ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This study was carried out on three different brands of cola which are marketed in Turkey. Liquid portions of the collected colas were fully removed at 55 oC. Antibacterial effect spectrum was determined by Cut Plug method. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations were determined by micro dilution method by preparing serial dilutions of cola on studied bacterial strains. It was found that cola has a strong antibacterial effect on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O: 157 H: 7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria and antifungal effect of cola could not identified. It was considered that cola drinks can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria that causing food toxicity. At the end of the study, a comparison could not carried out as there was no study on the antibacterial effects of cola on various bacteria. It has been considered that cola beverages can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria that causing food toxicity.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi
Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), Ciltl 36, No. 1 (2015)
ISSN: 1300-1949
Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science
Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No. 1 (2015)
ISSN: 1300-1949
_____________
* Corresponding author. Email address: biochemist58@gmail.com
http://dergi.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/ojs/index.php/fenbilimleri ©2015 Faculty of Science, Cumhuriyet University
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
Şeker DAĞ1*, Necati ÖZPINAR2, Hülya ÖZPINAR1, Musa SARI1
1Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 58140 Sivas, Türkiye
23th Army Food and Central Laboratuary, Erzincan, Turkey
Received: 02.10.2014; Accepted: 10.12.2014
__________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract. This study was carried out on three different brands of cola which are marketed in Turkey. Liquid portions of the
collected colas were fully removed at 55 oC. Antibacterial effect spectrum was determined by Cut Plug method. Minimum
Inhibitory Concentrations were determined by micro dilution method by preparing serial dilutions of cola on studied bacterial
strains. It was found that cola has a strong antibacterial effect on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli,
Escherichia coli O: 157 H: 7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria and antifungal effect of cola could not
identified. It was considered that cola drinks can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria that causing food
toxicity. At the end of the study, a comparison could not carried out as there was no study on the antibacterial effects of cola
on various bacteria. It has been considered that cola beverages can be used for the treatment of bacterial factors and bacteria
that causing food toxicity.
Keywords: Cola, Antibacterial Effect, Bacterial Diarrhea, Cut Plug Method
__________________________________________________________________________________
1. INTRODUCTION
In line with the information they got from their ancestors, people have used many methods by
taking advantage of natural resources for the treatments of numerous diseases throughout history.
Although medicine has developed in the recent years, this tradition based on nature still continues
especially in developing communities as the resources are easily accessible and economical.
Cola was invented as syrup by J.S. Premberton who was a famous pharmacist by that time.
The formula has been the world's biggest secret since the invention and has been kept safe for more
than 125 years. Coca-Cola is said to be healing many diseases such as headache, weakness and
morphine addiction in those years [1, 2]. In addition, cola is reported to be used for the treatment of
diarrhea in remote areas of Zambia in which medical assistance is insufficient [3].
Various researches on the effect of cola on human and animal health have been carried out in
recent years. These researches are mainly about the erosive and mechanic effects of cola [4]. However,
there is no research on the question of whether cola has some antibacterial effects on the various
bacteria or not.
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
53
As it is known, cola has a large consumption potential all around the world. The aim of this
study was to determine if cola has antibacterial effects on various bacteria. And in this research, it was
intended to demonstrate experimentally whether cola can be used for the treatment of some infectious
diseases.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was made on three different brands of cola which are marketed in Erzincan
(Turkey). 5x1000 ml of cola samples were collected from each brand colas were incubated at 55 oC
until liquid part evaporated. Remaining cola extract was tested by using humidity determining tool
Precisa (XM60) and concentration range was determined according to the result
Antibacterial activity- Cut plug method was used in the study [5]. Each bacterial suspension as
described in Table 1 was prepared as 0.5 McFarland (1×108 CFU/ml) in NaCl of 0,9 % from 24-hour
culture in accordance with the recommendations of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [6].
