 Band C) and that 91% of
negative precipitation years in 19952014 co-occurred with warm
anomalies (Fig. 1B) suggests possible emergence of a regime in
which nearly all dry years co-occur with warm conditions. We
assess this possibility using an ensemble of 30 realizations of
a single global climate model [the National Center for Atmo-
spheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model
(CESM1) Large Ensemble experiment (LENS)] (29) (Materials
and Methods). Before 1980, the simulated probability of a warm
dry year is approximately half that of a dry year (Fig. 4B), similar to
observations (Figs. 1Band 2). However, the simulated probability
of a warmdry year becomes equal to that of a dry year by 2030 of
RCP8.5. Likewise, the probabilities of co-occurring 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5
SD warmdry anomalies become approximately equal to those of
0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 SD dry anomalies (respectively) by 2030 (Fig. 4B).
The probability of co-occurring extremely warm and extremely
dry conditions (1.5 SD anomaly) remains greatly elevated
throughout the 21st century (Fig. 4B). In addition, the number
of multiyear periods in which a 0.5 SD precipitation anomaly
co-occurs with a 0.5 SD temperature anomaly more than doubles
between the Historical and RCP8.5 experiments (Fig. 4A). We
find similar results using a 12-mo moving average (Fig. 4C). As
with the AugustJuly 12-mo mean (Fig. 4B), the probability of
a dry year is approximately twice the probability of a warmdry
year for all 12-mo periods before 1980 (Fig. 4C). However, the
occurrence of warm years (including +1.5 SD temperature
anomalies) increases after 1980, reaching 1.0 by 2030. This
increase implies a transition to a permanent condition of 100%
risk that any negativeor extremely negative12-mo precipitation
anomaly is also extremely warm.
The overall occurrence of dry years declines after 2040 (Fig.
4C). However, the occurrence of extreme 12-mo precipitation
deficits (1.5 SD) is greater in 20062080 than in 19202005
(<0.03 significance level). This detectable increase in extremely
low-precipitation years adds to the effect of rising temperatures
and contributes to the increasing occurrence of extremely warm
dry 12-mo periods during the 21st century.
All four 3-mo seasons likewise show higher probability of
co-occurring 1.5 SD warmdry anomalies after 1980, with the
probability of an extremely warmdry season equaling that of an
extremely dry season by 2030 for spring, summer, and autumn,
and by 2060 for winter (Fig. 4D). In addition, the probability of
a1.5 SD precipitation anomaly increases in spring (P<0.001)
and autumn (P=0.01) in 20062080 relative to 19202005, with
spring occurrence increasing by 75% and autumn occurrence
increasing by 44%which represents a substantial and statis-
tically significant increase in the risk of extremely low-precipitation
events at both margins of Californias wet season. In contrast, there
is no statistically significant difference in the probability of a 1.5
SD precipitation anomaly for winter.
A recent report by Seager et al. (30) found no significant long-
term trend in cool-season precipitation in California during the
20th and early 21st centuries, which is consistent with our
anomaly (s.d.)
1896-2014 PMDI
precipitation anomaly (s.d.)
temperature anomaly (s.d.)
August-July 12-month Mean
1995-2014 PMDI
precipitation anomaly (s.d.)
-4 -2 0 2 4 -4 -2 0 2 4
% of p < 0 that produce PMDI < -1
% of p < -0.5 that produce PMDI < -1
% of years that have p < -0.5
% of years that fall in quadrant
40% 40%
% of p < -0.5 years that fall in quadrant
% of PMDI < -1.0 that fall in quadrant
Fig. 2. Historical occurrence of drought, precipitation, and temperature in
California. Standardized anomalies are shown for each AugustJuly 12-mo
period in the historical record (calculated as in Fig. 1). Anomalies are shown
for the full historical record (A) and for the most recent two decades (B). Per-
centage values show the percentage of years meeting different precipitation
and drought criteria that fall in each quadrant of the temperatureprecipitation
space. The respective criteria are identified by different colors of text.
Historical Natural
Historical Natural
August-July 12-month Mean
1880 1920 1960 2000
temperature anomaly (s.d.)
1880 1920 1960 2000
precipitation anomaly (s.d.)
prob. pre. < -0.5 and temp. > 0
1880 1920 1960 2000
prob. precipitation anom. < -0.5
1880 1920 1960 2000
1986-2005: p = 0.001
1976-2005: p = 0.001
1966-2005: p = 0.069
1986-2005: p = 0.023
1976-2005: p = 0.108
1966-2005: p = 0.073
1986-2005: p < 0.001
1976-2005: p < 0.001
1966-2005: p = 0.001
1986-2005: p = 0.885
1976-2005: p = 0.887
1966-2005: p = 0.167
Fig. 3. Influence of anthropogenic forcing on the probability of warmdry
years in California. Temperature and precipitation values are calculated for
the AugustJuly 12-mo mean in each year of the CMIP5 Historical and Nat-
ural forcing experiments (Materials and Methods). The Top panels (Aand B)
showthetimeseriesofensemblemean standardized temperature and pre-
cipitation anomalies. The Bottom panels (Cand D) show the unconditional
probability (across the ensemble) that the annual precipitation anomaly is less
than 0.5 SDs, and the conditional probability that both the annual precipitation
anomaly is less than 0.5 SDs and the temperature anomaly is greater than 0. The
bold curves show the 20-y running mean of each annual time series. The CMIP5
Historical and Natural forcing experiments were run until the year 2005. Pvalues
are shown for the difference between the Historical and Natural experiments for
the most recent 20-y (19862005; gray band), 30-y (19762005), and 40-y (1966
2005) periods of the CMIP5 protocol. Pvalues are calculated using the block
bootstrap resampling approach of ref. 28 (Materials and Methods).
