ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

China is a prominent outsourcing destination in Asia. International labour outsourcing, specially in the IT sector, has grown rapidly in recent years. This article defines outsourcing through an extensive review of the literature and discusses the opportunities and challenges for outsourcing to China. Seeking strategic 'fit' among the disparate elements that influence the firm's outsourcing decision is recommended. The authors explore the IT and business landscapes in China and propose strategies for outsourcing success there. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Content may be subject to copyright.
Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 33-66, 2007
© 2007 Economics Faculty Zagreb
All rights reserved. Printed in Croatia
ISSN 1331-5609; UDC: 33+65
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic
Ilan Alon*
Theodore T. Herbert**
J. Mark Munoz***
Abstract: China is a prominent outsourcing destination in Asia. International labour outsourcing,
specially in the IT sector, has grown rapidly in recent years. This article defines outsourcing
through an extensive review of the literature and discusses the opportunities and challenges
for outsourcing to China. Seeking strategic ‘fit’ among the disparate elements that influence
the firm’s outsourcing decision is recommended. The authors explore the IT and business
landscapes in China and propose strategies for outsourcing success there.
Keywords: labour outsourcing, China, information technology, international business, international
JEL Classification: F200
Corporate participation in outsourcing is evolving and expanding, with notable and
increasing participation of US firms in offshore outsourcing (Guerra 2002). Most
enterprises outsource at least one business function, potentially affecting the course
of thousands of businesses (Logan, 2000). Over 88% of firms in the UK have
outsourced IT or other business functions, with 82% having outsourced a core IT or
business function between 1998 and 2003 (Cap Gemini Ernst & Young 2003). An
increasing tendency is that multinational companies have begun aligning with smaller
firms in order to heighten specialization (Dana et al 2000). Increasingly, firms have
* Ilan Alon is at the Rollins College, Rollins-China Center, Winter Park, Florida, USA.
** Theodore T. Herbert is at the Rollins College, Crummer Graduate School of Business,
Winter Park, Florida, USA.
*** J. Mark Munoz is at the Millikin University, Tabor School of Business, Decatur, Illinois,
come to understand that, when undertaken in an enlightened fashion, outsourcing
offers substantial potential for growth, optimizing the use of home-country staff, and
increasing employment opportunities, and other advantages including the
opportunities to
…turn around dying businesses, speed up their pace of innovation, or fund
development projects that otherwise would have been unaffordable. More
aggressive outsourcers are aiming to create radical business models that can
give them an edge and change the game in their industries. Old-line
multinationals see offshoring as a catalyst for a broader plan to overhaul
outdated office operations and prepare for new competitive battles. And while
some want to downsize, others are keen to liberate expensive analysts,
engineers, and salesmen from routine tasks so they can spend more time
innovating and dealing with customers (Engardio 2006a: 55).
While the benefits of outsourcing have been widely publicized, less well
understood are the several factors which influence its nature and effectiveness.
Through this paper, we provide an overview of the nature of the outsourcing process
and some indications of the various approaches used by outsourcers, the complex
array of benefits and pitfalls entailed, and the implications for outsourcing to China,
with particular attention to I.T. outsourcing; our end intent is to provide an integrated,
strategic perspective useful for practising executives and scholars alike.
On the Nature of Outsourcing
Before exploring these factors, definitions are in order, especially since outsourcing
often is misunderstood. Outsourcing is the strategic use of outside resources or
suppliers to perform activities traditionally handled by internal staff and resources
(Griffith 2001), also considered as the process used by an enterprise in which
business-related work functions are subcontracted to a supplier external to and
unrelated to the outsourcing organization (Drezner 2002). In contrast, international
outsourcing (also called ‘offshoring’) is the subcontracting of business functions to
organizations in foreign locations, typically undertaken to improve the efficiencies or
effectiveness of those functions. Examples include half of all telephone calls to UK
National Rail Inquiries being handled by operators in India (Nash 2004), IBM
moving up to 4,700 programming jobs offshore in order to save on costs, and
London-based bank HSBC’s intended moving of 4,000 customer service jobs to Asia
( 2003; BBC News 2003).
34 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
A further refinement concerns the differences associated with global outsourcing,
which is a management strategy in which one organization delegates one or more of
its major, non-core functions to other firms which specialize in efficiently providing
service in specific business functions; these transactions are encouraged by the
enhanced capabilities of contemporary organizations to manage endeavors which
support another firm’s business (Elmuti and Kathawala 2000). Executives
worldwide are beginning to view the process through the lens of ‘transformational
outsourcing’, recognizing that outsourcing is not simply about cheap labour abroad,
but pertains to the potential for huge gains in efficiency, productivity, quality, and
revenues available through the full leveraging of offshore talent (Engardio 2006a).
Wachovia, the US-based bank, for instance, was one company which carefully
studied its outsourcing options. Its executives quickly realized that international
outsourcing for cost savings yielded but a quick and short-lived ‘fix’, while the
substance of the benefits available lay in the opportunities to transform the ways in
which they did business, a much more intensive, multi-year process. Wachovia has
proceeded cautiously, outsourcing some human resources jobs to a local firm and
other programming and analytical work offshore, after having decided to retain as
internal functions other outsourcing candidate functions like call centres since they
were newly identified as strategic assets (Foust 2006). The experience of Wachovia
and others underscores that the outsourcing process is complex, and entails planning,
strategic definition, opportunity investigation, supplier selection, contract
formulation, implementation, relationship management, and assessment (Chase
1998; Green 1999).
In reviewing herein the experiences of Western firms with outsourcing as a basis
for extracting insights useful to other executives and scholars, we cannot identify
with certainty which specific definition of or set of objectives for outsourcing was
employed by those firms; many imply their intentions to have been that of gaining
short-term cost relief, while others seem to view their outsourcing as a long-term
commitment to fundamental business re-invention, with others having apparent
objectives anywhere between these two end-points. In addition, the specific
information related to the strategic positioning of the outsourced function typically is
unavailable, so we are left to share our insights from a rather broader perspective than
may be preferred. Thus, when we refer to outsourcing or offshoring, we are using the
broadest appropriate and inclusive term, which for us means the formalized
off-loading and subcontracting of one or more of a firm’s non-core business
functions to one or more organizations, which are typically unrelated to the
outsourcer, which specialize in providing more efficiently and effectively specific
business functions and which are sited in foreign locations, for the purpose of gaining
cost, financial, staffing, management, or strategic benefits by the outsourcing firm.
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 35
While such benefits as cost-reduction often are ascribed to outsourcing, inherent
challenges exist even to gain such a benefit. Despite the number of organizations that
consider themselves to be successful at global outsourcing, the need continues to
further identify, comprehend, and manage the risk factors that underlie both the
outsourcing process and the realities of doing business in international locations
(Elmuti and Kathawala 2000). The potential complexities and risks from offshoring
is illustrated in the US case
…involving medical transcription, a commonly outsourced process for the
medical industry, which the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Medical Centre had been outsourcing for the past 20 years. Unknown to them,
part of the work was outsourced by the service provider in Florida, which
subsequently subcontracted the work to Texas, and without knowledge of
anyone, was further subcontracted the work to someone in Pakistan (Bagby
2003). This Offshore arrangement went without a hitch for 18 months, until
the Texas operation refused to pay the Pakistani company, who then
threatened to post the patient medical histories on the Internet if they were not
given the back pay, thereby infringing privacy and confidentiality laws (Ho,
Atkins, and Eardley 2004: 2).
Risks may exist in any outsourcing activities. As the modalities for the creative
arbitrage of labour (that is, the major wage gap that exists between developing and
industrialized nations – Engardio 2006a) have expanded within a global
environment, an additional priority is added: understanding the business and
technological intricacies associated with specific locations. There is benefit to be
gained for the outsourcer’s business practice for putting the factors influencing
outsourcing into perspective.
The need to understand the nature of country-based difficulties for foreign firms is
particularly true with reference to outsourcing to China; this is because of the
importance to the individual firm, the increasing centrality of China in global
outsourcing, and China’s being one of the most attractive and popular outsourcing
destinations in the world (A.T. Kearney 2004; Cohen 2006). China’s appeal has
increased markedly in the recent past with its WTO-membership-fueled
liberalization of laws and government policies, especially those regarding private
ownership, intellectual property, and foreign partnerships; heavy investment in
academic technical education; and low labour costs (Furniss 2003).
Our intent through this paper is to contribute to improving insights into
outsourcing to China. We begin by considering the nature of global outsourcing.
Next, we explore the special but complex situation of China with particular emphasis
on international labour outsourcing for IT, a valuable business opportunity. In the
36 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
section below are detailed considerations of the various challenges and opportunities
for outsourcing to China, then we offer a consideration of strategic approaches for
enhancing outsourcing success.
Outsourcing and the Evolving International Landscape
Outsourcing as a corporate strategy has attracted wide interest and is in the process of
exceptional growth (Bolumole 2001; McCarthy and Anagnostou 2004.). While some
consider outsourcing as a move to simplify or save on costs for business functions,
others view outsourcing as part of the evolution of business. Author and former
MIT/Sloan School Professor Michael Treacy’s view is that outsourcing is an
adaptation phase in the process leading toward creating more efficient business
models, adjustments to inherent organizational weaknesses, and in uncovering better
opportunities (Gibson 2004). This view has helped reshape organizational
management and strategic inter-organizational interactions (Pollalis 2003) and has
spearheaded the trend towards what has been termed ‘worldsourcing’ (Ellis 2004).
The Rationales for International Outsourcing
Advocates have pointed out several economic benefits of outsourcing. The positive
end-effects include the firm’s economic improvement in developing locations (Ellis,
2004); building foreign-based skills and infrastructure (Harrison 2004); consumer
and taxpayer benefits derived from service enhancement and affordability (Griswold
2004); trade benefits (Kleinert 2003; Glassman 2004); increased wage rate and trade
union benefits (Shaksen 2004); impact on the employment level in developed
economies (Economist 2004); as a gateway to privatization (Prager 1997); and for its
demonstrated profitability in certain manufacturing sectors (Harrison 2004).
Negative economic implications have also been noted. These include job drain
(Dolan and Meredith 2004), reduction in employment and aggregate welfare
(Shaksen 2004), effect on the pattern of employment (Economist 2004), detrimental
effects on owners of capital (Shaksen 2004), contribution to insecurity (Ellis 2004),
and reduction of skills and infrastructure in the home country (Harrison 2004).