Densitometer (Den-1, Latvia) was used to measure cell concentration. 1 ml of the bacteria suspension
was put into the 20 ml of the prepared Mueller-Hinton Agar (Oxoid CM337); when casting
temperature was reached mixing process was completed, it was left for solidifying at room
temperature by pouring into the sterile petri dish. This process is performed separately for each
bacterium. For retests, this amount was determined by multiplying the number of petri dishes required
to be prepared. Wells in a diameter of 6 mm were opened on solidified petri dishes and 20 mg of cola
extract was put into these wells. Zone diameters of the disks that were formed after 72 hours of
incubation at 30 oC for fungus and after 24 hours of incubation at 35 oC for Mueller Hinton Agar
bacteria were measured.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)- Minimum inhibitory
concentration was determined by micro dilution method in accordance with the procedures developed
by the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards [7]. Dilutions of 0,007gr/10ml, 0,015
gr/10ml, 0,03gr/10ml, 0,06gr/10ml, 0,12gr/10ml, 0,25gr/10ml, 0,5gr/10ml, 1gr/10ml, 2gr/10ml were
prepared from cola extract. 50µl Mueller-Hinton Broth (Oxoid CM0405), the previously prepared
bacteria suspension at 0.5 McFarland turbidity and 100µl from each cola dilution were added into each
well within the 96-well micro plate. The last well was used as a negative control and cola extract was
not added. After 24 hours of incubation at 37 °C, plates were shaken at 300 rpm for a period of 20
minutes in the shaker and they were read by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Reader (Chopen)
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
54
at 620 nm. Doses suppressing bacterial growth were evaluated as the minimum inhibitory
concentration. Test was repeated 3 times.
Statistical analysis- Minitab 16 (Minitab Inc, State College, PA) software was used for the
statistical analysis of the findings. Results were evaluated at P<0, 05 level with 2 sample t tests at a
confidence interval of 95%.
3. RESULTS
The results of antibacterial effect- The research was carried out on three different cola brands
and it was observed that all colas had strong antibacterial effect on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus
faecalis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O: 157 H: 7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica
bacteria and they had mild or weak antibacterial effect on the other bacteria used in the research.
Antifungal effect of cola was not observed (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Concentration range of the colas that are ready to be consumed- It was determined that colas
from three different brands had active ingredient between 9.5% - 10%.
(a) (b)
Fig. 1. Antibacterial analysis image of Yersinia enterocolitica (a), antibacterial analysis image of Enterococcus faecalis (b).
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
55
Table 1. Antibacterial and antifungal effects of Cola1, Cola2, Cola3
Results of the minimum inhibitory concentration- For Cola1 and Cola2, Bacillus Cereus,
Escherichia coli O:157 H:7, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria MIC value was
0,015 gr/10ml Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus
aureus, Streptococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria MIC value was 0,03 gr/10ml
Salmonella enteritidis bacteria MIC value was 0,06 gr/10 ml and for Cola3, Enterococcus faecalis,
Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O:157 H:7, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria
MIC value was 0,015gr/10ml Bacillus cereus bacteria MIC value was 0,007 gr/10ml Listeria
monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes bacteria
MIC value was 0,03 gr/10ml Salmonella enteritidis bacteria MIC value was 0,06gr/10ml (Table 2).
Statistical analysis results- No statistically significant difference was found between cola 1
and cola 2 except for Streptococcus pyogenes but the difference was considered to be statistically
significant according to the control (ampisilin sulbaktam 10 ug) in three cola brands. In addition, the
difference between Cola1 and Cola3 and between Cola2 and Cola3 was significant except for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis, Streptococcus epidermidis and Yersinia
enterocolitica bacteria (Table 3).
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
56
Tablo 2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Cola1, Cola2 and Cola3.
Table 3. Statistical Analysis Result of Control, Cola1, Cola2 and Cola3
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
57
4. DISCUSSION
Cola and cola beverages have become the most consumed beverage in the world in decades.
Therefore, many studies have been carried out on cola. In addition to the researches showing harmful
effects of cola, there are also studies showing the therapeutic use of this beverage.
It was reported that Hypokalemic myopathies have developed as a result of excessive cola
consumption in Appel's and Rice's studies [8, 9]. There are many causes of hypokalemia. One of them
is that cola contains too much sugar (11gr/dl) and insufficient amount of potassium. Osmotic diuresis
develops as a result of uncontrolled consumption of cola and inadequate intake of potassium with the
diet leads to lack of potassium. Another reason of this is the caffeine (97 mg/L) concentration in cola.
Caffeine has antagonist effects on the adenosine receptors. Effect of adenosine receptors in many
organs including kidney cause disposal of potassium through urinary tract and hypokalemia develops.