Diffenbaugh et al. PNAS
March 31, 2015
vol. 112
no. 13
findings. Further, under a scenario of strongly elevated green-
house forcing, Neelin et al. (31) found a modest increase in Cal-
ifornia mean DecemberJanuaryFebruary (DJF) precipitation
associated with a local eastward extension of the mean subtropical
jet stream west of California. However, considerable evidence (8
11, 3133) simultaneously suggests that the response of north-
eastern Pacific atmospheric circulation to anthropogenic warming
is likely to be complex and spatiotemporally inhomogeneous, and
that changes in the atmospheric mean state may not be reflective
of changes in the risk of extreme events (including atmospheric
configurations conducive to precipitation extremes). Although
there is clearly value in understanding possible changes in pre-
cipitation, our results highlight the fact that efforts to understand
drought without examining the role of temperature miss a critical
contributor to drought risk. Indeed, our results show that even in
the absence of trends in mean precipitationor trends in the
occurrence of extremely low-precipitation eventsthe risk of se-
vere drought in California has already increased due to extremely
warm conditions induced by anthropogenic global warming.
We note that the interplay between the existence of a well-
defined summer dry period and the historical prevalence of a
substantial high-elevation snowpack may create particular sus-
ceptibility to temperature-driven increases in drought duration
and/or intensity in California. In regions where precipitation ex-
hibits a distinct seasonal cycle, recovery from preexisting drought
conditions is unlikely during the characteristic yearly dry spell
(34). Because Californias dry season occurs during the warm
summer months, soil moisture loss through evapotranspiration
(ET) is typically highmeaning that soil moisture deficits that
exist at the beginning of the dry season are exacerbated by the
warm conditions that develop during the dry season, as occurred
during the summers of 2013 and 2014 (7).
Further, Californias seasonal snowpack (which resides almost
entirely in the Sierra Nevada Mountains) provides a critical
source of runoff during the low-precipitation spring and summer
months. Trends toward earlier runoff in the Sierra Nevada have
already been detected in observations (e.g., ref. 35), and con-
tinued global warming is likely to result in earlier snowmelt and
increased rain-to-snow ratios (35, 36). As a result, the peaks in
Californias snowmelt and surface runoff are likely to be more
pronounced and to occur earlier in the calendar year (35, 36),
increasing the duration of the warm-season low-runoff period
(36) and potentially reducing montane surface soil moisture (37).
Although these hydrological changes could potentially increase
soil water availability in previously snow-covered regions during
the cool low-ET season (34), this effect would likely be out-
weighed by the influence of warming temperatures (and de-
creased runoff) during the warm high-ET season (36, 38), as well
as by the increasing occurrence of consecutive years with low
precipitation and high temperature (Fig. 4A).
The increasing risk of consecutive warmdry years (Fig. 4A)
raises the possibility of extended drought periods such as those
found in the paleoclimate record (14, 39, 40). Recent work
suggests that record warmth could have made the current event
the most severe annual-scale drought of the past millennium
(12). However, numerous paleoclimate records also suggest that
the region has experienced multidecadal periods in which most
years were in a drought state (14, 39, 41, 42), albeit less acute
than the current California event (12, 39, 41). Although multi-
decadal ocean variability was a primary cause of the megadroughts
of the last millenium (41), the emergence of a condition in which
there is 100% probability of an extremely warm year (Fig. 4)
substantially increases the risk of prolonged drought conditions in
the region (14, 39, 40).
A number of caveats should be considered. For example, ours
is an implicit approach that analyzes the temperature and pre-
cipitation conditions that have historically occurred with low
PMDI years, but does not explicitly explore the physical pro-
cesses that produce drought. The impact of increasing temper-
atures on the processes governing runoff, baseflow, groundwater,
soil moisture, and land-atmosphere evaporative feedbacks over
both the historical period and in response to further global warming
remains a critical uncertainty (43). Likewise, our analyses of
anthropogenic forcing rely on global climate models that do not
resolve the topographic complexity that strongly influences Cal-
ifornias precipitation and temperature. Further investigation using
high-resolution modeling approaches that better resolve the
boundary conditions and fine-scale physical processes (4446)
and/or using analyses that focus on the underlying large-scale
climate dynamics of individual extreme events (8) could help to
overcome the limitations of simulated precipitation and tem-
perature in the current generation of global climate models.
Our results suggest that anthropogenic warming has increased
the probability of the co-occurring temperature and precipitation
conditions that have historically led to drought in California.
In addition, continued global warming is likely to cause a tran-
sition to a regime in which essentially every seasonal, annual,
and multiannual precipitation deficit co-occurs with historically
warm conditions. The current warmdry event in Californiaas
well as historical observations of previous seasonal, annual, and
multiannual warmdry eventssuggests such a regime would
substantially increase the risk of severe impacts on human and
natural systems. For example, the projected increase in extremely
Precipitation Temp+Precip
1.5 s.d.
0.5 s.d.
0.0 s.d. 1.0 s.d.
Duration of Consecutive Aug-Jul Events
LENS Prob. of Aug-Jul 12-Month Event
1920 1950 1980 2010 2040 2070 2100
24 86
24 86
1920 1950 1980 2010 2040 2070 2100
LENS Prob. of Any 12-Month Event
1.5 s.d.
0 s.d.
1.0 s.d.
Temp Precip
Precipitation < -0.5 s.d. and Temperature > 0.5 s.d.
1920 1950 1980 2010 2040 2070 2100
0.1 1.5 s.d.
Precip Temp+Precip
p <
p < 0.001
p = 0.01
p = 0.36
p < 0.04
1.5 s.d.
1.5 s.d.
1.5 s.d.
Fig. 4. Projected changes in the probability of co-occurring warmdry con-
ditions in the 21st century. (A) Histogram of the frequency of occurrence of
consecutive AugustJuly 12-mo periods in which the 12-mo precipitation
anomaly is less than 0.5 SDs and the 12-mo temperature anomaly is at least
0.5 SDs, in historical observations and the LENS large ensemble experiment.
(B) The probability that a negative 12-mo precipitation anomaly and a pos-
itive 12-mo temperature anomaly equal to or exceeding a given magnitude
occur in the same AugustJuly 12-mo period, for varying severity of anom-
alies. (C) The probability that a negative precipitation anomaly and a posi-
tive temperature anomaly equal to or exceeding a given magnitude occur in
the same 12-mo period, for all possible 12-mo periods (using a 12-mo run-
ning mean; see Materials and Methods), for varying severity of anomalies.