Particularly in view of the outsourcing phenomenon’s potential negative effects,
closer investigation seems advisable. One useful approach recognizes the increasing
interest in using foreign-based labour through outsourcing business functions,
attributable to several factors which should be considered more closely. These factors
may be considered as offensive or defensive strategic responses to business
development and the competitive landscape.
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 37
Offensive approaches refer to the organization’s use of international outsourcing
as a strategic move to build its corporate strength or capture new market
opportunities. Influencing factors include market internationalization (Elmuti et al
1998; Rao 2004); growing availability and demand for competent yet affordable
talent (Greenemeier 2002); gaining cost and time advantages (Jeffay, Bohannon and
Laspisa 1997); reliability of communication technology and enhanced project
management abilities (King 1999; Rao 2004); availability of software tools,
platforms, and systems (Webster et al 2000); confluence of the telecommunication
and computing sectors that strengthened web and software applications (Currie
2003); standardization of business tasks (Drezner 2004); acceleration of IT
innovation (Mitchell 2004); globalization and trade liberalization in emerging
locations (Rao 2004); improving operational efficiencies and capturing globalization
advantages (Karklins 2003); productivity improvement (Kulmala et al 2002); better
staff management and strategic focus (Leung 2003); mutuality of trade benefits to
participating parties (Glassman 2004); and enhancing competitive advantage and
core competencies (Griswold 2004).
An area of offensive opportunity has been expanding recently. Beyond shifting
labour offshore for cost savings, another emerging function to be outsourced is that of
research and development. The world-class scientists of China and India have
attracted the attention of large multinational firms from the US and Western Europe
recently, with many moving some of their R&D there. The prime reasons were
neither lower labour costs nor tax incentives, although these were considered, but
rather were driven by the talent available through allying with leading local
universities, their professors, and promising graduates. Dow Chemical, for instance,
is building a research centre in Shanghai, with 600 technical workers to be employed
there (Lohr 2006). The pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly too has begun to move its R&D
offshore, including clinical trials, with twenty percent of its chemistry work
outsourced to a dedicated facility in China. Lilly has chosen to offshore these
functions for its savings in cost and in time in the development process, while noting
no drop-off in quality and a three-fourths decrease in its costs from those in the US or
Western Europe (Arndt 2006).
Defensive approaches are the use of strategies to respond to business threats,
competition, and market forces. Influencing factors include a focus on key core
functions (Smith 1991); skills shortages, visa caps, rising labour costs (King 1999);
downsizing, restructuring, and industry decline (Greer, Youngblood and Gray 1999);
adjusting to the deflation of technological spending (Dolan and Meredith 2004);
cost-cutting pressures (Rao 2004); responding to competition and market forces
(Kulmala et al 2002); and international competition and survival (Harrison 2004).
Identifying these more complex competitive rationales for international outsourcing
assists in placing the decision to outsource in a more substantive perspective; the
38 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
proposition is not without its negative side, however, as is detailed in the following
Outsourcing as Controversy and an Emerging Reality
The end results of outsourcing have been argued and contested. The outsourcing
strategy itself has been hotly-debated, with no consensus reached on the actual
end-results or net effect of outsourcing (Kotabe and Murray 2004). Nevertheless,
companies use the outsourcing strategy as a way of dealing with the contemporary
business landscape; this scenario is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
Outsourcing firms have increased in frequency and number as a competitive response
of companies to a global environment (Andersen and Chao 2003). A Gartner research
study found that 80% of all US companies will consider outsourcing as a strategic
option in the near term (Leung 2003), while at least 23% of IT jobs in the US will
gravitate overseas by 2007 (Fisher 2004). Approximately 3.3 million technology
services jobs, amounting to US$136 billion, will move overseas from the US,
according to a Forrester Research forecast (Grimm 2004).
The outsourcing-business phenomenon has not been universally popular, and has
led to calls for protectionism. A Harris Poll in 2004 found that 69% of American
consumers would support a plan to tax companies that substitute domestic jobs with
offshore labour (Grimm 2004); anti-outsourcing legislation has been proposed in the
U.S. by 31 states, and the US Senate has banned outsourcing federal contracts (Dolan
and Meredith 2004).
Shifting jobs offshore (that is, out of the outsourcing firm’s country, a process also
called ‘offshoring’) has been widespread in the manufacturing sector. Offshoring has
broadened recently to include the service sector, due to international competition and
the breaking down of technological and geographical barriers (Economist 2004). As
a result of globalization, the international flow of capital and technology has
increased. The creative arbitrage of labour has become a by-product of these flows.
The business interactions of importers and manufacturers from North America have
increased greatly with brokers, agents, and companies in developing nations (Coates
The question before executives, to outsource or not, then contains issues of much
more complexity and strategic value than a simple cost-saving move entails. Such
questions and issues will vary by the firm’s industry and its strategies, so insights to
be gained from any deeper investigation must be viewed as general guides. That said,
considering the concerns and experiences of Information Technology firms allows
developing some interesting insights, and further permits establishing some general
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 39
directions for developing more explicit applications to the situations facing other
The Shifts in IT and Outsourcing
While the range of businesses becoming active in outsourcing their functions is
broad, financial institutions and services providers increasingly are considering
outsourcing as a means by which to build competitive strength, lower their costs,
enhance profitability, and contribute to global economics (Gnuschke et al 2004). IT
has been an obvious target for outsourcing, especially since global annual spending
on IT is between US$400 and $500 billion, with about US$200 billion of that sum
having the potential for being outsourced. Current IT outsourcing has been estimated
variously at about US$20 billion a year (Rosenbush 2006), or one-third of all global
IT spending by firms (Cap Gemini Ernst & Young 2003); the McKinsey Global
Institute estimates that only 10% of the potential offshore market has been realized,
with US$18.4 billion in global IT and US$11.4 billion in business-process services.
Whatever the actual value, for perspective, IT spending may amount to 10-15% of a
large firm’s revenues (Engardio 2006b), so the savings and productivity increases
may prove tempting.
Tasks such as IT support, accounting, and data entry are easier to outsource
overseas than are the more complex functions of marketing and research (Drezner
2004). Service sector occupations are rather easily outsourced because they have
minimal face-to-face customer interaction, large information bases, and significant
cross-border wage differences; they also are web-enabled and are relatively easier to
set up (Harrison 2004). As more companies explore outsourcing in international
venues, a heightened awareness of specific international markets is critical.
Emerging locations provide huge opportunities and numerous risks (Coates 2003).
Exchange rate instability, for one, has posed challenges to internationally dispersed
operations (Kotabe and Murray 2004).
Given these indications of the complexities of international outsourcing, no firm
should outsource without adequate information (Wallace 1998), which includes
understanding the modalities of business in emerging locations (Ramamurti 2004). A
major destination for outsourcing is China, which is likely to play increasingly key
roles as IT labour outsourcing increases. Understanding the pros and cons of both
environments helps the business and academic communities identify and plan for
viable management strategies.
40 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
China and Its Outsourcing
While any of the several business functions of any firm may be outsourced,
outsourcing information technology (IT) or information services (IS) has become
quite common. IT/IS outsourcing consists of turning over all or part of an
organization’s IT/IS functions to external or unrelated service providers (Chen et al
2002). There are a number of different approaches to IT/IS outsourcing. Four modes
of IT outsourcing have been identified: back office (facilitating payroll, accounting,
finance, tax preparation, auditing, document processing, transcriptions, and data
storage), front office (expanding marketing and customer service through call
centres, e-mail and websites), operations departments (using procurement, inventory,
and supply chain management), and special projects (introducing software
transitions) (Burr 2002). The scope of the function to be outsourced also varies
considerably. The range and implicit complexity of the outsourced function’s scope
may be seen in these varieties of scope: (1) ad-hoc – as a supplementary skill to the
organization’s staff, (2) selective – utilizing projects in designated areas to
supplement existing organizational resources, and (3) full-scale – as a strategic
approach through the engagement in a comprehensive alliance (Luftman 1996).
China is the world’s second most attractive outsourcing location, with India being
first (A.T. Kearney 2004). This finding was based on such viability factors as
financial structure, people skills and availability, and business environment. As one
of the world’s prime outsourcing destinations (DiCarlo 2003), China also is a prime
contender for the top spot in international labour outsourcing. Contributing to its
attractiveness to outsourcers are the technical specializations among China IT
workers in hardware services, localization, and application development (Leung
China’s culture offers some insights into its relative attractiveness as an
outsourcing location. The applications of Hofstede’s (1991) research are illustrative,
as well as helpful, for suggesting the broad outlines of some of the aspects of China’s
complex culture and its values which are salient for outsourcers. While broad
generalizations can be dangerous, they may also offer useful insights and factors for
awareness and further consideration.
China has been noted to be characterized by rather high power distance, implying
a broad preference for formalized and hierarchy-oriented organization, centralized
power, and a relatively high amount of formality in relationships and
communications (Ross 1999). It is also characterized as being highly collectivist in
nature, yielding an emphasis on harmony, group-centeredness and a deep concern for
appropriate behaviours and values as determined by others, which have implications
for personal relationships, social obligations, and guanxi. Uncertainty avoidance is
mid-range for China, with rules tending to be formal, implicit, and traditional;
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 41
communication is high context, with multiple and subtle dimensions, or with low
levels of explicit content. The Chinese value a long-term orientation, yielding
priority for continuing and stable harmonious relations within highly structured
organizations; concern for the future, doggedness in pursuing goals, thrift, and
subordination of individual goals for a higher goal, and high social content in
organizations. These interpretations are useful primarily for their broad outlines, of
course, especially given the complexity and flux of China’s changing environments.
Other important attributes of China are shown in Table 1. Among the
socio-economic elements of particular interest to outsourcers are those of a relatively
young population, high literacy rates, increasing level of economic development, low
inflation, low unemployment rates, and high economic growth. Of note also are the
factors of area, population, GDP, and China’s culture, religion, ethnic groupings, and
Table 1: Summary of Important Attributes of China
Dimension China’s Situation
Location/Capital Eastern Asia / Beijing
Currency/ Exchange rate Yuan/RMB / 8.27 to 1 US$
Median Age / Age Structure 31.8 / 70% in the 15-64 age range
Literacy 90.9%
Inflation rate 1.2%
Unemployment 10%
GDP real growth rate 9.1%
Area 9,596,960 sq. km.
