No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.
Douglas K, O'Malley PG, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: the effect of statins on albuminuria
Abstract
Background: Albuminuria is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease with limited therapeutic options. Data on the effects of statins on albuminuria are conflicting. Purpose: To determine whether and to what degree statins affect albuminuria. Data Sources: English-language and non-English-language studies found in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciSearch, PASCAL, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (I PA) databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that were published between January 1974 and November 2005. Study Selection: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of statins reporting baseline and follow-up measurements of albuminuria or proteinuria measured by 24-hour urine collection or the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently abstracted study quality, characteristics, and outcomes. Data Synthesis: Fifteen studies involving a total of 1384 patients and averaging 24 weeks in duration were included. Meta-analysis of the proportional reduction in proteinuria showed that statins reduced albuminuria (11 studies) and proteinuria (4 studies) in 13 of 15 studies. The reduction in excretion was greater among studies with greater baseline albuminuria or proteinuria: change of 2% (95% Cl, -32% to 35%) for those with excretion less than 30 mg/d, -48% (Cl, -71% to -25%) for those with excretion of 30 to 300 mg/d, and -47% (Cl, -67% to -26%) for those with excretion more than 300 mg/d. Statistical heterogeneity was evident only in the group with excretion greater than 300 mg/d (excretion < 30 mg/d, I 2 = 23% [P = 0.27]; excretion of 30 to 299 mg/d, I 2 = 0% [P = 0.64]; excretion ≥ 300 mg/d, I 2 = 63% [P = 0.020]). Limitations: Published studies were not of high quality on average and varied markedly in effect size, as well as in characteristics of the cohorts. Unpublished studies showing no effect could impact these results. Conclusion: Statins may have a beneficial effect on pathologic albuminuria. The validity of this finding, and whether this effect translates into reduction of cardiovascular or end-stage renal disease, requires larger studies.
... Extensive research has been conducted on statins and their relationship with CKD or kidney function, yet these studies remain controversial. Some trials have confirmed renal protective effects and reduced proteinuria (15,16), while other RCTs show no effect (17). However, the latest meta-analysis of statins and CKD included 33 RCTs, finding no significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine levels between the statin and control groups (18). ...
Objective
The impact of lipid-lowering medications on chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a subject of debate. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to elucidate the potential effects of lipid-lowering drug targets on CKD development.
Methods
We extracted 11 genetic variants encoding targets of lipid-lowering drugs from published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, encompassing LDLR, HMGCR, PCSK9, NPC1L1, APOB, ABCG5/ABCG8, LPL, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and PPARA. A Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted targeting these drug-related genes. CKD risk was designated as the primary outcome, while estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were assessed as secondary outcomes. Additionally, mediation analysis was performed utilizing 731 immune cell phenotypes to identify potential mediators.
Results
The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between ANGPTL3 inhibitors and a reduced risk of CKD (OR [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.75-0.96]). Conversely, LDLR agonists were significantly linked to an increased risk of CKD (OR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02-1.22]). Regarding secondary outcomes, lipid-lowering drugs did not significantly affect eGFR and BUN levels. Mediation analysis indicated that the reduction in CKD risk by ANGPTL3 inhibitors was mediated through modulation of the immune cell phenotype, specifically HLA-DR on CD14+ CD16+ monocytes (Mediated proportion: 4.69%; Mediated effect: -0.00899).
Conclusion
Through drug-targeted MR analysis, we identified a causal relationship between lipid-lowering drug targets and CKD. ANGPTL3 and LDLR may represent promising candidate drug targets for CKD treatment.
... 41 Also, previous meta-analyses showed similar findings with a lower sample size. 42 Moreover, another two meta-analyses showed that statin reduced proteinuria and GFR deterioration. 43,44 The latest meta-analysis done in this regard showed that statin reduced albuminuria but not proteinuria or GFR, which is different from our findings as we showed that statin use reduced all 3 measures of DKD progression. ...
Introduction This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate the effect of statin on the prevention and progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) hypothesizing that statin would elicit beneficial effects on patients with DKD. Methods PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Sciences were searched. The studies were included if they investigated the impact of statin on the development or progression of DKD. DKD development was defined as the occurrence of proteinuria or albuminuria due to type 2 diabetes. DKD progression was defined as the change in proteinuria, albuminuria, and GFR over time. Results The total number of the included patients was 36,938 from 27 studies. Statin use was significantly associated with reduction in DKD risk (HR=0.66; 95%CI: 0.58-00.76). Moreover, patients on statin had significantly lower deterioration in albuminuria (WMD=-21.81; 95%CI: -36.91- -6.70), proteinuria (WMD= -0.12; 95%CI: -0.12- -0.03) and GFR (WMD=-1.21; 95%CI: -2.20- -0.23). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that statin has beneficial effect on DKD by reducing albuminuria, proteinuria and GFR. These findings were reproducible among patients with microalbuminuria, patients on low intensity statins and patients on different treatment durations. Future larger high-quality trials are needed to investigate this topic and make more fine and reliable conclusions in the view of the encouraging findings we found in our analysis.
... g/day on average. Although other studies have found no effect of statin therapy on proteinuria, there is a lack of well-designed clinical trials with the primary objective of assessing the impact of LDL-C on proteinuria [24,25]. To date, the effect of PCSK9i on proteinuria has not been published, but based on the toxic effects of lipids on the kidneys, it seems plausible that higher LDL-C reductions achieved with these drugs could favor more renal benefits, especially in terms of proteinuria. ...
Control of dyslipidemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not always guaranteed with statins and/or ezetimibe. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have opened up a new era in lipid control, but their effect on renal function and proteinuria in real life have not yet been evaluated. The aim of the present study was to analyze the evolution of renal function and proteinuria in a cohort of CKD patients treated with PCSK9i. This retrospective multicentric cohort study included CKD patients treated with PCSK9i. Baseline epidemiological data, comorbidities and laboratory findings (including estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], proteinuria and lipid profile) were collected. The evolution of renal function, proteinuria and lipid profile was analyzed during the 1-year follow-up. The cohort included 76 patients (68% male, mean age 66 ± 10 years). The mean baseline creatinine was 1.55 ± 0.77 mg/dL, and the mean eGFR was 52 ± 22 mL/min/1.73 m2. Reductions in LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides during the first month were 51 ± 25%, 32 ± 25% and 11 ± 40%, respectively, levels that remained stable throughout the first year (p < 0.001 for LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol trends and p = 0.002 for triglyceride trend). During follow-up, proteinuria improved from 57 (9–481) to 30 (7–520) mg/g (p = 0.021). In addition, eGFR remained stable, and no adverse events were reported. In our cohort, dyslipidemia treatment with PCSK9i was associated with decreased proteinuria in CKD patients, an effect that might be due to reduced lipid nephrotoxicity. Clinical trials are needed to further investigate whether this impact on proteinuria can significantly slow CKD progression in the long term.
... High dose statin leads to proteinuria and hematuria and renal tubule toxicity [120,167]. But it has reported to have reduced proteinuria in some groups and may not do so in some other groups [168,169]. ...
... In addition, it has been reported that dyslipidaemia associated with arteriosclerotic complications is the most common cause of death in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and dyslipidaemia has also been shown to be an independent risk factor for the progression of CKD [13,14]. Furthermore, a previous meta-analysis demonstrated that statins for treatment of dyslipidaemia may be beneficial for the reduction of albuminuria in CKD patients [15]. In practice, however, it is unclear which routinely available lipid measure is more applicable in estimation of kidney function. ...
Background:
Dyslipidaemia has always been regarded as the cornerstone of arteriosclerosis and is related to the pathogenesis of renal insufficiency. However, it is unclear which routinely available lipid parameter is related to urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR). The purpose of this study was to examine the lipid abnormalities associated with UACR in the general population in China.
Methods:
The present study was nested in an ongoing Risk Evaluation of cAncers in Chinese diabetic Individuals: A lONgitudinal (REACTION) study, which was designed to demonstrate the association of abnormal glucose metabolism with the risk of cancer in the Chinese population. This cross-sectional study included 34, 569 subjects (11, 390 males and 23, 179 females) from 8 different regional community cohorts, with an average age of 57.9 years. The UACR data were divided into the < 25% group, the 25-49% group, the 50-74% group, and the ≥ 75% group according to the quartile division of the centre where the subjects visited. The lipid classes were defined according to the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of dyslipidaemia in Chinese adults. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of the lipid parameters and UACR.
Results:
Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared with the other lipid parameters, triglycerides (TG) showed an adjusted odds ratio that was significant in model 1-4. This relationship was attenuated after adjusting for Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP), but TG ≥ 2.3 mmol/L was still significantly associated with UACR in total subjects and in both men and women (OR: 1.131, 95% CI 1.065-1.203, P < 0.001 in total subjects; OR: 1.134, 95% CI 1.022-1.258, P = 0.017 in men; OR: 1.129, 95% CI 1.046-1.219, P = 0.002 in women). In the stratified analysis, elevated TG was significantly associated with increased urinary albumin in subjects with eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 5.6 ≤ FBG < 7.0 or 7.8 ≤ PBG < 11.1 mmol/L, 24 ≤ BMI < 28 kg/m2, 120 ≤ SBP < 140 and/or 80 ≤ DBP < 90 mmHg.
Conclusions:
We conclude that high TG levels rather than total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels are associated with UACR in the general population in China.
... Hemmer oder Angiotensin-II-Rezeptorantagonist als erster Wahl und vermutlich die Behandlung einer Dyslipidämie (Ziel: LDL-Cholesterol <2,6 mmol/l)[7][8][9][10][11][12].MAU und essentielle arterielle HypertonieIn mehreren Studien bei hypertensiven Patienten scheint eine Korrelation zwischen dem Vorliegen einer MAU und einer erhöhten Häufigkeit kardiovaskulärer Komplikationen zu bestehen. Das Risiko steigt mit zunehmender Schwere der MAU[13]. ...
... A noter également que la présence d'une MAU semble représenter un stade de néphropathie diabétique où le traitement peut éviter la progression vers l'insuffisance rénale chronique. C'est pourquoi un contrôle glycémique strict (but: HbA1c <7%), un traitement intensif de la tension artérielle (but: TA <130/80) avec l'introduction d'un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine (IECA) ou d'un antagoniste des récepteurs de l'angiotensine 2 (ARA2) en premier choix et probablement le traitement d'une dyslipidémie (but: LDL-cholestérol <2,6 mmol/l) sont recommandés[7][8][9][10][11][12].MAU et hypertension artérielle essentielleDans plusieurs études avec des patients hypertendus, la présence d'une MAU semble corrélée avec une augmentation des événements cardiovasculaires. Ce risque augmente d'autant plus que la MAU est importante ...
... It is clear that progress in proteinuria and permanent renal damage is corrected by early treatment of albuminuria patients (32) . There are numerous studies that examine the relationship between albuminuria and use of statin (30,(33)(34)(35) . ...
... However, statins did not significantly influence urinary albumin excretion when baseline levels were <30 mg/24 h. 21 Considering this issue, in the present study, effect of atorvastatin as a well-known statin was investigated in patients with diabetic nephropathy with history of gestational diabetes by examining proteinuria and renal function. ...
Background
Gestational diabetes is known as one of the diseases through pregnancy. In the present study, changes in proteinuria after atorvastatin administration among patients with history of gestational diabetes were studied.
Materials and Methods
In this randomized clinical trial, 42 patients were included in the study. Atorvastatin was administered for 21 patients, and 21 patients were designated as control group. Lipid profile, protein, and 24 h urine creatinine (uCr) levels were determined in the beginning and 3 months after intervention. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Lipid profile in intervention group was enhanced; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had decreased while triglyceride had not changed and high-density lipoprotein had been increased. There was no statistically significant change in serum Cr, serum urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uCr, urine volume, 24-h urine protein level, or urine protein/Cr ratio on both groups during the study; also, there was no statistically significant difference between groups.
Conclusions
Although LDL level decreased after atorvastatin therapy, atorvastatin therapy had no effect on the level of proteinuria or other parameters related to kidney function.
... The NLA Renal Expert Panel was not convinced that statins are associated with proteinuria and recommended the use of more potent statins in patients who have an increased albumin/creatinine ratio as part of their CVD risk profile. Statins may have beneficial effects on albuminuria, an independent risk factor for CVD and renal diseases [79] , as there seems to be some effect of statin therapy in reducing progression of renal function deterioration, demonstrated in patients with established renal disease [80] . ...