(D) The unconditional probability of a 1.5 SD seasonal precipitation anomaly
(blue curve) and the conditional probability that a 1.5 SD seasonal pre-
cipitation anomaly occurs in conjunction with a 1.5 SD seasonal temperature
anomaly (red curve), for each of the four 3-mo seasons. Time series show
the 20-y running mean of each annual time series. Pvalues are shown for
the difference in occurrence of 1.5 SD precipitation anomalies between the
Historical period (19202005) and the RCP8.5 period (20062080).
| Diffenbaugh et al.
low precipitation and extremely high temperature during spring
and autumn has substantial implications for snowpack water
storage, wildfire risk, and terrestrial ecosystems (47). Likewise,
the projected increase in annual and multiannual warmdry periods
implies increasing risk of the acute water shortages, critical
groundwater overdraft, and species extinction potential that
have been experienced during the 20122014 drought (5, 20).
Californias human population (38.33 million as of 2013) has
increased by nearly 72% since the much-remembered 19761977
drought (1). Gains in urban and agricultural water use efficiency
have offset this rapid increase in the number of water users to the
extent that overall water demand is nearly the same in 2013 as it
was in 1977 (5). As a result, Californias per capita water use has
declined in recent decades, meaning that additional short-term
water conservation in response to acute shortages during drought
conditions has become increasingly challenging. Although a va-
riety of opportunities exist to manage drought risk through long-
term changes in water policy, management, and infrastructure
(5), our results strongly suggest that global warming is already
increasing the probability of conditions that have historically
created high-impact drought in California.
Materials and Methods
We use historical time series of observed California statewide temperature,
precipitation, and drought data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administrations NCDC (7). The data are from the NCDC nClimDivdi-
visional temperatureprecipitationdrought database, available at monthly
time resolution from January 1895 to the present (7, 25). The NCDC nClimDiv
database includes temperature, precipitation, and multiple Palmer drought
indicators, aggregated at statewide and substate climate division levels for
the United States. The available Palmer drought indicators include PDSI,
the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI), and PMDI.
PMDI and PHDI are variants of PDSI (2527, 48, 49). PDSI is an index that
measures the severity of wet and dry anomalies (26). The NCDC nClimDiv PDSI
calculation is reported at the monthly scale, based on monthly temperature
and precipitation (49). Together, the monthly temperature and precipitation
values are used to compute the net moisture balance, based on a simple
supply-and-demand model that uses potential evapotranspiration (PET)
calculated using the Thornthwaite method. Calculated PET values can be
very different when using other methods (e.g., PenmanMonteith), with the
Thornthwaite methods dependence on surface temperature creating the
potential for overestimation of PET (e.g., ref. 43). However, it has been
found that the choice of methods in the calculation of PET does not critically
influence the outcome of historical PDSI estimates in the vicinity of Cal-
ifornia (15, 43, 50). In contrast, the sensitivity of the PET calculation to large
increases in temperature could make the PDSI inappropriate for calculating
the response of drought to high levels of greenhouse forcing (15). As a re-
sult, we analyze the NCDC Palmer indicators in conjunction with observed
temperature and precipitation data for the historical period, but we do not
calculate the Palmer indicators for the future (for future projections of the
PDSI, refer to refs. 15 and 40).
Because the PDSI is based on recent temperature and precipitation con-
ditions (and does not include human demand for water), it is considered an
indicator of meterologicaldrought (25). The PDSI calculates wet,”“dry,
and transitionindices, using the wet or dry index when the probability is
100% and the transition index when the probability is less than 100% (26).
Because the PMDI always calculates a probability-weighted average of the
wet and dry indices (27), the PDSI and PMDI will give equal values in periods
that are clearly wet or dry, but the PMDI will yield smoother transitions
between wet and dry periods (25). In this work, we use the PMDI as our
primary drought indicator, although we note that the long-term time series
of the PMDI is similar to that of the PDSI and PHDI, particularly at the annual
scale considered here (Figs. S1 and S2).
We analyze global climate model simulations from phase 5 of the Coupled
Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) (51). We compare two of the CMIP5
multimodel historical experiments (which were run through 2005): (i)the
Historical experiment, in which the climate models are prescribed both an-
thropogenic and nonanthropogenic historical climate forcings, and (ii )the
Natural experiment, in which the climate models are prescribed only the
nonanthropogenic historical climate forcings. We analyze those realizations
for which both temperature and precipitation were available from both
experiments at the time of data acquisition. We calculate the temperature
and precipitation values over the state of California at each models native
resolution using all grid points that overlap with the geographical borders of
California, as defined by a high-resolution shapefile (vector digital data
obtained from the US Geological Survey via the National Weather Service at
We also analyze NCARs large ensemble (LENS) climate model exper-
iment (29). The LENS experiment includes 30 realizations of the NCAR
CESM1. This large single-model experiment enables quantification of the
uncertainty arising from internal cl imate system variability. Although the
calculation of this irreducibleuncertainty likely varies between climate
models, it exists independent of uncertainty arising from model structure,
model parameter values, and climate forcing pathway. At the time of ac-
quisition, LENS results were available for 19202005intheHistoricalex-
periment and 20062080 in the RCP8.5 (Representative Concentration
Pathway) experiment. The four RCPs are mostly indistinguishable over
the first half of the 21st century (52). RCP8.5 has the highest forcing in the
second half of the 21st century and reaches 4 °C of global warming by th e
year 2100 (52).
Given that the ongoing California drought encompasses the most extreme
12-mo precipitation deficit on record (8) and that both temperature and
many drought indicators reached their most extreme historical values for
California in July 2014 (7) (Fig. 1 and Figs. S1 and S2), we use the 12-mo
AugustJuly period as one period of analysis. However, because severe
conditions can manifest at both multiannual and subannual timescales, we
also analyze the probability of occurrence of co-occurring warm and dry
conditions for multiannual periods, for all possible 12-mo periods, and for
the winter (DJF), spring (MarchAprilMay), summer (JuneJulyAugust),
and autumn (SeptemberOctoberNovember) seasons.