Population 1,299 million
GDP / GDP per capita 6.449 trillion / US$5,000
Ethnic groups Majority Han Chinese, 10 others
Religion Mostly non-religious, Taoist, Buddhist, Muslim, Christian
Languages Standard Chinese, Mandarin, at least 8 other dialects
42 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
Government type Communist
Legal System Custom and statute, criminal law, civil code
IT issues Constrained with trade policies that hamper growth, over-regulation, and
intellectual property issues.
Labor force / participation 778.1 million / 60%
Labor force – by occupation Agriculture – 50%, industry – 22%, services – 28%
Technical labor pool 50,000 technical graduates annually, with high percentage unable to speak
Labor Costs Annual salary from $3,000 - $8,000, little BPO skills
Telecommunications/Technology Infrastructure
Telephones 263 million / 4.9 people/telephone
Mobile telephones 269 million / 4.8 people/mobile
Internet hosts / users 160,421 / 79.5 million / Every 16th individual
Infrastructure Despite intensive efforts to develop telecommunication facilities,
infrastructure in the countryside can be weak.
Expertise Low-end software development, transaction processing, and maintenance.
Major US customers HSBC, Microsoft
Sources: CIA World Factbook (2004); DiCarlo (2003)
Opportunities and Challenges for IT Outsourcing
Table 2 summarizes the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of IT
outsourcing in China (A.T. Kearney 2004). We will look more closely at these
opportunities for outsourcers, then discuss the challenges.
China can offer substantial economic benefits to an outsourcer. Businesses,
industries, and economies are in a position to gain mutual advantages from
well-implemented outsourcing endeavours (Knowles 2002; Krishna et al 2004). One
caveat, however, is that outsourcing helps economies only when the savings to
consumers exceed the wages lost (Evans 2004). On the other hand, developing
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 43
countries must manage their economic development strategically in order to tap into
the benefits of outsourcing (Worell 2001).
Table 2: SWOT Analysis of China as an Outsourcing Candidate
Strengths Low cost, large labour pool
General lack of IT/BPO experience of workforce,
weak infrastructure,
challenges in English language competencies
Presence of large tech companies, such as IBM/Lenovo, Dell, Huawei,
potential changes due to WTO entry,
existence of WesternR&Dcenters,
enhanced government efforts (training, technical certifications, establishment of 5
special economic zones and 15 industrial parks),
many IT professionals have been returning to China,
location may be strategic for supply to Japanese and Korean markets
Political and economic risks,
intellectual property rights concerns,
concerns about continued corruption,
bureaucracy and red tape,
Sources: A.T. Kearney (2004). Making offshore decisions. A.T. Kearney’s 2004 Offshore
Location Attractiveness Index (accessed September 2004), [available at:];
Transparency International (2005). Corruption perceptions index 2005 (accessed February
13, 2006), available at:].
The financial merits ascribed to outsourcing can be attractive to companies. Call
centre operators can save as much as 5-8% when outsourcing to a location like
Canada, approximately 10% in Mexico, and up to 20-40% in emerging locations
(Read 2002). According to a McKinsey Global Institute study, outsourcing has the
potential to reduce the cost of IT and related services by 60% (Griswold 2004).
In addition, outsourcing to a location like China allows companies to gain
strategic value in a broad range of areas:
capitalizing on lower wages and costs along with turnover rates (Rabinovich et
al 1999; Tusa et al 2004; Munro 2004; Read 2002);
obtaining skilled labour and expertise (Bansal 2002; Cohn 2003);
addressing shortages in personnel (Clark 1998);
44 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
improving customer service (Rabinovich et al 1999);
expanding markets (Lacity et al 1997);
helping manage complexity of select initiatives (Chase 1998; Weiss 2002);
gaining competitive advantage (Elmuti et al 1998; Griswold 2004);
gaining efficiencies in the utilization of IT tools to heighten responsiveness
(Chan and Chung 2002);
obtaining cheaper real estate rates (Bansal 2002);
facilitating joint venture formations (Chen et al 2002);
avoiding complex issues such as site selection, legal and regulatory matters
(Read 2002);
attaining operational flexibility (Wild et al 1999; Blaxill and Hout 1991;
Steenhuis and de Boer 2003);
expanding market niches (Tusa et al 2004);
tapping into cost variability (Tusa et al 2004);
adapting to globalization (Karklins 2003);
operating with a limited budget (Cohn 2003);
establishing value added partnerships that provide experience and capital
(Karklins 2003);
improving profitability, increasing the rate of innovation, while gaining
favourable tax structure and incentives (Glass and Saggi 2001);
enhancing control and operational discipline (Economist 2003);
providing value to shareholders (Griswold 2004); and
building efficiencies in economies of scale, scope, and application (Currie
The reasons for outsourcing can be as different as the number of firms expressing
interest. Firms have outsourced to foreign locations in response to consumer
demands, stakeholder profit expectations, and challenges related to pricing and the
competitive landscape (Pedersen 2004). The motivations and approaches to
international outsourcing also are important and of significant difference among
organizations. US outsourcers, for instance, tend to pursue a value-added component
for outsourcing, while European outsourcers emphasize gains in economies of scale
(Kakabadse and Kakabadse 2002).
Several factors facilitate the process of international outsourcing. One such factor
is the availability of technologies and market integration as accelerators of
outsourcing to foreign markets (Munro 2004), while another is that a lower cost for
technological adaptation and lower resource requirements are key drivers to the
process (Glass and Saggi 2001). US and European companies view outsourcing as an
integral component to business expansion, and products or services that are
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 45
unprofitable in industrial locations would gravitate to lower-cost locations
(Kakabadse and Kakabadse 2002; Ellis 2004).
Suppliers in China are in a position to provide operational value to outsourcing
companies. In a study of IT outsourcers, the majority were pleased with their
suppliers specifically in the areas of operations management, pricing stability and
flexibility, and leveraging asset procurement (Goldman 1998). Bardhan and Kroll
(2003) identified the ‘pull’ factors in overseas outsourcing destinations as the wide
use of English, compatibility in accounting and institutional frameworks, overnight
turnaround time, and availability of technological graduates. If these competencies
are available in a selected supplier in China, advantages may be derived by the
However, the country and company infrastructure are other important
considerations in the outsourcing arrangement (Jennex and Adelakun 2003). The
majority of outsourced jobs are those that are digitalized, and which capitalize on
telecommunication efficiencies from international venues (The Economist 2003).
Of similar importance is the evolution of cultural and business environments in
China. Asian organizations have been observed to be changing, developing greater
openness to competition and international markets, heightened literacy, and a more
proactive agenda directed towards greater industrialization (Sen 1997).
China is a bright prospect for international outsourcing in Asia. China’s strengths
are in its market size, infrastructure, and manufacturing competence (Infoshop 2004).
Particular strengths are in telecommunication (US$36 billion in 2002), electronics
(US$9 billion), and assembled computers (US$4 billion) exports. Advanced
technology and their applications are becoming another advantage to be gained in
China. The emerging technological centres in China are Beijing, Guangzhou, and
Shanghai (DiCarlo 2003). Science and technology parks have become increasingly
common, and partnerships with foreign firms are increasing. Science and technology
parks help foster market-oriented development of technologies, by providing a
location to which academic, business and governmental organizations are brought.
With the recognition of China’s increasing scientific expertise and talent, including
the more than 220,000 engineering graduates per year, foreign firms have undertaken
outsourcing their more advanced projects and technology development (including
R&D and basic science) projects to China.
There are several types of Science and Technology Parks for developing centres
of excellence in scientific applications. On the national level, assisted by significant
government incentives, 53 technology parks focus on basic and applied research;
Zhongguancun Science and Technical Park (Beijing), CSSIP (Suzhou), and Pudong
(Shanghai) are examples. At the municipal level, technology parks are production -
focussed and intended to create jobs and higher income prospects; an example is the
Nanjing New and High Technology Development Zone. Forty-eight Universities
46 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
and 640 research institutes have participated in municipal parks. A final form is that
of University Science and Technology Parks, which focus on new scientific
enterprises and the reform and development of higher education; an example is USST
in Shanghai.
Companies are bound to face significant challenges when outsourcing to emerging
locations such as China. With the globalization of markets, business managers
confront heightened complexity, requiring more realistic expectations and
knowledge on dealing with operational issues in foreign environments (Chen et al
2002; Rao 2004). Numerous outsourcing attempts have ended in failure (Logan
2000), and many other outsourcers have not attained the benefits typically credited to
outsourcing (Elmuti and Kathawala 2000). Separate from the negative effects,
location selection also can impact outsourcing success. In the case of India, for
instance, government support and educational improvements have been seen as
contributors to the country’s maturity as an offshore destination (Greenemeier 2002).
Proficiency in English, too, may be useful in offshore outsourcing by US firms
(Guerra 2002). In China, lack of general English proficiency is still a cultural barrier,
although efforts to educate the public are underway.
The difficulties in international outsourcing cover a vast variety and broad range
of issues. These issues have been observed to include the following: cross-border
communication and cultural barriers (Schwartz 2004; Economist 2003; Krishna et al
2004); language issues (Bryan 2003; Rao 2004), selecting an effective vision and
suitable strategy (Chan and Pollard 2003); financial challenges through erroneous
resource allocation and expectations (McClelland 2003; Londe 2004); appropriate
leadership and management (Chan and Pollard 2003; Krishna et al 2004); poor
relationship and conflicts (Logan 2000; David and Allgood 2002: McClelland 2003);
need for constant monitoring (Guterl 1996); loss of control (Byham and Riddle
1999); infrastructure challenges (Chan and Pollard 2003; Rao 2004); disparity of
productivity across organizations (Grossman and Helpman 2004); lack of patience
(Horwitt 1999); disparity of systems and procedures (Krishna et al 2004; Bryan
2003); imitation from competitors and intellectual property theft (Chung et al 2004;
Verton 2004); morale issues in the corporate headquarters (Kessler et al 1999);
political and legal conflicts (Horwitt 1999; Bryan 2003); failure to see a broader
perspective (Love et al 2003); lack of standards and strategy (Hartman et al 2003;
Yongmin and Ishikawa 2004); hidden costs and potential cost increases due to
transportation, custom duties and tariffs, taxation and handling expenses (Ramarapu
et al 1997; van Beesten 2002; Hannon 2003; Londe 2004); strikes and work
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 47
stoppages (Ramarapu et al 1997); inflexibility of cost (Lowson 2002); concern about
terrorism and security issues (Gallagher 2002; Rao 2004); country disparities in
approaches to value-added tax or VAT (Knowles 2002); ineffective contract that
does not enforce discipline (McClaren 1999); over-promising supplier (Kern et al
2002); rigid contracts that prevent innovation (McClaren 1999); lack of
understanding of objectives, performance analysis, monitoring (Green 1999);
inability to respond to increasing complexities requiring expertise and diplomacy,
(Horwitt 1999); misalignment of attitudes and strategy (Garner 1998); and
challenges in market and supplier proximity (Bryan 2003).