Statin therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in reducing mortalities associated with cardiovascular diseases through preventing myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Despite the proven benefits of statins in this context, there are growing concerns among patients and physicians on the safety of short-term and long-term use and their adverse effects, especially muscle toxicity, resulting in non-adherence and withdrawal of the treatment. Reports and publications on a variety of statin-associated side effects, with major focus on myopathy as the most commonly reported side effect, were reviewed. The incidence, diagnosis, prevention and management of statin-induced adverse effects are outlined in this updated review to highlight the importance of statin use in high-risk populations, and to reduce the rate of under-prescription and withdrawal of the treatment. Key points: Side effects of statins, including muscle aches, diabetes and liver function test abnormalities, are increasingly recognised. Statin-related muscle side effects have recently been systematically classified. Rare autoimmune phenomena related to statin therapy, including necrotising myopathy, interstitial lung disease and lupus-like reactions, are now recognised. Statins increase the risk of transition to diabetes in susceptible individuals with the metabolic syndrome. There is little systematic evidence to link cognitive impairment with statin therapy.
... Статины уменьшают накопление липидов в ткани почек, угнетают пролиферацию мезангиальных клеток и развитие гломерулосклероза, обладают антипротеинурическим действием [15]. Эффективность терапии статинами в снижении патологической альбуминурии связывают с уменьшением эндотелиальной дисфункции [16]. ...
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is related to increased cardiovascular risk, and requires thorough dyslipidemia control. Statin therapy is expedient for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disorders in CKD patients. The opportunities are reviewed for the use of statins in these patients, efficacy and safety at different stages of CKD, the need for dosage correction and choice of the exact drug. The comparison performed, benefits and misconveniences discussed of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in CKD.
... 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors-also known as statins-are a class of drugs used to lower cholesterol levels by inhibiting the enzyme HMG-CoA reductase that plays a central role the production of cholesterol in the liver. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been shown to decrease the rate of decline of kidney function and to reduce proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease stages I-III [62,63]. These effects are independent of serum lipid levels, implicating pleiotropic effects of statins in the kidney [64]. ...
Several of the drugs currently used for the treatment of glomerular diseases are prescribed for their immunotherapeutic or anti-inflammatory properties, based on the current understanding that glomerular diseases are mediated by immune responses. In recent years our understanding of podocytic signalling pathways and the crucial role of genetic predispositions in the pathology of glomerular diseases has broadened. Delineation of those signalling pathways supports the hypothesis that several of the medications and immunosuppressive agents used to treat glomerular diseases directly target glomerular podocytes. Several central downstream signalling pathways merge into regulatory pathways of the podocytic actin cytoskeleton and its connection to the slit diaphragm. The slit diaphragm and the cytoskeleton of the foot process represent a functional unit. A breakdown of the cytoskeletal backbone of the foot processes leads to internalization of slit diaphragm molecules, and internalization of slit diaphragm components in turn negatively affects cytoskeletal signalling pathways. Podocytes display a remarkable ability to recover from complete effacement and to re-form interdigitating foot processes and intact slit diaphragms after pharmacological intervention. This ability indicates an active inside-out signalling machinery which stabilizes integrin complex formations and triggers the recycling of slit diaphragm molecules from intracellular compartments to the cell surface. In this review we summarize current evidence from patient studies and model organisms on the direct impact of immunosuppressive and supportive drugs on podocyte signalling pathways. We highlight new therapeutic targets that may open novel opportunities to enhance and stabilize inside-out pathways in podocytes.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a set of metabolic disorders specified by hyperglycemia as a result of abnormalities in insulin secretion or sensitivity. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are the widespread co-morbidities of T2DM and share risk factors for onset and progression. Despite numerous mono- and combination therapies exist, the progression of diabetes complications remains a global health concern. Treatment options for diabetic- CKD and CVD include drugs targeting hyperglycemia, hypertension, albuminuria, hyperlipidemia and the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS). The sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 channel (SGLT2) is abundantly present in proximal tubules of the kidney and its capacity to recover glucose and sodium from the glomerular filtrate limits urinary glucose and sodium excretion. SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal and thus increase urinary glucose excretion in T2DM. SGLT2i monotherapy can improve but dual SGLT2/RAAS inhibition or SGLT2i along with other classes of drugs are more effective in protecting the kidneys and the cardiovascular system in patients with and without diabetes. Combinations such as empagliflozin and linagliptin, ertugliflozin and metolazone, dapagliflozin and sacubitril-valsartan and many more show promising results. Here, we have reviewed the ongoing and completed clinical trials, addressed current theories, and discussed necessary future research to explain the possible risks and benefits of using an SGLT2i alone and in combination with existing antidiabetic drugs and drugs acting on the cardiovascular system.
Background
Studies have shown that the use of statins could significantly improve lipid profiles; however, it remains controversial whether the use of statins could improve renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of statins on renal function in patients with CKD.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for eligible RCTs from inception to October 2020. Pooled effect estimates were assigned as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random-effects model.
Results
We selected 33 RCTs that recruited 37,391 patients with CKD patients. The summary results suggested that statin use significantly reduced urinary albumin (WMD: −2.04; 95%CI: −3.53 to −0.56; p = .007) and protein (WMD: −0.58; 95%CI: −0.95 to −0.21; p = .002) excretions and increased creatinine clearance (WMD: 0.86; 95%CI: 0.32–1.41; p = .002). However, there were no significant differences between statin and control groups in terms of changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD: 0.38; 95%CI: −0.04 to 0.79; p = .075), and serum creatinine levels (WMD: −0.07; 95%CI: −0.25, 0.12; p = .475).
Conclusions
We found that statin use in patients with CKD may slow CKD progression by lowering urinary albumin and protein excretions or increasing creatinine clearance. Further large-scale RCTs should be conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of statins on renal outcomes. Abbreviations: CKD: chronic kidney disease; RCT: randomized controlled trials; WMD: weighted mean differences; CI: confidence intervals; ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate
Since the association of microalbuminuria (MAU) with cardiovascular (CV) risk was described, a huge number of reports have emerged. MAU is a specific integrated marker of CV risk and targets organ damage in patients with hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetes and its recognition is important for identifying patients at a high or very high global CV risk. The gold standard for diagnosis is albumin measured in 24-hour urine collection (normal values of less than 30 mg/day, MAU of 30 to 300 mg/day, macroalbuminuria of more than 300 mg/day) or, more practically, the determination of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in a urine morning sample (30 to 300 mg/g). MAU screening is mandatory in individuals at risk of developing or presenting elevated global CV risk. Evidence has shown that intensive treatment could turn MAU into normoalbuminuria. Intensive treatment with the administration of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker, in combination with other anti-hypertensive drugs and drugs covering other aspects of CV risk, such as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, new anti-diabetic drugs, and statins, can diminish the risk accompanying albuminuria in hypertensive patients with or without CKD and diabetes.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the leading cause of death in Western civilizations, and hyperlipidemia is a well-established independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and CVD progression. Many chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients have the traditional CVD risk factors (age, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia); however, CKD and dialysis predispose patients to several non-traditional risk factors, including myocardial remodeling, hyperparathyroidism, malnutrition, bone and mineral disorders, anemia, albuminuria, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Interestingly, as both cardiovascular morbidity and mortality increase and renal function declines, the therapeutic benefits of lipid-lowering agents decrease significantly. However, their recognized reduction in cardiovascular events and excellent tolerability contribute to the frequent use of lipid-lowering agents. Statins are the most commonly prescribed agents for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Recent post hoc analyses of the lipid lowering in patients with CKD indicate that lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol may provide long-term cardiovascular protection in patients with CKD stages I–IV. However, questions remain regarding the optimal role of lipid-lowering agents for primary prevention in patients on dialysis. Statins remain the preferred first-line pharmacologic therapy, but non-statin add-on therapies can be used to decrease the overall risk of CVD in the CKD population, though evidence supporting each agent in CKD is limited. Finally, given the reduced glomerular filtration and drug clearance, healthcare providers should monitor their patients closely and adjust treatment goals and objectives according to patient factors, drug safety, efficacy, and cost.
This chapter will focus on the pharmacologic interventions for treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Herein, we will discuss drugs of interest for lipid management and their current and potential future use in CKD patients.
Introduction:
Apparent elevations in reporting of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)-like conditions associated with statin use have been previously described from data obtained via US and European databases.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to examine US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to compare reporting odds ratios (RORs) of ALS and ALS-like conditions between statins and other drugs, for each statin agent.
Methods:
We assessed for disproportional rates of reported ALS and ALS-related conditions for each statin agent separately by using the ROR formula. FAERS data were analyzed through September 2015.
Results:
RORs for ALS were elevated for all statins, with elevations possibly stronger for lipophilic statins. RORs ranged from 9.09 (6.57-12.6) and 16.2 (9.56-27.5) for rosuvastatin and pravastatin (hydrophilic) to 17.0 (14.1-20.4), 23.0 (18.3-29.1), and 107 (68.5-167) for atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin (lipophilic), respectively. For simvastatin, an ROR of 57.1 (39.5-82.7) was separately present for motor neuron disease.
Conclusion:
These findings extend previous evidence showing that significantly elevated ALS reporting extends to individual statin agents, and add to concerns about potential elevated occurrence of ALS-like conditions in association with statin usage.
Statins are the standard of care in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, and their use is supported by extensive evidence demonstrating their effectiveness in primary and secondary cardiovascular risk reduction. However, clinical and epidemiologic data have clearly demonstrated that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease. However, the efficacy of statins in the reduction of cardiovascular risk has not been definitively confirmed in patients with CKD and especially those with stage 5 CKD or on dialysis. This review aims to provide the current clinical and scientific data pertaining to the effects of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD.
Background:
The effects of statins on renal outcomes in patients with diabetic kidney disease were conflicting. The aim of the study was to investigate whether statins treatment could affect renal outcomes (albuminuria or proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) for diabetic kidney disease patients.
Methods:
We searched the PubMed, OVID (including MEDLINE and EMBASE), Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of statins in diabetic kidney disease patients were selected. The main outcomes were albuminuria (or proteinuria). Secondary outcomes were levels of eGFR. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted the information from enrolled trials.
Results:
Eleven randomized controlled trials with a total number of 543 diabetic kidney disease participants were included in our study. The overall estimates showed that statins statistically reduced albuminuria (standardized mean differences -0.71, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.23, P = .004), though marked heterogeneity was found within studies. However, the analysis results indicated that statins could not reduce overt proteinuria (standardized mean differences -0.14, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.26, P = .49) or slow the rate of reduction in eGFR (standardized mean differences 0.06, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.26, P = .53).
Conclusions:
In general, our study demonstrated that statins might have beneficial effects on reducing albuminuria in diabetic kidney disease patients. However, there was no strong evidence that the same intervention had an effect on overt proteinuria or eGFR outcomes in these patients.
Arterial hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are intimately related. The control of blood pressure (BP) levels is strongly recommended in patients with CKD in order to protect the kidney against the accompanying elevation in global cardiovascular (CV) risk. Actually, the goal BP in patients with CKD involves attaining values <140/90 mmHg except if albuminuria is present. In this case, it is often recommended to attain values <130/80 mmHg, although some guidelines still recommend <140/90 mmHg. Strict BP control to values of systolic BP around 120 mmHg was recently shown to be safe in CKD according to data from the SPRINT trial, albeit more data confirming this benefit are required. Usually, combination therapy initiated with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and commonly followed by the addition of a calcium channel blocker and a diuretic is needed. Further studies are required as well as new drugs in particular after the positive data obtained from new oral anti-diabetic drugs.
Background
The effects of statins in patients with diabetic nephropathy are controversial. With increasing interest in the potential therapeutic role of statins in diabetic nephropathy, it is essential to evaluate its real effects.
Methods
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Results
Fourteen trials with 2866 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, albuminuria and urinary albumin excretion rates in the statin group were reduced by 0.46 [95 % confidence interval (CI),−0.68 to −0.25, P < 0.0001] and 1.68 (95 % CI, −3.23 to −0.12, P = 0.03), respectively. The reduction of albuminuria was greater in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.56; 95 % CI, −0.80 to −0.32, P < 0.00001] and the decrease was significant during the 1 to 3 years period of statin therapy (SMD, −0.57; 95 % CI, −0.95 to −0.19, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the effects of statins were much stronger in subjects with pathologic albuminuria: change of −0.71 (95 % CI, −1.09 to −0.33, P = 0.0003) for those with urinary protein excretion 30 to 300 mg/day, −0.37 (95 % CI, −0.67 to −0.06, P = 0.02) for those with excretion more than 300 mg/day and −0.29 (95 % CI, −0.78 to 0.21, P = 0.26) for those with excretion less than 30 mg/day. In contrast, statins did not significantly reduce estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels.