We use the monthly-mean time series from NCDC to calculate observed
time series of statewide 12-movalues of temperature, precipitation, and PMDI.
Likewise, we use the monthly-mean time series from CMIP5 and LENS to
calculate simulated time series of statewide 12-mo and seasonal values of
temperature and precipitation. From the time series of annual-mean values for
each observed or simulated realization, we calculate (i) the baseline mean
value over the length of the record, (ii) the annual anomaly from the baseline
mean value, (iii) the SD of the detrended baseline annual anomaly time se-
ries, and (iv) the ratio of each individual annual anomaly value to the SD of
the detrended baseline annual anomaly time series. (For the 21st-century
simulations, we use the Historical simulation as the baseline.) Our time series
of standardized values are thereby derived from the time series of 12-mo
annual (or 3-mo seasonal) mean anomaly values that occur in each year.
For the multiannual analysis, we calculate consecutive occurrences of
AugustJuly 12-mo values. For the analysis of all possible 12-mo periods, we
generate the annual time series of each 12-mo period (JanuaryDecember,
FebruaryJanuary, etc.) using a 12-mo running mean. For the seasonal analysis,
we generate the time series by calculating the mean of the respective 3-mo
season in each year.
We quantify the statistical significance of differences in the populations of
different time periods using the block bootstrap resampling approach of ref.
28. For the CMIP5 Historical and Natural ensembles, we compare the pop-
ulations of the AugustJuly values in the two experiments for the 1986
2005, 19762005, and 19662005 periods. For the LENS seasonal analysis, we
compare the respective populations of DJF, MarchAprilMay, JuneJuly
August, and SeptemberOctoberNovember values in the 19202005 and
20062080 periods. For the LENS 12-mo analysis, we compare the pop-
ulations of 12-mo values in the 19202005 and 20062080 periods, testing
block lengths up to 16 to account for temporal autocorrelation out to 16 mo
for the 12-mo running mean data. (Autocorrelations beyond 16 mo are found
to be negligible.)
Throughout the text, we consider drought to be those years in which
negative 12-mo PMDI anomalies exceed 1.0 SDs of the historical interannual
PMDI variability. We stress that this value is indicative of the variability of
the annual (12-mo) PMDI, rather than of the monthly values (compare Fig. 1
and Figs. S1 and S2). We consider moderatetemperature and precipitation
anomalies to be those that exceed 0.5 SDs (0.5 SD)andextremetemper-
ature and precipitation anomalies to be those that exceed 1.5 SDs (1.5 SD).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers
for insightful comments; Deepti Singh for assistance with the block bootstrap
resampling; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationsNCDCfor
access to the historical temperature, precipitation, and drought data; the
World Climate Research Program and Department of EnergysProgramfor
Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison for access to the CMIP5 simu-
lations; and NCAR for access to the LENS simulations. Our work was supported
by National Science Foundation Award 0955283 and National Institutes of
Health Award 1 R01AI090159-01.
Diffenbaugh et al. PNAS
March 31, 2015
vol. 112
no. 13
1. US Census Bureau (2014) State and County QuickFacts. Available at quickfacts.census.
2. US Bureau of Economic Analysis (2014) Bureau of Economic Analysis Interactive Data.
Available at
3. US Department of Agriculture (2013) CALIFORNIA Agricultural Statistics 2012
Crop Year. Available at
California _Ag_Statisti cs/Reports /2012cas-a ll.pdf.
4. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity
hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772):853858.
5. Hanak E, et al. (2011) Managing Californias Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation
(Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco).
6. California Energy Commission (2014) California Energy Almanac. Available at www.
7. US National Climate Data Center (2014) National Climate Data Center NNDC Climate
Data Online. Available at
8. Swain DL, et al. (2014) The extraordinary California drought of 2013-2014: Character,
context, and the role of climate change. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(7):S3S7.
9. Wang S, Hipps L, Gillies RR, Yoon J (2014) Probable causes of the abnormal ridge
accompanying the 20132014 California drought: ENSO precursor and anthropogenic
warming footprint. Geophys Res Lett 41(9):32203226.
10. Wang H, Schubert S (2014) Causes of the extreme dry conditions over California
during early 2013. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(7):S7S11.
11. Funk C, Hoell A, Stone D (2014) Examining the contribution of the observed global
warming trend to the California droughts of 2012/13 and 2013/2014. Bull Am Me-
teorol Soc 95(7):S11S15.
12. Griffin D, Anchukaitis KJ (2014) How unusual is the 2012-2014 California drought?
Geophys Res Lett 41(24):90179023.
13. AghaKouchak A, Cheng L, Mazdiyasni O, Farahmand A (2014) Global warming and
changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California
drought. Geophys Res Lett 41(24):88478852.
14. Overpeck JT (2013) Climate science: The challenge of hot drought. Nature 503(7476):
15. Dai A (2010) Drought under global warming: A review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim
Chang 2(1):4565.
16. Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models.
Nat Clim Chang 3(1):5258.
17. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index
for 1870-2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming.
J Hydrometeorol 5(6):11171130.
18. Famiglietti JS, et al. (2011) Satellites measure recent rates of groundwater depletion
in Californias Central Valley. Geophys Res Lett 38(3):L03403.
19. Borsa AA, Agnew DC, Cayan DR (2014) Remote hydrology. Ongoing drought-induced
uplift in the western United States. Science 345(6204):15871590.
20. Christian-Smith J, Levy M, Gleick P (2014) Maladaptation to drought: A case report
from California. Sustain Sci, 10.1007/s11625-014-0269-1.
21. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier
spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 313(5789):940943.
22. King NE, e t al. (2007) Space geodetic observation of expansionoftheSanGabrielValley,
California, aquifer system, during heavy rainfall in winter 20042005. J Geophys Res Solid
Earth 112(3):B03409.