Corporate outsourcers should be aware of these issues and implement specific
measures by which to address those they are most likely to encounter. For instance,
outsourcers must understand the importance of providing attention to supplier
selection, change management, service quality, management control, data security
and sustainability (Grieves 2002). In addition, issues in cross-border management
efficiencies and business planning should be considered, since they too have high
potential for difficult processes and detrimental outcomes. Also among the complex
concerns that will need to be examined are those of cultural factors and political,
financial, technological, managerial, and legal complexities (Bierce 1999). Planning
ahead for these challenges is critical, due to their impact on (1) time constraints on
project implementation, (2) performance risks, (3) quality and cost factors, (4) trust
and commitment issues, (5) variability in the structure and scope of agreements, (6)
diversity of performance measures and standards, (7) currency fluctuations, and (8)
international laws that legal aspects that are country specific (Barton 2003). Of
additional importance is planning for venture contingencies and disaster recovery
(Guerra 2002).
China has inherent deficiencies which should be evaluated by the outsourcer.
Potential challenges in the IT environment in China include: (1) piracy and the legal
system, (2) English language competencies, (3) shortfalls in technical innovation, (4)
process quality, (5) lack of compatibility with Western culture (Leung 2003). In
China, outsourcing challenges also lie on the threat of cross-cultural conflicts and
miscommunication, instability of the political and economic landscape, legal
barriers, disparity in contract expectations, and poor partner selection.
Strategic Fit and Alignment of Outsourcing Initiatives
The numerous issues to be considered in outsourcing ensure that the decision to
outsource or not to China becomes complex. The discipline imposed by a systematic
identification and assessment, through the concept of strategic fit (Miller and Friesen
1983), of the factors relevant to the outsourcing decision or process may prove
48 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
helpful. For ‘fit’ to exist, the various components of any system must be internally
consistent both with each other, and with those components’ external purpose. When
this occurs, the opportunity for high performance is concluded to be optimal. The
concept has been extensively investigated in Western organizations and in more
limited studies in emerging economies such as China’s (e.g., Ross 1999; Lucas, Tan,
and Hult 2001), with positive results.
To better consider their elements’ mutual fit, strategic outsourcing initiatives may
be evaluated through viewing the factors most pertinent to outsourcing success
through the lenses of three related conditions or levels of analysis: (1) the Individual
level, (2) the Intra-Organizational level, and (3) the Inter-Organizational level. In the
following sections, we investigate briefly each level for its implications for
performance and for fit with the firm’s outsourcing conditions, identifying those
level-specific programs for strategic action which seem to offer the potential for
important performance increments for the outsourcing firm. The framework offered,
while suggestive, should be adapted as appropriate for any specific outsourcing
Individual Level
Outsourcing changes the variety and intensity for skill sets at all levels in the
organization, both for the outsourcer and for the firm receiving the outsourcing;
national, cultural, and language differences contribute to intimidating challenges.
For instance, outsourcers may need to become aware of the relative states of
technological competencies required, broaden their knowledge of foreign
environments and cultures, and acquire language skills in order to heighten the
chances of business success. Those elements which operate through the skills,
talents, and capacities of individual members of the organization, which are
important for improving or hindering outsourcing performance through initiating,
implementing, and monitoring outsourced activities, must be identified and
appropriate actions taken for enhancing the potential for individual performance.
Cultural or institutional elements can introduce additional discordant effects,
pointed out by Confucianism’s having maintained influence over individuals and
their beliefs and behaviours in the Chinese culture (Lu 2003), even as Chinese
organizations adapt to the world economy by re-shaping their pre-existing cultural
and institutional heritage into new, uniquely Chinese responses (Redding 2005).
These value systems are deeply ingrained in business and economic activities and
continue to shape people’s behaviours, ways of thinking, and linguistic activities, so
Western outsourcers must consider their partners’ behaviours and values as they are
so shaped.
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 49
Personal relationships (guanxi) long have been known to play an important role in
the conduct of business in the Chinese society (Luo 1997). Guanxi is philosophically
aligned with Confucian values pertaining to the maintenance of relationships,
helping those in need, and fully reciprocating favours; it works to maintain network
harmony, sets the rules of cooperation, secures knowledge and resources, and lowers
the transaction costs of doing business (Davies, Leung, Luk and Wong 2003).
Western outsourcers should attend to developing their own guanxi, as well as learn to
recognize the implications of the guanxi of their Chinese partner.
The extent and nature of the differences between various cultural representatives
can be difficult to identify or to accommodate. It is important that organizational
decision-makers understand cultural influences on organizational members and the
goals for which people work. If there are work goals specific to one culture, they must
be identified and factored into work strategies; working with foreign personnel offers
opportunities for conflicts from differing work goals, an outcome to be anticipated
and pre-empted.
Intra-Organizational Level
The intra-organizational level is concerned with adjusting and fine-tuning the
activities pursued by an organization as a coping mechanism in a global environment.
These include needed capabilities and resources, structural adjustments,
technological innovations, and enhancements to appropriate processes, with their
accommodations becoming embedded in the ongoing processes and structures of the
firm. The outsourcing firm then needs to investigate the capabilities and resources of
the firm which is an outsourcing candidate, as well as the relevance of its own
capabilities and resources.
A critical constraint is that of the managerial resource, currently scarce in China
due to the Cultural Revolution, decades of subsistence-level living, and the historic
managerial roles of compliance and implementation rather than initiative (Redding
2005). While entrepreneurial talent in small and medium-sized organizations has
quickly emerged, a cadre of professional managers remains underdeveloped,
although management practices in China have been improving as a result of its
market transition (Zhu and Dowling 1994). Still remaining, however, are the
residuals from a centrally-planned economy. Traditional Chinese management
attributes are ongoing challenges to Western expectations, in such areas as: (1)
Top-down decision-making: Workers follow orders and are not creative, because the
old centrally-planned economy rewarded age and service time, not performance. (2)
Vertical communication: Effective communication between levels is rare; feedback
from lower levels takes a long time because many layers separate workers from top
50 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
management. (3) Focus on production: The priority had been on meeting the
production targets of the planning authority, so managers learned to focus on
production; as a result, today they are limited in such management skills as
advertising, HRM, inventory control, accounting, and financing (Bai and Enderwick
More explicitly, traditionally-experienced Chinese managers (that is, those with
experience gained under a centrally-planned economy) are very likely to be risk
aversive, have little appreciation of setting incentives to link pay and performance,
have little or no financial management skills, are unfamiliar with marketing
activities, are unaware of the need for investing to create competitive advantage, are
unfamiliar with the need for leadership and governance skills, and are narrowly
specialized rather than cross-functional or integrative in their skill-sets (Bai and
Enderwick 2005). As a result, the outsourcer may experience difficulty with their
expectations for appropriately entrepreneurial, risk- and marketing-oriented
perspectives among the partner’s members and executives.
There is a risk, too, that firms operating in China may adopt overly aggressive or
ambitious business approaches that do not match their partner’s competencies. An
example of this was found in the differences between a French and a Chinese
organization in their policy decision-making, planning activities, delegation and
organization of management activity, leadership and authority roles, and
coordination and control of staff, which led to serious and mutual misunderstandings
(Tian and Cone 2003). Any one of these factors can pose serious challenges and
difficulties, let alone this potentially lethal combination. There is thus a need to
identify, plan for, and pursue developing mutually appropriate organizational
processes and capabilities.
Inter-Organizational Level
The Inter-Organizational level refers to the conditions that lead to companies’
adjusting and fine-tuning their business strategies in response to forces that are
external to their boundaries; these include heightened trade integration, technological
exposure, and international competition, and can pertain to relationships with
relevant government agencies and other stakeholders, and also to outsourcing-driven
business strategies.
The intra-U.S. or E.U. model recognizes few significant regional barriers to
commerce, but typically cannot be applied to China. The distinct regions in China
each have their own cultural and economic characteristics, as well as a separate legal
system, which may not be consistent from one region to another, and which operates
for local protectionism. Thus, for the firm with pan-Chinese aspirations, each region
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 51
must be dealt with and organized for separately. For the outsourcing firm wishing to
deal in China, then, working also with local, regional and national governments is
vital. Most companies have a government-relations officer responsible for
monitoring and managing relations with government agencies and individuals.
While organizations in China are scattered across a wide range of development
(Geng 1998), some have evolved new organizational capabilities. Contract
manufacturing firms in the electronics industry, for instance, have re-invented their
requisite value-chain capabilities. As a result, transaction costs have been reduced,
external economies of scale expanded, and risks reduced (Sturgeon 2002). Thus, the
outsourcing firm must investigate the current and potential capabilities of a candidate
partner; good matches may be found with proper effort and insight.
Alignment among Levels
Companies outsourcing to China risk pursuing conflicting or mal-aligned strategies.
Inter-Organizational or Intra-Organizational initiatives may prove incompatible to
the requirements of the Individual level, resulting in organizational conflicts or
failure. A U.S. company, for example, may have decided to outsource its back-office
IT function to a company in China, but had their own (unstated) assumptions of what
constitutes commonly-available work methods, quality assurance, or technology,
relying instead on the contract’s outcomes and performance terms. However, the
Chinese organization’s employees may be unprepared or untrained for the
technology or methods required by the U.S. outsourcer; or they may have insufficient
English language competence, resulting to organizational conflicts and even project
failures. Following through on contract terms to confirm actual capabilities and
resources can be helpful.
