- Access to this full-text is provided by Hindawi.
- Learn more
Download available
Content available from International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Research Article
Improved Vlasov Antenna with Curved Cuts and Optimized
Reflector Position and Shape
H. M. El Misilmani,1M. Al-Husseini,2and K. Y. Kabalan1
1ECE Department, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
2Beirut Research and Innovation Center, Lebanese Center for Studies and Research, Beirut 2030 8303, Lebanon
Correspondence should be addressed to H. M. El Misilmani; hilal.elmisilmani@ieee.org
Received October ; Accepted January
Academic Editor: Jun Hu
Copyright © H. M. El Misilmani et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
is paper presents a Vlasov antenna with curved cut shape and improved reector position and geometry suitable for high power
microwave applications. e curved shape of the proposed cut totally eliminates the sharp edges and angles present in Vlasov
antennas with step and bevel cuts. Furthermore, with the proposed reector conguration, the wave is radiated in the direction of
the axis of the waveguide. A Vlasov antenna, designed for operation at GHz, is used to compare the three cut types. An additional
comparison is conducted to validate the concept of the enhanced reector position, using the bevel-cut antenna and the improved
cut. e proposed antenna results in increased antenna gain and in good performance in terms of sidelobe level and half-power
beamwidth, with maximum radiation directed toward the axis of the waveguide center.
1. Introduction
High power microwave (HPM) sources, such as the back-
ward-wave oscillator (BWO), the gyrotron, and the vircator
(virtual cathode oscillator), generate power in cylindrically
symmetric transverse electric TE0𝑛 or transverse magnetic
TM0𝑛 modes. e sidelobe generation, gain reduction, and
inecient power loading on the antenna aperture make these
modes unsuitable for driving conventional antennas. is
gave the idea of using mode converters at the output of these
sources to convert these modes into a plane-parallel linearly
polarized beam.
AVlasovantenna[–], which is one of the most known
mode converters used, is composed of a cylindrical waveg-
uide with a shaped end, which can directly radiate energy
from cylindrically symmetric modes in circular waveguides,
without the need for an additional mode converter. e two
well-known Vlasov antenna types come with a step cut and
with a beveled cut []. e rst type, a waveguide aperture
with a step cut, originally suggested by Vlasov, has sharp
edges and therefore may suer from electrical breakdown
when radiating HPM []. e beveled cut was suggested by
Wada and Nak aj i m a [ ] to avoid the sharp points of the
step cut, leading to a more suitable shape for usage in HPM
applications.
A comparison of the performance of bevel-cut and step-
cutVlasovantennasinHPMisconductedbyRuthetal.in
[], concluding that the bevel cut has better performance in
such applications. A series of Vlasov-type high power micro-
wave launchers have been investigated with several slant-cut
angles in []. Additional experimental results and theoretical
investigation of TE0𝑛 and TM0𝑛 mode Vlasov launchers
have been presented in [,]. Other studies focused on
increasing the gain of bevel-cut and step-cut Vlasov antennas.
Dahlstrom et al. added a reector to a bevel-cut Vlasov
antenna to increase its gain and better direct the main beam
[]. Fazaelifar and Fatorehchy proposed in []twomethods
for increasing the gain of a bevel-cut antenna, one using a
parabolic cylinder reector and the second using a horn.
Moreover, Zhang et al. studied the step cut in the presence of a
parabolic reector []. Other work discussed the use of dual-
reector in the presence of Vlasov antennas [,]. Improved
beam focusing of high powered microwaves radiating from a
Vlasov antenna has been also achieved by applying a are to
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Volume 2015, Article ID 193630, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/193630
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Y
X
Z
A
𝛼
(a) Bevel-cut design
Y
X
Z
A
B
(b) Step-cut design
F : Congurations and parameters of bevel- and step-cut Vlasov antennas.
thelauncheraperture[]. Moreover, Sealy et al. investigated
the use of corrugations with the are to enhance the pattern
performance []. Other studies used Vlasov antennas as a
component in several systems [–]. However, a Vlasov
antenna with either the bevel- or step-cut has its own
maximum radiation shied by some angle with respect to
the axis of the waveguide. e work by the authors in []
focused on optimizing the reector position to bring back the
maximum radiation along the axis of the waveguide antenna.