23. US Energy Information Administration (2014) California drought leads to less hy-
dropower, increased natural gas generation. Today in Energy. Available at www.eia.
24. Palmer MA, et al. (2009) Climate change and river ecosystems: Protection and ad-
aptation options. Environ Manage 44(6):10531068.
25. US National Climate Data Center (2014) nClimDiv STATEWIDE-REGIONAL-NATIONAL
DROUGHT. Available at
26. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological Drought (US Department of Commerce, Weather
Bureau, Washington, DC).
27. Heddinghaus TR, Sabol P (1991) in Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Applied
Climatology (American Meteorological Society, Boston).
28. Singh D, Tsiang M, Rajaratnam B, Diffenbaugh NS (2014) Observed changes in ex-
treme wet and dry spells during the South Asian summer monsoon season. Nat Clim
Chang 4(6):456461.
29. Kay JE, et al. (2015) The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble
project: A community resource for studying climate change in the presence of in-
ternal climate variability. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00255.1.
30. Seager R, et al. (2014) Causes and Predictability of the 2011-14 California Drought.
Available at
31. Neelin JD, Langenbrunner B, Meyerson JE, Hall A, Berg N (2013) California winter
precipitation change under global warming in the Coupled Model Intercomparison
Project Phase 5 Ensemble. J Clim 26(17):62386256.
32. Seager R, et al. (2014) Dynamical and thermodynamical causes of large-scale changes
in the hydrological cycle over North America in response to global warming. J Clim
33. Simpson IR, Shaw TA , Seager R (2014) A diagnosis of the seasonally an d longitudi-
nally varying midl atitude circulatio n response to global war ming. J Atmos Sci 71 (7):
34. Van Loon AF, et al. (2014) How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and
deficit. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(8):46404656.
35. Rauscher SA, Pal JS, Diffenbaugh NS, Benedetti MM (2008) Future changes in snow-
melt-driven runoff timing over the western US. Geophys Res Lett 35(16):L16703.
36. Ashfaq M, et al. (2013) Near-term acceleration of hydroclimatic change in the western
U.S. J Geophys Res 118(10):10,67610,693.
37. Blankinship JC, Meadows MW, Lucas RG, Hart SC (2014) Snowmelt timing alters shallow
but not deep soil moisture in the Sierra Nevada. Water Resour Res 50(2):14481456.
38. Diffenbaugh NS, Ashfaq M (2010) Intensification of hot extremes in the United States.
Geophys Res Lett 37(15):L15701.
39. Ault TR, Cole JE, Overpeck JT, Pederson GT, Meko DM (2014) Assessing the risk of
persistent drought using climate model simulations and paleoclimate data. J Clim
40. Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE (2015) Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the
American Southwest and Central Plains. Science Advances 1(1):e1400082.
41. Cook BI, Smerdon JE, Seager R, Cook ER (2013) Pan-continental droughts in North
America over the last millennium. J Clim 27(1):383397.
42. Cook BI, Seager R, Smerdon JE (2014) The worst North American drought year of the
last millennium: 1934. Geophys Res Lett 41(20):72987305.
43. Sheffield J, Wood EF, Roderick ML (2012) Little change in global drought over the
past 60 years. Nature 491(7424):435438.
44. Diffenbaugh NS, Pal JS, Trapp RJ, Giorgi F (2005) Fine-scale processes regulate the
response of extreme events to global climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(44):
45. Diffenbaugh NS, Ashfaq M, Scherer M (2011) Transient regional climate change:
Analysis of the summer climate response in a high-resolution, century-scale, ensemble
experiment over the continental United States. J Geophys Res 116(D24):D24111.
46. Lebassi-Habtezion B, Diffenbaugh NS (2013) Nonhydrostatic nested climate modeling:
A case study of the 2010 summer season over the western United States. J Geophys
Res Atmos 118(19):1094410962.
47. Romero-Lankao P, et al. (2014) Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Re-
gional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Climate Change, eds Barros VR, et al.
(Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 14391498.
48. Heim RR, Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United
States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):11491165.
49. Karl TR (1986) The sensitivity of the Palmer drought severity index and Palmers
Z-index to their calibration coefficients including potential evapotranspiration. J Clim
Appl Meteorol 25(1):7786.
50. Van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Briffa KR (2011) The sensitivity of the PDSI to the
Thornthwaite and Penman-Monteith parameterizations for potential evapotranspi-
ration. J Geophys Res Atmos 116(D3):D03106.
51. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment
design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485498.
52. Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Knutti R (2012) Global warming under old and new sce-
narios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat Clim Chang 2(4):248253.
| Diffenbaugh et al.
... Additionally, novel functions can emerge throu munity-level metabolic interactions. A better understanding of these interactions vide a more complete picture of the functional capabilities of microorganisms a munities [38]. ...
... Additionally, novel functions can emerge through community-level metabolic interactions. A better understanding of these interactions can provide a more complete picture of the functional capabilities of microorganisms and communities [38]. ...
Full-text available
Plant growth-promoting bacteria are commonly used in agriculture, particularly for seed inoculation. Multispecies consortia are believed to be the most promising form of these bacteria. However, designing and modeling bacterial consortia to achieve desired phenotypic outcomes in plants is challenging. This review aims to address this challenge by exploring key antimicrobial interactions. Special attention is given to approaches for developing soil plant growth-promoting bacteria consortia. Additionally, advanced omics-based methods are analyzed that allow soil microbiomes to be characterized, providing an understanding of the molecular and functional aspects of these microbial communities. A comprehensive discussion explores the utilization of bacterial preparations in biofertilizers for agricultural applications, focusing on the intricate design of synthetic bacterial consortia with these preparations. Overall, the review provides valuable insights and strategies for intentionally designing bacterial consortia to enhance plant growth and development.
... However, trends in droughts are more regionally heterogeneous. For example, from 1925-2003 the southwestern United States experienced an upward trend in drought frequency and severity, while the remainder of the United States experienced decreasing trends [18][19]. During the last decade, there has been growing interest in the investigation of CHD events. ...