Conclusions
Statins decrease the albuminuria and urinary albumin excretion rates significantly. The efficacy of statins on renal function is time dependent and better in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy.
Background:
Taiwan has the highest renal disease incidence and prevalence in the world. We evaluated the association of statin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) use with dialysis risk in hypertensive patients.
Methods:
Of 248,797 patients who received a hypertension diagnosis in Taiwan during 2001-2012, our cohort contained 110,829 hypertensive patients: 44,764 who used RASIs alone; 7,606 who used statins alone; 27,836 who used both RASIs and statins; and 33,716 who used neither RASIs or statins. We adjusted for the following factors to reduce selection bias by using propensity scores (PSs): age; sex; comorbidities; urbanization level; monthly income; and use of nonstatin lipid-lowering drugs, metformin, aspirin, antihypertensives, diuretics, and beta and calcium channel blockers. The statin and RASI use index dates were considered the hypertension confirmation dates. To examine the dose-response relationship, we categorized only statin or RASI use into four groups in each cohort: <28 (nonusers), 28-90, 91-365, and >365 cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs).
Results:
In the main model, PS-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for dialysis risk were 0.57 (0.50-0.65), 0.72 (0.53-0.98), and 0.47 (0.41-0.54) in the only RASI, only statin, and RASI + statin users, respectively. RASIs dose-dependently reduced dialysis risk in most subgroups and in the main model. RASI use significantly reduced dialysis risk in most subgroups, regardless of comorbidities or other drug use (P < 0.001). Statins at >365 cDDDs protected hypertensive patients against dialysis risk in the main model (aHR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.71), regardless of whether a high cDDD of RASIs, metformin, or aspirin was used.
Conclusion:
Statins and RASIs independently have a significant dose-dependent protective effect against dialysis risk in hypertensive patients. The combination of statins and RASIs can additively protect hypertensive patients against dialysis risk.
Physiologically, the liver and kidney are two most crucial organs for maintenance of homeostasis and metabolic regulation in the body. Although both organs possess their unique functions, both are cooperative and/or compensative for some biological regulations such as hepatorenal reflex, glucose metabolism, EPO production, and excretion of exogenous substances. Thus, dysfunction of each organ may cause that of the other such as hepatorenal syndrome. Various types of renal diseases are also caused by various liver diseases; however, the opposite relation is rare. Coexistence of multi-organ diseases is caused by systemic disorders, which may also cause multi-organ interactions such as brain-heart-liver-kidney in metabolic syndrome. So far, treatments of some of these complexed pathological conditions have been established; evidences for benefits of treatments are not enough. Thus, RCTs on treatments of these interactions are needed in the near future.
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are known to prevent cardiovascular disease and improve lipid profiles. However, the effects of statins on renal outcomes, including decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), are controversial. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of statins on renal outcomes in patients with CKD.We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. The inclusion criteria were published RCT and cohort studies comparing statin therapy to placebo or active controls in patients with CKD (eGFR
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the main cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Simultaneously, dyslipidemia has been recognized as an important cardiovascular risk factor in the general population, as well as in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several lines of evidence suggest that mechanisms and factors contributing to the pathogenesis of both cardiovascular and kidney injury may be similar. Moreover, abnormalities in lipid metabolism may be associated with the progression of CKD. Therefore, numerous experimental and clinical studies were conducted to assess the potential nephroprotective effects of statins. Although experimental data suggested that statins may slow down progression of CKD, which may underline the role of lipids in the pathogenesis of progression of CKD, at the present time, there is no clinical evidence indicating that statins postpone a decline in renal function. Further prospective, randomized, controlled studies designed specifically for the CKD population are needed to investigate the association between the lipids and the use of statins and CKD in particular. Despite clear evidence that lipid-lowering therapy reduces the risk of atherosclerotic events and death of cardiac causes in individuals without CKD, the use of HMG-Co-A reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with kidney disease is significantly less frequent. For a long time one of the explanations was the lack of a prospective, randomized, controlled study designed specifically for nondialyzed CKD patients. After recent publication of the data from the SHARP trial, given the safety and potential efficacy of statins, this lipid-lowering treatment should be administered more frequently to individuals with CKD stage 1–4, as well as those undergoing dialysis.
Hyperlipidemia in the general population is strongly associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dyslipidemia is a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at all stages. Trial results from the general population may not be applicable to all patients with CKD because they have a different lipid profile with increased atherogenic lipid fractions. Lipid-lowering therapies in these patients may have substantial benefit. Statin therapy is recommended in patients with CKD of any stage if they have elevated serum cholesterol levels. Treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with early stage CKD clearly reduces cardiovascular risk; however, available data do not support a strong nephroprotective role for statins in CKD population. In contrast to the predialysis patient population, statins do not seem to have substantial improvement in cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis patients. Although fibrates can be used to treat mixed dyslipidemia, they need to be used carefully in patients with CKD, and limited available data suggest that fibrates may have a place in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with mild to moderate CKD.
The prevailing pandemic of type 2 diabetes and hypertension has led to a dramatic rise in the incidence of chronic kidney disease worldwide. Chronic kidney disease and proteinuria are associated with cardiovascular disease and profound alteration of lipid metabolism and serum lipid and lipoprotein profile. The associated lipid disorders play a major role in progression of renal and cardiovascular disease in this population. The nature and mechanisms of lipid abnormalities in kidney disease vary depending on the presence and severity of proteinuria, renal failure, renal replacement modalities (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation), dietary and drug regimens, and preexistent genetic disorders of lipid metabolism.
This chapter aims to provide a pragmatic approach to the management of patients with CKD. First, we must correctly identify those with CKD, impart the information to the patient in an informative and appropriate way and then offer strategies to ameliorate the complications of CKD and prevent progression of the kidney disease.
Conclusive evidence regarding the effect of statins on non-end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been reported previously. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between statins and microalbuminuria, proteinuria, progression, and all-cause mortality in patients with non-end stage CKD. Databases (e.g., PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with data on statins, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, renal health endpoints, and all-cause mortality patients with non-end stage CKD to perform this meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) of the urine albumin excretion ratios (UAER), 24-h urine protein excretion, and risk ratios (RR) of all-cause mortality and renal health endpoints were calculated, and the results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 23 RCTs with 39,419 participants were selected. The analysis demonstrated that statins statistically reduced UAER to 26.73 μg/min [95%CI (−51.04, −2.43), Z = 2.16, P < 0.05], 24-h urine protein excretion to 682.68 mg [95%CI (−886.72, −478.63), Z = 6.56, P < 0.01] and decreased all-cause mortality [RR = 0.78, 95%CI (0.72, 0.84), Z = 6.08, P < 0.01]. However, the analysis results did not indicate that statins reduced the events of renal health endpoints [RR = 0.96, 95%CI (0.91,1.01), Z = 1.40, P > 0.05]. In summary, our study indicates that statins statistically reduced microalbuminuria, proteinuria, and clinical deaths, but statins did not effectively slow the clinical progression of non-end stage CKD.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common medical problem, especially in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures. The risk of kidney damage has multiple determinants and is often related to or exacerbated by intravenous or intra-arterial iodinated contrast. Contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI) has been associated with an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction, stroke, the development of heart failure, rehospitalization, progression of chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, and death. Statins have been studied extensively in the setting of chronic kidney disease and they have been shown to reduce albuminuria, but they have had no effect on the progressive reduction of glomerular filtration or the need for renal replacement therapy. Several meta-analyses have shown a protective effect of short-term statin administration on CI-AKI and led to two large randomized controlled trials evaluating the role of rosuvastatin in the prevention of CI-AKI in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus. Both trials showed a benefit of rosuvastatin prior to contrast administration in a statin-naive patient population. In aggregate, these studies support the short-term use of statins specifically for the prevention of CI-AKI in patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.
Background
In non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with dyslipidemia, statin therapy is recommended to prevent cardiovascular complications. Dyslipidemia has been also shown to be an independent risk factor for the progression of CKD. However, it is still unclear whether statin therapy exerts an inhibitory effect on renal deterioration in CKD patients with dyslipidemia. The purpose of the present study was to examine possible therapeutic effects of statin add-on therapy on renal function as well as parameters of lipid and glucose metabolism, arterial stiffness and oxidative stress, in comparison to diet therapy, in CKD patients with dyslipidemia.
Methods
This study was a randomized, open-label, and parallel-group trial consisted of a 12-months treatment period in non-dialysis CKD patients with alubuminuria and dyslipidemia. Twenty eight patients were randomly assigned either to receive diet counseling alone (diet therapy group) or diet counseling plus pitavastatin (diet-plus-statin therapy group), to achieve the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <100 mg/dl.
Results
The statin treatment by pitavastatin was well tolerated in all of the patients without any significant adverse events and the average dose of pitavastatin was 1.0 ± 0.0 mg daily after treatment. After the 12-months treatment period, LDL-C was significantly lower in the diet-plus-statin therapy group compared with the diet therapy group (diet vs diet-plus-statin: LDL-C, 126 ± 5 vs 83 ± 4 mg/dL, P < 0.001). On the other hand, the diet-plus-statin therapy did not significantly reduce albuminuria or delay the decline in eGFR compared with the diet therapy, and there was no relationship between the change in LDL-C and the change in eGFR or albuminuria. However, diet therapy as well as diet-plus-statin therapy exerted similar lowering effects on the pentosidine levels (diet therapy group, baseline vs 12 months: 40 ± 4 vs 24 ± 3 ng/mL, P = 0.001; diet-plus-statin therapy, 46 ± 7 vs 34 ± 6 ng/mL, P = 0.008). Furthermore, the results of multivariate regression analysis indicated that the change in pentosidine was a significant contributor to the change in eGFR (β = −0.536, P = 0.011).
Conclusions
Although statin add-on therapy did not show additive renal protective effects, the diet therapy as well as the diet-plus-statin therapy could contribute to the reduction in plasma pentosidine in CKD patients with albuminuria and dyslipidemia.
Meta-analyses of prospective trials of statins have revealed an approximately 25% reduction in cardiovascular events per 39 mg/dL (1 mmol/L) decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Notably, these analyses have proven the principle that the relative risk reduction achieved by a certain absolute reduction in LDL cholesterol is uniform across all strata of baseline LDL cholesterol values. Statins have also been investigated widely in early stages of chronic kidney disease, including those with diabetes; statin-based therapies reduces the risk of major atherosclerotic events. In later stages of the disease, two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients undergoing hemodialysis did not show a significant benefit of statins. A different cardiovascular pathology with vascular stiffness, calcification, structural heart disease, and sympathetic overactivity contributing to an increasing risk for cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure was deemed responsible.
Current data suggests that statins might have beneficial effects on renal outcomes. Beneficial effects of statin treatment on renal progression in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are obviously controversial. In a retrospective, controlled study, the authors have evaluated the effects of 53-week treatment with simvastatin, versus no treatment on proteinuria and renal function among 51 patients with CKD stages III-IV. By the end of the 53-week treatment, urine protein excretion decreased from 0.96 (IQR 0.54, 2.9) to 0.48 (IQR 0.18, 0.79) g/g creatinine (
P
<
0.001
) in patients treated with simvastatin in addition to ACEI and ARBs, while no change was observed among the untreated patients. Moreover, a significantly greater decrease in urine protein excretion was observed in the simvastatin group as compared with the untreated group. The mean changes of serum creatinine and eGFR did not significantly differ in both groups. A significantly greater decrease in total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was found in the simvastatin group than in the untreated group. In summary, apart from lipid lowering among CKD patients, ingesting simvastatin was associated with a decrease in proteinuria. These statin effects may become important for supportive therapy in renal damage in the future.
Background:
It is not clear which hypercholesterolemic patients benefit most from β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors with respect to the prevention of cardiovascular events. Early signs of atherosclerotic vascular damage may identify high-risk patients.
