Content uploaded by Necati Ozpinar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Necati Ozpinar on Mar 02, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi
Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), Ciltl 36, No. 1 (2015)
ISSN: 1300-1949
Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science
Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No. 1 (2015)
ISSN: 1300-1949
_____________
* Corresponding author. Email address: biochemist58@gmail.com
http://dergi.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/ojs/index.php/fenbilimleri ©2015 Faculty of Science, Cumhuriyet University
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
Şeker DAĞ1*, Necati ÖZPINAR2, Hülya ÖZPINAR1, Musa SARI1
1Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 58140 Sivas, Türkiye
23th Army Food and Central Laboratuary, Erzincan, Turkey
Received: 02.10.2014; Accepted: 10.12.2014
__________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract. This study was carried out on three different brands of cola which are marketed in Turkey. Liquid portions of the
collected colas were fully removed at 55 oC. Antibacterial effect spectrum was determined by Cut Plug method. Minimum
Inhibitory Concentrations were determined by micro dilution method by preparing serial dilutions of cola on studied bacterial
strains. It was found that cola has a strong antibacterial effect on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli,
Escherichia coli O: 157 H: 7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria and antifungal effect of cola could not
identified. It was considered that cola drinks can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria that causing food
toxicity. At the end of the study, a comparison could not carried out as there was no study on the antibacterial effects of cola
on various bacteria. It has been considered that cola beverages can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria
that causing food toxicity.
Keywords: Cola, Antibacterial Effect, Bacterial Diarrhea, Cut Plug Method
__________________________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION
In line with the information they got from their ancestors, people have used many methods by
taking advantage of natural resources for the treatments of numerous diseases throughout history.
Although medicine has developed in the recent years, this tradition based on nature still continues
especially in developing communities as the resources are easily accessible and economical.
Cola was invented as syrup by J.S. Premberton who was a famous pharmacist by that time.
The formula has been the world's biggest secret since the invention and has been kept safe for more
than 125 years. Coca-Cola is said to be healing many diseases such as headache, weakness and
morphine addiction in those years [1, 2]. In addition, cola is reported to be used for the treatment of
diarrhea in remote areas of Zambia in which medical assistance is insufficient [3].
Various researches on the effect of cola on human and animal health have been carried out in
recent years. These researches are mainly about the erosive and mechanic effects of cola [4]. However,
there is no research on the question of whether cola has some antibacterial effects on the various
bacteria or not.
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
53
As it is known, cola has a large consumption potential all around the world. The aim of this
study was to determine if cola has antibacterial effects on various bacteria. And in this research, it was
intended to demonstrate experimentally whether cola can be used for the treatment of some infectious
diseases.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was made on three different brands of cola which are marketed in Erzincan
(Turkey). 5x1000 ml of cola samples were collected from each brand colas were incubated at 55 oC
until liquid part evaporated. Remaining cola extract was tested by using humidity determining tool
Precisa (XM60) and concentration range was determined according to the result
Antibacterial activity- Cut plug method was used in the study [5]. Each bacterial suspension as
described in Table 1 was prepared as 0.5 McFarland (1×108 CFU/ml) in NaCl of 0,9 % from 24-hour
culture in accordance with the recommendations of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [6].
Densitometer (Den-1, Latvia) was used to measure cell concentration. 1 ml of the bacteria suspension
was put into the 20 ml of the prepared Mueller-Hinton Agar (Oxoid CM337); when casting
temperature was reached mixing process was completed, it was left for solidifying at room
temperature by pouring into the sterile petri dish. This process is performed separately for each
bacterium. For retests, this amount was determined by multiplying the number of petri dishes required
to be prepared. Wells in a diameter of 6 mm were opened on solidified petri dishes and 20 mg of cola
extract was put into these wells. Zone diameters of the disks that were formed after 72 hours of
incubation at 30 oC for fungus and after 24 hours of incubation at 35 oC for Mueller Hinton Agar
bacteria were measured.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)- Minimum inhibitory
concentration was determined by micro dilution method in accordance with the procedures developed
by the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards [7]. Dilutions of 0,007gr/10ml, 0,015
gr/10ml, 0,03gr/10ml, 0,06gr/10ml, 0,12gr/10ml, 0,25gr/10ml, 0,5gr/10ml, 1gr/10ml, 2gr/10ml were
prepared from cola extract. 50µl Mueller-Hinton Broth (Oxoid CM0405), the previously prepared
bacteria suspension at 0.5 McFarland turbidity and 100µl from each cola dilution were added into each
well within the 96-well micro plate. The last well was used as a negative control and cola extract was
not added. After 24 hours of incubation at 37 °C, plates were shaken at 300 rpm for a period of 20
minutes in the shaker and they were read by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Reader (Chopen)
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
54
at 620 nm. Doses suppressing bacterial growth were evaluated as the minimum inhibitory
concentration. Test was repeated 3 times.