Meeting outsourcing objectives may be best optimized when the requirements of
each of the three levels are identified, the levels aligned (investigated for
inconsistencies or conflicts, and those found being rectified) with each other, and all
levels also be found to be consistent with the relevant program objectives. In other
words, the executives of an outsourcing firm may undertake any of numerous actions
in any given decision area, but must be aware of their implications for each of the
other decision areas, creatively seeking to modify or refine those important for the
level so that their impacts on any of the other level(s) are benign or, better, beneficial
and multiplicative in their interactions and end results.
Understanding these and other business inhibitors in the outsourcing location can
help avert future challenges. We emphasize that the specific factors to be considered
will vary by company, outsourcing agreement, capabilities needed, and others; the
extensive review of the factors which affect outsourcing, in the earlier sections of this
52 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
paper, provides a resource for the outsourcer’s review for optimizing potential and
mutual success. In the following section, we conclude by relating the attributes and
challenges reasonably to be anticipated when outsourcing IT labour to China.
Conclusions and Implications
In summary, international outsourcing poses significant opportunities and challenges
for organizations in China. Among the obvious potential advantages of international
outsourcing are (1) having moderate/low labour cost, (2) generally lower overall
costs, (3) moderate/low day-to-day control, and (4) moderate/high level of risk
(CINCOM Online 2004). The risks in the country typically are less apparent and are
thus more dangerous, but may be minimized by thoroughly understanding the
organization’s objectives, gaining a thorough knowledge of the market environment
and the service providers, as well as undertaking appropriate strategic planning. As
companies examine the prospects of international outsourcing, careful planning and
the use of strategic approaches are necessary.
Several factors shaping IT international outsourcing are within the control of the
outsourcing company. These factors include strategy, platforms, data sharing, and
the cultural frameworks in the IT outsourcing outcome (Chen et al 2002), as well as
overall management, economics, and technological quality (Yang and Huang 2000).
Success factors are attributed to people, infrastructure (both business and technical),
and interfaces (Jennex and Adelakun 2003).
Outsourcing companies, however, have to be constantly conscious of economic
and business factors affecting the international location. Among the difficulties in
emerging locations are these factors: (1) protectionism or closure of certain
industries, (2) currency devaluation, (3) lack of information, (4) an ill-equipped
workforce, (5) inadequate infrastructure, and (6) challenges in governance (Hooke
2000). Due diligence must be exercised by the outsourcer, and patent and regulatory
issues examined; taxes and laws, language and culture, and ‘hidden costs’ in the form
of duties and tariffs must be conscientiously researched (Nyberg 2003). International
entrepreneurs need to constantly monitor and prepare for unanticipated changes in
the business environment.
The expansion of outsourcing in foreign locations is expected to further grow in
the coming years (Rao 2004). The competitive landscape in outsourcing destinations
will intensify in the future (A.T. Kearney 2004). Outsourcing companies should be
prepared to develop their businesses in conjunction with the host government. For
instance, in developing countries, there is a continuing need to work on such issues as
quality assurance, infrastructure, accessibility, country reputation, market niche
development, competition research, structures and laws, enhancement of awareness,
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 53
and establishing an advisory council in order to further grow the outsourcing industry
in the country (Worell 2001). Outsourcers are in a position to provide much-needed
support to the host government. In doing so, the chances for venture sustainability
would likely be heightened. China is keenly interested in developing a vibrant
high-tech sector and to penetrate the high-added value goods and services market of
the world.
Outsourcing in China provides strategic value to internationalizing firms, and
offers unique advantages. In developing businesses in emerging locations,
companies should be cognizant of the primary objectives, varying location merits,
and optimum combination of strategies. After an extensive literature review, the
authors concluded that, when considering outsourcing to China, the decision depends
heavily on the specific needs of the outsourcing company. Table 3 summarizes some
of the authors’ observations regarding common outsourcing criteria and how they
may relate to China’s outsourcing competencies.
Table 3: Some corporate requirements for selecting China as an optimal location
Parameters/Requirements Justification
Company requirements are anchored more on
low-end software development and maintenance
These have been cited as China’s strong points in the
IT sector
Company needs a large internal market and high
access to nearby markets like Korea and Japan
China has a far larger internal market than any other
Company is forward looking and perceives growth
over the long-term
Prognosis for long-term growth in China has been
Company views currency exchange rate stability as
critical to the business China’s currency has been very stable.
Company desires a less competitive landscape and
first-mover advantages
The IT landscape in China is relatively young and
still growing.
Company requires a location with political and
economic stability
China’s political system is strong and appears stable,
while its economy is vibrant.
There are other factors to consider as well. For instance, knowing a supplier well
and planning an efficient organizational integration can help prevent operational
problems. Thus, since the weaknesses of service providers typically lie on their
timing and cost deficiencies, narrow perceptions, and personnel incompatibilities due
to cultural barriers (Goldman 1998), difficulties may be avoided through prior
investigation and action. Major emphasis should be placed on the supply chain,
strategic direction, role of the service provider, relationship objectives, and scope of
collaboration (Bolumole 2001). In the case of China, pursuing strategies that
capitalize on an optimal mix of location advantages heightens the chances for
54 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
success, although we recognized earlier that the distinct geographical regions in
China have their own separate legal and institutional systems, which must be dealt
with separately.
Managerial Implications
We recommend a number of approaches that are viable in emerging locations such as
China, and point out that the specific factors to be considered within these approaches
will depend strongly on the particular company’s outsourcing objectives, nature of
the candidate being considered, the industry and business function, as well as the
organizational and strategic alignment between the company, its environment, and its
internal organization. Our broad-brush guidelines are starting points for the
outsourcing firm to evaluate its potential for success, particularly with attention
given to those elements deemed appropriate for that company’s specific situation. In
so doing, we first establish broadly-based principles pertinent to the actions
prescribed, and then make suggestions for the manner in which each of those sets of
principles pertain to outsourcing in China.
Formulate a solid vision and clear strategy. Understanding the business
development agenda and goals are important considerations. In telecommunication
companies, among others, it becomes highly relevant to identify where the core
competencies are anchored (Tusa et al 2004). Goal assessment, organizational
culture understanding, and assessments of the impact of international outsourcing on
the future agenda and product lifecycle are similarly important (Pedersen 2004). In a
study of 3,500 manufacturers in the UK, widespread use of a structured analysis of
needs and capabilities among outsourcers was found (Baines and Kay 2002). The
ability of two business organizations to blend operations across borders is critical to
the success of the outsourcing process. Sustainability is anchored on the depth and
scope of business integration and its compatibility to the organizational strategy of
the participating organizations. Benefits associated with strategic outsourcing
include the following: value creation (Karklins 2003); cost benefits (Choi and
Davidson 2004); competitive merits (Chen and Ishikawa 2004); enhanced business
performance (Pollalis 2003); holistic perspective (Love et al 2003); and broadened
perspectives, networks, and linkages (Chan and Chung 2002). Companies
considering outsourcing to China should have a clear understanding of their key
objectives and their implications for the venture’s overall plan. Creating a vision in
China is creating a global vision for most companies. China’s vastness coupled with
business opportunity and growth makes China central to most companies’ strategic
calculus. For most companies it is not whether they should operate, sell or outsource
in China, but rather when and how fast. Domestic strategies that align with the
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 55
Chinese international business environments, local suppliers, local partners, global
partners and global demand are paramount for success.
Weigh the pros and cons of potential locations. Different international locations
offer unique advantages to companies. Executives need to strategically select
location merits based on pre-identified needs. Outsourcing key tasks that provide
optimum benefits offers an opportunity for significant benefits (Dryden 1998).
Taking a closer look at infrastructure and ease of system integration is helpful
(Schwaninger and Warsop 1999). In the case of China, tapping into the primary
technological competencies of the location can lead to optimal results. While China is
not as advanced as India in English-language competence and software development,
the countries advanced infrastructure coupled with its desire to promote high-tech
and higher-added value services to the economic infrastructure is a positive signal for
outsourcers. China is already the world’s manufacturer and outsourcing supplier,
and for the Chinese to add the high-tech sector the impressive portfolio of leading
industries is a natural development of their economic prospectus. However, China’s
business environment is neither easy to understand nor simple to navigate. Legal and
institutional changes complicate matters further. China is a capitalistic dictatorship
that while providing stability in general can act rather selfishly at times serving
specific demands of its political and industrial elites. Internet operators such as
Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo were ‘forced’ to cooperate with the Chinese regime in
pursuing political goals, sometimes at the expense of the freedom and the livelihood
of selected individuals and organizations. Such actions on behalf of multinational
internet firms have serious social, political and economic implications.
Increase understanding on target locations. When doing business in international
locations, companies are exposed to an ever-changing mix of factors. Sensitivity to
the evolving dynamics of the selected environment is necessary. A country’s existing
infrastructure is important in the process of technology transfer (Steenhuis and de
Boer 2003; Elmuti and Kathawala 2000). Political and foreign exchange risk
assessments also must be made (Coates 2003), and accurate information prior to
making the outsourcing decision is critical (Michala, 2001). In addition, business
adjustments may be necessary in order to deal with challenges such as cultural
differences, lack of globalization skills among workers, legal disparities (Leung
2003), inconsistent infrastructure levels (DiCarlo 2003), and business and economic
constraints (A.T. Kearney 2004). Our ‘strategic fit’ framework described in the
above section suggests that success in China hinges on the assessment and reaction to
the internal-external linkages. In China, individuals in the high tech sector still lack
important skills, such as English language, innovation capacity, and independent
critical-thinking skills. This is in part attributable to the educational system,
institutional framework, and cultural antecedents. Secondly, partner companies may
not have the same business ethics and values, for example, in enforcing intellectual
56 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
property protection, obeying their contractual obligations, sharing partner sensitive
information, and following the letter and the spirit of the law. The Chinese spiritual
and religious map is markedly different from the West. Confucianism, guanxi, and
competitive behaviours can create misunderstandings, at best, and lead to a breakup
of the relationship or expropriation of core technologies, at worst.