Design:
We studied whether subjects with hypercholesterolemia will benefit more from starting statin treatment in the case of high albuminuria and/or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
Methods:
Included were subjects who had hypercholesterolemia at baseline, a negative cardiovascular disease history and who were not treated with statins. In total, 2011 subjects were analysed, of whom 695 started with a statin during a follow-up of 7.0 ± 1.7 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular events were calculated in subjects who started versus those who did not start a statin stratified for albuminuria less than or ≥ 15 mg/day and/or hsCRP less than or ≥ 3 mg/L.
Results:
The start of a statin was associated with a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk in subjects with high albuminuria (HR 0.38 (0.23-0.60)), while the effect of starting a statin was non-significant in subjects with low albuminuria (HR 0.74 (0.44-1.24), P for interaction < 0.05). The effect of starting a statin was similar in subgroups with high and low hsCRP (P for interaction 0.34). When combining albuminuria and hsCRP subgroups, the start of statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events dependent on albuminuria and not on the hsCRP level.
Conclusions:
The start of statin treatment is associated with a significantly lower absolute as well as relative risk of cardiovascular events in subjects with hypercholesterolemia and elevated albuminuria, whereas these drugs had less effect in subjects with normal albuminuria.
Diabetic nephropathy has a significant impact on the quality of life and longevity for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Declining kidney function leads to secondary metabolic effects and adverse changes in lipoprotein metabolism, but, crucially, in patients with diabetes, the lipid abnormalities often emerge before the glomerular reserve is lost. The lipid profile is strongly correlated with albuminuria and predicts adverse outcomes, especially in the presence of other risk factors, such as poor glycemic control, obesity, and hypertension. In this chapter, we discuss the diagnostic and prognostic significance of lipoproteins and their subclasses in diabetic kidney disease and evaluate the evidence from clinical trials of lipid-lowering treatment and renal outcomes.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to atherosclerosis of the arterial vessel wall and to thrombosis is the foremost cause of premature mortality and of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in Europe, and is also increasingly common in developing countries.1 In the European Union, the economic cost of CVD represents annually E192 billion1 in direct and indirect healthcare costs. The main clinical entities are coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The causes of these CVDs are multifactorial. Some of these factors relate to lifestyles, such as tobacco smoking, lack of physical activity, and dietary habits, and are thus modifiable. Other risk factors are also modifiable, such as elevated blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidaemias, or non-modifiable, such as age and male gender. These guidelines deal with the management of dyslipidaemias as an essential and integral part of CVD prevention. Prevention and treatment of dyslipidaemias should always be considered within the broader framework of CVD prevention, which is addressed in guidelines of the Joint European Societies’ Task forces on CVD prevention in clinical practice.2 – 5 The latest version of these guidelines was published in 20075; an update will become available in 2012. These Joint ESC/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias are complementary to the guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice and address not only physicians [e.g. general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists] interested in CVD prevention, but also specialists from lipid clinics or metabolic units who are dealing with dyslipidaemias that are more difficult to classify and treat.
Introduction:
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), is increasing worldwide. Statin treatment, the cornerstone of prevention or treatment of CVD, might have beneficial effects on urine protein excretion and renal function as determined by the glomerular filtration rate, whereas it might protect from acute kidney injury (AKI), mainly due to contrast-induced AKI. These beneficial effects on CKD may not be drug class effects; specific statins at specific doses may help prevent CKD deterioration and reduce CVD risk. We analysed all statin studies that had renal and CVD endpoints as main outcome measures. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to February 2015.
Areas covered:
We consider the effects of statins on microalbuminuria, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, AKI associated with angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention and on CVD event rates in patients with CKD.
Expert opinion:
Current evidence points towards the need to prescribe high-potency statins in patients with CKD, before a major decline in kidney function occurs. This may reduce CVD risk and delay the progress of CKD. Administration of either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin can prevent contrast-induced AKI before angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The combination of simvastatin + ezetimibe may decrease vascular events in patients with advanced CKD.
Purpose
The aim of this article was to present the most important matters associated with dyslipidemia treatment in CKD patients. Moreover, the most important recommendations of the current (2013) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for lipid management in chronic kidney disease are presented.
Methods
Authors looked through the most recent large clinical trials and meta-analyses and presented their results. We searched using the electronic databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, DARE]. Additionally, abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings were studied.
Results
Analysis results suggest that statins exert beneficial effects on kidney since they considerably reduce 24 h urinary protein excretion and are associated with a rise in GFR. Beneficial effects of statins may be influenced by kidney disease stage, doses of medicine and treatment duration. Data suggest that statins are effective and safe for secondary prevention of CV events in individuals with mild CKD. Patients treated with statins had decreased frequency of major atherosclerotic events compared with placebo, reduced risk of CV mortality and deaths from all causes.
Conclusions
Meta-analyses results suggest that statins are associated with lipid lowering, cardiovascular and anti-proteinuric benefits in CKD patients. However, their effects on overall and cardiovascular mortality are much less obvious. Bearing in mind the advantageous effects and low risk of adverse effects, it seems that mild renal impairment should not exclude these patients from receiving a statin. However, because CKD patients in stages III–V are underrepresented in clinical trials, administration of statins to these patients who have not yet had a vascular event remains controversial.
Urinary albumin excretion is a predictor of cardiovascular death. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) with exercise training (ET) has been shown to improve exercise capacity and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, it remains unclear whether CR reduces urinary albumin excretion in CVD patients. We performed a retrospective, observational study using data obtained from 98 male CVD patients without macroalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) who participated in CR with ET during hospitalization. Twenty-three patients continued supervised ET for 6 months (supervised group) and 75 patients quit supervised ET (non-supervised group). The supervised ET program consisted of 60 minutes of supervised sessions 1-3 times a week and 30-60 minutes of home exercise at least twice a week. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) was significantly decreased in the supervised group at 6 months after enrollment (43 ± 71 mg/g to 17 ± 20 mg/g creatinine, P < 0.05) but not in the non-supervised group. eGFR was unchanged in the supervised group but was significantly decreased in the non-supervised group (72 ± 18 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) to 67 ± 17 mL/minute/1.73 m(2), P < 0.001). The results of multiple regression analysis showed that only supervised ET was an independent contributor to ΔACR. CR with supervised ET decreased urinary albumin excretion without deterioration of renal function. These findings suggest that continuation of a supervised ET program is associated with reduction in the development of CVD and reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in CVD patients.
Aim:
Whether there are differences among statins in their effect on the kidney function in diabetic patients remains controversial. In this report, we aimed to examine the comparative effects of statins on the kidney function in a long-term follow-up study.
Methods:
This was a single-center longitudinal observational historical cohort study. We enrolled 326 Japanese adult ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes who were newly prescribed one of four statins (pravastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and pitavastatin) and who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30 mL/min/1.73m(2). The outcome measurement was the annual rate of change in eGFR. We used the standardized inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) method based on the propensity score to adjust for the effects of confounding factors. Furthermore, in order to take into account the variety in the number and spacing of eGFR measurements and the duration of the follow-up period for each individual, we conducted a linear mixed-effects model regression analysis.
Results:
The median follow-up period was 4.3years (range, 3.0-7.1years). In an analysis using the IPTW method, the mean (±standard error) annual rate of change in eGFR among the patients treated with pravastatin (-0.86±0.28 mL/min/1.73m(2)/year) was significantly lower than that observed among the patients treated with rosuvastatin (-1.80±0.27, p=0.02), atorvastatin (-1.99± 0.28, p=0.004) and pitavastatin (-2.23±0.49, p=0.02). Similar results were obtained in the linear mixed-effects model regression analysis.
Conclusions:
Pravastatin may be superior to rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and pitavastatin in preserving the kidney function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Aims/IntroductionSeveral studies have indicated that statins suppress the progression of diabetic nephropathy. However, few reports have directly compared the renoprotective effects between potent and conventional statins.Materials and Methods
Patients with diabetic nephropathy, selected as those with serum creatinine level of 0.9-1.5 mg/dL and simultaneously having either microalbuminuria or positive proteinuria, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a conventional diet therapy group, a group administered 10 mg of pravastatin, and a group administered 10 mg of atorvastatin. Renal function was evaluated before and after a 12-month period of therapy.ResultsThe atorvastatin group had a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at 3 months and thereafter compared with the other groups. The urinary albumin/Cr ratio significantly decreased in the atorvastatin group; the degree of this decrease was significantly greater than that in the diet therapy group. The kidney function estimated with cystatin C (CysC) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from CysC were significantly preserved in the atorvastatin group compared with the pravastatin group. In a multivariate regression analysis, the use of atorvastatin was the only explanatory variable for the changes in CysC; this was independent of changes in LDL-C.Conclusions
Atorvastatin is more effective than pravastatin for the prevention of increase in CysC, and this renoprotective effect was considered to be due to the pleiotropic effect of atorvastatin independent of its lipid-lowering effect. This study was registered with UMIN (no. UMIN 000001774).This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Background:
High-dose statin loading is known to reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction and contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the clinical role of high-dose statin loading in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains unknown.
Methods and results:
In a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study, patients hospitalized with AHF were randomly assigned to receive oral high-dose atorvastatin loading (80 mg for 3 days, followed by 10 mg/day until discharge) or no statin therapy, on top of optimal HF treatment. The primary outcome measures were changes to the level of biomarkers related to inflammation and renal injury from admission to hospital day 4. No significant changes in the levels of NT-proBNP (-2,627±4,956 vs. -2,981±6,951 pg/ml, P=0.845), hsCRP (-6.1±16.4 vs. -2.1±16.2 mg/L, P=0.105), cystatin C (0.002±0.185 vs. 0.009±0.216 mg/L, P=0.904), ACR (-886.3±1,984.9 vs. -165.6±825.2 mg/day, P=0.124) were observed in either group. In-hospital mortality (4.3% vs. 3.8%, P>0.999) and all-cause mortality at 90 days (4.3% vs. 3.8%, P>0.999) were not significantly different between groups.
Conclusions:
This pilot study showed that oral high-dose atorvastatin loading may be used safely in patients with AHF, but is not effective in reducing the levels of circulating biomarkers related to inflammation and renal injury during hospitalization.
Souhrnný přehled Residual Risk Reduction Initiative, R 3 i* Navzdory současným standardům léčby zaměřené na dosažení cílových hodnot LDL cholesterolu, krevního tlaku a glykemie mají pa-cienti s dyslipidemií vysoké reziduální riziko vzniku vaskulárních příhod. Aterogenní dyslipidemie, zejména vyšší hodnota triglyceridů a nízká koncentrace HDL cholesterolu, se často vyskytuje spolu s vyšší koncentrací apolipoproteinu B a non-HDL cholesterolu u pacien-tů s diagnostikovanými kardiovaskulárními onemocněními, diabetes mellitus 2. typu, obezitou nebo metabolickým syndromem a je spojena s reziduálním makrovaskulárním a mikrovaskulárním rizikem. Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R 3 i) byla založena proto, aby se touto důležitou problematikou zabývala. Cílem tohoto souhrnného přehledu je vyzdvihnout skutečnost, že se aterogenní dyslipidemie podílí na reziduálním makrovaskulárním riziku a mikrovaskulárních komplikacích, a doporučit léčebnou intervenci vedoucí ke snížení tohoto rizika, podpořenou důkazy a odbor-ným konsensem. Důležitým prvním krokem je úprava životního stylu. Často je mimo to nutná také farmakoterapie. Přidání niacinu, fi brátu nebo ω-3 mastných kyselin k terapii statiny zlepšuje všechny lipidové rizikové faktory. Klinické studie hodnotí, zda mají tyto strategie lepší klinický přínos než léčba statiny. Závěrem lze říci, že iniciativa R 3 i zdůrazňuje potřebu ovlivnit vysokou míru reziduálního vaskulárního rizika u pacientů s dyslipidemií, kteří jsou léčeni prostřednictvím úpravy životního stylu anebo farmakoterapií v souladu se současnými standardy léčby.
In the past 15 years, major advances have been made in understanding the role of lipids in podocyte biology. First, susceptibility to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and glomerular disease is associated with an APOL1 sequence variant, is expressed in podocytes and encodes apolipoprotein L1, an important component of HDL. Second, acid sphingomyelinase-like phosphodiesterase 3b encoded by SMPDL3b has a role in the conversion of sphingomyelin to ceramide and its levels are reduced in renal biopsy samples from patients with recurrent FSGS. Furthermore, decreased SMPDL3b expression is associated with increased susceptibility of podocytes to injury after exposure to sera from these patients. Third, in many individuals with membranous nephropathy, autoantibodies against the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) receptor, which is expressed in podocytes, have been identified. Whether these autoantibodies affect the activity of PLA2, which liberates arachidonic acid from glycerophospholipids and modulates podocyte function, is unknown. Fourth, clinical and experimental evidence support a role for ATP-binding cassette sub-family A member 1-dependent cholesterol efflux, free fatty acids and glycerophospolipids in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease. An improved understanding of lipid biology in podocytes might provide insights to develop therapeutic targets for primary and secondary glomerulopathies.