In this paper, we rst design a bevel-cut Vlasov antenna
operating at GHz with the aim of obtaining maximum
gain. Next, a step-cut version is designed to have radiation
in the same direction as the bevel-cut counterpart, and a
comparison of the performance of both is conducted. Later, a
newcutshape,bettersuitablefortheuseofVlasovantennas
in HPM applications, is presented and its advantages are
reported. Furthermore, the optimized reector position for
Vlasov antennas is presented, which will help, with the proper
rotation angle, to orient the generated waves along the +
direction, which is the axis of the waveguide in our case.
In addition, with our proposed conguration, the reector
is directly attached to the waveguide structure, decreasing
the size of the usual Vlasov antennas with reectors, and
eliminating the need of extra components to hold the waveg-
uide and reector together. e proposed reector is applied
to bevel-cut and step-cut Vlasov antennas and then further
enhanced with curved edges to be applied to the curved cut
to evaluate its performance.
2. Vlasov Antennas
Both step- and bevel-cut Vlasov antennas are the result of
shaping the end part of a circular waveguide. For operation
at GHz, the used circular waveguide has a radius of mm
and a length of mm.
2.1. Vlasov with Bevel Cut. AVlasovantennawithabeveled
cut is shown in Figure (a).ecutangleis the single
parameter available for optimization, and it has the main
eect on the gain and radiation patterns of the antenna. e
angle that maximizes the gain of the antenna is given by []
=sin−1 0𝑛
(2),()
where 0𝑛 is the th root of the equation 0(0𝑛)=0,is the
wavelength, is the inner radius of the waveguide, and 0is
the Bessel function of the rst kind and zeroth order.
For the TM01 circular waveguide designed for GHz, =
4.5cm and =10cm. Also, 01 =2.405,sothebevelcutwill
be calculated as follows:
=sin−1 (2.405×10)
(2×4.5)= 58.32∘.()
e highest gain according to the equation is obtained at
acutangleof58.32∘. is result has been veried by simula-
tions using ANSYS HFSS. For this angle, the resulting peak
gainis.dB.egainpatterns,computedinCSTMWS
for both =0
∘and =90
∘planes, are shown in Figure .
Maximum radiation is obtained in the =32
∘and =90
∘
direction.
2.2. Vlasov with Step Cut. AVlasovantennawithabeveled
cut is shown in Figure (b). e step cut is determined by the
two parameters, and ,asindicated.evalueofis xed
at . mm, which is the same value obtained with the bevel
cut aer nding the angle . For comparison purposes, the
step-cutVlasovisdesignedsothatithasthesamedirection
of maximum radiation obtained with the beveled cut. For
this purpose, via CST simulations, is found to be mm.
Itwasnoticedthat,asthevalueofdecreases, the angle of
maximum radiation increases. e gain patterns of the step-
cut Vlasov antenna, in the =0
∘and =90
∘planes, are
shown in Figures (a) and (b), respectively. As is the design
aim, the main lobe peaks at =32∘.
ComparingthetwoVlasovantennatypes,itisveried
that the step cut gives better performance in terms of max-
imum gain and half-power beamwidth (HPBW). However,
the beveled cut results in lower sidelobes, and this comes in
addition to its suitability for HPM applications.
3. Improved Cut
e conventional Vlasov antennas may suer from electric
breakdownwhentheyradiateatHPM.Althoughthebeveled
cut was introduced to avoid the sharp edges present in the
step cut, it results in a decreased gain and an increased HPBW
of the antenna. A new cut shape, introduced by the authors in
[], is shown in Figure .isshape,totallybasedoncurves,
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
−25
0
30
30
60 60
9090
12
120
120
150
150
180
−6.5
(a) 𝜙=0
∘plane
0
30
30
60 60
90
90
6.5 12
120
120
150
150
180
−25
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Gain patterns of bevel-cut design (using CST).