Independently, both droughts and heatwaves can induce severe impacts on human and natural systems. However, when these two climate extremes occur concurrently in a given region, their compound impacts are often more pronounced. With the improvement in both the spatiotemporal resolution and representation of complex climate processes in the global climate models (GCMs), they are increasingly used to study future changes in these extremes and associated regional impacts. However, GCM selection for such impact assessments is generally based on historical performance and/or future mean changes, without considering individual or compound extremes. In contrast, this study evaluates historical performance and projected changes in heatwaves, droughts, and compound heatwave-droughts using an ensemble of GCMs from the latest Phase 6 of Coupled Models Intercomparison Project at a regional scale across the conterminous United States. Additionally, we explore the inter-model differences in the projected changes that are associated with various characteristics of extremes and the choice of drought indices. Our analysis reveals considerable variation among the GCMs, as well as substantial differences in the projected changes based on the choice of drought indices and region of interest. For example, the projected increases in both the frequency and intensity of drought and associated compound extreme days, based on the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index far exceed those derived from the Standard Precipitation Index. Further, the largest changes in the frequency of compound extremes are projected over the Southwest, South Central, and parts of the Southeast while the smallest changes are projected over the Northeast. Overall, this study provides important insights for the interpretation and selection of GCMs for future assessment studies that are crucial for the development of regional adaptation strategies in the face of climate change.
... The vulnerability of California to drought stems from its Mediterranean climate, and high dependence on snowpack and atmospheric rivers for water supply (Diffenbaugh et al 2015, Gershunov et al 2019, Payne et al 2020, which result in multiyear drought periods and significant surface water shortages. The agricultural sector, which holds substantial economic importance in the region and is recognized as one of the most economically valuable in the United States (CDFA 2022), heavily relies on groundwater extraction for irrigation purposes. ...
Full-text available
Over the past decade, California has experienced two multiyear droughts, resulting in water insecurity for communities and significant economic losses for the agricultural sector. Despite the recognition of water as a human right in the state since 2012, droughts consistently lead to the failure of thousands of domestic wells due to intensified groundwater pumping for irrigation purposes. In the Central Valley alone, groundwater sustains the livelihoods of thousands of individuals (and millions across the state) serving as their sole water source, rendering them vulnerable due to inadequate groundwater management. In this study, we present a spatial statistical model to identify critical localized factors within the food-water-human system that contribute to the vulnerability of domestic wells during droughts. Our results indicate that the depth of domestic wells, density of domestic and agricultural wells, socioeconomic conditions, and the extent of perennial crops play significant roles in predicting well failures during droughts. We show the implications of addressing these factors within the context of ongoing groundwater sustainability initiatives, and we propose strategies to safeguard the water source for thousands of individuals necessary to protect domestic wells
... For example, high temperature leads to greater evaporation rates and plant transpiration, which results in water loss in soil and plants. A Stanford study (Diffenbaugh et al. 2015) showed that drought conditions worsened when higher temperatures coincided with minimal precipitation during the California drought of 2011 to 2017. South Africa also experienced serious droughts in 2016 and 2017 which resulted in severe shortages of water supply in major cities around the country. ...
Full-text available
In this era of climate change, extreme weather events are expected to become more intense and frequent. This study analysed the long-term future climate data from the mean of five climate model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) global climate models (GCMs) to examine the impacts of climate change on extreme temperature in four major South African cities. The bias correction was successfully conducted using the CMhyd software program. The analysis of extreme temperatures was conducted using indices developed by the World Meteorological Organization's Expert Team on Sector-specific Climate Indices (ET-SCI) and calculated using the R-based Climpact2 software. All statistical metrics (mean, R 2 and RMSE) show that bias correction was fairly good, and further analysis and conclusions could also be drawn using the adjusted dataset. The overall result shows that annual trends of all temperature indices analysed in this study are significantly increasing for both scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) except for some lower extreme temperature indices (i.e., number of cool days, cold nights and cold spells). In the historical time scale, however, some indices showed no trend for some stations. The study also found that coastal cities had a slower increase in higher extreme weather indices as compared to inland cities. However, for lower extreme indices (such as number of cool days, cold nights, cool day's temperature and cold spells), the opposite was true. This information is important for policymakers, development agents and disaster prevention workers to make informed decisions about adapting to and mitigating extreme weather events.
... This demonstrates that anthropogenic forcing makes soil moisture extremes (as measured by PDSI) and agricultural droughts more likely and expands the distribution to include a wider range of possible PDSI values. These results are consistent with other studies where drought remains dominated by natural rainfall variability, but has been intensified by warming (Diffenbaugh et al., 2015;Griffin & Anchukaitis, 2014;Williams et al., 2015Williams et al., , 2020. Research on the 2013-2016 Caribbean drought also revealed that warming temperatures exacerbated soil moisture deficits and expanded the susceptible area (D. A. Herrera et al., 2018). ...
Full-text available
Plain Language Summary Climate models project that Central America is one of the global hotspots for future decreases in precipitation as a result of human‐caused climate change. This is particularly concerning for the Dry Corridor region, which is already prone to frequent droughts and high levels of food insecurity among households. Much of this region experienced severe rainfall deficits between 2015 and 2019, provoking the question of whether or not this drought was caused by climate change or if it could have occurred because of natural climate variability alone. Using a statistical model, we show that while 2015–2019 was the driest period in the observational record, droughts as bad as this one are possible even without the influence of human‐caused climate change. We examine the additional role of temperature since it can modulate drought severity through its influence on soil moisture. We find warming temperatures increase the occurrences of greater soil moisture deficits. We also determine that the strength of the Caribbean Low‐Level Jet, which transports moisture from the Caribbean Sea into Central America, is strongly associated with persistent dry conditions in the region.
... Here, we were able to evaluate lake conditions before and after extended drought periods. Since 1950, there have been a few major drought periods effecting California including significant drought periods in 1976-1977and 2014-2016(Diffenbaugh et al., 2015Stewart et al., 2020). Higher levels of TKN, TP, and specific conductance accompanied decreases in Secchi depth, gauge height, and lake discharge in Clear Lake during these periods. ...