Give importance to partner selection. Selecting the right supplier or partner in
China is an important consideration for potential outsourcers. Outsourcing may be
considered as a convergence of two companies in the process of building a common
culture (Garner 1998). For the outsourcer, it is important to evaluate applications
suitability, project management capability, timing of execution, and agreed-upon
deliverables between participants (Clark 1998). Since outsourcing is partly anchored
on technology, it is also important to consider the maturity of a supplier’s business
processes and approaches (Weiss 2002). A partner that has an industry focus and an
established record should be selected (Kakabadse and Kakabadse 2002), and
importance given to the size of the respective operations (Jain and Song 2002).
Effective relationships take time to build, and require effective communication
procedures in place, as well as heightened staff efficiencies (Davey and Allgood
2002). The nature and process of the competency migration that takes place between
the outsourcer and supplier should be taken into account (Caputo and Zirpoli 2002).
In the case of outsourcing in the hospitality industry, five factors have been found to
play a role in the outsourcing relationship: (1) core competencies, (2) brand
compatibility, (3) organizational culture, (4) operational tension, and (5) evaluation
and assessment of systems (Hemington and King 2000). Outsourcing relationships
should be transparent (Murphy 2004), while and a fair and equitable partnership must
be developed in order that the outsourcing relationship will be sustainable (Elmuti et
al 1998). When selecting potential suppliers in China, personal and organizational
compatibilities and differences need to be understood and evaluated. Partner
selection in China often relies on an assessment of (1) capabilities of the supplier, (2)
quality control and processes, (3) past/present work with competitors, (4) past record
of achievement, (5) leadership capabilities and willingness to cooperate, and, of
course, (6) cost.
Prepare for organizational discrepancies. Organizations across borders differ in
objectives, perspectives, and infrastructure. Planning for risk variables contributes to
successful implementation (Crowley 1999), suggesting the critical role of
management skills in outsourcing arrangements (Boyson et al 1999). Since Chinese
organizations vary extensively in the quality, speed, and reliability among suppliers
(Murphy 2004), anticipating and planning for these differences ahead of time can
help prevent problems. Project management assessments are helpful to clearly
evaluate the risks and benefits of the outsourced tasks (Currie 2003). Establishing a
shared philosophy and common commitment in developing a sustainable
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 57
cross-border relationship is useful (Vavrek 2002), as is cultural training for managers
outsourcing in international locations (Sullivan and Tu 1995). In addition,
outsourcing companies need to be prepared to respond to infrastructure disparities
and challenges in the availability of electrical power in certain locations (DiCarlo
2003; McGarry 2004). In China, perhaps more so than other locations, managerial
and technical know-how of partner companies is often lacking and needs to be
reinforced by training and development. The ‘window’ into the partner companies
capabilities is often narrow consisting of one or two individuals with the right skills.
This limits cooperation since projects can only expand as fast as capacity of the
selected individuals. Companies, thus, need to be prepared to educate and prepare
their suppliers and to increase their competitiveness in the marketplace. There is a
risk, of course, that teaching companies will transfer know-how to their supplier that
will undermine their bargaining power and create new competitors.
Engage in strategic contracting, but focus on the relationship. Planning for
synergistic contracts that provide mutual value is critical. Trust and commitment are
critical in the outsourcing process (Moore 1998). Over-promising, however, by
suppliers must be guarded against and the contract dynamics be evaluated thoroughly
(Kern et al 2002). Higher levels of integration typically require more elaborate
contract formation (McClaren 1999), calling for exploring broader supplier options
and examining the supplier’s record closer before signing a contract (Horwitt 1999).
Looking at the contract from both sides assists an emphasis of relationship in contract
development and may help foster trust between the parties involved (Logan 2000).
Outsourcing companies contemplating investments in China should prepare to
clearly outline specific contract expectations and requirements in order to prevent
potential misunderstandings. In China, however, the ‘contract’ itself is sometimes
not worth the paper it is written on. Contracts are often viewed as memorandum of
understanding or ‘flexible’ work arrangements that can change with the environment.
Relationships are often more important to forge than contracts per se. A strong
relationship (or so called guanxi network) can help overcome contractual
deficiencies, operational difficulties, or adverse changes in the environment.
Review all cost angles ahead of time. Many outsourcing firms are motivated by
the cost advantages brought about by outsourcing. However, there could be unseen
factors that can adversely impact cost advantages. Logistic factors, product content
and origin, as well as security issues should be reviewed (Trunick 2004). Cost
benefits should be quantified and contingencies considered (Lowson 2002).
Although cost structures are low in China, careful assessment of all operational costs
leads to the avoidance of ‘hidden costs’ such as taxes, tariffs, training, infrastructure
development, or regulatory barriers. Companies in China need to invest in
maintaining harmony with suppliers, supporting their activities, engaging
government (local or national), and making a contribution to the local environment.
58 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
Consider partnership formations. Outsourcing firms can build on the strengths
provided by government and academic institutions in China. Government and
academic support to outsourcing activities in the country can be helpful
(Greenemeier 2002). Benefits may be derived from gaining the cooperation of
governments in international locations (Luo 2002), and acquiring professional help
and guidance similarly can be critically important (Grieves 2002). Benefits also may
accrue from introducing innovative and transformational models in global sourcing
(Chung et al 2004). Creative partnerships and linkages may be formed in China to
further research objectives, enhance technology and training, and ensure a steady
supply of technology workers. Technology parks are useful entry points, but large
variations exist among them and various industry clusters exist in different locations.
Provincial and national technology parks have more clout in the national political
agenda, and provide both the infrastructure and support that may be required.
Conduct assessments on an ongoing basis. With growing global competition,
strategic assessments can help firms grow and improve. In the telecommunications
industry, for instance, performance analysis, benchmarking, and forecasting have
been found to be valuable in the outsourcing decision (Gree 1999). Creating a joint
effort with partners in pursuit of developmental initiatives can lead to positive
outcomes (Gooley 1994). As organizations in China compete with outsourcers in
India, Russia, the Philippines, and other emerging locations, the continuous updating
of skills and the quest for improvement can become anchors for long-term success.
While China is the host market of choice for many companies today, changes in the
political economy, or the emergence of other countries can influence the choice of
future partnerships. That China will remain a ‘hot’ spot for investment in many years
to come is undeniable. But, other locations may become more attractive over time for
specific investments as costs are gradually increasing in China (particularly in
Shanghai, Beijing, and Guangzhou) and because other locations are also developing
competencies in selected industries and their labour forces.
Andersen, P. H., Chao, P., (2003), Country-of-origin effects in global industrial sourcing: Toward an
integrated framework, Management International Review 43 (4): 339-360.
Arndt (n.i.), (2006, January 30). Online extra: Lilly’s labs go global, Business Week, (accessed
February 17, 2006), [available at: ]
Kearney, A. T., (2004), Making offshore decisions, A. T. Kearney’s 2004 Offshore Location
Attractiveness Index (accessed Sept 2004), [available at:
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 59
Bagby, R., (2003), Protecting data: Navigating the rough waters of offshore data security,
Outsourcing Journal, (accessed February 13, 2006), [available at: ]
Bai, X., Enderwick, P., (2005), Economic transition and management skills: The case of China, in I.
Alon and J. R. McIntyre (Eds.), Business and management education in China, 21-45.,
Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Baines, T., Kay, G., (2002), Manufacturing sourcing practices and relationships, International Journal
of Logistics Management 13 (2): 101-113.
Bardhan, A. D., Kroll, C., (2003). The new wave of outsourcing, Fisher Center Research Reports #1103,
Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, (accessed September 2004), [available
Barton, G. T. Jr., (2003), How to negotiate an international outsourcing contract, Computerworld,
(accessed September 2004), [available at: http://www.computerworld.
BBC News, (2003), Anger as HSBC cuts 4,000 UK jobs, (accessed Feb 17, 2006), [available at:]
Bierce, B., (1999), International outsourcing: The legal view of what’s different, Outsourcing (accessed Sept 2004), [available at]
Blaxill, M. F., Hout, T. M., (1991), The fallacy of the overhead quick fix, Harvard Business Review 69
(4): 93-101.
Bolumole, Y. A., (2001), The supply chain role of third-party logistics providers, International Journal
of Logistics Management 12 (2): 87-102.
Boyson, S., Corsi, T., Dresner, M., and Rabinovich, E., (1999), Managing effective third-party logistics
partnerships: What does it take? The Journal of Business Logistics 20 (1): 73-100.
Bryan, L., (2003). International outsourcing: Is it right for you? Medical Device and Diagnostic
Industry: 101.
Burr, J. B., (2002), The keys to the back office: Building a legal and policy framework to attract
IT-enabled outsourcing, Global Internet Policy Initiative, (available at:]
Byham, W. C., Riddle, S., (1999), Outsourcing: A strategic tool for a more strategic HR, Employment
Relations Today 26 (1): 37-55.
Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, (2003), The outsourcing report: Making choices – Insights into
successful outsourcing, (accessed February 13, 2006), [available at:]
Caputo, M., Zirpoli, F., (2002), Supplier involvement in automotive component design: Outsourcing
strategies and supply chain management, International Journal of Technology Management
23 (1-3): 113-128.
Cateora, P. R., Graham, J. L., (1999), International Marketing, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.:
Boston, MA.
Chan, M. F. S., Chung, W. W. C., (2002), A framework to develop an enterprise information portal for
contract manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics 75 (1/2): 113-126.
Chan, P. S., Pollard, D., (2003), Succeeding in the dotcom economy: Challenges for brick and mortar
companies, International Journal of Management 20 (1): 11-16.
Chase, R., (1998), Map your route to outsourcing success, Transportation and Distribution 39 (12):
Chen, Q., Tu, Q., Lin, B., (2002), Global IT/IS outsourcing: Expectations, considerations, and
implications, Advances in Competitiveness Research 10 (1): 100-111.
60 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
Chen, Y., Ishikawa, J. Y. Z., (2004), Trade liberalization and strategic outsourcing, Journal of
International Economics 63 (2): 419-436.
CIA World Fact Book, (2004), Country Guides: FY 2004, (accessed Oct 2004), [available at:]
CINCOM Online, (2004), Outsourcing: Which type is best for you? (accessed Sept 2004), [available at:]
Choi, J. P., Davidson, C., (2004), Strategic second sourcing by multinationals, International Economic
Review 45 (2): 579-600.
Chung, W. C., Yan, A. Y. K., Chan, M. F. S., (2004), Networked enterprise: A new business model for
global sourcing, International Journal of Production Economics 87 (3): 267-280.