0
30
30
60 60
90
90
12
120
120
150
150
180
−25 −6.5
(a) 𝜙=0
∘plane
0
30
30
60 60
90
90
12
120
120
150
150
180
−25 −6.5
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Gain patterns of step-cut design (using CST).
(a) D view
R1
R2
R3
Y
L
X
Z
(b) Parametrized dimensions
F:Vlasovantennawithproposedcut.
goes ahead of the beveled cut in removing the sharp edges
and corners and is a result better suitable for applications
involving HPM.
In this design, we have the exibility to optimize several
parameters to reach the desired gain, HPBW, and direction of
maximum radiation. ese are the radius of Curve (), the
radius of Curve (), the radius of Curve (), and the
separation between Curves and , noted by on Figure .
To compare it with the step- and bevel-cut versions,
a Vlasov antenna based on the same waveguide and on
theproposedcutisdesignedsothatithasthemaximum
radiation in the same =32
∘and =90
∘direction. Tabl e
lists the obtained parameters of the new design. e resulting
patterns are shown in Figure .
e gain patterns resulting from the step, the beveled,
and the proposed Vlasov cuts are compared in Figure .e
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
0
3030
60 60
90
12
120
120
150
150
180
−25 −6.5
90
(a) 𝜙=0
∘plane
0
30
30
60 60
90
90
12
120
120
150150
180
−25 −6.5
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Gain patterns of the proposed Vlasov antenna (using CST).
0
5
10
0 50 100 150
Absolute gain (dB)
Step cut
Bevel cut
New cut
𝜃(deg)
−150
−5
−10
−15
−20
−25
−100 −50
(a) 𝜙=0
∘plane
Step cut
Bevel cut
New cut
0
5
10
Absolute gain (dB)
−5
−10
−15
−20
−25
0 50 100 150
𝜃(deg)
−150 −100 −50
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Comparison of the gain patterns of the step, the beveled, and the proposed Vlasov cuts.
T : Parameters of the proposed Vlasov antenna.
Parameter Value (mm)
Waveguide radius
Waveguide length
1 .
2 .
3
obtained peak gain values are given in Table .BothCSTand
HFSS reveal that the proposed Vlasov antenna has a higher
peak gain, which overcomes the decreased gain issue that the
bevel cut has.
e compared HPBW and sidelobe level ratio (SLR)
results, computed in CST, are listed in Tab l e . In addition
to totally eliminating the sharp edges and corners that limit
theperformanceoftheantennaathighpowersandproviding
higher peak gains, the results have shown that the proposed
cut gives a smaller HPBW and a better SLR in the =90
∘
plane, a better SLR compared to the step cut in the =0
∘
plane, and a slightly narrower beam in the =0
∘plane
when compared to the bevel cut. ese observations are also
veried using HFSS simulations.
e reection coecient plots, for the three cut types, are
given in Figure .Asshown,thethreeantennasoperateatand
around GHz with very low values.
4. Vlasov with Reflector
Vlasov antennas radiate waves with maximum radiation
obtained in a shied direction. is was proven through
our simulations in Section , for which the three designed
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
T : Compared peak gain, HPBW, and sidelobe level ratio (SLR).
Antenna Gain (dB) HPBW∘SLR (dB)
CST HFSS =0∘plane =90∘plane =0∘plane =90∘plane
Bevel cut . . . . . .
Step cut . . . . .
Curved cut . . . .