Objective
To evaluate the degree of compliance in the annual measurement of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients.MethodsA descriptive, cross-sectional observational study in which 381 clinical histories of patients with DM2 were selected in three teams of primary care centers of Madrid. Sociodemiographic and concomitant disease information were gathered, the date of the annual request for the microalbuminuria as well as the existence of pathological microalbuminuria were determined and compliance in the request for HbA1c and lipid profile in the last year was evaluated.ResultsTwo hundred ninety eight patients were evaluated (mean age: 55.7 years; SD 7.51 and 55.7% were males). Microalbuminuria was requested in 42.3% (95% CI: 36.5–48.05) of the cases, however, this decreased to 25.6% (p: 0.017) in patients with a background of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A total of 59% had arterial hypertension, 43.3% dyslipidemia, 63.7% obesity (BMI>30) and 10% had some associated cardiovascular disease. In the 30 patients for whom there were records, 24% (95% CI: 16.3–32.3) had altered microalbuminuria. The mean value of HbA1c was 6.87 (±1.57).Conclusions
Request for Microalbuminuria in our setting is deficient. Both physicians and nurses must become aware of the importance of the routine request for microalbuminuria.
Comorbidity can be defined as the occurrence in a particular patient of a number of diseases that are not related to the principal diagnosis and which have substantial implications for the risk of death, clinical outcomes, the development of complications, functional class, the period of hospitalization and treatment intensity. Comorbidity is frequently present in patients with dyslipidemia and, as with other patients, it leads to alterations in the care received. It is important that the cardiologist is aware of both the indications for treatment and treatment objectives in the different clinical contexts in which dyslipidemic patients can present, not only with respect to the patient's overall risk but also with regard to the presence of other conditions, such as diabetes, metabolic syndrome or chronic kidney disease, and in commonly encountered specific clinical situations involving, for example, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, transplantation, autoimmune disease or infectious disease, such as human immunodeficiency virus infection. It is also important to have an understanding of the principle characteristics of the more common forms of familial hyperlipidemia because they are associated with a high cardiovascular risk and because the evidence indicates that early diagnosis and treatment can have a substantial effect on prognosis.
Context
Microalbuminuria is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events. The
relationship between the degree of albuminuria and CV risk is unclear.Objectives
To estimate the risk of CV events in high-risk individuals with diabetes
mellitus (DM) and without DM who have microalbuminuria and to determine whether
levels of albuminuria below the microalbuminuria threshold increase CV risk.Design
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study, a cohort study conducted
between 1994 and 1999 with a median 4.5 years of follow-up.Setting
Community and academic practices in North and South America and Europe.Participants
Individuals aged 55 years or more with a history of CV disease (n =
5545) or DM and at least 1 CV risk factor (n = 3498) and a baseline urine
albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) measurement.Main Outcome Measures
Cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or CV death);
all-cause death; and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.Results
Microalbuminuria was detected in 1140 (32.6%) of those with DM and 823
(14.8%) of those without DM at baseline. Microalbuminuria increased the adjusted
relative risk (RR) of major CV events (RR, 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI],
1.64-2.05), all-cause death (RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.84-2.38), and hospitalization
for congestive heart failure (RR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.54-4.10). Similar RRs were
seen for participants with or without DM, even after adjusting for other CV
risk factors (eg, the adjusted RR of the primary aggregate end point was 1.97
[95% CI, 1.68-2.31] in those with DM and 1.61 [95% CI, 1.36-1.90] in those
without DM).Compared with the lowest quartile of ACR (<0.22 mg/mmol), the
RRs of the primary aggregate end point in the second quartile (ie, ACR range,
0.22-0.57 mg/mmol) was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.95-1.30); third quartile, 1.38 (95%
CI, 1.19-1.60; ACR range, 0.58-1.62 mg/mmol); and fourth quartile, 1.97 (95%
CI, 1.73-2.25; ACR range, >1.62 mg/mmol) (P for trend
<.001, even after excluding those with microalbuminuria). For every 0.4-mg/mmol
increase in ACR level, the adjusted hazard of major CV events increased by
5.9% (95% CI, 4.9%-7.0%).Conclusions
Our results indicate that any degree of albuminuria is a risk factor
for CV events in individuals with or without DM; the risk increases with the
ACR, starting well below the microalbuminuria cutoff. Screening for albuminuria
identifies people at high risk for CV events.
Figures in this Article
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular (CV)
disease.1 Compared with those who do not have
DM, people with DM have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of subsequent CV disease.2- 4 Risk factors that independently
increase CV risk in people with DM include smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia,3 renal dysfunction,5
and hyperglycemia.6- 10
Recently, data from several studies have established microalbuminuria (MA),
or dipstick-negative albuminuria, as another CV risk factor. Microalbuminuria
is reported in approximately 30% of middle-aged patients with either type
1 or type 2 DM and in approximately 10% to 15% of middle-aged individuals
who do not have DM.11- 13
Although MA is associated with other risk factors in those with or without
DM,11,13- 14 it is
also an independent predictor of future strokes, death, and myocardial infarction
(MI).15- 19
Moreover, MA may also predict future congestive heart failure (CHF). However,
at present, there are few prospective data regarding this association.20- 23
Despite being increasingly recognized as a CV risk factor, the definition
of MA was based on its ability to predict diabetic nephropathy (ie, macroalbuminuria
or clinical proteinuria). Whether individuals with albumin excretion rates
below the MA threshold are also at risk for CV disease or whether there is
a progressive graded relationship between different degrees of albuminuria
and CV events is unclear.
Our study examines the relationship between baseline albuminuria levels
and future CV events using data collected from individuals with or without
DM enrolled in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study. Participants
were followed-up for a median of 4.5 years
Experimental evidence suggests that lipid lowering therapy could slow the progression of renal disease in humans. We have conducted a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with the nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria (> 1 g/day) and hypercholesterolemia (> or = 6.5 mmol/liter). Patients were placed on a lipid lowering diet for at least 10 weeks before randomization. After a four-week placebo run-in, 30 adults were randomized to simvastatin or placebo therapy (10 mg/day, increasing to 20 to 40 mg/day as required) for 24 weeks. There were seven dropouts, none of whom were "definitely" related to drug therapy. Total and LDL cholesterol levels fell by a mean of 33 and 31%, respectively, in simvastatin treated patients, compared with only 5 and 1% in patients on placebo (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Apolipoprotein B100 levels fell by a mean of 31% in the simvastatin group but rose 0.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.014). There were no significant changes in HDL levels. There were no significant differences between the groups in their urine protein levels, their rise in plasma creatinine, or decline in plasma inulin clearance. Simvastatin is a safe, effective therapy for hypercholesterolemia in proteinuric states. A much larger trial is needed to show if potent lipid-lowering therapy slows progression of hypercholesterolemic proteinuric diseases.
It has been suggested that the quality of clinical trials should be assessed by blinded raters to limit the risk of introducing bias into meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and into the peer-review process. There is very little evidence in the literature to substantiate this. This study describes the development of an instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality. A multidisciplinary panel of six judges produced an initial version of the instrument. Fourteen raters from three different backgrounds assessed the quality of 36 research reports in pain research, selected from three different samples. Seven were allocated randomly to perform the assessments under blind conditions. The final version of the instrument included three items. These items were scored consistently by all the raters regardless of background and could discriminate between reports from the different samples. Blind assessments produced significantly lower and more consistent scores than open assessments. The implications of this finding for systematic reviews, meta-analytic research and the peer-review process are discussed.
To study the long-term effects of simvastatin on urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia.
A total of 19 normotensive microalbuminuric hypercholesterolemic type 2 diabetic patients entered a double-blind crossover study for 2 years, receiving either simvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo (each treatment for 1 year).
Simvastatin significantly decreased plasma cholesterol (total and LDL) after 52 weeks of treatment. A concomitant significant decrease of AER (25% from basal) with no significant changes in creatinine clearance was observed during the same period.
Our data are in keeping with the hypothesis that simvastatin might be used as an additional means to preserve renal function in microalbuminuric hypercholesterolemic type 2 diabetic patients.
Endothelial dysfunction associated with atherosclerosis has been attributed to alterations in the L-arginine-nitric oxide (NO)-cGMP pathway or to an excess of endothelin-1 (ET-1). The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to ameliorate endothelial function. However, the physiological basis of this observation is largely unknown. We investigated the effects of Atorvastatin and Simvastatin on the pre-proET-1 mRNA expression and ET-1 synthesis and on the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) transcript and protein levels in bovine aortic endothelial cells. These agents inhibited pre-proET-1 mRNA expression in a concentration- and time-dependent fashion (60-70% maximum inhibition) and reduced immunoreactive ET-1 levels (25-50%). This inhibitory effect was maintained in the presence of oxidized LDL (1-50 microg/ml). No significant modification of pre-proET-1 mRNA half-life was observed. In addition, mevalonate, but not cholesterol, reversed the statin-mediated decrease of pre-proET-1 mRNA levels. eNOS mRNA expression was reduced by oxidized LDL in a dose-dependent fashion (up to 57% inhibition), whereas native LDL had no effect. Statins were able to prevent the inhibitory action exerted by oxidized LDL on eNOS mRNA and protein levels. Hence, these drugs might influence vascular tone by modulating the expression of endothelial vasoactive factors.
Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation is an early sign of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic patients. We hypothesized that lipid-lowering therapy can improve endothelial function and that this effect is mainly mediated by increased bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO).
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we studied 29 patients (age, 50+/-12 years) with hypercholesterolemia (LDL cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dL) randomly assigned to receive either fluvastatin (40 mg twice daily; 17 patients) or placebo (12 patients). Forearm blood flow was measured by plethysmography before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh; 3, 12, 24, and 48 microg/min) and basal NO synthesis rate by intra-arterial infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 1, 2, and 4 micromol/min). Simultaneous intra-arterial infusion of L-NMMA (4 micromol/min) and ACh (12, 24, and 48 microg/min) was used to test whether any increase in endothelium-dependent vasodilation after lipid-lowering therapy could be blocked by this NO synthase inhibitor. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation improved significantly after 24 weeks of lipid-lowering therapy compared with before therapy (ACh 24 microg/min: 240+/-34% before versus 347+/-50% after therapy; P< or =0.01) and placebo (changes between after and before therapy with ACh 24 microg/min: 108+/-39% for fluvastatin versus -26+/-32% for placebo; P< or =0.05). This improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilation could be blocked by simultaneous administration of L-NMMA (ACh 24 microg/min plus L-NMMA 4 micromol/min: 170+/-69% before versus 219+/-47% after treatment; P=NS).
Lipid-lowering therapy with fluvastatin can improve disturbed endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic patients compared with placebo. This improvement is mediated by increased bioavailability of NO.
We previously reported urinary podocytes to be a marker of glomerular injury. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cerivastatin, a newly developed, potent synthetic statin, affects proteinuria and urinary podocyte excretion in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN).
We randomly assigned 40 normotensive hypercholesterolemic patients with CGN to receive either cerivastatin 0.15 mg/day (n=20) or placebo (n=20). Subjects comprised 24 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 40.8+/-14.4 years; 27 had IgA nephropathy and 13 had non-IgA proliferative glomerulonephritis. Treatment was continued for 6 months. Plasma total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, urinary protein excretion and the number of podocytes were measured before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment.
After 6 months, a significant reduction in total cholesterol (P<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) and triglycerides (P<0.05), and a significant increase in HDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) were observed in the group treated with cerivastatin. Urinary protein excretion decreased from 1.8+/-0.6 to 0.8+/-0.4 g/day, (P<0.01) in this group, and urinary podocyte excretion decreased from 1.6+/-0.6 to 0.9+/-0.4 cells/ml (P<0.01). However, placebo showed little effect on these lipid levels, urinary protein excretion and urinary podocyte excretion. The differences between the cerivastatin group and the placebo group were significant (cholesterol, P<0.001; LDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; triglycerides, P<0.05; HDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; urinary protein, P<0.01; and urinary podocytes, P<0.01).