Statistical analysis- Minitab 16 (Minitab Inc, State College, PA) software was used for the
statistical analysis of the findings. Results were evaluated at P<0, 05 level with 2 sample t tests at a
confidence interval of 95%.
3. RESULTS
The results of antibacterial effect- The research was carried out on three different cola brands
and it was observed that all colas had strong antibacterial effect on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus
faecalis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O: 157 H: 7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica
bacteria and they had mild or weak antibacterial effect on the other bacteria used in the research.
Antifungal effect of cola was not observed (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Concentration range of the colas that are ready to be consumed- It was determined that colas
from three different brands had active ingredient between 9.5% - 10%.
(a) (b)
Fig. 1. Antibacterial analysis image of Yersinia enterocolitica (a), antibacterial analysis image of Enterococcus faecalis (b).
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
55
Table 1. Antibacterial and antifungal effects of Cola1, Cola2, Cola3
Results of the minimum inhibitory concentration- For Cola1 and Cola2, Bacillus Cereus,
Escherichia coli O:157 H:7, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria MIC value was
0,015 gr/10ml Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus
aureus, Streptococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria MIC value was 0,03 gr/10ml
Salmonella enteritidis bacteria MIC value was 0,06 gr/10 ml and for Cola3, Enterococcus faecalis,
Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O:157 H:7, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria
MIC value was 0,015gr/10ml Bacillus cereus bacteria MIC value was 0,007 gr/10ml Listeria
monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria
MIC value was 0,03 gr/10ml Salmonella enteritidis bacteria MIC value was 0,06gr/10ml (Table 2).
Statistical analysis results- No statistically significant difference was found between cola 1
and cola 2 except for Streptococcus pyogenes but the difference was considered to be statistically
significant according to the control (ampisilin sulbaktam 10 ug) in three cola brands. In addition, the
difference between Cola1 and Cola3 and between Cola2 and Cola3 was significant except for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis, Streptococcus epidermidis and Yersinia
enterocolitica bacteria (Table 3).
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
56
Tablo 2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Cola1, Cola2 and Cola3.
Table 3. Statistical Analysis Result of Control, Cola1, Cola2 and Cola3
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
57
4. DISCUSSION
Cola and cola beverages have become the most consumed beverage in the world in decades.
Therefore, many studies have been carried out on cola. In addition to the researches showing harmful
effects of cola, there are also studies showing the therapeutic use of this beverage.
It was reported that Hypokalemic myopathies have developed as a result of excessive cola
consumption in Appel's and Rice's studies [8, 9]. There are many causes of hypokalemia. One of them
is that cola contains too much sugar (11gr/dl) and insufficient amount of potassium. Osmotic diuresis
develops as a result of uncontrolled consumption of cola and inadequate intake of potassium with the
diet leads to lack of potassium. Another reason of this is the caffeine (97 mg/L) concentration in cola.
Caffeine has antagonist effects on the adenosine receptors. Effect of adenosine receptors in many
organs including kidney cause disposal of potassium through urinary tract and hypokalemia develops.
It was reported that an Australian farmer had a sudden muscular atrophy on March 2002 and it was
reported that the reason for this muscular atrophy was excessive cola consumption (4L/Day) [10].
Another study was carried out on the carcinogenic effect of cola. In this study, cola was given
to rats in various age groups daily and the effects were evaluated histopathologically. As a result of the
experiment which lasted for 104 weeks, malignant mammary tumors were detected significantly in
females. In addition, pancreatic exocrine adenomas were detected both in males and females [11].
Besides, it has been reported that cola has negative effects in mouth and on teeth due to
erosive effects caused by the regular consumption [12, 13, 14].
When examined studies on the use of cola for treatment purposes are analyzed, we see that
[15], managed to treat gastric diospyrobezoars by endoscopic cola injection method in a study.
Phytobezoar was also treated successfully with cola in another study [16].