2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6
Reection coecient (dB)
Frequency (GHz)
Step cut
Bevel cut
Proposed cut
−15
−10
−20
−25
−35
−30
−40
(a) 𝑆 using CST
2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6
Frequency (GHz)
Step cut
Bevel cut
Proposed cut
Reection coecient (dB)
−15
−10
−20
−25
−35
−30
−40
(b) 𝑆 using HFSS
F : Comparison of the reection coecient, using both CST and HFSS.
antennas radiate in the shied directions corresponding to
=
𝑚=28
∘and =90
∘, computed using HFSS. However,
it is preferred to have the maximum radiation of the antenna
directed in a well-known and easy-to-locate direction. is
refers to the axis of the waveguide in our case. In addition,
the HPBW in =0
∘plane is large for the three radiated
antennas, and it is hard to highly increase the gain of these
antennas. In order to achieve rotation of the maximum point
of radiation of any of the Vlasov antennas and the curved-
cut shape antenna and decrease the HPBW in =0
∘
plane, an optimized reector is proposed in the following
work.ereectorhastheshapeofahalf-hollowcylinder.
A conventional reector is used with the step- and bevel-
cut antennas designed, whereas for the optimized curved-
cut shape proposed in Section an optimized reector
having also curved edges instead of the sharp corners of the
conventional reector is proposed. In both cases, the two
reectors have several parameters that aect the radiation:
the starting point of the reector, the radius of the reector,
the length of the reector, and the angle of rotation of the
reector with respect to the waveguide axis. All these param-
eters have been optimized to obtain the desired radiation
patterns.
300 mm
200 mm
R = 60 mm
58.32∘
17.5∘
148.5 mm
D = 90mm
X
Y
Z
F : Bevel-cut Vlasov antenna with reector.
4.1. Bevel-Cut Vlasov Antenna with Reector
4.1.1. Design and Simulations. Using the bevel-cut antenna
design in Section ., the maximum radiation is obtained in
the shied direction corresponding to =
𝑚=28
∘and
=90
∘, computed using HFSS. A conventional reector
having the shape of a half-hollow cylinder is then attached to
the bevel-cut Vlasov antenna as shown in Figure . e added
reectorhastheoptimizedvaluesofmmforthecylinder
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Reection coecient (dB)
With reector
Without reector
2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6
Frequency (GHz)
−55
−50
−45
−40
−35
−30
−25
−20
−15
F : Reection coecient computed using HFSS, with no-
reector case shown in red (dashed), and with reector in blue.
radius and a length of mm. Upon rotating the reector
by a specic angle, it is seen that as the angle increases the
shi angle approaches origin. e initial bevel-cut Vlasov
antenna gives a maximum computed gain of .dB, with the
maximum radiation along the =28∘and =90∘direction.
e optimized reector angle for perfect direction along the
+axis is seen at angle of 17.5∘. For thisangle, the maximum
radiation is back along the axis of the waveguide; that is,
=0∘and =90∘.ebevel-cutantennaoperatesatGHz
as shown in the reection coecient plot (11)inFigure .
Ithasagainof.dBandareducedHPBW,asindicatedin
Figures (a) and (b). It is shown that, for the case with the
reector, the maximum radiation is redirected along the axis
of the waveguide.
4.1.2. Verication of the Results Using CST. e same design
simulated in Section . using HFSS has been also tested using
CST. e gain patterns in the two cases (without and with
reector) are shown in Figure . As can be seen, the max-
imum gain of the antenna is redirected along the axis of the
waveguide. e D gain patterns comparing the two cases are
shown in Figure . Furthermore, the peak gain has increased
from . to dB, and the HPBW has decreased in the plane
of interest, that is, =0∘plane, from 58.4∘to 41.7∘.
4.2. Step-Cut Vlasov Antenna
4.2.1. Design and Simulations. Again, using the step-cut
antenna design in Section .,themaximumradiationis
obtained in the shied direction corresponding to =
𝑚=
28∘and =90
∘, computed using HFSS. e same reector
used in Section . is then attached to the step-cut antenna
as shown in Figure .Here,is the distance between the
waveguide port and the start of the reector. e gain patterns
of the designed step-cut antenna are shown in Figure .By
inspecting Figure (b), the concept of rotating the reector
is validated and maximum radiation is obtained back along
the waveguide axis for a rotation angle of 17.5∘similar to
the one used for the bevel-cut case. e design has been
also simulated using CST showing the same results with
an increment in gain from . dB to .dB with a large
decrement in HPBW in the plane of interest (=0
∘)from
55∘to 41∘with negligible changes in the =90∘plane.