It was reported that an Australian farmer had a sudden muscular atrophy on March 2002 and it was
reported that the reason for this muscular atrophy was excessive cola consumption (4L/Day) [10].
Another study was carried out on the carcinogenic effect of cola. In this study, cola was given
to rats in various age groups daily and the effects were evaluated histopathologically. As a result of the
experiment which lasted for 104 weeks, malignant mammary tumors were detected significantly in
females. In addition, pancreatic exocrine adenomas were detected both in males and females [11].
Besides, it has been reported that cola has negative effects in mouth and on teeth due to
erosive effects caused by the regular consumption [12, 13, 14].
When examined studies on the use of cola for treatment purposes are analyzed, we see that
[15], managed to treat gastric diospyrobezoars by endoscopic cola injection method in a study.
Phytobezoar was also treated successfully with cola in another study [16].
There was no study on the antibacterial activity of cola in related literature. In this study,
antibacterial spectrum of cola was determined and it was found out that cola has a strong antibacterial
effect especially on Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O:157
H:7, Salmonella enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria and it has a weak antibacterial effect on
the other bacteria used in this study. Antifungal effect of cola could not been identified.
Intestines are sterile at birth. More than 500 individual specific species and 104 bacteria form
bacterial flora according to the mode of delivery, genetic features, environmental contact and nutrition
type [17, 18]. These commensal bacteria provide significant benefits on nutrition, angiogenesis, and
DAĞ, ÖZPINAR, ÖZPINAR, SARI
58
mucosal immunity. Intestinal bacteria are also involved in bile salt metabolism, lipid hydrolysis,
fragmentation of proteins into peptides and amino acids and vitamin synthesis [18, 19].
Antibacterial effects of uncontrolled consumption of cola on the intestinal flora should also be
noted. It should not be ignored that uncontrolled consumption of cola may cause immune system
failures, vitamin deficiencies, and digestive problems. In addition, it is thought that cola can be used
for the treatment of bacterial factors and on bacterial diarrhea causing food toxicity.
REFERENCES
[1] http://www.kobitek.com_en_cok_taninan_markalarindan_coca- colanin_ dunyasi (2012).
[2] http://www.makaleler.com/tarih-makaleleri/tarihte-coca-cola-sirket-tarihinin-bir-ozeti. htm
Makaleler (2012).
[3] Torjesen, I., 2011.Coca-Cola supply chain helps bring diarrhoea treatments to developing World,
BMJ 343: d5825 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5825.
[4] Kapıcıoğlu, S., Baki, A., Reis, A., Tekelioğlu, Y., 1991. Cola drinks consumption and
oesophagitis, Dis. Esophagus, 2(4): 306–308.
[5] Pridham, T.G., Lindenfelser, L. A., Shotwell, O.L., Stodola, F., Benedict, R.G., Foley, C., Jacks,
P.W., Zaumeyer, W.J., Perston, W.H., Mitchell, J.W, Phytopathology (1956) 46:27.
[6] Anonymous, Clinical laboratory standards institute performance standards for antimicrobial disk
and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria ısolated from animals; approved standard- second edition,
(Standards Institute Pennsylvania, USA), 2002. 22(6):1–86.
[7] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial
Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically;Approved Standard – Eighth edition. NCCLS
document M7-A6. NCCLS, (Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA), 2003.
[8] Appel, C.C., Myles, T.D., 2001. Caffeine-induced hypokalemic paralysis in pregnancy, Obstet
Gynecol, 97(5 Pt 2): 805–807.
[9] Rice, J.E., Faunt, J.D., 2001. Excessive cola consumption as a cause of hypokalemic myopathy,
Int Med J. 31:317–318.
[10] Mudge, D.W., Jhonson, D.W., 2004. Coca-Cola and kangaroos, Lancet, 364:1190.
[11] Belpoggı, F., Soffrıttı, M., Tibaldı, E., et al., 2006. Results of Long-Term Carcinogenicity
Bioassays on Coca-Cola Administered to Sprague-Dawley Rats, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1076:736–752.
[12] Orbak, R., Dayı, E., Atasever, M., 2002. An experimental study on the effect of acidic drinks on
gingival health in dogs, Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 26:1277–1281.