There was no study on the antibacterial activity of cola in related literature. In this study,
antibacterial spectrum of cola was determined and it was found out that cola has a strong antibacterial
effect especially on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O:157
H:7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria and it has a weak antibacterial effect on
the other bacteria used in this study. Antifungal effect of cola could not been identified.
Intestines are sterile at birth. More than 500 individual specific species and 104 bacteria form
bacterial flora according to the mode of delivery, genetic features, environmental contact and nutrition
type [17, 18]. These commensal bacteria provide significant benefits on nutrition, angiogenesis, and
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
58
mucosal immunity. Intestinal bacteria are also involved in bile salt metabolism, lipid hydrolysis,
fragmentation of proteins into peptides and amino acids and vitamin synthesis [18, 19].
Antibacterial effects of uncontrolled consumption of cola on the intestinal flora should also be
noted. It should not be ignored that uncontrolled consumption of cola may cause immune system
failures, vitamin deficiencies, and digestive problems. In addition, it is thought that cola can be used
for the treatment of bacterial factors and on bacterial diarrhea causing food toxicity.
REFERENCES
[1] http://www.kobitek.com_en_cok_taninan_markalarindan_coca- colanin_ dunyasi (2012).
[2] http://www.makaleler.com/tarih-makaleleri/tarihte-coca-cola-sirket-tarihinin-bir-ozeti. htm –
Makaleler (2012).
[3] Torjesen, I., 2011.Coca-Cola supply chain helps bring diarrhoea treatments to developing World,
BMJ 343: d5825 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5825.
[4] Kapıcıoğlu, S., Baki, A., Reis, A., Tekelioğlu, Y., 1991. Cola drinks consumption and
oesophagitis, Dis. Esophagus, 2(4): 306–308.
[5] Pridham, T.G., Lindenfelser, L. A., Shotwell, O.L., Stodola, F., Benedict, R.G., Foley, C., Jacks,
P.W., Zaumeyer, W.J., Perston, W.H., Mitchell, J.W, Phytopathology (1956) 46:27.
[6] Anonymous, Clinical laboratory standards institute performance standards for antimicrobial disk
and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria ısolated from animals; approved standard- second edition,
(Standards Institute Pennsylvania, USA), 2002. 22(6):1–86.
[7] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically;Approved Standard – Eighth edition. NCCLS
document M7-A6. NCCLS, (Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA), 2003.
[8] Appel, C.C., Myles, T.D., 2001. Caffeine-induced hypokalemic paralysis in pregnancy, Obstet
Gynecol, 97(5 Pt 2): 805–807.
[9] Rice, J.E., Faunt, J.D., 2001. Excessive cola consumption as a cause of hypokalemic myopathy,
Int Med J. 31:317–318.
[10] Mudge, D.W., Jhonson, D.W., 2004. Coca-Cola and kangaroos, Lancet, 364:1190.
[11] Belpoggı, F., Soffrıttı, M., Tibaldı, E., et al., 2006. Results of Long-Term Carcinogenicity
Bioassays on Coca-Cola Administered to Sprague-Dawley Rats, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1076:736–752.
[12] Orbak, R., Dayı, E., Atasever, M., 2002. An experimental study on the effect of acidic drinks on
gingival health in dogs, Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 26:1277–1281.
[13] Turgut, M.D., Tekçiçek, M., Çetin, N., Pınar, A., Ölmez, S., Alpar, R., 2004. The erosive effects
of some carbonated beverages consumed in Turkey, Journal of Hacettepe Faculty of Dentistry, 28(3):
8–14.
[14] Rahim, T., Rahim, A., Mohammed, D., Akil, H., 2012. Water sorption characteristics of
restorative dental composites immersed in acidic drinks, Dental Materials, 28 (6):e63-e67.
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
59
[15] Chung, Y.W., Han, D.S., Par, Y. K., et al., 2006. Huge gastric diospyrobezoars successfully
treated by oral intake and endoscopic injection of Coca-Cola, Digestive and Liver Disease, 38: 515–
517.
[16] Juan, M., Lapiedra, M., Picazo, V., 2006. Phytobezoar dissolution with Coca-Cola, Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 29(5): 291–293.
[17] Saevedra, J.M., 2007.Use of Probiotics in Pediatrics: Rationale, Mechanisms of Action and
Practical Aspects. Nutrition in clinical practice, 22: 351–365.
[18] Neish, A., 2009. Microbes in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology, 136: 65–80.
[19] Tezcan F I,2007. Intestinal immun sistem. Turkey Clinics J Pediatr Sci. 3(6): 65–66.