Full-text available
Clear Lake is a large, natural lake in northern California, USA, with many beneficial uses but also substantive environmental issues. The lake has a long history of water quality problems including mercury contamination, pesticide usage, invasive species, and high rates of primary production. In recent years, an increase in cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) has been documented in the lake, adding to the environmental issues faced by aquatic species present in the lake and the local community. Extensive observations of various physical, chemical, and biological parameters in Clear Lake began in the mid-1900s. The most pertinent of these data sets and findings have been reviewed and analyzed with the intent of improving our understanding of the causes and drivers of cyanoHABs, toxin production, and identifying data gaps. Several parameters including average annual water temperature have remained relatively constant over the past 70 years, although the seasonally averaged water temperatures have shifted in a manner that may now favor cyanobacterial dominance. Clear Lake has also witnessed recent changes in several environmental variables such as total phosphorus concentrations that might contribute to blooms. An analysis of lake conditions prior to and following the enactment of a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for phosphorus in 2007 indicates little measurable influence on total phosphorus concentrations in Clear Lake. The present trajectory of lake chemistry suggests that additional research and management efforts will be needed to address the recurrence of cyanoHABs in the future. Future lake management strategies should include consideration of the role of internal nutrient loads to lessen cyanoHABs. Furthermore, a better understanding of cyanobacterial community interactions and top-down effects on bloom formation within the lake can help guide future cyanoHAB management strategies.
Full-text available
Climate change intensifies hydroclimate variability, leading to more frequent and severe drought, which pose significant challenges to water, food, and energy security. Droughts are complex natural hazards that area difficult to predict spatially and temporally. East Java, with its historically extreme droughts and reliance on agriculture, exemplifies these challenges. This study investigates the definition, measurement, driving mechanisms, and historical and future projections of drought occurrences in the region. Notably, a strong correlation is observed between El Niño and drought events, predominantly impacting the northern areas that heavily depend on rice irrigation. East Java’s prolonged dry season and limited rainfall exacerbate the recurring threat of extreme drought. With global warming amplifying these patterns, urgent action is imperative. This paper highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of drought dynamics to develop effective mitigation and adaptation strategies of agricultural activity. By examining the interplay between climate phenomena, rainfall patterns, and droughts impacts on agriculture, valuable insights are gained to foster sustainable water resource management and build resilience to drought in East Java.
Full-text available
This work investigates the meteorological mechanisms forming a classical frontal system on 26 August 2020 in the northeast and eastern parts of Afghanistan. The weather system caused heavy rainfall and led to severe flash floods. Flooding, affected by torrential rain showers, struck mostly the city of Charikar in Parvan province early in the morning day, while most people were asleep. This caused 150 deaths, and nearly 500 houses were destroyed. This research explores atmospheric processes by examining the National Centers for Environmental Prediction dataset and MERRA Model database. The calculation of the convective available potential energy (CAPE) and Showalter index extracted from the Skew-T log-pressure diagram shows a high value of the CAPE at around 2,632 J/kg and −6.6 for the Showalter index, respectively. This presents a very extreme instability in the study area during the time of the flood. The study reveals that the triggering of this system was mostly by thermodynamical aspects, low-level deep convergence, and local topographical aspects rather than the PV streamer. However, the anomaly climate analysis for different atmospheric elements with a comparison of the climate normal values shows the importance of climate change in the weather system into a stronger frontal activity associated with stronger baroclinicity over the study area.
Full-text available
Climate-change-intensified drought carries great challenges for socioeconomic development. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of research on the effects of drought disturbance on socioeconomic development within the context of climate change. According to the co-citation analysis of approximately 3000 literature sources, it should be emphasized that challenges resulting from drought carry significant socioeconomic implications, including agriculture losses, increased financial burdens on governments, and escalating insurance claims. Drought can also trigger humanitarian and social crises, especially in resource-limited areas, resulting in shortages of food and water, population displacement, and health risks. Therefore, effective policies, informed by robust research and data, are crucial for addressing the complex challenges of droughts in a changing climate. Proactive strategies, including improved water management, early warning systems, and sustainable agricultural practices, are essential for a comprehensive response. Addressing the socioeconomic impacts of climate-induced drought requires a holistic, interdisciplinary approach, emphasizing collaboration among governments, communities, researchers, and international organizations. Implementing adaptive measures and risk reduction strategies enhances resilience and mitigates the adverse effects of drought on society and the economy.
Full-text available
The interactions between natural water availability and societal water demand and management are complex. In response to gaps in empirical research of the adaptive capacity of social and environmental systems to climate stresses, we provide an assessment of responses to water scarcity during a multi-year drought in California. In particular, we use Barnett and O’Neill’s (Global Environ Change 20:211–213, 2010) criteria for maladaptation to examine responses in the agricultural and energy sectors to a multi-year (2007–2009) California drought. We conclude that despite evidence in both sectors of resiliency to the impacts of the drought, some of the coping strategies adopted increased the vulnerability of other systems. These other systems include California’s aquatic ecosystems and social groups that rely on those ecosystems for their health or employment; future generations whose resources were drawn down in the near-term, where otherwise those resources would have been available at a later time; and current and future generations who were, or will be, exposed to the effects of increased greenhouse gas emissions. This case study demonstrates that California’s current strategies for dealing with long or severe droughts are less successful than previously thought when short- and long-term impacts are evaluated together. This finding is particularly relevant given projections of more frequent and severe water shortages in the future due to climate change. This study recommends a shift from crisis-driven responses to the development and enactment of long-term mitigation measures that are anticipatory and focus on comprehensive risk reduction.
Full-text available
California's driest 12-month period on record occurred during 2013/14, and although global warming has very likely increased the probability of certain large-scale atmospheric conditions, implications for extremely low precipitation in California remain uncertain.