[13] Turgut, M.D., Tekçiçek, M., Çetin, N., Pınar, A., Ölmez, S., Alpar, R., 2004. The erosive effects
of some carbonated beverages consumed in Turkey, Journal of Hacettepe Faculty of Dentistry, 28(3):
8–14.
[14] Rahim, T., Rahim, A., Mohammed, D., Akil, H., 2012. Water sorption characteristics of
restorative dental composites immersed in acidic drinks, Dental Materials, 28 (6):e63-e67.
Antimicrobial Effect of Cola on Several Microorganisms
59
[15] Chung, Y.W., Han, D.S., Par, Y. K., et al., 2006. Huge gastric diospyrobezoars successfully
treated by oral intake and endoscopic injection of Coca-Cola, Digestive and Liver Disease, 38: 515–
517.
[16] Juan, M., Lapiedra, M., Picazo, V., 2006. Phytobezoar dissolution with Coca-Cola, Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 29(5): 291–293.
[17] Saevedra, J.M., 2007.Use of Probiotics in Pediatrics: Rationale, Mechanisms of Action and
Practical Aspects. Nutrition in clinical practice, 22: 351–365.
[18] Neish, A., 2009. Microbes in gastrointestinal health and disease. Gastroenterology, 136: 65–80.
[19] Tezcan F I,2007. Intestinal immun sistem. Turkey Clinics J Pediatr Sci. 3(6): 65–66.
... Throughout human history, according to knowledge gained by our ancestors, several methods have been used to benefit from natural resources and particularly of plants in the treatment of diseases. Despite the developments in medicine in recent years, this tradition has continued, especially in developing societies, due to both ease of availability and for economic reasons [1][2][3][4]. Traces of the human use of plants for different puposes such as a food source and treatment have been found in fossils 60,000 years old from the Mid-Paleolithic Age. Morphine, which was isolated in 1803-1804 by Derosne and Seguin and in 1805 by Frederich Serturner and digitalis which was obtained by Nativelle in 1868 were the first plant source components used as medicinal effect substances [5]. ...
... The red-coloured fruits have been used for treatment purposes for thousands of years in Chinese medicine. The known effects include anti-ageing, regulation of kidney and As C. elegans is similar to the human genome, they have been widely used in many recent scientific studies as a model organism [3,[7][8][9]. It is a soil-dwelling, apathogenic nematode, 1mm in length, with two genders of male and hermaphrodite. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Herbal treatments in particular have a place which cannot be ignored in current alternative medicine. One of these plants, which has become very well-known recently and which is widely consumed in Turkey is the Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.). To investigate the effects of Goji berry, on fertility when used by individuals in their 20s and on physical growth when used by those of a younger age. It was also aimed to test the genotoxic effects of the Goji berry on Allium cepa L. meristem stem cells. Material and Methods: Goji berry water and ethanol extracts were tested on a model organism of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) in respect of fertility and physical growth. Allium cepa L. meristem stem cells exposed to Goji berry extract were examined for genotoxic effects. Results: A significant dose-related reduction was determined in fertility, physical growth and mitotic index in ethanol extract. In the water extract, a reduction in fertility was determined at high doses and an increase with the lowest dose used in the study. No significant effect was found on physical growth of water extract at any dose. Conclusion: The results of this study showed negative effects on cell division, fertility and physical growth of Goji berry, which has been used since ancient times in Chinese medicine and for which several benefits have been claimed in literature. It must be emphasised that dose-related side-effects may develop with the use of plants for medicinal puposes.
... The estimated final concentration of caffeine in the soda product used in the present study (24 mg ml À1 , based on information obtained from the manufacturer [www.us.coca-cola. com]), was substantially lower than levels shown to exhibit antimicrobial or anti-biofilm properties in studies by Chakraborty et al. (2020) and Da g et al. (2015). In addition, studies by Parini et al. (2005) and Howlin et al. (2015) demonstrated that bubbles could significantly reduce the structure of Streptococcus mutans biofilms. ...