Statins such as cerivastatin may be beneficial for restoration of injured podocytes in patients with CGN and hypercholesterolaemia.
Several pieces of evidence support a role of inflammatory processes in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; it is also known that endothelial dysfunction is the initial lesion of the atherosclerotic process. Among other markers of endothelial dysfunction, some adhesion molecules seem to play an interesting role. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin vs placebo on some indexes of leukocytes adhesion in a group of Type 2 diabetic patients. Twenty-five Type 2 diabetic patients free from microangiopathic complications and with LDL-cholesterol lower than 180 mg/dl were randomized to receive either atorvastatin (T2DA) or placebo (T2Dp) for twelve months. BMI, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), albumin excretion rate (AER), lipid profile, and serum concentrations of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1), E-selectin and cadherin-5 were measured at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. At T0 E-selectin was 16 +/- 6 ng/ml in T2DA and 17 +/- 13 in T2Dp; VCAM1 was 413 +/- 112 ng/ml in T2DA and 411 +/- 112 in T2Dp. At T12 VCAM1 and E-selectin did not vary in T2Dp, while a significant reduction was observed in T2DA (VCAM1 275 +/- 104 ng/ml and E-selectin 8 +/- 3 ng/ml; p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). T2DA also showed a reduction of total and LDL cholesterol and an improved glycemic control respect to T2Dp. Hypolipidemic therapy was the strongest independent predictor of the cytokines variations along the time. These results confirm the role of statins in modulating endothelial function also in Type 2 diabetes, outlining a therapeutic role of these molecules probably independent from the hypolipidemic effect.
Cochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the consistency of the results of studies in meta-analyses. What does this new quantity mean, and why is assessment of heterogeneity so important to clinical practice?
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can provide convincing and reliable evidence relevant to many aspects of medicine and health care.1 Their value is especially clear when the results of the studies they include show clinically important effects of similar magnitude. However, the conclusions are less clear when the included studies have differing results. In an attempt to establish whether studies are consistent, reports of meta-analyses commonly present a statistical test of heterogeneity. The test seeks to determine whether there are genuine differences underlying the results of the studies (heterogeneity), or whether the variation in findings is compatible with chance alone (homogeneity). However, the test is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta-analysis. We have developed a new quantity, I 2, which we believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis.
Assessment of the consistency of effects across studies is an essential part of meta-analysis. Unless we know how consistent the results of studies are, we cannot determine the generalisability of the findings of the meta-analysis. Indeed, several hierarchical systems for grading evidence state that the results of studies must be consistent or homogeneous to obtain the highest grading.2–4
Tests for heterogeneity are commonly used to decide on methods for combining studies and for concluding consistency or inconsistency of findings.5 6 But what does the test achieve in practice, and how should the resulting P values be interpreted?
A test for heterogeneity examines the null hypothesis that all studies are evaluating the same effect. The usual test statistic …
Several studies have shown that albuminuria is associated with increased risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, independent of conventional risk factors. The partition values for urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) used to identify microalbuminuria have been based on studies that predicted risk in diabetic patients.
To determine whether the relation between albuminuria and cardiovascular risk can be used to predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients.
Multicenter cohort study derived from a randomized, controlled trial.
8206 patients with stage II or III hypertension randomly assigned to double-blind therapy with losartan or atenolol. Follow-up was 39 122 patient-years.
Renal glomerular permeability evaluated by UACR.
In nondiabetic hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the risk for the composite cardiovascular end point increased continuously as albuminuria increased (P < 0.001 for trend). There was no specific threshold for increased risk. For every 10-fold increase in UACR, hazard ratios in nondiabetic patients increased as follows: composite end point, by 57% (95% CI, 40.6% to 75.0%); cardiovascular mortality, by 97.7% (CI, 66.5% to 235%); all-cause mortality, by 75.2% (CI, 54.0% to 99.4%); stroke, by 51.0% (CI, 28.8% to 76.9%); and myocardial infarction, by 45% (CI, 19.9% to 75.4%) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Values were similar in diabetic patients, although for myocardial infarction the trend was weaker and not significant.
Increased UACR resulted in increasing risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. We found no thresholds or plateaus. Risk increases at much lower UACR values than has been reported among diabetic patients.
Exploring the possible reasons for heterogeneity between studies is an important aspect of conducting a meta-analysis. This paper compares a number of methods which can be used to investigate whether a particular covariate, with a value defined for each study in the meta-analysis, explains any heterogeneity. The main example is from a meta-analysis of randomized trials of serum cholesterol reduction, in which the log-odds ratio for coronary events is related to the average extent of cholesterol reduction achieved in each trial. Different forms of weighted normal errors regression and random effects logistic regression are compared. These analyses quantify the extent to which heterogeneity is explained, as well as the effect of cholesterol reduction on the risk of coronary events. In a second example, the relationship between treatment effect estimates and their precision is examined, in order to assess the evidence for publication bias. We conclude that methods which allow for an additive component of residual heterogeneity should be used. In weighted regression, a restricted maximum likelihood estimator is appropriate, although a number of other estimators are also available. Methods which use the original form of the data explicitly, for example the binomial model for observed proportions rather than assuming normality of the log-odds ratios, are now computationally feasible. Although such methods are preferable in principle, they often give similar results in practice. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Background:
The Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) conference was convened to address standards for improving the quality of reporting of meta-analyses of clinical randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods:
The QUOROM group consisted of 30 clinical epidemiologists, clinicians, statisticians, editors, and researchers. In conference, the group was asked to identify items they thought should be included in a checklist of standards. Whenever possible, checklist items were guided by research evidence suggesting that failure to adhere to the item proposed could lead to biased results. A modified Delphi technique was used in assessing candidate items.
Findings:
The conference resulted in the QUOROM statement, a checklist, and a flow diagram. The checklist describes our preferred way to present the abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of a report of a meta-analysis. It is organised into 21 headings and subheadings regarding searches, selection, validity assessment, data abstraction, study characteristics, and quantitative data synthesis, and in the results with "trial flow", study characteristics, and quantitative data synthesis; research documentation was identified for eight of the 18 items. The flow diagram provides information about both the numbers of RCTs identified, included, and excluded and the reasons for exclusion of trials.
Interpretation:
We hope this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.
Objective.
—To identify the extent to which meta-analyses currently include unpublished data and whether editors, meta-analysts, and methodologists believe unpublished material should be included.
Objectives
We sought to investigate the effects of intensive cholesterol reduction on large artery stiffness and blood pressure in normolipidemic patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).Background
Isolated systolic hypertension is associated with elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and is primarily due to large artery stiffening, which has been independently related to cardiovascular mortality. Cholesterol-lowering therapy has been efficacious in reducing arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and thus may be beneficial in ISH.Methods
In a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study design, 22 patients with stage I ISH received three months of atorvastatin therapy (80 mg/day) and three months of placebo treatment. Systemic arterial compliance was measured noninvasively using carotid applanation tonometry and Doppler velocimetry of the ascending aorta.ResultsAtorvastatin treatment reduced total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels by 36 ± 2% (p < 0.001), 48 ± 3% (p < 0.001) and 23 ± 5% (p = 0.003), respectively, and increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol by 7 ± 3% (p = 0.03). Systemic arterial compliance was higher after treatment (placebo vs. atorvastatin: 0.36 ± 0.03 vs. 0.43 ± 0.05 ml/mm Hg, p = 0.03). Brachial systolic blood pressure was lower after atorvastatin treatment (154 ± 3 vs. 148 ± 2 mm Hg, p = 0.03), as were mean (111 ± 2 vs. 107 ± 2 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and diastolic blood pressures (83 ± 1 vs. 81 ± 2 mm Hg, p = 0.04). There was a trend toward a reduction in pulse pressure (71 ± 3 vs. 67 ± 2 mm Hg, p = 0.08).Conclusions
Intensive cholesterol reduction may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with ISH and normal lipid levels, through a reduction in large artery stiffness.
Angiographic trials of coronary atherosclerosis treatment have demonstrated that lowering low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations improves coronary artery stenosis. Most patients in previous trials have had at least mildly elevated LDL. Recently, however, the Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project (HARP) did not find such benefit in patients with lower baseline LDL levels compared with previous trials. We reviewed and analyzed all cholesterol-lowering trials that used angiographic endpoints. Unifactorial trials of hypocholesterolemic dietary or drug therapy demonstrated that the higher the baseline LDL, the greater the improvement in quantitatively determined stenosis in the treatment group compared with the controls (r = .83). Considering the change in stenosis in the treatment group alone, regression was more common in trials in which baseline mean LDL was >170 mg/dl (>4.4 mmol/liter), whereas progression occurred when baseline mean LDL was < 170 mg/dl (<4.4 mmol/liter). HARP had the lowest baseline LDL (137 mg/dl [3.54 mmol/liter]), and showed no tendency for improvement in lesions. In contrast to the influence of baseline LDL levels, neither a low LDL level achieved on treatment nor a large percentage reduction in LDL was related to improvement in lesions. Sample size differences between HARP and the other trials are unlikely to be a major explanatory factor, since trials of comparable sample size to HARP, but with higher initial LDL, demonstrated favorable results. We conclude that coronary lesions that develop in the context of average LDL levels show less angiographic improvement in response to substantial LDL reduction than lesions in hypercholesterolemic patients. However, the clinical relevance of this finding awaits results from ongoing clinical endpoint trials in the normocholesterolemic population.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins and renal function in hypercholesterolaemic Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Twenty-six hypercholesterolaemic (total cholesterol greater than or equal to 5.5 mmol/l) Type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy were enrolled in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study for 12 weeks. The active treatment group (n = 14) received simvastatin (10-20 mg/day) for 12 weeks while the remaining 12 patients received treatment with placebo. The results during simvastatin treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks): total cholesterol 6.6 vs 4.8 mmol/l (p less than 0.01), LDL-cholesterol 4.25 vs 2.57 mmol/l (p less than 0.01) and apolipoprotein B 1.37 vs 1.06 mmol/l (p less than 0.01). HDL-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I remained unchanged. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B remained unchanged during placebo treatment. Albuminuria measured during the simvastatin and the placebo treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks) (the data are logarithmically transformed before analysis because of their positively skewed transformation; geometric mean (x/divided by antilog SE) is indicated) was 458 (x/divided by 1.58) vs 393 (x/divided by 1.61) and 481 (x/divided by 1.62) vs 368 (x/divided by 1.78 micrograms/min (NS). Glomerular filtration rate during simvastatin and placebo treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks) was 64 vs 63 and 72 vs 74 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2, respectively. Two patients receiving simvastatin treatment were withdrawn, one due to gastrointestinal side effects and one due to myalgia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
There is experimental evidence to suggest that hypercholesterolaemia may play a pathogenetic role in progressive glomerular injury. We investigated the effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the progression of diabetic nephropathy in 34 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned in a single-blind fashion to treatment with either lovastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (n = 16; mean dose 30.0 +/- 12.6 mg/day) or placebo (n = 18) for 2 years. Renal function was assessed by serially measuring the serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (using Cr51-EDTA), and 24-h urinary protein excretion. Lovastatin treatment was associated with significant reductions in total cholesterol (p < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (p < 0.001) and apo B (p < 0.01), the reductions at 24 months being 26, 30 and 18%, respectively. Beneficial effects on serum triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and apo A1 levels were also observed. Lp(a) showed no significant change in both groups. Glomerular filtration rate deteriorated significantly in the placebo group after 24 months (p < 0.025) but showed no significant change in the lovastatin-treated patients. The increase in serum creatinine was statistically significant (p < 0.02) in placebo-treated patients at 12 and 24 months, and in the lovastatin group after 24 months. Twenty-four hour urinary protein excretion increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Lovastatin treatment was not associated with significant elevations in liver or muscle enzymes. We conclude that effective normalisation of hypercholesterolaemia may retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy.