Full-text available
In the Southwest and Central Plains of Western North America, climate change is expected to increase drought severity in the coming decades. These regions nevertheless experienced extended Medieval-era droughts that were more persistent than any historical event, providing crucial targets in the paleoclimate record for benchmarking the severity of future drought risks. We use an empirical drought reconstruction and three soil moisture metrics from 17 state-of-the-art general circulation models to show that these models project significantly drier conditions in the later half of the 21st century compared to the 20th century and earlier paleoclimatic intervals. This desiccation is consistent across most of the models and moisture balance variables, indicating a coherent and robust drying response to warming despite the diversity of models and metrics analyzed. Notably, future drought risk will likely exceed even the driest centuries of the Medieval Climate Anomaly (1100-1300 CE) in both moderate (RCP 4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) future emissions scenarios, leading to unprecedented drought conditions during the last millennium.
Full-text available
Zonal-mean or basin-mean analyses often conclude that the midlatitude circulation will undergo a poleward shift with global warming. In this study, the models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project are used to provide a detailed examination of midlatitude circulation change as a function of longitude and season. The two-dimensional vertically integrated momentum budget is used to identify the dominant terms that maintain the anomalous surface wind stress, thereby allowing a distinction between features that are maintained by high-frequency eddies and those that involve changes in the lower-frequency or stationary flow. In the zonal mean, in each season and hemisphere there is a poleward shifting of the midlatitude surface wind stress, primarily maintained by high-frequency transient eddies. This is not necessarily the case locally. In the Southern Hemisphere, for the most part, the interpretation of the response as being a high-frequency eddy-driven poleward shifting of the midlatitude westerlies holds true. The Northern Hemisphere is considerably more complex with only the fall months showing a robust poleward shift of both the Atlantic and Pacific jets. During the winter months the jet in the east Pacific actually shifts equatorward and the Atlantic jet strengthens over Europe. An important role for altered climatological stationary waves in these responses is found. This motivates future work that should focus on zonal asymmetries and stationary wave changes, as well as the changes in high-frequency transients that bring about the poleward shifting of the westerlies in the zonal mean.
Full-text available
Regional droughts are common in North America, but pan-continental droughts extending across multiple regions, including the 2012 event, are rare relative to single-region events. Here, the tree-ring-derived North American Drought Atlas is used to investigate drought variability in four regions over the last millennium, focusing on pan-continental droughts. During the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA), the central plains (CP), Southwest (SW), and Southeast (SE) regions experienced drier conditions and increased occurrence of droughts and the Northwest (NW) experienced several extended pluvials. Enhanced MCA aridity in the SW and CP manifested as multidecadal megadroughts. Notably, megadroughts in these regions differed in their timing and persistence, suggesting that they represent regional events influenced by local dynamics rather than a unified, continental-scale phenomena. There is no trend in pan-continental drought occurrence, defined as synchronous droughts in three or more regions. SW, CP, and SE (SW+CP+SE) droughts are the most common, occurring in 12% of all years and peaking in prevalence during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries; patterns involving three other regions occur in about 8% of years. Positive values of the Southern Oscillation index (La Nina conditions) are linked to SW, CP, and SE (SW+CP+SE) droughts and SW, CP, and NW (SW+CP+NW) droughts, whereas CP, NW, and SE (CP+NW+SE) droughts are associated with positive values of the Pacific decadal oscillation and Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. While relatively rare, pan-continental droughts are present in the paleo record and are linked to defined modes of climate variability, implying the potential for seasonal predictability. Assuming stable drought teleconnections, these events will remain an important feature of future North American hydroclimate, possibly increasing in their severity in step with other expected hydroclimate responses to increased greenhouse gas forcing.
Full-text available
Projected changes in global rainfall patterns will likely alter water supplies and ecosystems in semiarid regions during the coming century. Instrumental and paleoclimate data indicate that natural hydroclimate fluctuations tend to be more energetic at low (multidecadal to multicentury) than at high (interannual) frequencies. State-of-the-art global climate models do not capture this characteristic of hydroclimate variability, suggesting that the models underestimate the risk of future persistent droughts. Methods are developed here for assessing the risk of such events in the coming century using climate model projections as well as observational (paleoclimate) information. Where instrumental and paleoclimate data are reliable, these methods may provide a more complete view of prolonged drought risk. In the U.S. Southwest, for instance, state-of-the-art climate model projections suggest the risk of a decade-scale megadrought in the coming century is less than 50%; the analysis herein suggests that the risk is at least 80%, and may be higher than 90% in certain areas. The likelihood of longer-lived events (>35 yr) is between 20% and 50%, and the risk of an unprecedented 50-yr megadrought is nonnegligible under the most severe warming scenario (5%-10%). These findings are important to consider as adaptation and mitigation strategies are developed to cope with regional impacts of climate change, where population growth is high and multidecadal megadrought worse than anything seen during the last 2000 years would pose unprecedented challenges to water resources in the region.
Long-term SST warming trends did not contribute substantially to the 2012/13 and 2013/14 California droughts. North Pacific SSTs were exceptionally warm, however; and coupled models indicate more frequent extreme precipitation.
The South Asian summer monsoon directly affects the lives of more than 1/6th of the world's population. There is substantial variability within the monsoon season, including fluctuations between periods of heavy rainfall (wet spells) and low rainfall (dry spells)(1). These fluctuations can cause extreme wet and dry regional conditions that adversely impact agricultural yields, water resources, infrastructure and human systems(2,3). Through a comprehensive statistical analysis of precipitation observations (1951-2011), we show that statistically significant decreases in peak-season precipitation over the core-monsoon region have co-occurred with statistically significant increases in daily-scale precipitation variability. Further, we find statistically significant increases in the frequency of dry spells and intensity of wet spells, and statistically significant decreases in the intensity of dry spells. These changes in extreme wet and dry spell characteristics are supported by increases in convective available potential energy and low-level moisture convergence, along with changes to the large-scale circulation aloft in the atmosphere. The observed changes in wet and dry extremes during the monsoon season are relevant for managing climate-related risks, with particular relevance for water resources, agriculture, disaster preparedness and infrastructure planning.