5. Improved Curved Cut with Optimized
Reflector Position
Aer modifying the cut of the Vlasov antenna in order to
optimize its performance as described in Section ,inthis
section the optimized reector proposed in Section will be
used to validate the concept of rotating the reector in order
to radiate the wave generated along the +direction on the
novel cut shape. However, in order to also avoid having sharp
corners in the reector, an optimized one is proposed here
to be attached to the curved-cut shape antenna. Figure
shows the proposed combined antenna joining the curved-
cut antenna and the curved-edges reector with its optimized
parameters. e parameters of the curved-cut antenna are
thesameasthoseusedinthepreviousdesigninSection
and are listed in Ta b l e . In order to get the optimized values
of the reector radius and length indicated, the following
parametric study has been done.
5.1. Parametric Study
5.1.1. Radius Study. In order to choose the appropriate value
of the reector radius, the radius has been varied from mm
to mm. e realized gain value at each value of radius
is shown in Figure (a), and the gain pattern in the plane
of interest (=90
∘) at each radius value is also shown in
Figure (b).
Inspecting Figure (a), it is seen that the realized gain in
the plane of interest (=90
∘) increases as the radius of the
reector increases, till reaching a maximum value at a radius
of mm. However, inspecting the gain pattern in the =
90∘plane in Figure (b),itisseenthatatthisradiustheSLL
and HPBW are higher than those with the second maximum
value of gain at a radius of mm. Hence a radius of mm
is suggested to be the optimized value taking into account the
value of gain, SLL and HPBW.
5.1.2. Length Study. In order to choose the appropriate value
of the reector length, the radius has been varied from
mm to mm. e realized gain value at each value of
length is shown in Figure (a), and the gain pattern in the
plane of interest (=90∘) at each length value is also shown
in Figure (b).
Inspecting Figure (a), it is seen that the realized gain in
the plane of interest (=90
∘) increases as the length of the
reector increases, till reaching an approximate maximum
value at a length of mm, aer which the value of gain
might increase but in very small steps compared to the
increase in the length. In addition, inspecting the gain pattern
in the =90
∘plane in Figure (b),itisseenthatatthis
chosen value of length the SLL and HPBW are better than
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
−30
−60
−90
−120
−150
−180
−1.00
−9.00
−17.00
0
30
7.00
60
90
120
150
(a) Red in the plane formed by the 𝑋-axis and the point
of maximum radiation (𝜃=𝜃
𝑚,𝜙=90
∘), blue in 𝜙=0
∘
plane
−30
−60
−90
−120
−150
−180
−1.00
−9.00
−17.00
0
30
7.00
60
90
120
150
(b) 𝜙=90
∘Plane
F : Simulated gain patterns computed using HFSS, with initial bevel-cut results shown in red (dashed) and proposed design results
in blue.
−25
0
30
30
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150150
180
−6
(a) 𝜃=𝜃
𝑚,𝜙=90
∘plane
−25
0
3030
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150
150
180
−6
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
−25
0
30
30
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150
150
180
−6
(c) 𝜙=0
∘plane
−25
0
3030
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150
150
180
−6
(d) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Bevel-cut simulated gain patterns using CST: (a) and (b) without adding the reector and (c) and (d) aer adding the reector.
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
(a) Without reector (b) With reector
F : Bevel-cut D gain patterns using CST: (a) without reector and (b) with reector.
300 mm
200 mm
R = 60 mm
17.5∘
D = 90mm
X
Y
Z
L = 130 mm
B = 35 mm
A = 148.5 mm
F : Step-cut Vlasov antenna with a reector.
those with the higher values. Hence a length of mm is
suggested to be the optimized value taking into account the
value of gain, SLL, HPBW, and antenna structure size.