Renal insufficiency is frequently associated with both quantitative and qualitative abnormalities in lipid and hemorheologic profiles. Although this may lead to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, a number of studies have also shown dyslipidemia to be a significant risk factor for the progression of renal insufficiency in human chronic renal disease. This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the effect of fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on these parameters in dyslipidemic patients with or without chronic renal insufficiency. After a 6-week placebo run-in, 42 patients who had been previously stratified into 2 groups on the basis of creatinine clearance levels (0.5-1.0 mL/sec or > 1.0-1.5 mL/sec) were randomized to treatment with fluvastatin (40 mg daily) or matching placebo. Significant differences (on analysis of variance with repeated measures) were seen between fluvastatin and placebo treatment groups for changes in total cholesterol (-15% vs 1%, respectively; p < 0.001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -21% vs -5%; p < 0.001), very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (-14% vs 14%; p = 0.017), very low density lipoprotein triglycerides (-1% vs 29%; p = 0.014) and total triglycerides (-7% vs 24%; p < 0.001). These effects on cholesterol levels were reflected in a significant decrease in apolipoprotein B levels with fluvastatin therapy (p < 0.001). Apolipoprotein A-I levels increased (p = 0.054) despite no significant change in the levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Response to therapy did not differ between the 2 renal function groups for any of the lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein variables. Hemorheologic parameters were not altered with fluvastatin therapy, regardless of renal function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
An adjusted rank correlation test is proposed as a technique for identifying publication bias in a meta-analysis, and its operating characteristics are evaluated via simulations. The test statistic is a direct statistical analogue of the popular "funnel-graph." The number of component studies in the meta-analysis, the nature of the selection mechanism, the range of variances of the effect size estimates, and the true underlying effect size are all observed to be influential in determining the power of the test. The test is fairly powerful for large meta-analyses with 75 component studies, but has only moderate power for meta-analyses with 25 component studies. However, in many of the configurations in which there is low power, there is also relatively little bias in the summary effect size estimate. Nonetheless, the test must be interpreted with caution in small meta-analyses. In particular, bias cannot be ruled out if the test is not significant. The proposed technique has potential utility as an exploratory tool for meta-analysts, as a formal procedure to complement the funnel-graph.
Impaired endothelium-mediated relaxation contributes to vasospasm and myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that cholesterol-lowering therapy with the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor lovastatin could improve endothelium-mediated responses in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we studied coronary endothelial responses in 23 patients randomly assigned to either lovastatin (40 mg twice daily; 11 patients) or placebo (12 patients) plus a lipid-lowering diet (American Heart Association Step 1 diet). Patients were studied 12 days after randomization and again at 5 1/2 months. These patients had total cholesterol levels ranging from 160 to 300 mg per deciliter (4.1 to 7.8 mmol per liter) and were undergoing coronary angioplasty. At the initial and follow-up studies, patients received serial intracoronary infusions (in a coronary artery not undergoing angioplasty) of acetylcholine to assess endothelium-mediated vasodilatation. The responses of the coronary vessels were analyzed with quantitative angiography.
The patients in the placebo and lovastatin groups had similar responses to acetylcholine at a mean of 12 days of therapy (expressed as the percentage of change in diameter in response to acetylcholine doses of 10(-9) M, 10(-8) M, 10(-7) M, and 10(-6) M). In the placebo group, the respective mean (+/- SE) changes were 1 +/- 2, 0 +/- 2, -2 +/- 4, and -19 +/- 4 percent; in the lovastatin group, they were -2 +/- 2, -4 +/- 4, -12 +/- 5, and -16 +/- 7 percent (P = 0.32). (Coronary-artery constriction is reflected by negative numbers). The responses to acetylcholine in the placebo group after a mean of 5.5 months of therapy were -3 +/- 3, -1 +/- 2, -8 +/- 4, and -18 +/- 5 percent, respectively; there was significant improvement in the lovastatin group, which had responses of 3 +/- 3, 3 +/- 3, 0 +/- 2, and 0 +/- 3 percent (P = 0.004).
Cholesterol lowering with lovastatin significantly improved endothelium-mediated responses in the coronary arteries of patients with atherosclerosis. Such improvement in the local regulation of coronary arterial tone could potentially relieve ischemic symptoms and signal the stabilization of the atherosclerotic plaque.
The effect of simvastatin (10-20 mg/day) on kidney function, urinary albumin excretion rate and insulin sensitivity was evaluated in 18 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and moderate hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol > or = 5.5 mmol.l-1). In a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled design treatment with simvastatin (n = 8) for 36 weeks significantly reduced total cholesterol (6.7 +/- 0.3 vs 5.1 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)), LDL-cholesterol (4.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)) and apolipoprotein B (1.05 +/- 0.04 vs 0.77 +/- 0.02 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)) levels as compared to placebo (n = 10). Both glomerular filtration rate (mean +/- SEM) (simvastatin: 96.6 +/- 8.0 vs 96.0 +/- 5.7 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2, placebo: 97.1 +/- 6.7 vs 88.8 +/- 6.0 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2)(NS) and urinary albumin excretion rate (geometric mean x/divided by antilog SEM) (simvastatin: 18.4 x/divided by 1.3 vs 16.2 x/divided by 1.2 microgram.min-1, placebo 33.1 x/divided by 1.3 vs 42.7 x/divided by 1.3 micrograms.min-1)(NS) were unchanged during the study. A euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp was performed at baseline and after 18 weeks in seven simvastatin- and nine placebo-treated patients. Isotopically determined basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was similarly reduced before and during therapy in both the simvastatin (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs 1.9 +/- 0.1 (NS) and 3.1 +/- 0.6 vs 3.1 +/- 0.7 mg.kg-1 x min-1 (NS)) and the placebo group (1.9 +/- 0.1 vs 1.8 +/- 0.1 (NS) and 4.1 +/- 0.6 vs 3.8 +/- 0.2 mg.kg-1 x min-1 (NS)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effects of pravastatin on plasma lipid levels, in vitro oxidizability of the non-HDL fraction, metabolic control, urinary albumin excretion, and four serum enzymes (SGPT, SGOT, GT and CPK) were studied in 20 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) with incipient nephropathy. The patients were divided into two groups and the study was carried out by a crossover design. After 12 weeks pravastatin treatment (20 mg daily), plasma cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (Apo B) decreased by 22, 19 and 15%, respectively. The thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) formation and the oxidation lagtime of the non-HDL fraction during the in vitro incubation with copper were not changed before and after treatment. The HbA1c and blood glucose levels, urinary albumin excretion, SGOT, SGPT and GT were not influenced by pravastatin treatment. CPK activity was elevated after 12 weeks of pravastatin treatment, and this elevation persisted even after the 12 weeks placebo period. So, pravastatin could be used as an effective drug for IDDM patients with incipient nephropathy, but close monitoring of the CPK activity is recommended.
Cholesterol lowering reduces coronary events. One mechanism could be improvement of endothelial function. In line with this hypothesis, this study investigates whether cholesterol reduction can result in rapid improvement of endothelial function after acute coronary syndromes.
Patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina and total cholesterol levels at admission >/=5.2 mmol/L or LDL >/=3.4 mmol/L were randomized to placebo (n=30) or pravastatin 40 mg daily (n=30) for 6 weeks. Brachial ultrasound was used to measure endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and response to endothelium-independent nitroglycerin. Changes in the levels of markers of platelet activation, coagulation factors, and plasma endothelin levels were also assessed. Total and LDL cholesterol levels were similar at admission and before randomization in both groups. With pravastatin, but not with placebo, they decreased by 23% (P<0.05) and 33% (P<0.01), respectively. FMD was unchanged with placebo, 5.43+/-0.74% (mean+/-SEM) to 5.84+/-0.81%, but increased with pravastatin, 4.93+/-0.81% to 7.0+/-0.79% (P=0.02), representing a 42% relative increase. Responses to nitroglycerin were similar during the time course of the study in the 2 groups. Markers of platelet activity, coagulation factors, and endothelin levels were not affected by pravastatin.
Cholesterol reduction with pravastatin initiated early after acute coronary syndromes rapidly improves endothelial function after 6 weeks of therapy.
Certain hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, ie, statins, may cause vasodilation by restoring the endothelial dysfunction that frequently accompanies hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Several studies have found that a blood pressure reduction is associated with the use of statins, but conclusive evidence from controlled trials is lacking. After an 8-week placebo and diet run-in period, 30 persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and untreated hypertension (total cholesterol 6.29+/-0.52 mmol/L, systolic and diastolic blood pressure 149+/-6 and 97+/-2 mm Hg) were randomized in a double-blind manner to placebo or pravastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) in a crossover design. In 25 participants who completed the 32-week trial, pravastatin decreased total and LDL cholesterol (both -1.09 mmol/L, P=0.001), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-8 and -5 mm Hg, both P=0.001), and pulse pressure (-3 mm Hg, P=0.011) and blunted the blood pressure increase caused by the cold pressor test (-4 mm Hg, P=0.005) compared with placebo. It also reduced the level of circulating endothelin-1 (P=0.001). The blood pressure results were virtually unchanged in stratified analyses according to gender and age and in intention-to-treat analyses that included the 5 patients who dropped out of the study. When the participants were taking either placebo or pravastatin, blood pressure was not significantly correlated with total or LDL cholesterol or with circulating endothelin-1. Pravastatin decreases systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures in persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. This antihypertensive effect may contribute to the documented health benefits of certain statins.
Significant advances in the management of cardiovascular disease have been made possible by the development of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors--"statins." Initial studies explored the impact of statin therapy on coronary artery disease (CAD) progression and regression. Although the angiographic changes were small, associated clinical responses appeared significant. Subsequent large prospective placebo-controlled clinical trials with statins demonstrated benefit in the secondary and primary prevention of CAD in subjects with elevated cholesterol levels. More recently, the efficacy of statins has been extended to the primary prevention of CAD in subjects with average cholesterol levels. Recent studies also suggest that statins have benefits beyond the coronary vascular bed and are capable of reducing ischemic stroke risk by approximately one-third in patients with evidence of vascular disease. In addition to lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, statin therapy appears to exhibit pleiotropic effects on many components of atherosclerosis including plaque thrombogenicity, cellular migration, endothelial function and thrombotic tendency. Growing clinical and experimental evidence indicates that the beneficial actions of statins occur rapidly and yield potentially clinically important anti-ischemic effects as early as one month after commencement of therapy. Future investigations are warranted to determine threshold LDL values in primary prevention studies, and to elucidate effects of statins other than LDL lowering. Finally, given the rapid and protean effects of statins on determinants of platelet reactivity, coagulation, and endothelial function, further research may establish a role for statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes.
Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are used widely for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. They inhibit HMG-CoA reductase competitively, reduce LDL levels more than other cholesterol-lowering drugs, and lower triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemic patients. Statins are well tolerated and have an excellent safety record. Clinical trials in patients with and without coronary heart disease and with and without high cholesterol have demonstrated consistently that statins reduce the relative risk of major coronary events by approximately 30% and produce a greater absolute benefit in patients with higher baseline risk. Proposed mechanisms include favorable effects on plasma lipoproteins, endothelial function, plaque architecture and stability, thrombosis, and inflammation. Mechanisms independent of LDL lowering may play an important role in the clinical benefits conferred by these drugs and may ultimately broaden their indication from lipid-lowering to antiatherogenic agents.
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are established drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, but several studies have shown that benefits obtained with these drugs are not causally related only to regression of cholesterol lowering. Moreover, in experimental models of progressive renal disease, statins have reduced the extent of glomerulosclerosis. This study evaluated the antiproteinuric effect of a daily dose of 40 mg fluvastatin for 6 months in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, stable renal function, and no indicators of poor long-term prognosis. The effects of therapy were evaluated on the basis of 24-hour proteinuria (total proteinuria and albuminuria), albuminemia, creatinine clearance, cholesterol, and triglyceride values. Renal function remained stable in all patients. A significant decrease in proteinuria was observed after 6 months of therapy and persisted for all the observations. An increase in serum albumin was observed after 6 months of therapy. This study suggests that there is an antiproteinuric effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy.
It has been proposed that hyperlipidemia contributes to the progression of renal disease. A large trial has not been performed; however, a number of small, controlled trials have been reported. We examined the effects of antilipemic agents on glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria or albuminuria in patients with renal disease.
We used Medline, abstracts from scientific meetings, and bibliographies from recent reviews and scientific reports to locate pertinent studies. Thirteen prospective controlled trials examining the effects of antilipemic agents on renal function, proteinuria, or albuminuria were included. Studies were published as full reports or abstracts and were at least three months in duration. For five of the studies, individual patient data were obtained. Other summary data were independently extracted from the published reports by two investigators and included study quality, subject characteristics, cause of renal disease, change in serum cholesterol, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and albuminuria.