Clark, J., (1998), Outsourcing IT, Manufacturing Systems 16 (9): 22., (2003), IBM moving 4,700 hi-tech jobs to Asia, (accessed Feb. 27, 2006), [available at:]
Coates, J. D., (2003, July). Sourcing in emerging markets: Some tips on avoiding trouble, World Trade
16 (7): 40.
Cohen, D., (2006), The global reverb of China and India, Business Week, (accessed Feb 28, 2006),
[available at: pi20060209_
469282.htm? campaign_id=search].
Cummins, D., Gilmore, A., Carson, D. and O’Donnell, A., (2000), Innovative marketing in SME’s: A
conceptual and descriptive framework, New Product Development and Innovation
Management 8 (2), 231-248.
Currie, W. L., (2003), A knowledge-based risk assessment framework for evaluating web-enabled
application outsourcing projects, International Journal of Project Management 21 (3):
Cohn, M., (2003), Outsourcing: The growing sector of IT, Internet World 9 (5): 36-40.
Crowley, A., (1999), Taming the ferocious outsourcing beast, PC Week: 85.
Dana, L. P., Etemad, H., Wright, R. W., (2000), The global reach of symbiotic networks, Journal of
Euro-Marketing 9 (2): 1-16.
Davey, H., Allgood, B., (2002), Offshore development, building relationships across international
boundaries: A case study, Information Strategy 18 (3): 13-16.
Davies, H., Leung, T. K. P., Luk, S. T., and Wong, Y. H., (2003), Guanxi and business practices in the
People’s Republic of China, in I. Alon (Ed.), Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and
international business management, 41-55, Praeger: Westport, CT.
DiCarlo, L., (2003), Best countries for outsourcing, (accessed Sept 2004), [available at:]
Dolan, K. D., Meredith, R., (2004), A tale of two cities, Forbes 173 (7): 94-102.
Drezner, D. W., (2004), The outsourcing bogeyman, Foreign Affairs 83 (3): 22-34.
Dryden, P., (1998), Outsourcing, with safeguards, can solve client/server problems, Computerworld 32
(3): 24.
Economist, (2003). Special report: Relocating the back-office – Offshoring, Economist 369 (8354):
Economist, (2004), Leaders: The new jobs migration; Trade and employment, Economist 370 (8363):
Ellis, W., (2004), From outsourcing to worldsourcing, International Trade Forum (1) 20-21.
Elmuti, D., Kathawala, Y., (2000), The effects of global outsourcing strategies on participants’ attitudes
and organizational effectiveness, International Journal of Manpower 21 (2): 112.
Elmuti, D., Kathawala, Y., Monippallil, M., (1998), Outsourcing to gain a competitive advantage,
Industrial Management 40 (3): 20-24.
Engardio, P., (2006a), The future of outsourcing, Business Week 50-64.
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 61
Engardio, P., (2006b), Online extra: Deutsche Bank’s outsourcing imperative, Business Week,
(accessed February 17, 2006), [available at]
Evans, M. K., (2004), Outsourcing could hurt, help the US, Industry Week 253 (4): 80.
Fisher, A., (2004), Think globally, save your job locally, Fortune 149 (4):60.
Foust, D., (2006), Online extra: Wachovia’s change of heart, Business Week, (accessed February 17,
2006), [available at:
Furniss, T., (2003), China: The next big wave in offshore outsourcing, BPO Outsourcing Journal,
(accessed February 13, 2006), [available at:]
Gallagher, J., (2002), Redefining the business case for offshore outsourcing, Insurance and Technology
27 (5): A5-A9.
Garner, R., (1998), Strategic outsourcing: It’s your move, Datamation 44 (2): 32-41.
Gibson, S., (2004), The offshoring tradition, eWeek 21 (27): 31.
Glass, A. J., Saggi, K., (2001), Innovation and wage effects of international outsourcing, European
Economic Review 45 (1): 67-86.
Glassman, J. K., (2004), Whine, the beloved country, American Enterprise 15 (4): 48.
Gnuschke, J. E., Wallace, J. W., Smith, D. R. and Stephen, C., (2004), Outsourcing production and jobs:
Cost and benefits, Business Perspectives 16 (2): 12-17.
Goldman, S., (1998), The ultimate outsourcing study, C/O Ultimate Outsourcing Study Supplement:
Gooley, T. B., (1994). Partnerships can make the customer-service difference, Traffic Management:
Green, W., (1999), Unlocking the potential of outsourcing, Telecommunication (International edition)
33 (8): S77-S79.
Greenemeier, L, (2002), Offshore outsourcing grows to global proportions, Insurance and Technology
27 (5): A12.
Greer, C. R.,Youngblood, S. A., Gray, D. A., (1999), Human resource management outsourcing: The
make or buy decision, Academy of Management Executive 13 (3): 85-96.
Grieves, K., (2002), Risks and benefits for the companies that outsource abroad, Accountancy Ireland
34 (5): 18.
Griffith, D., (2001), The theory and practice of outsourcing, Kudos Information Ltd., (accessed Feb. 13,
2006), [available at:]
Grimm, M., (2004), Profits vs jobs, American Demographics 26 (5): 42-43.
Griswold, D. T., (2004), Outsource, outsource, and outsource some more, National Review 56 (8):
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., (2004), Managerial incentives and the international organization of
production, Journal of International Economics 63 (2): 237-262.
Guerra, A., (2002), Offshore score, Wall Street and Technology: 32-33.
Guterl, F., (1996), How to manage your outsourcer, Datamation: 79-83.
Hannon, D., (2003), Source abroad, but watch those logistics costs, Purchasing 132 (2): 12-13.
Harrison, K., (2004), Is international outsourcing ethical? Machine Design 76 (16): 105.
Hartman, L. P., Shaw, B., Stevenson, R., (2003), Exploring the ethics and economics of global labor
standards: A challenge to integrated social contract theory, Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):
Hemmington, N., King, C., (2000), Key dimensions of outsourcing hotel food and beverage services.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 12 (4): 256-267.
62 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
Ho, L., Atkins, A., Eardley, A., (2004), The growth of outsourcing and application of strategic
framework techniques, Tunis, Tunisia: European and Mediterranean Conference on
Information Systems.
Hofstede, G., (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill.
Hooke, J. C., (2002), In an interview by the Center for International Enterprise (CIPE) on Feb. 08,
2002. (accessed Sept 2004), [available at:]
Horwitt, E., (1999), Bridging borders, Network World 16 (10): 47-48.
Infoshop, (2004), Outsourcing technology in Asia: Analysis of the changing face of R and D
(accessed Sept 2004), [available at:]
IT Matters, (2004), US poll rhetoric touches on outsourcing business, (accessed Sept 2004), [available at]
Jain, H. K., Song, J., (2002), Location economics and global software development centers, Global
information technology and electronic commerce: Issues for the new millennium (Palvia, P.
C.,Palvia, S. C. J. and Roche, E. M. eds), Ivy League Publishing: 447-462.
Jeffay, J., Bohannon, S., and Laspisa, E. K., (1997), Beyond benefits: The changing face of HR
outsourcing, Benefits Quarterly, 13 (1): 41-46.
Jennex, M. E., Adelakun, O., (2003), Success factors for offshore information system development,
Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications 5 (3): 12-31.
Jolly, V. K., Alahuhta, M., Jeannet, J., (1992), Challenging the incumbents: How high technology
start-ups compete globally, Journal of Strategic Change, (1), 71-82.
Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N., (2002), Trends in outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe, European
Management Journal 20 (2): 189-198.
Karklins, T. J., (2003), Global outsourcing of CRM: Techniques and trends, Customer Interaction
Solutions 21 (12): 48.
Kern, T., Willcocks, L. P., van Heck, E., (2002), The winners’ curse in IT outsourcing: strategies for
avoiding relational trauma, California Management Review 44 (2): 47-69.
Kessler, I., Coyle-Shapiro, J., Purcell, J., (1999), Outsourcing and the employee perspective, Human
Resource Management Journal 9 (2) 5-20.
King, J., (1999), Exporting jobs saves IT money, Computerworld 33 (11): 24
Kleinert, J., (2003), Growing trade in intermediate goods: Outsourcing, global sourcing, or increasing
importance of MNE networks? Review of International Economics 11 (3): 464.
Knowles, D., (2002), Strategies to minimize VAT on outsourced activities, International Tax Review:
Kotabe, M., Murray, J. Y., (2004), Global sourcing strategy and sustainable competitive advantage,
Industrial Marketing Management 33 (1): 7-14.
Krishna, S., Sahay, S., Walsham, G., (2004), Managing cross-cultural issues in global software
outsourcing, Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) 47 (4):
Kulmala, H. I., Paranko, J., Uusi-Rauva, E., (2002), The role of cost management in network
relationships, International Journal of Production Economics 79 (1): 33-43.
Lacity, M., Hirschheim, R., Willcoks, L., (1997), Realizing outsourcing expectations, Information
Systems Management, 11 (4): 7-18.
Leung, L., (2003), Taking IT offshore, Network World 20 (34): 57.
Logan, M. S., (2000), Using agency theory to design successful outsourcing relationships, International
Journal of Logistics Management 11 (2): 21-32.
Lohr, S., (2006), Outsourcing is climbing skills ladder, New York Times, (accessed February 16, 2006),
[available at:]
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 63
Londe, B. L., (2004), Rising to the offshoring challenge – Part 2, Supply Chain Management Review 8
(3): 9-10.
Love, D., Barton, J., Taylor, D. G., (2003), Evaluating approaches to product design sourcing decisions
in multinational companies, International Journal of Technology Management 26 (1):
Lowson, R. H., (2002), Assessing the operational cost of offshore sourcing strategies, International
Journal of Logistics Management 13 (2): 79-89.
Lu, L., (2003), Influences of Confucianism on the market economy of China, In I. Alon (Ed.), Chinese
culture, organizational behavior, and international business management, 27-39. Praeger:
Westport, CT.
Lukas, B. A., Tan, J. J., Hult, G. T. M., (2001), Strategic fit in transitional economies: The case of
China’s electronics industry, Journal of Management, 27: 409–429.
Luftman, J., (1996), Competing in the information age: Strategic alignment in practice, New York:
Oxford University Press.
Luo, Y., (1997), Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications, Human Systems Management,
16(1): 43-51.
Luo Y., (2002), Multinational enterprises in emerging markets, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business
School Press.