5.2. Simulations and Results. Taking into account the opti-
mized values of the reector parameters, the proposed com-
bined antenna suitable for high power microwave applica-
tions has been simulated using CST with the radiation pattern
results shown in Figure .
e maximum radiation of the curved-cut antenna with-
out using the reector was shied in the direction corre-
sponding to =
𝑚=28
∘and =90
∘,asdepictedin
Section .InspectingFigure , the concept of rotating the
reectorisvalidatedandtheradiationin=90∘plane is now
directed towards the +plane,ascanbeseeninFigure (b).
In addition, the proposed combined antenna also increases
the gain of the antenna from . dB to . dB and decreases
its HPBW in the =0
∘plane from 58∘to 41∘,withminor
changes in the =90
∘plane. e same result has been also
achieved using HFSS with an increment in gain from . dB
to . dB as shown in Figure .
−30
−60
−90
−120
−150
−180
−1.00
−9.00
−17.00
0
30
7.00
60
90
120
150
(a) Red in 𝜃=𝜃
𝑚,𝜙=90
∘plane, blue in 𝜙=0
∘plane
−1.00
−9.00
−17.00
7.00
−30
−60
−90
−120
−150
−180
0
30
60
90
120
150
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Step-cut simulated gain patterns, with initial step-cut
results shown in red (dashed) and proposed design results in blue.
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
D = 90mm
X
Y
200 mm
R = 60 mm
Z
300 mm
L=148.5 mm
Rc=15.85 mm
Rc=15.85 mm
17.5∘
F : Enhanced Vlasov cut with a rotated optimized reector
with curved edges.
T : Comparison of the radiation characteristics of the three
designed antennas, with and without having the enhanced suitable
reector computed using CST.
Antenna Reector HPBW∘
Gain (dB)
=0∘plane =∘
𝑚plane
Bevel cut Without . . .
With . .
Step cut Without . .
With .
Curved cut Without .
With . .
Combining all the simulations of the three designed
antennas, with and without having the enhanced suitable
reector, Tabl e compares the radiation characteristics of the
various cases studied. As listed, in addition to bringing back
the maximum radiation along the axis of the waveguide, the
proposedcombinedantennaalsoincreasesthegainofthe
antenna and decreases its HPBW.
Observations. Several simulations have been done to study
the eect of each parameter of the Vlasov antenna with
curved-cut and improved reector position and shape on the
radiation performance. e following observations have been
inspected.
(i) As the starting point of the reector goes backward to
the start of the Vlasov antenna, the gain decreases and
the HPBW highly increases. is change also aects
the point of maximum radiation which will be rotated
by a certain degree from the axis of the waveguide.
(ii) As the rotation angle of the reector increases, the
gain slowly increases with minor variations in HPBW.
However, this change also aects the point of max-
imum radiation which will be rotated by a certain
degree from the axis of the waveguide.
(iii) As the radius of the reector decreases, the gain slowly
decreases and the HPBW increases.
10.8
11
11.2
11.4
11.6
11.8
12
12.2
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Gain (dB)
Reector radius (mm)
Gain
(a)
−25
5
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
30
3.5
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
−15.5 −6 13
Ref Radius =40
Ref Radius =45
Ref Radius =50
Ref Radius =55
Ref Radius =60
Ref Radius =65
Ref Radius =70
0
(b)
F : Simulatedgain patterns computed using CST: (a) realized
gain values and (b) D gain patterns.
Hence, care should be taken in choosing the optimized values
for each of these parameters in order to attain the desired
performance.
One example on the use of such optimizations is to
extend the reector length to mm, decrease the angle of
rotation to 15∘, and increase the starting point of the reector
(noted by ) to mm. Applying these changes, the gain will
increase to . dB and the HPBW in the =90∘plane will
decrease to 37∘,withtheHPBWinthe=0
∘kept constant
at 41.1∘.