Article
Liquid wastes (LW) disposed in hospital handwashing sinks may affect colonization of sink P-traps by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP), causing CPKP dispersal into the patient care environment. This study aimed to determine the effect of LW on biofilm formation and CPKP colonization in a P-Trap model (PTM). PTMs containing polymicrobial biofilms grown in autoclaved municipal tap water (ATW) supplemented with 5% dextrose in water (D5W), nutritional shake (Shake), sugar-based soft drink (Soda), or ATW were inoculated with K. pneumoniae ST258 KPC+ (ST258) or K. pneumoniae CAV1016 (CAV1016) and sampled after 7, 14, and 21 d. Biofilm bio-volume, mean thickness, and heterotrophic plate counts were significantly reduced and roughness coefficient significantly increased by Soda compared with D5W, Shake, or ATW. CPKP were significantly reduced by Soda but significantly amplified by D5W (ST258; CAV1016, 7 d) and Shake (ST258) suggesting that reducing LW disposal in sinks may reduce CPKP dispersal into patient care environments.
Article
Full-text available
To determine the diffusion coefficient, water sorption and solubility of various types of restorative dental composites and to evaluate the effect of acidic media (orange juice and coke) on their characteristics. Resin composite specimens (Filtek™ Z350, Spectrum(®) TPH(®)3 and Durafill(®) VS) were prepared in a stainless steel mold of 1mm thickness and 10mm diameter (n=5) and light-cured. All samples were dried at 37°C, immersed in media (distilled water, orange and coke) at 37°C and weighed at suitable time intervals (15, 35, 155, 320, 785, etc.min) until 40 days of immersion and then were dried again for 40 days. Diffusion coefficient (m(2)s(-1)) was determined according to Fick's second law while water sorption and solubility (μg/mm(3)) were calculated based on BS EN ISO 4049:2000. Data of water sorption and solubility were analyzed with One-Way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe test at p=0.05. The experimental data obtained were obeyed and nearly fitted to the diffusion theoretical data plot. The highest values of diffusion coefficients were presented by Durafill(®) VS (32.23-45.25×10(-13)m(2)s(-1)). Diffusion coefficients of Filtek™ Z350 and Spectrum(®) TPH(®)3 were the highest when immersed in coke media followed by distilled water and orange juice. The water sorption of most composites was significantly increased after immersion in coke and orange (p<0.05). Meanwhile only Spectrum(®) TPH(®)3 showed an increase in solubility when immersed in coke media. Z350 presented the highest water sorption after immersion in distilled water and coke (16.13 and 18.22μg/mm(3)) while Durafill(®) VS presented the highest solubility (7.20-9.27μg/mm(3)). The exposure of restorative dental composites to acidic drinks can cause an increase in diffusion coefficient, water sorption and solubility parameters which may accelerate the degradation process and thus reduce the life span of composite restoration.
Article
The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary investigation on the effects of cola drink consumption on gingival health in dogs and thereafter to come up with an opinion as to what extent cola consumption has an impact on gingival health in humans. The study was carried out on 20 healthy dogs (range 2.3-12 years; mean 8.3 years). The dogs were randomly divided into two equal groups. The control group was not given anything containing acid, while the experimental group was given classic Coca Cola® (pH: 2.4) (500 ml daily). All the dogs were fed a number of different commercial diets throughout the study. Gingival index (Löe-Silness) and plaque index (Silness-Löe) scores were utilized in order to assess the periodontal status of the dogs. These scores were re-evaluated after 12 weeks. At the same time, a biopsy was taken from the gingiva. The biopsy samples were examined by flow-cytometry, thus the proliferative index (PI) was determined. The significance of the differences was assessed using the paired t-test. The findings suggested that the periodontal condition the control group was better than the experimental group. While the difference between the evaluations at the beginning and after 12 weeks was not found to be statistically significant in the control group (p>0.05), this difference was found to be statistically significant in the experimental group (p<0.001). Considering the DNA distribution fraction of the cell cycle, the rates of cells were determined. In the experimental group, the ratio of cells having stable DNA content, and which were not in the mitotic phase (G0), to the cells which transform into the proliferation phase with the increase in mRNA synthesis (G1) (G0/G1) was found to be low. Similarly, the ratio of cells which proliferated following the synthesis phase (G2), to cells in the mitotic phase(M) (G2/M) was determined to be low. Contrary to this, both the synthesis phase (S) and the P1 phase were seen to be high. The difference between the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant. In conclusion, acidic drinks are a potential risk factor for oral health. Cola that contained high acid resulted in erosive lesions in the oral mucosa.