McCarthy, I., Anagnostou, A., (2004), The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and
boundaries of manufacturing, International Journal of Production Economics 88 (1): 61-71.
McClelland, S., (2003), The outsourcing conundrum, Telecommunications International 37 (12): 6.
McClaren, J., (1999), Supplier relations and the market context: a theory of handshakes, Journal of
International Economics 48 (1): 121-138.
McGarry, M., (2004), Cited in an interview by Geoffrey Ramos in the article ‘RP’s bad media image
hurting local software developers, Computer World Philippines (accessed Sept 2004),
[available at:
Michalak, C. F., (2001), The business impact of outsourced project control, AACE International
Transactions: CS 111.
Mitchell, R. L., (2004), How IT has outsourced itself, Computerworld 38 (11): 25.
Moore, K. R., (1998), Trust and relationship commitment in logistics alliances: A buyer perspective,
International Journal of Purchasing Materials Management 34 (1): 24-37.
Munro, N., (2004), The online innovating planet, National Journal 36 (13): 956.
Murphy, D., (2004), Up close and personal, Far Eastern Economic Review 167 (31): 50-51.
Nyberg, F., (2003), International outsourcing: When outsourcing in Asia, a cornucopia of options
exist, Medical Product Outsourcing [available at:]
Oliva, E. L. G., (2003), China, India remain threats to RP offshore outsourcing, Inquirer News Service
(accessed Sept 2004), [available at:]
Pedersen, A., (2004), Tread carefully into low-cost countries, Purchasing 133 (3): 64.
Perkins, B., (2003), Selecting the right offshore vehicle, Computerworld 37 (37): 46.
Pollalis, Y. A., (2003), Patterns of a co-alignment in information-intensive organizations: business
performance through integration strategies, International Journal of Information
Management 23 (6): 469-492.
Prager, J., (1997), Contracting out as a vehicle for privatization: Half speed ahead, Journal of
International Affairs 5 (2): 613-632.
Rabinovich, E., Windle, R., Dresner, M., and Corsi, T., (1999), Outsourcing of integrated logistics
functions: An examination of industry practices, International Journal of Physical
Distribution and Logistics Management 29 (6): 353.
64 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
Ramamurti, R., (2004), Developing countries and MNE’s: Extending and enriching the research
agenda, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (4): 277-283.
Ramarapu, N., Parzinger, M., Lado, A., (1997), Issues in foreign outsourcing, Information Systems
Management: 7-31.
Rao, M. T., (2004), Key issues for global IT sourcing: Country and individual factors, Information
Systems Management 21 (3): 16-21.
Read, B. B., (2002), Riding the outsourcing wave, Call Center Magazine 15 (8): 18-35.
Redding, G., (2005), Feeling the stones on the river bed: Prospects and implications for China’s entry
into the world of global competition, Ivey Business Journal: 1-9.
Riddle, D., (2000), Back office operations, International Trade Forum 3: 7-12.
Rosenbush, S., (2006), Outsourcing hasn’t hit its peak, Business Week Online, accessed February 17,
2006., available at:
Ross, D. N., (1999), Culture as a context for multinational business: A framework for assessing the
strategy-culture ‘fit’, Multinational Business Review: 13-19.
Schwaninger, T., Warsop, T., (1999), Foreign policies: building an international IT strategy, Insurance
and Technology 2 (4): 42.
Schwartz, E., (2004), Secrets of outsourcing, Infoworld 26 (3): 12.
Sen, A., (1997), Human rights and Asian values, The New Republic.
Shaksen, J. R., (2004), International outsourcing when labour markets are unionized, Canadian Journal
of Economics 37 (1): 78-94.
Smith, J., (1991), Corporate little helpers, Australian Business 7: 44-46.
Steenhuis, H. J., de Boer, S., (2003), Agile manufacturing and technology transfer to industrializing
countries, International Journal of Technology Management 26 (1): 20-27.
Sturgeon, T. J., (2002), Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial
organization, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3): 451.
Sullivan, S., Tu, H., (1995), Developing globally competent students: a review and recommendation,
Journal of Management Education 19 (4): 473-493.
Tian, Z., Cone, M., (2003), Cultural conflicts between Chinese managers and foreign managers in joint
ventures, in I. Alon (Ed.), Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and international business
management, 137-149., Praeger: Westport, CT.
Transparency International, (2005), Corruption perceptions index 2005 (accessed February 13, 2006),
[available at:].
Trunick, P. A., (2004), How to stay on target when offshoring, Logistics Today 45 (4): 23-29.
Tusa, D., Eikelmann, S., Stomberg, M., (2004), Less is more: The advantage of outsourcing,
Telecommunications International 38 (1): 31.
Van Beesten, M., (2002), Implementing tax outsourcing on a global basis, International Tax Review:
Vavrek, C., (2002), Outsourced equity plan administration: Keys to successful vendor implementation
and management, Journal of Compensation and Benefits 19 (1): 13-17.
Vernon, D., (2004), IT vendor CEO’s make plea for help on Capitol Hill, Computerworld 38 (25): 7.
Wallace, K. S., (1998), Avoid the 10 major pitfalls of outsourcing, Workforce 77 (9): 44-45.
Webster, M., Muhlemann, A. P., Alder, C., (2000), Decision support for the scheduling of subcontract
manufacture, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 (10):
Weiss, P., (2002), Behind the numbers: Offshore outsourcing’s cost effective edge, Information Week
(916): 66-68.
Wild, J., Wild, K., Han, J., (1999), International business: An integrated approach, Prentice-Hall:
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p.505.
Outsourcing to China: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategic Fit 65
Worell, I., (2001), Back office operations, International Trade Forum (1): 6-10.
Yang, C., Huang, J., (2000), A decision model for IS outsourcing, International Journal of Information
Management 20 (3): 225-240.
Yongmin, C., Ishikawa, J. Y. Z., (2004), Trade liberalization and strategic outsourcing, Journal of
International Economics 63 (2): 419-436.
Zhu, C. J., Dowling, P. J., (1994), The impact of the economic system upon human resource
management, Human Resource Planning, 17(4): 1-21.
66 Ilan Alon, Theodore T. Herbert and J. Mark Munoz
... Regions within China are encouraged to take initiative, within allowable limits, to innovate and to provide a milieu auspicious to such activities. Historically, regions competed for foreign investment and exports of original equipment, but over time, as regions became more competitive, the interest in original design and brands increased (Alon et al., 2007). Recently, the focus has shifted to technology outsourcing as a source of competitive advantage (Gugler and Vanoli, 2015). ...
Full-text available
Purpose Performed over a five-year time horizon, this paper aims to analyze the progression rates of technological innovation across 15 sub-provincial Chinese cities. The authors quantify and rate innovation performance, then rank the cities based on a purpose-built index designed to gauge the rate of technological progress. Design/methodology/approach Using the inferior constraint method, and a variety of national sources of data, the authors construct an innovation index based in part on new product sales revenue, proportion of college students, research and development expenditure of industrial enterprises in relation to gross industrial output value, contract deals in technical markets per capita, hazard-free treatment rate of waste, enterprises with technical development agencies accounts for industrial enterprises, number of high-tech enterprises and invention patent ownership per million population. Findings The findings provide a methodology for indexing cities, with 15 Chinese provincial cities as examples. Among the top five cities with the highest technological innovation index were Shenzhen, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Hangzhou and Wuhan. In the bottom were Shenyang, Changchun, Dalian, Xi’an and Harbin. Research limitations/implications This study applied a new model of innovation at the city level for China. Application to other industries (real estate, manufacturing, etc.) and countries will extend boundaries of this model and show its wider applicability. Practical implications Companies can use this research and methodology when seeking new investments in high tech and innovative products. Locations offering more hospitable environments should be prioritized ceteris paribus . Originality/value One weakness of much of the international business and competitiveness literature is that it often views the country as the primary unit of analysis. In this way, nuanced views of the institutional environments within countries are often overlooked. This paper proposes a measure of regional rates of innovativeness across China.
From techie to truck driver in Silicon Valley. From tea broker to techie in Bangalore. The wave of jobs heading offshore causes wrenching loss-and produces enticing gains.
Most telcos need to adjust both strategy and operations if they are to remain differentiated and to continue to grow profitably in a rapidly evolving market. The twin pressures of building new capabilities and maximizing ongoing efficiency make outsourcing parts of the value chain a compelling option. It is believed that this will translate into strong demand for ever more specialized outsourcing-and may even herald a change in the fundamental nature of the relationship between vendors and operators.
The use of asset/management systems with maintenance for cost-cutting and to improve efficiencies and downtime is discussed. Maintenance support for specialized valves and actuators has long been outsourced. But now routine maintenance for other control and automation processes is also being handled by outsourcing vendors. MRO outsourcing is definitely a cost-effective solution for the maintenance and repair challenges today's plant operators face. Using new asset management systems, plant managers and operators are gaining vital predictive informative information on their operational performance.
Lori Bryan offers suggestions for contract manufacturing and their medical device clients on their offshoring plans. When medical device manufacturers start considering outsourcing, it is almost entirely matter of cost. They are really seeking to lower their production costs on the products they select to send outside for manufacture. Companies must determine where they can get the least-expensive labor force that is capable of producing their particular product. The bottom line is that companies venturing offshore are seeking much more than a low-cost manufacturing site. Device manufacturing companies considering transferring a relatively immature device to an offshore contract manufacturer must be sure the necessary skill set is there. A mature product with a very-well-developed set of documentation would be ready for the challenge of going offshore. Before entering into an agreement, companies must ascertain whether a potential partner meets their standards.
The views of Kenneth Harrison, founder of on international outsourcing ethics is discussed. International competition is forcing many companies to take extreme actions to survive as a result of which most of them are forced to take up outsourcing. Outsourcing helps customers benefit from lower prices and wide variety of products. It is more ethical to save whatever jobs and profits rather than to cease operations.
The techniques and trends of global outsourcing of CRM are discussed. Today, increasing number of businesses are using strategic planning to determine what specific functionality to outsource to optimize business values. As they do so, many are finding it pays to move higher-value functions 'off books' and are turning to outsourcers to support functions previously viewed as core to their operation. Research, advanced accounting, financial product cross-selling and advanced technical support are examples of applications that are working in both an outsourced and an offshore context.