6. Conclusion
e Vlasov antenna, originally designed with a step cut made
to one end of a circular waveguide, has been improved by
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7
11.8
11.9
12
150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220
Gain (dB)
Reflector length (mm)
Gain
(a)
Ref Length = 180
Ref Length = 190
Ref Length = 200
Ref Length = 210
Ref Length = 220
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
13
−25 3.5−15.5 −6
(b)
F : Simulated gain patterns computed using CST: (a) realized gain values, (b) D gain patterns.
−25
0
30
30
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150
150
180
−6
(a) 𝜙=0
∘plane
−6−25
0
30
30
60 60
90 90
13
120
120
150
150
180
(b) 𝜙=90
∘plane
F : Gain patterns of the proposed curved-cut antenna with the optimized reector position and shape, computed using CST.
−30
−60
−90
−120
−150
−180
−1.00
−9.00
−17.00
0
30
7.00
60
90
120
150
F : Gain patterns of the proposed curved-cut antenna with the optimized reector position and shape, computed using HFSS: red
(dashed) in =0∘plane and blue in =90∘plane.
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Nakajima who implemented it using a beveled cut. e latter
cut gets rid of the sharp corners present in the former one,
which makes the antenna supportive of higher microwave
powers, but this comes at the cost of reduced antenna
gain and broader beam widths. In addition, the maximum
radiation of these two antennas is shied by some angle in
the =90∘plane, assuming the antenna is directed along the
+axis.Inthispaper,animprovedshapewithcurvedcuts
for high power microwaves applications has been suggested,
leading to higher gain, decreased HPBW, and decreased
sidelobes levels. Furthermore, two optimized reectors, one
with enhanced position and the second with additional shape
enhancement having curved edges, are proposed, with the
ability to radiate the maximum radiation back to the +
axis and further decrease the HPBW. is concept has been
validated using the bevel- and step-cut Vlasov antenna, and
with the new curved cut proposed in this paper.
Conflict of Interests
e authors declare that there is no conict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
is work is partially supported by an Associated Research
Unit (ARU) Fund from the Lebanese National Council for
Scientic Research and by the Electromagnetics and Radio
Frequency Research Group (EMRF) Fund at the American
University of Beirut.
References
[] S. N. Vlasov and I. M. Orlova, “Quasioptical transformer which
transforms the waves in a waveguide having a circular cross
section into a highly directional wave beam,” Radiophysics and
Quantum Electronics,vol.,no.,pp.–,.
[] S. N. Vlasov and I. M. Orlova, “Quasioptical transformer which
transforms the waves in a waveguide having a circular cross sec-
tion into a highly directional wave beam,” Radiophysics Quan-
tum Electronics,vol.,no.,pp.–,.
[] S. N. Vlasov, L. I. Zagryadskaya, and M. I. Petelin, “Trans-
formation of a whispering gallery mode, propagating in a cir-
cular waveguide, into a beam of waves,” Radio Engineering and
Electronic Physics, vol. , no. , pp. –, .
[] G.S.LingandC.W.Yuan,“DesignofaVlasovantennawith
reector,” International Journal of Electronics,vol.,no.,pp.
–, .
[] H. Zhou and X. Yang , “Design of novel VLASOV-type antennas
for high power microwaves (HPM),” in Proceedings of the IEEE
34th International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS ’07),p.
, Albuquerque, NM, USA, June .
[] O. Wada and M. Nakajima, in Proceedings of the EC6 Joint
Workshop on ECE and ECRH, Oxford, UK, September .
[] B. G. Ruth, R. K. Dahlstrom, C. D. Schlesiger, and L. F. Libelo,
“Design and low-power testing of a microwave Vlasov mode
converter,” in Proceedings of the IEEE MTT-S International
Microwave Symposium Digest,vol.,pp.–,June.