Article
Most, if not all, animals coexist with a complement of prokaryotic symbionts that confer a variety of physiologic benefits. In humans, the interaction between animal and bacterial cells is especially important in the gastrointestinal tract. Technical and conceptual advances have enabled rapid progress in characterizing the taxonomic composition, metabolic capacity, and immunomodulatory activity of the human gut microbiota, allowing us to establish its role in human health and disease. The human host coevolved with a normal microbiota over millennia and developed, deployed, and optimized complex immune mechanisms that monitor and control this microbial ecosystem. These cellular mechanisms have homeostatic roles beyond the traditional concept of defense against potential pathogens, suggesting these pathways contribute directly to the well-being of the gut. During their coevolution, the bacterial microbiota has established multiple mechanisms to influence the eukaryotic host, generally in a beneficial fashion, and maintain their stable niche. The prokaryotic genomes of the human microbiota encode a spectrum of metabolic capabilities beyond that of the host genome, making the microbiota an integral component of human physiology. Gaining a fuller understanding of both partners in the normal gut-microbiota interaction may shed light on how the relationship can go awry and contribute to a spectrum of immune, inflammatory, and metabolic disorders and may reveal mechanisms by which this relationship could be manipulated toward therapeutic ends.
Article
For oesophageal epithelial changes to develop from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), the character of the refluxate must be acid enough to cause injury. Experimentally, copious perfusion of the oesophagus with weak acid is quite harmless. However, hydrochloric acid alone with a pH below 3.0 may cause oesophageal injury. Cola drinks are strongly acidic (pH 2.5). This study analyses the influence of and possible interaction between cola consumption and oesophagitis. Twenty rats were divided into two groups of 10. The animals received saline (pH 7.0) or cola (pH 2.6) per OS with 24 h free access to these solutions. After the experiment the oesophagus was dissected. The mucosa was macroscopically and histopathologically examined, and flow cytometric analysis was used to look for proliferative activity. The histopathological analysis showed that there is no difference between saline and cola. But the findings of cell cycle analysis showed that the effects of cola and saline in inducing oesophageal mucosal damage are different. In the cola group the values were G0/G1, 7.33 +/- 2.88; S, 29.88 +/- 2.88; G2/M, 0.10 +/- 0.01; PI (proliferative-regenerative index), 29.76 +/- 2.88. The rat cell population g0/g1 phases were found to be low (p < 0.01), and the cell population S and PI phases were found to be significantly elevated compared with the control group (p < 0.01). (G0/G1, 79.30 +/- 5.97; S, 16.06 +/- 8.27; G2/M, 4.66 +/- 4.03; PI, 20.03 +/- 6.01). These results were reflected in the proliferative index, which is used as a measure of the regeneration index. The data show that cola has proliferative and regenerative effects on the oesophageal mucosa, and it is possible that its regenerative effect is caused as a result of an irritant effect.
Article
Excessive ingestion of caffeine can induce hypokalemia, which affects the neuromuscular system and can lead to paralysis. A 24-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 2-0-0-2 at 33 weeks' gestation presented with muscular paralysis and hypokalemia secondary to drinking 6 to 7 L of cola per day with little other oral intake. After potassium replacement and stopping caffeine ingestion, the symptoms resolved quickly. The physiologic changes of pregnancy might potentiate the effect of caffeine on serum potassium concentration.
Article
A diospyrobezoar is a type of phytobezoar that is considered to be harder than any other types of phytobezoars. Here, we describe a new treatment modality, which effectively and easily disrupted huge gastric diospyrobezoars. A 41-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus was admitted with lower abdominal pain and vomiting. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed three huge, round diospyrobezoars in the stomach. He was made to drink two cans of Coca-Cola every 6 h. At endoscopy the next day, the bezoars were partially dissolved and turned to be softened. We performed direct endoscopic injection of Coca-Cola into each bezoar. At repeated endoscopy the next day, the bezoars were completely dissolved.
Article
The treatment of phytobezoar is empiric. The various therapeutic choices include dietary modifications, prokinetic drugs, gastric lavage, enzymatic dissolution, endoscopic treatment, and surgery. We present two cases of phytobezoar with successful outcome after Coca-Cola administration.