There was a lower rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate with treatment compared with controls (treated controls, 0.156 mL/min/month; 95% CI, 0.026 to 0. 285 mL/min/month, P = 0.008). The study results were statistically homogeneous, and in a regression analysis, the effect of treatment on glomerular filtration rate did not correlate with study quality, the percentage change in cholesterol, the type of lipid-lowering agent, or the cause of renal disease. However, longer follow-up correlated with the amount of improvement in glomerular filtration rate from treatment (P = 0.007). There was a tendency for a favorable effect of treatment on protein or albumin excretion [Ln (treatment) - Ln (control) = -0.248, 95% CI, -0.562 to 0.064, P = 0. 077]. However, these results were statistically heterogeneous between studies (P < 0.001). No obvious explanation for this heterogeneity was apparent in a regression analysis examining potential reasons for differences in study results.
Lipid reduction may preserve glomerular filtration rate and may decrease proteinuria in patients with renal disease.
Although hyperlipidemia is associated with the development of diabetes complications, the effect of lipid reduction on microvascular complications is unknown. We initiated a 2-year, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled pilot trial of simvastatin/diet vs. diet alone in Type 1 diabetic patients without overt nephropathy. Thirty-nine patients with LDL cholesterol 100-160 mg/dl, >10 year duration of diabetes and an albumin excretion rate (AER) <200 microg/min were recruited for study. The primary end-point was change in AER. Secondary end-points were change in ankle-brachial index, progression of retinopathy status, change in vibratory threshold, and development of new clinical neuropathy. Nineteen patients were treated with simvastatin and twenty with placebo. However, because of the lowering of drug initiation levels by the American Diabetes Association, the trial was terminated early with 2 subjects reaching 2 years, 17 reaching 18 months, 36 reaching 1 year, and all 6 months. Simvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol (mean on treatment 173.4 vs. 191.4, P=.020) and LDL cholesterol (mean on treatment 105.0 vs. 127.7, P<.001). Simvastatin therapy was associated with a slower rise in AER compared to placebo, though the result was not statistically significant (median rate of change/month 0.004 vs. 0.029). There was a trend towards slower progression of neuropathy as measured by vibratory threshold (median change at 1 year 0.03 simvastatin vs. 0.94, P=.07). There was no difference in change in ankle-brachial index, clinical neuropathy status, or retinopathy status. In conclusion, treatment with simvastatin may have a beneficial effect on early nephropathy and diabetic neuropathy, justifying a fully powered trial. However, this would be difficult under current treatment guidelines.
The short-term effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) on endothelial function at doses that do not affect plasma lipid levels are not known.
We investigated the short-term effects of cerivastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on endothelial function and endothelium-related products in elderly diabetic patients. Twenty-seven elderly diabetic patients (aged 69.3+/-3.4 years), with or without mild hypercholesterolemia, were enrolled in this study, which tested cerivastatin treatment (0.15 mg/d) for 3 days. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation, endothelium-independent dilatation by nitroglycerin in the brachial artery, nitric oxide-related products (nitrite/nitrate and cGMP), endothelium-related products (von Willebrand Factor, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1), and a marker of oxidant stress (8-isoprostane) were assessed. Levels of plasma lipids were not changed before and after treatment with cerivastatin. Flow-mediated dilatation was significantly increased by cerivastatin treatment, as were plasma nitrite/nitrate levels (from 16.9+/-3.4 to 22.0+/-3.7 micromol/L, P<0.05) and cGMP values. The percent of nitroglycerin-induced dilatation was not changed. Plasma concentrations of 8-isoprostane decreased, and levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule also tended to decrease with cerivastatin.
Improvement of endothelial function was in line with antiatherosclerotic effects. Cerivastatin improved impaired endothelial function in the short-term without affecting lipid profiles in elderly diabetic patients. This effect may be partly due to upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
To determine whether cerivastatin, a newly developed novel synthetic potent statin, exerts a renoprotective effect, we assessed urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and plasma and urinary endothelin (ET)-1 concentrations in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetes patients with dyslipidemia.
Sixty normotensive type 2 diabetic patients (38 men and 22 women; mean age 56.5 years) with microalbuminuria (20-200 microg/min) and dyslipidemia (total cholesterol >200 mg/dl, LDL cholesterol >160 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol <35 mg/dl, and triglyceride >150 mg/dl) were enrolled in a double-blind study for 6 months, receiving either cerivastatin (0.15 mg/day) or placebo. Plasma and urinary ET-1 concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay.
Cerivastatin did not affect serum creatinine and HbA(1c) levels, and reduced systolic blood pressure slightly, but not significantly. Plasma levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were significantly reduced (p < 0.01), and plasma triglyceride levels were also reduced significantly (p < 0.05) after 6 months of cerivastatin treatment. A concomitant significant decrease in UAE (p < 0.01), and urinary and plasma ET-1 concentrations (p < 0.01) were found during this period.
The use of cerivastatin is associated with decreased microalbuminuria and plasma and urinary ET-1 levels in microalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetic mellitus and speculate that this may represent an amelioration of renal injury.
Proteinuria is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. The effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy on proteinuria in normolipidemic patients with well-controlled hypertension have not been studied. A total of 63 normolipidemic (total cholesterol <240 mg/dL) and proteinuric (300 to 3000 mg/d) patients with well-controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either placebo (n=32) or pravastatin (10 mg/d; n=31) after a 3-month placebo period. Pravastatin lowered proteinuria after 6 months by 54% (P<0.0001). Creatinine clearance was stable throughout the study in the 2 groups. Despite unchanged plasma endothelin-1 levels throughout the study, urinary excretion of the peptide was decreased and significantly correlated with improvement in urinary protein excretion in pravastatin-treated patients (r=0.64, P=0.001). The urinary excretion of retinol-binding protein decreased after pravastatin administration, probably reflecting an improvement in tubular function. In contrast, the urinary excretion of IgG did not change significantly throughout the study in either group. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuria was only significantly correlated with statin use (P<0.0001, R2= 0.66). Linear regression analysis in the statin-treated group did not show any correlation between changes in lipid profiles and proteinuria regression. Thus, in addition to their primary function of antilipidemia, the addition of pravastatin to treatment for well-controlled hypertension may have an additive effect on reducing proteinuria independent of hemodynamics and lipid-lowering effects, possibly through inhibiting renal endothelin-1 synthesis and improving tubular function.
Several reports suggest that markers of renal function such as serum creatinine, serum uric acid, and urinary excretion of protein may be related to cardiovascular complications and mortality. This study analyzed the data from the Syst-Eur trial, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind intervention trial in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The purpose was to evaluate whether serum levels of creatinine and uric acid and urinary protein excretion at entry are related to subsequent morbidity and mortality. Incidence rates of total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke (fatal as well as nonfatal), coronary events, and all cardiovascular endpoints were calculated for each quintile of serum creatinine or serum uric acid or for each category of protein excretion (none, trace, and overt). Crude and adjusted relative hazard rates were also determined for each 20 micro M increase in serum creatinine, each 50 micro M increase in serum uric acid, and for each protein excretion category. Even when adjusted for age, gender, and various other covariates, serum creatinine was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. There was an U-shaped relationship between serum uric acid and total mortality, but otherwise no obvious relationships were detected between serum uric acid levels and complications when appropriate adjustments were made for confounding variables. Proteinuria at entry was a significant predictor of total mortality and all cardiovascular endpoints. It is concluded that higher levels of serum creatinine and trace or overt proteinuria are associated with an increased number of cardiovascular events and with a higher mortality in patients with isolated systolic hypertension.
For the general population, the clinical relevance of an increased urinary albumin excretion rate is still debated. Therefore, we examined the relationship between urinary albumin excretion and all-cause mortality and mortality caused by cardiovascular (CV) disease and non-CV disease in the general population.
In the period 1997 to 1998, all inhabitants of the city of Groningen, the Netherlands, aged between 28 and 75 years (n=85 421) were sent a postal questionnaire collecting information about risk factors for CV disease and CV morbidity and a vial to collect an early morning urine sample for measurement of urinary albumin concentration (UAC). The vital status of the cohort was subsequently obtained from the municipal register, and the cause of death was obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics. Of these 85 421 subjects, 40 856 (47.8%) responded, and 40 548 could be included in the analysis. During a median follow-up period of 961 days (maximum 1139 days), 516 deaths with known cause were recorded. We found a positive dose-response relationship between increasing UAC and mortality. A higher UAC increased the risk of both CV and non-CV death after adjustment for other well-recognized CV risk factors, with the increase being significantly higher for CV mortality than for non-CV mortality (P=0.014). A 2-fold increase in UAC was associated with a relative risk of 1.29 for CV mortality (95% CI 1.18 to 1.40) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.21) for non-CV mortality.
Urinary albumin excretion is a predictor of all-cause mortality in the general population. The excess risk was more attributable to death from CV causes, independent of the effects of other CV risk factors, and the relationship was already apparent at levels of albuminuria currently considered to be normal.
Pleiotropic effects of a drug are actions other than those for which the agent was specifically developed. These effects may be related or unrelated to the primary mechanism of action of the drug, and they are usually unanticipated. Pleiotropic effects may be undesirable (such as side effects or toxicity), neutral, or, as is especially the case with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), beneficial. Pleiotropic effects of statins include improvement of endothelial dysfunction, increased nitric oxide bioavailability, antioxidant properties, inhibition of inflammatory responses, and stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. These and several other emergent properties could act in concert with the potent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects of statins to exert early as well as lasting cardiovascular protective effects. Understanding the pleiotropic effects of statins is important to optimize their use in treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Microalbuminuria is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether therapeutic intervention aimed at lowering urinary albumin excretion would reduce cardiovascular events in microalbuminuric subjects (15 to 300 mg/24 hours).
From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) cohort (n=8592), 1439 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PREVEND Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT). Of these subjects, 864 were randomized to fosinopril 20 mg or matching placebo and to pravastatin 40 mg or matching placebo. The mean follow-up was 46 months, and the primary end point was cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular morbidity. Mean age was 51+/-12 years; 65% of subjects were male, and 3.4% had a previous cardiovascular event. Mean cholesterol level was 5.8+/-1.0 mmol/L, mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 130+/-18/76+/-10 mm Hg, and median urinary albumin excretion was 22.8 (15.8 to 41.3) mg/24 hours. The primary end point occurred in 45 subjects (5.2%). Fosinopril reduced urinary albumin excretion by 26% (P<0.001). Subjects treated with fosinopril showed a 40% lower incidence of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.33 to 1.10], P=0.098, log-rank). Pravastatin did not reduce urinary albumin excretion, and subjects treated with pravastatin showed a 13% lower incidence of the primary end point than subjects in the placebo group (0.87 [0.49 to 1.57], P=0.649, log-rank).
In microalbuminuric subjects, treatment with fosinopril had a significant effect on urinary albumin excretion. In addition, fosinopril treatment was associated with a trend in reducing cardiovascular events. Treatment with pravastatin did not result in a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion or cardiovascular events.
Although angiotensin receptor antagonists and 3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to attenuate proteinuria individually, it remains unclear whether proteinuria may be additionally improved by statin therapy in well-controlled hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin receptor antagonists-based regimen and whether withdrawal of chronic statin treatment may abrogate this beneficial effect in normolipidemic patients.
A total of consecutive 82 proteinuric patients treated with antihypertensive agents, including losartan, were randomized 10 mg of pravastatin or placebo with a 6-month treatment. After completing 6 months of drug treatment, the pravastatin-treated patients were randomly assigned to continue (N= 19) or withdraw (N= 17) pravastatin for a further 6 months.
Subjects treated with pravastatin had significant further improvement of proteinuria at 6 months compared with placebo group (559 +/- 251 mg/24 hours vs. 1262 +/- 557 mg/24 hours) (P < 0.0001). Of 17 patients assigned to withdraw pravastatin, proteinuria returned to the pretreatment levels and was significantly higher than those who continued treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuric improvement was significantly correlated with the continuous statin use. Urinary excretion of endothelin-1 (ET-1) is decreased in pravastatin-treated patients, but withdrawal of statin resulted in 27% up-regulation. The linear regression models in the initial statin-treated group showed that changes in urinary ET-1 correlated with urinary protein excretion (r= 0.83, P < 0.0001).
We conclude that pravastatin administration is associated with improved proteinuria probably by inhibiting urine ET-1 levels in patients with losartan-based treatment. However, statin withdrawal abrogates this beneficial effect in patients initially responsive to this therapy.