[] C.Vollaire,L.Nicolas,K.A.Connor,S.J.Salon,B.G.Ruth,
and L. F. Libelo, “Microwave radiation from slant cut cylindrical
antennas—modeling an experiment,” IEEE Transactions on
Magnetics,vol.,no.,pp.–,.
[] P. J. Sealy and R. J. Vernon, “Low-power investigation of TEn
and TMn mode Vlasov launchers (Gyrotron applications),” in
Proceedings of the Antennas and Propagation Society Interna-
tional Symposium,vol.,pp.–,.
[] P. J. Sealy and R. J. Vernon, “Equivalence-principle model for
radiation from TE0𝑛 and TM0𝑛 mode step-cut and slant-cut
Vlasov feeds,” in Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium,vol.,pp.–,London,Canada,.
[] R. K. Dahlstrom, L. J. Hadwin, B. G. Ruth, and L. F. Libelo,
“Reector design for an X-band Vlasov antenna,” in Proceedings
of the Antennas and Propagation Symposium Digest,vol.,pp.
–, May .
[] M. Fazaelifar and M. R. Fatorehchy, “Design, fabrication and
test of parabolic cylinder reector and horn for increasing the
gain of vlasov antenna,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research
Letters, vol. , pp. –, .
[]X.Zhang,Q.Wang,Y.Cheng,andS.Wen,“Designofa
G Hz Vlasov (antenna) mode converter,” in Proceedings of
the International Workshop on Microwave and Millimeter Wave
Circuits and System Technology (MMWCST ’12), pp. –,
Apri l .
[] J. A. Lorbeck and R. J. Vernon, “Singly curved dual-reector
synthesis technique applied to a quasi-optical antenna for a gy-
rotron with a whispering-gallery mode output,” IEEE Transac-
tions on Antennas and Propagation,vol.,no.,pp.–,
.
[] B. Wang, C.-H. Du, P.-K. Liu, Z.-H. Geng, and S.-X. Xu, “P-
: study of a Vlasov mode converter for GHz whispering
gallery mode gyrotron,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International
Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC ’10), pp. –, IEEE,
Monterey, Calif, USA, May .
[]J.Braunstein,K.Connor,S.Salon,L.Libelo,andC.D.
Schlesiger, “Analysis of ared end for Vlasov-type antenna:
comparison of D nite element analysis with experiment,”
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics,vol.,no.,pp.–,
.
[] P. J. Sea ly, R. J. Vernon, and J. A. Lorbeck, “Vlasov feeds
with corrugated ares for pattern enhancement,” in Proceedings
of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, vol. , pp. –, June .
[] A. D. R. Phelps, P. R. Winning, and S. N. Spark, “Broadband
quasi-optical mode converters for high power microwaves,”
in IEE Colloquium on Antenna and Propagation Problems of
Ultrawideband Radar,pp.–,London,UK,.
[]T.A.Spencer,C.E.Davis,K.J.Hendricks,R.M.Gilgen-
bach, and M. J. Arman, “Long-pulse Hyrotron-backward-wave
oscillator experiments,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Plasma Science,.
[] B. Wang, C.-H. Du, P.-K. Liu, Z.-H. Geng, and S.-X. Xu, “P–:
study of a Vlasov mode converter for GHz whispering gallery
mode gyrotron,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Vac-
uum Electronics Conference (IVEC ’10), pp. –, Monterey,
Calif, USA, May .
[] H. M. El Misilmani, M. Al-Husseini, K. Y. Kabalan, and A. El-
Hajj, “Optimized reector position for vlasov antennas,” in Pro-
ceedings of the Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium
(PIERS ’13), pp. –, Stockholm, Sweden, August .
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
[] H. M. El Misilmani, M. Al-Husseini, K. Y. Kabalan, and A.
El-Hajj, “Improved Vlasov antenna with curved cuts for high
power microwaves,” in Proceedings of the 11th International
Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation
(HPCS ’13), pp. –, July .
Content uploaded by Hilal El Misilmani
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hilal El Misilmani on Mar 03, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.